[bug-notifications] [powertop 0003581]: Solaris 10 pacakge in 5.8 and 5.9

Mantis Bug Tracker noreply at opencsw.org
Thu Apr 2 10:23:45 CEST 2009


A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
http://www.opencsw.org/bugtrack/view.php?id=3581 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                james
Assigned To:                
====================================================================== 
Project:                    powertop
Issue ID:                   3581
Category:                   packaging
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   major
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     new
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2009-04-01 21:35 CEST
Last Modified:              2009-04-02 10:23 CEST
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    Solaris 10 pacakge in 5.8 and 5.9
Description: 
powertop is built for solaris 10 only but is publish in the 5.8 and 5.9
packge collections.
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 (0005815) aubrey (manager) - 2009-04-02 02:30
 http://www.opencsw.org/bugtrack/view.php?id=3581#c5815 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
IIRC, the powertop package has a checkinstall script, if the script detects
the powertop dtrace probe is not available, the installation will abort.

But anyway, it's sort of unreasonable to put powertop into solaris8,
solaris9 package collections. 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 (0005819) james (reporter) - 2009-04-02 10:23
 http://www.opencsw.org/bugtrack/view.php?id=3581#c5819 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
I agree it's unreasonable to put powertop into S[89] collection, I'm
expecting the resolution to be its removal (from 8 9). 

Issue History 
Date Modified    Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
2009-04-01 21:35 james          New Issue                                    
2009-04-02 02:30 aubrey         Note Added: 0005815                          
2009-04-02 10:23 james          Note Added: 0005819                          
======================================================================




More information about the bug-notifications mailing list