From edwin at clamav.net Mon Feb 1 21:15:16 2010 From: edwin at clamav.net (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?T=F6r=F6k_Edwin?=) Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 22:15:16 +0200 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] High load with unknown source: Message-ID: <4B673654.9070201@clamav.net> Hi, One of my unit tests has timed out, it is taking 7-20s, while it normally takes ~0.5s under Linux/x86-64: b9s: real 21.0 user 2.2 sys 2.4 Linux: real 0m0.537s user 0m0.228s sys 0m0.320s I noticed that there is a high load on the Solaris buildhosts (b8s,b9s,b10s): 9:06pm up 13 day(s), 9:35, 5 users, load average: 14.52, 14.97, 15.93 Is this normal? Is some maintainance task running on the buildfarms right now? If so I can disable my automated builds during the maintainance, just let me know what time intervals I should exclude. I don't think this is my fault, all my processes are in sleep state: PID USERNAME LWP PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME CPU COMMAND 26726 edwin 1 59 0 4336K 2976K cpu/19 0:00 0.10% top 23909 edwin 1 59 0 7464K 4152K sleep 0:00 0.02% sshd 6818 edwin 1 59 0 6424K 936K sleep 2:40 0.00% ssh 12480 edwin 2 44 5 16M 2408K sleep 0:00 0.00% buildbot 23920 edwin 1 59 0 5000K 2832K sleep 0:00 0.00% bash The system load is 30+ right now, appears to be some heavy disk activity: load averages: 36.2, 22.7, 18.7; up 13+09:39:01 21:10:34 57 processes: 56 sleeping, 1 on cpu CPU states: 0.0% idle, 74.1% user, 25.9% kernel, 0.0% iowait, 0.0% swap Kernel: 6579 ctxsw, 8652 trap, 4935 intr, 20870 syscall, 12 fork, 1370 flt Memory: 12G phys mem, 384M free mem, 8000M total swap, 8000M free swap PID USERNAME LWP PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME CPU COMMAND 24143 edwin 1 49 0 4272K 2256K cpu/11 0:00 0.03% top 23830 rocky 1 59 0 35M 16M sleep 22:03 0.01% emacs-athena-23 23810 rocky 1 59 0 7640K 1544K sleep 8:50 0.01% sshd 10139 root 1 59 0 12M 4736K sleep 4:01 0.00% munin-node 23909 edwin 1 59 0 7464K 4616K sleep 0:00 0.00% sshd 10403 root 1 59 0 9184K 1128K sleep 0:56 0.00% httpd Best regards, --Edwin From dam at opencsw.org Mon Feb 1 21:23:46 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 21:23:46 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] High load with unknown source: In-Reply-To: <4B673654.9070201@clamav.net> References: <4B673654.9070201@clamav.net> Message-ID: Hi Edwin, Am 01.02.2010 um 21:15 schrieb T?r?k Edwin: > One of my unit tests has timed out, it is taking 7-20s, while it > normally takes ~0.5s under Linux/x86-64: > b9s: > real 21.0 > user 2.2 > sys 2.4 > > Linux: > real 0m0.537s > user 0m0.228s > sys 0m0.320s > > > I noticed that there is a high load on the Solaris buildhosts > (b8s,b9s,b10s): > > 9:06pm up 13 day(s), 9:35, 5 users, load average: 14.52, 14.97, 15.93 > > > Is this normal? Is some maintainance task running on the buildfarms > right now? No, James is rebuilding OpenOffice with parallel builds as the ususal build takes *very* long. The load looks quite impressive: Additionally I am rebuilding experimental-project catalogs which generates about 350.000 files. > If so I can disable my automated builds during the maintainance, just > let me know what time intervals I should exclude. No no, just go ahead. Sorry for the inconvenience -- Dago From dam at opencsw.org Mon Feb 1 21:25:22 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 21:25:22 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] High load with unknown source: In-Reply-To: References: <4B673654.9070201@clamav.net> Message-ID: Am 01.02.2010 um 21:23 schrieb Dagobert Michelsen: > Hi Edwin, > > Am 01.02.2010 um 21:15 schrieb T?r?k Edwin: >> One of my unit tests has timed out, it is taking 7-20s, while it >> normally takes ~0.5s under Linux/x86-64: >> b9s: >> real 21.0 >> user 2.2 >> sys 2.4 >> >> Linux: >> real 0m0.537s >> user 0m0.228s >> sys 0m0.320s >> >> >> I noticed that there is a high load on the Solaris buildhosts >> (b8s,b9s,b10s): >> >> 9:06pm up 13 day(s), 9:35, 5 users, load average: 14.52, 14.97, 15.93 >> >> >> Is this normal? Is some maintainance task running on the buildfarms >> right now? > > No, James is rebuilding OpenOffice with parallel builds as the ususal > build takes *very* long. The load looks quite impressive: > > Additionally I am rebuilding experimental-project catalogs which generates > about 350.000 files. > >> If so I can disable my automated builds during the maintainance, just >> let me know what time intervals I should exclude. > > No no, just go ahead. > > Sorry for the inconvenience > > -- Dago BTW, you can still use the x86 build hosts. Best regards -- Dago From edwin at clamav.net Mon Feb 1 21:28:11 2010 From: edwin at clamav.net (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?T=F6r=F6k_Edwin?=) Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 22:28:11 +0200 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] High load with unknown source: In-Reply-To: References: <4B673654.9070201@clamav.net> Message-ID: <4B67395B.1060001@clamav.net> On 02/01/2010 10:23 PM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > Hi Edwin, > > Am 01.02.2010 um 21:15 schrieb T?r?k Edwin: >> One of my unit tests has timed out, it is taking 7-20s, while it >> normally takes ~0.5s under Linux/x86-64: >> b9s: >> real 21.0 >> user 2.2 >> sys 2.4 >> >> Linux: >> real 0m0.537s >> user 0m0.228s >> sys 0m0.320s >> >> >> I noticed that there is a high load on the Solaris buildhosts >> (b8s,b9s,b10s): >> >> 9:06pm up 13 day(s), 9:35, 5 users, load average: 14.52, 14.97, 15.93 >> >> >> Is this normal? Is some maintainance task running on the buildfarms >> right now? > > No, James is rebuilding OpenOffice with parallel builds as the ususal > build takes *very* long. The load looks quite impressive: > > Additionally I am rebuilding experimental-project catalogs which generates > about 350.000 files. Interesting. How come none of the processes show up in top? :) Is that all I/O bound? > >> If so I can disable my automated builds during the maintainance, just >> let me know what time intervals I should exclude. > > No no, just go ahead. > > Sorry for the inconvenience No problem, I will figure a solution to not send false "build/test failed" emails from my buildbot in these cases. Best regards, --Edwin From dam at opencsw.org Mon Feb 1 21:30:12 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 21:30:12 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] High load with unknown source: In-Reply-To: <4B67395B.1060001@clamav.net> References: <4B673654.9070201@clamav.net> <4B67395B.1060001@clamav.net> Message-ID: <349FDCFD-2BB1-4E80-9530-2EC2330390C3@opencsw.org> Hi T?r?k, Am 01.02.2010 um 21:28 schrieb T?r?k Edwin: > On 02/01/2010 10:23 PM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: >> Am 01.02.2010 um 21:15 schrieb T?r?k Edwin: >>> One of my unit tests has timed out, it is taking 7-20s, while it >>> normally takes ~0.5s under Linux/x86-64: >>> b9s: >>> real 21.0 >>> user 2.2 >>> sys 2.4 >>> >>> Linux: >>> real 0m0.537s >>> user 0m0.228s >>> sys 0m0.320s >>> >>> >>> I noticed that there is a high load on the Solaris buildhosts >>> (b8s,b9s,b10s): >>> >>> 9:06pm up 13 day(s), 9:35, 5 users, load average: 14.52, 14.97, 15.93 >>> >>> >>> Is this normal? Is some maintainance task running on the buildfarms >>> right now? >> >> No, James is rebuilding OpenOffice with parallel builds as the ususal >> build takes *very* long. The load looks quite impressive: >> >> Additionally I am rebuilding experimental-project catalogs which generates >> about 350.000 files. > > Interesting. How come none of the processes show up in top? :) > Is that all I/O bound? The processes are shortlived. You could see them with DTrace from the global zone with shortlived.d from the DTraceToolkit. Best regards -- Dago From bonivart at opencsw.org Fri Feb 5 15:55:23 2010 From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart) Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 15:55:23 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Install CSWrazor Message-ID: <625385e31002050655l529aa8bcqd307a9888058e882@mail.gmail.com> Please install CSWrazor on build8x and build8s. -- /peter From dam at opencsw.org Fri Feb 5 16:01:28 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 16:01:28 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Install CSWrazor In-Reply-To: <625385e31002050655l529aa8bcqd307a9888058e882@mail.gmail.com> References: <625385e31002050655l529aa8bcqd307a9888058e882@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <621AD4F9-749F-4642-94D9-C505D0377E66@opencsw.org> Hi Peter, Am 05.02.2010 um 15:55 schrieb Peter Bonivart: > Please install CSWrazor on build8x and build8s. Doing this now. Best regards -- Dago From hson at opencsw.org Mon Feb 8 14:33:28 2010 From: hson at opencsw.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Roger_H=E5kansson?=) Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2010 14:33:28 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Install libgnugetopt on buildfarm Message-ID: <4B7012A8.9030708@opencsw.org> Could someone please install libgnugetopt on buildfarm, thanks... From dam at opencsw.org Mon Feb 8 14:43:02 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 14:43:02 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Install libgnugetopt on buildfarm In-Reply-To: <4B7012A8.9030708@opencsw.org> References: <4B7012A8.9030708@opencsw.org> Message-ID: <0C0D162D-BE2B-4C93-9B0B-746B2A007C49@opencsw.org> Hi Roger, Am 08.02.2010 um 14:33 schrieb Roger H?kansson: > Could someone please install libgnugetopt on buildfarm, thanks... Doing this now. Best regards -- Dago From bonivart at opencsw.org Tue Feb 9 15:11:13 2010 From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart) Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 15:11:13 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] gcc from opt/csw/ picks non-system zlib In-Reply-To: <4B716751.1060506@clamav.net> References: <4B716751.1060506@clamav.net> Message-ID: <625385e31002090611v15c47fc1v7ba2d9c7e40a7595@mail.gmail.com> 2010/2/9 T?r?k Edwin : > Hi, > > While investigating a ClamAV bugreport [1] on Solaris, I was wondering > why the Solaris9 buildbot didn't catch that problem [2]. > > I have a few questions: > ?- what do you use to build OpenCSW packages? gcc or SunCC? We build on Solaris 8 with Sun Studio 11. > ?- if you use SunCC is there a way to make sure that ClamAV is linked > against 1.2.3 (and not the system 1.1.4) on Solaris9 for the opencsw > ClamAV packages? > ?- do you run make check when building the opencsw package? Yes, here's the summary from 0.95.3: *** Unit tests disabled in this build *** Use ./configure --enable-check to enable them SKIP: check_clamav PASS: check_freshclam.sh PASS: check_sigtool.sh PASS: check1_clamscan.sh PASS: check2_clamd.sh *** Unit tests disabled in this build *** Use ./configure --enable-check to enable them PASS: check3_clamd.sh PASS: check4_clamd.sh *** valgrind tests skipped by default, use 'make check VG=1' to activate SKIP: check5_clamd_vg.sh *** valgrind tests skipped by default, use 'make check VG=1' to activate SKIP: check6_clamd_vg.sh *** valgrind tests skipped by default, use 'make check VG=1' to activate SKIP: check7_clamd_hg.sh *** valgrind tests skipped by default, use 'make check VG=1' to activate SKIP: check8_clamd_hg.sh ====================== All 6 tests passed (5 tests were not run) ====================== > ?- why does gcc link to /opt/csw/lib? I didn't ask it to do that (no -L > flags). It should link with /usr/lib provided files. (and apparently > /opt/csw/include is in the include path too). > ?- how is /usr/sfw/bin/gcc different from /opt/csw/gcc3/bin/gcc? > I can't find /usr/sfw/bin/gcc on the buildfarm, however it is installed > on login. We never use the compiler provided by Sun (/usr/sfw/bin/gcc), only our own packages. That's probably why you only find it on login which is not a build host. I'm sure Dagobert will jump in to take on the linking questions. -- /peter From maciej at opencsw.org Wed Feb 10 11:25:22 2010 From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski) Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:25:22 +0000 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] py_yaml on the buildfarm Message-ID: Can you install it please? Also on the login host, if possible. Maciej From rupert at opencsw.org Sat Feb 13 21:09:44 2010 From: rupert at opencsw.org (rupert THURNER) Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 21:09:44 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] libserf auf buildfarm Message-ID: <6af4271002131209v4e959125r59b76517af4903d7@mail.gmail.com> hi, could you please install libserf on the buildfarm to include it into the subversion build as additional feature to neon? rupert -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dam at opencsw.org Sat Feb 13 23:23:24 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 23:23:24 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] libserf auf buildfarm In-Reply-To: <6af4271002131209v4e959125r59b76517af4903d7@mail.gmail.com> References: <6af4271002131209v4e959125r59b76517af4903d7@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <42AFDD8C-6246-4FE4-8171-C8E37D55E56C@opencsw.org> Hi Rupert, Am 13.02.2010 um 21:09 schrieb rupert THURNER: > hi, could you please install libserf on the buildfarm to include it > into the subversion build as additional feature to neon? Doing this now. Best regrards -- Dago From skayser at opencsw.org Sun Feb 14 04:48:59 2010 From: skayser at opencsw.org (Sebastian Kayser) Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 04:48:59 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Please update pkgutil on the login box Message-ID: <4B7772AB.2000903@opencsw.org> Would you do yourself (and me :) a favor and upgrade pkgutil on the login box from 1.5 to 1.9.1, please? Sebastian From dam at opencsw.org Sun Feb 14 10:51:43 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 10:51:43 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Please update pkgutil on the login box In-Reply-To: <4B7772AB.2000903@opencsw.org> References: <4B7772AB.2000903@opencsw.org> Message-ID: <0B189BCE-FC9E-42E8-B7B7-04FFFCFFAADD@opencsw.org> Hi Sebastian, Am 14.02.2010 um 04:48 schrieb Sebastian Kayser: ----- Sportlich! Sorry for try to call you 5 hours later ,-) > Would you do yourself (and me :) a favor and upgrade pkgutil on the > login box from 1.5 to 1.9.1, please? Done. Best regards -- Dago From rupert at opencsw.org Sun Feb 14 12:03:04 2010 From: rupert at opencsw.org (rupert THURNER) Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 12:03:04 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] build8s - disk full error Message-ID: <6af4271002140303h20fa5dedkbe594434cbf8e7ae@mail.gmail.com> build8s gives a no space on device. i tried to use sudo su - .... but obviously this is gone again :) rupert. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dam at opencsw.org Sun Feb 14 13:59:20 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 13:59:20 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] build8s - disk full error In-Reply-To: <6af4271002140303h20fa5dedkbe594434cbf8e7ae@mail.gmail.com> References: <6af4271002140303h20fa5dedkbe594434cbf8e7ae@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <1498D0A8-3F82-4045-B309-A85EE59BCF67@opencsw.org> Hi Rupert, Am 14.02.2010 um 12:03 schrieb rupert THURNER: > build8s gives a no space on device. i tried to use sudo su - .... > but obviously this is gone again :) root at ncsw [global]:/export/home/bwalton > df -h . Filesystem size used avail capacity Mounted on oxygen/home/bwalton 437G 104G 4.2G 97% /export/home/bwalton Ben, what are you doing? 104 GB used? Wow! If you need this I can extend the diskspace. Umhhh..... -rw-r--r-- 1 bwalton csw 2.8T Feb 14 10:35 /export/home/ bwalton/packages/coreutils/trunk/work/build-isa-i386/coreutils-8.4/ tests/cu-infloop-1.XVW1nesaF5/t 2,8 TB on a compressed ZFS compressed down to 102 GB! Ok, I think we need quotas. It contains only repeated "y", I'll delete it for now. Best regards -- Dago From edwin at clamav.net Tue Feb 9 14:46:57 2010 From: edwin at clamav.net (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?T=F6r=F6k_Edwin?=) Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 15:46:57 +0200 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] gcc from opt/csw/ picks non-system zlib Message-ID: <4B716751.1060506@clamav.net> Hi, While investigating a ClamAV bugreport [1] on Solaris, I was wondering why the Solaris9 buildbot didn't catch that problem [2]. I have a few questions: - what do you use to build OpenCSW packages? gcc or SunCC? - if you use SunCC is there a way to make sure that ClamAV is linked against 1.2.3 (and not the system 1.1.4) on Solaris9 for the opencsw ClamAV packages? - do you run make check when building the opencsw package? - why does gcc link to /opt/csw/lib? I didn't ask it to do that (no -L flags). It should link with /usr/lib provided files. (and apparently /opt/csw/include is in the include path too). - how is /usr/sfw/bin/gcc different from /opt/csw/gcc3/bin/gcc? I can't find /usr/sfw/bin/gcc on the buildfarm, however it is installed on login. [1] https://wwws.clamav.net/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1821 [2] Looks like the problem is that if I use /opt/csw/gcc3/bin/gcc to link with zlib, then it links with /opt/csw/lib/libz.so (which is version 1.2.3), and not with the system one (which is 1.1.4). I was also running the SunCC builds on b10s only, not b9s. Looks like I'll have to run at least one SunCC build on b9s too to catch these problems. > /opt/csw/gcc3/bin/gcc x.c -lz > ldd a.out libz.so.1 => /opt/csw/lib/libz.so.1 libc.so.1 => /usr/lib/libc.so.1 libdl.so.1 => /usr/lib/libdl.so.1 Using the Sun studio compiler links with the system compiler though: > cc x.c -lz libz.so.1 => /usr/lib/libz.so.1 libc.so.1 => /usr/lib/libc.so.1 libdl.so.1 => /usr/lib/libdl.so.1 And of course users who use /usr/sfw/bin/gcc get linked to the system zlib too :( Best regards, --Edwin From edwin at clamav.net Tue Feb 9 16:00:05 2010 From: edwin at clamav.net (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?T=F6r=F6k_Edwin?=) Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 17:00:05 +0200 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] gcc from opt/csw/ picks non-system zlib In-Reply-To: <625385e31002090611v15c47fc1v7ba2d9c7e40a7595@mail.gmail.com> References: <4B716751.1060506@clamav.net> <625385e31002090611v15c47fc1v7ba2d9c7e40a7595@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <4B717875.7000805@clamav.net> On 02/09/2010 04:11 PM, Peter Bonivart wrote: > 2010/2/9 T?r?k Edwin : >> Hi, >> >> While investigating a ClamAV bugreport [1] on Solaris, I was wondering >> why the Solaris9 buildbot didn't catch that problem [2]. >> >> I have a few questions: >> - what do you use to build OpenCSW packages? gcc or SunCC? > > We build on Solaris 8 with Sun Studio 11. Alright. I will change my buildbot setup to test that configuration. > >> - if you use SunCC is there a way to make sure that ClamAV is linked >> against 1.2.3 (and not the system 1.1.4) on Solaris9 for the opencsw >> ClamAV packages? >> - do you run make check when building the opencsw package? > > Yes, here's the summary from 0.95.3: > > *** Unit tests disabled in this build > *** Use ./configure --enable-check to enable them It wouldn't hurt to have check-0.9.8 at build time, so you can run the unit tests, but its not critical. Best regards, --Edwin From edwin at clamav.net Sun Feb 14 11:19:25 2010 From: edwin at clamav.net (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?T=F6r=F6k_Edwin?=) Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 12:19:25 +0200 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] did login.opencsw.org ssh key change? Message-ID: <4B77CE2D.2040104@clamav.net> Hi, I was logged in to login.opencsw.org, I logged out, tried to log back in, and ssh gave me this message: ssh login.opencsw.org @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ @ WARNING: REMOTE HOST IDENTIFICATION HAS CHANGED! @ @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ IT IS POSSIBLE THAT SOMEONE IS DOING SOMETHING NASTY! Someone could be eavesdropping on you right now (man-in-the-middle attack)! It is also possible that the RSA host key has just been changed. The fingerprint for the RSA key sent by the remote host is 2b:25:1d:1e:53:eb:93:81:73:67:b9:28:af:b3:62:42. Please contact your system administrator. Add correct host key in /home/edwin/.ssh/known_hosts to get rid of this message. Offending key in /home/edwin/.ssh/known_hosts:96 RSA host key for login.opencsw.org has changed and you have requested strict checking. Host key verification failed. Did the ssh key, or host change? This is what I had at known_hosts:96: |1|PXJWT4V0ZLU5gHNIo2dxEbRIm3U=|8kzmrLz3CQvbyRryy7DBC9QiQv8= ssh-rsa AAAAB3NzaC1yc2EAAAABIwAAAIEAvW1sYL8U+zoQ7Sox4H1P7h8mvaqy3niD5YyrpPLhLRsNZjg+TDtU6tNsGxkBInqhxSyhMJllDxKzSAn+6JniourbBL0FsCiOkMTjXnZIVgA89OlsUveoke32Ph8GCApZBCruQIIH/k1wXQUaItCWUKG7VMTgfEKjQJO5J/QBlz8= Best regards, --Edwin From dam at opencsw.org Sun Feb 14 15:07:59 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 15:07:59 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] did login.opencsw.org ssh key change? In-Reply-To: <4B77CE2D.2040104@clamav.net> References: <4B77CE2D.2040104@clamav.net> Message-ID: <3AB33EE0-89D7-4961-A093-88474ACF76AB@opencsw.org> Hi T?r?k, Am 14.02.2010 um 11:19 schrieb T?r?k Edwin: > Did the ssh key, or host change? I accidentally started the OpenCSW OpenSSH in addition to the usual Sun SSH. The issues should be fixed now. Best regards -- Dago From edwin at clamav.net Sun Feb 14 15:09:27 2010 From: edwin at clamav.net (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?T=F6r=F6k_Edwin?=) Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 16:09:27 +0200 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] did login.opencsw.org ssh key change? In-Reply-To: <3AB33EE0-89D7-4961-A093-88474ACF76AB@opencsw.org> References: <4B77CE2D.2040104@clamav.net> <3AB33EE0-89D7-4961-A093-88474ACF76AB@opencsw.org> Message-ID: <4B780417.4030505@clamav.net> On 02/14/2010 04:07 PM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > Hi T?r?k, > > Am 14.02.2010 um 11:19 schrieb T?r?k Edwin: >> Did the ssh key, or host change? > > I accidentally started the OpenCSW OpenSSH in addition to the usual Sun > SSH. > The issues should be fixed now. > Yes, ssh doesn't complain anymore. Thanks, --Edwin From bwalton at opencsw.org Mon Feb 15 04:56:35 2010 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 22:56:35 -0500 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] build8s - disk full error In-Reply-To: <1498D0A8-3F82-4045-B309-A85EE59BCF67@opencsw.org> References: <6af4271002140303h20fa5dedkbe594434cbf8e7ae@mail.gmail.com> <1498D0A8-3F82-4045-B309-A85EE59BCF67@opencsw.org> Message-ID: <1266206107-sup-3021@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> Excerpts from Dagobert Michelsen's message of Sun Feb 14 07:59:20 -0500 2010: > Ben, what are you doing? 104 GB used? Wow! If you need this I can > extend the diskspace. Umhhh..... > > -rw-r--r-- 1 bwalton csw 2.8T Feb 14 10:35 /export/home/ > bwalton/packages/coreutils/trunk/work/build-isa-i386/coreutils-8.4/ > tests/cu-infloop-1.XVW1nesaF5/t Nothing intentional...that's nuts though! I'll remember to kill the test suite data in the future. I hadn't looked at the size it was using. :( Sorry everyone. -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From maciej at opencsw.org Tue Feb 16 22:20:51 2010 From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski) Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 21:20:51 +0000 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] py_yaml_rt on the buildfarm Message-ID: Hello buildfarm admins, Please install py_yaml_rt on the buildfarm (preferably including the login host). (Reason: py_yaml (that I use for checkpkg) works without it, but it's very slow. The C library will speed it up.) Maciej From bwalton at opencsw.org Wed Feb 17 02:19:43 2010 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 20:19:43 -0500 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] py_yaml_rt on the buildfarm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1266369554-sup-5941@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> Excerpts from Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski's message of Tue Feb 16 16:20:51 -0500 2010: > Please install py_yaml_rt on the buildfarm (preferably including the > login host). Doing this now (except for login host)...Dago? Thanks -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From dam at opencsw.org Wed Feb 17 10:22:35 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 10:22:35 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] py_yaml_rt on the buildfarm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi, Am 16.02.2010 um 22:20 schrieb Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski: > Hello buildfarm admins, > > Please install py_yaml_rt on the buildfarm (preferably including the > login host). > > (Reason: py_yaml (that I use for checkpkg) works without it, but it's > very slow. The C library will speed it up.) Done (including login) Best regards -- Dago From william at wbonnet.net Wed Feb 17 23:55:14 2010 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 23:55:14 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Please install CSWpmxmllibxml Message-ID: <4B7C73D2.3050604@wbonnet.net> Hi please can you install CSWpmxmllibxml on the farm ? thanks in advance cheers W. -- William http://www.wbonnet.net http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix http://www.opencsw.org Community SoftWare for Solaris http://www.guses.org French speaking Solaris User Group From bwalton at opencsw.org Thu Feb 18 00:00:01 2010 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 18:00:01 -0500 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Please install CSWpmxmllibxml In-Reply-To: <4B7C73D2.3050604@wbonnet.net> References: <4B7C73D2.3050604@wbonnet.net> Message-ID: <1266447588-sup-8030@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> Excerpts from William Bonnet's message of Wed Feb 17 17:55:14 -0500 2010: > please can you install CSWpmxmllibxml on the farm ? Doing this now. -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From william at wbonnet.net Fri Feb 19 07:57:56 2010 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 07:57:56 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Pkg install request Message-ID: <4B7E3674.2020000@wbonnet.net> Hi Please could you install CSWxf86miscproto on the farm ? thanks in advance cheers -- William http://www.wbonnet.net http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix http://www.opencsw.org Community SoftWare for Solaris http://www.guses.org French speaking Solaris User Group From dam at opencsw.org Fri Feb 19 09:17:08 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 09:17:08 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Pkg install request In-Reply-To: <4B7E3674.2020000@wbonnet.net> References: <4B7E3674.2020000@wbonnet.net> Message-ID: <106141E1-C611-46FF-9E34-43B4C9EBC0BC@opencsw.org> Hi William, Am 19.02.2010 um 07:57 schrieb William Bonnet: > Please could you install CSWxf86miscproto on the farm ? > > thanks in advance I would like to, but it hasn't been released yet: > web at web [web]:/home/web/bin > pkgutil -a | grep xf86 > x11_xf86bigfontproto CSWx11xf86bigftproto > 1.2.0,REV=2010.01.17 3.0 KB > x11_xf86dgaproto CSWx11xf86dgaproto > 2.1,REV=2010.01.17 5.1 KB > x11_xf86driproto CSWx11xf86driproto > 2.1.0,REV=2010.01.17 4.0 KB > x11_xf86vidmodeproto CSWx11xf86vidmdproto > 2.3,REV=2010.01.17 4.1 KB I just synced from the primary. Best regards -- Dago From maciej at opencsw.org Fri Feb 19 10:09:51 2010 From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski) Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 09:09:51 +0000 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] hdf5 on the buildfarm Message-ID: Can you install hdf5 on the buildfarm? From dam at opencsw.org Fri Feb 19 11:09:54 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 11:09:54 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] hdf5 on the buildfarm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <697951A6-1AFC-4DF0-8E9D-F3722BC6F48E@opencsw.org> Hi, Am 19.02.2010 um 10:09 schrieb Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski: > Can you install hdf5 on the buildfarm? Doing this now. Best regrads -- Dago From william at wbonnet.net Sat Feb 20 19:21:04 2010 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 19:21:04 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Testing10x root access Message-ID: <4B802810.2050807@wbonnet.net> Hi Please could i have root access to this box (as i have to t8{x,s} boxes ? I would like to install packages needed to compile X11 on the testing machines. I also noticed that the hostname is testing10x. testing8x also exist, but it was know at the beginning as build8xt or test8x. test10x and build10xt do not exist. Would it be possible to make the different names consistent ? either by addind or removing some name ? cheers W. -- William http://www.wbonnet.net http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix http://www.opencsw.org Community SoftWare for Solaris http://www.guses.org French speaking Solaris User Group From bwalton at opencsw.org Sat Feb 20 22:40:25 2010 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 16:40:25 -0500 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Testing10x root access In-Reply-To: <4B802810.2050807@wbonnet.net> References: <4B802810.2050807@wbonnet.net> Message-ID: <1266701990-sup-6370@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> Excerpts from William Bonnet's message of Sat Feb 20 13:21:04 -0500 2010: Hi William, > Please could i have root access to this box (as i have to t8{x,s} > boxes ? I don't have access on this box, so I can't process the request for you. Dago: Could you add me at the same time? Thanks -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From dam at opencsw.org Sun Feb 21 16:24:23 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 16:24:23 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Testing10x root access In-Reply-To: <4B802810.2050807@wbonnet.net> References: <4B802810.2050807@wbonnet.net> Message-ID: <2292480D-F058-4923-80D1-5DC2265E5E33@opencsw.org> Hi William, hi Ben, Am 20.02.2010 um 19:21 schrieb William Bonnet: > Please could i have root access to this box (as i have to t8{x,s} boxes ? You and Ben have now sudo on testing10x > I would like to install packages needed to compile X11 on the testing machines. > > I also noticed that the hostname is testing10x. testing8x also exist, but it was know at the beginning as build8xt or test8x. test10x and build10xt do not exist. > > Would it be possible to make the different names consistent ? either by addind or removing some name ? Initially we had build*x build*xt, then someone suggested that testing*x would be better, so made CNAMES. But those were physical machines. I am now moving them to VMware instanced one-by-one and the machine names may not point to different hosts (old vs. new). I'll do my best to clean that up soon. I will also make an announcement on maintainers. Best regards -- Dago From william at wbonnet.net Sun Feb 21 16:28:08 2010 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 16:28:08 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Testing10x root access In-Reply-To: <2292480D-F058-4923-80D1-5DC2265E5E33@opencsw.org> References: <4B802810.2050807@wbonnet.net> <2292480D-F058-4923-80D1-5DC2265E5E33@opencsw.org> Message-ID: <4B815108.5070501@wbonnet.net> Hi Dagobert Thanks a lot. > I'll do my best to clean that up soon. > > There is no hurry ;) cheers W. -- William http://www.wbonnet.net http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix http://www.opencsw.org Community SoftWare for Solaris http://www.guses.org French speaking Solaris User Group From blizinski at google.com Fri Feb 19 10:09:29 2010 From: blizinski at google.com (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski) Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 09:09:29 +0000 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] hdf5 on the buildfarm Message-ID: Can you install hdf5? From william at wbonnet.net Tue Feb 23 16:44:26 2010 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 16:44:26 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Update X11 proto Message-ID: Hi Could you please update the X11 proto when they will be on mirrors, and add x11_*proto packages that may be missing ? I need to be sure the farm is up to date before building the rest of the X11 libs thanks in advance cheers W. From bwalton at opencsw.org Wed Feb 24 02:06:53 2010 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 20:06:53 -0500 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Update X11 proto In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1266973590-sup-9926@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> Excerpts from William Bonnet's message of Tue Feb 23 10:44:26 -0500 2010: Hi William, > Could you please update the X11 proto when they will be on mirrors, > and add x11_*proto packages that may be missing ? Doing this now. Thanks -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From william at wbonnet.net Wed Feb 24 16:59:02 2010 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 16:59:02 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Package Update Message-ID: Hi Could you please update the X11 software on the farm and install new package ? libfontenc,libfontenc_devel,libfs,libfs_devel,libice,libice_devel,libpthreadstubs,libsm,libsm_devel,libx11,libx11_devel,libxau,libxau_devel,libxaw,libxaw_devel,libxdmcp,libxdmcp_devel,libxext,libxext_devel,libxfixes,libxfixes_devel,libxft2,libxft2_devel,libxkbfile,libxkbfile_devel,libxmu,libxmu_devel,libxpm,libxpm_devel,libxrender,libxrender_devel,libxt,libxt_devel,xpm,xtrans thanks in thanks cheers W. From dam at opencsw.org Wed Feb 24 17:00:56 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 17:00:56 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Package Update In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi William, Am 24.02.2010 um 16:59 schrieb William Bonnet: > Could you please update the X11 software on the farm and install new > package ? > > libfontenc,libfontenc_devel,libfs,libfs_devel,libice,libice_devel,libpthreadstubs,libsm,libsm_devel,libx11,libx11_devel,libxau,libxau_devel,libxaw,libxaw_devel,libxdmcp,libxdmcp_devel,libxext,libxext_devel,libxfixes,libxfixes_devel,libxft2,libxft2_devel,libxkbfile,libxkbfile_devel,libxmu,libxmu_devel,libxpm,libxpm_devel,libxrender,libxrender_devel,libxt,libxt_devel,xpm,xtrans Doing this now. Best regards -- Dago From william at wbonnet.net Wed Feb 24 17:18:06 2010 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 17:18:06 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Package Update In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <5E9DD11E-EE6E-4C6D-B3A1-95183D1E9E32@wbonnet.net> Thanks :) Le 24 f?vr. 2010 ? 17:00, Dagobert Michelsen a ?crit : > Hi William, > > Am 24.02.2010 um 16:59 schrieb William Bonnet: >> Could you please update the X11 software on the farm and install new package ? >> >> libfontenc,libfontenc_devel,libfs,libfs_devel,libice,libice_devel,libpthreadstubs,libsm,libsm_devel,libx11,libx11_devel,libxau,libxau_devel,libxaw,libxaw_devel,libxdmcp,libxdmcp_devel,libxext,libxext_devel,libxfixes,libxfixes_devel,libxft2,libxft2_devel,libxkbfile,libxkbfile_devel,libxmu,libxmu_devel,libxpm,libxpm_devel,libxrender,libxrender_devel,libxt,libxt_devel,xpm,xtrans > > Doing this now. > > > Best regards > > -- Dago From Russell.Wright at barclayscapital.com Tue Feb 23 16:33:24 2010 From: Russell.Wright at barclayscapital.com (Russell.Wright at barclayscapital.com) Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 15:33:24 +0000 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] SSH Access to the Baltic Online, Kiel, Germany Build Farm Message-ID: Hi, Would it be possible for you to grant access to the Build Farm at 'Baltic Online, Kiel, Germany'. I will be performing some build work on packages within Ganglia and on some packages required by Ganglia to operate. Thankyou. Russell Wright. _______________________________________________ This e-mail may contain information that is confidential, privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, do not duplicate or redistribute it by any means. Please delete it and any attachments and notify the sender that you have received it in error. Unless specifically indicated, this e-mail is not an offer to buy or sell or a solicitation to buy or sell any securities, investment products or other financial product or service, an official confirmation of any transaction, or an official statement of Barclays. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Barclays. This e-mail is subject to terms available at the following link: www.barcap.com/emaildisclaimer. By messaging with Barclays you consent to the foregoing. Barclays Capital is the investment banking division of Barclays Bank PLC, a company registered in England (number 1026167) with its registered office at 1 Churchill Place, London, E14 5HP. This email may relate to or be sent from other members of the Barclays Group. _______________________________________________ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From william at wbonnet.net Wed Feb 24 21:22:40 2010 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 21:22:40 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Package install request : CSWxv Message-ID: <4B858A90.30502@wbonnet.net> Hi Could you please isntall xv on the farm ? (needed for X11 libxvmc compil) Thanks in advance cheers W. -- William http://www.wbonnet.net http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix http://www.opencsw.org Community SoftWare for Solaris http://www.guses.org French speaking Solaris User Group From bwalton at opencsw.org Wed Feb 24 21:33:18 2010 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 15:33:18 -0500 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Fwd: Re: Package install request : CSWxv Message-ID: <1267043579-sup-1595@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Wrong address used to send... -Ben --- Begin forwarded message from Ben Walton --- From: Ben Walton To: William Bonnet Cc: BuildFarm List Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 15:27:33 -0500 Subject: Re: [csw-buildfarm] Package install request : CSWxv Excerpts from William Bonnet's message of Wed Feb 24 15:22:40 -0500 2010: > Could you please isntall xv on the farm ? (needed for X11 libxvmc > compil) Processing now.. Thanks -Ben --- End forwarded message --- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From dam at opencsw.org Wed Feb 24 23:25:42 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 23:25:42 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] SSH Access to the Baltic Online, Kiel, Germany Build Farm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <51AD6BE4-9798-42CF-9576-E9A6ECBEC5F5@opencsw.org> Hi Russel, Am 23.02.2010 um 16:33 schrieb : > Would it be possible for you to grant access to the Build Farm at > 'Baltic Online, Kiel, Germany'. > I will be performing some build work on packages within Ganglia and > on some packages required by Ganglia to operate. Sure. I need your intended user name and your ssh public key. Best regards -- Dago -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From maciej at opencsw.org Thu Feb 25 08:30:47 2010 From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski) Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 07:30:47 +0000 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] XML::Simple (pm_xmlsimple) Message-ID: Please install. It's needed for some packages to build. From dam at opencsw.org Thu Feb 25 10:05:23 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 10:05:23 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] XML::Simple (pm_xmlsimple) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <2A126D0A-0149-4C06-8732-318C6C0348A3@opencsw.org> Hi Maciej, Am 25.02.2010 um 08:30 schrieb Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski: > Please install. It's needed for some packages to build. Doing this now. Best regards -- Dago From maciej at opencsw.org Thu Feb 25 22:20:17 2010 From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski) Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 21:20:17 +0000 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] icon_naming_utils Message-ID: Please install freshly released icon_naming_utils, I'll proceed with gnome-icon-theme. From dam at opencsw.org Thu Feb 25 23:19:06 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 23:19:06 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] icon_naming_utils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Maciej, Am 25.02.2010 um 22:20 schrieb Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski: > Please install freshly released icon_naming_utils, I'll proceed with > gnome-icon-theme. I would, but it is not on the mirror yet. Best regards -- Dago From maciej at opencsw.org Fri Feb 26 08:17:14 2010 From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski) Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 07:17:14 +0000 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] icon_naming_utils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 10:19 PM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > Hi Maciej, > > Am 25.02.2010 um 22:20 schrieb Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski: >> >> Please install freshly released icon_naming_utils, I'll proceed with >> gnome-icon-theme. > > I would, but it is not on the mirror yet. How about now? It's been a couple hours. In the future, how long should I wait before asking? Maciej From dam at opencsw.org Fri Feb 26 09:24:49 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 09:24:49 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] icon_naming_utils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <374EFB5C-E6F1-4DF6-A4F9-7A1A5542EAF1@opencsw.org> Hi Maciej, Am 26.02.2010 um 08:17 schrieb Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski: > On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 10:19 PM, Dagobert Michelsen > wrote: >> Am 25.02.2010 um 22:20 schrieb Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski: >>> >>> Please install freshly released icon_naming_utils, I'll proceed with >>> gnome-icon-theme. >> >> I would, but it is not on the mirror yet. > > How about now? It's been a couple hours. Done. > In the future, how long should I wait before asking? No need to wait, I remember the backlog. The reply was just to give you feedback that I have seen it and that it was not installed because of my lazyness ;-) Best regards -- Dago From ellson at opencsw.org Fri Feb 26 18:10:41 2010 From: ellson at opencsw.org (John Ellson) Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 12:10:41 -0500 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] updates to buildfarms Message-ID: <4B880091.2040508@opencsw.org> There have been not-so-recent updates to "gd" and "swig" that haven't been installed on the buildfarms yet. I'm wondering if I've misunderstood some process? Shouldn't the buildfarms be kept up to date with the absolute latest, so that other packages that depend on updated packages and that are waiting for fixes, can be built? Is there some other mechanism that I'm not aware of to tell a build to use a test package rather than a stable package, perhaps? John From dam at opencsw.org Fri Feb 26 21:21:15 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 21:21:15 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Updating buildfarm now In-Reply-To: <4B880091.2040508@opencsw.org> References: <4B880091.2040508@opencsw.org> Message-ID: Hi John, Am 26.02.2010 um 18:10 schrieb John Ellson: > There have been not-so-recent updates to "gd" and "swig" that > haven't been installed on the buildfarms > yet. I'm wondering if I've misunderstood some process? The packages on the farm are updates on request by mail to buildfarm@ or on a scheduled downtime every couple of month when I patch the machines. > Shouldn't the buildfarms be kept up to date with the absolute > latest, so that other packages that depend on updated packages and > that are waiting for fixes, can be built? Usually there are no hard constraints on package versions. When there are needs for new versions just mail to buildfarm@ that you want the packages updated after release. > Is there some other mechanism that I'm not aware of to tell a build > to use a test package rather than a stable package, perhaps? Requesting ;-) As you obviously want the new versions I am updating all farm machines now to current/. Best regards -- Dago From william at wbonnet.net Sun Feb 28 01:57:14 2010 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 01:57:14 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Package install Message-ID: <4B89BF6A.8070709@wbonnet.net> Hi could you please install on the farm the latest versions of the X11 libs ? libxv libxinerama libxinerama_devel libxdamage libxdamage_devel libxfont libxfont_devel libdmx libdmx_devel libxxf86vm libxxf86vm_devel libxi libxi_devel libxcomposite_devel libxcomposite libxv_devel libxres_devel libxres libxcomposite libxcomposite_devel libxcursor_devel libxcursor libxv libxxf86dga libxxf86dga_devel libxrandr libxrandr_devel libxscrnsaver libxscrnsaver_devel Thanks in advance cheers W. -- William http://www.wbonnet.net http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix http://www.opencsw.org Community SoftWare for Solaris http://www.guses.org French speaking Solaris User Group From william at wbonnet.net Sun Feb 28 02:48:13 2010 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 02:48:13 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Package install In-Reply-To: <1267321535-sup-7358@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> References: <4B89BF6A.8070709@wbonnet.net> <1267321535-sup-7358@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: <4B89CB5D.5020203@wbonnet.net> Ben Walton wrote: > Excerpts from William Bonnet's message of Sat Feb 27 19:57:14 -0500 2010: > > >> could you please install on the farm the latest versions of the X11 >> libs ? >> > > Doing this now. > -Ben > cool :) thanks -- William http://www.wbonnet.net http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix http://www.opencsw.org Community SoftWare for Solaris http://www.guses.org French speaking Solaris User Group From bwalton at opencsw.org Sun Feb 28 02:52:44 2010 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 20:52:44 -0500 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Package install In-Reply-To: <4B89BF6A.8070709@wbonnet.net> References: <4B89BF6A.8070709@wbonnet.net> Message-ID: <1267321953-sup-1105@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Excerpts from William Bonnet's message of Sat Feb 27 19:57:14 -0500 2010: > could you please install on the farm the latest versions of the X11 libs ? Doing this now. -Ben From bwalton at artsci.utoronto.ca Wed Feb 24 21:27:33 2010 From: bwalton at artsci.utoronto.ca (Ben Walton) Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 15:27:33 -0500 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Package install request : CSWxv In-Reply-To: <4B858A90.30502@wbonnet.net> References: <4B858A90.30502@wbonnet.net> Message-ID: <1267043238-sup-876@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Excerpts from William Bonnet's message of Wed Feb 24 15:22:40 -0500 2010: > Could you please isntall xv on the farm ? (needed for X11 libxvmc > compil) Processing now.. Thanks -Ben -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: