From maciej at opencsw.org  Fri Jan  1 21:38:14 2010
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski)
Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 20:38:14 +0000
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] [csw-maintainers] pkgmk: ERROR: unable to
	obtain temporary file resources, errno=28
In-Reply-To: <ce97543b1001011233v6e7f0851w8b06abd3c6b3868c@mail.gmail.com>
References: <6af4271001010958x2ca2c707u62a1d25b29f12604@mail.gmail.com>
	<ce97543b1001011233v14be7e4fq5c290f170001e886@mail.gmail.com>
	<ce97543b1001011233v6e7f0851w8b06abd3c6b3868c@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <ce97543b1001011238tbf83d32ua5d4fc2378c87739@mail.gmail.com>

[+buildfarm]

On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 8:33 PM, Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski
<maciej at opencsw.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 8:33 PM, Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski
> <maciej at opencsw.org> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 5:58 PM, rupert THURNER <rupert at opencsw.org> wrote:
>>> where does this error come from?
>>> pkgmk: ERROR: unable to obtain temporary file resources, errno=28
>>
>> Can you try trussing it?
>>
>> truss -o /var/tmp/mkp.truss
>
> I think I found the problem (that's build8s):
>
> maciej at build8s [build8s]:~ > df -k /var/tmp
> Filesystem ? ? ? ? ? ?kbytes ? ?used ? avail capacity ?Mounted on
> / ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?11188159 11188159 ? ? ? 0 ? 100% ? ?/
>


From dam at opencsw.org  Fri Jan  1 22:34:55 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 22:34:55 +0100
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] [csw-maintainers] pkgmk: ERROR: unable to
	obtain temporary file resources, errno=28
In-Reply-To: <ce97543b1001011238tbf83d32ua5d4fc2378c87739@mail.gmail.com>
References: <6af4271001010958x2ca2c707u62a1d25b29f12604@mail.gmail.com>
	<ce97543b1001011233v14be7e4fq5c290f170001e886@mail.gmail.com>
	<ce97543b1001011233v6e7f0851w8b06abd3c6b3868c@mail.gmail.com>
	<ce97543b1001011238tbf83d32ua5d4fc2378c87739@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <FFE92784-19E7-47D1-AFC2-451966B2070F@opencsw.org>

Hi,

Am 01.01.2010 um 21:38 schrieb Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski:
> [+buildfarm]
>
> On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 8:33 PM, Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski
> <maciej at opencsw.org> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 8:33 PM, Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski
>> <maciej at opencsw.org> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 5:58 PM, rupert THURNER  
>>> <rupert at opencsw.org> wrote:
>>>> where does this error come from?
>>>> pkgmk: ERROR: unable to obtain temporary file resources, errno=28
>>>
>>> Can you try trussing it?
>>>
>>> truss -o /var/tmp/mkp.truss
>>
>> I think I found the problem (that's build8s):
>>
>> maciej at build8s [build8s]:~ > df -k /var/tmp
>> Filesystem            kbytes    used   avail capacity  Mounted on
>> /                    11188159 11188159       0   100%    /

Fixed. I guess I will set quota on Hudson now :-(


Best regards

   -- Dago


From rupert at opencsw.org  Sat Jan  2 12:18:24 2010
From: rupert at opencsw.org (rupert THURNER)
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 12:18:24 +0100
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] what is different on buildfarm? mercurial tests
	take long - or fail
Message-ID: <6af4271001020318k5f9fe830gd5378c9bf96e267b@mail.gmail.com>

while testing mercurial-1.4.2 i noticed that the tests take long - or
forever on build8s. and they fail with network errors on build10s.

as i did not have time to wait if they end at 8s, i breaked them and i
tried 1.4.1 as well, which also did not complete in a reasonable time.

so i wonder what might cause this. the new python? the new ipv6? something else?


here the output of a "ps" while waiting for something to happen:

rupert at build8s:~/tmp
$ /usr/ucb/ps aguxwwwww | grep test
rupert    7748  0.0  0.016920 2096 ?        S 02:50:25  0:00
/opt/csw/bin/python /tmp/hgtests.8Qqkub/install/bin/hg serve -p 20137
-d --pid-file=hg.pid -E errors.log --daemon-pipefds=3,4
rupert    9810  0.0  0.0 2168 1536 pts/35   S 04:23:46  0:00 grep test
rupert   12261  0.0  0.0 2232 1704 pts/60   S 04:11:39  0:00 /bin/sh
/home/rupert/mgar/pkg/mercurial/trunk/work/solaris8-sparc/build-isa-sparcv8/mercurial-1.4.1/tests/test-push-http
rupert   12341  0.0  0.116920 6064 ?        S 04:11:48  0:00
/opt/csw/bin/python /tmp/hgtests.ZTfh5M/install/bin/hg serve -p 20092
-d --pid-file=hg.pid -E errors.log --daemon-pipefds=3,4
rupert   12356  0.0  0.111784 8416 pts/60   S 04:11:49  0:00
/opt/csw/bin/python /tmp/hgtests.ZTfh5M/install/bin/hg --cwd ../test2
push http://localhost:20092/
rupert   15345  0.0  0.116920 2464 ?        S 03:37:32  0:00
/opt/csw/bin/python /tmp/hgtests.vKPSKj/install/bin/hg serve -p 20095
-d --pid-file=hg.pid -E errors.log --daemon-pipefds=3,4
rupert   17196  0.0  0.1 9208 5376 pts/60   S 04:04:44  0:01 python
run-tests.py -j30
rupert   18094  0.0  0.110232 6008 pts/60   S 04:04:56  0:01
/opt/csw/bin/python run-tests.py --jobs=1 --port=20059
--with-hg=/tmp/hgtests.ZTfh5M/install/bin/hg --timeout=180 --child=15
--port=20092 --tmpdir /tmp/hgtests.ZTfh5M/child11 test-audit-path
test-command-template test-convert-hg-startrev test-diff-newlines
test-git-export test-http-clone-r test-issue619 test-merge5
test-mv-cp-st-diff test-push-http test-resolve test-trusted.py
rupert   18123  0.0  0.110232 5312 pts/60   S 04:04:57  0:01
/opt/csw/bin/python run-tests.py --jobs=1 --port=20059
--with-hg=/tmp/hgtests.ZTfh5M/install/bin/hg --timeout=180 --child=30
--port=20137 --tmpdir /tmp/hgtests.ZTfh5M/child26 test-branchmap
test-convert-bzr-ghosts test-copy test-empty-file test-hgweb-auth.py
test-inotify-issue1371 test-merge-force test-mq-qclone-http test-patch
test-rebase-parameters test-static-http
rupert   23378  0.0  0.0 2232 1128 pts/60   S 04:06:03  0:00 /bin/sh
/home/rupert/mgar/pkg/mercurial/trunk/work/solaris8-sparc/build-isa-sparcv8/mercurial-1.4.1/tests/test-mq-qclone-http
rupert   24084  0.0  0.1 9360 4992 pts/60   S 04:06:13  0:00 python
/home/rupert/mgar/pkg/mercurial/trunk/work/solaris8-sparc/build-isa-sparcv8/mercurial-1.4.1/tests/get-with-headers.py
localhost:20137 /?style=raw


on build10s, using the tip of the crew repository, i get "network is
not reachable" errors:

rupert at build10s:~/hg-crew-10s
$ python setup.py build
...
rupert at build10s:~/hg-crew-10s/tests
$ python run-tests.py -j 30
..
ERROR: /home/rupert/hg-crew-10s/tests/test-bad-pull output changed and
returned error code 1
--- /home/rupert/hg-crew-10s/tests/test-bad-pull.out
+++ /home/rupert/hg-crew-10s/tests/test-bad-pull.err
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
-abort: error: Connection refused
+abort: error: Network is unreachable
 255
 copy: No such file or directory
-abort: HTTP Error 404
+abort: error: Network is unreachable
 0
+/home/rupert/hg-crew-10s/tests/test-bad-pull: kill: no such process
!...
ERROR: /home/rupert/hg-crew-10s/tests/test-branchmap output changed
and returned error code 1


ERROR: /home/rupert/hg-crew-10s/tests/test-webraw output changed
--- /home/rupert/hg-crew-10s/tests/test-webraw.out
+++ /home/rupert/hg-crew-10s/tests/test-webraw.err
@@ -1,10 +1,18 @@
-200 Script output follows
-content-type: text/plain
-content-length: 157
-content-disposition: inline; filename="some \"text\".txt"
-
-This is just some random text
-that will go inside the file and take a few lines.
-It is very boring to read, but computers don't
-care about things like that.
-host - - [date] "GET
/?f=a23bf1310f6e;file=sub/some%20%22text%22.txt;style=raw HTTP/1.1"
200 -
+Traceback (most recent call last):
+  File "/home/rupert/hg-crew-10s/tests/get-with-headers.py", line 17,
in <module>
+    conn.request("GET", sys.argv[2])
+  File "/opt/csw/lib/python/httplib.py", line 898, in request
+    self._send_request(method, url, body, headers)
+  File "/opt/csw/lib/python/httplib.py", line 935, in _send_request
+    self.endheaders()
+  File "/opt/csw/lib/python/httplib.py", line 892, in endheaders
+    self._send_output()
+  File "/opt/csw/lib/python/httplib.py", line 764, in _send_output
+    self.send(msg)
+  File "/opt/csw/lib/python/httplib.py", line 723, in send
+    self.connect()
+  File "/opt/csw/lib/python/httplib.py", line 704, in connect
+    self.timeout)
+  File "/opt/csw/lib/python/socket.py", line 514, in create_connection
+    raise error, msg
+socket.error: [Errno 128] Network is unreachable


rupert.


From dam at opencsw.org  Mon Jan  4 10:33:53 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 10:33:53 +0100
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] what is different on buildfarm? mercurial tests
	take long - or fail
In-Reply-To: <6af4271001020318k5f9fe830gd5378c9bf96e267b@mail.gmail.com>
References: <6af4271001020318k5f9fe830gd5378c9bf96e267b@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <841FE230-13C7-4CEC-9202-B01167FE8730@opencsw.org>

Hi Rupert,

Am 02.01.2010 um 12:18 schrieb rupert THURNER:
> while testing mercurial-1.4.2 i noticed that the tests take long - or
> forever on build8s. and they fail with network errors on build10s.
>
> as i did not have time to wait if they end at 8s, i breaked them and i
> tried 1.4.1 as well, which also did not complete in a reasonable time.
>
> so i wonder what might cause this. the new python? the new ipv6?  
> something else?

You may want to try test8s which doesn't have the novelties above.
If you want to have net access from the build machines you have to
use a proxy.


Best regards

   -- Dago


From maciej at opencsw.org  Mon Jan  4 20:04:59 2010
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski)
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 19:04:59 +0000
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] py_cheetah, py_mox
Message-ID: <ce97543b1001041104s318741cdv1eb35e1a617d2151@mail.gmail.com>

Install please?

py_cheetah
py_mox

I'm on my rampage of adding more and more dependencies to GAR.  Woohoo!

If possible, please also install on the login host.

Maciej


From rupert at opencsw.org  Mon Jan  4 20:48:07 2010
From: rupert at opencsw.org (rupert THURNER)
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 20:48:07 +0100
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] what is different on buildfarm? mercurial tests
	take long - or fail
In-Reply-To: <841FE230-13C7-4CEC-9202-B01167FE8730@opencsw.org>
References: <6af4271001020318k5f9fe830gd5378c9bf96e267b@mail.gmail.com>
	<841FE230-13C7-4CEC-9202-B01167FE8730@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <6af4271001041148x907e364ha7d09da31400df6b@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 10:33, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Hi Rupert,
>
> Am 02.01.2010 um 12:18 schrieb rupert THURNER:
>>
>> while testing mercurial-1.4.2 i noticed that the tests take long - or
>> forever on build8s. and they fail with network errors on build10s.
>>
>> as i did not have time to wait if they end at 8s, i breaked them and i
>> tried 1.4.1 as well, which also did not complete in a reasonable time.
>>
>> so i wonder what might cause this. the new python? the new ipv6? something
>> else?
>
> You may want to try test8s which doesn't have the novelties above.
> If you want to have net access from the build machines you have to
> use a proxy.

huhm .... the results are differing with the version built on build8s:
1. test8s, see below and http://mercurial.pastebin.com/m41cc23ac
2. build8s, see http://mercurial.pastebin.com/m6ed3c83a, just times ot / stops

should we try to change one parameter by one, and rerun the tests?

rupert at login:~
$ ssh test8s
...
rupert at build8st:~/hg-crew-8s/tests
$ python run-tests.py -j 30
...
Skipped test-convert-p4: missing feature: Perforce server and client
Skipped test-convert-bzr-ghosts: missing feature: Canonical's Bazaar client
Skipped test-inotify-issue1208: missing feature: inotify extension support
Skipped test-highlight: missing feature: Pygments source highlighting library
Skipped test-casefolding: missing feature: case insensitive file system
Skipped test-convert-bzr-merges: missing feature: Canonical's Bazaar client
Skipped test-inotify-issue1371: missing feature: inotify extension support
Skipped test-convert-bzr-directories: missing feature: Canonical's Bazaar client
Skipped test-convert-tla: missing feature: GNU Arch tla client
Skipped test-inotify-dirty-dirstate: missing feature: inotify extension support
Skipped test-convert-bzr-114: missing feature: Canonical's Bazaar client >= 1.14
Skipped test-inotify-debuginotify: missing feature: inotify extension support
Skipped test-convert-svn-branches: missing feature: subversion python bindings
Skipped test-convert-svn-move: missing feature: subversion python bindings
Skipped test-convert-bzr: missing feature: Canonical's Bazaar client
Skipped test-convert-svn-tags: missing feature: subversion python bindings
Skipped test-inotify: missing feature: inotify extension support
Skipped test-convert-baz: missing feature: GNU Arch baz client
Skipped test-convert-svn-startrev: missing feature: subversion python bindings
Skipped test-convert-svn-source: missing feature: subversion python bindings
Skipped test-convert-bzr-treeroot: missing feature: Canonical's Bazaar client
Skipped test-inotify-issue1542: missing feature: inotify extension support
Skipped test-convert-svn-sink: missing feature: subversion python bindings
Skipped test-inotify-lookup: missing feature: inotify extension support
Skipped test-convert-darcs: missing feature: darcs client
Skipped test-convert-p4-filetypes: missing feature: Perforce server and client
Skipped test-convert-hg-svn: missing feature: subversion python bindings
Skipped test-convert-mtn: missing feature: monotone client (> 0.31)
Skipped test-inotify-issue1556: missing feature: inotify extension support
Skipped test-gendoc: missing feature: Docutils rst2html tool
Skipped test-convert-svn-encoding: missing feature: subversion python bindings
Skipped test-no-symlinks: system supports symbolic links
Failed test-convert-cvs: output changed
Failed test-subrepo-svn: output changed and returned error code 2
Failed test-patch-offset: output changed and returned error code 2
# Ran 361 tests, 32 skipped, 3 failed.


From dam at opencsw.org  Mon Jan  4 21:36:16 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 21:36:16 +0100
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] py_cheetah, py_mox
In-Reply-To: <ce97543b1001041104s318741cdv1eb35e1a617d2151@mail.gmail.com>
References: <ce97543b1001041104s318741cdv1eb35e1a617d2151@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <D62FF435-F652-487A-929F-0B275FE5FC28@opencsw.org>

Hi,

Am 04.01.2010 um 20:04 schrieb Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski:
> Install please?
>
> py_cheetah
> py_mox
>
> I'm on my rampage of adding more and more dependencies to GAR.   
> Woohoo!
>
> If possible, please also install on the login host.

Doing this now.


Best regards

   -- Dago


From dam at opencsw.org  Mon Jan  4 21:38:29 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 21:38:29 +0100
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] what is different on buildfarm? mercurial tests
	take long - or fail
In-Reply-To: <6af4271001041148x907e364ha7d09da31400df6b@mail.gmail.com>
References: <6af4271001020318k5f9fe830gd5378c9bf96e267b@mail.gmail.com>
	<841FE230-13C7-4CEC-9202-B01167FE8730@opencsw.org>
	<6af4271001041148x907e364ha7d09da31400df6b@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <0DEA3BF3-1EC8-42F7-A160-1CC681304F3F@opencsw.org>

Hi Rupert,

Am 04.01.2010 um 20:48 schrieb rupert THURNER:
> huhm .... the results are differing with the version built on build8s:
> 1. test8s, see below and http://mercurial.pastebin.com/m41cc23ac
> 2. build8s, see http://mercurial.pastebin.com/m6ed3c83a, just times  
> ot / stops
>
> should we try to change one parameter by one, and rerun the tests?

You can do
   ssh root at test8s
now. You should be using the machine alone at the moment. Please don't  
FUBR it.


Best regards

   -- Dago


From rupert at opencsw.org  Mon Jan  4 23:53:47 2010
From: rupert at opencsw.org (rupert THURNER)
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 23:53:47 +0100
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] what is different on buildfarm? mercurial tests
	take long - or fail
In-Reply-To: <0DEA3BF3-1EC8-42F7-A160-1CC681304F3F@opencsw.org>
References: <6af4271001020318k5f9fe830gd5378c9bf96e267b@mail.gmail.com>
	<841FE230-13C7-4CEC-9202-B01167FE8730@opencsw.org>
	<6af4271001041148x907e364ha7d09da31400df6b@mail.gmail.com>
	<0DEA3BF3-1EC8-42F7-A160-1CC681304F3F@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <6af4271001041453o5324cc98t19981f6f67762853@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 21:38, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Hi Rupert,
>
> Am 04.01.2010 um 20:48 schrieb rupert THURNER:
>>
>> huhm .... the results are differing with the version built on build8s:
>> 1. test8s, see below and http://mercurial.pastebin.com/m41cc23ac
>> 2. build8s, see http://mercurial.pastebin.com/m6ed3c83a, just times ot /
>> stops
>>
>> should we try to change one parameter by one, and rerun the tests?
>
> You can do
> ?ssh root at test8s
> now. You should be using the machine alone at the moment. Please don't FUBR
> it.

did:
pkgrm CSWpython
pkgutil -U -i python

did not upgrade the dependent upgrades pkgutil suggested:
  CSWreadline-6.1,REV=2010.01.01
  CSWsqlite3rt-3.6.21,REV=2010.01.04
  CSWosslrt-0.9.8l,REV=2009.12.08

and you were right, the hg tests just stops. but i am completely lost
why this would happen. it seems to be (at least) the push-http test:

rupert at build8st:~/hg-crew-8s/tests
$ python run-tests.py test-push-http

rupert at build8st:~
$ /usr/ucb/ps aguxwwwww | grep rupert
rupert   22253  0.1  0.111784 8496 pts/76   S 15:39:36  0:00
/opt/csw/bin/python /tmp/hgtests.iyfh65/install/bin/hg --cwd ../test2
push http://localhost:20059/
rupert   22165  0.0  0.110232 6952 pts/76   S 15:39:11  0:00 python
run-tests.py test-push-http
rupert   22210  0.0  0.0 2232 1656 pts/76   S 15:39:26  0:00 /bin/sh
/home/rupert/hg-crew-8s/tests/test-push-http
rupert   22254  0.0  0.0 5432 1624 pts/73   O 15:39:43  0:00
/usr/ucb/ps -aguxwwwww
rupert    3135  0.0  0.116920 2904 ?        S 15:02:26  0:00
/opt/csw/bin/python /tmp/hgtests.DAKOec/install/bin/hg serve -p 20101
-d --pid-file=hg.pid -E errors.log --daemon-pipefds=3,4
rupert   21190  0.0  0.112624 3176 ?        S 15:33:05  0:00
/opt/csw/sbin/sshd -R
rupert   21192  0.0  0.1 3768 2840 pts/73   S 15:33:05  0:00 -bash
rupert   22209  0.0  0.0 2232 1656 pts/76   S 15:39:26  0:00 /bin/sh
-c "/home/rupert/hg-crew-8s/tests/test-push-http"
rupert   22244  0.0  0.116920 6272 ?        S 15:39:35  0:00
/opt/csw/bin/python /tmp/hgtests.iyfh65/install/bin/hg serve -p 20059
-d --pid-file=hg.pid -E errors.log --daemon-pipefds=3,4
rupert   22252  0.0  0.0 2240 1608 pts/76   S 15:39:36  0:00 sed -e
s,:[0-9][0-9]*/,/,
rupert   22255  0.0  0.0 2168 1456 pts/73   S 15:39:43  0:00 grep rupert
rupert   23303  0.0  0.012624 1632 ?        S 14:59:42  0:00
/opt/csw/sbin/sshd -R
rupert   23305  0.0  0.0 3832 1952 pts/76   S 14:59:43  0:00 -bash


then i upgraded the dependencies too. but no change in the output.

rupert.


From rupert at opencsw.org  Mon Jan  4 23:57:47 2010
From: rupert at opencsw.org (rupert THURNER)
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 23:57:47 +0100
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] what is different on buildfarm? mercurial tests
	take long - or fail
In-Reply-To: <0DEA3BF3-1EC8-42F7-A160-1CC681304F3F@opencsw.org>
References: <6af4271001020318k5f9fe830gd5378c9bf96e267b@mail.gmail.com>
	<841FE230-13C7-4CEC-9202-B01167FE8730@opencsw.org>
	<6af4271001041148x907e364ha7d09da31400df6b@mail.gmail.com>
	<0DEA3BF3-1EC8-42F7-A160-1CC681304F3F@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <6af4271001041457h4535abdar558fdb87b70cf151@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 21:38, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Hi Rupert,
>
> Am 04.01.2010 um 20:48 schrieb rupert THURNER:
>>
>> huhm .... the results are differing with the version built on build8s:
>> 1. test8s, see below and http://mercurial.pastebin.com/m41cc23ac
>> 2. build8s, see http://mercurial.pastebin.com/m6ed3c83a, just times ot /
>> stops
>>
>> should we try to change one parameter by one, and rerun the tests?
>
> You can do
> ?ssh root at test8s
> now. You should be using the machine alone at the moment. Please don't FUBR
> it.
>

did:
pkgrm CSWpython
pkgutil -U -i python

did not upgrade the related upgrades pkgutil suggested:
  CSWreadline-6.1,REV=2010.01.01
  CSWsqlite3rt-3.6.21,REV=2010.01.04
  CSWosslrt-0.9.8l,REV=2009.12.08

and you were right, the hg tests just stops. but i am completely lost
why this would happen. it seems to be (at least) the push-http test:

rupert at build8st:~/hg-crew-8s/tests
$ python run-tests.py test-push-http

rupert at build8st:~
$ /usr/ucb/ps aguxwwwww | grep rupert
rupert   22253  0.1  0.111784 8496 pts/76   S 15:39:36  0:00
/opt/csw/bin/python /tmp/hgtests.iyfh65/install/bin/hg --cwd ../test2
push http://localhost:20059/
rupert   22165  0.0  0.110232 6952 pts/76   S 15:39:11  0:00 python
run-tests.py test-push-http
rupert   22210  0.0  0.0 2232 1656 pts/76   S 15:39:26  0:00 /bin/sh
/home/rupert/hg-crew-8s/tests/test-push-http
rupert   22254  0.0  0.0 5432 1624 pts/73   O 15:39:43  0:00
/usr/ucb/ps -aguxwwwww
rupert    3135  0.0  0.116920 2904 ?        S 15:02:26  0:00
/opt/csw/bin/python /tmp/hgtests.DAKOec/install/bin/hg serve -p 20101
-d --pid-file=hg.pid -E errors.log --daemon-pipefds=3,4
rupert   21190  0.0  0.112624 3176 ?        S 15:33:05  0:00
/opt/csw/sbin/sshd -R
rupert   21192  0.0  0.1 3768 2840 pts/73   S 15:33:05  0:00 -bash
rupert   22209  0.0  0.0 2232 1656 pts/76   S 15:39:26  0:00 /bin/sh
-c "/home/rupert/hg-crew-8s/tests/test-push-http"
rupert   22244  0.0  0.116920 6272 ?        S 15:39:35  0:00
/opt/csw/bin/python /tmp/hgtests.iyfh65/install/bin/hg serve -p 20059
-d --pid-file=hg.pid -E errors.log --daemon-pipefds=3,4
rupert   22252  0.0  0.0 2240 1608 pts/76   S 15:39:36  0:00 sed -e
s,:[0-9][0-9]*/,/,
rupert   22255  0.0  0.0 2168 1456 pts/73   S 15:39:43  0:00 grep rupert
rupert   23303  0.0  0.012624 1632 ?        S 14:59:42  0:00
/opt/csw/sbin/sshd -R
rupert   23305  0.0  0.0 3832 1952 pts/76   S 14:59:43  0:00 -bash


then i upgraded the dependencies as well. but the result did not
change, the test just hang.


rupert.


From maciej at opencsw.org  Tue Jan  5 09:53:00 2010
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski)
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 08:53:00 +0000
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] [csw-maintainers] what is different on
	buildfarm? mercurial tests take long - or fail
In-Reply-To: <6af4271001041457h4535abdar558fdb87b70cf151@mail.gmail.com>
References: <6af4271001020318k5f9fe830gd5378c9bf96e267b@mail.gmail.com>
	<841FE230-13C7-4CEC-9202-B01167FE8730@opencsw.org>
	<6af4271001041148x907e364ha7d09da31400df6b@mail.gmail.com>
	<0DEA3BF3-1EC8-42F7-A160-1CC681304F3F@opencsw.org>
	<6af4271001041457h4535abdar558fdb87b70cf151@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <ce97543b1001050053l5113cf2bua7d50bf3a2f2360@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 10:57 PM, rupert THURNER <rupert at opencsw.org> wrote:
> then i upgraded the dependencies as well. but the result did not
> change, the test just hang.

My mantra is: what does truss say?


From skayser at opencsw.org  Wed Jan  6 00:59:33 2010
From: skayser at opencsw.org (Sebastian Kayser)
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2010 00:59:33 +0100
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] IPv6 loopback interfaces? (was Re:
 [csw-maintainers] apr-1.3.9 - test failure ?)
In-Reply-To: <4B308255.1020706@opencsw.org>
References: <6af4270912191739n67f31117pd5b526dfbb163de3@mail.gmail.com>	<4B2E570A.3080708@opencsw.org>	<d57eab940912211207j2bf83e38q464c431607b3a36d@mail.gmail.com>	<6af4270912211504r43f65310t86e00fa22570716e@mail.gmail.com>	<4B3001B8.9060408@opencsw.org>	<6af4270912211627m3e49bc36mbf44ae6a2a4bcb52@mail.gmail.com>	<4B30818F.7030809@opencsw.org>
	<4B308255.1020706@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <4B43D265.4050607@opencsw.org>

Sebastian Kayser wrote on 22.12.2009 09:24:
> Forgot to CC the original mail. Would it be possible to configure an
> IPv6 address for the loopback interfaces on the build boxes? This would
> make the apr test suite pass.

As a follow up: could you guys please add an IPv6 localhost entry to
/etc/hosts on both build10* nodes? Right now, these systems are not able
to resolve localhost to an IPv6 address, while the build8* systems are.

skayser @ build10s ~ $ getent ipnodes localhost
127.0.0.1       localhost

skayser @ build10x ~ $ getent ipnodes localhost
127.0.0.1       localhost loghost

skayser @ build8x ~ $ getent ipnodes localhost
::1     localhost
127.0.0.1       localhost

skayser @ build8s ~ $ getent ipnodes localhost
::1     localhost
127.0.0.1       localhost

Sebastian


From dam at opencsw.org  Wed Jan  6 22:33:25 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 22:33:25 +0100
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] IPv6 loopback interfaces? (was Re:
	[csw-maintainers] apr-1.3.9 - test failure ?)
In-Reply-To: <4B43D265.4050607@opencsw.org>
References: <6af4270912191739n67f31117pd5b526dfbb163de3@mail.gmail.com>	<4B2E570A.3080708@opencsw.org>	<d57eab940912211207j2bf83e38q464c431607b3a36d@mail.gmail.com>	<6af4270912211504r43f65310t86e00fa22570716e@mail.gmail.com>	<4B3001B8.9060408@opencsw.org>	<6af4270912211627m3e49bc36mbf44ae6a2a4bcb52@mail.gmail.com>	<4B30818F.7030809@opencsw.org>
	<4B308255.1020706@opencsw.org> <4B43D265.4050607@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <111537D1-336D-4491-A1F7-13478B0DA11C@opencsw.org>

Hi Sebastian,

Am 06.01.2010 um 00:59 schrieb Sebastian Kayser:

> Sebastian Kayser wrote on 22.12.2009 09:24:
>> Forgot to CC the original mail. Would it be possible to configure an
>> IPv6 address for the loopback interfaces on the build boxes? This would
>> make the apr test suite pass.
> 
> As a follow up: could you guys please add an IPv6 localhost entry to
> /etc/hosts on both build10* nodes? Right now, these systems are not able
> to resolve localhost to an IPv6 address, while the build8* systems are.
> 
> skayser @ build10s ~ $ getent ipnodes localhost
> 127.0.0.1       localhost
> 
> skayser @ build10x ~ $ getent ipnodes localhost
> 127.0.0.1       localhost loghost
> 
> skayser @ build8x ~ $ getent ipnodes localhost
> ::1     localhost
> 127.0.0.1       localhost
> 
> skayser @ build8s ~ $ getent ipnodes localhost
> ::1     localhost
> 127.0.0.1       localhost

Done, please verify. Personally I find this IPv6 stuff a bit with hosts/ipnodes
linked a bit confusing...

Best regards

  -- Dago

From skayser at opencsw.org  Thu Jan  7 01:01:02 2010
From: skayser at opencsw.org (Sebastian Kayser)
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2010 01:01:02 +0100
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] IPv6 loopback interfaces? (was Re:
 [csw-maintainers] apr-1.3.9 - test failure ?)
In-Reply-To: <111537D1-336D-4491-A1F7-13478B0DA11C@opencsw.org>
References: <6af4270912191739n67f31117pd5b526dfbb163de3@mail.gmail.com>	<4B2E570A.3080708@opencsw.org>	<d57eab940912211207j2bf83e38q464c431607b3a36d@mail.gmail.com>	<6af4270912211504r43f65310t86e00fa22570716e@mail.gmail.com>	<4B3001B8.9060408@opencsw.org>	<6af4270912211627m3e49bc36mbf44ae6a2a4bcb52@mail.gmail.com>	<4B30818F.7030809@opencsw.org>
	<4B308255.1020706@opencsw.org> <4B43D265.4050607@opencsw.org>
	<111537D1-336D-4491-A1F7-13478B0DA11C@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <4B45243E.9040209@opencsw.org>

Dagobert Michelsen wrote on 06.01.2010 22:33:
> Am 06.01.2010 um 00:59 schrieb Sebastian Kayser:
> 
>> Sebastian Kayser wrote on 22.12.2009 09:24:
>>> Forgot to CC the original mail. Would it be possible to configure an
>>> IPv6 address for the loopback interfaces on the build boxes? This would
>>> make the apr test suite pass.
>> As a follow up: could you guys please add an IPv6 localhost entry to
>> /etc/hosts on both build10* nodes? Right now, these systems are not able
>> to resolve localhost to an IPv6 address, while the build8* systems are.
>>
>> skayser @ build10s ~ $ getent ipnodes localhost
>> 127.0.0.1       localhost
>>
>> skayser @ build10x ~ $ getent ipnodes localhost
>> 127.0.0.1       localhost loghost
>>
>> skayser @ build8x ~ $ getent ipnodes localhost
>> ::1     localhost
>> 127.0.0.1       localhost
>>
>> skayser @ build8s ~ $ getent ipnodes localhost
>> ::1     localhost
>> 127.0.0.1       localhost
> 
> Done, please verify. Personally I find this IPv6 stuff a bit with hosts/ipnodes
> linked a bit confusing...

Thanks, works fine now. I haven't gotten around to fully dig into the
IPv6 setup on Solaris. From what I understand:

The ipnodes/hosts symlink is a relic of the past. With Solaris 10 11/06
and previous releases [1], ipnodes was a separate file for static IPv6
/etc/hosts like entries. This file (or more specifically the ipnodes
order given in nsswitch.conf) is consulted for IPv6 aware address
resolution syscalls [2]. Or in other words, ipnodes is consulted by any
application which is written with IPv6 in mind.

Nowadays, /etc/inet/hosts can carry both kinds of entries and the
ipnodes file is now simply a link to the hosts file.

While the hosts/ipnodes files were separate, it could happen that you
edited /etc/hosts for an IPv4 entry and then found out later that it
wasn't used at all. This is because IPv6 aware applications use the IPv6
address resolution syscalls (which are in fact IPv4/IPv6 syscalls) even
if they try to resolve an IPv4 address. Thus, they also use the ipnodes
resolution order given in nsswitch.conf. Per default, this order
includes DNS, so /etc/hosts was silently skipped (see [3]). With a
united file this can't happen any more.

The workaround which is suggested in [3] circumvents this possible IPv4
lookup hickup for Solaris releases <= 10 11/06 but should carry a word
of warning as it effectively deactivates IPv6 DNS lookups and thus makes
it unusable in a real IPv6 environment. OTOH i suppose, people working
in real IPv6 environments know what they are doing ;)

HTH

Sebastian

[1] http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/820-2980/ipv6-ref-65?l=de&a=view
[2] http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/806-0916/6ja8539c5?a=view
[3] http://www.brandonhutchinson.com/Solaris_10_ipnodes_caveat.html


From dam at opencsw.org  Thu Jan  7 14:47:16 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 14:47:16 +0100
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] BO Buildfarm will be down tomorrow for LDom update
Message-ID: <4610F26C-0F72-4B02-AB82-72C14942A20D@opencsw.org>

Hi,

I am finally going to update the T5220 for LDoms and OpenSolaris.
As "login" is affected the BO buildfarm will be down tomorrow 2010/01/08
between 9 AM MET and 6 PM MET.

Please use
   login.go.opencsw.org
in the meantime for something important.


Best regards

   -- Dago


From dam at opencsw.org  Fri Jan  8 18:44:57 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 18:44:57 +0100
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] [csw-maintainers] BO Buildfarm available again
In-Reply-To: <4610F26C-0F72-4B02-AB82-72C14942A20D@opencsw.org>
References: <4610F26C-0F72-4B02-AB82-72C14942A20D@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <C6EAC39B-B6EE-4FAC-9943-3AB024DE9CD1@opencsw.org>

Hi,

Am 07.01.2010 um 14:47 schrieb Dagobert Michelsen:
> I am finally going to update the T5220 for LDoms and OpenSolaris.
> As "login" is affected the BO buildfarm will be down tomorrow  
> 2010/01/08
> between 9 AM MET and 6 PM MET.

The T5220 is now split into two LDoms: One LDom with the existing  
Solaris 10
instance carrying all of the Sparc stuff which was already there (now
restricted to 12 GB Ram and 20 Strands) and one LDom with OpenSolaris
06/09 Sparc still installing with 3 GB Ram and 8 Strands.

Additionally, all zones have been patched with the current patchset.

Please let me know if you encounter anything strange.


Best regards

   -- Dago


From skayser at opencsw.org  Sat Jan  9 20:53:24 2010
From: skayser at opencsw.org (Sebastian Kayser)
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2010 20:53:24 +0100
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] gmake: warning: Clock skew detected. Your build
 may	be incomplete.
In-Reply-To: <4B378047.6020703@opencsw.org>
References: <4B047CB6.5050007@opencsw.org> <4B378047.6020703@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <4B48DEB4.6050203@opencsw.org>

Ihsan Dogan wrote on 27.12.2009 16:41:
> Am 19.11.09 00:01, schrieb Sebastian Kayser:
> 
>> I am working on build8x and build8s mostly and lately there seems to
>> be a time keeping issue. At least i am seeing lots of messages
>> like the following
>>
>> ...
>> gmake: Warning: File `work/solaris8-i386/cookies/global' has modification time 3.3 s in the future
>> ...
>> gmake: warning:  Clock skew detected.  Your build may be incomplete.
>> ...
>>
>> Looking at the systems, it seems as if the build.s are in sync, whereas
>> the build.x boxes have different notions of "the current time". Could
>> someone please have a look at it?
> 
> tools.syncTime = "TRUE" should fix this issue.

Make on the build machines shows clock skew warnings again. Compared to
my NTP synced local machine, build8s/10s are behind about 20 minutes,
while build8x/10x are behind for about 10 minutes.

Sebastian


From hson at opencsw.org  Sat Jan  9 23:39:25 2010
From: hson at opencsw.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Roger_H=E5kansson?=)
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2010 23:39:25 +0100
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] gmake: warning: Clock skew detected. Your build
 may	be incomplete.
In-Reply-To: <4B48DEB4.6050203@opencsw.org>
References: <4B047CB6.5050007@opencsw.org> <4B378047.6020703@opencsw.org>
	<4B48DEB4.6050203@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <4B49059D.5070009@opencsw.org>

Sebastian Kayser wrote:
> Ihsan Dogan wrote on 27.12.2009 16:41:
>> Am 19.11.09 00:01, schrieb Sebastian Kayser:
>>
>>> I am working on build8x and build8s mostly and lately there seems to
>>> be a time keeping issue. At least i am seeing lots of messages
>>> like the following
>>>
>>> ...
>>> gmake: Warning: File `work/solaris8-i386/cookies/global' has modification time 3.3 s in the future
>>> ...
>>> gmake: warning:  Clock skew detected.  Your build may be incomplete.
>>> ...
>>>
>>> Looking at the systems, it seems as if the build.s are in sync, whereas
>>> the build.x boxes have different notions of "the current time". Could
>>> someone please have a look at it?
>> tools.syncTime = "TRUE" should fix this issue.
> 
> Make on the build machines shows clock skew warnings again. Compared to
> my NTP synced local machine, build8s/10s are behind about 20 minutes,
> while build8x/10x are behind for about 10 minutes.

I think there might be some timezone issue also , because what I see is 
that buils*s* are 40min ahead of my local machines , not 20min behind.
( As far as I can tell build*x* are 10 min behind just as you wrote)




From sj at acts.hu  Mon Jan 11 22:23:25 2010
From: sj at acts.hu (Janos SUTO)
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 22:23:25 +0100
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Build farm access request
Message-ID: <4B4B96CD.6060804@acts.hu>


Hello,

I have an open source spam filter (http://clapf.acts.hu/), and I would 
like to compile it on your solaris 10 (x86 for starters).

Best regards,
Janos SUTO



From devon.odell at gmail.com  Tue Jan 12 15:48:02 2010
From: devon.odell at gmail.com (Devon H. O'Dell)
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 09:48:02 -0500
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Solaris Buildfarm Account for Go
Message-ID: <9ab217671001120648p2087463bt96ad15f3cc57d456@mail.gmail.com>

Hi there,

trygvis from #opencsw on Freenode told me I should email this address
in regards to access to your Solaris build farm. I'm looking to port
Go to Solaris/OpenSolaris and I don't have access to any such
machines. I've completed a FreeBSD port and am attempting to extend
Go's viability in the Unix / Unix-like market. it would be wonderful
if you could provide me access to some systems for doing this.

Thank you much,

Devon H. O'Dell


From dam at opencsw.org  Wed Jan 13 17:19:23 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 17:19:23 +0100
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Build farm access request
In-Reply-To: <4B4B96CD.6060804@acts.hu>
References: <4B4B96CD.6060804@acts.hu>
Message-ID: <34D2EB58-F56F-42D8-B9BD-BAC300363148@opencsw.org>

Hi Janos,

Am 11.01.2010 um 22:23 schrieb Janos SUTO:
> I have an open source spam filter (http://clapf.acts.hu/), and I  
> would like to compile it on your solaris 10 (x86 for starters).

Sure. I need you inteded user name, ssh public key and the permit to  
list
you on the farm users page:
   http://www-mockup.opencsw.org/extend-it/signup/to-upstream-maintainers/


Best regards

   -- Dago


From dam at opencsw.org  Wed Jan 13 17:41:45 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 17:41:45 +0100
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Solaris Buildfarm Account for Go
In-Reply-To: <9ab217671001120648p2087463bt96ad15f3cc57d456@mail.gmail.com>
References: <9ab217671001120648p2087463bt96ad15f3cc57d456@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <57A74F5D-0648-474A-BFF1-39A225D75579@opencsw.org>

Hi Devon,


Am 12.01.2010 um 15:48 schrieb Devon H. O'Dell:
> trygvis from #opencsw on Freenode told me I should email this address
> in regards to access to your Solaris build farm. I'm looking to port
> Go to Solaris/OpenSolaris and I don't have access to any such
> machines. I've completed a FreeBSD port and am attempting to extend
> Go's viability in the Unix / Unix-like market. it would be wonderful
> if you could provide me access to some systems for doing this.

Sure. I would need a link to the project, you intended user name,
your ssh key and if it is ok to list you on the farm usage page
   <http://www-mockup.opencsw.org/extend-it/signup/to-upstream-maintainers/ 
 >


Best regards

   -- Dago


From maciej at opencsw.org  Thu Jan 14 11:26:48 2010
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski)
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 10:26:48 +0000
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] sqlite3 and rlwrap on the buildfarm
Message-ID: <ce97543b1001140226y6b08614dh7a291719943ed548@mail.gmail.com>

Can you upgrade sqlite3 and install rlwrap on the buildfarm?


From dam at opencsw.org  Thu Jan 14 22:32:32 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 22:32:32 +0100
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] sqlite3 and rlwrap on the buildfarm
In-Reply-To: <ce97543b1001140226y6b08614dh7a291719943ed548@mail.gmail.com>
References: <ce97543b1001140226y6b08614dh7a291719943ed548@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <E33DCDDD-660C-431E-A374-3F9183EBE45C@opencsw.org>

Hi,

Am 14.01.2010 um 11:26 schrieb Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski:
> Can you upgrade sqlite3 and install rlwrap on the buildfarm?

Doing this now.


Best regards

   -- Dago


From ihsan at opencsw.org  Sun Jan 17 22:50:08 2010
From: ihsan at opencsw.org (Ihsan Dogan)
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2010 22:50:08 +0100
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] new.opencsw.org
Message-ID: <4B538610.4030008@opencsw.org>

Hello,

While cleaning up, I've found http://new.opencsw.org/ .

Is anybody still working on that? If not, can I delete it?





Ihsan

-- 
ihsan at dogan.ch		http://blog.dogan.ch/


From dam at opencsw.org  Sun Jan 17 22:58:13 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2010 22:58:13 +0100
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] new.opencsw.org
In-Reply-To: <4B538610.4030008@opencsw.org>
References: <4B538610.4030008@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <97FF0881-3331-4EA3-B930-176DCFE53935@opencsw.org>

Hi Ihsan,

Am 17.01.2010 um 22:50 schrieb Ihsan Dogan:
> While cleaning up, I've found http://new.opencsw.org/ .
>
> Is anybody still working on that? If not, can I delete it?

I guess that was from a colleague. Now that we have www-mockup
I am pretty sure you can delete it.


Bets regards

   -- Dago


From ihsan at opencsw.org  Sun Jan 17 23:00:06 2010
From: ihsan at opencsw.org (Ihsan Dogan)
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2010 23:00:06 +0100
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] new.opencsw.org
In-Reply-To: <97FF0881-3331-4EA3-B930-176DCFE53935@opencsw.org>
References: <4B538610.4030008@opencsw.org>
	<97FF0881-3331-4EA3-B930-176DCFE53935@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <4B538866.8050203@opencsw.org>

Hi Dago,

Am 17.01.10 22:58, schrieb Dagobert Michelsen:

>> While cleaning up, I've found http://new.opencsw.org/ .
>>
>> Is anybody still working on that? If not, can I delete it?
> 
> I guess that was from a colleague. Now that we have www-mockup
> I am pretty sure you can delete it.

Nothing easier than that. :-)
Thanks for the quick reply.

www-mockup is now on separate zone for web development and not any more
on the productive zone.




Ihsan

-- 
ihsan at dogan.ch		http://blog.dogan.ch/


From william at wbonnet.net  Sun Jan 17 22:58:19 2010
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2010 22:58:19 +0100
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] new.opencsw.org
In-Reply-To: <4B538610.4030008@opencsw.org>
References: <4B538610.4030008@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <4B5387FB.6030203@wbonnet.net>

Hi

> Is anybody still working on that? If not, can I delete it?
>   
Never heard of. I'm not involved in this.

cheers
W.

>
>
>
>
> Ihsan
>
>   


-- 
William                  http://www.wbonnet.net

http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix
http://www.opencsw.org 	 Community SoftWare for Solaris
http://www.guses.org     French speaking Solaris User Group




From dam at opencsw.org  Tue Jan 19 08:20:35 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 08:20:35 +0100
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Updating all packages now
Message-ID: <3CD2A795-7C2C-464B-BAF3-1BFEF14B4945@opencsw.org>

Hi,

updatng all packages now.


Best regards

  -- Dago


From skayser at opencsw.org  Thu Jan 21 09:03:03 2010
From: skayser at opencsw.org (Sebastian Kayser)
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 09:03:03 +0100
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] login.opencsw.org: /etc/setup went missing?
Message-ID: <4B580A37.9060408@opencsw.org>

Hi,

i just wanted to have a look at /etc/setup on the login host, but it
isn't there any more. Did it go missing for a reason?

Sebastian


From skayser at opencsw.org  Thu Jan 21 09:04:25 2010
From: skayser at opencsw.org (Sebastian Kayser)
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 09:04:25 +0100
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] login.opencsw.org: /etc/setup went missing?
In-Reply-To: <4B580A37.9060408@opencsw.org>
References: <4B580A37.9060408@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <4B580A89.1010307@opencsw.org>

Sebastian Kayser wrote on 21.01.2010 09:03:
> i just wanted to have a look at /etc/setup on the login host, but it
> isn't there any more. Did it go missing for a reason?

Sorry, please forget what I just said, it's /etc/SETUP and it is still
there. It just went missing from /etc/{issue,motd} or from whereever it
got included during login before.

Sebastian


From skayser at opencsw.org  Thu Jan 21 09:08:08 2010
From: skayser at opencsw.org (Sebastian Kayser)
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 09:08:08 +0100
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] root on build8st/build8xt
Message-ID: <4B580B68.8050908@opencsw.org>

Hi,

could I please get temporary root access via sudo on the two Solaris 8
test boxes? I would like to package perdition [1] which depends on three
inter-dependent libraries from the same author. Would like to make sure
that the library packages are working as expected and can indeed be used
for building perdition, before releasing them.

Sebastian

[1] http://www.vergenet.net/linux/perdition/


From bwalton at opencsw.org  Thu Jan 21 15:53:36 2010
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 09:53:36 -0500
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] root on build8st/build8xt
In-Reply-To: <4B580B68.8050908@opencsw.org>
References: <4B580B68.8050908@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <1264085576-sup-7602@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca>

Excerpts from Sebastian Kayser's message of Thu Jan 21 03:08:08 -0500 2010:

Hi Sebastian,

> could I please get temporary root access via sudo on the two Solaris 8
> test boxes? I would like to package perdition [1] which depends on three
> inter-dependent libraries from the same author. Would like to make sure
> that the library packages are working as expected and can indeed be used
> for building perdition, before releasing them.

I'm adding you to the wheel group on those boxes now, which should
give you full sudo rights.

Thanks
-Ben
-- 
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302

GPG Key Id: 8E89F6D2; Key Server: pgp.mit.edu
Contact me to arrange for a CAcert assurance meeting.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/buildfarm/attachments/20100121/8b2b9ea5/attachment.asc>

From william at wbonnet.net  Sat Jan 23 17:35:57 2010
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 17:35:57 +0100
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Installing new package on the web dev zone
Message-ID: <4B5B256D.9090203@wbonnet.net>

Hi,

I just installed gtar

cheers

bash-3.00$ sudo pkgutil --install -y gtar
Parsing catalog, may take a while...
New packages: CSWgtar-1.22,REV=2009.04.02
Current packages: CSWcommon-1.4.7,REV=2009.09.20 
CSWggettextrt-0.17,REV=2009.02.13 CSWiconv-1.13.1,REV=2009.07.31
Total size: 880.5 KB
Fetching CSWgtar-1.22,REV=2009.04.02 (1/1)...
--2010-01-23 17:34:28--  
http://csw.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/csw/unstable/sparc/5.10/gtar-1.22,REV=2009.04.02-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
Resolving csw.informatik.uni-erlangen.de... 131.188.30.102, 
2001:638:a00:1e:21e:68ff:fe2f:28c4
Connecting to csw.informatik.uni-erlangen.de|131.188.30.102|:80... 
connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 901641 (881K) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: 
`/var/opt/csw/pkgutil/packages/gtar-1.22,REV=2009.04.02-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz'

100%[==============================================================================>] 
901,641     1.05M/s   in 0.8s

2010-01-23 17:34:29 (1.05 MB/s) - 
`/var/opt/csw/pkgutil/packages/gtar-1.22,REV=2009.04.02-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz' 
saved [901641/901641]

=> Installing CSWgtar-1.22,REV=2009.04.02
Please see /opt/csw/share/doc/gtar/license for license information.

Installation of <CSWgtar> was successful.



From william at wbonnet.net  Sat Jan 23 17:39:33 2010
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 17:39:33 +0100
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Installing new packages on the web dev zone
Message-ID: <4B5B2645.2060404@wbonnet.net>

Hi,

I just install Perl module bmysql on the web dev zone, pulling some 
dependencies

cheers
W.

bash-3.00$ sudo pkgutil --install -y CSWpmdbdmysql
Parsing catalog, may take a while...
New packages: CSWpmdbdmysql-4.006,REV=2008.01.19 
CSWpmdbi-1.607,REV=2009.03.25 CSWpmnetdaemon-0.43,REV=2008.03.02 
CSWpmplrpc-0.2018
Current packages: CSWbdb47-4.7.25,REV=2009.10.18_rev=p4 
CSWcacertificates-20091101,REV=2009.11.01 CSWcommon-1.4.7,REV=2009.09.20 
CSWcswclassutils-1.30,REV=2009.11.21 CSWgdbm-1.8.3,REV=2006.01.01 
CSWisaexec-0.2,REV=2009.03.26 CSWmysql5rt-5.0.87,REV=2010.01.08 
CSWosslrt-0.9.8l,REV=2009.12.08 CSWperl-5.8.8,REV=2009.11.12 
CSWzlib-1.2.3,REV=2009.11.26
Total size: 817.9 KB
Fetching CSWpmnetdaemon-0.43,REV=2008.03.02 (1/4)...
--2010-01-23 17:37:55--  
http://csw.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/csw/unstable/sparc/5.10/pm_netdaemon-0.43,REV=2008.03.02-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz
Resolving csw.informatik.uni-erlangen.de... 131.188.30.102, 
2001:638:a00:1e:21e:68ff:fe2f:28c4
Connecting to csw.informatik.uni-erlangen.de|131.188.30.102|:80... 
connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 30175 (29K) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: 
`/var/opt/csw/pkgutil/packages/pm_netdaemon-0.43,REV=2008.03.02-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz'

100%[================================================================================================>] 
30,175      --.-K/s   in 0.05s

2010-01-23 17:37:55 (641 KB/s) - 
`/var/opt/csw/pkgutil/packages/pm_netdaemon-0.43,REV=2008.03.02-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz' 
saved [30175/30175]

Fetching CSWpmplrpc-0.2018 (2/4)...
--2010-01-23 17:37:55--  
http://csw.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/csw/unstable/sparc/5.10/pm_plrpc-0.2018-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz
Resolving csw.informatik.uni-erlangen.de... 131.188.30.102, 
2001:638:a00:1e:21e:68ff:fe2f:28c4
Connecting to csw.informatik.uni-erlangen.de|131.188.30.102|:80... 
connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 20866 (20K) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: 
`/var/opt/csw/pkgutil/packages/pm_plrpc-0.2018-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz'

100%[================================================================================================>] 
20,866      --.-K/s   in 0.03s

2010-01-23 17:37:55 (671 KB/s) - 
`/var/opt/csw/pkgutil/packages/pm_plrpc-0.2018-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz' 
saved [20866/20866]

Fetching CSWpmdbi-1.607,REV=2009.03.25 (3/4)...
--2010-01-23 17:37:55--  
http://csw.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/csw/unstable/sparc/5.10/pm_dbi-1.607,REV=2009.03.25-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
Resolving csw.informatik.uni-erlangen.de... 131.188.30.102, 
2001:638:a00:1e:21e:68ff:fe2f:28c4
Connecting to csw.informatik.uni-erlangen.de|131.188.30.102|:80... 
connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 670208 (654K) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: 
`/var/opt/csw/pkgutil/packages/pm_dbi-1.607,REV=2009.03.25-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz'

100%[================================================================================================>] 
670,208     2.11M/s   in 0.3s

2010-01-23 17:37:55 (2.11 MB/s) - 
`/var/opt/csw/pkgutil/packages/pm_dbi-1.607,REV=2009.03.25-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz' 
saved [670208/670208]

Fetching CSWpmdbdmysql-4.006,REV=2008.01.19 (4/4)...
--2010-01-23 17:37:55--  
http://csw.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/csw/unstable/sparc/5.10/pm_dbdmysql-4.006,REV=2008.01.19-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
Resolving csw.informatik.uni-erlangen.de... 131.188.30.102, 
2001:638:a00:1e:21e:68ff:fe2f:28c4
Connecting to csw.informatik.uni-erlangen.de|131.188.30.102|:80... 
connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 116245 (114K) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: 
`/var/opt/csw/pkgutil/packages/pm_dbdmysql-4.006,REV=2008.01.19-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz'

100%[================================================================================================>] 
116,245     --.-K/s   in 0.08s

2010-01-23 17:37:55 (1.41 MB/s) - 
`/var/opt/csw/pkgutil/packages/pm_dbdmysql-4.006,REV=2008.01.19-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz' 
saved [116245/116245]

=> Installing CSWpmnetdaemon-0.43,REV=2008.03.02

Installation of <CSWpmnetdaemon> was successful.
=> Installing CSWpmplrpc-0.2018

Installation of <CSWpmplrpc> was successful.
=> Installing CSWpmdbi-1.607,REV=2009.03.25
Please see /opt/csw/share/doc/pm_dbi/license for license information.

Installation of <CSWpmdbi> was successful.
=> Installing CSWpmdbdmysql-4.006,REV=2008.01.19

Installation of <CSWpmdbdmysql> was successful.



From william at wbonnet.net  Sat Jan 23 18:10:39 2010
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 18:10:39 +0100
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Installing new packages in the web dev zone
Message-ID: <4B5B2D8F.6070104@wbonnet.net>

Hi

I just install the mysql client

bash-3.00$ sudo pkgutil -y --install CSWmysql5client
Parsing catalog, may take a while...
New packages: CSWmysql5client-5.0.87,REV=2010.01.13
Current packages: CSWcommon-1.4.7,REV=2009.09.20 
CSWisaexec-0.2,REV=2009.03.26 CSWmysql5rt-5.0.87,REV=2010.01.08 
CSWncurses-5.7,REV=2009.04.06 CSWzlib-1.2.3,REV=2009.11.26
Total size: 6.6 MB
Fetching CSWmysql5client-5.0.87,REV=2010.01.13 (1/1)...
--2010-01-23 18:09:52--  
http://csw.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/csw/unstable/sparc/5.10/mysql5client-5.0.87,REV=2010.01.13-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
Resolving csw.informatik.uni-erlangen.de... 131.188.30.102, 
2001:638:a00:1e:21e:68ff:fe2f:28c4
Connecting to csw.informatik.uni-erlangen.de|131.188.30.102|:80... 
connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 6936423 (6.6M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: 
`/var/opt/csw/pkgutil/packages/mysql5client-5.0.87,REV=2010.01.13-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz'

100%[================================================================================================>] 
6,936,423   2.00M/s   in 3.4s

2010-01-23 18:09:55 (1.94 MB/s) - 
`/var/opt/csw/pkgutil/packages/mysql5client-5.0.87,REV=2010.01.13-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz' 
saved [6936423/6936423]

=> Installing CSWmysql5client-5.0.87,REV=2010.01.13
Please see /opt/csw/share/doc/mysql5client/license for license information.

Installation of <CSWmysql5client> was successful.



From hson at opencsw.org  Mon Jan 25 23:17:27 2010
From: hson at opencsw.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Roger_H=E5kansson?=)
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 23:17:27 +0100
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Update libcairo and libcairo_devel on buildfarm
Message-ID: <4B5E1877.90601@opencsw.org>

Could someone please update libcairo and libcairo_devel on the 
buildfarm, it's major breaking point, both for updating old packages as 
well as releasing a bunch of new ones.


From dam at opencsw.org  Tue Jan 26 08:21:28 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 08:21:28 +0100
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Update libcairo and libcairo_devel on buildfarm
In-Reply-To: <4B5E1877.90601@opencsw.org>
References: <4B5E1877.90601@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <06F4A19E-7412-4D28-8255-D732656D910A@opencsw.org>

Hi Roger,

Am 25.01.2010 um 23:17 schrieb Roger H?kansson:
> Could someone please update libcairo and libcairo_devel on the  
> buildfarm, it's major breaking point, both for updating old packages  
> as well as releasing a bunch of new ones.

The package has not reached the farm mirror. Will do when it does.


Best regards

   -- Dago

From ellson at opencsw.org  Tue Jan 26 21:14:02 2010
From: ellson at opencsw.org (John Ellson)
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 15:14:02 -0500
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] request for CSWmono on x86 buildhosts
Message-ID: <4B5F4D0A.7030606@opencsw.org>

Hi,

I'm getting the following error when trying to build CSWgraphviz using 
"gmake platforms":

     Doing late evaluations of package dependencies.
     ERROR: Couldn't validate CSWmono as a dependency in package 
CSWgraphvizsharp

I appear to be missing the  SunOS5.8-i386 packages.   Is it possible 
that CSWmono is not installed
on the x86 build hosts?    Could it be installed please?


John



From maciej at opencsw.org  Wed Jan 27 13:59:46 2010
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski)
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:59:46 +0000
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] The testing page looks outdated
In-Reply-To: <ce97543b1001270350iccc39fbo7d19da9e8ae1f669@mail.gmail.com>
References: <ce97543b1001270350iccc39fbo7d19da9e8ae1f669@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <ce97543b1001270459t21323cbfjfc8b28d5cccf77c@mail.gmail.com>

http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing.html

Latest packages are form the 25th, while it's 27th now and ceeswee
says there are new packages in testing.


From dam at opencsw.org  Wed Jan 27 14:24:09 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:24:09 +0100
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] request for CSWmono on x86 buildhosts
In-Reply-To: <4B5F4D0A.7030606@opencsw.org>
References: <4B5F4D0A.7030606@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <17FB176E-0A22-4D4D-B472-D733D7B2CD86@opencsw.org>

Hi John,

Am 26.01.2010 um 21:14 schrieb John Ellson:
> I'm getting the following error when trying to build CSWgraphviz  
> using "gmake platforms":
>
>    Doing late evaluations of package dependencies.
>    ERROR: Couldn't validate CSWmono as a dependency in package  
> CSWgraphvizsharp
>
> I appear to be missing the  SunOS5.8-i386 packages.   Is it possible  
> that CSWmono is not installed
> on the x86 build hosts?    Could it be installed please?

Doing this now. However, please note that our mono is very old
and currently orphaned.


Best regards

   -- Dago


From dam at opencsw.org  Wed Jan 27 14:26:04 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:26:04 +0100
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] The testing page looks outdated
In-Reply-To: <ce97543b1001270459t21323cbfjfc8b28d5cccf77c@mail.gmail.com>
References: <ce97543b1001270350iccc39fbo7d19da9e8ae1f669@mail.gmail.com>
	<ce97543b1001270459t21323cbfjfc8b28d5cccf77c@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <79685A93-DDDF-4B87-8B3D-05D7C31CFBB9@opencsw.org>

Hi Maciej,

Am 27.01.2010 um 13:59 schrieb Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski:
> http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing.html
>
> Latest packages are form the 25th, while it's 27th now and ceeswee
> says there are new packages in testing.

The page is basically a listing from /home/testing and the contents of
the directory is directly what I can see in testing.html. I don't
know why ceeswi reported it, maybe someone deleted them later?
BTW, testing.html is done every 10 minutes or so.


Best regards

   -- Dago


From dam at opencsw.org  Thu Jan 28 09:22:46 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 09:22:46 +0100
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Update libcairo and libcairo_devel on buildfarm
In-Reply-To: <06F4A19E-7412-4D28-8255-D732656D910A@opencsw.org>
References: <4B5E1877.90601@opencsw.org>
	<06F4A19E-7412-4D28-8255-D732656D910A@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <52E3F2E9-079D-4A1F-92A9-582BEF335264@opencsw.org>

Hi Roger,

Am 26.01.2010 um 08:21 schrieb Dagobert Michelsen:
> Am 25.01.2010 um 23:17 schrieb Roger H?kansson:
>> Could someone please update libcairo and libcairo_devel on the buildfarm, it's major breaking point, both for updating old packages as well as releasing a bunch of new ones.
> 
> The package has not reached the farm mirror. Will do when it does.

Doing this now.


Best regards

  -- Dago



From william at wbonnet.net  Thu Jan 28 11:15:12 2010
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 11:15:12 +0100
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] User creation in web dev zone
Message-ID: <4B6163B0.5090909@wbonnet.net>

Hi all

I have a technical account in this zone, named "uwatch"

This account accept ssh pubkey from web at web. It is used to copy files to 
the devel web server from the outside (files like xml file containing 
the list of recent updates, upstream watch stuff, etc.)

cheers
W.


From dam at opencsw.org  Thu Jan 28 14:44:25 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 14:44:25 +0100
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] User creation in web dev zone
In-Reply-To: <4B6163B0.5090909@wbonnet.net>
References: <4B6163B0.5090909@wbonnet.net>
Message-ID: <C3374C6D-4AB6-4DDD-9971-792C12D6342A@opencsw.org>

Hi William,

Am 28.01.2010 um 11:15 schrieb William Bonnet:
> I have a technical account in this zone, named "uwatch"
>
> This account accept ssh pubkey from web at web. It is used to copy  
> files to the devel web server from the outside (files like xml file  
> containing the list of recent updates, upstream watch stuff, etc.)

Umh, ok. Is this just FYI or should I do something?


Best regards

   -- Dago


From bonivart at opencsw.org  Fri Jan 29 14:57:27 2010
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 14:57:27 +0100
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Perl 5.10.1 on build test servers
Message-ID: <625385e31001290557m2fe80722k66545d37249533f6@mail.gmail.com>

Please install Perl 5.10.1 (from testing) on the build test servers,
build8st and build8xt, so we can start rebuilding modules for it.

Anyone who want to help can look at the wiki page. Please update your
own modules first, next the ones from retired maintainers. Everything
must be in GAR.

http://wiki.opencsw.org/perl

-- 
/peter


From dam at opencsw.org  Fri Jan 29 23:24:28 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 23:24:28 +0100
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Perl 5.10.1 on build test servers
In-Reply-To: <625385e31001290557m2fe80722k66545d37249533f6@mail.gmail.com>
References: <625385e31001290557m2fe80722k66545d37249533f6@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <63A43D71-BC2E-41D0-8B4F-1A84FF482F3E@opencsw.org>

Hi Peter,

Am 29.01.2010 um 14:57 schrieb Peter Bonivart:
> Please install Perl 5.10.1 (from testing) on the build test servers,
> build8st and build8xt, so we can start rebuilding modules for it.

Doing this now. I get collisions of build8xt with

   /opt/csw/bin/config_data
   /opt/csw/bin/ptar
   /opt/csw/bin/ptardiff
   /opt/csw/bin/shasum

/opt/csw/bin/config_data f none 0555 root bin 7244 11245 1200758331  
CSWpmmodulebuild
/opt/csw/bin/ptar f none 0555 root bin 2976 34189 1205448705  
CSWpmarchivetar
/opt/csw/bin/ptardiff f none 0555 root bin 2514 63805 1205448705  
CSWpmarchivetar
/opt/csw/bin/shasum f none 0555 root bin 7666 22683 1204981192  
CSWpmdigestsha

They have lots of dependencies which should then depend on Perl.
Should CSWperl have additional conflicts with these? Or should they be  
stubs
on CSWperl?

> Anyone who want to help can look at the wiki page. Please update your
> own modules first, next the ones from retired maintainers. Everything
> must be in GAR.
>
> http://wiki.opencsw.org/perl

Fwd'ing to maintainers@


Best regards

   -- Dago


From william at wbonnet.net  Sun Jan 31 17:57:18 2010
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2010 17:57:18 +0100
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Login to test8x
Message-ID: <4B65B66E.7080404@wbonnet.net>

Hi

It looks like i cannot log to test8x. It prompts me for password :(

Could someone please install my ssh key ?

thanks in advance

cheers
W.

-- 
William                  http://www.wbonnet.net

http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix
http://www.opencsw.org 	 Community SoftWare for Solaris
http://www.guses.org     French speaking Solaris User Group




From dam at opencsw.org  Sun Jan 31 19:25:13 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2010 19:25:13 +0100
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Login to test8x
In-Reply-To: <4B65B66E.7080404@wbonnet.net>
References: <4B65B66E.7080404@wbonnet.net>
Message-ID: <24F22714-35CB-4A0F-89E5-3B31D87075E0@opencsw.org>

Hi William,

Am 31.01.2010 um 17:57 schrieb William Bonnet:
> It looks like i cannot log to test8x. It prompts me for password :(
>
> Could someone please install my ssh key ?

Should work now. Sorry for the inconvenience.


Best regards

   -- Dago


From william at wbonnet.net  Sun Jan 31 19:29:14 2010
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2010 19:29:14 +0100
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Login to test8x
In-Reply-To: <24F22714-35CB-4A0F-89E5-3B31D87075E0@opencsw.org>
References: <4B65B66E.7080404@wbonnet.net>
	<24F22714-35CB-4A0F-89E5-3B31D87075E0@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <4B65CBFA.1000300@wbonnet.net>

Hi Dagobert

> Should work now. Sorry for the inconvenience.
it does

thanks a lot

cheers
W.

-- 
William                  http://www.wbonnet.net

http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix
http://www.opencsw.org 	 Community SoftWare for Solaris
http://www.guses.org     French speaking Solaris User Group




From dam at opencsw.org  Sun Jan 31 22:59:36 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2010 22:59:36 +0100
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] [csw-maintainers] build8s and ip-v6 for
	apr-1.4.2
In-Reply-To: <6af4271001300941h58c5a512ke935ab34d3c422ef@mail.gmail.com>
References: <6af4271001300941h58c5a512ke935ab34d3c422ef@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <DEC644ED-DF6C-4B0B-96DC-EFCEC6F1AF5C@opencsw.org>

Hi Rupert,

Am 30.01.2010 um 18:41 schrieb rupert THURNER:
> i tried to upgrade the apr package to 1.4.2, and it seems that ip-v6
> is off / gone again on build8s, as the test case again produces an
> error. was there a special reason to disable it?

No, I just rebooted the machine and due to a bug in Solaris IPv6
localhost interfaces don't get propagated into the zone automatically
and I simply forgot to turn it on in this zone. It should work
again. Sorry for the inconvenience!

Please note that the best address for these issues is buildfarm@


Best regards

   -- Dago


From blizinski at google.com  Wed Jan 27 12:50:36 2010
From: blizinski at google.com (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski)
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 11:50:36 +0000
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] The testing page looks outdated
Message-ID: <ce97543b1001270350iccc39fbo7d19da9e8ae1f669@mail.gmail.com>

http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing.html

Latest packages are form the 25th, while it's 27th now and ceeswee
says there are new packages in testing.