From bwalton at opencsw.org  Tue Jun  1 02:31:52 2010
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 20:31:52 -0400
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] testing machines
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimZ-3sG-2kGYODYlQAAhLp9fDdog2SXfR2wZbAS@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTimZ-3sG-2kGYODYlQAAhLp9fDdog2SXfR2wZbAS@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1275352288-sup-7407@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>

Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Mon May 31 17:10:50 -0400 2010:

Hi Phil,

> it would appear the testing machines are Very out of sync.  please
> fix. I can't continue gtk work

Normalizing these boxes now.

Thanks
-Ben

-- 
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302



From bwalton at opencsw.org  Tue Jun  1 04:19:50 2010
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 22:19:50 -0400
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] testing machines
In-Reply-To: <1275352288-sup-7407@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
References: <AANLkTimZ-3sG-2kGYODYlQAAhLp9fDdog2SXfR2wZbAS@mail.gmail.com>
	<1275352288-sup-7407@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
Message-ID: <1275358659-sup-7006@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>

Excerpts from Ben Walton's message of Mon May 31 20:31:52 -0400 2010:

> Normalizing these boxes now.

It took a while, but the package set (maybe not versions in all cases)
is now identical.  I think the X bits you care about should be good
though.  Let me know if that's not the case.

Thanks
-Ben
-- 
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302



From phil at bolthole.com  Tue Jun  1 04:24:57 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 19:24:57 -0700
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] testing machines
In-Reply-To: <1275358659-sup-7006@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
References: <AANLkTimZ-3sG-2kGYODYlQAAhLp9fDdog2SXfR2wZbAS@mail.gmail.com>
	<1275352288-sup-7407@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<1275358659-sup-7006@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
Message-ID: <AANLkTimgDel1S9P4EAGJ3pqd6DqF70ukH7jrN6kchrep@mail.gmail.com>

thanks Ben!

On Monday, May 31, 2010, Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Excerpts from Ben Walton's message of Mon May 31 20:31:52 -0400 2010:
>
>> Normalizing these boxes now.
>
> It took a while, but the package set (maybe not versions in all cases)
> is now identical. ?I think the X bits you care about should be good
> though. ?Let me know if that's not the case.
>
> Thanks
> -Ben
> --
> Ben Walton
> Systems Programmer - CHASS
> University of Toronto
> C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302
>
>


From phil at bolthole.com  Tue Jun  1 06:06:22 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 21:06:22 -0700
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] testing machine problems
Message-ID: <AANLkTilt7nFfgYKBuddyUmvCACTdNNngoiWX9swQ9N6P@mail.gmail.com>

compile still fails on testing9s

I note studio11 is unpatched. whereas on x86 it is patched

this is DIFFERENT from current 9s, which IS patched also.

that being said... even switching to studio 12 dies not fix problem

testing machines are still not trurly in sync.
would you please wipe the testing machines and @truly@ sync them?
with current?

and just rm -r /opt/csw/X11 since it no longer seems possible to
cleanly extricate ourselves from it yet.

and/or... just install the prerequisites fir gtk build


From phil at bolthole.com  Tue Jun  1 18:40:49 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 09:40:49 -0700
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] testing9s.bo.opencsw.org
Message-ID: <AANLkTim-HPJUQhDLQoIMK_kgEHzasu8uAjUpdtNnGjDb@mail.gmail.com>

FYI: I'm going to be wreaking havok on testing9s.  In the unlikelyi
event you were planning to use it today... I'd suggest making other
plans :)


From phil at bolthole.com  Tue Jun  1 20:01:37 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 11:01:37 -0700
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] blew up sudo on testing9s
Message-ID: <20100601180137.GA15104@bolthole.com>

SO... Oops... I forgot that I needed CSWsudo to be fuinctional, to continue
working on testing9s.

could someone please.. restore it? :-/

technically, sudo is there, but its dependancy, libintl, is no longer
there.



From dam at opencsw.org  Tue Jun  1 20:20:27 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 20:20:27 +0200
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] blew up sudo on testing9s
In-Reply-To: <20100601180137.GA15104@bolthole.com>
References: <20100601180137.GA15104@bolthole.com>
Message-ID: <A87FE207-E9BA-44D1-9CBF-58E635055603@opencsw.org>

Hi Phil,

Am 01.06.2010 um 20:01 schrieb Philip Brown:
> SO... Oops... I forgot that I needed CSWsudo to be fuinctional, to  
> continue
> working on testing9s.
>
> could someone please.. restore it? :-/

Someone? I guess that must be someone with the root password ;-)

> technically, sudo is there, but its dependancy, libintl, is no longer
> there.

And you removed your login shell "bash".

It works again. If you break it again you must wait for tomorrow :-D


Best regards

   -- Dago


From phil at bolthole.com  Tue Jun  1 21:01:50 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 12:01:50 -0700
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] blew up sudo on testing9s
In-Reply-To: <A87FE207-E9BA-44D1-9CBF-58E635055603@opencsw.org>
References: <20100601180137.GA15104@bolthole.com>
	<A87FE207-E9BA-44D1-9CBF-58E635055603@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTinKzE_7012eJZiMnlwXK-q287cXJxlt6_dGDE32@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
>
>
> And you removed your login shell "bash".

this is why I would always set my login shell to ksh, or at worst,
/bin/bash, NEVER /opt/csw/bin/bash ! :-}

Thank you.


From skayser at opencsw.org  Wed Jun  2 11:57:16 2010
From: skayser at opencsw.org (Sebastian Kayser)
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2010 11:57:16 +0200
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Please install pm_configinifiles. TIA! (eom)
Message-ID: <20100602095716.GB29711@sebastiankayser.de>




From dam at opencsw.org  Wed Jun  2 12:17:46 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2010 12:17:46 +0200
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Please install pm_configinifiles. TIA! (eom)
In-Reply-To: <20100602095716.GB29711@sebastiankayser.de>
References: <20100602095716.GB29711@sebastiankayser.de>
Message-ID: <E3F629EC-8B82-4381-AA62-F1585437743B@opencsw.org>

Hi,

Am 02.06.2010 um 11:57 schrieb Sebastian Kayser:
> Re: [csw-buildfarm] Please install pm_configinifiles. TIA! (eom)

Doing this now.


Best regards

   -- Dago


From phil at bolthole.com  Wed Jun  2 15:25:44 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2010 06:25:44 -0700
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] testing9s problems
Message-ID: <AANLkTinyQrX_WftiZ6olX4WnzM2CZrIPTFy6-uTFaHr9@mail.gmail.com>

after spending a bunch of time syncing csw packages, I discover that
the OS is out of sync :(
so please don't modify or use testing9s until further notice


From rupert at opencsw.org  Fri Jun  4 07:52:15 2010
From: rupert at opencsw.org (rupert THURNER)
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2010 07:52:15 +0200
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] [csw-maintainers] BerkeleyDB upgrade
In-Reply-To: <515B314C-A719-498C-8861-DF71A52E513B@opencsw.org>
References: <C2783926-199E-4446-900A-54A34E8C6BFA@opencsw.org> 
	<4C32281F-89A3-4B57-B840-699CA6795EDB@opencsw.org>
	<F5BB8EA2-485D-4397-AE43-BC1433E4B22E@opencsw.org> 
	<AANLkTinUwWbxracKtT7GV1MNd6qpHs-MjoLr2opnYfAa@mail.gmail.com> 
	<AANLkTimvZFBaWWs-k1kWo9H1swEWbi3NFo4jPiChx3Ly@mail.gmail.com> 
	<47B9E89A-9C18-442E-958F-7AF486387A7D@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTikg4xwHRFtGPJuxaosJnfEjeyQP_TWdD7rASuuW@mail.gmail.com> 
	<515B314C-A719-498C-8861-DF71A52E513B@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTimZZTTBYz8mNNvXb2_uUBBUS9YGXCkZ5Ot2xrYE@mail.gmail.com>

On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 22:05, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Hi Rupert,
>
> Am 30.05.2010 um 22:02 schrieb rupert THURNER:
>> On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 20:35, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
>>> Am 30.05.2010 um 12:57 schrieb rupert THURNER:
>>>> could you please remove CSWbdb from the buildfarm? otherwise we would
>>>> need to build something into the openldap recipe to not use it. and as
>>>> i understood the goal is to recompile _without_ using files out of
>>>> CSWbdb.
>>>
>>> Yes, but this should be not difficult. It should be sufficuent to
>>> add the stuff from subversion I added recently to openldap, like
>>> EXTRA_INC etc.
>>
>> what is the reason to leave a compatibility package on a buildserver?
>
> They are needed by the packages depending on it, especially Apache2.
> AFAIK removing CSWbdb would make it impossible to compile current
> apache modules, but I may be wrong here.
>
>>> Just let me know if you have trouble finding the right switches.
>>> - and thanks for picking of OpenLDAP!
>>
>> you are not serious about this, aren't you?
>>
>> ? ? ? ? EXTRA_LIB_garversion-2.4.22 = $(prefix)/bdb48/lib
>> ? ? ? ? EXTRA_INC_garversion-2.4.22 = $(prefix)/bdb48/include
>>
>> was something you added long time ago to openldap :)
>
> I thought so :) And you say it does not work? I would like to investigate
> that if yes. I am not against removing CSWbdb, I would just like to know
> why the switches don't work.
>

did you have any chance to look into this?

rupert.


From dam at opencsw.org  Sat Jun  5 11:44:59 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2010 11:44:59 +0200
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] [csw-maintainers] BerkeleyDB upgrade
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimZZTTBYz8mNNvXb2_uUBBUS9YGXCkZ5Ot2xrYE@mail.gmail.com>
References: <C2783926-199E-4446-900A-54A34E8C6BFA@opencsw.org>
	<4C32281F-89A3-4B57-B840-699CA6795EDB@opencsw.org>
	<F5BB8EA2-485D-4397-AE43-BC1433E4B22E@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinUwWbxracKtT7GV1MNd6qpHs-MjoLr2opnYfAa@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimvZFBaWWs-k1kWo9H1swEWbi3NFo4jPiChx3Ly@mail.gmail.com>
	<47B9E89A-9C18-442E-958F-7AF486387A7D@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTikg4xwHRFtGPJuxaosJnfEjeyQP_TWdD7rASuuW@mail.gmail.com>
	<515B314C-A719-498C-8861-DF71A52E513B@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTimZZTTBYz8mNNvXb2_uUBBUS9YGXCkZ5Ot2xrYE@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <D369BB78-22E3-4FDE-87A9-0EE6DCA86B66@opencsw.org>

Hi Rupert,

Am 04.06.2010 um 07:52 schrieb rupert THURNER:
> On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 22:05, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
>> Hi Rupert,
>> 
>> Am 30.05.2010 um 22:02 schrieb rupert THURNER:
>>> On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 20:35, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
>>>> Am 30.05.2010 um 12:57 schrieb rupert THURNER:
>>>>> could you please remove CSWbdb from the buildfarm? otherwise we would
>>>>> need to build something into the openldap recipe to not use it. and as
>>>>> i understood the goal is to recompile _without_ using files out of
>>>>> CSWbdb.
>>>> 
>>>> Yes, but this should be not difficult. It should be sufficuent to
>>>> add the stuff from subversion I added recently to openldap, like
>>>> EXTRA_INC etc.
>>> 
>>> what is the reason to leave a compatibility package on a buildserver?
>> 
>> They are needed by the packages depending on it, especially Apache2.
>> AFAIK removing CSWbdb would make it impossible to compile current
>> apache modules, but I may be wrong here.
>> 
>>>> Just let me know if you have trouble finding the right switches.
>>>> - and thanks for picking of OpenLDAP!
>>> 
>>> you are not serious about this, aren't you?
>>> 
>>>         EXTRA_LIB_garversion-2.4.22 = $(prefix)/bdb48/lib
>>>         EXTRA_INC_garversion-2.4.22 = $(prefix)/bdb48/include
>>> 
>>> was something you added long time ago to openldap :)
>> 
>> I thought so :) And you say it does not work? I would like to investigate
>> that if yes. I am not against removing CSWbdb, I would just like to know
>> why the switches don't work.
> 
> did you have any chance to look into this?

Sorry, not yet, and I will have very little time next week also. For now
I am removing CSWbdbdevel and CSWbdb from the current* buildservers.


Best regards

  -- Dago



From rupert at opencsw.org  Sat Jun  5 12:11:46 2010
From: rupert at opencsw.org (rupert THURNER)
Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2010 12:11:46 +0200
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] [csw-maintainers] BerkeleyDB upgrade
In-Reply-To: <D369BB78-22E3-4FDE-87A9-0EE6DCA86B66@opencsw.org>
References: <C2783926-199E-4446-900A-54A34E8C6BFA@opencsw.org> 
	<4C32281F-89A3-4B57-B840-699CA6795EDB@opencsw.org>
	<F5BB8EA2-485D-4397-AE43-BC1433E4B22E@opencsw.org> 
	<AANLkTinUwWbxracKtT7GV1MNd6qpHs-MjoLr2opnYfAa@mail.gmail.com> 
	<AANLkTimvZFBaWWs-k1kWo9H1swEWbi3NFo4jPiChx3Ly@mail.gmail.com> 
	<47B9E89A-9C18-442E-958F-7AF486387A7D@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTikg4xwHRFtGPJuxaosJnfEjeyQP_TWdD7rASuuW@mail.gmail.com> 
	<515B314C-A719-498C-8861-DF71A52E513B@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTimZZTTBYz8mNNvXb2_uUBBUS9YGXCkZ5Ot2xrYE@mail.gmail.com> 
	<D369BB78-22E3-4FDE-87A9-0EE6DCA86B66@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTikaypLhyEcC7wLfhqczEqF9_Tg1cuQhQN7FiH8_@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 11:44, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Hi Rupert,
>
> Am 04.06.2010 um 07:52 schrieb rupert THURNER:
>> On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 22:05, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
>>> Hi Rupert,
>>>
>>> Am 30.05.2010 um 22:02 schrieb rupert THURNER:
>>>> On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 20:35, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
>>>>> Am 30.05.2010 um 12:57 schrieb rupert THURNER:
>>>>>> could you please remove CSWbdb from the buildfarm? otherwise we would
>>>>>> need to build something into the openldap recipe to not use it. and as
>>>>>> i understood the goal is to recompile _without_ using files out of
>>>>>> CSWbdb.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, but this should be not difficult. It should be sufficuent to
>>>>> add the stuff from subversion I added recently to openldap, like
>>>>> EXTRA_INC etc.
>>>>
>>>> what is the reason to leave a compatibility package on a buildserver?
>>>
>>> They are needed by the packages depending on it, especially Apache2.
>>> AFAIK removing CSWbdb would make it impossible to compile current
>>> apache modules, but I may be wrong here.
>>>
>>>>> Just let me know if you have trouble finding the right switches.
>>>>> - and thanks for picking of OpenLDAP!
>>>>
>>>> you are not serious about this, aren't you?
>>>>
>>>> ? ? ? ? EXTRA_LIB_garversion-2.4.22 = $(prefix)/bdb48/lib
>>>> ? ? ? ? EXTRA_INC_garversion-2.4.22 = $(prefix)/bdb48/include
>>>>
>>>> was something you added long time ago to openldap :)
>>>
>>> I thought so :) And you say it does not work? I would like to investigate
>>> that if yes. I am not against removing CSWbdb, I would just like to know
>>> why the switches don't work.
>>
>> did you have any chance to look into this?
>
> Sorry, not yet, and I will have very little time next week also. For now
> I am removing CSWbdbdevel and CSWbdb from the current* buildservers.
>

that is great! i'll restart the openlda build as soon as the package
is gone, maybe you drop an email?

rupert.


From dam at opencsw.org  Sat Jun  5 12:21:25 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2010 12:21:25 +0200
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] [csw-maintainers] BerkeleyDB upgrade
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikaypLhyEcC7wLfhqczEqF9_Tg1cuQhQN7FiH8_@mail.gmail.com>
References: <C2783926-199E-4446-900A-54A34E8C6BFA@opencsw.org>
	<4C32281F-89A3-4B57-B840-699CA6795EDB@opencsw.org>
	<F5BB8EA2-485D-4397-AE43-BC1433E4B22E@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinUwWbxracKtT7GV1MNd6qpHs-MjoLr2opnYfAa@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimvZFBaWWs-k1kWo9H1swEWbi3NFo4jPiChx3Ly@mail.gmail.com>
	<47B9E89A-9C18-442E-958F-7AF486387A7D@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTikg4xwHRFtGPJuxaosJnfEjeyQP_TWdD7rASuuW@mail.gmail.com>
	<515B314C-A719-498C-8861-DF71A52E513B@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTimZZTTBYz8mNNvXb2_uUBBUS9YGXCkZ5Ot2xrYE@mail.gmail.com>
	<D369BB78-22E3-4FDE-87A9-0EE6DCA86B66@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTikaypLhyEcC7wLfhqczEqF9_Tg1cuQhQN7FiH8_@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <28D3717A-89F4-4FF7-9C25-FEAC80002BB7@opencsw.org>





Am 05.06.2010 um 12:11 schrieb rupert THURNER <rupert at opencsw.org>:

> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 11:44, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org>  
> wrote:
>> Hi Rupert,
>>
>> Am 04.06.2010 um 07:52 schrieb rupert THURNER:
>>> On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 22:05, Dagobert Michelsen  
>>> <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
>>>> Hi Rupert,
>>>>
>>>> Am 30.05.2010 um 22:02 schrieb rupert THURNER:
>>>>> On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 20:35, Dagobert Michelsen  
>>>>> <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
>>>>>> Am 30.05.2010 um 12:57 schrieb rupert THURNER:
>>>>>>> could you please remove CSWbdb from the buildfarm? otherwise  
>>>>>>> we would
>>>>>>> need to build something into the openldap recipe to not use  
>>>>>>> it. and as
>>>>>>> i understood the goal is to recompile _without_ using files  
>>>>>>> out of
>>>>>>> CSWbdb.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, but this should be not difficult. It should be sufficuent to
>>>>>> add the stuff from subversion I added recently to openldap, like
>>>>>> EXTRA_INC etc.
>>>>>
>>>>> what is the reason to leave a compatibility package on a  
>>>>> buildserver?
>>>>
>>>> They are needed by the packages depending on it, especially  
>>>> Apache2.
>>>> AFAIK removing CSWbdb would make it impossible to compile current
>>>> apache modules, but I may be wrong here.
>>>>
>>>>>> Just let me know if you have trouble finding the right switches.
>>>>>> - and thanks for picking of OpenLDAP!
>>>>>
>>>>> you are not serious about this, aren't you?
>>>>>
>>>>>         EXTRA_LIB_garversion-2.4.22 = $(prefix)/bdb48/lib
>>>>>         EXTRA_INC_garversion-2.4.22 = $(prefix)/bdb48/include
>>>>>
>>>>> was something you added long time ago to openldap :)
>>>>
>>>> I thought so :) And you say it does not work? I would like to  
>>>> investigate
>>>> that if yes. I am not against removing CSWbdb, I would just like  
>>>> to know
>>>> why the switches don't work.
>>>
>>> did you have any chance to look into this?
>>
>> Sorry, not yet, and I will have very little time next week also.  
>> For now
>> I am removing CSWbdbdevel and CSWbdb from the current* buildservers.
>>
>
> that is great! i'll restart the openlda build as soon as the package
> is gone, maybe you drop an email?
>
> rupert.

Already Done

Best regards -- Dago


From rupert at opencsw.org  Sun Jun  6 07:22:25 2010
From: rupert at opencsw.org (rupert THURNER)
Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2010 07:22:25 +0200
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] [csw-maintainers] BerkeleyDB upgrade
In-Reply-To: <28D3717A-89F4-4FF7-9C25-FEAC80002BB7@opencsw.org>
References: <C2783926-199E-4446-900A-54A34E8C6BFA@opencsw.org> 
	<4C32281F-89A3-4B57-B840-699CA6795EDB@opencsw.org>
	<F5BB8EA2-485D-4397-AE43-BC1433E4B22E@opencsw.org> 
	<AANLkTinUwWbxracKtT7GV1MNd6qpHs-MjoLr2opnYfAa@mail.gmail.com> 
	<AANLkTimvZFBaWWs-k1kWo9H1swEWbi3NFo4jPiChx3Ly@mail.gmail.com> 
	<47B9E89A-9C18-442E-958F-7AF486387A7D@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTikg4xwHRFtGPJuxaosJnfEjeyQP_TWdD7rASuuW@mail.gmail.com> 
	<515B314C-A719-498C-8861-DF71A52E513B@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTimZZTTBYz8mNNvXb2_uUBBUS9YGXCkZ5Ot2xrYE@mail.gmail.com> 
	<D369BB78-22E3-4FDE-87A9-0EE6DCA86B66@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTikaypLhyEcC7wLfhqczEqF9_Tg1cuQhQN7FiH8_@mail.gmail.com> 
	<28D3717A-89F4-4FF7-9C25-FEAC80002BB7@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTimAp6bfuJ2ekGgGHkuFwxrafnrco9rjkLR-2_y5@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 12:21, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Am 05.06.2010 um 12:11 schrieb rupert THURNER <rupert at opencsw.org>:
>
>> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 11:44, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Rupert,
>>>
>>> Am 04.06.2010 um 07:52 schrieb rupert THURNER:
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 22:05, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Rupert,
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 30.05.2010 um 22:02 schrieb rupert THURNER:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 20:35, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Am 30.05.2010 um 12:57 schrieb rupert THURNER:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> could you please remove CSWbdb from the buildfarm? otherwise we
>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>> need to build something into the openldap recipe to not use it. and
>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>> i understood the goal is to recompile _without_ using files out of
>>>>>>>> CSWbdb.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes, but this should be not difficult. It should be sufficuent to
>>>>>>> add the stuff from subversion I added recently to openldap, like
>>>>>>> EXTRA_INC etc.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> what is the reason to leave a compatibility package on a buildserver?
>>>>>
>>>>> They are needed by the packages depending on it, especially Apache2.
>>>>> AFAIK removing CSWbdb would make it impossible to compile current
>>>>> apache modules, but I may be wrong here.
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Just let me know if you have trouble finding the right switches.
>>>>>>> - and thanks for picking of OpenLDAP!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> you are not serious about this, aren't you?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ? ? ? ?EXTRA_LIB_garversion-2.4.22 = $(prefix)/bdb48/lib
>>>>>> ? ? ? ?EXTRA_INC_garversion-2.4.22 = $(prefix)/bdb48/include
>>>>>>
>>>>>> was something you added long time ago to openldap :)
>>>>>
>>>>> I thought so :) And you say it does not work? I would like to
>>>>> investigate
>>>>> that if yes. I am not against removing CSWbdb, I would just like to
>>>>> know
>>>>> why the switches don't work.
>>>>
>>>> did you have any chance to look into this?
>>>
>>> Sorry, not yet, and I will have very little time next week also. For now
>>> I am removing CSWbdbdevel and CSWbdb from the current* buildservers.
>>>
>>
>> that is great! i'll restart the openlda build as soon as the package
>> is gone, maybe you drop an email?
>>
>> rupert.
>
> Already Done

which machine should i use for sparc, as

rupert at current9s:~
$ ls -l /opt/csw/lib/sparcv9/libdb-4.7.so
lrwxrwxrwx    1 root     other          36 Oct 19  2009
/opt/csw/lib/sparcv9/libdb-4.7.so ->
../../bdb47/lib/sparcv9/libdb-4.7.so

rupert at current9s:~
$ date
Sun Jun  6 00:20:21 CDT 2010


From skayser at opencsw.org  Mon Jun  7 08:56:03 2010
From: skayser at opencsw.org (Sebastian Kayser)
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 08:56:03 +0200
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Please install ncurses on current10s,
	somehow it's missing. TIA! (eom)
Message-ID: <20100607065603.GA31767@sebastiankayser.de>




From dam at opencsw.org  Mon Jun  7 10:17:58 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 10:17:58 +0200
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] [csw-maintainers] BerkeleyDB upgrade
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimAp6bfuJ2ekGgGHkuFwxrafnrco9rjkLR-2_y5@mail.gmail.com>
References: <C2783926-199E-4446-900A-54A34E8C6BFA@opencsw.org>
	<4C32281F-89A3-4B57-B840-699CA6795EDB@opencsw.org>
	<F5BB8EA2-485D-4397-AE43-BC1433E4B22E@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinUwWbxracKtT7GV1MNd6qpHs-MjoLr2opnYfAa@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimvZFBaWWs-k1kWo9H1swEWbi3NFo4jPiChx3Ly@mail.gmail.com>
	<47B9E89A-9C18-442E-958F-7AF486387A7D@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTikg4xwHRFtGPJuxaosJnfEjeyQP_TWdD7rASuuW@mail.gmail.com>
	<515B314C-A719-498C-8861-DF71A52E513B@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTimZZTTBYz8mNNvXb2_uUBBUS9YGXCkZ5Ot2xrYE@mail.gmail.com>
	<D369BB78-22E3-4FDE-87A9-0EE6DCA86B66@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTikaypLhyEcC7wLfhqczEqF9_Tg1cuQhQN7FiH8_@mail.gmail.com>
	<28D3717A-89F4-4FF7-9C25-FEAC80002BB7@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTimAp6bfuJ2ekGgGHkuFwxrafnrco9rjkLR-2_y5@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <89934547-D626-4CBA-92EC-F816834AE55E@opencsw.org>

Hi Rupert,

Am 06.06.2010 um 07:22 schrieb rupert THURNER:
> which machine should i use for sparc, as
>
> rupert at current9s:~
> $ ls -l /opt/csw/lib/sparcv9/libdb-4.7.so
> lrwxrwxrwx    1 root     other          36 Oct 19  2009
> /opt/csw/lib/sparcv9/libdb-4.7.so ->
> ../../bdb47/lib/sparcv9/libdb-4.7.so
>
> rupert at current9s:~
> $ date
> Sun Jun  6 00:20:21 CDT 2010

Umh, I am pretty sure I removed it from the machine. I have again  
removed
it, maybe a package upgrade of something triggered the reinstall??


Best regards

   -- Dago


From dam at opencsw.org  Mon Jun  7 10:27:29 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 10:27:29 +0200
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Please install ncurses on current10s,
	somehow it's missing. TIA! (eom)
In-Reply-To: <20100607065603.GA31767@sebastiankayser.de>
References: <20100607065603.GA31767@sebastiankayser.de>
Message-ID: <E13C28F3-7577-4875-914F-AF87524AEE81@opencsw.org>

Hi Sebastian,

Am 07.06.2010 um 08:56 schrieb Sebastian Kayser:
> Please install ncurses on current10s, somehow it's missing

By golly, it is! Doing this now.


Best regards

   -- Dago



From rupert at opencsw.org  Tue Jun  8 06:48:33 2010
From: rupert at opencsw.org (rupert THURNER)
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 06:48:33 +0200
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] [csw-maintainers] BerkeleyDB upgrade
In-Reply-To: <89934547-D626-4CBA-92EC-F816834AE55E@opencsw.org>
References: <C2783926-199E-4446-900A-54A34E8C6BFA@opencsw.org> 
	<4C32281F-89A3-4B57-B840-699CA6795EDB@opencsw.org>
	<F5BB8EA2-485D-4397-AE43-BC1433E4B22E@opencsw.org> 
	<AANLkTinUwWbxracKtT7GV1MNd6qpHs-MjoLr2opnYfAa@mail.gmail.com> 
	<AANLkTimvZFBaWWs-k1kWo9H1swEWbi3NFo4jPiChx3Ly@mail.gmail.com> 
	<47B9E89A-9C18-442E-958F-7AF486387A7D@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTikg4xwHRFtGPJuxaosJnfEjeyQP_TWdD7rASuuW@mail.gmail.com> 
	<515B314C-A719-498C-8861-DF71A52E513B@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTimZZTTBYz8mNNvXb2_uUBBUS9YGXCkZ5Ot2xrYE@mail.gmail.com> 
	<D369BB78-22E3-4FDE-87A9-0EE6DCA86B66@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTikaypLhyEcC7wLfhqczEqF9_Tg1cuQhQN7FiH8_@mail.gmail.com> 
	<28D3717A-89F4-4FF7-9C25-FEAC80002BB7@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTimAp6bfuJ2ekGgGHkuFwxrafnrco9rjkLR-2_y5@mail.gmail.com> 
	<89934547-D626-4CBA-92EC-F816834AE55E@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTimlekEwQNKwo1HI3pJPgpCGd_cP6z8hx5Xr94k0@mail.gmail.com>

hi sebastian,

i saw you also started to use the -norunpath option in gar:
http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/gar/changeset/10006.

dago already suggested to undo this gar change, what do you think?

we get errors like in the subversion configure which fails with:

rupert at current9s ~/mgar/pkg/subversion/trunk
$ vi work/solaris9-sparc/build-isa-sparcv8/subversion-1.6.11/config.log


configure:21413: result: yes
configure:21525: checking for availability of Berkeley DB
configure:21597: /opt/studio/SOS12/SUNWspro/bin/cc -o conftest -xO3
-m32 -xarch=v8 -xnorunpath   -mt -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -DNE_LFS
-I/opt/csw/bdb48/include  -I/opt/csw/apache2/include
-I/opt/csw/include -I/opt/csw/apache2/include -I/opt/csw/include
-DSOLARIS2=8 -D_POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS -D_REENTRANT
-D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -m32 -xarch=v8 -norunpath -L/opt/csw/apache2/lib
-L/opt/csw/lib/svn -L/opt/csw/lib -lintl -liconv    -L/opt/csw/lib
-L/opt/csw/lib -L/opt/csw/bdb48/lib conftest.c  -L/opt/csw/lib -ldb
-lsocket  >&5
cc: Warning: illegal option -norunpath
configure:21597: $? = 0
configure:21597: ./conftest
ld.so.1: conftest: fatal: libdb-4.8.so: open failed: No such file or directory
./configure: line -2057:  4789 Killed                  ./conftest$ac_exeext
configure:21597: $? = 137
configure: program exited with status 137
configure: failed program was:


rupert.


On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 10:17, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Hi Rupert,
>
> Am 06.06.2010 um 07:22 schrieb rupert THURNER:
>>
>> which machine should i use for sparc, as
>>
>> rupert at current9s:~
>> $ ls -l /opt/csw/lib/sparcv9/libdb-4.7.so
>> lrwxrwxrwx ? ?1 root ? ? other ? ? ? ? ?36 Oct 19 ?2009
>> /opt/csw/lib/sparcv9/libdb-4.7.so ->
>> ../../bdb47/lib/sparcv9/libdb-4.7.so
>>
>> rupert at current9s:~
>> $ date
>> Sun Jun ?6 00:20:21 CDT 2010
>
> Umh, I am pretty sure I removed it from the machine. I have again removed
> it, maybe a package upgrade of something triggered the reinstall??
>
>
> Best regards
>
> ?-- Dago
>


From dam at opencsw.org  Tue Jun  8 09:43:30 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 09:43:30 +0200
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] [csw-maintainers] BerkeleyDB upgrade
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimlekEwQNKwo1HI3pJPgpCGd_cP6z8hx5Xr94k0@mail.gmail.com>
References: <C2783926-199E-4446-900A-54A34E8C6BFA@opencsw.org>
	<4C32281F-89A3-4B57-B840-699CA6795EDB@opencsw.org>
	<F5BB8EA2-485D-4397-AE43-BC1433E4B22E@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinUwWbxracKtT7GV1MNd6qpHs-MjoLr2opnYfAa@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimvZFBaWWs-k1kWo9H1swEWbi3NFo4jPiChx3Ly@mail.gmail.com>
	<47B9E89A-9C18-442E-958F-7AF486387A7D@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTikg4xwHRFtGPJuxaosJnfEjeyQP_TWdD7rASuuW@mail.gmail.com>
	<515B314C-A719-498C-8861-DF71A52E513B@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTimZZTTBYz8mNNvXb2_uUBBUS9YGXCkZ5Ot2xrYE@mail.gmail.com>
	<D369BB78-22E3-4FDE-87A9-0EE6DCA86B66@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTikaypLhyEcC7wLfhqczEqF9_Tg1cuQhQN7FiH8_@mail.gmail.com>
	<28D3717A-89F4-4FF7-9C25-FEAC80002BB7@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTimAp6bfuJ2ekGgGHkuFwxrafnrco9rjkLR-2_y5@mail.gmail.com>
	<89934547-D626-4CBA-92EC-F816834AE55E@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTimlekEwQNKwo1HI3pJPgpCGd_cP6z8hx5Xr94k0@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <3D47F521-68CD-4FA7-8ED8-6779563D0FDA@opencsw.org>

Hi Rupert,

Am 08.06.2010 um 06:48 schrieb rupert THURNER:
> hi sebastian,
>
> i saw you also started to use the -norunpath option in gar:
> http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/gar/changeset/10006.
>
> dago already suggested to undo this gar change, what do you think?
>
> we get errors like in the subversion configure which fails with:

To be precise, it is a warning, most certainly because they use the
linker flag for compilation.

> rupert at current9s ~/mgar/pkg/subversion/trunk
> $ vi work/solaris9-sparc/build-isa-sparcv8/subversion-1.6.11/ 
> config.log
>
> configure:21413: result: yes
> configure:21525: checking for availability of Berkeley DB
> configure:21597: /opt/studio/SOS12/SUNWspro/bin/cc -o conftest -xO3
> -m32 -xarch=v8 -xnorunpath   -mt -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -DNE_LFS
> -I/opt/csw/bdb48/include  -I/opt/csw/apache2/include
> -I/opt/csw/include -I/opt/csw/apache2/include -I/opt/csw/include
> -DSOLARIS2=8 -D_POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS -D_REENTRANT
> -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -m32 -xarch=v8 -norunpath -L/opt/csw/apache2/lib
> -L/opt/csw/lib/svn -L/opt/csw/lib -lintl -liconv    -L/opt/csw/lib
> -L/opt/csw/lib -L/opt/csw/bdb48/lib conftest.c  -L/opt/csw/lib -ldb
> -lsocket  >&5
> cc: Warning: illegal option -norunpath
> configure:21597: $? = 0
> configure:21597: ./conftest
> ld.so.1: conftest: fatal: libdb-4.8.so: open failed: No such file or  
> directory

The real problem is that there is no -R/opt/csw/bdb48/lib, so it can't  
find
the lib on execution. Maybe you want to add EXTRA_LIB?


Best regards

   -- Dago



From maciej at opencsw.org  Wed Jun  9 08:13:06 2010
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski)
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 07:13:06 +0100
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] py-libmagic on the buildfarm
Message-ID: <AANLkTinUtLKLdqCF9xbgx5CKeeguWJvFLf-3ezpSvNpQ@mail.gmail.com>

Could you install it please?  I'll port checkpkg to use the libmagic
API instead of forking and executing an external command.


From dam at opencsw.org  Wed Jun  9 08:28:51 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 08:28:51 +0200
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] py-libmagic on the buildfarm
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinUtLKLdqCF9xbgx5CKeeguWJvFLf-3ezpSvNpQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTinUtLKLdqCF9xbgx5CKeeguWJvFLf-3ezpSvNpQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <6DB207B7-2A16-46F6-B4B6-3A915FD1010D@opencsw.org>

Hi Maciej,

Am 09.06.2010 um 08:13 schrieb Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski:
> Could you install it please?  I'll port checkpkg to use the libmagic
> API instead of forking and executing an external command.

I think you mean py_libmagic ;-)

Doing this now.


Best regards

   -- Dago


From maciej at opencsw.org  Wed Jun  9 22:45:40 2010
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski)
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 21:45:40 +0100
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] py_progressbar on the login host
Message-ID: <AANLkTikNR6GjYhgc_pfmQ2uiPgzy6RvwSE3rTJqY208H@mail.gmail.com>

submitpkg imports the opencsw.py and checkpkg.py libraries, which
depend on py_progressbar now. Could you install py_progressbar on the
login host? (this is where submitpkg needs to be run)


From dam at opencsw.org  Thu Jun 10 10:04:38 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 10:04:38 +0200
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] py_progressbar on the login host
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikNR6GjYhgc_pfmQ2uiPgzy6RvwSE3rTJqY208H@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTikNR6GjYhgc_pfmQ2uiPgzy6RvwSE3rTJqY208H@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <5623E669-89CB-4F66-B9CC-6FA8480233CF@opencsw.org>

Hi Maciej,

Am 09.06.2010 um 22:45 schrieb Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski:
> submitpkg imports the opencsw.py and checkpkg.py libraries, which
> depend on py_progressbar now. Could you install py_progressbar on the
> login host? (this is where submitpkg needs to be run)

Done.


Best regards

   -- Dago


From skayser at opencsw.org  Fri Jun 11 00:43:47 2010
From: skayser at opencsw.org (Sebastian Kayser)
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 00:43:47 +0200
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Please install py_hachoir_parser,
	requirement for recent GAR enhancements
Message-ID: <4C116AA3.60608@opencsw.org>

Hi,

I just 'up'ed GAR and unfortunately it bails out with

...
[===== NOW BUILDING: xterm-258 =====]
 ==> Verifying for installed package CSWpy-hachoir-core: installed
 ==> Verifying for installed package CSWpy-hachoir-parser: MISSING
...

Could this package please be installed on the farm so that we can all
enjoy an even better checkpkg (plus a working GAR of course ;). Thanks!

Sebastian


From bwalton at opencsw.org  Fri Jun 11 02:40:06 2010
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 20:40:06 -0400
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Please install py_hachoir_parser,
	requirement for recent GAR enhancements
In-Reply-To: <4C116AA3.60608@opencsw.org>
References: <4C116AA3.60608@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <1276216791-sup-8545@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>

Excerpts from Sebastian Kayser's message of Thu Jun 10 18:43:47 -0400 2010:

> Could this package please be installed on the farm so that we can all
> enjoy an even better checkpkg (plus a working GAR of course ;). Thanks!

Doing this now.

-Ben
--
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302



From rupert at opencsw.org  Sun Jun 13 22:24:52 2010
From: rupert at opencsw.org (rupert THURNER)
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 22:24:52 +0200
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] upgrade openldap please
Message-ID: <AANLkTimHICU7DXslxRaN02hD8ekQlBm0oqPuvSDjHAWy@mail.gmail.com>

could you please upgrade openldap?


From maciej at opencsw.org  Mon Jun 14 15:51:55 2010
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski)
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 14:51:55 +0100
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] A MySQL database request
Message-ID: <AANLkTiknxXXzAUQ9Paj4Ws-Z6C6sazmqG5d34uk_ov5F@mail.gmail.com>

Hello buildfarm admins,

I'd like to as for the following:

A new MySQL database, called 'checkpkg', with a user 'checkpkg', and a
randomly generated password.  I'd like to connect to the database from
all buildfarm hosts (current9s, current9x, etc.).

Maciej


From maciej at opencsw.org  Mon Jun 14 16:01:18 2010
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski)
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 15:01:18 +0100
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] pymysql on the buildfarm
Message-ID: <AANLkTikWkGfJtI1OLHsz7XG_tYxwfXDF_8n8-Kve5CsJ@mail.gmail.com>

Could you install it?  It's part of my plan to take over the world.

Please also install on the login host.


From dam at opencsw.org  Mon Jun 14 17:01:45 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 17:01:45 +0200
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] pymysql on the buildfarm
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikWkGfJtI1OLHsz7XG_tYxwfXDF_8n8-Kve5CsJ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTikWkGfJtI1OLHsz7XG_tYxwfXDF_8n8-Kve5CsJ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <6B7DA11A-5A86-4BB4-94FB-158F76CE9170@opencsw.org>

Hi Maciej,

Am 14.06.2010 um 16:01 schrieb Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski:
> Could you install it?  It's part of my plan to take over the world.
>
> Please also install on the login host.

Doing this now.


Best regards

   -- Dago



From bwalton at opencsw.org  Tue Jun 15 14:32:32 2010
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 08:32:32 -0400
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] upgrade openldap please
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimHICU7DXslxRaN02hD8ekQlBm0oqPuvSDjHAWy@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTimHICU7DXslxRaN02hD8ekQlBm0oqPuvSDjHAWy@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1276605133-sup-5442@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>

Excerpts from rupert THURNER's message of Sun Jun 13 16:24:52 -0400 2010:

> could you please upgrade openldap?

Doing this now.

Thanks
-Ben

--
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302



From phil at bolthole.com  Wed Jun 16 19:10:49 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 10:10:49 -0700
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] please update gtk and all dependancies
Message-ID: <AANLkTim0PjFji4H3gwlrXboIiP2e6FrCwUZ9MAKddEip@mail.gmail.com>

I just released our new gtk, etc. please update current machines with
it, and all deps.
this includes, but may not be limited to, gtk, pango, cairo.


From dam at opencsw.org  Wed Jun 16 22:27:59 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 22:27:59 +0200
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] please update gtk and all dependancies
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTim0PjFji4H3gwlrXboIiP2e6FrCwUZ9MAKddEip@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTim0PjFji4H3gwlrXboIiP2e6FrCwUZ9MAKddEip@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <E80B02A3-B05F-4BFF-A03B-5EA98825C07D@opencsw.org>

Hi,

Am 16.06.2010 um 19:10 schrieb Philip Brown:
> I just released our new gtk, etc. please update current machines with
> it, and all deps.
> this includes, but may not be limited to, gtk, pango, cairo.

Updating all current machines to latest packages now.


Best regards

   -- Dago


From phil at bolthole.com  Thu Jun 17 19:06:48 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 10:06:48 -0700
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] removals for csw x11
Message-ID: <AANLkTimr0FLl5ZKmeBx9eb3NaDfILCf9HasDaK2PJnRi@mail.gmail.com>

To avoid accidental use,
Please remove the following packages on the 'current' build machines:

CSWlibx11
CSWlibxau
CSWlibxaw
CSWlibxcomposite
CSWlibxcursor
CSWlibxdamage
CSWlibxdmcp
CSWlibxext
CSWlibxfixes
CSWlibxfont
CSWlibxi
CSWlibxinerama
CSWlibxmu
CSWlibxpm
CSWlibxrandr
CSWlibxres
CSWlibxscrnsaver
CSWlibxt
CSWlibxtst
CSWlibxv
CSWlibxxf86dga
CSWlibxxf86vm



They probably all have corresponding *devel packages to be removed, also.


From bwalton at opencsw.org  Sat Jun 19 18:38:54 2010
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2010 12:38:54 -0400
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] removals for csw x11
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimr0FLl5ZKmeBx9eb3NaDfILCf9HasDaK2PJnRi@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTimr0FLl5ZKmeBx9eb3NaDfILCf9HasDaK2PJnRi@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1276965522-sup-610@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>

Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Thu Jun 17 13:06:48 -0400 2010:

> To avoid accidental use,
> Please remove the following packages on the 'current' build
> machines:

Doing this now.

-Ben
--
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302



From bwalton at opencsw.org  Sat Jun 19 19:02:13 2010
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2010 13:02:13 -0400
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] removals for csw x11
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimr0FLl5ZKmeBx9eb3NaDfILCf9HasDaK2PJnRi@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTimr0FLl5ZKmeBx9eb3NaDfILCf9HasDaK2PJnRi@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1276966898-sup-1584@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>

Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Thu Jun 17 13:06:48 -0400 2010:

> CSWlibxt

## Removing installed package instance <CSWlibxt>
## Verifying package dependencies.
WARNING:
    The <CSWimagemagick> package depends on the package
    currently being removed.
WARNING:
    The <CSWlibxaw> package depends on the package
    currently being removed.
WARNING:
    The <CSWlibxpm> package depends on the package
    currently being removed.
WARNING:
    The <CSWlibxmu> package depends on the package
    currently being removed.
Dependency checking failed.

The last two are in the removal queue, but imagemagick and libxaw
aren't.  Resolution?

Thanks
-Ben
--
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302



From rupert at opencsw.org  Sat Jun 19 20:10:49 2010
From: rupert at opencsw.org (rupert THURNER)
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2010 20:10:49 +0200
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] newpkgs apr-util
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimMmbW_Z_JkkpsDEyd0YkfAiKQ-iOVh7NrUXltp@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTimMmbW_Z_JkkpsDEyd0YkfAiKQ-iOVh7NrUXltp@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTik5LCW6XHaIlWP5wU6fsKNe67PknoVMvGPFqM8D@mail.gmail.com>

could you please install apr-util on the buildfarm after it is released?

rupert.

On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 20:09, rupert THURNER <rupert at opencsw.org> wrote:
> i copied apr-util-1.3.9,REV=2010.06.19* to bender.
>
> as submitpkg failed with:
>
> rupert at login:~
> $ submitpkg /home/experimental/rupert/apr-util*
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> ?File "/opt/csw/bin/submitpkg", line 61, in <module>
> ? ?main()
> ?File "/opt/csw/bin/submitpkg", line 49, in main
> ? ?pkg_path_a = pkg_dir_a.GetLatest(options.catalog_name)[-1]
> ?File "/opt/csw/lib/python/csw/opencsw.py", line 279, in GetLatest
> ? ?files = os.listdir(self.dir_path)
> TypeError: coercing to Unicode: need string or buffer, NoneType
>


From bwalton at opencsw.org  Sat Jun 19 20:37:29 2010
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2010 14:37:29 -0400
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] removals for csw x11
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimr0FLl5ZKmeBx9eb3NaDfILCf9HasDaK2PJnRi@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTimr0FLl5ZKmeBx9eb3NaDfILCf9HasDaK2PJnRi@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1276972589-sup-2826@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>

Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Thu Jun 17 13:06:48 -0400 2010:

> CSWlibxext

This one is even more ingrained...I assume that all of the listed
packages need to be rebuilt against the reloaded stack?

## Removing installed package instance <CSWlibxext>
## Verifying package dependencies.
WARNING:
    The <CSWwxwidgetsdevel> package depends on the package
    currently being removed.
WARNING:
    The <CSWimagemagick> package depends on the package
    currently being removed.
WARNING:
    The <CSWlibxcomposite> package depends on the package
    currently being removed.
WARNING:
    The <CSWpinentry> package depends on the package
    currently being removed.
WARNING:
    The <CSWimlib2> package depends on the package
    currently being removed.
WARNING:
    The <CSWwireshark> package depends on the package
    currently being removed.
WARNING:
    The <CSWwxwidgetscommon> package depends on the package
    currently being removed.
WARNING:
    The <CSWlibdmx> package depends on the package
    currently being removed.
WARNING:
    The <CSWlibsdl> package depends on the package
    currently being removed.
WARNING:
    The <CSWwxwidgetsgtk2> package depends on the package
    currently being removed.
WARNING:
    The <CSWpidgin> package depends on the package
    currently being removed.
Dependency checking failed.
--
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302



From bwalton at opencsw.org  Sat Jun 19 20:39:49 2010
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2010 14:39:49 -0400
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] removals for csw x11
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimr0FLl5ZKmeBx9eb3NaDfILCf9HasDaK2PJnRi@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTimr0FLl5ZKmeBx9eb3NaDfILCf9HasDaK2PJnRi@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1276972761-sup-1778@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>

Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Thu Jun 17 13:06:48 -0400 2010:

> CSWlibxdmcp

This one has CSWlibxcb depending on it.  Should it be yanked too?

Thanks
-Ben
--
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302



From bwalton at opencsw.org  Sat Jun 19 20:51:55 2010
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2010 14:51:55 -0400
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] removals for csw x11
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimr0FLl5ZKmeBx9eb3NaDfILCf9HasDaK2PJnRi@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTimr0FLl5ZKmeBx9eb3NaDfILCf9HasDaK2PJnRi@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1276973502-sup-5393@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>

Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Thu Jun 17 13:06:48 -0400 2010:

> CSWlibxcomposite

## Removing installed package instance <CSWlibxcomposite>
## Verifying package dependencies.
WARNING:
    The <CSWkdebasegcc> package depends on the package
    currently being removed.
Dependency checking failed.
--
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302



From bwalton at opencsw.org  Sat Jun 19 20:54:00 2010
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2010 14:54:00 -0400
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] removals for csw x11
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimr0FLl5ZKmeBx9eb3NaDfILCf9HasDaK2PJnRi@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTimr0FLl5ZKmeBx9eb3NaDfILCf9HasDaK2PJnRi@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1276973628-sup-4134@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>

Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Thu Jun 17 13:06:48 -0400 2010:

> CSWlibxau

## Removing installed package instance <CSWlibxau>
## Verifying package dependencies.
WARNING:
    The <CSWemacs> package depends on the package currently
    being removed.
WARNING:
    The <CSWlibxext> package depends on the package
    currently being removed.
WARNING:
    The <CSWlibxcb> package depends on the package
    currently being removed.
Dependency checking failed.
--
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302



From bwalton at opencsw.org  Sat Jun 19 20:56:26 2010
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2010 14:56:26 -0400
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] removals for csw x11
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimr0FLl5ZKmeBx9eb3NaDfILCf9HasDaK2PJnRi@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTimr0FLl5ZKmeBx9eb3NaDfILCf9HasDaK2PJnRi@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1276973728-sup-2456@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>

Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Thu Jun 17 13:06:48 -0400
2010:

Last one.  Even with the packages left behind to not break deps, the
*devel parts are removed, so new stuff can't be built against these
libs.

Thanks
-Ben

> CSWlibx11

## Removing installed package instance <CSWlibx11>
## Verifying package dependencies.
WARNING:
    The <CSWlibwmf> package depends on the package
    currently being removed.
WARNING:
    The <CSWimagemagick> package depends on the package
    currently being removed.
WARNING:
    The <CSWlibxcomposite> package depends on the package
    currently being removed.
WARNING:
    The <CSWimlib2> package depends on the package
    currently being removed.
WARNING:
    The <CSWstartupnotif> package depends on the package
    currently being removed.
WARNING:
    The <CSWemacs> package depends on the package currently
    being removed.
WARNING:
    The <CSWwmf> package depends on the package currently
    being removed.
WARNING:
    The <CSWlibxkbfile> package depends on the package
    currently being removed.
WARNING:
    The <CSWlibdmx> package depends on the package
    currently being removed.
WARNING:
    The <CSWlibxt> package depends on the package currently
    being removed.
WARNING:
    The <CSWlibxext> package depends on the package
    currently being removed.
WARNING:
    The <CSWlibsdl> package depends on the package
    currently being removed.
WARNING:
    The <CSWpidgin> package depends on the package
    currently being removed.
Dependency checking failed.
--
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302



From phil at bolthole.com  Sun Jun 20 00:42:26 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2010 15:42:26 -0700
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] removals for csw x11
In-Reply-To: <1276973728-sup-2456@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
References: <AANLkTimr0FLl5ZKmeBx9eb3NaDfILCf9HasDaK2PJnRi@mail.gmail.com>
	<1276973728-sup-2456@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
Message-ID: <AANLkTilfzI5Mo2uuM-J4x7OQ7egIFlQzemWbbpHdXEjw@mail.gmail.com>

On Saturday, June 19, 2010, Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Thu Jun 17 13:06:48 -0400
> 2010:
>
> Last one. ?Even with the packages left behind to not break deps, the
> *devel parts are removed, so new stuff can't be built against these
> libs.

 it's nce to remove the ones with same names as sun standard libs,
like xaw, so older chechpkg does not mistakenly think it is related


From bwalton at opencsw.org  Sun Jun 20 01:52:10 2010
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2010 19:52:10 -0400
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] removals for csw x11
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTilfzI5Mo2uuM-J4x7OQ7egIFlQzemWbbpHdXEjw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTimr0FLl5ZKmeBx9eb3NaDfILCf9HasDaK2PJnRi@mail.gmail.com>
	<1276973728-sup-2456@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTilfzI5Mo2uuM-J4x7OQ7egIFlQzemWbbpHdXEjw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1276991458-sup-2348@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>

Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Sat Jun 19 18:42:26 -0400 2010:

>  it's nce to remove the ones with same names as sun standard libs,
> like xaw, so older chechpkg does not mistakenly think it is related

Ok, then we either break deps of things built against these libs or
start cutting deeper in the purge.  Your call.  I'd prefer not to have
dangling deps myself, but...

Thanks
-Ben
--
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302



From dam at opencsw.org  Sun Jun 20 10:19:10 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2010 10:19:10 +0200
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] removals for csw x11
In-Reply-To: <1276991458-sup-2348@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
References: <AANLkTimr0FLl5ZKmeBx9eb3NaDfILCf9HasDaK2PJnRi@mail.gmail.com>
	<1276973728-sup-2456@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTilfzI5Mo2uuM-J4x7OQ7egIFlQzemWbbpHdXEjw@mail.gmail.com>
	<1276991458-sup-2348@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
Message-ID: <94E536E2-45DF-47E1-88C8-641237777CFE@opencsw.org>

Hi,

Am 20.06.2010 um 01:52 schrieb Ben Walton:
> Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Sat Jun 19 18:42:26 -0400 2010:
>> it's nce to remove the ones with same names as sun standard libs,
>> like xaw, so older chechpkg does not mistakenly think it is related
> 
> Ok, then we either break deps of things built against these libs or
> start cutting deeper in the purge.  Your call.  I'd prefer not to have
> dangling deps myself, but...

The most important thing is to keep track which things need
updating. Phil, please carefully track the list on the wiki.
I may help out on rebuilding things. I can do stuff which
needs attention spans of < 10 minutes :-)


Best regards

  -- Dago


From phil at bolthole.com  Sun Jun 20 15:23:08 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2010 06:23:08 -0700
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] removals for csw x11
In-Reply-To: <94E536E2-45DF-47E1-88C8-641237777CFE@opencsw.org>
References: <AANLkTimr0FLl5ZKmeBx9eb3NaDfILCf9HasDaK2PJnRi@mail.gmail.com>
	<1276973728-sup-2456@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTilfzI5Mo2uuM-J4x7OQ7egIFlQzemWbbpHdXEjw@mail.gmail.com>
	<1276991458-sup-2348@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<94E536E2-45DF-47E1-88C8-641237777CFE@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTikDhnyvTabJhbeWjU32FtDoPdLnWNbj-FLK-u-5@mail.gmail.com>

>
> The most important thing is to keep track which things need
> updating. Phil, please carefully track the list on the wiki.
> I may help out on rebuilding things. I can do stuff which
> needs attention spans of < 10 minutes :-)


shouldn't be too hard: basically anything depending on cswx11 that is
not itself a cswx11 component.
it's about 10 things


From phil at bolthole.com  Tue Jun 22 00:44:21 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 15:44:21 -0700
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] more x11 libs still on buildfarm
Message-ID: <AANLkTimMkqPwrFxXAvaVYTx-LzJbOLEaQXLqRCJyyaQk@mail.gmail.com>

please also remove CSWlibice and CSWlibsm?


From bwalton at opencsw.org  Tue Jun 22 01:51:00 2010
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 19:51:00 -0400
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] more x11 libs still on buildfarm
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimMkqPwrFxXAvaVYTx-LzJbOLEaQXLqRCJyyaQk@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTimMkqPwrFxXAvaVYTx-LzJbOLEaQXLqRCJyyaQk@mail.gmail.com> n
	Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Mon Jun 21 18:44:21
	-0400 2010: > please also remove CSWlibice and CSWlibsm?
Message-ID: <1277164252-sup-9425@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>

Doing these now.

-Ben

--
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302



From nicols at opencsw.org  Wed Jun 23 17:28:03 2010
From: nicols at opencsw.org (Andrew Robert Nicols)
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 16:28:03 +0100
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] CSWpmtestpodcoverage on the buildfarm
Message-ID: <20100623152802.GA24797@banoffee.lancs.ac.uk>

Can I get Test::Pod::Coverage on the buildfarm please? This is so I for
some perl module tests for a couple of packages I'm building.

Thanks,

Andrew

-- 
Systems Developer

e: andrew.nicols at luns.net.uk
im: a.nicols at jabber.lancs.ac.uk
t: +44 (0)1524 5 10147

Lancaster University Network Services is a limited company registered in
England and Wales. Registered number: 04311892. Registered office:
University House, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YW
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/buildfarm/attachments/20100623/0eb93c80/attachment.asc>

From bwalton at opencsw.org  Wed Jun 23 17:31:11 2010
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 11:31:11 -0400
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] CSWpmtestpodcoverage on the buildfarm
In-Reply-To: <20100623152802.GA24797@banoffee.lancs.ac.uk>
References: <20100623152802.GA24797@banoffee.lancs.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <1277307058-sup-2505@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>

Excerpts from Andrew Robert Nicols's message of Wed Jun 23 11:28:03 -0400 2010:

> Can I get Test::Pod::Coverage on the buildfarm please? This is so I for
> some perl module tests for a couple of packages I'm building.

Doing this now.

Thanks
-Ben
--
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302



From nicols at opencsw.org  Wed Jun 23 18:16:55 2010
From: nicols at opencsw.org (Andrew Robert Nicols)
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 17:16:55 +0100
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] CSWpmperl6export on the buildfarm
Message-ID: <20100623161655.GC24797@banoffee.lancs.ac.uk>

Can I request CSWpmperl6export (Perl6::Export) on the buildfarm please?
It's currently in experimental but I submitted it this afternoon (GMT).

Andrew

-- 
Systems Developer

e: andrew.nicols at luns.net.uk
im: a.nicols at jabber.lancs.ac.uk
t: +44 (0)1524 5 10147

Lancaster University Network Services is a limited company registered in
England and Wales. Registered number: 04311892. Registered office:
University House, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YW
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/buildfarm/attachments/20100623/3fc9120a/attachment.asc>

From dam at opencsw.org  Wed Jun 23 20:07:51 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 20:07:51 +0200
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] CSWpmperl6export on the buildfarm
In-Reply-To: <20100623161655.GC24797@banoffee.lancs.ac.uk>
References: <20100623161655.GC24797@banoffee.lancs.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <28CE0195-B750-48EA-A687-B3D21FC84197@opencsw.org>

Hi Andrew,

Am 23.06.2010 um 18:16 schrieb Andrew Robert Nicols:
> Can I request CSWpmperl6export (Perl6::Export) on the buildfarm please?
> It's currently in experimental but I submitted it this afternoon (GMT).

Usually the packages are installed when they have been released and synced back to
the farm. This usually takes a day. If you need more speed for incremental builds
this can be done on the testing* servers.

I (or Ben) will install it ASAP 
when available.

Best regards

  -- Dago



From nicols at opencsw.org  Thu Jun 24 09:46:57 2010
From: nicols at opencsw.org (Andrew Robert Nicols)
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 08:46:57 +0100
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] CSWpmperl6export on the buildfarm
In-Reply-To: <28CE0195-B750-48EA-A687-B3D21FC84197@opencsw.org>
References: <20100623161655.GC24797@banoffee.lancs.ac.uk>
	<28CE0195-B750-48EA-A687-B3D21FC84197@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <20100624074657.GA26673@banoffee.lancs.ac.uk>

Hi Dago,

On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 08:07:51PM +0200, Dagobert Michelsen wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
> 
> Am 23.06.2010 um 18:16 schrieb Andrew Robert Nicols:
> > Can I request CSWpmperl6export (Perl6::Export) on the buildfarm please?
> > It's currently in experimental but I submitted it this afternoon (GMT).
> 
> Usually the packages are installed when they have been released and synced back to
> the farm. This usually takes a day. If you need more speed for incremental builds
> this can be done on the testing* servers.

I don't seem to have access to the testing* servers (username nicols). I'm
being asked for password auth.

> I (or Ben) will install it ASAP 
> when available.

Thanks for your hlep,

Andrew

-- 
Systems Developer

e: andrew.nicols at luns.net.uk
im: a.nicols at jabber.lancs.ac.uk
t: +44 (0)1524 5 10147

Lancaster University Network Services is a limited company registered in
England and Wales. Registered number: 04311892. Registered office:
University House, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YW
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/buildfarm/attachments/20100624/921b5edb/attachment.asc>

From dam at opencsw.org  Thu Jun 24 10:40:12 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 10:40:12 +0200
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] CSWpmperl6export on the buildfarm
In-Reply-To: <20100624074657.GA26673@banoffee.lancs.ac.uk>
References: <20100623161655.GC24797@banoffee.lancs.ac.uk>
	<28CE0195-B750-48EA-A687-B3D21FC84197@opencsw.org>
	<20100624074657.GA26673@banoffee.lancs.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <17CF68DB-2D20-41D4-AE25-C9D7EFDF98F5@opencsw.org>

Hi Andrew,

Am 24.06.2010 um 09:46 schrieb Andrew Robert Nicols:
> On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 08:07:51PM +0200, Dagobert Michelsen wrote:
>> Hi Andrew,
>>
>> Am 23.06.2010 um 18:16 schrieb Andrew Robert Nicols:
>>> Can I request CSWpmperl6export (Perl6::Export) on the buildfarm  
>>> please?
>>> It's currently in experimental but I submitted it this afternoon  
>>> (GMT).
>>
>> Usually the packages are installed when they have been released and  
>> synced back to
>> the farm. This usually takes a day. If you need more speed for  
>> incremental builds
>> this can be done on the testing* servers.
>
> I don't seem to have access to the testing* servers (username  
> nicols). I'm
> being asked for password auth.

You should now have access to the testing* servers. just let me know  
if you need anything
else.


Best regards

  -- Dago


From ihsan at opencsw.org  Thu Jun 24 15:15:27 2010
From: ihsan at opencsw.org (Ihsan Dogan)
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 16:15:27 +0300
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] CSWwdiff on buildfarm
Message-ID: <4C235A6F.4070204@opencsw.org>

Hello,

Could you please install CSWwdiff on the buildfarm?
Thanks.



Ihsan

-- 
ihsan at dogan.ch		http://blog.dogan.ch/


From dam at opencsw.org  Thu Jun 24 15:18:06 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 15:18:06 +0200
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] CSWwdiff on buildfarm
In-Reply-To: <4C235A6F.4070204@opencsw.org>
References: <4C235A6F.4070204@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <45168B1C-B851-41A2-847D-DCDA92FD0B45@opencsw.org>

Hi Ihsan,

Am 24.06.2010 um 15:15 schrieb Ihsan Dogan:
> Could you please install CSWwdiff on the buildfarm?

Doing this now.


Best regards

   -- Dago




From ihsan at opencsw.org  Thu Jun 24 15:19:39 2010
From: ihsan at opencsw.org (Ihsan Dogan)
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 16:19:39 +0300
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] CSWwdiff on buildfarm
In-Reply-To: <45168B1C-B851-41A2-847D-DCDA92FD0B45@opencsw.org>
References: <4C235A6F.4070204@opencsw.org>
	<45168B1C-B851-41A2-847D-DCDA92FD0B45@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <4C235B6B.7020602@opencsw.org>

Am 24.06.10 16:18, schrieb Dagobert Michelsen:

>> Could you please install CSWwdiff on the buildfarm?
> 
> Doing this now.

Thanks a lot Dago.



Ihsan

-- 
ihsan at dogan.ch		http://blog.dogan.ch/


From ihsan at opencsw.org  Fri Jun 25 10:41:43 2010
From: ihsan at opencsw.org (Ihsan Dogan)
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 11:41:43 +0300
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] ldns & ldns_devel on build machines
Message-ID: <4C246BC7.8040804@opencsw.org>

Hello,

Please upgrade ldns and ldns_devel on the build machine to 1.6.5
Thanks.




Ihsan

-- 
ihsan at dogan.ch		http://blog.dogan.ch/


From dam at opencsw.org  Fri Jun 25 10:51:02 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 10:51:02 +0200
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] ldns & ldns_devel on build machines
In-Reply-To: <4C246BC7.8040804@opencsw.org>
References: <4C246BC7.8040804@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <80530A97-DFCC-4FF9-B52B-DE9099EF0D52@opencsw.org>

Hi,

Am 25.06.2010 um 10:41 schrieb Ihsan Dogan:
> Please upgrade ldns and ldns_devel on the build machine to 1.6.5

Doing this now.


Best regards

   -- Dago




From phil at bolthole.com  Fri Jun 25 19:55:38 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 10:55:38 -0700
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] difference in environment
Message-ID: <AANLkTinOtn23UCWE8JORBxN9Shy87LZA5IvXByxli_LJ@mail.gmail.com>

btw, i just noticed that when i log into current9s, I get EDITOR and
VISUAL set to vi. but
on current9x, i do not.

Please make things consistent


From bwalton at opencsw.org  Fri Jun 25 22:32:39 2010
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 16:32:39 -0400
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] difference in environment
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinOtn23UCWE8JORBxN9Shy87LZA5IvXByxli_LJ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTinOtn23UCWE8JORBxN9Shy87LZA5IvXByxli_LJ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1277497883-sup-6413@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>

Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Fri Jun 25 13:55:38 -0400 2010:

Hi Phil,

> btw, i just noticed that when i log into current9s, I get EDITOR and
> VISUAL set to vi. but
> on current9x, i do not.

See .profile :)  Set it once and it's good across the whole farm.

Thanks
-Ben
--
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302



From phil at bolthole.com  Fri Jun 25 22:43:29 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 13:43:29 -0700
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] difference in environment
In-Reply-To: <1277497883-sup-6413@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
References: <AANLkTinOtn23UCWE8JORBxN9Shy87LZA5IvXByxli_LJ@mail.gmail.com>
	<1277497883-sup-6413@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
Message-ID: <AANLkTikcydVpMEbaj2t74PurDUbKOk9f4jaoBRyJ_Rpb@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Fri Jun 25 13:55:38 -0400 2010:
>
> Hi Phil,
>
>> btw, i just noticed that when i log into current9s, I get EDITOR and
>> VISUAL set to vi. but
>> on current9x, i do not.
>
> See .profile :) ?Set it once and it's good across the whole farm.
>

not the point.
The point is, the build farm machines have different setups, and they
should not have.
I think this is a potentially dangerous bug which should be looked into.


From dam at opencsw.org  Fri Jun 25 23:12:21 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 23:12:21 +0200
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] CSWpmperl6export on the buildfarm
In-Reply-To: <20100623161655.GC24797@banoffee.lancs.ac.uk>
References: <20100623161655.GC24797@banoffee.lancs.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <744B7518-E295-4DC2-82BC-7C5696E8B70A@opencsw.org>

Hi,

Am 23.06.2010 um 18:16 schrieb Andrew Robert Nicols:
> Can I request CSWpmperl6export (Perl6::Export) on the buildfarm please?
> It's currently in experimental but I submitted it this afternoon (GMT).

Doing this now.


Best regards

  -- Dago


From phil at bolthole.com  Sat Jun 26 00:57:24 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 15:57:24 -0700
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Fwd:  difference in environment
In-Reply-To: <1277506466-sup-5113@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
References: <AANLkTinOtn23UCWE8JORBxN9Shy87LZA5IvXByxli_LJ@mail.gmail.com>
	<1277497883-sup-6413@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTikcydVpMEbaj2t74PurDUbKOk9f4jaoBRyJ_Rpb@mail.gmail.com>
	<1277504704-sup-4325@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTilWqKh4E_MocJ6hvSJzZvLrpCa8nAxCBl6FFkRH@mail.gmail.com>
	<1277506466-sup-5113@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
Message-ID: <AANLkTilLco8H6bZ3ABWppXUZ3qsLS3vHbQChbtbvWvaj@mail.gmail.com>

Ben may have forgotten to reforward this to the list.
here ya go.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org>
Date: Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 3:55 PM
Subject: Re: [csw-buildfarm] difference in environment
To: Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com>


Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Fri Jun 25 18:41:14 -0400 2010:

> find out why the default environments are different, and then make
> them the same.
> Who knows what ELSE is different? ?There could be some build affecting
> differences somewhere, but we dont know yet.

current9s has /etc/profile source /etc/environment/environment,
current9x does not. ?As the pulled in file mentions some baltic online
folks, it's likely part of the stock solaris deployment (jumpstart?)
there that differs from the handling of i386 boxes. ?Dago?

Thanks
-Ben
--
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302


From phil at bolthole.com  Sat Jun 26 01:58:22 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 16:58:22 -0700
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] need gnomemime2
Message-ID: <AANLkTin5m7wUT3m--ma5dIUKavnXGmZYQ8zVH81zR7S8@mail.gmail.com>

need gnomemime2, aka gnome-mime-data, to build gnome-vfs


From bwalton at opencsw.org  Sat Jun 26 02:07:35 2010
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 20:07:35 -0400
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] need gnomemime2
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTin5m7wUT3m--ma5dIUKavnXGmZYQ8zVH81zR7S8@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTin5m7wUT3m--ma5dIUKavnXGmZYQ8zVH81zR7S8@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1277510838-sup-2299@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>

Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Fri Jun 25 19:58:22 -0400 2010:
> need gnomemime2, aka gnome-mime-data, to build gnome-vfs

Doing this now.

-Ben

--
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302



From phil at bolthole.com  Sat Jun 26 02:10:07 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 17:10:07 -0700
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] need gnomemime2
In-Reply-To: <1277510838-sup-2299@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
References: <AANLkTin5m7wUT3m--ma5dIUKavnXGmZYQ8zVH81zR7S8@mail.gmail.com>
	<1277510838-sup-2299@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
Message-ID: <AANLkTilHfAbnTAGEd0NQn5WhiXZCBTjyGsi3pUw8wLmm@mail.gmail.com>

Arrrrr.... gnome sux.
Are you going to be around for a while longer? I probably have omre requests :-/


From bwalton at opencsw.org  Sat Jun 26 13:30:17 2010
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2010 07:30:17 -0400
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] CSWgconf2
Message-ID: <1277551777-sup-5069@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>


As per Phil's irc request last night, I've just now updated CSWgconf2
to the REV=2010.06.26 that hit mirrors last night.

Thanks
-Ben
--
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302



From phil at bolthole.com  Mon Jun 28 02:17:12 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2010 17:17:12 -0700
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] gimp deps
Message-ID: <AANLkTimJfwOMxSrg1CegEUcBSqUEZjR7b556ARbu17Bu@mail.gmail.com>

please install babl and gegl


From bwalton at opencsw.org  Mon Jun 28 03:25:43 2010
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2010 21:25:43 -0400
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] gimp deps
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimJfwOMxSrg1CegEUcBSqUEZjR7b556ARbu17Bu@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTimJfwOMxSrg1CegEUcBSqUEZjR7b556ARbu17Bu@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1277688326-sup-2237@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>

Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Sun Jun 27 20:17:12 -0400 2010:
> please install babl and gegl

Doing this now...

Thanks
-Ben

--
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302



From phil at bolthole.com  Tue Jun 29 02:11:45 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 17:11:45 -0700
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] gtk_engines
Message-ID: <AANLkTikYf1XfF53UBmNMR3LC02SKGdz4U1XbFn4dNc0u@mail.gmail.com>

Please install gtk_engines:  the recent one, not the old one.


From bwalton at opencsw.org  Tue Jun 29 03:01:52 2010
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 21:01:52 -0400
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] gtk_engines
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikYf1XfF53UBmNMR3LC02SKGdz4U1XbFn4dNc0u@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTikYf1XfF53UBmNMR3LC02SKGdz4U1XbFn4dNc0u@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1277773305-sup-5627@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>

Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Mon Jun 28 20:11:45 -0400 2010:
> Please install gtk_engines:  the recent one, not the old one.

Installing now.

-Ben
--
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302



From ja at opencsw.org  Tue Jun 29 20:41:17 2010
From: ja at opencsw.org (Juergen Arndt)
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 20:41:17 +0200
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Access to buildfarm via SSGD
Message-ID: <D30211A5-312E-4458-8D94-15B35CCA07CD@opencsw.org>

Hi everyone,

may I get access to the buildfarm via SSGD, please? Then I could - hopefully - login from our company's network.

Login is "ja", a password needs to be set.

Thank you!

Juergen

-- 
Juergen Arndt



From cptsalek at gmail.com  Wed Jun 30 16:09:43 2010
From: cptsalek at gmail.com (Christian Walther)
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 16:09:43 +0200
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Requesting a maintainer account on the buildfarm
Message-ID: <AANLkTilLF9vQHvojFYD5i6ONtZiYLTyy_zH0gRBP6cwa@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

I recently took over maintainership of Dan Debertins packages (clisp
including dependencies). Since I'm unable to build OpenCSW packages on
my systems I would like to use a maintainer account on the buildfarm.

My OpenCSW account name is "cwalther".

Regards
Christian Walther