[csw-buildfarm] [csw-maintainers] BerkeleyDB upgrade

[rupert THURNER]

On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 22:05, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Hi Rupert,
>
> Am 30.05.2010 um 22:02 schrieb rupert THURNER:
>> On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 20:35, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
>>> Am 30.05.2010 um 12:57 schrieb rupert THURNER:
>>>> could you please remove CSWbdb from the buildfarm? otherwise we would
>>>> need to build something into the openldap recipe to not use it. and as
>>>> i understood the goal is to recompile _without_ using files out of
>>>> CSWbdb.
>>>
>>> Yes, but this should be not difficult. It should be sufficuent to
>>> add the stuff from subversion I added recently to openldap, like
>>> EXTRA_INC etc.
>>
>> what is the reason to leave a compatibility package on a buildserver?
>
> They are needed by the packages depending on it, especially Apache2.
> AFAIK removing CSWbdb would make it impossible to compile current
> apache modules, but I may be wrong here.
>
>>> Just let me know if you have trouble finding the right switches.
>>> - and thanks for picking of OpenLDAP!
>>
>> you are not serious about this, aren't you?
>>
>>         EXTRA_LIB_garversion-2.4.22 = $(prefix)/bdb48/lib
>>         EXTRA_INC_garversion-2.4.22 = $(prefix)/bdb48/include
>>
>> was something you added long time ago to openldap :)
>
> I thought so :) And you say it does not work? I would like to investigate
> that if yes. I am not against removing CSWbdb, I would just like to know
> why the switches don't work.
>

did you have any chance to look into this?

rupert.