[csw-buildfarm] [csw-maintainers] BerkeleyDB upgrade
Dagobert Michelsen
dam at opencsw.org
Sat Jun 5 11:44:59 CEST 2010
Hi Rupert,
Am 04.06.2010 um 07:52 schrieb rupert THURNER:
> On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 22:05, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
>> Hi Rupert,
>>
>> Am 30.05.2010 um 22:02 schrieb rupert THURNER:
>>> On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 20:35, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
>>>> Am 30.05.2010 um 12:57 schrieb rupert THURNER:
>>>>> could you please remove CSWbdb from the buildfarm? otherwise we would
>>>>> need to build something into the openldap recipe to not use it. and as
>>>>> i understood the goal is to recompile _without_ using files out of
>>>>> CSWbdb.
>>>>
>>>> Yes, but this should be not difficult. It should be sufficuent to
>>>> add the stuff from subversion I added recently to openldap, like
>>>> EXTRA_INC etc.
>>>
>>> what is the reason to leave a compatibility package on a buildserver?
>>
>> They are needed by the packages depending on it, especially Apache2.
>> AFAIK removing CSWbdb would make it impossible to compile current
>> apache modules, but I may be wrong here.
>>
>>>> Just let me know if you have trouble finding the right switches.
>>>> - and thanks for picking of OpenLDAP!
>>>
>>> you are not serious about this, aren't you?
>>>
>>> EXTRA_LIB_garversion-2.4.22 = $(prefix)/bdb48/lib
>>> EXTRA_INC_garversion-2.4.22 = $(prefix)/bdb48/include
>>>
>>> was something you added long time ago to openldap :)
>>
>> I thought so :) And you say it does not work? I would like to investigate
>> that if yes. I am not against removing CSWbdb, I would just like to know
>> why the switches don't work.
>
> did you have any chance to look into this?
Sorry, not yet, and I will have very little time next week also. For now
I am removing CSWbdbdevel and CSWbdb from the current* buildservers.
Best regards
-- Dago
More information about the buildfarm
mailing list