From dam at opencsw.org Fri Oct 1 10:24:32 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 10:24:32 +0200 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Fwd: current10s and others, c compiler for python development is missing In-Reply-To: References: <4C9A8A5B.6040207@kiilerich.com> <994862BA-8BAE-4C74-8F13-F117279CB8B3@opencsw.org> <1285424360-sup-4741@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> <60FA185E-A2A5-41F1-A743-821A342716FA@opencsw.org> Message-ID: Hi, Am 30.09.2010 um 21:54 schrieb Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski: > No dia 30 de Setembro de 2010 12:48, rupert THURNER > escreveu: >> uhm ... the below should read: >> "change the python based packages" of course. >> >> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 21:47, rupert THURNER >> wrote: >>> many thanks! the package gets now the error: >>> >>> CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWmercurial += missing-dependency|CSWlibpython26 > > This package hasn't been released. If you build on current9{s,x}, you > shouldn't get this message. The CSWlibpython26 was something I was > fiddling with lately, and I only put it into the experimental catalog, > without installing it anywhere. Yes. And this is also the reason why it is generally better to build on current* when possible. The status of the testing* machines may contain unreleased packages whose dependencies may break the installation. Best regards -- Dago From pfelecan at opencsw.org Tue Oct 5 19:43:05 2010 From: pfelecan at opencsw.org (Peter FELECAN) Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2010 19:43:05 +0200 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] cannot copy to newpkgs from login Message-ID: Trying to submit new packages I cannot authentify for www.opencsw.org pfelecan at login [login]:~ > scp out/tetex*.pkg.gz www.opencsw.org:/home/newpkgs Password: Password: Password: Permission denied (gssapi-keyex,gssapi-with-mic,publickey,keyboard-interactive). lost connection The submission method has changed or my public key was lost on the destination? TIA -- Peter From bonivart at opencsw.org Tue Oct 5 19:48:11 2010 From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart) Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 19:48:11 +0200 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] cannot copy to newpkgs from login In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 7:43 PM, Peter FELECAN wrote: > pfelecan at login [login]:~ > scp out/tetex*.pkg.gz www.opencsw.org:/home/newpkgs I think it's bender instead of www now. -- /peter From bonivart at opencsw.org Tue Oct 5 19:48:11 2010 From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart) Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 19:48:11 +0200 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] cannot copy to newpkgs from login In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 7:43 PM, Peter FELECAN wrote: > pfelecan at login [login]:~ > scp out/tetex*.pkg.gz www.opencsw.org:/home/newpkgs I think it's bender instead of www now. -- /peter From dam at opencsw.org Wed Oct 6 10:11:45 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 10:11:45 +0200 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] cannot copy to newpkgs from login In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Peter, Am 05.10.2010 um 19:48 schrieb Peter Bonivart: > On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 7:43 PM, Peter FELECAN > wrote: >> pfelecan at login [login]:~ > scp out/tetex*.pkg.gz www.opencsw.org:/ >> home/newpkgs > > I think it's bender instead of www now. As clarification: In the past we had bender == www, now www has been moved to another machine. So basically you always delivered to bender, but used a different name for it that no longer points to that machine. Best regards -- Dago From maciej at opencsw.org Sun Oct 10 14:27:28 2010 From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski) Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 05:27:28 -0700 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] pychecker on the the buildfarm Message-ID: Dear admins, Can you install pychecker on the buildfarm? Maciej From bwalton at opencsw.org Sun Oct 10 14:48:33 2010 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 08:48:33 -0400 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] pychecker on the the buildfarm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1286714891-sup-7052@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Excerpts from Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski's message of Sun Oct 10 08:27:28 -0400 2010: Hi Maciej, > Can you install pychecker on the buildfarm? Doing this now. -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 From maciej at opencsw.org Wed Oct 13 09:43:06 2010 From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski) Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 08:43:06 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Please install py_logilab_common on the buildfarm Message-ID: Thanks! From dam at opencsw.org Wed Oct 13 09:49:20 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 09:49:20 +0200 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Please install py_logilab_common on the buildfarm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Maciej, Am 13.10.2010 um 09:43 schrieb Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski: > Thanks! Doing this now. Best regards -- Dago From maciej at opencsw.org Thu Oct 14 00:43:31 2010 From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski) Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 23:43:31 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] scons on the buildfarm Message-ID: Can you install scons (CSWscons) on the buildfarm? From bwalton at opencsw.org Thu Oct 14 03:22:22 2010 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 21:22:22 -0400 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] scons on the buildfarm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1287019331-sup-6557@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Excerpts from Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski's message of Wed Oct 13 18:43:31 -0400 2010: > Can you install scons (CSWscons) on the buildfarm? In flight... Thanks -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 From maciej at opencsw.org Thu Oct 14 08:14:59 2010 From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski) Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 07:14:59 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] sudo on testing10x Message-ID: I tried sudo on testing10x and discovered I can't do it. Could you give me permissions to sudo? From dam at opencsw.org Thu Oct 14 08:44:29 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 08:44:29 +0200 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] sudo on testing10x In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Maciej, Am 14.10.2010 um 08:14 schrieb Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski: > I tried sudo on testing10x and discovered I can't do it. Could you > give me permissions to sudo? Done. Best regards -- Dago From maciej at opencsw.org Mon Oct 18 11:55:12 2010 From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski) Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 10:55:12 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Findutils database update Message-ID: The findutils database on current9s is 171 days old. Could you kick off gupdatedb on the buildfarm? From dam at opencsw.org Mon Oct 18 12:22:41 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 12:22:41 +0200 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Findutils database update In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <30164D6C-63FC-4A9D-B9FA-F4389E1C0C7B@opencsw.org> Hi Maciej, Am 18.10.2010 um 11:55 schrieb Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski: > The findutils database on current9s is 171 days old. Could you kick > off gupdatedb on the buildfarm? Sure, started on current9s taking the time. Best regards -- Dago From maciej at opencsw.org Tue Oct 19 01:32:16 2010 From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski) Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 00:32:16 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] CSWboostdevel on the buildfarm Message-ID: Kindly please install CSWboostdevel on the buildfarm. Thanks! From bwalton at opencsw.org Tue Oct 19 02:34:44 2010 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 20:34:44 -0400 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] CSWboostdevel on the buildfarm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1287448442-sup-4012@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Excerpts from Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski's message of Mon Oct 18 19:32:16 -0400 2010: > Kindly please install CSWboostdevel on the buildfarm. It was already there... Thanks -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 From maciej at opencsw.org Tue Oct 19 08:22:40 2010 From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski) Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 07:22:40 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] CSWboostdevel on the buildfarm In-Reply-To: <1287448442-sup-4012@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> References: <1287448442-sup-4012@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: No dia 19 de Outubro de 2010 01:34, Ben Walton escreveu: > Excerpts from Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski's message of Mon Oct 18 19:32:16 -0400 2010: >> Kindly please install CSWboostdevel on the buildfarm. > > It was already there... Perhaps I grepped pkginfo output for the wrong thing. Thanks! From cannedspam.cant at gmail.com Sat Oct 23 02:01:17 2010 From: cannedspam.cant at gmail.com (Jon Craig) Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 20:01:17 -0400 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Fwd: Maintainer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I'm resending this as I received no response to the first request. I suspect its caught in the buildfarm lists lint trap as I wasn't subscribed when I first sent it. Of course I didn't realize I needed to be subscribed as I simply clicked the "request buildfarm resources" on the contribute page. Please advise as to whether resources are available as I need to get going on some packages. I have resources but felt it might be easier (setup wise) to use a provided environment while I gain a better understanding of whats involved. Thanks, Jon Craig ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Jon Craig Date: Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 09:50 Subject: Maintainer To: buildfarm at opencsw.org I am new to the OpenCSW community and only recently discovered your excellent collection of packages and distribution system. ?I am promoting the use of OpenCSW at work to solve our open source needs in the Solaris environment. ?I currently need to build some additional Perl modules and wish to contribute my efforts back to the community. I have a great deal of unix admin experience but would only consider myself a novice developer (mostly compiling and installing applications). ?If there are examples of packaging perl modules that I could refer to that would be very handy tutorial. -- Jonathan Craig From dam at opencsw.org Sat Oct 23 11:56:06 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 11:56:06 +0200 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Fwd: Maintainer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <104F60C5-7526-4D3D-90D3-1E475471773A@opencsw.org> Hi Jon, nice to see you around again :-) (We worked together on SE Toolkit some time ago, btw I also made a package for SE Toolkit which you may want to co-maintain) Am 23.10.2010 um 02:01 schrieb Jon Craig: > I'm resending this as I received no response to the first request. I > suspect its caught in the buildfarm lists lint trap as I wasn't > subscribed when I first sent it. Of course I didn't realize I needed > to be subscribed as I simply clicked the "request buildfarm resources" > on the contribute page. I think it already is open for posting by anybody. Ihsan: Is buildfarm@ moderated or subscribers only? > Please advise as to whether resources are > available as I need to get going on some packages. I have resources > but felt it might be easier (setup wise) to use a provided environment > while I gain a better understanding of whats involved. Good. > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Jon Craig > Date: Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 09:50 > Subject: Maintainer > To: buildfarm at opencsw.org > > I am new to the OpenCSW community and only recently discovered your > excellent collection of packages and distribution system. I am > promoting the use of OpenCSW at work to solve our open source needs in > the Solaris environment. I currently need to build some additional > Perl modules and wish to contribute my efforts back to the community. > I have a great deal of unix admin experience but would only consider > myself a novice developer (mostly compiling and installing > applications). If there are examples of packaging perl modules that I > could refer to that would be very handy tutorial. This sounds like you want to join the project and maintain some Perl modules, excellent! We will need one email sent from your work email address for identity verification (I already know you, but these are the project rules...) and your ssh public key. Is your SF username still jonbcraig ? The Perl modulare are built with "GAR", please see http://gar.opencsw.org for an introduction. A built recipe is usually quite short, e.g. http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/gar/browser/csw/mgar/pkg/cpan/Algorithm-Diff/trunk/Makefile The heavy lifting is all done in the GAR packaging framework. Best regards -- Dago From kester at opencsw.org Wed Oct 27 14:00:05 2010 From: kester at opencsw.org (Kester Habermann) Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 14:00:05 +0200 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Please install CSWpy-django Message-ID: <20101027120005.GB10704@bender.opencsw.org> Hi, I'm getting CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWpy-django-auth-ldap += unidentified-dependency|CSWpy-django could you please install CSWpy-django on current9s? Thank you! Best Regards Kester From bwalton at opencsw.org Wed Oct 27 14:16:48 2010 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 08:16:48 -0400 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Please install CSWpy-django In-Reply-To: <20101027120005.GB10704@bender.opencsw.org> References: <20101027120005.GB10704@bender.opencsw.org> Message-ID: <1288181749-sup-695@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Excerpts from Kester Habermann's message of Wed Oct 27 08:00:05 -0400 2010: Hi Kester, > could you please install CSWpy-django on current9s? We try to keep the packages the same on all build machines, so this action will be done on each box. The exception to this 'rule' is that on the testing* boxes, we add/remove in a more ad-hoc fashion. I'm initiating this install now... Thanks -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 From kester at opencsw.org Wed Oct 27 14:29:53 2010 From: kester at opencsw.org (Kester Habermann) Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 14:29:53 +0200 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Please install CSWpy-django In-Reply-To: <1288181749-sup-695@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> References: <20101027120005.GB10704@bender.opencsw.org> <1288181749-sup-695@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: <20101027122953.GA12594@bender.opencsw.org> Hi Ben, On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 08:16:48AM -0400, Ben Walton wrote: > We try to keep the packages the same on all build machines, so this > action will be done on each box. The exception to this 'rule' is that > on the testing* boxes, we add/remove in a more ad-hoc fashion. That is fine with me, thanks! Kester