From maciej at opencsw.org Sat Oct 1 17:04:52 2011 From: maciej at opencsw.org (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_=28Matchek=29_Blizi=C5=84ski?=) Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2011 16:04:52 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] proftpd build problem In-Reply-To: <201110010108.34930.ai@vsu.ru> References: <201109301937.27994.ai@vsu.ru> <990CF0B0-0562-41F7-AE65-2E3D68D4ED8F@opencsw.org> <201110010108.34930.ai@vsu.ru> Message-ID: 2011/9/30 Andy Igoshin : > now i do not see mysql files on unstable* in > > /opt/csw/lib/64 and /opt/csw/include I just pushed new MySQL packages. Dago, could you install CSWmysql-dev on the buildfarm? From dam at opencsw.org Sat Oct 1 21:50:52 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2011 21:50:52 +0200 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] proftpd build problem In-Reply-To: References: <201109301937.27994.ai@vsu.ru> <990CF0B0-0562-41F7-AE65-2E3D68D4ED8F@opencsw.org> <201110010108.34930.ai@vsu.ru> Message-ID: Hi, Am 01.10.2011 um 17:04 schrieb Maciej (Matchek) Blizi?ski: > 2011/9/30 Andy Igoshin : >> now i do not see mysql files on unstable* in >> >> /opt/csw/lib/64 and /opt/csw/include > > I just pushed new MySQL packages. Dago, could you install > CSWmysql-dev on the buildfarm? Done. Andy: Would you mind giving it a new try? Sorry for the inconvenience -- Dago -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896 From dam at opencsw.org Mon Oct 3 18:55:08 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2011 18:55:08 +0200 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Nmap access to Solaris build farm In-Reply-To: References: <20110928215705.GA21307@debian.bamsoftware.com> <20110928220502.GB21307@debian.bamsoftware.com> <13DFA436-B696-42F9-9A52-F79BB09D389D@opencsw.org> <20110929142455.GA32530@debian.bamsoftware.com> <5C91E747-D63B-4A56-BEF5-EBEB63468348@opencsw.org> Message-ID: Hi David, Am 30.09.2011 um 17:39 schrieb Dagobert Michelsen: > Am 29.09.2011 um 17:46 schrieb Dagobert Michelsen: >> Am 29.09.2011 um 16:24 schrieb David Fifield: >>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:42:36AM +0200, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: >>>> Am 29.09.2011 um 00:05 schrieb David Fifield: >>>>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 02:57:05PM -0700, David Fifield wrote: >>>>>> In http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/2011/q3/646, you offered to let us have >>>>>> access to the Solaris build farm for the purpose of testing Nmap. We'd >>>>>> like to accept the offer. >>>>>> >>>>>> I've seen the page at >>>>>> http://www.opencsw.org/extend-it/contribute-packages/build-standards/build-machines/. >>>>>> Here is an SSH public key. If you need a user name, "nmap" will do. Do >>>>>> you need anything else? >>>>> >>>>> I forgot to add: does build farm access include root access? Most >>>>> non-trivial testing of Nmap requires access to raw sockets. >>>> >>>> Not by default. What do you need? Will an internal zone without >>>> connection to the internet (only via the login server) suffice? We are >>>> a bit short on official IP adresses, but if you need one I can set up >>>> a special zone with root access just for nmap and a dedicated network >>>> interface. >>> >>> It doesn't necessarily have to have raw sockets to the Internet; just >>> being able to scan internal IPs would be okay. >>> >>> We had trouble with another Solaris zone because it didn't have the >>> /dev/ip device. I found this documentation: >>> >>> http://docs.huihoo.com/opensolaris/solaris-containers-resource-management-and-solaris-zones/html/p87.html >>> In general, all applications can run in a non-global zone. >>> However, the following types of applications might not be >>> suitable for this environment: >>> * The few applications dependent upon certain devices that do >>> not exist in a non-global zone, such as /dev/kmem or /dev/ip. >>> >>> I think, in short, that we need the DLPI interface; i.e., the "snoop" >>> command would have to work. From what I read, that would expose even >>> traffic destined to other zones, so a dedicated network interface is a >>> good idea if that's easy to do. >> >> A zone with exclusive interface may suffice, I'll set this up tomorrow. >> If that is not enough I can generate a vSphere VM which definitely >> fits your requirements, but has also a larger footprint in terms of >> patching etc. so I would go with a zone first. >> >> I'll keep you informed. > > I made a new zone Solaris 10 Sparc with exclusive interface vnet2: > david at login [login]:~ > ssh root at nmap10s > > It is not really separated from the other buildfarm traffic, so please > do not fubar the installation. The zone still has some minor issues which > however should not disturb initial testing. Please let me know if you > see anything strange. Did you have time to look into the zone? Does it fit your needs or do you need more? If this zone is not sufficient the next thing would a sepaarate Solaris x86 VM. Best regards -- Dago From david at bamsoftware.com Mon Oct 3 20:34:45 2011 From: david at bamsoftware.com (David Fifield) Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2011 11:34:45 -0700 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Nmap access to Solaris build farm In-Reply-To: References: <20110928215705.GA21307@debian.bamsoftware.com> <20110928220502.GB21307@debian.bamsoftware.com> <13DFA436-B696-42F9-9A52-F79BB09D389D@opencsw.org> <20110929142455.GA32530@debian.bamsoftware.com> <5C91E747-D63B-4A56-BEF5-EBEB63468348@opencsw.org> Message-ID: <20111003183445.GU8333@ignominy.bamsoftware.com> On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 06:55:08PM +0200, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > Hi David, > > Did you have time to look into the zone? Does it fit your needs or do you need > more? If this zone is not sufficient the next thing would a sepaarate Solaris x86 VM. I did try a build and it looks like it will be suitable. I ran into problems with the xlc compiler and didn't yet have time to work through them. David Fifield From maciej at opencsw.org Thu Oct 6 23:57:50 2011 From: maciej at opencsw.org (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_=28Matchek=29_Blizi=C5=84ski?=) Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2011 22:57:50 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] cmake on the buildfarm Message-ID: Please install cmake on the buildfarm, mysql-5.5 uses it. From bwalton at opencsw.org Fri Oct 7 01:23:21 2011 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2011 19:23:21 -0400 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] cmake on the buildfarm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1317943390-sup-8301@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Excerpts from Maciej (Matchek) Blizi?ski's message of Thu Oct 06 17:57:50 -0400 2011: > Please install cmake on the buildfarm, mysql-5.5 uses it. Installing now. Thanks -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 From emarossini at email.it Tue Oct 11 23:29:47 2011 From: emarossini at email.it (Informazioni Finanziamenti) Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 23:29:47 +0200 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Finanziamenti. Message-ID: <20111011212943.CCFFFC08C@smtp-out08.email.it> Speciale Prestiti. Da oggi ? pi? semplice accedere a un finanziamento on-line. Procedura semplici e risposte veloci, possibilit? di avere un nuovo finanziamento e consolidare dei prestiti a breve termine. Speciale Prestiti ? a vostra disposizione per tutte le informazioni e chiarimenti sui finanziamenti proposti. Richiedi on-line il tuo finanziamento Per non ricevere in futuro informazioni da speciale prestiti clicca qui. -- Caselle da 1GB, trasmetti allegati fino a 3GB e in piu' IMAP, POP3 e SMTP autenticato? GRATIS solo con Email.it http://www.email.it/f Sponsor: Sviluppa il tuo business e trova nuovi clienti con il Direct Email Marketing di Email.it, la strategia vincente per rafforzare la notorieta'della tua impresa! Clicca qui: http://adv.email.it/cgi-bin/foclick.cgi?mid=11845&d=11-10 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rupert at opencsw.org Mon Oct 17 07:28:30 2011 From: rupert at opencsw.org (rupert THURNER) Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 07:28:30 +0200 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Fwd: Mercurial 2.0 call for testing In-Reply-To: <4E9B5883.4040005@kiilerich.com> References: <1318711862.4708.54.camel@calx> <6f0c13be-0485-455e-893f-8753b2004475@b41g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> <4E9B5883.4040005@kiilerich.com> Message-ID: hi, as i understood cvs-upload automatically updates unstable9s, unstable10s. end of last week i compiled svn-1.7.0 - and it is not yet there? rupert ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Mads Kiilerich Date: Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 00:19 Subject: Re: Mercurial 2.0 call for testing To: "rupert.thurner" Cc: mercurial at selenic.com rupert.thurner wrote, On 10/16/2011 09:34 PM: > > for solaris the folloing unit tests fail: > > Failed test-highlight.t: output changed, see http://pastebin.com/RgQbkaka That seems to be an internal problem in the pygments installation: + ? ?File "/opt/csw/lib/python/site-packages/pkg_resources.py", line 565, in resolve + ? ? ?raise DistributionNotFound(req) ?# XXX put more info here + ?DistributionNotFound: MarkupSafe>=0.9.2 It works fine on current9x. > Failed test-progress.t: output changed, see http://pastebin.com/4K8NaEHH Strange. Random failures on unstable9x, apparently related to the shell and pipings and redirects and when the pipes are closed. No problems on current9x and current10x. > Failed test-convert-svn-sink.t: output changed, see http://pastebin.com/jAH3Ewgw "svn exited with status 256" - and it gives no indication what the problem could be. That must be some kind of svn issue. I guess you are using svn 1.7.0-rc3. Can you try to update to the real 1.7.0? It is very likely that they have made non backward compatible changes and that Mercurial doesn't support it (yet) (at least not in the test suite). > Failed test-subrepo-svn.t: output changed and returned error code 1, > see http://pastebin.com/Jmwd9TXQ Yes, I had a workaround for that in my queue - it is in crew now. Yet another solaris bug. /Mads From skayser at opencsw.org Mon Oct 17 09:09:46 2011 From: skayser at opencsw.org (Sebastian Kayser) Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 09:09:46 +0200 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Fwd: Mercurial 2.0 call for testing In-Reply-To: References: <1318711862.4708.54.camel@calx> <6f0c13be-0485-455e-893f-8753b2004475@b41g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> <4E9B5883.4040005@kiilerich.com> Message-ID: <20111017070946.GS26160@sebastiankayser.de> * rupert THURNER wrote: > hi, as i understood cvs-upload automatically updates unstable9s, > unstable10s. end of last week i compiled svn-1.7.0 - and it is not yet > there? The update bit isn't automated (yet?), but carried out manually every now and then. Last update happened last Tuesday. skayser @ unstable9x ~$ gstat -c %y /var/sadm/pkg/ 2011-10-11 18:27:57.551272000 +0200 If you need a near-time package installation, an email to this list is usually sufficient. Ben or Dago will take care of it then. Sebastian From dam at opencsw.org Mon Oct 17 09:41:01 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 09:41:01 +0200 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Fwd: Mercurial 2.0 call for testing In-Reply-To: <20111017070946.GS26160@sebastiankayser.de> References: <1318711862.4708.54.camel@calx> <6f0c13be-0485-455e-893f-8753b2004475@b41g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> <4E9B5883.4040005@kiilerich.com> <20111017070946.GS26160@sebastiankayser.de> Message-ID: Hi, Am 17.10.2011 um 09:09 schrieb Sebastian Kayser: > * rupert THURNER wrote: >> hi, as i understood cvs-upload automatically updates unstable9s, >> unstable10s. end of last week i compiled svn-1.7.0 - and it is not yet >> there? > > The update bit isn't automated (yet?), but carried out manually every > now and then. Last update happened last Tuesday. > > skayser @ unstable9x ~$ gstat -c %y /var/sadm/pkg/ > 2011-10-11 18:27:57.551272000 +0200 > > If you need a near-time package installation, an email to this list is > usually sufficient. Ben or Dago will take care of it then. Yes. Updating unstable/ now. Best regards -- Dago -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896 From maciej at opencsw.org Wed Oct 19 12:20:25 2011 From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski) Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 11:20:25 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Dev packages on current* Message-ID: Please install these on current* hosts: libgmp_dev libmpfr_dev libppl_dev cloog_dev This is required for gcc4 work. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dam at opencsw.org Wed Oct 19 13:19:30 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 13:19:30 +0200 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Dev packages on current* In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <333E3ADD-F757-48F6-96A5-213AA4AB1442@opencsw.org> Hi, Am 19.10.2011 um 12:20 schrieb Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski: > Please install these on current* hosts: > > libgmp_dev > libmpfr_dev > libppl_dev > cloog_dev > > This is required for gcc4 work. Doing this now on current*. Best regards -- Dago -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896 From maciej at opencsw.org Wed Oct 19 16:59:30 2011 From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski) Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 15:59:30 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] More package cleanup is necessary on current* hosts Message-ID: Please do the following on the current* hosts: - point pkgutil at the dublin catalog, not unstable - please remove and reinstall CSWgcc4corert CSWgcc4g++rt CSWlibstdc++6 CSWlibgcc-s1, making sure that versions from the dublin catalog are installed - in general any packages from unstable should be removed in reverted to the versions from dublin Maciej -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dam at opencsw.org Wed Oct 19 17:28:19 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 17:28:19 +0200 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] More package cleanup is necessary on current* hosts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <00F5BDD9-227D-42FE-8679-98B09B586EAC@opencsw.org> Hi Maciej, Am 19.10.2011 um 16:59 schrieb Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski: > Please do the following on the current* hosts: > > - point pkgutil at the dublin catalog, not unstable > - please remove and reinstall CSWgcc4corert CSWgcc4g++rt CSWlibstdc++6 CSWlibgcc-s1, making sure that versions from the dublin catalog are installed > - in general any packages from unstable should be removed in reverted to the versions from dublin Doing this now. Best regards -- Dago -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896 From maciej at opencsw.org Wed Oct 19 18:26:22 2011 From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski) Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 17:26:22 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] More package cleanup is necessary on current* hosts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: No dia 19 de Outubro de 2011 15:59, Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski escreveu: > Please do the following on the current* hosts: > - point pkgutil at the dublin catalog, not unstable > - please remove and reinstall CSWgcc4corert CSWgcc4g++rt CSWlibstdc++6 > CSWlibgcc-s1, making sure that versions from the dublin catalog are > installed > - in general any packages from unstable should be removed in reverted to the > versions from dublin Two things I noticed are missing on current9s: /opt/csw/bin/bash /opt/csw/bin/gas Maciej From jh at baltic-online.de Wed Oct 19 19:11:07 2011 From: jh at baltic-online.de (Jan Holzhueter) Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 19:11:07 +0200 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] More package cleanup is necessary on current* hosts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4E9F04AB.4020407@baltic-online.de> Hi, I did fix bash and gas but I would guess Dago was not done when he left :) Maybe he can look into what is still missing. Greetings Jan Am 19.10.11 18:26, schrieb Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski: > No dia 19 de Outubro de 2011 15:59, Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski > escreveu: >> Please do the following on the current* hosts: >> - point pkgutil at the dublin catalog, not unstable >> - please remove and reinstall CSWgcc4corert CSWgcc4g++rt CSWlibstdc++6 >> CSWlibgcc-s1, making sure that versions from the dublin catalog are >> installed >> - in general any packages from unstable should be removed in reverted to the >> versions from dublin > > Two things I noticed are missing on current9s: > > /opt/csw/bin/bash > /opt/csw/bin/gas > > Maciej > _______________________________________________ > buildfarm mailing list > buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/buildfarm From maciej at opencsw.org Thu Oct 20 09:51:11 2011 From: maciej at opencsw.org (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_=28Matchek=29_Blizi=C5=84ski?=) Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 08:51:11 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] ssh: connect to host current9x port 22: Connection refused Message-ID: Hello, maciej at login [login]:~ > ssh current9x ssh: connect to host current9x port 22: Connection refused Can you bring sshd on current9x back up? Maciej From maciej at opencsw.org Thu Oct 20 10:00:41 2011 From: maciej at opencsw.org (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_=28Matchek=29_Blizi=C5=84ski?=) Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 09:00:41 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] More library issues on current* Message-ID: Unfortunately, PPL packages built on unstable don't work on current. Please remove: - libppl_dev - libppl9 - libppl_c4 - libpwl5 The CSWlibgnugetopt package is not installed correctly. It should provide /opt/csw/lib/libgnugetopt.so, but /opt/csw/lib/libgnugetopt.so is missing. - please reinstall libgnugetopt Maciej From jh at baltic-online.de Thu Oct 20 10:34:22 2011 From: jh at baltic-online.de (Jan Holzhueter) Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 10:34:22 +0200 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] ssh: connect to host current9x port 22: Connection refused In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4E9FDD0E.90703@baltic-online.de> Hi, I did reboot the system do no what happened. Am 20.10.11 09:51, schrieb Maciej (Matchek) Blizi?ski: > Hello, > > maciej at login [login]:~ > ssh current9x > ssh: connect to host current9x port 22: Connection refused > > Can you bring sshd on current9x back up? > > Maciej > _______________________________________________ > buildfarm mailing list > buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/buildfarm From dam at opencsw.org Thu Oct 20 11:04:00 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 11:04:00 +0200 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] ssh: connect to host current9x port 22: Connection refused In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <11FABD69-CBC3-4300-8529-C138958C70A7@opencsw.org> Hi Maciej, Am 20.10.2011 um 09:51 schrieb Maciej (Matchek) Blizi?ski: > maciej at login [login]:~ > ssh current9x > ssh: connect to host current9x port 22: Connection refused > > Can you bring sshd on current9x back up? Works for me, maybe holzi has restarted that already. Best regards -- Dago From dam at opencsw.org Thu Oct 20 11:10:19 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 11:10:19 +0200 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] More library issues on current* In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <5C60DFF5-AAE7-4FC0-8554-EC87D9A2CA38@opencsw.org> Hi Maciej, Am 20.10.2011 um 10:00 schrieb Maciej (Matchek) Blizi?ski: > Unfortunately, PPL packages built on unstable don't work on current. > > Please remove: > - libppl_dev > - libppl9 > - libppl_c4 > - libpwl5 Done. > The CSWlibgnugetopt package is not installed correctly. It should > provide /opt/csw/lib/libgnugetopt.so, but /opt/csw/lib/libgnugetopt.so > is missing. > > - please reinstall libgnugetopt This is in CSWlibgnugetopt-dev, so I installed that one. Best regards -- Dago From sales3 at printingcote.com Mon Oct 24 15:18:43 2011 From: sales3 at printingcote.com (admin) Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 21:18:43 +0800 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] =?utf-8?q?A_letter_from_H=26C=E2=80=94a_competiti?= =?utf-8?q?ve_printer?= Message-ID: <20111025150419.99541458@gz-smtp2.gz263xmail.com> %{CURRENT_MAILCONTENT} %{CURRENT_CURRTIME} Subscribe This Mail UnSubscribe This Mail -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: