From buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org  Sat Jan  2 15:34:13 2016
From: buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen via buildfarm)
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2016 15:34:13 +0100
Subject: login to build farm not possible
In-Reply-To: <CAJs9aZ-d5rkGV38QLrxQuw8rHNx5NqJtoNF832FeN38OxuNmuA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJs9aZ-d5rkGV38QLrxQuw8rHNx5NqJtoNF832FeN38OxuNmuA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <BFD943D7-CFE0-4FB9-A729-718ACBF0895D@opencsw.org>

Hi Rupert,

> Am 30.12.2015 um 21:59 schrieb rupert THURNER via buildfarm <buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org>:
> 
> hi,
> 
> i cannot login any more because of
> 
> rt at rt:~$ ssh rupert at login.opencsw.org
> rupert at login.opencsw.org's password:
> Last login: Tue Dec 29 04:19:32 2015 from adsl-84-227-248-103.adslplus.ch
> Sun Microsystems Inc.   SunOS 5.10      Generic January 2005
> 
> Please make sure to read /etc/SETUP for general info.
> 
> Agent pid 17493
> There is a screen on:
>        11490.pts-48.login      (Dead ???)
> Remove dead screens with 'screen -wipe'.
> There is no screen to be attached.
> Connection to login.opencsw.org closed.
> rt at rt:~$
> 
> could you please have an eye on this, i am not sure i could do
> something on the ssh client side to make the login work again.

Your bash setup looks quite elaborate, I deactivated the .bashrc for now
so you can login again:
  mv .bashrc .bashrc-deactivated


Best regards

  ? Dago

--
"You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 203 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/buildfarm/attachments/20160102/a1569ac6/attachment.asc>

From buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org  Sat Jan  2 15:53:31 2016
From: buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org (Ben Walton via buildfarm)
Date: Sat, 02 Jan 2016 14:53:31 +0000
Subject: login to build farm not possible
In-Reply-To: <BFD943D7-CFE0-4FB9-A729-718ACBF0895D@opencsw.org>
References: <CAJs9aZ-d5rkGV38QLrxQuw8rHNx5NqJtoNF832FeN38OxuNmuA@mail.gmail.com>
	<BFD943D7-CFE0-4FB9-A729-718ACBF0895D@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <CAP30j16T5GFBOmU3Hs9rZP8w9zWJ_fpfrWWrXjxw8ZWoujn_Fg@mail.gmail.com>

Iirc, you grabbed a copy of my bash configuration a long time ago. If
that's true, you can bypass the screen setup by: ssh user at host touch
.noscreen

Then a regular login will let you cleanup failed screen sessions, etc.

Fwiw, I've discarded must of the complexity in that bash configuration now
while still retaining the useful bits. (I'm also doing this in zsh instead
of bash).

Thanks
-Ben

On Sat, Jan 2, 2016, 2:34 PM Dagobert Michelsen via buildfarm <
buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org> wrote:

> Hi Rupert,
>
> > Am 30.12.2015 um 21:59 schrieb rupert THURNER via buildfarm <
> buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org>:
> >
> > hi,
> >
> > i cannot login any more because of
> >
> > rt at rt:~$ ssh rupert at login.opencsw.org
> > rupert at login.opencsw.org's password:
> > Last login: Tue Dec 29 04:19:32 2015 from
> adsl-84-227-248-103.adslplus.ch
> > Sun Microsystems Inc.   SunOS 5.10      Generic January 2005
> >
> > Please make sure to read /etc/SETUP for general info.
> >
> > Agent pid 17493
> > There is a screen on:
> >        11490.pts-48.login      (Dead ???)
> > Remove dead screens with 'screen -wipe'.
> > There is no screen to be attached.
> > Connection to login.opencsw.org closed.
> > rt at rt:~$
> >
> > could you please have an eye on this, i am not sure i could do
> > something on the ssh client side to make the login work again.
>
> Your bash setup looks quite elaborate, I deactivated the .bashrc for now
> so you can login again:
>   mv .bashrc .bashrc-deactivated
>
>
> Best regards
>
>   ? Dago
>
> --
> "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting
> to do something,
> and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd
> #896
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/buildfarm/attachments/20160102/e2a572e6/attachment-0001.html>

From buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org  Mon Jan  4 10:18:51 2016
From: buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen via buildfarm)
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 10:18:51 +0100
Subject: install new gnustep-make packages
In-Reply-To: <56795668.7010305@opencsw.org>
References: <56795668.7010305@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <DD7D70DE-F9FB-4AF4-B009-582D06C23D73@opencsw.org>

Hi Riccardo,

Am 22.12.2015 um 14:55 schrieb Riccardo Mottola via buildfarm <buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org>:
> I forgot to write to the proper list.
> 
> I'd need these packages installed on 9s-9x-10s-10x
> 
> gnustep_make-2.6.7,REV=2015.12.20-SunOS5.10-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> gnustep_make-2.6.7,REV=2015.12.20-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> gnustep_make-2.6.7,REV=2015.12.20-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> gnustep_make-2.6.7,REV=2015.12.20-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

Sorry for the delay, was on prolonged christmas vacation.
Done now.


Best regards

  ? Dago

PS: Happy new year!!

--
"You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 203 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/buildfarm/attachments/20160104/d2aae995/attachment.asc>

From buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org  Tue Jan  5 18:41:54 2016
From: buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org (Riccardo Mottola via buildfarm)
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 18:41:54 +0100
Subject: install new gnustep-make packages
In-Reply-To: <DD7D70DE-F9FB-4AF4-B009-582D06C23D73@opencsw.org>
References: <56795668.7010305@opencsw.org>
	<DD7D70DE-F9FB-4AF4-B009-582D06C23D73@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <568C0062.3080900@opencsw.org>

Hi,


Dagobert Michelsen wrote:
> Hi Riccardo,
>
> Am 22.12.2015 um 14:55 schrieb Riccardo Mottola via buildfarm<buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org>:
>> >I forgot to write to the proper list.
>> >
>> >I'd need these packages installed on 9s-9x-10s-10x
>> >
>> >gnustep_make-2.6.7,REV=2015.12.20-SunOS5.10-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>> >gnustep_make-2.6.7,REV=2015.12.20-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>> >gnustep_make-2.6.7,REV=2015.12.20-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>> >gnustep_make-2.6.7,REV=2015.12.20-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> Sorry for the delay, was on prolonged christmas vacation.
> Done now.

oh, I thought you forgot about it. I saw commits flowing...
No problem!

happy new year to you too!!!


With the new makefiles, gnussteo-base compiled and uploaded fine! Would 
you mind installing the gnustep_base packages for all 4 combinations? 
Just uploaded them.

Riccardo



From buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org  Wed Jan  6 10:04:25 2016
From: buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen via buildfarm)
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 10:04:25 +0100
Subject: install new gnustep-make packages
In-Reply-To: <568C0062.3080900@opencsw.org>
References: <56795668.7010305@opencsw.org>
	<DD7D70DE-F9FB-4AF4-B009-582D06C23D73@opencsw.org>
	<568C0062.3080900@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <9F051E90-B6B9-4189-A757-DD8C4B5DCDC3@opencsw.org>

Hi Riccardo,

Am 05.01.2016 um 18:41 schrieb Riccardo Mottola <rmottola at opencsw.org>:
> Dagobert Michelsen wrote:
>> Am 22.12.2015 um 14:55 schrieb Riccardo Mottola via buildfarm<buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org>:
>>> >I forgot to write to the proper list.
>>> >
>>> >I'd need these packages installed on 9s-9x-10s-10x
>>> >
>>> >gnustep_make-2.6.7,REV=2015.12.20-SunOS5.10-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>>> >gnustep_make-2.6.7,REV=2015.12.20-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>>> >gnustep_make-2.6.7,REV=2015.12.20-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>>> >gnustep_make-2.6.7,REV=2015.12.20-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>> Sorry for the delay, was on prolonged christmas vacation.
>> Done now.
> 
> oh, I thought you forgot about it. I saw commits flowing...
> No problem!

In fact I did :-( But remembered! If you have the impression that I forgot
please ping me again, days are just packed lately. Sometimes I read the email
but can?t do it right now and then these things happen.

> With the new makefiles, gnussteo-base compiled and uploaded fine! Would you mind installing the gnustep_base packages for all 4 combinations? Just uploaded them.

Done.


Best regards

  - Dago

--
"You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 203 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/buildfarm/attachments/20160106/0368f01d/attachment.asc>

From buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org  Tue Jan 12 12:41:52 2016
From: buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org (Riccardo Mottola via buildfarm)
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 12:41:52 +0100
Subject: new aspell packages for sol 9&10
Message-ID: <5694E680.6020106@opencsw.org>

Hello,

please install on solaris 9 and if wished (no real changes) update on 
solaris 10/11

libaspell15-0.60.6.1,REV=2016.01.08-SunOS5.10-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
libaspell15-0.60.6.1,REV=2016.01.08-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
libaspell15-0.60.6.1,REV=2016.01.08-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
libaspell15-0.60.6.1,REV=2016.01.08-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
libaspell_dev-0.60.6.1,REV=2016.01.08-SunOS5.10-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
libaspell_dev-0.60.6.1,REV=2016.01.08-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
libaspell_dev-0.60.6.1,REV=2016.01.08-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
libaspell_dev-0.60.6.1,REV=2016.01.08-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz


Thank you,
Riccardo

From buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org  Tue Jan 12 14:53:43 2016
From: buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen via buildfarm)
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 14:53:43 +0100
Subject: new aspell packages for sol 9&10
In-Reply-To: <5694E680.6020106@opencsw.org>
References: <5694E680.6020106@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <8F99783D-25AC-4E29-A59A-B48026436964@opencsw.org>

Hi Riccardo,

Am 12.01.2016 um 12:41 schrieb Riccardo Mottola via buildfarm <buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org>:
> please install on solaris 9 and if wished (no real changes) update on solaris 10/11
> 
> libaspell15-0.60.6.1,REV=2016.01.08-SunOS5.10-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> libaspell15-0.60.6.1,REV=2016.01.08-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> libaspell15-0.60.6.1,REV=2016.01.08-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> libaspell15-0.60.6.1,REV=2016.01.08-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> libaspell_dev-0.60.6.1,REV=2016.01.08-SunOS5.10-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> libaspell_dev-0.60.6.1,REV=2016.01.08-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> libaspell_dev-0.60.6.1,REV=2016.01.08-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> libaspell_dev-0.60.6.1,REV=2016.01.08-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

They are not there yet, did you receive the email about the catalog change?
Please send requests for installation only after you received the email because
otherwise I will try, fail and need to track the issue (which I probably can?t
due to high workload).


Best regards

  ? Dago

--
"You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 203 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/buildfarm/attachments/20160112/50c5b1d4/attachment.asc>

From buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org  Wed Jan 13 09:06:26 2016
From: buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen via buildfarm)
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 09:06:26 +0100
Subject: new aspell packages for sol 9&10
In-Reply-To: <8F99783D-25AC-4E29-A59A-B48026436964@opencsw.org>
References: <5694E680.6020106@opencsw.org>
	<8F99783D-25AC-4E29-A59A-B48026436964@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <10283B25-08DF-4E11-B736-BD677547E205@opencsw.org>

Hi Riccardo,

> Am 12.01.2016 um 14:53 schrieb Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org>:
> 
> Hi Riccardo,
> 
> Am 12.01.2016 um 12:41 schrieb Riccardo Mottola via buildfarm <buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org>:
>> please install on solaris 9 and if wished (no real changes) update on solaris 10/11
>> 
>> libaspell15-0.60.6.1,REV=2016.01.08-SunOS5.10-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>> libaspell15-0.60.6.1,REV=2016.01.08-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>> libaspell15-0.60.6.1,REV=2016.01.08-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>> libaspell15-0.60.6.1,REV=2016.01.08-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>> libaspell_dev-0.60.6.1,REV=2016.01.08-SunOS5.10-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>> libaspell_dev-0.60.6.1,REV=2016.01.08-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>> libaspell_dev-0.60.6.1,REV=2016.01.08-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>> libaspell_dev-0.60.6.1,REV=2016.01.08-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> 
> They are not there yet, did you receive the email about the catalog change?
> Please send requests for installation only after you received the email because
> otherwise I will try, fail and need to track the issue (which I probably can?t
> due to high workload).

Still not there, are you sure you uploaded them?


Best regards

  ? Dago

--
"You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 203 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/buildfarm/attachments/20160113/99181254/attachment.asc>

From buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org  Wed Jan 13 09:41:14 2016
From: buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org (Riccardo Mottola via buildfarm)
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 09:41:14 +0100
Subject: new aspell packages for sol 9&10
In-Reply-To: <10283B25-08DF-4E11-B736-BD677547E205@opencsw.org>
References: <5694E680.6020106@opencsw.org>
	<8F99783D-25AC-4E29-A59A-B48026436964@opencsw.org>
	<10283B25-08DF-4E11-B736-BD677547E205@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <56960DAA.7030504@opencsw.org>

Hi Dago,



Dagobert Michelsen wrote:
>> Am 12.01.2016 um 12:41 schrieb Riccardo Mottola via buildfarm<buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org>:
>>> >>please install on solaris 9 and if wished (no real changes) update on solaris 10/11
>>> >>
>>> >>libaspell15-0.60.6.1,REV=2016.01.08-SunOS5.10-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>>> >>libaspell15-0.60.6.1,REV=2016.01.08-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>>> >>libaspell15-0.60.6.1,REV=2016.01.08-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>>> >>libaspell15-0.60.6.1,REV=2016.01.08-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>>> >>libaspell_dev-0.60.6.1,REV=2016.01.08-SunOS5.10-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>>> >>libaspell_dev-0.60.6.1,REV=2016.01.08-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>>> >>libaspell_dev-0.60.6.1,REV=2016.01.08-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>>> >>libaspell_dev-0.60.6.1,REV=2016.01.08-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>> >
>> >They are not there yet, did you receive the email about the catalog change?
>> >Please send requests for installation only after you received the email because
>> >otherwise I will try, fail and need to track the issue (which I probably can?t
>> >due to high workload).
> Still not there, are you sure you uploaded them?
>

no, as I wrote in the other thread, I got some errors. Sorry. I did not 
check the console and yes, indeed, I did not get the mail.

Next time I wait for it before sending any request. Best to wait for the 
"loop" to close instead of just checking things on the conosle output.

Riccardo

From buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org  Wed Jan 13 12:43:21 2016
From: buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org (Riccardo Mottola via buildfarm)
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 12:43:21 +0100
Subject: new aspell packages for sol 9&10
In-Reply-To: <10283B25-08DF-4E11-B736-BD677547E205@opencsw.org>
References: <5694E680.6020106@opencsw.org>
	<8F99783D-25AC-4E29-A59A-B48026436964@opencsw.org>
	<10283B25-08DF-4E11-B736-BD677547E205@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <56963859.9090804@opencsw.org>

Hi,

Dagobert Michelsen wrote:
> Still not there, are you sure you uploaded them?

this time it is for real.. and it worked.  Correctly I have "taken over" 
the newer one, and added the solaris 9 ones, which are new.

Riccardo

New packages:
* libaspell_dev-0.60.6.1,REV=2016.01.08-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
   In catalogs:
   - unstable: i386 (5.9)

* libaspell15-0.60.6.1,REV=2016.01.08-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
   In catalogs:
   - unstable: sparc (5.9)

* libaspell_dev-0.60.6.1,REV=2016.01.08-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
   In catalogs:
   - unstable: sparc (5.9)

* libaspell15-0.60.6.1,REV=2016.01.08-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
   In catalogs:
   - unstable: i386 (5.9)


You took over packages:
* aspell-0.60.6.1,REV=2016.01.08-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
   In catalogs:
   - unstable: sparc (5.10, 5.11)

* libaspell15-0.60.6.1,REV=2016.01.08-SunOS5.10-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
   In catalogs:
   - unstable: i386 (5.10, 5.11)

* aspell-0.60.6.1,REV=2016.01.08-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
   In catalogs:
   - unstable: i386 (5.9)

* libaspell_dev-0.60.6.1,REV=2016.01.08-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
   In catalogs:
   - unstable: sparc (5.10, 5.11)

* libaspell15-0.60.6.1,REV=2016.01.08-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
   In catalogs:
   - unstable: sparc (5.10, 5.11)

* aspell-0.60.6.1,REV=2016.01.08-SunOS5.10-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
   In catalogs:
   - unstable: i386 (5.10, 5.11)

* libaspell_dev-0.60.6.1,REV=2016.01.08-SunOS5.10-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
   In catalogs:
   - unstable: i386 (5.10, 5.11)

* aspell-0.60.6.1,REV=2016.01.08-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
   In catalogs:
   - unstable: sparc (5.9)

From buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org  Thu Jan 14 21:04:44 2016
From: buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen via buildfarm)
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 21:04:44 +0100
Subject: new aspell packages for sol 9&10
In-Reply-To: <56963859.9090804@opencsw.org>
References: <5694E680.6020106@opencsw.org>
	<8F99783D-25AC-4E29-A59A-B48026436964@opencsw.org>
	<10283B25-08DF-4E11-B736-BD677547E205@opencsw.org>
	<56963859.9090804@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <DFCDFFE6-1130-4805-9426-8CBBE036312E@opencsw.org>

Hi Riccardo,

Am 13.01.2016 um 12:43 schrieb Riccardo Mottola <rmottola at opencsw.org>:
> Dagobert Michelsen wrote:
>> Still not there, are you sure you uploaded them?
> 
> this time it is for real.. and it worked.  Correctly I have "taken over" the newer one, and added the solaris 9 ones, which are new.

Done.


Best regards

  ? Dago

> 
> Riccardo
> 
> New packages:
> * libaspell_dev-0.60.6.1,REV=2016.01.08-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>  In catalogs:
>  - unstable: i386 (5.9)
> 
> * libaspell15-0.60.6.1,REV=2016.01.08-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>  In catalogs:
>  - unstable: sparc (5.9)
> 
> * libaspell_dev-0.60.6.1,REV=2016.01.08-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>  In catalogs:
>  - unstable: sparc (5.9)
> 
> * libaspell15-0.60.6.1,REV=2016.01.08-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>  In catalogs:
>  - unstable: i386 (5.9)
> 
> 
> You took over packages:
> * aspell-0.60.6.1,REV=2016.01.08-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>  In catalogs:
>  - unstable: sparc (5.10, 5.11)
> 
> * libaspell15-0.60.6.1,REV=2016.01.08-SunOS5.10-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>  In catalogs:
>  - unstable: i386 (5.10, 5.11)
> 
> * aspell-0.60.6.1,REV=2016.01.08-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>  In catalogs:
>  - unstable: i386 (5.9)
> 
> * libaspell_dev-0.60.6.1,REV=2016.01.08-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>  In catalogs:
>  - unstable: sparc (5.10, 5.11)
> 
> * libaspell15-0.60.6.1,REV=2016.01.08-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>  In catalogs:
>  - unstable: sparc (5.10, 5.11)
> 
> * aspell-0.60.6.1,REV=2016.01.08-SunOS5.10-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>  In catalogs:
>  - unstable: i386 (5.10, 5.11)
> 
> * libaspell_dev-0.60.6.1,REV=2016.01.08-SunOS5.10-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>  In catalogs:
>  - unstable: i386 (5.10, 5.11)
> 
> * aspell-0.60.6.1,REV=2016.01.08-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>  In catalogs:
>  - unstable: sparc (5.9)

--
"You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 203 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/buildfarm/attachments/20160114/af9bfc2f/attachment.asc>

From buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org  Fri Jan 15 18:59:26 2016
From: buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org (NARUSE, Yui via buildfarm)
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2016 02:59:26 +0900
Subject: Ruby CI on Solaris
In-Reply-To: <CAK6HhsqtKBJ8J_d11YUMc8GuSMwEkZjR4UmfVyqF2pgQY-Q6qg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1EA8DF6D-92BB-4C73-87F5-5BA4C3973775@opencsw.org>
	<CAK6HhsprMyZQHt0U7n-SePLDVoav+pCO+zhVA_MAVNOo5DHOVw@mail.gmail.com>
	<9F1E6394-E4BB-4A3E-ACA5-516A377058C1@opencsw.org>
	<CAK6HhsqiXHtNFssUoAg_jPwx-xa0s8-_9_LNGNZNRTAB9iQHxA@mail.gmail.com>
	<30D9969C-3384-411A-8A58-639AA80EF8BF@opencsw.org>
	<CAK6Hhsp978KhruQYGsMXtPHxriBxHbcSbCmyi4VNJR2m_Y1yfg@mail.gmail.com>
	<50670133-E974-4ECB-8C3C-86C5F99CD395@opencsw.org>
	<CAK6HhsrADOsJTBi1sneCEiwMUtygkajhwjynqJr=rgg0iODjfA@mail.gmail.com>
	<1268078D-6141-4337-A32E-89F45119A027@opencsw.org>
	<CAK6Hhsqe9zAR5oXJKRfmzFKOm81n23TbVD+d6T_0h5-aV3x00A@mail.gmail.com>
	<55275C6C.6070800@opencsw.org>
	<CAK6HhsoFuZsonr5eTs2FUdT104Gqd22mqvpKRkak3VT4jAq8Kg@mail.gmail.com>
	<60E7F379-4EA2-4E63-BE54-15DA00A37E29@opencsw.org>
	<CAK6HhsongfCQV6fbCkp65UC4RqPFuQWmOGcA6hJn1CEq0QA5_Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<24D31241-9556-4390-BB9D-E204655361F5@opencsw.org>
	<CAK6HhspOAmV1iEdb5PnJ=iXi-_xYt46h2ZOvzHGYrxHTexgfsQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<77E841F7-28C2-448C-8A08-EAF1E79DF3A5@opencsw.org>
	<CAK6HhsqtKBJ8J_d11YUMc8GuSMwEkZjR4UmfVyqF2pgQY-Q6qg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAK6HhsrrL_rCR+M_ZPVVXRnJC-6KkNXGTPLp6iW=mVOgNJam7w@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

Thank you for previous help, preparing local filesystem for unstable10x.
It makes our CI 2.5x faster than before, and we can find issues and
identify sooner.
Now Solaris 10x is usually green on our CI (http://rubyci.org/).

Then could you also setup local fs for unstable11x?

Best regards,


2015-11-11 10:55 GMT+09:00 NARUSE, Yui <naruse at airemix.jp>:
> Hi,
>
> As far as I remember, I changed the build process to avoid the heavy use of /tmp
> in April. Is there still exist some garbage?
>
> Anyway the regular local filesystem sounds improve the speed of the
> build process.
> I changed to use the fs. thanks!
>
> If it still uses /tmp because of my miss, please tell me; I'll fix it.
>
> Best regards,
>
> 2015-11-10 17:43 GMT+09:00 Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org>:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I noticed the Ruby CI builds in /tmp:
>>
>> root at unstable10x [global]:/tmp/build > df -h /tmp ~rubyci
>> Filesystem             size   used  avail capacity  Mounted on
>> swap                   1.3G   1.2G   137M    91%    /tmp
>> csw:/export/home/rubyci
>>                         50G   4.7G    45G    10%    /home/rubyci
>>
>> This is not good as /tmp is a memory filesystem in Solaris - it draws
>> directly from RAM. I set up a regular local filesystem on unstable10x
>>   /export/home/rubyci
>>
>> Can you please change the build to use something inside this filesystem
>> instead /tmp ?
>>
>>
>> Best regards
>>
>>   ? Dago
>>
>>
>> --
>> "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
>> and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896
>>
>
> --
> NARUSE, Yui  <naruse at airemix.jp>



-- 
NARUSE, Yui  <naruse at airemix.jp>

From buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org  Mon Jan 18 10:28:51 2016
From: buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen via buildfarm)
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 10:28:51 +0100
Subject: Ruby CI on Solaris
In-Reply-To: <CAK6HhsrrL_rCR+M_ZPVVXRnJC-6KkNXGTPLp6iW=mVOgNJam7w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1EA8DF6D-92BB-4C73-87F5-5BA4C3973775@opencsw.org>
	<CAK6HhsprMyZQHt0U7n-SePLDVoav+pCO+zhVA_MAVNOo5DHOVw@mail.gmail.com>
	<9F1E6394-E4BB-4A3E-ACA5-516A377058C1@opencsw.org>
	<CAK6HhsqiXHtNFssUoAg_jPwx-xa0s8-_9_LNGNZNRTAB9iQHxA@mail.gmail.com>
	<30D9969C-3384-411A-8A58-639AA80EF8BF@opencsw.org>
	<CAK6Hhsp978KhruQYGsMXtPHxriBxHbcSbCmyi4VNJR2m_Y1yfg@mail.gmail.com>
	<50670133-E974-4ECB-8C3C-86C5F99CD395@opencsw.org>
	<CAK6HhsrADOsJTBi1sneCEiwMUtygkajhwjynqJr=rgg0iODjfA@mail.gmail.com>
	<1268078D-6141-4337-A32E-89F45119A027@opencsw.org>
	<CAK6Hhsqe9zAR5oXJKRfmzFKOm81n23TbVD+d6T_0h5-aV3x00A@mail.gmail.com>
	<55275C6C.6070800@opencsw.org>
	<CAK6HhsoFuZsonr5eTs2FUdT104Gqd22mqvpKRkak3VT4jAq8Kg@mail.gmail.com>
	<60E7F379-4EA2-4E63-BE54-15DA00A37E29@opencsw.org>
	<CAK6HhsongfCQV6fbCkp65UC4RqPFuQWmOGcA6hJn1CEq0QA5_Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<24D31241-9556-4390-BB9D-E204655361F5@opencsw.org>
	<CAK6HhspOAmV1iEdb5PnJ=iXi-_xYt46h2ZOvzHGYrxHTexgfsQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<77E841F7-28C2-448C-8A08-EAF1E79DF3A5@opencsw. org>
	<CAK6HhsqtKBJ8J_d11YUMc8GuSMwEkZjR4UmfVyqF2pgQY-Q6qg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAK6HhsrrL_rCR+M_ZPVVXRnJC-6KkNXGTPLp6iW=mVOgNJam7w@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <842892C5-7D30-476A-81D2-410405CDAF41@opencsw.org>

Hi,

Am 15.01.2016 um 18:59 schrieb NARUSE, Yui <naruse at airemix.jp>:
> Thank you for previous help, preparing local filesystem for unstable10x.
> It makes our CI 2.5x faster than before, and we can find issues and
> identify sooner.
> Now Solaris 10x is usually green on our CI (http://rubyci.org/).
> 
> Then could you also setup local fs for unstable11x?

Sure, you now also have /export/home/rubyci on unstable11x.
I also made one on unstable11s, it would be great if you could also
keep an eye on the Solaris 11 Sparc build :-)


Best regards

  ? Dago


--
"You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 203 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/buildfarm/attachments/20160118/ddc2ccfc/attachment.asc>

From buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org  Tue Jan 19 12:40:06 2016
From: buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org (NARUSE, Yui via buildfarm)
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 20:40:06 +0900
Subject: Ruby CI on Solaris
In-Reply-To: <842892C5-7D30-476A-81D2-410405CDAF41@opencsw.org>
References: <1EA8DF6D-92BB-4C73-87F5-5BA4C3973775@opencsw.org>
	<CAK6HhsprMyZQHt0U7n-SePLDVoav+pCO+zhVA_MAVNOo5DHOVw@mail.gmail.com>
	<9F1E6394-E4BB-4A3E-ACA5-516A377058C1@opencsw.org>
	<CAK6HhsqiXHtNFssUoAg_jPwx-xa0s8-_9_LNGNZNRTAB9iQHxA@mail.gmail.com>
	<30D9969C-3384-411A-8A58-639AA80EF8BF@opencsw.org>
	<CAK6Hhsp978KhruQYGsMXtPHxriBxHbcSbCmyi4VNJR2m_Y1yfg@mail.gmail.com>
	<50670133-E974-4ECB-8C3C-86C5F99CD395@opencsw.org>
	<CAK6HhsrADOsJTBi1sneCEiwMUtygkajhwjynqJr=rgg0iODjfA@mail.gmail.com>
	<1268078D-6141-4337-A32E-89F45119A027@opencsw.org>
	<CAK6Hhsqe9zAR5oXJKRfmzFKOm81n23TbVD+d6T_0h5-aV3x00A@mail.gmail.com>
	<55275C6C.6070800@opencsw.org>
	<CAK6HhsoFuZsonr5eTs2FUdT104Gqd22mqvpKRkak3VT4jAq8Kg@mail.gmail.com>
	<60E7F379-4EA2-4E63-BE54-15DA00A37E29@opencsw.org>
	<CAK6HhsongfCQV6fbCkp65UC4RqPFuQWmOGcA6hJn1CEq0QA5_Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<24D31241-9556-4390-BB9D-E204655361F5@opencsw.org>
	<CAK6HhspOAmV1iEdb5PnJ=iXi-_xYt46h2ZOvzHGYrxHTexgfsQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAK6HhsqtKBJ8J_d11YUMc8GuSMwEkZjR4UmfVyqF2pgQY-Q6qg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAK6HhsrrL_rCR+M_ZPVVXRnJC-6KkNXGTPLp6iW=mVOgNJam7w@mail.gmail.com>
	<842892C5-7D30-476A-81D2-410405CDAF41@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <CAK6Hhsq2KLOFZWdEXt8NhW1fv_auGFvWA7WBBb8+c9_vR6q07Q@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

Thank you.
unstable11x and unstable11s are now much faster and green!

2016-01-18 18:28 GMT+09:00 Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org>:
> Hi,
>
> Am 15.01.2016 um 18:59 schrieb NARUSE, Yui <naruse at airemix.jp>:
>> Thank you for previous help, preparing local filesystem for unstable10x.
>> It makes our CI 2.5x faster than before, and we can find issues and
>> identify sooner.
>> Now Solaris 10x is usually green on our CI (http://rubyci.org/).
>>
>> Then could you also setup local fs for unstable11x?
>
> Sure, you now also have /export/home/rubyci on unstable11x.
> I also made one on unstable11s, it would be great if you could also
> keep an eye on the Solaris 11 Sparc build :-)
>
>
> Best regards
>
>   ? Dago
>
>
> --
> "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
> and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896
>



-- 
NARUSE, Yui  <naruse at airemix.jp>

From buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org  Tue Jan 19 13:10:04 2016
From: buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen via buildfarm)
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 13:10:04 +0100
Subject: Ruby CI on Solaris
In-Reply-To: <CAK6Hhsq2KLOFZWdEXt8NhW1fv_auGFvWA7WBBb8+c9_vR6q07Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1EA8DF6D-92BB-4C73-87F5-5BA4C3973775@opencsw.org>
	<CAK6HhsprMyZQHt0U7n-SePLDVoav+pCO+zhVA_MAVNOo5DHOVw@mail.gmail.com>
	<9F1E6394-E4BB-4A3E-ACA5-516A377058C1@opencsw.org>
	<CAK6HhsqiXHtNFssUoAg_jPwx-xa0s8-_9_LNGNZNRTAB9iQHxA@mail.gmail.com>
	<30D9969C-3384-411A-8A58-639AA80EF8BF@opencsw.org>
	<CAK6Hhsp978KhruQYGsMXtPHxriBxHbcSbCmyi4VNJR2m_Y1yfg@mail.gmail.com>
	<50670133-E974-4ECB-8C3C-86C5F99CD395@opencsw.org>
	<CAK6HhsrADOsJTBi1sneCEiwMUtygkajhwjynqJr=rgg0iODjfA@mail.gmail.com>
	<1268078D-6141-4337-A32E-89F45119A027@opencsw.org>
	<CAK6Hhsqe9zAR5oXJKRfmzFKOm81n23TbVD+d6T_0h5-aV3x00A@mail.gmail.com>
	<55275C6C.6070800@opencsw.org>
	<CAK6HhsoFuZsonr5eTs2FUdT104Gqd22mqvpKRkak3VT4jAq8Kg@mail.gmail.com>
	<60E7F379-4EA2-4E63-BE54-15DA00A37E29@opencsw.org>
	<CAK6HhsongfCQV6fbCkp65UC4RqPFuQWmOGcA6hJn1CEq0QA5_Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<24D31241-9556-4390-BB9D-E204655361F5@opencsw.org>
	<CAK6HhspOAmV1iEdb5PnJ=iXi-_xYt46h2ZOvzHGYrxHTexgfsQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAK6HhsqtKBJ8J_d11YUMc8GuSMwEkZjR4UmfVyqF2pgQ
	Y-Q6qg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAK6HhsrrL_rCR+M_ZPVVXRnJC-6KkNXGTPLp6iW=mVOgNJam7w@mail.gmail.com>
	<842892C5-7D30-476A-81D2-410405CDAF41@opencsw.org>
	<CAK6Hhsq2KLOFZWdEXt8NhW1fv_auGFvWA7WBBb8+c9_vR6q07Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4F11F953-18DD-40EF-AC61-A04842B490BE@opencsw.org>

Hi,

> Am 19.01.2016 um 12:40 schrieb NARUSE, Yui <naruse at airemix.jp>:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Thank you.
> unstable11x and unstable11s are now much faster and green!

Excellent! Now only Solaris 10s is failing, but the CPU is quite slow and
the filesystem is already local. Is there something you can do to extend
the timeout or do you really need a fater machine for that?


Best regards

  ? Dago

> 
> 2016-01-18 18:28 GMT+09:00 Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org>:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Am 15.01.2016 um 18:59 schrieb NARUSE, Yui <naruse at airemix.jp>:
>>> Thank you for previous help, preparing local filesystem for unstable10x.
>>> It makes our CI 2.5x faster than before, and we can find issues and
>>> identify sooner.
>>> Now Solaris 10x is usually green on our CI (http://rubyci.org/).
>>> 
>>> Then could you also setup local fs for unstable11x?
>> 
>> Sure, you now also have /export/home/rubyci on unstable11x.
>> I also made one on unstable11s, it would be great if you could also
>> keep an eye on the Solaris 11 Sparc build :-)
>> 
>> 
>> Best regards
>> 
>>  ? Dago
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
>> and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> NARUSE, Yui  <naruse at airemix.jp>

--
"You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 203 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/buildfarm/attachments/20160119/5fa6e87b/attachment-0001.asc>

From buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org  Wed Jan 20 17:23:00 2016
From: buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org (NARUSE, Yui via buildfarm)
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 01:23:00 +0900
Subject: Ruby CI on Solaris
In-Reply-To: <4F11F953-18DD-40EF-AC61-A04842B490BE@opencsw.org>
References: <1EA8DF6D-92BB-4C73-87F5-5BA4C3973775@opencsw.org>
	<CAK6HhsprMyZQHt0U7n-SePLDVoav+pCO+zhVA_MAVNOo5DHOVw@mail.gmail.com>
	<9F1E6394-E4BB-4A3E-ACA5-516A377058C1@opencsw.org>
	<CAK6HhsqiXHtNFssUoAg_jPwx-xa0s8-_9_LNGNZNRTAB9iQHxA@mail.gmail.com>
	<30D9969C-3384-411A-8A58-639AA80EF8BF@opencsw.org>
	<CAK6Hhsp978KhruQYGsMXtPHxriBxHbcSbCmyi4VNJR2m_Y1yfg@mail.gmail.com>
	<50670133-E974-4ECB-8C3C-86C5F99CD395@opencsw.org>
	<CAK6HhsrADOsJTBi1sneCEiwMUtygkajhwjynqJr=rgg0iODjfA@mail.gmail.com>
	<1268078D-6141-4337-A32E-89F45119A027@opencsw.org>
	<CAK6Hhsqe9zAR5oXJKRfmzFKOm81n23TbVD+d6T_0h5-aV3x00A@mail.gmail.com>
	<55275C6C.6070800@opencsw.org>
	<CAK6HhsoFuZsonr5eTs2FUdT104Gqd22mqvpKRkak3VT4jAq8Kg@mail.gmail.com>
	<60E7F379-4EA2-4E63-BE54-15DA00A37E29@opencsw.org>
	<CAK6HhsongfCQV6fbCkp65UC4RqPFuQWmOGcA6hJn1CEq0QA5_Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<24D31241-9556-4390-BB9D-E204655361F5@opencsw.org>
	<CAK6HhspOAmV1iEdb5PnJ=iXi-_xYt46h2ZOvzHGYrxHTexgfsQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAK6HhsrrL_rCR+M_ZPVVXRnJC-6KkNXGTPLp6iW=mVOgNJam7w@mail.gmail.com>
	<842892C5-7D30-476A-81D2-410405CDAF41@opencsw.org>
	<CAK6Hhsq2KLOFZWdEXt8NhW1fv_auGFvWA7WBBb8+c9_vR6q07Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<4F11F953-18DD-40EF-AC61-A04842B490BE@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <CAK6Hhsq9E0Zf_bCN_dgQwWoT5FHb-EphQmukmMko9uWb8bjp+g@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

Once I had extended the timeout.
But these days the disk seems too slow that it fails `svn checkout`
because it takes 1 hour.
It took less than 10min three days ago.
Maybe something IO hard task is running...

Best regards,

-- naruse

2016-01-19 21:10 GMT+09:00 Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org>:
> Hi,
>
>> Am 19.01.2016 um 12:40 schrieb NARUSE, Yui <naruse at airemix.jp>:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thank you.
>> unstable11x and unstable11s are now much faster and green!
>
> Excellent! Now only Solaris 10s is failing, but the CPU is quite slow and
> the filesystem is already local. Is there something you can do to extend
> the timeout or do you really need a fater machine for that?
>
>
> Best regards
>
>   ? Dago
>
>>
>> 2016-01-18 18:28 GMT+09:00 Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org>:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Am 15.01.2016 um 18:59 schrieb NARUSE, Yui <naruse at airemix.jp>:
>>>> Thank you for previous help, preparing local filesystem for unstable10x.
>>>> It makes our CI 2.5x faster than before, and we can find issues and
>>>> identify sooner.
>>>> Now Solaris 10x is usually green on our CI (http://rubyci.org/).
>>>>
>>>> Then could you also setup local fs for unstable11x?
>>>
>>> Sure, you now also have /export/home/rubyci on unstable11x.
>>> I also made one on unstable11s, it would be great if you could also
>>> keep an eye on the Solaris 11 Sparc build :-)
>>>
>>>
>>> Best regards
>>>
>>>  ? Dago
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
>>> and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> NARUSE, Yui  <naruse at airemix.jp>
>
> --
> "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
> and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896
>



-- 
NARUSE, Yui  <naruse at airemix.jp>

From buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org  Wed Jan 20 17:49:12 2016
From: buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen via buildfarm)
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 17:49:12 +0100
Subject: Ruby CI on Solaris
In-Reply-To: <CAK6Hhsq9E0Zf_bCN_dgQwWoT5FHb-EphQmukmMko9uWb8bjp+g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1EA8DF6D-92BB-4C73-87F5-5BA4C3973775@opencsw.org>
	<CAK6HhsprMyZQHt0U7n-SePLDVoav+pCO+zhVA_MAVNOo5DHOVw@mail.gmail.com>
	<9F1E6394-E4BB-4A3E-ACA5-516A377058C1@opencsw.org>
	<CAK6HhsqiXHtNFssUoAg_jPwx-xa0s8-_9_LNGNZNRTAB9iQHxA@mail.gmail.com>
	<30D9969C-3384-411A-8A58-639AA80EF8BF@opencsw.org>
	<CAK6Hhsp978KhruQYGsMXtPHxriBxHbcSbCmyi4VNJR2m_Y1yfg@mail.gmail.com>
	<50670133-E974-4ECB-8C3C-86C5F99CD395@opencsw.org>
	<CAK6HhsrADOsJTBi1sneCEiwMUtygkajhwjynqJr=rgg0iODjfA@mail.gmail.com>
	<1268078D-6141-4337-A32E-89F45119A027@opencsw.org>
	<CAK6Hhsqe9zAR5oXJKRfmzFKOm81n23TbVD+d6T_0h5-aV3x00A@mail.gmail.com>
	<55275C6C.6070800@opencsw.org>
	<CAK6HhsoFuZsonr5eTs2FUdT104Gqd22mqvpKRkak3VT4jAq8Kg@mail.gmail.com>
	<60E7F379-4EA2-4E63-BE54-15DA00A37E29@opencsw.org>
	<CAK6HhsongfCQV6fbCkp65UC4RqPFuQWmOGcA6hJn1CEq0QA5_Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<24D31241-9556-4390-BB9D-E204655361F5@opencsw.org>
	<CAK6HhspOAmV1iEdb5PnJ=iXi-_xYt46h2ZOvzHGYrxHTexgfsQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAK6HhsrrL_rCR+M_ZPVVXRnJC-6KkNXGTPLp6iW=mVOg
	NJam7w@mail.gmail.com>
	<842892C5-7D30-476A-81D2-410405CDAF41@opencsw.org>
	<CAK6Hhsq2KLOFZWdEXt8NhW1fv_auGFvWA7WBBb8+c9_vR6q07Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<4F11F953-18DD-40EF-AC61-A04842B490BE@opencsw.org>
	<CAK6Hhsq9E0Zf_bCN_dgQwWoT5FHb-EphQmukmMko9uWb8bjp+g@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <331F1EEF-B326-47CF-AE93-4DF0DCC2DEC8@opencsw.org>

Hi Naruse,

> Am 20.01.2016 um 17:23 schrieb NARUSE, Yui <naruse at airemix.jp>:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Once I had extended the timeout.
> But these days the disk seems too slow that it fails `svn checkout`
> because it takes 1 hour.
> It took less than 10min three days ago.
> Maybe something IO hard task is running?

Yes, there is a kernel issue and Jan wants to fix that tomorrow.
A reboot will be necessary. Let?s keep an eye on it and if the
problem persists over the weekend we should look again.


Best regards

  ? Dago

> 
> Best regards,
> 
> -- naruse
> 
> 2016-01-19 21:10 GMT+09:00 Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org>:
>> Hi,
>> 
>>> Am 19.01.2016 um 12:40 schrieb NARUSE, Yui <naruse at airemix.jp>:
>>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> Thank you.
>>> unstable11x and unstable11s are now much faster and green!
>> 
>> Excellent! Now only Solaris 10s is failing, but the CPU is quite slow and
>> the filesystem is already local. Is there something you can do to extend
>> the timeout or do you really need a fater machine for that?
>> 
>> 
>> Best regards
>> 
>>  ? Dago
>> 
>>> 
>>> 2016-01-18 18:28 GMT+09:00 Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org>:
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> Am 15.01.2016 um 18:59 schrieb NARUSE, Yui <naruse at airemix.jp>:
>>>>> Thank you for previous help, preparing local filesystem for unstable10x.
>>>>> It makes our CI 2.5x faster than before, and we can find issues and
>>>>> identify sooner.
>>>>> Now Solaris 10x is usually green on our CI (http://rubyci.org/).
>>>>> 
>>>>> Then could you also setup local fs for unstable11x?
>>>> 
>>>> Sure, you now also have /export/home/rubyci on unstable11x.
>>>> I also made one on unstable11s, it would be great if you could also
>>>> keep an eye on the Solaris 11 Sparc build :-)
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Best regards
>>>> 
>>>> ? Dago
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
>>>> and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> NARUSE, Yui  <naruse at airemix.jp>
>> 
>> --
>> "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
>> and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> NARUSE, Yui  <naruse at airemix.jp>

--
"You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 203 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/buildfarm/attachments/20160120/a8db9a15/attachment.asc>

From buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org  Tue Jan 26 15:58:00 2016
From: buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org (Carsten Grzemba via buildfarm)
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 15:58:00 +0100
Subject: Please add user nagios on unstable11s
Message-ID: <befd88bd6528.56a79788@contac-dt.de>

Can anyone add user nagios on unstable11s like on unstable11x:

cgrzemba at unstable11x:~$ getent passwd nagios
nagios:x:100:100:Nagios_user:/opt/csw/nagios:/usr/bin/zsh

Thanks
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/buildfarm/attachments/20160126/31b87ded/attachment.html>

From buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org  Tue Jan 26 16:16:51 2016
From: buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org (Riccardo Mottola via buildfarm)
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 16:16:51 +0100
Subject: please install new gnustep-gui packages
Message-ID: <56A78DE3.7070000@opencsw.org>

Hi,

on Solaris 9 & 10. And yes, I did wait for the email to confirm that 
everything was smooth :)

gnustep_gui-0.24.1,REV=2016.01.22-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
gnustep_gui-0.24.1,REV=2016.01.22-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
gnustep_gui-0.24.1,REV=2016.01.22-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
gnustep_gui-0.24.1,REV=2016.01.22-SunOS5.10-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

Thanks

Riccardo

From buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org  Tue Jan 26 17:50:57 2016
From: buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen via buildfarm)
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 17:50:57 +0100
Subject: Please add user nagios on unstable11s
In-Reply-To: <befd88bd6528.56a79788@contac-dt.de>
References: <befd88bd6528.56a79788@contac-dt.de>
Message-ID: <CD808EA5-BF66-42A7-ADF2-F07F0EFECB78@opencsw.org>

Hi Carsten,

Am 26.01.2016 um 15:58 schrieb Carsten Grzemba via buildfarm <buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org>:
> Can anyone add user nagios on unstable11s like on unstable11x:
> 
> cgrzemba at unstable11x:~$ getent passwd nagios
> nagios:x:100:100:Nagios_user:/opt/csw/nagios:/usr/bin/zsh

Sure, I just installed the CSWnagios package which takes care of this.


Best regards

  ? Dago

--
"You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 203 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/buildfarm/attachments/20160126/42d885a6/attachment.asc>

From buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org  Tue Jan 26 17:53:46 2016
From: buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen via buildfarm)
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 17:53:46 +0100
Subject: please install new gnustep-gui packages
In-Reply-To: <56A78DE3.7070000@opencsw.org>
References: <56A78DE3.7070000@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <47AFA754-1A74-4CDF-90DC-2CDB14FAB56F@opencsw.org>

Hi Riccardo,

Am 26.01.2016 um 16:16 schrieb Riccardo Mottola via buildfarm <buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org>:
> on Solaris 9 & 10. And yes, I did wait for the email to confirm that everything was smooth :)
> 
> gnustep_gui-0.24.1,REV=2016.01.22-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> gnustep_gui-0.24.1,REV=2016.01.22-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> gnustep_gui-0.24.1,REV=2016.01.22-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> gnustep_gui-0.24.1,REV=2016.01.22-SunOS5.10-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

Sure, done.


Best regards

  ? Dago

--
"You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 203 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/buildfarm/attachments/20160126/b88e9779/attachment.asc>

From buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org  Tue Jan 26 18:18:49 2016
From: buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org (Riccardo Mottola via buildfarm)
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 18:18:49 +0100
Subject: please install new gnustep-gui packages
In-Reply-To: <47AFA754-1A74-4CDF-90DC-2CDB14FAB56F@opencsw.org>
References: <56A78DE3.7070000@opencsw.org>
	<47AFA754-1A74-4CDF-90DC-2CDB14FAB56F@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <56A7AA79.6030909@opencsw.org>

Hi,

Dagobert Michelsen wrote:
>> gnustep_gui-0.24.1,REV=2016.01.22-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>> >gnustep_gui-0.24.1,REV=2016.01.22-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>> >gnustep_gui-0.24.1,REV=2016.01.22-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>> >gnustep_gui-0.24.1,REV=2016.01.22-SunOS5.10-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> Sure, done.

could it be that this package is arelady ... obsolete?

It is built against gcc4objc on solaris 10... today I build 
gnustep-back, which requires gnustep-gui, and it is not available 
anymore. Is it gcc5 now? in case... I need to rebuild gnustep make, base 
and gui *again* on solaris 10 :(

Did the switch happen in these past 4 days? I'm puzzled

Riccardo

From buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org  Tue Jan 26 18:20:39 2016
From: buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen via buildfarm)
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 18:20:39 +0100
Subject: please install new gnustep-gui packages
In-Reply-To: <56A7AA79.6030909@opencsw.org>
References: <56A78DE3.7070000@opencsw.org>
	<47AFA754-1A74-4CDF-90DC-2CDB14FAB56F@opencsw.org>
	<56A7AA79.6030909@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <1C4B3613-716E-44E2-87F2-79CD0EC78D96@opencsw.org>

Hi Riccardo,

Am 26.01.2016 um 18:18 schrieb Riccardo Mottola <rmottola at opencsw.org>:
> Dagobert Michelsen wrote:
>>> gnustep_gui-0.24.1,REV=2016.01.22-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>>> >gnustep_gui-0.24.1,REV=2016.01.22-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>>> >gnustep_gui-0.24.1,REV=2016.01.22-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>>> >gnustep_gui-0.24.1,REV=2016.01.22-SunOS5.10-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>> Sure, done.
> 
> could it be that this package is arelady ... obsolete?
> 
> It is built against gcc4objc on solaris 10... today I build gnustep-back, which requires gnustep-gui, and it is not available anymore. Is it gcc5 now? in case... I need to rebuild gnustep make, base and gui *again* on solaris 10 :(
> 
> Did the switch happen in these past 4 days? I'm puzzled

No, that was done in the middle of December:
  http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/2015-December/020195.html


Best regards

  ? Dago

--
"You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 203 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/buildfarm/attachments/20160126/165d23b1/attachment.asc>

From buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org  Wed Jan 27 15:36:06 2016
From: buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org (NARUSE, Yui via buildfarm)
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 23:36:06 +0900
Subject: Ruby CI on Solaris
In-Reply-To: <331F1EEF-B326-47CF-AE93-4DF0DCC2DEC8@opencsw.org>
References: <1EA8DF6D-92BB-4C73-87F5-5BA4C3973775@opencsw.org>
	<CAK6HhsprMyZQHt0U7n-SePLDVoav+pCO+zhVA_MAVNOo5DHOVw@mail.gmail.com>
	<9F1E6394-E4BB-4A3E-ACA5-516A377058C1@opencsw.org>
	<CAK6HhsqiXHtNFssUoAg_jPwx-xa0s8-_9_LNGNZNRTAB9iQHxA@mail.gmail.com>
	<30D9969C-3384-411A-8A58-639AA80EF8BF@opencsw.org>
	<CAK6Hhsp978KhruQYGsMXtPHxriBxHbcSbCmyi4VNJR2m_Y1yfg@mail.gmail.com>
	<50670133-E974-4ECB-8C3C-86C5F99CD395@opencsw.org>
	<CAK6HhsrADOsJTBi1sneCEiwMUtygkajhwjynqJr=rgg0iODjfA@mail.gmail.com>
	<1268078D-6141-4337-A32E-89F45119A027@opencsw.org>
	<CAK6Hhsqe9zAR5oXJKRfmzFKOm81n23TbVD+d6T_0h5-aV3x00A@mail.gmail.com>
	<55275C6C.6070800@opencsw.org>
	<CAK6HhsoFuZsonr5eTs2FUdT104Gqd22mqvpKRkak3VT4jAq8Kg@mail.gmail.com>
	<60E7F379-4EA2-4E63-BE54-15DA00A37E29@opencsw.org>
	<CAK6HhsongfCQV6fbCkp65UC4RqPFuQWmOGcA6hJn1CEq0QA5_Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<24D31241-9556-4390-BB9D-E204655361F5@opencsw.org>
	<CAK6HhspOAmV1iEdb5PnJ=iXi-_xYt46h2ZOvzHGYrxHTexgfsQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<842892C5-7D30-476A-81D2-410405CDAF41@opencsw.org>
	<CAK6Hhsq2KLOFZWdEXt8NhW1fv_auGFvWA7WBBb8+c9_vR6q07Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<4F11F953-18DD-40EF-AC61-A04842B490BE@opencsw.org>
	<CAK6Hhsq9E0Zf_bCN_dgQwWoT5FHb-EphQmukmMko9uWb8bjp+g@mail.gmail.com>
	<331F1EEF-B326-47CF-AE93-4DF0DCC2DEC8@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <CAK6HhsppSP=UkPq1vaTiDZqqY7TpbzYbnBx5gQ033VKQvrYFZg@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

After I/O become fine, I increased some timeouts.
Now Solaris 10 SPAC also green.

Thank you!

2016-01-21 1:49 GMT+09:00 Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org>:
> Hi Naruse,
>
>> Am 20.01.2016 um 17:23 schrieb NARUSE, Yui <naruse at airemix.jp>:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Once I had extended the timeout.
>> But these days the disk seems too slow that it fails `svn checkout`
>> because it takes 1 hour.
>> It took less than 10min three days ago.
>> Maybe something IO hard task is running?
>
> Yes, there is a kernel issue and Jan wants to fix that tomorrow.
> A reboot will be necessary. Let?s keep an eye on it and if the
> problem persists over the weekend we should look again.
>
>
> Best regards
>
>   ? Dago
>
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> -- naruse
>>
>> 2016-01-19 21:10 GMT+09:00 Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org>:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>> Am 19.01.2016 um 12:40 schrieb NARUSE, Yui <naruse at airemix.jp>:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Thank you.
>>>> unstable11x and unstable11s are now much faster and green!
>>>
>>> Excellent! Now only Solaris 10s is failing, but the CPU is quite slow and
>>> the filesystem is already local. Is there something you can do to extend
>>> the timeout or do you really need a fater machine for that?
>>>
>>>
>>> Best regards
>>>
>>>  ? Dago
>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2016-01-18 18:28 GMT+09:00 Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org>:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 15.01.2016 um 18:59 schrieb NARUSE, Yui <naruse at airemix.jp>:
>>>>>> Thank you for previous help, preparing local filesystem for unstable10x.
>>>>>> It makes our CI 2.5x faster than before, and we can find issues and
>>>>>> identify sooner.
>>>>>> Now Solaris 10x is usually green on our CI (http://rubyci.org/).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Then could you also setup local fs for unstable11x?
>>>>>
>>>>> Sure, you now also have /export/home/rubyci on unstable11x.
>>>>> I also made one on unstable11s, it would be great if you could also
>>>>> keep an eye on the Solaris 11 Sparc build :-)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards
>>>>>
>>>>> ? Dago
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
>>>>> and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> NARUSE, Yui  <naruse at airemix.jp>
>>>
>>> --
>>> "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
>>> and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> NARUSE, Yui  <naruse at airemix.jp>
>
> --
> "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
> and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896
>



-- 
NARUSE, Yui  <naruse at airemix.jp>

From buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org  Wed Jan 27 15:38:46 2016
From: buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen via buildfarm)
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 15:38:46 +0100
Subject: Ruby CI on Solaris
In-Reply-To: <CAK6HhsppSP=UkPq1vaTiDZqqY7TpbzYbnBx5gQ033VKQvrYFZg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1EA8DF6D-92BB-4C73-87F5-5BA4C3973775@opencsw.org>
	<CAK6HhsprMyZQHt0U7n-SePLDVoav+pCO+zhVA_MAVNOo5DHOVw@mail.gmail.com>
	<9F1E6394-E4BB-4A3E-ACA5-516A377058C1@opencsw.org>
	<CAK6HhsqiXHtNFssUoAg_jPwx-xa0s8-_9_LNGNZNRTAB9iQHxA@mail.gmail.com>
	<30D9969C-3384-411A-8A58-639AA80EF8BF@opencsw.org>
	<CAK6Hhsp978KhruQYGsMXtPHxriBxHbcSbCmyi4VNJR2m_Y1yfg@mail.gmail.com>
	<50670133-E974-4ECB-8C3C-86C5F99CD395@opencsw.org>
	<CAK6HhsrADOsJTBi1sneCEiwMUtygkajhwjynqJr=rgg0iODjfA@mail.gmail.com>
	<1268078D-6141-4337-A32E-89F45119A027@opencsw.org>
	<CAK6Hhsqe9zAR5oXJKRfmzFKOm81n23TbVD+d6T_0h5-aV3x00A@mail.gmail.com>
	<55275C6C.6070800@opencsw.org>
	<CAK6HhsoFuZsonr5eTs2FUdT104Gqd22mqvpKRkak3VT4jAq8Kg@mail.gmail.com>
	<60E7F379-4EA2-4E63-BE54-15DA00A37E29@opencsw.org>
	<CAK6HhsongfCQV6fbCkp65UC4RqPFuQWmOGcA6hJn1CEq0QA5_Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<24D31241-9556-4390-BB9D-E204655361F5@opencsw.org>
	<CAK6HhspOAmV1iEdb5PnJ=iXi-_xYt46h2ZOvzHGYrxHTexgfsQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<842892C5-7D30-476A-81D2-410405CDAF41@opencsw. org>
	<CAK6Hhsq2KLOFZWdEXt8NhW1fv_auGFvWA7WBBb8+c9_vR6q07Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<4F11F953-18DD-40EF-AC61-A04842B490BE@opencsw.org>
	<CAK6Hhsq9E0Zf_bCN_dgQwWoT5FHb-EphQmukmMko9uWb8bjp+g@mail.gmail.com>
	<331F1EEF-B326-47CF-AE93-4DF0DCC2DEC8@opencsw.org>
	<CAK6HhsppSP=UkPq1vaTiDZqqY7TpbzYbnBx5gQ033VKQvrYFZg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <B98EDF3F-5EBC-48D3-83B6-1C2FF4AA75E9@opencsw.org>

Hi,

Am 27.01.2016 um 15:36 schrieb NARUSE, Yui <naruse at airemix.jp>:
> After I/O become fine, I increased some timeouts.
> Now Solaris 10 SPAC also green.

Excellent, thanks for you efforts!

Best regards ? Dago

> 
> Thank you!
> 
> 2016-01-21 1:49 GMT+09:00 Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org>:
>> Hi Naruse,
>> 
>>> Am 20.01.2016 um 17:23 schrieb NARUSE, Yui <naruse at airemix.jp>:
>>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> Once I had extended the timeout.
>>> But these days the disk seems too slow that it fails `svn checkout`
>>> because it takes 1 hour.
>>> It took less than 10min three days ago.
>>> Maybe something IO hard task is running?
>> 
>> Yes, there is a kernel issue and Jan wants to fix that tomorrow.
>> A reboot will be necessary. Let?s keep an eye on it and if the
>> problem persists over the weekend we should look again.
>> 
>> 
>> Best regards
>> 
>>  ? Dago
>> 
>>> 
>>> Best regards,
>>> 
>>> -- naruse
>>> 
>>> 2016-01-19 21:10 GMT+09:00 Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org>:
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>>> Am 19.01.2016 um 12:40 schrieb NARUSE, Yui <naruse at airemix.jp>:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thank you.
>>>>> unstable11x and unstable11s are now much faster and green!
>>>> 
>>>> Excellent! Now only Solaris 10s is failing, but the CPU is quite slow and
>>>> the filesystem is already local. Is there something you can do to extend
>>>> the timeout or do you really need a fater machine for that?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Best regards
>>>> 
>>>> ? Dago
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 2016-01-18 18:28 GMT+09:00 Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org>:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Am 15.01.2016 um 18:59 schrieb NARUSE, Yui <naruse at airemix.jp>:
>>>>>>> Thank you for previous help, preparing local filesystem for unstable10x.
>>>>>>> It makes our CI 2.5x faster than before, and we can find issues and
>>>>>>> identify sooner.
>>>>>>> Now Solaris 10x is usually green on our CI (http://rubyci.org/).
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Then could you also setup local fs for unstable11x?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Sure, you now also have /export/home/rubyci on unstable11x.
>>>>>> I also made one on unstable11s, it would be great if you could also
>>>>>> keep an eye on the Solaris 11 Sparc build :-)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Best regards
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> ? Dago
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
>>>>>> and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> NARUSE, Yui  <naruse at airemix.jp>
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
>>>> and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> NARUSE, Yui  <naruse at airemix.jp>
>> 
>> --
>> "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
>> and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> NARUSE, Yui  <naruse at airemix.jp>

--
"You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 203 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/buildfarm/attachments/20160127/dcebf1b0/attachment.asc>