[csw-maintainers] package hooks

Philip Brown phil at bolthole.com
Thu Jun 25 23:13:19 CEST 2009

On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 03:25:47PM -0400, Ben Walton wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback.  More welcome, as always.

ah, that helps a lot.


Some more thoughts:

"The package tools shall pass, at most, a single argument to each hook that
is run. "

I think putting arbitrary limits on that, is unneccessary, and possibly
harmful. It's usually better to define a MINIMUM set of arguments that is
passed, but allow room for future expansion.

Hmm... was going to comment on something else, but will think about it a
bit more first....

More information about the maintainers mailing list