[csw-maintainers] Berkeley DB: Keep old versions or concentrate on 4.7?

Mike Watters mwatters at opencsw.org
Wed May 27 23:55:22 CEST 2009


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Philip Brown wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 11:25:16PM +0200, Dagobert Michelsen wrote:
>> ...
>> Or should be officially drop 3.3, 4.2, 4.3 and 4.4 and just build 4.7?
> 
> (and if so, we should probably rename/create new package,
>  "berkeleydb", and have everything else depend on its rt package)

I say just build 4.7 but keep libdb4-4 as deprecated libs in 4.7.
rename the package to berkeleydb and have core,runtime and devel

just my 2 cents ( or 1/1000th of a euro, the way the US market is going )

- --

Thanks,
Mike

"Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex,
and more violent.  It takes a touch of genius -- and a lot of courage --
to move in the opposite direction."

* Albert Einstein 1879 - 1955
    US German-born Theoretical Physicist
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (SunOS)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkodtsoACgkQLrhmsXMSLxcXbQCgvPYHw6mdNVAGL6yveCMYJGLM
JkYAniTTtKmnfQchif6e7DwtLWsVgMua
=pIUO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the maintainers mailing list