[csw-maintainers] Oddity with Runpath and GCC4 on Solaris 10 x86

[Geoff Davis]

On 12/3/2010 11:49 PM, Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski wrote:
> I do agree with that. There are 2 separate issues:
> - which package does the symlink belong to?
> - given that the symlink is in gcc4core, what should be the
> dependencies of a newly built package?

In light of these issues, what should I do with my package in the 
meantime? Should I wait for someone to step up and do a quick respool of 
gcc4corert with the "64" symlink included, or make my package depend on 
gcc4core? I am hoping to finish work on packaging the Generic Mapping 
Tools but I can't do that until I get NetCDF and friends out the door.

Thanks,
Geoff