[csw-maintainers] Why are packages named in a "creative", non-consistent way?
phil at bolthole.com
Mon Jun 7 15:08:34 CEST 2010
On Monday, June 7, 2010, Peter Bonivart <bonivart at opencsw.org> wrote:
> I'm talking about the sparconly tag on these...
that's something we've actually done for a very long time, when only
one arch of a package got an update for purely packaging reasons.
as far as . vs _ in that trailing position ... didn't think anyone cared much
More information about the maintainers