[csw-maintainers] Fwd: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_podescapes

Peter Bonivart bonivart at opencsw.org
Fri Sep 3 16:03:28 CEST 2010


Sorry for top-posting, background below.

CSWpmpodescapes only has three packages that depend on it, two of them
(CSWpmpodsimple and CSWmailscanner) are mine and already rebuilt
without it. The third one is an orphaned package from Cory, CSWsvk
which I have also rebuilt without this dep.

CSWsvk and CSWpmpodsimple are now also up to date, also respun a new
version of pm_svnmirror to make CSWsvk happy.

If this is ok I will submit these four and you can remove CSWpmpodescapes.

-- 
/peter

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com>
Date: Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 12:36 AM
Subject: Re: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_podescapes
To: pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org


On 9/2/10, Peter Bonivart <bonivart at opencsw.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 8:18 PM, Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> wrote:
>> FYI there's a problem with pm_podescapes.
>>
>> ERROR 1062 (23000) at line 8: Duplicate entry
>> '/opt/csw/share/man/man3/Pod::Escapes.3perl' for key 1
>>
>>
>> It's also in perldoc.
>>
>> So please either submit an updated perldoc, or remove from podescapes
>
> First I went to fix this by removing the man page from podescapes but
> when I took a closer look I see that 5.10.1 (CSWperl) already contains
> the latest podescapes (1.04 from 2004-05-07) so I see no need for this
> package at all.
>
> How to proceed now?
>

well, if Perldoc is part of official 5.10.1 perl, then just officially
request that the package be removed and marked as obsolete.
"official", in this case, is probably best pursued as "email the
maintainers list", so it gets archived properly.


More information about the maintainers mailing list