[csw-maintainers] [POLICY] Shared library placement proposal

[Philip Brown]

On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 6:44 AM, Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org> wrote:
>
> I don't think this is a case where you want to dumb down the language
> and make it run contrary to commonly accepted usage in other contexts
> (RFC's etc).

people complain about the language of the RFCs, too :)

but, reguardless: I'll withdraw my objection, as long as we copy the
RFC methodology of including a "key" to terms. Explicitly stating in
the document, or in a page directly linked from that document, what
"must, should, may", etc mean in our context.