[csw-maintainers] /usr/{local,share} references

Philip Brown phil at bolthole.com
Thu Feb 10 05:59:31 CET 2011


On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Tue Feb 08 17:01:16 -0500 2011:
>
>> Well, I would certainly prefer that people manually inspect and
>> replace.
>
> Or, manually inspect and _not_ replace.  That is possibly a valid
> option in some cases.  I'm with Dago on this.  Manual inspection is a
> must.  Checkpkg will point out problem files, so it's not even a
> matter of grepping the source tree by hand now.
>
>> But for those people whining that this takes too much effort, the
>> above provides an almost effortless alternative.
>
> I don't think anyone has complained about the effort involved.  The
> complaints were centred around the how suddenly this check came into
> sight.

well, wonderful.  Does that mean we have "consensus" that this is the
right thing to do moving forward then?

And to answer a prior email, the circumstances of the recent
occurence, were a package that pops up a dialog box that by default,
has a particular set of directories that the user can choose from,
along with manually typing in a full path to a different directory.
/usr/local was present, /opt/csw/anything was not.
So the user misses out on the "feature" of convenience, unless the
/usr/local reference is either patched or augmented.


More information about the maintainers mailing list