Reminder about *_dev package naming

[Maciej (Matchek) Bliziński]

If you're packaging a new library, let's call it foo, keep the
development package name "foo_dev", not "foo1_dev" (or any other
number).

Good: libfoo1 and foo_dev

Not good: libfoo1 and foo1_dev

Why? Because as API of the shared library changes, the development
package will likely stay the same. You'll end up with libfoo2 and
corresponding libfoo1_dev.

An exception could be when multiple versions of the development
package can coexist, e.g. when they use versioned file names such as
/opt/csw/include/foo-1.h.

Maciej