From laurent at opencsw.org  Wed Nov  4 10:11:30 2015
From: laurent at opencsw.org (Laurent Blume)
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2015 10:11:30 +0100
Subject: MySQL issues on Solaris 11/sparc
Message-ID: <5639CBC2.2040405@opencsw.org>

Hello all,

Dagobert has pointed out that the MySQL packages don't work on Solaris
11/sparc, failing with this error:

This seems t151104  9:56:09 [Note] /opt/csw/libexec/mysqld (mysqld
5.5.46) starting as process 19236 ...
151104  9:56:09 [ERROR] Initialization of transaction delegates failed.
Please report a bug.
151104  9:56:09 [ERROR] Aborting

o be a known bug about which Oracle does not give much of a shit, since
they provide a magical ?fix?, but no solution.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!topic/dimstat/596RKYcVPIQ
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/dimstat/GiewfGElRZk

The workaround is to use the MySQL 5.6 package in 64 mode. Edit or
create /etc/opt/csw/csw.conf after installing it, and add this line:
mysql56_arch=sparcv9

I'll make it use 64 bit as default instead of the historical 32 in a respin.
MySQL 5.5 32 bit, MySQL 5.5 64 bit, MySQL 5.6 32 bit, all have the same
issue on Solaris 11/sparc exclusively.

I will not investigate further. If somebody wants to, you're welcome to it.

Regards,

Laurent

From grzemba at contac-dt.de  Thu Nov  5 12:38:45 2015
From: grzemba at contac-dt.de (Carsten Grzemba)
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 12:38:45 +0100
Subject: OSQA community
Message-ID: <beed82f64f8c.563b4dd5@contac-dt.de>

Hi folks,

it is some time ago where I have migrated the Google login to oauth2. The login works, unfortunately it does not map the new oauth tokens to the existing logins. So I recommend how whats access to OSQA again, should re register with an new (similar) login name. After that I can copy the new authkey in the previous account and the delete the new login again. Then it should be possible to login with the old login and the new Google oauth2 API and nobody loose the references the the existing threads.

Carsten
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/attachments/20151105/0a2ff33f/attachment.html>

From grzemba at contac-dt.de  Fri Nov  6 10:01:04 2015
From: grzemba at contac-dt.de (Carsten Grzemba)
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2015 10:01:04 +0100
Subject: PHP 56 packages
Message-ID: <be41fd86fc7.563c7a60@contac-dt.de>

I have packaged PHP 5.6.13 with a mod_php for Apache24 and it works for me for an canto CMS setup.
Shoud we still deliver a mod_php for Apache22?
Is it reasonable to replace the PHP 5.3 package or should we keep this in repository and publish new php56 packages?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/attachments/20151106/4f09567d/attachment-0001.html>

From wilbury at opencsw.org  Fri Nov  6 10:04:59 2015
From: wilbury at opencsw.org (Juraj Lutter)
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 10:04:59 +0100
Subject: PHP 56 packages
In-Reply-To: <be41fd86fc7.563c7a60@contac-dt.de>
References: <be41fd86fc7.563c7a60@contac-dt.de>
Message-ID: <563C6D3B.8040602@opencsw.org>

On 11/06/15 10:01, Carsten Grzemba wrote:
> I have packaged PHP 5.6.13 with a mod_php for Apache24 and it works
> for me for an canto CMS setup.
> Shoud we still deliver a mod_php for Apache22?
> Is it reasonable to replace the PHP 5.3 package or should we keep this
> in repository and publish new php56 packages?

- PHP 5.3 and 5.4 aredead now
- Apache 2.2 will be phased out
- Apache 2.4 is the new "production" release

For the time being, we should deliver PHP 5.5 and 5.6 for Apache 2.2 and
Apache 2.4. When Apache 2.2 will get deprecated, we could consider to
only update PHP packages for Apache 2.2 in case of serious security flaws.

j.



-- 
Juraj Lutter <wilbury at opencsw.org>


From ihsan at opencsw.org  Fri Nov  6 12:40:39 2015
From: ihsan at opencsw.org (Ihsan Dogan)
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 12:40:39 +0100
Subject: PHP 56 packages
In-Reply-To: <563C6D3B.8040602@opencsw.org>
References: <be41fd86fc7.563c7a60@contac-dt.de> <563C6D3B.8040602@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <20151106114039.GD21916@dogan.ch>

On Friday, 06 Nov 2015 10:04 +0100, Juraj Lutter wrote:

> > I have packaged PHP 5.6.13 with a mod_php for Apache24 and it works
> > for me for an canto CMS setup.
> > Shoud we still deliver a mod_php for Apache22?
> > Is it reasonable to replace the PHP 5.3 package or should we keep this
> > in repository and publish new php56 packages?
> 
> - PHP 5.3 and 5.4 aredead now
> - Apache 2.2 will be phased out
> - Apache 2.4 is the new "production" release
> 
> For the time being, we should deliver PHP 5.5 and 5.6 for Apache 2.2 and
> Apache 2.4. When Apache 2.2 will get deprecated, we could consider to
> only update PHP packages for Apache 2.2 in case of serious security flaws.

I fully agree with Juraj.

Carsten, have you been also able to build php-fpm?



Ihsan

-- 
ihsan at dogan.ch http://blog.dogan.ch/

From grzemba at contac-dt.de  Fri Nov  6 14:05:59 2015
From: grzemba at contac-dt.de (Carsten Grzemba)
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2015 14:05:59 +0100
Subject: PHP 56 packages
In-Reply-To: <20151106114039.GD21916@dogan.ch>
References: <be41fd86fc7.563c7a60@contac-dt.de> <563C6D3B.8040602@opencsw.org>
	<20151106114039.GD21916@dogan.ch>
Message-ID: <be41f92e2bca.563cb3c7@contac-dt.de>

forgot to mention, experimental packages at:

pkgutil -t http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/opencsw/experimental/php56 -i php5


On 06.11.15 12:40, Ihsan Dogan  <ihsan at opencsw.org> wrote: 
> 
> On Friday, 06 Nov 2015 10:04 +0100, Juraj Lutter wrote:
> 
> > > I have packaged PHP 5.6.13 with a mod_php for Apache24 and it works
> > > for me for an canto CMS setup.
> > > Shoud we still deliver a mod_php for Apache22?
> > > Is it reasonable to replace the PHP 5.3 package or should we keep this
> > > in repository and publish new php56 packages?
> > 
> > - PHP 5.3 and 5.4 aredead now
> > - Apache 2.2 will be phased out
> > - Apache 2.4 is the new "production" release
> > 
> > For the time being, we should deliver PHP 5.5 and 5.6 for Apache 2.2 and
> > Apache 2.4. When Apache 2.2 will get deprecated, we could consider to
> > only update PHP packages for Apache 2.2 in case of serious security flaws.
> 
> I fully agree with Juraj.
> 
> Carsten, have you been also able to build php-fpm?
> 
> 
> 
> Ihsan
> 
> -- 
> ihsan at dogan.ch http://blog.dogan.ch/
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/attachments/20151106/d837a732/attachment.html>

From grzemba at contac-dt.de  Tue Nov 10 08:25:26 2015
From: grzemba at contac-dt.de (Carsten Grzemba)
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 08:25:26 +0100
Subject: unstable10x out of space
Message-ID: <bef0a4a5247.5641a9f6@contac-dt.de>

Hi,

Can anyone remove the /tmp/build directory on unstable10x

cgrzemba at unstable10x:~$ du -sh /tmp/build 
?1.3G /tmp/build
cgrzemba at unstable10x:~$ ls -ld /tmp/build
drwxrwxr-x 7 rubyci csw 531 Jul 31 07:20 /tmp/build

Thanks
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/attachments/20151110/a9d9314c/attachment.html>

From grzemba at contac-dt.de  Tue Nov 10 09:20:25 2015
From: grzemba at contac-dt.de (Carsten Grzemba)
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 09:20:25 +0100
Subject: PHP 56 packages
In-Reply-To: <20151106114039.GD21916@dogan.ch>
References: <be41fd86fc7.563c7a60@contac-dt.de> <563C6D3B.8040602@opencsw.org>
	<20151106114039.GD21916@dogan.ch>
Message-ID: <be419b695e61.5641b6d9@contac-dt.de>

I will try it and drop the legacy cgi support.

Carsten

On 06.11.15 12:40, Ihsan Dogan  <ihsan at opencsw.org> wrote: 
> 
> On Friday, 06 Nov 2015 10:04 +0100, Juraj Lutter wrote:
> 
> > > I have packaged PHP 5.6.13 with a mod_php for Apache24 and it works
> > > for me for an canto CMS setup.
> > > Shoud we still deliver a mod_php for Apache22?
> > > Is it reasonable to replace the PHP 5.3 package or should we keep this
> > > in repository and publish new php56 packages?
> > 
> > - PHP 5.3 and 5.4 aredead now
> > - Apache 2.2 will be phased out
> > - Apache 2.4 is the new "production" release
> > 
> > For the time being, we should deliver PHP 5.5 and 5.6 for Apache 2.2 and
> > Apache 2.4. When Apache 2.2 will get deprecated, we could consider to
> > only update PHP packages for Apache 2.2 in case of serious security flaws.
> 
> I fully agree with Juraj.
> 
> Carsten, have you been also able to build php-fpm?
> 
> 
> 
> Ihsan
> 
> -- 
> ihsan at dogan.ch http://blog.dogan.ch/
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/attachments/20151110/3914cba6/attachment.html>

From jh at opencsw.org  Tue Nov 10 09:38:27 2015
From: jh at opencsw.org (Jan Holzhueter)
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 09:38:27 +0100
Subject: unstable10x out of space
In-Reply-To: <bef0a4a5247.5641a9f6@contac-dt.de>
References: <bef0a4a5247.5641a9f6@contac-dt.de>
Message-ID: <5641AD03.8040000@opencsw.org>

Hi,

Am 10.11.15 um 08:25 schrieb Carsten Grzemba:
> Hi,
> 
> Can anyone remove the /tmp/build directory on unstable10x
> 
> cgrzemba at unstable10x:~$ du -sh /tmp/build
>  1.3G   /tmp/build
> cgrzemba at unstable10x:~$ ls -ld /tmp/build
> drwxrwxr-x   7 rubyci   csw          531 Jul 31 07:20 /tmp/build

done.


Greetings
Jan

From ihsan at opencsw.org  Tue Nov 10 12:11:49 2015
From: ihsan at opencsw.org (=?UTF-8?B?xLBoc2FuwqBEb8SfYW4=?=)
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 13:11:49 +0200
Subject: PHP 56 packages
In-Reply-To: <be419b695e61.5641b6d9@contac-dt.de>
References: <be41fd86fc7.563c7a60@contac-dt.de> <563C6D3B.8040602@opencsw.org>
	<20151106114039.GD21916@dogan.ch>
	<be419b695e61.5641b6d9@contac-dt.de>
Message-ID: <5641D0F5.5030802@opencsw.org>

thanks

Am 10.11.2015 um 10:20 schrieb Carsten Grzemba:
> I will try it and drop the legacy cgi support.
> 
> Carsten
> 
> On 06.11.15 12:40, *Ihsan Dogan * <ihsan at opencsw.org> wrote:
>> On Friday, 06 Nov 2015 10:04 +0100, Juraj Lutter wrote:
>>
>> > > I have packaged PHP 5.6.13 with a mod_php for Apache24 and it works
>> > > for me for an canto CMS setup.
>> > > Shoud we still deliver a mod_php for Apache22?
>> > > Is it reasonable to replace the PHP 5.3 package or should we keep this
>> > > in repository and publish new php56 packages?
>> >
>> > - PHP 5.3 and 5.4 aredead now
>> > - Apache 2.2 will be phased out
>> > - Apache 2.4 is the new "production" release
>> >
>> > For the time being, we should deliver PHP 5.5 and 5.6 for Apache 2.2 and
>> > Apache 2.4. When Apache 2.2 will get deprecated, we could consider to
>> > only update PHP packages for Apache 2.2 in case of serious security
>> flaws.
>>
>> I fully agree with Juraj.
>>
>> Carsten, have you been also able to build php-fpm?
>>
>>
>>
>> Ihsan
>>
>> -- 
>> ihsan at dogan.ch http://blog.dogan.ch/

-- 
ihsan at dogan.ch        http://blog.dogan.ch/

From grzemba at contac-dt.de  Fri Nov 13 12:23:53 2015
From: grzemba at contac-dt.de (Carsten Grzemba)
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 12:23:53 +0100
Subject: next Camp
Message-ID: <befde1a86feb.5645d659@contac-dt.de>

Hi folks,

A beautiful summer  has passed. Have anyone an idea for next (winter) camp location? 

Carsten
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/attachments/20151113/926ffef1/attachment.html>

From ihsan at opencsw.org  Fri Nov 13 13:39:42 2015
From: ihsan at opencsw.org (Ihsan Dogan)
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 13:39:42 +0100
Subject: next Camp
In-Reply-To: <befde1a86feb.5645d659@contac-dt.de>
References: <befde1a86feb.5645d659@contac-dt.de>
Message-ID: <20151113123942.GD3290@dogan.ch>

On Friday, 13 Nov 2015 12:23 +0100, Carsten Grzemba wrote:

> A beautiful summer  has passed. Have anyone an idea for next (winter) camp location? 

What about Kiel? I've heard rumors, that BO has shiny new offices
next to the sea. :-)


Ihsan

-- 
ihsan at dogan.ch http://blog.dogan.ch/

From dam at opencsw.org  Fri Nov 13 14:00:39 2015
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 14:00:39 +0100
Subject: next Camp
In-Reply-To: <20151113123942.GD3290@dogan.ch>
References: <befde1a86feb.5645d659@contac-dt.de>
	<20151113123942.GD3290@dogan.ch>
Message-ID: <EF6B96E1-95BC-4BA7-B4E2-E7FDCC40D6A0@opencsw.org>

Hi Ihsan,

Am 13.11.2015 um 13:39 schrieb Ihsan Dogan <ihsan at opencsw.org>:
> On Friday, 13 Nov 2015 12:23 +0100, Carsten Grzemba wrote:
> 
>> A beautiful summer  has passed. Have anyone an idea for next (winter) camp location?
> 
> What about Kiel? I've heard rumors, that BO has shiny new offices
> next to the sea. :-)

Sure :-) I also asked Maciej about another camp in Dublin and he
also liked the idea. But the next camp in Kiel would be fine.


Best regards

  ? Dago

--
"You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 203 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/attachments/20151113/a52c6ad8/attachment.asc>

From pfelecan at opencsw.org  Fri Nov 13 14:01:50 2015
From: pfelecan at opencsw.org (Peter FELECAN)
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 14:01:50 +0100
Subject: next Camp
In-Reply-To: <20151113123942.GD3290@dogan.ch> (Ihsan Dogan's message of "Fri, 
	13 Nov 2015 13:39:42 +0100")
References: <befde1a86feb.5645d659@contac-dt.de>
	<20151113123942.GD3290@dogan.ch>
Message-ID: <x6y4e2t5mp.fsf@opencsw.org>

Ihsan Dogan <ihsan at opencsw.org> writes:

> On Friday, 13 Nov 2015 12:23 +0100, Carsten Grzemba wrote:
>
>> A beautiful summer  has passed. Have anyone an idea for next (winter) camp location? 
>
> What about Kiel? I've heard rumors, that BO has shiny new offices
> next to the sea. :-)

Is Kiel colder or warmer than Hamburg during the winter?
Hope that the new offices are heated (it seems that Germany stopped all
its nuclear plants).
-- 
Peter

From bwalton at opencsw.org  Fri Nov 13 19:35:58 2015
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 18:35:58 +0000
Subject: next Camp
In-Reply-To: <x6y4e2t5mp.fsf@opencsw.org>
References: <befde1a86feb.5645d659@contac-dt.de>
	<20151113123942.GD3290@dogan.ch> <x6y4e2t5mp.fsf@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <CAP30j15fOj2TJTstA+WMjEZa4GRRt7EFrAU-nN1NvvsrEcG6uQ@mail.gmail.com>

Maciej and I had chatted about Dublin. If folks are interested, that's
definitely an option. Otherwise, Kiel sounds cool too.

Thanks
-Ben

On Fri, Nov 13, 2015, 1:02 PM Peter FELECAN <pfelecan at opencsw.org> wrote:

> Ihsan Dogan <ihsan at opencsw.org> writes:
>
> > On Friday, 13 Nov 2015 12:23 +0100, Carsten Grzemba wrote:
> >
> >> A beautiful summer  has passed. Have anyone an idea for next (winter)
> camp location?
> >
> > What about Kiel? I've heard rumors, that BO has shiny new offices
> > next to the sea. :-)
>
> Is Kiel colder or warmer than Hamburg during the winter?
> Hope that the new offices are heated (it seems that Germany stopped all
> its nuclear plants).
> --
> Peter
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/attachments/20151113/394e7ac3/attachment.html>

From pfelecan at opencsw.org  Fri Nov 13 19:59:30 2015
From: pfelecan at opencsw.org (Peter FELECAN)
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 19:59:30 +0100
Subject: next Camp
In-Reply-To: <CAP30j15fOj2TJTstA+WMjEZa4GRRt7EFrAU-nN1NvvsrEcG6uQ@mail.gmail.com>
	(Ben Walton's message of "Fri, 13 Nov 2015 18:35:58 +0000")
References: <befde1a86feb.5645d659@contac-dt.de>
	<20151113123942.GD3290@dogan.ch> <x6y4e2t5mp.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<CAP30j15fOj2TJTstA+WMjEZa4GRRt7EFrAU-nN1NvvsrEcG6uQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <x6pozdu3n1.fsf@opencsw.org>

Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org> writes:

> Maciej and I had chatted about Dublin. If folks are interested, that's
> definitely an option. Otherwise, Kiel sounds cool too.

So, Dublin is as cold as Kiel?

Although both have good beer.

> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015, 1:02 PM Peter FELECAN <pfelecan at opencsw.org> wrote:
>
>> Ihsan Dogan <ihsan at opencsw.org> writes:
>>
>> > On Friday, 13 Nov 2015 12:23 +0100, Carsten Grzemba wrote:
>> >
>> >> A beautiful summer  has passed. Have anyone an idea for next (winter)
>> camp location?
>> >
>> > What about Kiel? I've heard rumors, that BO has shiny new offices
>> > next to the sea. :-)
>>
>> Is Kiel colder or warmer than Hamburg during the winter?
>> Hope that the new offices are heated (it seems that Germany stopped all
>> its nuclear plants).
>> --
>> Peter
>>

-- 
Peter

From bwalton at opencsw.org  Wed Nov 18 08:59:56 2015
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 07:59:56 +0000
Subject: next Camp
In-Reply-To: <x6pozdu3n1.fsf@opencsw.org>
References: <befde1a86feb.5645d659@contac-dt.de>
	<20151113123942.GD3290@dogan.ch> <x6y4e2t5mp.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<CAP30j15fOj2TJTstA+WMjEZa4GRRt7EFrAU-nN1NvvsrEcG6uQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<x6pozdu3n1.fsf@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <CAP30j16-bJAo04rxxF4Pweqtq2hMz-FSjEkrSMQkS_YDWGqWbw@mail.gmail.com>

Not so much cold as _really_ windy. :) We did get below zero the other
night though. By local standard that's an arctic temperature.

Thanks
-Ben

On Fri, Nov 13, 2015, 7:00 PM Peter FELECAN <pfelecan at opencsw.org> wrote:

> Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org> writes:
>
> > Maciej and I had chatted about Dublin. If folks are interested, that's
> > definitely an option. Otherwise, Kiel sounds cool too.
>
> So, Dublin is as cold as Kiel?
>
> Although both have good beer.
>
> > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015, 1:02 PM Peter FELECAN <pfelecan at opencsw.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Ihsan Dogan <ihsan at opencsw.org> writes:
> >>
> >> > On Friday, 13 Nov 2015 12:23 +0100, Carsten Grzemba wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> A beautiful summer  has passed. Have anyone an idea for next (winter)
> >> camp location?
> >> >
> >> > What about Kiel? I've heard rumors, that BO has shiny new offices
> >> > next to the sea. :-)
> >>
> >> Is Kiel colder or warmer than Hamburg during the winter?
> >> Hope that the new offices are heated (it seems that Germany stopped all
> >> its nuclear plants).
> >> --
> >> Peter
> >>
>
> --
> Peter
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/attachments/20151118/a778d0c6/attachment-0001.html>

From grzemba at contac-dt.de  Wed Nov 25 15:45:19 2015
From: grzemba at contac-dt.de (Carsten Grzemba)
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 15:45:19 +0100
Subject: mgar branch v2-ips
Message-ID: <bef0fa452c7f.5655d78f@contac-dt.de>

I like to contribute some things for IPS and I wondering is v2-ips the last version and can I commit in this branch.

Casten
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/attachments/20151125/32ff3a4b/attachment.html>

From dam at opencsw.org  Wed Nov 25 15:55:38 2015
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 15:55:38 +0100
Subject: mgar branch v2-ips
In-Reply-To: <bef0fa452c7f.5655d78f@contac-dt.de>
References: <bef0fa452c7f.5655d78f@contac-dt.de>
Message-ID: <642058C1-8D34-41D0-9E25-4728070D757A@opencsw.org>

Hi Carsten,

Am 25.11.2015 um 15:45 schrieb Carsten Grzemba <grzemba at contac-dt.de>:
> I like to  contribute some things for IPS and I wondering is v2-ips the last version and can I commit in this branch.

I am glad to hear that. I committed what I made meanwhile in ?v2? as r25411.
Please continue from that point.

I have also setup something like the experimental catalogs for IPS,
I?ll write up some docs for that next week.


Best regards

  ? Dago

--
"You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 203 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/attachments/20151125/6ae965b2/attachment.asc>

From grzemba at contac-dt.de  Wed Nov 25 16:05:41 2015
From: grzemba at contac-dt.de (Carsten Grzemba)
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 16:05:41 +0100
Subject: mgar branch v2-ips
In-Reply-To: <642058C1-8D34-41D0-9E25-4728070D757A@opencsw.org>
References: <bef0fa452c7f.5655d78f@contac-dt.de>
	<642058C1-8D34-41D0-9E25-4728070D757A@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <be418e8f4489.5655dc55@contac-dt.de>

for the pkg dependency resolving I have extend the REST API on pkgdb_web so we have to integrate this on buildfarm later.

On 25.11.15 15:55, Dagobert Michelsen  <dam at opencsw.org> wrote: 
> 
> Hi Carsten,
> 
> Am 25.11.2015 um 15:45 schrieb Carsten Grzemba <grzemba at contac-dt.de>:
> > I like to contribute some things for IPS and I wondering is v2-ips the last version and can I commit in this branch.
> 
> I am glad to hear that. I committed what I made meanwhile in ?v2? as r25411.
> Please continue from that point.
> 
> I have also setup something like the experimental catalogs for IPS,
> I?ll write up some docs for that next week.
> 
> 
> Best regards
> 
>  ? Dago
> 
> --
> "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
> and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896
> 
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/attachments/20151125/724a0be2/attachment.html>

From dam at opencsw.org  Wed Nov 25 16:12:26 2015
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 16:12:26 +0100
Subject: mgar branch v2-ips
In-Reply-To: <be418e8f4489.5655dc55@contac-dt.de>
References: <bef0fa452c7f.5655d78f@contac-dt.de>
	<642058C1-8D34-41D0-9E25-4728070D757A@opencsw.org>
	<be418e8f4489.5655dc55@contac-dt.de>
Message-ID: <AADF3045-1961-4460-B820-903EFB8435D7@opencsw.org>

Hi Carsten,

Am 25.11.2015 um 16:05 schrieb Carsten Grzemba <grzemba at contac-dt.de>:
> for the pkg dependency resolving I have extend the REST API on pkgdb_web so we have to integrate this on buildfarm later.

Sure. Do you have all the access you need?


Best regards

  ? Dago

--
"You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 203 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/attachments/20151125/6751d438/attachment.asc>