From dam at opencsw.org Wed Jan 3 10:34:45 2018 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2018 10:34:45 +0100 Subject: mgar stuck applying patch In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <7149605B-5A97-4F4D-A6E5-602418BFE534@opencsw.org> Hi Jake, Am 03.01.2018 um 04:31 schrieb Jake Goerzen : > I have a recipe I can build unstable9x successfully, but on unstable9s it gets stuck at applying patch? I can reproduce this. It looks like an issue in the gluecode during fork: unstable9s% pstack 27002 27002: git am --ignore-space-change --ignore-whitespace /home/dam/mgar/pkg/to ff3dcba4 lwp_park (0, 0, 0) ff3d3d3c s9_lwp_park (0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0) + 6c ff3dcb08 s9_handler (0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0) + 90 fec811bc mutex_lock_queue (fec98c04, 0, fed82408, 0, 0, 0) + 104 fec818cc mutex_lock_internal (0, 0, fec90000, 0, 0, 0) + 610 fed58a28 atfork_append (0, 0, fedd6044, fed82404, fed82408, 0) + 4 fed58b94 pthread_atfork (0, 0, fedd6044, ffe77590, 188800, 188a2c) + 24 fedd6114 solaris_locking_setup (fedd6044, 0, fedd5fe0, 400, fef5f140, 400) + 90 fed58d70 run_postfork_child (fed823f0, fed82408, 2526c, fec7cfa8, 5, 0) + 24 fec7cfa8 fork1 (1, 1afc8, 0, 0, 0, 0) + f4 fec7d05c fork (0, 4, ffbff3c0, 223544, 1b5d80, 0) + 28 00151534 start_command (ffbff4a4, 0, 9, 0, 0, 0) + 220 00151b80 run_command (ffbff4a4, 0, 20, 0, 8, 8) + 4 00151cac run_command_v_opt (ffbff660, 28, 1e6c00, 223544, 1b5d80, 0) + 14 000212a8 ???????? (ffbff660, ffffffff, 1fc000, 223544, 1aadd0, 0) 00021308 ???????? (ffbff63c, ffbff640, ffbffa73, 1dadc8, 0, 1b5000) 00021448 main (ffbff660, ffbff63c, 1fc818, 1b6fe8, ffbff640, ffbff7a4) + f8 0001f840 _start (0, ffbff65c, 1, ff3dca78, ff3ee850, ff3ee000) + 108 Maybe there is a patch, but I am a bit reluctant as this ususally means raising libc-level. Best regards ? Dago -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896 From jh at opencsw.org Wed Jan 3 10:39:06 2018 From: jh at opencsw.org (Jan Holzhueter) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2018 10:39:06 +0100 Subject: mgar stuck applying patch In-Reply-To: <7149605B-5A97-4F4D-A6E5-602418BFE534@opencsw.org> References: <7149605B-5A97-4F4D-A6E5-602418BFE534@opencsw.org> Message-ID: Hi, try with NOGITPATCH += 1 git stuff might be broken maybe? Am 03.01.18 um 10:34 schrieb Dagobert Michelsen via maintainers: > Hi Jake, > > Am 03.01.2018 um 04:31 schrieb Jake Goerzen : >> I have a recipe I can build unstable9x successfully, but on unstable9s it gets stuck at applying patch? > > I can reproduce this. It looks like an issue in the gluecode during fork: > > unstable9s% pstack 27002 > 27002: git am --ignore-space-change --ignore-whitespace /home/dam/mgar/pkg/to > ff3dcba4 lwp_park (0, 0, 0) > ff3d3d3c s9_lwp_park (0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0) + 6c > ff3dcb08 s9_handler (0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0) + 90 > fec811bc mutex_lock_queue (fec98c04, 0, fed82408, 0, 0, 0) + 104 > fec818cc mutex_lock_internal (0, 0, fec90000, 0, 0, 0) + 610 > fed58a28 atfork_append (0, 0, fedd6044, fed82404, fed82408, 0) + 4 > fed58b94 pthread_atfork (0, 0, fedd6044, ffe77590, 188800, 188a2c) + 24 > fedd6114 solaris_locking_setup (fedd6044, 0, fedd5fe0, 400, fef5f140, 400) + 90 > fed58d70 run_postfork_child (fed823f0, fed82408, 2526c, fec7cfa8, 5, 0) + 24 > fec7cfa8 fork1 (1, 1afc8, 0, 0, 0, 0) + f4 > fec7d05c fork (0, 4, ffbff3c0, 223544, 1b5d80, 0) + 28 > 00151534 start_command (ffbff4a4, 0, 9, 0, 0, 0) + 220 > 00151b80 run_command (ffbff4a4, 0, 20, 0, 8, 8) + 4 > 00151cac run_command_v_opt (ffbff660, 28, 1e6c00, 223544, 1b5d80, 0) + 14 > 000212a8 ???????? (ffbff660, ffffffff, 1fc000, 223544, 1aadd0, 0) > 00021308 ???????? (ffbff63c, ffbff640, ffbffa73, 1dadc8, 0, 1b5000) > 00021448 main (ffbff660, ffbff63c, 1fc818, 1b6fe8, ffbff640, ffbff7a4) + f8 > 0001f840 _start (0, ffbff65c, 1, ff3dca78, ff3ee850, ff3ee000) + 108 > > > Maybe there is a patch, but I am a bit reluctant as this ususally means raising libc-level. > > > Best regards > > ? Dago > From jgoerzen at opencsw.org Wed Jan 3 18:35:46 2018 From: jgoerzen at opencsw.org (Jake Goerzen) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2018 09:35:46 -0800 Subject: mgar stuck applying patch In-Reply-To: References: <7149605B-5A97-4F4D-A6E5-602418BFE534@opencsw.org> Message-ID: <7f77a922-388b-5312-9050-d0084888184f@opencsw.org> Hi Jan and Dago, Yes, that was it. The recipe now builds. Thanks, Jake On 01/03/18 01:39, Jan Holzhueter via maintainers wrote: > Hi, > try with NOGITPATCH += 1 > git stuff might be broken maybe? > > > > > Am 03.01.18 um 10:34 schrieb Dagobert Michelsen via maintainers: >> Hi Jake, >> >> Am 03.01.2018 um 04:31 schrieb Jake Goerzen : >>> I have a recipe I can build unstable9x successfully, but on unstable9s it gets stuck at applying patch? >> I can reproduce this. It looks like an issue in the gluecode during fork: >> >> unstable9s% pstack 27002 >> 27002: git am --ignore-space-change --ignore-whitespace /home/dam/mgar/pkg/to >> ff3dcba4 lwp_park (0, 0, 0) >> ff3d3d3c s9_lwp_park (0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0) + 6c >> ff3dcb08 s9_handler (0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0) + 90 >> fec811bc mutex_lock_queue (fec98c04, 0, fed82408, 0, 0, 0) + 104 >> fec818cc mutex_lock_internal (0, 0, fec90000, 0, 0, 0) + 610 >> fed58a28 atfork_append (0, 0, fedd6044, fed82404, fed82408, 0) + 4 >> fed58b94 pthread_atfork (0, 0, fedd6044, ffe77590, 188800, 188a2c) + 24 >> fedd6114 solaris_locking_setup (fedd6044, 0, fedd5fe0, 400, fef5f140, 400) + 90 >> fed58d70 run_postfork_child (fed823f0, fed82408, 2526c, fec7cfa8, 5, 0) + 24 >> fec7cfa8 fork1 (1, 1afc8, 0, 0, 0, 0) + f4 >> fec7d05c fork (0, 4, ffbff3c0, 223544, 1b5d80, 0) + 28 >> 00151534 start_command (ffbff4a4, 0, 9, 0, 0, 0) + 220 >> 00151b80 run_command (ffbff4a4, 0, 20, 0, 8, 8) + 4 >> 00151cac run_command_v_opt (ffbff660, 28, 1e6c00, 223544, 1b5d80, 0) + 14 >> 000212a8 ???????? (ffbff660, ffffffff, 1fc000, 223544, 1aadd0, 0) >> 00021308 ???????? (ffbff63c, ffbff640, ffbffa73, 1dadc8, 0, 1b5000) >> 00021448 main (ffbff660, ffbff63c, 1fc818, 1b6fe8, ffbff640, ffbff7a4) + f8 >> 0001f840 _start (0, ffbff65c, 1, ff3dca78, ff3ee850, ff3ee000) + 108 >> >> >> Maybe there is a patch, but I am a bit reluctant as this ususally means raising libc-level. >> >> >> Best regards >> >> ? Dago >> From dam at opencsw.org Mon Jan 15 09:52:25 2018 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 09:52:25 +0100 Subject: Fwd: SF.net SVN: gar:[26317] csw/mgar/pkg/tor/trunk References: <1515969236.17203.16663@sfp-scm-5.v30.ch3.sourceforge.com> Message-ID: Hi Jake, in this case it is probably ok to do LINKER_MAPS = and also override the error for the package - it is probably worse to stick with an old TOR version than to upgrade Solaris. Best regards ? Dago > Anfang der weitergeleiteten Nachricht: > > Von: jake_goerzen--- via devel > Betreff: SF.net SVN: gar:[26317] csw/mgar/pkg/tor/trunk > Datum: 14. Januar 2018 um 23:33:55 MEZ > An: devel at lists.opencsw.org > Kopie: jake_goerzen at users.sourceforge.net > Antwort an: Broadcasts commit logs for build descriptions and GAR > > Revision: 26317 > http://sourceforge.net/p/gar/code/26317 > Author: jake_goerzen > Date: 2018-01-14 22:33:55 +0000 (Sun, 14 Jan 2018) > Log Message: > ----------- > tor/trunk: downgrade to version 0.2.5.16 security release since newer versions require vasprintf which is not available in the current build level > > Modified Paths: > -------------- > csw/mgar/pkg/tor/trunk/Makefile > csw/mgar/pkg/tor/trunk/checksums > > Modified: csw/mgar/pkg/tor/trunk/Makefile > =================================================================== > --- csw/mgar/pkg/tor/trunk/Makefile 2018-01-14 22:19:08 UTC (rev 26316) > +++ csw/mgar/pkg/tor/trunk/Makefile 2018-01-14 22:33:55 UTC (rev 26317) > @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ > # $Id$ > NAME = tor > -VERSION = 0.2.8.6 > +VERSION = 0.2.5.16 > GARTYPE = v2 > > DESCRIPTION = Secure network traffic router > @@ -22,6 +22,8 @@ > RUNTIME_DEP_PKGS_CSWtor += CSWlibz1 > RUNTIME_DEP_PKGS_CSWtor += CSWlibssp0 > > +NOGITPATCH = 1 > + > GARCOMPILER = GNU > > BUILD64 = 1 > > Modified: csw/mgar/pkg/tor/trunk/checksums > =================================================================== > --- csw/mgar/pkg/tor/trunk/checksums 2018-01-14 22:19:08 UTC (rev 26316) > +++ csw/mgar/pkg/tor/trunk/checksums 2018-01-14 22:33:55 UTC (rev 26317) > @@ -1 +1 @@ > -195e4b3f8d19ca2cd816f1e826b61f86 tor-0.2.8.6.tar.gz > +2d0d6da30a06419c307f05210a944ac3 tor-0.2.5.16.tar.gz > > This was sent by the SourceForge.net collaborative development platform, the world's largest Open Source development site. > -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dam at opencsw.org Mon Jan 15 16:13:02 2018 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 16:13:02 +0100 Subject: OpenCSW 10th Anniversary Camp Message-ID: <7E71624F-7067-47EF-8F68-9B6DCD7F9F34@opencsw.org> Dear maintainers, OpenCSW was founded 6. December 2008 and we will have our 10th anniversary this year! Personally I don?t have much to do with Solaris any more (as probably most of you too) but I still think back how much fun it was and I wonder what all the cool people from those days are doing now. The camps have basically stalled in the past years (the last one was in Ilmenau 2014). However, maybe there is some interest in doing a special 10 year anniversary camp where all attendees talk about their current profession and hobbies and what they think is cool, have some beer, probably hack on stuff of general interest, ideas welcome! I?ll happily take suggestions on where to make the camp and the agenda, I could think of making it in Dublin, first because it is easily reachable and also because it was a great venue last time. Best regards ? Dago -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896 From cgrzemba at opencsw.org Mon Jan 15 18:58:46 2018 From: cgrzemba at opencsw.org (cgrzemba at opencsw.org) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 18:58:46 +0100 Subject: OpenCSW 10th Anniversary Camp In-Reply-To: <7E71624F-7067-47EF-8F68-9B6DCD7F9F34@opencsw.org> References: <7E71624F-7067-47EF-8F68-9B6DCD7F9F34@opencsw.org> Message-ID: On 15.01.18 16:13, Dagobert Michelsen via maintainers wrote: > > Dear maintainers, > > OpenCSW was founded 6. December 2008 and we will have our 10th anniversary this year! > Personally I don?t have much to do with Solaris any more (as probably most of you too) > but I still think back how much fun it was and I wonder what all the cool people > from those days are doing now. > > The camps have basically stalled in the past years (the last one was in Ilmenau 2014). > However, maybe there is some interest in doing a special 10 year anniversary camp > where all attendees talk about their current profession and hobbies and what they > think is cool, have some beer, probably hack on stuff of general interest, ideas welcome! > > I?ll happily take suggestions on where to make the camp and the agenda, > I could think of making it in Dublin, first because it is easily reachable and > also because it was a great venue last time. > > > Best regards > > ?? Dago > Count me in! Carsten -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jgoerzen at opencsw.org Mon Jan 15 23:11:56 2018 From: jgoerzen at opencsw.org (Jake Goerzen) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 14:11:56 -0800 Subject: Fwd: SF.net SVN: gar:[26317] csw/mgar/pkg/tor/trunk In-Reply-To: References: <1515969236.17203.16663@sfp-scm-5.v30.ch3.sourceforge.com> Message-ID: Hi Dago, Yes, that's a good idea. I set that and rebuilt a newer version 0.2.9.14 and the updated packages are now submitted to the catalog. Thanks, Jake On 01/15/18 00:52, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > Hi Jake, > > in this case it is probably ok to do > LINKER_MAPS = > and also override the error for the package - it is probably worse to > stick with an old TOR version than to upgrade Solaris. > > > Best regards > > ? Dago > >> Anfang der weitergeleiteten Nachricht: >> >> *Von: *jake_goerzen--- via devel > > >> *Betreff: **SF.net SVN: gar:[26317] >> csw/mgar/pkg/tor/trunk* >> *Datum: *14. Januar 2018 um 23:33:55 MEZ >> *An: *devel at lists.opencsw.org >> *Kopie: *jake_goerzen at users.sourceforge.net >> >> *Antwort an: *Broadcasts commit logs for build descriptions and GAR >> > >> >> Revision: 26317 >> http://sourceforge.net/p/gar/code/26317 >> Author: jake_goerzen >> Date: 2018-01-14 22:33:55 +0000 (Sun, 14 Jan 2018) >> Log Message: >> ----------- >> tor/trunk: downgrade to version 0.2.5.16 security release since newer >> versions require vasprintf which is not available in the current >> build level >> >> Modified Paths: >> -------------- >> csw/mgar/pkg/tor/trunk/Makefile >> csw/mgar/pkg/tor/trunk/checksums >> >> Modified: csw/mgar/pkg/tor/trunk/Makefile >> =================================================================== >> --- csw/mgar/pkg/tor/trunk/Makefile2018-01-14 22:19:08 UTC (rev 26316) >> +++ csw/mgar/pkg/tor/trunk/Makefile2018-01-14 22:33:55 UTC (rev 26317) >> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ >> # $Id$ >> NAME = tor >> -VERSION = 0.2.8.6 >> +VERSION = 0.2.5.16 >> GARTYPE = v2 >> >> DESCRIPTION = Secure network traffic router >> @@ -22,6 +22,8 @@ >> RUNTIME_DEP_PKGS_CSWtor += CSWlibz1 >> RUNTIME_DEP_PKGS_CSWtor += CSWlibssp0 >> >> +NOGITPATCH = 1 >> + >> GARCOMPILER = GNU >> >> BUILD64 = 1 >> >> Modified: csw/mgar/pkg/tor/trunk/checksums >> =================================================================== >> --- csw/mgar/pkg/tor/trunk/checksums2018-01-14 22:19:08 UTC (rev 26316) >> +++ csw/mgar/pkg/tor/trunk/checksums2018-01-14 22:33:55 UTC (rev 26317) >> @@ -1 +1 @@ >> -195e4b3f8d19ca2cd816f1e826b61f86 tor-0.2.8.6.tar.gz >> +2d0d6da30a06419c307f05210a944ac3 tor-0.2.5.16.tar.gz >> >> This was sent by the SourceForge.net >> collaborative development platform, the world's largest Open Source >> development site. >> > > -- > "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by > wanting to do something, > and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - > xkcd #896 > From laurent at opencsw.org Mon Jan 22 14:40:57 2018 From: laurent at opencsw.org (Laurent Blume) Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 14:40:57 +0100 Subject: OpenCSW 10th Anniversary Camp In-Reply-To: <7E71624F-7067-47EF-8F68-9B6DCD7F9F34@opencsw.org> References: <7E71624F-7067-47EF-8F68-9B6DCD7F9F34@opencsw.org> Message-ID: A camp with more beer and less Solaris? Count me in! I'm good for Dublin, I've not been there yet. I'm also good for pretty much any locale reachable under a 6 hour flight for that kind of short stay, so feel free to target white beaches if you feel like it! :D Laurent Le 2018/01/15 16:13 +0100, List For Opencsw Maintainers a ?crit: > Dear maintainers, > > OpenCSW was founded 6. December 2008 and we will have our 10th anniversary this year! > Personally I don?t have much to do with Solaris any more (as probably most of you too) > but I still think back how much fun it was and I wonder what all the cool people > from those days are doing now. > > The camps have basically stalled in the past years (the last one was in Ilmenau 2014). > However, maybe there is some interest in doing a special 10 year anniversary camp > where all attendees talk about their current profession and hobbies and what they > think is cool, have some beer, probably hack on stuff of general interest, ideas welcome! > > I?ll happily take suggestions on where to make the camp and the agenda, > I could think of making it in Dublin, first because it is easily reachable and > also because it was a great venue last time. > > > Best regards > > ? Dago > ? From rmottola at opencsw.org Mon Jan 22 18:26:45 2018 From: rmottola at opencsw.org (Riccardo Mottola) Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 18:26:45 +0100 Subject: OpenCSW 10th Anniversary Camp In-Reply-To: References: <7E71624F-7067-47EF-8F68-9B6DCD7F9F34@opencsw.org> Message-ID: Hi, Laurent Blume via maintainers wrote: > A camp with more beer and less Solaris? > Count me in! But some hacking would be fun nevertheless?? > I'm good for Dublin, I've not been there yet. > I'm also good for pretty much any locale reachable under a 6 hour flight > for that kind of short stay, so feel free to target white beaches if you > feel like it! What do you think of Frankfurt? Actually a place easily reachable with Ryanair and where the Airport is not too far :) Frankfurt is so-so, but I've never been there. Actually, Dublin is a littlebit expensive for a stay, depending on the season, I already had a hacking meeting there and it was $$$. Actually ??? Riccardo From dam at opencsw.org Wed Jan 24 08:13:29 2018 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 08:13:29 +0100 Subject: OpenCSW 10th Anniversary Camp In-Reply-To: References: <7E71624F-7067-47EF-8F68-9B6DCD7F9F34@opencsw.org>

Message-ID: Hi Riccardo, Am 22.01.2018 um 18:26 schrieb Riccardo Mottola via maintainers : > Laurent Blume via maintainers wrote: >> A camp with more beer and less Solaris? >> Count me in! > > But some hacking would be fun nevertheless?? Of course! >> I'm good for Dublin, I've not been there yet. >> I'm also good for pretty much any locale reachable under a 6 hour flight >> for that kind of short stay, so feel free to target white beaches if you >> feel like it! > > What do you think of Frankfurt? > Actually a place easily reachable with Ryanair and where the Airport is not too far :) Frankfurt is so-so, but I've never been there. Well, the main reason is there is no maintainer in Frankfurt to organize this ;-) > Actually, Dublin is a littlebit expensive for a stay, depending on the season, I already had a hacking meeting there and it was $$$. Actually ??? I guess that depended on your specific event. Last time it wasn?t too expensive - especially when you compare it to Frankfurt. But I am pretty sure we find something that suits everyones needs. Best regards ? Dago -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rmottola at opencsw.org Tue Jan 30 15:39:02 2018 From: rmottola at opencsw.org (Riccardo Mottola) Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 15:39:02 +0100 Subject: platforms build hangs at juicing Message-ID: Hi all! I wanted to rebuild all the GNUstep packages with the fresh releases. I started with gnustep-make of course, but when sparc 9 finishes /home/rmottola/spool.5.9-sparc/CSWgnustep-make/install/checkpkg_override /home/rmottola/spool.5.9-sparc/CSWgnustep-make/install/copyright /home/rmottola/spool.5.9-sparc/CSWgnustep-make/install/depend ## Validating control scripts. ## Packaging complete. mkp: exec( pkgtrans -s /home/rmottola/spool.5.9-sparc /tmp/gnustep_make-2.7.0,REV=2018.01.30-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg CSWgnustep-make ) Transferring package instance mkp: exec( gzip -9 -f /tmp/gnustep_make-2.7.0,REV=2018.01.30-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg ) mkp: exec( mv /tmp/gnustep_make-2.7.0,REV=2018.01.30-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz /home/rmottola/pkgs ) mkp: exec( rm -rf /home/rmottola/spool.5.9-sparc/CSWgnustep-make ) INFO 2018-01-30 15:12:39,203 package_stats.py:132 Juicing the svr4 package stream files... 0% ETA: --:--:-- | | and just sits there for undefined time! Is this a package issue or an infrastructure issue? I am going to build the packages one by one on all 4 unstable machines and see what happens. Riccardo From jh at opencsw.org Tue Jan 30 15:51:04 2018 From: jh at opencsw.org (Jan Holzhueter) Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 15:51:04 +0100 Subject: platforms build hangs at juicing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <3f84ea00-d616-72b8-5e7b-04746586682c@opencsw.org> Could be that the packagedb rest interface was hung. Restartete the apache. try again. Am 30.01.18 um 15:39 schrieb Riccardo Mottola via maintainers: > Hi all! > > I wanted to rebuild all the GNUstep packages with the fresh releases. > > I started with gnustep-make of course, but when sparc 9 finishes > > /home/rmottola/spool.5.9-sparc/CSWgnustep-make/install/checkpkg_override > /home/rmottola/spool.5.9-sparc/CSWgnustep-make/install/copyright > /home/rmottola/spool.5.9-sparc/CSWgnustep-make/install/depend > ## Validating control scripts. > ## Packaging complete. > mkp: exec( pkgtrans -s /home/rmottola/spool.5.9-sparc > /tmp/gnustep_make-2.7.0,REV=2018.01.30-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg > CSWgnustep-make ) > Transferring package instance > mkp: exec( gzip -9 -f > /tmp/gnustep_make-2.7.0,REV=2018.01.30-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg ) > mkp: exec( mv > /tmp/gnustep_make-2.7.0,REV=2018.01.30-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > /home/rmottola/pkgs ) > mkp: exec( rm -rf /home/rmottola/spool.5.9-sparc/CSWgnustep-make ) > INFO 2018-01-30 15:12:39,203 package_stats.py:132 Juicing the svr4 > package stream files... > ? 0% ETA:? --:--:-- |????????????????????????????????????????????????? > ?????????????????????????????? | > > and just sits there for undefined time! Is this a package issue or an > infrastructure issue? > I am going to build the packages one by one on all 4 unstable machines > and see what happens. > > Riccardo > From dam at opencsw.org Tue Jan 30 16:19:26 2018 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 16:19:26 +0100 Subject: platforms build hangs at juicing In-Reply-To: <3f84ea00-d616-72b8-5e7b-04746586682c@opencsw.org> References: <3f84ea00-d616-72b8-5e7b-04746586682c@opencsw.org> Message-ID: <7EA2EC2F-D316-45B6-872C-FCA106FC4215@opencsw.org> Hi, this is an issue with the wrapper for the Solaris 9 brand where fork hangs. I have not identified the issue yet. For starters you can build the packages individually and check the package for Solaris 9 Sparc on Solaris 10 by invoking checkpkg manually. Best regards ? Dago > Am 30.01.2018 um 15:51 schrieb Jan Holzhueter via maintainers : > > Could be that the packagedb rest interface was hung. > Restartete the apache. > try again. > > Am 30.01.18 um 15:39 schrieb Riccardo Mottola via maintainers: >> Hi all! >> >> I wanted to rebuild all the GNUstep packages with the fresh releases. >> >> I started with gnustep-make of course, but when sparc 9 finishes >> >> /home/rmottola/spool.5.9-sparc/CSWgnustep-make/install/checkpkg_override >> /home/rmottola/spool.5.9-sparc/CSWgnustep-make/install/copyright >> /home/rmottola/spool.5.9-sparc/CSWgnustep-make/install/depend >> ## Validating control scripts. >> ## Packaging complete. >> mkp: exec( pkgtrans -s /home/rmottola/spool.5.9-sparc >> /tmp/gnustep_make-2.7.0,REV=2018.01.30-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg >> CSWgnustep-make ) >> Transferring package instance >> mkp: exec( gzip -9 -f >> /tmp/gnustep_make-2.7.0,REV=2018.01.30-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg ) >> mkp: exec( mv >> /tmp/gnustep_make-2.7.0,REV=2018.01.30-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz >> /home/rmottola/pkgs ) >> mkp: exec( rm -rf /home/rmottola/spool.5.9-sparc/CSWgnustep-make ) >> INFO 2018-01-30 15:12:39,203 package_stats.py:132 Juicing the svr4 >> package stream files... >> 0% ETA: --:--:-- | >> | >> >> and just sits there for undefined time! Is this a package issue or an >> infrastructure issue? >> I am going to build the packages one by one on all 4 unstable machines >> and see what happens. >> >> Riccardo >> > -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rmottola at opencsw.org Tue Jan 30 18:34:57 2018 From: rmottola at opencsw.org (Riccardo Mottola) Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 18:34:57 +0100 Subject: platforms build hangs at juicing In-Reply-To: <7EA2EC2F-D316-45B6-872C-FCA106FC4215@opencsw.org> Message-ID: <943ebf36537c453c995831b7d02bd97b@Balthasar.local> Hi, On 2018-01-30 16:19:26 +0100 Dagobert Michelsen via maintainers wrote: > Hi, > > this is an issue with the wrapper for the Solaris 9 brand where fork > hangs. > I have not identified the issue yet. For starters you can build the > packages Once such a similar issue happened due to a bad openssh upgrade, do you remember? > individually and check the package for Solaris 9 Sparc on Solaris 10 > by I built them on all 4 platforms with success, that's a thing at least, "mgar package" worked, so I have them.. could I just upload them_ > invoking > checkpkg manually. there is no checkpkg executable... Riccardo From dam at opencsw.org Wed Jan 31 15:36:48 2018 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 15:36:48 +0100 Subject: platforms build hangs at juicing In-Reply-To: <943ebf36537c453c995831b7d02bd97b@Balthasar.local> References: <943ebf36537c453c995831b7d02bd97b@Balthasar.local> Message-ID: Hi Riccardo, > Am 30.01.2018 um 18:34 schrieb Riccardo Mottola via maintainers : > > Hi, > > On 2018-01-30 16:19:26 +0100 Dagobert Michelsen via maintainers wrote: > >> Hi, >> this is an issue with the wrapper for the Solaris 9 brand where fork hangs. >> I have not identified the issue yet. For starters you can build the packages > > Once such a similar issue happened due to a bad openssh upgrade, do you remember? > >> individually and check the package for Solaris 9 Sparc on Solaris 10 by > > I built them on all 4 platforms with success, that's a thing at least, "mgar package" worked, so I have them.. could I just upload them_ > >> invoking >> checkpkg manually. > > there is no checkpkg executable... It works like this: dam at unstable10x [global]:/home/dam/staging/build-19.Jan.2018 > ls -l Gesamt 2316 -rw-r--r-- 1 dam csw 56170 Jan 19 14:58 libhistory7-7.0,REV=2018.01.19-SunOS5.10-sparc-UNCOMMITTED.pkg.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 dam csw 56504 Jan 19 15:08 libhistory7-7.0,REV=2018.01.19-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 dam csw 211834 Jan 19 14:58 libreadline_dev-7.0,REV=2018.01.19-SunOS5.10-sparc-UNCOMMITTED.pkg.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 dam csw 191679 Jan 19 15:08 libreadline_dev-7.0,REV=2018.01.19-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 dam csw 296463 Jan 19 14:58 libreadline7-7.0,REV=2018.01.19-SunOS5.10-sparc-UNCOMMITTED.pkg.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 dam csw 297283 Jan 19 15:08 libreadline7-7.0,REV=2018.01.19-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 dam csw 13383 Jan 19 14:58 readline_stub-7.0,REV=2018.01.19-SunOS5.10-all-UNCOMMITTED.pkg.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 dam csw 13372 Jan 19 15:08 readline_stub-7.0,REV=2018.01.19-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz dam at unstable10x [global]:/home/dam/staging/build-19.Jan.2018 > PYTHONPATH=~/mgar/pkg/.buildsys/v2 ~/mgar/pkg/.buildsys/v2/bin/checkpkg --os-releases=SunOS5.10 --catalog-architecture=sparc --catalog-release=unstabl e libhistory7-7.0,REV=2018.01.19-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz libreadline_dev-7.0,REV=2018.01.19-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz libreadline7-7.0,REV=2018.01.19-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz readline_stub-7.0,REV=2018.01.19-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz INFO 2018-01-31 15:35:54,936 package_stats.py:132 Juicing the svr4 package stream files... 100% Time: 0:00:05 |#################################################################################################################################################################################################| INFO 2018-01-31 15:36:02,788 checkpkg_lib.py:263 Unwrapping candies... 100% |###############################################################################################################################################################################################################| INFO 2018-01-31 15:36:02,924 checkpkg_lib.py:878 Tasting candies one by one... 100% |###############################################################################################################################################################################################################| INFO 2018-01-31 15:36:03,775 checkpkg_lib.py:914 Tasting them all at once... INFO 2018-01-31 15:36:10,215 checkpkg_lib.py:305 Stuffing the candies under the pillow... 100% |###############################################################################################################################################################################################################| CSWlibreadline7: CSWreadline: * Dependency issues of CSWlibreadline7: * CSWlibncurses5 is needed by CSWlibreadline7, because: * - opt/csw/lib/libreadline.so.7 needs the libncurses.so.5 soname * - opt/csw/lib/sparcv9/libreadline.so.7 needs the libncurses.so.5 soname * RUNTIME_DEP_PKGS_CSWlibreadline7 += CSWlibncurses5 * If you don't know of any reasons to include these dependencies, you might remove them: * ? CSWlibncurses6 * Dependency issues of CSWreadline: * If you don't know of any reasons to include these dependencies, you might remove them: * ? CSWlibhistory5 * ? CSWlibreadline5 # Checkpkg suggests adding the following lines to the GAR recipe: # This is a summary; see above for details. RUNTIME_DEP_PKGS_CSWlibreadline7 += CSWlibncurses5 If any of the reported errors were false positives, you can override them pasting the lines below to the GAR recipe. CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWlibreadline7 += surplus-dependency|CSWlibncurses6 CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWlibreadline7 += missing-dependency|CSWlibncurses5 Do not copy/paste these overrides without thinking! If you're not sure, scroll up and read the details. If you're still not sure, go to the wiki and read about the error tags you see, or ask on the maintainers@ mailing list. http://wiki.opencsw.org/checkpkg-error-tags WARNING: Some overrides did not match any errors. They can probably be removed, as they don't take any effect anyway. If you're getting errors at the same time, maybe you didn't specify your overrides correctly. * Unused Override: CSWreadline: unidentified-dependency CSWlibreadline5 * Unused Override: CSWreadline: unidentified-dependency CSWlibhistory5 * Unused Override: CSWreadline: archall-devel-package [1] 5586 exit 1 PYTHONPATH=~/mgar/pkg/.buildsys/v2 ~/mgar/pkg/.buildsys/v2/bin/checkpkg dam at unstable10x [global]:/home/dam/staging/build-19.Jan.2018 > Best regards ? Dago -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: