From dam at opencsw.org  Tue May  1 21:09:32 2018
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Tue, 1 May 2018 21:09:32 +0200
Subject: rebuilding WebServices / GNUTLS on 9
In-Reply-To: <16e73a31-445c-2d0c-017f-7e47c8344b92@opencsw.org>
References: <16e73a31-445c-2d0c-017f-7e47c8344b92@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <36FF95F9-D2FE-4F67-A206-929ABD099536@opencsw.org>

Hi Riccardo,

> Am 01.05.2018 um 09:42 schrieb Riccardo Mottola <rmottola at opencsw.org>:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I was rebuilding WebServices, of which now all libraries are up-to-date:
> 
> I get this on Solaris 10s:
> 
> CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWgnustep-webservices += surplus-dependency|CSWperformance
> CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWgnustep-webservices += dependency-on-nonexistent-package|CSWperformance
> 
> Why not existent? it is installed!
> 
> application CSWperformance                   performance - GNUstep data utility library

Ugh, that is probably another artefact from my attempt to clean up the mess around
CSWPerformance / CSWperformance. I?ll need to understand the design of pkgdb better,
maybe Maciej still remember and can shed some light on it.

> Then on Solaris 9x, both x86 and solaris
> Making all for test_tool testWebServices...
> Compiling file testWebServices.m ...
> Linking test_tool testWebServices ...
> Undefined                       first referenced
> symbol                             in file
> gnutls_rnd                          ././obj/libWebServices.so
> ld: fatal: Symbol referencing errors. No output written to obj/testWebServices
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> gmake[5]: *** [obj/testWebServices] Error 1
> 
> this comes from GNUtls, but didn't I build a new package and did you not install it?
> 
> the dates are all very old though:
> lrwxrwxrwx   1 root     other         21 Mar  8  2011 /opt/csw/lib/libgnutls.so -> libgnutls.so.26.16.13
> lrwxrwxrwx   1 root     other         19 Mar  8  2011 /opt/csw/lib/libgnutls.so.13 -> libgnutls.so.13.9.1
> -rwxr-xr-x   1 root     bin      1443896 Jan 18  2011 /opt/csw/lib/libgnutls.so.13.9.1
> lrwxrwxrwx   1 root     other         21 Mar  8  2011 /opt/csw/lib/libgnutls.so.26 -> libgnutls.so.26.16.13
> -rwxr-xr-x   1 root     bin      1304644 Jan 18  2011 /opt/csw/lib/libgnutls.so.26.16.13
> 
> I am confused or have a hole in memory!
> 
> Could you check that the catalog says? meybe you just forgot to install it.. or... GNUTLS ended up like the OpenSSL mess and I never finished the solaris 9 package? darn... I really forgot, too much time passed. I remember having issues... do you remember?

OpenSSL has already been taken care of by Jan to fix the hang issue.
I can?t remember where we were on GnuTLS.


Best regards

  ? Dago

-- 
"You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896


From maciej at opencsw.org  Tue May  1 21:30:24 2018
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej =?utf-8?Q?Blizi=C5=84ski?=)
Date: Tue, 1 May 2018 16:30:24 -0300
Subject: rebuilding WebServices / GNUTLS on 9
In-Reply-To: <36FF95F9-D2FE-4F67-A206-929ABD099536@opencsw.org>
References: <16e73a31-445c-2d0c-017f-7e47c8344b92@opencsw.org>
 <36FF95F9-D2FE-4F67-A206-929ABD099536@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <20180501192858.GA88863@blizinski-linux.roam.corp.google.com>

On Tue, May 01, 2018 at 09:09:32PM +0200, Dagobert Michelsen via maintainers wrote:
> Hi Riccardo,
> 
> > Am 01.05.2018 um 09:42 schrieb Riccardo Mottola <rmottola at opencsw.org>:
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I was rebuilding WebServices, of which now all libraries are up-to-date:
> > 
> > I get this on Solaris 10s:
> > 
> > CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWgnustep-webservices += surplus-dependency|CSWperformance
> > CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWgnustep-webservices += dependency-on-nonexistent-package|CSWperformance
> > 
> > Why not existent? it is installed!

pkgdb doesn't care about what's installed on your machine. It does care about
what is in the catalog (as represented in the database).

Have a browse around here:
http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/pkgdb/catalogs/

Look at the content of the catalogs you're interested in -- probably 'unstable',
because that's where the packages go after you build them.

Also, take a look here:

http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/pkgdb/catalognames/performance/

This is a list of all the .pkg.gz files that feature 'performance' as the
catalogname.

Overall tip how to deal with mess in pkgdb, if you managed to create some:

pkgdb will warn you about errors it has detected in the package, or potential
problems that might result if you upload the package to pkgdb. But you can
override any and all errors that it shows. So, you may, if you like, force an
upload of a package. If there's a sequence of steps that require you to have
some sort of an inconsistent state, feel free to use overrides, and finally
arrive at a consistent state.

A word of warning: the errors that pkgdb shows you are the only way in which
pkgdb can communicate to you that there are problems, there is no second level
protection. So, you have the freedom to take all the steps to arrive at a
consistent state, but you also have the possibility of leaving the database in
an inconsistent state -- in which case the automation will no longer write the
new catalog to disk, and package releases will stop. Dago knows where to look
for logs from catalog generation.

Dago: do you care to add a link to those logs from buildfarm.opencsw.org?

> > 
> > application CSWperformance                   performance - GNUstep data utility library
> 
> Ugh, that is probably another artefact from my attempt to clean up the mess around
> CSWPerformance / CSWperformance. I?ll need to understand the design of pkgdb better,
> maybe Maciej still remember and can shed some light on it.

My brain has garbage-collected most of intimate knowledge of pkgdb, but I still
remember the main ideas: there's a table which holds serialized metadata of each
.pkg.gz file, and there are relations which match every .pkg.gz file to a
catalog (arch+osrel+name_of_catalog).

Hope it helps,
Maciej

From bwalton at opencsw.org  Fri May 11 21:21:16 2018
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Fri, 11 May 2018 20:21:16 +0100
Subject: 10th Anniversary Camp!
Message-ID: <CAP30j14SuD6vPvYS1ffj_iJeoMZ=p3KHt_JKhML3-f0cR-KEfA@mail.gmail.com>

Hi All,

We're coming up on the 10 year anniversary of OpenCSW and thought it might
be fun to get together for a camp. Maciej and I are willing to host it in
Dublin again. We did a bit of pre-filtering to nail down when both Maciej
and I would be around as hosts and when Dago would also be available. That
left us two weekends in November. Please vote for your preferred weekend
here: https://doodle.com/poll/yc9xkw7vm3qqdt7t

Note that by voting for the Friday, you're voting for Fri-Sun.

We'll close the poll next Friday and publicize the chosen date. With that
nailed down, we can arrange the rest of the camp.

I know that I've essentially gone dormant over the last years, but I'd
still love to see you again if you're able to make it. :)

Thanks
-Ben
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/attachments/20180511/963c8590/attachment.html>

From bwalton at opencsw.org  Sat May 19 21:30:48 2018
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Sat, 19 May 2018 20:30:48 +0100
Subject: 10th Anniversary Camp!
In-Reply-To: <CAP30j14SuD6vPvYS1ffj_iJeoMZ=p3KHt_JKhML3-f0cR-KEfA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAP30j14SuD6vPvYS1ffj_iJeoMZ=p3KHt_JKhML3-f0cR-KEfA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAP30j14XmxQonpegM6yxJ6PqNPdoJoBuHg9LkrtcRTTjMf_WyA@mail.gmail.com>

Ok, the poll is now closed. The majority of folks preferred November 9-11,
so we'll go with that. Stay tuned for more details as we plan things.

Thanks
-Ben

On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 8:21 PM Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org> wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> We're coming up on the 10 year anniversary of OpenCSW and thought it might
> be fun to get together for a camp. Maciej and I are willing to host it in
> Dublin again. We did a bit of pre-filtering to nail down when both Maciej
> and I would be around as hosts and when Dago would also be available. That
> left us two weekends in November. Please vote for your preferred weekend
> here: https://doodle.com/poll/yc9xkw7vm3qqdt7t
>
> Note that by voting for the Friday, you're voting for Fri-Sun.
>
> We'll close the poll next Friday and publicize the chosen date. With that
> nailed down, we can arrange the rest of the camp.
>
> I know that I've essentially gone dormant over the last years, but I'd
> still love to see you again if you're able to make it. :)
>
> Thanks
> -Ben
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/attachments/20180519/f7e2b5f9/attachment.html>