<div class="gmail_quote">2009/3/16 Dagobert Michelsen <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:dam@opencsw.org">dam@opencsw.org</a>></span></div><div class="gmail_quote"><span dir="ltr">> About the "Core GAR" there is no doubt: It was released under GPLv2</span></div>
<div class="gmail_quote"><span dir="ltr">> and I'm comfortable with sticking my mGAR v2 stuff under it.</span></div><div class="gmail_quote"><span dir="ltr">> Personally, I like the idea of having all the stuff under the same license</span></div>
<div class="gmail_quote"><span dir="ltr">> if possible.</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana, sans-serif;"><br></span></div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana, sans-serif;">It would be nice if that were possible, I'm sure most people would be OK with GPLv2.</span><div>
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana, sans-serif;"><br></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana, sans-serif;">I don't think you should accept anything into mGAR that's not at the very least open source under some sort of recognised OSS licence (GPL, BSD...)</span><br>
<div><br>-- <br>Gary Law<br><br>
</div></div>