<p>Em 18/07/2011 14:02, <<a href="mailto:pfelecan@opencsw.org">pfelecan@opencsw.org</a>> escreveu:<br>
><br>
> Maciej BliziĆski <<a href="mailto:maciej@opencsw.org">maciej@opencsw.org</a>> writes:<br>
><br>
> > 2011/2/13 Peter FELECAN <<a href="mailto:pfelecan@opencsw.org">pfelecan@opencsw.org</a>>:<br>
> >> If we volunteered on the policy review is that we want to discuss. What<br>
> >> we don't wish is to run in circles.<br>
> ><br>
> > Yes, that was exactly the motivation behind policy-team: Have a small, agile<br>
> > team which can move quickly and get things done, while preserving the<br>
> > consensus-driven culture and allowing open discussion.<br>
> ><br>
> > I would like to revisit this topic in the near future.<br>
> ><br>
> > Peter, would you like to resume your participation in the policy team?<br>
><br>
> Of course I wish to. I think that we should start from where we left the<br>
> discussion before it was polluted, i.e., the copyright and the<br>
> abstract. Taking on the Debian policy document and adapting it to our<br>
> specifics but not more.</p>
<p>Excellent! I have since looked at sphinx, a higher level tool which helps with structured documentation. It uses reStructured Text as the lightweight markup language. I will send the patch and a link to an example when I'm back home at the beginning of August.</p>
<p>Maciej</p>