<html><head></head><body>Hi Peter,<br>
<br>
Personally I'd be ok with changing that default but it may have consequences I haven't considered.<br>
<br>
To fix it for a specific recipe, add the following line after thee include statement that pulls in gar:<br>
<br>
PATH := /opt/csw/gnu:$(PATH)<br>
<br>
Thanks<br>
-Ben<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">pfelecan@opencsw.org wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<pre style="white-space: pre-wrap; word-wrap:break-word; font-family: sans-serif">When configuring a project which uses gettext I have the following:<br /><br /> checking for xgettext... /usr/bin/xgettext<br /> checking for msgmerge... no<br /> checking for msgfmt... /usr/bin/msgfmt<br /> checking for gmsgfmt... /opt/csw/bin/gmsgfmt<br /><br />which raises the following issues:<br /><br /> 1. some utilities are taken from the base Solaris supply<br /> 2. other utilities are taken from Open CSW supply<br /> 3. and some utilities are not found...<br /><br />quite a mess; it is very probable that the gettext package has some<br />incoherent transforms of the binaries names, some with the 'g' prefix,<br />some without.<br /><br />All these issues are solved by adding the /opt/csw/gnu path to the<br />PATH environment variable:<br /><br /> checking for xgettext... /opt/csw/gnu/xgettext<br /> checking for msgmerge... /opt/csw/gnu/msgmerge<br /> checking for msgfmt... /opt/csw/gnu/msgfmt<br /> checking for gmsgfmt... /opt/csw/bin/gmsgfmt<br /><br />This is not the first time that I encounter issues that are solved by<br />this addition. Moreover, I think that in many cases, such as the one<br />described above, we have a higher coherency.<br /><br />Unfortunately, in the configure step of mGAR it is not clear how can<br />we enrich the PATH. The only way to do it, from my point of view, is<br />to modify its definition in <a href="http://gar.conf.mk">gar.conf.mk</a><br /><br />I remember that there was such a suggestion in the near past but with<br />no consequence.<br /><br />What do you think?<br /><br /><hr /><br />maintainers mailing list<br />maintainers@lists.opencsw.org<br /><a href="https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers">https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers</a><br />.:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.<br /><br /></pre></blockquote></div></body></html>