<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">Hi,<div><br><div><div>Am 15.06.2012 um 13:36 schrieb Ben Walton:</div><blockquote type="cite">I agree with you. We should preserve the traditional locations for data and doc directories when building gxx packages.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>The problem is when we have packages compiled both with Sun Studio</div><div>and gxx competing for the files. For licenses it is easy as the docdir</div><div>contains the catalogname of the package in the path which is unique.</div><div>This is not true for datadir.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Best regards</div><div><br></div><div> -- Dago</div><br><blockquote type="cite">Thanks<br>
-Ben<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">Carsten Grzemba <<a href="mailto:grzemba@contac-dt.de">grzemba@contac-dt.de</a>> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
Hi,<br><br>there are gcc packages which use prefix /opt/csw/gxx. mgar handles this in a kind that docdir and datadir also are located below this prefix (except license file)<br>Im my opinion we should not establish a new subpath /opt/csw/gxx/share instead put all the doc and data stuff below /opt/csw/share.<br><br>What think the others.<br>--<br signature="separator">Carsten Grzemba<br>
</blockquote></div>_______________________________________________<br>maintainers mailing list<br><a href="mailto:maintainers@lists.opencsw.org">maintainers@lists.opencsw.org</a><br>https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers<br>.:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.</blockquote></div><br></div></body></html>