<br /><br /><span>Am 08.04.14 schrieb <b class="name">Carsten Grzemba </b> <grzemba@contac-dt.de>:</span><blockquote cite="mid:bbaf0b976fc8.5343cea6@contac-dt.de" class="iwcQuote" style="border-left: 1px solid #00F; padding-left: 13px; margin-left: 0;" type="cite"><div class="mimepart text html">after some fiddle around why a non autotools package will find 32bit-libs and 64bit-libs not I saw that CSWcommon has a link<br />/opt/csw/lib/sparcv8 -> .<br />but it has no link<br />/opt/csw/lib/sparcv9/sparcv9 -> .<br /><br />Should we have this link or have we solve this with an explicit listed search path for the base: '-R/opt/csw/lib/64/$ISALIST -R/opt/csw/lib/64'<br /><br />Btw.: we have a recipe in gar for CSWcommon but it is not listed as 'package source' on http://www.opencsw.org/packages/CSWcommon/ (because it is called cswcommon?).<br /><br />Carsten
</div></blockquote>Interesting: binutils creates an empty dir /opt/csw/lib/sparcv9/sparcv9<br /><blockquote cite="mid:bbaf0b976fc8.5343cea6@contac-dt.de" class="iwcQuote" style="border-left: 1px solid #00F; padding-left: 13px; margin-left: 0;" type="cite"><div><br/></div></blockquote>