From bwalton at opencsw.org  Thu Apr  1 04:37:51 2010
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 22:37:51 -0400
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs qhull, qhull_rt
In-Reply-To: <d57eab941003301434v6ae9fde3g8fd6c4038a1a78e0@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201003291223.o2TCNaXf013748@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<d57eab941003291744p6a285311yda5708d2461bbc9d@mail.gmail.com>
	<992CF47E-7BE8-42B6-8367-6201CA0C38A3@opencsw.org>
	<d57eab941003301434v6ae9fde3g8fd6c4038a1a78e0@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1270089424-sup-6066@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>

Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Tue Mar 30 17:34:45 -0400 2010:

> yes, you can put anything you like as an "i" package I think.

I seem to recall reading (although I'm not able to dig up a reference
presently) that this is correct.  If it's doable, I think it's a
better place for the overrides file.

I agree with Dago that it's not something that should hold up the
release of a package; it's a 'beauty' issue, not a technical
shortcoming.

Thanks
-Ben
-- 
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302


From dam at opencsw.org  Thu Apr  1 12:15:40 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 12:15:40 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libpcap, libpcap_devel, tcpdump
Message-ID: <201004011015.o31AFed3011756@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* libpcap: minor version upgrade
  - from: 1.0.0,REV=2009.10.01
  -   to: 1.1.0,REV=2010.04.01
  + libpcap-1.1.0,REV=2010.04.01-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libpcap-1.1.0,REV=2010.04.01-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libpcap_devel-1.1.0,REV=2010.04.01-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libpcap_devel-1.1.0,REV=2010.04.01-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

* tcpdump: minor version upgrade
  - from: 4.0.0,REV=2009.10.01
  -   to: 4.1.0,REV=2010.04.01
  + tcpdump-4.1.0,REV=2010.04.01-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + tcpdump-4.1.0,REV=2010.04.01-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From phil at opencsw.org  Thu Apr  1 20:51:55 2010
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 11:51:55 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs qhull, qhull_rt
In-Reply-To: <1270089424-sup-6066@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
References: <201003291223.o2TCNaXf013748@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<d57eab941003291744p6a285311yda5708d2461bbc9d@mail.gmail.com>
	<992CF47E-7BE8-42B6-8367-6201CA0C38A3@opencsw.org>
	<d57eab941003301434v6ae9fde3g8fd6c4038a1a78e0@mail.gmail.com>
	<1270089424-sup-6066@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
Message-ID: <i2hd57eab941004011151j20e5e0b6rc287fdac3b8fb59f@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 7:37 PM, Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Tue Mar 30 17:34:45 -0400 2010:
>
>> yes, you can put anything you like as an "i" package I think.
>
> I seem to recall reading (although I'm not able to dig up a reference
> presently) that this is correct. ?If it's doable, I think it's a
> better place for the overrides file.
>
> I agree with Dago that it's not something that should hold up the
> release of a package; it's a 'beauty' issue, not a technical
> shortcoming.
>

I already released it

From phil at bolthole.com  Thu Apr  1 20:54:00 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 11:54:00 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libpcap, libpcap_devel, tcpdump
In-Reply-To: <201004011015.o31AFed3011756@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201004011015.o31AFed3011756@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <x2vd57eab941004011154s94998e60tda9ee2b836e26c6e@mail.gmail.com>

okay


On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 3:15 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> * libpcap: minor version upgrade
> ?- from: 1.0.0,REV=2009.10.01
> ?- ? to: 1.1.0,REV=2010.04.01
> ?+ libpcap-1.1.0,REV=2010.04.01-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ libpcap-1.1.0,REV=2010.04.01-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ libpcap_devel-1.1.0,REV=2010.04.01-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ libpcap_devel-1.1.0,REV=2010.04.01-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> * tcpdump: minor version upgrade
> ?- from: 4.0.0,REV=2009.10.01
> ?- ? to: 4.1.0,REV=2010.04.01
> ?+ tcpdump-4.1.0,REV=2010.04.01-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ tcpdump-4.1.0,REV=2010.04.01-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at opencsw.org  Thu Apr  1 20:54:44 2010
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 11:54:44 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] Newpkg: zebra
In-Reply-To: <9568F535-EABE-472E-B761-A71D66DE2D7F@opencsw.org>
References: <9568F535-EABE-472E-B761-A71D66DE2D7F@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <w2od57eab941004011154pbabbb2baz9452fbc54679567d@mail.gmail.com>

okay


On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 7:11 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>
> there is still a recompile of zebra laying around. The previous
> one had wrong binaries in it.
>

From phil at opencsw.org  Thu Apr  1 20:55:57 2010
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 11:55:57 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs cswpkgloghooks
In-Reply-To: <201003310016.o2V0GZbX023959@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201003310016.o2V0GZbX023959@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <m2nd57eab941004011155x11cb24e9n425994485d193ec@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 5:16 PM, Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>
> This update drops the CSWbash dependency and uses #!env bash instead.
>

great
Although really, better still would be to just program in standard sh

From phil at opencsw.org  Thu Apr  1 20:57:10 2010
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 11:57:10 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] Drop 5 packages from catalog
In-Reply-To: <x6sk7ghn70.fsf@opencsw.org>
References: <625385e31003290831s48c57fcbg4c0deb347fbe9ec5@mail.gmail.com>
	<x6iq8fhyn6.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<8B5671EB-AFEF-41C2-BCD1-B9451B8A0980@opencsw.org>
	<x6eij2i4xj.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<1DD1EC07-F6D3-4E73-985E-1EFC8294A2FD@opencsw.org>
	<x61vf2hspc.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<v2z625385e31003310138nc33a48ep52829eef16a36b5f@mail.gmail.com>
	<x6sk7ghn70.fsf@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <m2od57eab941004011157lc9b8c947ie4c9c787395aa5b6@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 2:09 AM, Peter FELECAN <pfelecan at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Peter Bonivart <bonivart at opencsw.org> writes:
>

>> Ok, but can we agree to drop:
>>
>> CSWpmcs (no dependents, obsolete)
>> CSWpmdigest (integrated into core perl)
>> CSWpmmodulebuild (integrated into core perl)
>
> Yes, we can drop the 3 packages above mentioned. As stated, I disagree
> only with the removal of CSWpilotlink.
>

nice to see agreement. just please remind me when the actual perl
release officially happens :)

From bwalton at opencsw.org  Thu Apr  1 21:02:02 2010
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2010 15:02:02 -0400
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs cswpkgloghooks
In-Reply-To: <m2nd57eab941004011155x11cb24e9n425994485d193ec@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201003310016.o2V0GZbX023959@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<m2nd57eab941004011155x11cb24e9n425994485d193ec@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1270148434-sup-7861@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>

Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Thu Apr 01 14:55:57 -0400 2010:

> Although really, better still would be to just program in standard sh

Standard sh sucks.  I won't use it for anything other than forking
something useful.

-Ben
-- 
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302


From rupert at opencsw.org  Fri Apr  2 10:48:49 2010
From: rupert at opencsw.org (rupert THURNER)
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 10:48:49 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] release trac-0.11.7
Message-ID: <o2u6af4271004020148r533fb8d6k98a468ebb1e25647@mail.gmail.com>

hi,

please release trac-0.11.7.

rupert.

From benny at opencsw.org  Fri Apr  2 16:47:10 2010
From: benny at opencsw.org (Benjamin von Mossner)
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 16:47:10 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_netanalysis, pm_netpacket,
	pm_netp(...)
Message-ID: <201004021447.o32ElAxC015637@login.bo.opencsw.org>

Hey Phil,

pm_netanalysis and pm_netpacket are package requests 
by users, the other ones are needed to build them. 
Please take them off the webpage...

* pm_universalcan: new package
  + pm_universalcan-1.16,REV=2010.03.31-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

* pm_netpacket: new package
  + pm_netpacket-0.41.1,REV=2010.03.31-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

* pm_tstmockobject: new package
  + pm_tstmockobject-1.09,REV=2010.03.31-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

* pm_netpcap: new package
  + pm_netpcap-0.16,REV=2010.03.31-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + pm_netpcap-0.16,REV=2010.03.31-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

* pm_tstexception: new package
  + pm_tstexception-0.29,REV=2010.03.31-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

* pm_universalisa: new package
  + pm_universalisa-1.03,REV=2010.03.31-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

* pm_netanalysis: new package
  + pm_netanalysis-0.40,REV=2010.03.31-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

Cheers,
benny
-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From hson at opencsw.org  Sat Apr  3 23:44:36 2010
From: hson at opencsw.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Roger_H=E5kansson?=)
Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2010 23:44:36 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libproxy
In-Reply-To: <d57eab941003220837l6ecba381o6867259ca829d62e@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4BA64225.9040909@opencsw.org>
	<d57eab941003220837l6ecba381o6867259ca829d62e@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4BB7B6C4.4030700@opencsw.org>

On 2010-03-22 16:37, Philip Brown wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Roger H?kansson<hson at opencsw.org>  wrote:
>> Further split the package, see issue 4307
>>
>>
>> libproxy-0.3.0,REV=2010.03.21-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>> libproxy-0.3.0,REV=2010.03.21-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>> libproxy_devel-0.3.0,REV=2010.03.21-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>> libproxy_devel-0.3.0,REV=2010.03.21-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>> libproxy_gnome-0.3.0,REV=2010.03.21-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>> libproxy_gnome-0.3.0,REV=2010.03.21-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>> libproxy_kde-0.3.0,REV=2010.03.21-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>> libproxy_kde-0.3.0,REV=2010.03.21-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>> py_libproxy-0.3.0,REV=2010.03.21-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>>
>
> problem with dependancies: uses isaexec in ALL packages. not appropriate.
>
> For that matter, why is there even a 64bit binary at all?
> (/opt/csw/bin/sparcv9/libproxy) ?

Package rebuilt, old files removed

libproxy-0.3.0,REV=2010.04.03-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
libproxy-0.3.0,REV=2010.04.03-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
libproxy_devel-0.3.0,REV=2010.04.03-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
libproxy_devel-0.3.0,REV=2010.04.03-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
libproxy_gnome-0.3.0,REV=2010.04.03-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
libproxy_gnome-0.3.0,REV=2010.04.03-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
libproxy_kde-0.3.0,REV=2010.04.03-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
libproxy_kde-0.3.0,REV=2010.04.03-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
py_libproxy-0.3.0,REV=2010.04.03-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz


From bwalton at opencsw.org  Sun Apr  4 15:01:19 2010
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2010 15:01:19 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libxml2, libxml2_devel, py_libxml2
Message-ID: <201004041301.o34D1JPq021492@login.bo.opencsw.org>

Hi Phil,

These packages address the recent zlib misuse exposed by the zlib update.

* libxml2: patchlevel upgrade
  - from: 2.7.6,REV=2009.12.17
  -   to: 2.7.7,REV=2010.03.29
  + libxml2-2.7.7,REV=2010.03.29-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libxml2-2.7.7,REV=2010.03.29-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libxml2_devel-2.7.7,REV=2010.03.29-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libxml2_devel-2.7.7,REV=2010.03.29-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + py_libxml2-2.7.7,REV=2010.03.29-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + py_libxml2-2.7.7,REV=2010.03.29-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

Thanks
-Ben
-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From benny at opencsw.org  Mon Apr  5 16:21:17 2010
From: benny at opencsw.org (Benjamin von Mossner)
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 16:21:17 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs xpdf, xpdf_utils
Message-ID: <201004051421.o35ELHXH020806@login.bo.opencsw.org>

Hi Phil,

due to the conflict between CSWpoppler and CSWxpdf (#0004390)
xpdf is now split into two separate packages.

* xpdf: revision upgrade
  - from: 2010.02.16
  -   to: 2010.04.05
  + xpdf-3.02p4,REV=2010.04.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + xpdf-3.02p4,REV=2010.04.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

* xpdf_utils: new package
  + xpdf_utils-3.02p4,REV=2010.04.05-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + xpdf_utils-3.02p4,REV=2010.04.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

Cheers,
benny
-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From dam at opencsw.org  Mon Apr  5 20:31:27 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 20:31:27 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libpcap, libpcap_devel, orbit2,
	tcpdump
In-Reply-To: <201003311329.o2VDT35U019146@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201003311329.o2VDT35U019146@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <D3C596E0-C13F-4341-A520-2A3E4733E016@opencsw.org>

Hi,

Am 31.03.2010 um 15:29 schrieb Dagobert Michelsen:
> * libpcap: minor version upgrade
>  - from: 1.0.0,REV=2009.10.01
>  -   to: 1.1,REV=2010.03.31
>  + libpcap-1.1,REV=2010.03.31-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>  + libpcap-1.1,REV=2010.03.31-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>  + libpcap_devel-1.1,REV=2010.03.31-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>  + libpcap_devel-1.1,REV=2010.03.31-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> 
> * orbit2: patchlevel upgrade
>  - from: 2.14.17,REV=2009.09.09
>  -   to: 2.14.18,REV=2010.03.31
>  + orbit2-2.14.18,REV=2010.03.31-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>  + orbit2-2.14.18,REV=2010.03.31-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> 
> * tcpdump: minor version upgrade
>  - from: 4.0.0,REV=2009.10.01
>  -   to: 4.1,REV=2010.03.31
>  + tcpdump-4.1,REV=2010.03.31-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>  + tcpdump-4.1,REV=2010.03.31-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

This is all confusing to me. libpcap and tcpdump are both on the frontpage,
but not orbit2, although there has been no acknowledge that the packages
have been accepted, but none of them are on the mirrors after 6 days.

Phil: Ping?


Best regards

  -- Dago

From dam at opencsw.org  Mon Apr  5 20:54:12 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 20:54:12 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] Drop 5 packages from catalog
In-Reply-To: <m2od57eab941004011157lc9b8c947ie4c9c787395aa5b6@mail.gmail.com>
References: <625385e31003290831s48c57fcbg4c0deb347fbe9ec5@mail.gmail.com>
	<x6iq8fhyn6.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<8B5671EB-AFEF-41C2-BCD1-B9451B8A0980@opencsw.org>
	<x6eij2i4xj.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<1DD1EC07-F6D3-4E73-985E-1EFC8294A2FD@opencsw.org>
	<x61vf2hspc.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<v2z625385e31003310138nc33a48ep52829eef16a36b5f@mail.gmail.com>
	<x6sk7ghn70.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<m2od57eab941004011157lc9b8c947ie4c9c787395aa5b6@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <3884CDE6-B5A9-49C2-8A07-4DBDBB03C722@opencsw.org>

Hi Phil,

Am 01.04.2010 um 20:57 schrieb Philip Brown:
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 2:09 AM, Peter FELECAN <pfelecan at opencsw.org> wrote:
>> Peter Bonivart <bonivart at opencsw.org> writes:
> 
>>> Ok, but can we agree to drop:
>>> 
>>> CSWpmcs (no dependents, obsolete)
>>> CSWpmdigest (integrated into core perl)
>>> CSWpmmodulebuild (integrated into core perl)
>> 
>> Yes, we can drop the 3 packages above mentioned. As stated, I disagree
>> only with the removal of CSWpilotlink.
> 
> nice to see agreement. just please remind me when the actual perl
> release officially happens :)

??? It was already released a week ago, so you can drop them now.
While we are at it you can also drop
  CSWcs clearsilver
which is also orphaned, outdated and no longer needed (was a dependency
for Trac before they switched to Genshi).


Best regards

  -- Dago

From phil at opencsw.org  Mon Apr  5 21:36:49 2010
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 12:36:49 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs ncsa_mosaic
In-Reply-To: <ce97543b1003300248u78dd0fc8t962187b1591badde@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201003291156.o2TBuOQX002011@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<d57eab941003291740x4ff886e1q232edc667b2473cb@mail.gmail.com>
	<ce97543b1003300248u78dd0fc8t962187b1591badde@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <g2gd57eab941004051236q501e7354o9ffa533ba1c1c8a0@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 2:48 AM, Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski
<maciej at opencsw.org> wrote:
> 2010/3/30 Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com>:

>> I would presume it cant even properly render 50% of the websites out
>> there, at this point
>
> It won't be this kind of justification. ?Mosaic is of historical
> value. ?If we added, say, an Atari ST emulator, it would be the same
> reason.

no, not at all the same.


An atari ST emulator, actually has a specific function, that has not
been supplanted.
If you wish to be nostalgic and play old ST games, then odds are you
need an emulator of some kind.

No emulator, no ability to play the games. So it actually adds value,
to have an atari emulator (or, MAME type progs) in our packages.

In contrast, if you dont have ncsa mosaic 1.0... you do *not* lose the
ability to view [html 1.0 or whatever] sites. There are plenty of
other browsers around to view them.

Our repository is not a museum. The only reason we keep v1 packages
around after v2 is out, is if they have unique functional value.  Once
they no longer do, we drop them in favour of the v2 package.

From phil at bolthole.com  Mon Apr  5 21:40:18 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 12:40:18 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] release trac-0.11.7
In-Reply-To: <o2u6af4271004020148r533fb8d6k98a468ebb1e25647@mail.gmail.com>
References: <o2u6af4271004020148r533fb8d6k98a468ebb1e25647@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <j2kd57eab941004051240ve2407884hccde0a57b637653a@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 1:48 AM, rupert THURNER <rupert at opencsw.org> wrote:
> hi,
>
> please release trac-0.11.7.
>

was pushed out yesterday

From phil at bolthole.com  Mon Apr  5 21:42:15 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 12:42:15 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_netanalysis, pm_netpacket,
	pm_netp(...)
In-Reply-To: <201004021447.o32ElAxC015637@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201004021447.o32ElAxC015637@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <u2nd57eab941004051242w2f2ed8f6x9c90444a7b2d2ece@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 7:47 AM, Benjamin von Mossner <benny at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Hey Phil,
>
> pm_netanalysis and pm_netpacket are package requests

you mean pm_netanalysis and pm_netpcap.
Thanks for mentioning this!  updated page.

I releasd the packages yesterday


> by users, the other ones are needed to build them.
> Please take them off the webpage...
>
> * pm_universalcan: new package
> ?+ pm_universalcan-1.16,REV=2010.03.31-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> * pm_netpacket: new package
> ?+ pm_netpacket-0.41.1,REV=2010.03.31-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> * pm_tstmockobject: new package
> ?+ pm_tstmockobject-1.09,REV=2010.03.31-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> * pm_netpcap: new package
> ?+ pm_netpcap-0.16,REV=2010.03.31-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ pm_netpcap-0.16,REV=2010.03.31-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> * pm_tstexception: new package
> ?+ pm_tstexception-0.29,REV=2010.03.31-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> * pm_universalisa: new package
> ?+ pm_universalisa-1.03,REV=2010.03.31-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> * pm_netanalysis: new package
> ?+ pm_netanalysis-0.40,REV=2010.03.31-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>

From phil at opencsw.org  Mon Apr  5 21:42:47 2010
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 12:42:47 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libproxy
In-Reply-To: <4BB7B6C4.4030700@opencsw.org>
References: <4BA64225.9040909@opencsw.org>
	<d57eab941003220837l6ecba381o6867259ca829d62e@mail.gmail.com>
	<4BB7B6C4.4030700@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <s2gd57eab941004051242h959d0046o2fbfe86c2013e728@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Roger H?kansson <hson at opencsw.org> wrote:
>
> Package rebuilt, old files removed
>

thanks. released yesterday

From phil at bolthole.com  Mon Apr  5 21:43:19 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 12:43:19 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libxml2, libxml2_devel, py_libxml2
In-Reply-To: <201004041301.o34D1JPq021492@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201004041301.o34D1JPq021492@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <h2pd57eab941004051243u785e4c7flac20dadc47ec8f07@mail.gmail.com>

On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 6:01 AM, Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>
> These packages address the recent zlib misuse exposed by the zlib update.
>

great. released yesterday




> * libxml2: patchlevel upgrade
> ?- from: 2.7.6,REV=2009.12.17
> ?- ? to: 2.7.7,REV=2010.03.29
> ?+ libxml2-2.7.7,REV=2010.03.29-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ libxml2-2.7.7,REV=2010.03.29-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ libxml2_devel-2.7.7,REV=2010.03.29-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ libxml2_devel-2.7.7,REV=2010.03.29-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ py_libxml2-2.7.7,REV=2010.03.29-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ py_libxml2-2.7.7,REV=2010.03.29-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> Thanks
> -Ben
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at opencsw.org  Mon Apr  5 21:44:00 2010
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 12:44:00 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libidl
In-Reply-To: <201003310817.o2V8HSiA013948@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201003310817.o2V8HSiA013948@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <n2id57eab941004051244v1eadcbc7zf539c6c82badea2e@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 1:17 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> * libidl: patchlevel upgrade
> ?- from: 0.8.13,REV=2009.06.10
> ?- ? to: 0.8.14,REV=2010.03.31
> ?+ libidl-0.8.14,REV=2010.03.31-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ libidl-0.8.14,REV=2010.03.31-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>

done yesterday

From bonivart at opencsw.org  Mon Apr  5 21:45:24 2010
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 21:45:24 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] release trac-0.11.7
In-Reply-To: <j2kd57eab941004051240ve2407884hccde0a57b637653a@mail.gmail.com>
References: <o2u6af4271004020148r533fb8d6k98a468ebb1e25647@mail.gmail.com> 
	<j2kd57eab941004051240ve2407884hccde0a57b637653a@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <j2w625385e31004051245h4e51223dnd6e03017592c3254@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 9:40 PM, Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 1:48 AM, rupert THURNER <rupert at opencsw.org> wrote:
>> hi,
>>
>> please release trac-0.11.7.
>>
>
> was pushed out yesterday

What do you mean by pushed? Nothing new has hit the mirrors since March 28th.

-- 
/peter

From dam at opencsw.org  Mon Apr  5 21:50:02 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 21:50:02 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs ncsa_mosaic
In-Reply-To: <g2gd57eab941004051236q501e7354o9ffa533ba1c1c8a0@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201003291156.o2TBuOQX002011@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<d57eab941003291740x4ff886e1q232edc667b2473cb@mail.gmail.com>
	<ce97543b1003300248u78dd0fc8t962187b1591badde@mail.gmail.com>
	<g2gd57eab941004051236q501e7354o9ffa533ba1c1c8a0@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <609DFB5E-D8B2-4E49-A658-DE536A65771B@opencsw.org>

Hi Phil,

Am 05.04.2010 um 21:36 schrieb Philip Brown:
> In contrast, if you dont have ncsa mosaic 1.0... you do *not* lose the
> ability to view [html 1.0 or whatever] sites. There are plenty of
> other browsers around to view them.

Nobody wants Mosaic 1.0 any more, it can't do frames. That's why
Maciej packaged up 2.7 ;-)

> Our repository is not a museum. The only reason we keep v1 packages
> around after v2 is out, is if they have unique functional value.  Once
> they no longer do, we drop them in favour of the v2 package.

There is to my knowledge no newer version than 2.7b6 and there has
also not been a fork.


Best regards

  -- Dago

From phil at bolthole.com  Mon Apr  5 21:50:49 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 12:50:49 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] /newpkgs (current) bind, perl modules,
	qpopper
In-Reply-To: <625385e31003301005i7ff8aff6oeea5147035612faa@mail.gmail.com>
References: <625385e31003301005i7ff8aff6oeea5147035612faa@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <o2md57eab941004051250n91cecae6y732dc26d73aa6ef4@mail.gmail.com>

Sorry for the lag.
I think you pulled qpopper or something? I dont see it.


pm packages have been released.
bind email separately




On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 10:05 AM, Peter Bonivart <bonivart at opencsw.org> wrote:
> bind-9.7.0P1,REV=2010.03.30-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> bind-9.7.0P1,REV=2010.03.30-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> bind_chroot-9.7.0P1,REV=2010.03.30-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
> bind_devel-9.7.0P1,REV=2010.03.30-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
> bind_utils-9.7.0P1,REV=2010.03.30-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> bind_utils-9.7.0P1,REV=2010.03.30-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> libbind-9.7.0P1,REV=2010.03.30-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> libbind-9.7.0P1,REV=2010.03.30-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> pm_appcli-0.08,REV=2010.03.29-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
> pm_modcorelist-2.26,REV=2010.03.30-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
> pm_modload-0.18,REV=2010.03.30-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
> pm_modloadcond-0.36,REV=2010.03.30-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
> pm_netip-1.25,REV=2010.03.30-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
> pm_numberformat-1.73,REV=2010.03.30-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
> pm_olestoragelite-0.19,REV=2010.03.30-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
> pm_tstbldrtester-1.01,REV=2010.03.30-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
> pm_txtreform-1.20,REV=2010.03.30-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
> qpopper-4.0.19,REV=2010.03.30-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> qpopper-4.0.19,REV=2010.03.30-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> /peter
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Mon Apr  5 21:53:49 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 12:53:49 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] /newpkgs (current) bind
Message-ID: <h2nd57eab941004051253yf7450f96s3602ea233ef0c097@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 10:05 AM, Peter Bonivart <bonivart at opencsw.org> wrote:
> bind-9.7.0P1,REV=2010.03.30-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> bind-9.7.0P1,REV=2010.03.30-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> bind_chroot-9.7.0P1,REV=2010.03.30-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
> bind_devel-9.7.0P1,REV=2010.03.30-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
> bind_utils-9.7.0P1,REV=2010.03.30-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> bind_utils-9.7.0P1,REV=2010.03.30-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> libbind-9.7.0P1,REV=2010.03.30-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> libbind-9.7.0P1,REV=2010.03.30-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>

Soooo... this makes me curious.
libbind-9.7.0,REV=2010.02.17

prior version of libbind, is
it has libbind9.so.0.0.50

This version is a mere minor patch level.. 1 month later... but it has
an INCOMPATIBLE shared library version?
libbind9.so.60

?

we already have in the older package
libbind9.so.0.0.10
libbind9.so.50.0.3


This accumilating rumble of library revisions has me concerned.

From phil at bolthole.com  Mon Apr  5 21:56:52 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 12:56:52 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] release trac-0.11.7
In-Reply-To: <j2w625385e31004051245h4e51223dnd6e03017592c3254@mail.gmail.com>
References: <o2u6af4271004020148r533fb8d6k98a468ebb1e25647@mail.gmail.com>
	<j2kd57eab941004051240ve2407884hccde0a57b637653a@mail.gmail.com>
	<j2w625385e31004051245h4e51223dnd6e03017592c3254@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <v2id57eab941004051256i9d110f3bs3de2588cb07417ec@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 12:45 PM, Peter Bonivart <bonivart at opencsw.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 9:40 PM, Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 1:48 AM, rupert THURNER <rupert at opencsw.org> wrote:
>>> hi,
>>>
>>> please release trac-0.11.7.
>>>
>>
>> was pushed out yesterday
>
> What do you mean by pushed? Nothing new has hit the mirrors since March 28th.
>

Hmm.
giving it another nudge

From phil at bolthole.com  Mon Apr  5 22:13:26 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 13:13:26 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] release trac-0.11.7
In-Reply-To: <v2id57eab941004051256i9d110f3bs3de2588cb07417ec@mail.gmail.com>
References: <o2u6af4271004020148r533fb8d6k98a468ebb1e25647@mail.gmail.com>
	<j2kd57eab941004051240ve2407884hccde0a57b637653a@mail.gmail.com>
	<j2w625385e31004051245h4e51223dnd6e03017592c3254@mail.gmail.com>
	<v2id57eab941004051256i9d110f3bs3de2588cb07417ec@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <w2rd57eab941004051313n95a5a320v402c3e8d20adff05@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 12:45 PM, Peter Bonivart <bonivart at opencsw.org> wrote:
>>
>> What do you mean by pushed? Nothing new has hit the mirrors since March 28th.
>>
>
> Hmm.
> giving it another nudge
>



aha.

The nice folks who run our rsync server, unfortunately upgraded AND
changed keys.
The keychange glitched the publishing script.


mystery solved, and fixed, now

From bonivart at opencsw.org  Mon Apr  5 22:41:25 2010
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 22:41:25 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] /newpkgs (current) bind
In-Reply-To: <h2nd57eab941004051253yf7450f96s3602ea233ef0c097@mail.gmail.com>
References: <h2nd57eab941004051253yf7450f96s3602ea233ef0c097@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <u2l625385e31004051341tbedf258bybe4c269ae2774e9b@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 9:53 PM, Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> wrote:
> Soooo... this makes me curious.
> libbind-9.7.0,REV=2010.02.17
>
> prior version of libbind, is
> it has libbind9.so.0.0.50
>
> This version is a mere minor patch level.. 1 month later... but it has
> an INCOMPATIBLE shared library version?
> libbind9.so.60

Aren't you looking at 9.6? I see /opt/csw/lib/libbind9.so.60.0.1 in 9.7.0.

-- 
/peter

From phil at bolthole.com  Mon Apr  5 23:08:52 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 14:08:52 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] /newpkgs (current) bind
In-Reply-To: <u2l625385e31004051341tbedf258bybe4c269ae2774e9b@mail.gmail.com>
References: <h2nd57eab941004051253yf7450f96s3602ea233ef0c097@mail.gmail.com>
	<u2l625385e31004051341tbedf258bybe4c269ae2774e9b@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <h2wd57eab941004051408nfeef0ecey28577da99f7bf8c8@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Peter Bonivart <bonivart at opencsw.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 9:53 PM, Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> wrote:
>> Soooo... this makes me curious.
>> libbind-9.7.0,REV=2010.02.17
>>
>> prior version of libbind, is
>> it has libbind9.so.0.0.50
>>
>> This version is a mere minor patch level.. 1 month later... but it has
>> an INCOMPATIBLE shared library version?
>> libbind9.so.60
>
> Aren't you looking at 9.6? I see /opt/csw/lib/libbind9.so.60.0.1 in 9.7.0.
>

okay, I'm taking a fresh look.

latest packages,

libbind-9.7.0P1,REV=2010.03.30-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

contains  /opt/csw/lib/libbind9.so.60.0.1
It has SONAME of libbind9.so.60. Or at least, that's what the
bind-utils stuffs need, explicitly.

So apparently, minor rev numbers these days are important.
Looking at what is in current...
huh. only the .60 as you say.  Perhaps I was indeed looking in stable
by mistake.

but wait... there is no libbind in stable.

What was I looking at?!?? this is Very Odd.
oh.. OOPS!  I was seeing the sun shipped libbind packages! didnt know
they had them now!
sorry about that.

erm. but that has libbind9.so.0.0.10
I think there was a Much Older, now disappeared package of CSWlibbind installed.
and THAT had .50 libs in it.

Which makes me worry.

hmm.not that much older.

libbind-9.6.1P3,REV=2010.01.25

But I SUPPOSE, since nothing depends on libbind, but CSWbind, and
CSWbindutils, that the rambling SONAME changes are okay to do.

(makes me rather sickened with the quality control of the BIND
people... but unfortunately, nothing to do there)

From phil at bolthole.com  Tue Apr  6 00:11:39 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 15:11:39 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs xpdf, xpdf_utils
In-Reply-To: <201004051421.o35ELHXH020806@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201004051421.o35ELHXH020806@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <s2td57eab941004051511m571f38a6v7e7dbd47635ef5cc@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 7:21 AM, Benjamin von Mossner <benny at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>
> due to the conflict between CSWpoppler and CSWxpdf (#0004390)
> xpdf is now split into two separate packages.
>

well hold off there...
this doesnt properly resolve it.
poppler is the one abusing the namespace. poppler is the one that
needs to split.
particularly since it was previously split anyways.

I'm going to hold off on accepting this sort of thing, until poppler is fixed.

From phil at bolthole.com  Tue Apr  6 00:13:49 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 15:13:49 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libpcap, libpcap_devel, orbit2,
	tcpdump
In-Reply-To: <D3C596E0-C13F-4341-A520-2A3E4733E016@opencsw.org>
References: <201003311329.o2VDT35U019146@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<D3C596E0-C13F-4341-A520-2A3E4733E016@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <z2xd57eab941004051513yf0f5bac0le6623788db801964@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
>
> This is all confusing to me. libpcap and tcpdump are both on the frontpage,
> but not orbit2, although there has been no acknowledge that the packages
> have been accepted, but none of them are on the mirrors after 6 days.
>

i hadnt gotten to orbit2 yet
now I have.
enjoy :)

From phil at bolthole.com  Tue Apr  6 00:17:36 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 15:17:36 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] Drop 5 packages from catalog
In-Reply-To: <3884CDE6-B5A9-49C2-8A07-4DBDBB03C722@opencsw.org>
References: <625385e31003290831s48c57fcbg4c0deb347fbe9ec5@mail.gmail.com>
	<x6iq8fhyn6.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<8B5671EB-AFEF-41C2-BCD1-B9451B8A0980@opencsw.org>
	<x6eij2i4xj.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<1DD1EC07-F6D3-4E73-985E-1EFC8294A2FD@opencsw.org>
	<x61vf2hspc.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<v2z625385e31003310138nc33a48ep52829eef16a36b5f@mail.gmail.com>
	<x6sk7ghn70.fsf@opencsw.org>
	<m2od57eab941004011157lc9b8c947ie4c9c787395aa5b6@mail.gmail.com>
	<3884CDE6-B5A9-49C2-8A07-4DBDBB03C722@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <p2id57eab941004051517h77c874e9h921873aab28934dc@mail.gmail.com>

O
> ??? It was already released a week ago, so you can drop them now.
> While we are at it you can also drop
> ?CSWcs clearsilver
> which is also orphaned, outdated and no longer needed (was a dependency
> for Trac before they switched to Genshi).
>
>

okay, thanks.
in progress

From bwalton at opencsw.org  Tue Apr  6 03:55:05 2010
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 03:55:05 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs emacs_sitestart
Message-ID: <201004060155.o361t5kC019159@login.bo.opencsw.org>

Hi Phil,

This adds site-start plugin functionality to our emacs stack that
is on par with other distros.  I discussed it with Peter F. this
morning.

* emacs_sitestart: new package
  + emacs_sitestart-1.0,REV=2010.04.06-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

Thanks
-Ben
-- 
Generated by submitpkg


From pfelecan at opencsw.org  Tue Apr  6 09:54:28 2010
From: pfelecan at opencsw.org (Peter FELECAN)
Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 09:54:28 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs ncsa_mosaic
In-Reply-To: <609DFB5E-D8B2-4E49-A658-DE536A65771B@opencsw.org> (Dagobert
	Michelsen's message of "Mon, 5 Apr 2010 21:50:02 +0200")
References: <201003291156.o2TBuOQX002011@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<d57eab941003291740x4ff886e1q232edc667b2473cb@mail.gmail.com>
	<ce97543b1003300248u78dd0fc8t962187b1591badde@mail.gmail.com>
	<g2gd57eab941004051236q501e7354o9ffa533ba1c1c8a0@mail.gmail.com>
	<609DFB5E-D8B2-4E49-A658-DE536A65771B@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <x6ochxaudn.fsf@opencsw.org>

Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> writes:

> Hi Phil,
>
> Am 05.04.2010 um 21:36 schrieb Philip Brown:
>> In contrast, if you dont have ncsa mosaic 1.0... you do *not* lose the
>> ability to view [html 1.0 or whatever] sites. There are plenty of
>> other browsers around to view them.
>
> Nobody wants Mosaic 1.0 any more, it can't do frames. That's why
> Maciej packaged up 2.7 ;-)

Funny but...

>> Our repository is not a museum. The only reason we keep v1 packages
>> around after v2 is out, is if they have unique functional value.  Once
>> they no longer do, we drop them in favour of the v2 package.
>
> There is to my knowledge no newer version than 2.7b6 and there has
> also not been a fork.

C'mon, feature wise there are a lot of projects supplying a more rich
(and inclusive) feature set. Games like this could justify the "clunker"
syndrome that we see about old operating system releases, shells, web
sites, &c. Please let Mosaic RIP.
-- 
Peter

From dam at opencsw.org  Tue Apr  6 12:01:42 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 12:01:42 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libpcap, libpcap_devel, tcpdump
Message-ID: <201004061001.o36A1guW026123@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* libpcap: patchlevel upgrade
  - from: 1.1.0,REV=2010.04.01
  -   to: 1.1.1,REV=2010.04.06
  + libpcap-1.1.1,REV=2010.04.06-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libpcap-1.1.1,REV=2010.04.06-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libpcap_devel-1.1.1,REV=2010.04.06-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libpcap_devel-1.1.1,REV=2010.04.06-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

* tcpdump: patchlevel upgrade
  - from: 4.1.0,REV=2010.04.01
  -   to: 4.1.1,REV=2010.04.06
  + tcpdump-4.1.1,REV=2010.04.06-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + tcpdump-4.1.1,REV=2010.04.06-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From bwalton at opencsw.org  Tue Apr  6 15:14:03 2010
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 15:14:03 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs gnulinks
Message-ID: <201004061314.o36DE3Rk027824@login.bo.opencsw.org>

Hi Phil,

This drops the gnu grep links from the package as Dago has included them
directly, as per below.

* gnulinks: minor version upgrade
  - from: 1.2,REV=2010.01.11
  -   to: 1.3,REV=2010.03.26
  + gnulinks-1.3,REV=2010.03.26-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

> From: Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org>
> To: Release Manager <pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org>
> Subject: newpkgs grep, wdiff
>
> * wdiff: new package
>   + wdiff-0.6.1,REV=2010.04.06-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + wdiff-0.6.1,REV=2010.04.06-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> * grep: new package
>   + grep-2.6.3,REV=2010.04.06-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + grep-2.6.3,REV=2010.04.06-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg

Thanks
-Ben
-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From dam at opencsw.org  Tue Apr  6 15:24:07 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 15:24:07 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs gnulinks
In-Reply-To: <201004061314.o36DE3Rk027824@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201004061314.o36DE3Rk027824@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <BEA509BC-538D-4B28-A38E-918C237606D5@opencsw.org>

Hi,

Am 06.04.2010 um 15:14 schrieb Ben Walton:

> Hi Phil,
>
> This drops the gnu grep links from the package as Dago has included  
> them
> directly, as per below.
>
> * gnulinks: minor version upgrade
>  - from: 1.2,REV=2010.01.11
>  -   to: 1.3,REV=2010.03.26
>  + gnulinks-1.3,REV=2010.03.26-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
>> From: Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org>
>> To: Release Manager <pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org>
>> Subject: newpkgs grep, wdiff
>>
>> * wdiff: new package
>>  + wdiff-0.6.1,REV=2010.04.06-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>>  + wdiff-0.6.1,REV=2010.04.06-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>>
>> * grep: new package
>>  + grep-2.6.3,REV=2010.04.06-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>>  + grep-2.6.3,REV=2010.04.06-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

This is in fact an update for CSWgrep with an adjusted catalog name.
   Old: ggrep
   New: grep


Best regards

   -- Dago

From phil at bolthole.com  Tue Apr  6 21:29:59 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 12:29:59 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs gnulinks
In-Reply-To: <BEA509BC-538D-4B28-A38E-918C237606D5@opencsw.org>
References: <201004061314.o36DE3Rk027824@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<BEA509BC-538D-4B28-A38E-918C237606D5@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <z2rd57eab941004061229z199cc7b1p34ab230bf2c4b3b@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 6:24 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> z
>
> This is in fact an update for CSWgrep with an adjusted catalog name.
> ?Old: ggrep
> ?New: grep
>
>

this was not an apropriate change.
both packages rejected, I'm afraid.

note that we do have "ngrep".
so "ggrep" is most appropriate. not to mention it's been that way for
a Long Time now.

From dam at opencsw.org  Tue Apr  6 22:03:41 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 22:03:41 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs gnulinks
In-Reply-To: <z2rd57eab941004061229z199cc7b1p34ab230bf2c4b3b@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201004061314.o36DE3Rk027824@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<BEA509BC-538D-4B28-A38E-918C237606D5@opencsw.org>
	<z2rd57eab941004061229z199cc7b1p34ab230bf2c4b3b@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <C59B4060-39C9-4E74-B313-892F9564ACBB@opencsw.org>

Hi Phil,

Am 06.04.2010 um 21:29 schrieb Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com>:

> On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 6:24 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org>  
> wrote:
>> z
>>
>> This is in fact an update for CSWgrep with an adjusted catalog name.
>>  Old: ggrep
>>  New: grep
>>
>>
>
> this was not an apropriate change.
> both packages rejected, I'm afraid.
>
> note that we do have "ngrep".

That is "network grep" and is in no way a replacement for any normal  
grep.

> so "ggrep" is most appropriate. not to mention it's been that way for
> a Long Time now.

Most gnu packages don't have a g prefix in the catalog, and  
catalogname != pkgname is generally and especially here really bad.  
Even after two years I can't remember it :-( So, no, "it has always  
been this way is not an argument.

Best regards

   -- Dago

From bonivart at opencsw.org  Wed Apr  7 13:43:45 2010
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 13:43:45 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] /newpkgs (current) bind
In-Reply-To: <h2wd57eab941004051408nfeef0ecey28577da99f7bf8c8@mail.gmail.com>
References: <h2nd57eab941004051253yf7450f96s3602ea233ef0c097@mail.gmail.com> 
	<u2l625385e31004051341tbedf258bybe4c269ae2774e9b@mail.gmail.com> 
	<h2wd57eab941004051408nfeef0ecey28577da99f7bf8c8@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <j2z625385e31004070443k5d7dd54ek52a76bdc969fe039@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 11:08 PM, Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Peter Bonivart <bonivart at opencsw.org> wrote:
>> Aren't you looking at 9.6? I see /opt/csw/lib/libbind9.so.60.0.1 in 9.7.0.
>
> okay, I'm taking a fresh look.
>
> latest packages,
>
> libbind-9.7.0P1,REV=2010.03.30-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> contains ?/opt/csw/lib/libbind9.so.60.0.1
> It has SONAME of libbind9.so.60. Or at least, that's what the
> bind-utils stuffs need, explicitly.
>
> So apparently, minor rev numbers these days are important.
> Looking at what is in current...
> huh. only the .60 as you say. ?Perhaps I was indeed looking in stable
> by mistake.
>
> but wait... there is no libbind in stable.
>
> What was I looking at?!?? this is Very Odd.
> oh.. OOPS! ?I was seeing the sun shipped libbind packages! didnt know
> they had them now!
> sorry about that.

So, do we have a go?

-- 
/peter

From phil at bolthole.com  Thu Apr  8 04:04:49 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 19:04:49 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] /newpkgs (current) bind
In-Reply-To: <j2z625385e31004070443k5d7dd54ek52a76bdc969fe039@mail.gmail.com>
References: <h2nd57eab941004051253yf7450f96s3602ea233ef0c097@mail.gmail.com>
	<u2l625385e31004051341tbedf258bybe4c269ae2774e9b@mail.gmail.com>
	<h2wd57eab941004051408nfeef0ecey28577da99f7bf8c8@mail.gmail.com>
	<j2z625385e31004070443k5d7dd54ek52a76bdc969fe039@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <i2kd57eab941004071904sb28b0e35l67bdb371554512c3@mail.gmail.com>

> So, do we have a go?
>
> --
> /peter

all right then

From dam at opencsw.org  Thu Apr  8 11:23:06 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 11:23:06 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs ggrep
Message-ID: <201004080923.o389N6kP021074@login.bo.opencsw.org>

Hi,

I made a new package similar to the existing one, but the catalog name
is just inconsistent to what we have else.

* ggrep: minor version upgrade
  - from: 2.5.4,REV=2009.05.21
  -   to: 2.6.3,REV=2010.04.08
  + ggrep-2.6.3,REV=2010.04.08-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + ggrep-2.6.3,REV=2010.04.08-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From dam at opencsw.org  Thu Apr  8 13:15:47 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 13:15:47 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs ncftp
Message-ID: <201004081115.o38BFlPc004963@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* ncftp: patchlevel upgrade
  - from: 3.2.3,REV=2010.01.01
  -   to: 3.2.4,REV=2010.04.08
  + ncftp-3.2.4,REV=2010.04.08-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + ncftp-3.2.4,REV=2010.04.08-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From dam at opencsw.org  Thu Apr  8 13:17:24 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 13:17:24 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libidl
In-Reply-To: <n2id57eab941004051244v1eadcbc7zf539c6c82badea2e@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201003310817.o2V8HSiA013948@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<n2id57eab941004051244v1eadcbc7zf539c6c82badea2e@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <E2AB0FA5-CDEA-4382-A8BA-98CA53AE6FE4@opencsw.org>

Hi,

Am 05.04.2010 um 21:44 schrieb Philip Brown:
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 1:17 AM, Dagobert Michelsen  
> <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
>> * libidl: patchlevel upgrade
>>  - from: 0.8.13,REV=2009.06.10
>>  -   to: 0.8.14,REV=2010.03.31
>>  + libidl-0.8.14,REV=2010.03.31-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>>  + libidl-0.8.14,REV=2010.03.31-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> done yesterday

Still not released, neither webpage nor mirror.


Best regards

   -- Dago


From bonivart at opencsw.org  Thu Apr  8 13:49:06 2010
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 13:49:06 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] /newpkgs (current) pm_modulesign, qpopper
Message-ID: <q2z625385e31004080449hbb74d28bzcb4db1245172902b@mail.gmail.com>

pm_modulesign-0.63,REV=2010.03.31-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
qpopper-4.0.19,REV=2010.04.08-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
qpopper-4.0.19,REV=2010.04.08-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
/peter

From bwalton at opencsw.org  Thu Apr  8 15:03:36 2010
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 15:03:36 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs gnulinks
Message-ID: <201004081303.o38D3aTp006574@login.bo.opencsw.org>

This is to match Dago's resubmission of ggrep.

* gnulinks: minor version upgrade
  - from: 1.2,REV=2010.01.11
  -   to: 1.3,REV=2010.03.26
  + gnulinks-1.3,REV=2010.03.26-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

Thanks
-Ben
-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From phil at bolthole.com  Thu Apr  8 16:57:12 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 07:57:12 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libidl
In-Reply-To: <E2AB0FA5-CDEA-4382-A8BA-98CA53AE6FE4@opencsw.org>
References: <201003310817.o2V8HSiA013948@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<n2id57eab941004051244v1eadcbc7zf539c6c82badea2e@mail.gmail.com>
	<E2AB0FA5-CDEA-4382-A8BA-98CA53AE6FE4@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <g2kd57eab941004080757n38a611b8z7503473bd0ae5e3@mail.gmail.com>

hit a snag with releases. poppler is halfway backed out. I either need
a fixed set today from Roger, or I guess I will revert to the old
stable packages.
then things will be flowing again

On Thursday, April 8, 2010, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 05.04.2010 um 21:44 schrieb Philip Brown:
>
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 1:17 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
>
> * libidl: patchlevel upgrade
> ?- from: 0.8.13,REV=2009.06.10
> ?- ? to: 0.8.14,REV=2010.03.31
> ?+ libidl-0.8.14,REV=2010.03.31-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ libidl-0.8.14,REV=2010.03.31-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>
>
> done yesterday
>
>
> Still not released, neither webpage nor mirror.
>
>
> Best regards
>
>  ?-- Dago
>
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Thu Apr  8 22:49:51 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 13:49:51 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs ggrep
In-Reply-To: <201004080923.o389N6kP021074@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201004080923.o389N6kP021074@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <y2od57eab941004081349mb8af15f1x6fb4069eed2516cb@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 2:23 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I made a new package similar to the existing one, but the catalog name
> is just inconsistent to what we have else.
>

thank you.. except that the current one is NOT inconsistent:

- the command is named "ggrep"
- the software name is "ggrep"
- the pkg name, is "CSWggrep"

That is perfect consistency!

The fact that you tend to use the command through the gnulinks alias,
of "grep", does not justify mangling the existing package naming.

Speaking of which: you reverted the software name to "ggrep", but you
changed the pkg name.
Please revert to existing.

From skayser at opencsw.org  Fri Apr  9 00:07:27 2010
From: skayser at opencsw.org (Sebastian Kayser)
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 00:07:27 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs tmpwatch
Message-ID: <201004082207.o38M7RFH027498@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* tmpwatch: new package
  + tmpwatch-2.10.1,REV=2010.04.08-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + tmpwatch-2.10.1,REV=2010.04.08-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

The software from which tmpreaper was forked by Debian. It has an
exclude switch (-X) which allows to skip whole directory trees
before the tree is even recursed. Not possible with tmpreaper.
Ben did some very nice gnulib integration work with upstream so that
it compiles nicely on Solaris.


https://fedorahosted.org/tmpwatch/
The tmpwatch utility recursively searches through specified directories
and removes files which have not been accessed in a specified period of
time. tmpwatch is normally used to clean up directories which are used
for temporarily holding files (for example, /tmp). 

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From phil at bolthole.com  Fri Apr  9 01:51:51 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 16:51:51 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs ncftp
In-Reply-To: <201004081115.o38BFlPc004963@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201004081115.o38BFlPc004963@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <m2rd57eab941004081651q3a1d390foe02b54c08eaf4841@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 4:15 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> * ncftp: patchlevel upgrade
> ?- from: 3.2.3,REV=2010.01.01
> ?- ? to: 3.2.4,REV=2010.04.08
> ?+ ncftp-3.2.4,REV=2010.04.08-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ ncftp-3.2.4,REV=2010.04.08-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>

okay

From phil at opencsw.org  Fri Apr  9 01:52:50 2010
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 16:52:50 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] /newpkgs (current) pm_modulesign, qpopper
In-Reply-To: <q2z625385e31004080449hbb74d28bzcb4db1245172902b@mail.gmail.com>
References: <q2z625385e31004080449hbb74d28bzcb4db1245172902b@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <h2xd57eab941004081652gfee92c20rdca0cd52623338c1@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 4:49 AM, Peter Bonivart <bonivart at opencsw.org> wrote:
> pm_modulesign-0.63,REV=2010.03.31-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
> qpopper-4.0.19,REV=2010.04.08-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> qpopper-4.0.19,REV=2010.04.08-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --

okay

From phil at bolthole.com  Fri Apr  9 01:54:09 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 16:54:09 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs tmpwatch
In-Reply-To: <201004082207.o38M7RFH027498@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201004082207.o38M7RFH027498@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <k2vd57eab941004081654hdbaa7b79o67070f575e106db9@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Sebastian Kayser <skayser at opencsw.org> wrote:
> * tmpwatch: new package
> ?+ tmpwatch-2.10.1,REV=2010.04.08-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ tmpwatch-2.10.1,REV=2010.04.08-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>

sounds pretty cool

From phil at bolthole.com  Fri Apr  9 01:56:10 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 16:56:10 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] wdiff
Message-ID: <q2md57eab941004081656m383fcf04o3f8cfb95ca98399@mail.gmail.com>

BTW, to Dagobert:
while I noticed the "forwarded" email from Ben which included notice
about wdiff.. i did NOT receive a copy of the email directly.

Nor do I see it on the archives of the pkgsubmissions list? !!

But I'm processing it now.

From bwalton at opencsw.org  Fri Apr  9 03:35:53 2010
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 03:35:53 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs ruby19, ruby19dev, ruby19ri,
	ruby19sa(...)
Message-ID: <201004090135.o391ZrvM028889@login.bo.opencsw.org>

Hi Phil,

Ruby 1.9.  Plays nicely with the existing ruby packages.
 
* ruby19: new package
  + ruby19-1.9.1p376,REV=2010.04.03-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + ruby19-1.9.1p376,REV=2010.04.03-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + ruby19dev-1.9.1p376,REV=2010.04.03-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + ruby19dev-1.9.1p376,REV=2010.04.03-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + ruby19ri-1.9.1p376,REV=2010.04.03-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
  + ruby19samples-1.9.1p376,REV=2010.04.03-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
  + ruby19tk-1.9.1p376,REV=2010.04.03-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + ruby19tk-1.9.1p376,REV=2010.04.03-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

Thanks
-Ben
-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From dam at opencsw.org  Fri Apr  9 09:36:02 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 09:36:02 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs ggrep
In-Reply-To: <y2od57eab941004081349mb8af15f1x6fb4069eed2516cb@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201004080923.o389N6kP021074@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<y2od57eab941004081349mb8af15f1x6fb4069eed2516cb@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <5043F712-675D-4FB4-9BE5-A7368C979D13@opencsw.org>

Hi Phil,

Am 08.04.2010 um 22:49 schrieb Philip Brown:
> On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 2:23 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org>  
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I made a new package similar to the existing one, but the catalog  
>> name
>> is just inconsistent to what we have else.
>
> thank you.. except that the current one is NOT inconsistent:
>
> - the command is named "ggrep"
> - the software name is "ggrep"
> - the pkg name, is "CSWggrep"
>
> That is perfect consistency!

It is... Strange, somehow I remembered the package to be named CSWgrep.
Obviously I remembered wrong.

Updates packages in newpkgs/.


Best regards

   -- Dago


From dam at opencsw.org  Fri Apr  9 09:37:19 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 09:37:19 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] wdiff
In-Reply-To: <q2md57eab941004081656m383fcf04o3f8cfb95ca98399@mail.gmail.com>
References: <q2md57eab941004081656m383fcf04o3f8cfb95ca98399@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <BCB232D7-CE24-4F5B-A5B5-B5B12EC1A738@opencsw.org>

Hi Phil,

Am 09.04.2010 um 01:56 schrieb Philip Brown:
> BTW, to Dagobert:
> while I noticed the "forwarded" email from Ben which included notice
> about wdiff.. i did NOT receive a copy of the email directly.
>
> Nor do I see it on the archives of the pkgsubmissions list? !!
>
> But I'm processing it now.

This is correct. I batched it together with ggrep and I wanted that one
to be released in-sync with gnulinks. So I pushed my packages and sent
to Ben to forward it when he is ready.


Best regards

   -- Dago


From dam at opencsw.org  Fri Apr  9 14:00:46 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 14:00:46 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] Problem with CSWpmlistmoreut and
	CSWpmlistmoreutils
Message-ID: <8A13B3E4-471D-4DA0-A9D7-3B8B57F160CF@opencsw.org>

Hi,

looks like there was a glitch in the package refreshment of Perl:
the existing package CSWpmlistmoreut should have been replace by
a new package, but the contents was released as CSWpmlistmoreutils.

I suggest making the old one a stub depending in the new one. There
are no dependencies anyway.


Best regards

   -- Dago

From dam at opencsw.org  Fri Apr  9 15:44:11 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 15:44:11 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_cachecache, pm_datetime,
	pm_dateti(...)
Message-ID: <201004091344.o39DiBr6012045@login.bo.opencsw.org>

Hi,

some updated Perl modules, nothing spectacular.

* pm_podcoverage: new package
  + pm_podcoverage-0.20,REV=2010.04.09-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

* pm_datetimefmtmail: new package
  + pm_datetimefmtmail-0.3001,REV=2010.04.09-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

* pm_testpodcoverage: new package
  + pm_testpodcoverage-1.08,REV=2010.04.09-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

* pm_datetimelocale: new package
  + pm_datetimelocale-0.45,REV=2010.04.09-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

* pm_datetimefmtw3tf: new package
  + pm_datetimefmtw3tf-0.05,REV=2010.04.09-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

* pm_xmlrss: minor version upgrade
  - from: 1.05
  -   to: 1.47,REV=2010.04.09
  + pm_xmlrss-1.47,REV=2010.04.09-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

* pm_error: minor version upgrade
  - from: 0.17011,REV=2008.01.19
  -   to: 0.17016,REV=2010.04.09
  + pm_error-0.17016,REV=2010.04.09-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

* pm_cachecache: minor version upgrade
  - from: 1.05,REV=2008.03.13
  -   to: 1.06,REV=2010.04.09
  + pm_cachecache-1.06,REV=2010.04.09-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

* pm_datetime: new package
  + pm_datetime-0.55,REV=2010.04.09-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + pm_datetime-0.55,REV=2010.04.09-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

* pm_datetimetz: new package
  + pm_datetimetz-1.16,REV=2010.04.09-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From dam at opencsw.org  Fri Apr  9 17:33:35 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 17:33:35 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_cachesmptimexp, pm_capitalization
Message-ID: <201004091533.o39FXZ5d008045@login.bo.opencsw.org>

Two simple imports to GAR.

* pm_capitalization: revision upgrade
  - from: 2005.12.12
  -   to: 2010.04.09
  + pm_capitalization-0.03,REV=2010.04.09-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

* pm_cachesmptimexp: revision upgrade
  - from: 2008.03.13
  -   to: 2010.04.09
  + pm_cachesmptimexp-0.27,REV=2010.04.09-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From bonivart at opencsw.org  Fri Apr  9 18:16:34 2010
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 18:16:34 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] /newpkgs (current) jpeginfo, jpegoptim
Message-ID: <s2o625385e31004090916pcbd9c09ch3bb705e550863054@mail.gmail.com>

updated:
jpeginfo-1.6.1,REV=2010.04.09-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
jpeginfo-1.6.1,REV=2010.04.09-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

new:
jpegoptim-1.2.3,REV=2010.04.09-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
jpegoptim-1.2.3,REV=2010.04.09-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
/peter

From phil at bolthole.com  Fri Apr  9 19:53:20 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 10:53:20 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs ggrep
In-Reply-To: <5043F712-675D-4FB4-9BE5-A7368C979D13@opencsw.org>
References: <201004080923.o389N6kP021074@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<y2od57eab941004081349mb8af15f1x6fb4069eed2516cb@mail.gmail.com>
	<5043F712-675D-4FB4-9BE5-A7368C979D13@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <k2kd57eab941004091053uc9a5f8ebndf8550916a3ed2f5@mail.gmail.com>

> It is... Strange, somehow I remembered the package to be named CSWgrep.
> Obviously I remembered wrong.
>
> Updates packages in newpkgs/.
>

okay. batched

From phil at opencsw.org  Fri Apr  9 19:53:58 2010
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 10:53:58 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs gnulinks
In-Reply-To: <201004081303.o38D3aTp006574@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201004081303.o38D3aTp006574@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <r2wd57eab941004091053icf853513k4619c1f058fcc2da@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 6:03 AM, Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org> wrote:
> This is to match Dago's resubmission of ggrep.
>
> * gnulinks: minor version upgrade
> ?- from: 1.2,REV=2010.01.11
> ?- ? to: 1.3,REV=2010.03.26
> ?+ gnulinks-1.3,REV=2010.03.26-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>

i guess I can also toss this into batch now :)

From phil at opencsw.org  Fri Apr  9 19:55:23 2010
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 10:55:23 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs ruby19, ruby19dev, ruby19ri,
	ruby19sa(...)
In-Reply-To: <201004090135.o391ZrvM028889@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201004090135.o391ZrvM028889@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <u2td57eab941004091055q44826568q7ef27364e23bb12e@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 6:35 PM, Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>
> Ruby 1.9. ?Plays nicely with the existing ruby packages.
>
> * ruby19: new package
> ?+ ruby19-1.9.1p376,REV=2010.04.03-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ ruby19-1.9.1p376,REV=2010.04.03-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ ruby19dev-1.9.1p376,REV=2010.04.03-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ ruby19dev-1.9.1p376,REV=2010.04.03-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ ruby19ri-1.9.1p376,REV=2010.04.03-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ ruby19samples-1.9.1p376,REV=2010.04.03-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ ruby19tk-1.9.1p376,REV=2010.04.03-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ ruby19tk-1.9.1p376,REV=2010.04.03-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>

Errr.. and existing ruby is ruby 1.8.

So... why are you making a new (named) set of packages like this?

From phil at opencsw.org  Fri Apr  9 19:56:43 2010
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 10:56:43 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_cachesmptimexp,
	pm_capitalization
In-Reply-To: <201004091533.o39FXZ5d008045@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201004091533.o39FXZ5d008045@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <o2ld57eab941004091056hd6ec2600gc1f82dfaccdb8a2c@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 8:33 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Two simple imports to GAR.
>
> * pm_capitalization: revision upgrade
> ?- from: 2005.12.12
> ?- ? to: 2010.04.09
> ?+ pm_capitalization-0.03,REV=2010.04.09-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> * pm_cachesmptimexp: revision upgrade
> ?- from: 2008.03.13
> ?- ? to: 2010.04.09
> ?+ pm_cachesmptimexp-0.27,REV=2010.04.09-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --

batching

From bwalton at opencsw.org  Fri Apr  9 20:00:27 2010
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2010 14:00:27 -0400
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs ruby19, ruby19dev, ruby19ri,
	ruby19sa(...)
In-Reply-To: <u2td57eab941004091055q44826568q7ef27364e23bb12e@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201004090135.o391ZrvM028889@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<u2td57eab941004091055q44826568q7ef27364e23bb12e@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1270835770-sup-2376@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>

Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Fri Apr 09 13:55:23 -0400 2010:

> Errr.. and existing ruby is ruby 1.8.
> 
> So... why are you making a new (named) set of packages like this?

Lots of stuff doesn't run on 1.9 yet (modules not forward ported,
etc).  I believe, but would need to verify that Rails still doesn't
play nicely on 1.9.  Thus, many shops still want/need 1.8.  The 1.9
version offers many language improvements and has a much faster vm
engine, so it's no longer as slow.  For the foreseeable future, both
versions will be made available.

When the time comes that 1.8 is no longer the preferred version, it
will likely become ruby18 with the binaries being named ruby18, irb18,
etc like the 19 counterparts are doing now.

This is very similar to how Debian offers both versions.

Thanks
-Ben
-- 
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302


From bwalton at opencsw.org  Fri Apr  9 20:10:18 2010
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2010 14:10:18 -0400
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs ruby19, ruby19dev, ruby19ri,
	ruby19sa(...)
In-Reply-To: <u2td57eab941004091055q44826568q7ef27364e23bb12e@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201004090135.o391ZrvM028889@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<u2td57eab941004091055q44826568q7ef27364e23bb12e@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1270836529-sup-8417@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>

Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Fri Apr 09 13:55:23 -0400 2010:

> Errr.. and existing ruby is ruby 1.8.
> 
> So... why are you making a new (named) set of packages like this?

...oh, and this was a special request from Jens Deppe (an Oracle,
former Sun employee).

Thanks
-Ben
-- 
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302


From bonivart at opencsw.org  Fri Apr  9 20:14:05 2010
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 20:14:05 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] /newpkgs (current) clamav
Message-ID: <j2q625385e31004091114yf066d1c4u217b4b99211dfcb3@mail.gmail.com>

updated:
clamav-0.96,REV=2010.04.01-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
clamav-0.96,REV=2010.04.01-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
libclamav-0.96,REV=2010.04.01-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
libclamav-0.96,REV=2010.04.01-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
/peter

From phil at opencsw.org  Fri Apr  9 20:20:53 2010
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 11:20:53 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] /newpkgs (current) clamav
In-Reply-To: <j2q625385e31004091114yf066d1c4u217b4b99211dfcb3@mail.gmail.com>
References: <j2q625385e31004091114yf066d1c4u217b4b99211dfcb3@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <t2ud57eab941004091120yad672e4ci9d9c001bb8403a74@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Peter Bonivart <bonivart at opencsw.org> wrote:
> updated:
> clamav-0.96,REV=2010.04.01-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> clamav-0.96,REV=2010.04.01-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> libclamav-0.96,REV=2010.04.01-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> libclamav-0.96,REV=2010.04.01-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>

batched

From phil at bolthole.com  Fri Apr  9 20:22:09 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 11:22:09 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_cachecache, pm_datetime,
	pm_dateti(...)
In-Reply-To: <201004091344.o39DiBr6012045@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201004091344.o39DiBr6012045@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <n2od57eab941004091122sc143cbaaw91aa30f731fba41d@mail.gmail.com>

batching

From phil at opencsw.org  Fri Apr  9 20:33:07 2010
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 11:33:07 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] /newpkgs (current) jpeginfo, jpegoptim
In-Reply-To: <s2o625385e31004090916pcbd9c09ch3bb705e550863054@mail.gmail.com>
References: <s2o625385e31004090916pcbd9c09ch3bb705e550863054@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <y2md57eab941004091133y2ff80caah5cc5cb947eb43d70@mail.gmail.com>

batched

On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Peter Bonivart <bonivart at opencsw.org> wrote:
> updated:
> jpeginfo-1.6.1,REV=2010.04.09-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> jpeginfo-1.6.1,REV=2010.04.09-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> new:
> jpegoptim-1.2.3,REV=2010.04.09-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> jpegoptim-1.2.3,REV=2010.04.09-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

From phil at bolthole.com  Fri Apr  9 20:37:39 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 11:37:39 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs ruby19, ruby19dev, ruby19ri,
	ruby19sa(...)
In-Reply-To: <1270835770-sup-2376@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
References: <201004090135.o391ZrvM028889@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<u2td57eab941004091055q44826568q7ef27364e23bb12e@mail.gmail.com>
	<1270835770-sup-2376@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
Message-ID: <x2yd57eab941004091137l66101c44g9b324297c5bbbe27@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Fri Apr 09 13:55:23 -0400 2010:
>
>> Errr.. and existing ruby is ruby 1.8.
>>
>> So... why are you making a new (named) set of packages like this?
>
> Lots of stuff doesn't run on 1.9 yet (modules not forward ported,
> etc). ?I believe, but would need to verify that Rails still doesn't
> play nicely on 1.9. ?Thus, many shops still want/need 1.8. ?The 1.9
> version offers many language improvements and has a much faster vm
> engine, so it's no longer as slow. ?For the foreseeable future, both
> versions will be made available.


Is ruby1.9 explicitly designed to be incompatible with 1.8?
(if so, the writers need to learn what major numbering means :-} )

If incompatibility is a bug, rather than a feature, I dont think this
is a good way for us to go.

As a side comment.. We only have a limited (under 10?) set of packages
that need ruby.
If all of our packages are fine with the newer ruby, maybe we should
just bump CSWruby, reguardless?

From bwalton at opencsw.org  Fri Apr  9 20:49:43 2010
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2010 14:49:43 -0400
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs ruby19, ruby19dev, ruby19ri,
	ruby19sa(...)
In-Reply-To: <x2yd57eab941004091137l66101c44g9b324297c5bbbe27@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201004090135.o391ZrvM028889@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<u2td57eab941004091055q44826568q7ef27364e23bb12e@mail.gmail.com>
	<1270835770-sup-2376@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<x2yd57eab941004091137l66101c44g9b324297c5bbbe27@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1270838493-sup-8360@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>

Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Fri Apr 09 14:37:39 -0400 2010:

> Is ruby1.9 explicitly designed to be incompatible with 1.8?
> (if so, the writers need to learn what major numbering means :-} )

No, it's not intentionally breaking things, but it is a transitional
step on the way to 2.0.  Things have changed.  Many modules will work,
but others won't...especially binary modules.

Although I haven't followed it closely for a while, 1.9 was not
originally intended for general use.  2.0 is way off though and people
wanted some of the nice new langauge features, so they've started
using it anyway.  My mail client[1], for example, is almost at the
point of forcing me to use 1.9 instead of my (really old, RHEL5
supplied)
1.8.5.

> If incompatibility is a bug, rather than a feature, I dont think
> this is a good way for us to go.

People want both.  Some will _need_ both, at least for a while.

> As a side comment.. We only have a limited (under 10?) set of
> packages that need ruby.  If all of our packages are fine with the
> newer ruby, maybe we should just bump CSWruby, reguardless?

It doesn't work like that, unfortunately.  If you're running 1.8 with
a Rails stack (installed locally as gems, outside of the pkg world)
and all of a sudden we drop 1.9 in the place of 1.8, you're going to
annoy a lot[2] of people.

If apps want to move their dependencies to 1.9 instead, that's fine
with me, but we can't simply roll over the old version.

Thanks
-Ben

[1] Sup: http://sup.rubyforge.org/
[2] I don't know how many shops are using 1.8.  Most of them will
    likely be puppeteers, but we're using it for Rails here until we
    move that to some other gear.
-- 
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302


From phil at bolthole.com  Fri Apr  9 21:06:25 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 12:06:25 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs ruby19, ruby19dev, ruby19ri,
	ruby19sa(...)
In-Reply-To: <1270838493-sup-8360@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
References: <201004090135.o391ZrvM028889@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<u2td57eab941004091055q44826568q7ef27364e23bb12e@mail.gmail.com>
	<1270835770-sup-2376@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<x2yd57eab941004091137l66101c44g9b324297c5bbbe27@mail.gmail.com>
	<1270838493-sup-8360@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
Message-ID: <v2gd57eab941004091206ve933b638gd8bfa76d4d42bfdb@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Fri Apr 09 14:37:39 -0400 2010:
>
>> Is ruby1.9 explicitly designed to be incompatible with 1.8?
>> (if so, the writers need to learn what major numbering means :-} )
>
> No, it's not intentionally breaking things, but it is a transitional
> step on the way to 2.0. ?Things have changed. ?Many modules will work,
> but others won't...especially binary modules.
>
> Although I haven't followed it closely for a while, 1.9 was not
> originally intended for general use.


This sounds... quite bad.

>> As a side comment.. We only have a limited (under 10?) set of
>> packages that need ruby.  If all of our packages are fine with the
>> newer ruby, maybe we should just bump CSWruby, reguardless?
>
> It doesn't work like that, unfortunately.  If you're running 1.8 with
> a Rails stack (installed locally as gems, outside of the pkg world)
> and all of a sudden we drop 1.9 in the place of 1.8, you're going to
> annoy a lot[2] of people.

Technically, that's Not Our Problem, until we package something in
that category.

We might approach this, by migrating CSWruby to 1.9, but then providing 1.8
as "ruby_old" or something?

(I really dont like having "18" when it's really "1.8". Yes I know we
do that for bdb. I hate that :-/ )



> People want both. ?Some will _need_ both, at least for a while.

I dont think mangling our namespace quasi-permenantly, for a temporary
benefit, is a positive thing.




> If apps want to move their dependencies to 1.9 instead, that's fine
> with me, but we can't simply roll over the old version.

Would you care to test out our existing ruby-using packages, and
verify whether or not they will work with 1.9 ?

If yu find even one that does not work, you could stop without testing
the others, and report that one.

Otherwise... if they DO all work.. seems like  "upgrade ruby, provide
ruby_old" might be our best course of action?






meanwhile, you are of course welcome to toss your ruby 1.9 packages in
testing, (and/or "experimental?") if you have not done so already, and
thus people who want them can relatively easily grab them there, for
now.

From bwalton at opencsw.org  Fri Apr  9 21:48:25 2010
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2010 15:48:25 -0400
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs ruby19, ruby19dev, ruby19ri,
	ruby19sa(...)
In-Reply-To: <v2gd57eab941004091206ve933b638gd8bfa76d4d42bfdb@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201004090135.o391ZrvM028889@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<u2td57eab941004091055q44826568q7ef27364e23bb12e@mail.gmail.com>
	<1270835770-sup-2376@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<x2yd57eab941004091137l66101c44g9b324297c5bbbe27@mail.gmail.com>
	<1270838493-sup-8360@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<v2gd57eab941004091206ve933b638gd8bfa76d4d42bfdb@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1270841985-sup-4988@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>

Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Fri Apr 09 15:06:25 -0400 2010:

> This sounds... quite bad.

Go tell the ruby folks then. :)  It's really no worse than a breakage
caused by perl 5.8 -> 5.10 or python 2.x -> py3k.  Languages change.
Bindings and modules always lag.

> > It doesn't work like that, unfortunately.  If you're running 1.8 with
> > a Rails stack (installed locally as gems, outside of the pkg world)
> > and all of a sudden we drop 1.9 in the place of 1.8, you're going to
> > annoy a lot[2] of people.
> 
> Technically, that's Not Our Problem, until we package something in
> that category.

So we'll bend over backwards not to break NFS or sparse zones where
it's _hard_ to meet all the needs and yet say 'fffffuuuuuuuu' (see:
reddit) to those that simply installed some gems using a supported
package when it's easy not to screw them?

> We might approach this, by migrating CSWruby to 1.9, but then
> providing 1.8 as "ruby_old" or something?

That only makes sense when 1.9 is ready to be the default.  I don't
believe that's the case yet.

> (I really dont like having "18" when it's really "1.8". Yes I know
> we do that for bdb. I hate that :-/ )

If package naming will allow for 1.9 (and 1.8), I'll change both the
name and the binary filenames.  This would be closer to what Debian
does, but I opted for shorter names without dots.

> > People want both. ?Some will _need_ both, at least for a while.
> 
> I dont think mangling our namespace quasi-permenantly, for a
> temporary benefit, is a positive thing.

> Would you care to test out our existing ruby-using packages, and
> verify whether or not they will work with 1.9 ?

No, not really.  I don't have personal need for this yet.  I packaged
it due to _user request_ and while I'll certainly play with it for
scripting purposes, I won't be deploying it to run anything like
puppet or rails on my own boxes in the foreseeable future.

> Otherwise... if they DO all work.. seems like "upgrade ruby, provide
> ruby_old" might be our best course of action?

Lets look to the other distros for this:

Debian provides a package named 'ruby' which is a dummy package that
depends on default debian ruby version, ruby1.8 currently.  They ship
an additional 1.9 package.

Fedora 12 doesn't provide a 1.9 package that I could see.

So, if you're proposing the following, I can agree to more work.
Otherwise, I think my original plan is still the best option at this
point, with the minor exception that I'm willing to make our 19 be
1.9, assuming we'd demote the current ruby package to 1.8 later.

1. Rename current ruby packages to include 18 in the name (ruby18,
   ruby18doc, etc).
2. Make binary/path names use the 18 suffix (or maybe 1.8,
   depending...)
3. Add dummy packages in the place of the old ruby packages that
   simply depend on the current _default_ version (must be 1.8 for
   now) that provide symlinks in all required areas to make the 1.8
   version work.
4a. Ship the ruby19* packages, as is, since they'll still play nicely.
4b. Ship the ruby19* packages with binaries/paths using 1.9 instead of
    19 as they stand now.

1 and 2 above are tangled up in the fact that I can't currently
rebuild 1.8.7 as gcc4 is broken...the breakage isn't affecting 1.9
currently.

3 above is tangled up in that there will be several paths that need
symlink behaviour.  It's also complicated by the fact that binary
modules may have RPATH built in.  (Had we had this version naming
stuff built in from the start, things would be easier, but ruby was
around long before I took it over...and even when I took it over, 1.9
wasn't as popular as it is now.)

I think the best course of action is to follow Debian in this.  When
they flip their default version, I'll do the same for OpenCSW.

Thanks
-Ben
-- 
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302


From phil at opencsw.org  Fri Apr  9 21:58:15 2010
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 12:58:15 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs ruby19, ruby19dev, ruby19ri,
	ruby19sa(...)
In-Reply-To: <1270841985-sup-4988@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
References: <201004090135.o391ZrvM028889@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<u2td57eab941004091055q44826568q7ef27364e23bb12e@mail.gmail.com>
	<1270835770-sup-2376@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<x2yd57eab941004091137l66101c44g9b324297c5bbbe27@mail.gmail.com>
	<1270838493-sup-8360@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<v2gd57eab941004091206ve933b638gd8bfa76d4d42bfdb@mail.gmail.com>
	<1270841985-sup-4988@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
Message-ID: <o2sd57eab941004091258xc872865ar50eb8c37fa6b94da@mail.gmail.com>

minor point:



On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org> wrote:
>
> If package naming will allow for 1.9 (and 1.8), I'll change both the
> name and the binary filenames.

unfortunately, dots are not allowed.

well, technically, it might work, for the "software name", but you
cant put dots in the PKG name, that I'm aware of.
So, that wont work.

I'll have to think about the other stuff for a while. i might agree
with your plan. dunno yet.

From hson at opencsw.org  Sat Apr 10 00:09:04 2010
From: hson at opencsw.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Roger_H=E5kansson?=)
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 00:09:04 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] poppler
Message-ID: <4BBFA580.5010402@opencsw.org>

CSWpoppler now is an empty package with CSWlibpoppler as dependency

libpoppler-0.12.4,REV=2010.04.10-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
libpoppler-0.12.4,REV=2010.04.10-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
libpoppler_devel-0.12.4,REV=2010.04.10-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
libpoppler_devel-0.12.4,REV=2010.04.10-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
libpoppler_doc-0.12.4,REV=2010.04.10-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
poppler-0.12.4,REV=2010.04.10-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

From phil at bolthole.com  Sat Apr 10 06:55:39 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 21:55:39 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] poppler
In-Reply-To: <4BBFA580.5010402@opencsw.org>
References: <4BBFA580.5010402@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <p2hd57eab941004092155n952fc5a3n47bb0eaf38de71ff@mail.gmail.com>

thannk you. matching

On Friday, April 9, 2010, Roger H?kansson <hson at opencsw.org> wrote:
> CSWpoppler now is an empty package with CSWlibpoppler as dependency
>
> libpoppler-0.12.4,REV=2010.04.10-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> libpoppler-0.12.4,REV=2010.04.10-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> libpoppler_devel-0.12.4,REV=2010.04.10-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> libpoppler_devel-0.12.4,REV=2010.04.10-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> libpoppler_doc-0.12.4,REV=2010.04.10-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
> poppler-0.12.4,REV=2010.04.10-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From dam at opencsw.org  Sat Apr 10 09:00:31 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 09:00:31 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs ruby19, ruby19dev, ruby19ri,
	ruby19sa(...)
In-Reply-To: <v2gd57eab941004091206ve933b638gd8bfa76d4d42bfdb@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201004090135.o391ZrvM028889@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<u2td57eab941004091055q44826568q7ef27364e23bb12e@mail.gmail.com>
	<1270835770-sup-2376@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<x2yd57eab941004091137l66101c44g9b324297c5bbbe27@mail.gmail.com>
	<1270838493-sup-8360@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<v2gd57eab941004091206ve933b638gd8bfa76d4d42bfdb@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <EA9B1D5E-4ACE-4DF7-A06C-EC10AF5EC221@opencsw.org>

Hi Phil,

Am 09.04.2010 um 21:06 schrieb Philip Brown:
> (I really dont like having "18" when it's really "1.8". Yes I know we
> do that for bdb. I hate that :-/ )

And MySQL. And Postgres. And Apache. And sqlite.


Best regards

   -- Dago

From dam at opencsw.org  Sat Apr 10 13:18:20 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:18:20 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_algorithmannotate,
	pm_algorithmdif(...)
Message-ID: <201004101118.o3ABIKLm006461@login.bo.opencsw.org>

Just some takeovers from Alex Moore.

* pm_probeperl: new package
  + pm_probeperl-0.01,REV=2010.04.10-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

* pm_fileslurp: minor version upgrade
  - from: 9999.12,REV=2008.02.14
  -   to: 9999.13,REV=2010.04.10
  + pm_fileslurp-9999.13,REV=2010.04.10-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

* pm_fileflat: minor version upgrade
  - from: 1.02,REV=2007.12.24
  -   to: 1.04,REV=2010.04.10
  + pm_fileflat-1.04,REV=2010.04.10-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

* pm_plrpc: minor version upgrade
  - from: 0.2018
  -   to: 0.2020,REV=2010.04.10
  + pm_plrpc-0.2020,REV=2010.04.10-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

* pm_prefork: minor version upgrade
  - from: 1.02,REV=2008.01.30
  -   to: 1.04,REV=2010.04.10
  + pm_prefork-1.04,REV=2010.04.10-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

* pm_filecpyrecurs: minor version upgrade
  - from: 0.35,REV=2008.02.01
  -   to: 0.38,REV=2010.04.10
  + pm_filecpyrecurs-0.38,REV=2010.04.10-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From dam at opencsw.org  Mon Apr 12 16:43:45 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 16:43:45 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs xsnow
Message-ID: <201004121443.o3CEhjQT015959@login.bo.opencsw.org>

Simple takeover from retired Thomas Glanzmann and rebuild with GAR.
Now uses Sun provided libxpm.

* xsnow: revision upgrade
  - from: 2003.12.05
  -   to: 2010.04.10
  + xsnow-1.42,REV=2010.04.10-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + xsnow-1.42,REV=2010.04.10-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From dam at opencsw.org  Mon Apr 12 17:57:29 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 17:57:29 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_digesthmac, pm_iostringy,
	pm_timedate
Message-ID: <201004121557.o3CFvThN009519@login.bo.opencsw.org>

All takeovers from retired.

* pm_digesthmac: minor version upgrade
  - from: 1.01,REV=2006.01.23
  -   to: 1.02,REV=2010.04.12
  + pm_digesthmac-1.02,REV=2010.04.12-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

* pm_iostringy: revision upgrade
  - from: 2008.03.07
  -   to: 2010.04.12
  + pm_iostringy-2.110,REV=2010.04.12-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

* pm_timedate: minor version upgrade
  - from: 1.16
  -   to: 1.20,REV=2010.04.12
  + pm_timedate-1.20,REV=2010.04.12-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From phil at opencsw.org  Mon Apr 12 18:05:31 2010
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 09:05:31 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs xsnow
In-Reply-To: <201004121443.o3CEhjQT015959@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201004121443.o3CEhjQT015959@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <t2md57eab941004120905t6a44f79cm6d696b40562738f9@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 7:43 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Simple takeover from retired Thomas Glanzmann and rebuild with GAR.
> Now uses Sun provided libxpm.
>
> * xsnow: revision upgrade
> ?- from: 2003.12.05
> ?- ? to: 2010.04.10
> ?+ xsnow-1.42,REV=2010.04.10-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ xsnow-1.42,REV=2010.04.10-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>

batched

From phil at opencsw.org  Tue Apr 13 00:29:25 2010
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:29:25 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_digesthmac, pm_iostringy,
	pm_timedate
In-Reply-To: <201004121557.o3CFvThN009519@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201004121557.o3CFvThN009519@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <k2gd57eab941004121529g1802647bs3a43ada0ec86c804@mail.gmail.com>

great. batched


On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 8:57 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> All takeovers from retired.
>
> * pm_digesthmac: minor version upgrade
> ?- from: 1.01,REV=2006.01.23
> ?- ? to: 1.02,REV=2010.04.12
> ?+ pm_digesthmac-1.02,REV=2010.04.12-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> * pm_iostringy: revision upgrade
> ?- from: 2008.03.07
> ?- ? to: 2010.04.12
> ?+ pm_iostringy-2.110,REV=2010.04.12-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> * pm_timedate: minor version upgrade
> ?- from: 1.16
> ?- ? to: 1.20,REV=2010.04.12
> ?+ pm_timedate-1.20,REV=2010.04.12-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at opencsw.org  Tue Apr 13 00:30:21 2010
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:30:21 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_algorithmannotate,
	pm_algorithmdif(...)
In-Reply-To: <201004101118.o3ABIKLm006461@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201004101118.o3ABIKLm006461@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <v2hd57eab941004121530recb1415fjf76af1f4535f2c59@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 4:18 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Just some takeovers from Alex Moore.

thanks. batching.


> * pm_probeperl: new package
> ?+ pm_probeperl-0.01,REV=2010.04.10-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> * pm_fileslurp: minor version upgrade
> ?- from: 9999.12,REV=2008.02.14
> ?- ? to: 9999.13,REV=2010.04.10
> ?+ pm_fileslurp-9999.13,REV=2010.04.10-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> * pm_fileflat: minor version upgrade
> ?- from: 1.02,REV=2007.12.24
> ?- ? to: 1.04,REV=2010.04.10
> ?+ pm_fileflat-1.04,REV=2010.04.10-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> * pm_plrpc: minor version upgrade
> ?- from: 0.2018
> ?- ? to: 0.2020,REV=2010.04.10
> ?+ pm_plrpc-0.2020,REV=2010.04.10-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> * pm_prefork: minor version upgrade
> ?- from: 1.02,REV=2008.01.30
> ?- ? to: 1.04,REV=2010.04.10
> ?+ pm_prefork-1.04,REV=2010.04.10-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> * pm_filecpyrecurs: minor version upgrade
> ?- from: 0.35,REV=2008.02.01
> ?- ? to: 0.38,REV=2010.04.10
> ?+ pm_filecpyrecurs-0.38,REV=2010.04.10-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at opencsw.org  Tue Apr 13 00:33:45 2010
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:33:45 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs ruby19, ruby19dev, ruby19ri,
	ruby19sa(...)
In-Reply-To: <EA9B1D5E-4ACE-4DF7-A06C-EC10AF5EC221@opencsw.org>
References: <201004090135.o391ZrvM028889@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<u2td57eab941004091055q44826568q7ef27364e23bb12e@mail.gmail.com>
	<1270835770-sup-2376@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<x2yd57eab941004091137l66101c44g9b324297c5bbbe27@mail.gmail.com>
	<1270838493-sup-8360@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<v2gd57eab941004091206ve933b638gd8bfa76d4d42bfdb@mail.gmail.com>
	<EA9B1D5E-4ACE-4DF7-A06C-EC10AF5EC221@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <s2sd57eab941004121533wc0c511aegeb90ea7f2ad45a72@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 12:00 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>
> Am 09.04.2010 um 21:06 schrieb Philip Brown:
>>
>> (I really dont like having "18" when it's really "1.8". Yes I know we
>> do that for bdb. I hate that :-/ )
>
> And MySQL. And Postgres. And Apache. And sqlite.
>
>

no. apache, sqlite, mysql all have SINGLE-digit signifiers in the
software name. Just the major rev. That's relatively clean.

erm... postgres dosnt have any? not sure why you picked that one :-}

From maciej at opencsw.org  Tue Apr 13 11:35:09 2010
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski)
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 10:35:09 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs ruby19, ruby19dev, ruby19ri,
	ruby19sa(...)
In-Reply-To: <s2sd57eab941004121533wc0c511aegeb90ea7f2ad45a72@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201004090135.o391ZrvM028889@login.bo.opencsw.org> 
	<u2td57eab941004091055q44826568q7ef27364e23bb12e@mail.gmail.com> 
	<1270835770-sup-2376@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<x2yd57eab941004091137l66101c44g9b324297c5bbbe27@mail.gmail.com>
	<1270838493-sup-8360@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<v2gd57eab941004091206ve933b638gd8bfa76d4d42bfdb@mail.gmail.com>
	<EA9B1D5E-4ACE-4DF7-A06C-EC10AF5EC221@opencsw.org>
	<s2sd57eab941004121533wc0c511aegeb90ea7f2ad45a72@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <j2vce97543b1004130235g6400f6dbu144d3c02e2b16f7d@mail.gmail.com>

No dia 12 de Abril de 2010 23:33, Philip Brown <phil at opencsw.org> escreveu:
> On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 12:00 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
>> Hi Phil,
>>
>> Am 09.04.2010 um 21:06 schrieb Philip Brown:
>>>
>>> (I really dont like having "18" when it's really "1.8". Yes I know we
>>> do that for bdb. I hate that :-/ )
>>
>> And MySQL. And Postgres. And Apache. And sqlite.
>>
>>
>
> no. apache, sqlite, mysql all have SINGLE-digit signifiers in the
> software name. Just the major rev. That's relatively clean.
>
> erm... postgres dosnt have any? not sure why you picked that one :-}

Postgres is just about to get them.  CSWpostgresql83, CSWpostgresql84,
in the future CSWpostgresql90, etc.  For postgres, it's necessary to
be able to install _and_ run both 8.3 and 8.4 in order to perform an
upgrade.

From bwalton at opencsw.org  Wed Apr 14 13:55:28 2010
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 13:55:28 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libxml2, libxml2_devel, py_libxml2
Message-ID: <201004141155.o3EBtSnX003492@login.bo.opencsw.org>

Hi Phil,

This is a minor fix to include proper 64-bit handling for xml-config.

* libxml2: revision upgrade
  - from: 2010.03.29
  -   to: 2010.04.10
  + libxml2-2.7.7,REV=2010.04.10-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libxml2-2.7.7,REV=2010.04.10-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libxml2_devel-2.7.7,REV=2010.04.10-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libxml2_devel-2.7.7,REV=2010.04.10-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + py_libxml2-2.7.7,REV=2010.04.10-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + py_libxml2-2.7.7,REV=2010.04.10-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

Thanks
-Ben
-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From dam at opencsw.org  Wed Apr 14 15:28:03 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 15:28:03 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libssh2, libssh2_devel
Message-ID: <201004141328.o3EDS3ak003332@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* libssh2: patchlevel upgrade
  - from: 1.2.4,REV=2010.02.15
  -   to: 1.2.5,REV=2010.04.14
  + libssh2-1.2.5,REV=2010.04.14-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libssh2-1.2.5,REV=2010.04.14-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libssh2_devel-1.2.5,REV=2010.04.14-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libssh2_devel-1.2.5,REV=2010.04.14-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From dam at opencsw.org  Wed Apr 14 16:18:31 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 16:18:31 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs lha
Message-ID: <201004141418.o3EEIVGC021393@login.bo.opencsw.org>

Takeover from missing Markus Mayer and now in GAR

* lha: minor version upgrade
  - from: 1.14,REV=2004.02.02_rev=i
  -   to: 1.14i_ac20050924p1,REV=2010.04.14
  + lha-1.14i_ac20050924p1,REV=2010.04.14-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + lha-1.14i_ac20050924p1,REV=2010.04.14-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From ihsan at opencsw.org  Wed Apr 14 20:57:35 2010
From: ihsan at opencsw.org (Ihsan Dogan)
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 20:57:35 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_maildkim
Message-ID: <201004141857.o3EIvYCD008080@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* pm_maildkim: revision upgrade
  - from: 2010.01.26
  -   to: 2010.04.14
  + pm_maildkim-0.37,REV=2010.04.14-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From phil at opencsw.org  Wed Apr 14 23:37:30 2010
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 14:37:30 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libxml2, libxml2_devel, py_libxml2
In-Reply-To: <201004141155.o3EBtSnX003492@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201004141155.o3EBtSnX003492@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <l2xd57eab941004141437q289d5f68k549ecbcf252e0b3c@mail.gmail.com>

okay


On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 4:55 AM, Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>
> This is a minor fix to include proper 64-bit handling for xml-config.
>
> * libxml2: revision upgrade
> ?- from: 2010.03.29
> ?- ? to: 2010.04.10
> ?+ libxml2-2.7.7,REV=2010.04.10-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ libxml2-2.7.7,REV=2010.04.10-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ libxml2_devel-2.7.7,REV=2010.04.10-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ libxml2_devel-2.7.7,REV=2010.04.10-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ py_libxml2-2.7.7,REV=2010.04.10-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ py_libxml2-2.7.7,REV=2010.04.10-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> Thanks
> -Ben
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at opencsw.org  Wed Apr 14 23:38:24 2010
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 14:38:24 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libssh2, libssh2_devel
In-Reply-To: <201004141328.o3EDS3ak003332@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201004141328.o3EDS3ak003332@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <j2nd57eab941004141438zcc775782q5d38fac018417ddf@mail.gmail.com>

okay


On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> * libssh2: patchlevel upgrade
> ?- from: 1.2.4,REV=2010.02.15
> ?- ? to: 1.2.5,REV=2010.04.14
> ?+ libssh2-1.2.5,REV=2010.04.14-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ libssh2-1.2.5,REV=2010.04.14-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ libssh2_devel-1.2.5,REV=2010.04.14-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ libssh2_devel-1.2.5,REV=2010.04.14-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>

From phil at opencsw.org  Wed Apr 14 23:41:16 2010
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 14:41:16 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs lha
In-Reply-To: <201004141418.o3EEIVGC021393@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201004141418.o3EEIVGC021393@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <y2qd57eab941004141441i717d820chd849e183f7fad741@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 7:18 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Takeover from missing Markus Mayer

erm... Markus is currently loged in to bender. and quasi active.

From phil at bolthole.com  Wed Apr 14 23:46:17 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 14:46:17 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_maildkim
In-Reply-To: <201004141857.o3EIvYCD008080@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201004141857.o3EIvYCD008080@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <y2od57eab941004141446gfa86f22dsf46165b6f7560cb6@mail.gmail.com>

okaies


On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Ihsan Dogan <ihsan at opencsw.org> wrote:
> * pm_maildkim: revision upgrade
> ?- from: 2010.01.26
> ?- ? to: 2010.04.14
> ?+ pm_maildkim-0.37,REV=2010.04.14-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>

From bonivart at opencsw.org  Wed Apr 14 23:48:07 2010
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 23:48:07 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs lha
In-Reply-To: <y2qd57eab941004141441i717d820chd849e183f7fad741@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201004141418.o3EEIVGC021393@login.bo.opencsw.org> 
	<y2qd57eab941004141441i717d820chd849e183f7fad741@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <q2y625385e31004141448i73b3a88m3f051726f72e7347@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:41 PM, Philip Brown <phil at opencsw.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 7:18 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
>> Takeover from missing Markus Mayer
>
> erm... Markus is currently loged in to bender. and quasi active.

Yes, he responded to my ping March 31st and requested to be listed as active.

-- 
/peter

From phil at opencsw.org  Wed Apr 14 23:56:34 2010
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 14:56:34 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs lha
In-Reply-To: <q2y625385e31004141448i73b3a88m3f051726f72e7347@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201004141418.o3EEIVGC021393@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<y2qd57eab941004141441i717d820chd849e183f7fad741@mail.gmail.com>
	<q2y625385e31004141448i73b3a88m3f051726f72e7347@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <k2ld57eab941004141456n6c6b0b40xe223f2f68d783b62@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 2:48 PM, Peter Bonivart <bonivart at opencsw.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:41 PM, Philip Brown <phil at opencsw.org> wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 7:18 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
>>> Takeover from missing Markus Mayer
>>
>> erm... Markus is currently loged in to bender. and quasi active.
>
> Yes, he responded to my ping March 31st and requested to be listed as active.
>

okay

From bwalton at opencsw.org  Thu Apr 15 01:56:02 2010
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 19:56:02 -0400
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs ruby19, ruby19dev, ruby19ri,
	ruby19sa(...)
In-Reply-To: <201004090135.o391ZrvM028889@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201004090135.o391ZrvM028889@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <1271289342-sup-4039@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>

Excerpts from Ben Walton's message of Thu Apr 08 21:35:53 -0400 2010:

Bump.

> * ruby19: new package
>   + ruby19-1.9.1p376,REV=2010.04.03-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + ruby19-1.9.1p376,REV=2010.04.03-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + ruby19dev-1.9.1p376,REV=2010.04.03-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + ruby19dev-1.9.1p376,REV=2010.04.03-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + ruby19ri-1.9.1p376,REV=2010.04.03-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + ruby19samples-1.9.1p376,REV=2010.04.03-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + ruby19tk-1.9.1p376,REV=2010.04.03-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>   + ruby19tk-1.9.1p376,REV=2010.04.03-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

Thanks
-Ben
-- 
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302


From maciej at opencsw.org  Thu Apr 15 14:03:27 2010
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej Blizinski)
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 14:03:27 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs idle, python, python_devel, python_tk
Message-ID: <201004151203.o3FC3RU2026745@login.bo.opencsw.org>

Requested and subsequently tested by Ken Mays.

- links against CSW X11
- fixes runpath for berkeley db: no longer uses the legacy symlink provided by
	the CSWbdb package
- contains two Solaris-related fixes

* python: patchlevel upgrade
  - from: 2.6.4,REV=2010.02.15
  -   to: 2.6.5,REV=2010.03.30
  + idle-2.6.5,REV=2010.03.30-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
  + python-2.6.5,REV=2010.03.30-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + python-2.6.5,REV=2010.03.30-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + python_devel-2.6.5,REV=2010.03.30-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + python_devel-2.6.5,REV=2010.03.30-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + python_tk-2.6.5,REV=2010.03.30-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + python_tk-2.6.5,REV=2010.03.30-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From dam at opencsw.org  Fri Apr 16 09:27:58 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 09:27:58 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs yasm
Message-ID: <201004160727.o3G7Rwaj017730@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* yasm: major version upgrade
  - from: 0.8.0,REV=2010.01.02
  -   to: 1.0.0,REV=2010.04.16
  + yasm-1.0.0,REV=2010.04.16-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + yasm-1.0.0,REV=2010.04.16-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From dam at opencsw.org  Fri Apr 16 14:59:54 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 14:59:54 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libical, libicaldevel
Message-ID: <201004161259.o3GCxsxo029771@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* libical: minor version upgrade
  - from: 0.23
  -   to: 0.44,REV=2010.04.16
  + libical-0.44,REV=2010.04.16-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libical-0.44,REV=2010.04.16-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

* libicaldevel: new package
  + libicaldevel-0.44,REV=2010.04.16-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libicaldevel-0.44,REV=2010.04.16-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From dam at opencsw.org  Fri Apr 16 15:33:07 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 15:33:07 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs msmtp
Message-ID: <201004161333.o3GDX7I5027704@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* msmtp: patchlevel upgrade
  - from: 1.4.19,REV=2009.10.25
  -   to: 1.4.20,REV=2010.04.16
  + msmtp-1.4.20,REV=2010.04.16-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + msmtp-1.4.20,REV=2010.04.16-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From dam at opencsw.org  Fri Apr 16 16:04:34 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 16:04:34 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libassuan
Message-ID: <201004161404.o3GE4YQm024653@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* libassuan: major version upgrade
  - from: 1.0.5,REV=2009.02.09
  -   to: 2.0.0,REV=2010.04.16
  + libassuan-2.0.0,REV=2010.04.16-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libassuan-2.0.0,REV=2010.04.16-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From ihsan at opencsw.org  Fri Apr 16 22:48:06 2010
From: ihsan at opencsw.org (Ihsan Dogan)
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 22:48:06 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_mailtools
Message-ID: <201004162048.o3GKm6SV019523@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* pm_mailtools: minor version upgrade
  - from: 2.05,REV=2009.12.27
  -   to: 2.06,REV=2010.04.16
  + pm_mailtools-2.06,REV=2010.04.16-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From ihsan at opencsw.org  Fri Apr 16 23:28:07 2010
From: ihsan at opencsw.org (Ihsan Dogan)
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 23:28:07 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs nsd
Message-ID: <201004162128.o3GLS79L025010@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* nsd: patchlevel upgrade
  - from: 3.2.4,REV=2010.01.07
  -   to: 3.2.5,REV=2010.04.16
  + nsd-3.2.5,REV=2010.04.16-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + nsd-3.2.5,REV=2010.04.16-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From phil at bolthole.com  Fri Apr 16 23:39:52 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 14:39:52 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_mailtools
In-Reply-To: <201004162048.o3GKm6SV019523@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201004162048.o3GKm6SV019523@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <r2pd57eab941004161439g69e5bf8pc8a7a031823bef76@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Ihsan Dogan <ihsan at opencsw.org> wrote:
> * pm_mailtools: minor version upgrade
> ?- from: 2.05,REV=2009.12.27
> ?- ? to: 2.06,REV=2010.04.16
> ?+ pm_mailtools-2.06,REV=2010.04.16-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>

okay

From phil at opencsw.org  Fri Apr 16 23:42:13 2010
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 14:42:13 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs nsd
In-Reply-To: <201004162128.o3GLS79L025010@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201004162128.o3GLS79L025010@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <s2sd57eab941004161442qd00a6807oa06bc1c09a1a15f9@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Ihsan Dogan <ihsan at opencsw.org> wrote:
> * nsd: patchlevel upgrade
> ?- from: 3.2.4,REV=2010.01.07
> ?- ? to: 3.2.5,REV=2010.04.16
> ?+ nsd-3.2.5,REV=2010.04.16-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ nsd-3.2.5,REV=2010.04.16-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>

change /etc/opt/csw/init.d/cswnsd
to /opt/csw/etc/init.d please. See updated guidelines.


also the other stuff too.
with possible exception of
/etc/opt/csw/nsd/nsd.conf.CSW

If this is a "locally running ONLY" demon,
Might be nice to provide it in BOTH /opt/csw/etc, and /etc/opt/csw,
but then only have the
/etc/opt/csw version of the template configured to auto-install.

From phil at bolthole.com  Fri Apr 16 23:45:01 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 14:45:01 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libassuan
In-Reply-To: <201004161404.o3GE4YQm024653@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201004161404.o3GE4YQm024653@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <l2sd57eab941004161445m37f6ac77ye3d659049429dce2@mail.gmail.com>

huh. they changed the "major" name, but not the lib version number?
(still "0.0".. sheeesh...)
oh well, okay.



On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 7:04 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> * libassuan: major version upgrade
> ?- from: 1.0.5,REV=2009.02.09
> ?- ? to: 2.0.0,REV=2010.04.16
> ?+ libassuan-2.0.0,REV=2010.04.16-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ libassuan-2.0.0,REV=2010.04.16-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Fri Apr 16 23:46:34 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 14:46:34 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs msmtp
In-Reply-To: <201004161333.o3GDX7I5027704@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201004161333.o3GDX7I5027704@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <u2kd57eab941004161446qe721017qa1dd4e14a2a51e0d@mail.gmail.com>

batching



On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 6:33 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> * msmtp: patchlevel upgrade
> ?- from: 1.4.19,REV=2009.10.25
> ?- ? to: 1.4.20,REV=2010.04.16
> ?+ msmtp-1.4.20,REV=2010.04.16-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ msmtp-1.4.20,REV=2010.04.16-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --

From phil at bolthole.com  Fri Apr 16 23:49:50 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 14:49:50 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libical, libicaldevel
In-Reply-To: <201004161259.o3GCxsxo029771@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201004161259.o3GCxsxo029771@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <n2pd57eab941004161449t626d5495s4596b70a81fbba2d@mail.gmail.com>

thanks for the takeover...
erm.. except you did some name mangling, apparently.

ERROR 1062 (23000) at line 2: Duplicate entry 'libical' for key 1
Update failed. Presumably there is a PKGname/software mismatch




On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 5:59 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> * libical: minor version upgrade
> ?- from: 0.23
> ?- ? to: 0.44,REV=2010.04.16
> ?+ libical-0.44,REV=2010.04.16-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ libical-0.44,REV=2010.04.16-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> * libicaldevel: new package
> ?+ libicaldevel-0.44,REV=2010.04.16-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ libicaldevel-0.44,REV=2010.04.16-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Fri Apr 16 23:50:39 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 14:50:39 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs yasm
In-Reply-To: <201004160727.o3G7Rwaj017730@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201004160727.o3G7Rwaj017730@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <s2vd57eab941004161450xc9aaca29k4d123bbbf0e3b7db@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 12:27 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> * yasm: major version upgrade
> ?- from: 0.8.0,REV=2010.01.02
> ?- ? to: 1.0.0,REV=2010.04.16
> ?+ yasm-1.0.0,REV=2010.04.16-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ yasm-1.0.0,REV=2010.04.16-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>

batching

From phil at opencsw.org  Fri Apr 16 23:57:01 2010
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 14:57:01 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs idle, python, python_devel,
	python_tk
In-Reply-To: <201004151203.o3FC3RU2026745@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201004151203.o3FC3RU2026745@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <i2od57eab941004161457v2a4a7cbch43fe12a21f90e3bd@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 5:03 AM, Maciej Blizinski <maciej at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Requested and subsequently tested by Ken Mays.
>
> - links against CSW X11

That, I'm thinking, is a bad idea. particularly given the current
"in-flux" state of our x11 support.



Why are you even considering doing that?

(a side issue: we currently have separate "libxrender" and
"x11_renderproto" packages.

Seems to me, we might benefit from having "libxrender" be the pure
csw+sun version, and
the x11_render* be the "CSW X11" one.

Could someone step up and implement that please?
(anyone else listening on here? :)




> - fixes runpath for berkeley db: no longer uses the legacy symlink provided by
> ? ? ? ?the CSWbdb package

that's a great thing at least.

From ihsan at opencsw.org  Sat Apr 17 00:01:16 2010
From: ihsan at opencsw.org (Ihsan Dogan)
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 00:01:16 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs amavisd_new
Message-ID: <201004162201.o3GM1GpP023223@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* amavisd_new: patchlevel upgrade
  - from: 2.6.3,REV=2009.04.23
  -   to: 2.6.4,REV=2010.04.16
  + amavisd_new-2.6.4,REV=2010.04.16-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From phil at bolthole.com  Sat Apr 17 00:52:47 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 15:52:47 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs amavisd_new
In-Reply-To: <201004162201.o3GM1GpP023223@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201004162201.o3GM1GpP023223@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <n2vd57eab941004161552j50c31f9fh83088be0bf12fef2@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Ihsan Dogan <ihsan at opencsw.org> wrote:
> * amavisd_new: patchlevel upgrade
> ?- from: 2.6.3,REV=2009.04.23
> ?- ? to: 2.6.4,REV=2010.04.16
> ?+ amavisd_new-2.6.4,REV=2010.04.16-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>

batched

From dam at opencsw.org  Sat Apr 17 21:11:31 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 21:11:31 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libassuan
In-Reply-To: <l2sd57eab941004161445m37f6ac77ye3d659049429dce2@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201004161404.o3GE4YQm024653@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<l2sd57eab941004161445m37f6ac77ye3d659049429dce2@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <ED9E1E6F-8EF9-434F-B062-271E1BFD0070@opencsw.org>

Hi Phil,

Am 16.04.2010 um 23:45 schrieb Philip Brown:
> huh. they changed the "major" name, but not the lib version number?
> (still "0.0".. sheeesh...)
> oh well, okay.

libassuan 1.0.5 provided static libs only, so 2.0.0 is the first
version providing shared libraries.

Maciej: Which leads to the question why gnupg2 depends on a package
with static libraries :-)

> On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 7:04 AM, Dagobert Michelsen  
> <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
>> * libassuan: major version upgrade
>>  - from: 1.0.5,REV=2009.02.09
>>  -   to: 2.0.0,REV=2010.04.16
>>  + libassuan-2.0.0,REV=2010.04.16-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>>  + libassuan-2.0.0,REV=2010.04.16-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

Best regards

   -- Dago

From dam at opencsw.org  Sat Apr 17 21:12:50 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 21:12:50 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libical, libicaldevel
In-Reply-To: <n2pd57eab941004161449t626d5495s4596b70a81fbba2d@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201004161259.o3GCxsxo029771@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<n2pd57eab941004161449t626d5495s4596b70a81fbba2d@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <ED729B57-EE6D-490A-800A-D4F270816B7B@opencsw.org>

Hi Phil,

Am 16.04.2010 um 23:49 schrieb Philip Brown:
> thanks for the takeover...
> erm.. except you did some name mangling, apparently.
>
> ERROR 1062 (23000) at line 2: Duplicate entry 'libical' for key 1
> Update failed. Presumably there is a PKGname/software mismatch

I should have mentioned: The catalog name is libical and the
package name was CSWical. As there are no dependencies to the
package (yet) we should take the opportunity of adjusting the
package name.


Best regards

   -- Dago

> On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 5:59 AM, Dagobert Michelsen  
> <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
>> * libical: minor version upgrade
>>  - from: 0.23
>>  -   to: 0.44,REV=2010.04.16
>>  + libical-0.44,REV=2010.04.16-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>>  + libical-0.44,REV=2010.04.16-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>>
>> * libicaldevel: new package
>>  + libicaldevel-0.44,REV=2010.04.16-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>>  + libicaldevel-0.44,REV=2010.04.16-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>>
>> --
>> Generated by submitpkg
>> _______________________________________________
>> pkgsubmissions mailing list
>> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
>> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>>
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions


From ihsan at opencsw.org  Sat Apr 17 23:44:50 2010
From: ihsan at opencsw.org (Ihsan Dogan)
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 23:44:50 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs nsd
In-Reply-To: <s2sd57eab941004161442qd00a6807oa06bc1c09a1a15f9@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201004162128.o3GLS79L025010@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<s2sd57eab941004161442qd00a6807oa06bc1c09a1a15f9@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4BCA2BD2.3080309@opencsw.org>

Am 16.04.10 23:42, schrieb Philip Brown:

>> * nsd: patchlevel upgrade
>>  - from: 3.2.4,REV=2010.01.07
>>  -   to: 3.2.5,REV=2010.04.16
>>  + nsd-3.2.5,REV=2010.04.16-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>>  + nsd-3.2.5,REV=2010.04.16-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>>
> 
> change /etc/opt/csw/init.d/cswnsd
> to /opt/csw/etc/init.d please. See updated guidelines.

Oh, I've missed that one.

> also the other stuff too.
> with possible exception of
> /etc/opt/csw/nsd/nsd.conf.CSW

The init script is clear to me, but which other stuff do you mean?




Ihsan

-- 
ihsan at dogan.ch		http://blog.dogan.ch/

From ihsan at opencsw.org  Sun Apr 18 13:43:37 2010
From: ihsan at opencsw.org (Ihsan Dogan)
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 13:43:37 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs nsd
Message-ID: <201004181143.o3IBhbTV024450@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* nsd: patchlevel upgrade
  - from: 3.2.4,REV=2010.01.07
  -   to: 3.2.5,REV=2010.04.18
  + nsd-3.2.5,REV=2010.04.18-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + nsd-3.2.5,REV=2010.04.18-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From ihsan at opencsw.org  Sun Apr 18 15:08:27 2010
From: ihsan at opencsw.org (Ihsan Dogan)
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 15:08:27 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs irssi
Message-ID: <201004181308.o3ID8Rjp025306@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* irssi: patchlevel upgrade
  - from: 0.8.14,REV=2010.03.15
  -   to: 0.8.15,REV=2010.04.18
  + irssi-0.8.15,REV=2010.04.18-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + irssi-0.8.15,REV=2010.04.18-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From ihsan at opencsw.org  Sun Apr 18 15:40:37 2010
From: ihsan at opencsw.org (Ihsan Dogan)
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 15:40:37 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_maildkim
Message-ID: <201004181340.o3IDebq2017541@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* pm_maildkim: revision upgrade
  - from: 2010.04.14
  -   to: 2010.04.18
  + pm_maildkim-0.37,REV=2010.04.18-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From maciej at opencsw.org  Mon Apr 19 10:30:46 2010
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski)
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 09:30:46 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libassuan
In-Reply-To: <ED9E1E6F-8EF9-434F-B062-271E1BFD0070@opencsw.org>
References: <201004161404.o3GE4YQm024653@login.bo.opencsw.org> 
	<l2sd57eab941004161445m37f6ac77ye3d659049429dce2@mail.gmail.com> 
	<ED9E1E6F-8EF9-434F-B062-271E1BFD0070@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <l2jce97543b1004190130lcf2614dcu63c2d961ce05c40f@mail.gmail.com>

No dia 17 de Abril de 2010 20:11, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> escreveu:
> Hi Phil,
>
> Am 16.04.2010 um 23:45 schrieb Philip Brown:
>>
>> huh. they changed the "major" name, but not the lib version number?
>> (still "0.0".. sheeesh...)
>> oh well, okay.
>
> libassuan 1.0.5 provided static libs only, so 2.0.0 is the first
> version providing shared libraries.
>
> Maciej: Which leads to the question why gnupg2 depends on a package
> with static libraries :-)

I'm guessing that it was a suggestion made by the pre-accurate
checkpkg incarnation.  I'll also upgrade gnupg2 to 2.0.15, but it
needs libassuan => 2.0.0.

From maciej at opencsw.org  Mon Apr 19 12:08:48 2010
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski)
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 11:08:48 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs nsd
In-Reply-To: <s2sd57eab941004161442qd00a6807oa06bc1c09a1a15f9@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201004162128.o3GLS79L025010@login.bo.opencsw.org> 
	<s2sd57eab941004161442qd00a6807oa06bc1c09a1a15f9@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <y2pce97543b1004190308l625d324bo1e6793f6d42d3453@mail.gmail.com>

No dia 16 de Abril de 2010 22:42, Philip Brown <phil at opencsw.org> escreveu:
> On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Ihsan Dogan <ihsan at opencsw.org> wrote:
>> * nsd: patchlevel upgrade
>> ?- from: 3.2.4,REV=2010.01.07
>> ?- ? to: 3.2.5,REV=2010.04.16
>> ?+ nsd-3.2.5,REV=2010.04.16-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>> ?+ nsd-3.2.5,REV=2010.04.16-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>>
>
> change /etc/opt/csw/init.d/cswnsd
> to /opt/csw/etc/init.d please. See updated guidelines.

>From what I can see, it's not in the guildelines.  Here's how you can
expect maintainers to look for information:

Start: www.opencsw.org, click "pkg standards", click "Filesystem
layout standards" from the TOC, read the section, follow to the
filesystem layout page, read the whole thing, not a word on init.d.

From maciej at opencsw.org  Mon Apr 19 12:22:12 2010
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski)
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 11:22:12 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs nsd
In-Reply-To: <s2sd57eab941004161442qd00a6807oa06bc1c09a1a15f9@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201004162128.o3GLS79L025010@login.bo.opencsw.org> 
	<s2sd57eab941004161442qd00a6807oa06bc1c09a1a15f9@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <r2wce97543b1004190322m19754a98t760c7d82243ec084@mail.gmail.com>

No dia 16 de Abril de 2010 22:42, Philip Brown <phil at opencsw.org> escreveu:
> On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Ihsan Dogan <ihsan at opencsw.org> wrote:
>> * nsd: patchlevel upgrade
>> ?- from: 3.2.4,REV=2010.01.07
>> ?- ? to: 3.2.5,REV=2010.04.16
>> ?+ nsd-3.2.5,REV=2010.04.16-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>> ?+ nsd-3.2.5,REV=2010.04.16-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>>
>
> change /etc/opt/csw/init.d/cswnsd

I've updated checkpkg to catch this in the future:

http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/gar/changeset/9705

From dam at opencsw.org  Mon Apr 19 13:36:05 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 13:36:05 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libspectre
Message-ID: <201004191136.o3JBa5Va020465@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* libspectre: patchlevel upgrade
  - from: 0.2.2,REV=2009.04.14
  -   to: 0.2.5,REV=2010.04.19
  + libspectre-0.2.5,REV=2010.04.19-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libspectre-0.2.5,REV=2010.04.19-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From dam at opencsw.org  Mon Apr 19 14:09:30 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 14:09:30 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs blame
Message-ID: <201004191209.o3JC9UIr005958@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* blame: new package
  + blame-1.3.1,REV=2010.04.19-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + blame-1.3.1,REV=2010.04.19-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From dam at opencsw.org  Mon Apr 19 17:04:12 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 17:04:12 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_localegettext
Message-ID: <201004191504.o3JF4CRf027354@login.bo.opencsw.org>

This module contains a Perl 5.10 specific bugfix

* pm_localegettext: revision upgrade
  - from: 2010.02.02
  -   to: 2010.04.19
  + pm_localegettext-1.05,REV=2010.04.19-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + pm_localegettext-1.05,REV=2010.04.19-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From dam at opencsw.org  Mon Apr 19 17:34:10 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 17:34:10 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_filechmod
Message-ID: <201004191534.o3JFYAmV004747@login.bo.opencsw.org>

Simple takeover, now in GAR

* pm_filechmod: revision upgrade
  - from: 2008.02.24
  -   to: 2010.04.19
  + pm_filechmod-0.32,REV=2010.04.19-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From rupert at opencsw.org  Mon Apr 19 18:32:17 2010
From: rupert at opencsw.org (rupert THURNER)
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 18:32:17 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions]  newpkgs ap2_modwsgi
Message-ID: <q2l6af4271004190932z8d12bd61v969ba5b4b0edf349@mail.gmail.com>

upgrade from 2.5 to 3.2

From rupert at opencsw.org  Mon Apr 19 18:33:25 2010
From: rupert at opencsw.org (rupert THURNER)
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 18:33:25 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs mercurial
Message-ID: <n2w6af4271004190933n7f71ff9ctd8428254259ce062@mail.gmail.com>

upgrade from 1.5 to 1.5.1

From rupert at opencsw.org  Mon Apr 19 19:22:50 2010
From: rupert at opencsw.org (rupert THURNER)
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 19:22:50 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] [csw-maintainers]  Subject: newpkgs libserf
Message-ID: <w2o6af4271004191022tb472e93cke3b747af523cdf17@mail.gmail.com>

upgrade from 0.3.0 to 0.3.1

From rupert at opencsw.org  Mon Apr 19 19:52:20 2010
From: rupert at opencsw.org (rupert THURNER)
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 19:52:20 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions]  Subject: newpkgs subversion
Message-ID: <u2o6af4271004191052i1114230bi2c536cb25ea93202@mail.gmail.com>

upgrade from 1.6.6 to 1.6.9

From phil at bolthole.com  Mon Apr 19 21:25:24 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 12:25:24 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs ruby19, ruby19dev, ruby19ri,
	ruby19sa(...)
In-Reply-To: <1271289342-sup-4039@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
References: <201004090135.o391ZrvM028889@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<1271289342-sup-4039@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
Message-ID: <p2zd57eab941004191225g4d19bf5em6fb509546602673b@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Excerpts from Ben Walton's message of Thu Apr 08 21:35:53 -0400 2010:
>
> Bump.
>
>> * ruby19: new package
>> ? + ruby19-1.9.1p376,REV=2010.04.03-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>> ? + ruby19-1.9.1p376,REV=2010.04.03-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>> ? + ruby19dev-1.9.1p376,REV=2010.04.03-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>> ? + ruby19dev-1.9.1p376,REV=2010.04.03-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>> ? + ruby19ri-1.9.1p376,REV=2010.04.03-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>> ? + ruby19samples-1.9.1p376,REV=2010.04.03-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>> ? + ruby19tk-1.9.1p376,REV=2010.04.03-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>> ? + ruby19tk-1.9.1p376,REV=2010.04.03-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>

sigh.

Sorry I didnt reply about this sooner.

i HAVE been thinking about this.
(Deep, dark, unhappy thoughts, about how more "open source" developers
badly need to gain a clue about maintainability, sustainability, and
business/stability-friendly practices....)

I'm thinking that for ruby, what sounds best for us, would be to
migrate to something similar to our berkeleydb practice.
Which is approximately as follows:

- we maintain version-specific packages of ruby
- we maintain them only so long as WE need them for OUR packages
- once none of OUR packages uses an older version, we drop it
- there is no generic "ruby" package, since it is guaranteed to cause
problems in the future due to shortsightedness of the ruby developers.

So... we COULD replace all our "CSWruby*" packages, with "empty"
packages that depend on ruby18 packages(that you would then have to
make)... but only as a temporary stopgap measure. The packages need to
clearly identify that they are a transition package only.
There will be no ongoing "CSWruby" package, after transition is complete.

Sound okay?

From phil at opencsw.org  Mon Apr 19 21:36:03 2010
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 12:36:03 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs nsd
In-Reply-To: <y2pce97543b1004190308l625d324bo1e6793f6d42d3453@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201004162128.o3GLS79L025010@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<s2sd57eab941004161442qd00a6807oa06bc1c09a1a15f9@mail.gmail.com>
	<y2pce97543b1004190308l625d324bo1e6793f6d42d3453@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <u2nd57eab941004191236l482a43a6x7a1571dd7ce90088@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 3:08 AM, Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski
<maciej at opencsw.org> wrote:
>
>> change /etc/opt/csw/init.d/cswnsd
>> to /opt/csw/etc/init.d please. See updated guidelines.
>
> From what I can see, it's not in the guildelines. ?Here's how you can
> expect maintainers to look for information:
>
> Start: www.opencsw.org, click "pkg standards", click "Filesystem
> layout standards" from the TOC, read the section, follow to the
> filesystem layout page, read the whole thing, not a word on init.d.
>


its in the wiki page on using cswinitsmf. that's what I was referring to.
But I'll update our "layout standards" as well.

From phil at bolthole.com  Mon Apr 19 21:46:08 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 12:46:08 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs nsd
In-Reply-To: <201004181143.o3IBhbTV024450@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201004181143.o3IBhbTV024450@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <x2vd57eab941004191246kff7a20b2l326eec344e2c17b2@mail.gmail.com>

On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 4:43 AM, Ihsan Dogan <ihsan at opencsw.org> wrote:
> * nsd: patchlevel upgrade
> ?- from: 3.2.4,REV=2010.01.07
> ?- ? to: 3.2.5,REV=2010.04.18
> ?+ nsd-3.2.5,REV=2010.04.18-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ nsd-3.2.5,REV=2010.04.18-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --

thanks for the update

From phil at opencsw.org  Mon Apr 19 21:46:56 2010
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 12:46:56 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs irssi
In-Reply-To: <201004181308.o3ID8Rjp025306@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201004181308.o3ID8Rjp025306@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <x2pd57eab941004191246k6a89a1f8u6b407349d1d8acc3@mail.gmail.com>

batched


On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 6:08 AM, Ihsan Dogan <ihsan at opencsw.org> wrote:
> * irssi: patchlevel upgrade
> ?- from: 0.8.14,REV=2010.03.15
> ?- ? to: 0.8.15,REV=2010.04.18
> ?+ irssi-0.8.15,REV=2010.04.18-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ irssi-0.8.15,REV=2010.04.18-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Mon Apr 19 21:48:02 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 12:48:02 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_maildkim
In-Reply-To: <201004181340.o3IDebq2017541@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201004181340.o3IDebq2017541@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <p2kd57eab941004191248ubd0df19dgba20a1fd413698c5@mail.gmail.com>

okay


On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 6:40 AM, Ihsan Dogan <ihsan at opencsw.org> wrote:
> * pm_maildkim: revision upgrade
> ?- from: 2010.04.14
> ?- ? to: 2010.04.18
> ?+ pm_maildkim-0.37,REV=2010.04.18-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Mon Apr 19 21:50:19 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 12:50:19 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] [csw-maintainers] Subject: newpkgs libserf
In-Reply-To: <w2o6af4271004191022tb472e93cke3b747af523cdf17@mail.gmail.com>
References: <w2o6af4271004191022tb472e93cke3b747af523cdf17@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <o2hd57eab941004191250r70b0319az1c8fd99a4cf03c00@mail.gmail.com>

2010/4/19 rupert THURNER <rupert at opencsw.org>:
> upgrade from 0.3.0 to 0.3.1
>

erm.. okay...
please watch your subject line explosion in the future though, please :)

From phil at bolthole.com  Mon Apr 19 22:17:17 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 13:17:17 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs blame
In-Reply-To: <201004191209.o3JC9UIr005958@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201004191209.o3JC9UIr005958@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <t2md57eab941004191317w2259b792ie40def1bb0762cee@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 5:09 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> * blame: new package
> ?+ blame-1.3.1,REV=2010.04.19-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ blame-1.3.1,REV=2010.04.19-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>

gotit

From phil at opencsw.org  Mon Apr 19 22:17:32 2010
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 13:17:32 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libspectre
In-Reply-To: <201004191136.o3JBa5Va020465@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201004191136.o3JBa5Va020465@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <m2hd57eab941004191317p20dd3388u47f04923928a26e7@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 4:36 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> * libspectre: patchlevel upgrade
> ?- from: 0.2.2,REV=2009.04.14
> ?- ? to: 0.2.5,REV=2010.04.19
> ?+ libspectre-0.2.5,REV=2010.04.19-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ libspectre-0.2.5,REV=2010.04.19-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>

okay

From phil at bolthole.com  Mon Apr 19 22:18:22 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 13:18:22 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] Subject: newpkgs subversion
In-Reply-To: <u2o6af4271004191052i1114230bi2c536cb25ea93202@mail.gmail.com>
References: <u2o6af4271004191052i1114230bi2c536cb25ea93202@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <i2kd57eab941004191318qc0131b51ye834e10084d2b2e3@mail.gmail.com>

in something as complex as this, it's nice to explicitly list which
packages are involved here.



2010/4/19 rupert THURNER <rupert at opencsw.org>:
> upgrade from 1.6.6 to 1.6.9
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at opencsw.org  Mon Apr 19 22:18:51 2010
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 13:18:51 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_localegettext
In-Reply-To: <201004191504.o3JF4CRf027354@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201004191504.o3JF4CRf027354@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <i2id57eab941004191318mada7cfb5i183f409189849838@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 8:04 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> This module contains a Perl 5.10 specific bugfix
>
> * pm_localegettext: revision upgrade
> ?- from: 2010.02.02
> ?- ? to: 2010.04.19
> ?+ pm_localegettext-1.05,REV=2010.04.19-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ pm_localegettext-1.05,REV=2010.04.19-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --

okay

From phil at opencsw.org  Mon Apr 19 22:19:25 2010
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 13:19:25 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_filechmod
In-Reply-To: <201004191534.o3JFYAmV004747@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201004191534.o3JFYAmV004747@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <q2qd57eab941004191319q50ab9805ja728026172bf6567@mail.gmail.com>

batched




On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Simple takeover, now in GAR
>
> * pm_filechmod: revision upgrade
> ?- from: 2008.02.24
> ?- ? to: 2010.04.19
> ?+ pm_filechmod-0.32,REV=2010.04.19-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Mon Apr 19 22:21:06 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 13:21:06 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs mercurial
In-Reply-To: <n2w6af4271004190933n7f71ff9ctd8428254259ce062@mail.gmail.com>
References: <n2w6af4271004190933n7f71ff9ctd8428254259ce062@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <y2zd57eab941004191321i60068f28zf795fc37e04e48bd@mail.gmail.com>

2010/4/19 rupert THURNER <rupert at opencsw.org>:
> upgrade from 1.5 to 1.5.1
> ___



batched

From rupert at opencsw.org  Mon Apr 19 22:25:20 2010
From: rupert at opencsw.org (rupert THURNER)
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 22:25:20 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] Subject: newpkgs subversion
In-Reply-To: <i2kd57eab941004191318qc0131b51ye834e10084d2b2e3@mail.gmail.com>
References: <u2o6af4271004191052i1114230bi2c536cb25ea93202@mail.gmail.com> 
	<i2kd57eab941004191318qc0131b51ye834e10084d2b2e3@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <l2g6af4271004191325wf96ff2aekf7de3c68950cacf@mail.gmail.com>

rupert at bender:~$ ls -1 /home/newpkgs/*1.6.9*
/home/newpkgs/ap2_subversion-1.6.9,REV=2010.03.07-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
/home/newpkgs/ap2_subversion-1.6.9,REV=2010.03.07-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
/home/newpkgs/javasvn-1.6.9,REV=2010.03.07-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
/home/newpkgs/javasvn-1.6.9,REV=2010.03.07-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
/home/newpkgs/pm_subversion-1.6.9,REV=2010.03.07-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
/home/newpkgs/pm_subversion-1.6.9,REV=2010.03.07-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
/home/newpkgs/pythonsvn-1.6.9,REV=2010.03.07-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
/home/newpkgs/pythonsvn-1.6.9,REV=2010.03.07-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
/home/newpkgs/rbsvn-1.6.9,REV=2010.03.07-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
/home/newpkgs/rbsvn-1.6.9,REV=2010.03.07-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
/home/newpkgs/subversion-1.6.9,REV=2010.03.07-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
/home/newpkgs/subversion-1.6.9,REV=2010.03.07-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
/home/newpkgs/subversion_contrib-1.6.9,REV=2010.03.07-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz
/home/newpkgs/subversion_devel-1.6.9,REV=2010.03.07-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz
/home/newpkgs/subversion_tools-1.6.9,REV=2010.03.07-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz


On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 22:18, Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> wrote:
> in something as complex as this, it's nice to explicitly list which
> packages are involved here.
>
>
>
> 2010/4/19 rupert THURNER <rupert at opencsw.org>:
>> upgrade from 1.6.6 to 1.6.9
>> _______________________________________________
>> pkgsubmissions mailing list
>> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
>> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>>
>

From bwalton at opencsw.org  Tue Apr 20 04:33:44 2010
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 04:33:44 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs quilt, quilt_completion, quilt_el
Message-ID: <201004200233.o3K2Xikt012367@login.bo.opencsw.org>

Hi Phil,

This is an amicable takeover from Murray Jensen.  It's now in GAR.
It'll be an easy transition to coreutils dependencies when the time
comes.

* quilt: new package
  + quilt_completion-0.48,REV=2010.04.19-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
  + quilt_el-0.48,REV=2010.04.19-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

* quilt: minor version upgrade
  - from: 0.32,REV=2005.06.14
  -   to: 0.48,REV=2010.04.19
  + quilt-0.48,REV=2010.04.19-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + quilt-0.48,REV=2010.04.19-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

Thanks
-Ben
-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From bwalton at opencsw.org  Tue Apr 20 04:56:54 2010
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 22:56:54 -0400
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs ruby19, ruby19dev, ruby19ri,
	ruby19sa(...)
In-Reply-To: <p2zd57eab941004191225g4d19bf5em6fb509546602673b@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201004090135.o391ZrvM028889@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<1271289342-sup-4039@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<p2zd57eab941004191225g4d19bf5em6fb509546602673b@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1271731727-sup-1351@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>

Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Mon Apr 19 15:25:24 -0400 2010:

> - we maintain version-specific packages of ruby
> - we maintain them only so long as WE need them for OUR packages
> - once none of OUR packages uses an older version, we drop it
> - there is no generic "ruby" package, since it is guaranteed to
>   cause problems in the future due to shortsightedness of the ruby
>   developers.

Ok.  This is livable.  I'm certainly in favour of less work (eg: fewer
packages) going forward.  I think the only point I'd make about the
above list is that older versions should only be dropped as of a new
stable release.  This will hopefully ease things for people with gems
installed locally (I don't want to get into gem packaging...)  that
have the potential to break across version upgrades.  We shouldn't
just drop one of the ruby versions at 'random.'

> So... we COULD replace all our "CSWruby*" packages, with "empty"
> packages that depend on ruby18 packages(that you would then have to
> make)... but only as a temporary stopgap measure. The packages need
> to clearly identify that they are a transition package only.  There
> will be no ongoing "CSWruby" package, after transition is complete.

I think this will need to get tied into the system with alternatives
too, so that we can setup /opt/csw/bin/ruby -> ruby18, etc.  I'll also
need to handle migrating gems for the ruby18 packages since the
$libdir will change when I add a suffix to everything.  A post install
script should handle this nicely.

> Sound okay?

I'm good with it, provided the caveats above are acceptable.  Once
gcc4 is back in action I can tackle this.

/me goes off to work on a new libmpfr.

Thanks
-Ben
-- 
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302


From maciej at opencsw.org  Tue Apr 20 07:57:26 2010
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej Blizinski)
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 07:57:26 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs idle, python, python_devel, python_tk
Message-ID: <201004200557.o3K5vQGr024663@login.bo.opencsw.org>

- linked against Sun X11

* python: patchlevel upgrade
  - from: 2.6.4,REV=2010.02.15
  -   to: 2.6.5,REV=2010.04.19
  + idle-2.6.5,REV=2010.04.19-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
  + python-2.6.5,REV=2010.04.19-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + python-2.6.5,REV=2010.04.19-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + python_devel-2.6.5,REV=2010.04.19-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + python_devel-2.6.5,REV=2010.04.19-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + python_tk-2.6.5,REV=2010.04.19-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + python_tk-2.6.5,REV=2010.04.19-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From dam at opencsw.org  Tue Apr 20 10:49:57 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 10:49:57 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libtasn1, libtasn1_devel
Message-ID: <201004200849.o3K8nvFh023773@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* libtasn1: minor version upgrade
  - from: 2.5,REV=2010.03.15
  -   to: 2.6,REV=2010.04.20
  + libtasn1-2.6,REV=2010.04.20-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libtasn1-2.6,REV=2010.04.20-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libtasn1_devel-2.6,REV=2010.04.20-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libtasn1_devel-2.6,REV=2010.04.20-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From dam at opencsw.org  Tue Apr 20 15:56:20 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 15:56:20 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs gsasl, libgsasl, libgsasl_devel
Message-ID: <201004201356.o3KDuKko012884@login.bo.opencsw.org>

This is a version bump. Additionally, I split off devel, not due to size,
but because the devel package will pull in all extra dependencies to other
devel packages so compiling against libgsasl with devel packages "just works".

* gsasl: minor version upgrade
  - from: 1.2,REV=2009.07.30
  -   to: 1.4.4,REV=2010.04.20
  + gsasl-1.4.4,REV=2010.04.20-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + gsasl-1.4.4,REV=2010.04.20-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libgsasl-1.4.4,REV=2010.04.20-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libgsasl-1.4.4,REV=2010.04.20-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

* libgsasl_devel: new package
  + libgsasl_devel-1.4.4,REV=2010.04.20-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libgsasl_devel-1.4.4,REV=2010.04.20-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From dam at opencsw.org  Tue Apr 20 17:54:43 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 17:54:43 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libglpk, pm_freezethaw, pm_gdtextut,
	(...)
Message-ID: <201004201554.o3KFshIG014920@login.bo.opencsw.org>

The Perl modules are just minor refreshes.

* pm_mldbm: minor version upgrade
  - from: 2.01
  -   to: 2.04,REV=2010.04.20
  + pm_mldbm-2.04,REV=2010.04.20-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

This now includes isaexec again for some large data. It may be a good idea
to factor out just the glpk binary, but there is currently no package using
this apart from the binary anyway.

* libglpk: minor version upgrade
  - from: 4.39,REV=2009.11.02
  -   to: 4.43,REV=2010.04.20
  + libglpk-4.43,REV=2010.04.20-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libglpk-4.43,REV=2010.04.20-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

* pm_freezethaw: minor version upgrade
  - from: 0.43
  -   to: 0.5001,REV=2010.04.20
  + pm_freezethaw-0.5001,REV=2010.04.20-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

* pm_gdtextut: revision number added upgrade
  - from: 
  -   to: 2010.04.20
  + pm_gdtextut-0.86,REV=2010.04.20-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From dam at opencsw.org  Wed Apr 21 10:36:34 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 10:36:34 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libical, libical_devel
Message-ID: <201004210836.o3L8aXun020746@login.bo.opencsw.org>

Hi Phil,

sorry, I had a typo in the catalog name: It said libicaldevel in the
previous package instead of libical_devel. Please rerelease :-(

Best regards

  -- Dago

* libical: revision upgrade
  - from: 2010.04.16
  -   to: 2010.04.21
  + libical-0.44,REV=2010.04.21-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libical-0.44,REV=2010.04.21-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

* libical_devel: new package
  + libical_devel-0.44,REV=2010.04.21-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libical_devel-0.44,REV=2010.04.21-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From dam at opencsw.org  Wed Apr 21 11:08:42 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 11:08:42 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs xmlstarlet
Message-ID: <201004210908.o3L98gn2007318@login.bo.opencsw.org>

This is the first release after I took over upstream. A lot of things
are fixed.

* xmlstarlet: patchlevel upgrade
  - from: 1.0.1,REV=2009.04.09
  -   to: 1.0.2,REV=2010.04.17
  + xmlstarlet-1.0.2,REV=2010.04.17-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + xmlstarlet-1.0.2,REV=2010.04.17-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From phil at opencsw.org  Fri Apr 23 22:45:06 2010
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 13:45:06 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs quilt, quilt_completion, quilt_el
In-Reply-To: <201004200233.o3K2Xikt012367@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201004200233.o3K2Xikt012367@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <o2hd57eab941004231345pdf6aa59eia921d815e5a48041@mail.gmail.com>

okay

From phil at bolthole.com  Fri Apr 23 22:46:57 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 13:46:57 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs gsasl, libgsasl, libgsasl_devel
In-Reply-To: <201004201356.o3KDuKko012884@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201004201356.o3KDuKko012884@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <l2nd57eab941004231346k518e99fexf08bcefe50fa92d2@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 6:56 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> This is a version bump. Additionally, I split off devel, not due to size,
> but because the devel package will pull in all extra dependencies to other
> devel packages so compiling against libgsasl with devel packages "just works".
>

good reason



> * gsasl: minor version upgrade
> ?- from: 1.2,REV=2009.07.30
> ?- ? to: 1.4.4,REV=2010.04.20
> ?+ gsasl-1.4.4,REV=2010.04.20-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ gsasl-1.4.4,REV=2010.04.20-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ libgsasl-1.4.4,REV=2010.04.20-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ libgsasl-1.4.4,REV=2010.04.20-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> * libgsasl_devel: new package
> ?+ libgsasl_devel-1.4.4,REV=2010.04.20-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ libgsasl_devel-1.4.4,REV=2010.04.20-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at opencsw.org  Fri Apr 23 22:45:58 2010
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 13:45:58 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libtasn1, libtasn1_devel
In-Reply-To: <201004200849.o3K8nvFh023773@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201004200849.o3K8nvFh023773@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <s2hd57eab941004231345me7a007cekc3f3695bb0457fed@mail.gmail.com>

okay


On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 1:49 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> * libtasn1: minor version upgrade
> ?- from: 2.5,REV=2010.03.15
> ?- ? to: 2.6,REV=2010.04.20
> ?+ libtasn1-2.6,REV=2010.04.20-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ libtasn1-2.6,REV=2010.04.20-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ libtasn1_devel-2.6,REV=2010.04.20-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ libtasn1_devel-2.6,REV=2010.04.20-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at opencsw.org  Fri Apr 23 22:48:51 2010
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 13:48:51 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libglpk, pm_freezethaw, pm_gdtextut,
	(...)
In-Reply-To: <201004201554.o3KFshIG014920@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201004201554.o3KFshIG014920@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <p2id57eab941004231348h55ab70b7tabde69d78ff47758@mail.gmail.com>

okay


On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> The Perl modules are just minor refreshes.
>
> * pm_mldbm: minor version upgrade
> ?- from: 2.01
> ?- ? to: 2.04,REV=2010.04.20
> ?+ pm_mldbm-2.04,REV=2010.04.20-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> This now includes isaexec again for some large data. It may be a good idea
> to factor out just the glpk binary, but there is currently no package using
> this apart from the binary anyway.
>
> * libglpk: minor version upgrade
> ?- from: 4.39,REV=2009.11.02
> ?- ? to: 4.43,REV=2010.04.20
> ?+ libglpk-4.43,REV=2010.04.20-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ libglpk-4.43,REV=2010.04.20-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> * pm_freezethaw: minor version upgrade
> ?- from: 0.43
> ?- ? to: 0.5001,REV=2010.04.20
> ?+ pm_freezethaw-0.5001,REV=2010.04.20-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> * pm_gdtextut: revision number added upgrade
> ?- from:
> ?- ? to: 2010.04.20
> ?+ pm_gdtextut-0.86,REV=2010.04.20-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Fri Apr 23 22:49:56 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 13:49:56 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs idle, python, python_devel,
	python_tk
In-Reply-To: <201004200557.o3K5vQGr024663@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201004200557.o3K5vQGr024663@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <u2pd57eab941004231349rae38fbdbz94e37a3701f2d0cb@mail.gmail.com>

erm... there's some really really old legacy garbage in the python package.

ERROR: build-machine paths found in file
python-2.6.5,REV=2010.04.19-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz




On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 10:57 PM, Maciej Blizinski <maciej at opencsw.org> wrote:
> - linked against Sun X11
>
> * python: patchlevel upgrade
> ?- from: 2.6.4,REV=2010.02.15
> ?- ? to: 2.6.5,REV=2010.04.19
> ?+ idle-2.6.5,REV=2010.04.19-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ python-2.6.5,REV=2010.04.19-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ python-2.6.5,REV=2010.04.19-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ python_devel-2.6.5,REV=2010.04.19-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ python_devel-2.6.5,REV=2010.04.19-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ python_tk-2.6.5,REV=2010.04.19-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ python_tk-2.6.5,REV=2010.04.19-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at opencsw.org  Fri Apr 23 22:51:08 2010
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 13:51:08 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs xmlstarlet
In-Reply-To: <201004210908.o3L98gn2007318@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201004210908.o3L98gn2007318@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <w2ld57eab941004231351ye19ea006t332bf70222290e77@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 2:08 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> This is the first release after I took over upstream. A lot of things
> are fixed.
>
> * xmlstarlet: patchlevel upgrade
> ?- from: 1.0.1,REV=2009.04.09
> ?- ? to: 1.0.2,REV=2010.04.17
> ?+ xmlstarlet-1.0.2,REV=2010.04.17-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ xmlstarlet-1.0.2,REV=2010.04.17-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>

okay

From phil at bolthole.com  Fri Apr 23 22:53:32 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 13:53:32 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libical, libical_devel
In-Reply-To: <201004210836.o3L8aXun020746@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201004210836.o3L8aXun020746@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <t2yd57eab941004231353kbf11961dz249122f970e6f10c@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 1:36 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>
> sorry, I had a typo in the catalog name: It said libicaldevel in the
> previous package instead of libical_devel. Please rerelease :-(
>

and rename.

EVIL.



> Best regards
>
> ?-- Dago
>
> * libical: revision upgrade
> ?- from: 2010.04.16
> ?- ? to: 2010.04.21
> ?+ libical-0.44,REV=2010.04.21-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ libical-0.44,REV=2010.04.21-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> * libical_devel: new package
> ?+ libical_devel-0.44,REV=2010.04.21-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ libical_devel-0.44,REV=2010.04.21-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Fri Apr 23 23:09:09 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 14:09:09 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs ruby19, ruby19dev, ruby19ri,
	ruby19sa(...)
In-Reply-To: <1271731727-sup-1351@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
References: <201004090135.o391ZrvM028889@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<1271289342-sup-4039@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<p2zd57eab941004191225g4d19bf5em6fb509546602673b@mail.gmail.com>
	<1271731727-sup-1351@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
Message-ID: <q2vd57eab941004231409h810a2663n450f9503c0e31ccd@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 7:56 PM, Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org> wrote:
>
>> So... we COULD replace all our "CSWruby*" packages, with "empty"
>> packages that depend on ruby18 packages(that you would then have to
>> make)... but only as a temporary stopgap measure. The packages need
>> to clearly identify that they are a transition package only. ?There
>> will be no ongoing "CSWruby" package, after transition is complete.
>
> I think this will need to get tied into the system with alternatives
> too, so that we can setup /opt/csw/bin/ruby -> ruby18, etc. ?I'll also
> need to handle migrating gems for the ruby18 packages since the
> $libdir will change when I add a suffix to everything.

Hrrrm.

well, you probably shouldnt use CSWalternatives, until I finally come
out with the newer version that is NFS friendly. (probably a week).
initial proof-of-concept code is written,but I have to get around to
packaging it. ugh.


Hmm... i was presuming that the "alternatives" call would be in the
CSWruby virtual package,but it would actually go in the individual
"real", versioned ruby packages, I think.
That makes sense to me.

From maciej at opencsw.org  Sat Apr 24 09:49:14 2010
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski)
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 08:49:14 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs idle, python, python_devel,
	python_tk
In-Reply-To: <u2pd57eab941004231349rae38fbdbz94e37a3701f2d0cb@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201004200557.o3K5vQGr024663@login.bo.opencsw.org> 
	<u2pd57eab941004231349rae38fbdbz94e37a3701f2d0cb@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <l2yce97543b1004240049tb900327fh30cececd7f1bfe0b@mail.gmail.com>

No dia 23 de Abril de 2010 21:49, Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> escreveu:
> erm... there's some really really old legacy garbage in the python package.
>
> ERROR: build-machine paths found in file
> python-2.6.5,REV=2010.04.19-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

Yes, this is known and expected.  It deserves a bit of explanation.
I'm cc'ing maintainers@, as the same issue might affect other people
too.

The CSWpython package contains legacy shared library, namely
/opt/csw/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0.  This file is stored in the
repository in the binary form and added to the pkgroot in a separate
step during building.  It's not recompiled any more.  There's no
description to compile it, so it's bound to stay the way it is until
it's removed.

The legacy library contains build-machine paths, and it always did.
Here's a session dump from build9s:

maciej at current9s :~/src/opencsw/pkg/python/trunk > ggrep medusa
/opt/csw/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
Binary file /opt/csw/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0 matches

The reason we didn't know about it is because the pre-maciej version
of checkpkg failed to detect that.  Current version of checkpkg does
detect and report it.  There is a need to tell checkpkg that we know
about this problem and that it's okay.  If you look into
python-2.6.5,REV=2010.04.19-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz, you'll notice:

/opt/csw/share/checkpkg/overrides/python

containing:

CSWpython: file-with-bad-content /export/medusa
root/opt/csw/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
CSWpython: file-with-bad-content /opt/build root/opt/csw/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
CSWpython: file-with-bad-content /export/medusa
root/opt/csw/share/checkpkg/overrides/python
CSWpython: file-with-bad-content /opt/build
root/opt/csw/share/checkpkg/overrides/python

The override file is a plaintext file, and it contains the
"/export/medusa" string.  I believe that this is the file that the old
checkpkg complained about.  If it was able to detect build-machine
paths reliably, it would have always complained about CSWpython.

Looking at the whole catalog, there are currently 189 packages
affected by this issue (build-machine paths).  Here's the list of
packages with details: http://www.opencsw.org/~maciej/bad-content.txt

Maciej

From maciej at opencsw.org  Sat Apr 24 10:20:38 2010
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski)
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 09:20:38 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs ruby19, ruby19dev, ruby19ri,
	ruby19sa(...)
In-Reply-To: <q2vd57eab941004231409h810a2663n450f9503c0e31ccd@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201004090135.o391ZrvM028889@login.bo.opencsw.org> 
	<1271289342-sup-4039@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<p2zd57eab941004191225g4d19bf5em6fb509546602673b@mail.gmail.com>
	<1271731727-sup-1351@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<q2vd57eab941004231409h810a2663n450f9503c0e31ccd@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <k2wce97543b1004240120t151ea225i66ebec96fcbce17a@mail.gmail.com>

No dia 23 de Abril de 2010 22:09, Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> escreveu:
> well, you probably shouldnt use CSWalternatives, until I finally come
> out with the newer version that is NFS friendly. (probably a week).
> initial proof-of-concept code is written,but I have to get around to
> packaging it. ugh.

How about releasing a .tar.gz and deferring packaging to someone else?

From bonivart at opencsw.org  Sun Apr 25 11:30:32 2010
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 11:30:32 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] /newpkgs (current) spamassassin
Message-ID: <l2p625385e31004250230hf36d3ff2y397950b58ed4feed@mail.gmail.com>

spamassassin-3.3.1,REV=2010.04.25-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
spamassassin-3.3.1,REV=2010.04.25-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
/peter

From dam at opencsw.org  Sun Apr 25 21:42:41 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 21:42:41 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs ruby19, ruby19dev, ruby19ri,
	ruby19sa(...)
In-Reply-To: <k2wce97543b1004240120t151ea225i66ebec96fcbce17a@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201004090135.o391ZrvM028889@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<1271289342-sup-4039@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<p2zd57eab941004191225g4d19bf5em6fb509546602673b@mail.gmail.com>
	<1271731727-sup-1351@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<q2vd57eab941004231409h810a2663n450f9503c0e31ccd@mail.gmail.com>
	<k2wce97543b1004240120t151ea225i66ebec96fcbce17a@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <912ED7DB-38DC-45EE-AB64-D9522BDE1A1B@opencsw.org>

Hi Maciej,

Am 24.04.2010 um 10:20 schrieb Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski:
> No dia 23 de Abril de 2010 22:09, Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> escreveu:
>> well, you probably shouldnt use CSWalternatives, until I finally come
>> out with the newer version that is NFS friendly. (probably a week).
>> initial proof-of-concept code is written,but I have to get around to
>> packaging it. ugh.
> 
> How about releasing a .tar.gz and deferring packaging to someone else?

If it would be pressed, yes. But Phil wants to do a release build with GAR,
so I happily bear with him and help in the learning curve.


Best regards

  -- Dago

From dam at opencsw.org  Mon Apr 26 16:32:46 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 16:32:46 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs mktemp
Message-ID: <201004261432.o3QEWkae005001@login.bo.opencsw.org>

Just a small respin.

* mktemp: minor version upgrade
  - from: 1.6,REV=2008.12.02
  -   to: 1.7,REV=2010.04.26
  + mktemp-1.7,REV=2010.04.26-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + mktemp-1.7,REV=2010.04.26-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From phil at opencsw.org  Mon Apr 26 20:01:08 2010
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 11:01:08 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs mktemp
In-Reply-To: <201004261432.o3QEWkae005001@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201004261432.o3QEWkae005001@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <u2md57eab941004261101se2219f00pa077dab6c43815f4@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 7:32 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Just a small respin.
>
> * mktemp: minor version upgrade
> ?- from: 1.6,REV=2008.12.02
> ?- ? to: 1.7,REV=2010.04.26
> ?+ mktemp-1.7,REV=2010.04.26-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ mktemp-1.7,REV=2010.04.26-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --

batched

From phil at opencsw.org  Mon Apr 26 20:02:59 2010
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 11:02:59 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] /newpkgs (current) spamassassin
In-Reply-To: <l2p625385e31004250230hf36d3ff2y397950b58ed4feed@mail.gmail.com>
References: <l2p625385e31004250230hf36d3ff2y397950b58ed4feed@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <u2nd57eab941004261102y5f28cff3n8913db6d28186149@mail.gmail.com>

On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 2:30 AM, Peter Bonivart <bonivart at opencsw.org> wrote:
> spamassassin-3.3.1,REV=2010.04.25-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> spamassassin-3.3.1,REV=2010.04.25-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>

batched

From phil at opencsw.org  Mon Apr 26 20:15:45 2010
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 11:15:45 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs ruby19, ruby19dev, ruby19ri,
	ruby19sa(...)
In-Reply-To: <912ED7DB-38DC-45EE-AB64-D9522BDE1A1B@opencsw.org>
References: <201004090135.o391ZrvM028889@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<1271289342-sup-4039@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<p2zd57eab941004191225g4d19bf5em6fb509546602673b@mail.gmail.com>
	<1271731727-sup-1351@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<q2vd57eab941004231409h810a2663n450f9503c0e31ccd@mail.gmail.com>
	<k2wce97543b1004240120t151ea225i66ebec96fcbce17a@mail.gmail.com>
	<912ED7DB-38DC-45EE-AB64-D9522BDE1A1B@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <i2zd57eab941004261115gcc0e56e8l7321a1d6f819f372@mail.gmail.com>

On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Hi Maciej,
>
> Am 24.04.2010 um 10:20 schrieb Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski:
>> No dia 23 de Abril de 2010 22:09, Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> escreveu:
>>> well, you probably shouldnt use CSWalternatives, until I finally come
>>> out with the newer version that is NFS friendly. (probably a week).
>>> initial proof-of-concept code is written,but I have to get around to
>>> packaging it. ugh.
>>
>> How about releasing a .tar.gz and deferring packaging to someone else?
>
> If it would be pressed, yes. But Phil wants to do a release build with GAR,
> so I happily bear with him and help in the learning curve.
>

well, I dont know about "wants to " :-}
but I have offered to try it

From maciej at opencsw.org  Tue Apr 27 08:24:49 2010
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej Blizinski)
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 08:24:49 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs py_hachoir_core, py_hachoir_parser
Message-ID: <201004270624.o3R6OnMw010611@login.bo.opencsw.org>

This upgrade is partly evil: it changes a pkgname to conform to the Python
package naming standard (CSWpy-*).  Fortunately, it's a relatively obscure
package, I don't expect there to be any installations in the outside world.

* py_hachoir_core: minor version upgrade
  - from: 1.2.1,REV=2010.01.15
  -   to: 1.3.3,REV=2010.04.24
  + py_hachoir_core-1.3.3,REV=2010.04.24-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

* py_hachoir_parser: minor version upgrade
  - from: 1.2.1,REV=2010.01.15
  -   to: 1.3.3,REV=2010.04.27
  + py_hachoir_parser-1.3.3,REV=2010.04.27-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From maciej at opencsw.org  Tue Apr 27 08:26:11 2010
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej Blizinski)
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 08:26:11 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs geeqie
Message-ID: <201004270626.o3R6QBqh011962@login.bo.opencsw.org>

It's a fork of now-unmaintained gqview.  A user requested and then tested this
package.  There is still room for improvement, but the package is already
useful.

* geeqie: new package
  + geeqie-1.0,REV=2010.04.24-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + geeqie-1.0,REV=2010.04.24-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From dam at opencsw.org  Tue Apr 27 10:43:43 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 10:43:43 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_cryptblowfish, pm_cryptcast5,
	pm_c(...)
Message-ID: <201004270843.o3R8hhVd012236@login.bo.opencsw.org>

Hi,

Am 26.04.2010 um 22:55 schrieb Martin, Jeremy:
> Wasn't aware Data::Dumper was in Perl 5.10.1, awesome, that takes care of that. We
> definitely want to use CSW's Perl package to play nice with all of the pm_* modules right?
> Since the CSW modules use the Sun compiler I was hoping they might work with the vanilla
> Perl package but it's no big deal to use CSW's.

You are aware that the Sun Studio compiler comes for free?
  <http://developers.sun.com/sunstudio/downloads/index.jsp>

> Also thanks for the tip about GAR, definitely will check that out. We had been doing
> it a more crude way based on i.e. http://www.sunmanagers.org/pipermail/summaries/2003-May/003910.html 

Ugh, GAR is *a lot* easier to maintain than that.

> If you go ahead and package up those other two, how long might it take for them
> to show up in the official packages list?

I just finished them and this is the contribution email. They should show up in the
next few days.


Best regards

  -- Dago

Phil: Here comes the new stuff:

* pm_dataserializer: new package
  + pm_dataserializer-0.49,REV=2010.04.27-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

* pm_cryptcbc: new package
  + pm_cryptcbc-2.30,REV=2010.04.27-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

* pm_cryptblowfish: new package
  + pm_cryptblowfish-2.12,REV=2010.04.27-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + pm_cryptblowfish-2.12,REV=2010.04.27-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

* pm_cryptidea: new package
  + pm_cryptidea-1.08,REV=2010.04.27-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + pm_cryptidea-1.08,REV=2010.04.27-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

* pm_cryptcast5: new package
  + pm_cryptcast5-0.05,REV=2010.04.27-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + pm_cryptcast5-0.05,REV=2010.04.27-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From dam at opencsw.org  Tue Apr 27 11:49:05 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 11:49:05 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs help2man
Message-ID: <201004270949.o3R9n5m5005838@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* help2man: minor version upgrade
  - from: 1.37.1,REV=2009.12.20
  -   to: 1.38.1,REV=2010.04.27
  + help2man-1.38.1,REV=2010.04.27-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From phil at bolthole.com  Tue Apr 27 18:27:07 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 09:27:07 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs geeqie
In-Reply-To: <201004270626.o3R6QBqh011962@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201004270626.o3R6QBqh011962@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <w2zd57eab941004270927v46d31ad3ub93215fd7effac16@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 11:26 PM, Maciej Blizinski <maciej at opencsw.org> wrote:
> It's a fork of now-unmaintained gqview. ?A user requested and then tested this
> package. ?There is still room for improvement, but the package is already
> useful.
>
> * geeqie: new package
> ?+ geeqie-1.0,REV=2010.04.24-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ geeqie-1.0,REV=2010.04.24-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --

batched

From phil at bolthole.com  Tue Apr 27 18:31:31 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 09:31:31 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs py_hachoir_core, py_hachoir_parser
In-Reply-To: <201004270624.o3R6OnMw010611@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201004270624.o3R6OnMw010611@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <u2qd57eab941004270931o6cfce7ecrd55a277812f024cd@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 11:24 PM, Maciej Blizinski <maciej at opencsw.org> wrote:
> This upgrade is partly evil: it changes a pkgname to conform to the Python
> package naming standard (CSWpy-*). ?Fortunately, it's a relatively obscure
> package, I don't expect there to be any installations in the outside world.
>

huh.
it would appear that the "core" was already named normally, but the
parser was not.
even though the "software name" already had the py prefix.
blah.

Thanks for the heads-up.

Ironically(?), even though I hate PKG renames more than software
renames... they're actually easier for me to do on the back end :-}




> * py_hachoir_core: minor version upgrade
> ?- from: 1.2.1,REV=2010.01.15
> ?- ? to: 1.3.3,REV=2010.04.24
> ?+ py_hachoir_core-1.3.3,REV=2010.04.24-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> * py_hachoir_parser: minor version upgrade
> ?- from: 1.2.1,REV=2010.01.15
> ?- ? to: 1.3.3,REV=2010.04.27
> ?+ py_hachoir_parser-1.3.3,REV=2010.04.27-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Tue Apr 27 18:33:20 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 09:33:20 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs help2man
In-Reply-To: <201004270949.o3R9n5m5005838@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201004270949.o3R9n5m5005838@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <v2xd57eab941004270933ja9a66b2frfa8abd9a07852f84@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 2:49 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> * help2man: minor version upgrade
> ?- from: 1.37.1,REV=2009.12.20
> ?- ? to: 1.38.1,REV=2010.04.27
> ?+ help2man-1.38.1,REV=2010.04.27-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
batched

From phil at opencsw.org  Tue Apr 27 18:35:13 2010
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 09:35:13 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_cryptblowfish, pm_cryptcast5,
	pm_c(...)
In-Reply-To: <201004270843.o3R8hhVd012236@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201004270843.o3R8hhVd012236@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <h2ud57eab941004270935vd89e1e35xd0e6a3a1a5c8c4f1@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 1:43 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
>
>
> Phil: Here comes the new stuff:
>
> * pm_dataserializer: new package
> ?+ pm_dataserializer-0.49,REV=2010.04.27-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> * pm_cryptcbc: new package
> ?+ pm_cryptcbc-2.30,REV=2010.04.27-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> * pm_cryptblowfish: new package
> ?+ pm_cryptblowfish-2.12,REV=2010.04.27-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ pm_cryptblowfish-2.12,REV=2010.04.27-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> * pm_cryptidea: new package
> ?+ pm_cryptidea-1.08,REV=2010.04.27-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ pm_cryptidea-1.08,REV=2010.04.27-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> * pm_cryptcast5: new package
> ?+ pm_cryptcast5-0.05,REV=2010.04.27-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ pm_cryptcast5-0.05,REV=2010.04.27-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>

batched