From maciej at opencsw.org  Tue Jun  1 13:05:36 2010
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski)
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 12:05:36 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs cups, cupsd, cupsdev, cupsdoc,
	libcups
In-Reply-To: <201005311937.o4VJbgsx006111@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201005311937.o4VJbgsx006111@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTil-CDFiZwRMVtbpD0ZeBnQZilZzzD2jR21MDiF9@mail.gmail.com>

No dia 31 de Maio de 2010 20:37, Maciej Blizinski <maciej at opencsw.org> escreveu:
> CUPS: Upgrade to 1.4.3. ?Contains some of my fixes accepted upstream.

These packages have a bug related to the init script location policy
change.  I've removed them from /home/newpkgs.  I'll roll a new fixed
version soon.

From maciej at opencsw.org  Tue Jun  1 18:00:07 2010
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej Blizinski)
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 18:00:07 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs cups, cupsd, cupsdev, cupsdoc, libcups
Message-ID: <201006011600.o51G07bi018900@login.bo.opencsw.org>

Fixed a problem with the startup scripts, by moving them back to
/etc/opt/csw/init.d.  Tested, works.

* cups: patchlevel upgrade
  - from: 1.4.2,REV=2010.02.20
  -   to: 1.4.3,REV=2010.06.01
  + cups-1.4.3,REV=2010.06.01-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
  + cupsdev-1.4.3,REV=2010.06.01-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + cupsdev-1.4.3,REV=2010.06.01-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + cupsdoc-1.4.3,REV=2010.06.01-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libcups-1.4.3,REV=2010.06.01-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libcups-1.4.3,REV=2010.06.01-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

* cupsd: patchlevel upgrade
  - from: 1.4.2,REV=2010.03.04
  -   to: 1.4.3,REV=2010.06.01
  + cupsd-1.4.3,REV=2010.06.01-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + cupsd-1.4.3,REV=2010.06.01-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From rupert at opencsw.org  Tue Jun  1 22:37:48 2010
From: rupert at opencsw.org (THURNER Rupert)
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 15:37:48 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs mercurial
Message-ID: <201006012037.o51KbmqV001338@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* mercurial: patchlevel upgrade
  - from: 1.5.3,REV=2010.05.14
  -   to: 1.5.4,REV=2010.06.01
  + mercurial-1.5.4,REV=2010.06.01-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + mercurial-1.5.4,REV=2010.06.01-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From phil at opencsw.org  Tue Jun  1 23:29:31 2010
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 14:29:31 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs mercurial
In-Reply-To: <201006012037.o51KbmqV001338@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201006012037.o51KbmqV001338@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTik2DJt6yCeO68wbYtPmj_IFuxhTDCtGfJEjqnZC@mail.gmail.com>

batched

On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 1:37 PM, THURNER Rupert <rupert at opencsw.org> wrote:
> * mercurial: patchlevel upgrade
>  - from: 1.5.3,REV=2010.05.14
>  -   to: 1.5.4,REV=2010.06.01
>  + mercurial-1.5.4,REV=2010.06.01-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>  + mercurial-1.5.4,REV=2010.06.01-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>

From dam at opencsw.org  Wed Jun  2 11:24:02 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2010 11:24:02 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs di
Message-ID: <201006020924.o529O2pB003807@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* di: new package
  + di-4.24,REV=2010.06.02-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + di-4.24,REV=2010.06.02-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From phil at bolthole.com  Wed Jun  2 22:46:33 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2010 13:46:33 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs di
In-Reply-To: <201006020924.o529O2pB003807@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201006020924.o529O2pB003807@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTimwZyEQibaISwEav50IXdqBg-xdGtQQ7mAr2QrE@mail.gmail.com>

di.. as opposed to du?

okay fine :)



On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 2:24 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> * di: new package
>  + di-4.24,REV=2010.06.02-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>  + di-4.24,REV=2010.06.02-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>

From bwalton at opencsw.org  Thu Jun  3 03:43:42 2010
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 03:43:42 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs buildbot, colormake, coreutils,
	cswut(...)
Message-ID: <201006030143.o531hgwc009167@login.bo.opencsw.org>

Hi Phil,

Sorry for the big set, but this is an all or nothing set.  This provides
coreutils and all the required dependency updates.

Please remove CSWgfile, CSWshutils and CSWtextutils as a result.

Also, I'm not sure how your backend scripts assign ownership in mantis, etc,
but please don't override existing owners for the following:

wgetpaste
gcc3core
buildbot

Thanks
-Ben

* xmlto: revision upgrade
  - from: 2010.03.10
  -   to: 2010.04.17
  + xmlto-0.0.23,REV=2010.04.17-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + xmlto-0.0.23,REV=2010.04.17-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

* quilt: revision upgrade
  - from: 2010.04.19
  -   to: 2010.04.24
  + quilt-0.48,REV=2010.04.24-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + quilt-0.48,REV=2010.04.24-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + quilt_completion-0.48,REV=2010.04.24-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
  + quilt_el-0.48,REV=2010.04.24-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

* colormake: revision upgrade
  - from: 2009.12.02
  -   to: 2010.04.17
  + colormake-0.2,REV=2010.04.17-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

* wgetpaste: revision upgrade
  - from: 2010.01.05
  -   to: 2010.04.19
  + wgetpaste-2.16,REV=2010.04.19-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

* rubydev: revision upgrade
  - from: 2009.10.26
  -   to: 2010.04.24
  + rubydev-1.8.7,REV=2010.04.24_rev=p174-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + rubydev-1.8.7,REV=2010.04.24_rev=p174-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

* cswutils: patchlevel upgrade
  - from: 1.14.4,REV=2009.10.02
  -   to: 1.14.6,REV=2010.06.03
  + cswutils-1.14.6,REV=2010.06.03-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

* gnulinks: revision upgrade
  - from: 2010.05.11
  -   to: 2010.05.15
  + gnulinks-1.3,REV=2010.05.15-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

* buildbot: patchlevel upgrade
  - from: 0.7.11,REV=2009.10.23_rev=p3
  -   to: 0.7.12,REV=2010.04.24
  + buildbot-0.7.12,REV=2010.04.24-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

* logwatch: major version upgrade
  - from: 5.2.2
  -   to: 7.3.6,REV=2010.04.17
  + logwatch-7.3.6,REV=2010.04.17-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

* gar_devel: revision upgrade
  - from: 2010.01.11
  -   to: 2010.04.17
  + gar_devel-1.0,REV=2010.04.17-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

* coreutils: new package
  + coreutils-8.4,REV=2010.05.20-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + coreutils-8.4,REV=2010.05.20-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

* gcc3core: revision upgrade
  - from: 2009.06.25
  -   to: 2010.05.14
  + gcc3core-3.4.6,REV=2010.05.14-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + gcc3core-3.4.6,REV=2010.05.14-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From phil at bolthole.com  Thu Jun  3 04:19:23 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2010 19:19:23 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs buildbot, colormake, coreutils,
	cswut(...)
In-Reply-To: <201006030143.o531hgwc009167@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201006030143.o531hgwc009167@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTilChXMiMSSlpob07d1omZ18wwUldk-DjQiw_Gij@mail.gmail.com>

 Also, I'm not sure how your backend scripts assign ownership in mantis, etc,
> but please don't override existing owners for the following:
>


uuuhhh... nuh-uh. you touch it. you own it :-)

pull what you don't want to take, and let me know

From bwalton at opencsw.org  Thu Jun  3 04:23:49 2010
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 22:23:49 -0400
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs buildbot, colormake, coreutils,
	cswut(...)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTilChXMiMSSlpob07d1omZ18wwUldk-DjQiw_Gij@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201006030143.o531hgwc009167@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTilChXMiMSSlpob07d1omZ18wwUldk-DjQiw_Gij@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1275531772-sup-121@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>

Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Wed Jun 02 22:19:23 -0400 2010:
>  Also, I'm not sure how your backend scripts assign ownership in mantis, etc,
> > but please don't override existing owners for the following:
> >
> 
> 
> uuuhhh... nuh-uh. you touch it. you own it :-)

The ones I referred to were packaged by the others and deposited by
them.  I'm just doing the actual push.  Do you still need them to be
submitted separately?

Thanks
-Ben
-- 
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302


From dam at opencsw.org  Thu Jun  3 14:43:48 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 14:43:48 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_configaugeas, py_augeas
Message-ID: <201006031243.o53Chmwt004593@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* pm_configaugeas: new package
  + pm_configaugeas-0.701,REV=2010.03.01-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + pm_configaugeas-0.701,REV=2010.03.01-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

* py_augeas: new package
  + py_augeas-0.3.0,REV=2010.03.01-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From phil at bolthole.com  Thu Jun  3 18:33:03 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 09:33:03 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs buildbot, colormake, coreutils,
	cswut(...)
In-Reply-To: <1275531772-sup-121@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
References: <201006030143.o531hgwc009167@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTilChXMiMSSlpob07d1omZ18wwUldk-DjQiw_Gij@mail.gmail.com>
	<1275531772-sup-121@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
Message-ID: <AANLkTilRd33n5b1y2qIcHEnL4HpKWuYtXRfY1Sw0AJfM@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 7:23 PM, Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Wed Jun 02 22:19:23 -0400 2010:
>>  Also, I'm not sure how your backend scripts assign ownership in mantis, etc,
>> > but please don't override existing owners for the following:
>> >
>>
>>
>> uuuhhh... nuh-uh. you touch it. you own it :-)
>
> The ones I referred to were packaged by the others and deposited by
> them.  I'm just doing the actual push.  Do you still need them to be
> submitted separately?
>

oh, sorry for the misunderstanding. that will be fine.

From bwalton at opencsw.org  Thu Jun  3 18:37:19 2010
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2010 12:37:19 -0400
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs buildbot, colormake, coreutils,
	cswut(...)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTilRd33n5b1y2qIcHEnL4HpKWuYtXRfY1Sw0AJfM@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201006030143.o531hgwc009167@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTilChXMiMSSlpob07d1omZ18wwUldk-DjQiw_Gij@mail.gmail.com>
	<1275531772-sup-121@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTilRd33n5b1y2qIcHEnL4HpKWuYtXRfY1Sw0AJfM@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1275583010-sup-5679@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>

Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Thu Jun 03 12:33:03 -0400 2010:

> oh, sorry for the misunderstanding. that will be fine.

Not a problem.  I just wanted to clarify before complicating the
submission by more than just the size of the package set involved.

Thanks
-Ben
-- 
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302


From maciej at opencsw.org  Thu Jun  3 18:43:49 2010
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej Blizinski)
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 18:43:49 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs py_formencode, py_sqlobject
Message-ID: <201006031643.o53GhnSc026276@login.bo.opencsw.org>

SQLObject, a Python ORM library with a dependency (formencode).

* py_formencode: new package
  + py_formencode-1.2.2,REV=2010.06.03-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

* py_sqlobject: new package
  + py_sqlobject-0.12.4,REV=2010.06.03-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From phil at opencsw.org  Fri Jun  4 01:36:28 2010
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 16:36:28 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs py_formencode, py_sqlobject
In-Reply-To: <201006031643.o53GhnSc026276@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201006031643.o53GhnSc026276@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTikMMOJjaqp4o8zeX1Fp_MyZo4DeqOOw6_3gDqhx@mail.gmail.com>

batched


On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 9:43 AM, Maciej Blizinski <maciej at opencsw.org> wrote:
> SQLObject, a Python ORM library with a dependency (formencode).
>
> * py_formencode: new package
>  + py_formencode-1.2.2,REV=2010.06.03-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> * py_sqlobject: new package
>  + py_sqlobject-0.12.4,REV=2010.06.03-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --

From phil at opencsw.org  Fri Jun  4 02:05:48 2010
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 17:05:48 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs buildbot, colormake, coreutils,
	cswut(...)
In-Reply-To: <201006030143.o531hgwc009167@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201006030143.o531hgwc009167@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTimERhFUGomeGPVALQcW-PvRRaA28gvPXrqp3AlR@mail.gmail.com>

Hurray for new collision detection... I forgot to tell you that gawk
now has a gnu link. please remove from gnulinks and resubmit.

From phil at opencsw.org  Fri Jun  4 02:22:50 2010
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 17:22:50 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs buildbot, colormake, coreutils,
	cswut(...)
In-Reply-To: <201006030143.o531hgwc009167@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201006030143.o531hgwc009167@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTimRdR5UgIl8O6kf6h_BeThOygdQctyYJ6Tq-GTO@mail.gmail.com>

well, I had to tweak gcc3core, to be "SunOS5.9" instead of "SunOS5.8".

seeing as how our 5.8 tree DOES NOT HAVE coreutils... it would have
broken things :-/

but it went into 5.9+ fine.  so, other than that, and gnulinks,
everything in the big batch, has been batched for release.
Thanks for chasing around and doing the work.

From bwalton at opencsw.org  Fri Jun  4 02:25:46 2010
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2010 02:25:46 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs gnulinks
Message-ID: <201006040025.o540PkCF014430@login.bo.opencsw.org>

After removing CSWgawk.  This should allow the push of the rest
of the coreutils set.

* gnulinks: revision upgrade
  - from: 2010.05.11
  -   to: 2010.06.04
  + gnulinks-1.3,REV=2010.06.04-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

Thanks
-Ben
-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From bwalton at opencsw.org  Fri Jun  4 02:26:39 2010
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2010 20:26:39 -0400
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs buildbot, colormake, coreutils,
	cswut(...)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimERhFUGomeGPVALQcW-PvRRaA28gvPXrqp3AlR@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201006030143.o531hgwc009167@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTimERhFUGomeGPVALQcW-PvRRaA28gvPXrqp3AlR@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1275611180-sup-6178@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>

Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Thu Jun 03 20:05:48 -0400 2010:
> Hurray for new collision detection... I forgot to tell you that gawk
> now has a gnu link. please remove from gnulinks and resubmit.

On its way.

Thanks
-Ben
-- 
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302


From phil at opencsw.org  Fri Jun  4 02:27:57 2010
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 17:27:57 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs buildbot, colormake, coreutils,
	cswut(...)
In-Reply-To: <1275611180-sup-6178@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
References: <201006030143.o531hgwc009167@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTimERhFUGomeGPVALQcW-PvRRaA28gvPXrqp3AlR@mail.gmail.com>
	<1275611180-sup-6178@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
Message-ID: <AANLkTinCSRxAYSbbW2MIgEuGVRRs0eVcVPtNLnIVQGbv@mail.gmail.com>

Theres another prpoblem. apparently you didnt chase down ALL the
crossreferences :-/

ERROR! Dependency CSWgfile of package CSWrubydev is missing.

From bwalton at opencsw.org  Fri Jun  4 02:32:50 2010
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2010 20:32:50 -0400
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs buildbot, colormake, coreutils,
	cswut(...)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinCSRxAYSbbW2MIgEuGVRRs0eVcVPtNLnIVQGbv@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201006030143.o531hgwc009167@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTimERhFUGomeGPVALQcW-PvRRaA28gvPXrqp3AlR@mail.gmail.com>
	<1275611180-sup-6178@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTinCSRxAYSbbW2MIgEuGVRRs0eVcVPtNLnIVQGbv@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1275611357-sup-706@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>

Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Thu Jun 03 20:27:57 -0400 2010:
> Theres another prpoblem. apparently you didnt chase down ALL the
> crossreferences :-/
> 
> ERROR! Dependency CSWgfile of package CSWrubydev is missing.

...?  I just unpacked both i386 and sparc version and the depend file
is CSWgfile free.  Recursive grep through the unpacked package doesn't
turn up anything either.  Help?

Thanks
-Ben
-- 
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302


From phil at bolthole.com  Fri Jun  4 02:44:47 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 17:44:47 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs buildbot, colormake, coreutils,
	cswut(...)
In-Reply-To: <1275611357-sup-706@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
References: <201006030143.o531hgwc009167@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTimERhFUGomeGPVALQcW-PvRRaA28gvPXrqp3AlR@mail.gmail.com>
	<1275611180-sup-6178@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTinCSRxAYSbbW2MIgEuGVRRs0eVcVPtNLnIVQGbv@mail.gmail.com>
	<1275611357-sup-706@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
Message-ID: <AANLkTikcAZ5q9bZvSUCmssW17iESAQonuYLZ2VXj3q_S@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 5:32 PM, Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Thu Jun 03 20:27:57 -0400 2010:
>> Theres another prpoblem. apparently you didnt chase down ALL the
>> crossreferences :-/
>>
>> ERROR! Dependency CSWgfile of package CSWrubydev is missing.
>
> ...?  I just unpacked both i386 and sparc version and the depend file
> is CSWgfile free.  Recursive grep through the unpacked package doesn't
> turn up anything either.  Help?
>

huh.. THAT's wierd. Thanks for checking... I may have to poke at this
for a while.

From phil at bolthole.com  Fri Jun  4 02:47:44 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 17:47:44 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs buildbot, colormake, coreutils,
	cswut(...)
In-Reply-To: <1275611357-sup-706@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
References: <201006030143.o531hgwc009167@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTimERhFUGomeGPVALQcW-PvRRaA28gvPXrqp3AlR@mail.gmail.com>
	<1275611180-sup-6178@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTinCSRxAYSbbW2MIgEuGVRRs0eVcVPtNLnIVQGbv@mail.gmail.com>
	<1275611357-sup-706@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
Message-ID: <AANLkTin5-OyN0u8i1Ezpa-anWEo6mX5MsqlbfzOoTbjn@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 5:32 PM, Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Thu Jun 03 20:27:57 -0400 2010:
>> Theres another prpoblem. apparently you didnt chase down ALL the
>> crossreferences :-/
>>
>> ERROR! Dependency CSWgfile of package CSWrubydev is missing.
>
> ...?  I just unpacked both i386 and sparc version and the depend file
> is CSWgfile free.  Recursive grep through the unpacked package doesn't
> turn up anything either.  Help?
>

you arent checking right.

VENDOR=ftp://ftp.ruby-lang.org/pub/ruby/ packaged for CSW by Ben Walton
EMAIL=bwalton at opencsw.org
PSTAMP=bwalton at build8s-20091026034133
  ....

P CSWruby ruby - An object-oriented language for quick and easy programming.
P CSWgfile fileutils - GNU file utilities
P CSWcommon common - common files and dirs for CSW packages

From bwalton at opencsw.org  Fri Jun  4 02:55:51 2010
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2010 20:55:51 -0400
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs buildbot, colormake, coreutils,
	cswut(...)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTin5-OyN0u8i1Ezpa-anWEo6mX5MsqlbfzOoTbjn@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201006030143.o531hgwc009167@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTimERhFUGomeGPVALQcW-PvRRaA28gvPXrqp3AlR@mail.gmail.com>
	<1275611180-sup-6178@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTinCSRxAYSbbW2MIgEuGVRRs0eVcVPtNLnIVQGbv@mail.gmail.com>
	<1275611357-sup-706@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTin5-OyN0u8i1Ezpa-anWEo6mX5MsqlbfzOoTbjn@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1275612877-sup-636@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>

Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Thu Jun 03 20:47:44 -0400 2010:
> On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 5:32 PM, Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org> wrote:
> > Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Thu Jun 03 20:27:57 -0400 2010:
> >> Theres another prpoblem. apparently you didnt chase down ALL the
> >> crossreferences :-/
> >>
> >> ERROR! Dependency CSWgfile of package CSWrubydev is missing.
> >
> > ...?  I just unpacked both i386 and sparc version and the depend file
> > is CSWgfile free.  Recursive grep through the unpacked package doesn't
> > turn up anything either.  Help?
> >
> 
> you arent checking right.
> 
> VENDOR=ftp://ftp.ruby-lang.org/pub/ruby/ packaged for CSW by Ben Walton
> EMAIL=bwalton at opencsw.org
> PSTAMP=bwalton at build8s-20091026034133
>   ....
> 
> P CSWruby ruby - An object-oriented language for quick and easy programming.
> P CSWgfile fileutils - GNU file utilities
> P CSWcommon common - common files and dirs for CSW packages

I think we're (somehow) looking at different files...

bwalton @ bender : ~/rubydev/i386/CSWrubydev
$ cat install/depend 
P CSWruby ruby - An object-oriented language for quick and easy
programming.
P CSWcoreutils coreutils - GNU core utilities
P CSWcommon common - common files and dirs for CSW packages

They're still sitting there in ~bwalton/rubydev if you want to take a
peek.

Thanks
-Ben
-- 
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302


From dam at opencsw.org  Fri Jun  4 08:59:02 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2010 08:59:02 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs sysstat
Message-ID: <201006040659.o546x2Is003847@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* sysstat: major version upgrade
  - from: 20100315,REV=2010.03.16
  -   to: 20100528,REV=2010.05.29
  + sysstat-20100528,REV=2010.05.29-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + sysstat-20100528,REV=2010.05.29-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From dam at opencsw.org  Fri Jun  4 09:23:16 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2010 09:23:16 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] New cdrtools etc.
References: <8639DF7C-892E-4810-B516-FF091CFB0F1F@baltic-online.de>
Message-ID: <A4521BAE-2921-4AED-A7EA-BF68DAE8496E@opencsw.org>

Hi,

Am 03.06.2010 um 15:14 schrieb Joerg Schilling:
> aktuelle Pakete stehen in:
>  login.bo.opencsw.org:~joerg/newpackages/*

Thanks Joerg!

I copied them over to www.opencsw.org:/home/newpkgs for release:

  cdrtools-3.00,REV=2010.06.03-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  cdrtools-3.00,REV=2010.06.03-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  pxupgrade-1.47,REV=2010.06.03-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  pxupgrade-1.47,REV=2010.06.03-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  sccs-1.00.04,REV=2010.06.03-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  sccs-1.00.04,REV=2010.06.03-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  schilybase-1.01,REV=2010.06.03-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  schilybase-1.01,REV=2010.06.03-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  schilyutils-1.02,REV=2010.06.03-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  schilyutils-1.02,REV=2010.06.03-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  smake-1.2.1,REV=2010.06.03-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  smake-1.2.1,REV=2010.06.03-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  star-1.5.1,REV=2010.06.03-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  star-1.5.1,REV=2010.06.03-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  ved-1.7a07,REV=2010.06.03-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  ved-1.7a07,REV=2010.06.03-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz


Best regards

  -- Dago


From phil at opencsw.org  Fri Jun  4 18:02:49 2010
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2010 09:02:49 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] New cdrtools etc.
In-Reply-To: <A4521BAE-2921-4AED-A7EA-BF68DAE8496E@opencsw.org>
References: <8639DF7C-892E-4810-B516-FF091CFB0F1F@baltic-online.de>
	<A4521BAE-2921-4AED-A7EA-BF68DAE8496E@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTilA55iF51saV3oR3YW_wrP74I7aBYBF4pWp1YUy@mail.gmail.com>

yes,thanks...
unfortunately, there are multiple issues.

cdrtools: v8+ binaries in /opt/csw/bin
plus
ERROR: package build as relocatable, but binaries have hardcoded
/opt/csw paths in them


schilybase: needs to not have

/opt/csw/man  1 s none man=share/man

because it triggers error detection of "contains /opt/csw/man".


schilyutils: has v8+ binaries






On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 12:23 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 03.06.2010 um 15:14 schrieb Joerg Schilling:
>>
>> aktuelle Pakete stehen in:
>>  login.bo.opencsw.org:~joerg/newpackages/*
>
> Thanks Joerg!
>
> I copied them over to www.opencsw.org:/home/newpkgs for release:
>
>  cdrtools-3.00,REV=2010.06.03-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>  cdrtools-3.00,REV=2010.06.03-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>  pxupgrade-1.47,REV=2010.06.03-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>  pxupgrade-1.47,REV=2010.06.03-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>  sccs-1.00.04,REV=2010.06.03-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>  sccs-1.00.04,REV=2010.06.03-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>  schilybase-1.01,REV=2010.06.03-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>  schilybase-1.01,REV=2010.06.03-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>  schilyutils-1.02,REV=2010.06.03-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>  schilyutils-1.02,REV=2010.06.03-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>  smake-1.2.1,REV=2010.06.03-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>  smake-1.2.1,REV=2010.06.03-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>  star-1.5.1,REV=2010.06.03-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>  star-1.5.1,REV=2010.06.03-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>  ved-1.7a07,REV=2010.06.03-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>  ved-1.7a07,REV=2010.06.03-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>
>
> Best regards
>
>  -- Dago
>
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Fri Jun  4 18:03:19 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2010 09:03:19 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs sysstat
In-Reply-To: <201006040659.o546x2Is003847@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201006040659.o546x2Is003847@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTinKjfDB6GqT0CHJhMxz8xFA_ZNuLkOmRL0zaQIc@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 11:59 PM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> * sysstat: major version upgrade
>  - from: 20100315,REV=2010.03.16
>  -   to: 20100528,REV=2010.05.29
>  + sysstat-20100528,REV=2010.05.29-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>  + sysstat-20100528,REV=2010.05.29-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --

okay

From phil at bolthole.com  Fri Jun  4 18:08:27 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2010 09:08:27 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_configaugeas, py_augeas
In-Reply-To: <201006031243.o53Chmwt004593@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201006031243.o53Chmwt004593@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTiljEzdd7Hy3sClBsFjnMY5o_P0ZWimIG1dmBRY8@mail.gmail.com>

batched


On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 5:43 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> * pm_configaugeas: new package
>  + pm_configaugeas-0.701,REV=2010.03.01-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>  + pm_configaugeas-0.701,REV=2010.03.01-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> * py_augeas: new package
>  + py_augeas-0.3.0,REV=2010.03.01-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz

From dam at opencsw.org  Mon Jun  7 11:30:05 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 11:30:05 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs xbattle
Message-ID: <201006070930.o579U5s4029785@login.bo.opencsw.org>

Heaving the desk real full with work related stuff this is a
thing I wanted to do for a long time to give me some refreshment
and let the old times at the university comes to life again!

Unfortunately it needs an 8 bit pseudo color display...

* xbattle: new package
  + xbattle-5.4.1,REV=2010.06.04-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + xbattle-5.4.1,REV=2010.06.04-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From dam at opencsw.org  Mon Jun  7 11:48:07 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 11:48:07 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pca
Message-ID: <201006070948.o579m7cN023142@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* pca: major version upgrade
  - from: 20100514.01,REV=2010.05.17
  -   to: 20100607.01,REV=2010.06.07
  + pca-20100607.01,REV=2010.06.07-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From phil at opencsw.org  Mon Jun  7 19:25:28 2010
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 10:25:28 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pca
In-Reply-To: <201006070948.o579m7cN023142@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201006070948.o579m7cN023142@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTinO3SR3hQ47ZAME3EYJeE3Zl__f4-1fEmIexvhA@mail.gmail.com>

batching

On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 2:48 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> * pca: major version upgrade
>  - from: 20100514.01,REV=2010.05.17
>  -   to: 20100607.01,REV=2010.06.07
>  + pca-20100607.01,REV=2010.06.07-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>

From phil at opencsw.org  Mon Jun  7 19:27:16 2010
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 10:27:16 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs xbattle
In-Reply-To: <201006070930.o579U5s4029785@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201006070930.o579U5s4029785@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTinXiFAMdbAhfOcYBGwIKsC66hskze5VRux1vDCb@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 2:30 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Heaving the desk real full with work related stuff this is a
> thing I wanted to do for a long time to give me some refreshment
> and let the old times at the university comes to life again!
>

woohooo!


> Unfortunately it needs an 8 bit pseudo color display...

urk..  vnc or virtualbox? :-)


Wait, wait! porting opportunities! advertise to mailing list :)


>
> * xbattle: new package
>  + xbattle-5.4.1,REV=2010.06.04-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>  + xbattle-5.4.1,REV=2010.06.04-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>

batched

From maciej at opencsw.org  Tue Jun  8 13:11:49 2010
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej Blizinski)
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 13:11:49 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs slack
Message-ID: <201006081111.o58BBnFL018601@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* slack: revision upgrade
  Patches it to use /etc/opt/csw instead of /etc.
  - from: 2010.02.04
  -   to: 2010.06.03
  + slack-0.15.2,REV=2010.06.03-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From maciej at opencsw.org  Tue Jun  8 13:12:08 2010
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej Blizinski)
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 13:12:08 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs file, libmagic, py_libmagic
Message-ID: <201006081112.o58BC8Yw018849@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* libmagic: new package
  Splits off libmagic, and adds Python bindings in py_libmagic.
  + file-5.04,REV=2010.06.08-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + file-5.04,REV=2010.06.08-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libmagic-5.04,REV=2010.06.08-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libmagic-5.04,REV=2010.06.08-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + py_libmagic-5.04,REV=2010.06.08-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + py_libmagic-5.04,REV=2010.06.08-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From phil at opencsw.org  Tue Jun  8 18:56:45 2010
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 09:56:45 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs slack
In-Reply-To: <201006081111.o58BBnFL018601@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201006081111.o58BBnFL018601@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTiksNfNkb_uH4Q_rHXoMj0ZMrJcAuGr9Xtn1yeBG@mail.gmail.com>

batched.


On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 4:11 AM, Maciej Blizinski <maciej at opencsw.org> wrote:
> * slack: revision upgrade
>  Patches it to use /etc/opt/csw instead of /etc.
>  - from: 2010.02.04
>  -   to: 2010.06.03
>  + slack-0.15.2,REV=2010.06.03-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Tue Jun  8 18:59:20 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 09:59:20 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs file, libmagic, py_libmagic
In-Reply-To: <201006081112.o58BC8Yw018849@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201006081112.o58BC8Yw018849@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTila9lX9aXqtzNLJvKma06KmcCoLi3KjhbSYlNbK@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 4:12 AM, Maciej Blizinski <maciej at opencsw.org> wrote:
> * libmagic: new package
>  Splits off libmagic, and adds Python bindings in py_libmagic.
>  + file-5.04,REV=2010.06.08-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>  + file-5.04,REV=2010.06.08-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz


This violates our usual principles of "dont collide with names of
existing system level utils". At least under /opt/csw/bin

You might have been able to make a symlink pointing to it, from /opt/csw/gnu...
except that /opt/csw/gnu/file is already taken, by GNU file?


>  + libmagic-5.04,REV=2010.06.08-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>  + libmagic-5.04,REV=2010.06.08-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>  + py_libmagic-5.04,REV=2010.06.08-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>  + py_libmagic-5.04,REV=2010.06.08-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --

From maciej at opencsw.org  Tue Jun  8 19:07:59 2010
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski)
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 18:07:59 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs file, libmagic, py_libmagic
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTila9lX9aXqtzNLJvKma06KmcCoLi3KjhbSYlNbK@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201006081112.o58BC8Yw018849@login.bo.opencsw.org> 
	<AANLkTila9lX9aXqtzNLJvKma06KmcCoLi3KjhbSYlNbK@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTimS-vpND_FttykpHL_cZduEDgoF-dM7io21ObCc@mail.gmail.com>

No dia 8 de Junho de 2010 17:59, Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> escreveu:
> On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 4:12 AM, Maciej Blizinski <maciej at opencsw.org> wrote:
>> * libmagic: new package
>> ?Splits off libmagic, and adds Python bindings in py_libmagic.
>> ?+ file-5.04,REV=2010.06.08-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>> ?+ file-5.04,REV=2010.06.08-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>
>
> This violates our usual principles of "dont collide with names of
> existing system level utils". At least under /opt/csw/bin
>
> You might have been able to make a symlink pointing to it, from /opt/csw/gnu...
> except that /opt/csw/gnu/file is already taken, by GNU file?

Is it really taken?  Our search[1] doesn't find it.  I think this
package is the GNU file.  I could just rename it to
/opt/csw/bin/gfile, following our tradition.  In this batch I'm really
only interested in libmagic and py_libmagic.  If you don't mind
releases these two now, it would be great.  I can provide newer
CSWfile (renamed to gfile) tomorrow.

Maciej

[1] http://www.opencsw.org/search

From phil at bolthole.com  Tue Jun  8 19:16:08 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 10:16:08 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs file, libmagic, py_libmagic
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimS-vpND_FttykpHL_cZduEDgoF-dM7io21ObCc@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201006081112.o58BC8Yw018849@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTila9lX9aXqtzNLJvKma06KmcCoLi3KjhbSYlNbK@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimS-vpND_FttykpHL_cZduEDgoF-dM7io21ObCc@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTinBqBjGL_c1NkB7YPvNREeZoeJ06YF-caw9_QzC@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 10:07 AM, Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski
<maciej at opencsw.org> wrote:
> No dia 8 de Junho de 2010 17:59, Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> escreveu:
>>
>> You might have been able to make a symlink pointing to it, from /opt/csw/gnu...
>> except that /opt/csw/gnu/file is already taken, by GNU file?
>
> Is it really taken?  Our search[1] doesn't find it.  I think this
> package is the GNU file.

Oh.. Umm.. Hmm. I thought we already had that. wiierrdd......

> I could just rename it to
> /opt/csw/bin/gfile, following our tradition.  In this batch I'm really
> only interested in libmagic and py_libmagic.  If you don't mind
> releases these two now, it would be great.  I can provide newer
> CSWfile (renamed to gfile) tomorrow.
>

Mmm.. since they dont depend on anything else, I consider this....
but the naming for those is very bad :-(

"magic"? "libmagic"? yikes.
Do linux distributions really use that upstream naming, for their own
package names?

From maciej at opencsw.org  Tue Jun  8 19:39:34 2010
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski)
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 18:39:34 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs file, libmagic, py_libmagic
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinBqBjGL_c1NkB7YPvNREeZoeJ06YF-caw9_QzC@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201006081112.o58BC8Yw018849@login.bo.opencsw.org> 
	<AANLkTila9lX9aXqtzNLJvKma06KmcCoLi3KjhbSYlNbK@mail.gmail.com> 
	<AANLkTimS-vpND_FttykpHL_cZduEDgoF-dM7io21ObCc@mail.gmail.com> 
	<AANLkTinBqBjGL_c1NkB7YPvNREeZoeJ06YF-caw9_QzC@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTinX5ejgFiQ9lVoaD3u0nx2mZ7Rh3lnFSpQ10Amt@mail.gmail.com>

No dia 8 de Junho de 2010 18:16, Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> escreveu:
> Oh.. Umm.. Hmm. I thought we already had that. wiierrdd......

The build file was written maybe half a year ago, but it wasn't
released.  I was also suprised that we didn't have it.

>> I could just rename it to
>> /opt/csw/bin/gfile, following our tradition. ?In this batch I'm really
>> only interested in libmagic and py_libmagic. ?If you don't mind
>> releases these two now, it would be great. ?I can provide newer
>> CSWfile (renamed to gfile) tomorrow.
>>
>
> Mmm.. since they dont depend on anything else, I consider this....
> but the naming for those is very bad :-(
>
> "magic"? "libmagic"? yikes.
> Do linux distributions really use that upstream naming, for their own
> package names?

That's the name of the library, apparently.
For example, Debian: http://packages.debian.org/sid/libmagic1

It comes from "magic numbers" used to determine file types.

Maciej

From phil at bolthole.com  Tue Jun  8 20:43:15 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 11:43:15 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs file, libmagic, py_libmagic
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinX5ejgFiQ9lVoaD3u0nx2mZ7Rh3lnFSpQ10Amt@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201006081112.o58BC8Yw018849@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTila9lX9aXqtzNLJvKma06KmcCoLi3KjhbSYlNbK@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimS-vpND_FttykpHL_cZduEDgoF-dM7io21ObCc@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinBqBjGL_c1NkB7YPvNREeZoeJ06YF-caw9_QzC@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinX5ejgFiQ9lVoaD3u0nx2mZ7Rh3lnFSpQ10Amt@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTin1fE2-EFVSHNli8qdC1zS7sq8xTZZ2W0j5XlKX@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski
<maciej at opencsw.org> wrote:
> No dia 8 de Junho de 2010 18:16, Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> escreveu:
>
>> "magic"? "libmagic"? yikes.
>> Do linux distributions really use that upstream naming, for their own
>> package names?
>
> That's the name of the library, apparently.
> For example, Debian: http://packages.debian.org/sid/libmagic1
>
> It comes from "magic numbers" used to determine file types.
>

yes I do know that. still a lousy name for a library :)

okay, thanks for checking. i'll add in those lib packages at lesat.

From rupert at opencsw.org  Wed Jun  9 02:45:03 2010
From: rupert at opencsw.org (THURNER Rupert)
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 19:45:03 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs openldap, openldap_client,
	openldap_d(...)
Message-ID: <201006090045.o590j32i010003@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* openldap: minor version upgrade
  - from: 2.3.39,REV=2008.02.22
  -   to: 2.4.22,REV=2010.06.07
  + openldap-2.4.22,REV=2010.06.07-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + openldap_client-2.4.22,REV=2010.06.07-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + openldap_devel-2.4.22,REV=2010.06.07-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
  + openldap_rt-2.4.22,REV=2010.06.07-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

* openldap: minor version upgrade
  - from: 2.3.39,REV=2008.02.22
  -   to: 2.4.22,REV=2010.06.08
  + openldap-2.4.22,REV=2010.06.08-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + openldap_client-2.4.22,REV=2010.06.08-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + openldap_rt-2.4.22,REV=2010.06.08-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From rupert at opencsw.org  Wed Jun  9 06:43:04 2010
From: rupert at opencsw.org (THURNER Rupert)
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 23:43:04 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs berkeleydb50, berkeleydb50_devel,
	ber(...)
Message-ID: <201006090443.o594h4Tf023012@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* berkeleydb50: new package
  + berkeleydb50-5.0.21,REV=2010.06.08_rev=p0-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + berkeleydb50_devel-5.0.21,REV=2010.06.08_rev=p0-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

* berkeleydb50: new package
  + berkeleydb50-5.0.21,REV=2010.06.09_rev=p0-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + berkeleydb50_devel-5.0.21,REV=2010.06.09_rev=p0-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + berkeleydb50_doc-5.0.21,REV=2010.06.09_rev=p0-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From maciej at opencsw.org  Wed Jun  9 08:04:48 2010
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej Blizinski)
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 08:04:48 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs gfile
Message-ID: <201006090604.o5964mmh026959@login.bo.opencsw.org>

Adjusted CSWgfile.  The command has been renamed to gfile, a symlink in
/opt/csw/gnu/file has been created.  The package is now named CSWgfile.

* gfile: new package
  + gfile-5.04,REV=2010.06.09-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + gfile-5.04,REV=2010.06.09-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From bwalton at opencsw.org  Wed Jun  9 15:03:05 2010
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 09:03:05 -0400
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs gfile
In-Reply-To: <201006090604.o5964mmh026959@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201006090604.o5964mmh026959@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <1276088525-sup-7598@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>

Excerpts from Maciej Blizinski's message of Wed Jun 09 02:04:48 -0400 2010:

> Adjusted CSWgfile.  The command has been renamed to gfile, a symlink in
> /opt/csw/gnu/file has been created.  The package is now named CSWgfile.

This is a little bit nasty as we're now offering a new package with
the same name as a recently retired one (which should have been
CSWfileutils, imo)...Why not CSWfile ?

-Ben
-- 
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302


From maciej at opencsw.org  Wed Jun  9 15:11:54 2010
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski)
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 14:11:54 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs gfile
In-Reply-To: <1276088525-sup-7598@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
References: <201006090604.o5964mmh026959@login.bo.opencsw.org> 
	<1276088525-sup-7598@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
Message-ID: <AANLkTincj8HkPRB4dH5_2WjUdTj-RHTeEuN5sr-6Dnqu@mail.gmail.com>

No dia 9 de Junho de 2010 14:03, Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org> escreveu:
> Excerpts from Maciej Blizinski's message of Wed Jun 09 02:04:48 -0400 2010:
>
>> Adjusted CSWgfile. ?The command has been renamed to gfile, a symlink in
>> /opt/csw/gnu/file has been created. ?The package is now named CSWgfile.
>
> This is a little bit nasty as we're now offering a new package with
> the same name as a recently retired one (which should have been
> CSWfileutils, imo)...Why not CSWfile ?

It was /opt/csw/bin/file initially, but had to be renamed to
/opt/csw/bin/gfile.  We seem to follow the rule of providing gawk in
CSWgawk, ggrep in CSWggrep, and so on.   Now since the previous
CSWgfile is gone, is there any problem with providing a new one?

Maciej

From bwalton at opencsw.org  Wed Jun  9 15:24:11 2010
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 09:24:11 -0400
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs gfile
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTincj8HkPRB4dH5_2WjUdTj-RHTeEuN5sr-6Dnqu@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201006090604.o5964mmh026959@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<1276088525-sup-7598@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTincj8HkPRB4dH5_2WjUdTj-RHTeEuN5sr-6Dnqu@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1276089552-sup-3320@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>

Excerpts from Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski's message of Wed Jun 09 09:11:54 -0400 2010:

> It was /opt/csw/bin/file initially, but had to be renamed to
> /opt/csw/bin/gfile.  We seem to follow the rule of providing gawk in
> CSWgawk, ggrep in CSWggrep, and so on.  Now since the previous
> CSWgfile is gone, is there any problem with providing a new one?

Just confusion for the users, but maybe not enough to bother changing
it again...I was just tossing this out there before it hits the
streets.  Feel free to ignore.

(A side thought/personal opinion of mine is that putting the g prefix
in the filenames makes sense while putting it in the package name
doesn't...)

Thanks
-Ben
-- 
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302


From maciej at opencsw.org  Wed Jun  9 16:19:10 2010
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski)
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 15:19:10 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs gfile
In-Reply-To: <1276089552-sup-3320@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
References: <201006090604.o5964mmh026959@login.bo.opencsw.org> 
	<1276088525-sup-7598@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTincj8HkPRB4dH5_2WjUdTj-RHTeEuN5sr-6Dnqu@mail.gmail.com> 
	<1276089552-sup-3320@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
Message-ID: <AANLkTilxASEe4HE67cUiETteqCTf8sc-erSaH3u60cuy@mail.gmail.com>

No dia 9 de Junho de 2010 14:24, Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org> escreveu:
> Excerpts from Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski's message of Wed Jun 09 09:11:54 -0400 2010:
>
>> It was /opt/csw/bin/file initially, but had to be renamed to
>> /opt/csw/bin/gfile. ?We seem to follow the rule of providing gawk in
>> CSWgawk, ggrep in CSWggrep, and so on. ?Now since the previous
>> CSWgfile is gone, is there any problem with providing a new one?
>
> Just confusion for the users, but maybe not enough to bother changing
> it again...I was just tossing this out there before it hits the
> streets. ?Feel free to ignore.
>
> (A side thought/personal opinion of mine is that putting the g prefix
> in the filenames makes sense while putting it in the package name
> doesn't...)

I agree with that, but it's hard to decide which is more important to
follow: what makes more sense, or consistency.  Let's wait for Phil to
comment on the package name.

From bonivart at opencsw.org  Wed Jun  9 18:05:12 2010
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 18:05:12 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] /newpkgs (current) cswclassutils, memconf,
	namebench, pkgutil, pkgutilplus, policydweight
Message-ID: <AANLkTinAWaG-wbaDbxv4Zv6VPYInMrvGW16DTsQ-6Rfb@mail.gmail.com>

cswclassutils-1.37,REV=2010.05.27-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
memconf-2.15,REV=2010.06.09-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
namebench-1.3,REV=2010.06.07-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
pkgutil-2.0,REV=2010.06.08-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
pkgutil-2.0,REV=2010.06.08-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
pkgutilplus-2.0,REV=2010.06.08-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz
policydweight-0.1.15,REV=2010.05.26-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
/peter

From phil at opencsw.org  Wed Jun  9 18:19:37 2010
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 09:19:37 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs gfile
In-Reply-To: <1276088525-sup-7598@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
References: <201006090604.o5964mmh026959@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<1276088525-sup-7598@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
Message-ID: <AANLkTimTyn3emMh7pSDydaZfZQGKKav6Ya1AqKf1em2p@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 6:03 AM, Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Excerpts from Maciej Blizinski's message of Wed Jun 09 02:04:48 -0400 2010:
>
>> Adjusted CSWgfile. ?The command has been renamed to gfile, a symlink in
>> /opt/csw/gnu/file has been created. ?The package is now named CSWgfile.
>
> This is a little bit nasty as we're now offering a new package with
> the same name as a recently retired one (which should have been
> CSWfileutils, imo)...Why not CSWfile ?
>


aah! I KNEW we had gfile, I'm not crazy after all ;-)
So... waitaminit...
if we USED to have "fileutils"... and fileutils was replaced by "coreutils"...
and fileutils used to have "gfile"... but "coreutils" does not...

oh waitaminit.. fileutils did NOT have gfile. so I am crazy :-}

i vaguely recall someone requesting to have gfile added in the past at
least, and I think it was this same thingie. wonder why it didnt go
in? oh well, glad its here now.

as far as naming goes:
In absense of other factors, we name things based on the executable
presented in /opt/csw/bin, not /opt/csw/gnu.

so, "gfile", rather than "file", should be the name.

I'm accepting the gfile package in.

From phil at bolthole.com  Wed Jun  9 18:23:38 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 09:23:38 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs screen
In-Reply-To: <4C0EA758.6050700@pleiades.fr.eu.org>
References: <4C0EA758.6050700@pleiades.fr.eu.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTik2yrn8iAroqtbF1SXxvXr6JFJBMQaRK1un2x_d@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Yann Rouillard <yann at pleiades.fr.eu.org> wrote:
> * screen: revision upgrade
> ?- from: 2008.04.30
> ?- ? to: 2010.01.10
> ?+ screen-4.0.3,REV=2010.01.10-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ screen-4.0.3,REV=2010.01.10-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>



Errmm... we had a prior conversation on this... I thought the end thought was,

"wait until ncurses termcap was split out, then force use of that
termcap, and drop ncurses dependancy".

The termcap has been split out.  well, "terminfo" is the package actually :)
So how about reworking that please?

btw: terminfo package is only sol9 and above (though not sure why), so
a screen dependant on that, would also have to be sol9.

From maciej at opencsw.org  Wed Jun  9 18:29:16 2010
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski)
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 17:29:16 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs gfile
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimTyn3emMh7pSDydaZfZQGKKav6Ya1AqKf1em2p@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201006090604.o5964mmh026959@login.bo.opencsw.org> 
	<1276088525-sup-7598@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTimTyn3emMh7pSDydaZfZQGKKav6Ya1AqKf1em2p@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTilxLrAFPzQ7mtcr8GtHloeBfXBREhNPn-5CvvTz@mail.gmail.com>

No dia 9 de Junho de 2010 17:19, Philip Brown <phil at opencsw.org> escreveu:
> as far as naming goes:
> In absense of other factors, we name things based on the executable
> presented in /opt/csw/bin, not /opt/csw/gnu.
>
> so, "gfile", rather than "file", should be the name.

Right, it seemed like a reasonable bet.

> I'm accepting the gfile package in.

\o/

From phil at bolthole.com  Wed Jun  9 18:33:37 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 09:33:37 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] /newpkgs (current) cswclassutils, memconf,
	namebench, pkgutil, pkgutilplus, policydweight
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinAWaG-wbaDbxv4Zv6VPYInMrvGW16DTsQ-6Rfb@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTinAWaG-wbaDbxv4Zv6VPYInMrvGW16DTsQ-6Rfb@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTimlsT-A5Xvwl1buw5Pnl5AyoHhphTqoVNENh85L@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 9:05 AM, Peter Bonivart <bonivart at opencsw.org> wrote:
> cswclassutils-1.37,REV=2010.05.27-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
> memconf-2.15,REV=2010.06.09-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
> namebench-1.3,REV=2010.06.07-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
> pkgutil-2.0,REV=2010.06.08-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> pkgutil-2.0,REV=2010.06.08-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> pkgutilplus-2.0,REV=2010.06.08-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz
> policydweight-0.1.15,REV=2010.05.26-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>

you didnt mark policydweight as new.. I'm going to review that one
later. others are now batched.

From phil at opencsw.org  Wed Jun  9 18:35:51 2010
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 09:35:51 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs openldap, openldap_client,
	openldap_d(...)
In-Reply-To: <201006090045.o590j32i010003@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201006090045.o590j32i010003@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTikuLIX-7t1JOzPoILDG9IpO5ngbmU1oJQNz2kNe@mail.gmail.com>

coool. nice to have an update on this, thanks.

odd that submitpkg gives double-ouput for this.
but okay, batched.



On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 5:45 PM, THURNER Rupert <rupert at opencsw.org> wrote:
> * openldap: minor version upgrade
> ?- from: 2.3.39,REV=2008.02.22
> ?- ? to: 2.4.22,REV=2010.06.07
> ?+ openldap-2.4.22,REV=2010.06.07-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ openldap_client-2.4.22,REV=2010.06.07-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ openldap_devel-2.4.22,REV=2010.06.07-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ openldap_rt-2.4.22,REV=2010.06.07-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> * openldap: minor version upgrade
> ?- from: 2.3.39,REV=2008.02.22
> ?- ? to: 2.4.22,REV=2010.06.08
> ?+ openldap-2.4.22,REV=2010.06.08-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ openldap_client-2.4.22,REV=2010.06.08-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ openldap_rt-2.4.22,REV=2010.06.08-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at opencsw.org  Wed Jun  9 18:40:32 2010
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 09:40:32 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs openldap, openldap_client,
	openldap_d(...)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikuLIX-7t1JOzPoILDG9IpO5ngbmU1oJQNz2kNe@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201006090045.o590j32i010003@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTikuLIX-7t1JOzPoILDG9IpO5ngbmU1oJQNz2kNe@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTin68rrR3yEyPAAcoKo-dGC4HeNsacthFn7uKjVs@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 9:35 AM, Philip Brown <phil at opencsw.org> wrote:
> coool. nice to have an update on this, thanks.
>
> odd that submitpkg gives double-ouput for this.
> but okay, batched.
>

Hey, bonus... you cleaned up one of our file path conflicts too!
Thanks Rupert!

(ldif.5 used to be in both openldap and openldap_client)

From bonivart at opencsw.org  Wed Jun  9 19:12:37 2010
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 19:12:37 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] /newpkgs (current) cswclassutils, memconf,
	namebench, pkgutil, pkgutilplus, policydweight
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimlsT-A5Xvwl1buw5Pnl5AyoHhphTqoVNENh85L@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTinAWaG-wbaDbxv4Zv6VPYInMrvGW16DTsQ-6Rfb@mail.gmail.com> 
	<AANLkTimlsT-A5Xvwl1buw5Pnl5AyoHhphTqoVNENh85L@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTikikvjcI2gyvXgxDa-kR4quw97QNclJ4xQfTRzv@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 6:33 PM, Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> wrote:
> you didnt mark policydweight as new.. I'm going to review that one
> later. others are now batched.

policydweight was a requested package, it was discussed here
(including testing results):

https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/private/pkgrequests/2010-May/001277.html

-- 
/peter

From maciej at opencsw.org  Thu Jun 10 08:28:41 2010
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej Blizinski)
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 08:28:41 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs gnupg2, gnupg_agent
Message-ID: <201006100628.o5A6SfPh008293@login.bo.opencsw.org>

As jdoe at #opencsw pointed out, gnupg2 depended on gnupg_agent, which depended
on pinentry, which depended on GTK.  I've removed the gnupg2->gnupg_agent
dependency, especially that gnupg_agent can be used with gnupg (1.x) as well.

* gnupg: revision upgrade
  - from: 2010.05.24
  -   to: 2010.06.09
  + gnupg2-2.0.15,REV=2010.06.09-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + gnupg2-2.0.15,REV=2010.06.09-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + gnupg_agent-2.0.15,REV=2010.06.09-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + gnupg_agent-2.0.15,REV=2010.06.09-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From phil at bolthole.com  Thu Jun 10 18:15:52 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 09:15:52 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs gnupg2, gnupg_agent
In-Reply-To: <201006100628.o5A6SfPh008293@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201006100628.o5A6SfPh008293@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTikly-BQU_Zt2LksaCB95VnhuMw1dGzhddkMl7xI@mail.gmail.com>

owchie. fix batched.


On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 11:28 PM, Maciej Blizinski <maciej at opencsw.org> wrote:
> As jdoe at #opencsw pointed out, gnupg2 depended on gnupg_agent, which depended
> on pinentry, which depended on GTK. ?I've removed the gnupg2->gnupg_agent
> dependency, especially that gnupg_agent can be used with gnupg (1.x) as well.
>
> * gnupg: revision upgrade
> ?- from: 2010.05.24
> ?- ? to: 2010.06.09
> ?+ gnupg2-2.0.15,REV=2010.06.09-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ gnupg2-2.0.15,REV=2010.06.09-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ gnupg_agent-2.0.15,REV=2010.06.09-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ gnupg_agent-2.0.15,REV=2010.06.09-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Thu Jun 10 18:17:44 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 09:17:44 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] /newpkgs (current) cswclassutils, memconf,
	namebench, pkgutil, pkgutilplus, policydweight
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikikvjcI2gyvXgxDa-kR4quw97QNclJ4xQfTRzv@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTinAWaG-wbaDbxv4Zv6VPYInMrvGW16DTsQ-6Rfb@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimlsT-A5Xvwl1buw5Pnl5AyoHhphTqoVNENh85L@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTikikvjcI2gyvXgxDa-kR4quw97QNclJ4xQfTRzv@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTimo3UeH3UQhmn1LNEamQ3ZTD50UTK0T0D36sowf@mail.gmail.com>

excellent. thanks for the ref.


On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Peter Bonivart <bonivart at opencsw.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 6:33 PM, Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> wrote:
>> you didnt mark policydweight as new.. I'm going to review that one
>> later. others are now batched.
>
> policydweight was a requested package, it was discussed here
> (including testing results):
>
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/private/pkgrequests/2010-May/001277.html
>
> --
> /peter
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at opencsw.org  Thu Jun 10 18:20:04 2010
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 09:20:04 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs berkeleydb50, berkeleydb50_devel,
	ber(...)
In-Reply-To: <201006090443.o594h4Tf023012@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201006090443.o594h4Tf023012@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTilnnTiDuRQlf-5ubEN5HElkU3tWcN5YML2ZLhzb@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Rupert,
Thanks for packaging this.  However....
is there a specific software you are planning to package, that needs this?


Given the abominable track record of berkeleydb not being backward
compatible, and also the tendancy of older versions to lay around
littering the repository.. I am loath to allow in a new version,
unless there is specific need for it.
Particularly a ".0" release, even though it's 0.21.




On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 9:43 PM, THURNER Rupert <rupert at opencsw.org> wrote:
> * berkeleydb50: new package
> ?+ berkeleydb50-5.0.21,REV=2010.06.08_rev=p0-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ berkeleydb50_devel-5.0.21,REV=2010.06.08_rev=p0-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> * berkeleydb50: new package
> ?+ berkeleydb50-5.0.21,REV=2010.06.09_rev=p0-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ berkeleydb50_devel-5.0.21,REV=2010.06.09_rev=p0-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ berkeleydb50_doc-5.0.21,REV=2010.06.09_rev=p0-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>

From rupert at opencsw.org  Fri Jun 11 06:42:20 2010
From: rupert at opencsw.org (rupert THURNER)
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 06:42:20 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs openldap, openldap_client,
	openldap_d(...)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTin68rrR3yEyPAAcoKo-dGC4HeNsacthFn7uKjVs@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201006090045.o590j32i010003@login.bo.opencsw.org> 
	<AANLkTikuLIX-7t1JOzPoILDG9IpO5ngbmU1oJQNz2kNe@mail.gmail.com> 
	<AANLkTin68rrR3yEyPAAcoKo-dGC4HeNsacthFn7uKjVs@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTilbknbnrbXetc6-w3douXxHMvHXOEC6wuDJy2Sr@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 18:40, Philip Brown <phil at opencsw.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 9:35 AM, Philip Brown <phil at opencsw.org> wrote:
>> coool. nice to have an update on this, thanks.
>>
>> odd that submitpkg gives double-ouput for this.
>> but okay, batched.
>>
>
> Hey, bonus... you cleaned up one of our file path conflicts too!
> Thanks Rupert!
>
> (ldif.5 used to be in both openldap and openldap_client)

i guess you are thanking the wrong person atm - its dago. who seems to
very talented in starting with the more difficult part and dragging
others as well into it and so growing our community :)

rupert.

From rupert at opencsw.org  Fri Jun 11 06:57:12 2010
From: rupert at opencsw.org (rupert THURNER)
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 06:57:12 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs berkeleydb50, berkeleydb50_devel,
	ber(...)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTilnnTiDuRQlf-5ubEN5HElkU3tWcN5YML2ZLhzb@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201006090443.o594h4Tf023012@login.bo.opencsw.org> 
	<AANLkTilnnTiDuRQlf-5ubEN5HElkU3tWcN5YML2ZLhzb@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTinswAlsQ5Faz8zvJivnxz_aNGHzVZpBEEYiBF20@mail.gmail.com>

i am perfectly fine with not delivering it at the moment.

rupert.


On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 18:20, Philip Brown <phil at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Hi Rupert,
> Thanks for packaging this. ?However....
> is there a specific software you are planning to package, that needs this?
>
>
> Given the abominable track record of berkeleydb not being backward
> compatible, and also the tendancy of older versions to lay around
> littering the repository.. I am loath to allow in a new version,
> unless there is specific need for it.
> Particularly a ".0" release, even though it's 0.21.
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 9:43 PM, THURNER Rupert <rupert at opencsw.org> wrote:
>> * berkeleydb50: new package
>> ?+ berkeleydb50-5.0.21,REV=2010.06.08_rev=p0-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>> ?+ berkeleydb50_devel-5.0.21,REV=2010.06.08_rev=p0-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>>
>> * berkeleydb50: new package
>> ?+ berkeleydb50-5.0.21,REV=2010.06.09_rev=p0-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>> ?+ berkeleydb50_devel-5.0.21,REV=2010.06.09_rev=p0-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>> ?+ berkeleydb50_doc-5.0.21,REV=2010.06.09_rev=p0-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>>
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From bwalton at opencsw.org  Sat Jun 12 02:00:16 2010
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 20:00:16 -0400
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs rubydev
Message-ID: <1276300661-sup-1878@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>

Hi Phil,

This addresses the bug caught today with the mismatch between the
internal and external REV stamps on this package due to the manual
edit I made to update for the CSWcoreutils dependency.

* rubydev: minor update
  + rubydev-1.8.7,REV=2010.06.11_rev=p174-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

* rubydev: minor update
  + rubydev-1.8.7,REV=2010.06.11_rev=p174-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

Thanks
-Ben
--
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302


From phil at opencsw.org  Sat Jun 12 02:42:30 2010
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 17:42:30 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs rubydev
In-Reply-To: <1276300661-sup-1878@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
References: <1276300661-sup-1878@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
Message-ID: <AANLkTikfc3lPSbTGlECOOw8135SQmk2YIaEejBYHKdXL@mail.gmail.com>

thanks for the fix.



On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>
> This addresses the bug caught today with the mismatch between the
> internal and external REV stamps on this package due to the manual
> edit I made to update for the CSWcoreutils dependency.
>
> * rubydev: minor update
> ?+ rubydev-1.8.7,REV=2010.06.11_rev=p174-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> * rubydev: minor update
> ?+ rubydev-1.8.7,REV=2010.06.11_rev=p174-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>

From bwalton at opencsw.org  Sat Jun 12 03:10:11 2010
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 21:10:11 -0400
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs gitosis
Message-ID: <1276304964-sup-7960@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>


Hi Phil,

This is a bugfix release for a CAS ordering issue I noticed while
tracking down the problem with i.cswinetd.

gitosis-0.2,REV=2010.06.12_rev=73a03-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

Thanks
-Ben
--
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302


From phil at bolthole.com  Sat Jun 12 05:50:47 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 20:50:47 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs gitosis
In-Reply-To: <1276304964-sup-7960@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
References: <1276304964-sup-7960@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
Message-ID: <AANLkTin0JpW55GWKpFmoB0bE-HodzXm-83sJIRz-Gk59@mail.gmail.com>

roger


On Friday, June 11, 2010, Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Phil,
>
> This is a bugfix release for a CAS ordering issue I noticed while
> tracking down the problem with i.cswinetd.
>
> gitosis-0.2,REV=2010.06.12_rev=73a03-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> Thanks
> -Ben
> --
> Ben Walton
> Systems Programmer - CHASS
> University of Toronto
> C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302
>
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From yann at pleiades.fr.eu.org  Tue Jun  8 22:26:00 2010
From: yann at pleiades.fr.eu.org (Yann Rouillard)
Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 22:26:00 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs screen
Message-ID: <4C0EA758.6050700@pleiades.fr.eu.org>

* screen: revision upgrade
   - from: 2008.04.30
   -   to: 2010.01.10
   + screen-4.0.3,REV=2010.01.10-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
   + screen-4.0.3,REV=2010.01.10-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

--
Generated by submitpkg

From dam at opencsw.org  Wed Jun 16 22:22:05 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 22:22:05 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] Update of giflib
Message-ID: <8EB1D37F-7835-4FEF-BF2F-E713A9B4580D@opencsw.org>

Hi,

a new batch of giflib packages, now without duplicate files:

giflib-4.1.6,REV=2010.06.16-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
giflib-4.1.6,REV=2010.06.16-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
giflib_doc-4.1.6,REV=2010.06.16-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
giflib_rt-4.1.6,REV=2010.06.16-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
giflib_rt-4.1.6,REV=2010.06.16-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
libungif-4.1.6,REV=2010.06.16-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
x11_giflib-4.1.6,REV=2010.06.16-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
x11_giflib-4.1.6,REV=2010.06.16-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
x11_giflib_rt-4.1.6,REV=2010.06.16-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
x11_giflib_rt-4.1.6,REV=2010.06.16-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz


Best regards

   -- Dago

From phil at bolthole.com  Wed Jun 16 23:00:50 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 14:00:50 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] Update of giflib
In-Reply-To: <8EB1D37F-7835-4FEF-BF2F-E713A9B4580D@opencsw.org>
References: <8EB1D37F-7835-4FEF-BF2F-E713A9B4580D@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTinWLf4EHZBLf0IV_M9IC5iPpBBa4InkbVyeOFQv@mail.gmail.com>

errrr... I'm not seeing em on bender

On Wednesday, June 16, 2010, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> a new batch of giflib packages, now without duplicate files:
>
> giflib-4.1.6,REV=2010.06.16-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> giflib-4.1.6,REV=2010.06.16-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> giflib_doc-4.1.6,REV=2010.06.16-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
> giflib_rt-4.1.6,REV=2010.06.16-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> giflib_rt-4.1.6,REV=2010.06.16-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> libungif-4.1.6,REV=2010.06.16-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
> x11_giflib-4.1.6,REV=2010.06.16-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> x11_giflib-4.1.6,REV=2010.06.16-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> x11_giflib_rt-4.1.6,REV=2010.06.16-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> x11_giflib_rt-4.1.6,REV=2010.06.16-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>
>
> Best regards
>
>  ?-- Dago
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From dam at opencsw.org  Wed Jun 16 23:16:28 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 23:16:28 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] Update of giflib
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinWLf4EHZBLf0IV_M9IC5iPpBBa4InkbVyeOFQv@mail.gmail.com>
References: <8EB1D37F-7835-4FEF-BF2F-E713A9B4580D@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinWLf4EHZBLf0IV_M9IC5iPpBBa4InkbVyeOFQv@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <C927C5F1-C406-4697-953E-A7202BD86895@opencsw.org>

Hi Phil,

Am 16.06.2010 um 23:00 schrieb Philip Brown:
> errrr... I'm not seeing em on bender

Hum, seing them now?

Best regards

   -- Dago

> On Wednesday, June 16, 2010, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org>  
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> a new batch of giflib packages, now without duplicate files:
>>
>> giflib-4.1.6,REV=2010.06.16-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>> giflib-4.1.6,REV=2010.06.16-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>> giflib_doc-4.1.6,REV=2010.06.16-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>> giflib_rt-4.1.6,REV=2010.06.16-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>> giflib_rt-4.1.6,REV=2010.06.16-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>> libungif-4.1.6,REV=2010.06.16-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>> x11_giflib-4.1.6,REV=2010.06.16-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>> x11_giflib-4.1.6,REV=2010.06.16-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>> x11_giflib_rt-4.1.6,REV=2010.06.16-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>> x11_giflib_rt-4.1.6,REV=2010.06.16-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>>
>>
>> Best regards
>>
>>  -- Dago
>> _______________________________________________
>> pkgsubmissions mailing list
>> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
>> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>>
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions


From phil at opencsw.org  Thu Jun 17 00:01:32 2010
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 15:01:32 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] Update of giflib
In-Reply-To: <C927C5F1-C406-4697-953E-A7202BD86895@opencsw.org>
References: <8EB1D37F-7835-4FEF-BF2F-E713A9B4580D@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinWLf4EHZBLf0IV_M9IC5iPpBBa4InkbVyeOFQv@mail.gmail.com>
	<C927C5F1-C406-4697-953E-A7202BD86895@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTinR3m-n-mXr8ykKAYqCtllCiyVs1fLjbOFz2zuF@mail.gmail.com>

yup. batched, thanks.



On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>
> Am 16.06.2010 um 23:00 schrieb Philip Brown:
>>
>> errrr... I'm not seeing em on bender
>
> Hum, seing them now?
>
> Best regards
>
> ?-- Dago
>
>> On Wednesday, June 16, 2010, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> a new batch of giflib packages, now without duplicate files:
>>>
>>> giflib-4.1.6,REV=2010.06.16-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>>> giflib-4.1.6,REV=2010.06.16-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>>> giflib_doc-4.1.6,REV=2010.06.16-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>>> giflib_rt-4.1.6,REV=2010.06.16-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>>> giflib_rt-4.1.6,REV=2010.06.16-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>>> libungif-4.1.6,REV=2010.06.16-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>>> x11_giflib-4.1.6,REV=2010.06.16-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>>> x11_giflib-4.1.6,REV=2010.06.16-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>>> x11_giflib_rt-4.1.6,REV=2010.06.16-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>>> x11_giflib_rt-4.1.6,REV=2010.06.16-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>>>
>>>
>>> Best regards
>>>
>>> ?-- Dago
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> pkgsubmissions mailing list
>>> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
>>> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> pkgsubmissions mailing list
>> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
>> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From bonivart at opencsw.org  Thu Jun 17 16:02:14 2010
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 16:02:14 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] /newpkgs (current) [lots of pkgs]
Message-ID: <AANLkTikgo62VQr_dpnuTp99h6JZ0sXqg7U-TBY4qFDZ8@mail.gmail.com>

All these are new packages built by Dago and me for project Koha:

idzebra-2.0.43,REV=2010.06.15-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
idzebra-2.0.43,REV=2010.06.15-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
pm_algorithmchkdig-0.53,REV=2010.06.08-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
pm_barcodecode128-2.01,REV=2010.06.09-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
pm_biblioendnotest-0.05,REV=2010.06.08-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
pm_cgisession-4.42,REV=2010.06.08-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
pm_classadapter-1.07,REV=2010.06.10-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
pm_classfactutil-1.7,REV=2010.06.08-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
pm_dataical-0.16,REV=2010.06.16-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
pm_dateical-1.72,REV=2010.06.09-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
pm_dateleapyear-1.72,REV=2010.06.09-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
pm_dublincorerecord-0.03,REV=2010.06.11-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
pm_gdbarcode-1.15,REV=2010.06.08-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
pm_htmltemplatepro-0.95,REV=2010.06.11-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
pm_htmltemplatepro-0.95,REV=2010.06.11-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
pm_json-2.21,REV=2010.06.11-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
pm_linguaptstemmer-0.01,REV=2010.06.10-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
pm_linguastem-0.84,REV=2010.06.11-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
pm_linguastemfr-0.02,REV=2010.06.10-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
pm_linguastemit-0.02,REV=2010.06.10-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
pm_linguastemru-0.01,REV=2010.06.11-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
pm_linguastemsnoda-1.01,REV=2010.06.11-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
pm_marccharset-1.2,REV=2010.06.11-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
pm_marccrosswalkdblc-0.02,REV=2010.06.11-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
pm_marcrecord-2.0.2,REV=2010.06.09-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
pm_marcxml-0.92,REV=2010.06.11-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
pm_netz3950zoom-1.26,REV=2010.06.10-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
pm_netz3950zoom-1.26,REV=2010.06.10-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
pm_pdfreuse-0.35,REV=2010.06.09-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
pm_pdfreusebarcode-0.06,REV=2010.06.09-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
pm_scheduleat-1.10,REV=2010.06.10-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
pm_smssend-0.05,REV=2010.06.10-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
pm_snowballnorwegian-1.2,REV=2010.06.11-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
pm_snowballswedish-1.2,REV=2010.06.11-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
pm_testwarn-0.21,REV=2010.06.16-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
pm_textgerman-0.06,REV=2010.06.11-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
pm_texticonv-1.7,REV=2010.06.10-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
pm_texticonv-1.7,REV=2010.06.10-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
pm_textvfileasdata-0.05,REV=2010.06.16-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
pm_treedagnode-1.06,REV=2010.06.16-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
pm_xmldumper-0.81,REV=2010.06.10-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
pm_xmllibxslt-1.70,REV=2010.06.08-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
pm_xmllibxslt-1.70,REV=2010.06.08-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
yaz-4.0.9,REV=2010.06.09-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
yaz-4.0.9,REV=2010.06.09-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
/peter

From maciej at opencsw.org  Thu Jun 17 20:11:55 2010
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej Blizinski)
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 20:11:55 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libev
Message-ID: <201006171811.o5HIBt7U000845@login.bo.opencsw.org>

Removed the file conflict by renaming a file.
Fixes bug 4376: https://www.opencsw.org/mantis/view.php?id=4376

* libev: revision upgrade
  - from: 2010.03.09
  -   to: 2010.06.16
  + libev-3.9,REV=2010.06.16-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libev-3.9,REV=2010.06.16-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From maciej at opencsw.org  Thu Jun 17 20:12:41 2010
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej Blizinski)
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 20:12:41 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs sharutils
Message-ID: <201006171812.o5HICfnU000875@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* sharutils: minor version upgrade
  - from: 4.6.3,REV=2010.02.25
  -   to: 4.9,REV=2010.06.14
  + sharutils-4.9,REV=2010.06.14-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + sharutils-4.9,REV=2010.06.14-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From bwalton at opencsw.org  Thu Jun 17 20:26:51 2010
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 20:26:51 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs cswutils
Message-ID: <201006171826.o5HIQpS4011978@login.bo.opencsw.org>

Hi Phil,

A bugfix for a bad symlink.  Mantis ID 4467.

* cswutils: revision upgrade
  - from: 2010.06.03
  -   to: 2010.06.17
  + cswutils-1.14.6,REV=2010.06.17-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

Thanks
-Ben
-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From phil at opencsw.org  Thu Jun 17 20:33:57 2010
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 11:33:57 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libev
In-Reply-To: <201006171811.o5HIBt7U000845@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201006171811.o5HIBt7U000845@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTinemOt62LJjPn34hu17CccDw7CgPQTpLYSZJcuT@mail.gmail.com>

thanks, batched

On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Maciej Blizinski <maciej at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Removed the file conflict by renaming a file.
> Fixes bug 4376: https://www.opencsw.org/mantis/view.php?id=4376
>
> * libev: revision upgrade
> ?- from: 2010.03.09
> ?- ? to: 2010.06.16
> ?+ libev-3.9,REV=2010.06.16-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ libev-3.9,REV=2010.06.16-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Thu Jun 17 20:35:42 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 11:35:42 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs sharutils
In-Reply-To: <201006171812.o5HICfnU000875@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201006171812.o5HICfnU000875@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTimH5DrnWoUqg4YmIkaqc6qevmhrwg8CMaaWShG2@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Maciej Blizinski <maciej at opencsw.org> wrote:
> * sharutils: minor version upgrade
> ?- from: 4.6.3,REV=2010.02.25
> ?- ? to: 4.9,REV=2010.06.14
> ?+ sharutils-4.9,REV=2010.06.14-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ sharutils-4.9,REV=2010.06.14-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>

errr.. we SERIOUSLY need a 64-bit sharutils??!?

From phil at bolthole.com  Thu Jun 17 20:34:53 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 11:34:53 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs cswutils
In-Reply-To: <201006171826.o5HIQpS4011978@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201006171826.o5HIQpS4011978@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTikUG9R_EGVnojiQFoIy66kyikxXfJJ9vXSyuT2k@mail.gmail.com>

awwright


On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>
> A bugfix for a bad symlink. ?Mantis ID 4467.
>
> * cswutils: revision upgrade
> ?- from: 2010.06.03
> ?- ? to: 2010.06.17
> ?+ cswutils-1.14.6,REV=2010.06.17-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>

From maciej at opencsw.org  Fri Jun 18 16:53:45 2010
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski)
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 15:53:45 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs sharutils
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimH5DrnWoUqg4YmIkaqc6qevmhrwg8CMaaWShG2@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201006171812.o5HICfnU000875@login.bo.opencsw.org> 
	<AANLkTimH5DrnWoUqg4YmIkaqc6qevmhrwg8CMaaWShG2@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTikiJYMZLwkgnRmV5BSqnJBCBIGKoWaHDSIjtAZ1@mail.gmail.com>

No dia 17 de Junho de 2010 19:35, Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> escreveu:
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Maciej Blizinski <maciej at opencsw.org> wrote:
>> * sharutils: minor version upgrade
>> ?- from: 4.6.3,REV=2010.02.25
>> ?- ? to: 4.9,REV=2010.06.14
>> ?+ sharutils-4.9,REV=2010.06.14-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>> ?+ sharutils-4.9,REV=2010.06.14-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>>
>
> errr.. we SERIOUSLY need a 64-bit sharutils??!?

2GB should be enough for anyone.  Here's the 32-bit version.  I'm
working on a 8-bit one.

* sharutils: minor version upgrade
  - from: 4.6.3,REV=2010.02.25
  -   to: 4.9,REV=2010.06.18
  + sharutils-4.9,REV=2010.06.18-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + sharutils-4.9,REV=2010.06.18-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

From phil at bolthole.com  Fri Jun 18 17:07:16 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 08:07:16 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs sharutils
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikiJYMZLwkgnRmV5BSqnJBCBIGKoWaHDSIjtAZ1@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201006171812.o5HICfnU000875@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTimH5DrnWoUqg4YmIkaqc6qevmhrwg8CMaaWShG2@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTikiJYMZLwkgnRmV5BSqnJBCBIGKoWaHDSIjtAZ1@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTil8SIR0Zsw8-o52FiV_HF0uKEUpZTeXhMu_msGP@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 7:53 AM, Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski
<maciej at opencsw.org> wrote:
>
>> errr.. we SERIOUSLY need a 64-bit sharutils??!?
>
> 2GB should be enough for anyone.  Here's the 32-bit version.  I'm
> working on a 8-bit one.
>


lol. well it can still handle (Foo)gigabyte FILES. theres just no need
for it to hog up more than 2gig of ram while doing so.

batching...

> * sharutils: minor version upgrade
>  - from: 4.6.3,REV=2010.02.25
>  -   to: 4.9,REV=2010.06.18
>  + sharutils-4.9,REV=2010.06.18-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>  + sharutils-4.9,REV=2010.06.18-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Fri Jun 18 17:08:44 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 08:08:44 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs sharutils
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTil8SIR0Zsw8-o52FiV_HF0uKEUpZTeXhMu_msGP@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201006171812.o5HICfnU000875@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTimH5DrnWoUqg4YmIkaqc6qevmhrwg8CMaaWShG2@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTikiJYMZLwkgnRmV5BSqnJBCBIGKoWaHDSIjtAZ1@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTil8SIR0Zsw8-o52FiV_HF0uKEUpZTeXhMu_msGP@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTim_F_DQkYo_Do0_DQkqXrIMbK495V_oXzv__tz4@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 8:07 AM, Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> wrote:
>
> batching...
>

or not.


ERROR 1062 (23000) at line 16: Duplicate entry '/opt/csw/bin/uudecode' for key 1
DB Update failed. Possibly a filename collision


Some hand poking yields:

+----------+-----------------------+
| pkgname  | fullpath              |
+----------+-----------------------+
| CSWgmime | /opt/csw/bin/uudecode |
+----------+-----------------------+

From dam at opencsw.org  Fri Jun 18 17:10:37 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 17:10:37 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs sharutils
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTil8SIR0Zsw8-o52FiV_HF0uKEUpZTeXhMu_msGP@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201006171812.o5HICfnU000875@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTimH5DrnWoUqg4YmIkaqc6qevmhrwg8CMaaWShG2@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTikiJYMZLwkgnRmV5BSqnJBCBIGKoWaHDSIjtAZ1@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTil8SIR0Zsw8-o52FiV_HF0uKEUpZTeXhMu_msGP@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <D5CAD84B-C5FF-4540-92BB-3004FA630DD5@opencsw.org>

Hi Phil,

Am 18.06.2010 um 17:07 schrieb Philip Brown:
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 7:53 AM, Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski
> <maciej at opencsw.org> wrote:
>> 
>>> errr.. we SERIOUSLY need a 64-bit sharutils??!?
>> 
>> 2GB should be enough for anyone.  Here's the 32-bit version.  I'm
>> working on a 8-bit one.
> 
> lol. well it can still handle (Foo)gigabyte FILES. theres just no need
> for it to hog up more than 2gig of ram while doing so.

It is actually almost 4 GB on 64 bit systems. Only on 32 bit kernels
it is 2 GB as the kernel itself must also fit in the 4 GB.


Best regards

  -- Dago

From maciej at opencsw.org  Fri Jun 18 17:20:15 2010
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski)
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 16:20:15 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs sharutils
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTim_F_DQkYo_Do0_DQkqXrIMbK495V_oXzv__tz4@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201006171812.o5HICfnU000875@login.bo.opencsw.org> 
	<AANLkTimH5DrnWoUqg4YmIkaqc6qevmhrwg8CMaaWShG2@mail.gmail.com> 
	<AANLkTikiJYMZLwkgnRmV5BSqnJBCBIGKoWaHDSIjtAZ1@mail.gmail.com> 
	<AANLkTil8SIR0Zsw8-o52FiV_HF0uKEUpZTeXhMu_msGP@mail.gmail.com> 
	<AANLkTim_F_DQkYo_Do0_DQkqXrIMbK495V_oXzv__tz4@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTilnNb6srjUrmfs7Qj-0FrW4wLIKgwdb4NX90Vl4@mail.gmail.com>

No dia 18 de Junho de 2010 16:08, Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> escreveu:
> ERROR 1062 (23000) at line 16: Duplicate entry '/opt/csw/bin/uudecode' for key 1
> DB Update failed. Possibly a filename collision
>
>
> Some hand poking yields:
>
> +----------+-----------------------+
> | pkgname ?| fullpath ? ? ? ? ? ? ?|
> +----------+-----------------------+
> | CSWgmime | /opt/csw/bin/uudecode |
> +----------+-----------------------+

Hum.  Looks like something that could use alternatives, but CSWgmime
would have to be updated too.  Should I move uu{en,de}code binaries to
a separate package and deal with it later, or stop this release until
CSWgmime is updated?  (which is not in svn, unfortunately)

From dam at opencsw.org  Fri Jun 18 17:34:40 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 17:34:40 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs sharutils
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTilnNb6srjUrmfs7Qj-0FrW4wLIKgwdb4NX90Vl4@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201006171812.o5HICfnU000875@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTimH5DrnWoUqg4YmIkaqc6qevmhrwg8CMaaWShG2@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTikiJYMZLwkgnRmV5BSqnJBCBIGKoWaHDSIjtAZ1@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTil8SIR0Zsw8-o52FiV_HF0uKEUpZTeXhMu_msGP@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTim_F_DQkYo_Do0_DQkqXrIMbK495V_oXzv__tz4@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTilnNb6srjUrmfs7Qj-0FrW4wLIKgwdb4NX90Vl4@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <8C7FC410-6C3D-48C0-9745-CEC53AD52A20@opencsw.org>

Hi Maciej,

Am 18.06.2010 um 17:20 schrieb Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski:
> No dia 18 de Junho de 2010 16:08, Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> escreveu:
>> ERROR 1062 (23000) at line 16: Duplicate entry '/opt/csw/bin/uudecode' for key 1
>> DB Update failed. Possibly a filename collision
>> 
>> 
>> Some hand poking yields:
>> 
>> +----------+-----------------------+
>> | pkgname  | fullpath              |
>> +----------+-----------------------+
>> | CSWgmime | /opt/csw/bin/uudecode |
>> +----------+-----------------------+
> 
> Hum.  Looks like something that could use alternatives, but CSWgmime
> would have to be updated too.  Should I move uu{en,de}code binaries to
> a separate package and deal with it later, or stop this release until
> CSWgmime is updated?  (which is not in svn, unfortunately)

I suggest just taking over orphaned gmime and take out uudecode from one or
the other (or rename it to uudecode-sharutils). Do you really think
alternatives are useful here??


Best regards

  -- Dago

From phil at opencsw.org  Fri Jun 18 17:40:11 2010
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 08:40:11 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs sharutils
In-Reply-To: <8C7FC410-6C3D-48C0-9745-CEC53AD52A20@opencsw.org>
References: <201006171812.o5HICfnU000875@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTimH5DrnWoUqg4YmIkaqc6qevmhrwg8CMaaWShG2@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTikiJYMZLwkgnRmV5BSqnJBCBIGKoWaHDSIjtAZ1@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTil8SIR0Zsw8-o52FiV_HF0uKEUpZTeXhMu_msGP@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTim_F_DQkYo_Do0_DQkqXrIMbK495V_oXzv__tz4@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTilnNb6srjUrmfs7Qj-0FrW4wLIKgwdb4NX90Vl4@mail.gmail.com>
	<8C7FC410-6C3D-48C0-9745-CEC53AD52A20@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTingHKOG_hRlEo0-PqTRafLb1TtSUVCbJBD9R0Ac@mail.gmail.com>

> I suggest just taking over orphaned gmime and take out uudecode from one or
> the other (or rename it to uudecode-sharutils). Do you really think
> alternatives are useful here??
>
>

i agree. there's no reason for us to support two implementations of
uudecode. pick the "best" one, and lets move forward with it.

From phil at opencsw.org  Fri Jun 18 17:47:56 2010
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 08:47:56 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] /newpkgs (current) [lots of pkgs]
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikgo62VQr_dpnuTp99h6JZ0sXqg7U-TBY4qFDZ8@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTikgo62VQr_dpnuTp99h6JZ0sXqg7U-TBY4qFDZ8@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTilYNW5eOOI3oVIKnLyJfaHLEqbUEA47RJKfoQJX@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 7:02 AM, Peter Bonivart <bonivart at opencsw.org> wrote:
> All these are new packages built by Dago and me for project Koha:
>

Gaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa


            ....aaaaaaaaaaaaa.....



                     .....aaaaaaaaaa....


                                       aaa


                                           a



                                            .







> idzebra-2.0.43,REV=2010.06.15-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> idzebra-2.0.43,REV=2010.06.15-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> pm_algorithmchkdig-0.53,REV=2010.06.08-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
> pm_barcodecode128-2.01,REV=2010.06.09-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
> pm_biblioendnotest-0.05,REV=2010.06.08-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
> pm_cgisession-4.42,REV=2010.06.08-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
> pm_classadapter-1.07,REV=2010.06.10-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
> pm_classfactutil-1.7,REV=2010.06.08-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
> pm_dataical-0.16,REV=2010.06.16-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
> pm_dateical-1.72,REV=2010.06.09-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
> pm_dateleapyear-1.72,REV=2010.06.09-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
> pm_dublincorerecord-0.03,REV=2010.06.11-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
> pm_gdbarcode-1.15,REV=2010.06.08-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
> pm_htmltemplatepro-0.95,REV=2010.06.11-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> pm_htmltemplatepro-0.95,REV=2010.06.11-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> pm_json-2.21,REV=2010.06.11-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
> pm_linguaptstemmer-0.01,REV=2010.06.10-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
> pm_linguastem-0.84,REV=2010.06.11-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
> pm_linguastemfr-0.02,REV=2010.06.10-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
> pm_linguastemit-0.02,REV=2010.06.10-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
> pm_linguastemru-0.01,REV=2010.06.11-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
> pm_linguastemsnoda-1.01,REV=2010.06.11-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
> pm_marccharset-1.2,REV=2010.06.11-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
> pm_marccrosswalkdblc-0.02,REV=2010.06.11-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
> pm_marcrecord-2.0.2,REV=2010.06.09-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
> pm_marcxml-0.92,REV=2010.06.11-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
> pm_netz3950zoom-1.26,REV=2010.06.10-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> pm_netz3950zoom-1.26,REV=2010.06.10-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> pm_pdfreuse-0.35,REV=2010.06.09-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
> pm_pdfreusebarcode-0.06,REV=2010.06.09-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
> pm_scheduleat-1.10,REV=2010.06.10-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
> pm_smssend-0.05,REV=2010.06.10-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
> pm_snowballnorwegian-1.2,REV=2010.06.11-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
> pm_snowballswedish-1.2,REV=2010.06.11-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
> pm_testwarn-0.21,REV=2010.06.16-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
> pm_textgerman-0.06,REV=2010.06.11-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
> pm_texticonv-1.7,REV=2010.06.10-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> pm_texticonv-1.7,REV=2010.06.10-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> pm_textvfileasdata-0.05,REV=2010.06.16-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
> pm_treedagnode-1.06,REV=2010.06.16-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
> pm_xmldumper-0.81,REV=2010.06.10-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
> pm_xmllibxslt-1.70,REV=2010.06.08-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> pm_xmllibxslt-1.70,REV=2010.06.08-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> yaz-4.0.9,REV=2010.06.09-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> yaz-4.0.9,REV=2010.06.09-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> /peter
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From rupert at opencsw.org  Sat Jun 19 20:09:43 2010
From: rupert at opencsw.org (rupert THURNER)
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2010 20:09:43 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs apr-util
Message-ID: <AANLkTimMmbW_Z_JkkpsDEyd0YkfAiKQ-iOVh7NrUXltp@mail.gmail.com>

i copied apr-util-1.3.9,REV=2010.06.19* to bender.

as submitpkg failed with:

rupert at login:~
$ submitpkg /home/experimental/rupert/apr-util*
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/opt/csw/bin/submitpkg", line 61, in <module>
    main()
  File "/opt/csw/bin/submitpkg", line 49, in main
    pkg_path_a = pkg_dir_a.GetLatest(options.catalog_name)[-1]
  File "/opt/csw/lib/python/csw/opencsw.py", line 279, in GetLatest
    files = os.listdir(self.dir_path)
TypeError: coercing to Unicode: need string or buffer, NoneType

From rupert at opencsw.org  Sat Jun 19 20:10:49 2010
From: rupert at opencsw.org (rupert THURNER)
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2010 20:10:49 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs apr-util
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimMmbW_Z_JkkpsDEyd0YkfAiKQ-iOVh7NrUXltp@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTimMmbW_Z_JkkpsDEyd0YkfAiKQ-iOVh7NrUXltp@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTik5LCW6XHaIlWP5wU6fsKNe67PknoVMvGPFqM8D@mail.gmail.com>

could you please install apr-util on the buildfarm after it is released?

rupert.

On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 20:09, rupert THURNER <rupert at opencsw.org> wrote:
> i copied apr-util-1.3.9,REV=2010.06.19* to bender.
>
> as submitpkg failed with:
>
> rupert at login:~
> $ submitpkg /home/experimental/rupert/apr-util*
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> ?File "/opt/csw/bin/submitpkg", line 61, in <module>
> ? ?main()
> ?File "/opt/csw/bin/submitpkg", line 49, in main
> ? ?pkg_path_a = pkg_dir_a.GetLatest(options.catalog_name)[-1]
> ?File "/opt/csw/lib/python/csw/opencsw.py", line 279, in GetLatest
> ? ?files = os.listdir(self.dir_path)
> TypeError: coercing to Unicode: need string or buffer, NoneType
>

From dam at opencsw.org  Sat Jun 19 20:15:42 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2010 20:15:42 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs apr-util
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimMmbW_Z_JkkpsDEyd0YkfAiKQ-iOVh7NrUXltp@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTimMmbW_Z_JkkpsDEyd0YkfAiKQ-iOVh7NrUXltp@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <886396F0-3190-45CF-92B0-387C2DB21138@opencsw.org>

Hi Rupert,

Am 19.06.2010 um 20:09 schrieb rupert THURNER:

> i copied apr-util-1.3.9,REV=2010.06.19* to bender.
> 
> as submitpkg failed with:
> 
> rupert at login:~
> $ submitpkg /home/experimental/rupert/apr-util*
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>  File "/opt/csw/bin/submitpkg", line 61, in <module>
>    main()
>  File "/opt/csw/bin/submitpkg", line 49, in main
>    pkg_path_a = pkg_dir_a.GetLatest(options.catalog_name)[-1]
>  File "/opt/csw/lib/python/csw/opencsw.py", line 279, in GetLatest
>    files = os.listdir(self.dir_path)
> TypeError: coercing to Unicode: need string or buffer, NoneType

This is because /opt/csw/bin/submitpkg was a link to comparepkg. I adjusted
the link manually for now, please retry.


Best regards

  -- Dago



From bwalton at opencsw.org  Sat Jun 19 20:16:38 2010
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2010 14:16:38 -0400
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs apr-util
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimMmbW_Z_JkkpsDEyd0YkfAiKQ-iOVh7NrUXltp@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTimMmbW_Z_JkkpsDEyd0YkfAiKQ-iOVh7NrUXltp@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1276971335-sup-2635@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>

Excerpts from rupert THURNER's message of Sat Jun 19 14:09:43 -0400 2010:

Hi Rupert,

> i copied apr-util-1.3.9,REV=2010.06.19* to bender.

The name must be apr_util or it's not releaseable.  If you set the
catalog name properly you can then drop the checkpkg overrides you
added.

Thanks
-Ben
--
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302


From bwalton at opencsw.org  Sat Jun 19 20:21:50 2010
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2010 14:21:50 -0400
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs apr-util
In-Reply-To: <886396F0-3190-45CF-92B0-387C2DB21138@opencsw.org>
References: <AANLkTimMmbW_Z_JkkpsDEyd0YkfAiKQ-iOVh7NrUXltp@mail.gmail.com>
	<886396F0-3190-45CF-92B0-387C2DB21138@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <1276971669-sup-1643@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>

Excerpts from Dagobert Michelsen's message of Sat Jun 19 14:15:42 -0400 2010:

> This is because /opt/csw/bin/submitpkg was a link to comparepkg. I adjusted
> the link manually for now, please retry.

I'm currently working on Phil's X11 removal list, but I'll update
cswutils when I'm done.  Dago, you'll need to do this on 'login.'

Thanks
-Ben

--
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302


From rupert at opencsw.org  Sat Jun 19 20:26:41 2010
From: rupert at opencsw.org (rupert THURNER)
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2010 20:26:41 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs apr-util
In-Reply-To: <1276971335-sup-2635@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
References: <AANLkTimMmbW_Z_JkkpsDEyd0YkfAiKQ-iOVh7NrUXltp@mail.gmail.com> 
	<1276971335-sup-2635@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
Message-ID: <AANLkTindQKIVSfssa1RlkUMHxUsWZ7En-G-eXIjq5YVF@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 20:16, Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Excerpts from rupert THURNER's message of Sat Jun 19 14:09:43 -0400 2010:
>
> Hi Rupert,
>
>> i copied apr-util-1.3.9,REV=2010.06.19* to bender.
>
> The name must be apr_util or it's not releaseable. ?If you set the

is there any reason for this? the debian package is also called apr-util?

rupert.

From dam at opencsw.org  Sat Jun 19 20:28:25 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2010 20:28:25 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs apr-util
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTindQKIVSfssa1RlkUMHxUsWZ7En-G-eXIjq5YVF@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTimMmbW_Z_JkkpsDEyd0YkfAiKQ-iOVh7NrUXltp@mail.gmail.com>
	<1276971335-sup-2635@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTindQKIVSfssa1RlkUMHxUsWZ7En-G-eXIjq5YVF@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1D328963-37B3-4E9F-86AD-8E9161C5FE08@opencsw.org>

Hi Rupert,

Am 19.06.2010 um 20:26 schrieb rupert THURNER:
> On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 20:16, Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org> wrote:
>> Excerpts from rupert THURNER's message of Sat Jun 19 14:09:43 -0400 2010:
>> 
>> Hi Rupert,
>> 
>>> i copied apr-util-1.3.9,REV=2010.06.19* to bender.
>> 
>> The name must be apr_util or it's not releaseable.  If you set the
> 
> is there any reason for this? the debian package is also called apr-util?

Yes, look at a typical package filename:
  autoconf-2.65,REV=2009.11.22-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz 
The '-' is used as a separator in catalog names.


Best regards

  -- Dago

From dam at opencsw.org  Sat Jun 19 20:28:54 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2010 20:28:54 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs apr-util
In-Reply-To: <1276971669-sup-1643@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
References: <AANLkTimMmbW_Z_JkkpsDEyd0YkfAiKQ-iOVh7NrUXltp@mail.gmail.com>
	<886396F0-3190-45CF-92B0-387C2DB21138@opencsw.org>
	<1276971669-sup-1643@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
Message-ID: <CB0799B4-AB62-461D-A0D8-218EDEBDB4F2@opencsw.org>

Hi Ben,

Am 19.06.2010 um 20:21 schrieb Ben Walton:
> I'm currently working on Phil's X11 removal list, but I'll update
> cswutils when I'm done.  Dago, you'll need to do this on 'login.'

It *is* up to date, but the link is wrong even in the latest version.


Best regards

  -- Dago

From bwalton at opencsw.org  Sat Jun 19 20:28:59 2010
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2010 14:28:59 -0400
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs apr-util
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTindQKIVSfssa1RlkUMHxUsWZ7En-G-eXIjq5YVF@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTimMmbW_Z_JkkpsDEyd0YkfAiKQ-iOVh7NrUXltp@mail.gmail.com>
	<1276971335-sup-2635@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTindQKIVSfssa1RlkUMHxUsWZ7En-G-eXIjq5YVF@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1276972061-sup-214@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>

Excerpts from rupert THURNER's message of Sat Jun 19 14:26:41 -0400 2010:

> is there any reason for this? the debian package is also called
> apr-util?

It bungs up the parsing of filenames (hence the checkpkg errors you
got) and catalog stuff.  I'm not sure what the original reasoning was,
but it's definitely enshrined at this point.  The package name _can_
have dashes though.

HTH.
-Ben
--
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302


From bwalton at opencsw.org  Sat Jun 19 20:33:47 2010
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2010 14:33:47 -0400
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs apr-util
In-Reply-To: <CB0799B4-AB62-461D-A0D8-218EDEBDB4F2@opencsw.org>
References: <AANLkTimMmbW_Z_JkkpsDEyd0YkfAiKQ-iOVh7NrUXltp@mail.gmail.com>
	<886396F0-3190-45CF-92B0-387C2DB21138@opencsw.org>
	<1276971669-sup-1643@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<CB0799B4-AB62-461D-A0D8-218EDEBDB4F2@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <1276972305-sup-6674@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>

Excerpts from Dagobert Michelsen's message of Sat Jun 19 14:28:54 -0400 2010:

Hi Dago,

> It *is* up to date, but the link is wrong even in the latest
> version.

login.bo is running: 1.14.6,REV=2010.06.03

I pushed 2010.06.17 on the 17th.  Phil ack'd it, it's listed as such
in the package browser but the catalog isn't noting the update...?
Does something need a nudge somewhere?

Thanks
-Ben

--
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302


From dam at opencsw.org  Sat Jun 19 20:35:18 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2010 20:35:18 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs apr-util
In-Reply-To: <1276972305-sup-6674@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
References: <AANLkTimMmbW_Z_JkkpsDEyd0YkfAiKQ-iOVh7NrUXltp@mail.gmail.com>
	<886396F0-3190-45CF-92B0-387C2DB21138@opencsw.org>
	<1276971669-sup-1643@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<CB0799B4-AB62-461D-A0D8-218EDEBDB4F2@opencsw.org>
	<1276972305-sup-6674@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
Message-ID: <6E16FB4F-6A32-4771-BAAC-35526CC8469C@opencsw.org>

Hi Ben,

Am 19.06.2010 um 20:33 schrieb Ben Walton:
> Excerpts from Dagobert Michelsen's message of Sat Jun 19 14:28:54 -0400 2010:
> 
> Hi Dago,
> 
>> It *is* up to date, but the link is wrong even in the latest
>> version.
> 
> login.bo is running: 1.14.6,REV=2010.06.03
> 
> I pushed 2010.06.17 on the 17th.  Phil ack'd it, it's listed as such
> in the package browser but the catalog isn't noting the update...?
> Does something need a nudge somewhere?

Yes, Phil ;-)


Best regards

  -- Dago

From rupert at opencsw.org  Sat Jun 19 21:03:27 2010
From: rupert at opencsw.org (THURNER Rupert)
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2010 14:03:27 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs apr_util
Message-ID: <201006191903.o5JJ3RsT025217@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* apr_util: new package
  + apr_util-1.3.9,REV=2010.06.19-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + apr_util-1.3.9,REV=2010.06.19-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From dam at opencsw.org  Sat Jun 19 22:34:27 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2010 22:34:27 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libtool, libtool_rt
Message-ID: <201006192034.o5JKYRLP016231@login.bo.opencsw.org>

Base compiler level has been raised to Sun Studio 12.

* libtool: patchlevel upgrade
  - from: 2.2.6b,REV=2010.01.05
  -   to: 2.2.10,REV=2010.06.19
  + libtool-2.2.10,REV=2010.06.19-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libtool-2.2.10,REV=2010.06.19-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libtool_rt-2.2.10,REV=2010.06.19-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libtool_rt-2.2.10,REV=2010.06.19-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From dam at opencsw.org  Sat Jun 19 23:25:39 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2010 23:25:39 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs doxygen, doxygen_doc
Message-ID: <201006192125.o5JLPdVK022069@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* doxygen: minor version upgrade
  - from: 1.6.3,REV=2010.02.24
  -   to: 1.7.0,REV=2010.06.19
  + doxygen-1.7.0,REV=2010.06.19-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + doxygen-1.7.0,REV=2010.06.19-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + doxygen_doc-1.7.0,REV=2010.06.19-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From phil at bolthole.com  Sun Jun 20 00:45:49 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2010 15:45:49 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs doxygen, doxygen_doc
In-Reply-To: <201006192125.o5JLPdVK022069@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201006192125.o5JLPdVK022069@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTin-pd9BY_0ETovjscooXyy4nevLDuadqtWCHnZa@mail.gmail.com>

batched

On Saturday, June 19, 2010, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> * doxygen: minor version upgrade
>  ?- from: 1.6.3,REV=2010.02.24
>  ?- ? to: 1.7.0,REV=2010.06.19
>  ?+ doxygen-1.7.0,REV=2010.06.19-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>  ?+ doxygen-1.7.0,REV=2010.06.19-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>  ?+ doxygen_doc-1.7.0,REV=2010.06.19-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Sun Jun 20 00:47:14 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2010 15:47:14 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs apr_util
In-Reply-To: <201006191903.o5JJ3RsT025217@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201006191903.o5JJ3RsT025217@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTil88OU0LmuAQjyXrp6sCaLllSLFN_vJsKqNpDcB@mail.gmail.com>

no dependancy for libapr-1.so.0
and does not seem to be in package ??



On Saturday, June 19, 2010, THURNER Rupert <rupert at opencsw.org> wrote:
> * apr_util: new package
>  ?+ apr_util-1.3.9,REV=2010.06.19-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>  ?+ apr_util-1.3.9,REV=2010.06.19-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Sun Jun 20 00:51:54 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2010 15:51:54 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs libtool, libtool_rt
In-Reply-To: <201006192034.o5JKYRLP016231@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201006192034.o5JKYRLP016231@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTinwWC1QdsN0hyIcv7JGVXXcry5Qznqo_Ch2FQ2R@mail.gmail.com>

batched

On Saturday, June 19, 2010, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Base compiler level has been raised to Sun Studio 12.
>
> * libtool: patchlevel upgrade
>  ?- from: 2.2.6b,REV=2010.01.05
>  ?- ? to: 2.2.10,REV=2010.06.19
>  ?+ libtool-2.2.10,REV=2010.06.19-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>  ?+ libtool-2.2.10,REV=2010.06.19-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>  ?+ libtool_rt-2.2.10,REV=2010.06.19-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>  ?+ libtool_rt-2.2.10,REV=2010.06.19-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From rupert at opencsw.org  Sun Jun 20 01:21:58 2010
From: rupert at opencsw.org (rupert THURNER)
Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2010 01:21:58 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs apr_util
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTil88OU0LmuAQjyXrp6sCaLllSLFN_vJsKqNpDcB@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201006191903.o5JJ3RsT025217@login.bo.opencsw.org> 
	<AANLkTil88OU0LmuAQjyXrp6sCaLllSLFN_vJsKqNpDcB@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTin3azARQnUK2ppZFz6Q8l0fgXuRhpWLGyKBP58d@mail.gmail.com>

how did you see that? checkpkg complains without putting apr into the
runtime dependencies at least, therefor its there:

RUNTIME_DEP_PKGS = CSWapr CSWiconv CSWsqlite3rt CSWunixodbc CSWexpat

rupert.

On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 00:47, Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> wrote:
> no dependancy for libapr-1.so.0
> and does not seem to be in package ??
>
>
>
> On Saturday, June 19, 2010, THURNER Rupert <rupert at opencsw.org> wrote:
>> * apr_util: new package
>> ??+ apr_util-1.3.9,REV=2010.06.19-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>> ??+ apr_util-1.3.9,REV=2010.06.19-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>>
>> --
>> Generated by submitpkg
>> _______________________________________________
>> pkgsubmissions mailing list
>> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
>> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>>
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Sun Jun 20 02:01:14 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2010 17:01:14 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs apr_util
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTin3azARQnUK2ppZFz6Q8l0fgXuRhpWLGyKBP58d@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201006191903.o5JJ3RsT025217@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTil88OU0LmuAQjyXrp6sCaLllSLFN_vJsKqNpDcB@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTin3azARQnUK2ppZFz6Q8l0fgXuRhpWLGyKBP58d@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTinWeRRFLFCFEnu22Zd8sTwHlcnwejVOE5isUbTH@mail.gmail.com>

ah sorry, my end was out of date and did not recognize cswapr.
that looks good so am batching aprutuil now

On Saturday, June 19, 2010, rupert THURNER <rupert at opencsw.org> wrote:
> how did you see that? checkpkg complains without putting apr into the
> runtime dependencies at least, therefor its there:
>
> RUNTIME_DEP_PKGS = CSWapr CSWiconv CSWsqlite3rt CSWunixodbc CSWexpat
>
> rupert.
>
> On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 00:47, Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> wrote:
>> no dependancy for libapr-1.so.0
>> and does not seem to be in package ??
>>
>>
>>
>> On Saturday, June 19, 2010, THURNER Rupert <rupert at opencsw.org> wrote:
>>> * apr_util: new package
>>> ??+ apr_util-1.3.9,REV=2010.06.19-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>>> ??+ apr_util-1.3.9,REV=2010.06.19-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>>>
>>> --
>>> Generated by submitpkg
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> pkgsubmissions mailing list
>>> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
>>> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> pkgsubmissions mailing list
>> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
>> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>>
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions

From bonivart at opencsw.org  Sun Jun 20 21:38:39 2010
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2010 21:38:39 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] Problem with CSWpmlistmoreut and
	CSWpmlistmoreutils
In-Reply-To: <8A13B3E4-471D-4DA0-A9D7-3B8B57F160CF@opencsw.org>
References: <8A13B3E4-471D-4DA0-A9D7-3B8B57F160CF@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTimsQ2Cd6BAAJ3D2sTbKjT0nMhCAqkrzpVfxuIYN@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 2:00 PM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> looks like there was a glitch in the package refreshment of Perl:
> the existing package CSWpmlistmoreut should have been replace by
> a new package, but the contents was released as CSWpmlistmoreutils.
>
> I suggest making the old one a stub depending in the new one. There
> are no dependencies anyway.

I guess it's getting worse the longer we don't address this issue, we
can't know which package people use.

We have the same issue with CSWpmparamsvalidate and CSWpmprmsvldt,
however both of those have dependencies which need to be sorted.

-- 
/peter

From bwalton at opencsw.org  Mon Jun 21 03:34:06 2010
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 03:34:06 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs git_svn
Message-ID: <201006210134.o5L1Y6wA016277@login.bo.opencsw.org>

Hi Phil,

For some reason this wasn't released with the 1.7.1 update of the
other git packages...it was left out of my submission list.

* git_svn: patchlevel upgrade
  - from: 1.7.0,REV=2010.02.15
  -   to: 1.7.1,REV=2010.04.24
  + git_svn-1.7.1,REV=2010.04.24-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

Thanks
-Ben
-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From bwalton at opencsw.org  Mon Jun 21 03:40:38 2010
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 03:40:38 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs coreutils
Message-ID: <201006210140.o5L1echL019397@login.bo.opencsw.org>

Hi Phil,

This drops the CSWgfile I-dep.  (Nothing to do with the locales
issue we're discussing...)

* coreutils: revision upgrade
  - from: 2010.05.20
  -   to: 2010.06.21
  + coreutils-8.4,REV=2010.06.21-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + coreutils-8.4,REV=2010.06.21-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

Thanks
-Ben
-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From dam at opencsw.org  Mon Jun 21 15:29:05 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 15:29:05 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] Problem with CSWpmlistmoreut and
	CSWpmlistmoreutils
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimsQ2Cd6BAAJ3D2sTbKjT0nMhCAqkrzpVfxuIYN@mail.gmail.com>
References: <8A13B3E4-471D-4DA0-A9D7-3B8B57F160CF@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTimsQ2Cd6BAAJ3D2sTbKjT0nMhCAqkrzpVfxuIYN@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <93FB6867-6A4D-4FB6-8C05-0B83CC454F04@opencsw.org>

Hi Peter,

Am 20.06.2010 um 21:38 schrieb Peter Bonivart:
> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 2:00 PM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org>  
> wrote:
>> looks like there was a glitch in the package refreshment of Perl:
>> the existing package CSWpmlistmoreut should have been replace by
>> a new package, but the contents was released as CSWpmlistmoreutils.
>>
>> I suggest making the old one a stub depending in the new one. There
>> are no dependencies anyway.
>
> I guess it's getting worse the longer we don't address this issue, we
> can't know which package people use.
>
> We have the same issue with CSWpmparamsvalidate and CSWpmprmsvldt,
> however both of those have dependencies which need to be sorted.

Ok then, I suggest the following actions:
- Make CSWpmlistmoreutils incompatible with CSWpmlistmoreut as both
   have no packages depending on it. The package is maintained by
   Benny, I don't know if he has idle by now. I can do a
   courtesy rebuild if necessary. Then CSWpmlistmoreut should be removed
   from the catalog.
- Make CSWpmprmsvldt an empty stub depending on CSWpmparamsvalidate
- File bugs against packages depending on CSWpmprmsvldt to depend
   on CSWpmparamsvalidate instead
- After resolving all these remove CSWpmprmsvldt from the catalog
   and make it incompatible to CSWpmparamsvalidate

Comments?


Best regards

   -- Dago

From bonivart at opencsw.org  Mon Jun 21 16:33:25 2010
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 16:33:25 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] Problem with CSWpmlistmoreut and
	CSWpmlistmoreutils
In-Reply-To: <93FB6867-6A4D-4FB6-8C05-0B83CC454F04@opencsw.org>
References: <8A13B3E4-471D-4DA0-A9D7-3B8B57F160CF@opencsw.org> 
	<AANLkTimsQ2Cd6BAAJ3D2sTbKjT0nMhCAqkrzpVfxuIYN@mail.gmail.com> 
	<93FB6867-6A4D-4FB6-8C05-0B83CC454F04@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTimaV75JRpuw4gSZkh7BHKV8IdgdpHM3CwFQ-pwe@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Ok then, I suggest the following actions:
> - Make CSWpmlistmoreutils incompatible with CSWpmlistmoreut as both
> ?have no packages depending on it. The package is maintained by
> ?Benny, I don't know if he has idle by now. I can do a
> ?courtesy rebuild if necessary. Then CSWpmlistmoreut should be removed
> ?from the catalog.
> - Make CSWpmprmsvldt an empty stub depending on CSWpmparamsvalidate
> - File bugs against packages depending on CSWpmprmsvldt to depend
> ?on CSWpmparamsvalidate instead
> - After resolving all these remove CSWpmprmsvldt from the catalog
> ?and make it incompatible to CSWpmparamsvalidate

I agree, that would get us over to the better names with little or no
consequences.

I can also help with rebuilds if needed.

-- 
/peter

From phil at bolthole.com  Mon Jun 21 18:49:42 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 09:49:42 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] Problem with CSWpmlistmoreut and
	CSWpmlistmoreutils
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimaV75JRpuw4gSZkh7BHKV8IdgdpHM3CwFQ-pwe@mail.gmail.com>
References: <8A13B3E4-471D-4DA0-A9D7-3B8B57F160CF@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTimsQ2Cd6BAAJ3D2sTbKjT0nMhCAqkrzpVfxuIYN@mail.gmail.com>
	<93FB6867-6A4D-4FB6-8C05-0B83CC454F04@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTimaV75JRpuw4gSZkh7BHKV8IdgdpHM3CwFQ-pwe@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTilJk6PrcPIOMjxRKUc0HPUP_O_pAHgZVGGQASiq@mail.gmail.com>

side comment: now that we have file conflict checking, this sort of
thing should not happen again.

From bonivart at opencsw.org  Mon Jun 21 18:55:32 2010
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 18:55:32 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] /newpkgs (current) bind, cswclassutils
Message-ID: <AANLkTikz8wJaIAsc71W1P3ffA_0dtSwJHk3QVfIt7tRg@mail.gmail.com>

bind-9.7.1,REV=2010.06.21-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
bind-9.7.1,REV=2010.06.21-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
bind_chroot-9.7.1,REV=2010.06.21-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
bind_devel-9.7.1,REV=2010.06.21-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
bind_utils-9.7.1,REV=2010.06.21-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
bind_utils-9.7.1,REV=2010.06.21-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
cswclassutils-1.38,REV=2010.06.15-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
libbind-9.7.1,REV=2010.06.21-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
libbind-9.7.1,REV=2010.06.21-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
/peter

From phil at opencsw.org  Mon Jun 21 19:37:49 2010
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 10:37:49 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs git_svn
In-Reply-To: <201006210134.o5L1Y6wA016277@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201006210134.o5L1Y6wA016277@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTimdKEuu-Ku-PNa1gCT2Q63bIwAEZ-tCsMDNWr-s@mail.gmail.com>

ok, batched


On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 6:34 PM, Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>
> For some reason this wasn't released with the 1.7.1 update of the
> other git packages...it was left out of my submission list.
>
> * git_svn: patchlevel upgrade
> ?- from: 1.7.0,REV=2010.02.15
> ?- ? to: 1.7.1,REV=2010.04.24
> ?+ git_svn-1.7.1,REV=2010.04.24-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

From phil at opencsw.org  Mon Jun 21 19:38:19 2010
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 10:38:19 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs coreutils
In-Reply-To: <201006210140.o5L1echL019397@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201006210140.o5L1echL019397@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTilyUmPt8JXqTA12uYV-GWt8QuFKL7Gr3_aoZREc@mail.gmail.com>

batched


On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>
> This drops the CSWgfile I-dep. ?(Nothing to do with the locales
> issue we're discussing...)
>
> * coreutils: revision upgrade
> ?- from: 2010.05.20
> ?- ? to: 2010.06.21
> ?+ coreutils-8.4,REV=2010.06.21-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ coreutils-8.4,REV=2010.06.21-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> Thanks
> -Ben
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at opencsw.org  Mon Jun 21 20:21:55 2010
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 11:21:55 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] /newpkgs (current) bind, cswclassutils
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikz8wJaIAsc71W1P3ffA_0dtSwJHk3QVfIt7tRg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTikz8wJaIAsc71W1P3ffA_0dtSwJHk3QVfIt7tRg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTimA_jqUWP6Z3o0DRPnICQm89px0KODF-6hd1wL7@mail.gmail.com>

batched


On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Peter Bonivart <bonivart at opencsw.org> wrote:
> bind-9.7.1,REV=2010.06.21-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> bind-9.7.1,REV=2010.06.21-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> bind_chroot-9.7.1,REV=2010.06.21-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
> bind_devel-9.7.1,REV=2010.06.21-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
> bind_utils-9.7.1,REV=2010.06.21-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> bind_utils-9.7.1,REV=2010.06.21-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> cswclassutils-1.38,REV=2010.06.15-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
> libbind-9.7.1,REV=2010.06.21-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> libbind-9.7.1,REV=2010.06.21-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>

From maciej at opencsw.org  Tue Jun 22 21:00:22 2010
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej Blizinski)
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 21:00:22 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs startup_notif
Message-ID: <201006221900.o5MJ0MmC000180@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* startup_notif: minor version up^H^Hdowngrade
  - from: 0.10,REV=2010.03.09
  -   to: 0.9,REV=2010.06.22
  + startup_notif-0.9,REV=2010.06.22-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + startup_notif-0.9,REV=2010.06.22-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From phil at opencsw.org  Tue Jun 22 21:59:00 2010
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 12:59:00 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs startup_notif
In-Reply-To: <201006221900.o5MJ0MmC000180@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201006221900.o5MJ0MmC000180@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTimLxbUoiCs-aeVAvE9BRbiOL13hDpl_Tys2XjyS@mail.gmail.com>

grabbed already. ha

:-)



On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Maciej Blizinski <maciej at opencsw.org> wrote:
> * startup_notif: minor version up^H^Hdowngrade
> ?- from: 0.10,REV=2010.03.09
> ?- ? to: 0.9,REV=2010.06.22
> ?+ startup_notif-0.9,REV=2010.06.22-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ startup_notif-0.9,REV=2010.06.22-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --

From dam at opencsw.org  Wed Jun 23 14:18:10 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 14:18:10 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_clscontainer, pm_listmoreutils,
	pm(...)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimaV75JRpuw4gSZkh7BHKV8IdgdpHM3CwFQ-pwe@mail.gmail.com>
References: <8A13B3E4-471D-4DA0-A9D7-3B8B57F160CF@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTimsQ2Cd6BAAJ3D2sTbKjT0nMhCAqkrzpVfxuIYN@mail.gmail.com>
	<93FB6867-6A4D-4FB6-8C05-0B83CC454F04@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTimaV75JRpuw4gSZkh7BHKV8IdgdpHM3CwFQ-pwe@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <0DB8943A-C1CB-40DF-8F20-FC9380C3FABD@opencsw.org>

Hi,

Am 21.06.2010 um 16:33 schrieb Peter Bonivart:
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Dagobert Michelsen  
> <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
>> Ok then, I suggest the following actions:
>> - Make CSWpmlistmoreutils incompatible with CSWpmlistmoreut as both
>>  have no packages depending on it. The package is maintained by
>>  Benny, I don't know if he has idle by now. I can do a
>>  courtesy rebuild if necessary. Then CSWpmlistmoreut should be  
>> removed
>>  from the catalog.
>> - Make CSWpmprmsvldt an empty stub depending on CSWpmparamsvalidate
>> - File bugs against packages depending on CSWpmprmsvldt to depend
>>  on CSWpmparamsvalidate instead
>> - After resolving all these remove CSWpmprmsvldt from the catalog
>>  and make it incompatible to CSWpmparamsvalidate
>
> I agree, that would get us over to the better names with little or no
> consequences.
>
> I can also help with rebuilds if needed.

Ok, here is the batch:

* pm_prmsvldt: minor version upgrade
   - from: 0.91,REV=2008.11.19
   -   to: 0.95,REV=2010.06.23
   + pm_prmsvldt-0.95,REV=2010.06.23-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

* pm_logdispatch: revision upgrade
   - from: 2009.10.27
   -   to: 2010.06.23
   + pm_logdispatch-2.26,REV=2010.06.23-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

* pm_listmoreutils: revision upgrade
   - from: 2010.02.01
   -   to: 2010.06.23
   + pm_listmoreutils-0.22,REV=2010.06.23-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
   + pm_listmoreutils-0.22,REV=2010.06.23-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

* pm_clscontainer: revision upgrade
   - from: 2009.08.06
   -   to: 2010.06.23
   + pm_clscontainer-0.12,REV=2010.06.23-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

* pm_paramsvalidate: minor version upgrade
   - from: 0.94,REV=2010.03.29
   -   to: 0.95,REV=2010.06.23
   + pm_paramsvalidate-0.95,REV=2010.06.23-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
   + pm_paramsvalidate-0.95,REV=2010.06.23-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

Phil: Please remove CSWpmlistmoreut from the catalog.

I have filed a bug against the only remaining package depending on  
CSWpmprmsvldt,
which is CSWpmhtmlmason:
   http://www.opencsw.org/mantis/view.php?id=4476

Peter: Would you mind repackaging it so I can remove CSWpmprmsvldt and  
make it "I"?


Best regards

   -- Dago


From ai at vsu.ru  Thu Jun 17 14:45:26 2010
From: ai at vsu.ru (Andy Igoshin)
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 16:45:26 +0400
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs: nginx 0.7.67
Message-ID: <201006171645.27007.ai@vsu.ru>

Hi!

nginx-0.7.67,REV=2010.06.16-SunOS5.10-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
nginx-0.7.67,REV=2010.06.16-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
nginx-0.7.67,REV=2010.06.16-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
nginx-0.7.67,REV=2010.06.16-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz


-- 
Andy Igoshin <ai at vsu.ru>                 Voronezh State University
Phone: +7 (4732) 522406                  Network Operation Center
Fax:   +7 (4732) 208820                  Voronezh, Russia

From ai at opencsw.org  Thu Jun 17 14:48:52 2010
From: ai at opencsw.org (ai at opencsw.org)
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 14:48:52 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] (no subject)
Message-ID: <201006171248.o5HCmqfL021774@login.bo.opencsw.org>

nginx-0.7.67,REV=2010.06.16-SunOS5.10-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
nginx-0.7.67,REV=2010.06.16-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
nginx-0.7.67,REV=2010.06.16-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
nginx-0.7.67,REV=2010.06.16-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz


From nicols at opencsw.org  Tue Jun 22 16:04:11 2010
From: nicols at opencsw.org (Andrew Nicols)
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 16:04:11 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_classstd
Message-ID: <201006221404.o5ME4Bhi020226@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* pm_classstd: new package
  + pm_classstd-0.011,REV=2010.06.22-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From nicols at opencsw.org  Wed Jun 23 18:03:56 2010
From: nicols at opencsw.org (Andrew Nicols)
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 18:03:56 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs liblockfile, pm_perl6export,
	pm_perl6(...)
Message-ID: <201006231603.o5NG3uCt005492@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* pm_smartcomments: new package
  + pm_smartcomments-1.0.4,REV=2010.06.23-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

* pm_readonly: new package
  + pm_readonly-1.03,REV=2010.06.23-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

* pm_perl6export: new package
  + pm_perl6export-0.07,REV=2010.06.23-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

* pm_perl6exportattr: new package
  + pm_perl6exportattr-0.0.3,REV=2010.06.23-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

* liblockfile: new package
  + liblockfile-1.08,REV=2010.06.23-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + liblockfile-1.08,REV=2010.06.23-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From dam at opencsw.org  Thu Jun 24 10:40:55 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 10:40:55 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs fltk, freetds
Message-ID: <201006240840.o5O8etvt009091@login.bo.opencsw.org>

Friendly takeover from Jake.

* fltk: patchlevel upgrade
  - from: 1.1.7,REV=2006.06.26
  -   to: 1.1.10,REV=2010.06.19
  + fltk-1.1.10,REV=2010.06.19-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + fltk-1.1.10,REV=2010.06.19-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

Update and takeover from Alex Moore for Rupert Thurner.

* freetds: minor version upgrade
  - from: 0.64.0,REV=2006.07.02
  -   to: 0.82,REV=2010.06.20
  + freetds-0.82,REV=2010.06.20-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + freetds-0.82,REV=2010.06.20-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From dam at opencsw.org  Thu Jun 24 11:20:11 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 11:20:11 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs cdrtools, pxupgrade, sccs,
	schilybase(...)
Message-ID: <201006240920.o5O9KBH0028782@login.bo.opencsw.org>

> Hallo,
> 
> neu kompilierte Pakete sind in /home/testing
> 
> J??rg

Hi Phil,

on behalf of Joerg updated packages :-)

Best regards

  -- Dago

* various packages: revision upgrade
  - from: 2009.05.15
  -   to: 2010.06.24
  + pxupgrade-1.47,REV=2010.06.24-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + pxupgrade-1.47,REV=2010.06.24-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + sccs-1.00.04,REV=2010.06.24-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + sccs-1.00.04,REV=2010.06.24-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + schilybase-1.01,REV=2010.06.24-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + schilybase-1.01,REV=2010.06.24-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + schilyutils-1.02,REV=2010.06.24-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + schilyutils-1.02,REV=2010.06.24-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + star-1.5.1,REV=2010.06.24-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + star-1.5.1,REV=2010.06.24-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + ved-1.7a07,REV=2010.06.24-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + ved-1.7a07,REV=2010.06.24-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

* cdrtools: major version upgrade
  - from: 2.01.01a59,REV=2009.05.15
  -   to: 3.00,REV=2010.06.24
  + cdrtools-3.00,REV=2010.06.24-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + cdrtools-3.00,REV=2010.06.24-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

* smake: minor version upgrade
  - from: 1.2a43,REV=2009.05.15
  -   to: 1.2.1,REV=2010.06.24
  + smake-1.2.1,REV=2010.06.24-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + smake-1.2.1,REV=2010.06.24-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From ihsan at opencsw.org  Thu Jun 24 14:25:28 2010
From: ihsan at opencsw.org (Ihsan Dogan)
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 14:25:28 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs ldns, ldns_devel
Message-ID: <201006241225.o5OCPSRe008601@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* ldns: patchlevel upgrade
  - from: 1.6.4,REV=2010.03.18
  -   to: 1.6.5,REV=2010.06.24
  + ldns-1.6.5,REV=2010.06.24-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + ldns-1.6.5,REV=2010.06.24-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + ldns_devel-1.6.5,REV=2010.06.24-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + ldns_devel-1.6.5,REV=2010.06.24-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From bonivart at opencsw.org  Thu Jun 24 14:28:31 2010
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 14:28:31 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] /newpkgs (current) pm_htmlmason, pm_logany,
	pm_testdeep
Message-ID: <AANLkTilM6_S6x-tukzokmmIYR1InnsVqjXXRFk2vEcFI@mail.gmail.com>

Updated with dependency to pm_paramsvalidate instead of pm_prmsvldt (bug #4476):

pm_htmlmason-1.45,REV=2010.06.24-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

New packages needed for HTML-Mason to pass tests:

pm_logany-0.11,REV=2010.06.24-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
pm_testdeep-0.106,REV=2010.06.24-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
/peter

From nicols at opencsw.org  Thu Jun 24 18:11:44 2010
From: nicols at opencsw.org (Andrew Nicols)
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 18:11:44 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_perl6slurp
Message-ID: <201006241611.o5OGBiRT010825@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* pm_perl6slurp: new package
  + pm_perl6slurp-0.03,REV=2010.06.24-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From phil at bolthole.com  Fri Jun 25 02:18:52 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 17:18:52 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] /newpkgs (current) pm_htmlmason, pm_logany,
	pm_testdeep
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTilM6_S6x-tukzokmmIYR1InnsVqjXXRFk2vEcFI@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTilM6_S6x-tukzokmmIYR1InnsVqjXXRFk2vEcFI@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTilmIBo-a0IUp-21IsghY9Nk8V9RRCNCb9RnDEpb@mail.gmail.com>

batched

On Thursday, June 24, 2010, Peter Bonivart <bonivart at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Updated with dependency to pm_paramsvalidate instead of pm_prmsvldt (bug #4476):
>
> pm_htmlmason-1.45,REV=2010.06.24-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> New packages needed for HTML-Mason to pass tests:
>
> pm_logany-0.11,REV=2010.06.24-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
> pm_testdeep-0.106,REV=2010.06.24-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> /peter
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Fri Jun 25 02:19:53 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 17:19:53 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs ldns, ldns_devel
In-Reply-To: <201006241225.o5OCPSRe008601@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201006241225.o5OCPSRe008601@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTilI2AqRgAJFdu2eks_oIqPmQyA7Gi2EA6Hn39ct@mail.gmail.com>

batched

On Thursday, June 24, 2010, Ihsan Dogan <ihsan at opencsw.org> wrote:
> * ldns: patchlevel upgrade
>  ?- from: 1.6.4,REV=2010.03.18
>  ?- ? to: 1.6.5,REV=2010.06.24
>  ?+ ldns-1.6.5,REV=2010.06.24-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>  ?+ ldns-1.6.5,REV=2010.06.24-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>  ?+ ldns_devel-1.6.5,REV=2010.06.24-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>  ?+ ldns_devel-1.6.5,REV=2010.06.24-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Fri Jun 25 02:19:39 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 17:19:39 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs fltk, freetds
In-Reply-To: <201006240840.o5O8etvt009091@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201006240840.o5O8etvt009091@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTinzQTt1QKBB7REuUbvEKdGUK_jHQmXOkrMSfZ6K@mail.gmail.com>

fltk batched. freetds not. conflicts with doc package

On Thursday, June 24, 2010, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Friendly takeover from Jake.
>
> * fltk: patchlevel upgrade
>  ?- from: 1.1.7,REV=2006.06.26
>  ?- ? to: 1.1.10,REV=2010.06.19
>  ?+ fltk-1.1.10,REV=2010.06.19-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>  ?+ fltk-1.1.10,REV=2010.06.19-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> Update and takeover from Alex Moore for Rupert Thurner.
>
> * freetds: minor version upgrade
>  ?- from: 0.64.0,REV=2006.07.02
>  ?- ? to: 0.82,REV=2010.06.20
>  ?+ freetds-0.82,REV=2010.06.20-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>  ?+ freetds-0.82,REV=2010.06.20-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Fri Jun 25 02:25:06 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 17:25:06 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs: nginx 0.7.67
In-Reply-To: <201006171645.27007.ai@vsu.ru>
References: <201006171645.27007.ai@vsu.ru>
Message-ID: <AANLkTil0hT5JoB_4l8HfAMsgzrq-zrDMYqkGX7K5sPFQ@mail.gmail.com>

thanks! er...
unfortunately though, I'm going to hold this demon package until the
init script discussion is resolved.
Thw good news is, you may have to do nothing

On Thursday, June 17, 2010, Andy Igoshin <ai at vsu.ru> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> nginx-0.7.67,REV=2010.06.16-SunOS5.10-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> nginx-0.7.67,REV=2010.06.16-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> nginx-0.7.67,REV=2010.06.16-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> nginx-0.7.67,REV=2010.06.16-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>
>
> --
> Andy Igoshin <ai at vsu.ru> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Voronezh State University
> Phone: +7 (4732) 522406 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Network Operation Center
> Fax: ? +7 (4732) 208820 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Voronezh, Russia
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Fri Jun 25 02:27:44 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 17:27:44 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs liblockfile)
Message-ID: <AANLkTimQHHoBuDFa-FsJ-wCxcsWwtSnoCuVwc9azcsVF@mail.gmail.com>

first comment; please dnt submit so many packages at once, especially
as a new maintainer. it's likely there may be issues. which there are
:-}

first, liblockfile: where's the "lib"?
(you probably compiled in static mode)


On Wednesday, June 23, 2010, Andrew Nicols <nicols at opencsw.org> wrote:
> * pm_smartcomments: new package
>  ?+ pm_smartcomments-1.0.4,REV=2010.06.23-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> * pm_readonly: new package
>  ?+ pm_readonly-1.03,REV=2010.06.23-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> * pm_perl6export: new package
>  ?+ pm_perl6export-0.07,REV=2010.06.23-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> * pm_perl6exportattr: new package
>  ?+ pm_perl6exportattr-0.0.3,REV=2010.06.23-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> * liblockfile: new package
>  ?+ liblockfile-1.08,REV=2010.06.23-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>  ?+ liblockfile-1.08,REV=2010.06.23-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Fri Jun 25 02:28:57 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 17:28:57 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_perl6export, pm_perl6(...)
Message-ID: <AANLkTilaKI0A4GxT4Dc-WobXYEDz-DyYydP8Br5SK9KH@mail.gmail.com>

second comment: what's with all the "perl6" stuff?

particularly since we don't have perl 6?

On Wednesday, June 23, 2010, Andrew Nicols <nicols at opencsw.org> wrote:
> * pm_smartcomments: new package
>  ?+ pm_smartcomments-1.0.4,REV=2010.06.23-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> * pm_readonly: new package
>  ?+ pm_readonly-1.03,REV=2010.06.23-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> * pm_perl6export: new package
>  ?+ pm_perl6export-0.07,REV=2010.06.23-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> * pm_perl6exportattr: new package
>  ?+ pm_perl6exportattr-0.0.3,REV=2010.06.23-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> * liblockfile: new package
>  ?+ liblockfile-1.08,REV=2010.06.23-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>  ?+ liblockfile-1.08,REV=2010.06.23-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Fri Jun 25 02:25:06 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 17:25:06 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs: nginx 0.7.67
In-Reply-To: <201006171645.27007.ai@vsu.ru>
References: <201006171645.27007.ai@vsu.ru>
Message-ID: <AANLkTil0hT5JoB_4l8HfAMsgzrq-zrDMYqkGX7K5sPFQ@mail.gmail.com>

thanks! er...
unfortunately though, I'm going to hold this demon package until the
init script discussion is resolved.
Thw good news is, you may have to do nothing

On Thursday, June 17, 2010, Andy Igoshin <ai at vsu.ru> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> nginx-0.7.67,REV=2010.06.16-SunOS5.10-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> nginx-0.7.67,REV=2010.06.16-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> nginx-0.7.67,REV=2010.06.16-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> nginx-0.7.67,REV=2010.06.16-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>
>
> --
> Andy Igoshin <ai at vsu.ru> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Voronezh State University
> Phone: +7 (4732) 522406 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Network Operation Center
> Fax: ? +7 (4732) 208820 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Voronezh, Russia
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Fri Jun 25 02:32:25 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 17:32:25 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs cdrtools, pxupgrade, sccs,
	schilybase(...)
In-Reply-To: <201006240920.o5O9KBH0028782@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201006240920.o5O9KBH0028782@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTikZAjkPJNgYAlDWHEzmJo0tBNzddx032F4j0zoF@mail.gmail.com>

On Thursday, June 24, 2010, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
>> Hallo,
>>
>> neu kompilierte Pakete sind in /home/testing
>>
>> J?rg
>
> Hi Phil,
>
> on behalf of Joerg updated packages :-)
>


sadly he only saw fit to correct one out of the three error types in
his packages. maybe he should focus on getting clean schilybase and
schilyutils packages before redoing te others.

reminder:

1. use of /opt/csw/man
2. not relocatable packages, made as relocatable packages

From dam at opencsw.org  Fri Jun 25 09:52:27 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 09:52:27 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs: nginx 0.7.67
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTil0hT5JoB_4l8HfAMsgzrq-zrDMYqkGX7K5sPFQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201006171645.27007.ai@vsu.ru>
	<AANLkTil0hT5JoB_4l8HfAMsgzrq-zrDMYqkGX7K5sPFQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <D1C5428B-2E64-4B03-BCF2-786802A68AC2@opencsw.org>

Hi Phil,

Am 25.06.2010 um 02:25 schrieb Philip Brown:
> thanks! er...
> unfortunately though, I'm going to hold this demon package until the
> init script discussion is resolved.
> Thw good news is, you may have to do nothing

Is this really necessary? It is not worse than what we have.

Best regards

   -- Dago

>
> On Thursday, June 17, 2010, Andy Igoshin <ai at vsu.ru> wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> nginx-0.7.67,REV=2010.06.16-SunOS5.10-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>> nginx-0.7.67,REV=2010.06.16-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>> nginx-0.7.67,REV=2010.06.16-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>> nginx-0.7.67,REV=2010.06.16-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>>
>>
>> --
>> Andy Igoshin <ai at vsu.ru>                 Voronezh State University
>> Phone: +7 (4732) 522406                  Network Operation Center
>> Fax:   +7 (4732) 208820                  Voronezh, Russia
>> _______________________________________________
>> pkgsubmissions mailing list
>> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
>> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>>
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions


From dam at opencsw.org  Fri Jun 25 09:54:11 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 09:54:11 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_perl6export, pm_perl6(...)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTilaKI0A4GxT4Dc-WobXYEDz-DyYydP8Br5SK9KH@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTilaKI0A4GxT4Dc-WobXYEDz-DyYydP8Br5SK9KH@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <7B4F79FF-66D0-4A76-B876-458AD22C878F@opencsw.org>

Hi Phil,

Am 25.06.2010 um 02:28 schrieb Philip Brown:
> second comment: what's with all the "perl6" stuff?
> particularly since we don't have perl 6?

These are backports of features from Perl 6 into Perl 5, so this  
actually
makes Perl 5 even more useful and the advantages to have Perl 6 even  
less
mandatory.


Best regards

   -- Dago

>
> On Wednesday, June 23, 2010, Andrew Nicols <nicols at opencsw.org> wrote:
>> * pm_smartcomments: new package
>>  + pm_smartcomments-1.0.4,REV=2010.06.23-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>>
>> * pm_readonly: new package
>>  + pm_readonly-1.03,REV=2010.06.23-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>>
>> * pm_perl6export: new package
>>  + pm_perl6export-0.07,REV=2010.06.23-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>>
>> * pm_perl6exportattr: new package
>>  + pm_perl6exportattr-0.0.3,REV=2010.06.23-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>>
>> * liblockfile: new package
>>  + liblockfile-1.08,REV=2010.06.23-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>>  + liblockfile-1.08,REV=2010.06.23-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>>
>> --
>> Generated by submitpkg
>> _______________________________________________
>> pkgsubmissions mailing list
>> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
>> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>>
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions


From dam at opencsw.org  Fri Jun 25 09:56:27 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 09:56:27 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs freetds, freetds_doc
Message-ID: <201006250756.o5P7uRio021138@login.bo.opencsw.org>

Hi Phil,

the existence of _doc slipped through, thanks for catching! Please release
both updated packages to keep them in sync for REV.

Best regards

  -- Dago


* freetds_doc: minor version upgrade
  - from: 0.64.0,REV=2006.07.30
  -   to: 0.82,REV=2010.06.25
  + freetds_doc-0.82,REV=2010.06.25-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

* freetds: minor version upgrade
  - from: 0.64.0,REV=2006.07.02
  -   to: 0.82,REV=2010.06.25
  + freetds-0.82,REV=2010.06.25-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + freetds-0.82,REV=2010.06.25-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From ihsan at opencsw.org  Fri Jun 25 10:56:34 2010
From: ihsan at opencsw.org (Ihsan Dogan)
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 10:56:34 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs drill
Message-ID: <201006250856.o5P8uYsZ020027@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* drill: patchlevel upgrade
  - from: 1.6.1,REV=2009.08.22
  -   to: 1.6.5,REV=2010.06.25
  + drill-1.6.5,REV=2010.06.25-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + drill-1.6.5,REV=2010.06.25-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From dam at opencsw.org  Fri Jun 25 17:01:45 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 17:01:45 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs sar2rrd
Message-ID: <201006251501.o5PF1j2P013135@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* sar2rrd: minor version upgrade
  - from: 2.4,REV=2009.11.24
  -   to: 2.5,REV=2010.06.25
  + sar2rrd-2.5,REV=2010.06.25-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From nicols at opencsw.org  Fri Jun 25 17:51:27 2010
From: nicols at opencsw.org (Andrew Nicols)
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 17:51:27 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs liblockfile
Message-ID: <201006251551.o5PFpRAt029462@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* liblockfile: new package
  + liblockfile-1.08,REV=2010.06.25-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + liblockfile-1.08,REV=2010.06.25-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From andrew.nicols at luns.net.uk  Fri Jun 25 17:53:09 2010
From: andrew.nicols at luns.net.uk (Andrew Robert Nicols)
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 16:53:09 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs liblockfile)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimQHHoBuDFa-FsJ-wCxcsWwtSnoCuVwc9azcsVF@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTimQHHoBuDFa-FsJ-wCxcsWwtSnoCuVwc9azcsVF@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20100625155309.GE26673@banoffee.lancs.ac.uk>

On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 05:27:44PM -0700, Philip Brown wrote:
> first comment; please dnt submit so many packages at once, especially
> as a new maintainer. it's likely there may be issues. which there are
> :-}
I'll hold off submitting any more then until you're happy with the ones
I've done thus far.

> first, liblockfile: where's the "lib"?
> (you probably compiled in static mode)

Ahem - thank you. Yup, I've done the necessaries to distribute liblockfile
with shared libs and re-submitted the package.

Andrew

-- 
Systems Developer

e: andrew.nicols at luns.net.uk
im: a.nicols at jabber.lancs.ac.uk
t: +44 (0)1524 5 10147

Lancaster University Network Services is a limited company registered in
England and Wales. Registered number: 04311892. Registered office:
University House, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YW
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/pkgsubmissions/attachments/20100625/396a9fe7/attachment.asc>

From nicols at opencsw.org  Fri Jun 25 17:54:59 2010
From: nicols at opencsw.org (Andrew Robert Nicols)
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 16:54:59 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs liblockfile)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimQHHoBuDFa-FsJ-wCxcsWwtSnoCuVwc9azcsVF@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTimQHHoBuDFa-FsJ-wCxcsWwtSnoCuVwc9azcsVF@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20100625155459.GF26673@banoffee.lancs.ac.uk>

On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 05:27:44PM -0700, Philip Brown wrote:
> first comment; please dnt submit so many packages at once, especially
> as a new maintainer. it's likely there may be issues. which there are
> :-}
I'll hold off submitting any more then until you're happy with the ones
I've done thus far.

> first, liblockfile: where's the "lib"?
> (you probably compiled in static mode)

Ahem - thank you. Yup, I've done the necessaries to distribute liblockfile
with shared libs and re-submitted the package.

Andrew

-- 
Systems Developer

e: andrew.nicols at luns.net.uk
im: a.nicols at jabber.lancs.ac.uk
t: +44 (0)1524 5 10147

Lancaster University Network Services is a limited company registered in
England and Wales. Registered number: 04311892. Registered office:
University House, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YW
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/pkgsubmissions/attachments/20100625/e4ab3cf2/attachment-0001.asc>

From phil at opencsw.org  Fri Jun 25 18:12:54 2010
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 09:12:54 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs freetds, freetds_doc
In-Reply-To: <201006250756.o5P7uRio021138@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201006250756.o5P7uRio021138@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTinhrOhZhLrKWAtFSmxy0VjYtrYSIxIzbC-fDN0h@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 12:56 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>
> the existence of _doc slipped through, thanks for catching! Please release
> both updated packages to keep them in sync for REV.
>

you didnt clean up the old stuff. Grrr.

Maciej, when are you going to update submitpkg to do this?



> * freetds_doc: minor version upgrade
> ?- from: 0.64.0,REV=2006.07.30
> ?- ? to: 0.82,REV=2010.06.25
> ?+ freetds_doc-0.82,REV=2010.06.25-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> * freetds: minor version upgrade
> ?- from: 0.64.0,REV=2006.07.02
> ?- ? to: 0.82,REV=2010.06.25
> ?+ freetds-0.82,REV=2010.06.25-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ freetds-0.82,REV=2010.06.25-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Fri Jun 25 18:23:43 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 09:23:43 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs drill
In-Reply-To: <201006250856.o5P8uYsZ020027@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201006250856.o5P8uYsZ020027@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTilG1e-08WUWXKGiXoJRRqn9Kd2b7d0g-hzzf2Ky@mail.gmail.com>

batched

On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 1:56 AM, Ihsan Dogan <ihsan at opencsw.org> wrote:
> * drill: patchlevel upgrade
> ?- from: 1.6.1,REV=2009.08.22
> ?- ? to: 1.6.5,REV=2010.06.25
> ?+ drill-1.6.5,REV=2010.06.25-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ drill-1.6.5,REV=2010.06.25-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at opencsw.org  Fri Jun 25 18:24:12 2010
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 09:24:12 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs sar2rrd
In-Reply-To: <201006251501.o5PF1j2P013135@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201006251501.o5PF1j2P013135@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTikvqiAbUt_Y8isp9kOJ6izvuDKjQi1qK61u0jWL@mail.gmail.com>

batched


On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 8:01 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> * sar2rrd: minor version upgrade
> ?- from: 2.4,REV=2009.11.24
> ?- ? to: 2.5,REV=2010.06.25
> ?+ sar2rrd-2.5,REV=2010.06.25-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at opencsw.org  Fri Jun 25 18:26:06 2010
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 09:26:06 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs liblockfile
In-Reply-To: <201006251551.o5PFpRAt029462@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201006251551.o5PFpRAt029462@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTin-L5KDtFww7RWLxDopQTPM5xJmvaFG_3LeUYDs@mail.gmail.com>

looks good. batched


On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Andrew Nicols <nicols at opencsw.org> wrote:
> * liblockfile: new package
> ?+ liblockfile-1.08,REV=2010.06.25-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ liblockfile-1.08,REV=2010.06.25-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Fri Jun 25 18:28:54 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 09:28:54 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_clscontainer, pm_listmoreutils,
	pm(...)
In-Reply-To: <0DB8943A-C1CB-40DF-8F20-FC9380C3FABD@opencsw.org>
References: <8A13B3E4-471D-4DA0-A9D7-3B8B57F160CF@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTimsQ2Cd6BAAJ3D2sTbKjT0nMhCAqkrzpVfxuIYN@mail.gmail.com>
	<93FB6867-6A4D-4FB6-8C05-0B83CC454F04@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTimaV75JRpuw4gSZkh7BHKV8IdgdpHM3CwFQ-pwe@mail.gmail.com>
	<0DB8943A-C1CB-40DF-8F20-FC9380C3FABD@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTikstcmD2xw7YXEcNEkjW9plNkZotmm7CY-G6wP1@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 5:18 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
>
> Phil: Please remove CSWpmlistmoreut from the catalog.
>...


btw, I did this, and batched the other ones. please lemme know if
there are any problems.

From phil at bolthole.com  Fri Jun 25 18:32:32 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 09:32:32 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_perl6export, pm_perl6(...)
In-Reply-To: <7B4F79FF-66D0-4A76-B876-458AD22C878F@opencsw.org>
References: <AANLkTilaKI0A4GxT4Dc-WobXYEDz-DyYydP8Br5SK9KH@mail.gmail.com>
	<7B4F79FF-66D0-4A76-B876-458AD22C878F@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTilhxZQxyRtfp_abAX02s4OH1YGaXZ7m638Q6MUy@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 12:54 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>
> Am 25.06.2010 um 02:28 schrieb Philip Brown:
>>
>> second comment: what's with all the "perl6" stuff?
>> particularly since we don't have perl 6?
>
> These are backports of features from Perl 6 into Perl 5, so this actually
> makes Perl 5 even more useful and the advantages to have Perl 6 even less
> mandatory.
>
>


Urrrr... I hate the naming. but since "Perl6::" is part of the actual
perl "namespace"... ok i guess.

From dam at opencsw.org  Fri Jun 25 23:11:02 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 23:11:02 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs freetds, freetds_doc
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinhrOhZhLrKWAtFSmxy0VjYtrYSIxIzbC-fDN0h@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201006250756.o5P7uRio021138@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinhrOhZhLrKWAtFSmxy0VjYtrYSIxIzbC-fDN0h@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <472183D8-BC8C-4AB8-BF67-1390BD36A8A5@opencsw.org>

Hi Phil,

Am 25.06.2010 um 18:12 schrieb Philip Brown:
> you didnt clean up the old stuff. Grrr.

I don't understand why you don't modify your release scripts to delete files
aftewards (or move them in released/ or rejected/). It is one line of code and
it belongs to the release process, not the submit process.


Best regards

  -- Dago

From phil at opencsw.org  Fri Jun 25 23:43:46 2010
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 14:43:46 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs freetds, freetds_doc
In-Reply-To: <472183D8-BC8C-4AB8-BF67-1390BD36A8A5@opencsw.org>
References: <201006250756.o5P7uRio021138@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinhrOhZhLrKWAtFSmxy0VjYtrYSIxIzbC-fDN0h@mail.gmail.com>
	<472183D8-BC8C-4AB8-BF67-1390BD36A8A5@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTil6DGkgb6AfN3FEY03lmuCgoy1MUAR2_6h0SL54@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>
> Am 25.06.2010 um 18:12 schrieb Philip Brown:
>> you didnt clean up the old stuff. Grrr.
>
> I don't understand why you don't modify your release scripts to delete files
> aftewards (or move them in released/ or rejected/). It is one line of code and
> it belongs to the release process, not the submit process.


Consider this:

If a maintainer submits a package... but then realizes they made a
mistake, and submits a new package, before I even get to it... it
should not be my job to cleanup their older junk.
The submitpkg program should take care of removing the old stuff automatically.

and if it should take care of it in that case, it makes sense for it
to always do that.

From bonivart at opencsw.org  Fri Jun 25 23:51:29 2010
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 23:51:29 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs freetds, freetds_doc
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTil6DGkgb6AfN3FEY03lmuCgoy1MUAR2_6h0SL54@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201006250756.o5P7uRio021138@login.bo.opencsw.org> 
	<AANLkTinhrOhZhLrKWAtFSmxy0VjYtrYSIxIzbC-fDN0h@mail.gmail.com> 
	<472183D8-BC8C-4AB8-BF67-1390BD36A8A5@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTil6DGkgb6AfN3FEY03lmuCgoy1MUAR2_6h0SL54@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTin6ScIDQlsykdfDZ0ofatCsUzpAaYH3028tzzwx@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 11:43 PM, Philip Brown <phil at opencsw.org> wrote:
> The submitpkg program should take care of removing the old stuff automatically.

Would it work if submitpkg removed every file with the same first part
(up until first dash) as the one being submitted? That would clean up
other versions/REVs.

-- 
/peter

From phil at opencsw.org  Fri Jun 25 23:59:00 2010
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 14:59:00 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs freetds, freetds_doc
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTin6ScIDQlsykdfDZ0ofatCsUzpAaYH3028tzzwx@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201006250756.o5P7uRio021138@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinhrOhZhLrKWAtFSmxy0VjYtrYSIxIzbC-fDN0h@mail.gmail.com>
	<472183D8-BC8C-4AB8-BF67-1390BD36A8A5@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTil6DGkgb6AfN3FEY03lmuCgoy1MUAR2_6h0SL54@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTin6ScIDQlsykdfDZ0ofatCsUzpAaYH3028tzzwx@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTikw5MkLWlPVpk42R_8FlfO_kaxi7mWAcKhzyms-@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 2:51 PM, Peter Bonivart <bonivart at opencsw.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 11:43 PM, Philip Brown <phil at opencsw.org> wrote:
>> The submitpkg program should take care of removing the old stuff automatically.
>
> Would it work if submitpkg removed every file with the same first part
> (up until first dash) as the one being submitted? That would clean up
> other versions/REVs.
>

That would certainly be an improvement, and catch 95%+ of all cases.
which would make me considerably happier.

From rupert at opencsw.org  Sun Jun 27 21:59:46 2010
From: rupert at opencsw.org (THURNER Rupert)
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2010 14:59:46 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs sqlite3, sqlite3_devel, sqlite3_rt
Message-ID: <201006271959.o5RJxkt3007054@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* sqlite3: patchlevel upgrade
  - from: 3.6.21,REV=2010.01.04
  -   to: 3.6.23.1,REV=2010.04.25
  + sqlite3-3.6.23.1,REV=2010.04.25-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + sqlite3-3.6.23.1,REV=2010.04.25-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + sqlite3_devel-3.6.23.1,REV=2010.04.25-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + sqlite3_devel-3.6.23.1,REV=2010.04.25-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + sqlite3_rt-3.6.23.1,REV=2010.04.25-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + sqlite3_rt-3.6.23.1,REV=2010.04.25-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From phil at bolthole.com  Sun Jun 27 23:28:48 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2010 14:28:48 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs sqlite3, sqlite3_devel, sqlite3_rt
In-Reply-To: <201006271959.o5RJxkt3007054@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201006271959.o5RJxkt3007054@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTimwmjPXuxvvpyI2qgD-FkVYDtwHq0kxKykNH0i7@mail.gmail.com>

errrr... it looks like you have deliberately put in "bad-content" into
the rt file. please remove

On Sunday, June 27, 2010, THURNER Rupert <rupert at opencsw.org> wrote:
> * sqlite3: patchlevel upgrade
>  ?- from: 3.6.21,REV=2010.01.04
>  ?- ? to: 3.6.23.1,REV=2010.04.25
>  ?+ sqlite3-3.6.23.1,REV=2010.04.25-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>  ?+ sqlite3-3.6.23.1,REV=2010.04.25-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>  ?+ sqlite3_devel-3.6.23.1,REV=2010.04.25-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>  ?+ sqlite3_devel-3.6.23.1,REV=2010.04.25-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>  ?+ sqlite3_rt-3.6.23.1,REV=2010.04.25-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>  ?+ sqlite3_rt-3.6.23.1,REV=2010.04.25-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From dam at opencsw.org  Mon Jun 28 09:34:02 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 09:34:02 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs freetds, freetds_doc
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTil6DGkgb6AfN3FEY03lmuCgoy1MUAR2_6h0SL54@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201006250756.o5P7uRio021138@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinhrOhZhLrKWAtFSmxy0VjYtrYSIxIzbC-fDN0h@mail.gmail.com>
	<472183D8-BC8C-4AB8-BF67-1390BD36A8A5@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTil6DGkgb6AfN3FEY03lmuCgoy1MUAR2_6h0SL54@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <984EC821-1B8C-4DF9-B18F-ACE075ADFD73@opencsw.org>

Hi Phil,

Am 25.06.2010 um 23:43 schrieb Philip Brown:
> On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Dagobert Michelsen  
> <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
>> Am 25.06.2010 um 18:12 schrieb Philip Brown:
>>> you didnt clean up the old stuff. Grrr.
>>
>> I don't understand why you don't modify your release scripts to  
>> delete files
>> aftewards (or move them in released/ or rejected/). It is one line  
>> of code and
>> it belongs to the release process, not the submit process.
>
> Consider this:
>
> If a maintainer submits a package... but then realizes they made a
> mistake, and submits a new package, before I even get to it... it
> should not be my job to cleanup their older junk.
> The submitpkg program should take care of removing the old stuff  
> automatically.

True. Consider this: A maintainer pushes a package which you reject
and erranously chose a broken catalog name. The rejection script can
get rid of it, the submitpkg script can not. Same is true if the
maintainer won't bother updating a rejected package - and exactly
that is happening: newpkgs/ is filling up with old stuff. Not good.

I see two usecases here: One is the overriding of packages which have
not been processed (which should go into submitpkg), the other one is
for packages that are rejected (which should go into releasepkg).


Best regards

   -- Dago

From maciej at opencsw.org  Mon Jun 28 11:29:02 2010
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski)
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 10:29:02 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs sqlite3, sqlite3_devel, sqlite3_rt
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimwmjPXuxvvpyI2qgD-FkVYDtwHq0kxKykNH0i7@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201006271959.o5RJxkt3007054@login.bo.opencsw.org> 
	<AANLkTimwmjPXuxvvpyI2qgD-FkVYDtwHq0kxKykNH0i7@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTins6Lw5Ifs4MrK-ej3H4aOtHiyuSSPYlTcApBi6@mail.gmail.com>

No dia 27 de Junho de 2010 22:28, Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> escreveu:
> errrr... it looks like you have deliberately put in "bad-content" into
> the rt file. please remove

Do you mean the override file?  It is the package's metadata, what's
the problem with it?

From maciej at opencsw.org  Mon Jun 28 12:31:17 2010
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski)
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 11:31:17 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs freetds, freetds_doc
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikw5MkLWlPVpk42R_8FlfO_kaxi7mWAcKhzyms-@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201006250756.o5P7uRio021138@login.bo.opencsw.org> 
	<AANLkTinhrOhZhLrKWAtFSmxy0VjYtrYSIxIzbC-fDN0h@mail.gmail.com> 
	<472183D8-BC8C-4AB8-BF67-1390BD36A8A5@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTil6DGkgb6AfN3FEY03lmuCgoy1MUAR2_6h0SL54@mail.gmail.com> 
	<AANLkTin6ScIDQlsykdfDZ0ofatCsUzpAaYH3028tzzwx@mail.gmail.com> 
	<AANLkTikw5MkLWlPVpk42R_8FlfO_kaxi7mWAcKhzyms-@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTik0JiQVUEhi0bP97yQPZLDBWsD3J_q5ilOgDk5-@mail.gmail.com>

No dia 25 de Junho de 2010 22:59, Philip Brown <phil at opencsw.org> escreveu:
> On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 2:51 PM, Peter Bonivart <bonivart at opencsw.org> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 11:43 PM, Philip Brown <phil at opencsw.org> wrote:
>>> The submitpkg program should take care of removing the old stuff automatically.
>>
>> Would it work if submitpkg removed every file with the same first part
>> (up until first dash) as the one being submitted? That would clean up
>> other versions/REVs.
>>
>
> That would certainly be an improvement, and catch 95%+ of all cases.
> which would make me considerably happier.

r10253 (2010-06-18) implements this, but I guess the change hasn't
been pushed.  Current CSWcswutils has been build on the 17th, so we
need a new release.  Looping Ben in.

Maciej

From dam at opencsw.org  Mon Jun 28 14:48:10 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 14:48:10 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs imlib2
Message-ID: <201006281248.o5SCmACb017820@login.bo.opencsw.org>

Now linked against SUNW X11

* imlib2: patchlevel upgrade
  - from: 1.4.3,REV=2010.03.17
  -   to: 1.4.4,REV=2010.06.28
  + imlib2-1.4.4,REV=2010.06.28-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + imlib2-1.4.4,REV=2010.06.28-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From dam at opencsw.org  Mon Jun 28 16:18:18 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 16:18:18 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs doxygen, doxygen_doc
Message-ID: <201006281418.o5SEIIcG020587@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* doxygen: patchlevel upgrade
  - from: 1.7.0,REV=2010.06.19
  -   to: 1.7.1,REV=2010.06.28
  + doxygen-1.7.1,REV=2010.06.28-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + doxygen-1.7.1,REV=2010.06.28-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + doxygen_doc-1.7.1,REV=2010.06.28-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From dam at opencsw.org  Mon Jun 28 17:03:00 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 17:03:00 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pcre, pcre_rt
Message-ID: <201006281503.o5SF30L1026246@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* pcre: minor version upgrade
  - from: 8.02,REV=2010.03.19
  -   to: 8.10,REV=2010.06.28
  + pcre-8.10,REV=2010.06.28-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + pcre-8.10,REV=2010.06.28-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + pcre_rt-8.10,REV=2010.06.28-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + pcre_rt-8.10,REV=2010.06.28-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From dam at opencsw.org  Mon Jun 28 17:12:59 2010
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 17:12:59 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs: nginx 0.7.67
In-Reply-To: <D1C5428B-2E64-4B03-BCF2-786802A68AC2@opencsw.org>
References: <201006171645.27007.ai@vsu.ru>
	<AANLkTil0hT5JoB_4l8HfAMsgzrq-zrDMYqkGX7K5sPFQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<D1C5428B-2E64-4B03-BCF2-786802A68AC2@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <B9B1C6EA-11C2-4329-897E-352DEE7D911F@opencsw.org>

Hi,

Am 25.06.2010 um 09:52 schrieb Dagobert Michelsen:
> Am 25.06.2010 um 02:25 schrieb Philip Brown:
>> thanks! er...
>> unfortunately though, I'm going to hold this demon package until the
>> init script discussion is resolved.
>> Thw good news is, you may have to do nothing
>
> Is this really necessary? It is not worse than what we have.

Ping. How long is this going to be held? I would like to propose a
max-date like end of june. If there is no decision then please release  
it.

Best regards

   -- Dago

>> On Thursday, June 17, 2010, Andy Igoshin <ai at vsu.ru> wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> nginx-0.7.67,REV=2010.06.16-SunOS5.10-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>>> nginx-0.7.67,REV=2010.06.16-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>>> nginx-0.7.67,REV=2010.06.16-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>>> nginx-0.7.67,REV=2010.06.16-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Andy Igoshin <ai at vsu.ru>                 Voronezh State University
>>> Phone: +7 (4732) 522406                  Network Operation Center
>>> Fax:   +7 (4732) 208820                  Voronezh, Russia
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> pkgsubmissions mailing list
>>> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
>>> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> pkgsubmissions mailing list
>> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
>> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions


From phil at opencsw.org  Mon Jun 28 17:51:26 2010
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 08:51:26 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs sqlite3, sqlite3_devel, sqlite3_rt
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTins6Lw5Ifs4MrK-ej3H4aOtHiyuSSPYlTcApBi6@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201006271959.o5RJxkt3007054@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTimwmjPXuxvvpyI2qgD-FkVYDtwHq0kxKykNH0i7@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTins6Lw5Ifs4MrK-ej3H4aOtHiyuSSPYlTcApBi6@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTin84bfI6JprxscaAE7BNRVRxJhtzVu9sp97pIva@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 2:29 AM, Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski
<maciej at opencsw.org> wrote:
> No dia 27 de Junho de 2010 22:28, Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> escreveu:
>> errrr... it looks like you have deliberately put in "bad-content" into
>> the rt file. please remove
>
> Do you mean the override file? ?It is the package's metadata, what's
> the problem with it?
>

two problems:

1. why is it there in the first place!??!

2. it kicks out errors from /opt/csw/bin/checkpkg

From bonivart at opencsw.org  Mon Jun 28 18:10:31 2010
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 18:10:31 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] /newpkgs (current) pm_gdbarcode
Message-ID: <AANLkTik3cVaxLLk4s30LyhWkvMehp2nID1ayaIZOC7ka@mail.gmail.com>

This one was part of the Koha project but I forgot to list it:

pm_gdbarcode-1.15,REV=2010.06.08-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
/peter

From bonivart at opencsw.org  Mon Jun 28 18:12:57 2010
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 18:12:57 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] /newpkgs (current) pm_gdbarcode
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTik3cVaxLLk4s30LyhWkvMehp2nID1ayaIZOC7ka@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTik3cVaxLLk4s30LyhWkvMehp2nID1ayaIZOC7ka@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTinFLh3E-Z6BD-CAfviup4Ksy_5f_OwDLqACWH1q@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Peter Bonivart <bonivart at opencsw.org> wrote:
> This one was part of the Koha project but I forgot to list it:
>
> pm_gdbarcode-1.15,REV=2010.06.08-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz

Hmm, apparently I did list it but now I found it on bender in a
directory called "bad". What's bad about it? And why no response?

Other than that informative "gaaaaaaaaah" of course.

-- 
/peter

From maciej at opencsw.org  Mon Jun 28 18:21:00 2010
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski)
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 17:21:00 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs sqlite3, sqlite3_devel, sqlite3_rt
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTin84bfI6JprxscaAE7BNRVRxJhtzVu9sp97pIva@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201006271959.o5RJxkt3007054@login.bo.opencsw.org> 
	<AANLkTimwmjPXuxvvpyI2qgD-FkVYDtwHq0kxKykNH0i7@mail.gmail.com> 
	<AANLkTins6Lw5Ifs4MrK-ej3H4aOtHiyuSSPYlTcApBi6@mail.gmail.com> 
	<AANLkTin84bfI6JprxscaAE7BNRVRxJhtzVu9sp97pIva@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTilLCjf71VJTbvKTToP5irYT8AV4KO1ou0uvlhEm@mail.gmail.com>

No dia 28 de Junho de 2010 16:51, Philip Brown <phil at opencsw.org> escreveu:
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 2:29 AM, Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski
> <maciej at opencsw.org> wrote:
>> No dia 27 de Junho de 2010 22:28, Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> escreveu:
>>> errrr... it looks like you have deliberately put in "bad-content" into
>>> the rt file. please remove
>>
>> Do you mean the override file? ?It is the package's metadata, what's
>> the problem with it?
>>
>
> two problems:
>
> 1. why is it there in the first place!??!

It's there to declare what particular errors are known to the
maintainer and safe to release (or false-positive).

> 2. it kicks out errors from /opt/csw/bin/checkpkg

/opt/csw/bin/checkpkg is deprecated; only the one kept in the gar
source tree is maintained.

Perhaps we should remove /opt/csw/bin/checkpkg?  Or replace it with
the new one perhaps?  Thoughts?

From bwalton at opencsw.org  Mon Jun 28 18:32:40 2010
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 12:32:40 -0400
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs sqlite3, sqlite3_devel, sqlite3_rt
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTilLCjf71VJTbvKTToP5irYT8AV4KO1ou0uvlhEm@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201006271959.o5RJxkt3007054@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTimwmjPXuxvvpyI2qgD-FkVYDtwHq0kxKykNH0i7@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTins6Lw5Ifs4MrK-ej3H4aOtHiyuSSPYlTcApBi6@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTin84bfI6JprxscaAE7BNRVRxJhtzVu9sp97pIva@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTilLCjf71VJTbvKTToP5irYT8AV4KO1ou0uvlhEm@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1277742608-sup-354@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>

Excerpts from Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski's message of Mon Jun 28 12:21:00 -0400 2010:

> > 2. it kicks out errors from /opt/csw/bin/checkpkg
> 
> /opt/csw/bin/checkpkg is deprecated; only the one kept in the gar
> source tree is maintained.

This file is provided by CSWcswutils and is the original ksh version.

> Perhaps we should remove /opt/csw/bin/checkpkg?  Or replace it with
> the new one perhaps?  Thoughts?

Is the python checkpkg stable enough to turn into it's own package
yet?  I know you're working on the shared database bits right now, so
that would require another release at some point, but as long as
you're no longer adding new checks daily, it may make sense to spin
off to a separate entity...at which point I'd drop this (old) checkpkg
from cswutils.  That may be a good choice anyway?

Thanks
-Ben

--
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302


From phil at bolthole.com  Mon Jun 28 18:56:24 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 09:56:24 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs sqlite3, sqlite3_devel, sqlite3_rt
In-Reply-To: <1277742608-sup-354@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
References: <201006271959.o5RJxkt3007054@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTimwmjPXuxvvpyI2qgD-FkVYDtwHq0kxKykNH0i7@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTins6Lw5Ifs4MrK-ej3H4aOtHiyuSSPYlTcApBi6@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTin84bfI6JprxscaAE7BNRVRxJhtzVu9sp97pIva@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTilLCjf71VJTbvKTToP5irYT8AV4KO1ou0uvlhEm@mail.gmail.com>
	<1277742608-sup-354@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
Message-ID: <AANLkTil2vAbcNuZtdV7NW1jdp9Frp3_Qy7RgPkTQQb8P@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org> wrote:
>
> Is the python checkpkg stable enough to turn into it's own package
> yet? ?I know you're working on the shared database bits right now, so
> that would require another release at some point, but as long as
> you're no longer adding new checks daily, it may make sense to spin
> off to a separate entity...at which point I'd drop this (old) checkpkg
> from cswutils. ?That may be a good choice anyway?
>

/opt/csw/bin/checkpkg is the one *I* use to qualify packages :-P
So no its not a good idea to drop it.

From phil at opencsw.org  Mon Jun 28 18:59:31 2010
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 09:59:31 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs: nginx 0.7.67
In-Reply-To: <B9B1C6EA-11C2-4329-897E-352DEE7D911F@opencsw.org>
References: <201006171645.27007.ai@vsu.ru>
	<AANLkTil0hT5JoB_4l8HfAMsgzrq-zrDMYqkGX7K5sPFQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<D1C5428B-2E64-4B03-BCF2-786802A68AC2@opencsw.org>
	<B9B1C6EA-11C2-4329-897E-352DEE7D911F@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTinbEvudgsxZKDD0tNerjVErJbzIw19DG_-LRZPt@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 8:12 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
>
> Ping. How long is this going to be held? I would like to propose a
> max-date like end of june. If there is no decision then please release it.
>

I'm just waiting for Maciej to respond to my comments about class
actions scripts, that I wrote last week. I thought he would have
replied by now...

(Since he's the only one who is actively keyed into the debate..) if
he says "okay, your way makes more sense now", then I'll go ahead and
release the two pending demon packages, and start writing an update to
the cswinitsmf script.

If he says otherwise, then we make alternative plans for it, and for
the pending packages.

From phil at bolthole.com  Mon Jun 28 19:02:33 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 10:02:33 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] /newpkgs (current) pm_gdbarcode
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinFLh3E-Z6BD-CAfviup4Ksy_5f_OwDLqACWH1q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTik3cVaxLLk4s30LyhWkvMehp2nID1ayaIZOC7ka@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinFLh3E-Z6BD-CAfviup4Ksy_5f_OwDLqACWH1q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTikNHUi0VwsW9jMS0MebkA17qtS4YC6EfOJ7kI-x@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Peter Bonivart <bonivart at opencsw.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Peter Bonivart <bonivart at opencsw.org> wrote:
>> This one was part of the Koha project but I forgot to list it:
>>
>> pm_gdbarcode-1.15,REV=2010.06.08-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> Hmm, apparently I did list it but now I found it on bender in a
> directory called "bad". What's bad about it? And why no response?
>
>

Hmm... apologies... it would appear it got shunted in there by
mistake. possibly with a set of other packages which I may have
over-wild-carded or something.

package now batched. thanks for checking back.

From bwalton at opencsw.org  Mon Jun 28 19:06:32 2010
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 13:06:32 -0400
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs sqlite3, sqlite3_devel, sqlite3_rt
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTil2vAbcNuZtdV7NW1jdp9Frp3_Qy7RgPkTQQb8P@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201006271959.o5RJxkt3007054@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTimwmjPXuxvvpyI2qgD-FkVYDtwHq0kxKykNH0i7@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTins6Lw5Ifs4MrK-ej3H4aOtHiyuSSPYlTcApBi6@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTin84bfI6JprxscaAE7BNRVRxJhtzVu9sp97pIva@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTilLCjf71VJTbvKTToP5irYT8AV4KO1ou0uvlhEm@mail.gmail.com>
	<1277742608-sup-354@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTil2vAbcNuZtdV7NW1jdp9Frp3_Qy7RgPkTQQb8P@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1277744647-sup-4187@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>

Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Mon Jun 28 12:56:24 -0400 2010:

> /opt/csw/bin/checkpkg is the one *I* use to qualify packages :-P
> So no its not a good idea to drop it.

Well, if Maciej releases a separate package of the new tool, it would
provide /opt/csw/bin/checkpkg.  I wasn't proposing that it be dropped
until that time.

Unless I'm mistaken[1] though, the version of checkpkg shipping in this
package is your version of checkpkg...any bugfixes should be done by
you until we replace it.

Thanks
-Ben

[1] Dago owned the package previously, so I could be wrong.  It's the
    ksh version though, so that's what I'm working from.
--
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302


From phil at opencsw.org  Mon Jun 28 19:12:46 2010
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 10:12:46 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs sqlite3, sqlite3_devel, sqlite3_rt
In-Reply-To: <1277744647-sup-4187@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
References: <201006271959.o5RJxkt3007054@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTimwmjPXuxvvpyI2qgD-FkVYDtwHq0kxKykNH0i7@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTins6Lw5Ifs4MrK-ej3H4aOtHiyuSSPYlTcApBi6@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTin84bfI6JprxscaAE7BNRVRxJhtzVu9sp97pIva@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTilLCjf71VJTbvKTToP5irYT8AV4KO1ou0uvlhEm@mail.gmail.com>
	<1277742608-sup-354@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTil2vAbcNuZtdV7NW1jdp9Frp3_Qy7RgPkTQQb8P@mail.gmail.com>
	<1277744647-sup-4187@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
Message-ID: <AANLkTikwTiX1t1cBVUyoPkoQm2VsHsJAcsSucyfZ3Cdq@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org> wrote:
> ...
> Unless I'm mistaken[1] though, the version of checkpkg shipping in this
> package is your version of checkpkg...any bugfixes should be done by
> you until we replace it.
>

I dont use gtr.
someone other than me, did that hack.

that someone wold be 'wahwah', according to svn.

From phil at opencsw.org  Mon Jun 28 19:21:01 2010
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 10:21:01 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs: nginx 0.7.67
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinbEvudgsxZKDD0tNerjVErJbzIw19DG_-LRZPt@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201006171645.27007.ai@vsu.ru>
	<AANLkTil0hT5JoB_4l8HfAMsgzrq-zrDMYqkGX7K5sPFQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<D1C5428B-2E64-4B03-BCF2-786802A68AC2@opencsw.org>
	<B9B1C6EA-11C2-4329-897E-352DEE7D911F@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinbEvudgsxZKDD0tNerjVErJbzIw19DG_-LRZPt@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTin-w7qWtXmAvY6ZpuzsE8uFuApZ-XK-IU6XuLrf@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Philip Brown <phil at opencsw.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 8:12 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
>>
>> Ping. How long is this going to be held? I would like to propose a
>> max-date like end of june. If there is no decision then please release it.
>>
>
> I'm just waiting for Maciej to respond to my comments about class
> actions scripts, that I wrote last week. I thought he would have
> replied by now...

HA! and he has.. it was just in a differnt mail folder :)

okay, i'll be releasing this today.

From bwalton at opencsw.org  Mon Jun 28 19:24:43 2010
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 13:24:43 -0400
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs sqlite3, sqlite3_devel, sqlite3_rt
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikwTiX1t1cBVUyoPkoQm2VsHsJAcsSucyfZ3Cdq@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201006271959.o5RJxkt3007054@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTimwmjPXuxvvpyI2qgD-FkVYDtwHq0kxKykNH0i7@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTins6Lw5Ifs4MrK-ej3H4aOtHiyuSSPYlTcApBi6@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTin84bfI6JprxscaAE7BNRVRxJhtzVu9sp97pIva@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTilLCjf71VJTbvKTToP5irYT8AV4KO1ou0uvlhEm@mail.gmail.com>
	<1277742608-sup-354@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTil2vAbcNuZtdV7NW1jdp9Frp3_Qy7RgPkTQQb8P@mail.gmail.com>
	<1277744647-sup-4187@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTikwTiX1t1cBVUyoPkoQm2VsHsJAcsSucyfZ3Cdq@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1277745808-sup-862@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>

Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Mon Jun 28 13:12:46 -0400 2010:

> I dont use gtr.
> someone other than me, did that hack.

Ok.  See the updated version in /home/experimental.  If that works (I
stuffed /opt/csw/bin at the head of the PATH), I'll release the
package.

Thanks
-Ben
--
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302


From maciej at opencsw.org  Mon Jun 28 19:53:02 2010
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski)
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 18:53:02 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs sqlite3, sqlite3_devel, sqlite3_rt
In-Reply-To: <1277742608-sup-354@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
References: <201006271959.o5RJxkt3007054@login.bo.opencsw.org> 
	<AANLkTimwmjPXuxvvpyI2qgD-FkVYDtwHq0kxKykNH0i7@mail.gmail.com> 
	<AANLkTins6Lw5Ifs4MrK-ej3H4aOtHiyuSSPYlTcApBi6@mail.gmail.com> 
	<AANLkTin84bfI6JprxscaAE7BNRVRxJhtzVu9sp97pIva@mail.gmail.com> 
	<AANLkTilLCjf71VJTbvKTToP5irYT8AV4KO1ou0uvlhEm@mail.gmail.com> 
	<1277742608-sup-354@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
Message-ID: <AANLkTimIgD8R6OXHepZ-n2JoIf3DHKj5uT-Z3Qn7YjDB@mail.gmail.com>

No dia 28 de Junho de 2010 17:32, Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org> escreveu:
> Excerpts from Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski's message of Mon Jun 28 12:21:00 -0400 2010:
>
>> > 2. it kicks out errors from /opt/csw/bin/checkpkg
>>
>> /opt/csw/bin/checkpkg is deprecated; only the one kept in the gar
>> source tree is maintained.
>
> This file is provided by CSWcswutils and is the original ksh version.
>
>> Perhaps we should remove /opt/csw/bin/checkpkg? ?Or replace it with
>> the new one perhaps? ?Thoughts?
>
> Is the python checkpkg stable enough to turn into it's own package
> yet?

I'd say it is.  I haven't been doing any larger changes for quite a
some time now.  It's been extensively tested, all the corner cases
that we came across, are now straightened out.

> ?I know you're working on the shared database bits right now, so
> that would require another release at some point, but as long as
> you're no longer adding new checks daily, it may make sense to spin
> off to a separate entity...at which point I'd drop this (old) checkpkg
> from cswutils. ?That may be a good choice anyway?

As far as the shared database is concerned, the pile of balls of
crumpled paper next to my desk is still growing.  I still haven't
decided what's the best way of going about it.  It will surely take
time to roll out, somewhere from a month to half a year (assessing it
defensively).

From phil at bolthole.com  Mon Jun 28 19:59:49 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 10:59:49 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs sqlite3, sqlite3_devel, sqlite3_rt
In-Reply-To: <1277745808-sup-862@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
References: <201006271959.o5RJxkt3007054@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTimwmjPXuxvvpyI2qgD-FkVYDtwHq0kxKykNH0i7@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTins6Lw5Ifs4MrK-ej3H4aOtHiyuSSPYlTcApBi6@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTin84bfI6JprxscaAE7BNRVRxJhtzVu9sp97pIva@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTilLCjf71VJTbvKTToP5irYT8AV4KO1ou0uvlhEm@mail.gmail.com>
	<1277742608-sup-354@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTil2vAbcNuZtdV7NW1jdp9Frp3_Qy7RgPkTQQb8P@mail.gmail.com>
	<1277744647-sup-4187@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTikwTiX1t1cBVUyoPkoQm2VsHsJAcsSucyfZ3Cdq@mail.gmail.com>
	<1277745808-sup-862@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
Message-ID: <AANLkTinkCf8dYNR3VNZ19Dv9vL85Ea8OTtRdIrkoXl2l@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Mon Jun 28 13:12:46 -0400 2010:
>
>> I dont use gtr.
>> someone other than me, did that hack.
>
> Ok. ?See the updated version in /home/experimental. ?If that works (I
> stuffed /opt/csw/bin at the head of the PATH), I'll release the
> package.
>

Errr... the package contains both of:


/tmp/CSWcswutils/root/opt/csw/bin/checkpkg
/tmp/CSWcswutils/root/opt/csw/share/checkpkg

oh.
for the "other" checkpkg. "overrides".

erm.. this overrides thing, could be done better.

I think the override for "file with bad content", shoud simply say
"turn off bad content checks", rather than explicitly adding more "bad
content" matching strings.


But reguardless, that override wont even be needed any more, for
cswutils specifically since the "bad strings" are no longer directly
present in cswutils.

PS: please also pick up the update I just put in, for createpkg :-)

From phil at opencsw.org  Mon Jun 28 20:33:02 2010
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 11:33:02 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pcre, pcre_rt
In-Reply-To: <201006281503.o5SF30L1026246@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201006281503.o5SF30L1026246@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTikme08LoBnl8qPZy_KlH7e0TG6zXPwXIeWXhT-X@mail.gmail.com>

batched


On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 8:03 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> * pcre: minor version upgrade
> ?- from: 8.02,REV=2010.03.19
> ?- ? to: 8.10,REV=2010.06.28
> ?+ pcre-8.10,REV=2010.06.28-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ pcre-8.10,REV=2010.06.28-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ pcre_rt-8.10,REV=2010.06.28-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ pcre_rt-8.10,REV=2010.06.28-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Mon Jun 28 20:37:00 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 11:37:00 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs imlib2
In-Reply-To: <201006281248.o5SCmACb017820@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201006281248.o5SCmACb017820@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTimQzEVeUrrBBdaCP-NIK82zW7Iy9KUZtCxISk5V@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 5:48 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Now linked against SUNW X11
>

yay!  batched...



> * imlib2: patchlevel upgrade
> ?- from: 1.4.3,REV=2010.03.17
> ?- ? to: 1.4.4,REV=2010.06.28
> ?+ imlib2-1.4.4,REV=2010.06.28-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ imlib2-1.4.4,REV=2010.06.28-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at bolthole.com  Mon Jun 28 20:39:18 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 11:39:18 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs doxygen, doxygen_doc
In-Reply-To: <201006281418.o5SEIIcG020587@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201006281418.o5SEIIcG020587@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTilwCNx8ceSTDJdf5nrOCWHDVjx2IhNKW6zhHslV@mail.gmail.com>

batched



On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 7:18 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> * doxygen: patchlevel upgrade
> ?- from: 1.7.0,REV=2010.06.19
> ?- ? to: 1.7.1,REV=2010.06.28
> ?+ doxygen-1.7.1,REV=2010.06.28-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ doxygen-1.7.1,REV=2010.06.28-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ doxygen_doc-1.7.1,REV=2010.06.28-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From phil at opencsw.org  Mon Jun 28 20:43:23 2010
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 11:43:23 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs: nginx 0.7.67
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTin-w7qWtXmAvY6ZpuzsE8uFuApZ-XK-IU6XuLrf@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201006171645.27007.ai@vsu.ru>
	<AANLkTil0hT5JoB_4l8HfAMsgzrq-zrDMYqkGX7K5sPFQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<D1C5428B-2E64-4B03-BCF2-786802A68AC2@opencsw.org>
	<B9B1C6EA-11C2-4329-897E-352DEE7D911F@opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTinbEvudgsxZKDD0tNerjVErJbzIw19DG_-LRZPt@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTin-w7qWtXmAvY6ZpuzsE8uFuApZ-XK-IU6XuLrf@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTilOV5dLMifMS6exzywrUTqqPCzi6NPV7JzGrQe8@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Philip Brown <phil at opencsw.org> wrote:
>
> okay, i'll be releasing this today.
>



nginx officially batched now

From phil at opencsw.org  Mon Jun 28 20:49:47 2010
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 11:49:47 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] cups packages batched.. no wait...
Message-ID: <AANLkTimdb7dggt0xpnmE9mf0GBWtjKQwBzD82ApHbDxR@mail.gmail.com>

btw, since they were only officially waiting on the classutils thing
to come to resolution...i was ABOUT to batch the cups packages,
alongside the nginx ones.


But ran into a lastminute snag. File conflict.

CSWcupsclient 	/opt/csw/share/man/man1m/cupsdisable.1m
CSWcupsd 	/opt/csw/share/man/man1m/cupsdisable.1m

and oddly, I note that there is a new 'cupsd', but no new 'cupsclient'
that I see, in newpkgs

From maciej at opencsw.org  Mon Jun 28 20:50:58 2010
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski)
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 19:50:58 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs sqlite3, sqlite3_devel, sqlite3_rt
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinkCf8dYNR3VNZ19Dv9vL85Ea8OTtRdIrkoXl2l@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201006271959.o5RJxkt3007054@login.bo.opencsw.org> 
	<AANLkTimwmjPXuxvvpyI2qgD-FkVYDtwHq0kxKykNH0i7@mail.gmail.com> 
	<AANLkTins6Lw5Ifs4MrK-ej3H4aOtHiyuSSPYlTcApBi6@mail.gmail.com> 
	<AANLkTin84bfI6JprxscaAE7BNRVRxJhtzVu9sp97pIva@mail.gmail.com> 
	<AANLkTilLCjf71VJTbvKTToP5irYT8AV4KO1ou0uvlhEm@mail.gmail.com> 
	<1277742608-sup-354@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTil2vAbcNuZtdV7NW1jdp9Frp3_Qy7RgPkTQQb8P@mail.gmail.com> 
	<1277744647-sup-4187@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTikwTiX1t1cBVUyoPkoQm2VsHsJAcsSucyfZ3Cdq@mail.gmail.com> 
	<1277745808-sup-862@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTinkCf8dYNR3VNZ19Dv9vL85Ea8OTtRdIrkoXl2l@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTimlZ_26kq5jYNdZz0yDNdcH_pHuC3CS3Ae7OCJs@mail.gmail.com>

No dia 28 de Junho de 2010 18:59, Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> escreveu:
> I think the override for "file with bad content", shoud simply say
> "turn off bad content checks", rather than explicitly adding more "bad
> content" matching strings.

Yes, that's true.  The build file could just say:
CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWcswutils += file-with-bad-content

...and it would be enough.  (With the downside being, if a new bad
content appeared, it wouldn't be detected.)

> But reguardless, that override wont even be needed any more, for
> cswutils specifically since the "bad strings" are no longer directly
> present in cswutils.

They are still present in the libraries, where the checks are defined.
For example:
/opt/csw/lib/python/csw/checkpkg.py

A deep link to the relevant place in the source file:
http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/gar/browser/csw/mgar/gar/v2/lib/python/checkpkg.py#L47

From maciej at opencsw.org  Mon Jun 28 20:54:36 2010
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski)
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 19:54:36 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] cups packages batched.. no wait...
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimdb7dggt0xpnmE9mf0GBWtjKQwBzD82ApHbDxR@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTimdb7dggt0xpnmE9mf0GBWtjKQwBzD82ApHbDxR@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTilDTQqvwgsHJMVO0IBAQLpyXUEOa4Yi63agaTGf@mail.gmail.com>

No dia 28 de Junho de 2010 19:49, Philip Brown <phil at opencsw.org> escreveu:
> btw, since they were only officially waiting on the classutils thing
> to come to resolution...i was ABOUT to batch the cups packages,
> alongside the nginx ones.
>
>
> But ran into a lastminute snag. File conflict.
>
> CSWcupsclient ? /opt/csw/share/man/man1m/cupsdisable.1m
> CSWcupsd ? ? ? ?/opt/csw/share/man/man1m/cupsdisable.1m
>
> and oddly, I note that there is a new 'cupsd', but no new 'cupsclient'
> that I see, in newpkgs

Yes, there was a human error, cupsclient wasn't on the list of
packages for submitpkg to process.

I've resubmitted the same files, this time including the cupsclient package.

* cups: patchlevel upgrade
  - from: 1.4.2,REV=2010.02.20
  -   to: 1.4.3,REV=2010.06.01
  + cups-1.4.3,REV=2010.06.01-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
  + cupsclient-1.4.3,REV=2010.06.01-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + cupsclient-1.4.3,REV=2010.06.01-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + cupsdev-1.4.3,REV=2010.06.01-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + cupsdev-1.4.3,REV=2010.06.01-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + cupsdoc-1.4.3,REV=2010.06.01-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libcups-1.4.3,REV=2010.06.01-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libcups-1.4.3,REV=2010.06.01-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

* cupsd: patchlevel upgrade
  - from: 1.4.2,REV=2010.03.04
  -   to: 1.4.3,REV=2010.06.01
  + cupsd-1.4.3,REV=2010.06.01-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + cupsd-1.4.3,REV=2010.06.01-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

From phil at opencsw.org  Mon Jun 28 21:44:58 2010
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 12:44:58 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs sqlite3, sqlite3_devel, sqlite3_rt
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimlZ_26kq5jYNdZz0yDNdcH_pHuC3CS3Ae7OCJs@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201006271959.o5RJxkt3007054@login.bo.opencsw.org>
	<AANLkTimwmjPXuxvvpyI2qgD-FkVYDtwHq0kxKykNH0i7@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTins6Lw5Ifs4MrK-ej3H4aOtHiyuSSPYlTcApBi6@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTin84bfI6JprxscaAE7BNRVRxJhtzVu9sp97pIva@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTilLCjf71VJTbvKTToP5irYT8AV4KO1ou0uvlhEm@mail.gmail.com>
	<1277742608-sup-354@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTil2vAbcNuZtdV7NW1jdp9Frp3_Qy7RgPkTQQb8P@mail.gmail.com>
	<1277744647-sup-4187@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTikwTiX1t1cBVUyoPkoQm2VsHsJAcsSucyfZ3Cdq@mail.gmail.com>
	<1277745808-sup-862@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<AANLkTinkCf8dYNR3VNZ19Dv9vL85Ea8OTtRdIrkoXl2l@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimlZ_26kq5jYNdZz0yDNdcH_pHuC3CS3Ae7OCJs@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTim1aLNSRaCaKN5v-77ZC62o1zEL8bcoer8vQAtK@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski
<maciej at opencsw.org> wrote:
>....
>> But reguardless, that override wont even be needed any more, for
>> cswutils specifically since the "bad strings" are no longer directly
>> present in cswutils.
>
> They are still present in the libraries, where the checks are defined.
> For example:
> /opt/csw/lib/python/csw/checkpkg.py
>
> A deep link to the relevant place in the source file:
> http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/gar/browser/csw/mgar/gar/v2/lib/python/checkpkg.py#L47

and I see

# No need to encode / obfuscate these, as overrides can be used.


SO, just tweak em like the ksh checkpkg, and problem solved :)
nice thing about the method I use is that the strings are actually
*readable* still.

From phil at bolthole.com  Mon Jun 28 21:46:19 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 12:46:19 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] cups packages batched.. no wait...
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTilDTQqvwgsHJMVO0IBAQLpyXUEOa4Yi63agaTGf@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTimdb7dggt0xpnmE9mf0GBWtjKQwBzD82ApHbDxR@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTilDTQqvwgsHJMVO0IBAQLpyXUEOa4Yi63agaTGf@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTinjADEoSsj2DH5QMgdA9N9UM3d0OuZ9-QpRjKbd@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski
<maciej at opencsw.org> wrote:
>
>
> Yes, there was a human error, cupsclient wasn't on the list of
> packages for submitpkg to process.
>
> I've resubmitted the same files, this time including the cupsclient package.
>

more human error.. there is still the file conflict problem :)

bender$ gzgrep -l cupsdisable.1m *
cupsclient-1.4.3,REV=2010.06.01-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
cupsclient-1.4.3,REV=2010.06.01-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
cupsd-1.4.3,REV=2010.06.01-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
cupsd-1.4.3,REV=2010.06.01-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

From maciej at opencsw.org  Tue Jun 29 00:05:47 2010
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski)
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 23:05:47 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] cups packages batched.. no wait...
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinjADEoSsj2DH5QMgdA9N9UM3d0OuZ9-QpRjKbd@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTimdb7dggt0xpnmE9mf0GBWtjKQwBzD82ApHbDxR@mail.gmail.com> 
	<AANLkTilDTQqvwgsHJMVO0IBAQLpyXUEOa4Yi63agaTGf@mail.gmail.com> 
	<AANLkTinjADEoSsj2DH5QMgdA9N9UM3d0OuZ9-QpRjKbd@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTimSSLqvgJz7CLm_A_q_7buvT7ekEK_r-izYwGvh@mail.gmail.com>

No dia 28 de Junho de 2010 20:46, Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> escreveu:
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski
> <maciej at opencsw.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Yes, there was a human error, cupsclient wasn't on the list of
>> packages for submitpkg to process.
>>
>> I've resubmitted the same files, this time including the cupsclient package.
>>
>
> more human error.. there is still the file conflict problem :)
>
> bender$ gzgrep -l cupsdisable.1m *
> cupsclient-1.4.3,REV=2010.06.01-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> cupsclient-1.4.3,REV=2010.06.01-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> cupsd-1.4.3,REV=2010.06.01-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> cupsd-1.4.3,REV=2010.06.01-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

Oh, cool, an excellent test subject!  I shall make this particular
human error machine-detectable in the future.

From phil at opencsw.org  Tue Jun 29 00:08:47 2010
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 15:08:47 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] cups packages batched.. no wait...
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimSSLqvgJz7CLm_A_q_7buvT7ekEK_r-izYwGvh@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTimdb7dggt0xpnmE9mf0GBWtjKQwBzD82ApHbDxR@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTilDTQqvwgsHJMVO0IBAQLpyXUEOa4Yi63agaTGf@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinjADEoSsj2DH5QMgdA9N9UM3d0OuZ9-QpRjKbd@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimSSLqvgJz7CLm_A_q_7buvT7ekEK_r-izYwGvh@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTilavBsGHW4mPrp6zoP2KNjMaRK-XHd19Y3NSswO@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski
<maciej at opencsw.org> wrote:
>
>
> Oh, cool, an excellent test subject! ?I shall make this particular
> human error machine-detectable in the future.
> _

well, it IS machine-detectable already... thats how I found it!
 just not unfortunately at the pkg build level yet:-/


What did you have in mind?

From maciej at opencsw.org  Tue Jun 29 00:53:43 2010
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski)
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 23:53:43 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] cups packages batched.. no wait...
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTilavBsGHW4mPrp6zoP2KNjMaRK-XHd19Y3NSswO@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTimdb7dggt0xpnmE9mf0GBWtjKQwBzD82ApHbDxR@mail.gmail.com> 
	<AANLkTilDTQqvwgsHJMVO0IBAQLpyXUEOa4Yi63agaTGf@mail.gmail.com> 
	<AANLkTinjADEoSsj2DH5QMgdA9N9UM3d0OuZ9-QpRjKbd@mail.gmail.com> 
	<AANLkTimSSLqvgJz7CLm_A_q_7buvT7ekEK_r-izYwGvh@mail.gmail.com> 
	<AANLkTilavBsGHW4mPrp6zoP2KNjMaRK-XHd19Y3NSswO@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTikZ0_SbM0BOozNHTk1WawGle_ZPc_UYO8K8HFHO@mail.gmail.com>

No dia 28 de Junho de 2010 23:08, Philip Brown <phil at opencsw.org> escreveu:
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski
> <maciej at opencsw.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Oh, cool, an excellent test subject! ?I shall make this particular
>> human error machine-detectable in the future.
>> _
>
> well, it IS machine-detectable already... thats how I found it!
> ?just not unfortunately at the pkg build level yet:-/
>
>
> What did you have in mind?

I was thinking about exactly that - the package build level.  The
earlier a problem can be detected, the better, right?  For example:

maciej at current9s :~/src/opencsw/gar/gar-new-checks > bin/checkpkg
~/exp/*cups*sparc*
Analyzing collected statistics...
CSWcupsdev:
CSWcupsd:
CSWcupsclient:
CSWlibcups:
(...)
If any of the reported errors were false positives, you can
override them pasting the lines below to the GAR recipe.
CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWcupsd +=
file-conflict|/opt/csw/share/man/man1m/cupsdisable.1m|CSWcupsclient|CSWcupsd
CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWcupsclient +=
file-conflict|/opt/csw/share/man/man1m/cupsdisable.1m|CSWcupsclient|CSWcupsd

Implemented it and submitted in r10380.  I'll roll a corrected cups
package set tomorrow.

From maciej at opencsw.org  Tue Jun 29 08:13:17 2010
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski)
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 07:13:17 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] cups packages batched.. no wait...
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikZ0_SbM0BOozNHTk1WawGle_ZPc_UYO8K8HFHO@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTimdb7dggt0xpnmE9mf0GBWtjKQwBzD82ApHbDxR@mail.gmail.com> 
	<AANLkTilDTQqvwgsHJMVO0IBAQLpyXUEOa4Yi63agaTGf@mail.gmail.com> 
	<AANLkTinjADEoSsj2DH5QMgdA9N9UM3d0OuZ9-QpRjKbd@mail.gmail.com> 
	<AANLkTimSSLqvgJz7CLm_A_q_7buvT7ekEK_r-izYwGvh@mail.gmail.com> 
	<AANLkTilavBsGHW4mPrp6zoP2KNjMaRK-XHd19Y3NSswO@mail.gmail.com> 
	<AANLkTikZ0_SbM0BOozNHTk1WawGle_ZPc_UYO8K8HFHO@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTilSJAzwmIDl0t6UiEE9F_9iVYxB1FHyyv1pnIBx@mail.gmail.com>

No dia 28 de Junho de 2010 23:53, Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski
<maciej at opencsw.org> escreveu:
> Implemented it and submitted in r10380. ?I'll roll a corrected cups
> package set tomorrow.
>

Build description corrected in r10384, here are the updated packages:

* cups: patchlevel upgrade
  - from: 1.4.2,REV=2010.02.20
  -   to: 1.4.3,REV=2010.06.29
  + cups-1.4.3,REV=2010.06.29-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
  + cupsclient-1.4.3,REV=2010.06.29-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + cupsclient-1.4.3,REV=2010.06.29-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + cupsdev-1.4.3,REV=2010.06.29-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + cupsdev-1.4.3,REV=2010.06.29-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + cupsdoc-1.4.3,REV=2010.06.29-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libcups-1.4.3,REV=2010.06.29-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + libcups-1.4.3,REV=2010.06.29-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

* cupsd: patchlevel upgrade
  - from: 1.4.2,REV=2010.03.04
  -   to: 1.4.3,REV=2010.06.29
  + cupsd-1.4.3,REV=2010.06.29-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + cupsd-1.4.3,REV=2010.06.29-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

...and, it won't happen in the future!

More specifically, file collisions will be detected within package sets.

From ihsan at opencsw.org  Tue Jun 29 09:32:57 2010
From: ihsan at opencsw.org (Ihsan Dogan)
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 09:32:57 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs ldns, ldns_devel
Message-ID: <201006290732.o5T7Wvus020612@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* ldns: revision upgrade (fixes a mising depedency)
  - from: 2010.06.24
  -   to: 2010.06.28
  + ldns-1.6.5,REV=2010.06.28-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + ldns-1.6.5,REV=2010.06.28-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  + ldns_devel-1.6.5,REV=2010.06.28-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + ldns_devel-1.6.5,REV=2010.06.28-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From phil at opencsw.org  Tue Jun 29 17:47:00 2010
From: phil at opencsw.org (Philip Brown)
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 08:47:00 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] cups packages batched.. no wait...
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikZ0_SbM0BOozNHTk1WawGle_ZPc_UYO8K8HFHO@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTimdb7dggt0xpnmE9mf0GBWtjKQwBzD82ApHbDxR@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTilDTQqvwgsHJMVO0IBAQLpyXUEOa4Yi63agaTGf@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinjADEoSsj2DH5QMgdA9N9UM3d0OuZ9-QpRjKbd@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimSSLqvgJz7CLm_A_q_7buvT7ekEK_r-izYwGvh@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTilavBsGHW4mPrp6zoP2KNjMaRK-XHd19Y3NSswO@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTikZ0_SbM0BOozNHTk1WawGle_ZPc_UYO8K8HFHO@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTil1yLbrHKRlaVMnUvXauevInIuLq5yq5mHkC-RX@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski
<maciej at opencsw.org> wrote:
>
>> What did you have in mind?
>
> I was thinking about exactly that - the package build level. ?The
> earlier a problem can be detected, the better, right?

I thought you might :)

> ?For example:
>
> maciej at current9s :~/src/opencsw/gar/gar-new-checks > bin/checkpkg
> ~/exp/*cups*sparc*
> Analyzing collected statistics...
> CSWcupsdev:
> CSWcupsd:
> CSWcupsclient:
> CSWlibcups:
> (...)

And where are these statistics "collected"?

Might it be better to define an API for accessing the "official"
filename path repository, rather than hoping the package has been seen
by that build machine before?

Ideally, some API that allows for a common shared local cached copy,
rather than "every maintainer has their own cache" ?

BTW: we should probably continue this on maintainers list.
and I'm processing the new cups packages now :)

From phil at bolthole.com  Tue Jun 29 17:51:11 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 08:51:11 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs ldns, ldns_devel
In-Reply-To: <201006290732.o5T7Wvus020612@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201006290732.o5T7Wvus020612@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTimfArUYW9cnYUwjbYuMIul0KF1ZL7nm19TEBmlo@mail.gmail.com>

batched


On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 12:32 AM, Ihsan Dogan <ihsan at opencsw.org> wrote:
> * ldns: revision upgrade (fixes a mising depedency)
> ?- from: 2010.06.24
> ?- ? to: 2010.06.28
> ?+ ldns-1.6.5,REV=2010.06.28-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ ldns-1.6.5,REV=2010.06.28-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ ldns_devel-1.6.5,REV=2010.06.28-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ ldns_devel-1.6.5,REV=2010.06.28-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>

From bonivart at opencsw.org  Wed Jun 30 13:35:47 2010
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 13:35:47 +0200
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] /newpkgs (current) rbldnsd
Message-ID: <AANLkTimYprIvLDmbT4nnwoTRtPZIEgaKQCE1k0MrCp6o@mail.gmail.com>

New package:

rbldnsd-0.996b,REV=2010.06.30-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
rbldnsd-0.996b,REV=2010.06.30-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
/peter

From bonivart at opencsw.org  Wed Jun 30 17:05:11 2010
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 17:05:11 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs tnef
Message-ID: <201006301505.o5UF5BlH007003@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* tnef: patchlevel upgrade
  - from: 1.4.6,REV=2009.09.29
  -   to: 1.4.7,REV=2010.06.30
  + tnef-1.4.7,REV=2010.06.30-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + tnef-1.4.7,REV=2010.06.30-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From maciej at opencsw.org  Wed Jun 30 17:21:02 2010
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski)
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 16:21:02 +0100
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] cups packages batched.. no wait...
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTil1yLbrHKRlaVMnUvXauevInIuLq5yq5mHkC-RX@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTimdb7dggt0xpnmE9mf0GBWtjKQwBzD82ApHbDxR@mail.gmail.com> 
	<AANLkTilDTQqvwgsHJMVO0IBAQLpyXUEOa4Yi63agaTGf@mail.gmail.com> 
	<AANLkTinjADEoSsj2DH5QMgdA9N9UM3d0OuZ9-QpRjKbd@mail.gmail.com> 
	<AANLkTimSSLqvgJz7CLm_A_q_7buvT7ekEK_r-izYwGvh@mail.gmail.com> 
	<AANLkTilavBsGHW4mPrp6zoP2KNjMaRK-XHd19Y3NSswO@mail.gmail.com> 
	<AANLkTikZ0_SbM0BOozNHTk1WawGle_ZPc_UYO8K8HFHO@mail.gmail.com> 
	<AANLkTil1yLbrHKRlaVMnUvXauevInIuLq5yq5mHkC-RX@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTimQEOXriVqpU-jlXypy-ONSG-tSm1Be07jNTTBU@mail.gmail.com>

[discussion moved from pkgsubmissions]

No dia 29 de Junho de 2010 16:47, Philip Brown <phil at opencsw.org> escreveu:
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski
> <maciej at opencsw.org> wrote:
>>
>>> What did you have in mind?
>>
>> I was thinking about exactly that - the package build level. ?The
>> earlier a problem can be detected, the better, right?
>
> I thought you might :)
>
>> ?For example:
>>
>> maciej at current9s :~/src/opencsw/gar/gar-new-checks > bin/checkpkg
>> ~/exp/*cups*sparc*
>> Analyzing collected statistics...
>> CSWcupsdev:
>> CSWcupsd:
>> CSWcupsclient:
>> CSWlibcups:
>> (...)
>
> And where are these statistics "collected"?

I wrote it up at http://wiki.opencsw.org/checkpkg#toc17  -- I've just
updated the 'Stats collection' section.

> Might it be better to define an API for accessing the "official"
> filename path repository, rather than hoping the package has been seen
> by that build machine before?
>
> Ideally, some API that allows for a common shared local cached copy,
> rather than "every maintainer has their own cache" ?

I never thought of it as something that needs caching.  The separation
between stats collection and analysis exists mainly because it makes
the development easier.  Operationally it doesn't make that much
difference for one maintainer.  The positive impact in operational
terms is the biggest when analyzing the whole catalog.

There are also data about the system files and the catalog, which are
in a sqlite database, which caches the content of
/var/sadm/install/contents.  This might be beneficial to share, but it
requires careful planning and needs to armored against race conditions
during updates.  It's something I intend to do, but it'll take time.

From bonivart at opencsw.org  Wed Jun 30 22:17:10 2010
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 22:17:10 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_netaddrip
Message-ID: <201006302017.o5UKHA1m011320@login.bo.opencsw.org>

* pm_netaddrip: minor version upgrade
  - from: 4.027,REV=2010.02.02
  -   to: 4.028,REV=2010.06.30
  + pm_netaddrip-4.028,REV=2010.06.30-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  + pm_netaddrip-4.028,REV=2010.06.30-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

-- 
Generated by submitpkg

From phil at bolthole.com  Wed Jun 30 23:01:12 2010
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 14:01:12 -0700
Subject: [csw-pkgsubmissions] cups packages batched.. no wait...
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimQEOXriVqpU-jlXypy-ONSG-tSm1Be07jNTTBU@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTimdb7dggt0xpnmE9mf0GBWtjKQwBzD82ApHbDxR@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTilDTQqvwgsHJMVO0IBAQLpyXUEOa4Yi63agaTGf@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinjADEoSsj2DH5QMgdA9N9UM3d0OuZ9-QpRjKbd@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimSSLqvgJz7CLm_A_q_7buvT7ekEK_r-izYwGvh@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTilavBsGHW4mPrp6zoP2KNjMaRK-XHd19Y3NSswO@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTikZ0_SbM0BOozNHTk1WawGle_ZPc_UYO8K8HFHO@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTil1yLbrHKRlaVMnUvXauevInIuLq5yq5mHkC-RX@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimQEOXriVqpU-jlXypy-ONSG-tSm1Be07jNTTBU@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTilh4ZYanb9F0HHhHZM9bOD_Z94Lzl7JFsYxQcRd@mail.gmail.com>

it shouldn't take that much time;
define the sqlite database as a publically writable location, have
updates be done by "download the latest db and then mv it into place"
which is atomic.
only thing left is to define export interface from our official file
path database.

you could actually reduce it's code a lot since you won't have to
extract and parse pkgs yourself :)