[csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs asciidoc
dam at opencsw.org
Tue May 17 16:37:35 CEST 2011
Am 17.05.2011 um 15:39 schrieb Philip Brown:
> On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 2:19 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
>> Am 28.04.2011 um 22:05 schrieb Philip Brown:
>>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 4:24 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
>>>> Just a version bump, no relocation of /etc files yet.
>>> and when is that going to happen?
>> Probably when I look at it next time.
>> This is again a non-policy issue.
> This is a perfect example of, "not everything is/will be covered in
> policy explicitly" But it's still a *quality* issue.
> and, even if it were possible to cover "everything" in policy.. do we
> really want a policy doc of encyclopaedic length? It would then become
> worthless, because then no-one would read the whole thing, and noone
> would use the whole thing anyway.
IMHO we don't want this in the policy. This is more like a thing of
beauty. The package will work perfectly fine. Fixing this would be
more like a "tweak".
More information about the pkgsubmissions