[csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs asciidoc
dam at opencsw.org
Tue May 17 19:56:41 CEST 2011
Am 17.05.2011 um 18:17 schrieb Philip Brown:
> On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org> wrote:
>> Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Tue May 17 10:55:53 -0400 2011:
>>> Please chime in your voice next time to support me, then, the next
>>> time I tell someone, "no, not EVERYTHING should be in policy" ;-)
>> Nobody else is claiming that _everything_ should be policy. What
>> we're claiming is that the role of release manager is to enforce
>> policy, not opinion.
> What Dagobert wrote, has the additional implication of, "no it is not
> in policy, but it is still worthwhile".
> That, is my point.
That may be your point, but it is not what I meant. It may be worthwhile
for discussion (which anybody is free to do and which is not a problem)
but it is not a "non-policy" to be applied to packages in the release
queue. Package beauty has nothing to do with release.
More information about the pkgsubmissions