From solskogen at carebears.mine.nu Mon Mar 1 11:58:53 2004 From: solskogen at carebears.mine.nu (Christer Solskogen) Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 11:58:53 +0100 Subject: [users] less In-Reply-To: <20040229134214.GK20370@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> References: <4041D000.4030500@carebears.mine.nu> <20040229114849.GA17506@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <4041EB5B.9030706@carebears.mine.nu> <20040229134214.GK20370@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> Message-ID: <4043176D.2090008@carebears.mine.nu> Thomas Glanzmann wrote: > Hi, > > >>try now. >>http://home.online.no/~dtun3z/less-3.8.2-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > > > same thing. No binaries. > > (faui03) [/var/tmp/sithglan] find CSWless/ > CSWless/ > CSWless/pkginfo > CSWless/pkgmap > CSWless/install > CSWless/install/copyright > After reading to my eyes bleed it figures that stagepkg should produce a cswstage/prototype file which contains a list over files, and permissions the program has. But stagepkg only produce a file that contains: i pkginfo i copyright and nothing more... have i missed something? the program is compiled, and works. -- Med vennlig hilsen / Best regards Christer Solskogen / dizzy tun3Z http://dtz.cjb.net - http://carebears.mine.nu "Cheap, but not as cheap as your girlfriend!" -Spider Jerusalem From asmoore at edge.net Mon Mar 1 12:54:40 2004 From: asmoore at edge.net (Alex S Moore) Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 05:54:40 -0600 Subject: [users] less In-Reply-To: <4043176D.2090008@carebears.mine.nu> References: <4041D000.4030500@carebears.mine.nu> <20040229114849.GA17506@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <4041EB5B.9030706@carebears.mine.nu> <20040229134214.GK20370@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <4043176D.2090008@carebears.mine.nu> Message-ID: <20040301055440.6060bbdb@sws602> On Mon, 01 Mar 2004 11:58:53 +0100 Christer Solskogen wrote: > After reading to my eyes bleed it figures that stagepkg should produce a > cswstage/prototype file which contains a list over files, and > permissions the program has. > But stagepkg only produce a file that contains: > i pkginfo > i copyright > > and nothing more... have i missed something? > the program is compiled, and works. > It looks like your Makefile does not have DESTDIR defined. Hence, make install from stagepkg, wrote the files to the final destination. Maybe your Makefile has some other variable to use for the distribution directory. If so, there is a note on this in the CSW build documents. Alex From solskogen at carebears.mine.nu Mon Mar 1 13:26:08 2004 From: solskogen at carebears.mine.nu (Christer Solskogen) Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 13:26:08 +0100 Subject: [users] less In-Reply-To: <20040301055440.6060bbdb@sws602> References: <4041D000.4030500@carebears.mine.nu> <20040229114849.GA17506@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <4041EB5B.9030706@carebears.mine.nu> <20040229134214.GK20370@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <4043176D.2090008@carebears.mine.nu> <20040301055440.6060bbdb@sws602> Message-ID: <40432BE0.8000304@carebears.mine.nu> Alex S Moore wrote: > > > > It looks like your Makefile does not have DESTDIR defined. Hence, make > install from stagepkg, wrote the files to the final destination. Maybe > your Makefile has some other variable to use for the distribution > directory. If so, there is a note on this in the CSW build documents. > I`m not sure of what you mean here, but i could try to tell you what i do. and if i`m doing anything wrong, please corrent me :) I have following directories in $HOME build\ pkgs\ src\ I also did 'mkdir pkgs\less' in pkgs\less i have a pkginfo file which looks like this: PKG=CSWless NAME=less - GNU less VERSION=3.82 CATEGORY=application VENDOR=http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/less/ packaged for CSW by Christer Solskogen HOTLINE=http://www.blastwave.org/bugtrack/ EMAIL=solskogen at carebears.mine.nu Unpacked less-382.tar.gz in ~build cp COPYING ~/pkgs/less/copyright export LD_OPTIONS='-R/opt/csw/lib/$ISALIST -R/opt/csw/lib -L/opt/csw/lib' ./configure --prefix=/opt/csw (it seems like the configure script does not support --program-prefix) gmake stagepkg gives this output as user 'cso' (my username) bash-2.05$ stagepkg creating staging area /export/home/cso/build/less-382/cswstage using make arguments of DESTDIR=/export/home/cso/build/less-382/cswstage install will use fakeroot to do install make DESTDIR=/export/home/cso/build/less-382/cswstage install /export/home/cso/build/less-382/cswstage fakeroot ./mkinstalldirs /opt/csw//bin /opt/csw//man/man1 ./install.sh -c less /opt/csw//bin/less cp: cannot create /opt/csw//bin/#inst.1756#: Permission denied mv: cannot access /opt/csw//bin/#inst.1756# ./install.sh -c lesskey /opt/csw//bin/lesskey cp: cannot create /opt/csw//bin/#inst.1761#: Permission denied mv: cannot access /opt/csw//bin/#inst.1761# ./install.sh -c lessecho /opt/csw//bin/lessecho cp: cannot create /opt/csw//bin/#inst.1766#: Permission denied mv: cannot access /opt/csw//bin/#inst.1766# ./install.sh -c -m 644 ./less.nro /opt/csw//man/man1/less.1 cp: cannot create /opt/csw//man/man1/#inst.1771#: Permission denied chmod: WARNING: can't access /opt/csw//man/man1/#inst.1771# mv: cannot access /opt/csw//man/man1/#inst.1771# ./install.sh -c -m 644 ./lesskey.nro /opt/csw//man/man1/lesskey.1 cp: cannot create /opt/csw//man/man1/#inst.1777#: Permission denied chmod: WARNING: can't access /opt/csw//man/man1/#inst.1777# mv: cannot access /opt/csw//man/man1/#inst.1777# Checking for relocatable capability... Stripping executables... prototype file is now in /export/home/cso/build/less-382/cswstage/prototype If you dont already have a prototype file, you should copy /export/home/cso/build/less-382/cswstage/prototype to where you keep your pkginfo file, and edit it as appropriate. Next, cd ~/pkgs/[software] You should then do EITHER createpkg -b /export/home/cso/build/less-382/cswstage/opt/csw OR if you want to do things the hard way pkgmk -b /export/home/cso/build/less-382/cswstage/opt/csw \ -f /export/home/cso/build/less-382/cswstage/prototype \ BASEDIR=/opt/csw [and then all the other cleanup type stuff by hand] (I`m wondereing why i get Permission Denied! I dont get them as root, but my prototype is still missing a lot of info) Just in case: uname -a SunOS hugs 5.9 Generic_112234-11 i86pc i386 i86pc -- Med vennlig hilsen / Best regards Christer Solskogen / dizzy tun3Z http://dtz.cjb.net - http://carebears.mine.nu "Cheap, but not as cheap as your girlfriend!" -Spider Jerusalem From asmoore at edge.net Mon Mar 1 13:46:29 2004 From: asmoore at edge.net (Alex S Moore) Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 06:46:29 -0600 Subject: [users] less In-Reply-To: <40432BE0.8000304@carebears.mine.nu> References: <4041D000.4030500@carebears.mine.nu> <20040229114849.GA17506@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <4041EB5B.9030706@carebears.mine.nu> <20040229134214.GK20370@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <4043176D.2090008@carebears.mine.nu> <20040301055440.6060bbdb@sws602> <40432BE0.8000304@carebears.mine.nu> Message-ID: <20040301064629.4099f96c@sws602> On Mon, 01 Mar 2004 13:26:08 +0100 Christer Solskogen wrote: > I`m not sure of what you mean here, but i could try to tell you what i > do. and if i`m doing anything wrong, please corrent me :) > >From your output, you can see that you did not have permissions to install into /opt/csw. There are a few documents on blastwave.org that explain some things about DESTDIR. Running configure created Makefile(s). See if the word DESTDIR is in Makefile. You will probably find that it is not. The makers of the less program may be using older versions of the tools to generate the build scripts, such as Makefile.in Alex From solskogen at carebears.mine.nu Mon Mar 1 14:04:26 2004 From: solskogen at carebears.mine.nu (Christer Solskogen) Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 14:04:26 +0100 Subject: [users] less In-Reply-To: <20040301064629.4099f96c@sws602> References: <4041D000.4030500@carebears.mine.nu> <20040229114849.GA17506@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <4041EB5B.9030706@carebears.mine.nu> <20040229134214.GK20370@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <4043176D.2090008@carebears.mine.nu> <20040301055440.6060bbdb@sws602> <40432BE0.8000304@carebears.mine.nu> <20040301064629.4099f96c@sws602> Message-ID: <404334DA.6070401@carebears.mine.nu> Alex S Moore wrote: > On Mon, 01 Mar 2004 13:26:08 +0100 > Christer Solskogen wrote: > > >>I`m not sure of what you mean here, but i could try to tell you what i >>do. and if i`m doing anything wrong, please corrent me :) >> > > >>From your output, you can see that you did not have permissions to install > into /opt/csw. There are a few documents on blastwave.org that explain > some things about DESTDIR. > > Running configure created Makefile(s). See if the word DESTDIR is in > Makefile. You will probably find that it is not. The makers of the less > program may be using older versions of the tools to generate the build > scripts, such as Makefile.in > I`m having a bad time trying to get what you say. DESTDIR is not in Makefile. Putting it there makes no diffrence. (I tried with DESTDIR=/export/home/cso/build/less-382/cswstage) Also, there are no files in ~build/less-382/cswstage/opt I also tried running stagepkg as root. Which gives: bash-2.05# stagepkg removing old staging area creating staging area /export/home/cso/build/less-382/cswstage using make arguments of DESTDIR=/export/home/cso/build/less-382/cswstage install will use fakeroot to do install make DESTDIR=/export/home/cso/build/less-382/cswstage install /export/home/cso/build/less-382/cswstage fakeroot ./mkinstalldirs /opt/csw//bin /opt/csw//man/man1 ./install.sh -c less /opt/csw//bin/less ./install.sh -c lesskey /opt/csw//bin/lesskey ./install.sh -c lessecho /opt/csw//bin/lessecho ./install.sh -c -m 644 ./less.nro /opt/csw//man/man1/less.1 ./install.sh -c -m 644 ./lesskey.nro /opt/csw//man/man1/lesskey.1 Checking for relocatable capability... Stripping executables... prototype file is now in /export/home/cso/build/less-382/cswstage/prototype If you dont already have a prototype file, you should copy /export/home/cso/build/less-382/cswstage/prototype to where you keep your pkginfo file, and edit it as appropriate. Next, cd ~/pkgs/[software] You should then do EITHER createpkg -b /export/home/cso/build/less-382/cswstage/opt/csw OR if you want to do things the hard way pkgmk -b /export/home/cso/build/less-382/cswstage/opt/csw \ -f /export/home/cso/build/less-382/cswstage/prototype \ BASEDIR=/opt/csw [and then all the other cleanup type stuff by hand] As noted on blasewave.org i also tried with 'MAKE=gmake stagepkg INSTALL_ROOT=$PWD/cswstage install' As far as I can see i have followed the documentation on blastwave as good as i can. It there is something i have lost, please tell me what. -- Med vennlig hilsen / Best regards Christer Solskogen / dizzy tun3Z http://dtz.cjb.net - http://carebears.mine.nu "Cheap, but not as cheap as your girlfriend!" -Spider Jerusalem From sithglan at stud.uni-erlangen.de Mon Mar 1 14:10:19 2004 From: sithglan at stud.uni-erlangen.de (Thomas Glanzmann) Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 14:10:19 +0100 Subject: [users] less In-Reply-To: <404334DA.6070401@carebears.mine.nu> References: <4041D000.4030500@carebears.mine.nu> <20040229114849.GA17506@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <4041EB5B.9030706@carebears.mine.nu> <20040229134214.GK20370@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <4043176D.2090008@carebears.mine.nu> <20040301055440.6060bbdb@sws602> <40432BE0.8000304@carebears.mine.nu> <20040301064629.4099f96c@sws602> <404334DA.6070401@carebears.mine.nu> Message-ID: <20040301131019.GH6103@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> Hello Christer, I make you a little example how I would package less: (faui04b) [~/work/blastwave] gmake less + export CC=cc + CC=cc + export 'CFLAGS=-O -I/opt/csw/include' + CFLAGS=-O -I/opt/csw/include + export PATH=/opt/forte8/SUNWspro/bin:/opt/csw/bin:/usr/ccs/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/openwin/bin + PATH=/opt/forte8/SUNWspro/bin:/opt/csw/bin:/usr/ccs/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/openwin/bin + cd less-381 + ./configure --prefix=/opt/csw --mandir=/opt/csw/share/man checking for gcc... cc checking for C compiler default output... a.out checking whether the C compiler works... yes checking whether we are cross compiling... no checking for suffix of executables... checking for suffix of object files... o checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... no checking whether cc accepts -g... yes checking for cc option to accept ANSI C... none needed checking for library containing strerror... none required checking how to run the C preprocessor... cc -E checking for egrep... egrep checking for a BSD-compatible install... /opt/csw/bin/ginstall -c checking for special C compiler options needed for large files... no checking for _FILE_OFFSET_BITS value needed for large files... 64 checking for _LARGE_FILES value needed for large files... no checking for initscr in -lxcurses... no checking for initscr in -lncurses... no checking for initscr in -lcurses... yes checking for tgetent in -ltermcap... yes checking for tgetent in -ltermlib... yes checking for regcmp in -lgen... yes checking for regcmp in -lintl... yes checking for regcmp in -lPW... no checking for working terminal libraries... using -lcurses checking for ANSI C header files... yes checking for sys/types.h... yes checking for sys/stat.h... yes checking for stdlib.h... yes checking for string.h... yes checking for memory.h... yes checking for strings.h... yes checking for inttypes.h... yes checking for stdint.h... no checking for unistd.h... yes checking ctype.h usability... yes checking ctype.h presence... yes checking for ctype.h... yes checking errno.h usability... yes checking errno.h presence... yes checking for errno.h... yes checking fcntl.h usability... yes checking fcntl.h presence... yes checking for fcntl.h... yes checking limits.h usability... yes checking limits.h presence... yes checking for limits.h... yes checking stdio.h usability... yes checking stdio.h presence... yes checking for stdio.h... yes checking for stdlib.h... (cached) yes checking for string.h... (cached) yes checking termcap.h usability... no checking termcap.h presence... no checking for termcap.h... no checking termio.h usability... yes checking termio.h presence... yes checking for termio.h... yes checking termios.h usability... yes checking termios.h presence... yes checking for termios.h... yes checking time.h usability... yes checking time.h presence... yes checking for time.h... yes checking for unistd.h... (cached) yes checking values.h usability... yes checking values.h presence... yes checking for values.h... yes checking sys/ioctl.h usability... yes checking sys/ioctl.h presence... yes checking for sys/ioctl.h... yes checking sys/stream.h usability... yes checking sys/stream.h presence... yes checking for sys/stream.h... yes checking sys/ptem.h usability... no checking sys/ptem.h presence... yes configure: WARNING: sys/ptem.h: present but cannot be compiled configure: WARNING: sys/ptem.h: check for missing prerequisite headers? configure: WARNING: sys/ptem.h: proceeding with the preprocessor's result checking for sys/ptem.h... yes checking whether stat file-mode macros are broken... no checking for an ANSI C-conforming const... yes checking for off_t... yes checking for size_t... yes checking whether time.h and sys/time.h may both be included... yes checking for off_t... (cached) yes checking for void... yes checking for const... yes checking for time_t... yes checking return type of signal handlers... void checking for fsync... yes checking for memcpy... yes checking for popen... yes checking for _setjmp... yes checking for sigprocmask... yes checking for sigsetmask... no checking for stat... yes checking for strchr... yes checking for strstr... yes checking for system... yes checking for tcgetattr... yes checking for fileno... yes checking for strerror... yes checking for sys_errlist... yes checking for sigset_t... no checking for sigemptyset... yes checking for errno... yes - in errno.h checking for locale... yes checking for ctype functions... yes checking termcap for ospeed... yes - must define checking for regcomp... using POSIX regcomp configure: creating ./config.status config.status: creating Makefile config.status: creating defines.h config.status: defines.h is unchanged + gmake gmake[2]: Entering directory `/var/tmp/sithglan-pkg/less-381' test ! -f stamp-h || CONFIG_FILES= CONFIG_HEADERS=defines.h ./config.status config.status: creating defines.h config.status: defines.h is unchanged touch stamp-h gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/sithglan-pkg/less-381' + gmake prefix=/var/tmp/sithglan-pkg/less-381-buildroot/opt/csw mandir=/var/tmp/sithglan-pkg/less-381-buildroot/opt/csw/share/man install gmake[2]: Entering directory `/var/tmp/sithglan-pkg/less-381' ./mkinstalldirs /var/tmp/sithglan-pkg/less-381-buildroot/opt/csw/bin /var/tmp/sithglan-pkg/less-381-buildroot/opt/csw/share/man/man1 /opt/csw/bin/ginstall -c less /var/tmp/sithglan-pkg/less-381-buildroot/opt/csw/bin/less /opt/csw/bin/ginstall -c lesskey /var/tmp/sithglan-pkg/less-381-buildroot/opt/csw/bin/lesskey /opt/csw/bin/ginstall -c lessecho /var/tmp/sithglan-pkg/less-381-buildroot/opt/csw/bin/lessecho /opt/csw/bin/ginstall -c -m 644 ./less.nro /var/tmp/sithglan-pkg/less-381-buildroot/opt/csw/share/man/man1/less.1 /opt/csw/bin/ginstall -c -m 644 ./lesskey.nro /var/tmp/sithglan-pkg/less-381-buildroot/opt/csw/share/man/man1/lesskey.1 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/sithglan-pkg/less-381' cp: cannot create copyright: Permission denied ## Building pkgmap from package prototype file. ## Processing pkginfo file. WARNING: missing directory entry for WARNING: parameter set to "faui04b20040301140643" WARNING: parameter set to "none" ## Attempting to volumize 10 entries in pkgmap. part 1 -- 574 blocks, 17 entries ## Packaging one part. /var/spool/pkg/CSWless/pkgmap /var/spool/pkg/CSWless/pkginfo /var/spool/pkg/CSWless/root/opt/csw/bin/less /var/spool/pkg/CSWless/root/opt/csw/bin/lessecho /var/spool/pkg/CSWless/root/opt/csw/bin/lesskey /var/spool/pkg/CSWless/root/opt/csw/share/man/man1/less.1 /var/spool/pkg/CSWless/root/opt/csw/share/man/man1/lesskey.1 /var/spool/pkg/CSWless/install/copyright /var/spool/pkg/CSWless/install/depend ## Validating control scripts. ## Packaging complete. Transferring package instance I used the following build script: (faui04b) [~/work/blastwave] gmake less.s export CC=cc export CFLAGS='-O -I/opt/csw/include' export PATH="/opt/forte8/SUNWspro/bin:/opt/csw/bin:/usr/ccs/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/openwin/bin" cd less-381 ./configure --prefix=/opt/csw --mandir=/opt/csw/share/man gmake gmake prefix=/var/tmp/sithglan-pkg/less-381-buildroot/opt/csw mandir=/var/tmp/sithglan-pkg/less-381-buildroot/opt/csw/share/man install If you want to have a look at the output packages. I can build and upload you the sparc/x86 versions of the package. The problem with less is that it doesn't support DESTDIR by default so I missused the prefix and mandir MAKEFILE variables to obtain the same effect. Of course you could also go and patch the Makefile to support DESTDIR. Thomas From solskogen at carebears.mine.nu Mon Mar 1 15:05:32 2004 From: solskogen at carebears.mine.nu (Christer Solskogen) Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 15:05:32 +0100 Subject: [users] less In-Reply-To: <20040301131019.GH6103@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> References: <4041D000.4030500@carebears.mine.nu> <20040229114849.GA17506@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <4041EB5B.9030706@carebears.mine.nu> <20040229134214.GK20370@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <4043176D.2090008@carebears.mine.nu> <20040301055440.6060bbdb@sws602> <40432BE0.8000304@carebears.mine.nu> <20040301064629.4099f96c@sws602> <404334DA.6070401@carebears.mine.nu> <20040301131019.GH6103@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> Message-ID: <4043432C.9080906@carebears.mine.nu> Thomas Glanzmann wrote: > Hello Christer, > I make you a little example how I would package less: > > (faui04b) [~/work/blastwave] gmake less > + export CC=cc > + CC=cc > + export 'CFLAGS=-O -I/opt/csw/include' > + CFLAGS=-O -I/opt/csw/include > + export PATH=/opt/forte8/SUNWspro/bin:/opt/csw/bin:/usr/ccs/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/openwin/bin > + PATH=/opt/forte8/SUNWspro/bin:/opt/csw/bin:/usr/ccs/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/openwin/bin > + cd less-381 > + ./configure --prefix=/opt/csw --mandir=/opt/csw/share/man > checking for gcc... cc > checking for C compiler default output... a.out > checking whether the C compiler works... yes > checking whether we are cross compiling... no > checking for suffix of executables... > checking for suffix of object files... o > checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... no > checking whether cc accepts -g... yes > checking for cc option to accept ANSI C... none needed > checking for library containing strerror... none required > checking how to run the C preprocessor... cc -E > checking for egrep... egrep > checking for a BSD-compatible install... /opt/csw/bin/ginstall -c > checking for special C compiler options needed for large files... no > checking for _FILE_OFFSET_BITS value needed for large files... 64 > checking for _LARGE_FILES value needed for large files... no > checking for initscr in -lxcurses... no > checking for initscr in -lncurses... no > checking for initscr in -lcurses... yes > checking for tgetent in -ltermcap... yes > checking for tgetent in -ltermlib... yes > checking for regcmp in -lgen... yes > checking for regcmp in -lintl... yes > checking for regcmp in -lPW... no > checking for working terminal libraries... using -lcurses > checking for ANSI C header files... yes > checking for sys/types.h... yes > checking for sys/stat.h... yes > checking for stdlib.h... yes > checking for string.h... yes > checking for memory.h... yes > checking for strings.h... yes > checking for inttypes.h... yes > checking for stdint.h... no > checking for unistd.h... yes > checking ctype.h usability... yes > checking ctype.h presence... yes > checking for ctype.h... yes > checking errno.h usability... yes > checking errno.h presence... yes > checking for errno.h... yes > checking fcntl.h usability... yes > checking fcntl.h presence... yes > checking for fcntl.h... yes > checking limits.h usability... yes > checking limits.h presence... yes > checking for limits.h... yes > checking stdio.h usability... yes > checking stdio.h presence... yes > checking for stdio.h... yes > checking for stdlib.h... (cached) yes > checking for string.h... (cached) yes > checking termcap.h usability... no > checking termcap.h presence... no > checking for termcap.h... no > checking termio.h usability... yes > checking termio.h presence... yes > checking for termio.h... yes > checking termios.h usability... yes > checking termios.h presence... yes > checking for termios.h... yes > checking time.h usability... yes > checking time.h presence... yes > checking for time.h... yes > checking for unistd.h... (cached) yes > checking values.h usability... yes > checking values.h presence... yes > checking for values.h... yes > checking sys/ioctl.h usability... yes > checking sys/ioctl.h presence... yes > checking for sys/ioctl.h... yes > checking sys/stream.h usability... yes > checking sys/stream.h presence... yes > checking for sys/stream.h... yes > checking sys/ptem.h usability... no > checking sys/ptem.h presence... yes > configure: WARNING: sys/ptem.h: present but cannot be compiled > configure: WARNING: sys/ptem.h: check for missing prerequisite headers? > configure: WARNING: sys/ptem.h: proceeding with the preprocessor's result > checking for sys/ptem.h... yes > checking whether stat file-mode macros are broken... no > checking for an ANSI C-conforming const... yes > checking for off_t... yes > checking for size_t... yes > checking whether time.h and sys/time.h may both be included... yes > checking for off_t... (cached) yes > checking for void... yes > checking for const... yes > checking for time_t... yes > checking return type of signal handlers... void > checking for fsync... yes > checking for memcpy... yes > checking for popen... yes > checking for _setjmp... yes > checking for sigprocmask... yes > checking for sigsetmask... no > checking for stat... yes > checking for strchr... yes > checking for strstr... yes > checking for system... yes > checking for tcgetattr... yes > checking for fileno... yes > checking for strerror... yes > checking for sys_errlist... yes > checking for sigset_t... no > checking for sigemptyset... yes > checking for errno... yes - in errno.h > checking for locale... yes > checking for ctype functions... yes > checking termcap for ospeed... yes - must define > checking for regcomp... using POSIX regcomp > configure: creating ./config.status > config.status: creating Makefile > config.status: creating defines.h > config.status: defines.h is unchanged > + gmake > gmake[2]: Entering directory `/var/tmp/sithglan-pkg/less-381' > test ! -f stamp-h || CONFIG_FILES= CONFIG_HEADERS=defines.h ./config.status > config.status: creating defines.h > config.status: defines.h is unchanged > touch stamp-h > gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/sithglan-pkg/less-381' > + gmake prefix=/var/tmp/sithglan-pkg/less-381-buildroot/opt/csw mandir=/var/tmp/sithglan-pkg/less-381-buildroot/opt/csw/share/man install > gmake[2]: Entering directory `/var/tmp/sithglan-pkg/less-381' > ./mkinstalldirs /var/tmp/sithglan-pkg/less-381-buildroot/opt/csw/bin /var/tmp/sithglan-pkg/less-381-buildroot/opt/csw/share/man/man1 > /opt/csw/bin/ginstall -c less /var/tmp/sithglan-pkg/less-381-buildroot/opt/csw/bin/less > /opt/csw/bin/ginstall -c lesskey /var/tmp/sithglan-pkg/less-381-buildroot/opt/csw/bin/lesskey > /opt/csw/bin/ginstall -c lessecho /var/tmp/sithglan-pkg/less-381-buildroot/opt/csw/bin/lessecho > /opt/csw/bin/ginstall -c -m 644 ./less.nro /var/tmp/sithglan-pkg/less-381-buildroot/opt/csw/share/man/man1/less.1 > /opt/csw/bin/ginstall -c -m 644 ./lesskey.nro /var/tmp/sithglan-pkg/less-381-buildroot/opt/csw/share/man/man1/lesskey.1 > gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/sithglan-pkg/less-381' > cp: cannot create copyright: Permission denied > ## Building pkgmap from package prototype file. > ## Processing pkginfo file. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ HOW?? > WARNING: missing directory entry for > WARNING: parameter set to "faui04b20040301140643" > WARNING: parameter set to "none" > ## Attempting to volumize 10 entries in pkgmap. > part 1 -- 574 blocks, 17 entries > ## Packaging one part. > /var/spool/pkg/CSWless/pkgmap > /var/spool/pkg/CSWless/pkginfo > /var/spool/pkg/CSWless/root/opt/csw/bin/less > /var/spool/pkg/CSWless/root/opt/csw/bin/lessecho > /var/spool/pkg/CSWless/root/opt/csw/bin/lesskey > /var/spool/pkg/CSWless/root/opt/csw/share/man/man1/less.1 > /var/spool/pkg/CSWless/root/opt/csw/share/man/man1/lesskey.1 > /var/spool/pkg/CSWless/install/copyright > /var/spool/pkg/CSWless/install/depend > ## Validating control scripts. > ## Packaging complete. > Transferring package instance > > I used the following build script: > > (faui04b) [~/work/blastwave] gmake less.s > export CC=cc > export CFLAGS='-O -I/opt/csw/include' > export > PATH="/opt/forte8/SUNWspro/bin:/opt/csw/bin:/usr/ccs/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/openwin/bin" > > cd less-381 > ./configure --prefix=/opt/csw --mandir=/opt/csw/share/man > gmake > gmake prefix=/var/tmp/sithglan-pkg/less-381-buildroot/opt/csw > mandir=/var/tmp/sithglan-pkg/less-381-buildroot/opt/csw/share/man install > > If you want to have a look at the output packages. I can build and > upload you the sparc/x86 versions of the package. The problem with less > is that it doesn't support DESTDIR by default so I missused the prefix > and mandir MAKEFILE variables to obtain the same effect. Of course you > could also go and patch the Makefile to support DESTDIR. > I still dont know what you are doing, or why. Could you please tell me what commands you are using, and not just the output they are giving? When do ya run stagepkg? -- Med vennlig hilsen / Best regards Christer Solskogen / dizzy tun3Z http://dtz.cjb.net - http://carebears.mine.nu "Cheap, but not as cheap as your girlfriend!" -Spider Jerusalem From sithglan at stud.uni-erlangen.de Mon Mar 1 15:13:13 2004 From: sithglan at stud.uni-erlangen.de (Thomas Glanzmann) Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 15:13:13 +0100 Subject: [users] less In-Reply-To: <4043432C.9080906@carebears.mine.nu> References: <20040229114849.GA17506@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <4041EB5B.9030706@carebears.mine.nu> <20040229134214.GK20370@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <4043176D.2090008@carebears.mine.nu> <20040301055440.6060bbdb@sws602> <40432BE0.8000304@carebears.mine.nu> <20040301064629.4099f96c@sws602> <404334DA.6070401@carebears.mine.nu> <20040301131019.GH6103@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <4043432C.9080906@carebears.mine.nu> Message-ID: <20040301141313.GB8652@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> Hello Christer, > I still dont know what you are doing, or why. Could you please tell > me what commands you are using, and not just the output they are > giving? I am using my own build environment which calls all the tools. I can give you access to the bitkeeper tree. The problem is that it relatively big. (faui03) [~/work/blastwave] du -sh 126M . > When do ya run stagepkg? I could send you the tool and the specfile for less, but I wrote this eMail to solve the problem that you had with the make install target. If you know call 'stagepkg' or whatever it is called in the right directory it should work. Look at the make prefix=... mandir=... line. Thomas From solskogen at carebears.mine.nu Mon Mar 1 15:22:23 2004 From: solskogen at carebears.mine.nu (Christer Solskogen) Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 15:22:23 +0100 Subject: [users] less In-Reply-To: <20040301141313.GB8652@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> References: <20040229114849.GA17506@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <4041EB5B.9030706@carebears.mine.nu> <20040229134214.GK20370@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <4043176D.2090008@carebears.mine.nu> <20040301055440.6060bbdb@sws602> <40432BE0.8000304@carebears.mine.nu> <20040301064629.4099f96c@sws602> <404334DA.6070401@carebears.mine.nu> <20040301131019.GH6103@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <4043432C.9080906@carebears.mine.nu> <20040301141313.GB8652@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> Message-ID: <4043471F.4010700@carebears.mine.nu> Thomas Glanzmann wrote: > Hello Christer, > > >>I still dont know what you are doing, or why. Could you please tell >>me what commands you are using, and not just the output they are >>giving? > > > I am using my own build environment which calls all the tools. I can > give you access to the bitkeeper tree. The problem is that it relatively > big. > > (faui03) [~/work/blastwave] du -sh > 126M . > > >>When do ya run stagepkg? > > > I could send you the tool and the specfile for less, but I wrote this > eMail to solve the problem that you had with the make install target. > If you know call 'stagepkg' or whatever it is called in the right > directory it should work. Look at the make prefix=... mandir=... line. > As far as i can see, what you do has nothing to do with http://www.blastwave.org/standards/pkg-walkthrough.php I try to use that as a template for less, but that does not seem to compute. And it looks like the info on that page it not true anymore, and thats why i look like an asshole now ;) -- Med vennlig hilsen / Best regards Christer Solskogen / dizzy tun3Z http://dtz.cjb.net - http://carebears.mine.nu "Cheap, but not as cheap as your girlfriend!" -Spider Jerusalem From delrio at mie.utoronto.ca Mon Mar 1 16:49:39 2004 From: delrio at mie.utoronto.ca (Oscar del Rio) Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 10:49:39 -0500 Subject: [users] nc conflicts - nedit and netcat Message-ID: <40435B93.3030301@mie.utoronto.ca> I noticed that the packages for nedit and netcat both install /opt/csw/bin/nc (which are completely unrelated) Perhaps the program name should be changed on either package. Are there any general recommendations when this kind of conflicts affect CSW packages? I have seen conflicts in other packages but usually "harmless", such as documentation files with the same names. Regards Oscar From sithglan at stud.uni-erlangen.de Mon Mar 1 16:59:59 2004 From: sithglan at stud.uni-erlangen.de (Thomas Glanzmann) Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 16:59:59 +0100 Subject: [users] nc conflicts - nedit and netcat In-Reply-To: <40435B93.3030301@mie.utoronto.ca> References: <40435B93.3030301@mie.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: <20040301155959.GC8652@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> Hi Oscar, > I noticed that the packages for nedit and netcat > both install /opt/csw/bin/nc (which are completely unrelated) Please file bugreport against netcat. > Are there any general recommendations when this kind of conflicts > affect CSW packages? Not, that I am aware of. Thomas From sithglan at stud.uni-erlangen.de Mon Mar 1 18:40:40 2004 From: sithglan at stud.uni-erlangen.de (Thomas Glanzmann) Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 18:40:40 +0100 Subject: [users] less In-Reply-To: <4043471F.4010700@carebears.mine.nu> References: <20040229134214.GK20370@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <4043176D.2090008@carebears.mine.nu> <20040301055440.6060bbdb@sws602> <40432BE0.8000304@carebears.mine.nu> <20040301064629.4099f96c@sws602> <404334DA.6070401@carebears.mine.nu> <20040301131019.GH6103@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <4043432C.9080906@carebears.mine.nu> <20040301141313.GB8652@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <4043471F.4010700@carebears.mine.nu> Message-ID: <20040301174040.GD8652@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> Hi Christer, > As far as i can see, what you do has nothing to do with > http://www.blastwave.org/standards/pkg-walkthrough.php Right. It's the way I do my packaging and how Michael Gernoth does it. > I try to use that as a template for less, but that does not seem to > compute. The problem with the way you do it is that stagepkg does indirectly call make DESTDIR=/path/to/whatever install . This is okay for the most packages but not for less. So you have to tell stagepkg to call make install with additional parameters or patch stagepkg or patch less to support DESTDIR. Thomas From ihsan at dogan.ch Mon Mar 1 22:19:26 2004 From: ihsan at dogan.ch (Ihsan Dogan) Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 22:19:26 +0100 Subject: [users] nc conflicts - nedit and netcat In-Reply-To: <40435B93.3030301@mie.utoronto.ca> References: <40435B93.3030301@mie.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: <20040301211926.GA28714@defiant.dogan.ch> On Monday, 01 Mar 2004 10:49 -0500, Oscar del Rio wrote: > I noticed that the packages for nedit and netcat > both install /opt/csw/bin/nc (which are completely unrelated) > > Perhaps the program name should be changed on either package. Oups. I take look on that. Cheers, Ihsan... -- Swiss Unix User Group: http://www.suug.ch/ Software Packages for Solaris: http://www.blastwave.org/ From mark.aston at gunfleet.com Wed Mar 3 22:52:03 2004 From: mark.aston at gunfleet.com (Mark Aston) Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 21:52:03 +0000 Subject: [users] Firefox Message-ID: <20040303215203.7affd46c@unknown> Phils advance release of Firefox has broken after I did a pkg-get upgrade (Gecko:9873): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: cannot register existing type `LINCConnection' (Gecko:9873): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: file gtype.c: line 1872: assertion `parent_type > 0' failed (Gecko:9873): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: file gobject.c: line 615: assertion `G_TYPE_IS_OBJECT (object_type)' failed any idea which package has broken it? -- Best regards Mark Aston http://www.gunfleet.com/solaris From dkg at con-fuse.org Thu Mar 4 22:49:10 2004 From: dkg at con-fuse.org (Daniel K. Gebhart) Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 22:49:10 +0100 Subject: [users] contributing to blastwave Message-ID: <20040304214910.GI31054@sperrstunde.at> Hi guys, I just saw your great service and immediately installed pkg-get to start using it. Looks really nice. Great work! The way I found your page was when reading an article about solaris 10 and zones at blastwave.org. I enjoyed this article. Now I wanna contribute to blastwave and would like to put my scripts for patching systems to your server if you want? You can take a look at it here: http://dps.uibk.ac.at/~dkg/sol/ Next week I'll start to build some csw packages. I've experience with building debian and crux packages so far. I'm interested in the way you build packages. kind regards, daniel -- Daniel K. Gebhart http://dkg.con-fuse.org/ Institute for Computer Science University of Innsbruck Fon: (office): +43 512 507 6444 Mail: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20040304/96e8321b/attachment.bin From sithglan at stud.uni-erlangen.de Thu Mar 4 22:52:09 2004 From: sithglan at stud.uni-erlangen.de (Thomas Glanzmann) Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 22:52:09 +0100 Subject: [users] contributing to blastwave In-Reply-To: <20040304214910.GI31054@sperrstunde.at> References: <20040304214910.GI31054@sperrstunde.at> Message-ID: <20040304215209.GA16674@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> Hi Daniel, > Next week I'll start to build some csw packages. I've experience with > building debian and crux packages so far. I'm interested in the way > you build packages. I personally use a perlscript with a spec file (rpm like) to package my csw packages. If you like I can give you access to this script and sample spec files. I manage my buildinfrastructure using bitkeeper. Thomas From ihsan at dogan.ch Thu Mar 4 23:37:46 2004 From: ihsan at dogan.ch (Ihsan Dogan) Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 23:37:46 +0100 Subject: [users] Firefox In-Reply-To: <20040303215203.7affd46c@unknown> References: <20040303215203.7affd46c@unknown> Message-ID: <20040304223746.GA14526@defiant.dogan.ch> Hi Mark, On Wednesday, 03 Mar 2004 21:52 +0000, Mark Aston wrote: > Phils advance release of Firefox has broken after I did a > > pkg-get upgrade > > > (Gecko:9873): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: cannot register existing type `LINCConnection' > > (Gecko:9873): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: file gtype.c: line 1872: assertion `parent_type > 0' failed > > (Gecko:9873): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: file gobject.c: line 615: assertion `G_TYPE_IS_OBJECT (object_type)' failed > > any idea which package has broken it? Phil is currently not on this list. Please contact him via e-mail. Cheers, Ihsan... -- Swiss Unix User Group: http://www.suug.ch/ Software Packages for Solaris: http://www.blastwave.org/ From mark.aston at gunfleet.com Fri Mar 5 07:34:25 2004 From: mark.aston at gunfleet.com (Mark Aston) Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 06:34:25 +0000 Subject: [users] Firefox In-Reply-To: <20040304223746.GA14526@defiant.dogan.ch> References: <20040303215203.7affd46c@unknown> <20040304223746.GA14526@defiant.dogan.ch> Message-ID: <20040305063425.469ea79f@unknown> On Thu, 4 Mar 2004 23:37:46 +0100 Ihsan Dogan wrote: > Phil is currently not on this list. Please contact him via > e-mail. Thanks, will do -- Best regards Mark Aston http://www.gunfleet.com/solaris From johann.barnard at alindigo.com Tue Mar 9 13:17:36 2004 From: johann.barnard at alindigo.com (Johann Barnard) Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 14:17:36 +0200 Subject: [users] Veritas/L9 ? Message-ID: HI All New to the site but hope you can help me. When I do a backup +-30gb not compressed at all it runs fine but to restore it, it ask for a 2nd tape Run robtest and this is the output. Netbackup 4.5 Solaris 8 SFV480 All with the latest and greatest patches loaded Error Codes when doing a "show slots" in "robtest": read_element_status failed, CHECK CONDITION sense key = 0x4, asc = 0x40, ascq = 0x80, UNKNOWN ERROR, SENSE_KEY: 0x04, ASC: 0x40, ASCQ: 0x80 The Veritas backups fail with code "98" Kind regards Johann From delrio at mie.utoronto.ca Wed Mar 10 04:04:45 2004 From: delrio at mie.utoronto.ca (Oscar del Rio) Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 22:04:45 -0500 Subject: [users] Veritas/L9 ? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <404E85CD.4020804@mie.utoronto.ca> Johann Barnard wrote: > When I do a backup +-30gb not compressed at all it runs fine but to restore > it, it ask for a 2nd tape > Run robtest and this is the output. > > Netbackup 4.5 > Solaris 8 > SFV480 > All with the latest and greatest patches loaded Off-topic for this mailing list. Try the newsgroups comp.unix.solaris, comp.sys.sun.admin, etc Regards Oscar From delrio at mie.utoronto.ca Wed Mar 10 19:01:36 2004 From: delrio at mie.utoronto.ca (Oscar del Rio) Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 13:01:36 -0500 Subject: [users] Evolution Message-ID: <404F5800.1070803@mie.utoronto.ca> As announced on the solaris-x86 yahoo group, Ximian Evolution is now available on blastwave for both sparc and x86. It works great. It has many library dependencies and you might have to upgrade some of them. http://www.blastwave.org/packages.php/evolution First time I ran it on x86 I got ld.so.1: /opt/csw/bin/evolution: fatal: libintl.so.3: open failed: No such file or directory A quick check showed that I had /opt/csw/lib/libintl.so.2 but not .3 "pkg-get upgrade ggettext" fixed it. From asmoore at edge.net Wed Mar 10 22:51:12 2004 From: asmoore at edge.net (Alex S Moore) Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 15:51:12 -0600 Subject: [users] Evolution In-Reply-To: <404F5800.1070803@mie.utoronto.ca> References: <404F5800.1070803@mie.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: <20040310155112.6fa978ab@sws602> On Wed, 10 Mar 2004 13:01:36 -0500 Oscar del Rio wrote: > As announced on the solaris-x86 yahoo group, Ximian Evolution > is now available on blastwave for both sparc and x86. > > It works great. It has many library dependencies and you > might have to upgrade some of them. > Yes, this is exciting. Some time ago, I worked on packaging Evolution. But I was overwhelmed by the dependencies. I am anxious to try this package. I have used Evolution on Solaris 9 sparc for several months and think that it is the best. I went through all of the hacks to get an install and it worked for about 6 weeks. Then something went wrong and I have not been able to use it with my main login id since then. So I created a secondary account and copy all of my mail, using procmail, to that account and have Evolution running all of the time with that account. I never log directly into my workstation with the secondary account and just use su, the xauth things and start Evolution. Alex From daniel at dseichter.de Thu Mar 11 22:31:51 2004 From: daniel at dseichter.de (Daniel Seichter) Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 22:31:51 +0100 Subject: [users] Re: [newpkgs] New PostgreSQL packages In-Reply-To: <40509EDA.9090008@markround.com> References: <40509EDA.9090008@markround.com> Message-ID: <20040311223151.760b855b@blade> Hello Mark, what differences I will get by using 64bit instead of 32bit? Thanks Daniel Seichter From mark at markround.com Fri Mar 12 11:28:03 2004 From: mark at markround.com (Mark Round) Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 10:28:03 +0000 Subject: [users] Re: [newpkgs] New PostgreSQL packages In-Reply-To: <20040311223151.760b855b@blade> References: <40509EDA.9090008@markround.com> <20040311223151.760b855b@blade> Message-ID: <405190B3.2020104@markround.com> Daniel Seichter wrote: >what differences I will get by using 64bit instead of 32bit? > > For "normal" usage, not much. In fact, the 64-bit version will most likely be slower than the 32-bit (although not by a huge amount). It's only really useful if you have very large databases/tables, otherwise, the 32-bit version should be fine. The advantage of having 64-bit libraries included in the package is that people compiling their own software now have the ability to link to the 64-bit libraries if they need. -Mark From ihsan at dogan.ch Fri Mar 12 14:09:30 2004 From: ihsan at dogan.ch (Ihsan Dogan) Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 14:09:30 +0100 Subject: [users] Evolution In-Reply-To: <20040310155112.6fa978ab@sws602> References: <404F5800.1070803@mie.utoronto.ca> <20040310155112.6fa978ab@sws602> Message-ID: <20040312130930.GB6012@defiant.dogan.ch> On Wednesday, 10 Mar 2004 15:51 -0600, Alex S Moore wrote: > > As announced on the solaris-x86 yahoo group, Ximian Evolution > > is now available on blastwave for both sparc and x86. > > > > It works great. It has many library dependencies and you > > might have to upgrade some of them. > > > > Yes, this is exciting. Some time ago, I worked on packaging Evolution. > But I was overwhelmed by the dependencies. I am anxious to try this > package. > > I have used Evolution on Solaris 9 sparc for several months and think that > it is the best. I went through all of the hacks to get an install and it > worked for about 6 weeks. Then something went wrong and I have not been > able to use it with my main login id since then. > > So I created a secondary account and copy all of my mail, using procmail, > to that account and have Evolution running all of the time with that > account. I never log directly into my workstation with the secondary > account and just use su, the xauth things and start Evolution. How can I delete all Evolution settings and files in my home directory? I'm a little bit confused, because there are so many files (~/evolution, .gconf-csw) files and directories for Evolution. Cheers, Ihsan... -- Swiss Unix User Group: http://www.suug.ch/ Software Packages for Solaris: http://www.blastwave.org/ From asmoore at edge.net Fri Mar 12 14:47:18 2004 From: asmoore at edge.net (Alex S Moore) Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 07:47:18 -0600 Subject: [users] Evolution In-Reply-To: <20040312130930.GB6012@defiant.dogan.ch> References: <404F5800.1070803@mie.utoronto.ca> <20040310155112.6fa978ab@sws602> <20040312130930.GB6012@defiant.dogan.ch> Message-ID: <20040312074718.6a633e79@sws602> On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 14:09:30 +0100 Ihsan Dogan wrote: > How can I delete all Evolution settings and files in my home > directory? I'm a little bit confused, because there are so many > files (~/evolution, .gconf-csw) files and directories for > Evolution. I wish it were simpler, but it is not only your home directory. There are also files relating to gnome tied to your account that are not in the home directory, such as activation servers. If you have not run Evolution before, maybe you can just rename ~/evolution and all .gconf* and .gnome* directories. Of course, to do this, you need a different account that has the proper permissions. If you have run Evolution, first run `evolution --force-shutdown'. That will kill off a few things. Alex From dkg at blastwave.org Fri Mar 12 19:08:41 2004 From: dkg at blastwave.org (Daniel K. Gebhart) Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 19:08:41 +0100 Subject: [users] pkg-get should use WGETFLAGS="--continue --dot-style=mega" Message-ID: <20040312180841.GA27058@sperrstunde.at> Hi, Please add "--continue" to $WGETFLAGS. kind regards, daniel -- Daniel K. Gebhart http://dkg.con-fuse.org/ Institute for Computer Science University of Innsbruck Fon: (office): +43 512 507 6444 Mail: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20040312/a070712a/attachment.bin From ihsan at dogan.ch Fri Mar 12 20:37:41 2004 From: ihsan at dogan.ch (Ihsan Dogan) Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 20:37:41 +0100 Subject: [users] Evolution In-Reply-To: <20040312074718.6a633e79@sws602> References: <404F5800.1070803@mie.utoronto.ca> <20040310155112.6fa978ab@sws602> <20040312130930.GB6012@defiant.dogan.ch> <20040312074718.6a633e79@sws602> Message-ID: <20040312193741.GA16628@defiant.dogan.ch> On Friday, 12 Mar 2004 07:47 -0600, Alex S Moore wrote: > > How can I delete all Evolution settings and files in my home > > directory? I'm a little bit confused, because there are so many > > files (~/evolution, .gconf-csw) files and directories for > > Evolution. > > I wish it were simpler, but it is not only your home directory. There are > also files relating to gnome tied to your account that are not in the home > directory, such as activation servers. > > If you have not run Evolution before, maybe you can just rename ~/evolution > and all .gconf* and .gnome* directories. Of course, to do this, you need a > different account that has the proper permissions. If you have run > Evolution, first run `evolution --force-shutdown'. That will kill off a > few things. I forgot to disable gconfd. After I disabled gconfd, I deleted ~/evolution and ~/.gconf/apps/evolution. Cheers, Ihsan... -- Swiss Unix User Group: http://www.suug.ch/ Software Packages for Solaris: http://www.blastwave.org/ From mats.larsson at ericsson.com Tue Mar 16 09:46:58 2004 From: mats.larsson at ericsson.com (Mats Larsson) Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 09:46:58 +0100 Subject: [users] Using admin file to override /opt/csw as install dir Message-ID: <4056BF02.30203@ericsson.com> I've been following the advice in /var/pkg-get/admin-fullauto and did create /var/pkg-get/admin with the following line: basedir=/opt/pub/csw But nothing gets installed in /opt/pub/csw everything goes to /opt/csw as usual. Am I missing something? /MOL This communication is confidential and intended solely for the addressee(s). Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you believe this message has been sent to you in error, please notify the sender by replying to this transmission and delete the message without disclosing it. Thank you. E-mail including attachments is susceptible to data corruption, interruption, unauthorized amendment, tampering and viruses, and we only send and receive e-mails on the basis that we are not liable for any such corruption, interception, amendment, tampering or viruses or any consequences thereof. From daniel at dseichter.de Tue Mar 16 17:29:47 2004 From: daniel at dseichter.de (Daniel Seichter) Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 17:29:47 +0100 Subject: [users] Problem compiling Message-ID: <20040316172947.7dc1f3cc@blade> Hello, first of all: Good work for all the packages!! I want to try to compile JPilot on myself, but I get the following error in the config.log. ############################### | /* confdefs.h. */ | | #define PACKAGE_NAME "" | #define PACKAGE_TARNAME "" | #define PACKAGE_VERSION "" | #define PACKAGE_STRING "" | #define PACKAGE_BUGREPORT "" | #define PACKAGE "jpilot" | #define VERSION "0.99.7" | /* end confdefs.h. */ | | int | main () | { | | ; | return 0; | } configure:2436: error: C compiler cannot create executables See `config.log' for more details. ############################### What other package I have to install? I installed automake, autoconf, gmake, gcc3 and other non compilie relevated software like pan, sylpheed, postgresql, gftp,... Hope to find an answer here. Thanks Daniel Seichter From daniel at dseichter.de Tue Mar 16 17:41:34 2004 From: daniel at dseichter.de (Daniel Seichter) Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 17:41:34 +0100 Subject: [users] Re: [newpkgs] New PostgreSQL packages In-Reply-To: <405190B3.2020104@markround.com> References: <40509EDA.9090008@markround.com> <20040311223151.760b855b@blade> <405190B3.2020104@markround.com> Message-ID: <20040316174134.7138af11@blade> Hello Mark, thank you for your answer. My database is at the moment about 3GB and only contains text. Is there a size of database where 64bit results a higher performancel than 32bit? Thanks Daniel On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 10:28:03 +0000 Mark Round wrote: > Daniel Seichter wrote: > > >what differences I will get by using 64bit instead of 32bit? > > > > > For "normal" usage, not much. In fact, the 64-bit version will most > likely be slower than the 32-bit (although not by a huge amount). It's > only really useful if you have very large databases/tables, otherwise, > the 32-bit version should be fine. The advantage of having 64-bit > libraries included in the package is that people compiling their own > software now have the ability to link to the 64-bit libraries if they > need. > > -Mark > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users From asmoore at edge.net Tue Mar 16 18:03:25 2004 From: asmoore at edge.net (Alex S Moore) Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 11:03:25 -0600 Subject: [users] Problem compiling In-Reply-To: <20040316172947.7dc1f3cc@blade> References: <20040316172947.7dc1f3cc@blade> Message-ID: <20040316110325.093bca2e@sws602> On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 17:29:47 +0100 Daniel Seichter wrote: > Hello, > > first of all: Good work for all the packages!! > > I want to try to compile JPilot on myself, but I get the following > error in the config.log. > configure:2436: error: C compiler cannot create executables > See `config.log' for more details. > ############################### I would set some environment variables for your compilers. Such as CC=, etc. Run `./configure --help` for the list of commonly used environment variables. If you want this for SylpheedClaws, I could give it a try. I think that JPilot is available as an option for SylpheedClaws. Assuming that you are using CSWsylpheed, I would be glad to try adding that option. Alex From daniel at dseichter.de Tue Mar 16 18:18:54 2004 From: daniel at dseichter.de (Daniel Seichter) Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 18:18:54 +0100 Subject: [users] Problem compiling In-Reply-To: <20040316110325.093bca2e@sws602> References: <20040316172947.7dc1f3cc@blade> <20040316110325.093bca2e@sws602> Message-ID: <20040316181854.43f9c47b@blade> Hello Alex, thank you for your answer. I will try to set the CC variable. You've right. This is one thing, I didn't think about it, because I use my Palm at the moment only for notices and small databases for Lotus Notes. Please try to use this option, think, if JPilot is working, I will use it on Sylpheed also. Maybe I will try to add JPilot to Blastwave after I got it run on my machine. Daniel On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 11:03:25 -0600 Alex S Moore wrote: > On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 17:29:47 +0100 > Daniel Seichter wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > first of all: Good work for all the packages!! > > > > I want to try to compile JPilot on myself, but I get the following > > error in the config.log. > > > configure:2436: error: C compiler cannot create executables > > See `config.log' for more details. > > ############################### > > I would set some environment variables for your compilers. Such as > CC=, etc. Run `./configure --help` for the list > of commonly used environment variables. > > If you want this for SylpheedClaws, I could give it a try. I think > that JPilot is available as an option for SylpheedClaws. Assuming > that you are using CSWsylpheed, I would be glad to try adding that > option. > > Alex > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users From daniel at dseichter.de Tue Mar 16 18:51:01 2004 From: daniel at dseichter.de (Daniel Seichter) Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 18:51:01 +0100 Subject: [users] Problem compiling In-Reply-To: <20040316181854.43f9c47b@blade> References: <20040316172947.7dc1f3cc@blade> <20040316110325.093bca2e@sws602> <20040316181854.43f9c47b@blade> Message-ID: <20040316185101.5895d700@blade> I can compile it with gtk, but not with gtk2. This error message occured: ######################################### checking for GTK+ - version >= 2.0.3... *** 'pkg-config --modversion gtk+-2.0' returned 2.1.0, but GTK+ (2.2.4) *** was found! If pkg-config was correct, then it is best *** to remove the old version of GTK+. You may also be able to fix the error*** by modifying your LD_LIBRARY_PATH enviroment variable, or by editing*** /etc/ld.so.conf. Make sure you have run ldconfig if that is *** required on your system. *** If pkg-config was wrong, set the environment variable PKG_CONFIG_PATH*** to point to the correct configuration files no configure: error: *** GTK >= 2.0.3 not found *** ######################################### And at this time, I do not know, what to do. Thanks Daniel On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 18:18:54 +0100 Daniel Seichter wrote: > Hello Alex, > > thank you for your answer. I will try to set the CC variable. > > You've right. This is one thing, I didn't think about it, because I > use my Palm at the moment only for notices and small databases for > Lotus Notes. > > Please try to use this option, think, if JPilot is working, I will use > it on Sylpheed also. > Maybe I will try to add JPilot to Blastwave after I got it run on my > machine. > > Daniel > > On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 11:03:25 -0600 > Alex S Moore wrote: > > > On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 17:29:47 +0100 > > Daniel Seichter wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > first of all: Good work for all the packages!! > > > > > > I want to try to compile JPilot on myself, but I get the following > > > error in the config.log. > > > > > configure:2436: error: C compiler cannot create executables > > > See `config.log' for more details. > > > ############################### > > > > I would set some environment variables for your compilers. Such as > > CC=, etc. Run `./configure --help` for the > > list of commonly used environment variables. > > > > If you want this for SylpheedClaws, I could give it a try. I think > > that JPilot is available as an option for SylpheedClaws. Assuming > > that you are using CSWsylpheed, I would be glad to try adding that > > option. > > > > Alex > > _______________________________________________ > > users mailing list > > users at lists.blastwave.org > > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users From asmoore at edge.net Tue Mar 16 19:18:57 2004 From: asmoore at edge.net (Alex S Moore) Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 12:18:57 -0600 Subject: [users] Problem compiling In-Reply-To: <20040316185101.5895d700@blade> References: <20040316172947.7dc1f3cc@blade> <20040316110325.093bca2e@sws602> <20040316181854.43f9c47b@blade> <20040316185101.5895d700@blade> Message-ID: <20040316121857.05659a6c@sws602> On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 18:51:01 +0100 Daniel Seichter wrote: > I can compile it with gtk, but not with gtk2. This error message > occured: If you plan to use JPilot with SylpheedClaws, you do want gtk. gtk2 claws is still in development and is a few months away from release. That said, have you done the following before running configure? PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/opt/csw/lib ; export PKG_CONFIG_PATH (or whatever is appropriate for your shell) You need gtk2 from CSW. Also, do not use LD_LIBRARY_PATH. Use LD_OPTIONS, or whatever is appropriate for your build tools, to set the runpath for binaries. Alex From daniel at dseichter.de Tue Mar 16 20:20:55 2004 From: daniel at dseichter.de (Daniel Seichter) Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 20:20:55 +0100 Subject: [users] Problem compiling In-Reply-To: <20040316121857.05659a6c@sws602> References: <20040316172947.7dc1f3cc@blade> <20040316110325.093bca2e@sws602> <20040316181854.43f9c47b@blade> <20040316185101.5895d700@blade> <20040316121857.05659a6c@sws602> Message-ID: <20040316202055.64877cb3@blade> Hello Alex, oh ok, than I will wait for compiling it with gtk2. With gtk it works ok and I am synching at the moment the first time. I want to compile it again with language support but at the moment I am happy about it. The configure options was: bash-2.05b$ CC=/opt/csw/gcc3/bin/gcc MAKE=/opt/csw/bin/gmake ./configure --with-pilot-prefix=/opt/csw --with-gtk-prefix=/opt/csw I do not know, if I can build the package till weekend. Daniel Seichter On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 12:18:57 -0600 Alex S Moore wrote: > On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 18:51:01 +0100 > Daniel Seichter wrote: > > > I can compile it with gtk, but not with gtk2. This error message > > occured: > > If you plan to use JPilot with SylpheedClaws, you do want gtk. gtk2 > claws is still in development and is a few months away from release. > > That said, have you done the following before running configure? > PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/opt/csw/lib ; export PKG_CONFIG_PATH (or whatever is > appropriate for your shell) > You need gtk2 from CSW. Also, do not use LD_LIBRARY_PATH. Use > LD_OPTIONS, or whatever is appropriate for your build tools, to set > the runpath for binaries. > > Alex > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users From ihsan at dogan.ch Tue Mar 16 22:45:17 2004 From: ihsan at dogan.ch (Ihsan Dogan) Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 22:45:17 +0100 Subject: [users] Using admin file to override /opt/csw as install dir In-Reply-To: <4056BF02.30203@ericsson.com> References: <4056BF02.30203@ericsson.com> Message-ID: <20040316214517.GB4774@defiant.dogan.ch> Hi, On Tuesday, 16 Mar 2004 09:46 +0100, Mats Larsson wrote: > I've been following the advice in /var/pkg-get/admin-fullauto and did > create /var/pkg-get/admin with the following line: > > basedir=/opt/pub/csw > > But nothing gets installed in /opt/pub/csw everything goes to /opt/csw > as usual. Am I missing something? You should be carefully with that. Not all packages are relocatable. Cheers, Ihsan... -- Swiss Unix User Group: http://www.suug.ch/ Software Packages for Solaris: http://www.blastwave.org/ From ihsan at dogan.ch Wed Mar 17 11:07:41 2004 From: ihsan at dogan.ch (Ihsan Dogan) Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 11:07:41 +0100 Subject: [users] Evolution & Proxy Message-ID: <20040317100741.GA26593@defiant.dogan.ch> Hi, How can I tell Evolution to use a http Proxy? Cheers, Ihsan... -- Swiss Unix User Group: http://www.suug.ch/ Software Packages for Solaris: http://www.blastwave.org/ From michael at blastwave.org Wed Mar 17 11:32:47 2004 From: michael at blastwave.org (Michael Gernoth) Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 11:32:47 +0100 Subject: [users] Evolution & Proxy In-Reply-To: <20040317100741.GA26593@defiant.dogan.ch> References: <20040317100741.GA26593@defiant.dogan.ch> Message-ID: <20040317103247.GA7805@zerfleddert.de> Hi, On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 11:07:41AM +0100, Ihsan Dogan wrote: > How can I tell Evolution to use a http Proxy? Follow these intuitive and simple steps ;-) http://support.ximian.com/cgi-bin/ximian.cfg/php/enduser/std_adp.php?p_faqid=159 Regards, Michael From mats.larsson at ericsson.com Wed Mar 17 13:44:33 2004 From: mats.larsson at ericsson.com (Mats Larsson) Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 13:44:33 +0100 Subject: [users] Using admin file to override /opt/csw as install dir In-Reply-To: <20040316214517.GB4774@defiant.dogan.ch> References: users@lists.blastwave.org <20040316214517.GB4774@defiant.dogan.ch> Message-ID: <40584831.1080508@ericsson.com> On 2004-03-16 22:45, Ihsan Dogan wrote: > Hi, > > On Tuesday, 16 Mar 2004 09:46 +0100, Mats Larsson wrote: > >> I've been following the advice in /var/pkg-get/admin-fullauto and did >> create /var/pkg-get/admin with the following line: >> >> basedir=/opt/pub/csw >> >> But nothing gets installed in /opt/pub/csw everything goes to /opt/csw > >> as usual. Am I missing something? > > You should be carefully with that. Not all packages are > relocatable. None so far has been relocatable :(. What's the problem? I don't want them to install on every machnie i our network. My intention is to install them once on a mounted network for anyone to use. Can I not do that? /MOL This communication is confidential and intended solely for the addressee(s). Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you believe this message has been sent to you in error, please notify the sender by replying to this transmission and delete the message without disclosing it. Thank you. E-mail including attachments is susceptible to data corruption, interruption, unauthorized amendment, tampering and viruses, and we only send and receive e-mails on the basis that we are not liable for any such corruption, interception, amendment, tampering or viruses or any consequences thereof. From ihsan at dogan.ch Wed Mar 17 14:20:54 2004 From: ihsan at dogan.ch (Ihsan Dogan) Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 14:20:54 +0100 Subject: [users] Evolution & Proxy In-Reply-To: <20040317103247.GA7805@zerfleddert.de> References: <20040317100741.GA26593@defiant.dogan.ch> <20040317103247.GA7805@zerfleddert.de> Message-ID: <20040317132054.GC1023@defiant.dogan.ch> Hi, On Wednesday, 17 Mar 2004 11:32 +0100, Michael Gernoth wrote: > > How can I tell Evolution to use a http Proxy? > > Follow these intuitive and simple steps ;-) > http://support.ximian.com/cgi-bin/ximian.cfg/php/enduser/std_adp.php?p_faqid=159 Thank you. It works perfect. :-) Is it somehow possible, that Evolution starts Acrobat Reader for pdf files? Cheers, Ihsan... -- Swiss Unix User Group: http://www.suug.ch/ Software Packages for Solaris: http://www.blastwave.org/ From ihsan at dogan.ch Wed Mar 17 14:24:16 2004 From: ihsan at dogan.ch (Ihsan Dogan) Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 14:24:16 +0100 Subject: [users] Using admin file to override /opt/csw as install dir In-Reply-To: <40584831.1080508@ericsson.com> References: <20040316214517.GB4774@defiant.dogan.ch> <40584831.1080508@ericsson.com> Message-ID: <20040317132416.GD1023@defiant.dogan.ch> On Wednesday, 17 Mar 2004 13:44 +0100, Mats Larsson wrote: > >You should be carefully with that. Not all packages are > >relocatable. > > None so far has been relocatable :(. What's the problem? I don't want > them to install on every machnie i our network. My intention is to > install them once on a mounted network for anyone to use. Can I not do that? That should be posible. Try to share /opt/csw, if it's possible. Don't forget, that some packages (like IceWM) have also some files on /etc. Cheers, Ihsan... -- Swiss Unix User Group: http://www.suug.ch/ Software Packages for Solaris: http://www.blastwave.org/ From asmoore at edge.net Wed Mar 17 15:08:07 2004 From: asmoore at edge.net (Alex S Moore) Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 08:08:07 -0600 Subject: [users] Re: [newpkgs] New evolution packages In-Reply-To: <20040316175936.GA10914@zerfleddert.de> References: <20040316175936.GA10914@zerfleddert.de> Message-ID: <1079532401.27298.2.camel@sws602> On Tue, 2004-03-16 at 11:59, Michael Gernoth wrote: > The evolution-packages have been updated to version > evolution-1.4.6,REV=2004.03.15. > It should be available within 24hrs from the mirror-sites. > > Changes since version evolution-1.4.5,REV=2004.03.09: > * New upstream version 1.4.6 > * compiled with --without-broken-spool > (closes bug #292) > Yes, Evolution works fine now. Thanks for the quick response Michael. Alex From markus at gyger.org Wed Mar 17 15:21:48 2004 From: markus at gyger.org (Markus Gyger) Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 15:21:48 +0100 (CET) Subject: [users] Using admin file to override /opt/csw as install dir In-Reply-To: <20040317132416.GD1023@defiant.dogan.ch> from Ihsan Dogan at "Mar 17, 2004 02:24:16 pm" Message-ID: <200403171421.i2HELnjv018743@cs1.gmu.edu> > > None so far has been relocatable :(. What's the problem? I don't want > > them to install on every machnie i our network. My intention is to > > install them once on a mounted network for anyone to use. Can I not do that? If you don't want to use /opt/csw then it's usually simplest to use a lofs mount and not to mess with BASEDIR or option -R. E.g. # mkdir -p /export/opt/csw /opt/csw # echo '/export/opt/csw - /opt/csw lofs - yes -' >> /etc/vfstab # mount /opt/csw # pkg-get ... # echo 'share -o ro=@192.168/16 /export/opt/csw' >> /etc/dfs/dfstab # shareall Markus From asmoore at edge.net Wed Mar 17 16:56:58 2004 From: asmoore at edge.net (Alex S Moore) Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 09:56:58 -0600 Subject: [users] RE: Fonts in Evolution Message-ID: <1079539017.27298.46.camel@sws602> How do I load additional fonts for use by CSW Evolution? For example, Arial 10.5, Roman Italic 10.5, Times New Roman 9, Tahoma 8.75, et.al. I constantly get messages like 'Couldn't load font falling back to "Sans 7.5". Alex From mark at markround.com Thu Mar 18 11:50:40 2004 From: mark at markround.com (Mark Round) Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 10:50:40 +0000 Subject: [users] Re: [newpkgs] New PostgreSQL packages In-Reply-To: <20040316174134.7138af11@blade> References: <40509EDA.9090008@markround.com> <20040311223151.760b855b@blade> <405190B3.2020104@markround.com> <20040316174134.7138af11@blade> Message-ID: <40597F00.8040101@markround.com> Daniel Seichter wrote: >Hello Mark, > >thank you for your answer. My database is at the moment about 3GB and >only contains text. Is there a size of database where 64bit results a >higher performancel than 32bit? > >Thanks >Daniel > Hi! Sorry for the delay in responding, I've been doing some digging around, to see what I could find. I've never myself run a database of that size, so it's hard for me to say - the only way you'll ever really be sure is to do some benchmarking yourself, comparing the performance of the two servers. However, I did find the following which seems to answer your question - the cut off point seems to be around the 5Gb mark (assuming you trust someone anecdotal evidence...) :- "Performance of 32-bit cpu machines will decline rapidly when the database size exceeds 5 GigaByte. You can run 30 gig database on 32-bit cpu but the performance will be degraded. Machines with 32-bit cpu impose a limitation of 2 GB on RAM, 2 GB on file system sizes and other limitations on the operating system. ... For extremely large databases, it is strongly advised to use 64-bit machines Compile PostgreSQL under a 64-bit cpu and it can support huge databases and large queries. ... Performance of PostgreSQL for queries on large tables and databases will be several times faster than PostgreSQL on 32-bit cpu machines. Advantage of 64-bit machines are that you get very large memory addressing space and the operating system can support very large file-systems, provide better performance with large databases, support much larger memory (RAM), have more capabilities etc.. " (Taken from http://www.collaborium.org/onsite/venezuela/docs/linux/Linux_HOWTOS/PDF/PostgreSQL-HOWTO.pdf) -Mark From daniel at dseichter.de Thu Mar 18 20:26:49 2004 From: daniel at dseichter.de (Daniel Seichter) Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 20:26:49 +0100 Subject: [users] Re: [newpkgs] New PostgreSQL packages In-Reply-To: <40597F00.8040101@markround.com> References: <40509EDA.9090008@markround.com> <20040311223151.760b855b@blade> <405190B3.2020104@markround.com> <20040316174134.7138af11@blade> <40597F00.8040101@markround.com> Message-ID: <20040318202649.4d5ef49a@blade> Hello Mark, thank you for your detailed answer. If I can finish my project I need a server which can handle big data volumes and handle many subqueries (like postgresql). And SUN advertises for the Opteron (but I don't think if this is a REAL 64bit engine, beccause of the compatibility of x86 code) but maybe it will be a server with this technology and so I can test it in real "life". On my Blade 1500 I can't really compare if it is faster, because there is a ATA Hard-Disk. But hope to get a real test soon. Wish you a nice evening Daniel Seichter P.S.: Maybe you are interested in another environment for postgresql: postgresql.dseichter.org (not actual but will be soon) On Thu, 18 Mar 2004 10:50:40 +0000 Mark Round wrote: > Daniel Seichter wrote: > > >Hello Mark, > > > >thank you for your answer. My database is at the moment about 3GB > >and only contains text. Is there a size of database where 64bit > >results a higher performancel than 32bit? > > > >Thanks > >Daniel > > > > Hi! > Sorry for the delay in responding, I've been doing some digging > around, to see what I could find. > I've never myself run a database of that size, so it's hard for me to > say - the only way you'll ever really be > sure is to do some benchmarking yourself, comparing the performance of > the two servers. However, > I did find the following which seems to answer your question - the cut > off point seems to be around the > 5Gb mark (assuming you trust someone anecdotal evidence...) :- > > "Performance of 32-bit cpu machines will decline rapidly when the > database size > exceeds 5 GigaByte. You can run 30 gig database on 32-bit cpu but the > performance > will be degraded. Machines with 32-bit cpu impose a limitation of 2 GB > on RAM, > 2 GB on file system sizes and other limitations on the operating > system.... > For extremely large databases, it is strongly advised to use 64-bit > machines > Compile PostgreSQL under a 64-bit cpu and it can support huge > databases and large queries. > ... > Performance of PostgreSQL for queries on large tables and databases > will be several times faster than PostgreSQL on 32-bit cpu machines. > Advantage of 64-bit > machines are that you get very large memory addressing space and the > operating > system can support very large file-systems, provide better performance > with large databases, support much larger memory (RAM), have more > capabilities etc.. > " > > (Taken from > http://www.collaborium.org/onsite/venezuela/docs/linux/Linux_HOWTOS/PDF/PostgreSQL-HOWTO.pdf) > > -Mark > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users From markus at gyger.org Thu Mar 18 21:42:39 2004 From: markus at gyger.org (Markus Gyger) Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 21:42:39 +0100 (CET) Subject: [users] Re: [newpkgs] ncurses 5.4 packaged In-Reply-To: <20040318201311.73108.qmail@mail2.infinology.com> from Andreas Almroth at "Mar 18, 2004 12:13:11 pm" Message-ID: <200403182042.i2IKgdg8013655@cs1.gmu.edu> > When using 64 bit libraries, make sure to adopt build scripts/Makefiles to > point to /opt/csw/lib/sparcv9. Preferably /opt/csw/lib/64 so the config will also work for AMD64. Markus From kenmays at blastwave.org Fri Mar 19 01:20:15 2004 From: kenmays at blastwave.org (Ken Mays) Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 19:20:15 -0500 (EST) Subject: [users] Re: [newpkgs] ncurses 5.4 packaged Message-ID: <200403190020.i2J0KFF09101@blastwave.org> From daniel at dseichter.de Sat Mar 20 19:43:49 2004 From: daniel at dseichter.de (Daniel Seichter) Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 19:43:49 +0100 Subject: [users] Solaris 10 Message-ID: <20040320194349.0608948a@blade> Hello, which packages will be used if I use Solaris 10? I want to install the Software Express, but using some applications from blastwave. Is it possible with Solaris 10 or not? Thanks Daniel Seichter From sithglan at stud.uni-erlangen.de Sat Mar 20 20:07:30 2004 From: sithglan at stud.uni-erlangen.de (Thomas Glanzmann) Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 20:07:30 +0100 Subject: [users] Solaris 10 In-Reply-To: <20040320194349.0608948a@blade> References: <20040320194349.0608948a@blade> Message-ID: <20040320190730.GX12274@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> Hi, > which packages will be used if I use Solaris 10? I want to install the > Software Express, but using some applications from blastwave. Is it > possible with Solaris 10 or not? indeed. it is possible and we're already doing so and had no problems expect for lsof which is fixed now. Some of the packages which were build on Solaris 8 dpend on the 'x'-libs which are merged in the normal libs under Solaris 10 so it maybe necessary to install some 'fake' packages in order to install some packages on Solaris 10. See also the whole thread beginning with http://www.blastwave.org/mailarchives/maint/2003/0694.html If you need help with creating fake packages just ask Michael Gernoth Thomas From daniel at dseichter.de Sat Mar 20 20:08:02 2004 From: daniel at dseichter.de (Daniel Seichter) Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 20:08:02 +0100 Subject: [users] Solaris 10 In-Reply-To: <20040320190730.GX12274@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> References: <20040320194349.0608948a@blade> <20040320190730.GX12274@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> Message-ID: <20040320200802.2d0c7691@blade> Hello, thank you very much for this answer. So I will install Solaris 10 this evening *yeeepie* Daniel On Sat, 20 Mar 2004 20:07:30 +0100 Thomas Glanzmann wrote: > Hi, > > > which packages will be used if I use Solaris 10? I want to install > > the Software Express, but using some applications from blastwave. > > Is it possible with Solaris 10 or not? > > indeed. it is possible and we're already doing so and had no problems > expect for lsof which is fixed now. Some of the packages which were > build on Solaris 8 dpend on the 'x'-libs which are merged in the > normal libs under Solaris 10 so it maybe necessary to install some > 'fake' packages in order to install some packages on Solaris 10. > > See also the whole thread beginning with > http://www.blastwave.org/mailarchives/maint/2003/0694.html > > If you need help with creating fake packages just ask Michael Gernoth > > > Thomas > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users From daniel at dseichter.de Sun Mar 21 18:36:00 2004 From: daniel at dseichter.de (Daniel Seichter) Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 18:36:00 +0100 Subject: [users] What to do after xfce installed??? Message-ID: <20040321183600.7901e522@blade> Hello, can anyone give me a short description, how to add the xfce into the login-screen? I installed xfce 4.0.4 and now want to login. Is there any script or something like else? The output from the installation I deleted so I do not know, if there was anything. Thanks Daniel Seichter P.S.: I did not upgrade to Solaris 10, because of some issues of my installation CDs. From mark.aston at gunfleet.com Sun Mar 21 19:00:28 2004 From: mark.aston at gunfleet.com (Mark Aston) Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 18:00:28 +0000 Subject: [users] What to do after xfce installed??? In-Reply-To: <20040321183600.7901e522@blade> References: <20040321183600.7901e522@blade> Message-ID: <20040321180028.171f27fa@unknown> On Sun, 21 Mar 2004 18:36:00 +0100 Daniel Seichter wrote: > I installed xfce 4.0.4 and now want to login. Is there any script or > something like else? The output from the installation I deleted so I do > not know, if there was anything. go to my site below, the Window Managers page and use the Blackbox files, you will need to edit for XFCE of course HTH -- Best regards Mark Aston http://www.gunfleet.com/solaris From daniel at dseichter.de Sun Mar 21 19:04:50 2004 From: daniel at dseichter.de (Daniel Seichter) Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 19:04:50 +0100 Subject: [users] What to do after xfce installed??? In-Reply-To: <20040321180028.171f27fa@unknown> References: <20040321183600.7901e522@blade> <20040321180028.171f27fa@unknown> Message-ID: <20040321190450.2bf46b27@blade> Hell Mark, > go to my site below, the Window Managers page and use the Blackbox > files, you will need to edit for XFCE of course thanks, I will take a look for it. Wish you a nice evening. Daniel From delrio at mie.utoronto.ca Sun Mar 21 20:33:52 2004 From: delrio at mie.utoronto.ca (Oscar del Rio) Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 14:33:52 -0500 Subject: [users] Re: [newpkgs] openssl update In-Reply-To: <20040320223018.GA28997@blastwave.blastwave.org> References: <20040320223018.GA28997@blastwave.blastwave.org> Message-ID: <405DEE20.6080303@mie.utoronto.ca> Philip Brown wrote: > openssl 0.9.7d was just pushed out > it's a security release Thanks! Just a reminder to everyone upgrading the package, that any daemons using the library must be restarted, such as the CSW versions of apache, mysql, sendmail, etc The whole list of CSW packages that depend on openssl is at http://www.blastwave.org/packages.php/openssl From daniel at dseichter.de Mon Mar 22 13:22:06 2004 From: daniel at dseichter.de (Daniel Seichter) Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 13:22:06 +0100 Subject: [users] Install information Solaris 10 Message-ID: <20040322132206.46316976@blade> Hello, I yesterday installed Solaris 10 (the error before was a USB device) and today I installed all blastwave software. I don't know earlier or later releases of Solaris 10, I used b51, but the following packages I had to install from Solaris 8: SUNWcslx SUNWdplx SUNWscpux These packages where needed by texinfo (dependency of sylpheed). Everything further works fine, so can't find errors after installing this packages from Solaris 8 (HW 7/03) This should only be for information. Daniel From garyarm at testedgeinc.com Tue Mar 23 23:31:55 2004 From: garyarm at testedgeinc.com (Gary Armstrong) Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 14:31:55 -0800 Subject: [users] /opt/csw Message-ID: <4060BADB.3000904@testedgeinc.com> I'm new to blastwave, so pardon my ignorance. Somewhere in the docs I read that for the most part, blastwave packages were network deployable. Only packages containing daemons should be installed local. Since they all default to loading in /opt/csw, what's the recommended way to load something local? Currently, I'm automounting /opt/csw using a direct map. For instance, if I want to run apache on 2 machines, what's the blastwave recommendation, for where/how the installs should be done. TIA Gary Note: Risking sounding corny, "Great job!!" From dclarke at blastwave.org Wed Mar 24 10:16:06 2004 From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke) Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 04:16:06 -0500 (EST) Subject: [users] Dedicated GNOME and KDE build server being setup Message-ID: FYI : I expect to have a dedicated build server in place for KDE and GNOME within the next 24 hours. The server is patching now and then Studio 8 will be installed. Stay tuned for further updates on GNOME. We await the GNOME source release after the security issues are solved. Dennis Clarke Director and Admin for Blastwave.org Home of Community Software Packages dclarke at blastwave.org for The Solaris Operating Environment From daniel at dseichter.de Wed Mar 24 12:18:53 2004 From: daniel at dseichter.de (Daniel Seichter) Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 12:18:53 +0100 Subject: [users] Dedicated GNOME and KDE build server being setup In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20040324121853.7feaa5e8@blade> Hello Dennis, > I expect to have a dedicated build server in place for KDE and > GNOME > within the next 24 hours. The server is patching now and then Studio > 8 will be installed. > > Stay tuned for further updates on GNOME. We await the GNOME source > release after the security issues are solved. This means, Gnome 2.4 is available for Solaris soon? Nice work!!! Daniel From delrio at mie.utoronto.ca Wed Mar 24 14:43:20 2004 From: delrio at mie.utoronto.ca (Oscar del Rio) Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 08:43:20 -0500 Subject: [users] /opt/csw In-Reply-To: <4060BADB.3000904@testedgeinc.com> References: <4060BADB.3000904@testedgeinc.com> Message-ID: <40619078.6020808@mie.utoronto.ca> Gary Armstrong wrote: > Since they all default to loading in /opt/csw, what's the recommended > way to load something local? Currently, I'm automounting /opt/csw using > a direct map. > > For instance, if I want to run apache on 2 machines, what's the > blastwave recommendation, for where/how the installs should be done. Speaking only for myself, not for blastwave: :-) You can install apache on the NFS server just like any other CSW package, and on the NFS clients that will run the apache daemon keep the conf file in a local dir, e.g. /etc/apache Make a /etc/init.d/ startup script to run /opt/csw/apache/bin/httpd -f /etc/apache/conf/httpd.conf In the local config file make sure the paths for DocumentRoot and log files are in a local dir. Alternatively, you can cd /opt/csw/apache mv conf conf.csw; ln -s /etc/apache/conf mv logs logs.csw; ln -s /etc/apache/logs mv htdocs htdocs.csw; ln -s /etc/apache/htdocs but be careful when you upgrade the apache package. From sithglan at stud.uni-erlangen.de Wed Mar 24 16:26:00 2004 From: sithglan at stud.uni-erlangen.de (Thomas Glanzmann) Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 16:26:00 +0100 Subject: [users] /opt/csw In-Reply-To: <4060BADB.3000904@testedgeinc.com> References: <4060BADB.3000904@testedgeinc.com> Message-ID: <20040324152559.GH3372@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> Hi, > Since they all default to loading in /opt/csw, what's the recommended > way to load something local? Currently, I'm automounting /opt/csw using > a direct map. you could loop mount a local volume to /opt/csw/etc or wherever the configs (dynamic) stuff is. We have such a setup (not for this purpose) but I think it isn't a good choice at all. Diskspace is cheap these days so buy extra diskspace if you need it and install the csw local on each machine. (That's how we do it at the moment) And of course automated everything (updates, installtion and so on) Thomas From warden at mail.testedgeinc.com Wed Mar 24 16:46:38 2004 From: warden at mail.testedgeinc.com (Gary Armstrong) Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 07:46:38 -0800 Subject: [users] /opt/csw References: <4060BADB.3000904@testedgeinc.com> <40619078.6020808@mie.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: <4061AD5E.1070200@mail.testedgeinc.com> Oscar del Rio wrote: > Gary Armstrong wrote: > >> Since they all default to loading in /opt/csw, what's the recommended >> way to load something local? Currently, I'm automounting /opt/csw >> using a direct map. >> >> For instance, if I want to run apache on 2 machines, what's the >> blastwave recommendation, for where/how the installs should be done. > > > Speaking only for myself, not for blastwave: :-) > > You can install apache on the NFS server just like any other CSW > package, and on the NFS clients that will run the apache daemon > keep the conf file in a local dir, e.g. /etc/apache > Make a /etc/init.d/ startup script to run > /opt/csw/apache/bin/httpd -f /etc/apache/conf/httpd.conf > > In the local config file make sure the paths for DocumentRoot > and log files are in a local dir. I am leaning this way. Anyway, blastwave might consider a second directory (ie csw-l), for things that should be configured locally. It also makes them easy to spot. That way if some software package is configured for the host I installed on, it doesn't get automounted on another. Thanks Gary > > Alternatively, you can > cd /opt/csw/apache > mv conf conf.csw; ln -s /etc/apache/conf > mv logs logs.csw; ln -s /etc/apache/logs > mv htdocs htdocs.csw; ln -s /etc/apache/htdocs > > but be careful when you upgrade the apache package. > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > From warden at mail.testedgeinc.com Wed Mar 24 16:47:59 2004 From: warden at mail.testedgeinc.com (Gary Armstrong) Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 07:47:59 -0800 Subject: [users] /opt/csw References: <4060BADB.3000904@testedgeinc.com> <20040324152559.GH3372@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> Message-ID: <4061ADAF.5050701@mail.testedgeinc.com> Thomas Glanzmann wrote: >Hi, > > > >>Since they all default to loading in /opt/csw, what's the recommended >>way to load something local? Currently, I'm automounting /opt/csw using >>a direct map. >> >> > >you could loop mount a local volume to /opt/csw/etc or wherever the >configs (dynamic) stuff is. We have such a setup (not for this purpose) >but I think it isn't a good choice at all. Diskspace is cheap these days >so buy extra diskspace if you need it and install the csw local on each >machine. (That's how we do it at the moment) And of course automated >everything (updates, installtion and so on) > > Thomas >_______________________________________________ >users mailing list >users at lists.blastwave.org >https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > > > It's not the price of disk. It's the ease of installation/maintenance the other way. Gary From sithglan at stud.uni-erlangen.de Wed Mar 24 18:09:55 2004 From: sithglan at stud.uni-erlangen.de (Thomas Glanzmann) Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 18:09:55 +0100 Subject: [users] /opt/csw In-Reply-To: <4061ADAF.5050701@mail.testedgeinc.com> References: <4060BADB.3000904@testedgeinc.com> <20040324152559.GH3372@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <4061ADAF.5050701@mail.testedgeinc.com> Message-ID: <20040324170955.GK3372@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> Hi, > It's not the price of disk. It's the ease of installation/maintenance > the other way. automate it. It isn't that hard. Thomas From warden at mail.testedgeinc.com Wed Mar 24 18:26:10 2004 From: warden at mail.testedgeinc.com (Gary Armstrong) Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 09:26:10 -0800 Subject: [users] /opt/csw References: <4060BADB.3000904@testedgeinc.com> <20040324152559.GH3372@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <4061ADAF.5050701@mail.testedgeinc.com> <20040324170955.GK3372@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> Message-ID: <4061C4B2.4050302@mail.testedgeinc.com> Thomas Glanzmann wrote: >Hi, > > > >>It's not the price of disk. It's the ease of installation/maintenance >>the other way. >> >> > >automate it. It isn't that hard. > > Thomas >_______________________________________________ >users mailing list >users at lists.blastwave.org >https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > > > I think I'd rather avoid any kind of religious war, but being hard/easy ( just like disk price) isn't the point. See maintenance. Gary From dclarke at blastwave.org Wed Mar 24 21:08:14 2004 From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke) Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 15:08:14 -0500 (EST) Subject: [users] Dedicated GNOME build server up but GNOME 2.6 delayed a week Message-ID: All: Due to security issues at gnome.org the release of the 2.6 code has been pushed off until next week. The dedicated build server callisto is up and running with Studio 8 and the Sun Performance Library. I will run some tests with a build of POV-Ray for 64-bit sparc. Dennis Clarke Director and Admin for Blastwave.org Home of Community Software Packages dclarke at blastwave.org for The Solaris Operating Environment From dkg at blastwave.org Fri Mar 26 18:27:26 2004 From: dkg at blastwave.org (Daniel K. Gebhart) Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 18:27:26 +0100 Subject: [users] ping phil Message-ID: <20040326172726.GJ13837@sperrstunde.at> Hi, Do you know whats up with Phil? I wrote some mails to him and did not get a reply so far. :( He wanted me to package something and did not respond to my questions afterwards. Because of a misstake it seems that I destroyed my ~/.ssh/authorized_keys2 at blastwave. Who is responsible for that? PS: Would be nice if someone could rename the subject of the mails to the list to something more detailed than users. I propose "csw-users". kind regards, daniel -- _ Daniel K. Gebhart, \. _(9> , http://dkg.con-fuse.org/ \==_) , http://www.pro-linux.de/ .o -'= , http://www.blastwave.org/ o. , http://monday-syndrome.org/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20040326/9709a7c9/attachment.bin From asmoore at edge.net Fri Mar 26 18:55:00 2004 From: asmoore at edge.net (Alex S Moore) Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 11:55:00 -0600 Subject: [users] ping phil In-Reply-To: <20040326172726.GJ13837@sperrstunde.at> References: <20040326172726.GJ13837@sperrstunde.at> Message-ID: <1080323699.16767.42.camel@sws602> On Fri, 2004-03-26 at 11:27, Daniel K. Gebhart wrote: > Hi, > > Do you know whats up with Phil? Phil gets busy. You must be patient:> > Because of a misstake it seems that I > destroyed my ~/.ssh/authorized_keys2 at blastwave. Who is responsible for > that? As far I know, Phil. See above. Alex From ihsan at dogan.ch Fri Mar 26 21:42:41 2004 From: ihsan at dogan.ch (Ihsan Dogan) Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 21:42:41 +0100 Subject: [users] ping phil In-Reply-To: <20040326172726.GJ13837@sperrstunde.at> References: <20040326172726.GJ13837@sperrstunde.at> Message-ID: <20040326204241.GA24963@defiant.dogan.ch> On Friday, 26 Mar 2004 18:27 +0100, Daniel K. Gebhart wrote: > PS: Would be nice if someone could rename the subject of the mails to the > list to something more detailed than users. I propose "csw-users". Why? users at lists.blastwave.org is detailled enough. Cheers, Ihsan... -- Swiss Unix User Group: http://www.suug.ch/ Software Packages for Solaris: http://www.blastwave.org/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 186 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20040326/7019f879/attachment.bin From solskogen at carebears.mine.nu Mon Mar 1 11:58:53 2004 From: solskogen at carebears.mine.nu (Christer Solskogen) Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 11:58:53 +0100 Subject: [users] less In-Reply-To: <20040229134214.GK20370@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> References: <4041D000.4030500@carebears.mine.nu> <20040229114849.GA17506@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <4041EB5B.9030706@carebears.mine.nu> <20040229134214.GK20370@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> Message-ID: <4043176D.2090008@carebears.mine.nu> Thomas Glanzmann wrote: > Hi, > > >>try now. >>http://home.online.no/~dtun3z/less-3.8.2-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > > > same thing. No binaries. > > (faui03) [/var/tmp/sithglan] find CSWless/ > CSWless/ > CSWless/pkginfo > CSWless/pkgmap > CSWless/install > CSWless/install/copyright > After reading to my eyes bleed it figures that stagepkg should produce a cswstage/prototype file which contains a list over files, and permissions the program has. But stagepkg only produce a file that contains: i pkginfo i copyright and nothing more... have i missed something? the program is compiled, and works. -- Med vennlig hilsen / Best regards Christer Solskogen / dizzy tun3Z http://dtz.cjb.net - http://carebears.mine.nu "Cheap, but not as cheap as your girlfriend!" -Spider Jerusalem From asmoore at edge.net Mon Mar 1 12:54:40 2004 From: asmoore at edge.net (Alex S Moore) Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 05:54:40 -0600 Subject: [users] less In-Reply-To: <4043176D.2090008@carebears.mine.nu> References: <4041D000.4030500@carebears.mine.nu> <20040229114849.GA17506@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <4041EB5B.9030706@carebears.mine.nu> <20040229134214.GK20370@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <4043176D.2090008@carebears.mine.nu> Message-ID: <20040301055440.6060bbdb@sws602> On Mon, 01 Mar 2004 11:58:53 +0100 Christer Solskogen wrote: > After reading to my eyes bleed it figures that stagepkg should produce a > cswstage/prototype file which contains a list over files, and > permissions the program has. > But stagepkg only produce a file that contains: > i pkginfo > i copyright > > and nothing more... have i missed something? > the program is compiled, and works. > It looks like your Makefile does not have DESTDIR defined. Hence, make install from stagepkg, wrote the files to the final destination. Maybe your Makefile has some other variable to use for the distribution directory. If so, there is a note on this in the CSW build documents. Alex From solskogen at carebears.mine.nu Mon Mar 1 13:26:08 2004 From: solskogen at carebears.mine.nu (Christer Solskogen) Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 13:26:08 +0100 Subject: [users] less In-Reply-To: <20040301055440.6060bbdb@sws602> References: <4041D000.4030500@carebears.mine.nu> <20040229114849.GA17506@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <4041EB5B.9030706@carebears.mine.nu> <20040229134214.GK20370@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <4043176D.2090008@carebears.mine.nu> <20040301055440.6060bbdb@sws602> Message-ID: <40432BE0.8000304@carebears.mine.nu> Alex S Moore wrote: > > > > It looks like your Makefile does not have DESTDIR defined. Hence, make > install from stagepkg, wrote the files to the final destination. Maybe > your Makefile has some other variable to use for the distribution > directory. If so, there is a note on this in the CSW build documents. > I`m not sure of what you mean here, but i could try to tell you what i do. and if i`m doing anything wrong, please corrent me :) I have following directories in $HOME build\ pkgs\ src\ I also did 'mkdir pkgs\less' in pkgs\less i have a pkginfo file which looks like this: PKG=CSWless NAME=less - GNU less VERSION=3.82 CATEGORY=application VENDOR=http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/less/ packaged for CSW by Christer Solskogen HOTLINE=http://www.blastwave.org/bugtrack/ EMAIL=solskogen at carebears.mine.nu Unpacked less-382.tar.gz in ~build cp COPYING ~/pkgs/less/copyright export LD_OPTIONS='-R/opt/csw/lib/$ISALIST -R/opt/csw/lib -L/opt/csw/lib' ./configure --prefix=/opt/csw (it seems like the configure script does not support --program-prefix) gmake stagepkg gives this output as user 'cso' (my username) bash-2.05$ stagepkg creating staging area /export/home/cso/build/less-382/cswstage using make arguments of DESTDIR=/export/home/cso/build/less-382/cswstage install will use fakeroot to do install make DESTDIR=/export/home/cso/build/less-382/cswstage install /export/home/cso/build/less-382/cswstage fakeroot ./mkinstalldirs /opt/csw//bin /opt/csw//man/man1 ./install.sh -c less /opt/csw//bin/less cp: cannot create /opt/csw//bin/#inst.1756#: Permission denied mv: cannot access /opt/csw//bin/#inst.1756# ./install.sh -c lesskey /opt/csw//bin/lesskey cp: cannot create /opt/csw//bin/#inst.1761#: Permission denied mv: cannot access /opt/csw//bin/#inst.1761# ./install.sh -c lessecho /opt/csw//bin/lessecho cp: cannot create /opt/csw//bin/#inst.1766#: Permission denied mv: cannot access /opt/csw//bin/#inst.1766# ./install.sh -c -m 644 ./less.nro /opt/csw//man/man1/less.1 cp: cannot create /opt/csw//man/man1/#inst.1771#: Permission denied chmod: WARNING: can't access /opt/csw//man/man1/#inst.1771# mv: cannot access /opt/csw//man/man1/#inst.1771# ./install.sh -c -m 644 ./lesskey.nro /opt/csw//man/man1/lesskey.1 cp: cannot create /opt/csw//man/man1/#inst.1777#: Permission denied chmod: WARNING: can't access /opt/csw//man/man1/#inst.1777# mv: cannot access /opt/csw//man/man1/#inst.1777# Checking for relocatable capability... Stripping executables... prototype file is now in /export/home/cso/build/less-382/cswstage/prototype If you dont already have a prototype file, you should copy /export/home/cso/build/less-382/cswstage/prototype to where you keep your pkginfo file, and edit it as appropriate. Next, cd ~/pkgs/[software] You should then do EITHER createpkg -b /export/home/cso/build/less-382/cswstage/opt/csw OR if you want to do things the hard way pkgmk -b /export/home/cso/build/less-382/cswstage/opt/csw \ -f /export/home/cso/build/less-382/cswstage/prototype \ BASEDIR=/opt/csw [and then all the other cleanup type stuff by hand] (I`m wondereing why i get Permission Denied! I dont get them as root, but my prototype is still missing a lot of info) Just in case: uname -a SunOS hugs 5.9 Generic_112234-11 i86pc i386 i86pc -- Med vennlig hilsen / Best regards Christer Solskogen / dizzy tun3Z http://dtz.cjb.net - http://carebears.mine.nu "Cheap, but not as cheap as your girlfriend!" -Spider Jerusalem From asmoore at edge.net Mon Mar 1 13:46:29 2004 From: asmoore at edge.net (Alex S Moore) Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 06:46:29 -0600 Subject: [users] less In-Reply-To: <40432BE0.8000304@carebears.mine.nu> References: <4041D000.4030500@carebears.mine.nu> <20040229114849.GA17506@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <4041EB5B.9030706@carebears.mine.nu> <20040229134214.GK20370@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <4043176D.2090008@carebears.mine.nu> <20040301055440.6060bbdb@sws602> <40432BE0.8000304@carebears.mine.nu> Message-ID: <20040301064629.4099f96c@sws602> On Mon, 01 Mar 2004 13:26:08 +0100 Christer Solskogen wrote: > I`m not sure of what you mean here, but i could try to tell you what i > do. and if i`m doing anything wrong, please corrent me :) > >From your output, you can see that you did not have permissions to install into /opt/csw. There are a few documents on blastwave.org that explain some things about DESTDIR. Running configure created Makefile(s). See if the word DESTDIR is in Makefile. You will probably find that it is not. The makers of the less program may be using older versions of the tools to generate the build scripts, such as Makefile.in Alex From solskogen at carebears.mine.nu Mon Mar 1 14:04:26 2004 From: solskogen at carebears.mine.nu (Christer Solskogen) Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 14:04:26 +0100 Subject: [users] less In-Reply-To: <20040301064629.4099f96c@sws602> References: <4041D000.4030500@carebears.mine.nu> <20040229114849.GA17506@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <4041EB5B.9030706@carebears.mine.nu> <20040229134214.GK20370@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <4043176D.2090008@carebears.mine.nu> <20040301055440.6060bbdb@sws602> <40432BE0.8000304@carebears.mine.nu> <20040301064629.4099f96c@sws602> Message-ID: <404334DA.6070401@carebears.mine.nu> Alex S Moore wrote: > On Mon, 01 Mar 2004 13:26:08 +0100 > Christer Solskogen wrote: > > >>I`m not sure of what you mean here, but i could try to tell you what i >>do. and if i`m doing anything wrong, please corrent me :) >> > > >>From your output, you can see that you did not have permissions to install > into /opt/csw. There are a few documents on blastwave.org that explain > some things about DESTDIR. > > Running configure created Makefile(s). See if the word DESTDIR is in > Makefile. You will probably find that it is not. The makers of the less > program may be using older versions of the tools to generate the build > scripts, such as Makefile.in > I`m having a bad time trying to get what you say. DESTDIR is not in Makefile. Putting it there makes no diffrence. (I tried with DESTDIR=/export/home/cso/build/less-382/cswstage) Also, there are no files in ~build/less-382/cswstage/opt I also tried running stagepkg as root. Which gives: bash-2.05# stagepkg removing old staging area creating staging area /export/home/cso/build/less-382/cswstage using make arguments of DESTDIR=/export/home/cso/build/less-382/cswstage install will use fakeroot to do install make DESTDIR=/export/home/cso/build/less-382/cswstage install /export/home/cso/build/less-382/cswstage fakeroot ./mkinstalldirs /opt/csw//bin /opt/csw//man/man1 ./install.sh -c less /opt/csw//bin/less ./install.sh -c lesskey /opt/csw//bin/lesskey ./install.sh -c lessecho /opt/csw//bin/lessecho ./install.sh -c -m 644 ./less.nro /opt/csw//man/man1/less.1 ./install.sh -c -m 644 ./lesskey.nro /opt/csw//man/man1/lesskey.1 Checking for relocatable capability... Stripping executables... prototype file is now in /export/home/cso/build/less-382/cswstage/prototype If you dont already have a prototype file, you should copy /export/home/cso/build/less-382/cswstage/prototype to where you keep your pkginfo file, and edit it as appropriate. Next, cd ~/pkgs/[software] You should then do EITHER createpkg -b /export/home/cso/build/less-382/cswstage/opt/csw OR if you want to do things the hard way pkgmk -b /export/home/cso/build/less-382/cswstage/opt/csw \ -f /export/home/cso/build/less-382/cswstage/prototype \ BASEDIR=/opt/csw [and then all the other cleanup type stuff by hand] As noted on blasewave.org i also tried with 'MAKE=gmake stagepkg INSTALL_ROOT=$PWD/cswstage install' As far as I can see i have followed the documentation on blastwave as good as i can. It there is something i have lost, please tell me what. -- Med vennlig hilsen / Best regards Christer Solskogen / dizzy tun3Z http://dtz.cjb.net - http://carebears.mine.nu "Cheap, but not as cheap as your girlfriend!" -Spider Jerusalem From sithglan at stud.uni-erlangen.de Mon Mar 1 14:10:19 2004 From: sithglan at stud.uni-erlangen.de (Thomas Glanzmann) Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 14:10:19 +0100 Subject: [users] less In-Reply-To: <404334DA.6070401@carebears.mine.nu> References: <4041D000.4030500@carebears.mine.nu> <20040229114849.GA17506@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <4041EB5B.9030706@carebears.mine.nu> <20040229134214.GK20370@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <4043176D.2090008@carebears.mine.nu> <20040301055440.6060bbdb@sws602> <40432BE0.8000304@carebears.mine.nu> <20040301064629.4099f96c@sws602> <404334DA.6070401@carebears.mine.nu> Message-ID: <20040301131019.GH6103@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> Hello Christer, I make you a little example how I would package less: (faui04b) [~/work/blastwave] gmake less + export CC=cc + CC=cc + export 'CFLAGS=-O -I/opt/csw/include' + CFLAGS=-O -I/opt/csw/include + export PATH=/opt/forte8/SUNWspro/bin:/opt/csw/bin:/usr/ccs/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/openwin/bin + PATH=/opt/forte8/SUNWspro/bin:/opt/csw/bin:/usr/ccs/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/openwin/bin + cd less-381 + ./configure --prefix=/opt/csw --mandir=/opt/csw/share/man checking for gcc... cc checking for C compiler default output... a.out checking whether the C compiler works... yes checking whether we are cross compiling... no checking for suffix of executables... checking for suffix of object files... o checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... no checking whether cc accepts -g... yes checking for cc option to accept ANSI C... none needed checking for library containing strerror... none required checking how to run the C preprocessor... cc -E checking for egrep... egrep checking for a BSD-compatible install... /opt/csw/bin/ginstall -c checking for special C compiler options needed for large files... no checking for _FILE_OFFSET_BITS value needed for large files... 64 checking for _LARGE_FILES value needed for large files... no checking for initscr in -lxcurses... no checking for initscr in -lncurses... no checking for initscr in -lcurses... yes checking for tgetent in -ltermcap... yes checking for tgetent in -ltermlib... yes checking for regcmp in -lgen... yes checking for regcmp in -lintl... yes checking for regcmp in -lPW... no checking for working terminal libraries... using -lcurses checking for ANSI C header files... yes checking for sys/types.h... yes checking for sys/stat.h... yes checking for stdlib.h... yes checking for string.h... yes checking for memory.h... yes checking for strings.h... yes checking for inttypes.h... yes checking for stdint.h... no checking for unistd.h... yes checking ctype.h usability... yes checking ctype.h presence... yes checking for ctype.h... yes checking errno.h usability... yes checking errno.h presence... yes checking for errno.h... yes checking fcntl.h usability... yes checking fcntl.h presence... yes checking for fcntl.h... yes checking limits.h usability... yes checking limits.h presence... yes checking for limits.h... yes checking stdio.h usability... yes checking stdio.h presence... yes checking for stdio.h... yes checking for stdlib.h... (cached) yes checking for string.h... (cached) yes checking termcap.h usability... no checking termcap.h presence... no checking for termcap.h... no checking termio.h usability... yes checking termio.h presence... yes checking for termio.h... yes checking termios.h usability... yes checking termios.h presence... yes checking for termios.h... yes checking time.h usability... yes checking time.h presence... yes checking for time.h... yes checking for unistd.h... (cached) yes checking values.h usability... yes checking values.h presence... yes checking for values.h... yes checking sys/ioctl.h usability... yes checking sys/ioctl.h presence... yes checking for sys/ioctl.h... yes checking sys/stream.h usability... yes checking sys/stream.h presence... yes checking for sys/stream.h... yes checking sys/ptem.h usability... no checking sys/ptem.h presence... yes configure: WARNING: sys/ptem.h: present but cannot be compiled configure: WARNING: sys/ptem.h: check for missing prerequisite headers? configure: WARNING: sys/ptem.h: proceeding with the preprocessor's result checking for sys/ptem.h... yes checking whether stat file-mode macros are broken... no checking for an ANSI C-conforming const... yes checking for off_t... yes checking for size_t... yes checking whether time.h and sys/time.h may both be included... yes checking for off_t... (cached) yes checking for void... yes checking for const... yes checking for time_t... yes checking return type of signal handlers... void checking for fsync... yes checking for memcpy... yes checking for popen... yes checking for _setjmp... yes checking for sigprocmask... yes checking for sigsetmask... no checking for stat... yes checking for strchr... yes checking for strstr... yes checking for system... yes checking for tcgetattr... yes checking for fileno... yes checking for strerror... yes checking for sys_errlist... yes checking for sigset_t... no checking for sigemptyset... yes checking for errno... yes - in errno.h checking for locale... yes checking for ctype functions... yes checking termcap for ospeed... yes - must define checking for regcomp... using POSIX regcomp configure: creating ./config.status config.status: creating Makefile config.status: creating defines.h config.status: defines.h is unchanged + gmake gmake[2]: Entering directory `/var/tmp/sithglan-pkg/less-381' test ! -f stamp-h || CONFIG_FILES= CONFIG_HEADERS=defines.h ./config.status config.status: creating defines.h config.status: defines.h is unchanged touch stamp-h gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/sithglan-pkg/less-381' + gmake prefix=/var/tmp/sithglan-pkg/less-381-buildroot/opt/csw mandir=/var/tmp/sithglan-pkg/less-381-buildroot/opt/csw/share/man install gmake[2]: Entering directory `/var/tmp/sithglan-pkg/less-381' ./mkinstalldirs /var/tmp/sithglan-pkg/less-381-buildroot/opt/csw/bin /var/tmp/sithglan-pkg/less-381-buildroot/opt/csw/share/man/man1 /opt/csw/bin/ginstall -c less /var/tmp/sithglan-pkg/less-381-buildroot/opt/csw/bin/less /opt/csw/bin/ginstall -c lesskey /var/tmp/sithglan-pkg/less-381-buildroot/opt/csw/bin/lesskey /opt/csw/bin/ginstall -c lessecho /var/tmp/sithglan-pkg/less-381-buildroot/opt/csw/bin/lessecho /opt/csw/bin/ginstall -c -m 644 ./less.nro /var/tmp/sithglan-pkg/less-381-buildroot/opt/csw/share/man/man1/less.1 /opt/csw/bin/ginstall -c -m 644 ./lesskey.nro /var/tmp/sithglan-pkg/less-381-buildroot/opt/csw/share/man/man1/lesskey.1 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/sithglan-pkg/less-381' cp: cannot create copyright: Permission denied ## Building pkgmap from package prototype file. ## Processing pkginfo file. WARNING: missing directory entry for WARNING: parameter set to "faui04b20040301140643" WARNING: parameter set to "none" ## Attempting to volumize 10 entries in pkgmap. part 1 -- 574 blocks, 17 entries ## Packaging one part. /var/spool/pkg/CSWless/pkgmap /var/spool/pkg/CSWless/pkginfo /var/spool/pkg/CSWless/root/opt/csw/bin/less /var/spool/pkg/CSWless/root/opt/csw/bin/lessecho /var/spool/pkg/CSWless/root/opt/csw/bin/lesskey /var/spool/pkg/CSWless/root/opt/csw/share/man/man1/less.1 /var/spool/pkg/CSWless/root/opt/csw/share/man/man1/lesskey.1 /var/spool/pkg/CSWless/install/copyright /var/spool/pkg/CSWless/install/depend ## Validating control scripts. ## Packaging complete. Transferring package instance I used the following build script: (faui04b) [~/work/blastwave] gmake less.s export CC=cc export CFLAGS='-O -I/opt/csw/include' export PATH="/opt/forte8/SUNWspro/bin:/opt/csw/bin:/usr/ccs/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/openwin/bin" cd less-381 ./configure --prefix=/opt/csw --mandir=/opt/csw/share/man gmake gmake prefix=/var/tmp/sithglan-pkg/less-381-buildroot/opt/csw mandir=/var/tmp/sithglan-pkg/less-381-buildroot/opt/csw/share/man install If you want to have a look at the output packages. I can build and upload you the sparc/x86 versions of the package. The problem with less is that it doesn't support DESTDIR by default so I missused the prefix and mandir MAKEFILE variables to obtain the same effect. Of course you could also go and patch the Makefile to support DESTDIR. Thomas From solskogen at carebears.mine.nu Mon Mar 1 15:05:32 2004 From: solskogen at carebears.mine.nu (Christer Solskogen) Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 15:05:32 +0100 Subject: [users] less In-Reply-To: <20040301131019.GH6103@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> References: <4041D000.4030500@carebears.mine.nu> <20040229114849.GA17506@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <4041EB5B.9030706@carebears.mine.nu> <20040229134214.GK20370@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <4043176D.2090008@carebears.mine.nu> <20040301055440.6060bbdb@sws602> <40432BE0.8000304@carebears.mine.nu> <20040301064629.4099f96c@sws602> <404334DA.6070401@carebears.mine.nu> <20040301131019.GH6103@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> Message-ID: <4043432C.9080906@carebears.mine.nu> Thomas Glanzmann wrote: > Hello Christer, > I make you a little example how I would package less: > > (faui04b) [~/work/blastwave] gmake less > + export CC=cc > + CC=cc > + export 'CFLAGS=-O -I/opt/csw/include' > + CFLAGS=-O -I/opt/csw/include > + export PATH=/opt/forte8/SUNWspro/bin:/opt/csw/bin:/usr/ccs/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/openwin/bin > + PATH=/opt/forte8/SUNWspro/bin:/opt/csw/bin:/usr/ccs/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/openwin/bin > + cd less-381 > + ./configure --prefix=/opt/csw --mandir=/opt/csw/share/man > checking for gcc... cc > checking for C compiler default output... a.out > checking whether the C compiler works... yes > checking whether we are cross compiling... no > checking for suffix of executables... > checking for suffix of object files... o > checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... no > checking whether cc accepts -g... yes > checking for cc option to accept ANSI C... none needed > checking for library containing strerror... none required > checking how to run the C preprocessor... cc -E > checking for egrep... egrep > checking for a BSD-compatible install... /opt/csw/bin/ginstall -c > checking for special C compiler options needed for large files... no > checking for _FILE_OFFSET_BITS value needed for large files... 64 > checking for _LARGE_FILES value needed for large files... no > checking for initscr in -lxcurses... no > checking for initscr in -lncurses... no > checking for initscr in -lcurses... yes > checking for tgetent in -ltermcap... yes > checking for tgetent in -ltermlib... yes > checking for regcmp in -lgen... yes > checking for regcmp in -lintl... yes > checking for regcmp in -lPW... no > checking for working terminal libraries... using -lcurses > checking for ANSI C header files... yes > checking for sys/types.h... yes > checking for sys/stat.h... yes > checking for stdlib.h... yes > checking for string.h... yes > checking for memory.h... yes > checking for strings.h... yes > checking for inttypes.h... yes > checking for stdint.h... no > checking for unistd.h... yes > checking ctype.h usability... yes > checking ctype.h presence... yes > checking for ctype.h... yes > checking errno.h usability... yes > checking errno.h presence... yes > checking for errno.h... yes > checking fcntl.h usability... yes > checking fcntl.h presence... yes > checking for fcntl.h... yes > checking limits.h usability... yes > checking limits.h presence... yes > checking for limits.h... yes > checking stdio.h usability... yes > checking stdio.h presence... yes > checking for stdio.h... yes > checking for stdlib.h... (cached) yes > checking for string.h... (cached) yes > checking termcap.h usability... no > checking termcap.h presence... no > checking for termcap.h... no > checking termio.h usability... yes > checking termio.h presence... yes > checking for termio.h... yes > checking termios.h usability... yes > checking termios.h presence... yes > checking for termios.h... yes > checking time.h usability... yes > checking time.h presence... yes > checking for time.h... yes > checking for unistd.h... (cached) yes > checking values.h usability... yes > checking values.h presence... yes > checking for values.h... yes > checking sys/ioctl.h usability... yes > checking sys/ioctl.h presence... yes > checking for sys/ioctl.h... yes > checking sys/stream.h usability... yes > checking sys/stream.h presence... yes > checking for sys/stream.h... yes > checking sys/ptem.h usability... no > checking sys/ptem.h presence... yes > configure: WARNING: sys/ptem.h: present but cannot be compiled > configure: WARNING: sys/ptem.h: check for missing prerequisite headers? > configure: WARNING: sys/ptem.h: proceeding with the preprocessor's result > checking for sys/ptem.h... yes > checking whether stat file-mode macros are broken... no > checking for an ANSI C-conforming const... yes > checking for off_t... yes > checking for size_t... yes > checking whether time.h and sys/time.h may both be included... yes > checking for off_t... (cached) yes > checking for void... yes > checking for const... yes > checking for time_t... yes > checking return type of signal handlers... void > checking for fsync... yes > checking for memcpy... yes > checking for popen... yes > checking for _setjmp... yes > checking for sigprocmask... yes > checking for sigsetmask... no > checking for stat... yes > checking for strchr... yes > checking for strstr... yes > checking for system... yes > checking for tcgetattr... yes > checking for fileno... yes > checking for strerror... yes > checking for sys_errlist... yes > checking for sigset_t... no > checking for sigemptyset... yes > checking for errno... yes - in errno.h > checking for locale... yes > checking for ctype functions... yes > checking termcap for ospeed... yes - must define > checking for regcomp... using POSIX regcomp > configure: creating ./config.status > config.status: creating Makefile > config.status: creating defines.h > config.status: defines.h is unchanged > + gmake > gmake[2]: Entering directory `/var/tmp/sithglan-pkg/less-381' > test ! -f stamp-h || CONFIG_FILES= CONFIG_HEADERS=defines.h ./config.status > config.status: creating defines.h > config.status: defines.h is unchanged > touch stamp-h > gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/sithglan-pkg/less-381' > + gmake prefix=/var/tmp/sithglan-pkg/less-381-buildroot/opt/csw mandir=/var/tmp/sithglan-pkg/less-381-buildroot/opt/csw/share/man install > gmake[2]: Entering directory `/var/tmp/sithglan-pkg/less-381' > ./mkinstalldirs /var/tmp/sithglan-pkg/less-381-buildroot/opt/csw/bin /var/tmp/sithglan-pkg/less-381-buildroot/opt/csw/share/man/man1 > /opt/csw/bin/ginstall -c less /var/tmp/sithglan-pkg/less-381-buildroot/opt/csw/bin/less > /opt/csw/bin/ginstall -c lesskey /var/tmp/sithglan-pkg/less-381-buildroot/opt/csw/bin/lesskey > /opt/csw/bin/ginstall -c lessecho /var/tmp/sithglan-pkg/less-381-buildroot/opt/csw/bin/lessecho > /opt/csw/bin/ginstall -c -m 644 ./less.nro /var/tmp/sithglan-pkg/less-381-buildroot/opt/csw/share/man/man1/less.1 > /opt/csw/bin/ginstall -c -m 644 ./lesskey.nro /var/tmp/sithglan-pkg/less-381-buildroot/opt/csw/share/man/man1/lesskey.1 > gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/sithglan-pkg/less-381' > cp: cannot create copyright: Permission denied > ## Building pkgmap from package prototype file. > ## Processing pkginfo file. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ HOW?? > WARNING: missing directory entry for > WARNING: parameter set to "faui04b20040301140643" > WARNING: parameter set to "none" > ## Attempting to volumize 10 entries in pkgmap. > part 1 -- 574 blocks, 17 entries > ## Packaging one part. > /var/spool/pkg/CSWless/pkgmap > /var/spool/pkg/CSWless/pkginfo > /var/spool/pkg/CSWless/root/opt/csw/bin/less > /var/spool/pkg/CSWless/root/opt/csw/bin/lessecho > /var/spool/pkg/CSWless/root/opt/csw/bin/lesskey > /var/spool/pkg/CSWless/root/opt/csw/share/man/man1/less.1 > /var/spool/pkg/CSWless/root/opt/csw/share/man/man1/lesskey.1 > /var/spool/pkg/CSWless/install/copyright > /var/spool/pkg/CSWless/install/depend > ## Validating control scripts. > ## Packaging complete. > Transferring package instance > > I used the following build script: > > (faui04b) [~/work/blastwave] gmake less.s > export CC=cc > export CFLAGS='-O -I/opt/csw/include' > export > PATH="/opt/forte8/SUNWspro/bin:/opt/csw/bin:/usr/ccs/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/openwin/bin" > > cd less-381 > ./configure --prefix=/opt/csw --mandir=/opt/csw/share/man > gmake > gmake prefix=/var/tmp/sithglan-pkg/less-381-buildroot/opt/csw > mandir=/var/tmp/sithglan-pkg/less-381-buildroot/opt/csw/share/man install > > If you want to have a look at the output packages. I can build and > upload you the sparc/x86 versions of the package. The problem with less > is that it doesn't support DESTDIR by default so I missused the prefix > and mandir MAKEFILE variables to obtain the same effect. Of course you > could also go and patch the Makefile to support DESTDIR. > I still dont know what you are doing, or why. Could you please tell me what commands you are using, and not just the output they are giving? When do ya run stagepkg? -- Med vennlig hilsen / Best regards Christer Solskogen / dizzy tun3Z http://dtz.cjb.net - http://carebears.mine.nu "Cheap, but not as cheap as your girlfriend!" -Spider Jerusalem From sithglan at stud.uni-erlangen.de Mon Mar 1 15:13:13 2004 From: sithglan at stud.uni-erlangen.de (Thomas Glanzmann) Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 15:13:13 +0100 Subject: [users] less In-Reply-To: <4043432C.9080906@carebears.mine.nu> References: <20040229114849.GA17506@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <4041EB5B.9030706@carebears.mine.nu> <20040229134214.GK20370@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <4043176D.2090008@carebears.mine.nu> <20040301055440.6060bbdb@sws602> <40432BE0.8000304@carebears.mine.nu> <20040301064629.4099f96c@sws602> <404334DA.6070401@carebears.mine.nu> <20040301131019.GH6103@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <4043432C.9080906@carebears.mine.nu> Message-ID: <20040301141313.GB8652@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> Hello Christer, > I still dont know what you are doing, or why. Could you please tell > me what commands you are using, and not just the output they are > giving? I am using my own build environment which calls all the tools. I can give you access to the bitkeeper tree. The problem is that it relatively big. (faui03) [~/work/blastwave] du -sh 126M . > When do ya run stagepkg? I could send you the tool and the specfile for less, but I wrote this eMail to solve the problem that you had with the make install target. If you know call 'stagepkg' or whatever it is called in the right directory it should work. Look at the make prefix=... mandir=... line. Thomas From solskogen at carebears.mine.nu Mon Mar 1 15:22:23 2004 From: solskogen at carebears.mine.nu (Christer Solskogen) Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 15:22:23 +0100 Subject: [users] less In-Reply-To: <20040301141313.GB8652@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> References: <20040229114849.GA17506@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <4041EB5B.9030706@carebears.mine.nu> <20040229134214.GK20370@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <4043176D.2090008@carebears.mine.nu> <20040301055440.6060bbdb@sws602> <40432BE0.8000304@carebears.mine.nu> <20040301064629.4099f96c@sws602> <404334DA.6070401@carebears.mine.nu> <20040301131019.GH6103@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <4043432C.9080906@carebears.mine.nu> <20040301141313.GB8652@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> Message-ID: <4043471F.4010700@carebears.mine.nu> Thomas Glanzmann wrote: > Hello Christer, > > >>I still dont know what you are doing, or why. Could you please tell >>me what commands you are using, and not just the output they are >>giving? > > > I am using my own build environment which calls all the tools. I can > give you access to the bitkeeper tree. The problem is that it relatively > big. > > (faui03) [~/work/blastwave] du -sh > 126M . > > >>When do ya run stagepkg? > > > I could send you the tool and the specfile for less, but I wrote this > eMail to solve the problem that you had with the make install target. > If you know call 'stagepkg' or whatever it is called in the right > directory it should work. Look at the make prefix=... mandir=... line. > As far as i can see, what you do has nothing to do with http://www.blastwave.org/standards/pkg-walkthrough.php I try to use that as a template for less, but that does not seem to compute. And it looks like the info on that page it not true anymore, and thats why i look like an asshole now ;) -- Med vennlig hilsen / Best regards Christer Solskogen / dizzy tun3Z http://dtz.cjb.net - http://carebears.mine.nu "Cheap, but not as cheap as your girlfriend!" -Spider Jerusalem From delrio at mie.utoronto.ca Mon Mar 1 16:49:39 2004 From: delrio at mie.utoronto.ca (Oscar del Rio) Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 10:49:39 -0500 Subject: [users] nc conflicts - nedit and netcat Message-ID: <40435B93.3030301@mie.utoronto.ca> I noticed that the packages for nedit and netcat both install /opt/csw/bin/nc (which are completely unrelated) Perhaps the program name should be changed on either package. Are there any general recommendations when this kind of conflicts affect CSW packages? I have seen conflicts in other packages but usually "harmless", such as documentation files with the same names. Regards Oscar From sithglan at stud.uni-erlangen.de Mon Mar 1 16:59:59 2004 From: sithglan at stud.uni-erlangen.de (Thomas Glanzmann) Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 16:59:59 +0100 Subject: [users] nc conflicts - nedit and netcat In-Reply-To: <40435B93.3030301@mie.utoronto.ca> References: <40435B93.3030301@mie.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: <20040301155959.GC8652@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> Hi Oscar, > I noticed that the packages for nedit and netcat > both install /opt/csw/bin/nc (which are completely unrelated) Please file bugreport against netcat. > Are there any general recommendations when this kind of conflicts > affect CSW packages? Not, that I am aware of. Thomas From sithglan at stud.uni-erlangen.de Mon Mar 1 18:40:40 2004 From: sithglan at stud.uni-erlangen.de (Thomas Glanzmann) Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 18:40:40 +0100 Subject: [users] less In-Reply-To: <4043471F.4010700@carebears.mine.nu> References: <20040229134214.GK20370@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <4043176D.2090008@carebears.mine.nu> <20040301055440.6060bbdb@sws602> <40432BE0.8000304@carebears.mine.nu> <20040301064629.4099f96c@sws602> <404334DA.6070401@carebears.mine.nu> <20040301131019.GH6103@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <4043432C.9080906@carebears.mine.nu> <20040301141313.GB8652@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <4043471F.4010700@carebears.mine.nu> Message-ID: <20040301174040.GD8652@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> Hi Christer, > As far as i can see, what you do has nothing to do with > http://www.blastwave.org/standards/pkg-walkthrough.php Right. It's the way I do my packaging and how Michael Gernoth does it. > I try to use that as a template for less, but that does not seem to > compute. The problem with the way you do it is that stagepkg does indirectly call make DESTDIR=/path/to/whatever install . This is okay for the most packages but not for less. So you have to tell stagepkg to call make install with additional parameters or patch stagepkg or patch less to support DESTDIR. Thomas From ihsan at dogan.ch Mon Mar 1 22:19:26 2004 From: ihsan at dogan.ch (Ihsan Dogan) Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 22:19:26 +0100 Subject: [users] nc conflicts - nedit and netcat In-Reply-To: <40435B93.3030301@mie.utoronto.ca> References: <40435B93.3030301@mie.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: <20040301211926.GA28714@defiant.dogan.ch> On Monday, 01 Mar 2004 10:49 -0500, Oscar del Rio wrote: > I noticed that the packages for nedit and netcat > both install /opt/csw/bin/nc (which are completely unrelated) > > Perhaps the program name should be changed on either package. Oups. I take look on that. Cheers, Ihsan... -- Swiss Unix User Group: http://www.suug.ch/ Software Packages for Solaris: http://www.blastwave.org/ From mark.aston at gunfleet.com Wed Mar 3 22:52:03 2004 From: mark.aston at gunfleet.com (Mark Aston) Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 21:52:03 +0000 Subject: [users] Firefox Message-ID: <20040303215203.7affd46c@unknown> Phils advance release of Firefox has broken after I did a pkg-get upgrade (Gecko:9873): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: cannot register existing type `LINCConnection' (Gecko:9873): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: file gtype.c: line 1872: assertion `parent_type > 0' failed (Gecko:9873): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: file gobject.c: line 615: assertion `G_TYPE_IS_OBJECT (object_type)' failed any idea which package has broken it? -- Best regards Mark Aston http://www.gunfleet.com/solaris From dkg at con-fuse.org Thu Mar 4 22:49:10 2004 From: dkg at con-fuse.org (Daniel K. Gebhart) Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 22:49:10 +0100 Subject: [users] contributing to blastwave Message-ID: <20040304214910.GI31054@sperrstunde.at> Hi guys, I just saw your great service and immediately installed pkg-get to start using it. Looks really nice. Great work! The way I found your page was when reading an article about solaris 10 and zones at blastwave.org. I enjoyed this article. Now I wanna contribute to blastwave and would like to put my scripts for patching systems to your server if you want? You can take a look at it here: http://dps.uibk.ac.at/~dkg/sol/ Next week I'll start to build some csw packages. I've experience with building debian and crux packages so far. I'm interested in the way you build packages. kind regards, daniel -- Daniel K. Gebhart http://dkg.con-fuse.org/ Institute for Computer Science University of Innsbruck Fon: (office): +43 512 507 6444 Mail: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From sithglan at stud.uni-erlangen.de Thu Mar 4 22:52:09 2004 From: sithglan at stud.uni-erlangen.de (Thomas Glanzmann) Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 22:52:09 +0100 Subject: [users] contributing to blastwave In-Reply-To: <20040304214910.GI31054@sperrstunde.at> References: <20040304214910.GI31054@sperrstunde.at> Message-ID: <20040304215209.GA16674@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> Hi Daniel, > Next week I'll start to build some csw packages. I've experience with > building debian and crux packages so far. I'm interested in the way > you build packages. I personally use a perlscript with a spec file (rpm like) to package my csw packages. If you like I can give you access to this script and sample spec files. I manage my buildinfrastructure using bitkeeper. Thomas From ihsan at dogan.ch Thu Mar 4 23:37:46 2004 From: ihsan at dogan.ch (Ihsan Dogan) Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 23:37:46 +0100 Subject: [users] Firefox In-Reply-To: <20040303215203.7affd46c@unknown> References: <20040303215203.7affd46c@unknown> Message-ID: <20040304223746.GA14526@defiant.dogan.ch> Hi Mark, On Wednesday, 03 Mar 2004 21:52 +0000, Mark Aston wrote: > Phils advance release of Firefox has broken after I did a > > pkg-get upgrade > > > (Gecko:9873): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: cannot register existing type `LINCConnection' > > (Gecko:9873): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: file gtype.c: line 1872: assertion `parent_type > 0' failed > > (Gecko:9873): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: file gobject.c: line 615: assertion `G_TYPE_IS_OBJECT (object_type)' failed > > any idea which package has broken it? Phil is currently not on this list. Please contact him via e-mail. Cheers, Ihsan... -- Swiss Unix User Group: http://www.suug.ch/ Software Packages for Solaris: http://www.blastwave.org/ From mark.aston at gunfleet.com Fri Mar 5 07:34:25 2004 From: mark.aston at gunfleet.com (Mark Aston) Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 06:34:25 +0000 Subject: [users] Firefox In-Reply-To: <20040304223746.GA14526@defiant.dogan.ch> References: <20040303215203.7affd46c@unknown> <20040304223746.GA14526@defiant.dogan.ch> Message-ID: <20040305063425.469ea79f@unknown> On Thu, 4 Mar 2004 23:37:46 +0100 Ihsan Dogan wrote: > Phil is currently not on this list. Please contact him via > e-mail. Thanks, will do -- Best regards Mark Aston http://www.gunfleet.com/solaris From johann.barnard at alindigo.com Tue Mar 9 13:17:36 2004 From: johann.barnard at alindigo.com (Johann Barnard) Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 14:17:36 +0200 Subject: [users] Veritas/L9 ? Message-ID: HI All New to the site but hope you can help me. When I do a backup +-30gb not compressed at all it runs fine but to restore it, it ask for a 2nd tape Run robtest and this is the output. Netbackup 4.5 Solaris 8 SFV480 All with the latest and greatest patches loaded Error Codes when doing a "show slots" in "robtest": read_element_status failed, CHECK CONDITION sense key = 0x4, asc = 0x40, ascq = 0x80, UNKNOWN ERROR, SENSE_KEY: 0x04, ASC: 0x40, ASCQ: 0x80 The Veritas backups fail with code "98" Kind regards Johann From delrio at mie.utoronto.ca Wed Mar 10 04:04:45 2004 From: delrio at mie.utoronto.ca (Oscar del Rio) Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 22:04:45 -0500 Subject: [users] Veritas/L9 ? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <404E85CD.4020804@mie.utoronto.ca> Johann Barnard wrote: > When I do a backup +-30gb not compressed at all it runs fine but to restore > it, it ask for a 2nd tape > Run robtest and this is the output. > > Netbackup 4.5 > Solaris 8 > SFV480 > All with the latest and greatest patches loaded Off-topic for this mailing list. Try the newsgroups comp.unix.solaris, comp.sys.sun.admin, etc Regards Oscar From delrio at mie.utoronto.ca Wed Mar 10 19:01:36 2004 From: delrio at mie.utoronto.ca (Oscar del Rio) Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 13:01:36 -0500 Subject: [users] Evolution Message-ID: <404F5800.1070803@mie.utoronto.ca> As announced on the solaris-x86 yahoo group, Ximian Evolution is now available on blastwave for both sparc and x86. It works great. It has many library dependencies and you might have to upgrade some of them. http://www.blastwave.org/packages.php/evolution First time I ran it on x86 I got ld.so.1: /opt/csw/bin/evolution: fatal: libintl.so.3: open failed: No such file or directory A quick check showed that I had /opt/csw/lib/libintl.so.2 but not .3 "pkg-get upgrade ggettext" fixed it. From asmoore at edge.net Wed Mar 10 22:51:12 2004 From: asmoore at edge.net (Alex S Moore) Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 15:51:12 -0600 Subject: [users] Evolution In-Reply-To: <404F5800.1070803@mie.utoronto.ca> References: <404F5800.1070803@mie.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: <20040310155112.6fa978ab@sws602> On Wed, 10 Mar 2004 13:01:36 -0500 Oscar del Rio wrote: > As announced on the solaris-x86 yahoo group, Ximian Evolution > is now available on blastwave for both sparc and x86. > > It works great. It has many library dependencies and you > might have to upgrade some of them. > Yes, this is exciting. Some time ago, I worked on packaging Evolution. But I was overwhelmed by the dependencies. I am anxious to try this package. I have used Evolution on Solaris 9 sparc for several months and think that it is the best. I went through all of the hacks to get an install and it worked for about 6 weeks. Then something went wrong and I have not been able to use it with my main login id since then. So I created a secondary account and copy all of my mail, using procmail, to that account and have Evolution running all of the time with that account. I never log directly into my workstation with the secondary account and just use su, the xauth things and start Evolution. Alex From daniel at dseichter.de Thu Mar 11 22:31:51 2004 From: daniel at dseichter.de (Daniel Seichter) Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 22:31:51 +0100 Subject: [users] Re: [newpkgs] New PostgreSQL packages In-Reply-To: <40509EDA.9090008@markround.com> References: <40509EDA.9090008@markround.com> Message-ID: <20040311223151.760b855b@blade> Hello Mark, what differences I will get by using 64bit instead of 32bit? Thanks Daniel Seichter From mark at markround.com Fri Mar 12 11:28:03 2004 From: mark at markround.com (Mark Round) Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 10:28:03 +0000 Subject: [users] Re: [newpkgs] New PostgreSQL packages In-Reply-To: <20040311223151.760b855b@blade> References: <40509EDA.9090008@markround.com> <20040311223151.760b855b@blade> Message-ID: <405190B3.2020104@markround.com> Daniel Seichter wrote: >what differences I will get by using 64bit instead of 32bit? > > For "normal" usage, not much. In fact, the 64-bit version will most likely be slower than the 32-bit (although not by a huge amount). It's only really useful if you have very large databases/tables, otherwise, the 32-bit version should be fine. The advantage of having 64-bit libraries included in the package is that people compiling their own software now have the ability to link to the 64-bit libraries if they need. -Mark From ihsan at dogan.ch Fri Mar 12 14:09:30 2004 From: ihsan at dogan.ch (Ihsan Dogan) Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 14:09:30 +0100 Subject: [users] Evolution In-Reply-To: <20040310155112.6fa978ab@sws602> References: <404F5800.1070803@mie.utoronto.ca> <20040310155112.6fa978ab@sws602> Message-ID: <20040312130930.GB6012@defiant.dogan.ch> On Wednesday, 10 Mar 2004 15:51 -0600, Alex S Moore wrote: > > As announced on the solaris-x86 yahoo group, Ximian Evolution > > is now available on blastwave for both sparc and x86. > > > > It works great. It has many library dependencies and you > > might have to upgrade some of them. > > > > Yes, this is exciting. Some time ago, I worked on packaging Evolution. > But I was overwhelmed by the dependencies. I am anxious to try this > package. > > I have used Evolution on Solaris 9 sparc for several months and think that > it is the best. I went through all of the hacks to get an install and it > worked for about 6 weeks. Then something went wrong and I have not been > able to use it with my main login id since then. > > So I created a secondary account and copy all of my mail, using procmail, > to that account and have Evolution running all of the time with that > account. I never log directly into my workstation with the secondary > account and just use su, the xauth things and start Evolution. How can I delete all Evolution settings and files in my home directory? I'm a little bit confused, because there are so many files (~/evolution, .gconf-csw) files and directories for Evolution. Cheers, Ihsan... -- Swiss Unix User Group: http://www.suug.ch/ Software Packages for Solaris: http://www.blastwave.org/ From asmoore at edge.net Fri Mar 12 14:47:18 2004 From: asmoore at edge.net (Alex S Moore) Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 07:47:18 -0600 Subject: [users] Evolution In-Reply-To: <20040312130930.GB6012@defiant.dogan.ch> References: <404F5800.1070803@mie.utoronto.ca> <20040310155112.6fa978ab@sws602> <20040312130930.GB6012@defiant.dogan.ch> Message-ID: <20040312074718.6a633e79@sws602> On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 14:09:30 +0100 Ihsan Dogan wrote: > How can I delete all Evolution settings and files in my home > directory? I'm a little bit confused, because there are so many > files (~/evolution, .gconf-csw) files and directories for > Evolution. I wish it were simpler, but it is not only your home directory. There are also files relating to gnome tied to your account that are not in the home directory, such as activation servers. If you have not run Evolution before, maybe you can just rename ~/evolution and all .gconf* and .gnome* directories. Of course, to do this, you need a different account that has the proper permissions. If you have run Evolution, first run `evolution --force-shutdown'. That will kill off a few things. Alex From dkg at blastwave.org Fri Mar 12 19:08:41 2004 From: dkg at blastwave.org (Daniel K. Gebhart) Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 19:08:41 +0100 Subject: [users] pkg-get should use WGETFLAGS="--continue --dot-style=mega" Message-ID: <20040312180841.GA27058@sperrstunde.at> Hi, Please add "--continue" to $WGETFLAGS. kind regards, daniel -- Daniel K. Gebhart http://dkg.con-fuse.org/ Institute for Computer Science University of Innsbruck Fon: (office): +43 512 507 6444 Mail: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From ihsan at dogan.ch Fri Mar 12 20:37:41 2004 From: ihsan at dogan.ch (Ihsan Dogan) Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 20:37:41 +0100 Subject: [users] Evolution In-Reply-To: <20040312074718.6a633e79@sws602> References: <404F5800.1070803@mie.utoronto.ca> <20040310155112.6fa978ab@sws602> <20040312130930.GB6012@defiant.dogan.ch> <20040312074718.6a633e79@sws602> Message-ID: <20040312193741.GA16628@defiant.dogan.ch> On Friday, 12 Mar 2004 07:47 -0600, Alex S Moore wrote: > > How can I delete all Evolution settings and files in my home > > directory? I'm a little bit confused, because there are so many > > files (~/evolution, .gconf-csw) files and directories for > > Evolution. > > I wish it were simpler, but it is not only your home directory. There are > also files relating to gnome tied to your account that are not in the home > directory, such as activation servers. > > If you have not run Evolution before, maybe you can just rename ~/evolution > and all .gconf* and .gnome* directories. Of course, to do this, you need a > different account that has the proper permissions. If you have run > Evolution, first run `evolution --force-shutdown'. That will kill off a > few things. I forgot to disable gconfd. After I disabled gconfd, I deleted ~/evolution and ~/.gconf/apps/evolution. Cheers, Ihsan... -- Swiss Unix User Group: http://www.suug.ch/ Software Packages for Solaris: http://www.blastwave.org/ From mats.larsson at ericsson.com Tue Mar 16 09:46:58 2004 From: mats.larsson at ericsson.com (Mats Larsson) Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 09:46:58 +0100 Subject: [users] Using admin file to override /opt/csw as install dir Message-ID: <4056BF02.30203@ericsson.com> I've been following the advice in /var/pkg-get/admin-fullauto and did create /var/pkg-get/admin with the following line: basedir=/opt/pub/csw But nothing gets installed in /opt/pub/csw everything goes to /opt/csw as usual. Am I missing something? /MOL This communication is confidential and intended solely for the addressee(s). Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you believe this message has been sent to you in error, please notify the sender by replying to this transmission and delete the message without disclosing it. Thank you. E-mail including attachments is susceptible to data corruption, interruption, unauthorized amendment, tampering and viruses, and we only send and receive e-mails on the basis that we are not liable for any such corruption, interception, amendment, tampering or viruses or any consequences thereof. From daniel at dseichter.de Tue Mar 16 17:29:47 2004 From: daniel at dseichter.de (Daniel Seichter) Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 17:29:47 +0100 Subject: [users] Problem compiling Message-ID: <20040316172947.7dc1f3cc@blade> Hello, first of all: Good work for all the packages!! I want to try to compile JPilot on myself, but I get the following error in the config.log. ############################### | /* confdefs.h. */ | | #define PACKAGE_NAME "" | #define PACKAGE_TARNAME "" | #define PACKAGE_VERSION "" | #define PACKAGE_STRING "" | #define PACKAGE_BUGREPORT "" | #define PACKAGE "jpilot" | #define VERSION "0.99.7" | /* end confdefs.h. */ | | int | main () | { | | ; | return 0; | } configure:2436: error: C compiler cannot create executables See `config.log' for more details. ############################### What other package I have to install? I installed automake, autoconf, gmake, gcc3 and other non compilie relevated software like pan, sylpheed, postgresql, gftp,... Hope to find an answer here. Thanks Daniel Seichter From daniel at dseichter.de Tue Mar 16 17:41:34 2004 From: daniel at dseichter.de (Daniel Seichter) Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 17:41:34 +0100 Subject: [users] Re: [newpkgs] New PostgreSQL packages In-Reply-To: <405190B3.2020104@markround.com> References: <40509EDA.9090008@markround.com> <20040311223151.760b855b@blade> <405190B3.2020104@markround.com> Message-ID: <20040316174134.7138af11@blade> Hello Mark, thank you for your answer. My database is at the moment about 3GB and only contains text. Is there a size of database where 64bit results a higher performancel than 32bit? Thanks Daniel On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 10:28:03 +0000 Mark Round wrote: > Daniel Seichter wrote: > > >what differences I will get by using 64bit instead of 32bit? > > > > > For "normal" usage, not much. In fact, the 64-bit version will most > likely be slower than the 32-bit (although not by a huge amount). It's > only really useful if you have very large databases/tables, otherwise, > the 32-bit version should be fine. The advantage of having 64-bit > libraries included in the package is that people compiling their own > software now have the ability to link to the 64-bit libraries if they > need. > > -Mark > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users From asmoore at edge.net Tue Mar 16 18:03:25 2004 From: asmoore at edge.net (Alex S Moore) Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 11:03:25 -0600 Subject: [users] Problem compiling In-Reply-To: <20040316172947.7dc1f3cc@blade> References: <20040316172947.7dc1f3cc@blade> Message-ID: <20040316110325.093bca2e@sws602> On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 17:29:47 +0100 Daniel Seichter wrote: > Hello, > > first of all: Good work for all the packages!! > > I want to try to compile JPilot on myself, but I get the following > error in the config.log. > configure:2436: error: C compiler cannot create executables > See `config.log' for more details. > ############################### I would set some environment variables for your compilers. Such as CC=, etc. Run `./configure --help` for the list of commonly used environment variables. If you want this for SylpheedClaws, I could give it a try. I think that JPilot is available as an option for SylpheedClaws. Assuming that you are using CSWsylpheed, I would be glad to try adding that option. Alex From daniel at dseichter.de Tue Mar 16 18:18:54 2004 From: daniel at dseichter.de (Daniel Seichter) Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 18:18:54 +0100 Subject: [users] Problem compiling In-Reply-To: <20040316110325.093bca2e@sws602> References: <20040316172947.7dc1f3cc@blade> <20040316110325.093bca2e@sws602> Message-ID: <20040316181854.43f9c47b@blade> Hello Alex, thank you for your answer. I will try to set the CC variable. You've right. This is one thing, I didn't think about it, because I use my Palm at the moment only for notices and small databases for Lotus Notes. Please try to use this option, think, if JPilot is working, I will use it on Sylpheed also. Maybe I will try to add JPilot to Blastwave after I got it run on my machine. Daniel On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 11:03:25 -0600 Alex S Moore wrote: > On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 17:29:47 +0100 > Daniel Seichter wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > first of all: Good work for all the packages!! > > > > I want to try to compile JPilot on myself, but I get the following > > error in the config.log. > > > configure:2436: error: C compiler cannot create executables > > See `config.log' for more details. > > ############################### > > I would set some environment variables for your compilers. Such as > CC=, etc. Run `./configure --help` for the list > of commonly used environment variables. > > If you want this for SylpheedClaws, I could give it a try. I think > that JPilot is available as an option for SylpheedClaws. Assuming > that you are using CSWsylpheed, I would be glad to try adding that > option. > > Alex > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users From daniel at dseichter.de Tue Mar 16 18:51:01 2004 From: daniel at dseichter.de (Daniel Seichter) Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 18:51:01 +0100 Subject: [users] Problem compiling In-Reply-To: <20040316181854.43f9c47b@blade> References: <20040316172947.7dc1f3cc@blade> <20040316110325.093bca2e@sws602> <20040316181854.43f9c47b@blade> Message-ID: <20040316185101.5895d700@blade> I can compile it with gtk, but not with gtk2. This error message occured: ######################################### checking for GTK+ - version >= 2.0.3... *** 'pkg-config --modversion gtk+-2.0' returned 2.1.0, but GTK+ (2.2.4) *** was found! If pkg-config was correct, then it is best *** to remove the old version of GTK+. You may also be able to fix the error*** by modifying your LD_LIBRARY_PATH enviroment variable, or by editing*** /etc/ld.so.conf. Make sure you have run ldconfig if that is *** required on your system. *** If pkg-config was wrong, set the environment variable PKG_CONFIG_PATH*** to point to the correct configuration files no configure: error: *** GTK >= 2.0.3 not found *** ######################################### And at this time, I do not know, what to do. Thanks Daniel On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 18:18:54 +0100 Daniel Seichter wrote: > Hello Alex, > > thank you for your answer. I will try to set the CC variable. > > You've right. This is one thing, I didn't think about it, because I > use my Palm at the moment only for notices and small databases for > Lotus Notes. > > Please try to use this option, think, if JPilot is working, I will use > it on Sylpheed also. > Maybe I will try to add JPilot to Blastwave after I got it run on my > machine. > > Daniel > > On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 11:03:25 -0600 > Alex S Moore wrote: > > > On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 17:29:47 +0100 > > Daniel Seichter wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > first of all: Good work for all the packages!! > > > > > > I want to try to compile JPilot on myself, but I get the following > > > error in the config.log. > > > > > configure:2436: error: C compiler cannot create executables > > > See `config.log' for more details. > > > ############################### > > > > I would set some environment variables for your compilers. Such as > > CC=, etc. Run `./configure --help` for the > > list of commonly used environment variables. > > > > If you want this for SylpheedClaws, I could give it a try. I think > > that JPilot is available as an option for SylpheedClaws. Assuming > > that you are using CSWsylpheed, I would be glad to try adding that > > option. > > > > Alex > > _______________________________________________ > > users mailing list > > users at lists.blastwave.org > > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users From asmoore at edge.net Tue Mar 16 19:18:57 2004 From: asmoore at edge.net (Alex S Moore) Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 12:18:57 -0600 Subject: [users] Problem compiling In-Reply-To: <20040316185101.5895d700@blade> References: <20040316172947.7dc1f3cc@blade> <20040316110325.093bca2e@sws602> <20040316181854.43f9c47b@blade> <20040316185101.5895d700@blade> Message-ID: <20040316121857.05659a6c@sws602> On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 18:51:01 +0100 Daniel Seichter wrote: > I can compile it with gtk, but not with gtk2. This error message > occured: If you plan to use JPilot with SylpheedClaws, you do want gtk. gtk2 claws is still in development and is a few months away from release. That said, have you done the following before running configure? PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/opt/csw/lib ; export PKG_CONFIG_PATH (or whatever is appropriate for your shell) You need gtk2 from CSW. Also, do not use LD_LIBRARY_PATH. Use LD_OPTIONS, or whatever is appropriate for your build tools, to set the runpath for binaries. Alex From daniel at dseichter.de Tue Mar 16 20:20:55 2004 From: daniel at dseichter.de (Daniel Seichter) Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 20:20:55 +0100 Subject: [users] Problem compiling In-Reply-To: <20040316121857.05659a6c@sws602> References: <20040316172947.7dc1f3cc@blade> <20040316110325.093bca2e@sws602> <20040316181854.43f9c47b@blade> <20040316185101.5895d700@blade> <20040316121857.05659a6c@sws602> Message-ID: <20040316202055.64877cb3@blade> Hello Alex, oh ok, than I will wait for compiling it with gtk2. With gtk it works ok and I am synching at the moment the first time. I want to compile it again with language support but at the moment I am happy about it. The configure options was: bash-2.05b$ CC=/opt/csw/gcc3/bin/gcc MAKE=/opt/csw/bin/gmake ./configure --with-pilot-prefix=/opt/csw --with-gtk-prefix=/opt/csw I do not know, if I can build the package till weekend. Daniel Seichter On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 12:18:57 -0600 Alex S Moore wrote: > On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 18:51:01 +0100 > Daniel Seichter wrote: > > > I can compile it with gtk, but not with gtk2. This error message > > occured: > > If you plan to use JPilot with SylpheedClaws, you do want gtk. gtk2 > claws is still in development and is a few months away from release. > > That said, have you done the following before running configure? > PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/opt/csw/lib ; export PKG_CONFIG_PATH (or whatever is > appropriate for your shell) > You need gtk2 from CSW. Also, do not use LD_LIBRARY_PATH. Use > LD_OPTIONS, or whatever is appropriate for your build tools, to set > the runpath for binaries. > > Alex > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users From ihsan at dogan.ch Tue Mar 16 22:45:17 2004 From: ihsan at dogan.ch (Ihsan Dogan) Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 22:45:17 +0100 Subject: [users] Using admin file to override /opt/csw as install dir In-Reply-To: <4056BF02.30203@ericsson.com> References: <4056BF02.30203@ericsson.com> Message-ID: <20040316214517.GB4774@defiant.dogan.ch> Hi, On Tuesday, 16 Mar 2004 09:46 +0100, Mats Larsson wrote: > I've been following the advice in /var/pkg-get/admin-fullauto and did > create /var/pkg-get/admin with the following line: > > basedir=/opt/pub/csw > > But nothing gets installed in /opt/pub/csw everything goes to /opt/csw > as usual. Am I missing something? You should be carefully with that. Not all packages are relocatable. Cheers, Ihsan... -- Swiss Unix User Group: http://www.suug.ch/ Software Packages for Solaris: http://www.blastwave.org/ From ihsan at dogan.ch Wed Mar 17 11:07:41 2004 From: ihsan at dogan.ch (Ihsan Dogan) Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 11:07:41 +0100 Subject: [users] Evolution & Proxy Message-ID: <20040317100741.GA26593@defiant.dogan.ch> Hi, How can I tell Evolution to use a http Proxy? Cheers, Ihsan... -- Swiss Unix User Group: http://www.suug.ch/ Software Packages for Solaris: http://www.blastwave.org/ From michael at blastwave.org Wed Mar 17 11:32:47 2004 From: michael at blastwave.org (Michael Gernoth) Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 11:32:47 +0100 Subject: [users] Evolution & Proxy In-Reply-To: <20040317100741.GA26593@defiant.dogan.ch> References: <20040317100741.GA26593@defiant.dogan.ch> Message-ID: <20040317103247.GA7805@zerfleddert.de> Hi, On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 11:07:41AM +0100, Ihsan Dogan wrote: > How can I tell Evolution to use a http Proxy? Follow these intuitive and simple steps ;-) http://support.ximian.com/cgi-bin/ximian.cfg/php/enduser/std_adp.php?p_faqid=159 Regards, Michael From mats.larsson at ericsson.com Wed Mar 17 13:44:33 2004 From: mats.larsson at ericsson.com (Mats Larsson) Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 13:44:33 +0100 Subject: [users] Using admin file to override /opt/csw as install dir In-Reply-To: <20040316214517.GB4774@defiant.dogan.ch> References: users@lists.blastwave.org <20040316214517.GB4774@defiant.dogan.ch> Message-ID: <40584831.1080508@ericsson.com> On 2004-03-16 22:45, Ihsan Dogan wrote: > Hi, > > On Tuesday, 16 Mar 2004 09:46 +0100, Mats Larsson wrote: > >> I've been following the advice in /var/pkg-get/admin-fullauto and did >> create /var/pkg-get/admin with the following line: >> >> basedir=/opt/pub/csw >> >> But nothing gets installed in /opt/pub/csw everything goes to /opt/csw > >> as usual. Am I missing something? > > You should be carefully with that. Not all packages are > relocatable. None so far has been relocatable :(. What's the problem? I don't want them to install on every machnie i our network. My intention is to install them once on a mounted network for anyone to use. Can I not do that? /MOL This communication is confidential and intended solely for the addressee(s). Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you believe this message has been sent to you in error, please notify the sender by replying to this transmission and delete the message without disclosing it. Thank you. E-mail including attachments is susceptible to data corruption, interruption, unauthorized amendment, tampering and viruses, and we only send and receive e-mails on the basis that we are not liable for any such corruption, interception, amendment, tampering or viruses or any consequences thereof. From ihsan at dogan.ch Wed Mar 17 14:20:54 2004 From: ihsan at dogan.ch (Ihsan Dogan) Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 14:20:54 +0100 Subject: [users] Evolution & Proxy In-Reply-To: <20040317103247.GA7805@zerfleddert.de> References: <20040317100741.GA26593@defiant.dogan.ch> <20040317103247.GA7805@zerfleddert.de> Message-ID: <20040317132054.GC1023@defiant.dogan.ch> Hi, On Wednesday, 17 Mar 2004 11:32 +0100, Michael Gernoth wrote: > > How can I tell Evolution to use a http Proxy? > > Follow these intuitive and simple steps ;-) > http://support.ximian.com/cgi-bin/ximian.cfg/php/enduser/std_adp.php?p_faqid=159 Thank you. It works perfect. :-) Is it somehow possible, that Evolution starts Acrobat Reader for pdf files? Cheers, Ihsan... -- Swiss Unix User Group: http://www.suug.ch/ Software Packages for Solaris: http://www.blastwave.org/ From ihsan at dogan.ch Wed Mar 17 14:24:16 2004 From: ihsan at dogan.ch (Ihsan Dogan) Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 14:24:16 +0100 Subject: [users] Using admin file to override /opt/csw as install dir In-Reply-To: <40584831.1080508@ericsson.com> References: <20040316214517.GB4774@defiant.dogan.ch> <40584831.1080508@ericsson.com> Message-ID: <20040317132416.GD1023@defiant.dogan.ch> On Wednesday, 17 Mar 2004 13:44 +0100, Mats Larsson wrote: > >You should be carefully with that. Not all packages are > >relocatable. > > None so far has been relocatable :(. What's the problem? I don't want > them to install on every machnie i our network. My intention is to > install them once on a mounted network for anyone to use. Can I not do that? That should be posible. Try to share /opt/csw, if it's possible. Don't forget, that some packages (like IceWM) have also some files on /etc. Cheers, Ihsan... -- Swiss Unix User Group: http://www.suug.ch/ Software Packages for Solaris: http://www.blastwave.org/ From asmoore at edge.net Wed Mar 17 15:08:07 2004 From: asmoore at edge.net (Alex S Moore) Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 08:08:07 -0600 Subject: [users] Re: [newpkgs] New evolution packages In-Reply-To: <20040316175936.GA10914@zerfleddert.de> References: <20040316175936.GA10914@zerfleddert.de> Message-ID: <1079532401.27298.2.camel@sws602> On Tue, 2004-03-16 at 11:59, Michael Gernoth wrote: > The evolution-packages have been updated to version > evolution-1.4.6,REV=2004.03.15. > It should be available within 24hrs from the mirror-sites. > > Changes since version evolution-1.4.5,REV=2004.03.09: > * New upstream version 1.4.6 > * compiled with --without-broken-spool > (closes bug #292) > Yes, Evolution works fine now. Thanks for the quick response Michael. Alex From markus at gyger.org Wed Mar 17 15:21:48 2004 From: markus at gyger.org (Markus Gyger) Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 15:21:48 +0100 (CET) Subject: [users] Using admin file to override /opt/csw as install dir In-Reply-To: <20040317132416.GD1023@defiant.dogan.ch> from Ihsan Dogan at "Mar 17, 2004 02:24:16 pm" Message-ID: <200403171421.i2HELnjv018743@cs1.gmu.edu> > > None so far has been relocatable :(. What's the problem? I don't want > > them to install on every machnie i our network. My intention is to > > install them once on a mounted network for anyone to use. Can I not do that? If you don't want to use /opt/csw then it's usually simplest to use a lofs mount and not to mess with BASEDIR or option -R. E.g. # mkdir -p /export/opt/csw /opt/csw # echo '/export/opt/csw - /opt/csw lofs - yes -' >> /etc/vfstab # mount /opt/csw # pkg-get ... # echo 'share -o ro=@192.168/16 /export/opt/csw' >> /etc/dfs/dfstab # shareall Markus From asmoore at edge.net Wed Mar 17 16:56:58 2004 From: asmoore at edge.net (Alex S Moore) Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 09:56:58 -0600 Subject: [users] RE: Fonts in Evolution Message-ID: <1079539017.27298.46.camel@sws602> How do I load additional fonts for use by CSW Evolution? For example, Arial 10.5, Roman Italic 10.5, Times New Roman 9, Tahoma 8.75, et.al. I constantly get messages like 'Couldn't load font falling back to "Sans 7.5". Alex From mark at markround.com Thu Mar 18 11:50:40 2004 From: mark at markround.com (Mark Round) Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 10:50:40 +0000 Subject: [users] Re: [newpkgs] New PostgreSQL packages In-Reply-To: <20040316174134.7138af11@blade> References: <40509EDA.9090008@markround.com> <20040311223151.760b855b@blade> <405190B3.2020104@markround.com> <20040316174134.7138af11@blade> Message-ID: <40597F00.8040101@markround.com> Daniel Seichter wrote: >Hello Mark, > >thank you for your answer. My database is at the moment about 3GB and >only contains text. Is there a size of database where 64bit results a >higher performancel than 32bit? > >Thanks >Daniel > Hi! Sorry for the delay in responding, I've been doing some digging around, to see what I could find. I've never myself run a database of that size, so it's hard for me to say - the only way you'll ever really be sure is to do some benchmarking yourself, comparing the performance of the two servers. However, I did find the following which seems to answer your question - the cut off point seems to be around the 5Gb mark (assuming you trust someone anecdotal evidence...) :- "Performance of 32-bit cpu machines will decline rapidly when the database size exceeds 5 GigaByte. You can run 30 gig database on 32-bit cpu but the performance will be degraded. Machines with 32-bit cpu impose a limitation of 2 GB on RAM, 2 GB on file system sizes and other limitations on the operating system. ... For extremely large databases, it is strongly advised to use 64-bit machines Compile PostgreSQL under a 64-bit cpu and it can support huge databases and large queries. ... Performance of PostgreSQL for queries on large tables and databases will be several times faster than PostgreSQL on 32-bit cpu machines. Advantage of 64-bit machines are that you get very large memory addressing space and the operating system can support very large file-systems, provide better performance with large databases, support much larger memory (RAM), have more capabilities etc.. " (Taken from http://www.collaborium.org/onsite/venezuela/docs/linux/Linux_HOWTOS/PDF/PostgreSQL-HOWTO.pdf) -Mark From daniel at dseichter.de Thu Mar 18 20:26:49 2004 From: daniel at dseichter.de (Daniel Seichter) Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 20:26:49 +0100 Subject: [users] Re: [newpkgs] New PostgreSQL packages In-Reply-To: <40597F00.8040101@markround.com> References: <40509EDA.9090008@markround.com> <20040311223151.760b855b@blade> <405190B3.2020104@markround.com> <20040316174134.7138af11@blade> <40597F00.8040101@markround.com> Message-ID: <20040318202649.4d5ef49a@blade> Hello Mark, thank you for your detailed answer. If I can finish my project I need a server which can handle big data volumes and handle many subqueries (like postgresql). And SUN advertises for the Opteron (but I don't think if this is a REAL 64bit engine, beccause of the compatibility of x86 code) but maybe it will be a server with this technology and so I can test it in real "life". On my Blade 1500 I can't really compare if it is faster, because there is a ATA Hard-Disk. But hope to get a real test soon. Wish you a nice evening Daniel Seichter P.S.: Maybe you are interested in another environment for postgresql: postgresql.dseichter.org (not actual but will be soon) On Thu, 18 Mar 2004 10:50:40 +0000 Mark Round wrote: > Daniel Seichter wrote: > > >Hello Mark, > > > >thank you for your answer. My database is at the moment about 3GB > >and only contains text. Is there a size of database where 64bit > >results a higher performancel than 32bit? > > > >Thanks > >Daniel > > > > Hi! > Sorry for the delay in responding, I've been doing some digging > around, to see what I could find. > I've never myself run a database of that size, so it's hard for me to > say - the only way you'll ever really be > sure is to do some benchmarking yourself, comparing the performance of > the two servers. However, > I did find the following which seems to answer your question - the cut > off point seems to be around the > 5Gb mark (assuming you trust someone anecdotal evidence...) :- > > "Performance of 32-bit cpu machines will decline rapidly when the > database size > exceeds 5 GigaByte. You can run 30 gig database on 32-bit cpu but the > performance > will be degraded. Machines with 32-bit cpu impose a limitation of 2 GB > on RAM, > 2 GB on file system sizes and other limitations on the operating > system.... > For extremely large databases, it is strongly advised to use 64-bit > machines > Compile PostgreSQL under a 64-bit cpu and it can support huge > databases and large queries. > ... > Performance of PostgreSQL for queries on large tables and databases > will be several times faster than PostgreSQL on 32-bit cpu machines. > Advantage of 64-bit > machines are that you get very large memory addressing space and the > operating > system can support very large file-systems, provide better performance > with large databases, support much larger memory (RAM), have more > capabilities etc.. > " > > (Taken from > http://www.collaborium.org/onsite/venezuela/docs/linux/Linux_HOWTOS/PDF/PostgreSQL-HOWTO.pdf) > > -Mark > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users From markus at gyger.org Thu Mar 18 21:42:39 2004 From: markus at gyger.org (Markus Gyger) Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 21:42:39 +0100 (CET) Subject: [users] Re: [newpkgs] ncurses 5.4 packaged In-Reply-To: <20040318201311.73108.qmail@mail2.infinology.com> from Andreas Almroth at "Mar 18, 2004 12:13:11 pm" Message-ID: <200403182042.i2IKgdg8013655@cs1.gmu.edu> > When using 64 bit libraries, make sure to adopt build scripts/Makefiles to > point to /opt/csw/lib/sparcv9. Preferably /opt/csw/lib/64 so the config will also work for AMD64. Markus From kenmays at blastwave.org Fri Mar 19 01:20:15 2004 From: kenmays at blastwave.org (Ken Mays) Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 19:20:15 -0500 (EST) Subject: [users] Re: [newpkgs] ncurses 5.4 packaged Message-ID: <200403190020.i2J0KFF09101@blastwave.org> From daniel at dseichter.de Sat Mar 20 19:43:49 2004 From: daniel at dseichter.de (Daniel Seichter) Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 19:43:49 +0100 Subject: [users] Solaris 10 Message-ID: <20040320194349.0608948a@blade> Hello, which packages will be used if I use Solaris 10? I want to install the Software Express, but using some applications from blastwave. Is it possible with Solaris 10 or not? Thanks Daniel Seichter From sithglan at stud.uni-erlangen.de Sat Mar 20 20:07:30 2004 From: sithglan at stud.uni-erlangen.de (Thomas Glanzmann) Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 20:07:30 +0100 Subject: [users] Solaris 10 In-Reply-To: <20040320194349.0608948a@blade> References: <20040320194349.0608948a@blade> Message-ID: <20040320190730.GX12274@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> Hi, > which packages will be used if I use Solaris 10? I want to install the > Software Express, but using some applications from blastwave. Is it > possible with Solaris 10 or not? indeed. it is possible and we're already doing so and had no problems expect for lsof which is fixed now. Some of the packages which were build on Solaris 8 dpend on the 'x'-libs which are merged in the normal libs under Solaris 10 so it maybe necessary to install some 'fake' packages in order to install some packages on Solaris 10. See also the whole thread beginning with http://www.blastwave.org/mailarchives/maint/2003/0694.html If you need help with creating fake packages just ask Michael Gernoth Thomas From daniel at dseichter.de Sat Mar 20 20:08:02 2004 From: daniel at dseichter.de (Daniel Seichter) Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 20:08:02 +0100 Subject: [users] Solaris 10 In-Reply-To: <20040320190730.GX12274@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> References: <20040320194349.0608948a@blade> <20040320190730.GX12274@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> Message-ID: <20040320200802.2d0c7691@blade> Hello, thank you very much for this answer. So I will install Solaris 10 this evening *yeeepie* Daniel On Sat, 20 Mar 2004 20:07:30 +0100 Thomas Glanzmann wrote: > Hi, > > > which packages will be used if I use Solaris 10? I want to install > > the Software Express, but using some applications from blastwave. > > Is it possible with Solaris 10 or not? > > indeed. it is possible and we're already doing so and had no problems > expect for lsof which is fixed now. Some of the packages which were > build on Solaris 8 dpend on the 'x'-libs which are merged in the > normal libs under Solaris 10 so it maybe necessary to install some > 'fake' packages in order to install some packages on Solaris 10. > > See also the whole thread beginning with > http://www.blastwave.org/mailarchives/maint/2003/0694.html > > If you need help with creating fake packages just ask Michael Gernoth > > > Thomas > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users From daniel at dseichter.de Sun Mar 21 18:36:00 2004 From: daniel at dseichter.de (Daniel Seichter) Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 18:36:00 +0100 Subject: [users] What to do after xfce installed??? Message-ID: <20040321183600.7901e522@blade> Hello, can anyone give me a short description, how to add the xfce into the login-screen? I installed xfce 4.0.4 and now want to login. Is there any script or something like else? The output from the installation I deleted so I do not know, if there was anything. Thanks Daniel Seichter P.S.: I did not upgrade to Solaris 10, because of some issues of my installation CDs. From mark.aston at gunfleet.com Sun Mar 21 19:00:28 2004 From: mark.aston at gunfleet.com (Mark Aston) Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 18:00:28 +0000 Subject: [users] What to do after xfce installed??? In-Reply-To: <20040321183600.7901e522@blade> References: <20040321183600.7901e522@blade> Message-ID: <20040321180028.171f27fa@unknown> On Sun, 21 Mar 2004 18:36:00 +0100 Daniel Seichter wrote: > I installed xfce 4.0.4 and now want to login. Is there any script or > something like else? The output from the installation I deleted so I do > not know, if there was anything. go to my site below, the Window Managers page and use the Blackbox files, you will need to edit for XFCE of course HTH -- Best regards Mark Aston http://www.gunfleet.com/solaris From daniel at dseichter.de Sun Mar 21 19:04:50 2004 From: daniel at dseichter.de (Daniel Seichter) Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 19:04:50 +0100 Subject: [users] What to do after xfce installed??? In-Reply-To: <20040321180028.171f27fa@unknown> References: <20040321183600.7901e522@blade> <20040321180028.171f27fa@unknown> Message-ID: <20040321190450.2bf46b27@blade> Hell Mark, > go to my site below, the Window Managers page and use the Blackbox > files, you will need to edit for XFCE of course thanks, I will take a look for it. Wish you a nice evening. Daniel From delrio at mie.utoronto.ca Sun Mar 21 20:33:52 2004 From: delrio at mie.utoronto.ca (Oscar del Rio) Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 14:33:52 -0500 Subject: [users] Re: [newpkgs] openssl update In-Reply-To: <20040320223018.GA28997@blastwave.blastwave.org> References: <20040320223018.GA28997@blastwave.blastwave.org> Message-ID: <405DEE20.6080303@mie.utoronto.ca> Philip Brown wrote: > openssl 0.9.7d was just pushed out > it's a security release Thanks! Just a reminder to everyone upgrading the package, that any daemons using the library must be restarted, such as the CSW versions of apache, mysql, sendmail, etc The whole list of CSW packages that depend on openssl is at http://www.blastwave.org/packages.php/openssl From daniel at dseichter.de Mon Mar 22 13:22:06 2004 From: daniel at dseichter.de (Daniel Seichter) Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 13:22:06 +0100 Subject: [users] Install information Solaris 10 Message-ID: <20040322132206.46316976@blade> Hello, I yesterday installed Solaris 10 (the error before was a USB device) and today I installed all blastwave software. I don't know earlier or later releases of Solaris 10, I used b51, but the following packages I had to install from Solaris 8: SUNWcslx SUNWdplx SUNWscpux These packages where needed by texinfo (dependency of sylpheed). Everything further works fine, so can't find errors after installing this packages from Solaris 8 (HW 7/03) This should only be for information. Daniel From garyarm at testedgeinc.com Tue Mar 23 23:31:55 2004 From: garyarm at testedgeinc.com (Gary Armstrong) Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 14:31:55 -0800 Subject: [users] /opt/csw Message-ID: <4060BADB.3000904@testedgeinc.com> I'm new to blastwave, so pardon my ignorance. Somewhere in the docs I read that for the most part, blastwave packages were network deployable. Only packages containing daemons should be installed local. Since they all default to loading in /opt/csw, what's the recommended way to load something local? Currently, I'm automounting /opt/csw using a direct map. For instance, if I want to run apache on 2 machines, what's the blastwave recommendation, for where/how the installs should be done. TIA Gary Note: Risking sounding corny, "Great job!!" From dclarke at blastwave.org Wed Mar 24 10:16:06 2004 From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke) Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 04:16:06 -0500 (EST) Subject: [users] Dedicated GNOME and KDE build server being setup Message-ID: FYI : I expect to have a dedicated build server in place for KDE and GNOME within the next 24 hours. The server is patching now and then Studio 8 will be installed. Stay tuned for further updates on GNOME. We await the GNOME source release after the security issues are solved. Dennis Clarke Director and Admin for Blastwave.org Home of Community Software Packages dclarke at blastwave.org for The Solaris Operating Environment From daniel at dseichter.de Wed Mar 24 12:18:53 2004 From: daniel at dseichter.de (Daniel Seichter) Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 12:18:53 +0100 Subject: [users] Dedicated GNOME and KDE build server being setup In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20040324121853.7feaa5e8@blade> Hello Dennis, > I expect to have a dedicated build server in place for KDE and > GNOME > within the next 24 hours. The server is patching now and then Studio > 8 will be installed. > > Stay tuned for further updates on GNOME. We await the GNOME source > release after the security issues are solved. This means, Gnome 2.4 is available for Solaris soon? Nice work!!! Daniel From delrio at mie.utoronto.ca Wed Mar 24 14:43:20 2004 From: delrio at mie.utoronto.ca (Oscar del Rio) Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 08:43:20 -0500 Subject: [users] /opt/csw In-Reply-To: <4060BADB.3000904@testedgeinc.com> References: <4060BADB.3000904@testedgeinc.com> Message-ID: <40619078.6020808@mie.utoronto.ca> Gary Armstrong wrote: > Since they all default to loading in /opt/csw, what's the recommended > way to load something local? Currently, I'm automounting /opt/csw using > a direct map. > > For instance, if I want to run apache on 2 machines, what's the > blastwave recommendation, for where/how the installs should be done. Speaking only for myself, not for blastwave: :-) You can install apache on the NFS server just like any other CSW package, and on the NFS clients that will run the apache daemon keep the conf file in a local dir, e.g. /etc/apache Make a /etc/init.d/ startup script to run /opt/csw/apache/bin/httpd -f /etc/apache/conf/httpd.conf In the local config file make sure the paths for DocumentRoot and log files are in a local dir. Alternatively, you can cd /opt/csw/apache mv conf conf.csw; ln -s /etc/apache/conf mv logs logs.csw; ln -s /etc/apache/logs mv htdocs htdocs.csw; ln -s /etc/apache/htdocs but be careful when you upgrade the apache package. From sithglan at stud.uni-erlangen.de Wed Mar 24 16:26:00 2004 From: sithglan at stud.uni-erlangen.de (Thomas Glanzmann) Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 16:26:00 +0100 Subject: [users] /opt/csw In-Reply-To: <4060BADB.3000904@testedgeinc.com> References: <4060BADB.3000904@testedgeinc.com> Message-ID: <20040324152559.GH3372@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> Hi, > Since they all default to loading in /opt/csw, what's the recommended > way to load something local? Currently, I'm automounting /opt/csw using > a direct map. you could loop mount a local volume to /opt/csw/etc or wherever the configs (dynamic) stuff is. We have such a setup (not for this purpose) but I think it isn't a good choice at all. Diskspace is cheap these days so buy extra diskspace if you need it and install the csw local on each machine. (That's how we do it at the moment) And of course automated everything (updates, installtion and so on) Thomas From warden at mail.testedgeinc.com Wed Mar 24 16:46:38 2004 From: warden at mail.testedgeinc.com (Gary Armstrong) Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 07:46:38 -0800 Subject: [users] /opt/csw References: <4060BADB.3000904@testedgeinc.com> <40619078.6020808@mie.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: <4061AD5E.1070200@mail.testedgeinc.com> Oscar del Rio wrote: > Gary Armstrong wrote: > >> Since they all default to loading in /opt/csw, what's the recommended >> way to load something local? Currently, I'm automounting /opt/csw >> using a direct map. >> >> For instance, if I want to run apache on 2 machines, what's the >> blastwave recommendation, for where/how the installs should be done. > > > Speaking only for myself, not for blastwave: :-) > > You can install apache on the NFS server just like any other CSW > package, and on the NFS clients that will run the apache daemon > keep the conf file in a local dir, e.g. /etc/apache > Make a /etc/init.d/ startup script to run > /opt/csw/apache/bin/httpd -f /etc/apache/conf/httpd.conf > > In the local config file make sure the paths for DocumentRoot > and log files are in a local dir. I am leaning this way. Anyway, blastwave might consider a second directory (ie csw-l), for things that should be configured locally. It also makes them easy to spot. That way if some software package is configured for the host I installed on, it doesn't get automounted on another. Thanks Gary > > Alternatively, you can > cd /opt/csw/apache > mv conf conf.csw; ln -s /etc/apache/conf > mv logs logs.csw; ln -s /etc/apache/logs > mv htdocs htdocs.csw; ln -s /etc/apache/htdocs > > but be careful when you upgrade the apache package. > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > From warden at mail.testedgeinc.com Wed Mar 24 16:47:59 2004 From: warden at mail.testedgeinc.com (Gary Armstrong) Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 07:47:59 -0800 Subject: [users] /opt/csw References: <4060BADB.3000904@testedgeinc.com> <20040324152559.GH3372@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> Message-ID: <4061ADAF.5050701@mail.testedgeinc.com> Thomas Glanzmann wrote: >Hi, > > > >>Since they all default to loading in /opt/csw, what's the recommended >>way to load something local? Currently, I'm automounting /opt/csw using >>a direct map. >> >> > >you could loop mount a local volume to /opt/csw/etc or wherever the >configs (dynamic) stuff is. We have such a setup (not for this purpose) >but I think it isn't a good choice at all. Diskspace is cheap these days >so buy extra diskspace if you need it and install the csw local on each >machine. (That's how we do it at the moment) And of course automated >everything (updates, installtion and so on) > > Thomas >_______________________________________________ >users mailing list >users at lists.blastwave.org >https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > > > It's not the price of disk. It's the ease of installation/maintenance the other way. Gary From sithglan at stud.uni-erlangen.de Wed Mar 24 18:09:55 2004 From: sithglan at stud.uni-erlangen.de (Thomas Glanzmann) Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 18:09:55 +0100 Subject: [users] /opt/csw In-Reply-To: <4061ADAF.5050701@mail.testedgeinc.com> References: <4060BADB.3000904@testedgeinc.com> <20040324152559.GH3372@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <4061ADAF.5050701@mail.testedgeinc.com> Message-ID: <20040324170955.GK3372@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> Hi, > It's not the price of disk. It's the ease of installation/maintenance > the other way. automate it. It isn't that hard. Thomas From warden at mail.testedgeinc.com Wed Mar 24 18:26:10 2004 From: warden at mail.testedgeinc.com (Gary Armstrong) Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 09:26:10 -0800 Subject: [users] /opt/csw References: <4060BADB.3000904@testedgeinc.com> <20040324152559.GH3372@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <4061ADAF.5050701@mail.testedgeinc.com> <20040324170955.GK3372@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> Message-ID: <4061C4B2.4050302@mail.testedgeinc.com> Thomas Glanzmann wrote: >Hi, > > > >>It's not the price of disk. It's the ease of installation/maintenance >>the other way. >> >> > >automate it. It isn't that hard. > > Thomas >_______________________________________________ >users mailing list >users at lists.blastwave.org >https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > > > I think I'd rather avoid any kind of religious war, but being hard/easy ( just like disk price) isn't the point. See maintenance. Gary From dclarke at blastwave.org Wed Mar 24 21:08:14 2004 From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke) Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 15:08:14 -0500 (EST) Subject: [users] Dedicated GNOME build server up but GNOME 2.6 delayed a week Message-ID: All: Due to security issues at gnome.org the release of the 2.6 code has been pushed off until next week. The dedicated build server callisto is up and running with Studio 8 and the Sun Performance Library. I will run some tests with a build of POV-Ray for 64-bit sparc. Dennis Clarke Director and Admin for Blastwave.org Home of Community Software Packages dclarke at blastwave.org for The Solaris Operating Environment From dkg at blastwave.org Fri Mar 26 18:27:26 2004 From: dkg at blastwave.org (Daniel K. Gebhart) Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 18:27:26 +0100 Subject: [users] ping phil Message-ID: <20040326172726.GJ13837@sperrstunde.at> Hi, Do you know whats up with Phil? I wrote some mails to him and did not get a reply so far. :( He wanted me to package something and did not respond to my questions afterwards. Because of a misstake it seems that I destroyed my ~/.ssh/authorized_keys2 at blastwave. Who is responsible for that? PS: Would be nice if someone could rename the subject of the mails to the list to something more detailed than users. I propose "csw-users". kind regards, daniel -- _ Daniel K. Gebhart, \. _(9> , http://dkg.con-fuse.org/ \==_) , http://www.pro-linux.de/ .o -'= , http://www.blastwave.org/ o. , http://monday-syndrome.org/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From asmoore at edge.net Fri Mar 26 18:55:00 2004 From: asmoore at edge.net (Alex S Moore) Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 11:55:00 -0600 Subject: [users] ping phil In-Reply-To: <20040326172726.GJ13837@sperrstunde.at> References: <20040326172726.GJ13837@sperrstunde.at> Message-ID: <1080323699.16767.42.camel@sws602> On Fri, 2004-03-26 at 11:27, Daniel K. Gebhart wrote: > Hi, > > Do you know whats up with Phil? Phil gets busy. You must be patient:> > Because of a misstake it seems that I > destroyed my ~/.ssh/authorized_keys2 at blastwave. Who is responsible for > that? As far I know, Phil. See above. Alex From ihsan at dogan.ch Fri Mar 26 21:42:41 2004 From: ihsan at dogan.ch (Ihsan Dogan) Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 21:42:41 +0100 Subject: [users] ping phil In-Reply-To: <20040326172726.GJ13837@sperrstunde.at> References: <20040326172726.GJ13837@sperrstunde.at> Message-ID: <20040326204241.GA24963@defiant.dogan.ch> On Friday, 26 Mar 2004 18:27 +0100, Daniel K. Gebhart wrote: > PS: Would be nice if someone could rename the subject of the mails to the > list to something more detailed than users. I propose "csw-users". Why? users at lists.blastwave.org is detailled enough. Cheers, Ihsan... -- Swiss Unix User Group: http://www.suug.ch/ Software Packages for Solaris: http://www.blastwave.org/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 186 bytes Desc: not available URL: