From asmoore at blastwave.org Mon Nov 1 12:52:50 2004 From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex S Moore) Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2004 05:52:50 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] [Fwd: [Clamav-users] please fix your freshclam setup] Message-ID: <1099309970.1696.4.camel@sws602> -------- Forwarded Message -------- From: Luca Gibelli Reply-To: ClamAV users ML To: clamav-announce at lists.clamav.net Cc: clamav-users at lists.clamav.net Subject: [Clamav-users] please fix your freshclam setup Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2004 01:26:23 +0100 Dear ClamAV users, we are seeing a lot of useless traffic on our mirror servers. It looks like there are many broken freshclam clients still running. Once again, we urge you to upgrade to ClamAV 0.80 and take advantage of the new DNSDatabaseInfo option, which allows to check for a new version of the database with a single DNS query. Until you do, please keep the check frequency below once per hour. Abusing clients will be added to a black list and won't be able to download our database anymore. We ask you to verify that your freshclam setup is correct, in particular: 1) if you run freshclam from crontab, check that you have an entry like the following: N * * * * /usr/local/bin/freshclam --quiet where N is a random integer between 3 and 57 and is not a multiple of 10. Do NOT use anything like this: * * * * * /usr/local/bin/freshclam --quiet */N * * * * /usr/local/bin/freshclam --quiet 2) if you run freshclam from crontab, make sure that you are _not_ using the -d flag (see the manpage for more info). Thanks From daniel at dseichter.de Mon Nov 1 18:19:05 2004 From: daniel at dseichter.de (Daniel Seichter) Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2004 18:19:05 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Firefox problems Message-ID: <1099329545.2065.3.camel@blade> Hello, following output occur each time I start firefox. $ firefox *** loading the extensions datasource *** loading the extensions datasource *** loading the extensions datasource *** loading the extensions datasource *** loading the extensions datasource *** loading the extensions datasource *** loading the extensions datasource *** loading the extensions datasource *** loading the extensions datasource *** loading the extensions datasource *** loading the extensions datasource *** loading the extensions datasource *** loading the extensions datasource *** loading the extensions datasource *** loading the extensions datasource *** loading the extensions datasource *** loading the extensions datasource *** loading the extensions datasource *** loading the extensions datasource *** loading the extensions datasource *** loading the extensions datasource *** loading the extensions datasource *** loading the extensions datasource *** loading the extensions datasource *** loading the extensions datasource *** loading the extensions datasource *** loading the extensions datasource *** loading the extensions datasource *** loading the extensions datasource *** loading the extensions datasource (Gecko:2096): libgnomevfs-WARNING **: Die Konfigurationsdatei ?/opt/csw/etc/gnome-vfs-2.0/modules/cdemenu-module.conf? wurde nicht gefunden: Zu viele offene Dateien (Gecko:2096): libgnomevfs-WARNING **: Die Konfigurationsdatei ?/opt/csw/etc/gnome-vfs-2.0/modules/default-modules.conf? wurde nicht gefunden: Zu viele offene Dateien (Gecko:2096): libgnomevfs-WARNING **: Die Konfigurationsdatei ?/opt/csw/etc/gnome-vfs-2.0/modules/smb-module.conf? wurde nicht gefunden: Zu viele offene Dateien (Gecko:2096): libgnomevfs-WARNING **: Die Konfigurationsdatei ?/opt/csw/etc/gnome-vfs-2.0/modules/ssl-modules.conf? wurde nicht gefunden: Zu viele offene Dateien *** loading the extensions datasource (Gecko:2096): libgnomevfs-WARNING **: Die Konfigurationsdatei ?/opt/csw/etc/gnome-vfs-2.0/modules/cdemenu-module.conf? wurde nicht gefunden: Zu viele offene Dateien (Gecko:2096): libgnomevfs-WARNING **: Die Konfigurationsdatei ?/opt/csw/etc/gnome-vfs-2.0/modules/default-modules.conf? wurde nicht gefunden: Zu viele offene Dateien (Gecko:2096): libgnomevfs-WARNING **: Die Konfigurationsdatei ?/opt/csw/etc/gnome-vfs-2.0/modules/smb-module.conf? wurde nicht gefunden: Zu viele offene Dateien (Gecko:2096): libgnomevfs-WARNING **: Die Konfigurationsdatei ?/opt/csw/etc/gnome-vfs-2.0/modules/ssl-modules.conf? wurde nicht gefunden: Zu viele offene Dateien $ How to fix? The missing config files are in this location! Using Solaris 9 with CDE (patchlevel 2004-10-30). Daniel -- Daniel Seichter DSeichter-Software From asmoore at edge.net Mon Nov 1 18:30:52 2004 From: asmoore at edge.net (Alex S Moore) Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2004 11:30:52 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] Firefox problems In-Reply-To: <1099329545.2065.3.camel@blade> References: <1099329545.2065.3.camel@blade> Message-ID: <1099330252.1696.15.camel@sws602> On Mon, 2004-11-01 at 18:19 +0100, Daniel Seichter wrote: > Hello, > > following output occur each time I start firefox. > > $ firefox > *** loading the extensions datasource Hi, Daniel. If you do not get an answer soon, create a bug report. This error looks familiar, but I do not remember the details since I do not use firefox. Alex From daniel at dseichter.de Mon Nov 1 19:17:19 2004 From: daniel at dseichter.de (Daniel Seichter) Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2004 19:17:19 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Firefox problems In-Reply-To: <1099330252.1696.15.camel@sws602> References: <1099329545.2065.3.camel@blade> <1099330252.1696.15.camel@sws602> Message-ID: <1099333039.2065.5.camel@blade> Hello Alex, > Hi, Daniel. If you do not get an answer soon, create a bug report. > This error looks familiar, but I do not remember the details since I do > not use firefox. I will do so, but I hope to get an answer. Daniel From OCallaghD at aol.com Mon Nov 1 20:49:21 2004 From: OCallaghD at aol.com (OCallaghD at aol.com) Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2004 14:49:21 EST Subject: [csw-users] Firefox problems Message-ID: <1aa.2a96991b.2eb7ed41@aol.com> i had this problem. i updated all my csw packages and problem went away, so it looks like it's one of the dependencies needs updating. cheers dan. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20041101/69bdf8c7/attachment.html From rsun at wlgore.com Mon Nov 1 20:49:38 2004 From: rsun at wlgore.com (Richard D Sun) Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2004 14:49:38 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] pureftpd Message-ID: Hi, I was using pureftpd and I had a problem with it not allowing me to receive a file over 2gb, while the one that comes with Sun worked just fine. Is there some sort of configuration setting I missed? --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Richard D. Sun ?? W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. mailto:rsun at wlgore.com (preferred) Tel: (410)506-4168, Fax: (410)506-4400 http://www.gore.com Gore Associates: Change the "Delivery Options" of your message to "High" Importance to page me immediately. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20041101/8f04acdd/attachment.html From comand at blastwave.org Mon Nov 1 20:59:34 2004 From: comand at blastwave.org (Cory Omand) Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2004 11:59:34 -0800 Subject: [csw-users] Warning: apache2 2.0.52,REV=2004.10.29 Message-ID: <1099339174.29221.215.camel@haywire> Please be aware that the 2004.10.29 release of the apache2 package has a package removal defect. When the package is installed, '/opt/csw/apache2/etc/httpd.conf' and '/opt/csw/apache2/etc/ssl.conf' are added to the package database. When the package is removed, these files will be deleted. If you rely on local customization of these files, please make a backup as soon as possible. A new version of apache2 which does not add customizable configuration files to the package database will be released later today. If you have any questions or concerns, please email me directly. -- Cory Omand From asmoore at edge.net Mon Nov 1 21:52:54 2004 From: asmoore at edge.net (Alex S Moore) Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2004 14:52:54 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] pureftpd In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1099342374.1696.21.camel@sws602> On Mon, 2004-11-01 at 14:49 -0500, Richard D Sun wrote: > > Hi, I was using pureftpd and I had a problem with it not allowing me > to receive a file over 2gb, while the one that comes with Sun worked > just fine. Is there some sort of configuration setting I missed? Some applications allow builds with largefile support, but I am not sure of this package. If you do not get a reply, send the maintainer a email or bug report. Alex From bogdan at its.uq.edu.au Tue Nov 2 00:57:18 2004 From: bogdan at its.uq.edu.au (Bogdan Iamandei) Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2004 09:57:18 +1000 Subject: [csw-users] pureftpd In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4186CD5E.6070204@its.uq.edu.au> Richard D Sun wrote: > Hi, I was using pureftpd and I had a problem with it not allowing me to > receive a file over 2gb, while the one that comes with Sun worked just > fine. Is there some sort of configuration setting I missed? If I recall correctly, normally, applications have to be compiled with largefiles support in order to support file sizes over 2G. Sometimes this is pretty straight forward, but some other times some code-changes need to happen. lfcompile(5) might be of some help to you. Ino!~ -- I have seen things you people wouldn't believe. Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion. I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser Gate. All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. Time to die. From jeff at cjsa.com Tue Nov 2 01:11:09 2004 From: jeff at cjsa.com (Jeffery Small) Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 00:11:09 GMT Subject: [csw-users] problem with gimp rotation Message-ID: A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text Size: 408 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20041102/454922b8/attachment.ksh From comand at blastwave.org Tue Nov 2 02:50:20 2004 From: comand at blastwave.org (Cory Omand) Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2004 17:50:20 -0800 Subject: [csw-users] problem with gimp rotation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1099360219.29221.226.camel@haywire> Jeff, You can only rotate layers by arbitrary amounts. The image -> transform -> rotate menu does limit you to 90/180 degree rotations. Instead, use layer -> transform -> arbitrary rotation. I am using CSWgimp 2.0.4 on Solaris 9 SPARC. Hope this helps, C. On Mon, 2004-11-01 at 16:11, Jeffery Small wrote: > I am using gimp 2.0.5 on my solaris 9 sparc system. I find that I can > rotate images by 90-degrees but I am unable to rotate a jpeg image by an > arbitrary amount. > > Could those of you using this version of gimp on the sparc platform > please try this and report whether or not you are able to perform an > arbitrary rotation. > > Thanks. -- Cory Omand From james at blastwave.org Tue Nov 2 11:08:51 2004 From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee) Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2004 10:08:51 GMT Subject: [csw-users] Warning: apache2 2.0.52,REV=2004.10.29 In-Reply-To: <1099339174.29221.215.camel@haywire> References: <1099339174.29221.215.camel@haywire> Message-ID: <20041102.10085100.432703434@landeck.jamesipoos.com> On 01/11/04, 19:59:34, Cory Omand wrote regarding [csw-users] Warning: apache2 2.0.52,REV=2004.10.29: > Please be aware that the 2004.10.29 release of the apache2 package has a > package removal defect. When the package is installed, > '/opt/csw/apache2/etc/httpd.conf' and '/opt/csw/apache2/etc/ssl.conf' > are added to the package database. When the package is removed, these > files will be deleted. I would like to add that this only affects new installs of the 2004.10.29 release. Upgrades where the *.conf files exists before installation of the 2004.10.29 release have no problem and the user's conf files are not removed. If you are in doubt run this: $ pkgchk -l -p /opt/csw/apache2/etc/httpd.conf If you see CSWapache2 in output then the file will be removed, otherwise you have no problem. James. From ocalld at cogent-dsn.com Thu Nov 4 12:56:23 2004 From: ocalld at cogent-dsn.com (Dan O'Callaghan) Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2004 11:56:23 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] problems with cdrecord Message-ID: <1099569383.4581.6.camel@dan-sun1> hi since upgrading to latest version of cdrecord i'm having problems burning disks. is anyone else having problems? i'm using a freecom usb dvd/cd writer. works ok with windows and did work ok prior to upgrade. usb port on sunblade 1500 works ok with mem sticks - so usb port is ok. any ideas? error below. Blocks total: 359849 Blocks current: 359849 Blocks remaining: 329361 Starting to write CD/DVD at speed 8 in real TAO mode for single session. Last chance to quit, starting real write 0 seconds. Operation starts. Waiting for reader process to fill input buffer ... input buffer ready. BURN-Free is ON. Turning BURN-Free off Performing OPC... Starting new track at sector: 0 Track 01: 6 of 59 MB written (fifo 100%) [buf 14%] 6.6x.cdrecord: I/O error. write_g1: scsi sendcmd: no error CDB: 2A 00 00 00 0D 90 00 00 1F 00 status: 0x0 (GOOD STATUS) resid: 63488 cmd finished after 1.350s timeout 40s write track data: error after 7110656 bytes cdrecord: A write error occured. cdrecord: Please properly read the error message above. Writing time: 18.390s Average write speed 28.1x. Min drive buffer fill was 14% Fixating... Fixating time: 32.868s cdrecord: fifo had 240 puts and 113 gets. cdrecord: fifo was 0 times empty and 112 times full, min fill was 99%. -- Dan O'Callaghan Cogent From ihsan at blastwave.org Mon Nov 8 22:48:13 2004 From: ihsan at blastwave.org (Ihsan Dogan) Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2004 22:48:13 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] openssl will not install CSWossl In-Reply-To: <4181D9F1.9030809@qwest.net> References: <4181D9F1.9030809@qwest.net> Message-ID: <20041108214813.GA14034@dogan.ch> Hi Abram, On Thursday, 28 Oct 2004 22:49 -0700, Abram Olson wrote: > 1. removed the openssl package and then tried to install it. The install > fails with no error more informative then "ERROR package not installed" This is not very informative. Could you please provide us more information? Regards, Ihsan... -- Swiss Unix User Group: http://www.suug.ch/ Software Packages for Solaris: http://www.blastwave.org/ From ihsan at blastwave.org Tue Nov 9 22:54:27 2004 From: ihsan at blastwave.org (Ihsan Dogan) Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 22:54:27 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] problems with cdrecord In-Reply-To: <1099569383.4581.6.camel@dan-sun1> References: <1099569383.4581.6.camel@dan-sun1> Message-ID: <20041109215427.GB29235@dogan.ch> On Thursday, 04 Nov 2004 11:56 +0000, Dan O'Callaghan wrote: > since upgrading to latest version of cdrecord i'm having problems > burning disks. > > is anyone else having problems? > i'm using a freecom usb dvd/cd writer. works ok with windows and did > work ok prior to upgrade. usb port on sunblade 1500 works ok with mem > sticks - so usb port is ok. > > any ideas? > error below. Did you executed cdrecord with the -v option? Do you have any errors in /var/adm/messages? Ihsan... -- Swiss Unix User Group: http://www.suug.ch/ Software Packages for Solaris: http://www.blastwave.org/ From robert at rootprompt.net Mon Nov 22 20:53:09 2004 From: robert at rootprompt.net (Robert Banniza) Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 13:53:09 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] OpenLDAP -- Unrecognized database type (bdb) Message-ID: <200411221353.09275.robert@rootprompt.net> *This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro* Hello, I'm currently using Solaris 9 and have installed openldap-2.1.22 and all dependencies including Berkeleydb4. When I try and start OpenLDAP, I get the following error: Unrecognized database type (bdb) I have performed a 'ldd' and everything looks fine: [root at testmachine:~]$ ldd /opt/csw/libexec/slapd libldap_r.so.2 => /opt/csw/lib/libldap_r.so.2 liblber.so.2 => /opt/csw/lib/liblber.so.2 libdb-4.1.so => /opt/csw/bdb4/lib/libdb-4.1.so libsasl2.so.2 => /opt/csw/lib/libsasl2.so.2 libssl.so.0.9.7 => /opt/csw/lib/libssl.so.0.9.7 libcrypto.so.0.9.7 => /opt/csw/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.7 libresolv.so.2 => /lib/libresolv.so.2 libgen.so.1 => /lib/libgen.so.1 libnsl.so.1 => /lib/libnsl.so.1 libsocket.so.1 => /lib/libsocket.so.1 libpthread.so.1 => /lib/libpthread.so.1 libltdl.so.3 => /opt/csw/lib/libltdl.so.3 libdl.so.1 => /lib/libdl.so.1 libc.so.1 => /lib/libc.so.1 libmp.so.2 => /lib/libmp.so.2 libthread.so.1 => /lib/libthread.so.1 /usr/platform/SUNW,UltraAX-i2/lib/libc_psr.so.1 I have tried setting $LD_LIBRARY_PATH to LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/opt/csw/bdb4/lib:/ opt/csw/lib to no avail. and have also tried unsetting LD_LIBRARY_PATH to no avail. I have even gone a step further by setting he library path through the use of 'crle'. What am I doing wrong here? Why can't openldap find the appropriate Berkeley libs/understand what db version to use? What else am I missing? Any information appreciated. Robert P.S. I have tried using truss to determine the issue as well as setting '-d 1068' when running slapd. From res at colnet.cmhnet.org Mon Nov 22 21:47:20 2004 From: res at colnet.cmhnet.org (Robert Stampfli) Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 15:47:20 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Latest Firefox In-Reply-To: <200411221353.09275.robert@rootprompt.net> References: <200411221353.09275.robert@rootprompt.net> Message-ID: <20041122204720.GA13874@colnet> I've downloaded the latest CSW Firefox build (1.0), and love the new features added since 0.9.3. However, it seems to be fairly verbose about spitting out messages on the console. Right now, I'm searching Ebay, and have gotten dozens of the following: (Gecko:17852): libgnomevfs-CRITICAL **: file gnome-vfs-mime-info.c: line 916: assertion `!does_string_contain_caps (mime_type)' failed I can invoke it with stdout/stderr redirected to NULL and hide the problem, but I wonder why this is happening in the first place. Any ideas? Rob From OCallaghD at aol.com Mon Nov 22 21:52:30 2004 From: OCallaghD at aol.com (OCallaghD at aol.com) Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 15:52:30 EST Subject: [csw-users] Latest Firefox Message-ID: <8e.1ac3a0f8.2ed3ab8e@aol.com> i'm having problems with firefox as well. not a big problem really. i can't use the arrow keys on the keyboard to navigate in screens of text i.e. when you use firefox to access yahoo mail, i can't navigate with with the arrow keys through the message i'm typing. i could with prev version, not a big problem though. cheers dan. In a message dated 22/11/2004 20:48:05 GMT Standard Time, res at colnet.cmhnet.org writes: I've downloaded the latest CSW Firefox build (1.0), and love the new features added since 0.9.3. However, it seems to be fairly verbose about spitting out messages on the console. Right now, I'm searching Ebay, and have gotten dozens of the following: (Gecko:17852): libgnomevfs-CRITICAL **: file gnome-vfs-mime-info.c: line 916: assertion `!does_string_contain_caps (mime_type)' failed I can invoke it with stdout/stderr redirected to NULL and hide the problem, but I wonder why this is happening in the first place. Any ideas? Rob _______________________________________________ users mailing list users at lists.blastwave.org https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20041122/5cb05edf/attachment.html From asmoore at blastwave.org Mon Nov 22 21:56:49 2004 From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex S Moore) Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 14:56:49 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] OpenLDAP -- Unrecognized database type (bdb) In-Reply-To: <200411221353.09275.robert@rootprompt.net> References: <200411221353.09275.robert@rootprompt.net> Message-ID: <1101157009.22748.16.camel@sws602> On Mon, 2004-11-22 at 13:53 -0600, Robert Banniza wrote: > *This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro* > Hello, > I'm currently using Solaris 9 and have installed openldap-2.1.22 and all > dependencies including Berkeleydb4. When I try and start OpenLDAP, I get the > following error: > > Unrecognized database type (bdb) > unset all LD_LIBRARY_PATH and crle changes. Unless specifically told to do so for a package, you should not need any of this for CSW packages. In /opt/csw/etc/openldap/slapd.conf, uncomment the following two lines. modulepath /opt/csw/libexec/openldap moduleload back_bdb.la Alex From robert at rootprompt.net Tue Nov 23 04:04:53 2004 From: robert at rootprompt.net (Robert Banniza) Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 21:04:53 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] OpenLDAP Unrecognized Database Message-ID: <41A2A8D5.802@rootprompt.net> *This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro* Hello, I'm currently using Solaris 9 and have installed openldap-2.1.22 and all dependencies including Berkeleydb4. When I try and start OpenLDAP, I get the following error: Unrecognized database type (bdb) I have performed a 'ldd' and everything looks fine: [root at testmachine:~]$ ldd /opt/csw/libexec/slapd libldap_r.so.2 => /opt/csw/lib/libldap_r.so.2 liblber.so.2 => /opt/csw/lib/liblber.so.2 libdb-4.1.so => /opt/csw/bdb4/lib/libdb-4.1.so libsasl2.so.2 => /opt/csw/lib/libsasl2.so.2 libssl.so.0.9.7 => /opt/csw/lib/libssl.so.0.9.7 libcrypto.so.0.9.7 => /opt/csw/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.7 libresolv.so.2 => /lib/libresolv.so.2 libgen.so.1 => /lib/libgen.so.1 libnsl.so.1 => /lib/libnsl.so.1 libsocket.so.1 => /lib/libsocket.so.1 libpthread.so.1 => /lib/libpthread.so.1 libltdl.so.3 => /opt/csw/lib/libltdl.so.3 libdl.so.1 => /lib/libdl.so.1 libc.so.1 => /lib/libc.so.1 libmp.so.2 => /lib/libmp.so.2 libthread.so.1 => /lib/libthread.so.1 /usr/platform/SUNW,UltraAX-i2/lib/libc_psr.so.1 I have tried setting $LD_LIBRARY_PATH to LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/opt/csw/bdb4/lib:/ opt/csw/lib to no avail. and have also tried unsetting LD_LIBRARY_PATH to no avail. I have even gone a step further by setting he library path through the use of 'crle'. What am I doing wrong here? Why can't openldap find the appropriate Berkeley libs/understand what db version to use? What else am I missing? Any information appreciated. Robert P.S. I have tried using truss to determine the issue as well as setting '-d 1068' when running slapd. From ocalld at cogent-dsn.com Wed Nov 24 12:42:54 2004 From: ocalld at cogent-dsn.com (Dan O'Callaghan) Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 11:42:54 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] firefox Message-ID: <1101296574.2254.44.camel@dan-sun1> With the latest version of firefox, i've just noticed that there is a problem with bookmarks. I can't export them, the file generated is zero size. Also, i can add bookmarks and they show in the bookmarks menu but, as soon as you restart firefox, they're gone. cheers -- Dan O'Callaghan Cogent From res at colnet.cmhnet.org Wed Nov 24 14:53:29 2004 From: res at colnet.cmhnet.org (Robert Stampfli) Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 08:53:29 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] firefox In-Reply-To: <1101296574.2254.44.camel@dan-sun1> References: <1101296574.2254.44.camel@dan-sun1> Message-ID: <20041124135329.GA17652@colnet> On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 11:42:54AM +0000, Dan O'Callaghan wrote: > With the latest version of firefox, i've just noticed that there is a > problem with bookmarks. > I can't export them, the file generated is zero size. > > Also, i can add bookmarks and they show in the bookmarks menu but, as > soon as you restart firefox, they're gone. This does not seem to be the case for me. Rob From qy1ggy802 at sneakemail.com Wed Nov 24 15:01:30 2004 From: qy1ggy802 at sneakemail.com (Tim Longo) Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 09:01:30 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] firefox In-Reply-To: <20041124135329.GA17652@colnet> References: <1101296574.2254.44.camel@dan-sun1> <20041124135329.GA17652@colnet> Message-ID: <26826-24948@sneakemail.com> Just tried this myself, and don't have the same problem. Seems to work fine. BTW, I am *very* impressed with Firefox. Question: Previously, I used Mozilla browser. When I wanted to edit a page, it would open in composer. Since Firefox does not come with composer, I can't edit html pages as easily. Anyone know of a pluging for Firefox that would allow me to open and edit the page I am viewing? Thanks. > On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 11:42:54AM +0000, Dan O'Callaghan wrote: > > With the latest version of firefox, i've just noticed that there is a > > problem with bookmarks. > > I can't export them, the file generated is zero size. > > > > Also, i can add bookmarks and they show in the bookmarks menu but, as > > soon as you restart firefox, they're gone. From qy1ggy802 at sneakemail.com Wed Nov 24 21:30:15 2004 From: qy1ggy802 at sneakemail.com (Tim Longo) Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 15:30:15 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] FONTS In-Reply-To: <20041007092616.GC17966@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> References: <20041007092616.GC17966@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> Message-ID: <23469-16518@sneakemail.com> Hi, I'm not sure what package update caused this, but the fonts on Evolution are blotchy, and I can't figure out how to fix it. Previously, the fonts were crisp and clear. Can anyone suggest some things to look at for font problems? From markmayo at bcgsc.ca Fri Nov 26 21:52:50 2004 From: markmayo at bcgsc.ca (Mark Mayo) Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 12:52:50 -0800 Subject: [csw-users] gcc ISALIST problem Message-ID: <86C6E520C12E52429ACBCB01546DF4D32D00@xchange1.phage.bcgsc.ca> Sorry if I'm missing the obvious, but I'm having a problem with gcc (3.4.2): markmayo at pinky:/tmp$ which gcc /opt/csw/bin/gcc markmayo at pinky:/tmp$ grep VERSION /var/sadm/pkg/CSWgcc3rt/pkginfo VERSION=3.4.2,REV=2004.10.04 markmayo at pinky:/tmp$ cat test.c #include int main(void) { printf("test\n"); return(0); } markmayo at pinky:/tmp$ gcc test.c markmayo at pinky:/tmp$ ./a.out ld.so.1: ./a.out: fatal: ./a.out: /opt/csw/gcc3/lib/$ISALIST -R/opt/csw/lib/$ISALIST: token ISALIST could not be expanded test markmayo at pinky:/tmp$ ldd a.out ld.so.1: a.out: fatal: a.out: /opt/csw/gcc3/lib/$ISALIST -R/opt/csw/lib/$ISALIST: token ISALIST could not be expanded libc.so.1 => /usr/lib/libc.so.1 libdl.so.1 => /usr/lib/libdl.so.1 /usr/platform/SUNW,Netra-T12/lib/libc_psr.so.1 markmayo at pinky:/tmp$ isalist sparcv9+vis2 sparcv9+vis sparcv9 sparcv8plus+vis sparcv8plus sparcv8 sparcv8-fsmuld sparcv7 sparc markmayo at pinky:/tmp$ echo $PATH /opt/csw/bin:/opt/csw/gcc3/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/xpg4/bin:/bi n:/usr/ccs/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/openwin/bin:/usr/dt/bin I don't have LD_LIBRARY_PATH defined. Any ideas? Thx, -Mark -- Mark Mayo markmayo at bcgsc.ca Systems Coordinator, BC Genome Sciences Centre (604) 707-5801 From res at colnet.cmhnet.org Fri Nov 26 22:44:06 2004 From: res at colnet.cmhnet.org (Robert Stampfli) Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 16:44:06 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Blastwave in trouble? Message-ID: <20041126214406.GA21439@colnet> The following post has created quite a flutter of comments in the newsgroup comp.unix.solaris. Can someone from blastwave comment? What can we do to help? Rob =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= From: mark.round7 at ntlworld.com Newsgroups: comp.unix.solaris, alt.solaris.x86 Subject: Blastwave.org in trouble Date: 25 Nov 2004 08:04:30 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 71 Message-ID: <1101398670.470145.22950 at f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.236.227.6 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1101398674 23243 127.0.0.1 (25 Nov 2004 16:04:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse at google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 16:04:34 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: G2/0.2 Complaints-To: groups-abuse at google.com Injection-Info: f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=64.236.227.6; posting-account=f5Ws2gwAAAD8Lp3PfyJnnIS_w_sEA1fa I'm a maintainer at Blastwave.org - a project that should be familiar to most people on these newsgroups. Many of you probably get your packages from there. Sadly, Dennis Clarke, the director and admin for the project is running into serious problems, and now it seems that the entire project is in jeopardy. In an email message sent today (reproduced with permission), he says : --Quote-- The situation is pretty bad at the moment. ... My primary business is on the brink of collapse. My house is up for sale. While Sun is still talking about servers that we could get there may be no way to fund the operation any longer. ... At the moment I have dropped financially into the deep well. There is nothing left anymore. After more than $100K in two years there is nothing left to give. ... Contact everone and simply let them know that Dennis has his house up for sale and that I have poured my last bottom dollar into this amazing project. --End quote-- In terms of infrastructure, we have licenses and servers on the way. But there is no way the project can continue without corporate sponsorship or donations. The DVDs have been well received, but to date only 30 of these get sent out each month. In order for Blastwave to continue, and move onto the next level, around 1000 need to be shipped. Dennis has thrown everything he has into this project in order to provide a fantastic resource for all Solaris users. I'm just a maintainer, but from what I can see, and from what I hear, we have succeeded in these aims; but right now Dennis is having to sell his house and is still making every effort to find some source of investment for Blastwave. And yet no one seems to be listening - we have no official corporate sponsorship despite the best efforts of a number of individuals. Pretty much every other major open source project around has corporate sponsorship or donations coming in - but for 2 years, the person footing the bills, working 60 hour weeks and doing all the legwork has been Dennis. This means there will be a freeze on package activity, a December edition of the DVD - and then it's all up in the air. On a personal level, I feel that this project is too succesful and important to the Solaris community to let it die - we're Solaris users producing packages _for_ Solaris users. I know that being a maintainer, I have a vested interest in seeing the project succeed. However, it's as a Solaris sysadmin, fan and user, that I will miss Blastwave the most. Using pkg-get and the huge repository of prepackaged software is what makes Solaris really comfortable for me, and is the first thing I point out to Linux admins "making the switch". We've supported Solaris x86 right from the start, we have full distros of KDE and GNOME, a grand total of 833 packages across 2 architectures (with AMD support on the way), and yet on the eve of Solaris 10 reaching FCS, we're struggling to stay afloat. And so, hence this post. Dennis asked me to spread the word to anyone who will listen. If you have ever used the packages from Blastwave.org, please help spread the message, post it on a blog, buy a DVD, make a donation - anything... Or the project will not be around for much longer. -Mark mark at blastwave.org =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= From asmoore at blastwave.org Mon Nov 1 12:52:50 2004 From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex S Moore) Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2004 05:52:50 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] [Fwd: [Clamav-users] please fix your freshclam setup] Message-ID: <1099309970.1696.4.camel@sws602> -------- Forwarded Message -------- From: Luca Gibelli Reply-To: ClamAV users ML To: clamav-announce at lists.clamav.net Cc: clamav-users at lists.clamav.net Subject: [Clamav-users] please fix your freshclam setup Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2004 01:26:23 +0100 Dear ClamAV users, we are seeing a lot of useless traffic on our mirror servers. It looks like there are many broken freshclam clients still running. Once again, we urge you to upgrade to ClamAV 0.80 and take advantage of the new DNSDatabaseInfo option, which allows to check for a new version of the database with a single DNS query. Until you do, please keep the check frequency below once per hour. Abusing clients will be added to a black list and won't be able to download our database anymore. We ask you to verify that your freshclam setup is correct, in particular: 1) if you run freshclam from crontab, check that you have an entry like the following: N * * * * /usr/local/bin/freshclam --quiet where N is a random integer between 3 and 57 and is not a multiple of 10. Do NOT use anything like this: * * * * * /usr/local/bin/freshclam --quiet */N * * * * /usr/local/bin/freshclam --quiet 2) if you run freshclam from crontab, make sure that you are _not_ using the -d flag (see the manpage for more info). Thanks From daniel at dseichter.de Mon Nov 1 18:19:05 2004 From: daniel at dseichter.de (Daniel Seichter) Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2004 18:19:05 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Firefox problems Message-ID: <1099329545.2065.3.camel@blade> Hello, following output occur each time I start firefox. $ firefox *** loading the extensions datasource *** loading the extensions datasource *** loading the extensions datasource *** loading the extensions datasource *** loading the extensions datasource *** loading the extensions datasource *** loading the extensions datasource *** loading the extensions datasource *** loading the extensions datasource *** loading the extensions datasource *** loading the extensions datasource *** loading the extensions datasource *** loading the extensions datasource *** loading the extensions datasource *** loading the extensions datasource *** loading the extensions datasource *** loading the extensions datasource *** loading the extensions datasource *** loading the extensions datasource *** loading the extensions datasource *** loading the extensions datasource *** loading the extensions datasource *** loading the extensions datasource *** loading the extensions datasource *** loading the extensions datasource *** loading the extensions datasource *** loading the extensions datasource *** loading the extensions datasource *** loading the extensions datasource *** loading the extensions datasource (Gecko:2096): libgnomevfs-WARNING **: Die Konfigurationsdatei ?/opt/csw/etc/gnome-vfs-2.0/modules/cdemenu-module.conf? wurde nicht gefunden: Zu viele offene Dateien (Gecko:2096): libgnomevfs-WARNING **: Die Konfigurationsdatei ?/opt/csw/etc/gnome-vfs-2.0/modules/default-modules.conf? wurde nicht gefunden: Zu viele offene Dateien (Gecko:2096): libgnomevfs-WARNING **: Die Konfigurationsdatei ?/opt/csw/etc/gnome-vfs-2.0/modules/smb-module.conf? wurde nicht gefunden: Zu viele offene Dateien (Gecko:2096): libgnomevfs-WARNING **: Die Konfigurationsdatei ?/opt/csw/etc/gnome-vfs-2.0/modules/ssl-modules.conf? wurde nicht gefunden: Zu viele offene Dateien *** loading the extensions datasource (Gecko:2096): libgnomevfs-WARNING **: Die Konfigurationsdatei ?/opt/csw/etc/gnome-vfs-2.0/modules/cdemenu-module.conf? wurde nicht gefunden: Zu viele offene Dateien (Gecko:2096): libgnomevfs-WARNING **: Die Konfigurationsdatei ?/opt/csw/etc/gnome-vfs-2.0/modules/default-modules.conf? wurde nicht gefunden: Zu viele offene Dateien (Gecko:2096): libgnomevfs-WARNING **: Die Konfigurationsdatei ?/opt/csw/etc/gnome-vfs-2.0/modules/smb-module.conf? wurde nicht gefunden: Zu viele offene Dateien (Gecko:2096): libgnomevfs-WARNING **: Die Konfigurationsdatei ?/opt/csw/etc/gnome-vfs-2.0/modules/ssl-modules.conf? wurde nicht gefunden: Zu viele offene Dateien $ How to fix? The missing config files are in this location! Using Solaris 9 with CDE (patchlevel 2004-10-30). Daniel -- Daniel Seichter DSeichter-Software From asmoore at edge.net Mon Nov 1 18:30:52 2004 From: asmoore at edge.net (Alex S Moore) Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2004 11:30:52 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] Firefox problems In-Reply-To: <1099329545.2065.3.camel@blade> References: <1099329545.2065.3.camel@blade> Message-ID: <1099330252.1696.15.camel@sws602> On Mon, 2004-11-01 at 18:19 +0100, Daniel Seichter wrote: > Hello, > > following output occur each time I start firefox. > > $ firefox > *** loading the extensions datasource Hi, Daniel. If you do not get an answer soon, create a bug report. This error looks familiar, but I do not remember the details since I do not use firefox. Alex From daniel at dseichter.de Mon Nov 1 19:17:19 2004 From: daniel at dseichter.de (Daniel Seichter) Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2004 19:17:19 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Firefox problems In-Reply-To: <1099330252.1696.15.camel@sws602> References: <1099329545.2065.3.camel@blade> <1099330252.1696.15.camel@sws602> Message-ID: <1099333039.2065.5.camel@blade> Hello Alex, > Hi, Daniel. If you do not get an answer soon, create a bug report. > This error looks familiar, but I do not remember the details since I do > not use firefox. I will do so, but I hope to get an answer. Daniel From OCallaghD at aol.com Mon Nov 1 20:49:21 2004 From: OCallaghD at aol.com (OCallaghD at aol.com) Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2004 14:49:21 EST Subject: [csw-users] Firefox problems Message-ID: <1aa.2a96991b.2eb7ed41@aol.com> i had this problem. i updated all my csw packages and problem went away, so it looks like it's one of the dependencies needs updating. cheers dan. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rsun at wlgore.com Mon Nov 1 20:49:38 2004 From: rsun at wlgore.com (Richard D Sun) Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2004 14:49:38 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] pureftpd Message-ID: Hi, I was using pureftpd and I had a problem with it not allowing me to receive a file over 2gb, while the one that comes with Sun worked just fine. Is there some sort of configuration setting I missed? --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Richard D. Sun ?? W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. mailto:rsun at wlgore.com (preferred) Tel: (410)506-4168, Fax: (410)506-4400 http://www.gore.com Gore Associates: Change the "Delivery Options" of your message to "High" Importance to page me immediately. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From comand at blastwave.org Mon Nov 1 20:59:34 2004 From: comand at blastwave.org (Cory Omand) Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2004 11:59:34 -0800 Subject: [csw-users] Warning: apache2 2.0.52,REV=2004.10.29 Message-ID: <1099339174.29221.215.camel@haywire> Please be aware that the 2004.10.29 release of the apache2 package has a package removal defect. When the package is installed, '/opt/csw/apache2/etc/httpd.conf' and '/opt/csw/apache2/etc/ssl.conf' are added to the package database. When the package is removed, these files will be deleted. If you rely on local customization of these files, please make a backup as soon as possible. A new version of apache2 which does not add customizable configuration files to the package database will be released later today. If you have any questions or concerns, please email me directly. -- Cory Omand From asmoore at edge.net Mon Nov 1 21:52:54 2004 From: asmoore at edge.net (Alex S Moore) Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2004 14:52:54 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] pureftpd In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1099342374.1696.21.camel@sws602> On Mon, 2004-11-01 at 14:49 -0500, Richard D Sun wrote: > > Hi, I was using pureftpd and I had a problem with it not allowing me > to receive a file over 2gb, while the one that comes with Sun worked > just fine. Is there some sort of configuration setting I missed? Some applications allow builds with largefile support, but I am not sure of this package. If you do not get a reply, send the maintainer a email or bug report. Alex From bogdan at its.uq.edu.au Tue Nov 2 00:57:18 2004 From: bogdan at its.uq.edu.au (Bogdan Iamandei) Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2004 09:57:18 +1000 Subject: [csw-users] pureftpd In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4186CD5E.6070204@its.uq.edu.au> Richard D Sun wrote: > Hi, I was using pureftpd and I had a problem with it not allowing me to > receive a file over 2gb, while the one that comes with Sun worked just > fine. Is there some sort of configuration setting I missed? If I recall correctly, normally, applications have to be compiled with largefiles support in order to support file sizes over 2G. Sometimes this is pretty straight forward, but some other times some code-changes need to happen. lfcompile(5) might be of some help to you. Ino!~ -- I have seen things you people wouldn't believe. Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion. I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser Gate. All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. Time to die. From jeff at cjsa.com Tue Nov 2 01:11:09 2004 From: jeff at cjsa.com (Jeffery Small) Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 00:11:09 GMT Subject: [csw-users] problem with gimp rotation Message-ID: I am using gimp 2.0.5 on my solaris 9 sparc system. I find that I can rotate images by 90-degrees but I am unable to rotate a jpeg image by an arbitrary amount. Could those of you using this version of gimp on the sparc platform please try this and report whether or not you are able to perform an arbitrary rotation. Thanks. -- Jeff Jeffery Small In real life: From comand at blastwave.org Tue Nov 2 02:50:20 2004 From: comand at blastwave.org (Cory Omand) Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2004 17:50:20 -0800 Subject: [csw-users] problem with gimp rotation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1099360219.29221.226.camel@haywire> Jeff, You can only rotate layers by arbitrary amounts. The image -> transform -> rotate menu does limit you to 90/180 degree rotations. Instead, use layer -> transform -> arbitrary rotation. I am using CSWgimp 2.0.4 on Solaris 9 SPARC. Hope this helps, C. On Mon, 2004-11-01 at 16:11, Jeffery Small wrote: > I am using gimp 2.0.5 on my solaris 9 sparc system. I find that I can > rotate images by 90-degrees but I am unable to rotate a jpeg image by an > arbitrary amount. > > Could those of you using this version of gimp on the sparc platform > please try this and report whether or not you are able to perform an > arbitrary rotation. > > Thanks. -- Cory Omand From james at blastwave.org Tue Nov 2 11:08:51 2004 From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee) Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2004 10:08:51 GMT Subject: [csw-users] Warning: apache2 2.0.52,REV=2004.10.29 In-Reply-To: <1099339174.29221.215.camel@haywire> References: <1099339174.29221.215.camel@haywire> Message-ID: <20041102.10085100.432703434@landeck.jamesipoos.com> On 01/11/04, 19:59:34, Cory Omand wrote regarding [csw-users] Warning: apache2 2.0.52,REV=2004.10.29: > Please be aware that the 2004.10.29 release of the apache2 package has a > package removal defect. When the package is installed, > '/opt/csw/apache2/etc/httpd.conf' and '/opt/csw/apache2/etc/ssl.conf' > are added to the package database. When the package is removed, these > files will be deleted. I would like to add that this only affects new installs of the 2004.10.29 release. Upgrades where the *.conf files exists before installation of the 2004.10.29 release have no problem and the user's conf files are not removed. If you are in doubt run this: $ pkgchk -l -p /opt/csw/apache2/etc/httpd.conf If you see CSWapache2 in output then the file will be removed, otherwise you have no problem. James. From ocalld at cogent-dsn.com Thu Nov 4 12:56:23 2004 From: ocalld at cogent-dsn.com (Dan O'Callaghan) Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2004 11:56:23 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] problems with cdrecord Message-ID: <1099569383.4581.6.camel@dan-sun1> hi since upgrading to latest version of cdrecord i'm having problems burning disks. is anyone else having problems? i'm using a freecom usb dvd/cd writer. works ok with windows and did work ok prior to upgrade. usb port on sunblade 1500 works ok with mem sticks - so usb port is ok. any ideas? error below. Blocks total: 359849 Blocks current: 359849 Blocks remaining: 329361 Starting to write CD/DVD at speed 8 in real TAO mode for single session. Last chance to quit, starting real write 0 seconds. Operation starts. Waiting for reader process to fill input buffer ... input buffer ready. BURN-Free is ON. Turning BURN-Free off Performing OPC... Starting new track at sector: 0 Track 01: 6 of 59 MB written (fifo 100%) [buf 14%] 6.6x.cdrecord: I/O error. write_g1: scsi sendcmd: no error CDB: 2A 00 00 00 0D 90 00 00 1F 00 status: 0x0 (GOOD STATUS) resid: 63488 cmd finished after 1.350s timeout 40s write track data: error after 7110656 bytes cdrecord: A write error occured. cdrecord: Please properly read the error message above. Writing time: 18.390s Average write speed 28.1x. Min drive buffer fill was 14% Fixating... Fixating time: 32.868s cdrecord: fifo had 240 puts and 113 gets. cdrecord: fifo was 0 times empty and 112 times full, min fill was 99%. -- Dan O'Callaghan Cogent From ihsan at blastwave.org Mon Nov 8 22:48:13 2004 From: ihsan at blastwave.org (Ihsan Dogan) Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2004 22:48:13 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] openssl will not install CSWossl In-Reply-To: <4181D9F1.9030809@qwest.net> References: <4181D9F1.9030809@qwest.net> Message-ID: <20041108214813.GA14034@dogan.ch> Hi Abram, On Thursday, 28 Oct 2004 22:49 -0700, Abram Olson wrote: > 1. removed the openssl package and then tried to install it. The install > fails with no error more informative then "ERROR package not installed" This is not very informative. Could you please provide us more information? Regards, Ihsan... -- Swiss Unix User Group: http://www.suug.ch/ Software Packages for Solaris: http://www.blastwave.org/ From ihsan at blastwave.org Tue Nov 9 22:54:27 2004 From: ihsan at blastwave.org (Ihsan Dogan) Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 22:54:27 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] problems with cdrecord In-Reply-To: <1099569383.4581.6.camel@dan-sun1> References: <1099569383.4581.6.camel@dan-sun1> Message-ID: <20041109215427.GB29235@dogan.ch> On Thursday, 04 Nov 2004 11:56 +0000, Dan O'Callaghan wrote: > since upgrading to latest version of cdrecord i'm having problems > burning disks. > > is anyone else having problems? > i'm using a freecom usb dvd/cd writer. works ok with windows and did > work ok prior to upgrade. usb port on sunblade 1500 works ok with mem > sticks - so usb port is ok. > > any ideas? > error below. Did you executed cdrecord with the -v option? Do you have any errors in /var/adm/messages? Ihsan... -- Swiss Unix User Group: http://www.suug.ch/ Software Packages for Solaris: http://www.blastwave.org/ From robert at rootprompt.net Mon Nov 22 20:53:09 2004 From: robert at rootprompt.net (Robert Banniza) Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 13:53:09 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] OpenLDAP -- Unrecognized database type (bdb) Message-ID: <200411221353.09275.robert@rootprompt.net> *This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro* Hello, I'm currently using Solaris 9 and have installed openldap-2.1.22 and all dependencies including Berkeleydb4. When I try and start OpenLDAP, I get the following error: Unrecognized database type (bdb) I have performed a 'ldd' and everything looks fine: [root at testmachine:~]$ ldd /opt/csw/libexec/slapd libldap_r.so.2 => /opt/csw/lib/libldap_r.so.2 liblber.so.2 => /opt/csw/lib/liblber.so.2 libdb-4.1.so => /opt/csw/bdb4/lib/libdb-4.1.so libsasl2.so.2 => /opt/csw/lib/libsasl2.so.2 libssl.so.0.9.7 => /opt/csw/lib/libssl.so.0.9.7 libcrypto.so.0.9.7 => /opt/csw/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.7 libresolv.so.2 => /lib/libresolv.so.2 libgen.so.1 => /lib/libgen.so.1 libnsl.so.1 => /lib/libnsl.so.1 libsocket.so.1 => /lib/libsocket.so.1 libpthread.so.1 => /lib/libpthread.so.1 libltdl.so.3 => /opt/csw/lib/libltdl.so.3 libdl.so.1 => /lib/libdl.so.1 libc.so.1 => /lib/libc.so.1 libmp.so.2 => /lib/libmp.so.2 libthread.so.1 => /lib/libthread.so.1 /usr/platform/SUNW,UltraAX-i2/lib/libc_psr.so.1 I have tried setting $LD_LIBRARY_PATH to LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/opt/csw/bdb4/lib:/ opt/csw/lib to no avail. and have also tried unsetting LD_LIBRARY_PATH to no avail. I have even gone a step further by setting he library path through the use of 'crle'. What am I doing wrong here? Why can't openldap find the appropriate Berkeley libs/understand what db version to use? What else am I missing? Any information appreciated. Robert P.S. I have tried using truss to determine the issue as well as setting '-d 1068' when running slapd. From res at colnet.cmhnet.org Mon Nov 22 21:47:20 2004 From: res at colnet.cmhnet.org (Robert Stampfli) Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 15:47:20 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Latest Firefox In-Reply-To: <200411221353.09275.robert@rootprompt.net> References: <200411221353.09275.robert@rootprompt.net> Message-ID: <20041122204720.GA13874@colnet> I've downloaded the latest CSW Firefox build (1.0), and love the new features added since 0.9.3. However, it seems to be fairly verbose about spitting out messages on the console. Right now, I'm searching Ebay, and have gotten dozens of the following: (Gecko:17852): libgnomevfs-CRITICAL **: file gnome-vfs-mime-info.c: line 916: assertion `!does_string_contain_caps (mime_type)' failed I can invoke it with stdout/stderr redirected to NULL and hide the problem, but I wonder why this is happening in the first place. Any ideas? Rob From OCallaghD at aol.com Mon Nov 22 21:52:30 2004 From: OCallaghD at aol.com (OCallaghD at aol.com) Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 15:52:30 EST Subject: [csw-users] Latest Firefox Message-ID: <8e.1ac3a0f8.2ed3ab8e@aol.com> i'm having problems with firefox as well. not a big problem really. i can't use the arrow keys on the keyboard to navigate in screens of text i.e. when you use firefox to access yahoo mail, i can't navigate with with the arrow keys through the message i'm typing. i could with prev version, not a big problem though. cheers dan. In a message dated 22/11/2004 20:48:05 GMT Standard Time, res at colnet.cmhnet.org writes: I've downloaded the latest CSW Firefox build (1.0), and love the new features added since 0.9.3. However, it seems to be fairly verbose about spitting out messages on the console. Right now, I'm searching Ebay, and have gotten dozens of the following: (Gecko:17852): libgnomevfs-CRITICAL **: file gnome-vfs-mime-info.c: line 916: assertion `!does_string_contain_caps (mime_type)' failed I can invoke it with stdout/stderr redirected to NULL and hide the problem, but I wonder why this is happening in the first place. Any ideas? Rob _______________________________________________ users mailing list users at lists.blastwave.org https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From asmoore at blastwave.org Mon Nov 22 21:56:49 2004 From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex S Moore) Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 14:56:49 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] OpenLDAP -- Unrecognized database type (bdb) In-Reply-To: <200411221353.09275.robert@rootprompt.net> References: <200411221353.09275.robert@rootprompt.net> Message-ID: <1101157009.22748.16.camel@sws602> On Mon, 2004-11-22 at 13:53 -0600, Robert Banniza wrote: > *This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro* > Hello, > I'm currently using Solaris 9 and have installed openldap-2.1.22 and all > dependencies including Berkeleydb4. When I try and start OpenLDAP, I get the > following error: > > Unrecognized database type (bdb) > unset all LD_LIBRARY_PATH and crle changes. Unless specifically told to do so for a package, you should not need any of this for CSW packages. In /opt/csw/etc/openldap/slapd.conf, uncomment the following two lines. modulepath /opt/csw/libexec/openldap moduleload back_bdb.la Alex From robert at rootprompt.net Tue Nov 23 04:04:53 2004 From: robert at rootprompt.net (Robert Banniza) Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 21:04:53 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] OpenLDAP Unrecognized Database Message-ID: <41A2A8D5.802@rootprompt.net> *This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro* Hello, I'm currently using Solaris 9 and have installed openldap-2.1.22 and all dependencies including Berkeleydb4. When I try and start OpenLDAP, I get the following error: Unrecognized database type (bdb) I have performed a 'ldd' and everything looks fine: [root at testmachine:~]$ ldd /opt/csw/libexec/slapd libldap_r.so.2 => /opt/csw/lib/libldap_r.so.2 liblber.so.2 => /opt/csw/lib/liblber.so.2 libdb-4.1.so => /opt/csw/bdb4/lib/libdb-4.1.so libsasl2.so.2 => /opt/csw/lib/libsasl2.so.2 libssl.so.0.9.7 => /opt/csw/lib/libssl.so.0.9.7 libcrypto.so.0.9.7 => /opt/csw/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.7 libresolv.so.2 => /lib/libresolv.so.2 libgen.so.1 => /lib/libgen.so.1 libnsl.so.1 => /lib/libnsl.so.1 libsocket.so.1 => /lib/libsocket.so.1 libpthread.so.1 => /lib/libpthread.so.1 libltdl.so.3 => /opt/csw/lib/libltdl.so.3 libdl.so.1 => /lib/libdl.so.1 libc.so.1 => /lib/libc.so.1 libmp.so.2 => /lib/libmp.so.2 libthread.so.1 => /lib/libthread.so.1 /usr/platform/SUNW,UltraAX-i2/lib/libc_psr.so.1 I have tried setting $LD_LIBRARY_PATH to LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/opt/csw/bdb4/lib:/ opt/csw/lib to no avail. and have also tried unsetting LD_LIBRARY_PATH to no avail. I have even gone a step further by setting he library path through the use of 'crle'. What am I doing wrong here? Why can't openldap find the appropriate Berkeley libs/understand what db version to use? What else am I missing? Any information appreciated. Robert P.S. I have tried using truss to determine the issue as well as setting '-d 1068' when running slapd. From ocalld at cogent-dsn.com Wed Nov 24 12:42:54 2004 From: ocalld at cogent-dsn.com (Dan O'Callaghan) Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 11:42:54 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] firefox Message-ID: <1101296574.2254.44.camel@dan-sun1> With the latest version of firefox, i've just noticed that there is a problem with bookmarks. I can't export them, the file generated is zero size. Also, i can add bookmarks and they show in the bookmarks menu but, as soon as you restart firefox, they're gone. cheers -- Dan O'Callaghan Cogent From res at colnet.cmhnet.org Wed Nov 24 14:53:29 2004 From: res at colnet.cmhnet.org (Robert Stampfli) Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 08:53:29 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] firefox In-Reply-To: <1101296574.2254.44.camel@dan-sun1> References: <1101296574.2254.44.camel@dan-sun1> Message-ID: <20041124135329.GA17652@colnet> On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 11:42:54AM +0000, Dan O'Callaghan wrote: > With the latest version of firefox, i've just noticed that there is a > problem with bookmarks. > I can't export them, the file generated is zero size. > > Also, i can add bookmarks and they show in the bookmarks menu but, as > soon as you restart firefox, they're gone. This does not seem to be the case for me. Rob From qy1ggy802 at sneakemail.com Wed Nov 24 15:01:30 2004 From: qy1ggy802 at sneakemail.com (Tim Longo) Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 09:01:30 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] firefox In-Reply-To: <20041124135329.GA17652@colnet> References: <1101296574.2254.44.camel@dan-sun1> <20041124135329.GA17652@colnet> Message-ID: <26826-24948@sneakemail.com> Just tried this myself, and don't have the same problem. Seems to work fine. BTW, I am *very* impressed with Firefox. Question: Previously, I used Mozilla browser. When I wanted to edit a page, it would open in composer. Since Firefox does not come with composer, I can't edit html pages as easily. Anyone know of a pluging for Firefox that would allow me to open and edit the page I am viewing? Thanks. > On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 11:42:54AM +0000, Dan O'Callaghan wrote: > > With the latest version of firefox, i've just noticed that there is a > > problem with bookmarks. > > I can't export them, the file generated is zero size. > > > > Also, i can add bookmarks and they show in the bookmarks menu but, as > > soon as you restart firefox, they're gone. From qy1ggy802 at sneakemail.com Wed Nov 24 21:30:15 2004 From: qy1ggy802 at sneakemail.com (Tim Longo) Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 15:30:15 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] FONTS In-Reply-To: <20041007092616.GC17966@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> References: <20041007092616.GC17966@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> Message-ID: <23469-16518@sneakemail.com> Hi, I'm not sure what package update caused this, but the fonts on Evolution are blotchy, and I can't figure out how to fix it. Previously, the fonts were crisp and clear. Can anyone suggest some things to look at for font problems? From markmayo at bcgsc.ca Fri Nov 26 21:52:50 2004 From: markmayo at bcgsc.ca (Mark Mayo) Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 12:52:50 -0800 Subject: [csw-users] gcc ISALIST problem Message-ID: <86C6E520C12E52429ACBCB01546DF4D32D00@xchange1.phage.bcgsc.ca> Sorry if I'm missing the obvious, but I'm having a problem with gcc (3.4.2): markmayo at pinky:/tmp$ which gcc /opt/csw/bin/gcc markmayo at pinky:/tmp$ grep VERSION /var/sadm/pkg/CSWgcc3rt/pkginfo VERSION=3.4.2,REV=2004.10.04 markmayo at pinky:/tmp$ cat test.c #include int main(void) { printf("test\n"); return(0); } markmayo at pinky:/tmp$ gcc test.c markmayo at pinky:/tmp$ ./a.out ld.so.1: ./a.out: fatal: ./a.out: /opt/csw/gcc3/lib/$ISALIST -R/opt/csw/lib/$ISALIST: token ISALIST could not be expanded test markmayo at pinky:/tmp$ ldd a.out ld.so.1: a.out: fatal: a.out: /opt/csw/gcc3/lib/$ISALIST -R/opt/csw/lib/$ISALIST: token ISALIST could not be expanded libc.so.1 => /usr/lib/libc.so.1 libdl.so.1 => /usr/lib/libdl.so.1 /usr/platform/SUNW,Netra-T12/lib/libc_psr.so.1 markmayo at pinky:/tmp$ isalist sparcv9+vis2 sparcv9+vis sparcv9 sparcv8plus+vis sparcv8plus sparcv8 sparcv8-fsmuld sparcv7 sparc markmayo at pinky:/tmp$ echo $PATH /opt/csw/bin:/opt/csw/gcc3/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/xpg4/bin:/bi n:/usr/ccs/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/openwin/bin:/usr/dt/bin I don't have LD_LIBRARY_PATH defined. Any ideas? Thx, -Mark -- Mark Mayo markmayo at bcgsc.ca Systems Coordinator, BC Genome Sciences Centre (604) 707-5801 From res at colnet.cmhnet.org Fri Nov 26 22:44:06 2004 From: res at colnet.cmhnet.org (Robert Stampfli) Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 16:44:06 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Blastwave in trouble? Message-ID: <20041126214406.GA21439@colnet> The following post has created quite a flutter of comments in the newsgroup comp.unix.solaris. Can someone from blastwave comment? What can we do to help? Rob =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= From: mark.round7 at ntlworld.com Newsgroups: comp.unix.solaris, alt.solaris.x86 Subject: Blastwave.org in trouble Date: 25 Nov 2004 08:04:30 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 71 Message-ID: <1101398670.470145.22950 at f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.236.227.6 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1101398674 23243 127.0.0.1 (25 Nov 2004 16:04:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse at google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 16:04:34 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: G2/0.2 Complaints-To: groups-abuse at google.com Injection-Info: f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=64.236.227.6; posting-account=f5Ws2gwAAAD8Lp3PfyJnnIS_w_sEA1fa I'm a maintainer at Blastwave.org - a project that should be familiar to most people on these newsgroups. Many of you probably get your packages from there. Sadly, Dennis Clarke, the director and admin for the project is running into serious problems, and now it seems that the entire project is in jeopardy. In an email message sent today (reproduced with permission), he says : --Quote-- The situation is pretty bad at the moment. ... My primary business is on the brink of collapse. My house is up for sale. While Sun is still talking about servers that we could get there may be no way to fund the operation any longer. ... At the moment I have dropped financially into the deep well. There is nothing left anymore. After more than $100K in two years there is nothing left to give. ... Contact everone and simply let them know that Dennis has his house up for sale and that I have poured my last bottom dollar into this amazing project. --End quote-- In terms of infrastructure, we have licenses and servers on the way. But there is no way the project can continue without corporate sponsorship or donations. The DVDs have been well received, but to date only 30 of these get sent out each month. In order for Blastwave to continue, and move onto the next level, around 1000 need to be shipped. Dennis has thrown everything he has into this project in order to provide a fantastic resource for all Solaris users. I'm just a maintainer, but from what I can see, and from what I hear, we have succeeded in these aims; but right now Dennis is having to sell his house and is still making every effort to find some source of investment for Blastwave. And yet no one seems to be listening - we have no official corporate sponsorship despite the best efforts of a number of individuals. Pretty much every other major open source project around has corporate sponsorship or donations coming in - but for 2 years, the person footing the bills, working 60 hour weeks and doing all the legwork has been Dennis. This means there will be a freeze on package activity, a December edition of the DVD - and then it's all up in the air. On a personal level, I feel that this project is too succesful and important to the Solaris community to let it die - we're Solaris users producing packages _for_ Solaris users. I know that being a maintainer, I have a vested interest in seeing the project succeed. However, it's as a Solaris sysadmin, fan and user, that I will miss Blastwave the most. Using pkg-get and the huge repository of prepackaged software is what makes Solaris really comfortable for me, and is the first thing I point out to Linux admins "making the switch". We've supported Solaris x86 right from the start, we have full distros of KDE and GNOME, a grand total of 833 packages across 2 architectures (with AMD support on the way), and yet on the eve of Solaris 10 reaching FCS, we're struggling to stay afloat. And so, hence this post. Dennis asked me to spread the word to anyone who will listen. If you have ever used the packages from Blastwave.org, please help spread the message, post it on a blog, buy a DVD, make a donation - anything... Or the project will not be around for much longer. -Mark mark at blastwave.org =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=