From asmoore at blastwave.org Wed Sep 8 15:52:20 2004 From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex S Moore) Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2004 08:52:20 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] RE: SpamAssassin testing Message-ID: <1094651539.13718.31.camel@sws602> SpamAssassin (SA) version 3.0 is nearing release. The last version for testing is release candidate 3. This time, the mailing list has been quiet regarding problems with rc3. I have pkgs available at our ftp site if someone would like to test. See: http://blastwave.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/csw/users/asmoore/ If you are running the previous CSWspamassassin pkg and using a site-wide bayes database, you should run `sa-learn --rebuild` to flush any records in the journal before removing the old package. Note that with 3.0, the --rebuild option is deprecated and replaced by --sync. The first email processed will upgrade a 2.6x database to 3.0 format. You can force this to occur before that first email by running `sa-learn --sync` after installing 3.0 The dependency list has changed. Run the pkgadd and see if there are missing dependencies. Quit and install the dependencies before proceeding with the install. It may work if you install dependencies last, but I have not tested that scenario. The new dependencies should be CSWpmdbi, CSWpmldap, CSWpmdigestsha1, CSWpmuri (for pkg-get, that is pm_dbi, pm_ldap, pm_digestsha1, pm_uri. Comments are welcome. There are a lot of new things in this release, so review the docs in /opt/csw/share/doc/spamassassin. I considered scripting the site-wide bayes update, but there were too many possibilities and it is simple enough to do once as needed. Thanks, Alex From litauer at uni-koblenz.de Wed Sep 8 13:54:43 2004 From: litauer at uni-koblenz.de (Christoph Litauer) Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2004 13:54:43 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] broken catalog? Message-ID: <413EF303.8030109@uni-koblenz.de> I just wanted to upgrade my kde installation (Sparc/Sol9) to 3.2.3. Now I have some problems: The catalog file seems to be broken. It contains lots of duplicate entries. I use http://blastwave.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/csw/unstable but I also tried other mirror sites. ray1:/ # pkg-get -U ... ray1:/ # pkg-get -i koffice_gcc Sorry, there are multiple versions possible Please specify one, in the following syntax pkg-get install koffice_gcc-1.3.2,REV=2004.08.26 pkg-get install koffice_gcc-1.3.2,REV=2004.08.26 So I deleted the duplicate entries. I was able to install the kde 3.2.3 packages now -- except koffice_gcc: ray1:/ # pkg-get -i koffice_gcc leads to install/depend 88450 blocks ERROR: no info for CSWimagick. Cannot install dependancy. ERROR: could not install required dependancies for CSWkofficegcc I installed package imagemagick containing CSWimagemagick. Seems as if the dependencies for koffice_gcc are wrong? Any help is greatly appreciated! Thanks in advance. -- Regards Christoph ________________________________________________________________________ Christoph Litauer litauer at uni-koblenz.de Uni Koblenz, Rechenzentrum, http://www.uni-koblenz.de/~litauer Postfach 201602, 56016 Koblenz Fon: +49 261 287-1311, Fax: -100 1311 PGP-Key: http://www.uni-koblenz.de/~litauer/public-key.html From mark at markround.com Fri Sep 10 11:34:59 2004 From: mark at markround.com (Mark Round) Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 10:34:59 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Updated PostgreSQL packages available Message-ID: <41417543.4020907@markround.com> Hi All, Updated PostgreSQL packages have been built, and should be available from your local mirror site soon. This bumps the version up to 7.3.7, and is a highly recommended update, as it fixes several bugs from the 7.3.6 release which could result in loss of data. From the PostgreSQL main site :- "Due to insufficient interlocking between transaction commit and checkpointing, it was possible for transactions committed just before the most recent checkpoint to be lost, in whole or in part, following a database crash and restart.... Due to the seriousness of the first bug, as relates to data integrity, it is strongly recommended that administrators upgrade their database servers at their earliest convience. " None of these releases require a dump-n-reload in order to address the problems. Please let me know of any issues. Thanks, -Mark mark at blastwave.org From csw at colnet.cboh.org Tue Sep 14 16:32:59 2004 From: csw at colnet.cboh.org (Robert Stampfli) Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 10:32:59 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] Re: [csw-newpkgs] apache update In-Reply-To: <20040903002150.GA18475@blastwave.blastwave.org> References: <20040903002150.GA18475@blastwave.blastwave.org> Message-ID: <20040914143259.GA5017@colnet> On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 05:21:50PM -0700, Philip Brown wrote: > It's a bit overdue, because of the complexity of getting the package > to actually _work nicely_, but the new, security-patched version of > apache 1.x is now available. I just noticed that apachectl in the new apache package is broken: If you attempt a restart, or do anything a root, it kills the server first. The problem turns out to be in the code which checks for the existance of a pidfile: In checking, it sends a SIGTERM to httpd, killing it. Here's how I've patched my system: *** /opt/csw/apache/bin/apachectl~ Thu Sep 2 20:08:14 2004 --- /opt/csw/apache/bin/apachectl Tue Sep 14 10:20:51 2004 *************** *** 50,56 **** # check for pidfile if [ -f $PIDFILE ] ; then PID=`cat $PIDFILE` ! if [ "x$PID" != "x" ] && kill $PID 2>/dev/null ; then STATUS="httpd (pid $PID) running" RUNNING=1 else --- 50,56 ---- # check for pidfile if [ -f $PIDFILE ] ; then PID=`cat $PIDFILE` ! if [ "x$PID" != "x" ] && kill -0 $PID 2>/dev/null ; then STATUS="httpd (pid $PID) running" RUNNING=1 else Rob From ahardjan at earthling.net Wed Sep 15 17:16:24 2004 From: ahardjan at earthling.net (Abraham Hardjana) Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 10:16:24 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Gnome 2.6 Message-ID: <20040915151624.6EB426EEE9@ws1-5.us4.outblaze.com> Hello, I have installed the Gnome 2.6 release on my Solaris 9 x86 server at home. Whenever I select Gnome(csw) from the login option menu, I get the Gnome 2.6 splashscreen and it stops at that point. Now I still have the original Sun Gnome installed, do I need to uninstall it first before I can run Gnome 2.6? Thanks in advance, Abraham -- ___________________________________________________________ Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com http://promo.mail.com/adsfreejump.htm From ocalld at cogent-dsn.com Wed Sep 15 17:48:34 2004 From: ocalld at cogent-dsn.com (Dan O'Callaghan) Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 16:48:34 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Gnome 2.6 In-Reply-To: <20040915151624.6EB426EEE9@ws1-5.us4.outblaze.com> References: <20040915151624.6EB426EEE9@ws1-5.us4.outblaze.com> Message-ID: <1095263314.540.5.camel@dan-sun1> yes, you need to uninstall sun's gnome first. phil has some advise under the bug tracker for gnome on www.blastwave.com use this to delete all of gnome's packages (will prob delete csw's gnome as well) pkginfo | grep SUNW | grep -i gnome |nawk '{print $2}'>/tmp/pkglist for p in `cat /tmp/pkglist` ; do yes | pkrm $p; done cheers Dan. have a look at On Wed, 2004-09-15 at 16:16, Abraham Hardjana wrote: > Hello, > > I have installed the Gnome 2.6 release on my Solaris 9 x86 server at home. Whenever I select Gnome(csw) from the login option menu, I get the Gnome 2.6 splashscreen and it stops at that point. Now I still have the original Sun Gnome installed, do I need to uninstall it first before I can run Gnome 2.6? > > Thanks in advance, > > Abraham -- Dan O'Callaghan Cogent From mats.larsson at ericsson.com Thu Sep 16 08:40:38 2004 From: mats.larsson at ericsson.com (Mats Larsson (AS/EAB)) Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 08:40:38 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] Gnome 2.6 In-Reply-To: <1095263314.540.5.camel@dan-sun1> References: <20040915151624.6EB426EEE9@ws1-5.us4.outblaze.com> <1095263314.540.5.camel@dan-sun1> Message-ID: <41493566.10604@ericsson.com> On 2004-09-15 17:48, Dan O'Callaghan wrote: > yes, you need to uninstall sun's gnome first. Do you know why? > phil has some advise under the bug tracker for gnome on > www.blastwave.com Couldn't find any specific info on why Sun's GNOME has to be uninstalled. TIA MOL From ahardjan at earthling.net Sat Sep 18 04:12:19 2004 From: ahardjan at earthling.net (Abraham Hardjana) Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 21:12:19 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Re: users Digest, Vol 8, Issue 4 Message-ID: <20040918021219.09472101C9@ws1-3.us4.outblaze.com> I have uninstalled sun's gnome alredy and tried to use Gnome 2.6 and I still run into the same problem. It looks like Gnome is hanging when gnome-session is run. This also occurs with Evolution. They seem to run at 50% - 99% CPU in top, but nothing seems to happen on screen. Is there any advice as to what I can do to get some sort of debugging information to provide some additional information? Abraham > Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 16:48:34 +0100 > From: Dan O'Callaghan > Subject: Re: [csw-users] Gnome 2.6 > To: questions and discussions > Message-ID: <1095263314.540.5.camel at dan-sun1> > Content-Type: text/plain > > yes, you need to uninstall sun's gnome first. > > phil has some advise under the bug tracker for gnome on > www.blastwave.com > > use this to delete all of gnome's packages (will prob delete csw's gnome > as well) > > pkginfo | grep SUNW | grep -i gnome |nawk '{print $2}'>/tmp/pkglist > for p in `cat /tmp/pkglist` ; do yes | pkrm $p; done > > > cheers > Dan. > > have a look at > On Wed, 2004-09-15 at 16:16, Abraham Hardjana wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I have installed the Gnome 2.6 release on my Solaris 9 x86 server at home. Whenever I select Gnome(csw) from the login option menu, I get the Gnome 2.6 splashscreen and it stops at that point. Now I still have the original Sun Gnome installed, do I need to uninstall it first before I can run Gnome 2.6? > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > Abraham > -- > Dan O'Callaghan > Cogent > > -- ___________________________________________________________ Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com http://promo.mail.com/adsfreejump.htm From anthony.hornby at cdu.edu.au Sat Sep 18 08:38:08 2004 From: anthony.hornby at cdu.edu.au (Anthony Hornby) Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 16:08:08 +0930 Subject: [csw-users] CUPS 1.1.20 error on solaris 8 - missing libslp.so.1 Message-ID: <1095489488.8650.3.camel@styx.ntu.edu.au> Hi, I'm switching to blastwave for pkg updates for one of my solaris boxes and all has gone well except for cups. I get the error /etc/init.d/cswcups start ld.so.1: /opt/csw/sbin/cupsd: fatal: libslp.so.1: open failed: No such file or directory Killed cups: unable to start scheduler. This package doesn't mention openslp as a dependency on the package description on www.blastwave.org & I have turned network browsing off in the config files. Do I need to install openslp? All advice appreciated. Regards Anthony. -- Mr Anthony Hornby RHCE BIT ALIATEC Library Systems & Technology Coordinator Charles Darwin University | CRICOS 300K anthony.hornby at cdu.edu.au | office +61 8 89 466011 From james at blastwave.org Sat Sep 18 11:09:27 2004 From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee) Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 09:09:27 GMT Subject: [csw-users] CUPS 1.1.20 error on solaris 8 - missing libslp.so.1 In-Reply-To: <1095489488.8650.3.camel@styx.ntu.edu.au> References: <1095489488.8650.3.camel@styx.ntu.edu.au> Message-ID: <20040918.9092700.2943319030@landeck.jamesipoos.com> On 18/09/04, 07:38:08, Anthony Hornby wrote regarding [csw-users] CUPS 1.1.20 error on solaris 8 - missing libslp.so.1: > /etc/init.d/cswcups start > ld.so.1: /opt/csw/sbin/cupsd: fatal: libslp.so.1: open failed: No such > file or directory > Killed > cups: unable to start scheduler. > This package doesn't mention openslp as a dependency on the package > description on www.blastwave.org & > I have turned network browsing off in the config files. > Do I need to install openslp? Yes. It's not in the dependancies because it's found in an OS package. Some detective work: $ ldd /opt/csw/sbin/cupsd libz.so.1 => /opt/csw/lib/libz.so.1 libz.so.1 (SUNW_1.1) => (version not found) libssl.so.0.9.7 => /opt/csw/lib/libssl.so.0.9.7 libcrypto.so.0.9.7 => /opt/csw/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.7 libslp.so.1 => /usr/lib/libslp.so.1 libpam.so.1 => /usr/lib/libpam.so.1 libdl.so.1 => /usr/lib/libdl.so.1 libcups.so.2 => /opt/csw/lib/libcups.so.2 libsocket.so.1 => /usr/lib/libsocket.so.1 libnsl.so.1 => /usr/lib/libnsl.so.1 libc.so.1 => /usr/lib/libc.so.1 libthread.so.1 => /usr/lib/libthread.so.1 libcmd.so.1 => /usr/lib/libcmd.so.1 libmp.so.2 => /usr/lib/libmp.so.2 $ pkgchk -l -p /usr/lib/libslp.so.1 Pathname: /usr/lib/libslp.so.1 Type: regular file Expected mode: 0755 Expected owner: root Expected group: bin Expected file size (bytes): 84304 Expected sum(1) of contents: 9997 Expected last modification: Jan 05 09:28:58 PM 2000 Referenced by the following packages: SUNWslpu Current status: installed So you need SUNWslpu which is on CD 1 of 2 of the Solaris 8 Software. From asmoore at blastwave.org Wed Sep 22 23:13:43 2004 From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex S Moore) Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 16:13:43 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] RE: SpamAssassin 3.0 Message-ID: <1095887622.11131.37.camel@sws602> SA 3.0 should be at your favorite CSW mirror in the next day or so. This is a major upgrade. The short set of need-to-know notes is at the top of README.CSW. A copy is attached. Be sure to stop whatever process is calling SA. For me, that is mimedefang. To restate things in case you are using a site-wide bayes database, before getting the new package, run `sa-learn --rebuild`. This will update the database with changes that are only in bayes_journal. After the upgrade, run `sa-learn --sync` to upgrade the database. If you get a message about 'unable to use version 2.0 database', ignore it and be patient. The database upgrade may take a while. Please read the documentation before using SA3.0. There are many changes and new features. Finally, check permissions on the bayes database and /opt/csw/etc/spamassassin directory and make any changes needed for your environment. Do not forget to run spamassassin in debug mode and lint the rules to test out your environment. Alex -------------- next part -------------- Notes for the CSW spamassassin distribution ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Version 3.0 is a major upgrade. Read all available information on upgrading. See /opt/csw/share/doc/spamassassin UPGRADE for most of this information. If you are using site-wide bayes, be sure to run `sa-learn --rebuild` before starting the package upgrade. Before starting whatever process you are using to run SpamAssassin after the upgrade, run `sa-learn --sync` to upgrade the database to version 3.0 format. Before starting spamassassin, run the following and look for warnings and errors that need to be fixed. Some scores are deprecated from version 2.x. These will produce only warnings, but you may want to see if similar scores are available and make the appropriate adjustments. Also, note the change in startup options in the UPGRADE file. To test your configuration: /opt/csw/bin/spamassassin -D --lint 2004-02-14 Thomas Glanzmann From michael at blastwave.org Tue Sep 28 19:38:59 2004 From: michael at blastwave.org (Michael Gernoth) Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 19:38:59 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] Evolution 2.0.0 test packages available Message-ID: <20040928173859.GA11242@zerfleddert.de> Hello, I have just uploaded first test-packages of evolution 2.0.0 to: http://blastwave.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/csw/users/michael/ To use this new version, download the package with the right architecture, and do the following: # pkg-get -i gal2 libsoup2 gtkhtml31 evolution_ds gnome_icon_theme # pkgrm CSWevolution # pkgadd -d evolution-2.0.0,REV\=2004.09.27-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg After that, you should have a shiny new evolution. A word of warning: Our current ximian_connector is not evolution 2.0 ready, so you need to fetch the updated connector from the above mentioned URL, too, if you currently use it. Please report back about encountered problems with this release. Regards, Michael From ocalld at cogent-dsn.com Tue Sep 28 20:12:35 2004 From: ocalld at cogent-dsn.com (Dan O'Callaghan) Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 19:12:35 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] pilot-link Message-ID: <1096395155.542.6.camel@dan-sun1> Hi Can somebody let me know how to configure pilot-link for use with USB sony clie under Solaris 9 sparc?? Thanks. -- Dan O'Callaghan Cogent From tomc at bio.umass.edu Wed Sep 29 17:16:04 2004 From: tomc at bio.umass.edu (Tom Carpenter) Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 11:16:04 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] remove software en masse? and Message-ID: Can one simply "rm -rf /opt/csw" to start over with CSW software? Tom Carpenter From tstewart at nibsc.ac.uk Wed Sep 29 17:26:44 2004 From: tstewart at nibsc.ac.uk (Thomas Stewart) Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:26:44 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] remove software en masse? and In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200409291626.44573.tstewart@nibsc.ac.uk> On Wednesday 29 September 2004 16:16, Tom Carpenter wrote: > Can one simply "rm -rf /opt/csw" to start over with CSW > software? No, because CSW uses the Solaris package management system, ie a datebase of what files are installed and where. You need to get Solaris to remove the packages for you. Something like "pkginfo | grep CSW | awk '{print $2}' | xargs" will print all the csw packages that are installed. (pkginfo prints all the installed packages, the grep filters for the csw ones, the awk only prints the packages name, and the xargs get it all on one line.) You can then do "pkgrm {package list}" to remove the packages. (you could just stick the pkgrm on the end of the xargs, but I think thats too scary, this way you can give the list a quick audit first. HTH Regards -- Tom From mark at markround.com Wed Sep 29 17:37:02 2004 From: mark at markround.com (Mark Round) Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:37:02 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] remove software en masse? and In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <415AD69E.8030401@markround.com> Tom Carpenter wrote: >Can one simply "rm -rf /opt/csw" to start over with CSW >software? Not a good idea, as you'll still have all the packages registered in your package database, which will likely lead to all kinds of confusion. A cleaner way is to do something along the lines of (Loosely taken from the example on the CSW Gnome bugtracker page):- # pkginfo | grep CSW | awk '{print $2}' > /tmp/cswpkgs.txt # while read pkg; do yes | pkgrm $pkg ; done < /tmp/cswpkgs.txt Which will put a list of CSW packages into /tmp/cswpkgs.txt, and then remove them without asking for confirmation. -Mark mark at blastwave.org From asmoore at blastwave.org Wed Sep 29 21:32:08 2004 From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex S Moore) Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:32:08 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Re: [csw-maintainers] Evolution 2.0.0 test packages available In-Reply-To: <20040928173859.GA11242@zerfleddert.de> References: <20040928173859.GA11242@zerfleddert.de> Message-ID: <20040929143208.6c700ae6@sws602> On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 19:38:59 +0200 Michael Gernoth wrote: > Hello, > I have just uploaded first test-packages of evolution 2.0.0 to: > http://blastwave.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/csw/users/michael/ > Very, very nice Michael. Did you see the recent release 2.0.1 notice? I installed and ran it on a test box with a test account, which is basically a duplicate of my mail under another account. No problems encountered and it is quite nice. Ran fine under CDE and as before, displaying a folder and any message in that folder is instantaneous. Even when the folder has over 22,000 messages. The new message view appears a bit different, but that must be by design. I will get used to it. I really like several of the new features, such as live-update of vfolders, which I use for an unread remote and important vfolder, and the certificate enhancements. Is there a default certificate database with maybe a list of common certificate authorities, like some other products have? Now, off to install it on my workstation for regular use :> Thanks again. Alex From michael at blastwave.org Thu Sep 30 20:30:31 2004 From: michael at blastwave.org (Michael Gernoth) Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:30:31 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] Re: Evolution 2.0.0 test packages available In-Reply-To: <20040929143208.6c700ae6@sws602> References: <20040928173859.GA11242@zerfleddert.de> <20040929143208.6c700ae6@sws602> Message-ID: <20040930183031.GA25877@zerfleddert.de> On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 02:32:08PM -0500, Alex S Moore wrote: > On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 19:38:59 +0200 > Michael Gernoth wrote: > > http://blastwave.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/csw/users/michael/ > Very, very nice Michael. Did you see the recent release 2.0.1 notice? No, but updated test-packages are now available from uni-erlangen.de. I will submit them to Phil as soon as I hear the MS exchange connections are still working with the new connector... > Is there a default certificate database with maybe a list of common > certificate authorities, like some other products have? Hmm, don't know, but evolution is now using Mozillas nss-libraries, so maybe it can use Mozillas certification database? Regards, Michael From asmoore at blastwave.org Wed Sep 8 15:52:20 2004 From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex S Moore) Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2004 08:52:20 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] RE: SpamAssassin testing Message-ID: <1094651539.13718.31.camel@sws602> SpamAssassin (SA) version 3.0 is nearing release. The last version for testing is release candidate 3. This time, the mailing list has been quiet regarding problems with rc3. I have pkgs available at our ftp site if someone would like to test. See: http://blastwave.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/csw/users/asmoore/ If you are running the previous CSWspamassassin pkg and using a site-wide bayes database, you should run `sa-learn --rebuild` to flush any records in the journal before removing the old package. Note that with 3.0, the --rebuild option is deprecated and replaced by --sync. The first email processed will upgrade a 2.6x database to 3.0 format. You can force this to occur before that first email by running `sa-learn --sync` after installing 3.0 The dependency list has changed. Run the pkgadd and see if there are missing dependencies. Quit and install the dependencies before proceeding with the install. It may work if you install dependencies last, but I have not tested that scenario. The new dependencies should be CSWpmdbi, CSWpmldap, CSWpmdigestsha1, CSWpmuri (for pkg-get, that is pm_dbi, pm_ldap, pm_digestsha1, pm_uri. Comments are welcome. There are a lot of new things in this release, so review the docs in /opt/csw/share/doc/spamassassin. I considered scripting the site-wide bayes update, but there were too many possibilities and it is simple enough to do once as needed. Thanks, Alex From litauer at uni-koblenz.de Wed Sep 8 13:54:43 2004 From: litauer at uni-koblenz.de (Christoph Litauer) Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2004 13:54:43 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] broken catalog? Message-ID: <413EF303.8030109@uni-koblenz.de> I just wanted to upgrade my kde installation (Sparc/Sol9) to 3.2.3. Now I have some problems: The catalog file seems to be broken. It contains lots of duplicate entries. I use http://blastwave.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/csw/unstable but I also tried other mirror sites. ray1:/ # pkg-get -U ... ray1:/ # pkg-get -i koffice_gcc Sorry, there are multiple versions possible Please specify one, in the following syntax pkg-get install koffice_gcc-1.3.2,REV=2004.08.26 pkg-get install koffice_gcc-1.3.2,REV=2004.08.26 So I deleted the duplicate entries. I was able to install the kde 3.2.3 packages now -- except koffice_gcc: ray1:/ # pkg-get -i koffice_gcc leads to install/depend 88450 blocks ERROR: no info for CSWimagick. Cannot install dependancy. ERROR: could not install required dependancies for CSWkofficegcc I installed package imagemagick containing CSWimagemagick. Seems as if the dependencies for koffice_gcc are wrong? Any help is greatly appreciated! Thanks in advance. -- Regards Christoph ________________________________________________________________________ Christoph Litauer litauer at uni-koblenz.de Uni Koblenz, Rechenzentrum, http://www.uni-koblenz.de/~litauer Postfach 201602, 56016 Koblenz Fon: +49 261 287-1311, Fax: -100 1311 PGP-Key: http://www.uni-koblenz.de/~litauer/public-key.html From mark at markround.com Fri Sep 10 11:34:59 2004 From: mark at markround.com (Mark Round) Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 10:34:59 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Updated PostgreSQL packages available Message-ID: <41417543.4020907@markround.com> Hi All, Updated PostgreSQL packages have been built, and should be available from your local mirror site soon. This bumps the version up to 7.3.7, and is a highly recommended update, as it fixes several bugs from the 7.3.6 release which could result in loss of data. From the PostgreSQL main site :- "Due to insufficient interlocking between transaction commit and checkpointing, it was possible for transactions committed just before the most recent checkpoint to be lost, in whole or in part, following a database crash and restart.... Due to the seriousness of the first bug, as relates to data integrity, it is strongly recommended that administrators upgrade their database servers at their earliest convience. " None of these releases require a dump-n-reload in order to address the problems. Please let me know of any issues. Thanks, -Mark mark at blastwave.org From csw at colnet.cboh.org Tue Sep 14 16:32:59 2004 From: csw at colnet.cboh.org (Robert Stampfli) Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 10:32:59 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] Re: [csw-newpkgs] apache update In-Reply-To: <20040903002150.GA18475@blastwave.blastwave.org> References: <20040903002150.GA18475@blastwave.blastwave.org> Message-ID: <20040914143259.GA5017@colnet> On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 05:21:50PM -0700, Philip Brown wrote: > It's a bit overdue, because of the complexity of getting the package > to actually _work nicely_, but the new, security-patched version of > apache 1.x is now available. I just noticed that apachectl in the new apache package is broken: If you attempt a restart, or do anything a root, it kills the server first. The problem turns out to be in the code which checks for the existance of a pidfile: In checking, it sends a SIGTERM to httpd, killing it. Here's how I've patched my system: *** /opt/csw/apache/bin/apachectl~ Thu Sep 2 20:08:14 2004 --- /opt/csw/apache/bin/apachectl Tue Sep 14 10:20:51 2004 *************** *** 50,56 **** # check for pidfile if [ -f $PIDFILE ] ; then PID=`cat $PIDFILE` ! if [ "x$PID" != "x" ] && kill $PID 2>/dev/null ; then STATUS="httpd (pid $PID) running" RUNNING=1 else --- 50,56 ---- # check for pidfile if [ -f $PIDFILE ] ; then PID=`cat $PIDFILE` ! if [ "x$PID" != "x" ] && kill -0 $PID 2>/dev/null ; then STATUS="httpd (pid $PID) running" RUNNING=1 else Rob From ahardjan at earthling.net Wed Sep 15 17:16:24 2004 From: ahardjan at earthling.net (Abraham Hardjana) Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 10:16:24 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Gnome 2.6 Message-ID: <20040915151624.6EB426EEE9@ws1-5.us4.outblaze.com> Hello, I have installed the Gnome 2.6 release on my Solaris 9 x86 server at home. Whenever I select Gnome(csw) from the login option menu, I get the Gnome 2.6 splashscreen and it stops at that point. Now I still have the original Sun Gnome installed, do I need to uninstall it first before I can run Gnome 2.6? Thanks in advance, Abraham -- ___________________________________________________________ Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com http://promo.mail.com/adsfreejump.htm From ocalld at cogent-dsn.com Wed Sep 15 17:48:34 2004 From: ocalld at cogent-dsn.com (Dan O'Callaghan) Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 16:48:34 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Gnome 2.6 In-Reply-To: <20040915151624.6EB426EEE9@ws1-5.us4.outblaze.com> References: <20040915151624.6EB426EEE9@ws1-5.us4.outblaze.com> Message-ID: <1095263314.540.5.camel@dan-sun1> yes, you need to uninstall sun's gnome first. phil has some advise under the bug tracker for gnome on www.blastwave.com use this to delete all of gnome's packages (will prob delete csw's gnome as well) pkginfo | grep SUNW | grep -i gnome |nawk '{print $2}'>/tmp/pkglist for p in `cat /tmp/pkglist` ; do yes | pkrm $p; done cheers Dan. have a look at On Wed, 2004-09-15 at 16:16, Abraham Hardjana wrote: > Hello, > > I have installed the Gnome 2.6 release on my Solaris 9 x86 server at home. Whenever I select Gnome(csw) from the login option menu, I get the Gnome 2.6 splashscreen and it stops at that point. Now I still have the original Sun Gnome installed, do I need to uninstall it first before I can run Gnome 2.6? > > Thanks in advance, > > Abraham -- Dan O'Callaghan Cogent From mats.larsson at ericsson.com Thu Sep 16 08:40:38 2004 From: mats.larsson at ericsson.com (Mats Larsson (AS/EAB)) Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 08:40:38 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] Gnome 2.6 In-Reply-To: <1095263314.540.5.camel@dan-sun1> References: <20040915151624.6EB426EEE9@ws1-5.us4.outblaze.com> <1095263314.540.5.camel@dan-sun1> Message-ID: <41493566.10604@ericsson.com> On 2004-09-15 17:48, Dan O'Callaghan wrote: > yes, you need to uninstall sun's gnome first. Do you know why? > phil has some advise under the bug tracker for gnome on > www.blastwave.com Couldn't find any specific info on why Sun's GNOME has to be uninstalled. TIA MOL From ahardjan at earthling.net Sat Sep 18 04:12:19 2004 From: ahardjan at earthling.net (Abraham Hardjana) Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 21:12:19 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Re: users Digest, Vol 8, Issue 4 Message-ID: <20040918021219.09472101C9@ws1-3.us4.outblaze.com> I have uninstalled sun's gnome alredy and tried to use Gnome 2.6 and I still run into the same problem. It looks like Gnome is hanging when gnome-session is run. This also occurs with Evolution. They seem to run at 50% - 99% CPU in top, but nothing seems to happen on screen. Is there any advice as to what I can do to get some sort of debugging information to provide some additional information? Abraham > Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 16:48:34 +0100 > From: Dan O'Callaghan > Subject: Re: [csw-users] Gnome 2.6 > To: questions and discussions > Message-ID: <1095263314.540.5.camel at dan-sun1> > Content-Type: text/plain > > yes, you need to uninstall sun's gnome first. > > phil has some advise under the bug tracker for gnome on > www.blastwave.com > > use this to delete all of gnome's packages (will prob delete csw's gnome > as well) > > pkginfo | grep SUNW | grep -i gnome |nawk '{print $2}'>/tmp/pkglist > for p in `cat /tmp/pkglist` ; do yes | pkrm $p; done > > > cheers > Dan. > > have a look at > On Wed, 2004-09-15 at 16:16, Abraham Hardjana wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I have installed the Gnome 2.6 release on my Solaris 9 x86 server at home. Whenever I select Gnome(csw) from the login option menu, I get the Gnome 2.6 splashscreen and it stops at that point. Now I still have the original Sun Gnome installed, do I need to uninstall it first before I can run Gnome 2.6? > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > Abraham > -- > Dan O'Callaghan > Cogent > > -- ___________________________________________________________ Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com http://promo.mail.com/adsfreejump.htm From anthony.hornby at cdu.edu.au Sat Sep 18 08:38:08 2004 From: anthony.hornby at cdu.edu.au (Anthony Hornby) Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 16:08:08 +0930 Subject: [csw-users] CUPS 1.1.20 error on solaris 8 - missing libslp.so.1 Message-ID: <1095489488.8650.3.camel@styx.ntu.edu.au> Hi, I'm switching to blastwave for pkg updates for one of my solaris boxes and all has gone well except for cups. I get the error /etc/init.d/cswcups start ld.so.1: /opt/csw/sbin/cupsd: fatal: libslp.so.1: open failed: No such file or directory Killed cups: unable to start scheduler. This package doesn't mention openslp as a dependency on the package description on www.blastwave.org & I have turned network browsing off in the config files. Do I need to install openslp? All advice appreciated. Regards Anthony. -- Mr Anthony Hornby RHCE BIT ALIATEC Library Systems & Technology Coordinator Charles Darwin University | CRICOS 300K anthony.hornby at cdu.edu.au | office +61 8 89 466011 From james at blastwave.org Sat Sep 18 11:09:27 2004 From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee) Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 09:09:27 GMT Subject: [csw-users] CUPS 1.1.20 error on solaris 8 - missing libslp.so.1 In-Reply-To: <1095489488.8650.3.camel@styx.ntu.edu.au> References: <1095489488.8650.3.camel@styx.ntu.edu.au> Message-ID: <20040918.9092700.2943319030@landeck.jamesipoos.com> On 18/09/04, 07:38:08, Anthony Hornby wrote regarding [csw-users] CUPS 1.1.20 error on solaris 8 - missing libslp.so.1: > /etc/init.d/cswcups start > ld.so.1: /opt/csw/sbin/cupsd: fatal: libslp.so.1: open failed: No such > file or directory > Killed > cups: unable to start scheduler. > This package doesn't mention openslp as a dependency on the package > description on www.blastwave.org & > I have turned network browsing off in the config files. > Do I need to install openslp? Yes. It's not in the dependancies because it's found in an OS package. Some detective work: $ ldd /opt/csw/sbin/cupsd libz.so.1 => /opt/csw/lib/libz.so.1 libz.so.1 (SUNW_1.1) => (version not found) libssl.so.0.9.7 => /opt/csw/lib/libssl.so.0.9.7 libcrypto.so.0.9.7 => /opt/csw/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.7 libslp.so.1 => /usr/lib/libslp.so.1 libpam.so.1 => /usr/lib/libpam.so.1 libdl.so.1 => /usr/lib/libdl.so.1 libcups.so.2 => /opt/csw/lib/libcups.so.2 libsocket.so.1 => /usr/lib/libsocket.so.1 libnsl.so.1 => /usr/lib/libnsl.so.1 libc.so.1 => /usr/lib/libc.so.1 libthread.so.1 => /usr/lib/libthread.so.1 libcmd.so.1 => /usr/lib/libcmd.so.1 libmp.so.2 => /usr/lib/libmp.so.2 $ pkgchk -l -p /usr/lib/libslp.so.1 Pathname: /usr/lib/libslp.so.1 Type: regular file Expected mode: 0755 Expected owner: root Expected group: bin Expected file size (bytes): 84304 Expected sum(1) of contents: 9997 Expected last modification: Jan 05 09:28:58 PM 2000 Referenced by the following packages: SUNWslpu Current status: installed So you need SUNWslpu which is on CD 1 of 2 of the Solaris 8 Software. From asmoore at blastwave.org Wed Sep 22 23:13:43 2004 From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex S Moore) Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 16:13:43 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] RE: SpamAssassin 3.0 Message-ID: <1095887622.11131.37.camel@sws602> SA 3.0 should be at your favorite CSW mirror in the next day or so. This is a major upgrade. The short set of need-to-know notes is at the top of README.CSW. A copy is attached. Be sure to stop whatever process is calling SA. For me, that is mimedefang. To restate things in case you are using a site-wide bayes database, before getting the new package, run `sa-learn --rebuild`. This will update the database with changes that are only in bayes_journal. After the upgrade, run `sa-learn --sync` to upgrade the database. If you get a message about 'unable to use version 2.0 database', ignore it and be patient. The database upgrade may take a while. Please read the documentation before using SA3.0. There are many changes and new features. Finally, check permissions on the bayes database and /opt/csw/etc/spamassassin directory and make any changes needed for your environment. Do not forget to run spamassassin in debug mode and lint the rules to test out your environment. Alex -------------- next part -------------- Notes for the CSW spamassassin distribution ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Version 3.0 is a major upgrade. Read all available information on upgrading. See /opt/csw/share/doc/spamassassin UPGRADE for most of this information. If you are using site-wide bayes, be sure to run `sa-learn --rebuild` before starting the package upgrade. Before starting whatever process you are using to run SpamAssassin after the upgrade, run `sa-learn --sync` to upgrade the database to version 3.0 format. Before starting spamassassin, run the following and look for warnings and errors that need to be fixed. Some scores are deprecated from version 2.x. These will produce only warnings, but you may want to see if similar scores are available and make the appropriate adjustments. Also, note the change in startup options in the UPGRADE file. To test your configuration: /opt/csw/bin/spamassassin -D --lint 2004-02-14 Thomas Glanzmann From michael at blastwave.org Tue Sep 28 19:38:59 2004 From: michael at blastwave.org (Michael Gernoth) Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 19:38:59 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] Evolution 2.0.0 test packages available Message-ID: <20040928173859.GA11242@zerfleddert.de> Hello, I have just uploaded first test-packages of evolution 2.0.0 to: http://blastwave.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/csw/users/michael/ To use this new version, download the package with the right architecture, and do the following: # pkg-get -i gal2 libsoup2 gtkhtml31 evolution_ds gnome_icon_theme # pkgrm CSWevolution # pkgadd -d evolution-2.0.0,REV\=2004.09.27-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg After that, you should have a shiny new evolution. A word of warning: Our current ximian_connector is not evolution 2.0 ready, so you need to fetch the updated connector from the above mentioned URL, too, if you currently use it. Please report back about encountered problems with this release. Regards, Michael From ocalld at cogent-dsn.com Tue Sep 28 20:12:35 2004 From: ocalld at cogent-dsn.com (Dan O'Callaghan) Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 19:12:35 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] pilot-link Message-ID: <1096395155.542.6.camel@dan-sun1> Hi Can somebody let me know how to configure pilot-link for use with USB sony clie under Solaris 9 sparc?? Thanks. -- Dan O'Callaghan Cogent From tomc at bio.umass.edu Wed Sep 29 17:16:04 2004 From: tomc at bio.umass.edu (Tom Carpenter) Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 11:16:04 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] remove software en masse? and Message-ID: Can one simply "rm -rf /opt/csw" to start over with CSW software? Tom Carpenter From tstewart at nibsc.ac.uk Wed Sep 29 17:26:44 2004 From: tstewart at nibsc.ac.uk (Thomas Stewart) Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:26:44 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] remove software en masse? and In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200409291626.44573.tstewart@nibsc.ac.uk> On Wednesday 29 September 2004 16:16, Tom Carpenter wrote: > Can one simply "rm -rf /opt/csw" to start over with CSW > software? No, because CSW uses the Solaris package management system, ie a datebase of what files are installed and where. You need to get Solaris to remove the packages for you. Something like "pkginfo | grep CSW | awk '{print $2}' | xargs" will print all the csw packages that are installed. (pkginfo prints all the installed packages, the grep filters for the csw ones, the awk only prints the packages name, and the xargs get it all on one line.) You can then do "pkgrm {package list}" to remove the packages. (you could just stick the pkgrm on the end of the xargs, but I think thats too scary, this way you can give the list a quick audit first. HTH Regards -- Tom From mark at markround.com Wed Sep 29 17:37:02 2004 From: mark at markround.com (Mark Round) Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:37:02 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] remove software en masse? and In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <415AD69E.8030401@markround.com> Tom Carpenter wrote: >Can one simply "rm -rf /opt/csw" to start over with CSW >software? Not a good idea, as you'll still have all the packages registered in your package database, which will likely lead to all kinds of confusion. A cleaner way is to do something along the lines of (Loosely taken from the example on the CSW Gnome bugtracker page):- # pkginfo | grep CSW | awk '{print $2}' > /tmp/cswpkgs.txt # while read pkg; do yes | pkgrm $pkg ; done < /tmp/cswpkgs.txt Which will put a list of CSW packages into /tmp/cswpkgs.txt, and then remove them without asking for confirmation. -Mark mark at blastwave.org From asmoore at blastwave.org Wed Sep 29 21:32:08 2004 From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex S Moore) Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:32:08 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Re: [csw-maintainers] Evolution 2.0.0 test packages available In-Reply-To: <20040928173859.GA11242@zerfleddert.de> References: <20040928173859.GA11242@zerfleddert.de> Message-ID: <20040929143208.6c700ae6@sws602> On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 19:38:59 +0200 Michael Gernoth wrote: > Hello, > I have just uploaded first test-packages of evolution 2.0.0 to: > http://blastwave.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/csw/users/michael/ > Very, very nice Michael. Did you see the recent release 2.0.1 notice? I installed and ran it on a test box with a test account, which is basically a duplicate of my mail under another account. No problems encountered and it is quite nice. Ran fine under CDE and as before, displaying a folder and any message in that folder is instantaneous. Even when the folder has over 22,000 messages. The new message view appears a bit different, but that must be by design. I will get used to it. I really like several of the new features, such as live-update of vfolders, which I use for an unread remote and important vfolder, and the certificate enhancements. Is there a default certificate database with maybe a list of common certificate authorities, like some other products have? Now, off to install it on my workstation for regular use :> Thanks again. Alex From michael at blastwave.org Thu Sep 30 20:30:31 2004 From: michael at blastwave.org (Michael Gernoth) Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:30:31 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] Re: Evolution 2.0.0 test packages available In-Reply-To: <20040929143208.6c700ae6@sws602> References: <20040928173859.GA11242@zerfleddert.de> <20040929143208.6c700ae6@sws602> Message-ID: <20040930183031.GA25877@zerfleddert.de> On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 02:32:08PM -0500, Alex S Moore wrote: > On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 19:38:59 +0200 > Michael Gernoth wrote: > > http://blastwave.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/csw/users/michael/ > Very, very nice Michael. Did you see the recent release 2.0.1 notice? No, but updated test-packages are now available from uni-erlangen.de. I will submit them to Phil as soon as I hear the MS exchange connections are still working with the new connector... > Is there a default certificate database with maybe a list of common > certificate authorities, like some other products have? Hmm, don't know, but evolution is now using Mozillas nss-libraries, so maybe it can use Mozillas certification database? Regards, Michael