From james at blastwave.org  Tue Nov  1 10:13:53 2005
From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee)
Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2005 09:13:53 GMT
Subject: [csw-users] Gedit and CSWlibcairo
In-Reply-To: <20051031232200.G24474-100000@xs3.xs4all.nl>
References: <20051031232200.G24474-100000@xs3.xs4all.nl>
Message-ID: <20051101.9135300.3402990147@landeck.jamesipoos.com>

On 31/10/05, 22:30:37, Alexey Kuzmichev <alekz at xs4all.nl> wrote regarding 
[csw-users] Gedit and CSWlibcairo:

> Looks like there is a problem with the freshly built
> gedit-2.12.0:

> # pkg-get -i gedit
> . . .
> ERROR: no info for CSWlibcairo. Cannot install dependancy.
> ERROR: could not install required dependancies for CSWgedit

> There is no such package as CSWlibcairo (yet?).

It's a pathetic naming mistake!  The required package exists but is
called CSWcairo.  Please file an urgent bug report.



> Also, CSWlibcairo is not in the dependency list on
> http://www.blastwave.org/packages.php/gedit

That's not up to date.


http://www.canoedissent.org.uk/ui/package.jsp?p=CSWlibcairo
http://www.canoedissent.org.uk/ui/package.jsp?p=CSWcairo
http://www.canoedissent.org.uk/ui/package.jsp?p=CSWgedit




James.


From mark.round at gmail.com  Tue Nov  1 11:35:22 2005
From: mark.round at gmail.com (Mark Round)
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 10:35:22 +0000
Subject: [csw-users] New PHP 4.4.0 packages
Message-ID: <7b46f0de0511010235t65a394aeo4db32ff8b947f91f@mail.gmail.com>

New PHP 4.4.0 packages are now available from the mirror sites. There
are a number of changes with these packages over previous 4.3.x
packages - please make sure you read the following to find out how
this move will affect your installation.

1. Changes in packaging

1.1 Modular extensions

The PHP packages now include a very minimal "core". Many extensions
are now built as shared libraries and have been split off into their
own packages. The reasoning behind this is that a user can just grab
what they need, instead of a huge monolithic build of PHP that eats up
memory with things that they very probably don't need - not to mention
saving space and time by not downloading all the various dependencies
that go with it.

Under this new system, if you just want PHP with, say MySQL and
OpenSSL support, you would install the core PHP package (and
optionally, the mod_php Apache extension) then php4_mysql and
php4_openssl.


1.2 Multiple SAPIs, Apache 2 support, standalone CGI package

As a user may just want the CLI or CGI executables, these are now
shipped in the core php4_cgi package, which all other PHP4 packages
now depend on. This includes the binaries, PEAR libraries, and various
headers. It also takes care of installing a php.ini, if none exists.
This is also the package you'd use if you wanted to set up a FastCGI
environment.

If you actually want mod_php for either Apache 1.3.x or 2.0.x, you'd
install mod_php4_core (CSWmodphp4).

This includes a dependency on php4_cgi, so if you install this, you'll
also get  the PEAR libraries and "foundations" needed for PHP to
function etc. It now includes an Apache 2 module shipped alongside the
standard Apache 1.  These have both been relocated to
/opt/csw/lib/php/sapi. The postinstall script will check for the
presence of CSWapache or CSWapache2, and if found, will activate
itself. As long as both servers are listening on different ports, you
can even run both on the same machine.

The big caveat here is that if you are using Apache 2 and PHP, you
should only ever use the prefork MPM.

There is also a "bundle" package, mod_php (CSWphp),  which now doesn't
contain any files, but does contain dependencies for php4_cgi,
mod_php4_core, apache 1.3.x, and all the extensions. This emulates the
behavious of the old monolithic CSWphp build; for a full PHP4
installation, this is the package you'd install (pkg-get -i php).


2. Upgrading a current installation

If you are using a current CSWphp installation, upgrade your catalog,
and then upgrade the "mod_php" package. This will then upgrade your
mod_php to the new dummy build, and install the core php4_cgi and
mod_php4_core packages, along with all extensions.

This will however leave you with a full PHP installation, and you may
then want to uninstall some of  the PHP extensions you are not using.

-Mark
mark at blastwave.org
http://www.markround.com


From ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr  Wed Nov  2 08:15:16 2005
From: ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=E9rard_Henry?=)
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2005 08:15:16 +0100
Subject: [csw-users]  openssl dependancies failed after upgrade
Message-ID: <43686784.8000307@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>

hello all,

just upgraded all my packages:
/opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -Uu
on solaris 10 x86, and now, many applications are unable to start 
because failed dependancies with libssl.so.0.9.7
this upgrade replace libssl release 0.9.7 with 0.9.8

Is there a mean to forbid upgrade of some packages?


thanks in advance,

gerard



From daniel at dseichter.de  Wed Nov  2 09:09:41 2005
From: daniel at dseichter.de (Daniel Seichter)
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 09:09:41 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-users] Problems with GAIM?!
Message-ID: <1023000.20245.217.6.141.226.1130918981.squirrel@webmailer.hosteurope.de>

Hello,

yesterday I started gaim after a break of about two months. The message
box said, there was a new version, 1.50 (I used 0.82). I do every week a
pkg-get -U -u, but the gaim package never was updated.
So I had to do a pkg-get -i gaim (BUT it was already installed!!) and then
the new version was installed.
So I think there can exists more such packages, they are not realy
registered. How I can do a pkg-get <trytoinstallallnew>?
It this problem known?

Daniel


From mark.round at gmail.com  Wed Nov  2 11:25:05 2005
From: mark.round at gmail.com (Mark Round)
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 10:25:05 +0000
Subject: [csw-users] openssl dependancies failed after upgrade
In-Reply-To: <43686784.8000307@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
References: <43686784.8000307@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
Message-ID: <7b46f0de0511020225k649261c0sa3adff2ad16b9b7d@mail.gmail.com>

>  many applications are unable to start
> because failed dependancies with libssl.so.0.9.7
> this upgrade replace libssl release 0.9.7 with 0.9.8

Just looked at the latest OpenSSL package from "unstable", and it
seems to include the 0.9.7 libraries for compatibility. What
applications are failing for you ?

# pkgchk -l CSWossl | grep 0.9.7
Pathname: /opt/csw/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.7
Pathname: /opt/csw/lib/libssl.so.0.9.7
Pathname: /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libcrypto.so.0.9.7
Pathname: /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libssl.so.0.9.7
Pathname: /opt/csw/lib/sparcv9/libcrypto.so.0.9.7
Pathname: /opt/csw/lib/sparcv9/libssl.so.0.9.7

[mround at builds:mround] # pkginfo -l CSWossl
   PKGINST:  CSWossl
      NAME:  openssl - The Open Source toolkit for SSL and TLS.
  CATEGORY:  application
      ARCH:  sparc
   VERSION:  0.9.8,REV=2005.10.31
    VENDOR:  http://www.openssl.org/ packaged for CSW by Derek Morr
    PSTAMP:  ra20051031211209
  INSTDATE:  Nov 02 2005 10:21
   HOTLINE:  http://www.blastwave.org/bugtrack/
     EMAIL:  derek at blastwave.org
    STATUS:  completely installed
     FILES:     1185 installed pathnames
                   2 shared pathnames
                  15 directories
                  31 executables
               69837 blocks used (approx)


From james at blastwave.org  Wed Nov  2 11:41:51 2005
From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee)
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2005 10:41:51 GMT
Subject: [csw-users] openssl dependancies failed after upgrade
In-Reply-To: <7b46f0de0511020225k649261c0sa3adff2ad16b9b7d@mail.gmail.com>
References: <43686784.8000307@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
	<7b46f0de0511020225k649261c0sa3adff2ad16b9b7d@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20051102.10415100.2749481247@landeck.jamesipoos.com>

On 02/11/05, 10:25:05, Mark Round <mark.round at gmail.com> wrote regarding 
Re: [csw-users] openssl dependancies failed after upgrade:

> >  many applications are unable to start
> > because failed dependancies with libssl.so.0.9.7
> > this upgrade replace libssl release 0.9.7 with 0.9.8

> Just looked at the latest OpenSSL package from "unstable", and it
> seems to include the 0.9.7 libraries for compatibility. What
> applications are failing for you ?

> # pkgchk -l CSWossl | grep 0.9.7
> Pathname: /opt/csw/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.7
> Pathname: /opt/csw/lib/libssl.so.0.9.7
> Pathname: /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libcrypto.so.0.9.7
> Pathname: /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libssl.so.0.9.7
> Pathname: /opt/csw/lib/sparcv9/libcrypto.so.0.9.7
> Pathname: /opt/csw/lib/sparcv9/libssl.so.0.9.7

> [mround at builds:mround] # pkginfo -l CSWossl
>    PKGINST:  CSWossl
>       NAME:  openssl - The Open Source toolkit for SSL and TLS.
>   CATEGORY:  application
>       ARCH:  sparc
>    VERSION:  0.9.8,REV=2005.10.31


The intel version doesn't have 0.9.7.





James.


From asmoore at blastwave.org  Wed Nov  2 12:53:37 2005
From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex Moore)
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 05:53:37 -0600
Subject: [csw-users] openssl dependancies failed after upgrade
In-Reply-To: <43686784.8000307@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
References: <43686784.8000307@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
Message-ID: <20051102055337.0000176f@sws602>

On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 08:15:16 +0100
G?rard Henry <ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr> wrote:

> hello all,
> 
> just upgraded all my packages:
> /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -Uu
> on solaris 10 x86, and now, many applications are unable to start 
> because failed dependancies with libssl.so.0.9.7
> this upgrade replace libssl release 0.9.7 with 0.9.8

Same here, and only on x86.  What I have
is /opt/csw/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.7 missing. However, for some reason, I
have multiple copies of the library with a type of time stamp on the
end of the filename.  I copied one of these to the proper name for both
i386 and pentium and all seems fine again.

Alex


From asmoore at blastwave.org  Wed Nov  2 12:54:10 2005
From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex Moore)
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 05:54:10 -0600
Subject: [csw-users] openssl dependancies failed after upgrade
In-Reply-To: <43686784.8000307@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
References: <43686784.8000307@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
Message-ID: <20051102055410.00003251@sws602>

On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 08:15:16 +0100
G?rard Henry <ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr> wrote:

> hello all,
> 
> just upgraded all my packages:
> /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -Uu
> on solaris 10 x86, and now, many applications are unable to start 
> because failed dependancies with libssl.so.0.9.7
> this upgrade replace libssl release 0.9.7 with 0.9.8
> 
P.S. I filed a bug report.

Alex


From dvm105 at psu.edu  Wed Nov  2 14:06:20 2005
From: dvm105 at psu.edu (Derek Morr)
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2005 08:06:20 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] openssl dependancies failed after upgrade
In-Reply-To: <43686784.8000307@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
References: <43686784.8000307@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
Message-ID: <4368B9CC.2020800@psu.edu>

G?rard Henry wrote:
> hello all,
> 
> just upgraded all my packages:
> /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -Uu
> on solaris 10 x86, and now, many applications are unable to start 
> because failed dependancies with libssl.so.0.9.7
> this upgrade replace libssl release 0.9.7 with 0.9.8

This was an error on my part when I took over the OpenSSL package. I've 
corrected the issue, and a fixed version of OpenSSL should be released 
later this morning.

I apologize for any inconvenience.

-derek


From blastwave at gmail.com  Wed Nov  2 14:27:35 2005
From: blastwave at gmail.com (Dennis Clarke)
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 08:27:35 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] openssl dependancies failed after upgrade
In-Reply-To: <20051102055410.00003251@sws602>
References: <43686784.8000307@cmi.univ-mrs.fr> <20051102055410.00003251@sws602>
Message-ID: <a6265da20511020527s31f8143ev2aa0548e73ff2f96@mail.gmail.com>

On 11/2/05, Alex Moore <asmoore at blastwave.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 08:15:16 +0100
> G?rard Henry <ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr> wrote:
>
> > hello all,
> >
> > just upgraded all my packages:
> > /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -Uu
> > on solaris 10 x86, and now, many applications are unable to start
> > because failed dependancies with libssl.so.0.9.7
> > this upgrade replace libssl release 0.9.7 with 0.9.8
> >
> P.S. I filed a bug report.

.. and I just took my DVD prototype with the build 25 source on it :

  http://www.blastwave.org/dclarke/stuff/dvd-proto.txt

  got that looking nice last night ..

and threw it away ...

sigh

I'm going for coffee .. Alex, let me know if there is anything I can
do to help at all.

Dennis

From achandler at visionael.com  Wed Nov  2 18:27:06 2005
From: achandler at visionael.com (Andy Chandler)
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 09:27:06 -0800 
Subject: [csw-users] Problem with the CSW install of KDE-GCC on Solaris 10
Message-ID: <B5C5FA91684C0B469E819ABD92BD028A1D01C0@pa-svr.visionael.com>

Greetings, pardon a newbie here but I'm having a problem with something that
previously worked for me without any problems at all!
 
We have a couple of boxes here one of which had solairs 10 - its a sun blade
2000 box and I originally had a plain vanilla solaris 10 install on it and
then installed pkg-get and downloaded without problem kde_gcc package....it
worked great.   The box suffered a hard drive problem which necessitated
replacing the drive and re-installing the OS.   This time I think I made the
following mistakes:
 
 
1: Installed companion CD - this actually put KDE 3.1 under the /opt/sfw
directory
2: Chose a language specification of en_US.ISO8859-1  ??? (not sure if it
should have been UTF or something else)
2: Installed PKG-GET and KDE_GCC BEFORE  I remembered the solaris patch
cluster
3: then installed Patch cluster.
 
KDE starts but no icons and the animated startup progress screen looks like
a bunch of colored blocks - basically there are no graphical resources -
originally I had graphics but just no title bars for minimizing / maximizing
windows but now I've lost even the basic desktop icons and the kicker icons.
 
I've since tried De-installing with pkgrm every package with CSW as the
prefix, deleted the /opt/csw structure and reinstalled everything.   I can
get a kde desktop but no graphics.   I figure I must have messed up a shared
resource that CSW links to?   Could it be a temp cache thing somewhere?
For what its worth CDE and the JDS desktops load and run great.   Also this
problem occurs both directly on the box or with a remote window manager
tunneled over ssh.
 
 
 
 

Andrew Chandler 

Manager DataCollection Group      


Visionael Corporation             Phone : (918) 388-8308

9717 E. 42nd Street               Fax   : (918) 663-1456
<mailto:achandler at visionael.com> 

Suite 200                         Email : andy at visionael.com
<mailto:achandler at visionael.com> 
Tulsa, OK 74146-3680              WEB   : www.visionael.com
<http://www.visionael.com/> 

 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20051102/2858062e/attachment.html 

From achandler at visionael.com  Wed Nov  2 18:33:05 2005
From: achandler at visionael.com (Andy Chandler)
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 11:33:05 -0600
Subject: [csw-users] Problem with the CSW install of KDE-GCC on Solaris 10
Message-ID: <20051102173318.7D289F8A9@mail.blastwave.org>

Sending again as type text and using correct Email Address 
Greetings, pardon a newbie here but I'm having a problem with something that
previously worked for me without any problems at all!
 
We have a couple of boxes here one of which had Solaris 10 - its a sun blade
2000 box and I originally had a plain vanilla Solaris 10 install on it and
then installed pkg-get and downloaded without problem kde_gcc package....it
worked great.   The box suffered a hard drive problem which necessitated
replacing the drive and re-installing the OS.   This time I think I made the
following mistakes:
 
 
1: Installed companion CD - this actually put KDE 3.1 under the /opt/sfw
directory
2: Chose a language specification of en_US.ISO8859-1  ??? (not sure if it
should have been UTF or something else)
2: Installed PKG-GET and KDE_GCC BEFORE  I remembered the solaris patch
cluster
3: then installed Patch cluster.
 
KDE starts but no icons and the animated startup progress screen looks like
a bunch of colored blocks - basically there are no graphical resources -
originally I had graphics but just no title bars for minimizing / maximizing
windows but now I've lost even the basic desktop icons and the kicker icons.
 
I've since tried De-installing with pkgrm every package with CSW as the
prefix, deleted the /opt/csw structure and reinstalled everything.   I can
get a kde desktop but no graphics.   I figure I must have messed up a shared
resource that CSW links to?   Could it be a temp cache thing somewhere?
For what its worth CDE and the JDS desktops load and run great.   Also this
problem occurs both directly on the box or with a remote window manager
tunneled over ssh.
 
 
 
 

Andrew Chandler 

Manager DataCollection Group      


Visionael Corporation             Phone : (918) 388-8308

9717 E. 42nd Street               Fax   : (918) 663-1456
<mailto:achandler at visionael.com> 

Suite 200                         Email : andy at visionael.com
<mailto:achandler at visionael.com> 
Tulsa, OK 74146-3680              WEB   : www.visionael.com
<http://www.visionael.com/> 




From mmayer at blastwave.org  Thu Nov  3 03:34:00 2005
From: mmayer at blastwave.org (Markus Mayer)
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 18:34:00 -0800
Subject: [csw-users] Problem with the CSW install of KDE-GCC on Solaris
	10
In-Reply-To: <B5C5FA91684C0B469E819ABD92BD028A1D01C0@pa-svr.visionael.com>
References: <B5C5FA91684C0B469E819ABD92BD028A1D01C0@pa-svr.visionael.com>
Message-ID: <20051103023400.GA31923@chinook.mmayer.net>

On Wednesday, 02 Nov 2005 09:27 -0800, Andy Chandler wrote:

> KDE starts but no icons and the animated startup progress screen
> looks like a bunch of colored blocks - basically there are no
> graphical resources - originally I had graphics but just no title
> bars for minimizing / maximizing windows but now I've lost even the
> basic desktop icons and the kicker icons.

You may have run into the same problem I saw this week-end after
upgrading to the latest KDE from unstable: the windows didn't have
frames around them (as if no window-manager was running), the panel
looked weird, etc.

In this case your KDE problems won't have anything to do with what you
did, that would just be coincidence.

See
  http://www.blastwave.org/mantis/view_bug_page.php?f_id=1246
for more.

If you click on [Main] from there you'll see this note:

------------------------------------------------------------
  In relation to Solaris 8/9, a move was made to start including kwin
  and kxkb in KDE under Solaris. You'll find the main kdebase packages
  as:

  http://www.blastwave.org/testing
  kdebase_gcc-3.4.3,REV=2005.10.27-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  kdebase_gcc-3.4.3,REV=2005.10.27-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

  Or, the older stable package:
  kdebase_gcc-3.4.2,REV=2005.09.20-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  kdebase_gcc-3.4.2,REV=2005.09.20-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
------------------------------------------------------------

I just checked, it has not been propagated to the mirrors yet, so
you'll have to grab that package from testing and install it manually.

  gzip -d kdebase_gcc-3.4.3,REV=2005.10.27-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  pkgrm CSWkdebasegcc
  pkgadd -d kdebase_gcc-3.4.3,REV=2005.10.27-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg

Hope that helps.

-Markus


From andy at riftware.com  Thu Nov  3 06:23:11 2005
From: andy at riftware.com (Andrew Chandler)
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 23:23:11 -0600
Subject: [csw-users] Problem with the CSW install of KDE-GCC on Solaris10
In-Reply-To: <20051103023400.GA31923@chinook.mmayer.net>
Message-ID: <20051103052316.0475BF8A4@mail.blastwave.org>

Thanks - I'll give it a try in the morning when I get to work!
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: users-bounces+andy=riftware.com at lists.blastwave.org 
> [mailto:users-bounces+andy=riftware.com at lists.blastwave.org] 
> On Behalf Of Markus Mayer
> Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 8:34 PM
> To: questions and discussions
> Subject: Re: [csw-users] Problem with the CSW install of 
> KDE-GCC on Solaris10
> 
> On Wednesday, 02 Nov 2005 09:27 -0800, Andy Chandler wrote:
> 
> > KDE starts but no icons and the animated startup progress 
> screen looks 
> > like a bunch of colored blocks - basically there are no graphical 
> > resources - originally I had graphics but just no title bars for 
> > minimizing / maximizing windows but now I've lost even the basic 
> > desktop icons and the kicker icons.
> 
> You may have run into the same problem I saw this week-end 
> after upgrading to the latest KDE from unstable: the windows 
> didn't have frames around them (as if no window-manager was 
> running), the panel looked weird, etc.
> 
> In this case your KDE problems won't have anything to do with 
> what you did, that would just be coincidence.
> 
> See
>   http://www.blastwave.org/mantis/view_bug_page.php?f_id=1246
> for more.
> 
> If you click on [Main] from there you'll see this note:
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>   In relation to Solaris 8/9, a move was made to start including kwin
>   and kxkb in KDE under Solaris. You'll find the main kdebase packages
>   as:
> 
>   http://www.blastwave.org/testing
>   kdebase_gcc-3.4.3,REV=2005.10.27-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>   kdebase_gcc-3.4.3,REV=2005.10.27-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> 
>   Or, the older stable package:
>   kdebase_gcc-3.4.2,REV=2005.09.20-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>   kdebase_gcc-3.4.2,REV=2005.09.20-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> I just checked, it has not been propagated to the mirrors 
> yet, so you'll have to grab that package from testing and 
> install it manually.
> 
>   gzip -d kdebase_gcc-3.4.3,REV=2005.10.27-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   pkgrm CSWkdebasegcc
>   pkgadd -d kdebase_gcc-3.4.3,REV=2005.10.27-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg
> 
> Hope that helps.
> 
> -Markus
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.blastwave.org
> https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> 
> 



From mats.larsson at ericsson.com  Thu Nov  3 13:55:16 2005
From: mats.larsson at ericsson.com (Mats Larsson)
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2005 13:55:16 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] Problem with the CSW install of KDE-GCC on Solaris
 10
In-Reply-To: <20051103023400.GA31923@chinook.mmayer.net>
References: <B5C5FA91684C0B469E819ABD92BD028A1D01C0@pa-svr.visionael.com>
	<20051103023400.GA31923@chinook.mmayer.net>
Message-ID: <436A08B4.1090607@ericsson.com>

On 2005-11-03 03:34, Markus Mayer wrote:

> On Wednesday, 02 Nov 2005 09:27 -0800, Andy Chandler wrote:
> 
>> KDE starts but no icons and the animated startup progress screen
>> looks like a bunch of colored blocks - basically there are no
>> graphical resources - originally I had graphics but just no title
>> bars for minimizing / maximizing windows but now I've lost even the
>> basic desktop icons and the kicker icons.

Same problem here but Solaris 8.

> You may have run into the same problem I saw this week-end after
> upgrading to the latest KDE from unstable: the windows didn't have
> frames around them (as if no window-manager was running), the panel
> looked weird, etc.
> 
> In this case your KDE problems won't have anything to do with what you
> did, that would just be coincidence.
> 
> See
>   http://www.blastwave.org/mantis/view_bug_page.php?f_id=1246
> for more.
> 
> If you click on [Main] from there you'll see this note:
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>   In relation to Solaris 8/9, a move was made to start including kwin
>   and kxkb in KDE under Solaris. You'll find the main kdebase packages
>   as:
> 
>   http://www.blastwave.org/testing
>   kdebase_gcc-3.4.3,REV=2005.10.27-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>   kdebase_gcc-3.4.3,REV=2005.10.27-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> 
>   Or, the older stable package:
>   kdebase_gcc-3.4.2,REV=2005.09.20-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>   kdebase_gcc-3.4.2,REV=2005.09.20-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> I just checked, it has not been propagated to the mirrors yet, so
> you'll have to grab that package from testing and install it manually.
> 
>   gzip -d kdebase_gcc-3.4.3,REV=2005.10.27-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   pkgrm CSWkdebasegcc
>   pkgadd -d kdebase_gcc-3.4.3,REV=2005.10.27-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg
> 
> Hope that helps.

It does not. The problem is still there as Andy describes it.

Reverting to kdebase_gcc-3.4.2,REV=2005.09.20-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz 
doesn't work either :(.

Wonder which one of the packages is broken this time? I did take the 
following upgrade:

        software                         old                         new
        --------                         ---                         ---
   kdeaddons_gcc                       3.3.1                       3.4.2
     kdebase_gcc        3.4.2,REV=2005.09.20                       3.4.3
      kdeedu_gcc                       3.4.1                       3.4.2
kdegraphics_gcc                       3.4.1                       3.4.2
kdemultimedia_gcc                     3.4.1                       3.4.2
    kdeutils_gcc                       3.4.1                       3.4.2

And after that I replaced kdebase_gcc 3.4.3 with 
kdebase_gcc-3.4.3,REV=2005.10.27-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz but I still 
get ni icons/images.

/MOL


From andy at riftware.com  Fri Nov  4 06:04:49 2005
From: andy at riftware.com (Andrew Chandler)
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 23:04:49 -0600
Subject: [csw-users] Problem with the CSW install of KDE-GCC on Solaris
	10
In-Reply-To: <436A08B4.1090607@ericsson.com>
Message-ID: <20051104050451.2A264F8AF@mail.blastwave.org>

I found the problem - reverting to the previous qt_gcc from 9/16 at least
gets me the splash screens back changing the kde base did nothing. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: users-bounces+andy=riftware.com at lists.blastwave.org 
> [mailto:users-bounces+andy=riftware.com at lists.blastwave.org] 
> On Behalf Of Mats Larsson
> Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005 6:55 AM
> To: questions and discussions
> Subject: Re: [csw-users] Problem with the CSW install of 
> KDE-GCC on Solaris 10
> 
> On 2005-11-03 03:34, Markus Mayer wrote:
> 
> > On Wednesday, 02 Nov 2005 09:27 -0800, Andy Chandler wrote:
> > 
> >> KDE starts but no icons and the animated startup progress screen 
> >> looks like a bunch of colored blocks - basically there are no 
> >> graphical resources - originally I had graphics but just no title 
> >> bars for minimizing / maximizing windows but now I've lost 
> even the 
> >> basic desktop icons and the kicker icons.
> 
> Same problem here but Solaris 8.
> 
> > You may have run into the same problem I saw this week-end after 
> > upgrading to the latest KDE from unstable: the windows didn't have 
> > frames around them (as if no window-manager was running), the panel 
> > looked weird, etc.
> > 
> > In this case your KDE problems won't have anything to do 
> with what you 
> > did, that would just be coincidence.
> > 
> > See
> >   http://www.blastwave.org/mantis/view_bug_page.php?f_id=1246
> > for more.
> > 
> > If you click on [Main] from there you'll see this note:
> > 
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> >   In relation to Solaris 8/9, a move was made to start 
> including kwin
> >   and kxkb in KDE under Solaris. You'll find the main 
> kdebase packages
> >   as:
> > 
> >   http://www.blastwave.org/testing
> >   kdebase_gcc-3.4.3,REV=2005.10.27-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> >   kdebase_gcc-3.4.3,REV=2005.10.27-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> > 
> >   Or, the older stable package:
> >   kdebase_gcc-3.4.2,REV=2005.09.20-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> >   kdebase_gcc-3.4.2,REV=2005.09.20-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > I just checked, it has not been propagated to the mirrors yet, so 
> > you'll have to grab that package from testing and install 
> it manually.
> > 
> >   gzip -d kdebase_gcc-3.4.3,REV=2005.10.27-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> >   pkgrm CSWkdebasegcc
> >   pkgadd -d kdebase_gcc-3.4.3,REV=2005.10.27-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg
> > 
> > Hope that helps.
> 
> It does not. The problem is still there as Andy describes it.
> 
> Reverting to 
> kdebase_gcc-3.4.2,REV=2005.09.20-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> doesn't work either :(.
> 
> Wonder which one of the packages is broken this time? I did 
> take the following upgrade:
> 
>         software                         old                  
>        new
>         --------                         ---                  
>        ---
>    kdeaddons_gcc                       3.3.1                  
>      3.4.2
>      kdebase_gcc        3.4.2,REV=2005.09.20                  
>      3.4.3
>       kdeedu_gcc                       3.4.1                  
>      3.4.2
> kdegraphics_gcc                       3.4.1                   
>     3.4.2
> kdemultimedia_gcc                     3.4.1                   
>     3.4.2
>     kdeutils_gcc                       3.4.1                  
>      3.4.2
> 
> And after that I replaced kdebase_gcc 3.4.3 with 
> kdebase_gcc-3.4.3,REV=2005.10.27-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz 
> but I still get ni icons/images.
> 
> /MOL
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.blastwave.org
> https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> 
> 



From garyarm at testedgeinc.com  Sat Nov  5 00:18:24 2005
From: garyarm at testedgeinc.com (Gary Armstrong)
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2005 15:18:24 -0800
Subject: [csw-users] ldap libraries
Message-ID: <436BEC40.1070807@testedgeinc.com>

I can no longer start my apache2 server. I get the following error:

ld.so.1: httpd: fatal: /opt/csw/lib/sparcv9/libldap.so.2: wrong ELF 
class: ELFCLASS64
Killed


I notice similar problems reported for apache and apache2.


I think I'm up to date with ldap: ( and the other ldap pkgs, which I 
don't use )
# pkg-get compare openldap_rt 
# (From site http://ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/unstable )
       software                    localrev                   remoterev
    openldap_rt       2.1.30,REV=2005.09.27                        SAME

I don't see any work around. Hard to believe people are sitting around 
with dead http servers, so what am I missing?

TIA
Gary



From asmoore at blastwave.org  Sat Nov  5 00:45:51 2005
From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex Moore)
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 17:45:51 -0600
Subject: [csw-users] ldap libraries
In-Reply-To: <436BEC40.1070807@testedgeinc.com>
References: <436BEC40.1070807@testedgeinc.com>
Message-ID: <20051104174551.00004db9@sws602>

On Fri, 04 Nov 2005 15:18:24 -0800
Gary Armstrong <garyarm at testedgeinc.com> wrote:

> I can no longer start my apache2 server. I get the following error:
> 
> ld.so.1: httpd: fatal: /opt/csw/lib/sparcv9/libldap.so.2: wrong ELF 
> class: ELFCLASS64
> Killed
> 
> 
> I don't see any work around. Hard to believe people are sitting
> around with dead http servers, so what am I missing?
> 
Not sure.  I run apache but have not used apache2. I restarted apache
on a couple of hosts this morning and there were no problems.

It looks like there is an object, maybe in apache2, that is 32-bit but
somehow looking for 64-bit libraries.  That does not make much sense.

I will see if I can find a sparc host to install apache2 for testing.

Alex


From garyarm at testedgeinc.com  Sat Nov  5 00:56:44 2005
From: garyarm at testedgeinc.com (Gary Armstrong)
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2005 15:56:44 -0800
Subject: [csw-users] ldap libraries
In-Reply-To: <20051104174551.00004db9@sws602>
References: <436BEC40.1070807@testedgeinc.com> <20051104174551.00004db9@sws602>
Message-ID: <436BF53C.6070901@testedgeinc.com>

Alex Moore wrote:

>On Fri, 04 Nov 2005 15:18:24 -0800
>Gary Armstrong <garyarm at testedgeinc.com> wrote:
>
>  
>
>>I can no longer start my apache2 server. I get the following error:
>>
>>ld.so.1: httpd: fatal: /opt/csw/lib/sparcv9/libldap.so.2: wrong ELF 
>>class: ELFCLASS64
>>Killed
>>
>>
>>I don't see any work around. Hard to believe people are sitting
>>around with dead http servers, so what am I missing?
>>
>>    
>>
>Not sure.  I run apache but have not used apache2. I restarted apache
>on a couple of hosts this morning and there were no problems.
>
>It looks like there is an object, maybe in apache2, that is 32-bit but
>somehow looking for 64-bit libraries.  That does not make much sense.
>
>I will see if I can find a sparc host to install apache2 for testing.
>
>Alex
>_______________________________________________
>users mailing list
>users at lists.blastwave.org
>https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
>  
>
I'd very much appreciate it. I guess if push comes to shove, I can try 
to go back to apache. From what I can glimmer you're the ldap 
maintainer. Is the apache2 maintainer offline?


Thanks
Gary


From asmoore at blastwave.org  Sat Nov  5 01:05:46 2005
From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex Moore)
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 18:05:46 -0600
Subject: [csw-users] ldap libraries
In-Reply-To: <436BF53C.6070901@testedgeinc.com>
References: <436BEC40.1070807@testedgeinc.com> <20051104174551.00004db9@sws602>
	<436BF53C.6070901@testedgeinc.com>
Message-ID: <20051104180546.000052ee@sws602>

On Fri, 04 Nov 2005 15:56:44 -0800
Gary Armstrong <garyarm at testedgeinc.com> wrote:

> I'd very much appreciate it. I guess if push comes to shove, I can
> try to go back to apache. From what I can glimmer you're the ldap 
> maintainer. Is the apache2 maintainer offline?

Correct, I am the openldap maintainer.  Don't know what Cory is doing.

I stopped apache on one of my sparc hosts and installed apache2, which
also installed apache2c, apacht2rt and ap2_prefork.  Apache2 started
fine and netstat shows listening on port 80, so still digging for now.

Assuming that there is such a thing, are there other apache2 modules
that you have installed?

Alex


-- 


From garyarm at testedgeinc.com  Sat Nov  5 01:18:28 2005
From: garyarm at testedgeinc.com (Gary Armstrong)
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2005 16:18:28 -0800
Subject: [csw-users] ldap libraries
In-Reply-To: <20051104180546.000052ee@sws602>
References: <436BEC40.1070807@testedgeinc.com>
	<20051104174551.00004db9@sws602>	<436BF53C.6070901@testedgeinc.com>
	<20051104180546.000052ee@sws602>
Message-ID: <436BFA54.7070700@testedgeinc.com>

Alex Moore wrote:

>On Fri, 04 Nov 2005 15:56:44 -0800
>Gary Armstrong <garyarm at testedgeinc.com> wrote:
>
>  
>
>>I'd very much appreciate it. I guess if push comes to shove, I can
>>try to go back to apache. From what I can glimmer you're the ldap 
>>maintainer. Is the apache2 maintainer offline?
>>    
>>
>
>Correct, I am the openldap maintainer.  Don't know what Cory is doing.
>
>I stopped apache on one of my sparc hosts and installed apache2, which
>also installed apache2c, apacht2rt and ap2_prefork.  Apache2 started
>fine and netstat shows listening on port 80, so still digging for now.
>
>Assuming that there is such a thing, are there other apache2 modules
>that you have installed?
>
>Alex
>
>
>  
>
Alex;


I uninstalled openldap, openldap_client, openldap_rt. Installed 
openldap_client which brought in rt. Didn't touch apache2 except to 
restart. Yup it works. Oh and even though I upgraded everything 
~Tuesday, one of them made me update openssl.

I'm clueless as to the why. Hope the info helps you.

Thanks
Gary


From pspuhler at ball.com  Sat Nov  5 01:24:57 2005
From: pspuhler at ball.com (Peter Spuhler)
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2005 17:24:57 -0700
Subject: [csw-users] ldap libraries
In-Reply-To: <20051104180546.000052ee@sws602>
References: <436BEC40.1070807@testedgeinc.com>
	<20051104174551.00004db9@sws602> <436BF53C.6070901@testedgeinc.com>
	<20051104180546.000052ee@sws602>
Message-ID: <1131150298.27602.4.camel@pspuhler1-pc.aero.ball.com>

On Fri, 2005-11-04 at 18:05 -0600, Alex Moore wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Nov 2005 15:56:44 -0800
> Gary Armstrong <garyarm at testedgeinc.com> wrote:
> 
> > I'd very much appreciate it. I guess if push comes to shove, I can
> > try to go back to apache. From what I can glimmer you're the ldap 
> > maintainer. Is the apache2 maintainer offline?
> 
> Correct, I am the openldap maintainer.  Don't know what Cory is doing.
> 
> I stopped apache on one of my sparc hosts and installed apache2, which
> also installed apache2c, apacht2rt and ap2_prefork.  Apache2 started
> fine and netstat shows listening on port 80, so still digging for now.
> 
> Assuming that there is such a thing, are there other apache2 modules
> that you have installed?
> 
> Alex
> 
> 
yes specifically i'm using ap2_subversion which seems to get mentioned
in the error messages.
 Peter


From asmoore at blastwave.org  Sat Nov  5 01:27:07 2005
From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex Moore)
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 18:27:07 -0600
Subject: [csw-users] ldap libraries
In-Reply-To: <436BFA54.7070700@testedgeinc.com>
References: <436BEC40.1070807@testedgeinc.com> <20051104174551.00004db9@sws602>
	<436BF53C.6070901@testedgeinc.com> <20051104180546.000052ee@sws602>
	<436BFA54.7070700@testedgeinc.com>
Message-ID: <20051104182707.00003386@sws602>

On Fri, 04 Nov 2005 16:18:28 -0800
Gary Armstrong <garyarm at testedgeinc.com> wrote:

> I uninstalled openldap, openldap_client, openldap_rt. Installed 
> openldap_client which brought in rt. Didn't touch apache2 except to 
> restart. Yup it works. Oh and even though I upgraded everything 
> ~Tuesday, one of them made me update openssl.
> 
> I'm clueless as to the why. Hope the info helps you.

My lack of knowledge on apache2 is now a limitation.  I do know a bit
about apache, but I cannot make apache2 run.  He is listening on port
80, but I get continuous error messages: [notice] child pid 15058 exit
signal Illegal instruction (4)

Please uninstall as before, but install only openldap_rt.  Does apache2
still run?

Alex


From asmoore at blastwave.org  Sat Nov  5 01:42:01 2005
From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex Moore)
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 18:42:01 -0600
Subject: [csw-users] ldap libraries
In-Reply-To: <1131150298.27602.4.camel@pspuhler1-pc.aero.ball.com>
References: <436BEC40.1070807@testedgeinc.com> <20051104174551.00004db9@sws602>
	<436BF53C.6070901@testedgeinc.com> <20051104180546.000052ee@sws602>
	<1131150298.27602.4.camel@pspuhler1-pc.aero.ball.com>
Message-ID: <20051104184201.000032a0@sws602>

On Fri, 04 Nov 2005 17:24:57 -0700
Peter Spuhler <pspuhler at ball.com> wrote:

> yes specifically i'm using ap2_subversion which seems to get mentioned
> in the error messages.
>  Peter

So you are having this problem as well?

I cannot get past the 'Illegal instruction' error that is filling up
the apache2 error log.

Alex

-- 


From garyarm at testedgeinc.com  Sat Nov  5 01:43:48 2005
From: garyarm at testedgeinc.com (Gary Armstrong)
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2005 16:43:48 -0800
Subject: [csw-users] ldap libraries
In-Reply-To: <20051104182707.00003386@sws602>
References: <436BEC40.1070807@testedgeinc.com>
	<20051104174551.00004db9@sws602>	<436BF53C.6070901@testedgeinc.com>
	<20051104180546.000052ee@sws602>	<436BFA54.7070700@testedgeinc.com>
	<20051104182707.00003386@sws602>
Message-ID: <436C0044.9060805@testedgeinc.com>

Alex Moore wrote:

>On Fri, 04 Nov 2005 16:18:28 -0800
>Gary Armstrong <garyarm at testedgeinc.com> wrote:
>
>  
>
>>I uninstalled openldap, openldap_client, openldap_rt. Installed 
>>openldap_client which brought in rt. Didn't touch apache2 except to 
>>restart. Yup it works. Oh and even though I upgraded everything 
>>~Tuesday, one of them made me update openssl.
>>
>>I'm clueless as to the why. Hope the info helps you.
>>    
>>
>
>My lack of knowledge on apache2 is now a limitation.  I do know a bit
>about apache, but I cannot make apache2 run.  He is listening on port
>80, but I get continuous error messages: [notice] child pid 15058 exit
>signal Illegal instruction (4)
>
>Please uninstall as before, but install only openldap_rt.  Does apache2
>still run?
>
>Alex
>_______________________________________________
>users mailing list
>users at lists.blastwave.org
>https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
>  
>
Alex;

pkg-get -r openldap_client
pkg-get -r openldap_rt

pkg-get -i openldap_rt

Apache2 still works fine. I had openldap installed even though it wasn't 
configured ( at least by me ). It doesn't appear to be client or rt. It 
could be that pkg-get was lying to me. Compare was telling me I was up 
to date. Maybe I wasn't.

Gary


From asmoore at blastwave.org  Sat Nov  5 02:23:55 2005
From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex Moore)
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 19:23:55 -0600
Subject: [csw-users] ldap libraries
In-Reply-To: <436C0044.9060805@testedgeinc.com>
References: <436BEC40.1070807@testedgeinc.com> <20051104174551.00004db9@sws602>
	<436BF53C.6070901@testedgeinc.com> <20051104180546.000052ee@sws602>
	<436BFA54.7070700@testedgeinc.com> <20051104182707.00003386@sws602>
	<436C0044.9060805@testedgeinc.com>
Message-ID: <20051104192355.00006750@sws602>

On Fri, 04 Nov 2005 16:43:48 -0800
Gary Armstrong <garyarm at testedgeinc.com> wrote:

> pkg-get -r openldap_client
> pkg-get -r openldap_rt
> 
> pkg-get -i openldap_rt
> 
> Apache2 still works fine. I had openldap installed even though it
> wasn't configured ( at least by me ). It doesn't appear to be client
> or rt. It could be that pkg-get was lying to me. Compare was telling
> me I was up to date. Maybe I wasn't.

Could be.  There has been only one release of openldap_rt.  There has
been two releases of openldap_client.

Glad things are working now.  I still have not gotten past the 'Illegal
instrution' errors that bombard apache2 error log.  This is on a
Sun-Fire V210.  I use CSWapache anyway and your problem seems to have
resolved itself, so I will not worry about for now.

Alex


-- 


From mmayer at blastwave.org  Sat Nov  5 06:17:57 2005
From: mmayer at blastwave.org (Markus Mayer)
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 21:17:57 -0800
Subject: [csw-users] ldap libraries
In-Reply-To: <20051104184201.000032a0@sws602>
References: <436BEC40.1070807@testedgeinc.com> <20051104174551.00004db9@sws602>
	<436BF53C.6070901@testedgeinc.com> <20051104180546.000052ee@sws602>
	<1131150298.27602.4.camel@pspuhler1-pc.aero.ball.com>
	<20051104184201.000032a0@sws602>
Message-ID: <20051105051757.GA16178@chinook.mmayer.net>

On Friday, 04 Nov 2005 18:42 -0600, Alex Moore wrote:

> I cannot get past the 'Illegal instruction' error that is filling up
> the apache2 error log.

Could you guys try starting apache2 like this:
  truss -f -o apache.log /opt/csw/apache2/sbin/httpd -f \
    /opt/csw/apache2/etc/httpd.conf -k start

Maybe the truss output gives a hint as to where and why it dies.
Another option would be to start disabling modules one by one and see
if the illegal instruction goes away.

I have apache2 running here on an Ultra 60 unter Solaris 10 (until
recently I was running Solaris 9), no problems with either. I also just
installed ap2_subversion, just to give it a try. It's still working.

$ telnet localhost 80
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to localhost.
Escape character is '^]'.
HEAD / HTTP/1.0

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2005 05:12:45 GMT
Server: Apache/2.0.55 (Unix) DAV/2 PHP/5.0.5 SVN/1.2.3
Last-Modified: Thu, 03 Nov 2005 17:48:52 GMT
ETag: "39087-59-cd4b6900"
Accept-Ranges: bytes
Content-Length: 89
Connection: close
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1

-Markus


From asmoore at blastwave.org  Sat Nov  5 14:44:27 2005
From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex Moore)
Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2005 07:44:27 -0600
Subject: [csw-users] ldap libraries
In-Reply-To: <20051105051757.GA16178@chinook.mmayer.net>
References: <436BEC40.1070807@testedgeinc.com> <20051104174551.00004db9@sws602>
	<436BF53C.6070901@testedgeinc.com> <20051104180546.000052ee@sws602>
	<1131150298.27602.4.camel@pspuhler1-pc.aero.ball.com>
	<20051104184201.000032a0@sws602>
	<20051105051757.GA16178@chinook.mmayer.net>
Message-ID: <20051105074427.000014f3@sws602>

On Fri, 4 Nov 2005 21:17:57 -0800
Markus Mayer <mmayer at blastwave.org> wrote:

> On Friday, 04 Nov 2005 18:42 -0600, Alex Moore wrote:
> 
> > I cannot get past the 'Illegal instruction' error that is filling up
> > the apache2 error log.
> 
> Could you guys try starting apache2 like this:
>   truss -f -o apache.log /opt/csw/apache2/sbin/httpd -f \
>     /opt/csw/apache2/etc/httpd.conf -k start

Hi Markus.  I ran truss and all that I could determine was that apache2
built with OpenLDAP and running on a host that uses Sun's ldap client
with TLS does not work.

I have another sparc host that has apache running that I can play
with.  It also uses Sun's ldap client, but without TLS. CSWapache2
worked fine on this box.

Thanks, Alex


From jreid at vnet.net  Sun Nov  6 02:07:35 2005
From: jreid at vnet.net (Joe Reid)
Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2005 19:07:35 -0600
Subject: [csw-users] horde
Message-ID: <436D5757.6070201@vnet.net>

I'm wanting to setup horde - does the apache and php build from 
blastwave support horde?  Anyone running horde on top of the basic 
blastwave tools?

-- 
Joe Reid
jreid at vnet.net
http://www.singlewhitemale.net
?c=a=rb=sc=fd=te=wf=zg=porh=n?


From mmayer at blastwave.org  Sun Nov  6 04:52:38 2005
From: mmayer at blastwave.org (Markus Mayer)
Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2005 19:52:38 -0800
Subject: [csw-users] Problem with the CSW install of KDE-GCC on Solaris
	10
In-Reply-To: <20051104050451.2A264F8AF@mail.blastwave.org>
References: <436A08B4.1090607@ericsson.com>
	<20051104050451.2A264F8AF@mail.blastwave.org>
Message-ID: <20051106035238.GA18075@chinook.mmayer.net>

On Thursday, 03 Nov 2005 23:04 -0600, Andrew Chandler wrote:

> I found the problem - reverting to the previous qt_gcc from 9/16 at
> least gets me the splash screens back changing the kde base did
> nothing.

Thanks for that tip. It happened to me now, too. Reverting back to Qt
from stable got things working again. Obviously, this was a different
problem from the one I saw with kdebase about a week ago.

-Markus


From mats.larsson at ericsson.com  Mon Nov  7 10:40:29 2005
From: mats.larsson at ericsson.com (Mats Larsson)
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 10:40:29 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] kde_gcc problem
Message-ID: <436F210D.1000806@ericsson.com>

http://www.blastwave.org/mantis/view_bug_advanced_page.php?f_id=0001263

This bug has a resolution of fixed but I don't understand how it's 
fixed. The current kde_* packages in unstable *does not* work with 
qt_gcc 3.3.5. Am I missing something?


From blastwave at gmail.com  Mon Nov  7 15:20:31 2005
From: blastwave at gmail.com (Dennis Clarke)
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 09:20:31 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] kde_gcc problem
In-Reply-To: <436F210D.1000806@ericsson.com>
References: <436F210D.1000806@ericsson.com>
Message-ID: <a6265da20511070620i1063ba4l59dd4cd35b5b1f85@mail.gmail.com>

On 11/7/05, Mats Larsson <mats.larsson at ericsson.com> wrote:
> http://www.blastwave.org/mantis/view_bug_advanced_page.php?f_id=0001263
>
> This bug has a resolution of fixed but I don't understand how it's
> fixed. The current kde_* packages in unstable *does not* work with
> qt_gcc 3.3.5. Am I missing something?

I think that there was a release of  kdebase_gcc-3.4.3 late yesterday.

Please see :

         http://www.blastwave.org/cronlist/

Dennis Clarke

From mats.larsson at ericsson.com  Mon Nov  7 15:43:07 2005
From: mats.larsson at ericsson.com (Mats Larsson)
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 15:43:07 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] kde_gcc problem
In-Reply-To: <a6265da20511070620i1063ba4l59dd4cd35b5b1f85@mail.gmail.com>
References: <436F210D.1000806@ericsson.com>
	<a6265da20511070620i1063ba4l59dd4cd35b5b1f85@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <436F67FB.7050604@ericsson.com>

On 2005-11-07 15:20, Dennis Clarke wrote:

> On 11/7/05, Mats Larsson <mats.larsson at ericsson.com> wrote:
>> http://www.blastwave.org/mantis/view_bug_advanced_page.php?f_id=0001263
>>
>> This bug has a resolution of fixed but I don't understand how it's
>> fixed. The current kde_* packages in unstable *does not* work with
>> qt_gcc 3.3.5. Am I missing something?
> 
> I think that there was a release of  kdebase_gcc-3.4.3 late yesterday.

That one I have already. Got it a couple of days back from the testing 
area to solve another glitch (no KDE window manager (kwin) present) so I 
don't think the qt_gcc-3.3.5 problem is solved by that.

I also see in the log:
Nov  7 00:41  qt_gcc-3.3.4-SunOS5.8-%ARCH%-CSW.pkg.gz

Does that mean that qt_gcc-3.3.5 has been reverted to qt_gcc-3.3.4? If 
so the problem in a way is fixed since no incompatibilities between 
qt_gcc and kde_gcc exist anymore.

/MOL


From garyarm at testedgeinc.com  Mon Nov  7 16:33:08 2005
From: garyarm at testedgeinc.com (Gary Armstrong)
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 07:33:08 -0800
Subject: [csw-users] ldap libraries
In-Reply-To: <20051104192355.00006750@sws602>
References: <436BEC40.1070807@testedgeinc.com>
	<20051104174551.00004db9@sws602>	<436BF53C.6070901@testedgeinc.com>
	<20051104180546.000052ee@sws602>	<436BFA54.7070700@testedgeinc.com>
	<20051104182707.00003386@sws602>	<436C0044.9060805@testedgeinc.com>
	<20051104192355.00006750@sws602>
Message-ID: <436F73B4.6030803@testedgeinc.com>

Alex Moore wrote:

>On Fri, 04 Nov 2005 16:43:48 -0800
>Gary Armstrong <garyarm at testedgeinc.com> wrote:
>
>  
>
>>pkg-get -r openldap_client
>>pkg-get -r openldap_rt
>>
>>pkg-get -i openldap_rt
>>
>>Apache2 still works fine. I had openldap installed even though it
>>wasn't configured ( at least by me ). It doesn't appear to be client
>>or rt. It could be that pkg-get was lying to me. Compare was telling
>>me I was up to date. Maybe I wasn't.
>>    
>>
>
>Could be.  There has been only one release of openldap_rt.  There has
>been two releases of openldap_client.
>
>Glad things are working now.  I still have not gotten past the 'Illegal
>instrution' errors that bombard apache2 error log.  This is on a
>Sun-Fire V210.  I use CSWapache anyway and your problem seems to have
>resolved itself, so I will not worry about for now.
>
>Alex
>
>
>  
>
This morning I: pkg-get -i openldap

Apache2 still works fine, even though I'm back to the configuration 
where I had the problem. Earlier this week I had done a pkg-get -Uuf. 
All I can figure is that the ldap packages weren't right even though 
pkg-get compare was returning SAME.

Thanks for the help
Gary


From blastwave at gmail.com  Mon Nov  7 16:47:42 2005
From: blastwave at gmail.com (Dennis Clarke)
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 10:47:42 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] kde_gcc problem
In-Reply-To: <436F67FB.7050604@ericsson.com>
References: <436F210D.1000806@ericsson.com>
	<a6265da20511070620i1063ba4l59dd4cd35b5b1f85@mail.gmail.com>
	<436F67FB.7050604@ericsson.com>
Message-ID: <a6265da20511070747q4dabf396n1a4329e2d7d89a79@mail.gmail.com>

On 11/7/05, Mats Larsson <mats.larsson at ericsson.com> wrote:
> On 2005-11-07 15:20, Dennis Clarke wrote:
>
> > On 11/7/05, Mats Larsson <mats.larsson at ericsson.com> wrote:
> >> http://www.blastwave.org/mantis/view_bug_advanced_page.php?f_id=0001263
> >>
> >> This bug has a resolution of fixed but I don't understand how it's
> >> fixed. The current kde_* packages in unstable *does not* work with
> >> qt_gcc 3.3.5. Am I missing something?
> >
> > I think that there was a release of  kdebase_gcc-3.4.3 late yesterday.
>
> That one I have already. Got it a couple of days back from the testing
> area to solve another glitch (no KDE window manager (kwin) present) so I
> don't think the qt_gcc-3.3.5 problem is solved by that.
>
> I also see in the log:
> Nov  7 00:41  qt_gcc-3.3.4-SunOS5.8-%ARCH%-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> Does that mean that qt_gcc-3.3.5 has been reverted to qt_gcc-3.3.4? If
> so the problem in a way is fixed since no incompatibilities between
> qt_gcc and kde_gcc exist anymore.

The idea here is to get us back to a fully functional KDE and if we
need to revert then that makes full sense I think.

Dennis

From maybird1776 at yahoo.com  Mon Nov  7 17:09:02 2005
From: maybird1776 at yahoo.com (ken mays)
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 08:09:02 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [csw-users] kde_gcc problem
In-Reply-To: <a6265da20511070747q4dabf396n1a4329e2d7d89a79@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20051107160902.67905.qmail@web33002.mail.mud.yahoo.com>

Revertion was done as of yesterday, thanks to Phil.
Trolltech's Qt is not binary backward compatible fully
with older Qt versions by design (similar to newer GCC
versions). So, I would have had to rebuild KDE from
scratch.

Everything should have stabilized by now.

~Ken


--- Dennis Clarke <blastwave at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 11/7/05, Mats Larsson <mats.larsson at ericsson.com>
> wrote:
> > On 2005-11-07 15:20, Dennis Clarke wrote:
> >
> > > On 11/7/05, Mats Larsson
> <mats.larsson at ericsson.com> wrote:
> > >>
>
http://www.blastwave.org/mantis/view_bug_advanced_page.php?f_id=0001263
> > >>
> > >> This bug has a resolution of fixed but I don't
> understand how it's
> > >> fixed. The current kde_* packages in unstable
> *does not* work with
> > >> qt_gcc 3.3.5. Am I missing something?
> > >
> > > I think that there was a release of 
> kdebase_gcc-3.4.3 late yesterday.
> >
> > That one I have already. Got it a couple of days
> back from the testing
> > area to solve another glitch (no KDE window
> manager (kwin) present) so I
> > don't think the qt_gcc-3.3.5 problem is solved by
> that.
> >
> > I also see in the log:
> > Nov  7 00:41 
> qt_gcc-3.3.4-SunOS5.8-%ARCH%-CSW.pkg.gz
> >
> > Does that mean that qt_gcc-3.3.5 has been reverted
> to qt_gcc-3.3.4? If
> > so the problem in a way is fixed since no
> incompatibilities between
> > qt_gcc and kde_gcc exist anymore.
> 
> The idea here is to get us back to a fully
> functional KDE and if we
> need to revert then that makes full sense I think.
> 
> Dennis
> 



	
		
__________________________________ 
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 
http://mail.yahoo.com


From pspuhler at ball.com  Mon Nov  7 17:49:39 2005
From: pspuhler at ball.com (Spuhler, Peter)
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 09:49:39 -0700
Subject: [csw-users] ldap libraries
Message-ID: <7575324F915A05448800386F6CEAF36701C09DC1@AEROMSG2.AERO.BALL.COM>

On Fri, 04 Nov 2005 16:43:48 -0800
Gary Armstrong <garyarm at testedgeinc.com> wrote:

> pkg-get -r openldap_client
> pkg-get -r openldap_rt
> 
> pkg-get -i openldap_rt
> 
> Apache2 still works fine. I had openldap installed even though it
> wasn't configured ( at least by me ). It doesn't appear to be client
> or rt. It could be that pkg-get was lying to me. Compare was telling
> me I was up to date. Maybe I wasn't.

Could be.  There has been only one release of openldap_rt.  There has
been two releases of openldap_client.

Glad things are working now.  I still have not gotten past the 'Illegal
instrution' errors that bombard apache2 error log.  This is on a
Sun-Fire V210.  I use CSWapache anyway and your problem seems to have
resolved itself, so I will not worry about for now.

Alex

This fixed apache2 for me as well. The lib error has gone away. Thanks


From asmoore at blastwave.org  Mon Nov  7 18:43:07 2005
From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex Moore)
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 11:43:07 -0600
Subject: [csw-users] ldap libraries
In-Reply-To: <436F73B4.6030803@testedgeinc.com>
References: <436BEC40.1070807@testedgeinc.com> <20051104174551.00004db9@sws602>
	<436BF53C.6070901@testedgeinc.com> <20051104180546.000052ee@sws602>
	<436BFA54.7070700@testedgeinc.com> <20051104182707.00003386@sws602>
	<436C0044.9060805@testedgeinc.com> <20051104192355.00006750@sws602>
	<436F73B4.6030803@testedgeinc.com>
Message-ID: <20051107114307.000061ab@sws602>

On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 07:33:08 -0800
Gary Armstrong <garyarm at testedgeinc.com> wrote:

> This morning I: pkg-get -i openldap
> 
> Apache2 still works fine, even though I'm back to the configuration 
> where I had the problem. Earlier this week I had done a pkg-get -Uuf. 
> All I can figure is that the ldap packages weren't right even though 
> pkg-get compare was returning SAME.
> 

Hi, Gary.  Glad to hear that apache2 is working for you and Peter as
well.  Thanks for reporting back.

Could you both make a note in any bug reports that you created that all
is ok now and the bug reports can be resolved and closed.

Thanks, Alex


From Mark.McCoy at utsa.edu  Mon Nov  7 22:21:00 2005
From: Mark.McCoy at utsa.edu (Mark McCoy)
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 15:21:00 -0600
Subject: [csw-users] Release schedule for stable packages
Message-ID: <7A663F65FEA3E248A4F92E1496322BF495EAA8@opal1604.UTSARR.NET>

Hey all, 

First, let me thank everyone at blastwave for their fine contribution to
all Solaris admins everywhere!

I was curious as to what the timeline/procedure/whatyacallit is for
moving packages into the stable tree.  Is it manual, a quarterly release
process, or something else?

I have been dabbling with pkgsrc from netbsd a little bit, and I like
how their release team puts out quarterly releases of the package tree.
This allows an admin to standardize on, for example, the 2005Q3
packages, and allows "cherry picking" of packages  for security updates
from a later tree.  Is there a way to do this at the blastwave level?
I'm currently working on doing something like this in-house, and I think
that this method might benefit others as well.

Just food for thought...

Mark
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20051107/42c177f7/attachment.html 

From a.cervellin at acm.org  Mon Nov  7 22:48:06 2005
From: a.cervellin at acm.org (Alessio Cervellin @ acm)
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 22:48:06 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] Release schedule for stable packages
In-Reply-To: <7A663F65FEA3E248A4F92E1496322BF495EAA8@opal1604.UTSARR.NET>
References: <7A663F65FEA3E248A4F92E1496322BF495EAA8@opal1604.UTSARR.NET>
Message-ID: <436FCB96.5000601@acm.org>

Mark McCoy wrote:

> I was curious as to what the timeline/procedure/whatyacallit is for 
> moving packages into the stable tree.  Is it manual, a quarterly release 
> process, or something else?

 From http://www.blastwave.org/userguide, section "Release Program":
[...]
The ?unstable? archive is updated often. Unstable will appeal to users 
that like to have that very latest versions of software. Due to nature 
of these rapid releases users must accept there might be packages that 
have open bug reports applied to them.

The ?stable? archive is updated every 3 months, nominally at the 
beginning of January, April, July and October. The packages that form 
?stable? are taken from ?unstable? but are first proven by use in 
?unstable? and through a program of QA testing. The packages are known 
to work together and have all known critical bugs fixed. Should any 
critical security problem need to be fixed then the ?stable? archive 
will be changed mid-term and due notice of the update given. Stable will 
suit the business or serious user who expects continuity and reliability 
of service.
[...]


From james at blastwave.org  Wed Nov  9 10:41:34 2005
From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee)
Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 09:41:34 GMT
Subject: [csw-users] Release schedule for stable packages
In-Reply-To: <7A663F65FEA3E248A4F92E1496322BF495EAA8@opal1604.UTSARR.NET>
References: <7A663F65FEA3E248A4F92E1496322BF495EAA8@opal1604.UTSARR.NET>
Message-ID: <20051109.9413400.523966970@landeck.jamesipoos.com>

On 07/11/05, 21:21:00, Mark McCoy <Mark.McCoy at utsa.edu> wrote regarding 
[csw-users] Release schedule for stable packages:

> This allows an admin to standardize on, for example, the 2005Q3
> packages, and allows "cherry picking" of packages for security updates
> from a later tree.

When you're cherry picking make sure you don't get a rotten apple.

If you add a package to stable from unstable check if you need
to add its prerequisite and *supported* packages too, then repeat
for any additional packages needed.  You might be able to add
parts of the package tree but please understand that it won't
always work unless a connected group is updated.  Unless you are
prepared to verify each package in the chain the group is going
to be large or unverified which nullifies your initial reasoning
of doing it for security.



From Mark.McCoy at utsa.edu  Wed Nov  9 15:00:25 2005
From: Mark.McCoy at utsa.edu (Mark McCoy)
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 08:00:25 -0600
Subject: [csw-users] Release schedule for stable packages
Message-ID: <7A663F65FEA3E248A4F92E1496322BF495EAA9@opal1604.UTSARR.NET>

By "cherry picking", I was referring to having a current pkgsrc tree
checked out alongside the 2005Q3 tree and building updated packages for
security reasons out of that (presumably the pkgsrc system is smart
enough to pull in proper dependencies for this type of update).  I
haven't looked into how the netbsd pkgsrc team handles security updates,
though.  They might already do something like this and issue patches to
their stable tree.


-----Original Message-----
From: users-bounces+mark.mccoy=utsa.edu at lists.blastwave.org
[mailto:users-bounces+mark.mccoy=utsa.edu at lists.blastwave.org] On Behalf
Of James Lee
Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 3:42 AM
To: questions and discussions
Subject: Re: [csw-users] Release schedule for stable packages


On 07/11/05, 21:21:00, Mark McCoy <Mark.McCoy at utsa.edu> wrote regarding 
[csw-users] Release schedule for stable packages:

> This allows an admin to standardize on, for example, the 2005Q3 
> packages, and allows "cherry picking" of packages for security updates

> from a later tree.

When you're cherry picking make sure you don't get a rotten apple.

If you add a package to stable from unstable check if you need to add
its prerequisite and *supported* packages too, then repeat for any
additional packages needed.  You might be able to add parts of the
package tree but please understand that it won't always work unless a
connected group is updated.  Unless you are prepared to verify each
package in the chain the group is going to be large or unverified which
nullifies your initial reasoning of doing it for security.

_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users at lists.blastwave.org
https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users


From james at blastwave.org  Wed Nov  9 15:38:00 2005
From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee)
Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 14:38:00 GMT
Subject: [csw-users] Release schedule for stable packages
In-Reply-To: <7A663F65FEA3E248A4F92E1496322BF495EAA9@opal1604.UTSARR.NET>
References: <7A663F65FEA3E248A4F92E1496322BF495EAA9@opal1604.UTSARR.NET>
Message-ID: <20051109.14380000.2660709097@landeck.jamesipoos.com>

On 09/11/05, 14:00:25, Mark McCoy <Mark.McCoy at utsa.edu> wrote regarding Re: 
[csw-users] Release schedule for stable packages:

> By "cherry picking", I was referring to having a current pkgsrc tree
> checked out alongside the 2005Q3 tree and building updated packages for
> security reasons out of that

And by "rotten apple" I was referring to spoiling the barrel.[1]
It's not as simple as pulling one package in isolation.  You have
to at least consider pulling a connected group which may have other
security implications.  If you are not prepared to consider the
related packages you will have failures.  Do what you like but you
have been warned.

Note also the packages don't form a tree but networks[2], most are
in one large network and only a few are isolated.



James.


[1] http://www.google.com/search?q=apple+spoil+barrel
[2] http://pfelecan.free.fr/blastwave/dependencyGraph/




From Mark.McCoy at utsa.edu  Wed Nov  9 15:52:40 2005
From: Mark.McCoy at utsa.edu (Mark McCoy)
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 08:52:40 -0600
Subject: [csw-users] Release schedule for stable packages
Message-ID: <7A663F65FEA3E248A4F92E1496322BF495EAAA@opal1604.UTSARR.NET>

I'm not sure we are on the same page here.  I'm not talking about mixing
stable and unstable from blastwave, I'm talking about pkgsrc from
netbsd.  They have a similar release method (quarterly stable, rolling
unstable).

I'm not sure what the security arrangements are for pkgsrc, however.
Like I said, they could already be doing this via their security team
(issuing updates to the quarterly releases for security reasons).

What it boils down to is: I was just thinking out loud.  



From james at blastwave.org  Wed Nov  9 16:12:38 2005
From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee)
Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 15:12:38 GMT
Subject: [csw-users] Release schedule for stable packages
In-Reply-To: <7A663F65FEA3E248A4F92E1496322BF495EAAA@opal1604.UTSARR.NET>
References: <7A663F65FEA3E248A4F92E1496322BF495EAAA@opal1604.UTSARR.NET>
Message-ID: <20051109.15123800.3680988370@landeck.jamesipoos.com>

On 09/11/05, 14:52:40, Mark McCoy <Mark.McCoy at utsa.edu> wrote regarding Re: 
[csw-users] Release schedule for stable packages:

> I'm not sure we are on the same page here.  I'm not talking about mixing
> stable and unstable from blastwave, I'm talking about pkgsrc from
> netbsd.

No you're not, this is the blastwave users' list.  Hopefully the
reference supplied by Alessio: http://www.blastwave.org/userguide
answers most of your original question, note in particular the
allowance for mid-term stable security updates.  As for "cherry
picking" it's not supported (by blastwave).




James.


From mark at markround.com  Mon Nov 14 22:21:48 2005
From: mark at markround.com (Mark Round)
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 21:21:48 +0000
Subject: [csw-users] New PostgreSQL 8.1.0 packages available
Message-ID: <DA652478-C2ED-47A3-BE79-B896E7B218F5@markround.com>

Hi all,

I'm pleased to announce that PostgreSQL 8.1.0 packages are now  
available from Blastwave, and should be making their way out to the  
mirrors as I type. This set of packages includes libpq, the core  
postgresql package, contrib, and the updated set of JDBC drivers.

Please note that there are a large number of changes with this 8.1.0  
release - for details on all the new features, please see the  
official PostgreSQL announcement : http://www.postgresql.org/docs/ 
whatsnew .

Please also note that if you are intending to update to this version  
from a previous installation (either 7.3.x or 8.0.x), you will need  
to do a dump and reload of your database. Your old data directory  
will not work with the new packages, due to changes made by the  
PostgreSQL developers. For information on this dump and reload  
procedure, see the HTML documentation (also included with the  
package) at the following URL : http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/ 
interactive/backup.html . I recommend taking a full dump of your  
database and testing the backup works as expected before proceeding  
with this upgrade.

All comments, bug reports, feedback etc. welcome.

--
Mark Round
mark at markround.com
:wq





From rob at colnet.cmhnet.org  Tue Nov 15 21:32:58 2005
From: rob at colnet.cmhnet.org (Robert Stampfli)
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 15:32:58 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] New mysql4 missing mysql_print_defaults
Message-ID: <20051115203258.GA3999@colnet>

The latest CSWmysql4 (which seems to have been split into
CSWmysql4 and CSWmysql4client) appears to be missing the
file:  /opt/csw/mysql4/bin/my_print_defaults

I've placed a copy of this file from the previous package
(both 4.1.15) on my website if anyone needs it after
upgrading:

http://stampfli.us/my_print_defaults

Rob


From asmoore at blastwave.org  Tue Nov 15 22:21:03 2005
From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex Moore)
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 15:21:03 -0600
Subject: [csw-users] New mysql4 missing mysql_print_defaults
In-Reply-To: <20051115203258.GA3999@colnet>
References: <20051115203258.GA3999@colnet>
Message-ID: <20051115152103.00000384@sws602>

On Tue, 15 Nov 2005 15:32:58 -0500
Robert Stampfli <rob at colnet.cmhnet.org> wrote:

> The latest CSWmysql4 (which seems to have been split into
> CSWmysql4 and CSWmysql4client) appears to be missing the
> file:  /opt/csw/mysql4/bin/my_print_defaults
> 

Thanks Robert.  I will find out what happened and cure the package.

Alex


From asmoore at blastwave.org  Wed Nov 16 00:35:42 2005
From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex Moore)
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 17:35:42 -0600
Subject: [csw-users] New mysql4 missing mysql_print_defaults
In-Reply-To: <20051115203258.GA3999@colnet>
References: <20051115203258.GA3999@colnet>
Message-ID: <20051115173542.00001b46@sws602>

On Tue, 15 Nov 2005 15:32:58 -0500
Robert Stampfli <rob at colnet.cmhnet.org> wrote:

> The latest CSWmysql4 (which seems to have been split into
> CSWmysql4 and CSWmysql4client) appears to be missing the
> file:  /opt/csw/mysql4/bin/my_print_defaults

Yes, mysql4 is split into three packages.  I must have 'd' too many
times on the list of files and dropped some from mysql4 package.

An update for mysql4 is at the testing site,
http://www.blastwave.org/testing 

Thanks for catching this, but I usually see bug reports before
checking the mailing list:>

Alex


From Daniel.Berger at qwest.com  Wed Nov 16 23:06:06 2005
From: Daniel.Berger at qwest.com (Daniel Berger)
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 15:06:06 -0700
Subject: [csw-users] Strange Firefox error
Message-ID: <437BAD4E.9000500@qwest.com>

Hi all,

Solaris 10
Firefox 1.06 (blastwave package)

Every now and then I'll get a blank page from Firefox with this error in the 
terminal:

*** Failed to load overlay chrome://devboi/content/devboi.xul

Google revealed nothing. Any ideas?

- Dan


From ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr  Tue Nov 22 10:25:09 2005
From: ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=E9rard_Henry?=)
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 10:25:09 +0100
Subject: [csw-users]  trouble with php?
Message-ID: <4382E3F5.90304@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>

hello,
i'm using apache 1.3.33 from blastwave on solaris 10 x86.
I can use phpmyadmin without trouble after installing CSWmodphp4 (4.4.0) 
and other stuff needed.
But i'm in trouble with a particular software, a kind of CMS called spip 
(www.spip.net) that uses php, and i got errors:
[Tue Nov 22 09:04:38 2005] [notice] Apache/1.3.33 (Unix) PHP/4.4.0 
mod_ssl/2.8.22 OpenSSL/0.9.7d configured -- resuming normal operations
[Tue Nov 22 09:04:38 2005] [notice] Accept mutex: fcntl (Default: fcntl)
[Tue Nov 22 09:04:44 2005] [error] PHP Warning: 
include_ecrire(ecrire/inc_flock.php3): failed to open stream: No such 
file or directory in 
/opt/csw/apache/htdocs/testgh/spip/ecrire/inc_version.php3 on line 51
[Tue Nov 22 09:04:44 2005] [error] PHP Warning:  include_ecrire(): 
Failed opening 'ecrire/inc_flock.php3' for inclusion 
(include_path='/opt/csw/lib/php') in 
/opt/csw/apache/htdocs/testgh/spip/ecrire/inc_version.php3 on line 51
[Tue Nov 22 09:04:44 2005] [error] PHP Warning: 
main(ecrire/data/meta_cache.php3): failed to open stream: No such file 
or directory in 
/opt/csw/apache/htdocs/testgh/spip/ecrire/inc_version.php3 on line 877

what is ununderstandable is that ecrire/inc_flock.php3 exists:
    8 -rw-r--r--   1 httpd    httpd       3463 Nov 22 07:24 
/opt/csw/apache/htdocs/testgh/spip/ecrire/inc_flock.php3



in httpd.conf, i have:
LoadModule php4_module        /opt/csw/lib/php/sapi/apache1-libphp4.so
# For PHP support. added by CSWphp
     AddType application/x-httpd-php .php .php3
     AddType application/x-httpd-php-source .phps
# If you want "index.php" to be an acceptible directory index, adjust
DirectoryIndex index.html index.php index.php3

anybody can help?


gerard




From mmayer at blastwave.org  Tue Nov 22 17:51:42 2005
From: mmayer at blastwave.org (Markus Mayer)
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 08:51:42 -0800
Subject: [csw-users] trouble with php?
In-Reply-To: <4382E3F5.90304@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
References: <4382E3F5.90304@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
Message-ID: <20051122165142.GA19580@chinook.mmayer.net>

On Tuesday, 22 Nov 2005 10:25 +0100, G?rard Henry wrote:

> [Tue Nov 22 09:04:44 2005] [error] PHP Warning: 
> include_ecrire(ecrire/inc_flock.php3): failed to open stream: No such 
> file or directory in 
> /opt/csw/apache/htdocs/testgh/spip/ecrire/inc_version.php3 on line 51
> [Tue Nov 22 09:04:44 2005] [error] PHP Warning:  include_ecrire(): 
> Failed opening 'ecrire/inc_flock.php3' for inclusion 
> (include_path='/opt/csw/lib/php') in 
> /opt/csw/apache/htdocs/testgh/spip/ecrire/inc_version.php3 on line 51
[...]


Could this be related to PHP bug #34552?
  http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=34552
I don't know if anybody ever reproduced it on x86 before or on Solaris
10, but on Solaris 9 SPARC __FILE__ definitely returns the wrong value
in certain circumstances.

You problem could be completely unrelated, however.

-Markus

-- 
Markus Mayer
http://www.mmayer.net/


From ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr  Tue Nov 22 18:36:55 2005
From: ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=E9rard_Henry?=)
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 18:36:55 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] trouble with php?
In-Reply-To: <20051122165142.GA19580@chinook.mmayer.net>
References: <4382E3F5.90304@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
	<20051122165142.GA19580@chinook.mmayer.net>
Message-ID: <43835737.6060906@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>

Markus Mayer wrote:
> On Tuesday, 22 Nov 2005 10:25 +0100, G?rard Henry wrote:
> 
> 
>>[Tue Nov 22 09:04:44 2005] [error] PHP Warning: 
>>include_ecrire(ecrire/inc_flock.php3): failed to open stream: No such 
>>file or directory in 
>>/opt/csw/apache/htdocs/testgh/spip/ecrire/inc_version.php3 on line 51
>>[Tue Nov 22 09:04:44 2005] [error] PHP Warning:  include_ecrire(): 
>>Failed opening 'ecrire/inc_flock.php3' for inclusion 
>>(include_path='/opt/csw/lib/php') in 
>>/opt/csw/apache/htdocs/testgh/spip/ecrire/inc_version.php3 on line 51
> 
> [...]
> 
> 
> Could this be related to PHP bug #34552?
>   http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=34552
> I don't know if anybody ever reproduced it on x86 before or on Solaris
> 10, but on Solaris 9 SPARC __FILE__ definitely returns the wrong value
> in certain circumstances.
> 
> You problem could be completely unrelated, however.
> 
> -Markus
> 

thanks for your answer
i try it, but everything happens as expected, so it's not related
what i don't understand, is that it works on another solaris server, but 
with apache manually compiled. So it seems there is something wrong with 
blastwave package, i think

gerard



From mark.round at gmail.com  Wed Nov 23 11:02:38 2005
From: mark.round at gmail.com (Mark Round)
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 10:02:38 +0000
Subject: [csw-users] trouble with php?
In-Reply-To: <43835737.6060906@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
References: <4382E3F5.90304@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
	<20051122165142.GA19580@chinook.mmayer.net>
	<43835737.6060906@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
Message-ID: <7b46f0de0511230202r1932afe5n825325f8b56a62c1@mail.gmail.com>

> >>[Tue Nov 22 09:04:44 2005] [error] PHP Warning:
> >>include_ecrire(ecrire/inc_flock.php3): failed to open stream: No such
> >>file or directory in
> >>/opt/csw/apache/htdocs/testgh/spip/ecrire/inc_version.php3 on line 51
> >>[Tue Nov 22 09:04:44 2005] [error] PHP Warning:  include_ecrire():
> >>Failed opening 'ecrire/inc_flock.php3' for inclusion
> >>(include_path='/opt/csw/lib/php') in
> >>/opt/csw/apache/htdocs/testgh/spip/ecrire/inc_version.php3 on line 51
> >

This is odd - I have just downloaded and installed SPIP on my
Blastwave installation of Apache/PHP4.4.0, and it's working fine. I
got through the installation procedure, set up the database, and now
I'm logged in the "private area". Did you manage to get this far ?


From ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr  Wed Nov 23 11:32:34 2005
From: ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr (Gerard Henry)
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 11:32:34 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] trouble with php?
In-Reply-To: <7b46f0de0511230202r1932afe5n825325f8b56a62c1@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4382E3F5.90304@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>	<20051122165142.GA19580@chinook.mmayer.net>	<43835737.6060906@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
	<7b46f0de0511230202r1932afe5n825325f8b56a62c1@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <43844542.7010701@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>

Mark Round wrote:

>>>>[Tue Nov 22 09:04:44 2005] [error] PHP Warning:
>>>>include_ecrire(ecrire/inc_flock.php3): failed to open stream: No such
>>>>file or directory in
>>>>/opt/csw/apache/htdocs/testgh/spip/ecrire/inc_version.php3 on line 51
>>>>[Tue Nov 22 09:04:44 2005] [error] PHP Warning:  include_ecrire():
>>>>Failed opening 'ecrire/inc_flock.php3' for inclusion
>>>>(include_path='/opt/csw/lib/php') in
>>>>/opt/csw/apache/htdocs/testgh/spip/ecrire/inc_version.php3 on line 51
>>>>        
>>>>
>
>This is odd - I have just downloaded and installed SPIP on my
>Blastwave installation of Apache/PHP4.4.0, and it's working fine. I
>got through the installation procedure, set up the database, and now
>I'm logged in the "private area". Did you manage to get this far ?
>  
>
no i didn't unfortunately! did you use apache 1.3 or 2.0?
my installation failed just after language choice


From mmayer at blastwave.org  Fri Nov 25 04:37:59 2005
From: mmayer at blastwave.org (Markus Mayer)
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 19:37:59 -0800
Subject: [csw-users] HPIJS
Message-ID: <20051125033759.GA9610@chinook.mmayer.net>

Hi everybody,

I built HPIJS[1] packages which are now available in
http://www.blastwave.org/testing/.

I would love to hear some feedback before the packages are released
into unstable. Thank you!

-Markus

[1] http://hpinkjet.sourceforge.net/


From blastwave at gmail.com  Fri Nov 25 05:17:42 2005
From: blastwave at gmail.com (Dennis Clarke)
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 23:17:42 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] HPIJS
In-Reply-To: <20051125033759.GA9610@chinook.mmayer.net>
References: <20051125033759.GA9610@chinook.mmayer.net>
Message-ID: <a6265da20511242017k1004aef3n7cae5fb90553ad6a@mail.gmail.com>

On 11/24/05, Markus Mayer <mmayer at blastwave.org> wrote:
> Hi everybody,

wow .. no holiday for Markus today ?   :-)

Dennis

From mmayer at blastwave.org  Fri Nov 25 17:46:48 2005
From: mmayer at blastwave.org (Markus Mayer)
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 08:46:48 -0800
Subject: [csw-users] HPIJS
In-Reply-To: <a6265da20511242017k1004aef3n7cae5fb90553ad6a@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20051125033759.GA9610@chinook.mmayer.net>
	<a6265da20511242017k1004aef3n7cae5fb90553ad6a@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20051125164648.GA12089@chinook.mmayer.net>

On Thursday, 24 Nov 2005 23:17 -0500, Dennis Clarke wrote:

> wow .. no holiday for Markus today ?   :-)

Nope, I'm in British Columbia, so a bit too far north for holidays. :-)

-Markus


From asmoore at blastwave.org  Mon Nov 28 04:13:10 2005
From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex Moore)
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2005 21:13:10 -0600
Subject: [csw-users] openldap version update for testing
Message-ID: <20051127211310.00006e48@sws602>

There is a version update for openldap in testing to bring us up to the
current release, which is 2.3.12.  This version update has been needed
for a long time.  The testing url is http://www.blastwave.org/testing

If you are running slapd on the current CSW 2.1.30 package, you must
unload and reload the database.  I used slapcat to extract the data to
an ldif file.  Ater installing the new version, I loaded the data
with slapadd.  Also, I run slapd with a non-root user and ran slapcat
not as that user and had to fix permissions on some new files. So
watch for that.

The old libraries are still in the openldap_rt package, so client
applications should be fine.  Note that the package
has /opt/csw/etc/openldap/DB_CONFIG.example.  The same file is
in /opt/csw/var/openldap-data and that is where your copy of DB_CONFIG
is to be installed.  I will fix that on the next update.

The 2.1.x patch for ROOTDSE is not supposed to be needed with this
version.  So that patch is not in the package.  If this causes someone
a problem, please let me know.  Also, if there are patches that you are
using for your build of OpenLDAP 2.3.x and you think they are needed,
please let me know.

To any slapd folks, please test these packages, i.e., openldap
openldap_client openldap_rt.

Thanks, Alex

-- 


From vvang3142 at charter.net  Mon Nov 28 04:59:12 2005
From: vvang3142 at charter.net (Vue Vang)
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2005 21:59:12 -0600
Subject: [csw-users] [users] Firefox
Message-ID: <438A8090.3010405@charter.net>

(Gecko:9873): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: cannot register existing type `LINCConnection'

(Gecko:9873): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: file gtype.c: line 1872: assertion `parent_type > 0' failed

(Gecko:9873): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: file gobject.c: line 615: assertion `G_TYPE_IS_OBJECT (object_type)' failed

any idea which package has broken it?

Did you find the answer to this question? If you did can you please let me know?  I'm having the same problem.

Thanks,
Vue


From jberry at plus.net  Wed Nov 30 12:11:05 2005
From: jberry at plus.net (Josh Berry)
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 11:11:05 +0000
Subject: [csw-users] CSWcourier_imap Logging
Message-ID: <1133349065.27862.104.camel@localhost.localdomain>

Hi,

I have installed the courier_imap package on Solaris10 for X86 and when
I initially installed it I am sure it was working. I stopped the process
to install and configure all my other sortware (MTA etc) and now it
won't start.

I did try to change it to MySQL authentication but rolled this back when
I had problems by removing and re-installing the package.

I am sure it is something that I have done that is causing the problem,
but I cannot find where the thing logs to. Nothing in syslog, no
sensible /var/log/courier.log or similar ... can anyone point me in the
right direction so that I can find the errors.

oh, and when I try and start the software it echo's "starting courier
imap" to terminal and then does nothing.

Thanks,
-- 
| Josh Berry                        Broadband Solutions for
| Internal Systems Engineer               Home & Business @
| PlusNet plc                                  www.plus.net
+ -----   Plusnet - The smarter way to Broadband!   ----- +



From asmoore at blastwave.org  Wed Nov 30 12:40:38 2005
From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex Moore)
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 05:40:38 -0600
Subject: [csw-users] CSWcourier_imap Logging
In-Reply-To: <1133349065.27862.104.camel@localhost.localdomain>
References: <1133349065.27862.104.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Message-ID: <20051130054038.00000e77@sws602.mcsun.local>

On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 11:11:05 +0000
Josh Berry <jberry at plus.net> wrote:

> I am sure it is something that I have done that is causing the
> problem, but I cannot find where the thing logs to. Nothing in
> syslog, no sensible /var/log/courier.log or similar ... can anyone
> point me in the right direction so that I can find the errors.
> 
> oh, and when I try and start the software it echo's "starting courier
> imap" to terminal and then does nothing.

man courierlogger
By default, courier_imap logs to /var/log/syslog

In /opt/csw/etc/courier-imap/, check the options that you have
changed.  Which files have the start option enabled?  For example, in
imapd, see IMAPDSTART

Alex


-- 


From jberry at plus.net  Wed Nov 30 13:04:39 2005
From: jberry at plus.net (Josh Berry)
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 12:04:39 +0000
Subject: [csw-users] CSWcourier_imap Logging
In-Reply-To: <20051130054038.00000e77@sws602.mcsun.local>
References: <1133349065.27862.104.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	<20051130054038.00000e77@sws602.mcsun.local>
Message-ID: <1133352279.27862.114.camel@localhost.localdomain>

On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 05:40 -0600, Alex Moore wrote:

> man courierlogger
> By default, courier_imap logs to /var/log/syslog
> 
> In /opt/csw/etc/courier-imap/, check the options that you have
> changed.  Which files have the start option enabled?  For example, in
> imapd, see IMAPDSTART

Cheers Alex,

My bad there, I had some stray random charactor in the IMAPDSTART
line ... thank you Solaris Vi :)

Josh



From sigsegv at alchiba.ni.cs.tu-berlin.de  Wed Nov 30 15:52:20 2005
From: sigsegv at alchiba.ni.cs.tu-berlin.de (Fabian Otto)
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 15:52:20 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] PSI Segfault
Message-ID: <20051130145220.GA29020@alchiba.ni.cs.tu-berlin.de>

Hi, 

I installed psi under Solaris 10 X86, but it segfaults right 
from the start.

|/opt/csw/bin/psi --version
|zsh: segmentation fault (core dumped)  /opt/csw/bin/psi --version


The installed qt version is

|ls /opt/csw/lib/libqt-mt.so.3.3.3
|/opt/csw/lib/libqt-mt.so.3.3.3*

My guess is that psi needs to be updated to the current libqt version.

could someone check this?


Thanks 

Otto

-- 
Bookmarks: http://del.icio.us/sigsegv
jabber: sigsegv at jabber.ccc.de
wiki/blog: http://jotpee.de/blog


From james at blastwave.org  Tue Nov  1 10:13:53 2005
From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee)
Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2005 09:13:53 GMT
Subject: [csw-users] Gedit and CSWlibcairo
In-Reply-To: <20051031232200.G24474-100000@xs3.xs4all.nl>
References: <20051031232200.G24474-100000@xs3.xs4all.nl>
Message-ID: <20051101.9135300.3402990147@landeck.jamesipoos.com>

On 31/10/05, 22:30:37, Alexey Kuzmichev <alekz at xs4all.nl> wrote regarding 
[csw-users] Gedit and CSWlibcairo:

> Looks like there is a problem with the freshly built
> gedit-2.12.0:

> # pkg-get -i gedit
> . . .
> ERROR: no info for CSWlibcairo. Cannot install dependancy.
> ERROR: could not install required dependancies for CSWgedit

> There is no such package as CSWlibcairo (yet?).

It's a pathetic naming mistake!  The required package exists but is
called CSWcairo.  Please file an urgent bug report.



> Also, CSWlibcairo is not in the dependency list on
> http://www.blastwave.org/packages.php/gedit

That's not up to date.


http://www.canoedissent.org.uk/ui/package.jsp?p=CSWlibcairo
http://www.canoedissent.org.uk/ui/package.jsp?p=CSWcairo
http://www.canoedissent.org.uk/ui/package.jsp?p=CSWgedit




James.


From mark.round at gmail.com  Tue Nov  1 11:35:22 2005
From: mark.round at gmail.com (Mark Round)
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 10:35:22 +0000
Subject: [csw-users] New PHP 4.4.0 packages
Message-ID: <7b46f0de0511010235t65a394aeo4db32ff8b947f91f@mail.gmail.com>

New PHP 4.4.0 packages are now available from the mirror sites. There
are a number of changes with these packages over previous 4.3.x
packages - please make sure you read the following to find out how
this move will affect your installation.

1. Changes in packaging

1.1 Modular extensions

The PHP packages now include a very minimal "core". Many extensions
are now built as shared libraries and have been split off into their
own packages. The reasoning behind this is that a user can just grab
what they need, instead of a huge monolithic build of PHP that eats up
memory with things that they very probably don't need - not to mention
saving space and time by not downloading all the various dependencies
that go with it.

Under this new system, if you just want PHP with, say MySQL and
OpenSSL support, you would install the core PHP package (and
optionally, the mod_php Apache extension) then php4_mysql and
php4_openssl.


1.2 Multiple SAPIs, Apache 2 support, standalone CGI package

As a user may just want the CLI or CGI executables, these are now
shipped in the core php4_cgi package, which all other PHP4 packages
now depend on. This includes the binaries, PEAR libraries, and various
headers. It also takes care of installing a php.ini, if none exists.
This is also the package you'd use if you wanted to set up a FastCGI
environment.

If you actually want mod_php for either Apache 1.3.x or 2.0.x, you'd
install mod_php4_core (CSWmodphp4).

This includes a dependency on php4_cgi, so if you install this, you'll
also get  the PEAR libraries and "foundations" needed for PHP to
function etc. It now includes an Apache 2 module shipped alongside the
standard Apache 1.  These have both been relocated to
/opt/csw/lib/php/sapi. The postinstall script will check for the
presence of CSWapache or CSWapache2, and if found, will activate
itself. As long as both servers are listening on different ports, you
can even run both on the same machine.

The big caveat here is that if you are using Apache 2 and PHP, you
should only ever use the prefork MPM.

There is also a "bundle" package, mod_php (CSWphp),  which now doesn't
contain any files, but does contain dependencies for php4_cgi,
mod_php4_core, apache 1.3.x, and all the extensions. This emulates the
behavious of the old monolithic CSWphp build; for a full PHP4
installation, this is the package you'd install (pkg-get -i php).


2. Upgrading a current installation

If you are using a current CSWphp installation, upgrade your catalog,
and then upgrade the "mod_php" package. This will then upgrade your
mod_php to the new dummy build, and install the core php4_cgi and
mod_php4_core packages, along with all extensions.

This will however leave you with a full PHP installation, and you may
then want to uninstall some of  the PHP extensions you are not using.

-Mark
mark at blastwave.org
http://www.markround.com


From ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr  Wed Nov  2 08:15:16 2005
From: ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=E9rard_Henry?=)
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2005 08:15:16 +0100
Subject: [csw-users]  openssl dependancies failed after upgrade
Message-ID: <43686784.8000307@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>

hello all,

just upgraded all my packages:
/opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -Uu
on solaris 10 x86, and now, many applications are unable to start 
because failed dependancies with libssl.so.0.9.7
this upgrade replace libssl release 0.9.7 with 0.9.8

Is there a mean to forbid upgrade of some packages?


thanks in advance,

gerard



From daniel at dseichter.de  Wed Nov  2 09:09:41 2005
From: daniel at dseichter.de (Daniel Seichter)
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 09:09:41 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-users] Problems with GAIM?!
Message-ID: <1023000.20245.217.6.141.226.1130918981.squirrel@webmailer.hosteurope.de>

Hello,

yesterday I started gaim after a break of about two months. The message
box said, there was a new version, 1.50 (I used 0.82). I do every week a
pkg-get -U -u, but the gaim package never was updated.
So I had to do a pkg-get -i gaim (BUT it was already installed!!) and then
the new version was installed.
So I think there can exists more such packages, they are not realy
registered. How I can do a pkg-get <trytoinstallallnew>?
It this problem known?

Daniel


From mark.round at gmail.com  Wed Nov  2 11:25:05 2005
From: mark.round at gmail.com (Mark Round)
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 10:25:05 +0000
Subject: [csw-users] openssl dependancies failed after upgrade
In-Reply-To: <43686784.8000307@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
References: <43686784.8000307@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
Message-ID: <7b46f0de0511020225k649261c0sa3adff2ad16b9b7d@mail.gmail.com>

>  many applications are unable to start
> because failed dependancies with libssl.so.0.9.7
> this upgrade replace libssl release 0.9.7 with 0.9.8

Just looked at the latest OpenSSL package from "unstable", and it
seems to include the 0.9.7 libraries for compatibility. What
applications are failing for you ?

# pkgchk -l CSWossl | grep 0.9.7
Pathname: /opt/csw/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.7
Pathname: /opt/csw/lib/libssl.so.0.9.7
Pathname: /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libcrypto.so.0.9.7
Pathname: /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libssl.so.0.9.7
Pathname: /opt/csw/lib/sparcv9/libcrypto.so.0.9.7
Pathname: /opt/csw/lib/sparcv9/libssl.so.0.9.7

[mround at builds:mround] # pkginfo -l CSWossl
   PKGINST:  CSWossl
      NAME:  openssl - The Open Source toolkit for SSL and TLS.
  CATEGORY:  application
      ARCH:  sparc
   VERSION:  0.9.8,REV=2005.10.31
    VENDOR:  http://www.openssl.org/ packaged for CSW by Derek Morr
    PSTAMP:  ra20051031211209
  INSTDATE:  Nov 02 2005 10:21
   HOTLINE:  http://www.blastwave.org/bugtrack/
     EMAIL:  derek at blastwave.org
    STATUS:  completely installed
     FILES:     1185 installed pathnames
                   2 shared pathnames
                  15 directories
                  31 executables
               69837 blocks used (approx)


From james at blastwave.org  Wed Nov  2 11:41:51 2005
From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee)
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2005 10:41:51 GMT
Subject: [csw-users] openssl dependancies failed after upgrade
In-Reply-To: <7b46f0de0511020225k649261c0sa3adff2ad16b9b7d@mail.gmail.com>
References: <43686784.8000307@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
	<7b46f0de0511020225k649261c0sa3adff2ad16b9b7d@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20051102.10415100.2749481247@landeck.jamesipoos.com>

On 02/11/05, 10:25:05, Mark Round <mark.round at gmail.com> wrote regarding 
Re: [csw-users] openssl dependancies failed after upgrade:

> >  many applications are unable to start
> > because failed dependancies with libssl.so.0.9.7
> > this upgrade replace libssl release 0.9.7 with 0.9.8

> Just looked at the latest OpenSSL package from "unstable", and it
> seems to include the 0.9.7 libraries for compatibility. What
> applications are failing for you ?

> # pkgchk -l CSWossl | grep 0.9.7
> Pathname: /opt/csw/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.7
> Pathname: /opt/csw/lib/libssl.so.0.9.7
> Pathname: /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libcrypto.so.0.9.7
> Pathname: /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libssl.so.0.9.7
> Pathname: /opt/csw/lib/sparcv9/libcrypto.so.0.9.7
> Pathname: /opt/csw/lib/sparcv9/libssl.so.0.9.7

> [mround at builds:mround] # pkginfo -l CSWossl
>    PKGINST:  CSWossl
>       NAME:  openssl - The Open Source toolkit for SSL and TLS.
>   CATEGORY:  application
>       ARCH:  sparc
>    VERSION:  0.9.8,REV=2005.10.31


The intel version doesn't have 0.9.7.





James.


From asmoore at blastwave.org  Wed Nov  2 12:53:37 2005
From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex Moore)
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 05:53:37 -0600
Subject: [csw-users] openssl dependancies failed after upgrade
In-Reply-To: <43686784.8000307@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
References: <43686784.8000307@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
Message-ID: <20051102055337.0000176f@sws602>

On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 08:15:16 +0100
G?rard Henry <ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr> wrote:

> hello all,
> 
> just upgraded all my packages:
> /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -Uu
> on solaris 10 x86, and now, many applications are unable to start 
> because failed dependancies with libssl.so.0.9.7
> this upgrade replace libssl release 0.9.7 with 0.9.8

Same here, and only on x86.  What I have
is /opt/csw/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.7 missing. However, for some reason, I
have multiple copies of the library with a type of time stamp on the
end of the filename.  I copied one of these to the proper name for both
i386 and pentium and all seems fine again.

Alex


From asmoore at blastwave.org  Wed Nov  2 12:54:10 2005
From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex Moore)
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 05:54:10 -0600
Subject: [csw-users] openssl dependancies failed after upgrade
In-Reply-To: <43686784.8000307@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
References: <43686784.8000307@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
Message-ID: <20051102055410.00003251@sws602>

On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 08:15:16 +0100
G?rard Henry <ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr> wrote:

> hello all,
> 
> just upgraded all my packages:
> /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -Uu
> on solaris 10 x86, and now, many applications are unable to start 
> because failed dependancies with libssl.so.0.9.7
> this upgrade replace libssl release 0.9.7 with 0.9.8
> 
P.S. I filed a bug report.

Alex


From dvm105 at psu.edu  Wed Nov  2 14:06:20 2005
From: dvm105 at psu.edu (Derek Morr)
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2005 08:06:20 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] openssl dependancies failed after upgrade
In-Reply-To: <43686784.8000307@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
References: <43686784.8000307@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
Message-ID: <4368B9CC.2020800@psu.edu>

G?rard Henry wrote:
> hello all,
> 
> just upgraded all my packages:
> /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -Uu
> on solaris 10 x86, and now, many applications are unable to start 
> because failed dependancies with libssl.so.0.9.7
> this upgrade replace libssl release 0.9.7 with 0.9.8

This was an error on my part when I took over the OpenSSL package. I've 
corrected the issue, and a fixed version of OpenSSL should be released 
later this morning.

I apologize for any inconvenience.

-derek


From blastwave at gmail.com  Wed Nov  2 14:27:35 2005
From: blastwave at gmail.com (Dennis Clarke)
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 08:27:35 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] openssl dependancies failed after upgrade
In-Reply-To: <20051102055410.00003251@sws602>
References: <43686784.8000307@cmi.univ-mrs.fr> <20051102055410.00003251@sws602>
Message-ID: <a6265da20511020527s31f8143ev2aa0548e73ff2f96@mail.gmail.com>

On 11/2/05, Alex Moore <asmoore at blastwave.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 08:15:16 +0100
> G?rard Henry <ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr> wrote:
>
> > hello all,
> >
> > just upgraded all my packages:
> > /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -Uu
> > on solaris 10 x86, and now, many applications are unable to start
> > because failed dependancies with libssl.so.0.9.7
> > this upgrade replace libssl release 0.9.7 with 0.9.8
> >
> P.S. I filed a bug report.

.. and I just took my DVD prototype with the build 25 source on it :

  http://www.blastwave.org/dclarke/stuff/dvd-proto.txt

  got that looking nice last night ..

and threw it away ...

sigh

I'm going for coffee .. Alex, let me know if there is anything I can
do to help at all.

Dennis

From achandler at visionael.com  Wed Nov  2 18:27:06 2005
From: achandler at visionael.com (Andy Chandler)
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 09:27:06 -0800 
Subject: [csw-users] Problem with the CSW install of KDE-GCC on Solaris 10
Message-ID: <B5C5FA91684C0B469E819ABD92BD028A1D01C0@pa-svr.visionael.com>

Greetings, pardon a newbie here but I'm having a problem with something that
previously worked for me without any problems at all!
 
We have a couple of boxes here one of which had solairs 10 - its a sun blade
2000 box and I originally had a plain vanilla solaris 10 install on it and
then installed pkg-get and downloaded without problem kde_gcc package....it
worked great.   The box suffered a hard drive problem which necessitated
replacing the drive and re-installing the OS.   This time I think I made the
following mistakes:
 
 
1: Installed companion CD - this actually put KDE 3.1 under the /opt/sfw
directory
2: Chose a language specification of en_US.ISO8859-1  ??? (not sure if it
should have been UTF or something else)
2: Installed PKG-GET and KDE_GCC BEFORE  I remembered the solaris patch
cluster
3: then installed Patch cluster.
 
KDE starts but no icons and the animated startup progress screen looks like
a bunch of colored blocks - basically there are no graphical resources -
originally I had graphics but just no title bars for minimizing / maximizing
windows but now I've lost even the basic desktop icons and the kicker icons.
 
I've since tried De-installing with pkgrm every package with CSW as the
prefix, deleted the /opt/csw structure and reinstalled everything.   I can
get a kde desktop but no graphics.   I figure I must have messed up a shared
resource that CSW links to?   Could it be a temp cache thing somewhere?
For what its worth CDE and the JDS desktops load and run great.   Also this
problem occurs both directly on the box or with a remote window manager
tunneled over ssh.
 
 
 
 

Andrew Chandler 

Manager DataCollection Group      


Visionael Corporation             Phone : (918) 388-8308

9717 E. 42nd Street               Fax   : (918) 663-1456
<mailto:achandler at visionael.com> 

Suite 200                         Email : andy at visionael.com
<mailto:achandler at visionael.com> 
Tulsa, OK 74146-3680              WEB   : www.visionael.com
<http://www.visionael.com/> 

 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20051102/2858062e/attachment-0001.html>

From achandler at visionael.com  Wed Nov  2 18:33:05 2005
From: achandler at visionael.com (Andy Chandler)
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 11:33:05 -0600
Subject: [csw-users] Problem with the CSW install of KDE-GCC on Solaris 10
Message-ID: <20051102173318.7D289F8A9@mail.blastwave.org>

Sending again as type text and using correct Email Address 
Greetings, pardon a newbie here but I'm having a problem with something that
previously worked for me without any problems at all!
 
We have a couple of boxes here one of which had Solaris 10 - its a sun blade
2000 box and I originally had a plain vanilla Solaris 10 install on it and
then installed pkg-get and downloaded without problem kde_gcc package....it
worked great.   The box suffered a hard drive problem which necessitated
replacing the drive and re-installing the OS.   This time I think I made the
following mistakes:
 
 
1: Installed companion CD - this actually put KDE 3.1 under the /opt/sfw
directory
2: Chose a language specification of en_US.ISO8859-1  ??? (not sure if it
should have been UTF or something else)
2: Installed PKG-GET and KDE_GCC BEFORE  I remembered the solaris patch
cluster
3: then installed Patch cluster.
 
KDE starts but no icons and the animated startup progress screen looks like
a bunch of colored blocks - basically there are no graphical resources -
originally I had graphics but just no title bars for minimizing / maximizing
windows but now I've lost even the basic desktop icons and the kicker icons.
 
I've since tried De-installing with pkgrm every package with CSW as the
prefix, deleted the /opt/csw structure and reinstalled everything.   I can
get a kde desktop but no graphics.   I figure I must have messed up a shared
resource that CSW links to?   Could it be a temp cache thing somewhere?
For what its worth CDE and the JDS desktops load and run great.   Also this
problem occurs both directly on the box or with a remote window manager
tunneled over ssh.
 
 
 
 

Andrew Chandler 

Manager DataCollection Group      


Visionael Corporation             Phone : (918) 388-8308

9717 E. 42nd Street               Fax   : (918) 663-1456
<mailto:achandler at visionael.com> 

Suite 200                         Email : andy at visionael.com
<mailto:achandler at visionael.com> 
Tulsa, OK 74146-3680              WEB   : www.visionael.com
<http://www.visionael.com/> 




From mmayer at blastwave.org  Thu Nov  3 03:34:00 2005
From: mmayer at blastwave.org (Markus Mayer)
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 18:34:00 -0800
Subject: [csw-users] Problem with the CSW install of KDE-GCC on Solaris
	10
In-Reply-To: <B5C5FA91684C0B469E819ABD92BD028A1D01C0@pa-svr.visionael.com>
References: <B5C5FA91684C0B469E819ABD92BD028A1D01C0@pa-svr.visionael.com>
Message-ID: <20051103023400.GA31923@chinook.mmayer.net>

On Wednesday, 02 Nov 2005 09:27 -0800, Andy Chandler wrote:

> KDE starts but no icons and the animated startup progress screen
> looks like a bunch of colored blocks - basically there are no
> graphical resources - originally I had graphics but just no title
> bars for minimizing / maximizing windows but now I've lost even the
> basic desktop icons and the kicker icons.

You may have run into the same problem I saw this week-end after
upgrading to the latest KDE from unstable: the windows didn't have
frames around them (as if no window-manager was running), the panel
looked weird, etc.

In this case your KDE problems won't have anything to do with what you
did, that would just be coincidence.

See
  http://www.blastwave.org/mantis/view_bug_page.php?f_id=1246
for more.

If you click on [Main] from there you'll see this note:

------------------------------------------------------------
  In relation to Solaris 8/9, a move was made to start including kwin
  and kxkb in KDE under Solaris. You'll find the main kdebase packages
  as:

  http://www.blastwave.org/testing
  kdebase_gcc-3.4.3,REV=2005.10.27-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  kdebase_gcc-3.4.3,REV=2005.10.27-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

  Or, the older stable package:
  kdebase_gcc-3.4.2,REV=2005.09.20-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
  kdebase_gcc-3.4.2,REV=2005.09.20-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
------------------------------------------------------------

I just checked, it has not been propagated to the mirrors yet, so
you'll have to grab that package from testing and install it manually.

  gzip -d kdebase_gcc-3.4.3,REV=2005.10.27-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
  pkgrm CSWkdebasegcc
  pkgadd -d kdebase_gcc-3.4.3,REV=2005.10.27-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg

Hope that helps.

-Markus


From andy at riftware.com  Thu Nov  3 06:23:11 2005
From: andy at riftware.com (Andrew Chandler)
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 23:23:11 -0600
Subject: [csw-users] Problem with the CSW install of KDE-GCC on Solaris10
In-Reply-To: <20051103023400.GA31923@chinook.mmayer.net>
Message-ID: <20051103052316.0475BF8A4@mail.blastwave.org>

Thanks - I'll give it a try in the morning when I get to work!
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: users-bounces+andy=riftware.com at lists.blastwave.org 
> [mailto:users-bounces+andy=riftware.com at lists.blastwave.org] 
> On Behalf Of Markus Mayer
> Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 8:34 PM
> To: questions and discussions
> Subject: Re: [csw-users] Problem with the CSW install of 
> KDE-GCC on Solaris10
> 
> On Wednesday, 02 Nov 2005 09:27 -0800, Andy Chandler wrote:
> 
> > KDE starts but no icons and the animated startup progress 
> screen looks 
> > like a bunch of colored blocks - basically there are no graphical 
> > resources - originally I had graphics but just no title bars for 
> > minimizing / maximizing windows but now I've lost even the basic 
> > desktop icons and the kicker icons.
> 
> You may have run into the same problem I saw this week-end 
> after upgrading to the latest KDE from unstable: the windows 
> didn't have frames around them (as if no window-manager was 
> running), the panel looked weird, etc.
> 
> In this case your KDE problems won't have anything to do with 
> what you did, that would just be coincidence.
> 
> See
>   http://www.blastwave.org/mantis/view_bug_page.php?f_id=1246
> for more.
> 
> If you click on [Main] from there you'll see this note:
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>   In relation to Solaris 8/9, a move was made to start including kwin
>   and kxkb in KDE under Solaris. You'll find the main kdebase packages
>   as:
> 
>   http://www.blastwave.org/testing
>   kdebase_gcc-3.4.3,REV=2005.10.27-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>   kdebase_gcc-3.4.3,REV=2005.10.27-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> 
>   Or, the older stable package:
>   kdebase_gcc-3.4.2,REV=2005.09.20-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>   kdebase_gcc-3.4.2,REV=2005.09.20-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> I just checked, it has not been propagated to the mirrors 
> yet, so you'll have to grab that package from testing and 
> install it manually.
> 
>   gzip -d kdebase_gcc-3.4.3,REV=2005.10.27-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   pkgrm CSWkdebasegcc
>   pkgadd -d kdebase_gcc-3.4.3,REV=2005.10.27-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg
> 
> Hope that helps.
> 
> -Markus
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.blastwave.org
> https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> 
> 



From mats.larsson at ericsson.com  Thu Nov  3 13:55:16 2005
From: mats.larsson at ericsson.com (Mats Larsson)
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2005 13:55:16 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] Problem with the CSW install of KDE-GCC on Solaris
 10
In-Reply-To: <20051103023400.GA31923@chinook.mmayer.net>
References: <B5C5FA91684C0B469E819ABD92BD028A1D01C0@pa-svr.visionael.com>
	<20051103023400.GA31923@chinook.mmayer.net>
Message-ID: <436A08B4.1090607@ericsson.com>

On 2005-11-03 03:34, Markus Mayer wrote:

> On Wednesday, 02 Nov 2005 09:27 -0800, Andy Chandler wrote:
> 
>> KDE starts but no icons and the animated startup progress screen
>> looks like a bunch of colored blocks - basically there are no
>> graphical resources - originally I had graphics but just no title
>> bars for minimizing / maximizing windows but now I've lost even the
>> basic desktop icons and the kicker icons.

Same problem here but Solaris 8.

> You may have run into the same problem I saw this week-end after
> upgrading to the latest KDE from unstable: the windows didn't have
> frames around them (as if no window-manager was running), the panel
> looked weird, etc.
> 
> In this case your KDE problems won't have anything to do with what you
> did, that would just be coincidence.
> 
> See
>   http://www.blastwave.org/mantis/view_bug_page.php?f_id=1246
> for more.
> 
> If you click on [Main] from there you'll see this note:
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>   In relation to Solaris 8/9, a move was made to start including kwin
>   and kxkb in KDE under Solaris. You'll find the main kdebase packages
>   as:
> 
>   http://www.blastwave.org/testing
>   kdebase_gcc-3.4.3,REV=2005.10.27-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>   kdebase_gcc-3.4.3,REV=2005.10.27-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> 
>   Or, the older stable package:
>   kdebase_gcc-3.4.2,REV=2005.09.20-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>   kdebase_gcc-3.4.2,REV=2005.09.20-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> I just checked, it has not been propagated to the mirrors yet, so
> you'll have to grab that package from testing and install it manually.
> 
>   gzip -d kdebase_gcc-3.4.3,REV=2005.10.27-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   pkgrm CSWkdebasegcc
>   pkgadd -d kdebase_gcc-3.4.3,REV=2005.10.27-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg
> 
> Hope that helps.

It does not. The problem is still there as Andy describes it.

Reverting to kdebase_gcc-3.4.2,REV=2005.09.20-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz 
doesn't work either :(.

Wonder which one of the packages is broken this time? I did take the 
following upgrade:

        software                         old                         new
        --------                         ---                         ---
   kdeaddons_gcc                       3.3.1                       3.4.2
     kdebase_gcc        3.4.2,REV=2005.09.20                       3.4.3
      kdeedu_gcc                       3.4.1                       3.4.2
kdegraphics_gcc                       3.4.1                       3.4.2
kdemultimedia_gcc                     3.4.1                       3.4.2
    kdeutils_gcc                       3.4.1                       3.4.2

And after that I replaced kdebase_gcc 3.4.3 with 
kdebase_gcc-3.4.3,REV=2005.10.27-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz but I still 
get ni icons/images.

/MOL


From andy at riftware.com  Fri Nov  4 06:04:49 2005
From: andy at riftware.com (Andrew Chandler)
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 23:04:49 -0600
Subject: [csw-users] Problem with the CSW install of KDE-GCC on Solaris
	10
In-Reply-To: <436A08B4.1090607@ericsson.com>
Message-ID: <20051104050451.2A264F8AF@mail.blastwave.org>

I found the problem - reverting to the previous qt_gcc from 9/16 at least
gets me the splash screens back changing the kde base did nothing. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: users-bounces+andy=riftware.com at lists.blastwave.org 
> [mailto:users-bounces+andy=riftware.com at lists.blastwave.org] 
> On Behalf Of Mats Larsson
> Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005 6:55 AM
> To: questions and discussions
> Subject: Re: [csw-users] Problem with the CSW install of 
> KDE-GCC on Solaris 10
> 
> On 2005-11-03 03:34, Markus Mayer wrote:
> 
> > On Wednesday, 02 Nov 2005 09:27 -0800, Andy Chandler wrote:
> > 
> >> KDE starts but no icons and the animated startup progress screen 
> >> looks like a bunch of colored blocks - basically there are no 
> >> graphical resources - originally I had graphics but just no title 
> >> bars for minimizing / maximizing windows but now I've lost 
> even the 
> >> basic desktop icons and the kicker icons.
> 
> Same problem here but Solaris 8.
> 
> > You may have run into the same problem I saw this week-end after 
> > upgrading to the latest KDE from unstable: the windows didn't have 
> > frames around them (as if no window-manager was running), the panel 
> > looked weird, etc.
> > 
> > In this case your KDE problems won't have anything to do 
> with what you 
> > did, that would just be coincidence.
> > 
> > See
> >   http://www.blastwave.org/mantis/view_bug_page.php?f_id=1246
> > for more.
> > 
> > If you click on [Main] from there you'll see this note:
> > 
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> >   In relation to Solaris 8/9, a move was made to start 
> including kwin
> >   and kxkb in KDE under Solaris. You'll find the main 
> kdebase packages
> >   as:
> > 
> >   http://www.blastwave.org/testing
> >   kdebase_gcc-3.4.3,REV=2005.10.27-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> >   kdebase_gcc-3.4.3,REV=2005.10.27-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> > 
> >   Or, the older stable package:
> >   kdebase_gcc-3.4.2,REV=2005.09.20-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> >   kdebase_gcc-3.4.2,REV=2005.09.20-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > I just checked, it has not been propagated to the mirrors yet, so 
> > you'll have to grab that package from testing and install 
> it manually.
> > 
> >   gzip -d kdebase_gcc-3.4.3,REV=2005.10.27-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> >   pkgrm CSWkdebasegcc
> >   pkgadd -d kdebase_gcc-3.4.3,REV=2005.10.27-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg
> > 
> > Hope that helps.
> 
> It does not. The problem is still there as Andy describes it.
> 
> Reverting to 
> kdebase_gcc-3.4.2,REV=2005.09.20-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> doesn't work either :(.
> 
> Wonder which one of the packages is broken this time? I did 
> take the following upgrade:
> 
>         software                         old                  
>        new
>         --------                         ---                  
>        ---
>    kdeaddons_gcc                       3.3.1                  
>      3.4.2
>      kdebase_gcc        3.4.2,REV=2005.09.20                  
>      3.4.3
>       kdeedu_gcc                       3.4.1                  
>      3.4.2
> kdegraphics_gcc                       3.4.1                   
>     3.4.2
> kdemultimedia_gcc                     3.4.1                   
>     3.4.2
>     kdeutils_gcc                       3.4.1                  
>      3.4.2
> 
> And after that I replaced kdebase_gcc 3.4.3 with 
> kdebase_gcc-3.4.3,REV=2005.10.27-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz 
> but I still get ni icons/images.
> 
> /MOL
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.blastwave.org
> https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> 
> 



From garyarm at testedgeinc.com  Sat Nov  5 00:18:24 2005
From: garyarm at testedgeinc.com (Gary Armstrong)
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2005 15:18:24 -0800
Subject: [csw-users] ldap libraries
Message-ID: <436BEC40.1070807@testedgeinc.com>

I can no longer start my apache2 server. I get the following error:

ld.so.1: httpd: fatal: /opt/csw/lib/sparcv9/libldap.so.2: wrong ELF 
class: ELFCLASS64
Killed


I notice similar problems reported for apache and apache2.


I think I'm up to date with ldap: ( and the other ldap pkgs, which I 
don't use )
# pkg-get compare openldap_rt 
# (From site http://ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/unstable )
       software                    localrev                   remoterev
    openldap_rt       2.1.30,REV=2005.09.27                        SAME

I don't see any work around. Hard to believe people are sitting around 
with dead http servers, so what am I missing?

TIA
Gary



From asmoore at blastwave.org  Sat Nov  5 00:45:51 2005
From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex Moore)
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 17:45:51 -0600
Subject: [csw-users] ldap libraries
In-Reply-To: <436BEC40.1070807@testedgeinc.com>
References: <436BEC40.1070807@testedgeinc.com>
Message-ID: <20051104174551.00004db9@sws602>

On Fri, 04 Nov 2005 15:18:24 -0800
Gary Armstrong <garyarm at testedgeinc.com> wrote:

> I can no longer start my apache2 server. I get the following error:
> 
> ld.so.1: httpd: fatal: /opt/csw/lib/sparcv9/libldap.so.2: wrong ELF 
> class: ELFCLASS64
> Killed
> 
> 
> I don't see any work around. Hard to believe people are sitting
> around with dead http servers, so what am I missing?
> 
Not sure.  I run apache but have not used apache2. I restarted apache
on a couple of hosts this morning and there were no problems.

It looks like there is an object, maybe in apache2, that is 32-bit but
somehow looking for 64-bit libraries.  That does not make much sense.

I will see if I can find a sparc host to install apache2 for testing.

Alex


From garyarm at testedgeinc.com  Sat Nov  5 00:56:44 2005
From: garyarm at testedgeinc.com (Gary Armstrong)
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2005 15:56:44 -0800
Subject: [csw-users] ldap libraries
In-Reply-To: <20051104174551.00004db9@sws602>
References: <436BEC40.1070807@testedgeinc.com> <20051104174551.00004db9@sws602>
Message-ID: <436BF53C.6070901@testedgeinc.com>

Alex Moore wrote:

>On Fri, 04 Nov 2005 15:18:24 -0800
>Gary Armstrong <garyarm at testedgeinc.com> wrote:
>
>  
>
>>I can no longer start my apache2 server. I get the following error:
>>
>>ld.so.1: httpd: fatal: /opt/csw/lib/sparcv9/libldap.so.2: wrong ELF 
>>class: ELFCLASS64
>>Killed
>>
>>
>>I don't see any work around. Hard to believe people are sitting
>>around with dead http servers, so what am I missing?
>>
>>    
>>
>Not sure.  I run apache but have not used apache2. I restarted apache
>on a couple of hosts this morning and there were no problems.
>
>It looks like there is an object, maybe in apache2, that is 32-bit but
>somehow looking for 64-bit libraries.  That does not make much sense.
>
>I will see if I can find a sparc host to install apache2 for testing.
>
>Alex
>_______________________________________________
>users mailing list
>users at lists.blastwave.org
>https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
>  
>
I'd very much appreciate it. I guess if push comes to shove, I can try 
to go back to apache. From what I can glimmer you're the ldap 
maintainer. Is the apache2 maintainer offline?


Thanks
Gary


From asmoore at blastwave.org  Sat Nov  5 01:05:46 2005
From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex Moore)
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 18:05:46 -0600
Subject: [csw-users] ldap libraries
In-Reply-To: <436BF53C.6070901@testedgeinc.com>
References: <436BEC40.1070807@testedgeinc.com> <20051104174551.00004db9@sws602>
	<436BF53C.6070901@testedgeinc.com>
Message-ID: <20051104180546.000052ee@sws602>

On Fri, 04 Nov 2005 15:56:44 -0800
Gary Armstrong <garyarm at testedgeinc.com> wrote:

> I'd very much appreciate it. I guess if push comes to shove, I can
> try to go back to apache. From what I can glimmer you're the ldap 
> maintainer. Is the apache2 maintainer offline?

Correct, I am the openldap maintainer.  Don't know what Cory is doing.

I stopped apache on one of my sparc hosts and installed apache2, which
also installed apache2c, apacht2rt and ap2_prefork.  Apache2 started
fine and netstat shows listening on port 80, so still digging for now.

Assuming that there is such a thing, are there other apache2 modules
that you have installed?

Alex


-- 


From garyarm at testedgeinc.com  Sat Nov  5 01:18:28 2005
From: garyarm at testedgeinc.com (Gary Armstrong)
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2005 16:18:28 -0800
Subject: [csw-users] ldap libraries
In-Reply-To: <20051104180546.000052ee@sws602>
References: <436BEC40.1070807@testedgeinc.com>
	<20051104174551.00004db9@sws602>	<436BF53C.6070901@testedgeinc.com>
	<20051104180546.000052ee@sws602>
Message-ID: <436BFA54.7070700@testedgeinc.com>

Alex Moore wrote:

>On Fri, 04 Nov 2005 15:56:44 -0800
>Gary Armstrong <garyarm at testedgeinc.com> wrote:
>
>  
>
>>I'd very much appreciate it. I guess if push comes to shove, I can
>>try to go back to apache. From what I can glimmer you're the ldap 
>>maintainer. Is the apache2 maintainer offline?
>>    
>>
>
>Correct, I am the openldap maintainer.  Don't know what Cory is doing.
>
>I stopped apache on one of my sparc hosts and installed apache2, which
>also installed apache2c, apacht2rt and ap2_prefork.  Apache2 started
>fine and netstat shows listening on port 80, so still digging for now.
>
>Assuming that there is such a thing, are there other apache2 modules
>that you have installed?
>
>Alex
>
>
>  
>
Alex;


I uninstalled openldap, openldap_client, openldap_rt. Installed 
openldap_client which brought in rt. Didn't touch apache2 except to 
restart. Yup it works. Oh and even though I upgraded everything 
~Tuesday, one of them made me update openssl.

I'm clueless as to the why. Hope the info helps you.

Thanks
Gary


From pspuhler at ball.com  Sat Nov  5 01:24:57 2005
From: pspuhler at ball.com (Peter Spuhler)
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2005 17:24:57 -0700
Subject: [csw-users] ldap libraries
In-Reply-To: <20051104180546.000052ee@sws602>
References: <436BEC40.1070807@testedgeinc.com>
	<20051104174551.00004db9@sws602> <436BF53C.6070901@testedgeinc.com>
	<20051104180546.000052ee@sws602>
Message-ID: <1131150298.27602.4.camel@pspuhler1-pc.aero.ball.com>

On Fri, 2005-11-04 at 18:05 -0600, Alex Moore wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Nov 2005 15:56:44 -0800
> Gary Armstrong <garyarm at testedgeinc.com> wrote:
> 
> > I'd very much appreciate it. I guess if push comes to shove, I can
> > try to go back to apache. From what I can glimmer you're the ldap 
> > maintainer. Is the apache2 maintainer offline?
> 
> Correct, I am the openldap maintainer.  Don't know what Cory is doing.
> 
> I stopped apache on one of my sparc hosts and installed apache2, which
> also installed apache2c, apacht2rt and ap2_prefork.  Apache2 started
> fine and netstat shows listening on port 80, so still digging for now.
> 
> Assuming that there is such a thing, are there other apache2 modules
> that you have installed?
> 
> Alex
> 
> 
yes specifically i'm using ap2_subversion which seems to get mentioned
in the error messages.
 Peter


From asmoore at blastwave.org  Sat Nov  5 01:27:07 2005
From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex Moore)
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 18:27:07 -0600
Subject: [csw-users] ldap libraries
In-Reply-To: <436BFA54.7070700@testedgeinc.com>
References: <436BEC40.1070807@testedgeinc.com> <20051104174551.00004db9@sws602>
	<436BF53C.6070901@testedgeinc.com> <20051104180546.000052ee@sws602>
	<436BFA54.7070700@testedgeinc.com>
Message-ID: <20051104182707.00003386@sws602>

On Fri, 04 Nov 2005 16:18:28 -0800
Gary Armstrong <garyarm at testedgeinc.com> wrote:

> I uninstalled openldap, openldap_client, openldap_rt. Installed 
> openldap_client which brought in rt. Didn't touch apache2 except to 
> restart. Yup it works. Oh and even though I upgraded everything 
> ~Tuesday, one of them made me update openssl.
> 
> I'm clueless as to the why. Hope the info helps you.

My lack of knowledge on apache2 is now a limitation.  I do know a bit
about apache, but I cannot make apache2 run.  He is listening on port
80, but I get continuous error messages: [notice] child pid 15058 exit
signal Illegal instruction (4)

Please uninstall as before, but install only openldap_rt.  Does apache2
still run?

Alex


From asmoore at blastwave.org  Sat Nov  5 01:42:01 2005
From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex Moore)
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 18:42:01 -0600
Subject: [csw-users] ldap libraries
In-Reply-To: <1131150298.27602.4.camel@pspuhler1-pc.aero.ball.com>
References: <436BEC40.1070807@testedgeinc.com> <20051104174551.00004db9@sws602>
	<436BF53C.6070901@testedgeinc.com> <20051104180546.000052ee@sws602>
	<1131150298.27602.4.camel@pspuhler1-pc.aero.ball.com>
Message-ID: <20051104184201.000032a0@sws602>

On Fri, 04 Nov 2005 17:24:57 -0700
Peter Spuhler <pspuhler at ball.com> wrote:

> yes specifically i'm using ap2_subversion which seems to get mentioned
> in the error messages.
>  Peter

So you are having this problem as well?

I cannot get past the 'Illegal instruction' error that is filling up
the apache2 error log.

Alex

-- 


From garyarm at testedgeinc.com  Sat Nov  5 01:43:48 2005
From: garyarm at testedgeinc.com (Gary Armstrong)
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2005 16:43:48 -0800
Subject: [csw-users] ldap libraries
In-Reply-To: <20051104182707.00003386@sws602>
References: <436BEC40.1070807@testedgeinc.com>
	<20051104174551.00004db9@sws602>	<436BF53C.6070901@testedgeinc.com>
	<20051104180546.000052ee@sws602>	<436BFA54.7070700@testedgeinc.com>
	<20051104182707.00003386@sws602>
Message-ID: <436C0044.9060805@testedgeinc.com>

Alex Moore wrote:

>On Fri, 04 Nov 2005 16:18:28 -0800
>Gary Armstrong <garyarm at testedgeinc.com> wrote:
>
>  
>
>>I uninstalled openldap, openldap_client, openldap_rt. Installed 
>>openldap_client which brought in rt. Didn't touch apache2 except to 
>>restart. Yup it works. Oh and even though I upgraded everything 
>>~Tuesday, one of them made me update openssl.
>>
>>I'm clueless as to the why. Hope the info helps you.
>>    
>>
>
>My lack of knowledge on apache2 is now a limitation.  I do know a bit
>about apache, but I cannot make apache2 run.  He is listening on port
>80, but I get continuous error messages: [notice] child pid 15058 exit
>signal Illegal instruction (4)
>
>Please uninstall as before, but install only openldap_rt.  Does apache2
>still run?
>
>Alex
>_______________________________________________
>users mailing list
>users at lists.blastwave.org
>https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
>  
>
Alex;

pkg-get -r openldap_client
pkg-get -r openldap_rt

pkg-get -i openldap_rt

Apache2 still works fine. I had openldap installed even though it wasn't 
configured ( at least by me ). It doesn't appear to be client or rt. It 
could be that pkg-get was lying to me. Compare was telling me I was up 
to date. Maybe I wasn't.

Gary


From asmoore at blastwave.org  Sat Nov  5 02:23:55 2005
From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex Moore)
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 19:23:55 -0600
Subject: [csw-users] ldap libraries
In-Reply-To: <436C0044.9060805@testedgeinc.com>
References: <436BEC40.1070807@testedgeinc.com> <20051104174551.00004db9@sws602>
	<436BF53C.6070901@testedgeinc.com> <20051104180546.000052ee@sws602>
	<436BFA54.7070700@testedgeinc.com> <20051104182707.00003386@sws602>
	<436C0044.9060805@testedgeinc.com>
Message-ID: <20051104192355.00006750@sws602>

On Fri, 04 Nov 2005 16:43:48 -0800
Gary Armstrong <garyarm at testedgeinc.com> wrote:

> pkg-get -r openldap_client
> pkg-get -r openldap_rt
> 
> pkg-get -i openldap_rt
> 
> Apache2 still works fine. I had openldap installed even though it
> wasn't configured ( at least by me ). It doesn't appear to be client
> or rt. It could be that pkg-get was lying to me. Compare was telling
> me I was up to date. Maybe I wasn't.

Could be.  There has been only one release of openldap_rt.  There has
been two releases of openldap_client.

Glad things are working now.  I still have not gotten past the 'Illegal
instrution' errors that bombard apache2 error log.  This is on a
Sun-Fire V210.  I use CSWapache anyway and your problem seems to have
resolved itself, so I will not worry about for now.

Alex


-- 


From mmayer at blastwave.org  Sat Nov  5 06:17:57 2005
From: mmayer at blastwave.org (Markus Mayer)
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 21:17:57 -0800
Subject: [csw-users] ldap libraries
In-Reply-To: <20051104184201.000032a0@sws602>
References: <436BEC40.1070807@testedgeinc.com> <20051104174551.00004db9@sws602>
	<436BF53C.6070901@testedgeinc.com> <20051104180546.000052ee@sws602>
	<1131150298.27602.4.camel@pspuhler1-pc.aero.ball.com>
	<20051104184201.000032a0@sws602>
Message-ID: <20051105051757.GA16178@chinook.mmayer.net>

On Friday, 04 Nov 2005 18:42 -0600, Alex Moore wrote:

> I cannot get past the 'Illegal instruction' error that is filling up
> the apache2 error log.

Could you guys try starting apache2 like this:
  truss -f -o apache.log /opt/csw/apache2/sbin/httpd -f \
    /opt/csw/apache2/etc/httpd.conf -k start

Maybe the truss output gives a hint as to where and why it dies.
Another option would be to start disabling modules one by one and see
if the illegal instruction goes away.

I have apache2 running here on an Ultra 60 unter Solaris 10 (until
recently I was running Solaris 9), no problems with either. I also just
installed ap2_subversion, just to give it a try. It's still working.

$ telnet localhost 80
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to localhost.
Escape character is '^]'.
HEAD / HTTP/1.0

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2005 05:12:45 GMT
Server: Apache/2.0.55 (Unix) DAV/2 PHP/5.0.5 SVN/1.2.3
Last-Modified: Thu, 03 Nov 2005 17:48:52 GMT
ETag: "39087-59-cd4b6900"
Accept-Ranges: bytes
Content-Length: 89
Connection: close
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1

-Markus


From asmoore at blastwave.org  Sat Nov  5 14:44:27 2005
From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex Moore)
Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2005 07:44:27 -0600
Subject: [csw-users] ldap libraries
In-Reply-To: <20051105051757.GA16178@chinook.mmayer.net>
References: <436BEC40.1070807@testedgeinc.com> <20051104174551.00004db9@sws602>
	<436BF53C.6070901@testedgeinc.com> <20051104180546.000052ee@sws602>
	<1131150298.27602.4.camel@pspuhler1-pc.aero.ball.com>
	<20051104184201.000032a0@sws602>
	<20051105051757.GA16178@chinook.mmayer.net>
Message-ID: <20051105074427.000014f3@sws602>

On Fri, 4 Nov 2005 21:17:57 -0800
Markus Mayer <mmayer at blastwave.org> wrote:

> On Friday, 04 Nov 2005 18:42 -0600, Alex Moore wrote:
> 
> > I cannot get past the 'Illegal instruction' error that is filling up
> > the apache2 error log.
> 
> Could you guys try starting apache2 like this:
>   truss -f -o apache.log /opt/csw/apache2/sbin/httpd -f \
>     /opt/csw/apache2/etc/httpd.conf -k start

Hi Markus.  I ran truss and all that I could determine was that apache2
built with OpenLDAP and running on a host that uses Sun's ldap client
with TLS does not work.

I have another sparc host that has apache running that I can play
with.  It also uses Sun's ldap client, but without TLS. CSWapache2
worked fine on this box.

Thanks, Alex


From jreid at vnet.net  Sun Nov  6 02:07:35 2005
From: jreid at vnet.net (Joe Reid)
Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2005 19:07:35 -0600
Subject: [csw-users] horde
Message-ID: <436D5757.6070201@vnet.net>

I'm wanting to setup horde - does the apache and php build from 
blastwave support horde?  Anyone running horde on top of the basic 
blastwave tools?

-- 
Joe Reid
jreid at vnet.net
http://www.singlewhitemale.net
?c=a=rb=sc=fd=te=wf=zg=porh=n?


From mmayer at blastwave.org  Sun Nov  6 04:52:38 2005
From: mmayer at blastwave.org (Markus Mayer)
Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2005 19:52:38 -0800
Subject: [csw-users] Problem with the CSW install of KDE-GCC on Solaris
	10
In-Reply-To: <20051104050451.2A264F8AF@mail.blastwave.org>
References: <436A08B4.1090607@ericsson.com>
	<20051104050451.2A264F8AF@mail.blastwave.org>
Message-ID: <20051106035238.GA18075@chinook.mmayer.net>

On Thursday, 03 Nov 2005 23:04 -0600, Andrew Chandler wrote:

> I found the problem - reverting to the previous qt_gcc from 9/16 at
> least gets me the splash screens back changing the kde base did
> nothing.

Thanks for that tip. It happened to me now, too. Reverting back to Qt
from stable got things working again. Obviously, this was a different
problem from the one I saw with kdebase about a week ago.

-Markus


From mats.larsson at ericsson.com  Mon Nov  7 10:40:29 2005
From: mats.larsson at ericsson.com (Mats Larsson)
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 10:40:29 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] kde_gcc problem
Message-ID: <436F210D.1000806@ericsson.com>

http://www.blastwave.org/mantis/view_bug_advanced_page.php?f_id=0001263

This bug has a resolution of fixed but I don't understand how it's 
fixed. The current kde_* packages in unstable *does not* work with 
qt_gcc 3.3.5. Am I missing something?


From blastwave at gmail.com  Mon Nov  7 15:20:31 2005
From: blastwave at gmail.com (Dennis Clarke)
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 09:20:31 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] kde_gcc problem
In-Reply-To: <436F210D.1000806@ericsson.com>
References: <436F210D.1000806@ericsson.com>
Message-ID: <a6265da20511070620i1063ba4l59dd4cd35b5b1f85@mail.gmail.com>

On 11/7/05, Mats Larsson <mats.larsson at ericsson.com> wrote:
> http://www.blastwave.org/mantis/view_bug_advanced_page.php?f_id=0001263
>
> This bug has a resolution of fixed but I don't understand how it's
> fixed. The current kde_* packages in unstable *does not* work with
> qt_gcc 3.3.5. Am I missing something?

I think that there was a release of  kdebase_gcc-3.4.3 late yesterday.

Please see :

         http://www.blastwave.org/cronlist/

Dennis Clarke

From mats.larsson at ericsson.com  Mon Nov  7 15:43:07 2005
From: mats.larsson at ericsson.com (Mats Larsson)
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 15:43:07 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] kde_gcc problem
In-Reply-To: <a6265da20511070620i1063ba4l59dd4cd35b5b1f85@mail.gmail.com>
References: <436F210D.1000806@ericsson.com>
	<a6265da20511070620i1063ba4l59dd4cd35b5b1f85@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <436F67FB.7050604@ericsson.com>

On 2005-11-07 15:20, Dennis Clarke wrote:

> On 11/7/05, Mats Larsson <mats.larsson at ericsson.com> wrote:
>> http://www.blastwave.org/mantis/view_bug_advanced_page.php?f_id=0001263
>>
>> This bug has a resolution of fixed but I don't understand how it's
>> fixed. The current kde_* packages in unstable *does not* work with
>> qt_gcc 3.3.5. Am I missing something?
> 
> I think that there was a release of  kdebase_gcc-3.4.3 late yesterday.

That one I have already. Got it a couple of days back from the testing 
area to solve another glitch (no KDE window manager (kwin) present) so I 
don't think the qt_gcc-3.3.5 problem is solved by that.

I also see in the log:
Nov  7 00:41  qt_gcc-3.3.4-SunOS5.8-%ARCH%-CSW.pkg.gz

Does that mean that qt_gcc-3.3.5 has been reverted to qt_gcc-3.3.4? If 
so the problem in a way is fixed since no incompatibilities between 
qt_gcc and kde_gcc exist anymore.

/MOL


From garyarm at testedgeinc.com  Mon Nov  7 16:33:08 2005
From: garyarm at testedgeinc.com (Gary Armstrong)
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 07:33:08 -0800
Subject: [csw-users] ldap libraries
In-Reply-To: <20051104192355.00006750@sws602>
References: <436BEC40.1070807@testedgeinc.com>
	<20051104174551.00004db9@sws602>	<436BF53C.6070901@testedgeinc.com>
	<20051104180546.000052ee@sws602>	<436BFA54.7070700@testedgeinc.com>
	<20051104182707.00003386@sws602>	<436C0044.9060805@testedgeinc.com>
	<20051104192355.00006750@sws602>
Message-ID: <436F73B4.6030803@testedgeinc.com>

Alex Moore wrote:

>On Fri, 04 Nov 2005 16:43:48 -0800
>Gary Armstrong <garyarm at testedgeinc.com> wrote:
>
>  
>
>>pkg-get -r openldap_client
>>pkg-get -r openldap_rt
>>
>>pkg-get -i openldap_rt
>>
>>Apache2 still works fine. I had openldap installed even though it
>>wasn't configured ( at least by me ). It doesn't appear to be client
>>or rt. It could be that pkg-get was lying to me. Compare was telling
>>me I was up to date. Maybe I wasn't.
>>    
>>
>
>Could be.  There has been only one release of openldap_rt.  There has
>been two releases of openldap_client.
>
>Glad things are working now.  I still have not gotten past the 'Illegal
>instrution' errors that bombard apache2 error log.  This is on a
>Sun-Fire V210.  I use CSWapache anyway and your problem seems to have
>resolved itself, so I will not worry about for now.
>
>Alex
>
>
>  
>
This morning I: pkg-get -i openldap

Apache2 still works fine, even though I'm back to the configuration 
where I had the problem. Earlier this week I had done a pkg-get -Uuf. 
All I can figure is that the ldap packages weren't right even though 
pkg-get compare was returning SAME.

Thanks for the help
Gary


From blastwave at gmail.com  Mon Nov  7 16:47:42 2005
From: blastwave at gmail.com (Dennis Clarke)
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 10:47:42 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] kde_gcc problem
In-Reply-To: <436F67FB.7050604@ericsson.com>
References: <436F210D.1000806@ericsson.com>
	<a6265da20511070620i1063ba4l59dd4cd35b5b1f85@mail.gmail.com>
	<436F67FB.7050604@ericsson.com>
Message-ID: <a6265da20511070747q4dabf396n1a4329e2d7d89a79@mail.gmail.com>

On 11/7/05, Mats Larsson <mats.larsson at ericsson.com> wrote:
> On 2005-11-07 15:20, Dennis Clarke wrote:
>
> > On 11/7/05, Mats Larsson <mats.larsson at ericsson.com> wrote:
> >> http://www.blastwave.org/mantis/view_bug_advanced_page.php?f_id=0001263
> >>
> >> This bug has a resolution of fixed but I don't understand how it's
> >> fixed. The current kde_* packages in unstable *does not* work with
> >> qt_gcc 3.3.5. Am I missing something?
> >
> > I think that there was a release of  kdebase_gcc-3.4.3 late yesterday.
>
> That one I have already. Got it a couple of days back from the testing
> area to solve another glitch (no KDE window manager (kwin) present) so I
> don't think the qt_gcc-3.3.5 problem is solved by that.
>
> I also see in the log:
> Nov  7 00:41  qt_gcc-3.3.4-SunOS5.8-%ARCH%-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> Does that mean that qt_gcc-3.3.5 has been reverted to qt_gcc-3.3.4? If
> so the problem in a way is fixed since no incompatibilities between
> qt_gcc and kde_gcc exist anymore.

The idea here is to get us back to a fully functional KDE and if we
need to revert then that makes full sense I think.

Dennis

From maybird1776 at yahoo.com  Mon Nov  7 17:09:02 2005
From: maybird1776 at yahoo.com (ken mays)
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 08:09:02 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [csw-users] kde_gcc problem
In-Reply-To: <a6265da20511070747q4dabf396n1a4329e2d7d89a79@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20051107160902.67905.qmail@web33002.mail.mud.yahoo.com>

Revertion was done as of yesterday, thanks to Phil.
Trolltech's Qt is not binary backward compatible fully
with older Qt versions by design (similar to newer GCC
versions). So, I would have had to rebuild KDE from
scratch.

Everything should have stabilized by now.

~Ken


--- Dennis Clarke <blastwave at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 11/7/05, Mats Larsson <mats.larsson at ericsson.com>
> wrote:
> > On 2005-11-07 15:20, Dennis Clarke wrote:
> >
> > > On 11/7/05, Mats Larsson
> <mats.larsson at ericsson.com> wrote:
> > >>
>
http://www.blastwave.org/mantis/view_bug_advanced_page.php?f_id=0001263
> > >>
> > >> This bug has a resolution of fixed but I don't
> understand how it's
> > >> fixed. The current kde_* packages in unstable
> *does not* work with
> > >> qt_gcc 3.3.5. Am I missing something?
> > >
> > > I think that there was a release of 
> kdebase_gcc-3.4.3 late yesterday.
> >
> > That one I have already. Got it a couple of days
> back from the testing
> > area to solve another glitch (no KDE window
> manager (kwin) present) so I
> > don't think the qt_gcc-3.3.5 problem is solved by
> that.
> >
> > I also see in the log:
> > Nov  7 00:41 
> qt_gcc-3.3.4-SunOS5.8-%ARCH%-CSW.pkg.gz
> >
> > Does that mean that qt_gcc-3.3.5 has been reverted
> to qt_gcc-3.3.4? If
> > so the problem in a way is fixed since no
> incompatibilities between
> > qt_gcc and kde_gcc exist anymore.
> 
> The idea here is to get us back to a fully
> functional KDE and if we
> need to revert then that makes full sense I think.
> 
> Dennis
> 



	
		
__________________________________ 
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 
http://mail.yahoo.com


From pspuhler at ball.com  Mon Nov  7 17:49:39 2005
From: pspuhler at ball.com (Spuhler, Peter)
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 09:49:39 -0700
Subject: [csw-users] ldap libraries
Message-ID: <7575324F915A05448800386F6CEAF36701C09DC1@AEROMSG2.AERO.BALL.COM>

On Fri, 04 Nov 2005 16:43:48 -0800
Gary Armstrong <garyarm at testedgeinc.com> wrote:

> pkg-get -r openldap_client
> pkg-get -r openldap_rt
> 
> pkg-get -i openldap_rt
> 
> Apache2 still works fine. I had openldap installed even though it
> wasn't configured ( at least by me ). It doesn't appear to be client
> or rt. It could be that pkg-get was lying to me. Compare was telling
> me I was up to date. Maybe I wasn't.

Could be.  There has been only one release of openldap_rt.  There has
been two releases of openldap_client.

Glad things are working now.  I still have not gotten past the 'Illegal
instrution' errors that bombard apache2 error log.  This is on a
Sun-Fire V210.  I use CSWapache anyway and your problem seems to have
resolved itself, so I will not worry about for now.

Alex

This fixed apache2 for me as well. The lib error has gone away. Thanks


From asmoore at blastwave.org  Mon Nov  7 18:43:07 2005
From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex Moore)
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 11:43:07 -0600
Subject: [csw-users] ldap libraries
In-Reply-To: <436F73B4.6030803@testedgeinc.com>
References: <436BEC40.1070807@testedgeinc.com> <20051104174551.00004db9@sws602>
	<436BF53C.6070901@testedgeinc.com> <20051104180546.000052ee@sws602>
	<436BFA54.7070700@testedgeinc.com> <20051104182707.00003386@sws602>
	<436C0044.9060805@testedgeinc.com> <20051104192355.00006750@sws602>
	<436F73B4.6030803@testedgeinc.com>
Message-ID: <20051107114307.000061ab@sws602>

On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 07:33:08 -0800
Gary Armstrong <garyarm at testedgeinc.com> wrote:

> This morning I: pkg-get -i openldap
> 
> Apache2 still works fine, even though I'm back to the configuration 
> where I had the problem. Earlier this week I had done a pkg-get -Uuf. 
> All I can figure is that the ldap packages weren't right even though 
> pkg-get compare was returning SAME.
> 

Hi, Gary.  Glad to hear that apache2 is working for you and Peter as
well.  Thanks for reporting back.

Could you both make a note in any bug reports that you created that all
is ok now and the bug reports can be resolved and closed.

Thanks, Alex


From Mark.McCoy at utsa.edu  Mon Nov  7 22:21:00 2005
From: Mark.McCoy at utsa.edu (Mark McCoy)
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 15:21:00 -0600
Subject: [csw-users] Release schedule for stable packages
Message-ID: <7A663F65FEA3E248A4F92E1496322BF495EAA8@opal1604.UTSARR.NET>

Hey all, 

First, let me thank everyone at blastwave for their fine contribution to
all Solaris admins everywhere!

I was curious as to what the timeline/procedure/whatyacallit is for
moving packages into the stable tree.  Is it manual, a quarterly release
process, or something else?

I have been dabbling with pkgsrc from netbsd a little bit, and I like
how their release team puts out quarterly releases of the package tree.
This allows an admin to standardize on, for example, the 2005Q3
packages, and allows "cherry picking" of packages  for security updates
from a later tree.  Is there a way to do this at the blastwave level?
I'm currently working on doing something like this in-house, and I think
that this method might benefit others as well.

Just food for thought...

Mark
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20051107/42c177f7/attachment-0001.html>

From a.cervellin at acm.org  Mon Nov  7 22:48:06 2005
From: a.cervellin at acm.org (Alessio Cervellin @ acm)
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 22:48:06 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] Release schedule for stable packages
In-Reply-To: <7A663F65FEA3E248A4F92E1496322BF495EAA8@opal1604.UTSARR.NET>
References: <7A663F65FEA3E248A4F92E1496322BF495EAA8@opal1604.UTSARR.NET>
Message-ID: <436FCB96.5000601@acm.org>

Mark McCoy wrote:

> I was curious as to what the timeline/procedure/whatyacallit is for 
> moving packages into the stable tree.  Is it manual, a quarterly release 
> process, or something else?

 From http://www.blastwave.org/userguide, section "Release Program":
[...]
The ?unstable? archive is updated often. Unstable will appeal to users 
that like to have that very latest versions of software. Due to nature 
of these rapid releases users must accept there might be packages that 
have open bug reports applied to them.

The ?stable? archive is updated every 3 months, nominally at the 
beginning of January, April, July and October. The packages that form 
?stable? are taken from ?unstable? but are first proven by use in 
?unstable? and through a program of QA testing. The packages are known 
to work together and have all known critical bugs fixed. Should any 
critical security problem need to be fixed then the ?stable? archive 
will be changed mid-term and due notice of the update given. Stable will 
suit the business or serious user who expects continuity and reliability 
of service.
[...]


From james at blastwave.org  Wed Nov  9 10:41:34 2005
From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee)
Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 09:41:34 GMT
Subject: [csw-users] Release schedule for stable packages
In-Reply-To: <7A663F65FEA3E248A4F92E1496322BF495EAA8@opal1604.UTSARR.NET>
References: <7A663F65FEA3E248A4F92E1496322BF495EAA8@opal1604.UTSARR.NET>
Message-ID: <20051109.9413400.523966970@landeck.jamesipoos.com>

On 07/11/05, 21:21:00, Mark McCoy <Mark.McCoy at utsa.edu> wrote regarding 
[csw-users] Release schedule for stable packages:

> This allows an admin to standardize on, for example, the 2005Q3
> packages, and allows "cherry picking" of packages for security updates
> from a later tree.

When you're cherry picking make sure you don't get a rotten apple.

If you add a package to stable from unstable check if you need
to add its prerequisite and *supported* packages too, then repeat
for any additional packages needed.  You might be able to add
parts of the package tree but please understand that it won't
always work unless a connected group is updated.  Unless you are
prepared to verify each package in the chain the group is going
to be large or unverified which nullifies your initial reasoning
of doing it for security.



From Mark.McCoy at utsa.edu  Wed Nov  9 15:00:25 2005
From: Mark.McCoy at utsa.edu (Mark McCoy)
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 08:00:25 -0600
Subject: [csw-users] Release schedule for stable packages
Message-ID: <7A663F65FEA3E248A4F92E1496322BF495EAA9@opal1604.UTSARR.NET>

By "cherry picking", I was referring to having a current pkgsrc tree
checked out alongside the 2005Q3 tree and building updated packages for
security reasons out of that (presumably the pkgsrc system is smart
enough to pull in proper dependencies for this type of update).  I
haven't looked into how the netbsd pkgsrc team handles security updates,
though.  They might already do something like this and issue patches to
their stable tree.


-----Original Message-----
From: users-bounces+mark.mccoy=utsa.edu at lists.blastwave.org
[mailto:users-bounces+mark.mccoy=utsa.edu at lists.blastwave.org] On Behalf
Of James Lee
Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 3:42 AM
To: questions and discussions
Subject: Re: [csw-users] Release schedule for stable packages


On 07/11/05, 21:21:00, Mark McCoy <Mark.McCoy at utsa.edu> wrote regarding 
[csw-users] Release schedule for stable packages:

> This allows an admin to standardize on, for example, the 2005Q3 
> packages, and allows "cherry picking" of packages for security updates

> from a later tree.

When you're cherry picking make sure you don't get a rotten apple.

If you add a package to stable from unstable check if you need to add
its prerequisite and *supported* packages too, then repeat for any
additional packages needed.  You might be able to add parts of the
package tree but please understand that it won't always work unless a
connected group is updated.  Unless you are prepared to verify each
package in the chain the group is going to be large or unverified which
nullifies your initial reasoning of doing it for security.

_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users at lists.blastwave.org
https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users


From james at blastwave.org  Wed Nov  9 15:38:00 2005
From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee)
Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 14:38:00 GMT
Subject: [csw-users] Release schedule for stable packages
In-Reply-To: <7A663F65FEA3E248A4F92E1496322BF495EAA9@opal1604.UTSARR.NET>
References: <7A663F65FEA3E248A4F92E1496322BF495EAA9@opal1604.UTSARR.NET>
Message-ID: <20051109.14380000.2660709097@landeck.jamesipoos.com>

On 09/11/05, 14:00:25, Mark McCoy <Mark.McCoy at utsa.edu> wrote regarding Re: 
[csw-users] Release schedule for stable packages:

> By "cherry picking", I was referring to having a current pkgsrc tree
> checked out alongside the 2005Q3 tree and building updated packages for
> security reasons out of that

And by "rotten apple" I was referring to spoiling the barrel.[1]
It's not as simple as pulling one package in isolation.  You have
to at least consider pulling a connected group which may have other
security implications.  If you are not prepared to consider the
related packages you will have failures.  Do what you like but you
have been warned.

Note also the packages don't form a tree but networks[2], most are
in one large network and only a few are isolated.



James.


[1] http://www.google.com/search?q=apple+spoil+barrel
[2] http://pfelecan.free.fr/blastwave/dependencyGraph/




From Mark.McCoy at utsa.edu  Wed Nov  9 15:52:40 2005
From: Mark.McCoy at utsa.edu (Mark McCoy)
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 08:52:40 -0600
Subject: [csw-users] Release schedule for stable packages
Message-ID: <7A663F65FEA3E248A4F92E1496322BF495EAAA@opal1604.UTSARR.NET>

I'm not sure we are on the same page here.  I'm not talking about mixing
stable and unstable from blastwave, I'm talking about pkgsrc from
netbsd.  They have a similar release method (quarterly stable, rolling
unstable).

I'm not sure what the security arrangements are for pkgsrc, however.
Like I said, they could already be doing this via their security team
(issuing updates to the quarterly releases for security reasons).

What it boils down to is: I was just thinking out loud.  



From james at blastwave.org  Wed Nov  9 16:12:38 2005
From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee)
Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 15:12:38 GMT
Subject: [csw-users] Release schedule for stable packages
In-Reply-To: <7A663F65FEA3E248A4F92E1496322BF495EAAA@opal1604.UTSARR.NET>
References: <7A663F65FEA3E248A4F92E1496322BF495EAAA@opal1604.UTSARR.NET>
Message-ID: <20051109.15123800.3680988370@landeck.jamesipoos.com>

On 09/11/05, 14:52:40, Mark McCoy <Mark.McCoy at utsa.edu> wrote regarding Re: 
[csw-users] Release schedule for stable packages:

> I'm not sure we are on the same page here.  I'm not talking about mixing
> stable and unstable from blastwave, I'm talking about pkgsrc from
> netbsd.

No you're not, this is the blastwave users' list.  Hopefully the
reference supplied by Alessio: http://www.blastwave.org/userguide
answers most of your original question, note in particular the
allowance for mid-term stable security updates.  As for "cherry
picking" it's not supported (by blastwave).




James.


From mark at markround.com  Mon Nov 14 22:21:48 2005
From: mark at markround.com (Mark Round)
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 21:21:48 +0000
Subject: [csw-users] New PostgreSQL 8.1.0 packages available
Message-ID: <DA652478-C2ED-47A3-BE79-B896E7B218F5@markround.com>

Hi all,

I'm pleased to announce that PostgreSQL 8.1.0 packages are now  
available from Blastwave, and should be making their way out to the  
mirrors as I type. This set of packages includes libpq, the core  
postgresql package, contrib, and the updated set of JDBC drivers.

Please note that there are a large number of changes with this 8.1.0  
release - for details on all the new features, please see the  
official PostgreSQL announcement : http://www.postgresql.org/docs/ 
whatsnew .

Please also note that if you are intending to update to this version  
from a previous installation (either 7.3.x or 8.0.x), you will need  
to do a dump and reload of your database. Your old data directory  
will not work with the new packages, due to changes made by the  
PostgreSQL developers. For information on this dump and reload  
procedure, see the HTML documentation (also included with the  
package) at the following URL : http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/ 
interactive/backup.html . I recommend taking a full dump of your  
database and testing the backup works as expected before proceeding  
with this upgrade.

All comments, bug reports, feedback etc. welcome.

--
Mark Round
mark at markround.com
:wq





From rob at colnet.cmhnet.org  Tue Nov 15 21:32:58 2005
From: rob at colnet.cmhnet.org (Robert Stampfli)
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 15:32:58 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] New mysql4 missing mysql_print_defaults
Message-ID: <20051115203258.GA3999@colnet>

The latest CSWmysql4 (which seems to have been split into
CSWmysql4 and CSWmysql4client) appears to be missing the
file:  /opt/csw/mysql4/bin/my_print_defaults

I've placed a copy of this file from the previous package
(both 4.1.15) on my website if anyone needs it after
upgrading:

http://stampfli.us/my_print_defaults

Rob


From asmoore at blastwave.org  Tue Nov 15 22:21:03 2005
From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex Moore)
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 15:21:03 -0600
Subject: [csw-users] New mysql4 missing mysql_print_defaults
In-Reply-To: <20051115203258.GA3999@colnet>
References: <20051115203258.GA3999@colnet>
Message-ID: <20051115152103.00000384@sws602>

On Tue, 15 Nov 2005 15:32:58 -0500
Robert Stampfli <rob at colnet.cmhnet.org> wrote:

> The latest CSWmysql4 (which seems to have been split into
> CSWmysql4 and CSWmysql4client) appears to be missing the
> file:  /opt/csw/mysql4/bin/my_print_defaults
> 

Thanks Robert.  I will find out what happened and cure the package.

Alex


From asmoore at blastwave.org  Wed Nov 16 00:35:42 2005
From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex Moore)
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 17:35:42 -0600
Subject: [csw-users] New mysql4 missing mysql_print_defaults
In-Reply-To: <20051115203258.GA3999@colnet>
References: <20051115203258.GA3999@colnet>
Message-ID: <20051115173542.00001b46@sws602>

On Tue, 15 Nov 2005 15:32:58 -0500
Robert Stampfli <rob at colnet.cmhnet.org> wrote:

> The latest CSWmysql4 (which seems to have been split into
> CSWmysql4 and CSWmysql4client) appears to be missing the
> file:  /opt/csw/mysql4/bin/my_print_defaults

Yes, mysql4 is split into three packages.  I must have 'd' too many
times on the list of files and dropped some from mysql4 package.

An update for mysql4 is at the testing site,
http://www.blastwave.org/testing 

Thanks for catching this, but I usually see bug reports before
checking the mailing list:>

Alex


From Daniel.Berger at qwest.com  Wed Nov 16 23:06:06 2005
From: Daniel.Berger at qwest.com (Daniel Berger)
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 15:06:06 -0700
Subject: [csw-users] Strange Firefox error
Message-ID: <437BAD4E.9000500@qwest.com>

Hi all,

Solaris 10
Firefox 1.06 (blastwave package)

Every now and then I'll get a blank page from Firefox with this error in the 
terminal:

*** Failed to load overlay chrome://devboi/content/devboi.xul

Google revealed nothing. Any ideas?

- Dan


From ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr  Tue Nov 22 10:25:09 2005
From: ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=E9rard_Henry?=)
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 10:25:09 +0100
Subject: [csw-users]  trouble with php?
Message-ID: <4382E3F5.90304@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>

hello,
i'm using apache 1.3.33 from blastwave on solaris 10 x86.
I can use phpmyadmin without trouble after installing CSWmodphp4 (4.4.0) 
and other stuff needed.
But i'm in trouble with a particular software, a kind of CMS called spip 
(www.spip.net) that uses php, and i got errors:
[Tue Nov 22 09:04:38 2005] [notice] Apache/1.3.33 (Unix) PHP/4.4.0 
mod_ssl/2.8.22 OpenSSL/0.9.7d configured -- resuming normal operations
[Tue Nov 22 09:04:38 2005] [notice] Accept mutex: fcntl (Default: fcntl)
[Tue Nov 22 09:04:44 2005] [error] PHP Warning: 
include_ecrire(ecrire/inc_flock.php3): failed to open stream: No such 
file or directory in 
/opt/csw/apache/htdocs/testgh/spip/ecrire/inc_version.php3 on line 51
[Tue Nov 22 09:04:44 2005] [error] PHP Warning:  include_ecrire(): 
Failed opening 'ecrire/inc_flock.php3' for inclusion 
(include_path='/opt/csw/lib/php') in 
/opt/csw/apache/htdocs/testgh/spip/ecrire/inc_version.php3 on line 51
[Tue Nov 22 09:04:44 2005] [error] PHP Warning: 
main(ecrire/data/meta_cache.php3): failed to open stream: No such file 
or directory in 
/opt/csw/apache/htdocs/testgh/spip/ecrire/inc_version.php3 on line 877

what is ununderstandable is that ecrire/inc_flock.php3 exists:
    8 -rw-r--r--   1 httpd    httpd       3463 Nov 22 07:24 
/opt/csw/apache/htdocs/testgh/spip/ecrire/inc_flock.php3



in httpd.conf, i have:
LoadModule php4_module        /opt/csw/lib/php/sapi/apache1-libphp4.so
# For PHP support. added by CSWphp
     AddType application/x-httpd-php .php .php3
     AddType application/x-httpd-php-source .phps
# If you want "index.php" to be an acceptible directory index, adjust
DirectoryIndex index.html index.php index.php3

anybody can help?


gerard




From mmayer at blastwave.org  Tue Nov 22 17:51:42 2005
From: mmayer at blastwave.org (Markus Mayer)
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 08:51:42 -0800
Subject: [csw-users] trouble with php?
In-Reply-To: <4382E3F5.90304@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
References: <4382E3F5.90304@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
Message-ID: <20051122165142.GA19580@chinook.mmayer.net>

On Tuesday, 22 Nov 2005 10:25 +0100, G?rard Henry wrote:

> [Tue Nov 22 09:04:44 2005] [error] PHP Warning: 
> include_ecrire(ecrire/inc_flock.php3): failed to open stream: No such 
> file or directory in 
> /opt/csw/apache/htdocs/testgh/spip/ecrire/inc_version.php3 on line 51
> [Tue Nov 22 09:04:44 2005] [error] PHP Warning:  include_ecrire(): 
> Failed opening 'ecrire/inc_flock.php3' for inclusion 
> (include_path='/opt/csw/lib/php') in 
> /opt/csw/apache/htdocs/testgh/spip/ecrire/inc_version.php3 on line 51
[...]


Could this be related to PHP bug #34552?
  http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=34552
I don't know if anybody ever reproduced it on x86 before or on Solaris
10, but on Solaris 9 SPARC __FILE__ definitely returns the wrong value
in certain circumstances.

You problem could be completely unrelated, however.

-Markus

-- 
Markus Mayer
http://www.mmayer.net/


From ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr  Tue Nov 22 18:36:55 2005
From: ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=E9rard_Henry?=)
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 18:36:55 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] trouble with php?
In-Reply-To: <20051122165142.GA19580@chinook.mmayer.net>
References: <4382E3F5.90304@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
	<20051122165142.GA19580@chinook.mmayer.net>
Message-ID: <43835737.6060906@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>

Markus Mayer wrote:
> On Tuesday, 22 Nov 2005 10:25 +0100, G?rard Henry wrote:
> 
> 
>>[Tue Nov 22 09:04:44 2005] [error] PHP Warning: 
>>include_ecrire(ecrire/inc_flock.php3): failed to open stream: No such 
>>file or directory in 
>>/opt/csw/apache/htdocs/testgh/spip/ecrire/inc_version.php3 on line 51
>>[Tue Nov 22 09:04:44 2005] [error] PHP Warning:  include_ecrire(): 
>>Failed opening 'ecrire/inc_flock.php3' for inclusion 
>>(include_path='/opt/csw/lib/php') in 
>>/opt/csw/apache/htdocs/testgh/spip/ecrire/inc_version.php3 on line 51
> 
> [...]
> 
> 
> Could this be related to PHP bug #34552?
>   http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=34552
> I don't know if anybody ever reproduced it on x86 before or on Solaris
> 10, but on Solaris 9 SPARC __FILE__ definitely returns the wrong value
> in certain circumstances.
> 
> You problem could be completely unrelated, however.
> 
> -Markus
> 

thanks for your answer
i try it, but everything happens as expected, so it's not related
what i don't understand, is that it works on another solaris server, but 
with apache manually compiled. So it seems there is something wrong with 
blastwave package, i think

gerard



From mark.round at gmail.com  Wed Nov 23 11:02:38 2005
From: mark.round at gmail.com (Mark Round)
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 10:02:38 +0000
Subject: [csw-users] trouble with php?
In-Reply-To: <43835737.6060906@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
References: <4382E3F5.90304@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
	<20051122165142.GA19580@chinook.mmayer.net>
	<43835737.6060906@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
Message-ID: <7b46f0de0511230202r1932afe5n825325f8b56a62c1@mail.gmail.com>

> >>[Tue Nov 22 09:04:44 2005] [error] PHP Warning:
> >>include_ecrire(ecrire/inc_flock.php3): failed to open stream: No such
> >>file or directory in
> >>/opt/csw/apache/htdocs/testgh/spip/ecrire/inc_version.php3 on line 51
> >>[Tue Nov 22 09:04:44 2005] [error] PHP Warning:  include_ecrire():
> >>Failed opening 'ecrire/inc_flock.php3' for inclusion
> >>(include_path='/opt/csw/lib/php') in
> >>/opt/csw/apache/htdocs/testgh/spip/ecrire/inc_version.php3 on line 51
> >

This is odd - I have just downloaded and installed SPIP on my
Blastwave installation of Apache/PHP4.4.0, and it's working fine. I
got through the installation procedure, set up the database, and now
I'm logged in the "private area". Did you manage to get this far ?


From ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr  Wed Nov 23 11:32:34 2005
From: ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr (Gerard Henry)
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 11:32:34 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] trouble with php?
In-Reply-To: <7b46f0de0511230202r1932afe5n825325f8b56a62c1@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4382E3F5.90304@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>	<20051122165142.GA19580@chinook.mmayer.net>	<43835737.6060906@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
	<7b46f0de0511230202r1932afe5n825325f8b56a62c1@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <43844542.7010701@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>

Mark Round wrote:

>>>>[Tue Nov 22 09:04:44 2005] [error] PHP Warning:
>>>>include_ecrire(ecrire/inc_flock.php3): failed to open stream: No such
>>>>file or directory in
>>>>/opt/csw/apache/htdocs/testgh/spip/ecrire/inc_version.php3 on line 51
>>>>[Tue Nov 22 09:04:44 2005] [error] PHP Warning:  include_ecrire():
>>>>Failed opening 'ecrire/inc_flock.php3' for inclusion
>>>>(include_path='/opt/csw/lib/php') in
>>>>/opt/csw/apache/htdocs/testgh/spip/ecrire/inc_version.php3 on line 51
>>>>        
>>>>
>
>This is odd - I have just downloaded and installed SPIP on my
>Blastwave installation of Apache/PHP4.4.0, and it's working fine. I
>got through the installation procedure, set up the database, and now
>I'm logged in the "private area". Did you manage to get this far ?
>  
>
no i didn't unfortunately! did you use apache 1.3 or 2.0?
my installation failed just after language choice


From mmayer at blastwave.org  Fri Nov 25 04:37:59 2005
From: mmayer at blastwave.org (Markus Mayer)
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 19:37:59 -0800
Subject: [csw-users] HPIJS
Message-ID: <20051125033759.GA9610@chinook.mmayer.net>

Hi everybody,

I built HPIJS[1] packages which are now available in
http://www.blastwave.org/testing/.

I would love to hear some feedback before the packages are released
into unstable. Thank you!

-Markus

[1] http://hpinkjet.sourceforge.net/


From blastwave at gmail.com  Fri Nov 25 05:17:42 2005
From: blastwave at gmail.com (Dennis Clarke)
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 23:17:42 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] HPIJS
In-Reply-To: <20051125033759.GA9610@chinook.mmayer.net>
References: <20051125033759.GA9610@chinook.mmayer.net>
Message-ID: <a6265da20511242017k1004aef3n7cae5fb90553ad6a@mail.gmail.com>

On 11/24/05, Markus Mayer <mmayer at blastwave.org> wrote:
> Hi everybody,

wow .. no holiday for Markus today ?   :-)

Dennis

From mmayer at blastwave.org  Fri Nov 25 17:46:48 2005
From: mmayer at blastwave.org (Markus Mayer)
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 08:46:48 -0800
Subject: [csw-users] HPIJS
In-Reply-To: <a6265da20511242017k1004aef3n7cae5fb90553ad6a@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20051125033759.GA9610@chinook.mmayer.net>
	<a6265da20511242017k1004aef3n7cae5fb90553ad6a@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20051125164648.GA12089@chinook.mmayer.net>

On Thursday, 24 Nov 2005 23:17 -0500, Dennis Clarke wrote:

> wow .. no holiday for Markus today ?   :-)

Nope, I'm in British Columbia, so a bit too far north for holidays. :-)

-Markus


From asmoore at blastwave.org  Mon Nov 28 04:13:10 2005
From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex Moore)
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2005 21:13:10 -0600
Subject: [csw-users] openldap version update for testing
Message-ID: <20051127211310.00006e48@sws602>

There is a version update for openldap in testing to bring us up to the
current release, which is 2.3.12.  This version update has been needed
for a long time.  The testing url is http://www.blastwave.org/testing

If you are running slapd on the current CSW 2.1.30 package, you must
unload and reload the database.  I used slapcat to extract the data to
an ldif file.  Ater installing the new version, I loaded the data
with slapadd.  Also, I run slapd with a non-root user and ran slapcat
not as that user and had to fix permissions on some new files. So
watch for that.

The old libraries are still in the openldap_rt package, so client
applications should be fine.  Note that the package
has /opt/csw/etc/openldap/DB_CONFIG.example.  The same file is
in /opt/csw/var/openldap-data and that is where your copy of DB_CONFIG
is to be installed.  I will fix that on the next update.

The 2.1.x patch for ROOTDSE is not supposed to be needed with this
version.  So that patch is not in the package.  If this causes someone
a problem, please let me know.  Also, if there are patches that you are
using for your build of OpenLDAP 2.3.x and you think they are needed,
please let me know.

To any slapd folks, please test these packages, i.e., openldap
openldap_client openldap_rt.

Thanks, Alex

-- 


From vvang3142 at charter.net  Mon Nov 28 04:59:12 2005
From: vvang3142 at charter.net (Vue Vang)
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2005 21:59:12 -0600
Subject: [csw-users] [users] Firefox
Message-ID: <438A8090.3010405@charter.net>

(Gecko:9873): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: cannot register existing type `LINCConnection'

(Gecko:9873): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: file gtype.c: line 1872: assertion `parent_type > 0' failed

(Gecko:9873): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: file gobject.c: line 615: assertion `G_TYPE_IS_OBJECT (object_type)' failed

any idea which package has broken it?

Did you find the answer to this question? If you did can you please let me know?  I'm having the same problem.

Thanks,
Vue


From jberry at plus.net  Wed Nov 30 12:11:05 2005
From: jberry at plus.net (Josh Berry)
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 11:11:05 +0000
Subject: [csw-users] CSWcourier_imap Logging
Message-ID: <1133349065.27862.104.camel@localhost.localdomain>

Hi,

I have installed the courier_imap package on Solaris10 for X86 and when
I initially installed it I am sure it was working. I stopped the process
to install and configure all my other sortware (MTA etc) and now it
won't start.

I did try to change it to MySQL authentication but rolled this back when
I had problems by removing and re-installing the package.

I am sure it is something that I have done that is causing the problem,
but I cannot find where the thing logs to. Nothing in syslog, no
sensible /var/log/courier.log or similar ... can anyone point me in the
right direction so that I can find the errors.

oh, and when I try and start the software it echo's "starting courier
imap" to terminal and then does nothing.

Thanks,
-- 
| Josh Berry                        Broadband Solutions for
| Internal Systems Engineer               Home & Business @
| PlusNet plc                                  www.plus.net
+ -----   Plusnet - The smarter way to Broadband!   ----- +



From asmoore at blastwave.org  Wed Nov 30 12:40:38 2005
From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex Moore)
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 05:40:38 -0600
Subject: [csw-users] CSWcourier_imap Logging
In-Reply-To: <1133349065.27862.104.camel@localhost.localdomain>
References: <1133349065.27862.104.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Message-ID: <20051130054038.00000e77@sws602.mcsun.local>

On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 11:11:05 +0000
Josh Berry <jberry at plus.net> wrote:

> I am sure it is something that I have done that is causing the
> problem, but I cannot find where the thing logs to. Nothing in
> syslog, no sensible /var/log/courier.log or similar ... can anyone
> point me in the right direction so that I can find the errors.
> 
> oh, and when I try and start the software it echo's "starting courier
> imap" to terminal and then does nothing.

man courierlogger
By default, courier_imap logs to /var/log/syslog

In /opt/csw/etc/courier-imap/, check the options that you have
changed.  Which files have the start option enabled?  For example, in
imapd, see IMAPDSTART

Alex


-- 


From jberry at plus.net  Wed Nov 30 13:04:39 2005
From: jberry at plus.net (Josh Berry)
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 12:04:39 +0000
Subject: [csw-users] CSWcourier_imap Logging
In-Reply-To: <20051130054038.00000e77@sws602.mcsun.local>
References: <1133349065.27862.104.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	<20051130054038.00000e77@sws602.mcsun.local>
Message-ID: <1133352279.27862.114.camel@localhost.localdomain>

On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 05:40 -0600, Alex Moore wrote:

> man courierlogger
> By default, courier_imap logs to /var/log/syslog
> 
> In /opt/csw/etc/courier-imap/, check the options that you have
> changed.  Which files have the start option enabled?  For example, in
> imapd, see IMAPDSTART

Cheers Alex,

My bad there, I had some stray random charactor in the IMAPDSTART
line ... thank you Solaris Vi :)

Josh



From sigsegv at alchiba.ni.cs.tu-berlin.de  Wed Nov 30 15:52:20 2005
From: sigsegv at alchiba.ni.cs.tu-berlin.de (Fabian Otto)
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 15:52:20 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] PSI Segfault
Message-ID: <20051130145220.GA29020@alchiba.ni.cs.tu-berlin.de>

Hi, 

I installed psi under Solaris 10 X86, but it segfaults right 
from the start.

|/opt/csw/bin/psi --version
|zsh: segmentation fault (core dumped)  /opt/csw/bin/psi --version


The installed qt version is

|ls /opt/csw/lib/libqt-mt.so.3.3.3
|/opt/csw/lib/libqt-mt.so.3.3.3*

My guess is that psi needs to be updated to the current libqt version.

could someone check this?


Thanks 

Otto

-- 
Bookmarks: http://del.icio.us/sigsegv
jabber: sigsegv at jabber.ccc.de
wiki/blog: http://jotpee.de/blog