From schluting at gmail.com Fri Dec 1 02:20:56 2006 From: schluting at gmail.com (Charlie Schluting) Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 17:20:56 -0800 Subject: [csw-users] Puppet in blastwave? Message-ID: <839465400611301720h7b764fa3r2ab2d2cc78b7753f@mail.gmail.com> Their download page has CSW packages, but they don't appear to exist in blastwave: http://reductivelabs.com/downloads/packages/SunOS/ Does anyone know if these are going to become part of blastwave? Thanks, -Charlie From dclarke at blastwave.org Fri Dec 1 03:19:49 2006 From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke) Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 21:19:49 -0500 (EST) Subject: [csw-users] Puppet in blastwave? In-Reply-To: <839465400611301720h7b764fa3r2ab2d2cc78b7753f@mail.gmail.com> References: <839465400611301720h7b764fa3r2ab2d2cc78b7753f@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <32834.24.146.17.108.1164939589.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> > Their download page has CSW packages, but they don't appear to exist > in blastwave: > http://reductivelabs.com/downloads/packages/SunOS/ > > Does anyone know if these are going to become part of blastwave? > Well imitation is the highest form of flattery they say. So I'm surprised to see these packages neatly build to install into /opt/csw correctly and yet they exist somewhere else and have nothing to do with us here at Blastwave. fascinating. I guess we can always send an email to the person doing this and just ask if they want those packages in testing and then into the catalog. Here is the complete file list by the way : # find . . ./var ./var/sadm ./var/sadm/install ./var/sadm/install/admin ./var/sadm/install/logs ./var/sadm/install/contents ./var/sadm/install/.lockfile ./var/sadm/install/.pkg.lock ./var/sadm/install/gz-only-packages ./var/sadm/pkg ./var/sadm/pkg/CSWfacter ./var/sadm/pkg/CSWfacter/install ./var/sadm/pkg/CSWfacter/install/copyright ./var/sadm/pkg/CSWfacter/save ./var/sadm/pkg/CSWfacter/save/pspool ./var/sadm/pkg/CSWfacter/save/pspool/CSWfacter ./var/sadm/pkg/CSWfacter/save/pspool/CSWfacter/install ./var/sadm/pkg/CSWfacter/save/pspool/CSWfacter/install/copyright ./var/sadm/pkg/CSWfacter/save/pspool/CSWfacter/pkginfo ./var/sadm/pkg/CSWfacter/save/pspool/CSWfacter/pkgmap ./var/sadm/pkg/CSWfacter/pkginfo ./var/sadm/pkg/CSWpuppet ./var/sadm/pkg/CSWpuppet/install ./var/sadm/pkg/CSWpuppet/install/copyright ./var/sadm/pkg/CSWpuppet/save ./var/sadm/pkg/CSWpuppet/save/pspool ./var/sadm/pkg/CSWpuppet/save/pspool/CSWpuppet ./var/sadm/pkg/CSWpuppet/save/pspool/CSWpuppet/install ./var/sadm/pkg/CSWpuppet/save/pspool/CSWpuppet/install/copyright ./var/sadm/pkg/CSWpuppet/save/pspool/CSWpuppet/pkginfo ./var/sadm/pkg/CSWpuppet/save/pspool/CSWpuppet/pkgmap ./var/sadm/pkg/CSWpuppet/pkginfo ./opt ./opt/csw ./opt/csw/bin ./opt/csw/bin/facter ./opt/csw/bin/puppet ./opt/csw/bin/puppetca ./opt/csw/bin/puppetd ./opt/csw/bin/puppetdoc ./opt/csw/bin/puppetmasterd ./opt/csw/bin/puppetrun ./opt/csw/lib ./opt/csw/lib/ruby ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8 ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/facter ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/facter/memory.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/facter/processor.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/facter.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/autoload.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/base64.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/client ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/client/ca.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/client/dipper.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/client/file.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/client/log.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/client/master.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/client/pelement.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/client/proxy.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/client/reporter.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/client/runner.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/client/status.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/client.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/config.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/configuration.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/daemon.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/dsl.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/element.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/error.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/event-loop ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/event-loop/better-definers.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/event-loop/event-loop.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/event-loop/signal-system.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/event-loop.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/event.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/feature ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/feature/usage.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/feature.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/filetype.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/inifile.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/loadedfile.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/lock.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/log.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/metatype ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/metatype/attributes.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/metatype/closure.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/metatype/container.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/metatype/evaluation.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/metatype/instances.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/metatype/manager.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/metatype/metaparams.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/metatype/providers.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/metatype/relationships.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/metatype/schedules.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/metatype/tags.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/metric.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/networkclient.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/parameter.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/parser ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/parser/ast ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/parser/ast/astarray.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/parser/ast/branch.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/parser/ast/caseopt.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/parser/ast/casestatement.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/parser/ast/collection.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/parser/ast/collexpr.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/parser/ast/component.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/parser/ast/else.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/parser/ast/function.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/parser/ast/hostclass.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/parser/ast/ifstatement.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/parser/ast/leaf.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/parser/ast/node.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/parser/ast/resourcedef.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/parser/ast/resourcedefaults.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/parser/ast/resourceoverride.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/parser/ast/resourceparam.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/parser/ast/resourceref.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/parser/ast/selector.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/parser/ast/tag.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/parser/ast/vardef.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/parser/ast.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/parser/collector.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/parser/functions.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/parser/interpreter.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/parser/lexer.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/parser/parser.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/parser/resource ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/parser/resource/param.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/parser/resource/reference.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/parser/resource.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/parser/scope.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/parser/templatewrapper.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/group ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/group/groupadd.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/group/netinfo.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/group/pw.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/host ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/host/netinfo.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/host/parsed.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/mount ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/mount/netinfo.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/mount/parsed.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/mount.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/nameservice ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/nameservice/netinfo.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/nameservice/objectadd.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/nameservice/pw.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/nameservice.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/package ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/package/apple.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/package/apt.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/package/aptitude.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/package/blastwave.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/package/darwinport.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/package/dpkg.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/package/freebsd.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/package/gem.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/package/openbsd.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/package/pkgdmg.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/package/portage.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/package/ports.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/package/rpm.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/package/sun.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/package/sunfreeware.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/package/up2date.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/package/yum.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/parsedfile.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/port ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/port/parsed.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/service ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/service/base.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/service/debian.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/service/gentoo.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/service/init.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/service/redhat.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/service/smf.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/sshkey ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/sshkey/parsed.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/user ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/user/netinfo.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/user/pw.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/user/useradd.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/rails ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/rails/database ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/rails/database/01_puppet_initialize.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/rails/host.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/rails/rails_parameter.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/rails/rails_resource.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/rails.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/reports ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/reports/log.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/reports/rrdgraph.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/reports/store.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/reports/tagmail.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/server ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/server/authconfig.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/server/authstore.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/server/ca.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/server/filebucket.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/server/fileserver.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/server/logger.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/server/master.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/server/pelement.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/server/report.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/server/rights.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/server/runner.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/server/servlet.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/server.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/sslcertificates ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/sslcertificates/ca.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/sslcertificates/certificate.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/sslcertificates/inventory.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/sslcertificates.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/statechange.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/storage.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/suidmanager.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/transaction ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/transaction/report.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/transaction.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/transportable.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/type ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/type/component.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/type/cron.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/type/exec.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/type/group.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/type/host.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/type/mount.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/type/notify.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/type/package.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/type/parsedtype.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/type/pfile ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/type/pfile/checksum.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/type/pfile/content.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/type/pfile/ensure.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/type/pfile/group.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/type/pfile/mode.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/type/pfile/source.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/type/pfile/target.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/type/pfile/type.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/type/pfile/uid.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/type/pfile.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/type/pfilebucket.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/type/port.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/type/schedule.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/type/service.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/type/sshkey.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/type/state.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/type/symlink.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/type/tidy.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/type/user.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/type/yumrepo.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/type/zone.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/type.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/util ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/util/classgen.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/util/docs.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/util/errors.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/util/execution.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/util/fileparsing.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/util/logging.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/util/metaid.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/util/methodhelper.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/util/package.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/util/plist ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/util/plist/generator.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/util/plist/parser.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/util/plist.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/util/posix.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/util/variables.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/util/warnings.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/util.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet.rb So it looks like some work has been done. PKG=CSWfacter NAME=facter - System Fact Gatherer VERSION=1.3.5 CATEGORY=application VENDOR=http://reductivelabs.com/projects/facter HOTLINE=http://reductivelabs.com/cgi-bin/facter.cgi EMAIL=luke at madstop.com BASEDIR=/opt/csw ARCH=i86pc PSTAMP=sol10b20060929101337 CLASSES=none fascinating eh ? Dennis From pfelecan at blastwave.org Fri Dec 1 18:24:58 2006 From: pfelecan at blastwave.org (Peter FELECAN) Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2006 18:24:58 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Emacs 22 snapsot 20061201 CVS in testing Message-ID: The monthly CVS snapshot of the next version of Emacs, is in the testing area: http://www.blastwave.org/testing/emacs-22.0.91,REV=cvs20061201-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz http://www.blastwave.org/testing/emacs-22.0.91,REV=cvs20061201-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz If you wish to use/test the bleeding edge Emacs, you're welcome. But, if there are issues, please report them upstream; I'll manage only the packaging side. To install this package, you need to remove all dependent packages and Emacs 21.4 itself; after that, you install, using pkgadd, the CVS Emacs corresponding to your architecture and, if you're a TeX user, the nifty AucTex package. Note that this version includes the successors of: oortgnus and emacscalc, available as Blastwave packages, and many other, previously separate, packages --- e.g., tramp. I'll made a new testing package the next month. Enjoy -- Peter From slindes.lists at gmail.com Fri Dec 1 23:21:13 2006 From: slindes.lists at gmail.com (slindes.lists at gmail.com) Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 23:21:13 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] CSWeclipse with wrong arch. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi, For infomration. I just fetched CSWeclipse from a laptop, hp nc6220 with Opensolars b52. But eclipse didn't want to start. % eclipse /opt/csw/bin/eclipse: ./eclipse: cannot execute % file /opt/csw/lib/eclipse/eclipse /opt/csw/lib/eclipse/eclipse: ELF 32-bit MSB executable SPARC Version 1, dynamically linked, not stripped snip from pkg-get output ======================== Processing package instance from eclipse - an open extensible IDE for Java(i386) 3.2.1,REV=2006.10.23 Eclipse Public License - v 1.0 and pkginfo -l ============== pkginfo -l CSWeclipse PKGINST: CSWeclipse NAME: eclipse - an open extensible IDE for Java CATEGORY: application ARCH: i386 VERSION: 3.2.1,REV=2006.10.23 BASEDIR: / VENDOR: http://www.eclipse.org/ packaged for CSW by William Bonnet PSTAMP: thor20061023154827 INSTDATE: Dec 01 2006 22:37 HOTLINE: http://www.blastwave.org/bugtrack/ EMAIL: wbonnet at blastwave.org STATUS: completely installed FILES: 1710 installed pathnames 316 directories 2 executables 268489 blocks used (approx) /stefan From william at wbonnet.net Sat Dec 2 00:43:11 2006 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2006 00:43:11 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] CSWeclipse with wrong arch. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4570BE0F.5040700@wbonnet.net> Hi all This is a known problem :( I still haven't replaced the package, because even if the 386 binary is available, the package has some other problem x86. It works fine on sparc. I hope i'll be able to release soon (in the next week). Otherwise i'll consider to switch back to version 3.2 which works on both 386 and sparc. sorry for the delay, Kind regards, William -- William http://www.wbonnet.net http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix http://www.blastwave.org An OpenSolaris Community Site http://www.guses.org French speaking Solaris User Group From r.mahoney at iconz.co.nz Sat Dec 2 05:28:36 2006 From: r.mahoney at iconz.co.nz (Richard Mahoney) Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2006 17:28:36 +1300 Subject: [csw-users] CSWeclipse with wrong arch. In-Reply-To: <4570BE0F.5040700@wbonnet.net> References: <4570BE0F.5040700@wbonnet.net> Message-ID: <1165033716.12197.3.camel@proliant> On Sat, 2006-12-02 at 12:43, William Bonnet wrote: > Hi all > > This is a known problem :( > > I still haven't replaced the package, because even if the 386 binary is > available, the package has some other problem x86. It works fine on sparc. > > I hope i'll be able to release soon (in the next week). Otherwise i'll > consider to switch back to version 3.2 which works on both 386 and sparc. > > sorry for the delay, For what its worth I built and installed a 3.2.1 on: SunOS proliant 5.10 Generic_118855-19 i86pc i386 i86pc by following the instructions here: http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=16022&tstart=0 i.e.: I have successfully built Eclipse 3.2.1 on Solaris x86 (Nevada b48). However, I had to make some changes. 1. You must download and install Sun Studio compiler. I use version 11. The Solaris makefile in Eclipse source uses Studio CC's flag. GCC will fail. See "./plugins/org.eclipse.swt/Eclipse SWT PI/gtk/library/make_solaris.mak": GLXLIBS = -G -K PIC -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lGL -lGLU -lm 2. Download the source from http://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/downloads/drops/R-3.2.1-200609210945/index.php Choose "eclipse-sourceBuild-srcIncluded-3.2.1.zip " (I found the mirror site in TW the fastest) 3. Unzip the source to a separate directory. 4. Change the following line in "build.xml" file. From: To: It is my workaround for this Eclipse bug: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=102560 5. Set JAVA_HOME to your jdk1.5 base directory, mine is /usr/java 6. Set CDE_HOME to /usr/dt Build Eclipse with the following command: CC=cc JAVA_HOME=/usr/java CDE_HOME=/usr/dt ./build -os solaris -ws gtk -arch x86 -java5home /usr/java -compilelibs Best regards, Richard Mahoney -- Richard MAHONEY | internet: http://indica-et-buddhica.org/ Littledene | telephone/telefax (man.): +64 3 312 1699 Bay Road | cellular: +64 27 482 9986 OXFORD, NZ | email: r.mahoney at indica-et-buddhica.org ----------------------------------------------------------- Philologica: http://indica-et-buddhica.org/philologica/ Repositorium: http://indica-et-buddhica.org/repositorium/ From william at wbonnet.net Sat Dec 2 12:06:34 2006 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2006 12:06:34 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] /testing Firefox 2.0 is available Message-ID: <45715E3A.1040707@wbonnet.net> Hi all Firefox 2.0 packages are availables from testing for both SPARC and i386. http://www.blastwave.org/testing/firefox-2.0,REV=2006.12.02-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz http://www.blastwave.org/testing/firefox-2.0,REV=2006.12.02-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz Problem reports goes to me, and thanks goes to Jake :) Kind regards, William -- William http://www.wbonnet.net http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix http://www.blastwave.org An OpenSolaris Community Site http://www.guses.org French speaking Solaris User Group From jreid at vnet.net Sun Dec 3 01:33:26 2006 From: jreid at vnet.net (Joe Reid) Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2006 18:33:26 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] php5 iconv? Message-ID: <45721B56.7090201@vnet.net> I was installing jinzora and the installer says I don't have iconv support (non-fatal). I have libiconv but there is no php5 module for iconv? Is there one in the works or a workaround? -- Joe Reid jreid at vnet.net http://www.singlewhitemale.net ?c=a=rb=sc=fd=te=wf=zg=porh=n? From comand at blastwave.org Sun Dec 3 01:58:32 2006 From: comand at blastwave.org (Cory Omand) Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 16:58:32 -0800 Subject: [csw-users] php5 iconv? In-Reply-To: <45721B56.7090201@vnet.net> References: <45721B56.7090201@vnet.net> Message-ID: On 12/2/06, Joe Reid wrote: > I was installing jinzora and the installer says I don't have iconv > support (non-fatal). I have libiconv but there is no php5 module for > iconv? Is there one in the works or a workaround? The module is included in the base php5 package, but not enabled by default. Just do: $ sudo /opt/csw/php5/bin/phpext -e iconv $ /opt/csw/php5/bin/phpext -q iconv iconv_enabled=true Then restart your server. - C. From james at blastwave.org Sun Dec 3 12:11:55 2006 From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee) Date: Sun, 03 Dec 2006 11:11:55 GMT Subject: [csw-users] netsnmp install issues In-Reply-To: <20061108.9314700.1726629784@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk> References: <90ee5fbb0611071944q4cc37637s2df5a359c9ad0897@mail.gmail.com> <20061108.9314700.1726629784@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk> Message-ID: <20061203.11115500.3148257538@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk> On 08/11/06, 09:31:47, James Lee wrote regarding Re: [csw-users] netsnmp install issues: > On 08/11/06, 07:48:09, Cory Omand wrote regarding > Re: [csw-users] netsnmp install issues: > > On 11/7/06, Amit wrote: > > [snip] > > > ERROR: no info for SUNWpiclu. Cannot install dependancy. > > > ERROR: could not install required dependancies for CSWnetsnmp > > [snip] > > > > > > Any suggestions or help would be greatly appreciated. > > > > > This package comes in a patch > Please will someone tell us which? Hello?? Lack response suggests that the assertion that the package comes in a patch is false. Please, someone say where we get SUNWpiclu. From andy at riftware.com Sun Dec 3 17:16:11 2006 From: andy at riftware.com (Andrew Chandler) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 10:16:11 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] netsnmp install issues In-Reply-To: <20061203.11115500.3148257538@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk> Message-ID: <003601c716f6$5a8d15f0$6709a8c0@AChandlerV> A simple Google search provides the following - please note, just because we don't know which patch doesn't mean its not true, just that it was installed at some point in the patch clusters we've got from sun. Remember google is your friend. Cannot Open PICL The message Failed to open PICL; libfru error: Feature not Supported# ./prtfru -x occurs when running SRS Net Connect 3.0 on a multi-domain Sun Fire 12K, 15K, E20K, or E25K server. The message indicates that the FRU provider is not working. The FRUID package relies on the PICL daemon running on the Sun Fire server, which requires the SUNWpiclu package to be installed. The SUNWpiclu and SUNWpiclr packages are included in the default installation for the Sun Fire 12K, 15K, E20K, or E25K system controller and must exist prior to installing SRS Net Connect 3.0. Check the /var/adm/messages file for errors and contact Sun Support and mention FIN #I0783-1. -----Original Message----- From: users-bounces+andy=riftware.com at lists.blastwave.org [mailto:users-bounces+andy=riftware.com at lists.blastwave.org] On Behalf Of James Lee Sent: Sunday, December 03, 2006 5:12 AM To: questions and discussions Subject: Re: [csw-users] netsnmp install issues On 08/11/06, 09:31:47, James Lee wrote regarding Re: [csw-users] netsnmp install issues: > On 08/11/06, 07:48:09, Cory Omand wrote > regarding > Re: [csw-users] netsnmp install issues: > > On 11/7/06, Amit wrote: > > [snip] > > > ERROR: no info for SUNWpiclu. Cannot install dependancy. > > > ERROR: could not install required dependancies for CSWnetsnmp > > [snip] > > > > > > Any suggestions or help would be greatly appreciated. > > > > > This package comes in a patch > Please will someone tell us which? Hello?? Lack response suggests that the assertion that the package comes in a patch is false. Please, someone say where we get SUNWpiclu. _______________________________________________ users mailing list users at lists.blastwave.org https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users From andy at riftware.com Sun Dec 3 17:25:24 2006 From: andy at riftware.com (Andrew Chandler) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 10:25:24 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] netsnmp install issues In-Reply-To: <20061203.11115500.3148257538@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk> Message-ID: <003701c716f7$a45c3cf0$6709a8c0@AChandlerV> Further query on sunsolve.sun.com yields the followign (found by searching on pkg name and then just choosing the results that don't have a "lock" symbol next to them - things with a key next to them can't be viewed unless you pay - however this was in the free section Interactive Installation of Solaris Software When you install the Solaris 8 4/01 operating environment from the Solaris CDs, all of the required software clusters and packages for your Sun hardware are automatically loaded. If you choose to customize your Solaris 8 4/01 software configuration using the interactive installation method, refer to TABLE 1-2 and TABLE 1-3 to identify which software packages and clusters are needed. skip some parts of the table Sun Blade 100 and Sun Blade 1000 SUNWpiclh SUNWpiclr SUNWpiclu SUNWpiclx PICL SUNW1394h SUNW1394x IEEE framework (1394) SUNWeridx RIO driver SUNWusx.u CPU power management's UltraSPARC This strongly suggests to me the picl package is on the original solaris install cd. -----Original Message----- From: users-bounces+andy=riftware.com at lists.blastwave.org [mailto:users-bounces+andy=riftware.com at lists.blastwave.org] On Behalf Of James Lee Sent: Sunday, December 03, 2006 5:12 AM To: questions and discussions Subject: Re: [csw-users] netsnmp install issues On 08/11/06, 09:31:47, James Lee wrote regarding Re: [csw-users] netsnmp install issues: > On 08/11/06, 07:48:09, Cory Omand wrote > regarding > Re: [csw-users] netsnmp install issues: > > On 11/7/06, Amit wrote: > > [snip] > > > ERROR: no info for SUNWpiclu. Cannot install dependancy. > > > ERROR: could not install required dependancies for CSWnetsnmp > > [snip] > > > > > > Any suggestions or help would be greatly appreciated. > > > > > This package comes in a patch > Please will someone tell us which? Hello?? Lack response suggests that the assertion that the package comes in a patch is false. Please, someone say where we get SUNWpiclu. _______________________________________________ users mailing list users at lists.blastwave.org https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users From james at blastwave.org Mon Dec 4 11:03:19 2006 From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee) Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2006 10:03:19 GMT Subject: [csw-users] netsnmp install issues References: <003601c716f6$5a8d15f0$6709a8c0@AChandlerV> Message-ID: <20061204.10031900.3864383226@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk> On 03/12/06, 16:16:11, Andrew Chandler wrote regarding Re: [csw-users] netsnmp install issues: > A simple Google search provides the following - please note, just because > we don't know which patch doesn't mean its not true, Indeed, I said *suggests* it's not true. > just that it was installed > at some point in the patch clusters we've got from sun. Remember > google is your friend. Went there first, no patch number was found, very possibly (but not certainly) because there isn't one. > Cannot Open PICL > The message Failed to open PICL; libfru error: Feature not Supported# > ./prtfru -x occurs when running SRS Net Connect 3.0 on a multi-domain Sun > Fire 12K, 15K, E20K, or E25K server. The message indicates that the FRU > provider is not working. > The FRUID package relies on the PICL daemon running on the Sun Fire > server, which requires the SUNWpiclu package to be installed. The > SUNWpiclu and SUNWpiclr packages are included in the default > installation for the Sun Fire 12K, 15K, E20K, or E25K system controller > and must exist prior to installing SRS Net Connect 3.0. > Check the /var/adm/messages file for errors and contact Sun Support and > mention FIN #I0783-1. So not with a patch then. From james at blastwave.org Mon Dec 4 11:08:24 2006 From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee) Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2006 10:08:24 GMT Subject: [csw-users] netsnmp install issues References: <003701c716f7$a45c3cf0$6709a8c0@AChandlerV> Message-ID: <20061204.10082400.2975825240@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk> On 03/12/06, 16:25:24, Andrew Chandler wrote regarding Re: [csw-users] netsnmp install issues: > Interactive Installation of Solaris Software > When you install the Solaris 8 4/01 operating environment from the > Solaris CDs, all > of the required software clusters and packages for your Sun hardware are > automatically loaded. If you choose to customize your Solaris 8 4/01 > software > configuration using the interactive installation method, refer to TABLE > 1-2 and TABLE 1-3 to identify which software packages and clusters are > needed. > skip some parts of the table > Sun Blade 100 and Sun Blade > 1000 > SUNWpiclh > SUNWpiclr > SUNWpiclu > SUNWpiclx > PICL > SUNW1394h > SUNW1394x > IEEE framework (1394) > SUNWeridx RIO driver > SUNWusx.u CPU power management's UltraSPARC > This strongly suggests to me the picl package is on the original solaris > install cd. It is but it does not get installed on all hardware with the install everything option. The answer is that it's only installed for certain hardware platforms. The package needs force installing on other platforms in order to satisfy the linkage of the SUNWpiclu package. Answer to Amit, the OP, and anyone else unable to install CSWnetsnmp, insert Solaris installation CD 1 and force an install: # pkgadd -d /cdrom/sol_8_*_sparc/s0/Solaris_8/Product SUNWpiclu nothing to do with patches... allegedly. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ The problem is that the CSWnetsnmp package is built on a machine that has a special package to support its class of hardware only. This means that users of other hardware, despite choosing the "entire" Solaris distribution, are left wondering why CSWnetsnmp won't install or run. Follow on questions are: + What does SUNWpiclu do for the Blade-1000 and would it matter if the package was removed? (Meaning builds can not link to this package.) + Can netsnmp be build without linking to libpicl.so.1? (When SUNWpiclu is installed.) From andy at riftware.com Mon Dec 4 15:20:21 2006 From: andy at riftware.com (Andrew Chandler) Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 08:20:21 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] netsnmp install issues In-Reply-To: <20061204.10031900.3864383226@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk> Message-ID: <009301c717af$56b3ad40$6709a8c0@AChandlerV> My only point is that you took a slightly beligerent tone against people who owe you nothing. I have nothing to do with blastwave nor did I have any history with your question, however I had a pretty good idea how to get on with life if I was in your position with less than 1/2 hour research and I only followed 4 links of my search results. Given that it seemed a bit over the top for you to use some of the words you use - I mean really "allegedly" when it is volunteers telling you sompeplace to look? I DID find where to look using the Sunsolve.sun.com patch system for one of my searches so if you had put in effort you could have figured out what was wrong. That isn't to say that dependencies shouldn't be explicitly noted where possible but you need to understand that the folks who are building these package systems 1: don't get paid 2: don't have access to every hardware platform and if there platform has it automatically installed then its not unreasonable for them to not know this. -----Original Message----- From: users-bounces+andy=riftware.com at lists.blastwave.org [mailto:users-bounces+andy=riftware.com at lists.blastwave.org] On Behalf Of James Lee Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 4:03 AM To: questions and discussions Subject: Re: [csw-users] netsnmp install issues On 03/12/06, 16:16:11, Andrew Chandler wrote regarding Re: [csw-users] netsnmp install issues: > A simple Google search provides the following - please note, just > because we don't know which patch doesn't mean its not true, Indeed, I said *suggests* it's not true. > just that it was installed > at some point in the patch clusters we've got from sun. Remember > google is your friend. Went there first, no patch number was found, very possibly (but not certainly) because there isn't one. > Cannot Open PICL > The message Failed to open PICL; libfru error: Feature not Supported# > ./prtfru -x occurs when running SRS Net Connect 3.0 on a multi-domain > Sun Fire 12K, 15K, E20K, or E25K server. The message indicates that > the FRU provider is not working. > The FRUID package relies on the PICL daemon running on the Sun Fire > server, which requires the SUNWpiclu package to be installed. The > SUNWpiclu and SUNWpiclr packages are included in the default > installation for the Sun Fire 12K, 15K, E20K, or E25K system > controller and must exist prior to installing SRS Net Connect 3.0. > Check the /var/adm/messages file for errors and contact Sun Support > and mention FIN #I0783-1. So not with a patch then. _______________________________________________ users mailing list users at lists.blastwave.org https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users From james at blastwave.org Mon Dec 4 15:58:49 2006 From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee) Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2006 14:58:49 GMT Subject: [csw-users] netsnmp install issues In-Reply-To: <009301c717af$56b3ad40$6709a8c0@AChandlerV> References: <009301c717af$56b3ad40$6709a8c0@AChandlerV> Message-ID: <20061204.14584900.1950961752@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk> On 04/12/06, 14:20:21, Andrew Chandler wrote regarding Re: [csw-users] netsnmp install issues: > My only point is that you took a slightly beligerent tone against people > who owe you nothing. Don't push your luck. > I have nothing to do with blastwave nor did I have any > history with your question, however I had a pretty good idea how to get > on with life if I was in your position with less than 1/2 hour research > and I only followed 4 links of my search results. Given that it seemed > a bit over the top for you to use some of the words you use - I mean > really "allegedly" when it is volunteers telling you sompeplace to look? > I DID find where to look using the Sunsolve.sun.com patch system for one > of my searches so if you had put in effort you could have figured out > what was wrong. That isn't to say that dependencies shouldn't be > explicitly noted where possible but you need to understand that the > folks who are building these package systems > 1: don't get paid > 2: don't have access to every hardware platform and if there platform has > it automatically installed then its not unreasonable for them to not know > this. Like I do? Please do some research before answering. From william at wbonnet.net Wed Dec 6 01:06:47 2006 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2006 01:06:47 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] /testing Eclipse 3.2.1 is fixed Message-ID: <45760997.407@wbonnet.net> Hi all The eclipse package has been fixed on x86 platform. Packages for both architectureare availables from http://www.blastwave.org/testing Direct urls are : http://www.blastwave.org/testing/eclipse-3.2.1,REV=2006.12.04-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz http://www.blastwave.org/testing/eclipse-3.2.1,REV=2006.12.04-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz Please report any problem before it moves to unstable (very soon since unstable is broken for x86) Kind regards, William -- William http://www.wbonnet.net http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix http://www.blastwave.org An OpenSolaris Community Site http://www.guses.org French speaking Solaris User Group From a.cervellin at virgilio.it Wed Dec 6 08:50:34 2006 From: a.cervellin at virgilio.it (Alessio Cervellin) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 08:50:34 +0100 (GMT+01:00) Subject: [csw-users] [announce] security fixes Message-ID: <10f56be12b7.a.cervellin@virgilio.it> Recently the following packages have been released to fix some security issues: wireshark-0.99.4,REV=2006.12.04 (http://www.wireshark. org/docs/relnotes/wireshark-0.99.4.html) zope-2.8.7 [1] tor-0.1.1.25 (http://archives.seul.org/or/announce/Nov-2006/msg00000.html) seamonkey- 1.0.6,REV=2006.11.12 (http://www.mozilla.org/projects/security/known- vulnerabilities.html#seamonkey1.0.6) All the users are encouraged to update them, though remember they are in the unstable catalog so do it at your own risk. [1 ] Zope 2.8.7 users should also manually install this hotfix manually on each of their own zope instances: http://www. zope.org/Products/Zope/Hotfix-2006-07-05/ From roman.klesel at googlemail.com Wed Dec 6 11:51:34 2006 From: roman.klesel at googlemail.com (Roman Klesel) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 11:51:34 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] cswexim and zones Message-ID: <1d96939c0612060251r4d4054e4v4b23521204de79b1@mail.gmail.com> Hello everyone, first of all thank you for providing this nice packages! I just installed exim from unstable. In the golbal-zone everything is fine and after some configuration and mkdir it is running as expected. However in the non-global zones the package has not installed as well: 1) The svc manifest has not been imported 2) The exim user and group have not been created 3) the spool and log directories are not redirected to /var To me it seems that the package is not fully aware of the zones. Or did something go wrong with my install? Do others have similar or contrary experiance? All the best Roman From roman.klesel at googlemail.com Wed Dec 6 12:24:17 2006 From: roman.klesel at googlemail.com (Roman Klesel) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 12:24:17 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] cswexim and zones In-Reply-To: <1d96939c0612060251r4d4054e4v4b23521204de79b1@mail.gmail.com> References: <1d96939c0612060251r4d4054e4v4b23521204de79b1@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <1d96939c0612060324r4588ba60w771b44dd75de1fb2@mail.gmail.com> Hello, > However in the non-global zones the package has not installed as well: to be more accurate: The package has nor been propageted to the zones at all. It tried to reinstall it. No effect. Other packages however are propagated to the zones. Any ideas? Greetings Roman From mmayer at blastwave.org Wed Dec 6 19:33:24 2006 From: mmayer at blastwave.org (Markus Mayer) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 10:33:24 -0800 Subject: [csw-users] cswexim and zones In-Reply-To: <1d96939c0612060324r4588ba60w771b44dd75de1fb2@mail.gmail.com> References: <1d96939c0612060251r4d4054e4v4b23521204de79b1@mail.gmail.com> <1d96939c0612060324r4588ba60w771b44dd75de1fb2@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20061206183324.GA9295@enterprise.blastwave.org> On Wednesday, 06 Dec 2006 12:24 +0100, Roman Klesel wrote: > to be more accurate: The package has nor been propageted to the zones > at all. > > It tried to reinstall it. No effect. > > Other packages however are propagated to the zones. I know of one fairly big zoned Exim installation, because the sysadmins reported a few issues that needed fixing. They seem quite happy with the way it is working now. Of course, there's always the possibility that something is broken. If your zone setup is quite different from theirs, for instance. Could you send the output of the pkgadd command(s) you are using (either via pkg-get or called directly)? Are you sharing /opt/csw across zones? How are your zones set up generally? Is it x86 or SPARC (unlikely to make a difference, but it's always good to know)? Thanks. -Markus From william at wbonnet.net Wed Dec 6 21:46:12 2006 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2006 21:46:12 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] /testing PCA 5.2 is available Message-ID: <45772C14.6010102@wbonnet.net> Hi PCA Patch Check Advance version 5.2 is available from testing ( http://www.blastwave.org/testing/pca-5.2,REV=2006.12.04-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz ) Kind regards, William -- William http://www.wbonnet.net http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix http://www.blastwave.org An OpenSolaris Community Site http://www.guses.org French speaking Solaris User Group From dclarke at blastwave.org Wed Dec 6 22:03:15 2006 From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 16:03:15 -0500 (EST) Subject: [csw-users] /testing PCA 5.2 is available In-Reply-To: <45772C14.6010102@wbonnet.net> References: <45772C14.6010102@wbonnet.net> Message-ID: <63588.24.146.17.108.1165438995.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> > Hi > > PCA Patch Check Advance version 5.2 is available from testing > excellent ! I'll test that today. dc From roman.klesel at googlemail.com Thu Dec 7 08:25:22 2006 From: roman.klesel at googlemail.com (Roman Klesel) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 08:25:22 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] cswexim and zones In-Reply-To: <20061206183324.GA9295@enterprise.blastwave.org> References: <1d96939c0612060251r4d4054e4v4b23521204de79b1@mail.gmail.com> <1d96939c0612060324r4588ba60w771b44dd75de1fb2@mail.gmail.com> <20061206183324.GA9295@enterprise.blastwave.org> Message-ID: <1d96939c0612062325g41ee55dfya60224272341a138@mail.gmail.com> Hello Markus, On 12/6/06, Markus Mayer wrote: > Could you send the output of the pkgadd command(s) you are using > (either via pkg-get or called directly)? > Shure, it's at the end of this post. I cut out the GPL so it will not be that long ... > Are you sharing /opt/csw across zones? Yes. >How are your zones set up > generally? They are all setup like that: root at www1q # cat /etc/zones/mail1q.xml > Is it x86 or SPARC (unlikely to make a difference, but it's > always good to know)? > It's an x4100 so x86. Really strange, pkgadd makes no attempt to install this package in the non global zones. Just for testing and to make shure the system isn't broken I tried installing gawk. Works as expected. When others have no similar problems I guess I'll reinstall the zones and all the csw packages. Not such a big deal. Thanks Roman root at www1q # pkgadd -d exim-4.63\,REV\=2006.09.30-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg The following packages are available: 1 CSWexim exim - The Exim Mail Transfer Agent (i386) 4.63,REV=2006.09.30 Select package(s) you wish to process (or 'all' to process all packages). (default: all) [?,??,q]: Processing package instance from ## Installing package in global zone exim - The Exim Mail Transfer Agent(i386) 4.63,REV=2006.09.30 GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE Version 2, June 1991 ... Found an existing sendmail installation. You have following choices with for installing postfix: 1. Send mail only, without changing existing sendmail installation. 2. Rename existing sendmail binaries to *.OFF and replace them with binaries provided by postfix. Enter your choice [1,2] (default 1): 2 ## Executing checkinstall script. ## Processing package information. ## Processing system information. 9 package pathnames are already properly installed. ## Verifying package dependencies. ## Verifying disk space requirements. ## Checking for conflicts with packages already installed. ## Checking for setuid/setgid programs. The following files are being installed with setuid and/or setgid permissions: /opt/csw/sbin/exim Do you want to install these as setuid/setgid files [y,n,?,q] y This package contains scripts which will be executed with super-user permission during the process of installing this package. Do you want to continue with the installation of [y,n,?] y Installing exim - The Exim Mail Transfer Agent as ## Executing preinstall script. group exim detected user exim detected ## Installing part 1 of 1. /opt/csw/etc/exim/aliases.CSW /opt/csw/etc/exim/exim-env.sh.CSW /opt/csw/etc/exim/exim.conf.CSW /opt/csw/sbin/exicyclog /opt/csw/sbin/exigrep /opt/csw/sbin/exim /opt/csw/sbin/exim_checkaccess /opt/csw/sbin/exim_dbmbuild /opt/csw/sbin/exim_dumpdb /opt/csw/sbin/exim_fixdb /opt/csw/sbin/exim_lock /opt/csw/sbin/exim_tidydb /opt/csw/sbin/eximon /opt/csw/sbin/eximon.bin /opt/csw/sbin/eximstats /opt/csw/sbin/exinext /opt/csw/sbin/exipick /opt/csw/sbin/exiqgrep /opt/csw/sbin/exiqsumm /opt/csw/sbin/exiwhat /opt/csw/share/doc/exim/ChangeLog.gz /opt/csw/share/doc/exim/Exim3.upgrade /opt/csw/share/doc/exim/Exim4.upgrade /opt/csw/share/doc/exim/NewStuff /opt/csw/share/doc/exim/OptionLists.txt /opt/csw/share/doc/exim/README /opt/csw/share/doc/exim/README.CSW /opt/csw/share/doc/exim/README.SIEVE /opt/csw/share/doc/exim/dbm.discuss.txt /opt/csw/share/doc/exim/filter.txt /opt/csw/share/doc/exim/pcrepattern.txt /opt/csw/share/doc/exim/pcretest.txt /opt/csw/share/doc/exim/spec.txt.gz [ verifying class ] Installing class . /opt/csw/lib/svc/method/svc-exim /opt/csw/var/svc/manifest/network/exim.xml [ verifying class ] ## Executing postinstall script. Setting up config-files... Copying /opt/csw/etc/exim/aliases.CSW to /opt/csw/etc/exim/aliases Not touching existing /opt/csw/etc/exim/exim.conf Copying /opt/csw/etc/exim/exim-env.sh.CSW to /opt/csw/etc/exim/exim-env.sh Checking for newaliases... /usr/sbin/newaliases Moving /usr/sbin/newaliases to newaliases.OFF Moving /usr/lib/sendmail to sendmail.OFF Moving /usr/bin/mailq to mailq.OFF Registering Exim with SMF... --------------------------------------------------------------- Please take the time to read /opt/csw/share/doc/exim/README.CSW --------------------------------------------------------------- Installation of was successful. From mats.larsson at ericsson.com Thu Dec 7 15:50:50 2006 From: mats.larsson at ericsson.com (Mats Larsson) Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2006 15:50:50 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] /testing PCA 5.2 is available In-Reply-To: <45772C14.6010102@wbonnet.net> References: <45772C14.6010102@wbonnet.net> Message-ID: <45782A4A.1090002@ericsson.com> On 2006-12-06 21:46, William Bonnet wrote: > PCA Patch Check Advance version 5.2 is available from testing Thanks, this is a great tool. Hope you will keep it updated whenever Martin Paul comes up with a new release. /MOL From chris.ridd at isode.com Fri Dec 8 11:29:09 2006 From: chris.ridd at isode.com (Chris Ridd) Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2006 10:29:09 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] Requesting new packages? Message-ID: <45793E75.8020103@isode.com> What's the best way to request a couple that a couple of additional packages be added to Blastwave? We're looking at rolling out Bugzilla on Solaris, and I'd like to maintain all the perl module dependencies using Blastwave. All but these two modules are already in Blastwave... Come to think of it, Bugzilla would be nice to have in Blastwave too :-) Cheers, Chris From a.cervellin at acm.org Fri Dec 8 11:46:39 2006 From: a.cervellin at acm.org (Alessio Cervellin) Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2006 11:46:39 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Requesting new packages? In-Reply-To: <45793E75.8020103@isode.com> References: <45793E75.8020103@isode.com> Message-ID: <4579428F.7090300@acm.org> Chris Ridd wrote: > What's the best way to request a couple that a couple of additional > packages be added to Blastwave? > > We're looking at rolling out Bugzilla on Solaris, and I'd like to > maintain all the perl module dependencies using Blastwave. All but these > two modules are already in Blastwave... > > > > > > Come to think of it, Bugzilla would be nice to have in Blastwave too :-) the pkg request form is here: http://www.blastwave.org/pkgreq.php though bugzilla is already listed there since long time From chris.ridd at isode.com Fri Dec 8 17:33:42 2006 From: chris.ridd at isode.com (Chris Ridd) Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2006 16:33:42 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] Requesting new packages? In-Reply-To: <4579428F.7090300@acm.org> Message-ID: On 8/12/06 10:46, Alessio Cervellin wrote: > Chris Ridd wrote: >> What's the best way to request a couple that a couple of additional >> packages be added to Blastwave? >> >> We're looking at rolling out Bugzilla on Solaris, and I'd like to >> maintain all the perl module dependencies using Blastwave. All but these >> two modules are already in Blastwave... >> >> >> >> >> >> Come to think of it, Bugzilla would be nice to have in Blastwave too :-) > > the pkg request form is here: > http://www.blastwave.org/pkgreq.php Great, thanks. The /bugtrack/ page ought to have a link to it instead of saying there would be a mechanism "at some point". > though bugzilla is already listed there since long time I'm less worried about bugzilla not being in Blastwave. But it would be nice if it was. Cheers, Chris From asmoore at blastwave.org Sat Dec 9 15:56:43 2006 From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex Moore) Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 08:56:43 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] Requesting new packages? In-Reply-To: <45793E75.8020103@isode.com> References: <45793E75.8020103@isode.com> Message-ID: <20061209085643.0000451d@sws602.mcsun.local> On Fri, 08 Dec 2006 10:29:09 +0000 Chris Ridd wrote: > We're looking at rolling out Bugzilla on Solaris, and I'd like to > maintain all the perl module dependencies using Blastwave. All but > these two modules are already in Blastwave... > > > > Chris, I put these two modules in http://www.blastwave.org/testing Since you cannot use pkg-get from /testing, you need to pkg-get the following as prerequisites: pm_gd pm_tt2common Let me know how this works for you. Alex From maseda at unc.edu Sun Dec 10 16:43:16 2006 From: maseda at unc.edu (Mike Seda) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 10:43:16 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] unstable versus stable Message-ID: <457C2B14.4040000@unc.edu> Hi All, I have read http://www.blastwave.org/userguide, but it is still a little unclear to me how to migrate from unstable to stable. During my setup of a production server, I used pkg-get to install everything I needed. Later I came to find out that I was pulling from the unstable mirror. This was of course my fault for not inspecting my pkg-get.conf before running pkg-get. Basically, what is the best way to go from unstable to stable without losing any of my current configuration, e.g. CSWapache? Best, Mike From dclarke at blastwave.org Sun Dec 10 16:52:36 2006 From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 10:52:36 -0500 (EST) Subject: [csw-users] unstable versus stable In-Reply-To: <457C2B14.4040000@unc.edu> References: <457C2B14.4040000@unc.edu> Message-ID: <61609.65.95.196.136.1165765956.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> > Hi All, > I have read http://www.blastwave.org/userguide, but it is still a little > unclear to me how to migrate from unstable to stable. During my setup of > a production server, I used pkg-get to install everything I needed. > Later I came to find out that I was pulling from the unstable mirror. > This was of course my fault for not inspecting my pkg-get.conf before > running pkg-get. Basically, what is the best way to > go from unstable to stable without losing any of my current > configuration, e.g. CSWapache? You just nailed a really important issue and I want to attack this head on. I will make the necessary modifications to the homepage such that people know that the unstable tree is selected by default. I think that the end user should have the option to select either "stable" or "unstable" when the CSWpkgget package is installed and thus they are made aware of that choice. The next issue is a HOW TO go from the unstable tree to the stable tree with a minimum of fuss. -- Dennis Clarke From james at blastwave.org Sun Dec 10 17:38:11 2006 From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 16:38:11 GMT Subject: [csw-users] unstable versus stable In-Reply-To: <457C2B14.4040000@unc.edu> References: <457C2B14.4040000@unc.edu> Message-ID: <20061210.16381100.2752331824@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk> On 10/12/06, 15:43:16, Mike Seda wrote regarding [csw-users] unstable versus stable: > Later I came to find out that I was pulling from the unstable mirror. > This was of course my fault for not inspecting my pkg-get.conf before > running pkg-get. Basically, what is the best way to > go from unstable to stable without losing any of my current > configuration, e.g. CSWapache? Use the "-S" option to force synchronisation. $ pkg-get --help ... '-S|sync' Makes update mode sync to version on mirror site ... We make every effort to ensure upgrade is successful but be aware that downgrade might not work. Old packages can't allow for those that didn't exist when they were made. James. From maseda at unc.edu Sun Dec 10 22:17:11 2006 From: maseda at unc.edu (Mike Seda) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 16:17:11 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] unstable versus stable In-Reply-To: <20061210.16381100.2752331824@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk> References: <457C2B14.4040000@unc.edu> <20061210.16381100.2752331824@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk> Message-ID: <457C7957.4050400@unc.edu> I am running Solaris 10 U2 (sparc). Do I need to specify any subdirectory under http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/stable? I noticed that there is i386 and sparc. Then under that, there is 5.8, 5.9, 5.10.1, 5.10, and 5.11. How does my system know which one to use? Btw, I am 30 minutes from ibiblio, which is why I have not changed the mirror. James Lee wrote: > On 10/12/06, 15:43:16, Mike Seda wrote regarding > [csw-users] unstable versus stable: > > >> Later I came to find out that I was pulling from the unstable mirror. >> This was of course my fault for not inspecting my pkg-get.conf before >> running pkg-get. Basically, what is the best way to >> go from unstable to stable without losing any of my current >> configuration, e.g. CSWapache? >> > > Use the "-S" option to force synchronisation. > > $ pkg-get --help > ... > '-S|sync' Makes update mode sync to version on mirror site > ... > > > > We make every effort to ensure upgrade is successful but be aware > that downgrade might not work. Old packages can't allow for those > that didn't exist when they were made. > > > > > > James. > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > From dclarke at blastwave.org Sun Dec 10 22:32:45 2006 From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 16:32:45 -0500 (EST) Subject: [csw-users] unstable versus stable In-Reply-To: <457C7957.4050400@unc.edu> References: <457C2B14.4040000@unc.edu> <20061210.16381100.2752331824@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk> <457C7957.4050400@unc.edu> Message-ID: <34305.24.146.17.108.1165786365.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> > I am running Solaris 10 U2 (sparc). Do I need to specify any > subdirectory under > http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/stable? I noticed that > there is i386 and sparc. Then under that, there is 5.8, 5.9, 5.10.1, > 5.10, and 5.11. How does my system know which one to use? Btw, I am 30 > minutes from ibiblio, which is why I have not changed the mirror. > The uname command reports the Solaris version. Actually its the SunOS version but that has not made sense to me since the last SunOS was in version 4.1.1 back in the early 90's. The first revs of Solaris would report that they were SunOS 5.4 or 5.5 or even 5.5.1. Thankfully we seem to have settled back into just a major and a minor number and thus Solaris 8 looks like so : # uname -X | grep Release Release = 5.8 A bleeding edge copy of Solaris Nevada looks like so : $ uname -X | grep Release Release = 5.11 This is the number used to look into the software tree to find a specific package IF and only IF a specific package is required. It makes little sense to have a specially built version of Apache for the UltraSparc T1 process packaged up and delivered into the 5.8 or 5.9 trees. That would have to be specific to 5.10 and up. Even then .. there are ways around that. Dennis From maseda at unc.edu Sun Dec 10 22:58:37 2006 From: maseda at unc.edu (Mike Seda) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 16:58:37 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] unstable versus stable In-Reply-To: <34305.24.146.17.108.1165786365.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> References: <457C2B14.4040000@unc.edu> <20061210.16381100.2752331824@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk> <457C7957.4050400@unc.edu> <34305.24.146.17.108.1165786365.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> Message-ID: <457C830D.6090404@unc.edu> Hi Everyone, You guys are awesome... I love blastwave... It has truly eased my transition from linux to solaris... I will do my best to spread the word about the blastwave project... Regards, Mike -- Mike Seda System Administrator LCCC Bioinformatics UNC-CH Dennis Clarke wrote: >> I am running Solaris 10 U2 (sparc). Do I need to specify any >> subdirectory under >> http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/stable? I noticed that >> there is i386 and sparc. Then under that, there is 5.8, 5.9, 5.10.1, >> 5.10, and 5.11. How does my system know which one to use? Btw, I am 30 >> minutes from ibiblio, which is why I have not changed the mirror. >> >> > > The uname command reports the Solaris version. Actually its the SunOS > version but that has not made sense to me since the last SunOS was in > version 4.1.1 back in the early 90's. The first revs of Solaris would > report that they were SunOS 5.4 or 5.5 or even 5.5.1. Thankfully we > seem to have settled back into just a major and a minor number and thus > Solaris 8 looks like so : > > # uname -X | grep Release > Release = 5.8 > > A bleeding edge copy of Solaris Nevada looks like so : > > $ uname -X | grep Release > Release = 5.11 > > This is the number used to look into the software tree to find a specific > package IF and only IF a specific package is required. It makes little > sense to have a specially built version of Apache for the UltraSparc T1 > process packaged up and delivered into the 5.8 or 5.9 trees. That would > have to be specific to 5.10 and up. Even then .. there are ways around > that. > > Dennis > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > From dclarke at blastwave.org Mon Dec 11 04:44:39 2006 From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 22:44:39 -0500 (EST) Subject: [csw-users] unstable versus stable In-Reply-To: <457C830D.6090404@unc.edu> References: <457C2B14.4040000@unc.edu> <20061210.16381100.2752331824@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk> <457C7957.4050400@unc.edu> <34305.24.146.17.108.1165786365.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> <457C830D.6090404@unc.edu> Message-ID: <49352.24.146.17.108.1165808679.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> > Hi Everyone, > You guys are awesome... I love blastwave... It has truly eased my > transition from linux to solaris... I will do my best to spread the word > about the blastwave project... > Regards, > Mike Thanks Mike !! We love words like this :-) Dennis From chris.ridd at isode.com Mon Dec 11 10:59:47 2006 From: chris.ridd at isode.com (Chris Ridd) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 09:59:47 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] Requesting new packages? In-Reply-To: <20061209085643.0000451d@sws602.mcsun.local> Message-ID: On 9/12/06 2:56, Alex Moore (by way of Alex Moore ) wrote: > On Fri, 08 Dec 2006 10:29:09 +0000 > Chris Ridd wrote: > >> We're looking at rolling out Bugzilla on Solaris, and I'd like to >> maintain all the perl module dependencies using Blastwave. All but >> these two modules are already in Blastwave... >> >> >> >> > > Chris, > > I put these two modules in http://www.blastwave.org/testing > > Since you cannot use pkg-get from /testing, you need to pkg-get the > following as prerequisites: > > pm_gd > pm_tt2common > > Let me know how this works for you. They work fine, thanks Alex! Cheers, Chris From delrio at mie.utoronto.ca Mon Dec 11 16:26:40 2006 From: delrio at mie.utoronto.ca (Oscar del Rio) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:26:40 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Firefox start up issues on Solaris 8 In-Reply-To: <90ee5fbb0611291455l216484e7vc56daea404b4304e@mail.gmail.com> References: <90ee5fbb0611291455l216484e7vc56daea404b4304e@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <457D78B0.1050502@mie.utoronto.ca> Amit wrote: > 1. Firefox complains off 108652-79 not being installed (Xsun patch). > However, this has been obsoleted by 119067-05 (which is installed on > the system). The Solaris patch checking is done by the scripts $FIREFOX_HOME/init.d/S02solaris_patchchecker.sh $FIREFOX_HOME/moz_patch_checker.dtksh I guess the hard-coded patch numbers have not been updated. You can disable the patch checking by defining MOZILLA_SOLARIS_PATCHCHECKER=disable_patchchecker export MOZILLA_SOLARIS_PATCHCHECKER From amit.uttam at gmail.com Mon Dec 11 18:34:06 2006 From: amit.uttam at gmail.com (Amit) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 09:34:06 -0800 Subject: [csw-users] Firefox start up issues on Solaris 8 In-Reply-To: <457D78B0.1050502@mie.utoronto.ca> References: <90ee5fbb0611291455l216484e7vc56daea404b4304e@mail.gmail.com> <457D78B0.1050502@mie.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: <90ee5fbb0612110934p762c36b2kc3e763b10e0191bb@mail.gmail.com> Thank you. I do not have a solaris machine in front me so I can't check it yet but thanks again. Amit On 12/11/06, Oscar del Rio wrote: > Amit wrote: > > > 1. Firefox complains off 108652-79 not being installed (Xsun patch). > > However, this has been obsoleted by 119067-05 (which is installed on > > the system). > > The Solaris patch checking is done by the scripts > > $FIREFOX_HOME/init.d/S02solaris_patchchecker.sh > $FIREFOX_HOME/moz_patch_checker.dtksh > > I guess the hard-coded patch numbers have not been updated. > > You can disable the patch checking by defining > > MOZILLA_SOLARIS_PATCHCHECKER=disable_patchchecker > export MOZILLA_SOLARIS_PATCHCHECKER > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > From maseda at unc.edu Thu Dec 14 00:43:42 2006 From: maseda at unc.edu (Mike Seda) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 18:43:42 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] error installing firefox In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4580902E.1050800@unc.edu> Hi All, I received the following error while attempting to execute "pkg-get -i firefox" on a SUN V440 (sparc) running solaris 10 U2 and pulling from the ibiblio .org stable repository: Installation of was successful. Processing package instance from openldap - OpenLDAP standalone server and update replication daemons (oldap)(sparc) 2.3.27,REV=2006.08.27 . . . ## Executing checkinstall script. /var/tmp//installxzaix2/checkinstallAzaix2: /tmp/sh278370: cannot create pkgadd: ERROR: checkinstall script did not complete successfully Installation of failed. No changes were made to the system. ERROR: could not add CSWoldap. ERROR: install of CSWoldap failed ERROR: could not install required dependancies for CSWgnomevfs2 ERROR: install of CSWgnomevfs2 failed ERROR: could not install required dependancies for CSWfirefox Any thoughts? Mike Chris Ridd wrote: > On 9/12/06 2:56, Alex Moore (by way of Alex Moore ) > wrote: > > >> On Fri, 08 Dec 2006 10:29:09 +0000 >> Chris Ridd wrote: >> >> >>> We're looking at rolling out Bugzilla on Solaris, and I'd like to >>> maintain all the perl module dependencies using Blastwave. All but >>> these two modules are already in Blastwave... >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> Chris, >> >> I put these two modules in http://www.blastwave.org/testing >> >> Since you cannot use pkg-get from /testing, you need to pkg-get the >> following as prerequisites: >> >> pm_gd >> pm_tt2common >> >> Let me know how this works for you. >> > > They work fine, thanks Alex! > > Cheers, > > Chris > > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > From maseda at unc.edu Thu Dec 14 00:57:10 2006 From: maseda at unc.edu (Mike Seda) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 18:57:10 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] error installing firefox In-Reply-To: <4580902E.1050800@unc.edu> References: <4580902E.1050800@unc.edu> Message-ID: <45809356.90803@unc.edu> Wow... Somehow the perms on /tmp were screwed up... I changed 'em back to 1777, and the install completed successfully... Very scary... I wonder what other perms are crazy on my system... I may have to tighten the sudo leash :-\ Mike Seda wrote: > Hi All, > I received the following error while attempting to execute "pkg-get -i > firefox" on a SUN V440 (sparc) running solaris 10 U2 and pulling from > the ibiblio .org stable repository: > Installation of was successful. > Processing package instance from > > openldap - OpenLDAP standalone server and update replication daemons > (oldap)(sparc) 2.3.27,REV=2006.08.27 > . > . > . > ## Executing checkinstall script. > /var/tmp//installxzaix2/checkinstallAzaix2: /tmp/sh278370: cannot create > pkgadd: ERROR: checkinstall script did not complete successfully > Installation of failed. > No changes were made to the system. > ERROR: could not add CSWoldap. > ERROR: install of CSWoldap failed > ERROR: could not install required dependancies for CSWgnomevfs2 > ERROR: install of CSWgnomevfs2 failed > ERROR: could not install required dependancies for CSWfirefox > > Any thoughts? > Mike > > > Chris Ridd wrote: > >> On 9/12/06 2:56, Alex Moore (by way of Alex Moore ) >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Fri, 08 Dec 2006 10:29:09 +0000 >>> Chris Ridd wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> We're looking at rolling out Bugzilla on Solaris, and I'd like to >>>> maintain all the perl module dependencies using Blastwave. All but >>>> these two modules are already in Blastwave... >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> Chris, >>> >>> I put these two modules in http://www.blastwave.org/testing >>> >>> Since you cannot use pkg-get from /testing, you need to pkg-get the >>> following as prerequisites: >>> >>> pm_gd >>> pm_tt2common >>> >>> Let me know how this works for you. >>> >>> >> They work fine, thanks Alex! >> >> Cheers, >> >> Chris >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> users mailing list >> users at lists.blastwave.org >> https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > From maseda at unc.edu Thu Dec 14 21:08:32 2006 From: maseda at unc.edu (Mike Seda) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 15:08:32 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] CSWlogwatch version 5.2.2 Message-ID: <4581AF40.3000007@unc.edu> Hi All, The /opt/csw/etc/log.d/scripts/services/sendmail-largeboxes file included with CSWlogwatch version 5.2.2 has relative paths for some executables. This produces errors in the logs. I have not tested it, but I think adding "export PATH=/opt/csw/bin:$PATH" before "if [ "$SPOOLDIR" ]; then" should work fine. Cheers, Mike From stenka1 at go.com Sat Dec 16 15:39:49 2006 From: stenka1 at go.com (stephen bond) Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 14:39:49 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [csw-users] boost Message-ID: <6377645.1166279989438.JavaMail.?@fh058.dia.cp.net> Does anybody know why the blastwave boost pkg installs only includes while a regular install with bjam will produce many libboost* in path/lib ? also, what needs those libboost* if anything? thank you stephen From james at blastwave.org Sat Dec 16 15:56:55 2006 From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee) Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 14:56:55 GMT Subject: [csw-users] boost In-Reply-To: <6377645.1166279989438.JavaMail.?@fh058.dia.cp.net> References: <6377645.1166279989438.JavaMail.?@fh058.dia.cp.net> Message-ID: <20061216.14565500.992108329@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk> On 16/12/06, 14:39:49, stephen bond wrote regarding [csw-users] boost: > Does anybody know why the blastwave boost pkg installs only includes > while a regular install with bjam will produce many libboost* in > path/lib ? There are 2 boost packages, boost_devel has the headers and a boost run time package for the libs which doesn't exist (released). > also, what needs those libboost* if anything? CSWmonotone uses the phantom CSWboostrt From roman.klesel at googlemail.com Tue Dec 19 09:11:17 2006 From: roman.klesel at googlemail.com (Roman Klesel) Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 09:11:17 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] cswexim and zones In-Reply-To: <1d96939c0612062325g41ee55dfya60224272341a138@mail.gmail.com> References: <1d96939c0612060251r4d4054e4v4b23521204de79b1@mail.gmail.com> <1d96939c0612060324r4588ba60w771b44dd75de1fb2@mail.gmail.com> <20061206183324.GA9295@enterprise.blastwave.org> <1d96939c0612062325g41ee55dfya60224272341a138@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <1d96939c0612190011s489be007l992a07efdf915989@mail.gmail.com> Hi again, On 12/7/06, Roman Klesel wrote: > Hello Markus, > > On 12/6/06, Markus Mayer wrote: > > > Could you send the output of the pkgadd command(s) you are using > > (either via pkg-get or called directly)? > > > > Shure, it's at the end of this post. I cut out the GPL so it will not > be that long ... can anyone here share experiances with this cswexim package from unstable? Do you observe the same phenomena? If so, is there s.o. working on a fix? I'm about to deploy this package on quite some systems and my interest that this works out of the box is of quite big interest to me. So far, I help myself by makeing the required adjustments (genereating the exim user and group, importing the svc-manifest) manually in the non-global zones. If there is need I'm ready to help to get this package flying whith zones. Thanks to everyone involved here for providing this valuable system. Regard Roman From jreid at vnet.net Wed Dec 20 21:13:54 2006 From: jreid at vnet.net (Joe Reid) Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 14:13:54 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] cpan.pm Message-ID: <45899982.5020504@vnet.net> I'll put the on the request page - but has anyone thought about the perl module that was designed for installing other perl modules - that would make a great blastwave package...or is it there and I'm missing it? -- Joe Reid jreid at vnet.net http://www.singlewhitemale.net ?c=a=rb=sc=fd=te=wf=zg=porh=n? From jreid at vnet.net Thu Dec 21 02:09:37 2006 From: jreid at vnet.net (Joe Reid) Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 20:09:37 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] gnu patch Message-ID: <20061221010937.GB1484@katie.ctc.net> I'm looking for gnu patch - is it in the archive somewhere? and thanks for the pointer that CPAN.pm is now part of perl itself. -- Joe Reid jreid at vnet.net Tactical Solaris Systems Engineering and Administration http://www.singlewhitemale.net ?c=a=rb=sc=fd=te=wf=zg=porh=n? From maseda at unc.edu Fri Dec 22 17:21:01 2006 From: maseda at unc.edu (Mike Seda) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 11:21:01 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] gnu patch In-Reply-To: <20061221010937.GB1484@katie.ctc.net> References: <20061221010937.GB1484@katie.ctc.net> Message-ID: <458C05ED.5070102@unc.edu> I have gpatch in /usr/bin on my solaris 10 u2 box... I think it came from the SUNWgpch package... I didn't seem to find an analog to that package on blastwave Joe Reid wrote: > I'm looking for gnu patch - is it in the archive somewhere? > > and thanks for the pointer that CPAN.pm is now part of perl itself. > > From comand at blastwave.org Sat Dec 23 01:39:22 2006 From: comand at blastwave.org (Cory Omand) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 16:39:22 -0800 Subject: [csw-users] gnu patch In-Reply-To: <458C05ED.5070102@unc.edu> References: <20061221010937.GB1484@katie.ctc.net> <458C05ED.5070102@unc.edu> Message-ID: On 12/22/06, Mike Seda wrote: > I have gpatch in /usr/bin on my solaris 10 u2 box... I think it came > from the SUNWgpch package... I didn't seem to find an analog to that > package on blastwave Hi Mike, GNU patch is distributed with Solaris, in SUNWgpch on S8+, so we don't repackage it. HTH, Cory. From jreid at vnet.net Sat Dec 23 20:37:16 2006 From: jreid at vnet.net (Joe Reid) Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 13:37:16 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] gnu patch (happy holidays!) In-Reply-To: References: <20061221010937.GB1484@katie.ctc.net> <458C05ED.5070102@unc.edu> Message-ID: <458D856C.4070700@vnet.net> thanks to all who responded - sometimes missing the obvious is painful :-) happy holidays and thanks to all of those of you who work so hard on Blastwave!!! Cory Omand wrote: >On 12/22/06, Mike Seda wrote: > > >>I have gpatch in /usr/bin on my solaris 10 u2 box... I think it came >>from the SUNWgpch package... I didn't seem to find an analog to that >>package on blastwave >> >> > >Hi Mike, > >GNU patch is distributed with Solaris, in SUNWgpch on S8+, so we don't >repackage it. > >HTH, >Cory. >_______________________________________________ >users mailing list >users at lists.blastwave.org >https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > -- Joe Reid jreid at vnet.net http://www.singlewhitemale.net ?c=a=rb=sc=fd=te=wf=zg=porh=n? From mats.larsson at ericsson.com Wed Dec 27 10:29:50 2006 From: mats.larsson at ericsson.com (Mats Larsson) Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 10:29:50 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Evolution problem ? In-Reply-To: <20061031131137.6724.qmail@web33605.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <20061031131137.6724.qmail@web33605.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <45923D0E.5030202@ericsson.com> On 2006-10-31 14:11, ken mays wrote: > I am in the process of fixing evolution and a few other apps like Rhythmbox hopefully within the next two weeks. > ~Ken Any progress Ken? > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Meik Hellmund > To: questions and discussions > Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 5:45:01 AM > Subject: Re: [csw-users] Evolution problem ? > On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 10:58:21 +0100 > Mats Larsson wrote: >> When I try to start evolution, I get the following: >>> /opt/csw/bin/evolution >> ld.so.1: evolution-2.6: fatal: libnss3.so: open failed: No such file or directory >> The wrapper script sets up LD_LIBRARY_PATH like this: >> LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/opt/csw/lib:/usr/gnome/lib:${LD_LIBRARY_PATH} >> But there is no libnss3.so in /opt/csw/lib or /usr/gnome/lib. > Yep, and when I add either /opt/csw/lib/mozilla or /opt/csw/libexec/firefox/lib/firefox-1.5.0.7/ > to LD_LIBRARY_PATH (the two places I found a libnss3 on my system), > then the monster segfaults (this is on Sol9/sparc). > Please help, > Meik -- Mats Larsson Local R&D IS/IT Service Manager (LSM) at TN From ingoldb at gmail.com Sat Dec 30 17:51:06 2006 From: ingoldb at gmail.com (Brian Ingold) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 10:51:06 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] gnome is broken horribly? Message-ID: <723a03ae0612300851p6fe2647ek590c0891e85bb76d@mail.gmail.com> Hello all - I am writing for some help with my recent install of the gnome desktop environment from blastwave. I should start by saying that this is the first build of gnome I've ever used (excepting what was pre-installed in redhat, suse, ubuntu). I really want to use Solaris though, as I have been an Oracle DBA & shell programmer on Solaris 8 for a few years now. This is my first home install of Solaris, and follows our first load of v10 at work. I have to say that as a black-box I love it... That having been said, let me say that the out-of-the-box experience with gnome so far has been horrid. I really like blastwave, but at this point I could Never recommend the functionality of their gnome 2.14 install (KDE worked wonderfully, btw, but it's just too busy for me) - would it work any differently from gnome.org? Before I attempt to get into the technical info (I Am asking for Help), let me say that it seems I don't know how to troubleshoot an incomplete gnome startup(?). >From the first start, the clock applet failed to load. I've read a bit about issues with the clock applet and Evolution/Evolution web calendar, but haven't found anything about how to correct. Firefox won't save all settings. I've also read a very few posts about Firefox 1.5.0.7 not keeping some settings (for example: not knowing that it is the default browser). But again, haven't found anything about how to correct. Rhythmbox crashes on startup too.... Evolution will not start from shortcut. If I try from command line, it tells me it's Killing old version of Wombat before a popup advises me of an Error: Cannot access the Email and Calendar shell. Startup works for me like this: the splash screen progress stops at "The Panel" - for about 1-2 minutes- then disappears. The desktop appears normal. If I click on the splash screen during startup, it disappears to show menu/panel bars but no desktop (just a black screen). Again, after ~2 minutes, the desktop appears. I don't know what to do here - will someone please assist/educate? Brian root at AMD64:~# uname -a SunOS AMD64 5.10 Generic_118855-19 i86pc i386 i86pc root at AMD64:~# cat /etc/release Solaris 10 6/06 s10x_u2wos_09a X86 Copyright 2006 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Use is subject to license terms. Assembled 09 June 2006 root at AMD64:~# /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -U Getting catalog... --13:55:14-- http://ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/unstable/i386/5.10/catalog => `catalog' Resolving ibiblio.org... 152.46.7.80 Connecting to ibiblio.org|152.46.7.80|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 191,943 (187K) [text/plain] 100%[==================================================================================>] 191,943 107.60K/s 13:55:16 (107.39 KB/s) - `catalog' saved [191943/191943] gpg: Signature made Thu Dec 14 23:44:50 2006 CST using DSA key ID E12E9D2F gpg: Good signature from "Distribution Manager " gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner. Primary key fingerprint: 0BF0 9891 9340 86DC EBE3 DDFF 06A1 ED1B E12E 9D2F Updating catalog file /var/pkg-get/catalog-ibiblio.org updated --13:55:17-- http://ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/unstable/i386/5.10/descriptions => `descriptions' Resolving ibiblio.org... 152.46.7.80 Connecting to ibiblio.org|152.46.7.80|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 85,597 (84K) [text/plain] 100%[==================================================================================>] 85,597 63.74K/s 13:55:18 (63.58 KB/s) - `descriptions' saved [85597/85597] Updated description file root at AMD64:~# /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -c | grep -v Not | grep -v SAME # (From site http://ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/unstable ) software localrev remoterev root at AMD64:~# -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20061230/ac28a446/attachment.html From maybird1776 at yahoo.com Sat Dec 30 22:42:51 2006 From: maybird1776 at yahoo.com (ken mays) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 13:42:51 -0800 (PST) Subject: [csw-users] Update on Blastwave's GNOME 2.14.3 Message-ID: <341673.69790.qm@web33605.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Hello, Blastwave's GNOME 2.14.3 currently requires updates that are in the /testing directory. Hopefully, these packages will get added to the UNSTABLE directory soon. I'd hope to get the updated GNOME packages into the new STABLE release, yet I needed more time to review the packages. Some of the packages are from the GNOME 2.16.2 release. I'll update more the packages from user requests. The focus is to streamline the GNOME desktop to work on Solaris 8 and older Sun UltraSPARC workstations. Please either request an updated package from /testing to the UNSTABLE or STABLE branch from Philip Brown or James Lee as they maintain those distros. ~K __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From grsmith1943 at centurytel.net Sat Dec 30 22:59:08 2006 From: grsmith1943 at centurytel.net (george r smith) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 15:59:08 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] Help on Eclipse 3.2.1 Message-ID: <200612302159.kBULx95X015245@msa2-mx.centurytel.net> All, I have an Solaris workstation (AMD) box running Solaris 10. Can I get Eclipse to run on this box. I just do not understand why it is so available on Windows but not on Sun. thanks grs From maseda at unc.edu Sat Dec 30 23:51:49 2006 From: maseda at unc.edu (Mike Seda) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 17:51:49 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Help on Eclipse 3.2.1 In-Reply-To: <200612302159.kBULx95X015245@msa2-mx.centurytel.net> References: <200612302159.kBULx95X015245@msa2-mx.centurytel.net> Message-ID: <4596ED85.708@unc.edu> george r smith wrote: > All, > > I have an Solaris workstation (AMD) box running Solaris 10. Can I get > Eclipse to run on this box. Yes > I just do not understand why it is so available > on Windows but not on Sun. > The Blastwave package you need is called CSWeclipse: http://www.canoedissent.org.uk/si/package.jsp?p=CSWeclipse > thanks > grs > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > From maseda at unc.edu Sat Dec 30 23:54:11 2006 From: maseda at unc.edu (Mike Seda) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 17:54:11 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Help on Eclipse 3.2.1 In-Reply-To: <4596ED85.708@unc.edu> References: <200612302159.kBULx95X015245@msa2-mx.centurytel.net> <4596ED85.708@unc.edu> Message-ID: <4596EE13.9000202@unc.edu> oops... If you want eclipse 3.2.1, get it from the unstable repo: http://www.canoedissent.org.uk/ui/package.jsp?p=CSWeclipse Mike Seda wrote: > george r smith wrote: >> All, >> >> I have an Solaris workstation (AMD) box running Solaris 10. Can I get >> Eclipse to run on this box. > Yes >> I just do not understand why it is so available >> on Windows but not on Sun. >> > The Blastwave package you need is called CSWeclipse: > http://www.canoedissent.org.uk/si/package.jsp?p=CSWeclipse > >> thanks >> grs >> >> _______________________________________________ >> users mailing list >> users at lists.blastwave.org >> https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users >> > > From anthony.cogan at thinkunix.com Sun Dec 31 07:06:48 2006 From: anthony.cogan at thinkunix.com (Anthony Cogan) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 00:06:48 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] Blastwave SASL/Sendmail Shadow authentication? Message-ID: I have the Blastwave SASL, Sendmail and other required packages downloaded, I have clam, spamassassing milters working and even the SMTP AUTH is working IF I use the /opt/etc/sasldb2 file and create the users with saslpasswd2, however, I do not want to maintain two password files for my users, one in the shadow file and one in the SASL database. I have set this up relatively easily before in Linux using the Sendmail.conf file and have even created one on the system. Location: /opt/csw/lib/sasl2/Sendmail.conf Contents: pwcheck_method: saslauthd mech_list: LOGIN PLAIN I don't seem to get an error in the log files and if I create the user using saslpasswd2 it works just fine. Anyone have any hints on how to get authentication working through the shadow file? Thanks! From james at blastwave.org Sun Dec 31 11:02:18 2006 From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 10:02:18 GMT Subject: [csw-users] gnome is broken horribly? In-Reply-To: <723a03ae0612300851p6fe2647ek590c0891e85bb76d@mail.gmail.com> References: <723a03ae0612300851p6fe2647ek590c0891e85bb76d@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20061231.10021800.635527043@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk> On 30/12/06, 16:51:06, Brian Ingold wrote regarding [csw-users] gnome is broken horribly?: "horribly" is a subjective term but yes the gnome from unstable is broken in places. If you find broken software annoying then use the stable resource. See /opt/csw/etc/pkg-get.conf, make your choice by selecting unstable or stable at the end of the url= setting. The gnome in stable works but is lagging in version because the later offerings were, yes, broken. An updated and clean gnome should be in the 2007-01 stable release - expected soon, it's currently the focus of much effort to ensure an updated gnome makes the next stable release. James. From ihsan at blastwave.org Sun Dec 31 12:58:32 2006 From: ihsan at blastwave.org (Ihsan Dogan) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 12:58:32 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Blastwave SASL/Sendmail Shadow authentication? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4597A5E8.4000306@blastwave.org> Hello, on 31.12.2006 07:06 Anthony Cogan said the following: > Location: /opt/csw/lib/sasl2/Sendmail.conf > > Contents: > pwcheck_method: saslauthd > mech_list: LOGIN PLAIN I think the file should be more like this. I don't know how it is with Sendmail, but with Postfix I'm using this to authenticate users with PAM: ihsan at enterprise:/opt/csw/lib/sasl2$ cat smtpd.conf pwcheck_method: saslauthd mech_list: plain login > I don't seem to get an error in the log files and if I create the > user using saslpasswd2 it works just fine. > > Anyone have any hints on how to get authentication working through > the shadow file? saslauthd is nasty if it's not working as expected, especially because it doesn't give enough log messages. What you can do is, to start saslauthd by hand with the option -d (debug) and see the console messages. Hope this helps. Ihsan -- ihsan at dogan.ch http://ihsan.dogan.ch/ From ingoldb at gmail.com Sun Dec 31 16:44:12 2006 From: ingoldb at gmail.com (Brian Ingold) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 09:44:12 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] gnome is broken horribly? In-Reply-To: <20061231.10021800.635527043@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk> References: <723a03ae0612300851p6fe2647ek590c0891e85bb76d@mail.gmail.com> <20061231.10021800.635527043@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk> Message-ID: <723a03ae0612310744o20f014fftf1e4afc8a3f0845@mail.gmail.com> Hi James, yes - I could have used a better word there. Twas my frustration speaking as I have spent quite a few hours trying to figure out what was wrong. Thank you for pointing out what should have been obvious (I guess I still need to put "newbie" down by my name). -B On 12/31/06, James Lee wrote: > > On 30/12/06, 16:51:06, Brian Ingold wrote regarding > [csw-users] gnome is broken horribly?: > > "horribly" is a subjective term but yes the gnome from unstable is > broken in places. If you find broken software annoying then use the > stable resource. > > See /opt/csw/etc/pkg-get.conf, make your choice by selecting > unstable or stable at the end of the url= setting. > > The gnome in stable works but is lagging in version because the > later offerings were, yes, broken. An updated and clean gnome should > be in the 2007-01 stable release - expected soon, it's currently the > focus of much effort to ensure an updated gnome makes the next stable > release. > > > > > James. > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20061231/8e032f1e/attachment.html From dclarke at blastwave.org Sun Dec 31 20:01:35 2006 From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 14:01:35 -0500 (EST) Subject: [csw-users] gnome is broken horribly? In-Reply-To: <723a03ae0612310744o20f014fftf1e4afc8a3f0845@mail.gmail.com> References: <723a03ae0612300851p6fe2647ek590c0891e85bb76d@mail.gmail.com> <20061231.10021800.635527043@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk> <723a03ae0612310744o20f014fftf1e4afc8a3f0845@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <33088.24.146.17.108.1167591695.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> > Hi James, > yes - I could have used a better word there. Twas my frustration speaking > as I have spent quite a few hours trying to figure out what was wrong. I can relate. I have a base Solaris 8 test box here and it takes a really really long time to go through a full GNOME test cycle. Days in fact. When something doesn't work or that "login hang time" issue wwon't go away I fell like kicking the cat. If I had a cat. Which I don't. > Thank you for pointing out what should have been obvious (I guess I still > need to put "newbie" down by my name). not at all ... glad we can help in some small way. Dennis Clarke From ingoldb at gmail.com Sun Dec 31 21:33:29 2006 From: ingoldb at gmail.com (Brian Ingold) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 14:33:29 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] gnome is broken horribly? In-Reply-To: <33088.24.146.17.108.1167591695.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> References: <723a03ae0612300851p6fe2647ek590c0891e85bb76d@mail.gmail.com> <20061231.10021800.635527043@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk> <723a03ae0612310744o20f014fftf1e4afc8a3f0845@mail.gmail.com> <33088.24.146.17.108.1167591695.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> Message-ID: <723a03ae0612311233o58d843b0h46bf30032b9db6ea@mail.gmail.com> Ok, downgraded to 2.8 using pkg-get -s http://ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/stable -U -S -u now it "hangs" when the splash screen shows nautilus. I never get more than a black desktop. Many more apps terminate spontaneously.... still no evolution either. Might there be a start log for gnome I can look at? On 12/31/06, Dennis Clarke wrote: > > > > Hi James, > > yes - I could have used a better word there. Twas my frustration > speaking > > as I have spent quite a few hours trying to figure out what was wrong. > > I can relate. I have a base Solaris 8 test box here and it takes a really > really long time to go through a full GNOME test cycle. Days in fact. > > When something doesn't work or that "login hang time" issue wwon't go away > I fell like kicking the cat. If I had a cat. Which I don't. > > > Thank you for pointing out what should have been obvious (I guess I > still > > need to put "newbie" down by my name). > > not at all ... glad we can help in some small way. > > Dennis Clarke > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20061231/d656c93e/attachment.html From james at blastwave.org Sun Dec 31 23:41:26 2006 From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 22:41:26 GMT Subject: [csw-users] gnome is broken horribly? In-Reply-To: <723a03ae0612311233o58d843b0h46bf30032b9db6ea@mail.gmail.com> References: <723a03ae0612300851p6fe2647ek590c0891e85bb76d@mail.gmail.com> <20061231.10021800.635527043@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk> <723a03ae0612310744o20f014fftf1e4afc8a3f0845@mail.gmail.com> <33088.24.146.17.108.1167591695.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> <723a03ae0612311233o58d843b0h46bf30032b9db6ea@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20061231.22412600.1009179168@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk> On 31/12/06, 20:33:29, Brian Ingold wrote regarding Re: [csw-users] gnome is broken horribly?: > Ok, downgraded to 2.8 using pkg-get -s > http://ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/stable -U -S -u > now it "hangs" when the splash screen shows nautilus. I never get more > than a black desktop. Many more apps terminate spontaneously.... still > no evolution either. Down grade is not supported and -S is inherently risky. Make sure you have cleaned out the newer gnome, any ~/.gnome like directories, thumbnail caches, perhaps in /opt/csw. Look for stray gconf processes, these hang round longer hang they ought. Etc... James. From schluting at gmail.com Fri Dec 1 02:20:56 2006 From: schluting at gmail.com (Charlie Schluting) Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 17:20:56 -0800 Subject: [csw-users] Puppet in blastwave? Message-ID: <839465400611301720h7b764fa3r2ab2d2cc78b7753f@mail.gmail.com> Their download page has CSW packages, but they don't appear to exist in blastwave: http://reductivelabs.com/downloads/packages/SunOS/ Does anyone know if these are going to become part of blastwave? Thanks, -Charlie From dclarke at blastwave.org Fri Dec 1 03:19:49 2006 From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke) Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 21:19:49 -0500 (EST) Subject: [csw-users] Puppet in blastwave? In-Reply-To: <839465400611301720h7b764fa3r2ab2d2cc78b7753f@mail.gmail.com> References: <839465400611301720h7b764fa3r2ab2d2cc78b7753f@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <32834.24.146.17.108.1164939589.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> > Their download page has CSW packages, but they don't appear to exist > in blastwave: > http://reductivelabs.com/downloads/packages/SunOS/ > > Does anyone know if these are going to become part of blastwave? > Well imitation is the highest form of flattery they say. So I'm surprised to see these packages neatly build to install into /opt/csw correctly and yet they exist somewhere else and have nothing to do with us here at Blastwave. fascinating. I guess we can always send an email to the person doing this and just ask if they want those packages in testing and then into the catalog. Here is the complete file list by the way : # find . . ./var ./var/sadm ./var/sadm/install ./var/sadm/install/admin ./var/sadm/install/logs ./var/sadm/install/contents ./var/sadm/install/.lockfile ./var/sadm/install/.pkg.lock ./var/sadm/install/gz-only-packages ./var/sadm/pkg ./var/sadm/pkg/CSWfacter ./var/sadm/pkg/CSWfacter/install ./var/sadm/pkg/CSWfacter/install/copyright ./var/sadm/pkg/CSWfacter/save ./var/sadm/pkg/CSWfacter/save/pspool ./var/sadm/pkg/CSWfacter/save/pspool/CSWfacter ./var/sadm/pkg/CSWfacter/save/pspool/CSWfacter/install ./var/sadm/pkg/CSWfacter/save/pspool/CSWfacter/install/copyright ./var/sadm/pkg/CSWfacter/save/pspool/CSWfacter/pkginfo ./var/sadm/pkg/CSWfacter/save/pspool/CSWfacter/pkgmap ./var/sadm/pkg/CSWfacter/pkginfo ./var/sadm/pkg/CSWpuppet ./var/sadm/pkg/CSWpuppet/install ./var/sadm/pkg/CSWpuppet/install/copyright ./var/sadm/pkg/CSWpuppet/save ./var/sadm/pkg/CSWpuppet/save/pspool ./var/sadm/pkg/CSWpuppet/save/pspool/CSWpuppet ./var/sadm/pkg/CSWpuppet/save/pspool/CSWpuppet/install ./var/sadm/pkg/CSWpuppet/save/pspool/CSWpuppet/install/copyright ./var/sadm/pkg/CSWpuppet/save/pspool/CSWpuppet/pkginfo ./var/sadm/pkg/CSWpuppet/save/pspool/CSWpuppet/pkgmap ./var/sadm/pkg/CSWpuppet/pkginfo ./opt ./opt/csw ./opt/csw/bin ./opt/csw/bin/facter ./opt/csw/bin/puppet ./opt/csw/bin/puppetca ./opt/csw/bin/puppetd ./opt/csw/bin/puppetdoc ./opt/csw/bin/puppetmasterd ./opt/csw/bin/puppetrun ./opt/csw/lib ./opt/csw/lib/ruby ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8 ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/facter ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/facter/memory.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/facter/processor.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/facter.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/autoload.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/base64.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/client ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/client/ca.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/client/dipper.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/client/file.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/client/log.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/client/master.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/client/pelement.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/client/proxy.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/client/reporter.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/client/runner.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/client/status.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/client.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/config.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/configuration.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/daemon.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/dsl.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/element.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/error.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/event-loop ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/event-loop/better-definers.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/event-loop/event-loop.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/event-loop/signal-system.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/event-loop.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/event.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/feature ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/feature/usage.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/feature.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/filetype.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/inifile.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/loadedfile.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/lock.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/log.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/metatype ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/metatype/attributes.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/metatype/closure.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/metatype/container.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/metatype/evaluation.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/metatype/instances.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/metatype/manager.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/metatype/metaparams.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/metatype/providers.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/metatype/relationships.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/metatype/schedules.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/metatype/tags.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/metric.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/networkclient.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/parameter.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/parser ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/parser/ast ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/parser/ast/astarray.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/parser/ast/branch.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/parser/ast/caseopt.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/parser/ast/casestatement.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/parser/ast/collection.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/parser/ast/collexpr.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/parser/ast/component.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/parser/ast/else.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/parser/ast/function.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/parser/ast/hostclass.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/parser/ast/ifstatement.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/parser/ast/leaf.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/parser/ast/node.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/parser/ast/resourcedef.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/parser/ast/resourcedefaults.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/parser/ast/resourceoverride.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/parser/ast/resourceparam.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/parser/ast/resourceref.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/parser/ast/selector.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/parser/ast/tag.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/parser/ast/vardef.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/parser/ast.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/parser/collector.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/parser/functions.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/parser/interpreter.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/parser/lexer.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/parser/parser.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/parser/resource ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/parser/resource/param.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/parser/resource/reference.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/parser/resource.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/parser/scope.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/parser/templatewrapper.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/group ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/group/groupadd.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/group/netinfo.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/group/pw.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/host ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/host/netinfo.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/host/parsed.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/mount ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/mount/netinfo.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/mount/parsed.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/mount.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/nameservice ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/nameservice/netinfo.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/nameservice/objectadd.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/nameservice/pw.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/nameservice.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/package ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/package/apple.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/package/apt.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/package/aptitude.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/package/blastwave.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/package/darwinport.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/package/dpkg.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/package/freebsd.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/package/gem.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/package/openbsd.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/package/pkgdmg.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/package/portage.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/package/ports.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/package/rpm.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/package/sun.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/package/sunfreeware.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/package/up2date.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/package/yum.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/parsedfile.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/port ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/port/parsed.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/service ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/service/base.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/service/debian.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/service/gentoo.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/service/init.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/service/redhat.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/service/smf.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/sshkey ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/sshkey/parsed.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/user ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/user/netinfo.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/user/pw.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/user/useradd.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/rails ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/rails/database ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/rails/database/01_puppet_initialize.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/rails/host.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/rails/rails_parameter.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/rails/rails_resource.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/rails.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/reports ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/reports/log.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/reports/rrdgraph.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/reports/store.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/reports/tagmail.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/server ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/server/authconfig.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/server/authstore.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/server/ca.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/server/filebucket.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/server/fileserver.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/server/logger.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/server/master.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/server/pelement.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/server/report.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/server/rights.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/server/runner.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/server/servlet.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/server.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/sslcertificates ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/sslcertificates/ca.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/sslcertificates/certificate.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/sslcertificates/inventory.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/sslcertificates.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/statechange.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/storage.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/suidmanager.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/transaction ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/transaction/report.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/transaction.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/transportable.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/type ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/type/component.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/type/cron.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/type/exec.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/type/group.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/type/host.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/type/mount.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/type/notify.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/type/package.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/type/parsedtype.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/type/pfile ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/type/pfile/checksum.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/type/pfile/content.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/type/pfile/ensure.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/type/pfile/group.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/type/pfile/mode.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/type/pfile/source.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/type/pfile/target.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/type/pfile/type.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/type/pfile/uid.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/type/pfile.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/type/pfilebucket.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/type/port.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/type/schedule.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/type/service.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/type/sshkey.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/type/state.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/type/symlink.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/type/tidy.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/type/user.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/type/yumrepo.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/type/zone.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/type.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/util ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/util/classgen.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/util/docs.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/util/errors.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/util/execution.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/util/fileparsing.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/util/logging.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/util/metaid.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/util/methodhelper.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/util/package.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/util/plist ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/util/plist/generator.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/util/plist/parser.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/util/plist.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/util/posix.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/util/variables.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/util/warnings.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/util.rb ./opt/csw/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/puppet.rb So it looks like some work has been done. PKG=CSWfacter NAME=facter - System Fact Gatherer VERSION=1.3.5 CATEGORY=application VENDOR=http://reductivelabs.com/projects/facter HOTLINE=http://reductivelabs.com/cgi-bin/facter.cgi EMAIL=luke at madstop.com BASEDIR=/opt/csw ARCH=i86pc PSTAMP=sol10b20060929101337 CLASSES=none fascinating eh ? Dennis From pfelecan at blastwave.org Fri Dec 1 18:24:58 2006 From: pfelecan at blastwave.org (Peter FELECAN) Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2006 18:24:58 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Emacs 22 snapsot 20061201 CVS in testing Message-ID: The monthly CVS snapshot of the next version of Emacs, is in the testing area: http://www.blastwave.org/testing/emacs-22.0.91,REV=cvs20061201-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz http://www.blastwave.org/testing/emacs-22.0.91,REV=cvs20061201-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz If you wish to use/test the bleeding edge Emacs, you're welcome. But, if there are issues, please report them upstream; I'll manage only the packaging side. To install this package, you need to remove all dependent packages and Emacs 21.4 itself; after that, you install, using pkgadd, the CVS Emacs corresponding to your architecture and, if you're a TeX user, the nifty AucTex package. Note that this version includes the successors of: oortgnus and emacscalc, available as Blastwave packages, and many other, previously separate, packages --- e.g., tramp. I'll made a new testing package the next month. Enjoy -- Peter From slindes.lists at gmail.com Fri Dec 1 23:21:13 2006 From: slindes.lists at gmail.com (slindes.lists at gmail.com) Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 23:21:13 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] CSWeclipse with wrong arch. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi, For infomration. I just fetched CSWeclipse from a laptop, hp nc6220 with Opensolars b52. But eclipse didn't want to start. % eclipse /opt/csw/bin/eclipse: ./eclipse: cannot execute % file /opt/csw/lib/eclipse/eclipse /opt/csw/lib/eclipse/eclipse: ELF 32-bit MSB executable SPARC Version 1, dynamically linked, not stripped snip from pkg-get output ======================== Processing package instance from eclipse - an open extensible IDE for Java(i386) 3.2.1,REV=2006.10.23 Eclipse Public License - v 1.0 and pkginfo -l ============== pkginfo -l CSWeclipse PKGINST: CSWeclipse NAME: eclipse - an open extensible IDE for Java CATEGORY: application ARCH: i386 VERSION: 3.2.1,REV=2006.10.23 BASEDIR: / VENDOR: http://www.eclipse.org/ packaged for CSW by William Bonnet PSTAMP: thor20061023154827 INSTDATE: Dec 01 2006 22:37 HOTLINE: http://www.blastwave.org/bugtrack/ EMAIL: wbonnet at blastwave.org STATUS: completely installed FILES: 1710 installed pathnames 316 directories 2 executables 268489 blocks used (approx) /stefan From william at wbonnet.net Sat Dec 2 00:43:11 2006 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2006 00:43:11 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] CSWeclipse with wrong arch. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4570BE0F.5040700@wbonnet.net> Hi all This is a known problem :( I still haven't replaced the package, because even if the 386 binary is available, the package has some other problem x86. It works fine on sparc. I hope i'll be able to release soon (in the next week). Otherwise i'll consider to switch back to version 3.2 which works on both 386 and sparc. sorry for the delay, Kind regards, William -- William http://www.wbonnet.net http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix http://www.blastwave.org An OpenSolaris Community Site http://www.guses.org French speaking Solaris User Group From r.mahoney at iconz.co.nz Sat Dec 2 05:28:36 2006 From: r.mahoney at iconz.co.nz (Richard Mahoney) Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2006 17:28:36 +1300 Subject: [csw-users] CSWeclipse with wrong arch. In-Reply-To: <4570BE0F.5040700@wbonnet.net> References: <4570BE0F.5040700@wbonnet.net> Message-ID: <1165033716.12197.3.camel@proliant> On Sat, 2006-12-02 at 12:43, William Bonnet wrote: > Hi all > > This is a known problem :( > > I still haven't replaced the package, because even if the 386 binary is > available, the package has some other problem x86. It works fine on sparc. > > I hope i'll be able to release soon (in the next week). Otherwise i'll > consider to switch back to version 3.2 which works on both 386 and sparc. > > sorry for the delay, For what its worth I built and installed a 3.2.1 on: SunOS proliant 5.10 Generic_118855-19 i86pc i386 i86pc by following the instructions here: http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=16022&tstart=0 i.e.: I have successfully built Eclipse 3.2.1 on Solaris x86 (Nevada b48). However, I had to make some changes. 1. You must download and install Sun Studio compiler. I use version 11. The Solaris makefile in Eclipse source uses Studio CC's flag. GCC will fail. See "./plugins/org.eclipse.swt/Eclipse SWT PI/gtk/library/make_solaris.mak": GLXLIBS = -G -K PIC -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lGL -lGLU -lm 2. Download the source from http://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/downloads/drops/R-3.2.1-200609210945/index.php Choose "eclipse-sourceBuild-srcIncluded-3.2.1.zip " (I found the mirror site in TW the fastest) 3. Unzip the source to a separate directory. 4. Change the following line in "build.xml" file. From: To: It is my workaround for this Eclipse bug: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=102560 5. Set JAVA_HOME to your jdk1.5 base directory, mine is /usr/java 6. Set CDE_HOME to /usr/dt Build Eclipse with the following command: CC=cc JAVA_HOME=/usr/java CDE_HOME=/usr/dt ./build -os solaris -ws gtk -arch x86 -java5home /usr/java -compilelibs Best regards, Richard Mahoney -- Richard MAHONEY | internet: http://indica-et-buddhica.org/ Littledene | telephone/telefax (man.): +64 3 312 1699 Bay Road | cellular: +64 27 482 9986 OXFORD, NZ | email: r.mahoney at indica-et-buddhica.org ----------------------------------------------------------- Philologica: http://indica-et-buddhica.org/philologica/ Repositorium: http://indica-et-buddhica.org/repositorium/ From william at wbonnet.net Sat Dec 2 12:06:34 2006 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2006 12:06:34 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] /testing Firefox 2.0 is available Message-ID: <45715E3A.1040707@wbonnet.net> Hi all Firefox 2.0 packages are availables from testing for both SPARC and i386. http://www.blastwave.org/testing/firefox-2.0,REV=2006.12.02-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz http://www.blastwave.org/testing/firefox-2.0,REV=2006.12.02-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz Problem reports goes to me, and thanks goes to Jake :) Kind regards, William -- William http://www.wbonnet.net http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix http://www.blastwave.org An OpenSolaris Community Site http://www.guses.org French speaking Solaris User Group From jreid at vnet.net Sun Dec 3 01:33:26 2006 From: jreid at vnet.net (Joe Reid) Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2006 18:33:26 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] php5 iconv? Message-ID: <45721B56.7090201@vnet.net> I was installing jinzora and the installer says I don't have iconv support (non-fatal). I have libiconv but there is no php5 module for iconv? Is there one in the works or a workaround? -- Joe Reid jreid at vnet.net http://www.singlewhitemale.net ?c=a=rb=sc=fd=te=wf=zg=porh=n? From comand at blastwave.org Sun Dec 3 01:58:32 2006 From: comand at blastwave.org (Cory Omand) Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 16:58:32 -0800 Subject: [csw-users] php5 iconv? In-Reply-To: <45721B56.7090201@vnet.net> References: <45721B56.7090201@vnet.net> Message-ID: On 12/2/06, Joe Reid wrote: > I was installing jinzora and the installer says I don't have iconv > support (non-fatal). I have libiconv but there is no php5 module for > iconv? Is there one in the works or a workaround? The module is included in the base php5 package, but not enabled by default. Just do: $ sudo /opt/csw/php5/bin/phpext -e iconv $ /opt/csw/php5/bin/phpext -q iconv iconv_enabled=true Then restart your server. - C. From james at blastwave.org Sun Dec 3 12:11:55 2006 From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee) Date: Sun, 03 Dec 2006 11:11:55 GMT Subject: [csw-users] netsnmp install issues In-Reply-To: <20061108.9314700.1726629784@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk> References: <90ee5fbb0611071944q4cc37637s2df5a359c9ad0897@mail.gmail.com> <20061108.9314700.1726629784@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk> Message-ID: <20061203.11115500.3148257538@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk> On 08/11/06, 09:31:47, James Lee wrote regarding Re: [csw-users] netsnmp install issues: > On 08/11/06, 07:48:09, Cory Omand wrote regarding > Re: [csw-users] netsnmp install issues: > > On 11/7/06, Amit wrote: > > [snip] > > > ERROR: no info for SUNWpiclu. Cannot install dependancy. > > > ERROR: could not install required dependancies for CSWnetsnmp > > [snip] > > > > > > Any suggestions or help would be greatly appreciated. > > > > > This package comes in a patch > Please will someone tell us which? Hello?? Lack response suggests that the assertion that the package comes in a patch is false. Please, someone say where we get SUNWpiclu. From andy at riftware.com Sun Dec 3 17:16:11 2006 From: andy at riftware.com (Andrew Chandler) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 10:16:11 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] netsnmp install issues In-Reply-To: <20061203.11115500.3148257538@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk> Message-ID: <003601c716f6$5a8d15f0$6709a8c0@AChandlerV> A simple Google search provides the following - please note, just because we don't know which patch doesn't mean its not true, just that it was installed at some point in the patch clusters we've got from sun. Remember google is your friend. Cannot Open PICL The message Failed to open PICL; libfru error: Feature not Supported# ./prtfru -x occurs when running SRS Net Connect 3.0 on a multi-domain Sun Fire 12K, 15K, E20K, or E25K server. The message indicates that the FRU provider is not working. The FRUID package relies on the PICL daemon running on the Sun Fire server, which requires the SUNWpiclu package to be installed. The SUNWpiclu and SUNWpiclr packages are included in the default installation for the Sun Fire 12K, 15K, E20K, or E25K system controller and must exist prior to installing SRS Net Connect 3.0. Check the /var/adm/messages file for errors and contact Sun Support and mention FIN #I0783-1. -----Original Message----- From: users-bounces+andy=riftware.com at lists.blastwave.org [mailto:users-bounces+andy=riftware.com at lists.blastwave.org] On Behalf Of James Lee Sent: Sunday, December 03, 2006 5:12 AM To: questions and discussions Subject: Re: [csw-users] netsnmp install issues On 08/11/06, 09:31:47, James Lee wrote regarding Re: [csw-users] netsnmp install issues: > On 08/11/06, 07:48:09, Cory Omand wrote > regarding > Re: [csw-users] netsnmp install issues: > > On 11/7/06, Amit wrote: > > [snip] > > > ERROR: no info for SUNWpiclu. Cannot install dependancy. > > > ERROR: could not install required dependancies for CSWnetsnmp > > [snip] > > > > > > Any suggestions or help would be greatly appreciated. > > > > > This package comes in a patch > Please will someone tell us which? Hello?? Lack response suggests that the assertion that the package comes in a patch is false. Please, someone say where we get SUNWpiclu. _______________________________________________ users mailing list users at lists.blastwave.org https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users From andy at riftware.com Sun Dec 3 17:25:24 2006 From: andy at riftware.com (Andrew Chandler) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 10:25:24 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] netsnmp install issues In-Reply-To: <20061203.11115500.3148257538@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk> Message-ID: <003701c716f7$a45c3cf0$6709a8c0@AChandlerV> Further query on sunsolve.sun.com yields the followign (found by searching on pkg name and then just choosing the results that don't have a "lock" symbol next to them - things with a key next to them can't be viewed unless you pay - however this was in the free section Interactive Installation of Solaris Software When you install the Solaris 8 4/01 operating environment from the Solaris CDs, all of the required software clusters and packages for your Sun hardware are automatically loaded. If you choose to customize your Solaris 8 4/01 software configuration using the interactive installation method, refer to TABLE 1-2 and TABLE 1-3 to identify which software packages and clusters are needed. skip some parts of the table Sun Blade 100 and Sun Blade 1000 SUNWpiclh SUNWpiclr SUNWpiclu SUNWpiclx PICL SUNW1394h SUNW1394x IEEE framework (1394) SUNWeridx RIO driver SUNWusx.u CPU power management's UltraSPARC This strongly suggests to me the picl package is on the original solaris install cd. -----Original Message----- From: users-bounces+andy=riftware.com at lists.blastwave.org [mailto:users-bounces+andy=riftware.com at lists.blastwave.org] On Behalf Of James Lee Sent: Sunday, December 03, 2006 5:12 AM To: questions and discussions Subject: Re: [csw-users] netsnmp install issues On 08/11/06, 09:31:47, James Lee wrote regarding Re: [csw-users] netsnmp install issues: > On 08/11/06, 07:48:09, Cory Omand wrote > regarding > Re: [csw-users] netsnmp install issues: > > On 11/7/06, Amit wrote: > > [snip] > > > ERROR: no info for SUNWpiclu. Cannot install dependancy. > > > ERROR: could not install required dependancies for CSWnetsnmp > > [snip] > > > > > > Any suggestions or help would be greatly appreciated. > > > > > This package comes in a patch > Please will someone tell us which? Hello?? Lack response suggests that the assertion that the package comes in a patch is false. Please, someone say where we get SUNWpiclu. _______________________________________________ users mailing list users at lists.blastwave.org https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users From james at blastwave.org Mon Dec 4 11:03:19 2006 From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee) Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2006 10:03:19 GMT Subject: [csw-users] netsnmp install issues References: <003601c716f6$5a8d15f0$6709a8c0@AChandlerV> Message-ID: <20061204.10031900.3864383226@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk> On 03/12/06, 16:16:11, Andrew Chandler wrote regarding Re: [csw-users] netsnmp install issues: > A simple Google search provides the following - please note, just because > we don't know which patch doesn't mean its not true, Indeed, I said *suggests* it's not true. > just that it was installed > at some point in the patch clusters we've got from sun. Remember > google is your friend. Went there first, no patch number was found, very possibly (but not certainly) because there isn't one. > Cannot Open PICL > The message Failed to open PICL; libfru error: Feature not Supported# > ./prtfru -x occurs when running SRS Net Connect 3.0 on a multi-domain Sun > Fire 12K, 15K, E20K, or E25K server. The message indicates that the FRU > provider is not working. > The FRUID package relies on the PICL daemon running on the Sun Fire > server, which requires the SUNWpiclu package to be installed. The > SUNWpiclu and SUNWpiclr packages are included in the default > installation for the Sun Fire 12K, 15K, E20K, or E25K system controller > and must exist prior to installing SRS Net Connect 3.0. > Check the /var/adm/messages file for errors and contact Sun Support and > mention FIN #I0783-1. So not with a patch then. From james at blastwave.org Mon Dec 4 11:08:24 2006 From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee) Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2006 10:08:24 GMT Subject: [csw-users] netsnmp install issues References: <003701c716f7$a45c3cf0$6709a8c0@AChandlerV> Message-ID: <20061204.10082400.2975825240@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk> On 03/12/06, 16:25:24, Andrew Chandler wrote regarding Re: [csw-users] netsnmp install issues: > Interactive Installation of Solaris Software > When you install the Solaris 8 4/01 operating environment from the > Solaris CDs, all > of the required software clusters and packages for your Sun hardware are > automatically loaded. If you choose to customize your Solaris 8 4/01 > software > configuration using the interactive installation method, refer to TABLE > 1-2 and TABLE 1-3 to identify which software packages and clusters are > needed. > skip some parts of the table > Sun Blade 100 and Sun Blade > 1000 > SUNWpiclh > SUNWpiclr > SUNWpiclu > SUNWpiclx > PICL > SUNW1394h > SUNW1394x > IEEE framework (1394) > SUNWeridx RIO driver > SUNWusx.u CPU power management's UltraSPARC > This strongly suggests to me the picl package is on the original solaris > install cd. It is but it does not get installed on all hardware with the install everything option. The answer is that it's only installed for certain hardware platforms. The package needs force installing on other platforms in order to satisfy the linkage of the SUNWpiclu package. Answer to Amit, the OP, and anyone else unable to install CSWnetsnmp, insert Solaris installation CD 1 and force an install: # pkgadd -d /cdrom/sol_8_*_sparc/s0/Solaris_8/Product SUNWpiclu nothing to do with patches... allegedly. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ The problem is that the CSWnetsnmp package is built on a machine that has a special package to support its class of hardware only. This means that users of other hardware, despite choosing the "entire" Solaris distribution, are left wondering why CSWnetsnmp won't install or run. Follow on questions are: + What does SUNWpiclu do for the Blade-1000 and would it matter if the package was removed? (Meaning builds can not link to this package.) + Can netsnmp be build without linking to libpicl.so.1? (When SUNWpiclu is installed.) From andy at riftware.com Mon Dec 4 15:20:21 2006 From: andy at riftware.com (Andrew Chandler) Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 08:20:21 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] netsnmp install issues In-Reply-To: <20061204.10031900.3864383226@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk> Message-ID: <009301c717af$56b3ad40$6709a8c0@AChandlerV> My only point is that you took a slightly beligerent tone against people who owe you nothing. I have nothing to do with blastwave nor did I have any history with your question, however I had a pretty good idea how to get on with life if I was in your position with less than 1/2 hour research and I only followed 4 links of my search results. Given that it seemed a bit over the top for you to use some of the words you use - I mean really "allegedly" when it is volunteers telling you sompeplace to look? I DID find where to look using the Sunsolve.sun.com patch system for one of my searches so if you had put in effort you could have figured out what was wrong. That isn't to say that dependencies shouldn't be explicitly noted where possible but you need to understand that the folks who are building these package systems 1: don't get paid 2: don't have access to every hardware platform and if there platform has it automatically installed then its not unreasonable for them to not know this. -----Original Message----- From: users-bounces+andy=riftware.com at lists.blastwave.org [mailto:users-bounces+andy=riftware.com at lists.blastwave.org] On Behalf Of James Lee Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 4:03 AM To: questions and discussions Subject: Re: [csw-users] netsnmp install issues On 03/12/06, 16:16:11, Andrew Chandler wrote regarding Re: [csw-users] netsnmp install issues: > A simple Google search provides the following - please note, just > because we don't know which patch doesn't mean its not true, Indeed, I said *suggests* it's not true. > just that it was installed > at some point in the patch clusters we've got from sun. Remember > google is your friend. Went there first, no patch number was found, very possibly (but not certainly) because there isn't one. > Cannot Open PICL > The message Failed to open PICL; libfru error: Feature not Supported# > ./prtfru -x occurs when running SRS Net Connect 3.0 on a multi-domain > Sun Fire 12K, 15K, E20K, or E25K server. The message indicates that > the FRU provider is not working. > The FRUID package relies on the PICL daemon running on the Sun Fire > server, which requires the SUNWpiclu package to be installed. The > SUNWpiclu and SUNWpiclr packages are included in the default > installation for the Sun Fire 12K, 15K, E20K, or E25K system > controller and must exist prior to installing SRS Net Connect 3.0. > Check the /var/adm/messages file for errors and contact Sun Support > and mention FIN #I0783-1. So not with a patch then. _______________________________________________ users mailing list users at lists.blastwave.org https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users From james at blastwave.org Mon Dec 4 15:58:49 2006 From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee) Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2006 14:58:49 GMT Subject: [csw-users] netsnmp install issues In-Reply-To: <009301c717af$56b3ad40$6709a8c0@AChandlerV> References: <009301c717af$56b3ad40$6709a8c0@AChandlerV> Message-ID: <20061204.14584900.1950961752@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk> On 04/12/06, 14:20:21, Andrew Chandler wrote regarding Re: [csw-users] netsnmp install issues: > My only point is that you took a slightly beligerent tone against people > who owe you nothing. Don't push your luck. > I have nothing to do with blastwave nor did I have any > history with your question, however I had a pretty good idea how to get > on with life if I was in your position with less than 1/2 hour research > and I only followed 4 links of my search results. Given that it seemed > a bit over the top for you to use some of the words you use - I mean > really "allegedly" when it is volunteers telling you sompeplace to look? > I DID find where to look using the Sunsolve.sun.com patch system for one > of my searches so if you had put in effort you could have figured out > what was wrong. That isn't to say that dependencies shouldn't be > explicitly noted where possible but you need to understand that the > folks who are building these package systems > 1: don't get paid > 2: don't have access to every hardware platform and if there platform has > it automatically installed then its not unreasonable for them to not know > this. Like I do? Please do some research before answering. From william at wbonnet.net Wed Dec 6 01:06:47 2006 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2006 01:06:47 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] /testing Eclipse 3.2.1 is fixed Message-ID: <45760997.407@wbonnet.net> Hi all The eclipse package has been fixed on x86 platform. Packages for both architectureare availables from http://www.blastwave.org/testing Direct urls are : http://www.blastwave.org/testing/eclipse-3.2.1,REV=2006.12.04-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz http://www.blastwave.org/testing/eclipse-3.2.1,REV=2006.12.04-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz Please report any problem before it moves to unstable (very soon since unstable is broken for x86) Kind regards, William -- William http://www.wbonnet.net http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix http://www.blastwave.org An OpenSolaris Community Site http://www.guses.org French speaking Solaris User Group From a.cervellin at virgilio.it Wed Dec 6 08:50:34 2006 From: a.cervellin at virgilio.it (Alessio Cervellin) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 08:50:34 +0100 (GMT+01:00) Subject: [csw-users] [announce] security fixes Message-ID: <10f56be12b7.a.cervellin@virgilio.it> Recently the following packages have been released to fix some security issues: wireshark-0.99.4,REV=2006.12.04 (http://www.wireshark. org/docs/relnotes/wireshark-0.99.4.html) zope-2.8.7 [1] tor-0.1.1.25 (http://archives.seul.org/or/announce/Nov-2006/msg00000.html) seamonkey- 1.0.6,REV=2006.11.12 (http://www.mozilla.org/projects/security/known- vulnerabilities.html#seamonkey1.0.6) All the users are encouraged to update them, though remember they are in the unstable catalog so do it at your own risk. [1 ] Zope 2.8.7 users should also manually install this hotfix manually on each of their own zope instances: http://www. zope.org/Products/Zope/Hotfix-2006-07-05/ From roman.klesel at googlemail.com Wed Dec 6 11:51:34 2006 From: roman.klesel at googlemail.com (Roman Klesel) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 11:51:34 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] cswexim and zones Message-ID: <1d96939c0612060251r4d4054e4v4b23521204de79b1@mail.gmail.com> Hello everyone, first of all thank you for providing this nice packages! I just installed exim from unstable. In the golbal-zone everything is fine and after some configuration and mkdir it is running as expected. However in the non-global zones the package has not installed as well: 1) The svc manifest has not been imported 2) The exim user and group have not been created 3) the spool and log directories are not redirected to /var To me it seems that the package is not fully aware of the zones. Or did something go wrong with my install? Do others have similar or contrary experiance? All the best Roman From roman.klesel at googlemail.com Wed Dec 6 12:24:17 2006 From: roman.klesel at googlemail.com (Roman Klesel) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 12:24:17 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] cswexim and zones In-Reply-To: <1d96939c0612060251r4d4054e4v4b23521204de79b1@mail.gmail.com> References: <1d96939c0612060251r4d4054e4v4b23521204de79b1@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <1d96939c0612060324r4588ba60w771b44dd75de1fb2@mail.gmail.com> Hello, > However in the non-global zones the package has not installed as well: to be more accurate: The package has nor been propageted to the zones at all. It tried to reinstall it. No effect. Other packages however are propagated to the zones. Any ideas? Greetings Roman From mmayer at blastwave.org Wed Dec 6 19:33:24 2006 From: mmayer at blastwave.org (Markus Mayer) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 10:33:24 -0800 Subject: [csw-users] cswexim and zones In-Reply-To: <1d96939c0612060324r4588ba60w771b44dd75de1fb2@mail.gmail.com> References: <1d96939c0612060251r4d4054e4v4b23521204de79b1@mail.gmail.com> <1d96939c0612060324r4588ba60w771b44dd75de1fb2@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20061206183324.GA9295@enterprise.blastwave.org> On Wednesday, 06 Dec 2006 12:24 +0100, Roman Klesel wrote: > to be more accurate: The package has nor been propageted to the zones > at all. > > It tried to reinstall it. No effect. > > Other packages however are propagated to the zones. I know of one fairly big zoned Exim installation, because the sysadmins reported a few issues that needed fixing. They seem quite happy with the way it is working now. Of course, there's always the possibility that something is broken. If your zone setup is quite different from theirs, for instance. Could you send the output of the pkgadd command(s) you are using (either via pkg-get or called directly)? Are you sharing /opt/csw across zones? How are your zones set up generally? Is it x86 or SPARC (unlikely to make a difference, but it's always good to know)? Thanks. -Markus From william at wbonnet.net Wed Dec 6 21:46:12 2006 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2006 21:46:12 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] /testing PCA 5.2 is available Message-ID: <45772C14.6010102@wbonnet.net> Hi PCA Patch Check Advance version 5.2 is available from testing ( http://www.blastwave.org/testing/pca-5.2,REV=2006.12.04-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz ) Kind regards, William -- William http://www.wbonnet.net http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix http://www.blastwave.org An OpenSolaris Community Site http://www.guses.org French speaking Solaris User Group From dclarke at blastwave.org Wed Dec 6 22:03:15 2006 From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 16:03:15 -0500 (EST) Subject: [csw-users] /testing PCA 5.2 is available In-Reply-To: <45772C14.6010102@wbonnet.net> References: <45772C14.6010102@wbonnet.net> Message-ID: <63588.24.146.17.108.1165438995.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> > Hi > > PCA Patch Check Advance version 5.2 is available from testing > excellent ! I'll test that today. dc From roman.klesel at googlemail.com Thu Dec 7 08:25:22 2006 From: roman.klesel at googlemail.com (Roman Klesel) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 08:25:22 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] cswexim and zones In-Reply-To: <20061206183324.GA9295@enterprise.blastwave.org> References: <1d96939c0612060251r4d4054e4v4b23521204de79b1@mail.gmail.com> <1d96939c0612060324r4588ba60w771b44dd75de1fb2@mail.gmail.com> <20061206183324.GA9295@enterprise.blastwave.org> Message-ID: <1d96939c0612062325g41ee55dfya60224272341a138@mail.gmail.com> Hello Markus, On 12/6/06, Markus Mayer wrote: > Could you send the output of the pkgadd command(s) you are using > (either via pkg-get or called directly)? > Shure, it's at the end of this post. I cut out the GPL so it will not be that long ... > Are you sharing /opt/csw across zones? Yes. >How are your zones set up > generally? They are all setup like that: root at www1q # cat /etc/zones/mail1q.xml > Is it x86 or SPARC (unlikely to make a difference, but it's > always good to know)? > It's an x4100 so x86. Really strange, pkgadd makes no attempt to install this package in the non global zones. Just for testing and to make shure the system isn't broken I tried installing gawk. Works as expected. When others have no similar problems I guess I'll reinstall the zones and all the csw packages. Not such a big deal. Thanks Roman root at www1q # pkgadd -d exim-4.63\,REV\=2006.09.30-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg The following packages are available: 1 CSWexim exim - The Exim Mail Transfer Agent (i386) 4.63,REV=2006.09.30 Select package(s) you wish to process (or 'all' to process all packages). (default: all) [?,??,q]: Processing package instance from ## Installing package in global zone exim - The Exim Mail Transfer Agent(i386) 4.63,REV=2006.09.30 GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE Version 2, June 1991 ... Found an existing sendmail installation. You have following choices with for installing postfix: 1. Send mail only, without changing existing sendmail installation. 2. Rename existing sendmail binaries to *.OFF and replace them with binaries provided by postfix. Enter your choice [1,2] (default 1): 2 ## Executing checkinstall script. ## Processing package information. ## Processing system information. 9 package pathnames are already properly installed. ## Verifying package dependencies. ## Verifying disk space requirements. ## Checking for conflicts with packages already installed. ## Checking for setuid/setgid programs. The following files are being installed with setuid and/or setgid permissions: /opt/csw/sbin/exim Do you want to install these as setuid/setgid files [y,n,?,q] y This package contains scripts which will be executed with super-user permission during the process of installing this package. Do you want to continue with the installation of [y,n,?] y Installing exim - The Exim Mail Transfer Agent as ## Executing preinstall script. group exim detected user exim detected ## Installing part 1 of 1. /opt/csw/etc/exim/aliases.CSW /opt/csw/etc/exim/exim-env.sh.CSW /opt/csw/etc/exim/exim.conf.CSW /opt/csw/sbin/exicyclog /opt/csw/sbin/exigrep /opt/csw/sbin/exim /opt/csw/sbin/exim_checkaccess /opt/csw/sbin/exim_dbmbuild /opt/csw/sbin/exim_dumpdb /opt/csw/sbin/exim_fixdb /opt/csw/sbin/exim_lock /opt/csw/sbin/exim_tidydb /opt/csw/sbin/eximon /opt/csw/sbin/eximon.bin /opt/csw/sbin/eximstats /opt/csw/sbin/exinext /opt/csw/sbin/exipick /opt/csw/sbin/exiqgrep /opt/csw/sbin/exiqsumm /opt/csw/sbin/exiwhat /opt/csw/share/doc/exim/ChangeLog.gz /opt/csw/share/doc/exim/Exim3.upgrade /opt/csw/share/doc/exim/Exim4.upgrade /opt/csw/share/doc/exim/NewStuff /opt/csw/share/doc/exim/OptionLists.txt /opt/csw/share/doc/exim/README /opt/csw/share/doc/exim/README.CSW /opt/csw/share/doc/exim/README.SIEVE /opt/csw/share/doc/exim/dbm.discuss.txt /opt/csw/share/doc/exim/filter.txt /opt/csw/share/doc/exim/pcrepattern.txt /opt/csw/share/doc/exim/pcretest.txt /opt/csw/share/doc/exim/spec.txt.gz [ verifying class ] Installing class . /opt/csw/lib/svc/method/svc-exim /opt/csw/var/svc/manifest/network/exim.xml [ verifying class ] ## Executing postinstall script. Setting up config-files... Copying /opt/csw/etc/exim/aliases.CSW to /opt/csw/etc/exim/aliases Not touching existing /opt/csw/etc/exim/exim.conf Copying /opt/csw/etc/exim/exim-env.sh.CSW to /opt/csw/etc/exim/exim-env.sh Checking for newaliases... /usr/sbin/newaliases Moving /usr/sbin/newaliases to newaliases.OFF Moving /usr/lib/sendmail to sendmail.OFF Moving /usr/bin/mailq to mailq.OFF Registering Exim with SMF... --------------------------------------------------------------- Please take the time to read /opt/csw/share/doc/exim/README.CSW --------------------------------------------------------------- Installation of was successful. From mats.larsson at ericsson.com Thu Dec 7 15:50:50 2006 From: mats.larsson at ericsson.com (Mats Larsson) Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2006 15:50:50 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] /testing PCA 5.2 is available In-Reply-To: <45772C14.6010102@wbonnet.net> References: <45772C14.6010102@wbonnet.net> Message-ID: <45782A4A.1090002@ericsson.com> On 2006-12-06 21:46, William Bonnet wrote: > PCA Patch Check Advance version 5.2 is available from testing Thanks, this is a great tool. Hope you will keep it updated whenever Martin Paul comes up with a new release. /MOL From chris.ridd at isode.com Fri Dec 8 11:29:09 2006 From: chris.ridd at isode.com (Chris Ridd) Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2006 10:29:09 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] Requesting new packages? Message-ID: <45793E75.8020103@isode.com> What's the best way to request a couple that a couple of additional packages be added to Blastwave? We're looking at rolling out Bugzilla on Solaris, and I'd like to maintain all the perl module dependencies using Blastwave. All but these two modules are already in Blastwave... Come to think of it, Bugzilla would be nice to have in Blastwave too :-) Cheers, Chris From a.cervellin at acm.org Fri Dec 8 11:46:39 2006 From: a.cervellin at acm.org (Alessio Cervellin) Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2006 11:46:39 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Requesting new packages? In-Reply-To: <45793E75.8020103@isode.com> References: <45793E75.8020103@isode.com> Message-ID: <4579428F.7090300@acm.org> Chris Ridd wrote: > What's the best way to request a couple that a couple of additional > packages be added to Blastwave? > > We're looking at rolling out Bugzilla on Solaris, and I'd like to > maintain all the perl module dependencies using Blastwave. All but these > two modules are already in Blastwave... > > > > > > Come to think of it, Bugzilla would be nice to have in Blastwave too :-) the pkg request form is here: http://www.blastwave.org/pkgreq.php though bugzilla is already listed there since long time From chris.ridd at isode.com Fri Dec 8 17:33:42 2006 From: chris.ridd at isode.com (Chris Ridd) Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2006 16:33:42 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] Requesting new packages? In-Reply-To: <4579428F.7090300@acm.org> Message-ID: On 8/12/06 10:46, Alessio Cervellin wrote: > Chris Ridd wrote: >> What's the best way to request a couple that a couple of additional >> packages be added to Blastwave? >> >> We're looking at rolling out Bugzilla on Solaris, and I'd like to >> maintain all the perl module dependencies using Blastwave. All but these >> two modules are already in Blastwave... >> >> >> >> >> >> Come to think of it, Bugzilla would be nice to have in Blastwave too :-) > > the pkg request form is here: > http://www.blastwave.org/pkgreq.php Great, thanks. The /bugtrack/ page ought to have a link to it instead of saying there would be a mechanism "at some point". > though bugzilla is already listed there since long time I'm less worried about bugzilla not being in Blastwave. But it would be nice if it was. Cheers, Chris From asmoore at blastwave.org Sat Dec 9 15:56:43 2006 From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex Moore) Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 08:56:43 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] Requesting new packages? In-Reply-To: <45793E75.8020103@isode.com> References: <45793E75.8020103@isode.com> Message-ID: <20061209085643.0000451d@sws602.mcsun.local> On Fri, 08 Dec 2006 10:29:09 +0000 Chris Ridd wrote: > We're looking at rolling out Bugzilla on Solaris, and I'd like to > maintain all the perl module dependencies using Blastwave. All but > these two modules are already in Blastwave... > > > > Chris, I put these two modules in http://www.blastwave.org/testing Since you cannot use pkg-get from /testing, you need to pkg-get the following as prerequisites: pm_gd pm_tt2common Let me know how this works for you. Alex From maseda at unc.edu Sun Dec 10 16:43:16 2006 From: maseda at unc.edu (Mike Seda) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 10:43:16 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] unstable versus stable Message-ID: <457C2B14.4040000@unc.edu> Hi All, I have read http://www.blastwave.org/userguide, but it is still a little unclear to me how to migrate from unstable to stable. During my setup of a production server, I used pkg-get to install everything I needed. Later I came to find out that I was pulling from the unstable mirror. This was of course my fault for not inspecting my pkg-get.conf before running pkg-get. Basically, what is the best way to go from unstable to stable without losing any of my current configuration, e.g. CSWapache? Best, Mike From dclarke at blastwave.org Sun Dec 10 16:52:36 2006 From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 10:52:36 -0500 (EST) Subject: [csw-users] unstable versus stable In-Reply-To: <457C2B14.4040000@unc.edu> References: <457C2B14.4040000@unc.edu> Message-ID: <61609.65.95.196.136.1165765956.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> > Hi All, > I have read http://www.blastwave.org/userguide, but it is still a little > unclear to me how to migrate from unstable to stable. During my setup of > a production server, I used pkg-get to install everything I needed. > Later I came to find out that I was pulling from the unstable mirror. > This was of course my fault for not inspecting my pkg-get.conf before > running pkg-get. Basically, what is the best way to > go from unstable to stable without losing any of my current > configuration, e.g. CSWapache? You just nailed a really important issue and I want to attack this head on. I will make the necessary modifications to the homepage such that people know that the unstable tree is selected by default. I think that the end user should have the option to select either "stable" or "unstable" when the CSWpkgget package is installed and thus they are made aware of that choice. The next issue is a HOW TO go from the unstable tree to the stable tree with a minimum of fuss. -- Dennis Clarke From james at blastwave.org Sun Dec 10 17:38:11 2006 From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 16:38:11 GMT Subject: [csw-users] unstable versus stable In-Reply-To: <457C2B14.4040000@unc.edu> References: <457C2B14.4040000@unc.edu> Message-ID: <20061210.16381100.2752331824@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk> On 10/12/06, 15:43:16, Mike Seda wrote regarding [csw-users] unstable versus stable: > Later I came to find out that I was pulling from the unstable mirror. > This was of course my fault for not inspecting my pkg-get.conf before > running pkg-get. Basically, what is the best way to > go from unstable to stable without losing any of my current > configuration, e.g. CSWapache? Use the "-S" option to force synchronisation. $ pkg-get --help ... '-S|sync' Makes update mode sync to version on mirror site ... We make every effort to ensure upgrade is successful but be aware that downgrade might not work. Old packages can't allow for those that didn't exist when they were made. James. From maseda at unc.edu Sun Dec 10 22:17:11 2006 From: maseda at unc.edu (Mike Seda) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 16:17:11 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] unstable versus stable In-Reply-To: <20061210.16381100.2752331824@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk> References: <457C2B14.4040000@unc.edu> <20061210.16381100.2752331824@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk> Message-ID: <457C7957.4050400@unc.edu> I am running Solaris 10 U2 (sparc). Do I need to specify any subdirectory under http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/stable? I noticed that there is i386 and sparc. Then under that, there is 5.8, 5.9, 5.10.1, 5.10, and 5.11. How does my system know which one to use? Btw, I am 30 minutes from ibiblio, which is why I have not changed the mirror. James Lee wrote: > On 10/12/06, 15:43:16, Mike Seda wrote regarding > [csw-users] unstable versus stable: > > >> Later I came to find out that I was pulling from the unstable mirror. >> This was of course my fault for not inspecting my pkg-get.conf before >> running pkg-get. Basically, what is the best way to >> go from unstable to stable without losing any of my current >> configuration, e.g. CSWapache? >> > > Use the "-S" option to force synchronisation. > > $ pkg-get --help > ... > '-S|sync' Makes update mode sync to version on mirror site > ... > > > > We make every effort to ensure upgrade is successful but be aware > that downgrade might not work. Old packages can't allow for those > that didn't exist when they were made. > > > > > > James. > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > From dclarke at blastwave.org Sun Dec 10 22:32:45 2006 From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 16:32:45 -0500 (EST) Subject: [csw-users] unstable versus stable In-Reply-To: <457C7957.4050400@unc.edu> References: <457C2B14.4040000@unc.edu> <20061210.16381100.2752331824@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk> <457C7957.4050400@unc.edu> Message-ID: <34305.24.146.17.108.1165786365.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> > I am running Solaris 10 U2 (sparc). Do I need to specify any > subdirectory under > http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/stable? I noticed that > there is i386 and sparc. Then under that, there is 5.8, 5.9, 5.10.1, > 5.10, and 5.11. How does my system know which one to use? Btw, I am 30 > minutes from ibiblio, which is why I have not changed the mirror. > The uname command reports the Solaris version. Actually its the SunOS version but that has not made sense to me since the last SunOS was in version 4.1.1 back in the early 90's. The first revs of Solaris would report that they were SunOS 5.4 or 5.5 or even 5.5.1. Thankfully we seem to have settled back into just a major and a minor number and thus Solaris 8 looks like so : # uname -X | grep Release Release = 5.8 A bleeding edge copy of Solaris Nevada looks like so : $ uname -X | grep Release Release = 5.11 This is the number used to look into the software tree to find a specific package IF and only IF a specific package is required. It makes little sense to have a specially built version of Apache for the UltraSparc T1 process packaged up and delivered into the 5.8 or 5.9 trees. That would have to be specific to 5.10 and up. Even then .. there are ways around that. Dennis From maseda at unc.edu Sun Dec 10 22:58:37 2006 From: maseda at unc.edu (Mike Seda) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 16:58:37 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] unstable versus stable In-Reply-To: <34305.24.146.17.108.1165786365.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> References: <457C2B14.4040000@unc.edu> <20061210.16381100.2752331824@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk> <457C7957.4050400@unc.edu> <34305.24.146.17.108.1165786365.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> Message-ID: <457C830D.6090404@unc.edu> Hi Everyone, You guys are awesome... I love blastwave... It has truly eased my transition from linux to solaris... I will do my best to spread the word about the blastwave project... Regards, Mike -- Mike Seda System Administrator LCCC Bioinformatics UNC-CH Dennis Clarke wrote: >> I am running Solaris 10 U2 (sparc). Do I need to specify any >> subdirectory under >> http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/stable? I noticed that >> there is i386 and sparc. Then under that, there is 5.8, 5.9, 5.10.1, >> 5.10, and 5.11. How does my system know which one to use? Btw, I am 30 >> minutes from ibiblio, which is why I have not changed the mirror. >> >> > > The uname command reports the Solaris version. Actually its the SunOS > version but that has not made sense to me since the last SunOS was in > version 4.1.1 back in the early 90's. The first revs of Solaris would > report that they were SunOS 5.4 or 5.5 or even 5.5.1. Thankfully we > seem to have settled back into just a major and a minor number and thus > Solaris 8 looks like so : > > # uname -X | grep Release > Release = 5.8 > > A bleeding edge copy of Solaris Nevada looks like so : > > $ uname -X | grep Release > Release = 5.11 > > This is the number used to look into the software tree to find a specific > package IF and only IF a specific package is required. It makes little > sense to have a specially built version of Apache for the UltraSparc T1 > process packaged up and delivered into the 5.8 or 5.9 trees. That would > have to be specific to 5.10 and up. Even then .. there are ways around > that. > > Dennis > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > From dclarke at blastwave.org Mon Dec 11 04:44:39 2006 From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 22:44:39 -0500 (EST) Subject: [csw-users] unstable versus stable In-Reply-To: <457C830D.6090404@unc.edu> References: <457C2B14.4040000@unc.edu> <20061210.16381100.2752331824@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk> <457C7957.4050400@unc.edu> <34305.24.146.17.108.1165786365.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> <457C830D.6090404@unc.edu> Message-ID: <49352.24.146.17.108.1165808679.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> > Hi Everyone, > You guys are awesome... I love blastwave... It has truly eased my > transition from linux to solaris... I will do my best to spread the word > about the blastwave project... > Regards, > Mike Thanks Mike !! We love words like this :-) Dennis From chris.ridd at isode.com Mon Dec 11 10:59:47 2006 From: chris.ridd at isode.com (Chris Ridd) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 09:59:47 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] Requesting new packages? In-Reply-To: <20061209085643.0000451d@sws602.mcsun.local> Message-ID: On 9/12/06 2:56, Alex Moore (by way of Alex Moore ) wrote: > On Fri, 08 Dec 2006 10:29:09 +0000 > Chris Ridd wrote: > >> We're looking at rolling out Bugzilla on Solaris, and I'd like to >> maintain all the perl module dependencies using Blastwave. All but >> these two modules are already in Blastwave... >> >> >> >> > > Chris, > > I put these two modules in http://www.blastwave.org/testing > > Since you cannot use pkg-get from /testing, you need to pkg-get the > following as prerequisites: > > pm_gd > pm_tt2common > > Let me know how this works for you. They work fine, thanks Alex! Cheers, Chris From delrio at mie.utoronto.ca Mon Dec 11 16:26:40 2006 From: delrio at mie.utoronto.ca (Oscar del Rio) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:26:40 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Firefox start up issues on Solaris 8 In-Reply-To: <90ee5fbb0611291455l216484e7vc56daea404b4304e@mail.gmail.com> References: <90ee5fbb0611291455l216484e7vc56daea404b4304e@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <457D78B0.1050502@mie.utoronto.ca> Amit wrote: > 1. Firefox complains off 108652-79 not being installed (Xsun patch). > However, this has been obsoleted by 119067-05 (which is installed on > the system). The Solaris patch checking is done by the scripts $FIREFOX_HOME/init.d/S02solaris_patchchecker.sh $FIREFOX_HOME/moz_patch_checker.dtksh I guess the hard-coded patch numbers have not been updated. You can disable the patch checking by defining MOZILLA_SOLARIS_PATCHCHECKER=disable_patchchecker export MOZILLA_SOLARIS_PATCHCHECKER From amit.uttam at gmail.com Mon Dec 11 18:34:06 2006 From: amit.uttam at gmail.com (Amit) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 09:34:06 -0800 Subject: [csw-users] Firefox start up issues on Solaris 8 In-Reply-To: <457D78B0.1050502@mie.utoronto.ca> References: <90ee5fbb0611291455l216484e7vc56daea404b4304e@mail.gmail.com> <457D78B0.1050502@mie.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: <90ee5fbb0612110934p762c36b2kc3e763b10e0191bb@mail.gmail.com> Thank you. I do not have a solaris machine in front me so I can't check it yet but thanks again. Amit On 12/11/06, Oscar del Rio wrote: > Amit wrote: > > > 1. Firefox complains off 108652-79 not being installed (Xsun patch). > > However, this has been obsoleted by 119067-05 (which is installed on > > the system). > > The Solaris patch checking is done by the scripts > > $FIREFOX_HOME/init.d/S02solaris_patchchecker.sh > $FIREFOX_HOME/moz_patch_checker.dtksh > > I guess the hard-coded patch numbers have not been updated. > > You can disable the patch checking by defining > > MOZILLA_SOLARIS_PATCHCHECKER=disable_patchchecker > export MOZILLA_SOLARIS_PATCHCHECKER > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > From maseda at unc.edu Thu Dec 14 00:43:42 2006 From: maseda at unc.edu (Mike Seda) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 18:43:42 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] error installing firefox In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4580902E.1050800@unc.edu> Hi All, I received the following error while attempting to execute "pkg-get -i firefox" on a SUN V440 (sparc) running solaris 10 U2 and pulling from the ibiblio .org stable repository: Installation of was successful. Processing package instance from openldap - OpenLDAP standalone server and update replication daemons (oldap)(sparc) 2.3.27,REV=2006.08.27 . . . ## Executing checkinstall script. /var/tmp//installxzaix2/checkinstallAzaix2: /tmp/sh278370: cannot create pkgadd: ERROR: checkinstall script did not complete successfully Installation of failed. No changes were made to the system. ERROR: could not add CSWoldap. ERROR: install of CSWoldap failed ERROR: could not install required dependancies for CSWgnomevfs2 ERROR: install of CSWgnomevfs2 failed ERROR: could not install required dependancies for CSWfirefox Any thoughts? Mike Chris Ridd wrote: > On 9/12/06 2:56, Alex Moore (by way of Alex Moore ) > wrote: > > >> On Fri, 08 Dec 2006 10:29:09 +0000 >> Chris Ridd wrote: >> >> >>> We're looking at rolling out Bugzilla on Solaris, and I'd like to >>> maintain all the perl module dependencies using Blastwave. All but >>> these two modules are already in Blastwave... >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> Chris, >> >> I put these two modules in http://www.blastwave.org/testing >> >> Since you cannot use pkg-get from /testing, you need to pkg-get the >> following as prerequisites: >> >> pm_gd >> pm_tt2common >> >> Let me know how this works for you. >> > > They work fine, thanks Alex! > > Cheers, > > Chris > > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > From maseda at unc.edu Thu Dec 14 00:57:10 2006 From: maseda at unc.edu (Mike Seda) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 18:57:10 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] error installing firefox In-Reply-To: <4580902E.1050800@unc.edu> References: <4580902E.1050800@unc.edu> Message-ID: <45809356.90803@unc.edu> Wow... Somehow the perms on /tmp were screwed up... I changed 'em back to 1777, and the install completed successfully... Very scary... I wonder what other perms are crazy on my system... I may have to tighten the sudo leash :-\ Mike Seda wrote: > Hi All, > I received the following error while attempting to execute "pkg-get -i > firefox" on a SUN V440 (sparc) running solaris 10 U2 and pulling from > the ibiblio .org stable repository: > Installation of was successful. > Processing package instance from > > openldap - OpenLDAP standalone server and update replication daemons > (oldap)(sparc) 2.3.27,REV=2006.08.27 > . > . > . > ## Executing checkinstall script. > /var/tmp//installxzaix2/checkinstallAzaix2: /tmp/sh278370: cannot create > pkgadd: ERROR: checkinstall script did not complete successfully > Installation of failed. > No changes were made to the system. > ERROR: could not add CSWoldap. > ERROR: install of CSWoldap failed > ERROR: could not install required dependancies for CSWgnomevfs2 > ERROR: install of CSWgnomevfs2 failed > ERROR: could not install required dependancies for CSWfirefox > > Any thoughts? > Mike > > > Chris Ridd wrote: > >> On 9/12/06 2:56, Alex Moore (by way of Alex Moore ) >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Fri, 08 Dec 2006 10:29:09 +0000 >>> Chris Ridd wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> We're looking at rolling out Bugzilla on Solaris, and I'd like to >>>> maintain all the perl module dependencies using Blastwave. All but >>>> these two modules are already in Blastwave... >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> Chris, >>> >>> I put these two modules in http://www.blastwave.org/testing >>> >>> Since you cannot use pkg-get from /testing, you need to pkg-get the >>> following as prerequisites: >>> >>> pm_gd >>> pm_tt2common >>> >>> Let me know how this works for you. >>> >>> >> They work fine, thanks Alex! >> >> Cheers, >> >> Chris >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> users mailing list >> users at lists.blastwave.org >> https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > From maseda at unc.edu Thu Dec 14 21:08:32 2006 From: maseda at unc.edu (Mike Seda) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 15:08:32 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] CSWlogwatch version 5.2.2 Message-ID: <4581AF40.3000007@unc.edu> Hi All, The /opt/csw/etc/log.d/scripts/services/sendmail-largeboxes file included with CSWlogwatch version 5.2.2 has relative paths for some executables. This produces errors in the logs. I have not tested it, but I think adding "export PATH=/opt/csw/bin:$PATH" before "if [ "$SPOOLDIR" ]; then" should work fine. Cheers, Mike From stenka1 at go.com Sat Dec 16 15:39:49 2006 From: stenka1 at go.com (stephen bond) Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 14:39:49 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [csw-users] boost Message-ID: <6377645.1166279989438.JavaMail.?@fh058.dia.cp.net> Does anybody know why the blastwave boost pkg installs only includes while a regular install with bjam will produce many libboost* in path/lib ? also, what needs those libboost* if anything? thank you stephen From james at blastwave.org Sat Dec 16 15:56:55 2006 From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee) Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 14:56:55 GMT Subject: [csw-users] boost In-Reply-To: <6377645.1166279989438.JavaMail.?@fh058.dia.cp.net> References: <6377645.1166279989438.JavaMail.?@fh058.dia.cp.net> Message-ID: <20061216.14565500.992108329@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk> On 16/12/06, 14:39:49, stephen bond wrote regarding [csw-users] boost: > Does anybody know why the blastwave boost pkg installs only includes > while a regular install with bjam will produce many libboost* in > path/lib ? There are 2 boost packages, boost_devel has the headers and a boost run time package for the libs which doesn't exist (released). > also, what needs those libboost* if anything? CSWmonotone uses the phantom CSWboostrt From roman.klesel at googlemail.com Tue Dec 19 09:11:17 2006 From: roman.klesel at googlemail.com (Roman Klesel) Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 09:11:17 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] cswexim and zones In-Reply-To: <1d96939c0612062325g41ee55dfya60224272341a138@mail.gmail.com> References: <1d96939c0612060251r4d4054e4v4b23521204de79b1@mail.gmail.com> <1d96939c0612060324r4588ba60w771b44dd75de1fb2@mail.gmail.com> <20061206183324.GA9295@enterprise.blastwave.org> <1d96939c0612062325g41ee55dfya60224272341a138@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <1d96939c0612190011s489be007l992a07efdf915989@mail.gmail.com> Hi again, On 12/7/06, Roman Klesel wrote: > Hello Markus, > > On 12/6/06, Markus Mayer wrote: > > > Could you send the output of the pkgadd command(s) you are using > > (either via pkg-get or called directly)? > > > > Shure, it's at the end of this post. I cut out the GPL so it will not > be that long ... can anyone here share experiances with this cswexim package from unstable? Do you observe the same phenomena? If so, is there s.o. working on a fix? I'm about to deploy this package on quite some systems and my interest that this works out of the box is of quite big interest to me. So far, I help myself by makeing the required adjustments (genereating the exim user and group, importing the svc-manifest) manually in the non-global zones. If there is need I'm ready to help to get this package flying whith zones. Thanks to everyone involved here for providing this valuable system. Regard Roman From jreid at vnet.net Wed Dec 20 21:13:54 2006 From: jreid at vnet.net (Joe Reid) Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 14:13:54 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] cpan.pm Message-ID: <45899982.5020504@vnet.net> I'll put the on the request page - but has anyone thought about the perl module that was designed for installing other perl modules - that would make a great blastwave package...or is it there and I'm missing it? -- Joe Reid jreid at vnet.net http://www.singlewhitemale.net ?c=a=rb=sc=fd=te=wf=zg=porh=n? From jreid at vnet.net Thu Dec 21 02:09:37 2006 From: jreid at vnet.net (Joe Reid) Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 20:09:37 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] gnu patch Message-ID: <20061221010937.GB1484@katie.ctc.net> I'm looking for gnu patch - is it in the archive somewhere? and thanks for the pointer that CPAN.pm is now part of perl itself. -- Joe Reid jreid at vnet.net Tactical Solaris Systems Engineering and Administration http://www.singlewhitemale.net ?c=a=rb=sc=fd=te=wf=zg=porh=n? From maseda at unc.edu Fri Dec 22 17:21:01 2006 From: maseda at unc.edu (Mike Seda) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 11:21:01 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] gnu patch In-Reply-To: <20061221010937.GB1484@katie.ctc.net> References: <20061221010937.GB1484@katie.ctc.net> Message-ID: <458C05ED.5070102@unc.edu> I have gpatch in /usr/bin on my solaris 10 u2 box... I think it came from the SUNWgpch package... I didn't seem to find an analog to that package on blastwave Joe Reid wrote: > I'm looking for gnu patch - is it in the archive somewhere? > > and thanks for the pointer that CPAN.pm is now part of perl itself. > > From comand at blastwave.org Sat Dec 23 01:39:22 2006 From: comand at blastwave.org (Cory Omand) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 16:39:22 -0800 Subject: [csw-users] gnu patch In-Reply-To: <458C05ED.5070102@unc.edu> References: <20061221010937.GB1484@katie.ctc.net> <458C05ED.5070102@unc.edu> Message-ID: On 12/22/06, Mike Seda wrote: > I have gpatch in /usr/bin on my solaris 10 u2 box... I think it came > from the SUNWgpch package... I didn't seem to find an analog to that > package on blastwave Hi Mike, GNU patch is distributed with Solaris, in SUNWgpch on S8+, so we don't repackage it. HTH, Cory. From jreid at vnet.net Sat Dec 23 20:37:16 2006 From: jreid at vnet.net (Joe Reid) Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 13:37:16 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] gnu patch (happy holidays!) In-Reply-To: References: <20061221010937.GB1484@katie.ctc.net> <458C05ED.5070102@unc.edu> Message-ID: <458D856C.4070700@vnet.net> thanks to all who responded - sometimes missing the obvious is painful :-) happy holidays and thanks to all of those of you who work so hard on Blastwave!!! Cory Omand wrote: >On 12/22/06, Mike Seda wrote: > > >>I have gpatch in /usr/bin on my solaris 10 u2 box... I think it came >>from the SUNWgpch package... I didn't seem to find an analog to that >>package on blastwave >> >> > >Hi Mike, > >GNU patch is distributed with Solaris, in SUNWgpch on S8+, so we don't >repackage it. > >HTH, >Cory. >_______________________________________________ >users mailing list >users at lists.blastwave.org >https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > -- Joe Reid jreid at vnet.net http://www.singlewhitemale.net ?c=a=rb=sc=fd=te=wf=zg=porh=n? From mats.larsson at ericsson.com Wed Dec 27 10:29:50 2006 From: mats.larsson at ericsson.com (Mats Larsson) Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 10:29:50 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Evolution problem ? In-Reply-To: <20061031131137.6724.qmail@web33605.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <20061031131137.6724.qmail@web33605.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <45923D0E.5030202@ericsson.com> On 2006-10-31 14:11, ken mays wrote: > I am in the process of fixing evolution and a few other apps like Rhythmbox hopefully within the next two weeks. > ~Ken Any progress Ken? > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Meik Hellmund > To: questions and discussions > Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 5:45:01 AM > Subject: Re: [csw-users] Evolution problem ? > On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 10:58:21 +0100 > Mats Larsson wrote: >> When I try to start evolution, I get the following: >>> /opt/csw/bin/evolution >> ld.so.1: evolution-2.6: fatal: libnss3.so: open failed: No such file or directory >> The wrapper script sets up LD_LIBRARY_PATH like this: >> LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/opt/csw/lib:/usr/gnome/lib:${LD_LIBRARY_PATH} >> But there is no libnss3.so in /opt/csw/lib or /usr/gnome/lib. > Yep, and when I add either /opt/csw/lib/mozilla or /opt/csw/libexec/firefox/lib/firefox-1.5.0.7/ > to LD_LIBRARY_PATH (the two places I found a libnss3 on my system), > then the monster segfaults (this is on Sol9/sparc). > Please help, > Meik -- Mats Larsson Local R&D IS/IT Service Manager (LSM) at TN From ingoldb at gmail.com Sat Dec 30 17:51:06 2006 From: ingoldb at gmail.com (Brian Ingold) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 10:51:06 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] gnome is broken horribly? Message-ID: <723a03ae0612300851p6fe2647ek590c0891e85bb76d@mail.gmail.com> Hello all - I am writing for some help with my recent install of the gnome desktop environment from blastwave. I should start by saying that this is the first build of gnome I've ever used (excepting what was pre-installed in redhat, suse, ubuntu). I really want to use Solaris though, as I have been an Oracle DBA & shell programmer on Solaris 8 for a few years now. This is my first home install of Solaris, and follows our first load of v10 at work. I have to say that as a black-box I love it... That having been said, let me say that the out-of-the-box experience with gnome so far has been horrid. I really like blastwave, but at this point I could Never recommend the functionality of their gnome 2.14 install (KDE worked wonderfully, btw, but it's just too busy for me) - would it work any differently from gnome.org? Before I attempt to get into the technical info (I Am asking for Help), let me say that it seems I don't know how to troubleshoot an incomplete gnome startup(?). >From the first start, the clock applet failed to load. I've read a bit about issues with the clock applet and Evolution/Evolution web calendar, but haven't found anything about how to correct. Firefox won't save all settings. I've also read a very few posts about Firefox 1.5.0.7 not keeping some settings (for example: not knowing that it is the default browser). But again, haven't found anything about how to correct. Rhythmbox crashes on startup too.... Evolution will not start from shortcut. If I try from command line, it tells me it's Killing old version of Wombat before a popup advises me of an Error: Cannot access the Email and Calendar shell. Startup works for me like this: the splash screen progress stops at "The Panel" - for about 1-2 minutes- then disappears. The desktop appears normal. If I click on the splash screen during startup, it disappears to show menu/panel bars but no desktop (just a black screen). Again, after ~2 minutes, the desktop appears. I don't know what to do here - will someone please assist/educate? Brian root at AMD64:~# uname -a SunOS AMD64 5.10 Generic_118855-19 i86pc i386 i86pc root at AMD64:~# cat /etc/release Solaris 10 6/06 s10x_u2wos_09a X86 Copyright 2006 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Use is subject to license terms. Assembled 09 June 2006 root at AMD64:~# /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -U Getting catalog... --13:55:14-- http://ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/unstable/i386/5.10/catalog => `catalog' Resolving ibiblio.org... 152.46.7.80 Connecting to ibiblio.org|152.46.7.80|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 191,943 (187K) [text/plain] 100%[==================================================================================>] 191,943 107.60K/s 13:55:16 (107.39 KB/s) - `catalog' saved [191943/191943] gpg: Signature made Thu Dec 14 23:44:50 2006 CST using DSA key ID E12E9D2F gpg: Good signature from "Distribution Manager " gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner. Primary key fingerprint: 0BF0 9891 9340 86DC EBE3 DDFF 06A1 ED1B E12E 9D2F Updating catalog file /var/pkg-get/catalog-ibiblio.org updated --13:55:17-- http://ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/unstable/i386/5.10/descriptions => `descriptions' Resolving ibiblio.org... 152.46.7.80 Connecting to ibiblio.org|152.46.7.80|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 85,597 (84K) [text/plain] 100%[==================================================================================>] 85,597 63.74K/s 13:55:18 (63.58 KB/s) - `descriptions' saved [85597/85597] Updated description file root at AMD64:~# /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -c | grep -v Not | grep -v SAME # (From site http://ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/unstable ) software localrev remoterev root at AMD64:~# -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From maybird1776 at yahoo.com Sat Dec 30 22:42:51 2006 From: maybird1776 at yahoo.com (ken mays) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 13:42:51 -0800 (PST) Subject: [csw-users] Update on Blastwave's GNOME 2.14.3 Message-ID: <341673.69790.qm@web33605.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Hello, Blastwave's GNOME 2.14.3 currently requires updates that are in the /testing directory. Hopefully, these packages will get added to the UNSTABLE directory soon. I'd hope to get the updated GNOME packages into the new STABLE release, yet I needed more time to review the packages. Some of the packages are from the GNOME 2.16.2 release. I'll update more the packages from user requests. The focus is to streamline the GNOME desktop to work on Solaris 8 and older Sun UltraSPARC workstations. Please either request an updated package from /testing to the UNSTABLE or STABLE branch from Philip Brown or James Lee as they maintain those distros. ~K __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From grsmith1943 at centurytel.net Sat Dec 30 22:59:08 2006 From: grsmith1943 at centurytel.net (george r smith) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 15:59:08 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] Help on Eclipse 3.2.1 Message-ID: <200612302159.kBULx95X015245@msa2-mx.centurytel.net> All, I have an Solaris workstation (AMD) box running Solaris 10. Can I get Eclipse to run on this box. I just do not understand why it is so available on Windows but not on Sun. thanks grs From maseda at unc.edu Sat Dec 30 23:51:49 2006 From: maseda at unc.edu (Mike Seda) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 17:51:49 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Help on Eclipse 3.2.1 In-Reply-To: <200612302159.kBULx95X015245@msa2-mx.centurytel.net> References: <200612302159.kBULx95X015245@msa2-mx.centurytel.net> Message-ID: <4596ED85.708@unc.edu> george r smith wrote: > All, > > I have an Solaris workstation (AMD) box running Solaris 10. Can I get > Eclipse to run on this box. Yes > I just do not understand why it is so available > on Windows but not on Sun. > The Blastwave package you need is called CSWeclipse: http://www.canoedissent.org.uk/si/package.jsp?p=CSWeclipse > thanks > grs > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > From maseda at unc.edu Sat Dec 30 23:54:11 2006 From: maseda at unc.edu (Mike Seda) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 17:54:11 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Help on Eclipse 3.2.1 In-Reply-To: <4596ED85.708@unc.edu> References: <200612302159.kBULx95X015245@msa2-mx.centurytel.net> <4596ED85.708@unc.edu> Message-ID: <4596EE13.9000202@unc.edu> oops... If you want eclipse 3.2.1, get it from the unstable repo: http://www.canoedissent.org.uk/ui/package.jsp?p=CSWeclipse Mike Seda wrote: > george r smith wrote: >> All, >> >> I have an Solaris workstation (AMD) box running Solaris 10. Can I get >> Eclipse to run on this box. > Yes >> I just do not understand why it is so available >> on Windows but not on Sun. >> > The Blastwave package you need is called CSWeclipse: > http://www.canoedissent.org.uk/si/package.jsp?p=CSWeclipse > >> thanks >> grs >> >> _______________________________________________ >> users mailing list >> users at lists.blastwave.org >> https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users >> > > From anthony.cogan at thinkunix.com Sun Dec 31 07:06:48 2006 From: anthony.cogan at thinkunix.com (Anthony Cogan) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 00:06:48 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] Blastwave SASL/Sendmail Shadow authentication? Message-ID: I have the Blastwave SASL, Sendmail and other required packages downloaded, I have clam, spamassassing milters working and even the SMTP AUTH is working IF I use the /opt/etc/sasldb2 file and create the users with saslpasswd2, however, I do not want to maintain two password files for my users, one in the shadow file and one in the SASL database. I have set this up relatively easily before in Linux using the Sendmail.conf file and have even created one on the system. Location: /opt/csw/lib/sasl2/Sendmail.conf Contents: pwcheck_method: saslauthd mech_list: LOGIN PLAIN I don't seem to get an error in the log files and if I create the user using saslpasswd2 it works just fine. Anyone have any hints on how to get authentication working through the shadow file? Thanks! From james at blastwave.org Sun Dec 31 11:02:18 2006 From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 10:02:18 GMT Subject: [csw-users] gnome is broken horribly? In-Reply-To: <723a03ae0612300851p6fe2647ek590c0891e85bb76d@mail.gmail.com> References: <723a03ae0612300851p6fe2647ek590c0891e85bb76d@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20061231.10021800.635527043@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk> On 30/12/06, 16:51:06, Brian Ingold wrote regarding [csw-users] gnome is broken horribly?: "horribly" is a subjective term but yes the gnome from unstable is broken in places. If you find broken software annoying then use the stable resource. See /opt/csw/etc/pkg-get.conf, make your choice by selecting unstable or stable at the end of the url= setting. The gnome in stable works but is lagging in version because the later offerings were, yes, broken. An updated and clean gnome should be in the 2007-01 stable release - expected soon, it's currently the focus of much effort to ensure an updated gnome makes the next stable release. James. From ihsan at blastwave.org Sun Dec 31 12:58:32 2006 From: ihsan at blastwave.org (Ihsan Dogan) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 12:58:32 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Blastwave SASL/Sendmail Shadow authentication? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4597A5E8.4000306@blastwave.org> Hello, on 31.12.2006 07:06 Anthony Cogan said the following: > Location: /opt/csw/lib/sasl2/Sendmail.conf > > Contents: > pwcheck_method: saslauthd > mech_list: LOGIN PLAIN I think the file should be more like this. I don't know how it is with Sendmail, but with Postfix I'm using this to authenticate users with PAM: ihsan at enterprise:/opt/csw/lib/sasl2$ cat smtpd.conf pwcheck_method: saslauthd mech_list: plain login > I don't seem to get an error in the log files and if I create the > user using saslpasswd2 it works just fine. > > Anyone have any hints on how to get authentication working through > the shadow file? saslauthd is nasty if it's not working as expected, especially because it doesn't give enough log messages. What you can do is, to start saslauthd by hand with the option -d (debug) and see the console messages. Hope this helps. Ihsan -- ihsan at dogan.ch http://ihsan.dogan.ch/ From ingoldb at gmail.com Sun Dec 31 16:44:12 2006 From: ingoldb at gmail.com (Brian Ingold) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 09:44:12 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] gnome is broken horribly? In-Reply-To: <20061231.10021800.635527043@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk> References: <723a03ae0612300851p6fe2647ek590c0891e85bb76d@mail.gmail.com> <20061231.10021800.635527043@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk> Message-ID: <723a03ae0612310744o20f014fftf1e4afc8a3f0845@mail.gmail.com> Hi James, yes - I could have used a better word there. Twas my frustration speaking as I have spent quite a few hours trying to figure out what was wrong. Thank you for pointing out what should have been obvious (I guess I still need to put "newbie" down by my name). -B On 12/31/06, James Lee wrote: > > On 30/12/06, 16:51:06, Brian Ingold wrote regarding > [csw-users] gnome is broken horribly?: > > "horribly" is a subjective term but yes the gnome from unstable is > broken in places. If you find broken software annoying then use the > stable resource. > > See /opt/csw/etc/pkg-get.conf, make your choice by selecting > unstable or stable at the end of the url= setting. > > The gnome in stable works but is lagging in version because the > later offerings were, yes, broken. An updated and clean gnome should > be in the 2007-01 stable release - expected soon, it's currently the > focus of much effort to ensure an updated gnome makes the next stable > release. > > > > > James. > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dclarke at blastwave.org Sun Dec 31 20:01:35 2006 From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 14:01:35 -0500 (EST) Subject: [csw-users] gnome is broken horribly? In-Reply-To: <723a03ae0612310744o20f014fftf1e4afc8a3f0845@mail.gmail.com> References: <723a03ae0612300851p6fe2647ek590c0891e85bb76d@mail.gmail.com> <20061231.10021800.635527043@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk> <723a03ae0612310744o20f014fftf1e4afc8a3f0845@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <33088.24.146.17.108.1167591695.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> > Hi James, > yes - I could have used a better word there. Twas my frustration speaking > as I have spent quite a few hours trying to figure out what was wrong. I can relate. I have a base Solaris 8 test box here and it takes a really really long time to go through a full GNOME test cycle. Days in fact. When something doesn't work or that "login hang time" issue wwon't go away I fell like kicking the cat. If I had a cat. Which I don't. > Thank you for pointing out what should have been obvious (I guess I still > need to put "newbie" down by my name). not at all ... glad we can help in some small way. Dennis Clarke From ingoldb at gmail.com Sun Dec 31 21:33:29 2006 From: ingoldb at gmail.com (Brian Ingold) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 14:33:29 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] gnome is broken horribly? In-Reply-To: <33088.24.146.17.108.1167591695.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> References: <723a03ae0612300851p6fe2647ek590c0891e85bb76d@mail.gmail.com> <20061231.10021800.635527043@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk> <723a03ae0612310744o20f014fftf1e4afc8a3f0845@mail.gmail.com> <33088.24.146.17.108.1167591695.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> Message-ID: <723a03ae0612311233o58d843b0h46bf30032b9db6ea@mail.gmail.com> Ok, downgraded to 2.8 using pkg-get -s http://ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/stable -U -S -u now it "hangs" when the splash screen shows nautilus. I never get more than a black desktop. Many more apps terminate spontaneously.... still no evolution either. Might there be a start log for gnome I can look at? On 12/31/06, Dennis Clarke wrote: > > > > Hi James, > > yes - I could have used a better word there. Twas my frustration > speaking > > as I have spent quite a few hours trying to figure out what was wrong. > > I can relate. I have a base Solaris 8 test box here and it takes a really > really long time to go through a full GNOME test cycle. Days in fact. > > When something doesn't work or that "login hang time" issue wwon't go away > I fell like kicking the cat. If I had a cat. Which I don't. > > > Thank you for pointing out what should have been obvious (I guess I > still > > need to put "newbie" down by my name). > > not at all ... glad we can help in some small way. > > Dennis Clarke > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From james at blastwave.org Sun Dec 31 23:41:26 2006 From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 22:41:26 GMT Subject: [csw-users] gnome is broken horribly? In-Reply-To: <723a03ae0612311233o58d843b0h46bf30032b9db6ea@mail.gmail.com> References: <723a03ae0612300851p6fe2647ek590c0891e85bb76d@mail.gmail.com> <20061231.10021800.635527043@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk> <723a03ae0612310744o20f014fftf1e4afc8a3f0845@mail.gmail.com> <33088.24.146.17.108.1167591695.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org> <723a03ae0612311233o58d843b0h46bf30032b9db6ea@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20061231.22412600.1009179168@gyor.asd.demon.co.uk> On 31/12/06, 20:33:29, Brian Ingold wrote regarding Re: [csw-users] gnome is broken horribly?: > Ok, downgraded to 2.8 using pkg-get -s > http://ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/csw/stable -U -S -u > now it "hangs" when the splash screen shows nautilus. I never get more > than a black desktop. Many more apps terminate spontaneously.... still > no evolution either. Down grade is not supported and -S is inherently risky. Make sure you have cleaned out the newer gnome, any ~/.gnome like directories, thumbnail caches, perhaps in /opt/csw. Look for stray gconf processes, these hang round longer hang they ought. Etc... James.