From strombrg at dcs.nac.uci.edu Wed Mar 1 01:24:27 2006 From: strombrg at dcs.nac.uci.edu (Dan Stromberg) Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 16:24:27 -0800 Subject: [csw-users] Odd problem installing pkg-get In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1141172668.26148.160.camel@seki.nac.uci.edu> On Tue, 2006-02-28 at 15:42 +0000, Chris Ridd wrote: > On 28/2/06 3:10, Dennis Clarke wrote: > > > On 2/28/06, Chris Ridd wrote: > >> This is all very odd. Have you tried using truss to get more details on > >> what's actually happening? > > > > forget truss .. please .. don't even go there .. its a waste of time > > OK :-) > > Cheers, > > Chris I've found system call tracers very effective in pinpointing the source of many, many, many problems: http://dcs.nac.uci.edu/~strombrg/debugging-with-syscall-tracers.html From chris.ridd at isode.com Wed Mar 1 07:42:43 2006 From: chris.ridd at isode.com (Chris Ridd) Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2006 06:42:43 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] Odd problem installing pkg-get In-Reply-To: <1141172668.26148.160.camel@seki.nac.uci.edu> Message-ID: On 1/3/06 12:24, Dan Stromberg wrote: > On Tue, 2006-02-28 at 15:42 +0000, Chris Ridd wrote: >> On 28/2/06 3:10, Dennis Clarke wrote: >> >>> On 2/28/06, Chris Ridd wrote: >>>> This is all very odd. Have you tried using truss to get more details on >>>> what's actually happening? >>> >>> forget truss .. please .. don't even go there .. its a waste of time >> >> OK :-) >> >> Cheers, >> >> Chris > > I've found system call tracers very effective in pinpointing the source > of many, many, many problems: > > http://dcs.nac.uci.edu/~strombrg/debugging-with-syscall-tracers.html > I love ktrace/strace/truss/tusc, but I think what Dennis is saying is that they're a bit of overkill when diagnosing problems in a shell script. Maybe running pkg-get with sh's -x (or is it +x) flag would be more useful. Cheers, Chris From mats.larsson at ericsson.com Wed Mar 1 13:09:58 2006 From: mats.larsson at ericsson.com (Mats Larsson) Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2006 13:09:58 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] XMMS and libvorbis Message-ID: <44058F16.1020302@ericsson.com> After latest upgrade of libvorbis from unstable I get the following when starting XMMS: % /opt/csw/bin/xmms ld.so.1: xmms: fatal: relocation error: file /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8/libvorbis.so.0: symbol __sincos: referenced symbol not found Anyone else seeing this? Don't get it if I use libvorbis from stable. /MOL From james at blastwave.org Wed Mar 1 13:44:49 2006 From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee) Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2006 12:44:49 GMT Subject: [csw-users] XMMS and libvorbis In-Reply-To: <44058F16.1020302@ericsson.com> References: <44058F16.1020302@ericsson.com> Message-ID: <20060301.12444900.2881133586@landeck.jamesipoos.com> On 01/03/06, 12:09:58, Mats Larsson wrote regarding [csw-users] XMMS and libvorbis: > After latest upgrade of libvorbis from unstable I get the following when > starting XMMS: > % /opt/csw/bin/xmms > ld.so.1: xmms: fatal: relocation error: file > /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8/libvorbis.so.0: symbol __sincos: referenced symbol > not found > Anyone else seeing this? Yes, just seen the same with timidity but you are 20 minutes ahead of me, will you file the bug? $ timidity -Ov XXXXX.mid -o XXXXX.ogg ld.so.1: timidity: fatal: relocation error: file /opt/csw/lib/libvorbis.so.0: symbol __sincos: referenced symbol not found > Don't get it if I use libvorbis from stable. There's a moral here. James. From jameslee at onetel.com Wed Mar 1 13:32:56 2006 From: jameslee at onetel.com (James Lee) Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2006 12:32:56 GMT Subject: [csw-users] XMMS and libvorbis In-Reply-To: <44058F16.1020302@ericsson.com> References: <44058F16.1020302@ericsson.com> Message-ID: <20060301.12325600.70846573@landeck.jamesipoos.com> On 01/03/06, 12:09:58, Mats Larsson wrote regarding [csw-users] XMMS and libvorbis: > After latest upgrade of libvorbis from unstable I get the following when > starting XMMS: > % /opt/csw/bin/xmms > ld.so.1: xmms: fatal: relocation error: file > /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8/libvorbis.so.0: symbol __sincos: referenced symbol > not found > Anyone else seeing this? Yes, just seen the same with timidity but you are 20 minutes ahead of me, will you file the bug? $ timidity -Ov XXXXX.mid -o XXXXX.ogg ld.so.1: timidity: fatal: relocation error: file /opt/csw/lib/libvorbis.so.0: symbol __sincos: referenced symbol not found > Don't get it if I use libvorbis from stable. There's a moral here. James. From mats.larsson at ericsson.com Wed Mar 1 15:45:11 2006 From: mats.larsson at ericsson.com (Mats Larsson) Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2006 15:45:11 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] XMMS and libvorbis In-Reply-To: <20060301.12325600.70846573@landeck.jamesipoos.com> References: <44058F16.1020302@ericsson.com> <20060301.12325600.70846573@landeck.jamesipoos.com> Message-ID: <4405B377.1020004@ericsson.com> On 2006-03-01 13:32, James Lee wrote: > On 01/03/06, 12:09:58, Mats Larsson wrote > regarding [csw-users] XMMS and libvorbis: > >> After latest upgrade of libvorbis from unstable I get the following when >> starting XMMS: > >> % /opt/csw/bin/xmms >> ld.so.1: xmms: fatal: relocation error: file >> /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8/libvorbis.so.0: symbol __sincos: referenced symbol >> not found > >> Anyone else seeing this? > > Yes, just seen the same with timidity but you are 20 minutes ahead of > me, will you file the bug? Hehe... ok I will. Done! >> Don't get it if I use libvorbis from stable. > > There's a moral here. I know, I know, just trying to be informative ;). From james at blastwave.org Thu Mar 2 10:49:06 2006 From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee) Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 09:49:06 GMT Subject: [csw-users] XMMS and libvorbis In-Reply-To: <4405B377.1020004@ericsson.com> References: <44058F16.1020302@ericsson.com> <20060301.12325600.70846573@landeck.jamesipoos.com> <4405B377.1020004@ericsson.com> Message-ID: <20060302.9490600.3206394461@landeck.jamesipoos.com> On 01/03/06, 14:45:11, Mats Larsson wrote regarding Re: [csw-users] XMMS and libvorbis: > >> % /opt/csw/bin/xmms > >> ld.so.1: xmms: fatal: relocation error: file > >> /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8/libvorbis.so.0: symbol __sincos: referenced symbol > >> not found > > > >> Anyone else seeing this? > > > > Yes, just seen the same with timidity but you are 20 minutes ahead of > > me, will you file the bug? > Hehe... ok I will. Done! > >> Don't get it if I use libvorbis from stable. > > > > There's a moral here. > I know, I know, just trying to be informative ;). Indeed, I'm just promoting use of stable to users but if everyone used it we'd loose field testing so I thank you for making the effort to find and report the problem. James. From SELundgr at email.uncc.edu Thu Mar 2 16:42:54 2006 From: SELundgr at email.uncc.edu (Lundgren, Scott) Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 10:42:54 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] symbol errors compiling using other blastwave packages Message-ID: I did some testing with the CSW pureftpd package and though it had been compiled including the "--with-everything" flag this did not include the MySQL support. I understand this package is no longer maintained so I'm trying to compile my own installation using other blastwave packages and I've run into a problem referencing symbols. Suggestions for how to fix them would be very appreciated. Thanks, Scott Lundgren ITS - Web Services UNC at Charlotte http://www.uncc.edu I'm compiling using: CSWossl 0.9.8,REV=2005.11.02_rev=a CSWmysql4 4.1.15,REV=2005.11.15 CSWmysql4client 4.1.15,REV=2005.11.13 CSWmysql4rt 4.1.15,REV=2005.11.13 CSWgmake 3.80,REV=2004.10.21 Sun Studio 11 Pureftpd-1.0.21 from source bash-2.05$ PATH=$PATH:.:/opt/SUNWspro/bin:/usr/ccs/bin:/opt/csw/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/ usr/sbin:/sbin;export PATH bash-2.05$ CPPFLAGS="-I/opt/csw/include";export CPPFLAGS bash-2.05$ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/opt/csw/mysql4/lib/mysql;export LD_LIBRARY_PATH bash-2.05$ LDFLAGS="-L/opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus";export LDFLAGS bash-2.05$ ./configure --prefix=/opt/csw --with-openssl=/opt/csw --mandir=/opt/csw/share/man --infodir=/opt/csw/share/info --with-tls --with-certfile=/opt/csw/ssl/private/pure-ftpd.pem --with-mysql=/opt/csw/mysql4 <-- snip --> bash-2.05$ make <-- snip --> cc -g -L/opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus -L/usr/local/lib -L/opt/csw/mysql4/lib -L/opt/csw/mysql4/lib/mysql -L/opt/csw/mysql4/mysql/lib -o pure-ftpd pure_ftpd-daemons.o pure_ftpd-ftpd.o pure_ftpd-log_unix.o pure_ftpd-log_mysql.o pure_ftpd-log_pgsql.o pure_ftpd-log_pam.o pure_ftpd-log_ldap.o pure_ftpd-log_puredb.o pure_ftpd-log_extauth.o pure_ftpd-ls.o pure_ftpd-parser.o pure_ftpd-bsd-glob.o pure_ftpd-fakesnprintf.o pure_ftpd-bsd-realpath.o pure_ftpd-mysnprintf.o pure_ftpd-caps.o pure_ftpd-ftp_parser.o pure_ftpd-dynamic.o pure_ftpd-ftpwho-update.o pure_ftpd-bsd-getopt_long.o pure_ftpd-upload-pipe.o pure_ftpd-ipv4stack.o pure_ftpd-altlog.o pure_ftpd-crypto.o pure_ftpd-crypto-md5.o pure_ftpd-crypto-sha1.o pure_ftpd-quotas.o pure_ftpd-fakechroot.o pure_ftpd-diraliases.o pure_ftpd-ftpwho-read.o pure_ftpd-getloadavg.o pure_ftpd-privsep.o pure_ftpd-tls.o pure_ftpd-osx-extensions.o ../puredb/src/libpuredb_read.a -lkstat -lcrypto -lmysqlclient -lz -lm -lcrypt -lsendfile -lnsl -lsocket Undefined first referenced symbol in file SSL_load_error_strings pure_ftpd-tls.o (symbol belongs to implicit dependency /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libssl.so.0.9.8) dlsym /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libcrypto.a(dso_dlfcn.o) (symbol belongs to implicit dependency /lib/libdl.so.1) SSL_CIPHER_get_bits pure_ftpd-tls.o (symbol belongs to implicit dependency /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libssl.so.0.9.8) SSL_CIPHER_get_name pure_ftpd-tls.o (symbol belongs to implicit dependency /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libssl.so.0.9.8) SSL_write pure_ftpd-ftpd.o (symbol belongs to implicit dependency /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libssl.so.0.9.8) SSL_CTX_use_PrivateKey_file pure_ftpd-tls.o (symbol belongs to implicit dependency /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libssl.so.0.9.8) SSL_set_accept_state pure_ftpd-tls.o (symbol belongs to implicit dependency /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libssl.so.0.9.8) SSL_accept pure_ftpd-tls.o (symbol belongs to implicit dependency /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libssl.so.0.9.8) SSLv23_server_method pure_ftpd-tls.o (symbol belongs to implicit dependency /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libssl.so.0.9.8) SSL_CTX_use_certificate_chain_file pure_ftpd-tls.o (symbol belongs to implicit dependency /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libssl.so.0.9.8) dlopen /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libcrypto.a(dso_dlfcn.o) (symbol belongs to implicit dependency /lib/libdl.so.1) SSL_free pure_ftpd-tls.o (symbol belongs to implicit dependency /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libssl.so.0.9.8) SSL_read pure_ftpd-ftp_parser.o (symbol belongs to implicit dependency /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libssl.so.0.9.8) SSL_new pure_ftpd-tls.o (symbol belongs to implicit dependency /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libssl.so.0.9.8) SSL_CTX_new pure_ftpd-tls.o (symbol belongs to implicit dependency /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libssl.so.0.9.8) SSL_set_rfd pure_ftpd-tls.o (symbol belongs to implicit dependency /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libssl.so.0.9.8) SSL_set_wfd pure_ftpd-tls.o (symbol belongs to implicit dependency /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libssl.so.0.9.8) SSL_CIPHER_get_version pure_ftpd-tls.o (symbol belongs to implicit dependency /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libssl.so.0.9.8) dlclose /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libcrypto.a(dso_dlfcn.o) (symbol belongs to implicit dependency /lib/libdl.so.1) dlerror /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libcrypto.a(dso_dlfcn.o) (symbol belongs to implicit dependency /lib/libdl.so.1) SSL_CTX_ctrl pure_ftpd-tls.o (symbol belongs to implicit dependency /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libssl.so.0.9.8) SSL_CTX_free pure_ftpd-tls.o (symbol belongs to implicit dependency /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libssl.so.0.9.8) SSL_get_current_cipher pure_ftpd-tls.o (symbol belongs to implicit dependency /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libssl.so.0.9.8) SSL_CTX_check_private_key pure_ftpd-tls.o (symbol belongs to implicit dependency /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libssl.so.0.9.8) SSL_library_init pure_ftpd-tls.o (symbol belongs to implicit dependency /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libssl.so.0.9.8) ld: fatal: Symbol referencing errors. No output written to pure-ftpd make[2]: *** [pure-ftpd] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/pure-ftpd-1.0.21/src' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/pure-ftpd-1.0.21' make: *** [all] Error 2 From dvm105 at psu.edu Thu Mar 2 16:55:21 2006 From: dvm105 at psu.edu (Derek Morr) Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 10:55:21 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] symbol errors compiling using other blastwave packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <44071569.3030101@psu.edu> All of those symbols are defined in libssl. Try adding "-lssl" to your CFLAGS. -derek -- Derek Morr Senior Systems Programmer Academic Services & Emerging Technologies Pennsylvania State University derekmorr at psu.edu From pfelecan at blastwave.org Thu Mar 2 18:48:31 2006 From: pfelecan at blastwave.org (Peter FELECAN) Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 18:48:31 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Emacs 22 snapsot 20060301 CVS in testing Message-ID: As promised, the monthly CVS snapshot of the next version of Emacs, in the testing area: http://www.blastwave.org/testing/emacs-22.0.50,REV=cvs20060301-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz http://www.blastwave.org/testing/emacs-22.0.50,REV=cvs20060301-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz If you wish to use/test the bleeding edge Emacs, you're welcome. But, if there are issues, please report them upstream; I'll manage only the packaging side. To install this package, you need to remove all dependent packages and Emacs 21.4 itself; after that, you install, using pkgadd, the CVS Emacs corresponding to your architecture and, if you're a TeX user, the nifty AucTex package. Note that this version includes the successors of: oortgnus and emacscalc, available as Blastwave packages, and many other, previously separate, packages --- e.g., tramp. I'll made a new testing package once a month, until the public release. Enjoy -- Peter From SELundgr at email.uncc.edu Thu Mar 2 18:53:14 2006 From: SELundgr at email.uncc.edu (Lundgren, Scott) Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 12:53:14 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] symbol errors compiling using other blastwavepackages Message-ID: That didn't work. Is there a gcc CFLAGS equivalent for sun's cc compiler? Scott Lundgren ITS - Web Services UNC at Charlotte http://www.uncc.edu bash-2.05$ make clean <-- snip --> bash-2.05$ CFLAGS="-lssl";export CFLAGS bash-2.05$ ./configure --prefix=/opt/csw --mandir=/opt/csw/share/man --infodir=/opt/csw/share/info --with-openssl=/opt/csw --with-tls --with-certfile=/opt/csw/ssl/private/pure-ftpd.pem --with-mysql=/opt/csw/mysql4 --with-puredb --with-quotas --with-altlog --with-virtualchroot checking for a BSD-compatible install... ./install-sh -c checking whether build environment is sane... yes checking for gawk... gawk checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes checking for a BSD-compatible install... ./install-sh -c checking for ranlib... ranlib checking for gcc... no checking for cc... cc checking for C compiler default output file name... configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables See `config.log' for more details. bash-2.05$ less config.log configure:2141: found /opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc configure:2151: result: cc configure:2315: checking for C compiler version configure:2318: cc --version &5 cc: Warning: option -- passed to ld usage: cc [ options] files. Use 'cc -flags' for details configure:2321: $? = 1 configure:2323: cc -v &5 usage: cc [ options] files. Use 'cc -flags' for details configure:2326: $? = 1 configure:2328: cc -V &5 cc: Sun C 5.8 2005/10/13 usage: cc [ options] files. Use 'cc -flags' for details configure:2331: $? = 1 configure:2354: checking for C compiler default output file name configure:2357: cc -lssl -I/opt/csw/include -L/opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus conftest.c >&5 ld: fatal: library -lssl: not found ld: fatal: File processing errors. No output written to a.out configure:2360: $? = 1 configure: failed program was: From dvm105 at psu.edu Thu Mar 2 19:10:56 2006 From: dvm105 at psu.edu (Derek Morr) Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 13:10:56 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] symbol errors compiling using other blastwavepackages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <44073530.3080906@psu.edu> Lundgren, Scott wrote: > That didn't work. Is there a gcc CFLAGS equivalent for sun's cc > compiler? CFLAGS is recognized by Sun's compiler as well. I think the problem was that you were setting LDFLAGS, not LD_OPTIONS. I'm not sure why you need to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH. I would unset it, since it can cause more problems than its worth. Try this: export CC="/opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc" export LD_OPTIONS="-R/opt/csw/lib -R/opt/csw/lib" export CPPFLAGS="-I/opt/csw/include" You shouldn't need to set CFLAGS. I just pulled pureftpd 1.0.21 and it built fine with the above options. -derek -- Derek Morr Senior Systems Programmer Academic Services & Emerging Technologies Pennsylvania State University derekmorr at psu.edu From Darin.Perusich at cognigencorp.com Thu Mar 2 19:14:17 2006 From: Darin.Perusich at cognigencorp.com (Darin Perusich) Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 13:14:17 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] symbol errors compiling using other blastwavepackages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <440735F9.7050305@cognigencorp.com> have you set the following environment variables before running configure? LD_OPTIONS='-R/opt/csw/lib/$ISALIST -R/opt/csw/lib -L/opt/csw/lib' CPPFLAGS=-I/opt/csw/include you also might want to read over the build standards if your going to be building against blastwave libs. http://www.blastwave.org/standards/build.html Lundgren, Scott wrote: > That didn't work. Is there a gcc CFLAGS equivalent for sun's cc > compiler? > > Scott Lundgren > ITS - Web Services > UNC at Charlotte > http://www.uncc.edu > > bash-2.05$ make clean > <-- snip --> > bash-2.05$ CFLAGS="-lssl";export CFLAGS > bash-2.05$ ./configure --prefix=/opt/csw --mandir=/opt/csw/share/man > --infodir=/opt/csw/share/info --with-openssl=/opt/csw --with-tls > --with-certfile=/opt/csw/ssl/private/pure-ftpd.pem > --with-mysql=/opt/csw/mysql4 --with-puredb --with-quotas --with-altlog > --with-virtualchroot > checking for a BSD-compatible install... ./install-sh -c > checking whether build environment is sane... yes > checking for gawk... gawk > checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes > checking for a BSD-compatible install... ./install-sh -c > checking for ranlib... ranlib > checking for gcc... no > checking for cc... cc > checking for C compiler default output file name... configure: error: C > compiler cannot create executables > See `config.log' for more details. > > bash-2.05$ less config.log > configure:2141: found /opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc > configure:2151: result: cc > configure:2315: checking for C compiler version > configure:2318: cc --version &5 > cc: Warning: option -- passed to ld > usage: cc [ options] files. Use 'cc -flags' for details > configure:2321: $? = 1 > configure:2323: cc -v &5 > usage: cc [ options] files. Use 'cc -flags' for details > configure:2326: $? = 1 > configure:2328: cc -V &5 > cc: Sun C 5.8 2005/10/13 > usage: cc [ options] files. Use 'cc -flags' for details > configure:2331: $? = 1 > configure:2354: checking for C compiler default output file name > configure:2357: cc -lssl -I/opt/csw/include -L/opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus > conftest.c >&5 > ld: fatal: library -lssl: not found > ld: fatal: File processing errors. No output written to a.out > configure:2360: $? = 1 > configure: failed program was: > > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users -- Darin Perusich Unix Systems Administrator Cognigen Corp. darinper at cognigencorp.com From william at wbonnet.net Thu Mar 2 20:31:16 2006 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 20:31:16 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] y y y y y "toot much" yes or ??? In-Reply-To: <440488E3.5060209@ganil.fr> References: <440488E3.5060209@ganil.fr> Message-ID: <44074804.3010301@wbonnet.net> Hi >How do you do an upgrade with no check, with the option: change all whatever > > Dennis gave you the clean way to do it. Here is the dirty one :) yes | /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -u -U -- William http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix http://www.blastwave.org An OpenSolaris Community Site http://www.guses.org French speaking Solaris User Group From SELundgr at email.uncc.edu Thu Mar 2 22:16:29 2006 From: SELundgr at email.uncc.edu (Lundgren, Scott) Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 16:16:29 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] symbol errors compiling using other blastwave packages Message-ID: I'm not familiar with LD_OPTIONS. When should I use LD_OPTIONS versus LD_LIBRARY_PATH? What is the difference between the -L & -R that Darin suggested LD_OPTIONS='-R/opt/csw/lib/$ISALIST -R/opt/csw/lib -L/opt/csw/lib' ad the -R & -R options that Derek suggested export LD_OPTIONS="-R/opt/csw/lib -R/opt/csw/lib" Thank you for everyone's contributions it's much easier than beating my head against this by myself. Scott Lundgren ITS - Web Services UNC at Charlotte http://www.uncc.edu From dvm105 at psu.edu Thu Mar 2 22:36:58 2006 From: dvm105 at psu.edu (Derek Morr) Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 16:36:58 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] symbol errors compiling using other blastwave packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4407657A.4050508@psu.edu> Lundgren, Scott wrote: > I'm not familiar with LD_OPTIONS. When should I use LD_OPTIONS versus > LD_LIBRARY_PATH? LD_LIBRARY_PATH sets the search path for the runtime linker. It's use is generally discouraged. > What is the difference between the -L & -R that Darin > suggested > > LD_OPTIONS='-R/opt/csw/lib/$ISALIST -R/opt/csw/lib -L/opt/csw/lib' > > ad the -R & -R options that Derek suggested > > export LD_OPTIONS="-R/opt/csw/lib -R/opt/csw/lib" This was a typo on my part. The second R should have been an L. Sorry. So, did it finally compile? -- Derek Morr Senior Systems Programmer Academic Services & Emerging Technologies Pennsylvania State University derekmorr at psu.edu From SELundgr at email.uncc.edu Thu Mar 2 22:59:32 2006 From: SELundgr at email.uncc.edu (Lundgren, Scott) Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 16:59:32 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] symbol errors compiling using other blastwavepackages Message-ID: Nope. Configure complains of not finding the mysql libraries now. Details below. Derek when you were able to get it to compile did you use my configure options? Scott Lundgren ITS - Web Services UNC at Charlotte http://www.uncc.edu bash-2.05$ env PWD=/var/tmp/pure-ftpd-1.0.21 LD_OPTIONS=-R/opt/csw/lib -L/opt/csw/lib CC=/opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc MACHTYPE=sparc-sun-solaris2.9 CPPFLAGS=-I/opt/csw/include SHELL=/bin/bash HOSTTYPE=sparc OSTYPE=solaris2.9 TERM=vt100 PATH=/usr/bin::.:/opt/csw/bin:/opt/csw/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/bin:/opt/SUN Wspro/bin:/usr/ccs/bin _=/usr/bin/env bash-2.05$ ./configure --prefix=/opt/csw --mandir=/opt/csw/share/man --infodir=/opt/csw/share/info --with-openssl=/opt/csw --with-tls --with-certfile=/opt/csw/ssl/private/pure-ftpd.pem --with-mysql=/opt/csw --with-puredb --with-quotas --with-altlog --with-virtualchroot <-- snip --> checking for mysql_init in -lmysqlclient... yes checking whether mysql clients can run... no configure: error: Your MySQL client libraries aren't properly installed bash-2.05$ less config.log <-- snip --> configure:22400: checking for mysql_init in -lmysqlclient configure:22430: /opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc -o conftest -g -I/opt/csw/include -D_GNU_SOURCE=1 -I/usr/local/include -D__EXTENSIONS__=1 -D_XPG4_2=1 -I/opt/csw/include -I/opt/csw/include/mysql -I/opt/csw/mysql/include -L/usr/local/lib -L/opt/csw/lib -L/opt/csw/lib/mysql -L/opt/csw/mysql/lib conftest.c -lmysqlclient -lz -lm -lcrypt -lsendfile -lnsl -lsocket >&5 configure:22436: $? = 0 configure:22439: test -z || test ! -s conftest.err configure:22442: $? = 0 configure:22445: test -s conftest configure:22448: $? = 0 configure:22461: result: yes configure:22476: checking whether mysql clients can run configure:22502: /opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc -o conftest -g -I/opt/csw/include -D_GNU_SOURCE=1 -I/usr/local/include -D__EXTENSIONS__=1 -D_XPG4_2=1 -I/opt/csw/include -I/opt/csw/include/ mysql -I/opt/csw/mysql/include -L/usr/local/lib -L/opt/csw/lib -L/opt/csw/lib/mysql -L/opt/csw/mysql/lib conftest.c -lmysqlclient -lz -lm -lcrypt -lsendfile -lnsl -lsocket >&5 configure:22505: $? = 0 configure:22507: ./conftest ld.so.1: conftest: fatal: libmysqlclient.so.14: open failed: No such file or directory ./configure: line 1: 17327 Killed ./conftest$ac_exeext configure:22510: $? = 137 configure: program exited with status 137 bash-2.05$ ls -l /opt/csw/lib/mysql/libmysqlclient.so.14 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 24 Feb 23 11:02 /opt/csw/lib/mysql/libmysqlclient.so.14 -> libmysqlclient.so.14.0.0 -----Original Message----- From: users-bounces+selundgr=email.uncc.edu at lists.blastwave.org [mailto:users-bounces+selundgr=email.uncc.edu at lists.blastwave.org] On Behalf Of Derek Morr Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 4:37 PM To: questions and discussions Subject: Re: [csw-users] symbol errors compiling using other blastwavepackages Lundgren, Scott wrote: > I'm not familiar with LD_OPTIONS. When should I use LD_OPTIONS versus > LD_LIBRARY_PATH? LD_LIBRARY_PATH sets the search path for the runtime linker. It's use is generally discouraged. > What is the difference between the -L & -R that Darin suggested > > LD_OPTIONS='-R/opt/csw/lib/$ISALIST -R/opt/csw/lib -L/opt/csw/lib' > > ad the -R & -R options that Derek suggested > > export LD_OPTIONS="-R/opt/csw/lib -R/opt/csw/lib" This was a typo on my part. The second R should have been an L. Sorry. So, did it finally compile? -- Derek Morr Senior Systems Programmer Academic Services & Emerging Technologies Pennsylvania State University derekmorr at psu.edu _______________________________________________ users mailing list users at lists.blastwave.org https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users From dvm105 at psu.edu Thu Mar 2 23:23:34 2006 From: dvm105 at psu.edu (Derek Morr) Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 17:23:34 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] symbol errors compiling using other blastwavepackages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <44077066.20901@psu.edu> Lundgren, Scott wrote: > Nope. Configure complains of not finding the mysql libraries now. > Details below. Derek when you were able to get it to compile did you use > my configure options? No, since I didn't build it with MySQL. I did build it with ssl. The missing library, libmysqlclient.so.14, is in /opt/csw/mysql4/lib/mysql, and the headers are in /opt/csw/mysql4/include. Try this: CPPFLAGS="-I/opt/csw/include -I/opt/csw/mysql4/include" LD_OPTIONS="-R/opt/csw/lib -R/opt/csw/mysql4/lib/mysql -L/opt/csw/lib" -derek -- Derek Morr Senior Systems Programmer Academic Services & Emerging Technologies Pennsylvania State University derekmorr at psu.edu From javier.augusto at gmx.net Thu Mar 2 23:39:48 2006 From: javier.augusto at gmx.net (Javier O. Augusto) Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 19:39:48 -0300 Subject: [csw-users] symbol errors compiling using other blastwavepackages In-Reply-To: <44077066.20901@psu.edu> References: <44077066.20901@psu.edu> Message-ID: <44077434.5070603@gmx.net> Hi, I think you can also do --with-mysql=/opt/csw/mysql4 ...It should work out. Regards, Jay From selundgr at email.uncc.edu Fri Mar 3 16:28:13 2006 From: selundgr at email.uncc.edu (Scott Lundgren) Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2006 10:28:13 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] symbol errors compiling using other blastwavepackages In-Reply-To: <44077066.20901@psu.edu> Message-ID: > No, since I didn't build it with MySQL. I did build it with ssl. Thanks for the clarification. I took the the --with-mysql option out and it did compile with the SSL, TLS, and certificate options. So the original unresolved symbols are fixed. Looking at the config.log I thought configure would resolve the library path because the CSWmysql4 package adds a symbolic link but I guess not. Now to try your MySQL suggestions. Thanks for the continual help! bash-2.05$ ls -l /opt/csw/lib/mysql lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 19 Feb 23 11:02 /opt/csw/lib/mysql -> ../mysql4/lib/mysql Scott Lundgren ITS - Web Services UNC at Charlotte http://www.uncc.edu From selundgr at email.uncc.edu Fri Mar 3 17:25:39 2006 From: selundgr at email.uncc.edu (Scott Lundgren) Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2006 11:25:39 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] symbol errors compiling using other blastwavepackages In-Reply-To: <44077066.20901@psu.edu> Message-ID: Derek & everyone else, Thank You! That was the trick I needed. Let me me get pureftpd up and doing what I need and I'll look at the documentation for building a package for submission. Scott Lundgren ITS - Web Services UNC at Charlotte http://www.uncc.edu > Try this: > > CPPFLAGS="-I/opt/csw/include -I/opt/csw/mysql4/include" > LD_OPTIONS="-R/opt/csw/lib -R/opt/csw/mysql4/lib/mysql -L/opt/csw/lib" > From mats.larsson at ericsson.com Wed Mar 8 14:09:10 2006 From: mats.larsson at ericsson.com (Mats Larsson) Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 14:09:10 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Eclipse problem Message-ID: <440ED776.5000309@ericsson.com> This Monday I did install Eclipse but can't get it to run. I get the following error: ================================================================================ !SESSION Mar 08, 2006 13:45:53.648 --------------------------------------------- eclipse.buildId=I200406251208 java.version=1.4.2_10 java.vendor=Sun Microsystems Inc. BootLoader constants: OS=solaris, ARCH=sparc, WS=motif, NL=en_US !ENTRY org.eclipse.osgi Mar 08, 2006 13:45:53.650 !MESSAGE Application error !STACK 1 java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: no swt-motif-3139 in java.library.path at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadLibrary(ClassLoader.java:1517) at java.lang.Runtime.loadLibrary0(Runtime.java:788) at java.lang.System.loadLibrary(System.java:834) at org.eclipse.swt.internal.Library.loadLibrary(Library.java:123) at org.eclipse.swt.internal.motif.OS.(OS.java:18) at org.eclipse.swt.graphics.Device.(Device.java:111) at org.eclipse.ui.internal.Workbench.createDisplay(Workbench.java:268) at org.eclipse.ui.PlatformUI.createDisplay(PlatformUI.java:153) at org.eclipse.ui.internal.ide.IDEApplication.createDisplay(IDEApplication.java:122) at org.eclipse.ui.internal.ide.IDEApplication.run(IDEApplication.java:72) at org.eclipse.core.internal.runtime.PlatformActivator$1.run(PlatformActivator.java:335) at org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter.run(EclipseStarter.java:273) at org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter.run(EclipseStarter.java:129) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:324) at org.eclipse.core.launcher.Main.basicRun(Main.java:183) at org.eclipse.core.launcher.Main.run(Main.java:644) at org.eclipse.core.launcher.Main.main(Main.java:628) ================================================================================ Furthermore when I look at the files I've installed it seems like I only have version 3.0 and not 3.1.2 which is what www.blastwave.org/packages.php/eclipse says is available. Doing a 'pkg-get -c eclipse' shows: software localrev remoterev eclipse 3.0 SAME Something is strange... anybody? /MOL From SELundgr at email.uncc.edu Fri Mar 10 19:53:00 2006 From: SELundgr at email.uncc.edu (Lundgren, Scott) Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 13:53:00 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Package Building Questions Message-ID: If there is a more appropriate place for this question please redirect me. I'm trying to build my own package of pure-ftpd to understand the process & perhaps volunteer to maintain it. I've been following http://www.blastwave.org/standards/build.html is it CFLAGS="-xarch=v8" that I need to set so that my Sun Studio 11 on Solaris 9 builds Solaris 8 binaries? how do I list the dynamic linked libraries my binary may be dependent on? how do I find what package those libraries are in ? (the Solaris equivalent of rpm -qf /opt/csw/mysql4/lib/mysql/libmysqlclient.so ?) Thanks, Scott Lundgren ITS - Web Services UNC at Charlotte http://www.uncc.edu -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20060310/42256a26/attachment.html From chris.ridd at isode.com Fri Mar 10 20:10:00 2006 From: chris.ridd at isode.com (Chris Ridd) Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 19:10:00 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] Package Building Questions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: On 10/3/06 6:53, Lundgren, Scott wrote: > If there is a more appropriate place for this question please redirect > me. I'm trying to build my own package of pure-ftpd to understand the > process & perhaps volunteer to maintain it. > I've been following http://www.blastwave.org/standards/build.html > is it CFLAGS="-xarch=v8" that I need to set so that my Sun Studio 11 > on Solaris 9 builds Solaris 8 binaries? No, that just indicates the version of SPARC (ie instruction set version) that your binary will work on. Also, you will need to build on the earliest version of Solaris that you want your binaries to work on. You can usually build on Solaris n and deploy on Solaris >= n. Typically you can't build on Solaris n, and deploy on Solaris < n. > how do I list the dynamic linked libraries my binary may be > dependent on? /usr/bin/ldd. > how do I find what package those libraries are in ? (the Solaris > equivalent of rpm -qf /opt/csw/mysql4/lib/mysql/libmysqlclient.so ?) pkgchk -lp /opt/csw/mysql4/lib/mysql/libmysqlclient.so Cheers, Chris From mats.larsson at ericsson.com Mon Mar 13 10:14:06 2006 From: mats.larsson at ericsson.com (Mats Larsson) Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 10:14:06 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Eclipse problem In-Reply-To: <440ED776.5000309@ericsson.com> References: <440ED776.5000309@ericsson.com> Message-ID: <441537DE.1010809@ericsson.com> Nobody using Blastwave Eclipse? On 2006-03-08 14:09, Mats Larsson wrote: > This Monday I did install Eclipse but can't get it to run. I get the > following error: > > ================================================================================ > !SESSION Mar 08, 2006 13:45:53.648 > --------------------------------------------- > eclipse.buildId=I200406251208 > java.version=1.4.2_10 > java.vendor=Sun Microsystems Inc. > BootLoader constants: OS=solaris, ARCH=sparc, WS=motif, NL=en_US > > !ENTRY org.eclipse.osgi Mar 08, 2006 13:45:53.650 > !MESSAGE Application error > !STACK 1 > java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: no swt-motif-3139 in java.library.path > at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadLibrary(ClassLoader.java:1517) > at java.lang.Runtime.loadLibrary0(Runtime.java:788) > at java.lang.System.loadLibrary(System.java:834) > at org.eclipse.swt.internal.Library.loadLibrary(Library.java:123) > at org.eclipse.swt.internal.motif.OS.(OS.java:18) > at org.eclipse.swt.graphics.Device.(Device.java:111) > at > org.eclipse.ui.internal.Workbench.createDisplay(Workbench.java:268) > at org.eclipse.ui.PlatformUI.createDisplay(PlatformUI.java:153) > at > org.eclipse.ui.internal.ide.IDEApplication.createDisplay(IDEApplication.java:122) > at > org.eclipse.ui.internal.ide.IDEApplication.run(IDEApplication.java:72) > at > org.eclipse.core.internal.runtime.PlatformActivator$1.run(PlatformActivator.java:335) > at > org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter.run(EclipseStarter.java:273) > at > org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter.run(EclipseStarter.java:129) > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) > at > sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) > at > sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:324) > at org.eclipse.core.launcher.Main.basicRun(Main.java:183) > at org.eclipse.core.launcher.Main.run(Main.java:644) > at org.eclipse.core.launcher.Main.main(Main.java:628) > ================================================================================ > > Furthermore when I look at the files I've installed it seems like I only > have version 3.0 and not 3.1.2 which is what > www.blastwave.org/packages.php/eclipse says is available. Doing a > 'pkg-get -c eclipse' shows: > > software localrev remoterev > eclipse 3.0 SAME > > Something is strange... anybody? > > /MOL > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > From chris.ridd at isode.com Mon Mar 13 10:39:38 2006 From: chris.ridd at isode.com (Chris Ridd) Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 09:39:38 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] Eclipse problem In-Reply-To: <441537DE.1010809@ericsson.com> Message-ID: On 13/3/06 9:14, Mats Larsson wrote: > Nobody using Blastwave Eclipse? I'm waiting for a GTK version... But the catalog from mirror.switch.ch (apparently updated on 9th March) still lists 3.0 for me too :-( Cheers, Chris From Darin.Perusich at cognigencorp.com Mon Mar 13 15:03:05 2006 From: Darin.Perusich at cognigencorp.com (Darin Perusich) Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 09:03:05 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] XEmacs lisp packages in testing Message-ID: <44157B99.3040601@cognigencorp.com> Hello, The XEmacs lisp packages are avialable for testing. The package includes all the avialable packages from the xemacs-sumo and xemacs-mule-sumo tarballs, with the exception of xemacs-base, efs, and mule-base which are included with xemacs itself. The package can be downloaded at: http://www.blastwave.org/testing/xemacs_packages-20051208-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz -- Darin Perusich Unix Systems Administrator Cognigen Corporation 395 Youngs Rd. Williamsville, NY 14221 darinper at cognigencorp.com From krist.vanbesien at gmail.com Mon Mar 13 16:07:50 2006 From: krist.vanbesien at gmail.com (Krist van Besien) Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 16:07:50 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Problem with apache2 Message-ID: <6ed6382b0603130707t783913ffj6e80e3015dd09699@mail.gmail.com> Apache2 has been built using the sun compiler. I now want to compile an additional module, but can't, since I don't have this sun compiler. I do have gcc. The problem is that apache modules are built using the apxs script, which calls libtool from the /opt/csw/apache/share/build directory. Both scripts have been created as part of the apache built process, and both expect the sun C compiler to be present. Is there a workaround for this? Krist -- krist.vanbesien at gmail.com Solothurn, Switzerland From dvm105 at psu.edu Mon Mar 13 16:16:45 2006 From: dvm105 at psu.edu (Derek Morr) Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 10:16:45 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Problem with apache2 In-Reply-To: <6ed6382b0603130707t783913ffj6e80e3015dd09699@mail.gmail.com> References: <6ed6382b0603130707t783913ffj6e80e3015dd09699@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <44158CDD.9040906@psu.edu> Krist van Besien wrote: > Apache2 has been built using the sun compiler. I now want to compile > an additional module, but can't, since I don't have this sun compiler. > I do have gcc. > Is there a workaround for this? Sun's compiler is now free. You could download it and use it. -derek From realmcking at gmail.com Mon Mar 13 16:18:26 2006 From: realmcking at gmail.com (Mark McCoy) Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 09:18:26 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] Problem with apache2 In-Reply-To: <6ed6382b0603130707t783913ffj6e80e3015dd09699@mail.gmail.com> References: <6ed6382b0603130707t783913ffj6e80e3015dd09699@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: You can download the Sun compiler for free now. On 3/13/06, Krist van Besien wrote: > Apache2 has been built using the sun compiler. I now want to compile > an additional module, but can't, since I don't have this sun compiler. > I do have gcc. > > The problem is that apache modules are built using the apxs script, > which calls libtool from the /opt/csw/apache/share/build directory. > Both scripts have been created as part of the apache built process, > and both expect the sun C compiler to be present. > > Is there a workaround for this? > > Krist > > -- > krist.vanbesien at gmail.com > Solothurn, Switzerland > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > -- Mark McCoy -- Professional Unix geek "On two occasions I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. " -- Charles Babbage From Darin.Perusich at cognigencorp.com Tue Mar 14 14:31:32 2006 From: Darin.Perusich at cognigencorp.com (Darin Perusich) Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 08:31:32 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] /testing: postfix 2.2.8 Message-ID: <4416C5B4.7060707@cognigencorp.com> hello, postfix 2.2.8 is now avialable in /testing and includes support for pcre, ldap, sasl2, and tls. "What is Postfix? It is Wietse Venema's mailer that started life as an alternative to the widely-used Sendmail program. Postfix attempts to be fast, easy to administer, and secure, while at the same time being sendmail compatible enough to not upset existing users. Thus, the outside has a sendmail-ish flavor, but the inside is completely different." http://www.postfix.org/ Dependencies: CSWcommon CSWoldaprt CSWossl CSWpcre CSWsasl -- Darin Perusich Unix Systems Administrator Cognigen Corporation 395 Youngs Rd. Williamsville, NY 14221 darinper at cognigencorp.com From qy1ggy802 at sneakemail.com Tue Mar 14 15:23:35 2006 From: qy1ggy802 at sneakemail.com (Tim Longo) Date: 14 Mar 2006 14:23:35 -0000 Subject: [csw-users] Evolution? Message-ID: <12917-73543@sneakemail.com> Hi, I was wondering if we would be seeing a newer version of Evolution from Blastwave anytime soon? Thanks for a great service! From a.cervellin at virgilio.it Tue Mar 14 15:43:10 2006 From: a.cervellin at virgilio.it (alessio) Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 15:43:10 +0100 (GMT+01:00) Subject: [csw-users] Evolution? Message-ID: <109f935de74.a.cervellin@virgilio.it> ----Messaggio originale---- Da: qy1ggy802 at sneakemail.com > Hi, > I was wondering if we would be seeing a newer version of Evolution from Blastwave anytime soon? > Thanks for a great service! I'd suggest you to sumbit a "package upgrade request" here on the blastwave's bugtrace board: http://www.blastwave.org/mantis/index.php From SELundgr at email.uncc.edu Tue Mar 14 17:05:25 2006 From: SELundgr at email.uncc.edu (Lundgren, Scott) Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 11:05:25 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Package Building Questions Message-ID: New Question, how do I fix the following? bash-2.05$ createpkg -r /export/home/wsadmin/build/pure-ftpd-1.0.21/cswstage i copyright ERROR: Pure-FTPd must be all lowercase I've gone through /export/home/wsadmin/pkgs/pureftpd/copyright and changed the 2 cases of "Pure-FTPd" to "pure-ftpd". Createpkg gives the same error. Is the createpkg script looking in the original COPYING file? Scott Lundgren ITS - Web Services UNC at Charlotte http://www.uncc.edu From Darin.Perusich at cognigencorp.com Tue Mar 14 17:07:36 2006 From: Darin.Perusich at cognigencorp.com (Darin Perusich) Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 11:07:36 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Package Building Questions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4416EA48.5000204@cognigencorp.com> updated your pkginfo file. Lundgren, Scott wrote: > New Question, how do I fix the following? > > bash-2.05$ createpkg -r > /export/home/wsadmin/build/pure-ftpd-1.0.21/cswstage > i copyright > ERROR: Pure-FTPd must be all lowercase > > I've gone through /export/home/wsadmin/pkgs/pureftpd/copyright and > changed the 2 cases of "Pure-FTPd" to "pure-ftpd". Createpkg gives the > same error. Is the createpkg script looking in the original COPYING > file? > > Scott Lundgren > ITS - Web Services > UNC at Charlotte > http://www.uncc.edu > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users -- Darin Perusich Unix Systems Administrator Cognigen Corporation 395 Youngs Rd. Williamsville, NY 14221 darinper at cognigencorp.com From james at blastwave.org Wed Mar 15 11:26:56 2006 From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee) Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 10:26:56 GMT Subject: [csw-users] Package Building Questions In-Reply-To: <4416EA48.5000204@cognigencorp.com> References: <4416EA48.5000204@cognigencorp.com> Message-ID: <20060315.10265600.302675939@landeck.jamesipoos.com> On 14/03/06, 16:07:36, Darin Perusich wrote regarding Re: [csw-users] Package Building Questions: > updated your pkginfo file. > Lundgren, Scott wrote: > > New Question, how do I fix the following? > > > > bash-2.05$ createpkg -r > > /export/home/wsadmin/build/pure-ftpd-1.0.21/cswstage > > i copyright > > ERROR: Pure-FTPd must be all lowercase > > > > I've gone through /export/home/wsadmin/pkgs/pureftpd/copyright and > > changed the 2 cases of "Pure-FTPd" to "pure-ftpd". Createpkg gives the > > same error. Is the createpkg script looking in the original COPYING > > file? If you are building a replacement for the current Blastwave package you need to follow the current naming, that is in pkginfo: PKG=CSWpureftpd NAME=pureftpd - Pure-FTPd is a free (BSD), secure, production-quality and standard-conformant FTP server. The package name is "CSWpureftpd". The software name is "pureftpd". The description is the part of the NAME after the hyphen and is flexible. Here I've shown the current description, it's straight from pureftpd, but note "conformant" isn't a proper English word. James. From SELundgr at email.uncc.edu Wed Mar 15 18:18:02 2006 From: SELundgr at email.uncc.edu (Lundgren, Scott) Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 12:18:02 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Package Building Questions Message-ID: >If you are building a replacement for the current Blastwave package you need to follow the current naming, that is in pkginfo: That is the goal, and once Darin pointed out to look at pkginfo I realized the - was used to parse name from package description. Once I had those hints the pacakge easily built & validated. Now I'm testing it. Thanks for the help Scott Lundgren ITS - Web Services UNC at Charlotte http://www.uncc.edu From search.lists at gmail.com Thu Mar 16 03:40:38 2006 From: search.lists at gmail.com (Milo) Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 18:40:38 -0800 Subject: [csw-users] orace php package Message-ID: Hello, I just installed a php4 and apache2 from blastwave and didn't see any oracle db client support (oci). Is this available anywhere? If not, I'm thinking maybe I should maintain it, since otherwise I'll have to build my own solaris packages. I'm looking for alternatives before I go building my own stuff. How difficult would it be to maintain my own php[4,5]_pdooci, or if anyone is thinking the same thing as me. Thanks! -- Milan Andric From Darin.Perusich at cognigencorp.com Thu Mar 16 13:59:12 2006 From: Darin.Perusich at cognigencorp.com (Darin Perusich) Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 07:59:12 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] orace php package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <44196120.10406@cognigencorp.com> hi milo, building the OCI extension is very straight forward, see the README.SELF-CONTAINED-EXTENSIONS which comes with the php source. i've built this for my linux systems with the oracle instant client, i wouldn't waste time with the full client installation anymore. the only problem that might arrise is the distribution of the oracle instant client apps and libs. in reading the instant client FAQ blastwave should be able to freely distribute it. License http://www.oracle.com/technology/software/htdocs/client_lic.html FAQ: http://www.oracle.com/technology/tech/oci/instantclient/ic-faq.html Milo wrote: > Hello, > > I just installed a php4 and apache2 from blastwave and didn't see any > oracle db client support (oci). Is this available anywhere? If not, > I'm thinking maybe I should maintain it, since otherwise I'll have to > build my own solaris packages. I'm looking for alternatives before I > go building my own stuff. > > How difficult would it be to maintain my own php[4,5]_pdooci, or if > anyone is thinking the same thing as me. > > Thanks! > > -- > Milan Andric > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users -- Darin Perusich Unix Systems Administrator Cognigen Corporation 395 Youngs Rd. Williamsville, NY 14221 darinper at cognigencorp.com From SELundgr at email.uncc.edu Thu Mar 16 14:47:37 2006 From: SELundgr at email.uncc.edu (Lundgren, Scott) Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 08:47:37 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] orace php package Message-ID: > PDO How difficult would it be to maintain my own php[4,5]_pdooci, or if anyone is thinking the same thing as me. While I would welcome Oracle support in Blastwave's distribution of PHP5 because that support is one of the reasons I build PHP from source, I would caution against distributing PDO OCI. The documentation regards it as experimental and subject to function/behavior changes: http://us2.php.net/manual/en/ref.pdo-oci.php Scott Lundgren ITS - Web Services UNC at Charlotte http://www.uncc.edu From blastwave at gmail.com Sat Mar 18 18:09:34 2006 From: blastwave at gmail.com (Dennis Clarke) Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2006 12:09:34 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Fwd: [osol-discuss] Re: Re: Mono .NET available on GNU/OpenSolaris! In-Reply-To: <29939649.1142650482617.JavaMail.suncom@oss1> References: <29939649.1142650482617.JavaMail.suncom@oss1> Message-ID: I dragged this in from the OpenSolaris discuss list. Dennis ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: MaTianyi Date: Mar 17, 2006 9:54 PM Subject: [osol-discuss] Re: Re: Mono .NET available on GNU/OpenSolaris! To: opensolaris-discuss at opensolaris.org thanks i have installed it,but it seams that only Runtime and Compiler without monodevlop. how can i get monodevlop and other things in the list above? This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss at opensolaris.org From asmoore at blastwave.org Sat Mar 18 18:20:20 2006 From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex Moore) Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2006 11:20:20 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] Fwd: [osol-discuss] Re: Re: Mono .NET available on GNU/OpenSolaris! In-Reply-To: References: <29939649.1142650482617.JavaMail.suncom@oss1> Message-ID: <20060318112020.00001465@sws602.mcsun.local> On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 12:09:34 -0500 "Dennis Clarke" wrote: > I dragged this in from the OpenSolaris discuss list. > > Dennis Interesting Dennis. I was going to write the mono maintainer about this very subject, sometime this weekend. I would like to hear what he says. As we speak, I am working on gtk#. He may already have this available somewhere, but all that I could see was i386. Alex From blastwave at gmail.com Sat Mar 18 18:30:02 2006 From: blastwave at gmail.com (Dennis Clarke) Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2006 12:30:02 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Fwd: [osol-discuss] Re: Re: Mono .NET available on GNU/OpenSolaris! In-Reply-To: <20060318112020.00001465@sws602.mcsun.local> References: <29939649.1142650482617.JavaMail.suncom@oss1> <20060318112020.00001465@sws602.mcsun.local> Message-ID: On 3/18/06, Alex Moore wrote: > On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 12:09:34 -0500 > "Dennis Clarke" wrote: > > > I dragged this in from the OpenSolaris discuss list. > > > > Dennis > > Interesting Dennis. I was going to write the mono maintainer about > this very subject, sometime this weekend. I would like to hear what he > says. > > As we speak, I am working on gtk#. He may already have this available > somewhere, but all that I could see was i386. > You have been very busy lately Alex. With the release of MySQL5 and also an update to SpamAssassin ( which I will never be able to spell ). I will most likely update the home page on a more regular basis to reflect these sort of package releases. Dennis From asmoore at blastwave.org Sat Mar 18 19:06:55 2006 From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex Moore) Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2006 12:06:55 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] Fwd: [osol-discuss] Re: Re: Mono .NET available on GNU/OpenSolaris! In-Reply-To: References: <29939649.1142650482617.JavaMail.suncom@oss1> <20060318112020.00001465@sws602.mcsun.local> Message-ID: <20060318120655.00001897@sws602.mcsun.local> On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 12:30:02 -0500 "Dennis Clarke" wrote: > You have been very busy lately Alex. With the release of MySQL5 and > also an update to SpamAssassin ( which I will never be able to spell > ). > > I will most likely update the home page on a more regular basis to > reflect these sort of package releases. These types of updates are helpful to me. I was not aware of the purpose of mono until I saw what you had written on the front page. Thanks for putting MySQL 5 on the front page. I have been providing that some time now and had several beta versions available on /testing before the official release. My last changes and testing from mysql5 took far longer than I had anticipated. And it is still not exactly where I want it to be. But at least, it does run on a zone enabled host and you can enable mysql5 on any combination of zones. You can also put the data directory wherever you like and it seemed to work for me. That is the part that may need more work. Only a large production shop can tell me if it really works:> Alex -- From jonel.rienton at reidata.com Sat Mar 18 21:51:35 2006 From: jonel.rienton at reidata.com (Jonel Rienton) Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2006 14:51:35 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] Fwd: [osol-discuss] Re: Re: Mono .NET available on GNU/OpenSolaris! Message-ID: <3BAF672E643DA84CB02A032EC314BD42020321BD@LDIADDMAIL01.sisco.stewart.net> Hi Alex, Dennis, I'm currently working only on the core Mono runtime and compiler package, xsp will probably see daylight pretty soon followed by mod_mono. Howerver, developer tools and libraries like MonoDevelop, MonoDoc and gtk# I will probably let others jump in if they have extra time or I will start working on them as soon as I get the extra time. Great to hear Alex has already started working on gtk#, this is really great news! RE: Homepage Dennis, thanks for letting others know that we have the Mono package available. -----Original Message----- From: users-bounces+jonel.rienton=reidata.com at lists.blastwave.org [mailto:users-bounces+jonel.rienton=reidata.com at lists.blastwave.org] On Behalf Of Alex Moore Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2006 11:20 AM To: users at lists.blastwave.org Subject: Re: [csw-users] Fwd: [osol-discuss] Re: Re: Mono .NET available on GNU/OpenSolaris! On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 12:09:34 -0500 "Dennis Clarke" wrote: > I dragged this in from the OpenSolaris discuss list. > > Dennis Interesting Dennis. I was going to write the mono maintainer about this very subject, sometime this weekend. I would like to hear what he says. As we speak, I am working on gtk#. He may already have this available somewhere, but all that I could see was i386. Alex _______________________________________________ users mailing list users at lists.blastwave.org https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users From jonel.rienton at reidata.com Sat Mar 18 22:16:54 2006 From: jonel.rienton at reidata.com (Jonel Rienton) Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2006 15:16:54 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] Fwd: [osol-discuss] Re: Re: Mono .NET available on GNU/OpenSolaris! Message-ID: <3BAF672E643DA84CB02A032EC314BD42020321C0@LDIADDMAIL01.sisco.stewart.net> Alex, Which version of gtk# are you working on? Jonel -----Original Message----- From: users-bounces+jonel.rienton=reidata.com at lists.blastwave.org [mailto:users-bounces+jonel.rienton=reidata.com at lists.blastwave.org] On Behalf Of Alex Moore Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2006 11:20 AM To: users at lists.blastwave.org Subject: Re: [csw-users] Fwd: [osol-discuss] Re: Re: Mono .NET available on GNU/OpenSolaris! On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 12:09:34 -0500 "Dennis Clarke" wrote: > I dragged this in from the OpenSolaris discuss list. > > Dennis Interesting Dennis. I was going to write the mono maintainer about this very subject, sometime this weekend. I would like to hear what he says. As we speak, I am working on gtk#. He may already have this available somewhere, but all that I could see was i386. Alex _______________________________________________ users mailing list users at lists.blastwave.org https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users From asmoore at blastwave.org Sat Mar 18 22:49:48 2006 From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex Moore) Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2006 15:49:48 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] Fwd: [osol-discuss] Re: Re: Mono .NET available on GNU/OpenSolaris! In-Reply-To: <3BAF672E643DA84CB02A032EC314BD42020321C0@LDIADDMAIL01.sisco.stewart.net> References: <3BAF672E643DA84CB02A032EC314BD42020321C0@LDIADDMAIL01.sisco.stewart.net> Message-ID: <20060318154948.00003672@sws602.mcsun.local> On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 15:16:54 -0600 "Jonel Rienton" wrote: > Alex, > > Which version of gtk# are you working on? 2.8.2 Alex From Robert.Doolittle at Sun.COM Mon Mar 20 00:09:02 2006 From: Robert.Doolittle at Sun.COM (Bob Doolittle) Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2006 18:09:02 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Unison? Message-ID: <441DE48E.5050401@Sun.COM> Does anybody have a copy of Unison ported? All I could find on the website was a note from Dennis saying he was working on it about a year ago... -Bob From search.lists at gmail.com Mon Mar 20 20:58:43 2006 From: search.lists at gmail.com (Milo) Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 11:58:43 -0800 Subject: [csw-users] orace php package In-Reply-To: <44196120.10406@cognigencorp.com> References: <44196120.10406@cognigencorp.com> Message-ID: Hi Darin, thanks, that work for php4. I am also interesting in testing php5/apache2 CSW stuff. I installed the CSWphp5 package, but I noticed it doesn't come with phpize. Was this intentional? I tried compiling and installing my own oci8.so from source, but get an error $ php -i 1>/dev/null PHP Warning: PHP Startup: Invalid library (maybe not a PHP library) 'oci8.so' in Unknown on line 0 On 3/16/06, Darin Perusich wrote: > hi milo, > > building the OCI extension is very straight forward, see the > README.SELF-CONTAINED-EXTENSIONS which comes with the php source. i've > built this for my linux systems with the oracle instant client, i > wouldn't waste time with the full client installation anymore. > > the only problem that might arrise is the distribution of the oracle > instant client apps and libs. in reading the instant client FAQ > blastwave should be able to freely distribute it. > > License > http://www.oracle.com/technology/software/htdocs/client_lic.html > > FAQ: > http://www.oracle.com/technology/tech/oci/instantclient/ic-faq.html > > Milo wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I just installed a php4 and apache2 from blastwave and didn't see any > > oracle db client support (oci). Is this available anywhere? If not, > > I'm thinking maybe I should maintain it, since otherwise I'll have to > > build my own solaris packages. I'm looking for alternatives before I > > go building my own stuff. > > > > How difficult would it be to maintain my own php[4,5]_pdooci, or if > > anyone is thinking the same thing as me. > > > > Thanks! > > > > -- > > Milan Andric > > _______________________________________________ > > users mailing list > > users at lists.blastwave.org > > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > -- > Darin Perusich > Unix Systems Administrator > Cognigen Corporation > 395 Youngs Rd. > Williamsville, NY 14221 > darinper at cognigencorp.com > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > From search.lists at gmail.com Mon Mar 20 21:01:06 2006 From: search.lists at gmail.com (Milo) Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 12:01:06 -0800 Subject: [csw-users] orace php package In-Reply-To: References: <44196120.10406@cognigencorp.com> Message-ID: On 3/20/06, Milo wrote: > Hi Darin, thanks, that work for php4. > > I am also interesting in testing php5/apache2 CSW stuff. I installed > the CSWphp5 package, but I noticed it doesn't come with phpize. Was > this intentional? > > I tried compiling and installing my own oci8.so from source, but get an error > > $ php -i 1>/dev/null > PHP Warning: PHP Startup: Invalid library (maybe not a PHP library) > 'oci8.so' in Unknown on line 0 Also, the configure line I used was PATH=/opt/csw/bin:$PATH ./configure --disable-all --with-oci8=shared,$ORACLE_HOME > > On 3/16/06, Darin Perusich wrote: > > hi milo, > > > > building the OCI extension is very straight forward, see the > > README.SELF-CONTAINED-EXTENSIONS which comes with the php source. i've > > built this for my linux systems with the oracle instant client, i > > wouldn't waste time with the full client installation anymore. > > > > the only problem that might arrise is the distribution of the oracle > > instant client apps and libs. in reading the instant client FAQ > > blastwave should be able to freely distribute it. > > > > License > > http://www.oracle.com/technology/software/htdocs/client_lic.html > > > > FAQ: > > http://www.oracle.com/technology/tech/oci/instantclient/ic-faq.html > > > > Milo wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > I just installed a php4 and apache2 from blastwave and didn't see any > > > oracle db client support (oci). Is this available anywhere? If not, > > > I'm thinking maybe I should maintain it, since otherwise I'll have to > > > build my own solaris packages. I'm looking for alternatives before I > > > go building my own stuff. > > > > > > How difficult would it be to maintain my own php[4,5]_pdooci, or if > > > anyone is thinking the same thing as me. > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > -- > > > Milan Andric > > > _______________________________________________ > > > users mailing list > > > users at lists.blastwave.org > > > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > > > -- > > Darin Perusich > > Unix Systems Administrator > > Cognigen Corporation > > 395 Youngs Rd. > > Williamsville, NY 14221 > > darinper at cognigencorp.com > > _______________________________________________ > > users mailing list > > users at lists.blastwave.org > > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > > From search.lists at gmail.com Mon Mar 20 21:40:49 2006 From: search.lists at gmail.com (Milo) Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 12:40:49 -0800 Subject: [csw-users] orace php package In-Reply-To: References: <44196120.10406@cognigencorp.com> Message-ID: On 3/20/06, Milo wrote: > Hi Darin, thanks, that work for php4. > > I am also interesting in testing php5/apache2 CSW stuff. I installed > the CSWphp5 package, but I noticed it doesn't come with phpize. Was > this intentional? Submitting this question to bugtrack ... [snip] -- Milan From search.lists at gmail.com Tue Mar 21 00:32:38 2006 From: search.lists at gmail.com (Milo) Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 15:32:38 -0800 Subject: [csw-users] orace php package In-Reply-To: References: <44196120.10406@cognigencorp.com> Message-ID: On 3/20/06, Milo wrote: > On 3/20/06, Milo wrote: > > Hi Darin, thanks, that work for php4. > > > > I am also interesting in testing php5/apache2 CSW stuff. I installed > > the CSWphp5 package, but I noticed it doesn't come with phpize. Was > > this intentional? > > Submitting this question to bugtrack ... > > [snip] oh, it was in php5_devel packages. doh > -- > Milan > From res at colnet.cmhnet.org Wed Mar 22 07:27:42 2006 From: res at colnet.cmhnet.org (Robert Stampfli) Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 01:27:42 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Warning: new php packages breaks low-end sparcs Message-ID: <20060322062742.GA12050@colnet> This is unlikely to be a problem for many people besides me, but the lastest php packages recently released are compiled to produce V8+ code for the Sparc instead of the V8 code that is supposed to be standard. This breaks certain low-end Sparcs like LXs and Classics. So, beware of the potential problems if you install these packages on your low-end Sparc machines. Rob From blastwave at gmail.com Wed Mar 22 07:51:29 2006 From: blastwave at gmail.com (Dennis Clarke) Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 01:51:29 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Warning: new php packages breaks low-end sparcs In-Reply-To: <20060322062742.GA12050@colnet> References: <20060322062742.GA12050@colnet> Message-ID: On 3/22/06, Robert Stampfli wrote: > This is unlikely to be a problem for many people besides me, > but the lastest php packages recently released are compiled > to produce V8+ code for the Sparc instead of the V8 code that > is supposed to be standard. This breaks certain low-end Sparcs > like LXs and Classics. So, beware of the potential problems > if you install these packages on your low-end Sparc machines. > And quad CPU Sparc 20 machines. Of which I have one. Thanks for the heads up on this. Dennis From comand at blastwave.org Wed Mar 22 08:29:40 2006 From: comand at blastwave.org (Cory Omand) Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 23:29:40 -0800 Subject: [csw-users] Warning: new php packages breaks low-end sparcs In-Reply-To: References: <20060322062742.GA12050@colnet> Message-ID: On 3/21/06, Dennis Clarke wrote: > > On 3/22/06, Robert Stampfli wrote: > > This is unlikely to be a problem for many people besides me, > > but the lastest php packages recently released are compiled > > to produce V8+ code for the Sparc instead of the V8 code that > > is supposed to be standard. This breaks certain low-end Sparcs > > like LXs and Classics. So, beware of the potential problems > > if you install these packages on your low-end Sparc machines. > > > > And quad CPU Sparc 20 machines. Of which I have one. > > Thanks for the heads up on this. For PHP5, this issue has been fixed for some time. I just verified that the latest version of the php5 packages (5.1.2,REV=2006.02.04) do not require V8+. - C. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20060321/34e4b5ca/attachment.html From mark.round at gmail.com Wed Mar 22 11:32:48 2006 From: mark.round at gmail.com (Mark Round) Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 10:32:48 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] Warning: new php packages breaks low-end sparcs In-Reply-To: References: <20060322062742.GA12050@colnet> Message-ID: <7b46f0de0603220232w78a8364s69f9a61b7a8689af@mail.gmail.com> > > And quad CPU Sparc 20 machines. Of which I have one. > > > > Thanks for the heads up on this. Hi all, Thanks for the bug report - I'm recompiling now, expect to see updated packages in /testing in the next hour or so; I'll drop a line when they're available. Apologies for any problems this may have caused (especially for giving the quad sparc 20 indigestion, I have very fond memories of those boxes - my first sparc box ever...) :( -Mark From mark.round at gmail.com Wed Mar 22 16:34:45 2006 From: mark.round at gmail.com (Mark Round) Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 15:34:45 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] Warning: new php packages breaks low-end sparcs In-Reply-To: <7b46f0de0603220232w78a8364s69f9a61b7a8689af@mail.gmail.com> References: <20060322062742.GA12050@colnet> <7b46f0de0603220232w78a8364s69f9a61b7a8689af@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <7b46f0de0603220734t244724c6v3e43a2011388cc4b@mail.gmail.com> New PHP4 packages are now available at http://www.blastwave.org/testing/ (REV=2005.03.22.SPARCONLY), if you're interested in testing (disclaimer: these have only just been built - they should be fine, but may set fire to your server, kill your cat etc.) # file /opt/csw/lib/php/sapi/apache1-libphp4.so /opt/csw/lib/php/sapi/apache1-libphp4.so: ELF 32-bit MSB dynamic lib SPARC Version 1, dynamically linked, stripped Hopefully this will be OK for the V8 people out there... -Mark From blastwave at gmail.com Wed Mar 22 16:46:55 2006 From: blastwave at gmail.com (Dennis Clarke) Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 10:46:55 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Warning: new php packages breaks low-end sparcs In-Reply-To: <7b46f0de0603220734t244724c6v3e43a2011388cc4b@mail.gmail.com> References: <20060322062742.GA12050@colnet> <7b46f0de0603220232w78a8364s69f9a61b7a8689af@mail.gmail.com> <7b46f0de0603220734t244724c6v3e43a2011388cc4b@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: On 3/22/06, Mark Round wrote: > New PHP4 packages are now available at > http://www.blastwave.org/testing/ (REV=2005.03.22.SPARCONLY), if > you're interested in testing (disclaimer: these have only just been > built - they should be fine, but may set fire to your server, kill > your cat etc.) > > # file /opt/csw/lib/php/sapi/apache1-libphp4.so > /opt/csw/lib/php/sapi/apache1-libphp4.so: ELF 32-bit MSB dynamic > lib SPARC Version 1, dynamically linked, stripped > > Hopefully this will be OK for the V8 people out there... > I really do wonder how many Sparc sun4m boxes are out there. Or even sun4d or sun4c. They're can not be many. Heck, I used to have a Sun SPARCServer 670MP tower only a few years ago and it was really old. Still worked and ran Solaris 2.5.1 just fine as well as WABI for Windows 3.1 emulation. My current Sparc 20 still runs just fine and it may never die. Its role is just testing however. Should I toss it into the rack and give everyone a login? For testing I mean ? Dennis From jreid at vnet.net Wed Mar 22 20:31:21 2006 From: jreid at vnet.net (Joe Reid) Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 13:31:21 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] Warning: new php packages breaks low-end sparcs In-Reply-To: <7b46f0de0603220734t244724c6v3e43a2011388cc4b@mail.gmail.com> References: <20060322062742.GA12050@colnet> <7b46f0de0603220232w78a8364s69f9a61b7a8689af@mail.gmail.com> <7b46f0de0603220734t244724c6v3e43a2011388cc4b@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <4421A609.8000003@vnet.net> Mark Round wrote: > Hopefully this will be OK for the V8 people out there... you mean I could have had a V8? My dual Ross HyperSPARC SS20 is mostly a counterweight these days and my IPX is a door stop. Both work, both boot whatever last OS I had put on them, I just don't need them anymore. I was going to build the SS20 into a NAS server driving my D1000 but I just couldn't justify the extra fans/noise/heat/electricty. -- Joe Reid jreid at vnet.net http://www.singlewhitemale.net ?c=a=rb=sc=fd=te=wf=zg=porh=n? From mlh at zip.com.au Wed Mar 22 23:40:07 2006 From: mlh at zip.com.au (Matthew Hannigan) Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 09:40:07 +1100 Subject: [csw-users] Warning: new php packages breaks low-end sparcs In-Reply-To: References: <20060322062742.GA12050@colnet> <7b46f0de0603220232w78a8364s69f9a61b7a8689af@mail.gmail.com> <7b46f0de0603220734t244724c6v3e43a2011388cc4b@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20060322224007.GB17923@evofed.localdomain> On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 10:46:55AM -0500, Dennis Clarke wrote: > Should I toss it into the rack and give everyone a login? For testing I mean ? Speaking for myself, that would be useful. I occasioanlly like to compile programs on an old os/arch combo to produce a binary that works anywhere. Regards, Matthew Hannigan From blastwave at gmail.com Wed Mar 22 23:41:12 2006 From: blastwave at gmail.com (Dennis Clarke) Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 17:41:12 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Warning: new php packages breaks low-end sparcs In-Reply-To: <20060322224007.GB17923@evofed.localdomain> References: <20060322062742.GA12050@colnet> <7b46f0de0603220232w78a8364s69f9a61b7a8689af@mail.gmail.com> <7b46f0de0603220734t244724c6v3e43a2011388cc4b@mail.gmail.com> <20060322224007.GB17923@evofed.localdomain> Message-ID: On 3/22/06, Matthew Hannigan wrote: > On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 10:46:55AM -0500, Dennis Clarke wrote: > > Should I toss it into the rack and give everyone a login? For testing I mean ? > > Speaking for myself, that would be useful. > I occasioanlly like to compile programs on an old os/arch > combo to produce a binary that works anywhere. > Well, I would need some time. Setting up a fresh server on a Sparc 20 will be a slow process. Also .. I think Sun ONE Studio 8 is the last rev to be supported and I don't even know if the recent patches address sun4m or not. Dennis From james at blastwave.org Thu Mar 23 12:42:20 2006 From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee) Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 11:42:20 GMT Subject: [csw-users] Warning: new php packages breaks low-end sparcs In-Reply-To: References: <20060322062742.GA12050@colnet> <7b46f0de0603220232w78a8364s69f9a61b7a8689af@mail.gmail.com> <7b46f0de0603220734t244724c6v3e43a2011388cc4b@mail.gmail.com> <20060322224007.GB17923@evofed.localdomain> Message-ID: <20060323.11422000.2593960669@landeck.jamesipoos.com> On 22/03/06, 22:41:12, Dennis Clarke wrote regarding Re: [csw-users] Warning: new php packages breaks low-end sparcs: > On 3/22/06, Matthew Hannigan wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 10:46:55AM -0500, Dennis Clarke wrote: > > > Should I toss it into the rack and give everyone a login? For testing I > > > mean ? > > > > Speaking for myself, that would be useful. > > I occasioanlly like to compile programs on an old os/arch > > combo to produce a binary that works anywhere. > Well, I would need some time. Setting up a fresh server on a Sparc 20 > will be a slow process. > Also .. I think Sun ONE Studio 8 is the last rev to be supported and I > don't even know if the recent patches address sun4m or not. There should be no need. One can test for v8 compliance and build v8 binaries on > v8 machines - as we do when people use the correct flags. There are some subtleties about strict v8 compliance, some of which I have ignored for pass-off testing, eg, Java 1.5 requires UltraSparc so any Java program needs to be <= v1.4. We also have packages (waiting for fix) that call for 64 bit SUNW packages despite not needing them - this isn't even an arch problem, someone might chose to run an UltraSparc in 32bit mode and not installed the redundant packages. More important that arch for "works anywhere" is to use a base OS (the Blastwave build machines use Solaris 8), then the newer Solaris 9/10 libraries won't be linked to the binaries. A finally note on v8 compliance: the penalty for choosing the base arch is small (disappointingly so, the newer processors don't provide the performance gains of simply cranking up the clock), and where performance does matter the isaexec mechanisms can and are used. James. From res at colnet.cmhnet.org Thu Mar 23 17:37:41 2006 From: res at colnet.cmhnet.org (Robert Stampfli) Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 11:37:41 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Sendmail Message-ID: <20060323163740.GA18804@stampfli> Can anyone give us some indication about when the sendmail 8.13.6 package will be available thru CSW blastwave? This release is somewhat pressing, as it was announced yesterday that prior versions of sendmail contain a security flaw which permits specially crafted emails to execute arbitrary code on the receiving system: Thanks, Rob From sloewenthal at gemini.edu Thu Mar 23 17:50:32 2006 From: sloewenthal at gemini.edu (LOEWENTHAL Simon) Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 12:50:32 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] Sendmail In-Reply-To: <20060323163740.GA18804@stampfli> References: <20060323163740.GA18804@stampfli> Message-ID: <4422D1D8.7020407@gemini.edu> I thought the latest version in the CSW tree was 8.13.15: # pkg-get -a|grep sendmail pm_mailsendmail 0.79 sendmail 8.13.5,REV=2006.02.10 S. Robert Stampfli wrote: >Can anyone give us some indication about when the >sendmail 8.13.6 package will be available thru CSW >blastwave? This release is somewhat pressing, as >it was announced yesterday that prior versions of >sendmail contain a security flaw which permits >specially crafted emails to execute arbitrary code >on the receiving system: > > > >Thanks, >Rob >_______________________________________________ >users mailing list >users at lists.blastwave.org >https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > From sloewenthal at gemini.edu Thu Mar 23 17:54:49 2006 From: sloewenthal at gemini.edu (LOEWENTHAL Simon) Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 12:54:49 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] Sendmail In-Reply-To: <4422D1D8.7020407@gemini.edu> References: <20060323163740.GA18804@stampfli> <4422D1D8.7020407@gemini.edu> Message-ID: <4422D2D9.4070202@gemini.edu> Sorry - I misread the number. oops - I must be asleep. Last version as you rightly said was 8.13.5. LOEWENTHAL Simon wrote: >I thought the latest version in the CSW tree was 8.13.15: > ># pkg-get -a|grep sendmail > pm_mailsendmail 0.79 > sendmail 8.13.5,REV=2006.02.10 > >S. > >Robert Stampfli wrote: > > > >>Can anyone give us some indication about when the >>sendmail 8.13.6 package will be available thru CSW >>blastwave? This release is somewhat pressing, as >>it was announced yesterday that prior versions of >>sendmail contain a security flaw which permits >>specially crafted emails to execute arbitrary code >>on the receiving system: >> >> >> >>Thanks, >>Rob >>_______________________________________________ >>users mailing list >>users at lists.blastwave.org >>https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users >> >> >> >> >_______________________________________________ >users mailing list >users at lists.blastwave.org >https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > From Darin.Perusich at cognigencorp.com Thu Mar 23 18:02:13 2006 From: Darin.Perusich at cognigencorp.com (Darin Perusich) Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 12:02:13 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Sendmail In-Reply-To: <20060323163740.GA18804@stampfli> References: <20060323163740.GA18804@stampfli> Message-ID: <4422D495.6090406@cognigencorp.com> did you submit a bug report via the bugtracking system? http://www.blastwave.org/mantis/login_page.php Robert Stampfli wrote: > Can anyone give us some indication about when the > sendmail 8.13.6 package will be available thru CSW > blastwave? This release is somewhat pressing, as > it was announced yesterday that prior versions of > sendmail contain a security flaw which permits > specially crafted emails to execute arbitrary code > on the receiving system: > > > > Thanks, > Rob > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users -- Darin Perusich Unix Systems Administrator Cognigen Corporation 395 Youngs Rd. Williamsville, NY 14221 darinper at cognigencorp.com From asmoore at blastwave.org Fri Mar 24 01:00:13 2006 From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex Moore) Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 18:00:13 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] Sendmail In-Reply-To: <20060323163740.GA18804@stampfli> References: <20060323163740.GA18804@stampfli> Message-ID: <20060323180013.00005a19@sws602.mcsun.local> On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 11:37:41 -0500 Robert Stampfli wrote: > Can anyone give us some indication about when the > sendmail 8.13.6 package will be available thru CSW > blastwave? This release is somewhat pressing, as > it was announced yesterday that prior versions of > sendmail contain a security flaw which permits > specially crafted emails to execute arbitrary code > on the receiving system: I saw the notice early this morning and started working on the package at that time. It should be in /testing later tonight. Alex From eric.enright at gmail.com Sat Mar 25 06:23:07 2006 From: eric.enright at gmail.com (Eric Enright) Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 00:23:07 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Becoming a Maintainer Message-ID: <3a74b99d0603242123j18b9f9eaq77db5ed46d9264e9@mail.gmail.com> Hi, I'm interested in becoming a maintainer. I submitted the maintainer's signup form about three weeks ago, and again earlier this week, and have not heard a reply. What do I need to do? Specifically, I would like to initially package gtkpod/libgpod, and then perhaps licq and/or giFT. -- Eric Enright From Darin.Perusich at cognigencorp.com Sat Mar 25 13:44:27 2006 From: Darin.Perusich at cognigencorp.com (Darin Perusich) Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 07:44:27 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Becoming a Maintainer In-Reply-To: <3a74b99d0603242123j18b9f9eaq77db5ed46d9264e9@mail.gmail.com> References: <3a74b99d0603242123j18b9f9eaq77db5ed46d9264e9@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <44253B2B.8010906@cognigencorp.com> head on over to http://www.blastwave.org/maintainer-signup.php and fill out the form. after you've done this someone will be in contact with you. Eric Enright wrote: > Hi, I'm interested in becoming a maintainer. I submitted the > maintainer's signup form about three weeks ago, and again earlier this > week, and have not heard a reply. What do I need to do? > Specifically, I would like to initially package gtkpod/libgpod, and > then perhaps licq and/or giFT. > > -- > Eric Enright > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users -- Darin Perusich Unix Systems Administrator Cognigen Corporation 395 Youngs Rd. Williamsville, NY 14221 darinper at cognigencorp.com From eric.enright at gmail.com Sat Mar 25 18:38:29 2006 From: eric.enright at gmail.com (Eric Enright) Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 12:38:29 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Becoming a Maintainer In-Reply-To: <44253B2B.8010906@cognigencorp.com> References: <3a74b99d0603242123j18b9f9eaq77db5ed46d9264e9@mail.gmail.com> <44253B2B.8010906@cognigencorp.com> Message-ID: <3a74b99d0603250938v166549bfsa777b6ab1447b81@mail.gmail.com> Ok, I went there and submitted the form for a third time. Eric On 3/25/06, Darin Perusich wrote: > head on over to http://www.blastwave.org/maintainer-signup.php and fill > out the form. after you've done this someone will be in contact with you. > > Eric Enright wrote: > > Hi, I'm interested in becoming a maintainer. I submitted the > > maintainer's signup form about three weeks ago, and again earlier this > > week, and have not heard a reply. What do I need to do? > > Specifically, I would like to initially package gtkpod/libgpod, and > > then perhaps licq and/or giFT. > > > > -- > > Eric Enright > > _______________________________________________ > > users mailing list > > users at lists.blastwave.org > > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > -- > Darin Perusich > Unix Systems Administrator > Cognigen Corporation > 395 Youngs Rd. > Williamsville, NY 14221 > darinper at cognigencorp.com > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > -- Eric Enright From ericr at sourmilk.net Sun Mar 26 19:45:22 2006 From: ericr at sourmilk.net (Eric Rivas) Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 12:45:22 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Becoming a Maintainer In-Reply-To: <3a74b99d0603250938v166549bfsa777b6ab1447b81@mail.gmail.com> References: <3a74b99d0603242123j18b9f9eaq77db5ed46d9264e9@mail.gmail.com> <44253B2B.8010906@cognigencorp.com> <3a74b99d0603250938v166549bfsa777b6ab1447b81@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <5DE187BA-5A73-4799-AD73-02C01A805128@sourmilk.net> Whom ever does it must be real busy or something. I applied a few months ago, got a couple of emails after two or three weeks, then stopped hearing from him. On Mar 25, 2006, at 12:38 PM, Eric Enright wrote: > Ok, I went there and submitted the form for a third time. > > Eric > > > On 3/25/06, Darin Perusich wrote: >> head on over to http://www.blastwave.org/maintainer-signup.php and >> fill >> out the form. after you've done this someone will be in contact >> with you. >> >> Eric Enright wrote: >>> Hi, I'm interested in becoming a maintainer. I submitted the >>> maintainer's signup form about three weeks ago, and again earlier >>> this >>> week, and have not heard a reply. What do I need to do? >>> Specifically, I would like to initially package gtkpod/libgpod, and >>> then perhaps licq and/or giFT. >>> >>> -- >>> Eric Enright >>> _______________________________________________ >>> users mailing list >>> users at lists.blastwave.org >>> https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users >> >> -- >> Darin Perusich >> Unix Systems Administrator >> Cognigen Corporation >> 395 Youngs Rd. >> Williamsville, NY 14221 >> darinper at cognigencorp.com >> _______________________________________________ >> users mailing list >> users at lists.blastwave.org >> https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users >> > > > -- > Eric Enright > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users -- Eric Rivas ericr at sourmilk.net From eric.enright at gmail.com Mon Mar 27 00:26:02 2006 From: eric.enright at gmail.com (Eric Enright) Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 17:26:02 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Becoming a Maintainer In-Reply-To: <5DE187BA-5A73-4799-AD73-02C01A805128@sourmilk.net> References: <3a74b99d0603242123j18b9f9eaq77db5ed46d9264e9@mail.gmail.com> <44253B2B.8010906@cognigencorp.com> <3a74b99d0603250938v166549bfsa777b6ab1447b81@mail.gmail.com> <5DE187BA-5A73-4799-AD73-02C01A805128@sourmilk.net> Message-ID: <3a74b99d0603261426r3f92747fx7eb03533b4ea6337@mail.gmail.com> Looks like that is the case. I got an email from Phil Brown yesterday. Eric On 3/26/06, Eric Rivas wrote: > Whom ever does it must be real busy or something. I applied a few > months ago, got a couple of emails after two or three weeks, then > stopped hearing from him. > > > On Mar 25, 2006, at 12:38 PM, Eric Enright wrote: > > > Ok, I went there and submitted the form for a third time. > > > > Eric > > > > > > On 3/25/06, Darin Perusich wrote: > >> head on over to http://www.blastwave.org/maintainer-signup.php and > >> fill > >> out the form. after you've done this someone will be in contact > >> with you. > >> > >> Eric Enright wrote: > >>> Hi, I'm interested in becoming a maintainer. I submitted the > >>> maintainer's signup form about three weeks ago, and again earlier > >>> this > >>> week, and have not heard a reply. What do I need to do? > >>> Specifically, I would like to initially package gtkpod/libgpod, and > >>> then perhaps licq and/or giFT. > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Eric Enright > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> users mailing list > >>> users at lists.blastwave.org > >>> https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > >> > >> -- > >> Darin Perusich > >> Unix Systems Administrator > >> Cognigen Corporation > >> 395 Youngs Rd. > >> Williamsville, NY 14221 > >> darinper at cognigencorp.com > >> _______________________________________________ > >> users mailing list > >> users at lists.blastwave.org > >> https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > >> > > > > > > -- > > Eric Enright > > _______________________________________________ > > users mailing list > > users at lists.blastwave.org > > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > > -- > Eric Rivas > ericr at sourmilk.net > > > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > -- Eric Enright From jreid at vnet.net Tue Mar 28 00:03:35 2006 From: jreid at vnet.net (Joe Reid) Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 17:03:35 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] FLAC encoding? Message-ID: <20060327220335.GG6249@katie.ctc.net> I don't have an diagnostics yet but I tried using flac to encode a wav file this weekend - after 24 hours of accumulated CPU time I killed the process. Should any normal 3-5 minute wav file take ...days to encode in FLAC on a dual 900MHZ SunBlade 1000? -- Joe Reid jreid at vnet.net Tactical Solaris Systems Engineering and Administration http://www.singlewhitemale.net ?c=a=rb=sc=fd=te=wf=zg=porh=n? From ax11 at ax11.de Wed Mar 29 13:36:11 2006 From: ax11 at ax11.de (Thomas Amm) Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 13:36:11 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] FLAC encoding? In-Reply-To: <20060327220335.GG6249@katie.ctc.net> References: <20060327220335.GG6249@katie.ctc.net> Message-ID: <442A712B.9080203@ax11.de> Joe Reid wrote: > I don't have an diagnostics yet but I tried using flac to encode a wav > file this weekend - after 24 hours of accumulated CPU time I killed the > process. Should any normal 3-5 minute wav file take ...days to encode > in FLAC on a dual 900MHZ SunBlade 1000? > No way, FLAC used to be pretty fast - but the actual flac hangs on my Blade1000 (Ultra Sparc III, 750MHz), too. Doesn't even seem to encode the first frame before it freezes. From javier.augusto at gmx.net Wed Mar 29 15:07:06 2006 From: javier.augusto at gmx.net (Javier O. Augusto) Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 10:07:06 -0300 Subject: [csw-users] FLAC encoding? In-Reply-To: <442A712B.9080203@ax11.de> References: <20060327220335.GG6249@katie.ctc.net> <442A712B.9080203@ax11.de> Message-ID: <442A867A.5070303@gmx.net> Thomas Amm wrote: > Joe Reid wrote: > >> I don't have an diagnostics yet but I tried using flac to encode a wav >> file this weekend - after 24 hours of accumulated CPU time I killed the >> process. Should any normal 3-5 minute wav file take ...days to encode >> in FLAC on a dual 900MHZ SunBlade 1000? >> >> > > No way, FLAC used to be pretty fast - but the actual flac hangs on my > Blade1000 (Ultra Sparc III, 750MHz), too. > Doesn't even seem to encode the first frame before it freezes. > Just thinking out loud, is this code too x86 eccentric or what? shouldn't it make use of vis+? Have you tried building up from source? Regards, Jay From ishikawa at yk.rim.or.jp Wed Mar 29 17:43:10 2006 From: ishikawa at yk.rim.or.jp (ci) Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 00:43:10 +0900 Subject: [csw-users] a package (but which one) removes a symlink /opt/csw and installs a real directory. Message-ID: <1143646990.7076.24.camel@solaris-nv-28-home> Hi, Thank you for creating this great repository of packages. I wish there was something like this more than 10 years ago when I administered a few Sun workstations and servers for internet gateway and NFS servers. Anyway, I would like to report a very disturbing event, namely, installing a package during "pkg-get install mplayer" removes a symlink /opt/csw (-> ${HOME}/csw } then creates a real directory /opt/csw and installs files under this real directory. But as a consequence, blastware packages installed under ${HOME}/csw via the old symlink were no longer recognized after this change. Sorry, I have only very sketchy information. But here is the step I took to see this event. Background: I had a symlink called /opt/csw -> /home/ishikawa/csw I made this symlink to my home directory after seeing the root partition that holds "/" is getting tight in terms of available space. CSW packages go into /home/ishikawa/csw by way of /opt/csw symlink. For example, pkg-get lives under /opt/csw/bin. Now, my internet connection at this moment is 64kbps ISDN line. (An optical fibre connection shared among 16 users is here RSN.) It is a dial-up line with fixed monthly charge. So I can connect as long as I want, but speed is slow. Anyway, last evening before going to bed, I ran pkg-get install mplayer I saw a few packages downloaded and installed before leaving the computer. (But I forgot to add -f, nor set up admin file yet.) What happened was that a few more large packages were installed during my absence from the console, but at one point, an interaction that required user input stopped the pkg-get process. So in the morning I noticed pkg-get has stopped waiting for user input and hit [RETURN], but then it continued to download another package. By that time, in the morning, the ISDN router's time-out feature had kicked in and the connection was lost. So wget called within pkg-get waited for a while [but I was too sleepy to notice this.], and failed to fetch the next package. Then pkg-get got clever and tried to download 'catalogue' or something thinking that the failure to download the previous package was due to incorrect inventory instead of network problem. However, downloading of 'catalogue' was also unsuccessful also due to the unavailable dial-up connection at the moment. Then pkg-get failed. So, by this time, I became aware of the network problem, and I started the dial-up ISDN connection, and hit pkg-get install mplayer again. Then the shell prompt said, "pkg-get: not found" or something. Whoa? pkg-get was nowhere to be found! It was not under /opt/csw/bin/ !? To make a long story short, I found to my great surprise that somehow installing one (?) of the pakcages somehow erased /opt/csw symlink and instead created a real /opt/csw directory and happily continued placing the package files under /opt/csw (real directory). After a moment of panic, I looked for ${HOME}/csw and I found it is still there and holding the previously installed files intact there. For example, pkg-get is still available ${HOME}/csw/bin/pkg-get. This is very strange. I am not sure which package is to blame. All I can say is that it is a package (or packages?) that are required by "mplayer" package that removed the symlink /opt/csw and recreated a real directory under the same name. I suspct that the checking for the existence of /opt/csw directory is not quite uniform across packages, and one package at least somehow mistook the presence of a symlink /opt/csw and deletes it forcibly and creates a real directory? After this discovery, I recreated /opt/csw symlink and re-ran the rest of pkg-get install mplayer and it seemed to run fine. e.g. mv /opt/csw /opt/csw.new ln -s ${HOME}/csw /opt/csw cd /opt/csw.new cp -pr * /opt/csw cd /tmp rmdir /opt/csw.new The above steps merged the previously installed files under ${HOME}/csw and the package files installed under real directory /opt/csw into ${HOME}/csw via symbolic link /opt/csw. I am not sure if I can track down which pakcage is to blame. In any case, I report this problem to alert package maintainers. TIA. CI From james at blastwave.org Wed Mar 29 18:04:03 2006 From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee) Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 16:04:03 GMT Subject: [csw-users] a package (but which one) removes a symlink /opt/csw and installs a real directory. In-Reply-To: <1143646990.7076.24.camel@solaris-nv-28-home> References: <1143646990.7076.24.camel@solaris-nv-28-home> Message-ID: <20060329.16040300.3732794722@landeck.jamesipoos.com> On 29/03/06, 16:43:10, ci wrote regarding [csw-users] a package (but which one) removes a symlink /opt/csw and installs a real directory.: > installing a package during "pkg-get install mplayer" > removes a symlink /opt/csw (-> ${HOME}/csw } then > creates a real directory /opt/csw and > installs files under this real directory. But as a consequence, > blastware packages installed under ${HOME}/csw via the old > symlink were no longer recognized after this > change. > Sorry, I have only very sketchy information. > But here is the step I took to see this event. > Background: > I had a symlink called > /opt/csw -> /home/ishikawa/csw > I made this symlink to my home directory after seeing the > root partition that holds "/" is getting tight in terms of available > space. Not sure which package does it but the solution is to use a lookback mount for /opt/csw and not a link. See lofs(7FS). Something like: mount -F lofs /home/ishikawa/csw /opt/csw James. From jonel.rienton at reidata.com Wed Mar 29 19:04:47 2006 From: jonel.rienton at reidata.com (Jonel Rienton) Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 11:04:47 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] CSWmono 1.1.13.6 in /testing Message-ID: <3BAF672E643DA84CB02A032EC314BD42021338CF@LDIADDMAIL01.sisco.stewart.net> I have just copied over a set of new versions of mono in http://www.blastwave.org/testing. I also had great success in running ASP.Net pages using xsp and mod_mono which are also available in /testing Brief Info: Mono provides the necessary software to develop and run .NET client and server applications on Linux, Solaris, Mac OS X, Windows, and UNIX. Sponsored by Novell, the Mono open source project has an active and enthusiastic contributing community and is positioned to become the leading choice for development of Linux applications. Regards, Jonel Rienton -- I know not english well, but I know 9 computer languages. Pinoy Ako! From jreid at vnet.net Wed Mar 29 19:18:26 2006 From: jreid at vnet.net (Joe Reid) Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 11:18:26 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] FLAC encoding? In-Reply-To: <442A712B.9080203@ax11.de> References: <20060327220335.GG6249@katie.ctc.net> <442A712B.9080203@ax11.de> Message-ID: <442AC162.2030609@vnet.net> Thomas Amm wrote: > Joe Reid wrote: > >>I don't have an diagnostics yet but I tried using flac to encode a wav >>file this weekend - after 24 hours of accumulated CPU time I killed the >>process. Should any normal 3-5 minute wav file take ...days to encode >>in FLAC on a dual 900MHZ SunBlade 1000? > > No way, FLAC used to be pretty fast - but the actual flac hangs on my > Blade1000 (Ultra Sparc III, 750MHz), too. > Doesn't even seem to encode the first frame before it freezes. I changed the song I was trying to encode and it encoded 94% of the song in like 65 seconds, but then hung there indefinatly. Anyone have any ideas what's up? -- Joe Reid jreid at vnet.net http://www.singlewhitemale.net ?c=a=rb=sc=fd=te=wf=zg=porh=n? From studentmark2004 at yahoo.com Thu Mar 30 00:06:10 2006 From: studentmark2004 at yahoo.com (mark student) Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 14:06:10 -0800 (PST) Subject: [csw-users] Remove from list Message-ID: <20060329220610.15114.qmail@web38711.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Please remove me from the users list. Thanks --------------------------------- New Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Call regular phones from your PC and save big. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20060329/bd2e0c6f/attachment.html From ihsan at dogan.ch Thu Mar 30 00:46:31 2006 From: ihsan at dogan.ch (Ihsan Dogan) Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 00:46:31 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] Remove from list In-Reply-To: <20060329220610.15114.qmail@web38711.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <20060329220610.15114.qmail@web38711.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <442B0E47.7080305@dogan.ch> Hello Mark, on 30.03.2006 00:06 mark student said the following: > Please remove me from the users list. Thanks You can do that yourself. Please go to https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users . Ihsan -- ihsan at dogan.ch http://ihsan.dogan.ch/ From Darin.Perusich at cognigencorp.com Thu Mar 30 15:53:43 2006 From: Darin.Perusich at cognigencorp.com (Darin Perusich) Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 08:53:43 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] /testing drupal 4.6.6 Message-ID: <442BE2E7.1030900@cognigencorp.com> hello everyone, drupal 4.6.6 is now available for your /testing pleasure, though the testing page hasn't updated yet. there is a full link to the package below. "Drupal is an open-source platform and content management system for building dynamic web sites offering a broad range of features and services including user administration, publishing workflow, discussion capabilities, news aggregation, metadata functionalities using controlled vocabularies and XML publishing for content sharing purposes. Equipped with a powerful blend of features and configurability, Drupal can support a diverse range of web projects ranging from personal weblogs to large community-driven sites." http://drupal.org Dependencies: CSWcommon CSWphp CSWmysql4 http://www.blastwave.org/testing/drupal-4.6.6-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz -- Darin Perusich Unix Systems Administrator Cognigen Corporation 395 Youngs Rd. Williamsville, NY 14221 darinper at cognigencorp.com From NandaHyde at cxbb.com Fri Mar 31 16:48:06 2006 From: NandaHyde at cxbb.com (Pratapwant Madison) Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 23:48:06 +0900 Subject: [csw-users] Microsoft Macro Assembler 32 v7.0 Microsoft Money 2004 Message-ID: An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20060331/8c5564f3/attachment.html From strombrg at dcs.nac.uci.edu Wed Mar 1 01:24:27 2006 From: strombrg at dcs.nac.uci.edu (Dan Stromberg) Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 16:24:27 -0800 Subject: [csw-users] Odd problem installing pkg-get In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1141172668.26148.160.camel@seki.nac.uci.edu> On Tue, 2006-02-28 at 15:42 +0000, Chris Ridd wrote: > On 28/2/06 3:10, Dennis Clarke wrote: > > > On 2/28/06, Chris Ridd wrote: > >> This is all very odd. Have you tried using truss to get more details on > >> what's actually happening? > > > > forget truss .. please .. don't even go there .. its a waste of time > > OK :-) > > Cheers, > > Chris I've found system call tracers very effective in pinpointing the source of many, many, many problems: http://dcs.nac.uci.edu/~strombrg/debugging-with-syscall-tracers.html From chris.ridd at isode.com Wed Mar 1 07:42:43 2006 From: chris.ridd at isode.com (Chris Ridd) Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2006 06:42:43 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] Odd problem installing pkg-get In-Reply-To: <1141172668.26148.160.camel@seki.nac.uci.edu> Message-ID: On 1/3/06 12:24, Dan Stromberg wrote: > On Tue, 2006-02-28 at 15:42 +0000, Chris Ridd wrote: >> On 28/2/06 3:10, Dennis Clarke wrote: >> >>> On 2/28/06, Chris Ridd wrote: >>>> This is all very odd. Have you tried using truss to get more details on >>>> what's actually happening? >>> >>> forget truss .. please .. don't even go there .. its a waste of time >> >> OK :-) >> >> Cheers, >> >> Chris > > I've found system call tracers very effective in pinpointing the source > of many, many, many problems: > > http://dcs.nac.uci.edu/~strombrg/debugging-with-syscall-tracers.html > I love ktrace/strace/truss/tusc, but I think what Dennis is saying is that they're a bit of overkill when diagnosing problems in a shell script. Maybe running pkg-get with sh's -x (or is it +x) flag would be more useful. Cheers, Chris From mats.larsson at ericsson.com Wed Mar 1 13:09:58 2006 From: mats.larsson at ericsson.com (Mats Larsson) Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2006 13:09:58 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] XMMS and libvorbis Message-ID: <44058F16.1020302@ericsson.com> After latest upgrade of libvorbis from unstable I get the following when starting XMMS: % /opt/csw/bin/xmms ld.so.1: xmms: fatal: relocation error: file /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8/libvorbis.so.0: symbol __sincos: referenced symbol not found Anyone else seeing this? Don't get it if I use libvorbis from stable. /MOL From james at blastwave.org Wed Mar 1 13:44:49 2006 From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee) Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2006 12:44:49 GMT Subject: [csw-users] XMMS and libvorbis In-Reply-To: <44058F16.1020302@ericsson.com> References: <44058F16.1020302@ericsson.com> Message-ID: <20060301.12444900.2881133586@landeck.jamesipoos.com> On 01/03/06, 12:09:58, Mats Larsson wrote regarding [csw-users] XMMS and libvorbis: > After latest upgrade of libvorbis from unstable I get the following when > starting XMMS: > % /opt/csw/bin/xmms > ld.so.1: xmms: fatal: relocation error: file > /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8/libvorbis.so.0: symbol __sincos: referenced symbol > not found > Anyone else seeing this? Yes, just seen the same with timidity but you are 20 minutes ahead of me, will you file the bug? $ timidity -Ov XXXXX.mid -o XXXXX.ogg ld.so.1: timidity: fatal: relocation error: file /opt/csw/lib/libvorbis.so.0: symbol __sincos: referenced symbol not found > Don't get it if I use libvorbis from stable. There's a moral here. James. From jameslee at onetel.com Wed Mar 1 13:32:56 2006 From: jameslee at onetel.com (James Lee) Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2006 12:32:56 GMT Subject: [csw-users] XMMS and libvorbis In-Reply-To: <44058F16.1020302@ericsson.com> References: <44058F16.1020302@ericsson.com> Message-ID: <20060301.12325600.70846573@landeck.jamesipoos.com> On 01/03/06, 12:09:58, Mats Larsson wrote regarding [csw-users] XMMS and libvorbis: > After latest upgrade of libvorbis from unstable I get the following when > starting XMMS: > % /opt/csw/bin/xmms > ld.so.1: xmms: fatal: relocation error: file > /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8/libvorbis.so.0: symbol __sincos: referenced symbol > not found > Anyone else seeing this? Yes, just seen the same with timidity but you are 20 minutes ahead of me, will you file the bug? $ timidity -Ov XXXXX.mid -o XXXXX.ogg ld.so.1: timidity: fatal: relocation error: file /opt/csw/lib/libvorbis.so.0: symbol __sincos: referenced symbol not found > Don't get it if I use libvorbis from stable. There's a moral here. James. From mats.larsson at ericsson.com Wed Mar 1 15:45:11 2006 From: mats.larsson at ericsson.com (Mats Larsson) Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2006 15:45:11 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] XMMS and libvorbis In-Reply-To: <20060301.12325600.70846573@landeck.jamesipoos.com> References: <44058F16.1020302@ericsson.com> <20060301.12325600.70846573@landeck.jamesipoos.com> Message-ID: <4405B377.1020004@ericsson.com> On 2006-03-01 13:32, James Lee wrote: > On 01/03/06, 12:09:58, Mats Larsson wrote > regarding [csw-users] XMMS and libvorbis: > >> After latest upgrade of libvorbis from unstable I get the following when >> starting XMMS: > >> % /opt/csw/bin/xmms >> ld.so.1: xmms: fatal: relocation error: file >> /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8/libvorbis.so.0: symbol __sincos: referenced symbol >> not found > >> Anyone else seeing this? > > Yes, just seen the same with timidity but you are 20 minutes ahead of > me, will you file the bug? Hehe... ok I will. Done! >> Don't get it if I use libvorbis from stable. > > There's a moral here. I know, I know, just trying to be informative ;). From james at blastwave.org Thu Mar 2 10:49:06 2006 From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee) Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 09:49:06 GMT Subject: [csw-users] XMMS and libvorbis In-Reply-To: <4405B377.1020004@ericsson.com> References: <44058F16.1020302@ericsson.com> <20060301.12325600.70846573@landeck.jamesipoos.com> <4405B377.1020004@ericsson.com> Message-ID: <20060302.9490600.3206394461@landeck.jamesipoos.com> On 01/03/06, 14:45:11, Mats Larsson wrote regarding Re: [csw-users] XMMS and libvorbis: > >> % /opt/csw/bin/xmms > >> ld.so.1: xmms: fatal: relocation error: file > >> /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8/libvorbis.so.0: symbol __sincos: referenced symbol > >> not found > > > >> Anyone else seeing this? > > > > Yes, just seen the same with timidity but you are 20 minutes ahead of > > me, will you file the bug? > Hehe... ok I will. Done! > >> Don't get it if I use libvorbis from stable. > > > > There's a moral here. > I know, I know, just trying to be informative ;). Indeed, I'm just promoting use of stable to users but if everyone used it we'd loose field testing so I thank you for making the effort to find and report the problem. James. From SELundgr at email.uncc.edu Thu Mar 2 16:42:54 2006 From: SELundgr at email.uncc.edu (Lundgren, Scott) Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 10:42:54 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] symbol errors compiling using other blastwave packages Message-ID: I did some testing with the CSW pureftpd package and though it had been compiled including the "--with-everything" flag this did not include the MySQL support. I understand this package is no longer maintained so I'm trying to compile my own installation using other blastwave packages and I've run into a problem referencing symbols. Suggestions for how to fix them would be very appreciated. Thanks, Scott Lundgren ITS - Web Services UNC at Charlotte http://www.uncc.edu I'm compiling using: CSWossl 0.9.8,REV=2005.11.02_rev=a CSWmysql4 4.1.15,REV=2005.11.15 CSWmysql4client 4.1.15,REV=2005.11.13 CSWmysql4rt 4.1.15,REV=2005.11.13 CSWgmake 3.80,REV=2004.10.21 Sun Studio 11 Pureftpd-1.0.21 from source bash-2.05$ PATH=$PATH:.:/opt/SUNWspro/bin:/usr/ccs/bin:/opt/csw/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/ usr/sbin:/sbin;export PATH bash-2.05$ CPPFLAGS="-I/opt/csw/include";export CPPFLAGS bash-2.05$ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/opt/csw/mysql4/lib/mysql;export LD_LIBRARY_PATH bash-2.05$ LDFLAGS="-L/opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus";export LDFLAGS bash-2.05$ ./configure --prefix=/opt/csw --with-openssl=/opt/csw --mandir=/opt/csw/share/man --infodir=/opt/csw/share/info --with-tls --with-certfile=/opt/csw/ssl/private/pure-ftpd.pem --with-mysql=/opt/csw/mysql4 <-- snip --> bash-2.05$ make <-- snip --> cc -g -L/opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus -L/usr/local/lib -L/opt/csw/mysql4/lib -L/opt/csw/mysql4/lib/mysql -L/opt/csw/mysql4/mysql/lib -o pure-ftpd pure_ftpd-daemons.o pure_ftpd-ftpd.o pure_ftpd-log_unix.o pure_ftpd-log_mysql.o pure_ftpd-log_pgsql.o pure_ftpd-log_pam.o pure_ftpd-log_ldap.o pure_ftpd-log_puredb.o pure_ftpd-log_extauth.o pure_ftpd-ls.o pure_ftpd-parser.o pure_ftpd-bsd-glob.o pure_ftpd-fakesnprintf.o pure_ftpd-bsd-realpath.o pure_ftpd-mysnprintf.o pure_ftpd-caps.o pure_ftpd-ftp_parser.o pure_ftpd-dynamic.o pure_ftpd-ftpwho-update.o pure_ftpd-bsd-getopt_long.o pure_ftpd-upload-pipe.o pure_ftpd-ipv4stack.o pure_ftpd-altlog.o pure_ftpd-crypto.o pure_ftpd-crypto-md5.o pure_ftpd-crypto-sha1.o pure_ftpd-quotas.o pure_ftpd-fakechroot.o pure_ftpd-diraliases.o pure_ftpd-ftpwho-read.o pure_ftpd-getloadavg.o pure_ftpd-privsep.o pure_ftpd-tls.o pure_ftpd-osx-extensions.o ../puredb/src/libpuredb_read.a -lkstat -lcrypto -lmysqlclient -lz -lm -lcrypt -lsendfile -lnsl -lsocket Undefined first referenced symbol in file SSL_load_error_strings pure_ftpd-tls.o (symbol belongs to implicit dependency /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libssl.so.0.9.8) dlsym /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libcrypto.a(dso_dlfcn.o) (symbol belongs to implicit dependency /lib/libdl.so.1) SSL_CIPHER_get_bits pure_ftpd-tls.o (symbol belongs to implicit dependency /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libssl.so.0.9.8) SSL_CIPHER_get_name pure_ftpd-tls.o (symbol belongs to implicit dependency /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libssl.so.0.9.8) SSL_write pure_ftpd-ftpd.o (symbol belongs to implicit dependency /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libssl.so.0.9.8) SSL_CTX_use_PrivateKey_file pure_ftpd-tls.o (symbol belongs to implicit dependency /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libssl.so.0.9.8) SSL_set_accept_state pure_ftpd-tls.o (symbol belongs to implicit dependency /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libssl.so.0.9.8) SSL_accept pure_ftpd-tls.o (symbol belongs to implicit dependency /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libssl.so.0.9.8) SSLv23_server_method pure_ftpd-tls.o (symbol belongs to implicit dependency /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libssl.so.0.9.8) SSL_CTX_use_certificate_chain_file pure_ftpd-tls.o (symbol belongs to implicit dependency /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libssl.so.0.9.8) dlopen /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libcrypto.a(dso_dlfcn.o) (symbol belongs to implicit dependency /lib/libdl.so.1) SSL_free pure_ftpd-tls.o (symbol belongs to implicit dependency /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libssl.so.0.9.8) SSL_read pure_ftpd-ftp_parser.o (symbol belongs to implicit dependency /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libssl.so.0.9.8) SSL_new pure_ftpd-tls.o (symbol belongs to implicit dependency /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libssl.so.0.9.8) SSL_CTX_new pure_ftpd-tls.o (symbol belongs to implicit dependency /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libssl.so.0.9.8) SSL_set_rfd pure_ftpd-tls.o (symbol belongs to implicit dependency /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libssl.so.0.9.8) SSL_set_wfd pure_ftpd-tls.o (symbol belongs to implicit dependency /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libssl.so.0.9.8) SSL_CIPHER_get_version pure_ftpd-tls.o (symbol belongs to implicit dependency /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libssl.so.0.9.8) dlclose /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libcrypto.a(dso_dlfcn.o) (symbol belongs to implicit dependency /lib/libdl.so.1) dlerror /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libcrypto.a(dso_dlfcn.o) (symbol belongs to implicit dependency /lib/libdl.so.1) SSL_CTX_ctrl pure_ftpd-tls.o (symbol belongs to implicit dependency /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libssl.so.0.9.8) SSL_CTX_free pure_ftpd-tls.o (symbol belongs to implicit dependency /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libssl.so.0.9.8) SSL_get_current_cipher pure_ftpd-tls.o (symbol belongs to implicit dependency /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libssl.so.0.9.8) SSL_CTX_check_private_key pure_ftpd-tls.o (symbol belongs to implicit dependency /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libssl.so.0.9.8) SSL_library_init pure_ftpd-tls.o (symbol belongs to implicit dependency /opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus/libssl.so.0.9.8) ld: fatal: Symbol referencing errors. No output written to pure-ftpd make[2]: *** [pure-ftpd] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/pure-ftpd-1.0.21/src' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/pure-ftpd-1.0.21' make: *** [all] Error 2 From dvm105 at psu.edu Thu Mar 2 16:55:21 2006 From: dvm105 at psu.edu (Derek Morr) Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 10:55:21 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] symbol errors compiling using other blastwave packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <44071569.3030101@psu.edu> All of those symbols are defined in libssl. Try adding "-lssl" to your CFLAGS. -derek -- Derek Morr Senior Systems Programmer Academic Services & Emerging Technologies Pennsylvania State University derekmorr at psu.edu From pfelecan at blastwave.org Thu Mar 2 18:48:31 2006 From: pfelecan at blastwave.org (Peter FELECAN) Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 18:48:31 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Emacs 22 snapsot 20060301 CVS in testing Message-ID: As promised, the monthly CVS snapshot of the next version of Emacs, in the testing area: http://www.blastwave.org/testing/emacs-22.0.50,REV=cvs20060301-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz http://www.blastwave.org/testing/emacs-22.0.50,REV=cvs20060301-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz If you wish to use/test the bleeding edge Emacs, you're welcome. But, if there are issues, please report them upstream; I'll manage only the packaging side. To install this package, you need to remove all dependent packages and Emacs 21.4 itself; after that, you install, using pkgadd, the CVS Emacs corresponding to your architecture and, if you're a TeX user, the nifty AucTex package. Note that this version includes the successors of: oortgnus and emacscalc, available as Blastwave packages, and many other, previously separate, packages --- e.g., tramp. I'll made a new testing package once a month, until the public release. Enjoy -- Peter From SELundgr at email.uncc.edu Thu Mar 2 18:53:14 2006 From: SELundgr at email.uncc.edu (Lundgren, Scott) Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 12:53:14 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] symbol errors compiling using other blastwavepackages Message-ID: That didn't work. Is there a gcc CFLAGS equivalent for sun's cc compiler? Scott Lundgren ITS - Web Services UNC at Charlotte http://www.uncc.edu bash-2.05$ make clean <-- snip --> bash-2.05$ CFLAGS="-lssl";export CFLAGS bash-2.05$ ./configure --prefix=/opt/csw --mandir=/opt/csw/share/man --infodir=/opt/csw/share/info --with-openssl=/opt/csw --with-tls --with-certfile=/opt/csw/ssl/private/pure-ftpd.pem --with-mysql=/opt/csw/mysql4 --with-puredb --with-quotas --with-altlog --with-virtualchroot checking for a BSD-compatible install... ./install-sh -c checking whether build environment is sane... yes checking for gawk... gawk checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes checking for a BSD-compatible install... ./install-sh -c checking for ranlib... ranlib checking for gcc... no checking for cc... cc checking for C compiler default output file name... configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables See `config.log' for more details. bash-2.05$ less config.log configure:2141: found /opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc configure:2151: result: cc configure:2315: checking for C compiler version configure:2318: cc --version &5 cc: Warning: option -- passed to ld usage: cc [ options] files. Use 'cc -flags' for details configure:2321: $? = 1 configure:2323: cc -v &5 usage: cc [ options] files. Use 'cc -flags' for details configure:2326: $? = 1 configure:2328: cc -V &5 cc: Sun C 5.8 2005/10/13 usage: cc [ options] files. Use 'cc -flags' for details configure:2331: $? = 1 configure:2354: checking for C compiler default output file name configure:2357: cc -lssl -I/opt/csw/include -L/opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus conftest.c >&5 ld: fatal: library -lssl: not found ld: fatal: File processing errors. No output written to a.out configure:2360: $? = 1 configure: failed program was: From dvm105 at psu.edu Thu Mar 2 19:10:56 2006 From: dvm105 at psu.edu (Derek Morr) Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 13:10:56 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] symbol errors compiling using other blastwavepackages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <44073530.3080906@psu.edu> Lundgren, Scott wrote: > That didn't work. Is there a gcc CFLAGS equivalent for sun's cc > compiler? CFLAGS is recognized by Sun's compiler as well. I think the problem was that you were setting LDFLAGS, not LD_OPTIONS. I'm not sure why you need to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH. I would unset it, since it can cause more problems than its worth. Try this: export CC="/opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc" export LD_OPTIONS="-R/opt/csw/lib -R/opt/csw/lib" export CPPFLAGS="-I/opt/csw/include" You shouldn't need to set CFLAGS. I just pulled pureftpd 1.0.21 and it built fine with the above options. -derek -- Derek Morr Senior Systems Programmer Academic Services & Emerging Technologies Pennsylvania State University derekmorr at psu.edu From Darin.Perusich at cognigencorp.com Thu Mar 2 19:14:17 2006 From: Darin.Perusich at cognigencorp.com (Darin Perusich) Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 13:14:17 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] symbol errors compiling using other blastwavepackages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <440735F9.7050305@cognigencorp.com> have you set the following environment variables before running configure? LD_OPTIONS='-R/opt/csw/lib/$ISALIST -R/opt/csw/lib -L/opt/csw/lib' CPPFLAGS=-I/opt/csw/include you also might want to read over the build standards if your going to be building against blastwave libs. http://www.blastwave.org/standards/build.html Lundgren, Scott wrote: > That didn't work. Is there a gcc CFLAGS equivalent for sun's cc > compiler? > > Scott Lundgren > ITS - Web Services > UNC at Charlotte > http://www.uncc.edu > > bash-2.05$ make clean > <-- snip --> > bash-2.05$ CFLAGS="-lssl";export CFLAGS > bash-2.05$ ./configure --prefix=/opt/csw --mandir=/opt/csw/share/man > --infodir=/opt/csw/share/info --with-openssl=/opt/csw --with-tls > --with-certfile=/opt/csw/ssl/private/pure-ftpd.pem > --with-mysql=/opt/csw/mysql4 --with-puredb --with-quotas --with-altlog > --with-virtualchroot > checking for a BSD-compatible install... ./install-sh -c > checking whether build environment is sane... yes > checking for gawk... gawk > checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes > checking for a BSD-compatible install... ./install-sh -c > checking for ranlib... ranlib > checking for gcc... no > checking for cc... cc > checking for C compiler default output file name... configure: error: C > compiler cannot create executables > See `config.log' for more details. > > bash-2.05$ less config.log > configure:2141: found /opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc > configure:2151: result: cc > configure:2315: checking for C compiler version > configure:2318: cc --version &5 > cc: Warning: option -- passed to ld > usage: cc [ options] files. Use 'cc -flags' for details > configure:2321: $? = 1 > configure:2323: cc -v &5 > usage: cc [ options] files. Use 'cc -flags' for details > configure:2326: $? = 1 > configure:2328: cc -V &5 > cc: Sun C 5.8 2005/10/13 > usage: cc [ options] files. Use 'cc -flags' for details > configure:2331: $? = 1 > configure:2354: checking for C compiler default output file name > configure:2357: cc -lssl -I/opt/csw/include -L/opt/csw/lib/sparcv8plus > conftest.c >&5 > ld: fatal: library -lssl: not found > ld: fatal: File processing errors. No output written to a.out > configure:2360: $? = 1 > configure: failed program was: > > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users -- Darin Perusich Unix Systems Administrator Cognigen Corp. darinper at cognigencorp.com From william at wbonnet.net Thu Mar 2 20:31:16 2006 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 20:31:16 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] y y y y y "toot much" yes or ??? In-Reply-To: <440488E3.5060209@ganil.fr> References: <440488E3.5060209@ganil.fr> Message-ID: <44074804.3010301@wbonnet.net> Hi >How do you do an upgrade with no check, with the option: change all whatever > > Dennis gave you the clean way to do it. Here is the dirty one :) yes | /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -u -U -- William http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix http://www.blastwave.org An OpenSolaris Community Site http://www.guses.org French speaking Solaris User Group From SELundgr at email.uncc.edu Thu Mar 2 22:16:29 2006 From: SELundgr at email.uncc.edu (Lundgren, Scott) Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 16:16:29 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] symbol errors compiling using other blastwave packages Message-ID: I'm not familiar with LD_OPTIONS. When should I use LD_OPTIONS versus LD_LIBRARY_PATH? What is the difference between the -L & -R that Darin suggested LD_OPTIONS='-R/opt/csw/lib/$ISALIST -R/opt/csw/lib -L/opt/csw/lib' ad the -R & -R options that Derek suggested export LD_OPTIONS="-R/opt/csw/lib -R/opt/csw/lib" Thank you for everyone's contributions it's much easier than beating my head against this by myself. Scott Lundgren ITS - Web Services UNC at Charlotte http://www.uncc.edu From dvm105 at psu.edu Thu Mar 2 22:36:58 2006 From: dvm105 at psu.edu (Derek Morr) Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 16:36:58 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] symbol errors compiling using other blastwave packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4407657A.4050508@psu.edu> Lundgren, Scott wrote: > I'm not familiar with LD_OPTIONS. When should I use LD_OPTIONS versus > LD_LIBRARY_PATH? LD_LIBRARY_PATH sets the search path for the runtime linker. It's use is generally discouraged. > What is the difference between the -L & -R that Darin > suggested > > LD_OPTIONS='-R/opt/csw/lib/$ISALIST -R/opt/csw/lib -L/opt/csw/lib' > > ad the -R & -R options that Derek suggested > > export LD_OPTIONS="-R/opt/csw/lib -R/opt/csw/lib" This was a typo on my part. The second R should have been an L. Sorry. So, did it finally compile? -- Derek Morr Senior Systems Programmer Academic Services & Emerging Technologies Pennsylvania State University derekmorr at psu.edu From SELundgr at email.uncc.edu Thu Mar 2 22:59:32 2006 From: SELundgr at email.uncc.edu (Lundgren, Scott) Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 16:59:32 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] symbol errors compiling using other blastwavepackages Message-ID: Nope. Configure complains of not finding the mysql libraries now. Details below. Derek when you were able to get it to compile did you use my configure options? Scott Lundgren ITS - Web Services UNC at Charlotte http://www.uncc.edu bash-2.05$ env PWD=/var/tmp/pure-ftpd-1.0.21 LD_OPTIONS=-R/opt/csw/lib -L/opt/csw/lib CC=/opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc MACHTYPE=sparc-sun-solaris2.9 CPPFLAGS=-I/opt/csw/include SHELL=/bin/bash HOSTTYPE=sparc OSTYPE=solaris2.9 TERM=vt100 PATH=/usr/bin::.:/opt/csw/bin:/opt/csw/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/bin:/opt/SUN Wspro/bin:/usr/ccs/bin _=/usr/bin/env bash-2.05$ ./configure --prefix=/opt/csw --mandir=/opt/csw/share/man --infodir=/opt/csw/share/info --with-openssl=/opt/csw --with-tls --with-certfile=/opt/csw/ssl/private/pure-ftpd.pem --with-mysql=/opt/csw --with-puredb --with-quotas --with-altlog --with-virtualchroot <-- snip --> checking for mysql_init in -lmysqlclient... yes checking whether mysql clients can run... no configure: error: Your MySQL client libraries aren't properly installed bash-2.05$ less config.log <-- snip --> configure:22400: checking for mysql_init in -lmysqlclient configure:22430: /opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc -o conftest -g -I/opt/csw/include -D_GNU_SOURCE=1 -I/usr/local/include -D__EXTENSIONS__=1 -D_XPG4_2=1 -I/opt/csw/include -I/opt/csw/include/mysql -I/opt/csw/mysql/include -L/usr/local/lib -L/opt/csw/lib -L/opt/csw/lib/mysql -L/opt/csw/mysql/lib conftest.c -lmysqlclient -lz -lm -lcrypt -lsendfile -lnsl -lsocket >&5 configure:22436: $? = 0 configure:22439: test -z || test ! -s conftest.err configure:22442: $? = 0 configure:22445: test -s conftest configure:22448: $? = 0 configure:22461: result: yes configure:22476: checking whether mysql clients can run configure:22502: /opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc -o conftest -g -I/opt/csw/include -D_GNU_SOURCE=1 -I/usr/local/include -D__EXTENSIONS__=1 -D_XPG4_2=1 -I/opt/csw/include -I/opt/csw/include/ mysql -I/opt/csw/mysql/include -L/usr/local/lib -L/opt/csw/lib -L/opt/csw/lib/mysql -L/opt/csw/mysql/lib conftest.c -lmysqlclient -lz -lm -lcrypt -lsendfile -lnsl -lsocket >&5 configure:22505: $? = 0 configure:22507: ./conftest ld.so.1: conftest: fatal: libmysqlclient.so.14: open failed: No such file or directory ./configure: line 1: 17327 Killed ./conftest$ac_exeext configure:22510: $? = 137 configure: program exited with status 137 bash-2.05$ ls -l /opt/csw/lib/mysql/libmysqlclient.so.14 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 24 Feb 23 11:02 /opt/csw/lib/mysql/libmysqlclient.so.14 -> libmysqlclient.so.14.0.0 -----Original Message----- From: users-bounces+selundgr=email.uncc.edu at lists.blastwave.org [mailto:users-bounces+selundgr=email.uncc.edu at lists.blastwave.org] On Behalf Of Derek Morr Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 4:37 PM To: questions and discussions Subject: Re: [csw-users] symbol errors compiling using other blastwavepackages Lundgren, Scott wrote: > I'm not familiar with LD_OPTIONS. When should I use LD_OPTIONS versus > LD_LIBRARY_PATH? LD_LIBRARY_PATH sets the search path for the runtime linker. It's use is generally discouraged. > What is the difference between the -L & -R that Darin suggested > > LD_OPTIONS='-R/opt/csw/lib/$ISALIST -R/opt/csw/lib -L/opt/csw/lib' > > ad the -R & -R options that Derek suggested > > export LD_OPTIONS="-R/opt/csw/lib -R/opt/csw/lib" This was a typo on my part. The second R should have been an L. Sorry. So, did it finally compile? -- Derek Morr Senior Systems Programmer Academic Services & Emerging Technologies Pennsylvania State University derekmorr at psu.edu _______________________________________________ users mailing list users at lists.blastwave.org https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users From dvm105 at psu.edu Thu Mar 2 23:23:34 2006 From: dvm105 at psu.edu (Derek Morr) Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 17:23:34 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] symbol errors compiling using other blastwavepackages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <44077066.20901@psu.edu> Lundgren, Scott wrote: > Nope. Configure complains of not finding the mysql libraries now. > Details below. Derek when you were able to get it to compile did you use > my configure options? No, since I didn't build it with MySQL. I did build it with ssl. The missing library, libmysqlclient.so.14, is in /opt/csw/mysql4/lib/mysql, and the headers are in /opt/csw/mysql4/include. Try this: CPPFLAGS="-I/opt/csw/include -I/opt/csw/mysql4/include" LD_OPTIONS="-R/opt/csw/lib -R/opt/csw/mysql4/lib/mysql -L/opt/csw/lib" -derek -- Derek Morr Senior Systems Programmer Academic Services & Emerging Technologies Pennsylvania State University derekmorr at psu.edu From javier.augusto at gmx.net Thu Mar 2 23:39:48 2006 From: javier.augusto at gmx.net (Javier O. Augusto) Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 19:39:48 -0300 Subject: [csw-users] symbol errors compiling using other blastwavepackages In-Reply-To: <44077066.20901@psu.edu> References: <44077066.20901@psu.edu> Message-ID: <44077434.5070603@gmx.net> Hi, I think you can also do --with-mysql=/opt/csw/mysql4 ...It should work out. Regards, Jay From selundgr at email.uncc.edu Fri Mar 3 16:28:13 2006 From: selundgr at email.uncc.edu (Scott Lundgren) Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2006 10:28:13 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] symbol errors compiling using other blastwavepackages In-Reply-To: <44077066.20901@psu.edu> Message-ID: > No, since I didn't build it with MySQL. I did build it with ssl. Thanks for the clarification. I took the the --with-mysql option out and it did compile with the SSL, TLS, and certificate options. So the original unresolved symbols are fixed. Looking at the config.log I thought configure would resolve the library path because the CSWmysql4 package adds a symbolic link but I guess not. Now to try your MySQL suggestions. Thanks for the continual help! bash-2.05$ ls -l /opt/csw/lib/mysql lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 19 Feb 23 11:02 /opt/csw/lib/mysql -> ../mysql4/lib/mysql Scott Lundgren ITS - Web Services UNC at Charlotte http://www.uncc.edu From selundgr at email.uncc.edu Fri Mar 3 17:25:39 2006 From: selundgr at email.uncc.edu (Scott Lundgren) Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2006 11:25:39 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] symbol errors compiling using other blastwavepackages In-Reply-To: <44077066.20901@psu.edu> Message-ID: Derek & everyone else, Thank You! That was the trick I needed. Let me me get pureftpd up and doing what I need and I'll look at the documentation for building a package for submission. Scott Lundgren ITS - Web Services UNC at Charlotte http://www.uncc.edu > Try this: > > CPPFLAGS="-I/opt/csw/include -I/opt/csw/mysql4/include" > LD_OPTIONS="-R/opt/csw/lib -R/opt/csw/mysql4/lib/mysql -L/opt/csw/lib" > From mats.larsson at ericsson.com Wed Mar 8 14:09:10 2006 From: mats.larsson at ericsson.com (Mats Larsson) Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 14:09:10 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Eclipse problem Message-ID: <440ED776.5000309@ericsson.com> This Monday I did install Eclipse but can't get it to run. I get the following error: ================================================================================ !SESSION Mar 08, 2006 13:45:53.648 --------------------------------------------- eclipse.buildId=I200406251208 java.version=1.4.2_10 java.vendor=Sun Microsystems Inc. BootLoader constants: OS=solaris, ARCH=sparc, WS=motif, NL=en_US !ENTRY org.eclipse.osgi Mar 08, 2006 13:45:53.650 !MESSAGE Application error !STACK 1 java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: no swt-motif-3139 in java.library.path at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadLibrary(ClassLoader.java:1517) at java.lang.Runtime.loadLibrary0(Runtime.java:788) at java.lang.System.loadLibrary(System.java:834) at org.eclipse.swt.internal.Library.loadLibrary(Library.java:123) at org.eclipse.swt.internal.motif.OS.(OS.java:18) at org.eclipse.swt.graphics.Device.(Device.java:111) at org.eclipse.ui.internal.Workbench.createDisplay(Workbench.java:268) at org.eclipse.ui.PlatformUI.createDisplay(PlatformUI.java:153) at org.eclipse.ui.internal.ide.IDEApplication.createDisplay(IDEApplication.java:122) at org.eclipse.ui.internal.ide.IDEApplication.run(IDEApplication.java:72) at org.eclipse.core.internal.runtime.PlatformActivator$1.run(PlatformActivator.java:335) at org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter.run(EclipseStarter.java:273) at org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter.run(EclipseStarter.java:129) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:324) at org.eclipse.core.launcher.Main.basicRun(Main.java:183) at org.eclipse.core.launcher.Main.run(Main.java:644) at org.eclipse.core.launcher.Main.main(Main.java:628) ================================================================================ Furthermore when I look at the files I've installed it seems like I only have version 3.0 and not 3.1.2 which is what www.blastwave.org/packages.php/eclipse says is available. Doing a 'pkg-get -c eclipse' shows: software localrev remoterev eclipse 3.0 SAME Something is strange... anybody? /MOL From SELundgr at email.uncc.edu Fri Mar 10 19:53:00 2006 From: SELundgr at email.uncc.edu (Lundgren, Scott) Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 13:53:00 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Package Building Questions Message-ID: If there is a more appropriate place for this question please redirect me. I'm trying to build my own package of pure-ftpd to understand the process & perhaps volunteer to maintain it. I've been following http://www.blastwave.org/standards/build.html is it CFLAGS="-xarch=v8" that I need to set so that my Sun Studio 11 on Solaris 9 builds Solaris 8 binaries? how do I list the dynamic linked libraries my binary may be dependent on? how do I find what package those libraries are in ? (the Solaris equivalent of rpm -qf /opt/csw/mysql4/lib/mysql/libmysqlclient.so ?) Thanks, Scott Lundgren ITS - Web Services UNC at Charlotte http://www.uncc.edu -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From chris.ridd at isode.com Fri Mar 10 20:10:00 2006 From: chris.ridd at isode.com (Chris Ridd) Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 19:10:00 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] Package Building Questions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: On 10/3/06 6:53, Lundgren, Scott wrote: > If there is a more appropriate place for this question please redirect > me. I'm trying to build my own package of pure-ftpd to understand the > process & perhaps volunteer to maintain it. > I've been following http://www.blastwave.org/standards/build.html > is it CFLAGS="-xarch=v8" that I need to set so that my Sun Studio 11 > on Solaris 9 builds Solaris 8 binaries? No, that just indicates the version of SPARC (ie instruction set version) that your binary will work on. Also, you will need to build on the earliest version of Solaris that you want your binaries to work on. You can usually build on Solaris n and deploy on Solaris >= n. Typically you can't build on Solaris n, and deploy on Solaris < n. > how do I list the dynamic linked libraries my binary may be > dependent on? /usr/bin/ldd. > how do I find what package those libraries are in ? (the Solaris > equivalent of rpm -qf /opt/csw/mysql4/lib/mysql/libmysqlclient.so ?) pkgchk -lp /opt/csw/mysql4/lib/mysql/libmysqlclient.so Cheers, Chris From mats.larsson at ericsson.com Mon Mar 13 10:14:06 2006 From: mats.larsson at ericsson.com (Mats Larsson) Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 10:14:06 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Eclipse problem In-Reply-To: <440ED776.5000309@ericsson.com> References: <440ED776.5000309@ericsson.com> Message-ID: <441537DE.1010809@ericsson.com> Nobody using Blastwave Eclipse? On 2006-03-08 14:09, Mats Larsson wrote: > This Monday I did install Eclipse but can't get it to run. I get the > following error: > > ================================================================================ > !SESSION Mar 08, 2006 13:45:53.648 > --------------------------------------------- > eclipse.buildId=I200406251208 > java.version=1.4.2_10 > java.vendor=Sun Microsystems Inc. > BootLoader constants: OS=solaris, ARCH=sparc, WS=motif, NL=en_US > > !ENTRY org.eclipse.osgi Mar 08, 2006 13:45:53.650 > !MESSAGE Application error > !STACK 1 > java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: no swt-motif-3139 in java.library.path > at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadLibrary(ClassLoader.java:1517) > at java.lang.Runtime.loadLibrary0(Runtime.java:788) > at java.lang.System.loadLibrary(System.java:834) > at org.eclipse.swt.internal.Library.loadLibrary(Library.java:123) > at org.eclipse.swt.internal.motif.OS.(OS.java:18) > at org.eclipse.swt.graphics.Device.(Device.java:111) > at > org.eclipse.ui.internal.Workbench.createDisplay(Workbench.java:268) > at org.eclipse.ui.PlatformUI.createDisplay(PlatformUI.java:153) > at > org.eclipse.ui.internal.ide.IDEApplication.createDisplay(IDEApplication.java:122) > at > org.eclipse.ui.internal.ide.IDEApplication.run(IDEApplication.java:72) > at > org.eclipse.core.internal.runtime.PlatformActivator$1.run(PlatformActivator.java:335) > at > org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter.run(EclipseStarter.java:273) > at > org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter.run(EclipseStarter.java:129) > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) > at > sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) > at > sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:324) > at org.eclipse.core.launcher.Main.basicRun(Main.java:183) > at org.eclipse.core.launcher.Main.run(Main.java:644) > at org.eclipse.core.launcher.Main.main(Main.java:628) > ================================================================================ > > Furthermore when I look at the files I've installed it seems like I only > have version 3.0 and not 3.1.2 which is what > www.blastwave.org/packages.php/eclipse says is available. Doing a > 'pkg-get -c eclipse' shows: > > software localrev remoterev > eclipse 3.0 SAME > > Something is strange... anybody? > > /MOL > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > From chris.ridd at isode.com Mon Mar 13 10:39:38 2006 From: chris.ridd at isode.com (Chris Ridd) Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 09:39:38 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] Eclipse problem In-Reply-To: <441537DE.1010809@ericsson.com> Message-ID: On 13/3/06 9:14, Mats Larsson wrote: > Nobody using Blastwave Eclipse? I'm waiting for a GTK version... But the catalog from mirror.switch.ch (apparently updated on 9th March) still lists 3.0 for me too :-( Cheers, Chris From Darin.Perusich at cognigencorp.com Mon Mar 13 15:03:05 2006 From: Darin.Perusich at cognigencorp.com (Darin Perusich) Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 09:03:05 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] XEmacs lisp packages in testing Message-ID: <44157B99.3040601@cognigencorp.com> Hello, The XEmacs lisp packages are avialable for testing. The package includes all the avialable packages from the xemacs-sumo and xemacs-mule-sumo tarballs, with the exception of xemacs-base, efs, and mule-base which are included with xemacs itself. The package can be downloaded at: http://www.blastwave.org/testing/xemacs_packages-20051208-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz -- Darin Perusich Unix Systems Administrator Cognigen Corporation 395 Youngs Rd. Williamsville, NY 14221 darinper at cognigencorp.com From krist.vanbesien at gmail.com Mon Mar 13 16:07:50 2006 From: krist.vanbesien at gmail.com (Krist van Besien) Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 16:07:50 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Problem with apache2 Message-ID: <6ed6382b0603130707t783913ffj6e80e3015dd09699@mail.gmail.com> Apache2 has been built using the sun compiler. I now want to compile an additional module, but can't, since I don't have this sun compiler. I do have gcc. The problem is that apache modules are built using the apxs script, which calls libtool from the /opt/csw/apache/share/build directory. Both scripts have been created as part of the apache built process, and both expect the sun C compiler to be present. Is there a workaround for this? Krist -- krist.vanbesien at gmail.com Solothurn, Switzerland From dvm105 at psu.edu Mon Mar 13 16:16:45 2006 From: dvm105 at psu.edu (Derek Morr) Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 10:16:45 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Problem with apache2 In-Reply-To: <6ed6382b0603130707t783913ffj6e80e3015dd09699@mail.gmail.com> References: <6ed6382b0603130707t783913ffj6e80e3015dd09699@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <44158CDD.9040906@psu.edu> Krist van Besien wrote: > Apache2 has been built using the sun compiler. I now want to compile > an additional module, but can't, since I don't have this sun compiler. > I do have gcc. > Is there a workaround for this? Sun's compiler is now free. You could download it and use it. -derek From realmcking at gmail.com Mon Mar 13 16:18:26 2006 From: realmcking at gmail.com (Mark McCoy) Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 09:18:26 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] Problem with apache2 In-Reply-To: <6ed6382b0603130707t783913ffj6e80e3015dd09699@mail.gmail.com> References: <6ed6382b0603130707t783913ffj6e80e3015dd09699@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: You can download the Sun compiler for free now. On 3/13/06, Krist van Besien wrote: > Apache2 has been built using the sun compiler. I now want to compile > an additional module, but can't, since I don't have this sun compiler. > I do have gcc. > > The problem is that apache modules are built using the apxs script, > which calls libtool from the /opt/csw/apache/share/build directory. > Both scripts have been created as part of the apache built process, > and both expect the sun C compiler to be present. > > Is there a workaround for this? > > Krist > > -- > krist.vanbesien at gmail.com > Solothurn, Switzerland > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > -- Mark McCoy -- Professional Unix geek "On two occasions I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. " -- Charles Babbage From Darin.Perusich at cognigencorp.com Tue Mar 14 14:31:32 2006 From: Darin.Perusich at cognigencorp.com (Darin Perusich) Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 08:31:32 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] /testing: postfix 2.2.8 Message-ID: <4416C5B4.7060707@cognigencorp.com> hello, postfix 2.2.8 is now avialable in /testing and includes support for pcre, ldap, sasl2, and tls. "What is Postfix? It is Wietse Venema's mailer that started life as an alternative to the widely-used Sendmail program. Postfix attempts to be fast, easy to administer, and secure, while at the same time being sendmail compatible enough to not upset existing users. Thus, the outside has a sendmail-ish flavor, but the inside is completely different." http://www.postfix.org/ Dependencies: CSWcommon CSWoldaprt CSWossl CSWpcre CSWsasl -- Darin Perusich Unix Systems Administrator Cognigen Corporation 395 Youngs Rd. Williamsville, NY 14221 darinper at cognigencorp.com From qy1ggy802 at sneakemail.com Tue Mar 14 15:23:35 2006 From: qy1ggy802 at sneakemail.com (Tim Longo) Date: 14 Mar 2006 14:23:35 -0000 Subject: [csw-users] Evolution? Message-ID: <12917-73543@sneakemail.com> Hi, I was wondering if we would be seeing a newer version of Evolution from Blastwave anytime soon? Thanks for a great service! From a.cervellin at virgilio.it Tue Mar 14 15:43:10 2006 From: a.cervellin at virgilio.it (alessio) Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 15:43:10 +0100 (GMT+01:00) Subject: [csw-users] Evolution? Message-ID: <109f935de74.a.cervellin@virgilio.it> ----Messaggio originale---- Da: qy1ggy802 at sneakemail.com > Hi, > I was wondering if we would be seeing a newer version of Evolution from Blastwave anytime soon? > Thanks for a great service! I'd suggest you to sumbit a "package upgrade request" here on the blastwave's bugtrace board: http://www.blastwave.org/mantis/index.php From SELundgr at email.uncc.edu Tue Mar 14 17:05:25 2006 From: SELundgr at email.uncc.edu (Lundgren, Scott) Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 11:05:25 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Package Building Questions Message-ID: New Question, how do I fix the following? bash-2.05$ createpkg -r /export/home/wsadmin/build/pure-ftpd-1.0.21/cswstage i copyright ERROR: Pure-FTPd must be all lowercase I've gone through /export/home/wsadmin/pkgs/pureftpd/copyright and changed the 2 cases of "Pure-FTPd" to "pure-ftpd". Createpkg gives the same error. Is the createpkg script looking in the original COPYING file? Scott Lundgren ITS - Web Services UNC at Charlotte http://www.uncc.edu From Darin.Perusich at cognigencorp.com Tue Mar 14 17:07:36 2006 From: Darin.Perusich at cognigencorp.com (Darin Perusich) Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 11:07:36 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Package Building Questions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4416EA48.5000204@cognigencorp.com> updated your pkginfo file. Lundgren, Scott wrote: > New Question, how do I fix the following? > > bash-2.05$ createpkg -r > /export/home/wsadmin/build/pure-ftpd-1.0.21/cswstage > i copyright > ERROR: Pure-FTPd must be all lowercase > > I've gone through /export/home/wsadmin/pkgs/pureftpd/copyright and > changed the 2 cases of "Pure-FTPd" to "pure-ftpd". Createpkg gives the > same error. Is the createpkg script looking in the original COPYING > file? > > Scott Lundgren > ITS - Web Services > UNC at Charlotte > http://www.uncc.edu > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users -- Darin Perusich Unix Systems Administrator Cognigen Corporation 395 Youngs Rd. Williamsville, NY 14221 darinper at cognigencorp.com From james at blastwave.org Wed Mar 15 11:26:56 2006 From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee) Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 10:26:56 GMT Subject: [csw-users] Package Building Questions In-Reply-To: <4416EA48.5000204@cognigencorp.com> References: <4416EA48.5000204@cognigencorp.com> Message-ID: <20060315.10265600.302675939@landeck.jamesipoos.com> On 14/03/06, 16:07:36, Darin Perusich wrote regarding Re: [csw-users] Package Building Questions: > updated your pkginfo file. > Lundgren, Scott wrote: > > New Question, how do I fix the following? > > > > bash-2.05$ createpkg -r > > /export/home/wsadmin/build/pure-ftpd-1.0.21/cswstage > > i copyright > > ERROR: Pure-FTPd must be all lowercase > > > > I've gone through /export/home/wsadmin/pkgs/pureftpd/copyright and > > changed the 2 cases of "Pure-FTPd" to "pure-ftpd". Createpkg gives the > > same error. Is the createpkg script looking in the original COPYING > > file? If you are building a replacement for the current Blastwave package you need to follow the current naming, that is in pkginfo: PKG=CSWpureftpd NAME=pureftpd - Pure-FTPd is a free (BSD), secure, production-quality and standard-conformant FTP server. The package name is "CSWpureftpd". The software name is "pureftpd". The description is the part of the NAME after the hyphen and is flexible. Here I've shown the current description, it's straight from pureftpd, but note "conformant" isn't a proper English word. James. From SELundgr at email.uncc.edu Wed Mar 15 18:18:02 2006 From: SELundgr at email.uncc.edu (Lundgren, Scott) Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 12:18:02 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Package Building Questions Message-ID: >If you are building a replacement for the current Blastwave package you need to follow the current naming, that is in pkginfo: That is the goal, and once Darin pointed out to look at pkginfo I realized the - was used to parse name from package description. Once I had those hints the pacakge easily built & validated. Now I'm testing it. Thanks for the help Scott Lundgren ITS - Web Services UNC at Charlotte http://www.uncc.edu From search.lists at gmail.com Thu Mar 16 03:40:38 2006 From: search.lists at gmail.com (Milo) Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 18:40:38 -0800 Subject: [csw-users] orace php package Message-ID: Hello, I just installed a php4 and apache2 from blastwave and didn't see any oracle db client support (oci). Is this available anywhere? If not, I'm thinking maybe I should maintain it, since otherwise I'll have to build my own solaris packages. I'm looking for alternatives before I go building my own stuff. How difficult would it be to maintain my own php[4,5]_pdooci, or if anyone is thinking the same thing as me. Thanks! -- Milan Andric From Darin.Perusich at cognigencorp.com Thu Mar 16 13:59:12 2006 From: Darin.Perusich at cognigencorp.com (Darin Perusich) Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 07:59:12 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] orace php package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <44196120.10406@cognigencorp.com> hi milo, building the OCI extension is very straight forward, see the README.SELF-CONTAINED-EXTENSIONS which comes with the php source. i've built this for my linux systems with the oracle instant client, i wouldn't waste time with the full client installation anymore. the only problem that might arrise is the distribution of the oracle instant client apps and libs. in reading the instant client FAQ blastwave should be able to freely distribute it. License http://www.oracle.com/technology/software/htdocs/client_lic.html FAQ: http://www.oracle.com/technology/tech/oci/instantclient/ic-faq.html Milo wrote: > Hello, > > I just installed a php4 and apache2 from blastwave and didn't see any > oracle db client support (oci). Is this available anywhere? If not, > I'm thinking maybe I should maintain it, since otherwise I'll have to > build my own solaris packages. I'm looking for alternatives before I > go building my own stuff. > > How difficult would it be to maintain my own php[4,5]_pdooci, or if > anyone is thinking the same thing as me. > > Thanks! > > -- > Milan Andric > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users -- Darin Perusich Unix Systems Administrator Cognigen Corporation 395 Youngs Rd. Williamsville, NY 14221 darinper at cognigencorp.com From SELundgr at email.uncc.edu Thu Mar 16 14:47:37 2006 From: SELundgr at email.uncc.edu (Lundgren, Scott) Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 08:47:37 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] orace php package Message-ID: > PDO How difficult would it be to maintain my own php[4,5]_pdooci, or if anyone is thinking the same thing as me. While I would welcome Oracle support in Blastwave's distribution of PHP5 because that support is one of the reasons I build PHP from source, I would caution against distributing PDO OCI. The documentation regards it as experimental and subject to function/behavior changes: http://us2.php.net/manual/en/ref.pdo-oci.php Scott Lundgren ITS - Web Services UNC at Charlotte http://www.uncc.edu From blastwave at gmail.com Sat Mar 18 18:09:34 2006 From: blastwave at gmail.com (Dennis Clarke) Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2006 12:09:34 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Fwd: [osol-discuss] Re: Re: Mono .NET available on GNU/OpenSolaris! In-Reply-To: <29939649.1142650482617.JavaMail.suncom@oss1> References: <29939649.1142650482617.JavaMail.suncom@oss1> Message-ID: I dragged this in from the OpenSolaris discuss list. Dennis ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: MaTianyi Date: Mar 17, 2006 9:54 PM Subject: [osol-discuss] Re: Re: Mono .NET available on GNU/OpenSolaris! To: opensolaris-discuss at opensolaris.org thanks i have installed it,but it seams that only Runtime and Compiler without monodevlop. how can i get monodevlop and other things in the list above? This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss at opensolaris.org From asmoore at blastwave.org Sat Mar 18 18:20:20 2006 From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex Moore) Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2006 11:20:20 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] Fwd: [osol-discuss] Re: Re: Mono .NET available on GNU/OpenSolaris! In-Reply-To: References: <29939649.1142650482617.JavaMail.suncom@oss1> Message-ID: <20060318112020.00001465@sws602.mcsun.local> On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 12:09:34 -0500 "Dennis Clarke" wrote: > I dragged this in from the OpenSolaris discuss list. > > Dennis Interesting Dennis. I was going to write the mono maintainer about this very subject, sometime this weekend. I would like to hear what he says. As we speak, I am working on gtk#. He may already have this available somewhere, but all that I could see was i386. Alex From blastwave at gmail.com Sat Mar 18 18:30:02 2006 From: blastwave at gmail.com (Dennis Clarke) Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2006 12:30:02 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Fwd: [osol-discuss] Re: Re: Mono .NET available on GNU/OpenSolaris! In-Reply-To: <20060318112020.00001465@sws602.mcsun.local> References: <29939649.1142650482617.JavaMail.suncom@oss1> <20060318112020.00001465@sws602.mcsun.local> Message-ID: On 3/18/06, Alex Moore wrote: > On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 12:09:34 -0500 > "Dennis Clarke" wrote: > > > I dragged this in from the OpenSolaris discuss list. > > > > Dennis > > Interesting Dennis. I was going to write the mono maintainer about > this very subject, sometime this weekend. I would like to hear what he > says. > > As we speak, I am working on gtk#. He may already have this available > somewhere, but all that I could see was i386. > You have been very busy lately Alex. With the release of MySQL5 and also an update to SpamAssassin ( which I will never be able to spell ). I will most likely update the home page on a more regular basis to reflect these sort of package releases. Dennis From asmoore at blastwave.org Sat Mar 18 19:06:55 2006 From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex Moore) Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2006 12:06:55 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] Fwd: [osol-discuss] Re: Re: Mono .NET available on GNU/OpenSolaris! In-Reply-To: References: <29939649.1142650482617.JavaMail.suncom@oss1> <20060318112020.00001465@sws602.mcsun.local> Message-ID: <20060318120655.00001897@sws602.mcsun.local> On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 12:30:02 -0500 "Dennis Clarke" wrote: > You have been very busy lately Alex. With the release of MySQL5 and > also an update to SpamAssassin ( which I will never be able to spell > ). > > I will most likely update the home page on a more regular basis to > reflect these sort of package releases. These types of updates are helpful to me. I was not aware of the purpose of mono until I saw what you had written on the front page. Thanks for putting MySQL 5 on the front page. I have been providing that some time now and had several beta versions available on /testing before the official release. My last changes and testing from mysql5 took far longer than I had anticipated. And it is still not exactly where I want it to be. But at least, it does run on a zone enabled host and you can enable mysql5 on any combination of zones. You can also put the data directory wherever you like and it seemed to work for me. That is the part that may need more work. Only a large production shop can tell me if it really works:> Alex -- From jonel.rienton at reidata.com Sat Mar 18 21:51:35 2006 From: jonel.rienton at reidata.com (Jonel Rienton) Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2006 14:51:35 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] Fwd: [osol-discuss] Re: Re: Mono .NET available on GNU/OpenSolaris! Message-ID: <3BAF672E643DA84CB02A032EC314BD42020321BD@LDIADDMAIL01.sisco.stewart.net> Hi Alex, Dennis, I'm currently working only on the core Mono runtime and compiler package, xsp will probably see daylight pretty soon followed by mod_mono. Howerver, developer tools and libraries like MonoDevelop, MonoDoc and gtk# I will probably let others jump in if they have extra time or I will start working on them as soon as I get the extra time. Great to hear Alex has already started working on gtk#, this is really great news! RE: Homepage Dennis, thanks for letting others know that we have the Mono package available. -----Original Message----- From: users-bounces+jonel.rienton=reidata.com at lists.blastwave.org [mailto:users-bounces+jonel.rienton=reidata.com at lists.blastwave.org] On Behalf Of Alex Moore Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2006 11:20 AM To: users at lists.blastwave.org Subject: Re: [csw-users] Fwd: [osol-discuss] Re: Re: Mono .NET available on GNU/OpenSolaris! On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 12:09:34 -0500 "Dennis Clarke" wrote: > I dragged this in from the OpenSolaris discuss list. > > Dennis Interesting Dennis. I was going to write the mono maintainer about this very subject, sometime this weekend. I would like to hear what he says. As we speak, I am working on gtk#. He may already have this available somewhere, but all that I could see was i386. Alex _______________________________________________ users mailing list users at lists.blastwave.org https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users From jonel.rienton at reidata.com Sat Mar 18 22:16:54 2006 From: jonel.rienton at reidata.com (Jonel Rienton) Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2006 15:16:54 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] Fwd: [osol-discuss] Re: Re: Mono .NET available on GNU/OpenSolaris! Message-ID: <3BAF672E643DA84CB02A032EC314BD42020321C0@LDIADDMAIL01.sisco.stewart.net> Alex, Which version of gtk# are you working on? Jonel -----Original Message----- From: users-bounces+jonel.rienton=reidata.com at lists.blastwave.org [mailto:users-bounces+jonel.rienton=reidata.com at lists.blastwave.org] On Behalf Of Alex Moore Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2006 11:20 AM To: users at lists.blastwave.org Subject: Re: [csw-users] Fwd: [osol-discuss] Re: Re: Mono .NET available on GNU/OpenSolaris! On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 12:09:34 -0500 "Dennis Clarke" wrote: > I dragged this in from the OpenSolaris discuss list. > > Dennis Interesting Dennis. I was going to write the mono maintainer about this very subject, sometime this weekend. I would like to hear what he says. As we speak, I am working on gtk#. He may already have this available somewhere, but all that I could see was i386. Alex _______________________________________________ users mailing list users at lists.blastwave.org https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users From asmoore at blastwave.org Sat Mar 18 22:49:48 2006 From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex Moore) Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2006 15:49:48 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] Fwd: [osol-discuss] Re: Re: Mono .NET available on GNU/OpenSolaris! In-Reply-To: <3BAF672E643DA84CB02A032EC314BD42020321C0@LDIADDMAIL01.sisco.stewart.net> References: <3BAF672E643DA84CB02A032EC314BD42020321C0@LDIADDMAIL01.sisco.stewart.net> Message-ID: <20060318154948.00003672@sws602.mcsun.local> On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 15:16:54 -0600 "Jonel Rienton" wrote: > Alex, > > Which version of gtk# are you working on? 2.8.2 Alex From Robert.Doolittle at Sun.COM Mon Mar 20 00:09:02 2006 From: Robert.Doolittle at Sun.COM (Bob Doolittle) Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2006 18:09:02 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Unison? Message-ID: <441DE48E.5050401@Sun.COM> Does anybody have a copy of Unison ported? All I could find on the website was a note from Dennis saying he was working on it about a year ago... -Bob From search.lists at gmail.com Mon Mar 20 20:58:43 2006 From: search.lists at gmail.com (Milo) Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 11:58:43 -0800 Subject: [csw-users] orace php package In-Reply-To: <44196120.10406@cognigencorp.com> References: <44196120.10406@cognigencorp.com> Message-ID: Hi Darin, thanks, that work for php4. I am also interesting in testing php5/apache2 CSW stuff. I installed the CSWphp5 package, but I noticed it doesn't come with phpize. Was this intentional? I tried compiling and installing my own oci8.so from source, but get an error $ php -i 1>/dev/null PHP Warning: PHP Startup: Invalid library (maybe not a PHP library) 'oci8.so' in Unknown on line 0 On 3/16/06, Darin Perusich wrote: > hi milo, > > building the OCI extension is very straight forward, see the > README.SELF-CONTAINED-EXTENSIONS which comes with the php source. i've > built this for my linux systems with the oracle instant client, i > wouldn't waste time with the full client installation anymore. > > the only problem that might arrise is the distribution of the oracle > instant client apps and libs. in reading the instant client FAQ > blastwave should be able to freely distribute it. > > License > http://www.oracle.com/technology/software/htdocs/client_lic.html > > FAQ: > http://www.oracle.com/technology/tech/oci/instantclient/ic-faq.html > > Milo wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I just installed a php4 and apache2 from blastwave and didn't see any > > oracle db client support (oci). Is this available anywhere? If not, > > I'm thinking maybe I should maintain it, since otherwise I'll have to > > build my own solaris packages. I'm looking for alternatives before I > > go building my own stuff. > > > > How difficult would it be to maintain my own php[4,5]_pdooci, or if > > anyone is thinking the same thing as me. > > > > Thanks! > > > > -- > > Milan Andric > > _______________________________________________ > > users mailing list > > users at lists.blastwave.org > > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > -- > Darin Perusich > Unix Systems Administrator > Cognigen Corporation > 395 Youngs Rd. > Williamsville, NY 14221 > darinper at cognigencorp.com > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > From search.lists at gmail.com Mon Mar 20 21:01:06 2006 From: search.lists at gmail.com (Milo) Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 12:01:06 -0800 Subject: [csw-users] orace php package In-Reply-To: References: <44196120.10406@cognigencorp.com> Message-ID: On 3/20/06, Milo wrote: > Hi Darin, thanks, that work for php4. > > I am also interesting in testing php5/apache2 CSW stuff. I installed > the CSWphp5 package, but I noticed it doesn't come with phpize. Was > this intentional? > > I tried compiling and installing my own oci8.so from source, but get an error > > $ php -i 1>/dev/null > PHP Warning: PHP Startup: Invalid library (maybe not a PHP library) > 'oci8.so' in Unknown on line 0 Also, the configure line I used was PATH=/opt/csw/bin:$PATH ./configure --disable-all --with-oci8=shared,$ORACLE_HOME > > On 3/16/06, Darin Perusich wrote: > > hi milo, > > > > building the OCI extension is very straight forward, see the > > README.SELF-CONTAINED-EXTENSIONS which comes with the php source. i've > > built this for my linux systems with the oracle instant client, i > > wouldn't waste time with the full client installation anymore. > > > > the only problem that might arrise is the distribution of the oracle > > instant client apps and libs. in reading the instant client FAQ > > blastwave should be able to freely distribute it. > > > > License > > http://www.oracle.com/technology/software/htdocs/client_lic.html > > > > FAQ: > > http://www.oracle.com/technology/tech/oci/instantclient/ic-faq.html > > > > Milo wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > I just installed a php4 and apache2 from blastwave and didn't see any > > > oracle db client support (oci). Is this available anywhere? If not, > > > I'm thinking maybe I should maintain it, since otherwise I'll have to > > > build my own solaris packages. I'm looking for alternatives before I > > > go building my own stuff. > > > > > > How difficult would it be to maintain my own php[4,5]_pdooci, or if > > > anyone is thinking the same thing as me. > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > -- > > > Milan Andric > > > _______________________________________________ > > > users mailing list > > > users at lists.blastwave.org > > > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > > > -- > > Darin Perusich > > Unix Systems Administrator > > Cognigen Corporation > > 395 Youngs Rd. > > Williamsville, NY 14221 > > darinper at cognigencorp.com > > _______________________________________________ > > users mailing list > > users at lists.blastwave.org > > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > > From search.lists at gmail.com Mon Mar 20 21:40:49 2006 From: search.lists at gmail.com (Milo) Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 12:40:49 -0800 Subject: [csw-users] orace php package In-Reply-To: References: <44196120.10406@cognigencorp.com> Message-ID: On 3/20/06, Milo wrote: > Hi Darin, thanks, that work for php4. > > I am also interesting in testing php5/apache2 CSW stuff. I installed > the CSWphp5 package, but I noticed it doesn't come with phpize. Was > this intentional? Submitting this question to bugtrack ... [snip] -- Milan From search.lists at gmail.com Tue Mar 21 00:32:38 2006 From: search.lists at gmail.com (Milo) Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 15:32:38 -0800 Subject: [csw-users] orace php package In-Reply-To: References: <44196120.10406@cognigencorp.com> Message-ID: On 3/20/06, Milo wrote: > On 3/20/06, Milo wrote: > > Hi Darin, thanks, that work for php4. > > > > I am also interesting in testing php5/apache2 CSW stuff. I installed > > the CSWphp5 package, but I noticed it doesn't come with phpize. Was > > this intentional? > > Submitting this question to bugtrack ... > > [snip] oh, it was in php5_devel packages. doh > -- > Milan > From res at colnet.cmhnet.org Wed Mar 22 07:27:42 2006 From: res at colnet.cmhnet.org (Robert Stampfli) Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 01:27:42 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Warning: new php packages breaks low-end sparcs Message-ID: <20060322062742.GA12050@colnet> This is unlikely to be a problem for many people besides me, but the lastest php packages recently released are compiled to produce V8+ code for the Sparc instead of the V8 code that is supposed to be standard. This breaks certain low-end Sparcs like LXs and Classics. So, beware of the potential problems if you install these packages on your low-end Sparc machines. Rob From blastwave at gmail.com Wed Mar 22 07:51:29 2006 From: blastwave at gmail.com (Dennis Clarke) Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 01:51:29 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Warning: new php packages breaks low-end sparcs In-Reply-To: <20060322062742.GA12050@colnet> References: <20060322062742.GA12050@colnet> Message-ID: On 3/22/06, Robert Stampfli wrote: > This is unlikely to be a problem for many people besides me, > but the lastest php packages recently released are compiled > to produce V8+ code for the Sparc instead of the V8 code that > is supposed to be standard. This breaks certain low-end Sparcs > like LXs and Classics. So, beware of the potential problems > if you install these packages on your low-end Sparc machines. > And quad CPU Sparc 20 machines. Of which I have one. Thanks for the heads up on this. Dennis From comand at blastwave.org Wed Mar 22 08:29:40 2006 From: comand at blastwave.org (Cory Omand) Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 23:29:40 -0800 Subject: [csw-users] Warning: new php packages breaks low-end sparcs In-Reply-To: References: <20060322062742.GA12050@colnet> Message-ID: On 3/21/06, Dennis Clarke wrote: > > On 3/22/06, Robert Stampfli wrote: > > This is unlikely to be a problem for many people besides me, > > but the lastest php packages recently released are compiled > > to produce V8+ code for the Sparc instead of the V8 code that > > is supposed to be standard. This breaks certain low-end Sparcs > > like LXs and Classics. So, beware of the potential problems > > if you install these packages on your low-end Sparc machines. > > > > And quad CPU Sparc 20 machines. Of which I have one. > > Thanks for the heads up on this. For PHP5, this issue has been fixed for some time. I just verified that the latest version of the php5 packages (5.1.2,REV=2006.02.04) do not require V8+. - C. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mark.round at gmail.com Wed Mar 22 11:32:48 2006 From: mark.round at gmail.com (Mark Round) Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 10:32:48 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] Warning: new php packages breaks low-end sparcs In-Reply-To: References: <20060322062742.GA12050@colnet> Message-ID: <7b46f0de0603220232w78a8364s69f9a61b7a8689af@mail.gmail.com> > > And quad CPU Sparc 20 machines. Of which I have one. > > > > Thanks for the heads up on this. Hi all, Thanks for the bug report - I'm recompiling now, expect to see updated packages in /testing in the next hour or so; I'll drop a line when they're available. Apologies for any problems this may have caused (especially for giving the quad sparc 20 indigestion, I have very fond memories of those boxes - my first sparc box ever...) :( -Mark From mark.round at gmail.com Wed Mar 22 16:34:45 2006 From: mark.round at gmail.com (Mark Round) Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 15:34:45 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] Warning: new php packages breaks low-end sparcs In-Reply-To: <7b46f0de0603220232w78a8364s69f9a61b7a8689af@mail.gmail.com> References: <20060322062742.GA12050@colnet> <7b46f0de0603220232w78a8364s69f9a61b7a8689af@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <7b46f0de0603220734t244724c6v3e43a2011388cc4b@mail.gmail.com> New PHP4 packages are now available at http://www.blastwave.org/testing/ (REV=2005.03.22.SPARCONLY), if you're interested in testing (disclaimer: these have only just been built - they should be fine, but may set fire to your server, kill your cat etc.) # file /opt/csw/lib/php/sapi/apache1-libphp4.so /opt/csw/lib/php/sapi/apache1-libphp4.so: ELF 32-bit MSB dynamic lib SPARC Version 1, dynamically linked, stripped Hopefully this will be OK for the V8 people out there... -Mark From blastwave at gmail.com Wed Mar 22 16:46:55 2006 From: blastwave at gmail.com (Dennis Clarke) Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 10:46:55 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Warning: new php packages breaks low-end sparcs In-Reply-To: <7b46f0de0603220734t244724c6v3e43a2011388cc4b@mail.gmail.com> References: <20060322062742.GA12050@colnet> <7b46f0de0603220232w78a8364s69f9a61b7a8689af@mail.gmail.com> <7b46f0de0603220734t244724c6v3e43a2011388cc4b@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: On 3/22/06, Mark Round wrote: > New PHP4 packages are now available at > http://www.blastwave.org/testing/ (REV=2005.03.22.SPARCONLY), if > you're interested in testing (disclaimer: these have only just been > built - they should be fine, but may set fire to your server, kill > your cat etc.) > > # file /opt/csw/lib/php/sapi/apache1-libphp4.so > /opt/csw/lib/php/sapi/apache1-libphp4.so: ELF 32-bit MSB dynamic > lib SPARC Version 1, dynamically linked, stripped > > Hopefully this will be OK for the V8 people out there... > I really do wonder how many Sparc sun4m boxes are out there. Or even sun4d or sun4c. They're can not be many. Heck, I used to have a Sun SPARCServer 670MP tower only a few years ago and it was really old. Still worked and ran Solaris 2.5.1 just fine as well as WABI for Windows 3.1 emulation. My current Sparc 20 still runs just fine and it may never die. Its role is just testing however. Should I toss it into the rack and give everyone a login? For testing I mean ? Dennis From jreid at vnet.net Wed Mar 22 20:31:21 2006 From: jreid at vnet.net (Joe Reid) Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 13:31:21 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] Warning: new php packages breaks low-end sparcs In-Reply-To: <7b46f0de0603220734t244724c6v3e43a2011388cc4b@mail.gmail.com> References: <20060322062742.GA12050@colnet> <7b46f0de0603220232w78a8364s69f9a61b7a8689af@mail.gmail.com> <7b46f0de0603220734t244724c6v3e43a2011388cc4b@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <4421A609.8000003@vnet.net> Mark Round wrote: > Hopefully this will be OK for the V8 people out there... you mean I could have had a V8? My dual Ross HyperSPARC SS20 is mostly a counterweight these days and my IPX is a door stop. Both work, both boot whatever last OS I had put on them, I just don't need them anymore. I was going to build the SS20 into a NAS server driving my D1000 but I just couldn't justify the extra fans/noise/heat/electricty. -- Joe Reid jreid at vnet.net http://www.singlewhitemale.net ?c=a=rb=sc=fd=te=wf=zg=porh=n? From mlh at zip.com.au Wed Mar 22 23:40:07 2006 From: mlh at zip.com.au (Matthew Hannigan) Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 09:40:07 +1100 Subject: [csw-users] Warning: new php packages breaks low-end sparcs In-Reply-To: References: <20060322062742.GA12050@colnet> <7b46f0de0603220232w78a8364s69f9a61b7a8689af@mail.gmail.com> <7b46f0de0603220734t244724c6v3e43a2011388cc4b@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20060322224007.GB17923@evofed.localdomain> On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 10:46:55AM -0500, Dennis Clarke wrote: > Should I toss it into the rack and give everyone a login? For testing I mean ? Speaking for myself, that would be useful. I occasioanlly like to compile programs on an old os/arch combo to produce a binary that works anywhere. Regards, Matthew Hannigan From blastwave at gmail.com Wed Mar 22 23:41:12 2006 From: blastwave at gmail.com (Dennis Clarke) Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 17:41:12 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Warning: new php packages breaks low-end sparcs In-Reply-To: <20060322224007.GB17923@evofed.localdomain> References: <20060322062742.GA12050@colnet> <7b46f0de0603220232w78a8364s69f9a61b7a8689af@mail.gmail.com> <7b46f0de0603220734t244724c6v3e43a2011388cc4b@mail.gmail.com> <20060322224007.GB17923@evofed.localdomain> Message-ID: On 3/22/06, Matthew Hannigan wrote: > On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 10:46:55AM -0500, Dennis Clarke wrote: > > Should I toss it into the rack and give everyone a login? For testing I mean ? > > Speaking for myself, that would be useful. > I occasioanlly like to compile programs on an old os/arch > combo to produce a binary that works anywhere. > Well, I would need some time. Setting up a fresh server on a Sparc 20 will be a slow process. Also .. I think Sun ONE Studio 8 is the last rev to be supported and I don't even know if the recent patches address sun4m or not. Dennis From james at blastwave.org Thu Mar 23 12:42:20 2006 From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee) Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 11:42:20 GMT Subject: [csw-users] Warning: new php packages breaks low-end sparcs In-Reply-To: References: <20060322062742.GA12050@colnet> <7b46f0de0603220232w78a8364s69f9a61b7a8689af@mail.gmail.com> <7b46f0de0603220734t244724c6v3e43a2011388cc4b@mail.gmail.com> <20060322224007.GB17923@evofed.localdomain> Message-ID: <20060323.11422000.2593960669@landeck.jamesipoos.com> On 22/03/06, 22:41:12, Dennis Clarke wrote regarding Re: [csw-users] Warning: new php packages breaks low-end sparcs: > On 3/22/06, Matthew Hannigan wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 10:46:55AM -0500, Dennis Clarke wrote: > > > Should I toss it into the rack and give everyone a login? For testing I > > > mean ? > > > > Speaking for myself, that would be useful. > > I occasioanlly like to compile programs on an old os/arch > > combo to produce a binary that works anywhere. > Well, I would need some time. Setting up a fresh server on a Sparc 20 > will be a slow process. > Also .. I think Sun ONE Studio 8 is the last rev to be supported and I > don't even know if the recent patches address sun4m or not. There should be no need. One can test for v8 compliance and build v8 binaries on > v8 machines - as we do when people use the correct flags. There are some subtleties about strict v8 compliance, some of which I have ignored for pass-off testing, eg, Java 1.5 requires UltraSparc so any Java program needs to be <= v1.4. We also have packages (waiting for fix) that call for 64 bit SUNW packages despite not needing them - this isn't even an arch problem, someone might chose to run an UltraSparc in 32bit mode and not installed the redundant packages. More important that arch for "works anywhere" is to use a base OS (the Blastwave build machines use Solaris 8), then the newer Solaris 9/10 libraries won't be linked to the binaries. A finally note on v8 compliance: the penalty for choosing the base arch is small (disappointingly so, the newer processors don't provide the performance gains of simply cranking up the clock), and where performance does matter the isaexec mechanisms can and are used. James. From res at colnet.cmhnet.org Thu Mar 23 17:37:41 2006 From: res at colnet.cmhnet.org (Robert Stampfli) Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 11:37:41 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Sendmail Message-ID: <20060323163740.GA18804@stampfli> Can anyone give us some indication about when the sendmail 8.13.6 package will be available thru CSW blastwave? This release is somewhat pressing, as it was announced yesterday that prior versions of sendmail contain a security flaw which permits specially crafted emails to execute arbitrary code on the receiving system: Thanks, Rob From sloewenthal at gemini.edu Thu Mar 23 17:50:32 2006 From: sloewenthal at gemini.edu (LOEWENTHAL Simon) Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 12:50:32 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] Sendmail In-Reply-To: <20060323163740.GA18804@stampfli> References: <20060323163740.GA18804@stampfli> Message-ID: <4422D1D8.7020407@gemini.edu> I thought the latest version in the CSW tree was 8.13.15: # pkg-get -a|grep sendmail pm_mailsendmail 0.79 sendmail 8.13.5,REV=2006.02.10 S. Robert Stampfli wrote: >Can anyone give us some indication about when the >sendmail 8.13.6 package will be available thru CSW >blastwave? This release is somewhat pressing, as >it was announced yesterday that prior versions of >sendmail contain a security flaw which permits >specially crafted emails to execute arbitrary code >on the receiving system: > > > >Thanks, >Rob >_______________________________________________ >users mailing list >users at lists.blastwave.org >https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > From sloewenthal at gemini.edu Thu Mar 23 17:54:49 2006 From: sloewenthal at gemini.edu (LOEWENTHAL Simon) Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 12:54:49 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] Sendmail In-Reply-To: <4422D1D8.7020407@gemini.edu> References: <20060323163740.GA18804@stampfli> <4422D1D8.7020407@gemini.edu> Message-ID: <4422D2D9.4070202@gemini.edu> Sorry - I misread the number. oops - I must be asleep. Last version as you rightly said was 8.13.5. LOEWENTHAL Simon wrote: >I thought the latest version in the CSW tree was 8.13.15: > ># pkg-get -a|grep sendmail > pm_mailsendmail 0.79 > sendmail 8.13.5,REV=2006.02.10 > >S. > >Robert Stampfli wrote: > > > >>Can anyone give us some indication about when the >>sendmail 8.13.6 package will be available thru CSW >>blastwave? This release is somewhat pressing, as >>it was announced yesterday that prior versions of >>sendmail contain a security flaw which permits >>specially crafted emails to execute arbitrary code >>on the receiving system: >> >> >> >>Thanks, >>Rob >>_______________________________________________ >>users mailing list >>users at lists.blastwave.org >>https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users >> >> >> >> >_______________________________________________ >users mailing list >users at lists.blastwave.org >https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > From Darin.Perusich at cognigencorp.com Thu Mar 23 18:02:13 2006 From: Darin.Perusich at cognigencorp.com (Darin Perusich) Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 12:02:13 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Sendmail In-Reply-To: <20060323163740.GA18804@stampfli> References: <20060323163740.GA18804@stampfli> Message-ID: <4422D495.6090406@cognigencorp.com> did you submit a bug report via the bugtracking system? http://www.blastwave.org/mantis/login_page.php Robert Stampfli wrote: > Can anyone give us some indication about when the > sendmail 8.13.6 package will be available thru CSW > blastwave? This release is somewhat pressing, as > it was announced yesterday that prior versions of > sendmail contain a security flaw which permits > specially crafted emails to execute arbitrary code > on the receiving system: > > > > Thanks, > Rob > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users -- Darin Perusich Unix Systems Administrator Cognigen Corporation 395 Youngs Rd. Williamsville, NY 14221 darinper at cognigencorp.com From asmoore at blastwave.org Fri Mar 24 01:00:13 2006 From: asmoore at blastwave.org (Alex Moore) Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 18:00:13 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] Sendmail In-Reply-To: <20060323163740.GA18804@stampfli> References: <20060323163740.GA18804@stampfli> Message-ID: <20060323180013.00005a19@sws602.mcsun.local> On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 11:37:41 -0500 Robert Stampfli wrote: > Can anyone give us some indication about when the > sendmail 8.13.6 package will be available thru CSW > blastwave? This release is somewhat pressing, as > it was announced yesterday that prior versions of > sendmail contain a security flaw which permits > specially crafted emails to execute arbitrary code > on the receiving system: I saw the notice early this morning and started working on the package at that time. It should be in /testing later tonight. Alex From eric.enright at gmail.com Sat Mar 25 06:23:07 2006 From: eric.enright at gmail.com (Eric Enright) Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 00:23:07 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Becoming a Maintainer Message-ID: <3a74b99d0603242123j18b9f9eaq77db5ed46d9264e9@mail.gmail.com> Hi, I'm interested in becoming a maintainer. I submitted the maintainer's signup form about three weeks ago, and again earlier this week, and have not heard a reply. What do I need to do? Specifically, I would like to initially package gtkpod/libgpod, and then perhaps licq and/or giFT. -- Eric Enright From Darin.Perusich at cognigencorp.com Sat Mar 25 13:44:27 2006 From: Darin.Perusich at cognigencorp.com (Darin Perusich) Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 07:44:27 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Becoming a Maintainer In-Reply-To: <3a74b99d0603242123j18b9f9eaq77db5ed46d9264e9@mail.gmail.com> References: <3a74b99d0603242123j18b9f9eaq77db5ed46d9264e9@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <44253B2B.8010906@cognigencorp.com> head on over to http://www.blastwave.org/maintainer-signup.php and fill out the form. after you've done this someone will be in contact with you. Eric Enright wrote: > Hi, I'm interested in becoming a maintainer. I submitted the > maintainer's signup form about three weeks ago, and again earlier this > week, and have not heard a reply. What do I need to do? > Specifically, I would like to initially package gtkpod/libgpod, and > then perhaps licq and/or giFT. > > -- > Eric Enright > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users -- Darin Perusich Unix Systems Administrator Cognigen Corporation 395 Youngs Rd. Williamsville, NY 14221 darinper at cognigencorp.com From eric.enright at gmail.com Sat Mar 25 18:38:29 2006 From: eric.enright at gmail.com (Eric Enright) Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 12:38:29 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Becoming a Maintainer In-Reply-To: <44253B2B.8010906@cognigencorp.com> References: <3a74b99d0603242123j18b9f9eaq77db5ed46d9264e9@mail.gmail.com> <44253B2B.8010906@cognigencorp.com> Message-ID: <3a74b99d0603250938v166549bfsa777b6ab1447b81@mail.gmail.com> Ok, I went there and submitted the form for a third time. Eric On 3/25/06, Darin Perusich wrote: > head on over to http://www.blastwave.org/maintainer-signup.php and fill > out the form. after you've done this someone will be in contact with you. > > Eric Enright wrote: > > Hi, I'm interested in becoming a maintainer. I submitted the > > maintainer's signup form about three weeks ago, and again earlier this > > week, and have not heard a reply. What do I need to do? > > Specifically, I would like to initially package gtkpod/libgpod, and > > then perhaps licq and/or giFT. > > > > -- > > Eric Enright > > _______________________________________________ > > users mailing list > > users at lists.blastwave.org > > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > -- > Darin Perusich > Unix Systems Administrator > Cognigen Corporation > 395 Youngs Rd. > Williamsville, NY 14221 > darinper at cognigencorp.com > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > -- Eric Enright From ericr at sourmilk.net Sun Mar 26 19:45:22 2006 From: ericr at sourmilk.net (Eric Rivas) Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 12:45:22 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Becoming a Maintainer In-Reply-To: <3a74b99d0603250938v166549bfsa777b6ab1447b81@mail.gmail.com> References: <3a74b99d0603242123j18b9f9eaq77db5ed46d9264e9@mail.gmail.com> <44253B2B.8010906@cognigencorp.com> <3a74b99d0603250938v166549bfsa777b6ab1447b81@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <5DE187BA-5A73-4799-AD73-02C01A805128@sourmilk.net> Whom ever does it must be real busy or something. I applied a few months ago, got a couple of emails after two or three weeks, then stopped hearing from him. On Mar 25, 2006, at 12:38 PM, Eric Enright wrote: > Ok, I went there and submitted the form for a third time. > > Eric > > > On 3/25/06, Darin Perusich wrote: >> head on over to http://www.blastwave.org/maintainer-signup.php and >> fill >> out the form. after you've done this someone will be in contact >> with you. >> >> Eric Enright wrote: >>> Hi, I'm interested in becoming a maintainer. I submitted the >>> maintainer's signup form about three weeks ago, and again earlier >>> this >>> week, and have not heard a reply. What do I need to do? >>> Specifically, I would like to initially package gtkpod/libgpod, and >>> then perhaps licq and/or giFT. >>> >>> -- >>> Eric Enright >>> _______________________________________________ >>> users mailing list >>> users at lists.blastwave.org >>> https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users >> >> -- >> Darin Perusich >> Unix Systems Administrator >> Cognigen Corporation >> 395 Youngs Rd. >> Williamsville, NY 14221 >> darinper at cognigencorp.com >> _______________________________________________ >> users mailing list >> users at lists.blastwave.org >> https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users >> > > > -- > Eric Enright > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users -- Eric Rivas ericr at sourmilk.net From eric.enright at gmail.com Mon Mar 27 00:26:02 2006 From: eric.enright at gmail.com (Eric Enright) Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 17:26:02 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Becoming a Maintainer In-Reply-To: <5DE187BA-5A73-4799-AD73-02C01A805128@sourmilk.net> References: <3a74b99d0603242123j18b9f9eaq77db5ed46d9264e9@mail.gmail.com> <44253B2B.8010906@cognigencorp.com> <3a74b99d0603250938v166549bfsa777b6ab1447b81@mail.gmail.com> <5DE187BA-5A73-4799-AD73-02C01A805128@sourmilk.net> Message-ID: <3a74b99d0603261426r3f92747fx7eb03533b4ea6337@mail.gmail.com> Looks like that is the case. I got an email from Phil Brown yesterday. Eric On 3/26/06, Eric Rivas wrote: > Whom ever does it must be real busy or something. I applied a few > months ago, got a couple of emails after two or three weeks, then > stopped hearing from him. > > > On Mar 25, 2006, at 12:38 PM, Eric Enright wrote: > > > Ok, I went there and submitted the form for a third time. > > > > Eric > > > > > > On 3/25/06, Darin Perusich wrote: > >> head on over to http://www.blastwave.org/maintainer-signup.php and > >> fill > >> out the form. after you've done this someone will be in contact > >> with you. > >> > >> Eric Enright wrote: > >>> Hi, I'm interested in becoming a maintainer. I submitted the > >>> maintainer's signup form about three weeks ago, and again earlier > >>> this > >>> week, and have not heard a reply. What do I need to do? > >>> Specifically, I would like to initially package gtkpod/libgpod, and > >>> then perhaps licq and/or giFT. > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Eric Enright > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> users mailing list > >>> users at lists.blastwave.org > >>> https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > >> > >> -- > >> Darin Perusich > >> Unix Systems Administrator > >> Cognigen Corporation > >> 395 Youngs Rd. > >> Williamsville, NY 14221 > >> darinper at cognigencorp.com > >> _______________________________________________ > >> users mailing list > >> users at lists.blastwave.org > >> https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > >> > > > > > > -- > > Eric Enright > > _______________________________________________ > > users mailing list > > users at lists.blastwave.org > > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > > -- > Eric Rivas > ericr at sourmilk.net > > > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.blastwave.org > https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users > -- Eric Enright From jreid at vnet.net Tue Mar 28 00:03:35 2006 From: jreid at vnet.net (Joe Reid) Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 17:03:35 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] FLAC encoding? Message-ID: <20060327220335.GG6249@katie.ctc.net> I don't have an diagnostics yet but I tried using flac to encode a wav file this weekend - after 24 hours of accumulated CPU time I killed the process. Should any normal 3-5 minute wav file take ...days to encode in FLAC on a dual 900MHZ SunBlade 1000? -- Joe Reid jreid at vnet.net Tactical Solaris Systems Engineering and Administration http://www.singlewhitemale.net ?c=a=rb=sc=fd=te=wf=zg=porh=n? From ax11 at ax11.de Wed Mar 29 13:36:11 2006 From: ax11 at ax11.de (Thomas Amm) Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 13:36:11 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] FLAC encoding? In-Reply-To: <20060327220335.GG6249@katie.ctc.net> References: <20060327220335.GG6249@katie.ctc.net> Message-ID: <442A712B.9080203@ax11.de> Joe Reid wrote: > I don't have an diagnostics yet but I tried using flac to encode a wav > file this weekend - after 24 hours of accumulated CPU time I killed the > process. Should any normal 3-5 minute wav file take ...days to encode > in FLAC on a dual 900MHZ SunBlade 1000? > No way, FLAC used to be pretty fast - but the actual flac hangs on my Blade1000 (Ultra Sparc III, 750MHz), too. Doesn't even seem to encode the first frame before it freezes. From javier.augusto at gmx.net Wed Mar 29 15:07:06 2006 From: javier.augusto at gmx.net (Javier O. Augusto) Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 10:07:06 -0300 Subject: [csw-users] FLAC encoding? In-Reply-To: <442A712B.9080203@ax11.de> References: <20060327220335.GG6249@katie.ctc.net> <442A712B.9080203@ax11.de> Message-ID: <442A867A.5070303@gmx.net> Thomas Amm wrote: > Joe Reid wrote: > >> I don't have an diagnostics yet but I tried using flac to encode a wav >> file this weekend - after 24 hours of accumulated CPU time I killed the >> process. Should any normal 3-5 minute wav file take ...days to encode >> in FLAC on a dual 900MHZ SunBlade 1000? >> >> > > No way, FLAC used to be pretty fast - but the actual flac hangs on my > Blade1000 (Ultra Sparc III, 750MHz), too. > Doesn't even seem to encode the first frame before it freezes. > Just thinking out loud, is this code too x86 eccentric or what? shouldn't it make use of vis+? Have you tried building up from source? Regards, Jay From ishikawa at yk.rim.or.jp Wed Mar 29 17:43:10 2006 From: ishikawa at yk.rim.or.jp (ci) Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 00:43:10 +0900 Subject: [csw-users] a package (but which one) removes a symlink /opt/csw and installs a real directory. Message-ID: <1143646990.7076.24.camel@solaris-nv-28-home> Hi, Thank you for creating this great repository of packages. I wish there was something like this more than 10 years ago when I administered a few Sun workstations and servers for internet gateway and NFS servers. Anyway, I would like to report a very disturbing event, namely, installing a package during "pkg-get install mplayer" removes a symlink /opt/csw (-> ${HOME}/csw } then creates a real directory /opt/csw and installs files under this real directory. But as a consequence, blastware packages installed under ${HOME}/csw via the old symlink were no longer recognized after this change. Sorry, I have only very sketchy information. But here is the step I took to see this event. Background: I had a symlink called /opt/csw -> /home/ishikawa/csw I made this symlink to my home directory after seeing the root partition that holds "/" is getting tight in terms of available space. CSW packages go into /home/ishikawa/csw by way of /opt/csw symlink. For example, pkg-get lives under /opt/csw/bin. Now, my internet connection at this moment is 64kbps ISDN line. (An optical fibre connection shared among 16 users is here RSN.) It is a dial-up line with fixed monthly charge. So I can connect as long as I want, but speed is slow. Anyway, last evening before going to bed, I ran pkg-get install mplayer I saw a few packages downloaded and installed before leaving the computer. (But I forgot to add -f, nor set up admin file yet.) What happened was that a few more large packages were installed during my absence from the console, but at one point, an interaction that required user input stopped the pkg-get process. So in the morning I noticed pkg-get has stopped waiting for user input and hit [RETURN], but then it continued to download another package. By that time, in the morning, the ISDN router's time-out feature had kicked in and the connection was lost. So wget called within pkg-get waited for a while [but I was too sleepy to notice this.], and failed to fetch the next package. Then pkg-get got clever and tried to download 'catalogue' or something thinking that the failure to download the previous package was due to incorrect inventory instead of network problem. However, downloading of 'catalogue' was also unsuccessful also due to the unavailable dial-up connection at the moment. Then pkg-get failed. So, by this time, I became aware of the network problem, and I started the dial-up ISDN connection, and hit pkg-get install mplayer again. Then the shell prompt said, "pkg-get: not found" or something. Whoa? pkg-get was nowhere to be found! It was not under /opt/csw/bin/ !? To make a long story short, I found to my great surprise that somehow installing one (?) of the pakcages somehow erased /opt/csw symlink and instead created a real /opt/csw directory and happily continued placing the package files under /opt/csw (real directory). After a moment of panic, I looked for ${HOME}/csw and I found it is still there and holding the previously installed files intact there. For example, pkg-get is still available ${HOME}/csw/bin/pkg-get. This is very strange. I am not sure which package is to blame. All I can say is that it is a package (or packages?) that are required by "mplayer" package that removed the symlink /opt/csw and recreated a real directory under the same name. I suspct that the checking for the existence of /opt/csw directory is not quite uniform across packages, and one package at least somehow mistook the presence of a symlink /opt/csw and deletes it forcibly and creates a real directory? After this discovery, I recreated /opt/csw symlink and re-ran the rest of pkg-get install mplayer and it seemed to run fine. e.g. mv /opt/csw /opt/csw.new ln -s ${HOME}/csw /opt/csw cd /opt/csw.new cp -pr * /opt/csw cd /tmp rmdir /opt/csw.new The above steps merged the previously installed files under ${HOME}/csw and the package files installed under real directory /opt/csw into ${HOME}/csw via symbolic link /opt/csw. I am not sure if I can track down which pakcage is to blame. In any case, I report this problem to alert package maintainers. TIA. CI From james at blastwave.org Wed Mar 29 18:04:03 2006 From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee) Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 16:04:03 GMT Subject: [csw-users] a package (but which one) removes a symlink /opt/csw and installs a real directory. In-Reply-To: <1143646990.7076.24.camel@solaris-nv-28-home> References: <1143646990.7076.24.camel@solaris-nv-28-home> Message-ID: <20060329.16040300.3732794722@landeck.jamesipoos.com> On 29/03/06, 16:43:10, ci wrote regarding [csw-users] a package (but which one) removes a symlink /opt/csw and installs a real directory.: > installing a package during "pkg-get install mplayer" > removes a symlink /opt/csw (-> ${HOME}/csw } then > creates a real directory /opt/csw and > installs files under this real directory. But as a consequence, > blastware packages installed under ${HOME}/csw via the old > symlink were no longer recognized after this > change. > Sorry, I have only very sketchy information. > But here is the step I took to see this event. > Background: > I had a symlink called > /opt/csw -> /home/ishikawa/csw > I made this symlink to my home directory after seeing the > root partition that holds "/" is getting tight in terms of available > space. Not sure which package does it but the solution is to use a lookback mount for /opt/csw and not a link. See lofs(7FS). Something like: mount -F lofs /home/ishikawa/csw /opt/csw James. From jonel.rienton at reidata.com Wed Mar 29 19:04:47 2006 From: jonel.rienton at reidata.com (Jonel Rienton) Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 11:04:47 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] CSWmono 1.1.13.6 in /testing Message-ID: <3BAF672E643DA84CB02A032EC314BD42021338CF@LDIADDMAIL01.sisco.stewart.net> I have just copied over a set of new versions of mono in http://www.blastwave.org/testing. I also had great success in running ASP.Net pages using xsp and mod_mono which are also available in /testing Brief Info: Mono provides the necessary software to develop and run .NET client and server applications on Linux, Solaris, Mac OS X, Windows, and UNIX. Sponsored by Novell, the Mono open source project has an active and enthusiastic contributing community and is positioned to become the leading choice for development of Linux applications. Regards, Jonel Rienton -- I know not english well, but I know 9 computer languages. Pinoy Ako! From jreid at vnet.net Wed Mar 29 19:18:26 2006 From: jreid at vnet.net (Joe Reid) Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 11:18:26 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] FLAC encoding? In-Reply-To: <442A712B.9080203@ax11.de> References: <20060327220335.GG6249@katie.ctc.net> <442A712B.9080203@ax11.de> Message-ID: <442AC162.2030609@vnet.net> Thomas Amm wrote: > Joe Reid wrote: > >>I don't have an diagnostics yet but I tried using flac to encode a wav >>file this weekend - after 24 hours of accumulated CPU time I killed the >>process. Should any normal 3-5 minute wav file take ...days to encode >>in FLAC on a dual 900MHZ SunBlade 1000? > > No way, FLAC used to be pretty fast - but the actual flac hangs on my > Blade1000 (Ultra Sparc III, 750MHz), too. > Doesn't even seem to encode the first frame before it freezes. I changed the song I was trying to encode and it encoded 94% of the song in like 65 seconds, but then hung there indefinatly. Anyone have any ideas what's up? -- Joe Reid jreid at vnet.net http://www.singlewhitemale.net ?c=a=rb=sc=fd=te=wf=zg=porh=n? From studentmark2004 at yahoo.com Thu Mar 30 00:06:10 2006 From: studentmark2004 at yahoo.com (mark student) Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 14:06:10 -0800 (PST) Subject: [csw-users] Remove from list Message-ID: <20060329220610.15114.qmail@web38711.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Please remove me from the users list. Thanks --------------------------------- New Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Call regular phones from your PC and save big. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ihsan at dogan.ch Thu Mar 30 00:46:31 2006 From: ihsan at dogan.ch (Ihsan Dogan) Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 00:46:31 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] Remove from list In-Reply-To: <20060329220610.15114.qmail@web38711.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <20060329220610.15114.qmail@web38711.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <442B0E47.7080305@dogan.ch> Hello Mark, on 30.03.2006 00:06 mark student said the following: > Please remove me from the users list. Thanks You can do that yourself. Please go to https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users . Ihsan -- ihsan at dogan.ch http://ihsan.dogan.ch/ From Darin.Perusich at cognigencorp.com Thu Mar 30 15:53:43 2006 From: Darin.Perusich at cognigencorp.com (Darin Perusich) Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 08:53:43 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] /testing drupal 4.6.6 Message-ID: <442BE2E7.1030900@cognigencorp.com> hello everyone, drupal 4.6.6 is now available for your /testing pleasure, though the testing page hasn't updated yet. there is a full link to the package below. "Drupal is an open-source platform and content management system for building dynamic web sites offering a broad range of features and services including user administration, publishing workflow, discussion capabilities, news aggregation, metadata functionalities using controlled vocabularies and XML publishing for content sharing purposes. Equipped with a powerful blend of features and configurability, Drupal can support a diverse range of web projects ranging from personal weblogs to large community-driven sites." http://drupal.org Dependencies: CSWcommon CSWphp CSWmysql4 http://www.blastwave.org/testing/drupal-4.6.6-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz -- Darin Perusich Unix Systems Administrator Cognigen Corporation 395 Youngs Rd. Williamsville, NY 14221 darinper at cognigencorp.com From NandaHyde at cxbb.com Fri Mar 31 16:48:06 2006 From: NandaHyde at cxbb.com (Pratapwant Madison) Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 23:48:06 +0900 Subject: [csw-users] Microsoft Macro Assembler 32 v7.0 Microsoft Money 2004 Message-ID: An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: