From brian.gupta at gmail.com Wed Jan 2 08:48:45 2008
From: brian.gupta at gmail.com (Brian Gupta)
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 02:48:45 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] Ruby questions...
In-Reply-To: <5b5090780801012340see35992o389245eed90ffb0@mail.gmail.com>
References: <5b5090780801012340see35992o389245eed90ffb0@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <5b5090780801012348k2bc8d841n9ca30098e5bc4825@mail.gmail.com>
It seems that Ruby was built with Sun Studio. This means that when I
try to install a "native" gem that needs to be compiled, the gems
installer will try to use Sun Studio to compile the gem.
I am wondering, since Sun Studio is not included in the Blastwave
repository, and is not freely redistributable, does it make sense to
instead build Ruby with the version of GCC that is in the repository?
Another option would be to support "packaging" of gems. This way
common gems that need to be compiled could be precompiled for pkg-get
installation. (One way to do this would be a single package with all
the most common "native" gems precompiled and preconfigured.).
Please let me know if I am missing a simple option, as this is making
upgrading and installing certain gems rather annoying. (And reminding
me again why Blastwave-like systems are useful).
(Another option, is to submit precompiled Solaris Gems to the upstream
gem repositories, like they do for Win32. I don't know if this would
only make things confusing with the Sparc and x86 32/64bit options.)
Cheers,
Brian
--
- Brian Gupta
http://opensolaris.org/os/project/nycosug/
From ihsan at blastwave.org Wed Jan 2 10:59:05 2008
From: ihsan at blastwave.org (Ihsan Dogan)
Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2008 10:59:05 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] Ruby questions...
In-Reply-To: <5b5090780801012348k2bc8d841n9ca30098e5bc4825@mail.gmail.com>
References: <5b5090780801012340see35992o389245eed90ffb0@mail.gmail.com>
<5b5090780801012348k2bc8d841n9ca30098e5bc4825@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <477B6069.9060509@blastwave.org>
Hello Brian,
Am 2.1.2008 8:48 Uhr, Brian Gupta schrieb:
> It seems that Ruby was built with Sun Studio. This means that when I
> try to install a "native" gem that needs to be compiled, the gems
> installer will try to use Sun Studio to compile the gem.
>
> I am wondering, since Sun Studio is not included in the Blastwave
> repository, and is not freely redistributable, does it make sense to
> instead build Ruby with the version of GCC that is in the repository?
You can download Sun Studio 12 for free from
http://developers.sun.com/sunstudio/
Ihsan
--
ihsan at dogan.ch http://blog.dogan.ch/
http://ihsan.dogan.ch/
From chewie at wookimus.net Wed Jan 2 18:03:54 2008
From: chewie at wookimus.net (Chad Walstrom)
Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2008 11:03:54 -0600
Subject: [csw-users] Ruby questions...
In-Reply-To: <477B6069.9060509@blastwave.org>
References: <5b5090780801012340see35992o389245eed90ffb0@mail.gmail.com>
<5b5090780801012348k2bc8d841n9ca30098e5bc4825@mail.gmail.com>
<477B6069.9060509@blastwave.org>
Message-ID: <7777.1199293434@skuld.wookimus.net>
You can also download Sun Studio 11 if you need Solaris 8 compiles.
Chad
From chris.ridd at isode.com Thu Jan 3 13:00:34 2008
From: chris.ridd at isode.com (Chris Ridd)
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2008 12:00:34 +0000
Subject: [csw-users] Request for git package
Message-ID: <477CCE62.5010100@isode.com>
I'm afraid I couldn't spot the (probably very obvious) link on the
Blastwave website for requesting new packages, so here goes:
Is it possible for someone to package the "git" distributed version
control system to Blastwave? It is becoming quite a popular tool, and is
similar in some ways to Mercurial.
It relies on a number of GNU utilities at runtime, but it does build on
Solaris using Sun Studio. I'd just rather someone else built it instead
of me ;-)
The project's website is at:
Thanks,
Chris
From maybird1776 at yahoo.com Thu Jan 3 17:00:44 2008
From: maybird1776 at yahoo.com (ken mays)
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 08:00:44 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [csw-users] GIMP 2.4.3 available
In-Reply-To: <477CCE62.5010100@isode.com>
Message-ID: <436073.6671.qm@web34209.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
GIMP 2.4.3 for Sun Solaris 8 and above now available!
GIMP is an acronym for GNU Image Manipulation Program.
It is a freely distributed program for such tasks as
photo retouching, image composition and image
authoring.
It has many capabilities. It can be used as a simple
paint program, an expert quality photo retouching
program, an online batch processing system, a mass
production image renderer, an image format converter,
etc.
GIMP is expandable and extensible. It is designed to
be augmented with plug-ins and extensions to do just
about anything. The advanced scripting interface
allows everything from the simplest task to the most
complex image manipulation procedures to be easily
scripted.
See:
http://www.gimp.org/about/introduction.html
http://www.gimp.org/books/
Ken Mays
Blastwave.org GIMP maintainer
____________________________________________________________________________________
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page.
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
From David.Mackintosh at xdroop.com Thu Jan 3 18:24:01 2008
From: David.Mackintosh at xdroop.com (David Mackintosh)
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 12:24:01 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] Self-inflicted sendmail problem?
Message-ID: <20080103172401.GC31828@xdroop.com>
Hi folks,
I'm having a problem installing CSWsendmail, and can't figure out how
to dig myself out of this hole I've dug.
I'm running Solaris 9 on a v210. My blastwave install is about 18
months old, but I do the pkg-get upgrade all; it was last done about
a week ago.
I think where I messed up was that I did not uninstall the Sun
packages before I attempted to install the blastwave one. I have
since uninstalled the Sun sendmail packages, and now I'm in this
state.
The install ticks along for a while, then announces:
## Executing checkinstall script.
## Processing package information.
## Processing system information.
5 package pathnames are already properly installed.
Installing sendmail - Sendmail MTA as
## Executing preinstall script.
adding smmsp group
adding smmsp user
chroot: No such file or directory
pkgadd: ERROR: preinstall script did not complete successfully
Installation of failed.
ERROR: could not add CSWsendmail.
On the advice of the #blastwave IRC channel, I removed the smmsp user
and groups; this is why they are being created, above.
Does anyone have a link to a web page that might help me figure
out how to get me out of this hole?
--
/\oo/\
/ /()\ \ David Mackintosh |
dave at xdroop.com | http://www.xdroop.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20080103/bf25c682/attachment-0001.bin
From bonivart at blastwave.org Thu Jan 3 18:52:07 2008
From: bonivart at blastwave.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 18:52:07 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] Self-inflicted sendmail problem?
In-Reply-To: <20080103172401.GC31828@xdroop.com>
References: <20080103172401.GC31828@xdroop.com>
Message-ID: <625385e30801030952s717172fckc0834d805a1d4f54@mail.gmail.com>
On Jan 3, 2008 6:24 PM, David Mackintosh wrote:
> I think where I messed up was that I did not uninstall the Sun
> packages before I attempted to install the blastwave one. I have
> since uninstalled the Sun sendmail packages, and now I'm in this
> state.
I've never had to remove Sun's sendmail.
> ## Executing preinstall script.
> adding smmsp group
> adding smmsp user
> chroot: No such file or directory
> pkgadd: ERROR: preinstall script did not complete successfully
Seems like one of these two lines have failed:
chroot $PKG_INSTALL_ROOT /usr/sbin/useradd -g smmsp smmsp
chroot $PKG_INSTALL_ROOT /usr/sbin/usermod -c "SendMail Message
Submission Program" -d $MYHOME smmsp
--
/peter
From res at colnet.cmhnet.org Thu Jan 3 20:04:33 2008
From: res at colnet.cmhnet.org (Rob Stampfli)
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 14:04:33 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] Self-inflicted sendmail problem?
In-Reply-To: <20080103172401.GC31828@xdroop.com>
References: <20080103172401.GC31828@xdroop.com>
Message-ID: <20080103190433.GA1283@keevey>
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 12:24:01PM -0500, David Mackintosh wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm having a problem installing CSWsendmail, and can't figure out how
> to dig myself out of this hole I've dug.
...
> ## Executing preinstall script.
> adding smmsp group
> adding smmsp user
> chroot: No such file or directory
> pkgadd: ERROR: preinstall script did not complete successfully
>
> Installation of failed.
> ERROR: could not add CSWsendmail.
>
> On the advice of the #blastwave IRC channel, I removed the smmsp user
> and groups; this is why they are being created, above.
>
> Does anyone have a link to a web page that might help me figure
> out how to get me out of this hole?
Are you sure you have the latest sendmail package? There was a
version release just before Christmas that had a bug which fails
precisely the same way on sparc architectures. The current
version is:
sendmail-8.14.2,REV=2007.12.17-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
(2384863 bytes, md5sum aca820319c20802e46d4d2cfe190e908)
This one installed correctly on my machine.
Perhaps you should try another mirror, or if you can't find it
elsewhere, write me and I'll make a copy available to you.
Rob
From David.Mackintosh at xdroop.com Thu Jan 3 21:22:02 2008
From: David.Mackintosh at xdroop.com (David Mackintosh)
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 15:22:02 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] Self-inflicted sendmail problem?
In-Reply-To: <20080103190433.GA1283@keevey>
References: <20080103172401.GC31828@xdroop.com> <20080103190433.GA1283@keevey>
Message-ID: <20080103202202.GA12388@xdroop.com>
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 02:04:33PM -0500, Rob Stampfli wrote:
> Are you sure you have the latest sendmail package? There was a
> version release just before Christmas that had a bug which fails
> precisely the same way on sparc architectures. The current
> version is:
>
> sendmail-8.14.2,REV=2007.12.17-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> (2384863 bytes, md5sum aca820319c20802e46d4d2cfe190e908)
Thank you -- I had the one from December 14, updating the catalog
fixes the problem.
One stupid/supplemental question: where might I find the sendmail.mc
file?
--
/\oo/\
/ /()\ \ David Mackintosh |
dave at xdroop.com | http://www.xdroop.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20080103/dfb2fe2c/attachment.bin
From res at colnet.cmhnet.org Thu Jan 3 22:38:53 2008
From: res at colnet.cmhnet.org (Rob Stampfli)
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 16:38:53 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] Self-inflicted sendmail problem?
In-Reply-To: <20080103202202.GA12388@xdroop.com>
References: <20080103172401.GC31828@xdroop.com> <20080103190433.GA1283@keevey>
<20080103202202.GA12388@xdroop.com>
Message-ID: <20080103213853.GA5851@keevey>
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 03:22:02PM -0500, David Mackintosh wrote:
> One stupid/supplemental question: where might I find the sendmail.mc
> file?
/opt/csw/share/mail/cf
Rob
From David.Mackintosh at xdroop.com Fri Jan 4 17:00:58 2008
From: David.Mackintosh at xdroop.com (David Mackintosh)
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 11:00:58 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] Self-inflicted sendmail problem?
In-Reply-To: <20080103213853.GA5851@keevey>
References: <20080103172401.GC31828@xdroop.com> <20080103190433.GA1283@keevey>
<20080103202202.GA12388@xdroop.com> <20080103213853.GA5851@keevey>
Message-ID: <20080104160057.GB12388@xdroop.com>
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 04:38:53PM -0500, Rob Stampfli wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 03:22:02PM -0500, David Mackintosh wrote:
> > One stupid/supplemental question: where might I find the sendmail.mc
> > file?
>
> /opt/csw/share/mail/cf
Doesn't seem to be there.
Ahh, maybe I'm not blind -- it's not in the package file list either
according to http://www.blastwave.org/filesearch/sendmail
/\oo/\
/ /()\ \ David Mackintosh |
dave at xdroop.com | http://www.xdroop.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20080104/9c46aa24/attachment.bin
From David.Mackintosh at xdroop.com Fri Jan 4 17:11:37 2008
From: David.Mackintosh at xdroop.com (David Mackintosh)
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 11:11:37 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] Self-inflicted sendmail problem?
In-Reply-To: <20080104160057.GB12388@xdroop.com>
References: <20080103172401.GC31828@xdroop.com> <20080103190433.GA1283@keevey>
<20080103202202.GA12388@xdroop.com> <20080103213853.GA5851@keevey>
<20080104160057.GB12388@xdroop.com>
Message-ID: <20080104161136.GC12388@xdroop.com>
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 11:00:58AM -0500, David Mackintosh wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 04:38:53PM -0500, Rob Stampfli wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 03:22:02PM -0500, David Mackintosh wrote:
> > > One stupid/supplemental question: where might I find the sendmail.mc
> > > file?
> >
> > /opt/csw/share/mail/cf
>
> Doesn't seem to be there.
>
> Ahh, maybe I'm not blind -- it's not in the package file list either
> according to http://www.blastwave.org/filesearch/sendmail
No, I am blind, I want main.cf and then edit it to taste.
Thanks all for your help!
--
/\oo/\
/ /()\ \ David Mackintosh |
dave at xdroop.com | http://www.xdroop.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20080104/da44e655/attachment.bin
From james at blastwave.org Fri Jan 4 17:17:47 2008
From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee)
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2008 16:17:47 GMT
Subject: [csw-users] Self-inflicted sendmail problem?
In-Reply-To: <20080104160057.GB12388@xdroop.com>
References: <20080103172401.GC31828@xdroop.com> <20080103190433.GA1283@keevey>
<20080103202202.GA12388@xdroop.com> <20080103213853.GA5851@keevey>
<20080104160057.GB12388@xdroop.com>
Message-ID: <20080104.16174700.3219626124@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk>
On 04/01/08, 16:00:58, David Mackintosh wrote
regarding Re: [csw-users] Self-inflicted sendmail problem?:
> On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 04:38:53PM -0500, Rob Stampfli wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 03:22:02PM -0500, David Mackintosh wrote:
> > > One stupid/supplemental question: where might I find the sendmail.mc
> > > file?
> >
> > /opt/csw/share/mail/cf
> Doesn't seem to be there.
> Ahh, maybe I'm not blind -- it's not in the package file list either
> according to http://www.blastwave.org/filesearch/sendmail
sendmail.mc isn't, you make sendmail.cf using m4 from one of the .mc
example files or write your own .mc file.
/opt/csw/share/mail/cf/ contains the example .mc files with suffix
.mc.CSW.
James.
From brian.gupta at gmail.com Mon Jan 7 19:48:31 2008
From: brian.gupta at gmail.com (Brian Gupta)
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 13:48:31 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] SMF behaviour.
Message-ID: <5b5090780801071048h47496af7g5011d39a1ec48944@mail.gmail.com>
Certain packages interact with the SMF database on SMF capable systems.
Is there anyway to disable this behavior, and have it act like it is
working with a system that does not have SMF capabilities? (So that my
Solaris 8, Solaris 10, and SXCE Blastwave package operations are
identical)
Thanks,
Brian
--
- Brian Gupta
http://opensolaris.org/os/project/nycosug/
From bonivart at blastwave.org Mon Jan 7 20:40:12 2008
From: bonivart at blastwave.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 20:40:12 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] SMF behaviour.
In-Reply-To: <5b5090780801071048h47496af7g5011d39a1ec48944@mail.gmail.com>
References: <5b5090780801071048h47496af7g5011d39a1ec48944@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <625385e30801071140n3be34ca4k4f35d5bf3d71a1a1@mail.gmail.com>
On Jan 7, 2008 7:48 PM, Brian Gupta wrote:
> Certain packages interact with the SMF database on SMF capable systems.
>
> Is there anyway to disable this behavior, and have it act like it is
> working with a system that does not have SMF capabilities? (So that my
> Solaris 8, Solaris 10, and SXCE Blastwave package operations are
> identical)
Here's what we follow to add SMF support to CSW packages. Maybe you
can find a way to make installation not pick up SMF capabilities on
your Solaris 10+ systems.
http://www.blastwave.org/standards/smf.html
I've never heard the request before but I guess it's a valid point.
:-) We have this autoenable_daemons variable we support (see below).
Maybe something like use_smf in csw.conf would be good to have?
http://www.blastwave.org/standards/csw.conf.html
--
/peter
From maseda at unc.edu Mon Jan 7 21:13:06 2008
From: maseda at unc.edu (Mike Seda)
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2008 15:13:06 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] SMF behaviour.
In-Reply-To: <625385e30801071140n3be34ca4k4f35d5bf3d71a1a1@mail.gmail.com>
References: <5b5090780801071048h47496af7g5011d39a1ec48944@mail.gmail.com>
<625385e30801071140n3be34ca4k4f35d5bf3d71a1a1@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <478287D2.7080904@unc.edu>
Peter Bonivart wrote:
> On Jan 7, 2008 7:48 PM, Brian Gupta wrote:
>
>> Certain packages interact with the SMF database on SMF capable systems.
>>
>> Is there anyway to disable this behavior, and have it act like it is
>> working with a system that does not have SMF capabilities? (So that my
>> Solaris 8, Solaris 10, and SXCE Blastwave package operations are
>> identical)
>>
>
> Here's what we follow to add SMF support to CSW packages. Maybe you
> can find a way to make installation not pick up SMF capabilities on
> your Solaris 10+ systems.
>
> http://www.blastwave.org/standards/smf.html
>
> I've never heard the request before but I guess it's a valid point.
> :-) We have this autoenable_daemons variable we support (see below).
> Maybe something like use_smf in csw.conf would be good to have?
>
yes, it would
> http://www.blastwave.org/standards/csw.conf.html
>
>
From bonivart at blastwave.org Tue Jan 8 10:03:45 2008
From: bonivart at blastwave.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 10:03:45 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] Problems with MailScanner
Message-ID: <625385e30801080103j2038107cv89e33dfe294cb470@mail.gmail.com>
The first problem is only for those of you running Solaris 8, the
pre/post-scripts have a feature in them that is only supported in
Solaris 9 and 10. You should upgrade to 4.65,REV=2008.01.04. It's on
its way to unstable but can be found in testing for manual upgrade:
http://www.blastwave.org/testing/mailscanner-4.65.3.1,REV=2008.01.04-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz
The second problem is much more serious. Upgrades of the perl modules
mailtools and mimetools broke MailScanner 4.65 and it hit a lot of
Linux users quick to upgrade their systems. We still had version 1.71
of mailtools and 5.420 of mimetools so we were OK but for MailScanner
4.66 to work OK we needed version 2.02 and 5.425 of those modules and
they were built quickly by their maintainers. That in combination with
problems with a third perl module (IO) made both MailScanner 4.65 and
4.66 problematic for us.
What this means is that if you upgrade mailtools and mimetools, either
separately or by doing a full upgrade, you will end up with a broken
MailScanner 4.65 that will not start. I have prepared a temporary
package for MailScanner 4.66 in testing that has workarounds for the
third problem with the IO module.
http://www.blastwave.org/testing/mailscanner-4.66.5.2-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz
http://www.blastwave.org/testing/pm_io-1.2301-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
http://www.blastwave.org/testing/pm_io-1.2301-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
We will soon have a new Perl package that will include IO 1.2301 which
is needed by MailScanner 4.66. Then I will release a new package to
unstable that will not need the separate IO package.
You have two choices:
1. Do not upgrade anything on your systems related to MailScanner.
Wait for MailScanner 4.66 to get into unstable.
2. Use the temporary MailScanner 4.66 and IO package from testing.
I only recommend 2 if you already have a broken system or you
absolutely must have version 4.66.
--
/peter
From jonathan.boyd at bioch.ox.ac.uk Tue Jan 8 11:49:45 2008
From: jonathan.boyd at bioch.ox.ac.uk (Jonathan Boyd)
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2008 10:49:45 +0000
Subject: [csw-users] pkg_get 3.8.3 unstable:
Message-ID: <20080108104945.2E2BEA8002@webmail223.herald.ox.ac.uk>
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Url: http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20080108/3f34dd1e/attachment.ksh
From mats.larsson at ericsson.com Tue Jan 8 14:08:54 2008
From: mats.larsson at ericsson.com (Mats Larsson)
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2008 14:08:54 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] pkg_get 3.8.3 unstable:
In-Reply-To: <20080108104945.2E2BEA8002@webmail223.herald.ox.ac.uk>
References: <20080108104945.2E2BEA8002@webmail223.herald.ox.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <478375E6.1070005@ericsson.com>
On 2008-01-08 11:49, Jonathan Boyd wrote:
> I have just downloaded the new version
> of pkg_get from unstable onto a Sparc
> using Solaris 9 and it appeared to
> download satisfactorily. However, when
> I issue a command such as, pkg-get -U,
> the following output occurs prior to
> the updataing of the catalog information.
> Is it something wrong with my system? or is it
> inherent in this new version of pkg_get?
>
Same for me...
> # pkg-get -U
> the: No such file or directory
> conf: No such file or directory
> file: No such file or directory
> tells: No such file or directory
> us: No such file or directory
> to: No such file or directory
> use: No such file or directory
> another: No such file or directory
> program,: No such file or directory
> that: No such file or directory
> is.: No such file or directory
> Getting catalog...
> --10:35:05--
> http://blastwave.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/csw/unstable//sparc/5.9/catalog
> => `catalog'
> .
> .
>
> Regards, Jonathan Boyd
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.blastwave.org
> https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
From dclarke at blastwave.org Tue Jan 8 15:08:33 2008
From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke)
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 09:08:33 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [csw-users] pkg_get 3.8.3 unstable:
In-Reply-To: <478375E6.1070005@ericsson.com>
References: <20080108104945.2E2BEA8002@webmail223.herald.ox.ac.uk>
<478375E6.1070005@ericsson.com>
Message-ID: <60737.70.50.143.237.1199801313.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
> On 2008-01-08 11:49, Jonathan Boyd wrote:
>> I have just downloaded the new version
>> in this new version of pkg_get?
>>
> Same for me...
>> # pkg-get -U
In the pkg-get script the following trivial error is the cause :
-- list begins at line 1988
# MUST HAVE gzip!
check_gzip
# Try to make sure we have wget SOMEWHERE in our path.
# Try to cover all potential reasonable places to look for it.
# Un
less the conf file tells us to use another program, that is.
WGET=${WGET:-wget}
---------------------------------------
Pretty obvious how to fix this
------------ change made --------
# MUST HAVE gzip!
check_gzip
# Try to make sure we have wget SOMEWHERE in our path.
# Try to cover all potential reasonable places to look for it.
# Unless the conf file tells us to use another program, that is.
WGET=${WGET:-wget}
------------------------------------
Expect a new pkg-get package right away. You can edit the script file with
vi at the moment.
Please keep in mind that while this error is annoying it is also harmless.
It just happens to attempt to execute less ( less == a linux/GPL pager
program like more ) on files that don't exist. Then pkg-get proceeds
normally.
One moment please, technical crews are dispatched to fix this.
Dennis Clarke
From a.cervellin at acm.org Tue Jan 8 15:15:24 2008
From: a.cervellin at acm.org (Alessio)
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2008 15:15:24 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] pkg_get 3.8.3 unstable:
In-Reply-To: <20080108104945.2E2BEA8002@webmail223.herald.ox.ac.uk>
References: <20080108104945.2E2BEA8002@webmail223.herald.ox.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <4783857C.9020709@acm.org>
Jonathan Boyd wrote:
> # pkg-get -U
> the: No such file or directory
[...]
the error has been fixed a few minutes ago and the new pkg-get should be
available in a few hours (just the time for the mirrors to get in sync)
From stefan.tomlik at tomlik.de Tue Jan 8 15:15:48 2008
From: stefan.tomlik at tomlik.de (Stefan Tomlik)
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 15:15:48 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-users] pkg_get 3.8.3 unstable:
In-Reply-To: <478375E6.1070005@ericsson.com>
References: <20080108104945.2E2BEA8002@webmail223.herald.ox.ac.uk>
<478375E6.1070005@ericsson.com>
Message-ID: <2176.80.152.208.69.1199801748.squirrel@secure.tomlik.de>
Yepp... superfluous newline in /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get
---snip ---
# diff /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get-right /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get-wrong
1993c1993,1994
< # Unless the conf file tells us to use another program, that is.
---
> # Un
> less the conf file tells us to use another program, that is.
---snip ---
I assume that has to do something with the last update of wget that bailed
out with deinstalling wget before wgetting the dependent packages...
have a lot fun
-- Stefan
On Tue, January 8, 2008 14:08, Mats Larsson wrote:
> On 2008-01-08 11:49, Jonathan Boyd wrote:
>
>> I have just downloaded the new version
>> of pkg_get from unstable onto a Sparc using Solaris 9 and it appeared to
>> download satisfactorily. However, when I issue a command such as,
>> pkg-get -U, the following output occurs prior to the updataing of the
>> catalog information. Is it something wrong with my system? or is it
>> inherent in this new version of pkg_get?
>>
> Same for me...
> [...]
From dclarke at blastwave.org Tue Jan 8 15:17:27 2008
From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke)
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 09:17:27 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [csw-users] trivial and harmless error in pkg_get 3.8.3
Message-ID: <60742.70.50.143.237.1199801847.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
ALL, be advised that we are aware of this. Also be advised that the error
is both trivial and entirely harmless.
The only way this could be even more annoying is if you actually had the
"less" binary in your PATH as well as files that it would echo to the
terminal. Not at all likely.
Dennis Clarke
----------------------------- Original Message -----------------------------
Subject: Re: [csw-users] pkg_get 3.8.3 unstable:
From: "Dennis Clarke"
Date: Tue, January 8, 2008 09:08
To: "questions and discussions"
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> On 2008-01-08 11:49, Jonathan Boyd wrote:
>> I have just downloaded the new version
>> in this new version of pkg_get?
>>
> Same for me...
>> # pkg-get -U
In the pkg-get script the following trivial error is the cause :
-- list begins at line 1988
# MUST HAVE gzip!
check_gzip
# Try to make sure we have wget SOMEWHERE in our path.
# Try to cover all potential reasonable places to look for it.
# Un
less the conf file tells us to use another program, that is.
WGET=${WGET:-wget}
---------------------------------------
Pretty obvious how to fix this
------------ change made --------
# MUST HAVE gzip!
check_gzip
# Try to make sure we have wget SOMEWHERE in our path.
# Try to cover all potential reasonable places to look for it.
# Unless the conf file tells us to use another program, that is.
WGET=${WGET:-wget}
------------------------------------
Expect a new pkg-get package right away. You can edit the script file with
vi at the moment.
Please keep in mind that while this error is annoying it is also harmless.
It just happens to attempt to execute less ( less == a linux/GPL pager
program like more ) on files that don't exist. Then pkg-get proceeds
normally.
One moment please, technical crews are dispatched to fix this.
Dennis Clarke
Tue Jan 8 09:17:16 EST 2008
From dclarke at blastwave.org Tue Jan 8 15:24:46 2008
From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke)
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 09:24:46 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [csw-users] pkg_get 3.8.3 unstable:
In-Reply-To: <2176.80.152.208.69.1199801748.squirrel@secure.tomlik.de>
References: <20080108104945.2E2BEA8002@webmail223.herald.ox.ac.uk>
<478375E6.1070005@ericsson.com>
<2176.80.152.208.69.1199801748.squirrel@secure.tomlik.de>
Message-ID: <60790.70.50.143.237.1199802286.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
> Yepp... superfluous newline in /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get
>
> ---snip ---
> # diff /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get-right /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get-wrong
> 1993c1993,1994
> < # Unless the conf file tells us to use another program, that is.
> ---
>> # Un
>> less the conf file tells us to use another program, that is.
> ---snip ---
>
> I assume that has to do something with the last update of wget that bailed
> out with deinstalling wget before wgetting the dependent packages...
>
> have a lot fun
Exactly! You are very insightful to see that coming. Phil and I were
talking on the weekend about the update to openssl packages as well as
openssh. I had been running those updates internally for some time and all
was well with them. We also re-packaged wget :
http://www.blastwave.org/packages.php/wget
This respin of wget was to remove a dependency on the openssl metapackage
and to put in a dependency on openssl_rt which is where the libs really are.
This means that during testing the pkg-get script would pull its legs out
from under itself with the removal of wget.
That explains the respin of pkg-get.
Now then, I am working on a procedure to control this sort of thing in the
future. It is 2008 now and we are well past the "getting started" stages.
Dennis Clarke
From khfp.blastwave0704 at gmx.de Thu Jan 10 14:55:36 2008
From: khfp.blastwave0704 at gmx.de (Klaus Heinz)
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 14:55:36 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] make target "package" does not work
Message-ID: <20080110135536.207170@gmx.net>
Hi,
with a csw repository at revision 1836 from svn.blastwave.org I get
the following error:
$ gmake package
...
[install] complete for libdes.
gmake: *** No rule to make target `/home/kh/CSW/destdir/
spool.5.9-sparc', needed by `package'. Stop.
This error happens with my own package recipe as well with recipes
from the repository (tested with devel/m4 and lib/readline).
The attached patch seems to fix it for me.
ciao
Klaus
--
GMX FreeMail: 1 GB Postfach, 5 E-Mail-Adressen, 10 Free SMS.
Alle Infos und kostenlose Anmeldung: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/freemail
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: gar.pkg.mk.diff
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 350 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20080110/524ab2dc/attachment.obj
From ml at eroteme.org Thu Jan 10 19:31:11 2008
From: ml at eroteme.org (S. Hakim Hamdani [ML])
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 23:01:11 +0430
Subject: [csw-users] meld and skencil broken by python upgrade?
Message-ID: <20080110230111.00001d00@asagao-jkk.greatwinter.org>
Hi all,
hadn't upgraded for a long time (six months roughly) and went from
python 2.3.x to 2.5.1 yesterday. since, meld and skencil are broken.
If anyone can advise, I'd be much obliged.
Cheers, Hakim
outputs:
[hhamdani at asagao-jkk ~]$ pkg-get -c | grep meld
meld 0.9 SAME
[hhamdani at asagao-jkk ~]$ pkg-get -c | grep skencil
skencil 0.6.16 SAME
[hhamdani at asagao-jkk ~]$ pkg-get -c | grep python
ap2_modpython [Not installed] 3.3.1,REV=2007.10.25
gnome_python 2.0.2,REV=2004.08.09 SAME
python 2.5.1,REV=2007.11.03 SAME
python_tk [Not installed] 2.5.1,REV=2007.11.03
[hhamdani at asagao-jkk ~]$ meld
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/opt/csw/bin/meld", line 69, in
import gtk
File "/opt/csw/lib/python2.3/site-packages/PIL/__init__.py", line 48,
in
ImportError: ld.so.1: python: fatal: relocation error:
file /opt/csw/lib/python/site-packages/gtk-2.0/gtk/_gtk.so: symbol
init_pygobject_check: referenced symbol not found
[hhamdani at asagao-jkk ~]$ skencil
/opt/csw/lib/skencil-0.6.16/Sketch/__init__.py:53: RuntimeWarning:
Python C API version mismatch for module _sketch: This Python has API
version 1013, module _sketch has version 1012. import
_sketch /opt/csw/lib/skencil-0.6.16/Sketch/__init__.py:53:
RuntimeWarning: Python C API version mismatch for module pax: This
Python has API version 1013, module pax has version 1012. import
_sketch /opt/csw/lib/python2.3/site-packages/PIL/Image.py:53:
RuntimeWarning: Python C API version mismatch for module _imaging: This
Python has API version 1013, module _imaging has version 1012. import
_imaging /opt/csw/lib/skencil-0.6.16/Sketch/Graphics/font.py:26:
RuntimeWarning: Python C API version mismatch for module streamfilter:
This Python has API version 1013, module streamfilter has version 1012.
import streamfilter /opt/csw/lib/skencil-0.6.16/Sketch/Lib/type1.py:31:
RuntimeWarning: Python C API version mismatch for module _type1: This
Python has API version 1013, module _type1 has version 1012. from
Sketch._type1 import decode,
hexdecode /opt/csw/lib/skencil-0.6.16/Sketch/Lib/type1.py:32:
RuntimeWarning: Python C API version mismatch for module pstokenize:
This Python has API version 1013, module pstokenize has version 1012.
from Sketch.pstokenize import PSTokenizer, OPERATOR, NAME, INT,
END /opt/csw/lib/skencil-0.6.16/Sketch/__init__.py:180: RuntimeWarning:
Python C API version mismatch for module paxtkinter: This Python has
API version 1013, module paxtkinter has version 1012. import paxtkinter
Traceback (most recent call last): File "/opt/csw/bin/skencil", line
34, in Sketch.main.main() File
"/opt/csw/lib/skencil-0.6.16/Sketch/Base/main.py", line 142, in main
Sketch.init_ui() File "/opt/csw/lib/skencil-0.6.16/Sketch/__init__.py",
line 187, in init_ui __import__(name) File
"/opt/csw/lib/skencil-0.6.16/Script/export_raster.py", line 46, in
from Sketch.UI.sketchdlg import SKModal File
"/opt/csw/lib/skencil-0.6.16/Sketch/UI/sketchdlg.py", line 66, in
from Tkinter import Toplevel, IntVar, Frame, Checkbutton,
Label ImportError: No module named Tkinter
--
S. Hakim Hamdani [ML] / Eroteme.org
From maybird1776 at yahoo.com Fri Jan 11 13:19:51 2008
From: maybird1776 at yahoo.com (ken mays)
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 04:19:51 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [csw-users] meld and skencil broken by python upgrade?
In-Reply-To: <20080110230111.00001d00@asagao-jkk.greatwinter.org>
Message-ID: <780117.88591.qm@web34203.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
The programs use various python binding packages. I've
refreshed pygtk and pygobject so that should fix them
for now. You have a few others, like gnome-python,
that will require those maintainers to refresh them as
well.
~ Ken
------------------->
Hi all,
hadn't upgraded for a long time (six months roughly)
and went from
python 2.3.x to 2.5.1 yesterday. since, meld and
skencil are broken.
If anyone can advise, I'd be much obliged.
Cheers, Hakim
outputs:
[hhamdani at asagao-jkk ~]$ pkg-get -c | grep meld
meld 0.9
SAME
[hhamdani at asagao-jkk ~]$ pkg-get -c | grep skencil
skencil 0.6.16
SAME
[hhamdani at asagao-jkk ~]$ pkg-get -c | grep python
ap2_modpython [Not installed]
3.3.1,REV=2007.10.25
gnome_python 2.0.2,REV=2004.08.09
SAME
python 2.5.1,REV=2007.11.03
SAME
python_tk
____________________________________________________________________________________
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page.
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
From ml at eroteme.org Sat Jan 12 20:32:14 2008
From: ml at eroteme.org (S. Hakim Hamdani [ML])
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 00:02:14 +0430
Subject: [csw-users] Another bit of python software broken after upgrade...
Message-ID: <20080113000214.00004df0@asagao-jkk.greatwinter.org>
Hello all,
bit of non-CSW software that used to run just fine with CSW software is
"gnome-specimen". since the last upgrade i did of my blastwave packages
(see my earlier email on the list regarding meld and skencil not
working anymore) it, too, isn't working anymore:
[hhamdani at asagao-jkk ~]$ gnome-specimen
Error: Importing pygtk and gtk modules failed (ld.so.1: python: fatal:
relocation error:
file /opt/csw/lib/python/site-packages/gtk-2.0/gtk/_gtk.so: symbol
init_pygobject_check: referenced symbol not found)
Cheers, Hakim
--
S. Hakim Hamdani [ML] / Eroteme.org
From a.cervellin at acm.org Sun Jan 13 10:52:29 2008
From: a.cervellin at acm.org (Alessio)
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 10:52:29 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] Another bit of python software broken after
upgrade...
In-Reply-To: <20080113000214.00004df0@asagao-jkk.greatwinter.org>
References: <20080113000214.00004df0@asagao-jkk.greatwinter.org>
Message-ID: <4789DF5D.6090707@acm.org>
Did you try pygobject 2.14.1 & pygtk 2.12.1?
You can find them on http://www.blastwave.org/testing
S. Hakim Hamdani [ML] wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> bit of non-CSW software that used to run just fine with CSW software is
> "gnome-specimen". since the last upgrade i did of my blastwave packages
> (see my earlier email on the list regarding meld and skencil not
> working anymore) it, too, isn't working anymore:
>
> [hhamdani at asagao-jkk ~]$ gnome-specimen
> Error: Importing pygtk and gtk modules failed (ld.so.1: python: fatal:
> relocation error:
> file /opt/csw/lib/python/site-packages/gtk-2.0/gtk/_gtk.so: symbol
> init_pygobject_check: referenced symbol not found)
>
> Cheers, Hakim
From gaa at ulticom.com Mon Jan 14 21:08:40 2008
From: gaa at ulticom.com (Gary Algier)
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 15:08:40 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] Source code for Blastwave packages?
Message-ID: <478BC148.1090905@ulticom.com>
Is there a simple way to get the source code for several Blastwave packages?
For example, I want to get the source code used to build Wireshark. If I
lookup Wireshark on the Blastwave software list it says:
http://www.wireshark.org/
While this may be the Wireshark web site, it does not get me to the exact
source code used to build Wireshark. This leads me to version 0.99.7, but
the binary is version 0.99.5.
In addition, I can't just stop there. In order to make Wireshark work,
I need to install 35 packages. Each of those could have the same problem.
I bring this up because the company I work for would like to include
Wireshark on our distributions for our own support purposes, but we
do not want to violate any of the license agreements. Several of the
licenses require us to be able to supply the source code matching
the binaries if we supply the binaries.
Is this stuff on the binary DVDs available? If I do order a set for
$45.00 can I order the equivalent source DVD for $45.00, too?
--
Gary Algier, WB2FWZ gaa at ulticom.com +1 856 787 2758
Ulticom Inc., 1020 Briggs Rd, Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054 Fax:+1 856 866 2033
Nielsen's First Law of Computer Manuals:
People don't read documentation voluntarily.
From dclarke at blastwave.org Mon Jan 14 21:25:35 2008
From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke)
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 15:25:35 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [csw-users] Source code for Blastwave packages?
In-Reply-To: <478BC148.1090905@ulticom.com>
References: <478BC148.1090905@ulticom.com>
Message-ID: <1481.72.39.216.186.1200342335.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
> Is there a simple way to get the source code for several Blastwave packages?
>
> For example, I want to get the source code used to build Wireshark. If I
> lookup Wireshark on the Blastwave software list it says:
> http://www.wireshark.org/
> While this may be the Wireshark web site, it does not get me to the exact
> source code used to build Wireshark. This leads me to version 0.99.7, but
> the binary is version 0.99.5.
>
> In addition, I can't just stop there. In order to make Wireshark work,
> I need to install 35 packages. Each of those could have the same problem.
>
> I bring this up because the company I work for would like to include
> Wireshark on our distributions for our own support purposes, but we
> do not want to violate any of the license agreements. Several of the
> licenses require us to be able to supply the source code matching
> the binaries if we supply the binaries.
>
> Is this stuff on the binary DVDs available? If I do order a set for
> $45.00 can I order the equivalent source DVD for $45.00, too?
I'm on the phone with you now .. we can sort this out.
No problem.
-
Dennis Clarke
From dclarke at blastwave.org Mon Jan 14 21:33:14 2008
From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke)
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 15:33:14 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [csw-users] Source code for Blastwave packages?
In-Reply-To: <478BC148.1090905@ulticom.com>
References: <478BC148.1090905@ulticom.com>
Message-ID: <1495.72.39.216.186.1200342794.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
> Is there a simple way to get the source code for several Blastwave packages?
>
> For example, I want to get the source code used to build Wireshark. If I
> lookup Wireshark on the Blastwave software list it says:
> http://www.wireshark.org/
> While this may be the Wireshark web site, it does not get me to the exact
> source code used to build Wireshark. This leads me to version 0.99.7, but
> the binary is version 0.99.5.
>
> In addition, I can't just stop there. In order to make Wireshark work,
> I need to install 35 packages. Each of those could have the same problem.
>
> I bring this up because the company I work for would like to include
> Wireshark on our distributions for our own support purposes, but we
> do not want to violate any of the license agreements. Several of the
> licenses require us to be able to supply the source code matching
> the binaries if we supply the binaries.
>
> Is this stuff on the binary DVDs available? If I do order a set for
> $45.00 can I order the equivalent source DVD for $45.00, too?
I know that you need more than this :
http://www.wireshark.org/download/src/all-versions/
... and I'll just wait for your email.
Dennis Clarke
dclarke at blastwave.org
From a.cervellin at acm.org Mon Jan 14 21:39:10 2008
From: a.cervellin at acm.org (Alessio)
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 21:39:10 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] Source code for Blastwave packages?
In-Reply-To: <478BC148.1090905@ulticom.com>
References: <478BC148.1090905@ulticom.com>
Message-ID: <478BC86E.5050009@acm.org>
Gary Algier wrote:
> For example, I want to get the source code used to build Wireshark. If I
> lookup Wireshark on the Blastwave software list it says:
> http://www.wireshark.org/
> While this may be the Wireshark web site, it does not get me to the exact
> source code used to build Wireshark.
it's built upon the official source code, which can be downloaded from
www.wireshark.org
no patches are needed, sometimes it could be needed small syntax fixes
to have it compliant with Sun C, anyway these patches are always
reported upstream.
> This leads me to version 0.99.7, but
> the binary is version 0.99.5.
because the 0.99.7 binary is still under testing on
http://www.blastwave.org/testing
From bob.cauthen at gmail.com Tue Jan 15 01:11:17 2008
From: bob.cauthen at gmail.com (BobC)
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 19:11:17 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] gnome hangs shortly after login
Message-ID: <4b3336c0801141611v4d6c0b9cpb21cb5fc70b08fa7@mail.gmail.com>
All-
Fresh install of Solaris 10 8/07. Just created a new zone and installed
Blastwave GNOME into the zone successfully.
I log in and everything is fine until..... I open File Manager/Nautilus and
choose help -> about and my gnome session hangs.
I can force it to hang every time that way. If I don't, it will hang 2-5
minutes after login every time.
I have enabled .dt session logs but they don't tell anything specific.
Anyone seen this before? Any other ideas?
BobC
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20080114/fb221875/attachment.html
From dclarke at blastwave.org Tue Jan 15 01:37:21 2008
From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke)
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 19:37:21 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [csw-users] gnome hangs shortly after login
In-Reply-To: <4b3336c0801141611v4d6c0b9cpb21cb5fc70b08fa7@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4b3336c0801141611v4d6c0b9cpb21cb5fc70b08fa7@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <60922.70.50.141.103.1200357441.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
> All-
> Fresh install of Solaris 10 8/07. Just created a new zone and installed
> Blastwave GNOME into the zone successfully.
>
> I log in and everything is fine until..... I open File Manager/Nautilus and
> choose help -> about and my gnome session hangs.
>
> I can force it to hang every time that way. If I don't, it will hang 2-5
> minutes after login every time.
>
> I have enabled .dt session logs but they don't tell anything specific.
>
sadly yes.
what version of GTK2 do you have there ?
run pkginfo -l CSWgtk2
Dennis
From bob.cauthen at gmail.com Tue Jan 15 16:51:10 2008
From: bob.cauthen at gmail.com (BobC)
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 10:51:10 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] gnome hangs shortly after login
In-Reply-To: <111812.93193.qm@web34210.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
References: <4b3336c0801141611v4d6c0b9cpb21cb5fc70b08fa7@mail.gmail.com>
<111812.93193.qm@web34210.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <4b3336c0801150751n3a1a6e98w7142e77728482718@mail.gmail.com>
Yep, I forced a pkgrm on CSWgtk2 that was installed with the current gnome
out of unstable, and installed the gtk2 2.10.11 from
blastwave.org/testingand it works (mostly).
It still seems to have some problems so I'll wait for 2.20/2.22...
Regardless, thanks for BOTH replies.... Ken and Dennis.
BobC
On Jan 14, 2008 11:49 PM, ken mays wrote:
> You may need the older GTK2 2.10.11 library until can
> be updated to GNOME 2.20/2.22.
>
> I'll try to leave a copy at
> http://www.blastwave.org/testing.
>
> ~K
>
>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> Be a better friend, newshound, and
> know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
> http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20080115/79436bc0/attachment.html
From dag at bakke.com Thu Jan 17 09:25:48 2008
From: dag at bakke.com (dag at bakke.com)
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 08:25:48 +0000 (GMT)
Subject: [csw-users] /testing ucarp 1.3
Message-ID: <721200944.293961200558348847.JavaMail.mail@webmail03>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20080117/e075f1e1/attachment.html
From michael.schmarck at habmalnefrage.de Fri Jan 18 14:56:31 2008
From: michael.schmarck at habmalnefrage.de (Michael Schmarck)
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 13:56:31 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: [csw-users] Cannot install gcc4core
Message-ID:
Hello.
I tried to install gcc4core-4.0.2,REV=2005.09.29-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
on my SunOS 5.10 Generic_127111-05 machine. The pkg-get -i gcc4core
failed:
## Executing postinstall script.
*** NOTICE ***
Fixing the system headers
for a detailed log see /var/sadm/install/logs/CSWgcc4core-20080118122651
Don't forget: whenever your system headers change run the mkheaders script!
pkgadd: ERROR: postinstall script did not complete successfully
Installation of failed.
ERROR: could not add CSWgcc4core.
apache at winds01 ~ $ cat /var/sadm/install/logs/CSWgcc4core-20080118122651
chown: X11: No such file or directory
postinstall: anomaly : cannot change ownership for include directory!
There are /usr/include/X11 and /usr/X11 directories/symlinks
on my system. The links point to existing directories.
What's broken?
Thanks a lot,
Michael
From dam at baltic-online.de Fri Jan 18 21:09:37 2008
From: dam at baltic-online.de (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 21:09:37 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] /testing ucarp 1.3
In-Reply-To: <721200944.293961200558348847.JavaMail.mail@webmail03>
References: <721200944.293961200558348847.JavaMail.mail@webmail03>
Message-ID: <0706B0E0-1969-43E9-AFC7-447AD06B7D9C@baltic-online.de>
Hi Dag,
Am 17.01.2008 um 09:25 schrieb dag at bakke.com:
> I'll refer to: http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/2006-June/
> 001543.html ,
> which lists a number of Solaris specific patches for ucarp.
> Of particular interest would be 'patch 003-ucarp-solaris-if.diff',
> as I appear to have a problem with timing between master and backup.
> (The new master detects backup as active on the virtual IP and
> decides to disable the virtual IP.)
>
> Are these patches present in the version of ucarp currently on
> blastwave?
> It sure doesn't look like it, but I could be mistaken. If the
> patches really are present, are there any undocumented switches I
> could use?
>
> In short, how do I go about not using the up/down scripts?
I opened a bug report where the maintainer is informed.
You can track the progress at
http://www.blastwave.org/mantis/view_bug_advanced_page.php?
f_id=0002745
Best regards
-- Dago
From waldirio at gmail.com Wed Jan 23 13:00:29 2008
From: waldirio at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Waldirio_Manh=E3es_Pinheiro?=)
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 10:00:29 -0200
Subject: [csw-users] NetSnmp
Message-ID: <7df9f1820801230400v7b7f0b5dm49d273833dcd8e94@mail.gmail.com>
Hello All
I checked in sparc version of netsnmp package and cannot find snmpconf (used
to create a snmpd.conf file), I extracted the i386 package and copy the
struct below:
1. copy the dir opt/csw/share/snmp to /opt/csw/share
2. copy the file opt/csw/bin/snmpconf to /opt/csw/bin
3. create the dir /opt/csw/etc/snmp
Now, snmpconf work's fine creating config file.
I would like of know if is possible the package upgrade with this include ;)
Another doubt is about the mib's files (generally put in
/opt/csw/share/snmp). What package is necessary to install.
Tnx and Regards
Waldirio
--
______________
Atenciosamente
Waldirio
msn: wmp at sinope.com.br
Site: www.waldirio.com.br
Blog: blog.waldirio.com.br
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20080123/485f1c56/attachment.html
From iand at blastwave.org Wed Jan 23 14:16:24 2008
From: iand at blastwave.org (Ian Dickinson)
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 13:16:24 +0000
Subject: [csw-users] NetSnmp
In-Reply-To: <7df9f1820801230400v7b7f0b5dm49d273833dcd8e94@mail.gmail.com>
References: <7df9f1820801230400v7b7f0b5dm49d273833dcd8e94@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <47973E28.9030807@blastwave.org>
I'm currently working on packaging the latest net-snmp and will make sure this
works in the new version.
Ian
Waldirio Manh?es Pinheiro wrote:
> Hello All
>
> I checked in sparc version of netsnmp package and cannot find snmpconf (used
> to create a snmpd.conf file), I extracted the i386 package and copy the
> struct below:
> 1. copy the dir opt/csw/share/snmp to /opt/csw/share
> 2. copy the file opt/csw/bin/snmpconf to /opt/csw/bin
> 3. create the dir /opt/csw/etc/snmp
>
> Now, snmpconf work's fine creating config file.
>
> I would like of know if is possible the package upgrade with this include ;)
>
> Another doubt is about the mib's files (generally put in
> /opt/csw/share/snmp). What package is necessary to install.
>
> Tnx and Regards
> Waldirio
From waldirio at gmail.com Wed Jan 23 19:53:31 2008
From: waldirio at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Waldirio_Manh=E3es_Pinheiro?=)
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:53:31 -0200
Subject: [csw-users] NetSnmp
In-Reply-To: <47973E28.9030807@blastwave.org>
References: <7df9f1820801230400v7b7f0b5dm49d273833dcd8e94@mail.gmail.com>
<47973E28.9030807@blastwave.org>
Message-ID: <7df9f1820801231053w54c6b630h7d523dea55073414@mail.gmail.com>
Ok Ian,
Thanks for answer and I would like of make a second question (if is
possible ;) ), about init scripts, what usually the friend recommend ??!
Normally I create a start script "/etc/init.d" and put a link in
/etc/rc3.d to start and /etc/rc0.d to halt. If this is normal to package CSW
(I don't know if is), why isn't created ?!
Thanks all and sorry for any mistake in my english.
Regards
Waldirio
2008/1/23, Ian Dickinson :
>
> I'm currently working on packaging the latest net-snmp and will make sure
> this
> works in the new version.
>
> Ian
>
> Waldirio Manh?es Pinheiro wrote:
> > Hello All
> >
> > I checked in sparc version of netsnmp package and cannot find snmpconf
> (used
> > to create a snmpd.conf file), I extracted the i386 package and copy the
> > struct below:
> > 1. copy the dir opt/csw/share/snmp to /opt/csw/share
> > 2. copy the file opt/csw/bin/snmpconf to /opt/csw/bin
> > 3. create the dir /opt/csw/etc/snmp
> >
> > Now, snmpconf work's fine creating config file.
> >
> > I would like of know if is possible the package upgrade with this
> include ;)
> >
> > Another doubt is about the mib's files (generally put in
> > /opt/csw/share/snmp). What package is necessary to install.
> >
> > Tnx and Regards
> > Waldirio
>
--
______________
Atenciosamente
Waldirio
msn: wmp at sinope.com.br
Site: www.waldirio.com.br
Blog: blog.waldirio.com.br
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20080123/69e8c234/attachment-0001.html
From iand at blastwave.org Tue Jan 29 12:58:55 2008
From: iand at blastwave.org (Ian Dickinson)
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 11:58:55 +0000
Subject: [csw-users] NetSnmp
In-Reply-To: <7df9f1820801231053w54c6b630h7d523dea55073414@mail.gmail.com>
References: <7df9f1820801230400v7b7f0b5dm49d273833dcd8e94@mail.gmail.com> <47973E28.9030807@blastwave.org>
<7df9f1820801231053w54c6b630h7d523dea55073414@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <479F14FF.9080709@blastwave.org>
Hi,
When the new netsnmp is packaged (coming soon) it will conform to the same
method as the existing package, which does not install startup scripts.
In a future release, I will repackage it to split out the agent and trap
listeners to different packages, since not everyone wants these i.e. it's
quite common to only want the commands and libraries, and have no services
running. At this point, I'll make it create the startup scripts in line with
blastwave guidelines.
In the meantime, I'm afraid you'll have to make your own.
Ian
Waldirio Manh?es Pinheiro wrote:
> Ok Ian,
>
> Thanks for answer and I would like of make a second question (if is
> possible ;) ), about init scripts, what usually the friend recommend ??!
>
> Normally I create a start script "/etc/init.d" and put a link in
> /etc/rc3.d to start and /etc/rc0.d to halt. If this is normal to package CSW
> (I don't know if is), why isn't created ?!
>
> Thanks all and sorry for any mistake in my english.
>
> Regards
> Waldirio
>
> 2008/1/23, Ian Dickinson :
>
>>I'm currently working on packaging the latest net-snmp and will make sure
>>this
>>works in the new version.
>>
>>Ian
>>
>>Waldirio Manh?es Pinheiro wrote:
>>
>>> Hello All
>>>
>>>I checked in sparc version of netsnmp package and cannot find snmpconf
>>
>>(used
>>
>>>to create a snmpd.conf file), I extracted the i386 package and copy the
>>>struct below:
>>>1. copy the dir opt/csw/share/snmp to /opt/csw/share
>>>2. copy the file opt/csw/bin/snmpconf to /opt/csw/bin
>>>3. create the dir /opt/csw/etc/snmp
>>>
>>>Now, snmpconf work's fine creating config file.
>>>
>>>I would like of know if is possible the package upgrade with this
>>
>>include ;)
>>
>>>Another doubt is about the mib's files (generally put in
>>>/opt/csw/share/snmp). What package is necessary to install.
>>>
>>>Tnx and Regards
>>>Waldirio
>>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.blastwave.org
> https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users
From delrio at mie.utoronto.ca Tue Jan 29 17:23:22 2008
From: delrio at mie.utoronto.ca (Oscar del Rio)
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 11:23:22 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] Cannot install gcc4core
In-Reply-To:
References:
Message-ID: <479F52FA.10707@mie.utoronto.ca>
Michael Schmarck wrote:
> I tried to install gcc4core-4.0.2,REV=2005.09.29-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> on my SunOS 5.10 Generic_127111-05 machine. The pkg-get -i gcc4core
> failed:
>
> ## Executing postinstall script.
> *** NOTICE ***
> Fixing the system headers
> for a detailed log see /var/sadm/install/logs/CSWgcc4core-20080118122651
> Don't forget: whenever your system headers change run the mkheaders script!
> pkgadd: ERROR: postinstall script did not complete successfully
>
> Installation of failed.
> ERROR: could not add CSWgcc4core.
>
> apache at winds01 ~ $ cat /var/sadm/install/logs/CSWgcc4core-20080118122651
> chown: X11: No such file or directory
> postinstall: anomaly : cannot change ownership for include directory!
I am getting the same error for gcc3core.
There is a bad symlink in /opt/csw/gcc3/...
# pwd
/opt/csw/gcc3/lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/3.4.5/include
# ls -ld X11
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 34 Jan 29 11:12 X11
-> root/usr/openwin/share/include/X11
^^^^
# cat /etc/release
Solaris Express Community Edition snv_78 SPARC
Copyright 2007 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Use is subject to license terms.
Assembled 20 November 2007
From delrio at mie.utoronto.ca Tue Jan 29 17:36:37 2008
From: delrio at mie.utoronto.ca (Oscar del Rio)
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 11:36:37 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] Cannot install gcc4core
In-Reply-To: <479F52FA.10707@mie.utoronto.ca>
References:
<479F52FA.10707@mie.utoronto.ca>
Message-ID: <479F5615.4070403@mie.utoronto.ca>
> # ls -ld X11
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 34 Jan 29 11:12 X11
> -> root/usr/openwin/share/include/X11
> ^^^^
sorry, there is a ./root directory but without the X11 target
From brian.gupta at gmail.com Wed Jan 2 08:48:45 2008
From: brian.gupta at gmail.com (Brian Gupta)
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 02:48:45 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] Ruby questions...
In-Reply-To: <5b5090780801012340see35992o389245eed90ffb0@mail.gmail.com>
References: <5b5090780801012340see35992o389245eed90ffb0@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <5b5090780801012348k2bc8d841n9ca30098e5bc4825@mail.gmail.com>
It seems that Ruby was built with Sun Studio. This means that when I
try to install a "native" gem that needs to be compiled, the gems
installer will try to use Sun Studio to compile the gem.
I am wondering, since Sun Studio is not included in the Blastwave
repository, and is not freely redistributable, does it make sense to
instead build Ruby with the version of GCC that is in the repository?
Another option would be to support "packaging" of gems. This way
common gems that need to be compiled could be precompiled for pkg-get
installation. (One way to do this would be a single package with all
the most common "native" gems precompiled and preconfigured.).
Please let me know if I am missing a simple option, as this is making
upgrading and installing certain gems rather annoying. (And reminding
me again why Blastwave-like systems are useful).
(Another option, is to submit precompiled Solaris Gems to the upstream
gem repositories, like they do for Win32. I don't know if this would
only make things confusing with the Sparc and x86 32/64bit options.)
Cheers,
Brian
--
- Brian Gupta
http://opensolaris.org/os/project/nycosug/
From ihsan at blastwave.org Wed Jan 2 10:59:05 2008
From: ihsan at blastwave.org (Ihsan Dogan)
Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2008 10:59:05 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] Ruby questions...
In-Reply-To: <5b5090780801012348k2bc8d841n9ca30098e5bc4825@mail.gmail.com>
References: <5b5090780801012340see35992o389245eed90ffb0@mail.gmail.com>
<5b5090780801012348k2bc8d841n9ca30098e5bc4825@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <477B6069.9060509@blastwave.org>
Hello Brian,
Am 2.1.2008 8:48 Uhr, Brian Gupta schrieb:
> It seems that Ruby was built with Sun Studio. This means that when I
> try to install a "native" gem that needs to be compiled, the gems
> installer will try to use Sun Studio to compile the gem.
>
> I am wondering, since Sun Studio is not included in the Blastwave
> repository, and is not freely redistributable, does it make sense to
> instead build Ruby with the version of GCC that is in the repository?
You can download Sun Studio 12 for free from
http://developers.sun.com/sunstudio/
Ihsan
--
ihsan at dogan.ch http://blog.dogan.ch/
http://ihsan.dogan.ch/
From chewie at wookimus.net Wed Jan 2 18:03:54 2008
From: chewie at wookimus.net (Chad Walstrom)
Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2008 11:03:54 -0600
Subject: [csw-users] Ruby questions...
In-Reply-To: <477B6069.9060509@blastwave.org>
References: <5b5090780801012340see35992o389245eed90ffb0@mail.gmail.com>
<5b5090780801012348k2bc8d841n9ca30098e5bc4825@mail.gmail.com>
<477B6069.9060509@blastwave.org>
Message-ID: <7777.1199293434@skuld.wookimus.net>
You can also download Sun Studio 11 if you need Solaris 8 compiles.
Chad
From chris.ridd at isode.com Thu Jan 3 13:00:34 2008
From: chris.ridd at isode.com (Chris Ridd)
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2008 12:00:34 +0000
Subject: [csw-users] Request for git package
Message-ID: <477CCE62.5010100@isode.com>
I'm afraid I couldn't spot the (probably very obvious) link on the
Blastwave website for requesting new packages, so here goes:
Is it possible for someone to package the "git" distributed version
control system to Blastwave? It is becoming quite a popular tool, and is
similar in some ways to Mercurial.
It relies on a number of GNU utilities at runtime, but it does build on
Solaris using Sun Studio. I'd just rather someone else built it instead
of me ;-)
The project's website is at:
Thanks,
Chris
From maybird1776 at yahoo.com Thu Jan 3 17:00:44 2008
From: maybird1776 at yahoo.com (ken mays)
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 08:00:44 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [csw-users] GIMP 2.4.3 available
In-Reply-To: <477CCE62.5010100@isode.com>
Message-ID: <436073.6671.qm@web34209.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
GIMP 2.4.3 for Sun Solaris 8 and above now available!
GIMP is an acronym for GNU Image Manipulation Program.
It is a freely distributed program for such tasks as
photo retouching, image composition and image
authoring.
It has many capabilities. It can be used as a simple
paint program, an expert quality photo retouching
program, an online batch processing system, a mass
production image renderer, an image format converter,
etc.
GIMP is expandable and extensible. It is designed to
be augmented with plug-ins and extensions to do just
about anything. The advanced scripting interface
allows everything from the simplest task to the most
complex image manipulation procedures to be easily
scripted.
See:
http://www.gimp.org/about/introduction.html
http://www.gimp.org/books/
Ken Mays
Blastwave.org GIMP maintainer
____________________________________________________________________________________
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page.
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
From David.Mackintosh at xdroop.com Thu Jan 3 18:24:01 2008
From: David.Mackintosh at xdroop.com (David Mackintosh)
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 12:24:01 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] Self-inflicted sendmail problem?
Message-ID: <20080103172401.GC31828@xdroop.com>
Hi folks,
I'm having a problem installing CSWsendmail, and can't figure out how
to dig myself out of this hole I've dug.
I'm running Solaris 9 on a v210. My blastwave install is about 18
months old, but I do the pkg-get upgrade all; it was last done about
a week ago.
I think where I messed up was that I did not uninstall the Sun
packages before I attempted to install the blastwave one. I have
since uninstalled the Sun sendmail packages, and now I'm in this
state.
The install ticks along for a while, then announces:
## Executing checkinstall script.
## Processing package information.
## Processing system information.
5 package pathnames are already properly installed.
Installing sendmail - Sendmail MTA as
## Executing preinstall script.
adding smmsp group
adding smmsp user
chroot: No such file or directory
pkgadd: ERROR: preinstall script did not complete successfully
Installation of failed.
ERROR: could not add CSWsendmail.
On the advice of the #blastwave IRC channel, I removed the smmsp user
and groups; this is why they are being created, above.
Does anyone have a link to a web page that might help me figure
out how to get me out of this hole?
--
/\oo/\
/ /()\ \ David Mackintosh |
dave at xdroop.com | http://www.xdroop.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
From bonivart at blastwave.org Thu Jan 3 18:52:07 2008
From: bonivart at blastwave.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 18:52:07 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] Self-inflicted sendmail problem?
In-Reply-To: <20080103172401.GC31828@xdroop.com>
References: <20080103172401.GC31828@xdroop.com>
Message-ID: <625385e30801030952s717172fckc0834d805a1d4f54@mail.gmail.com>
On Jan 3, 2008 6:24 PM, David Mackintosh wrote:
> I think where I messed up was that I did not uninstall the Sun
> packages before I attempted to install the blastwave one. I have
> since uninstalled the Sun sendmail packages, and now I'm in this
> state.
I've never had to remove Sun's sendmail.
> ## Executing preinstall script.
> adding smmsp group
> adding smmsp user
> chroot: No such file or directory
> pkgadd: ERROR: preinstall script did not complete successfully
Seems like one of these two lines have failed:
chroot $PKG_INSTALL_ROOT /usr/sbin/useradd -g smmsp smmsp
chroot $PKG_INSTALL_ROOT /usr/sbin/usermod -c "SendMail Message
Submission Program" -d $MYHOME smmsp
--
/peter
From res at colnet.cmhnet.org Thu Jan 3 20:04:33 2008
From: res at colnet.cmhnet.org (Rob Stampfli)
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 14:04:33 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] Self-inflicted sendmail problem?
In-Reply-To: <20080103172401.GC31828@xdroop.com>
References: <20080103172401.GC31828@xdroop.com>
Message-ID: <20080103190433.GA1283@keevey>
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 12:24:01PM -0500, David Mackintosh wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm having a problem installing CSWsendmail, and can't figure out how
> to dig myself out of this hole I've dug.
...
> ## Executing preinstall script.
> adding smmsp group
> adding smmsp user
> chroot: No such file or directory
> pkgadd: ERROR: preinstall script did not complete successfully
>
> Installation of failed.
> ERROR: could not add CSWsendmail.
>
> On the advice of the #blastwave IRC channel, I removed the smmsp user
> and groups; this is why they are being created, above.
>
> Does anyone have a link to a web page that might help me figure
> out how to get me out of this hole?
Are you sure you have the latest sendmail package? There was a
version release just before Christmas that had a bug which fails
precisely the same way on sparc architectures. The current
version is:
sendmail-8.14.2,REV=2007.12.17-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
(2384863 bytes, md5sum aca820319c20802e46d4d2cfe190e908)
This one installed correctly on my machine.
Perhaps you should try another mirror, or if you can't find it
elsewhere, write me and I'll make a copy available to you.
Rob
From David.Mackintosh at xdroop.com Thu Jan 3 21:22:02 2008
From: David.Mackintosh at xdroop.com (David Mackintosh)
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 15:22:02 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] Self-inflicted sendmail problem?
In-Reply-To: <20080103190433.GA1283@keevey>
References: <20080103172401.GC31828@xdroop.com> <20080103190433.GA1283@keevey>
Message-ID: <20080103202202.GA12388@xdroop.com>
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 02:04:33PM -0500, Rob Stampfli wrote:
> Are you sure you have the latest sendmail package? There was a
> version release just before Christmas that had a bug which fails
> precisely the same way on sparc architectures. The current
> version is:
>
> sendmail-8.14.2,REV=2007.12.17-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> (2384863 bytes, md5sum aca820319c20802e46d4d2cfe190e908)
Thank you -- I had the one from December 14, updating the catalog
fixes the problem.
One stupid/supplemental question: where might I find the sendmail.mc
file?
--
/\oo/\
/ /()\ \ David Mackintosh |
dave at xdroop.com | http://www.xdroop.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
From res at colnet.cmhnet.org Thu Jan 3 22:38:53 2008
From: res at colnet.cmhnet.org (Rob Stampfli)
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 16:38:53 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] Self-inflicted sendmail problem?
In-Reply-To: <20080103202202.GA12388@xdroop.com>
References: <20080103172401.GC31828@xdroop.com> <20080103190433.GA1283@keevey>
<20080103202202.GA12388@xdroop.com>
Message-ID: <20080103213853.GA5851@keevey>
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 03:22:02PM -0500, David Mackintosh wrote:
> One stupid/supplemental question: where might I find the sendmail.mc
> file?
/opt/csw/share/mail/cf
Rob
From David.Mackintosh at xdroop.com Fri Jan 4 17:00:58 2008
From: David.Mackintosh at xdroop.com (David Mackintosh)
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 11:00:58 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] Self-inflicted sendmail problem?
In-Reply-To: <20080103213853.GA5851@keevey>
References: <20080103172401.GC31828@xdroop.com> <20080103190433.GA1283@keevey>
<20080103202202.GA12388@xdroop.com> <20080103213853.GA5851@keevey>
Message-ID: <20080104160057.GB12388@xdroop.com>
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 04:38:53PM -0500, Rob Stampfli wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 03:22:02PM -0500, David Mackintosh wrote:
> > One stupid/supplemental question: where might I find the sendmail.mc
> > file?
>
> /opt/csw/share/mail/cf
Doesn't seem to be there.
Ahh, maybe I'm not blind -- it's not in the package file list either
according to http://www.blastwave.org/filesearch/sendmail
/\oo/\
/ /()\ \ David Mackintosh |
dave at xdroop.com | http://www.xdroop.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
From David.Mackintosh at xdroop.com Fri Jan 4 17:11:37 2008
From: David.Mackintosh at xdroop.com (David Mackintosh)
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 11:11:37 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] Self-inflicted sendmail problem?
In-Reply-To: <20080104160057.GB12388@xdroop.com>
References: <20080103172401.GC31828@xdroop.com> <20080103190433.GA1283@keevey>
<20080103202202.GA12388@xdroop.com> <20080103213853.GA5851@keevey>
<20080104160057.GB12388@xdroop.com>
Message-ID: <20080104161136.GC12388@xdroop.com>
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 11:00:58AM -0500, David Mackintosh wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 04:38:53PM -0500, Rob Stampfli wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 03:22:02PM -0500, David Mackintosh wrote:
> > > One stupid/supplemental question: where might I find the sendmail.mc
> > > file?
> >
> > /opt/csw/share/mail/cf
>
> Doesn't seem to be there.
>
> Ahh, maybe I'm not blind -- it's not in the package file list either
> according to http://www.blastwave.org/filesearch/sendmail
No, I am blind, I want main.cf and then edit it to taste.
Thanks all for your help!
--
/\oo/\
/ /()\ \ David Mackintosh |
dave at xdroop.com | http://www.xdroop.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
From james at blastwave.org Fri Jan 4 17:17:47 2008
From: james at blastwave.org (James Lee)
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2008 16:17:47 GMT
Subject: [csw-users] Self-inflicted sendmail problem?
In-Reply-To: <20080104160057.GB12388@xdroop.com>
References: <20080103172401.GC31828@xdroop.com> <20080103190433.GA1283@keevey>
<20080103202202.GA12388@xdroop.com> <20080103213853.GA5851@keevey>
<20080104160057.GB12388@xdroop.com>
Message-ID: <20080104.16174700.3219626124@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk>
On 04/01/08, 16:00:58, David Mackintosh wrote
regarding Re: [csw-users] Self-inflicted sendmail problem?:
> On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 04:38:53PM -0500, Rob Stampfli wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 03:22:02PM -0500, David Mackintosh wrote:
> > > One stupid/supplemental question: where might I find the sendmail.mc
> > > file?
> >
> > /opt/csw/share/mail/cf
> Doesn't seem to be there.
> Ahh, maybe I'm not blind -- it's not in the package file list either
> according to http://www.blastwave.org/filesearch/sendmail
sendmail.mc isn't, you make sendmail.cf using m4 from one of the .mc
example files or write your own .mc file.
/opt/csw/share/mail/cf/ contains the example .mc files with suffix
.mc.CSW.
James.
From brian.gupta at gmail.com Mon Jan 7 19:48:31 2008
From: brian.gupta at gmail.com (Brian Gupta)
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 13:48:31 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] SMF behaviour.
Message-ID: <5b5090780801071048h47496af7g5011d39a1ec48944@mail.gmail.com>
Certain packages interact with the SMF database on SMF capable systems.
Is there anyway to disable this behavior, and have it act like it is
working with a system that does not have SMF capabilities? (So that my
Solaris 8, Solaris 10, and SXCE Blastwave package operations are
identical)
Thanks,
Brian
--
- Brian Gupta
http://opensolaris.org/os/project/nycosug/
From bonivart at blastwave.org Mon Jan 7 20:40:12 2008
From: bonivart at blastwave.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 20:40:12 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] SMF behaviour.
In-Reply-To: <5b5090780801071048h47496af7g5011d39a1ec48944@mail.gmail.com>
References: <5b5090780801071048h47496af7g5011d39a1ec48944@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <625385e30801071140n3be34ca4k4f35d5bf3d71a1a1@mail.gmail.com>
On Jan 7, 2008 7:48 PM, Brian Gupta wrote:
> Certain packages interact with the SMF database on SMF capable systems.
>
> Is there anyway to disable this behavior, and have it act like it is
> working with a system that does not have SMF capabilities? (So that my
> Solaris 8, Solaris 10, and SXCE Blastwave package operations are
> identical)
Here's what we follow to add SMF support to CSW packages. Maybe you
can find a way to make installation not pick up SMF capabilities on
your Solaris 10+ systems.
http://www.blastwave.org/standards/smf.html
I've never heard the request before but I guess it's a valid point.
:-) We have this autoenable_daemons variable we support (see below).
Maybe something like use_smf in csw.conf would be good to have?
http://www.blastwave.org/standards/csw.conf.html
--
/peter
From maseda at unc.edu Mon Jan 7 21:13:06 2008
From: maseda at unc.edu (Mike Seda)
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2008 15:13:06 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] SMF behaviour.
In-Reply-To: <625385e30801071140n3be34ca4k4f35d5bf3d71a1a1@mail.gmail.com>
References: <5b5090780801071048h47496af7g5011d39a1ec48944@mail.gmail.com>
<625385e30801071140n3be34ca4k4f35d5bf3d71a1a1@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <478287D2.7080904@unc.edu>
Peter Bonivart wrote:
> On Jan 7, 2008 7:48 PM, Brian Gupta wrote:
>
>> Certain packages interact with the SMF database on SMF capable systems.
>>
>> Is there anyway to disable this behavior, and have it act like it is
>> working with a system that does not have SMF capabilities? (So that my
>> Solaris 8, Solaris 10, and SXCE Blastwave package operations are
>> identical)
>>
>
> Here's what we follow to add SMF support to CSW packages. Maybe you
> can find a way to make installation not pick up SMF capabilities on
> your Solaris 10+ systems.
>
> http://www.blastwave.org/standards/smf.html
>
> I've never heard the request before but I guess it's a valid point.
> :-) We have this autoenable_daemons variable we support (see below).
> Maybe something like use_smf in csw.conf would be good to have?
>
yes, it would
> http://www.blastwave.org/standards/csw.conf.html
>
>
From bonivart at blastwave.org Tue Jan 8 10:03:45 2008
From: bonivart at blastwave.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 10:03:45 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] Problems with MailScanner
Message-ID: <625385e30801080103j2038107cv89e33dfe294cb470@mail.gmail.com>
The first problem is only for those of you running Solaris 8, the
pre/post-scripts have a feature in them that is only supported in
Solaris 9 and 10. You should upgrade to 4.65,REV=2008.01.04. It's on
its way to unstable but can be found in testing for manual upgrade:
http://www.blastwave.org/testing/mailscanner-4.65.3.1,REV=2008.01.04-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz
The second problem is much more serious. Upgrades of the perl modules
mailtools and mimetools broke MailScanner 4.65 and it hit a lot of
Linux users quick to upgrade their systems. We still had version 1.71
of mailtools and 5.420 of mimetools so we were OK but for MailScanner
4.66 to work OK we needed version 2.02 and 5.425 of those modules and
they were built quickly by their maintainers. That in combination with
problems with a third perl module (IO) made both MailScanner 4.65 and
4.66 problematic for us.
What this means is that if you upgrade mailtools and mimetools, either
separately or by doing a full upgrade, you will end up with a broken
MailScanner 4.65 that will not start. I have prepared a temporary
package for MailScanner 4.66 in testing that has workarounds for the
third problem with the IO module.
http://www.blastwave.org/testing/mailscanner-4.66.5.2-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz
http://www.blastwave.org/testing/pm_io-1.2301-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
http://www.blastwave.org/testing/pm_io-1.2301-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
We will soon have a new Perl package that will include IO 1.2301 which
is needed by MailScanner 4.66. Then I will release a new package to
unstable that will not need the separate IO package.
You have two choices:
1. Do not upgrade anything on your systems related to MailScanner.
Wait for MailScanner 4.66 to get into unstable.
2. Use the temporary MailScanner 4.66 and IO package from testing.
I only recommend 2 if you already have a broken system or you
absolutely must have version 4.66.
--
/peter
From jonathan.boyd at bioch.ox.ac.uk Tue Jan 8 11:49:45 2008
From: jonathan.boyd at bioch.ox.ac.uk (Jonathan Boyd)
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2008 10:49:45 +0000
Subject: [csw-users] pkg_get 3.8.3 unstable:
Message-ID: <20080108104945.2E2BEA8002@webmail223.herald.ox.ac.uk>
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: not available
URL:
From mats.larsson at ericsson.com Tue Jan 8 14:08:54 2008
From: mats.larsson at ericsson.com (Mats Larsson)
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2008 14:08:54 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] pkg_get 3.8.3 unstable:
In-Reply-To: <20080108104945.2E2BEA8002@webmail223.herald.ox.ac.uk>
References: <20080108104945.2E2BEA8002@webmail223.herald.ox.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <478375E6.1070005@ericsson.com>
On 2008-01-08 11:49, Jonathan Boyd wrote:
> I have just downloaded the new version
> of pkg_get from unstable onto a Sparc
> using Solaris 9 and it appeared to
> download satisfactorily. However, when
> I issue a command such as, pkg-get -U,
> the following output occurs prior to
> the updataing of the catalog information.
> Is it something wrong with my system? or is it
> inherent in this new version of pkg_get?
>
Same for me...
> # pkg-get -U
> the: No such file or directory
> conf: No such file or directory
> file: No such file or directory
> tells: No such file or directory
> us: No such file or directory
> to: No such file or directory
> use: No such file or directory
> another: No such file or directory
> program,: No such file or directory
> that: No such file or directory
> is.: No such file or directory
> Getting catalog...
> --10:35:05--
> http://blastwave.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/csw/unstable//sparc/5.9/catalog
> => `catalog'
> .
> .
>
> Regards, Jonathan Boyd
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.blastwave.org
> https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
From dclarke at blastwave.org Tue Jan 8 15:08:33 2008
From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke)
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 09:08:33 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [csw-users] pkg_get 3.8.3 unstable:
In-Reply-To: <478375E6.1070005@ericsson.com>
References: <20080108104945.2E2BEA8002@webmail223.herald.ox.ac.uk>
<478375E6.1070005@ericsson.com>
Message-ID: <60737.70.50.143.237.1199801313.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
> On 2008-01-08 11:49, Jonathan Boyd wrote:
>> I have just downloaded the new version
>> in this new version of pkg_get?
>>
> Same for me...
>> # pkg-get -U
In the pkg-get script the following trivial error is the cause :
-- list begins at line 1988
# MUST HAVE gzip!
check_gzip
# Try to make sure we have wget SOMEWHERE in our path.
# Try to cover all potential reasonable places to look for it.
# Un
less the conf file tells us to use another program, that is.
WGET=${WGET:-wget}
---------------------------------------
Pretty obvious how to fix this
------------ change made --------
# MUST HAVE gzip!
check_gzip
# Try to make sure we have wget SOMEWHERE in our path.
# Try to cover all potential reasonable places to look for it.
# Unless the conf file tells us to use another program, that is.
WGET=${WGET:-wget}
------------------------------------
Expect a new pkg-get package right away. You can edit the script file with
vi at the moment.
Please keep in mind that while this error is annoying it is also harmless.
It just happens to attempt to execute less ( less == a linux/GPL pager
program like more ) on files that don't exist. Then pkg-get proceeds
normally.
One moment please, technical crews are dispatched to fix this.
Dennis Clarke
From a.cervellin at acm.org Tue Jan 8 15:15:24 2008
From: a.cervellin at acm.org (Alessio)
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2008 15:15:24 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] pkg_get 3.8.3 unstable:
In-Reply-To: <20080108104945.2E2BEA8002@webmail223.herald.ox.ac.uk>
References: <20080108104945.2E2BEA8002@webmail223.herald.ox.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <4783857C.9020709@acm.org>
Jonathan Boyd wrote:
> # pkg-get -U
> the: No such file or directory
[...]
the error has been fixed a few minutes ago and the new pkg-get should be
available in a few hours (just the time for the mirrors to get in sync)
From stefan.tomlik at tomlik.de Tue Jan 8 15:15:48 2008
From: stefan.tomlik at tomlik.de (Stefan Tomlik)
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 15:15:48 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [csw-users] pkg_get 3.8.3 unstable:
In-Reply-To: <478375E6.1070005@ericsson.com>
References: <20080108104945.2E2BEA8002@webmail223.herald.ox.ac.uk>
<478375E6.1070005@ericsson.com>
Message-ID: <2176.80.152.208.69.1199801748.squirrel@secure.tomlik.de>
Yepp... superfluous newline in /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get
---snip ---
# diff /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get-right /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get-wrong
1993c1993,1994
< # Unless the conf file tells us to use another program, that is.
---
> # Un
> less the conf file tells us to use another program, that is.
---snip ---
I assume that has to do something with the last update of wget that bailed
out with deinstalling wget before wgetting the dependent packages...
have a lot fun
-- Stefan
On Tue, January 8, 2008 14:08, Mats Larsson wrote:
> On 2008-01-08 11:49, Jonathan Boyd wrote:
>
>> I have just downloaded the new version
>> of pkg_get from unstable onto a Sparc using Solaris 9 and it appeared to
>> download satisfactorily. However, when I issue a command such as,
>> pkg-get -U, the following output occurs prior to the updataing of the
>> catalog information. Is it something wrong with my system? or is it
>> inherent in this new version of pkg_get?
>>
> Same for me...
> [...]
From dclarke at blastwave.org Tue Jan 8 15:17:27 2008
From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke)
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 09:17:27 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [csw-users] trivial and harmless error in pkg_get 3.8.3
Message-ID: <60742.70.50.143.237.1199801847.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
ALL, be advised that we are aware of this. Also be advised that the error
is both trivial and entirely harmless.
The only way this could be even more annoying is if you actually had the
"less" binary in your PATH as well as files that it would echo to the
terminal. Not at all likely.
Dennis Clarke
----------------------------- Original Message -----------------------------
Subject: Re: [csw-users] pkg_get 3.8.3 unstable:
From: "Dennis Clarke"
Date: Tue, January 8, 2008 09:08
To: "questions and discussions"
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> On 2008-01-08 11:49, Jonathan Boyd wrote:
>> I have just downloaded the new version
>> in this new version of pkg_get?
>>
> Same for me...
>> # pkg-get -U
In the pkg-get script the following trivial error is the cause :
-- list begins at line 1988
# MUST HAVE gzip!
check_gzip
# Try to make sure we have wget SOMEWHERE in our path.
# Try to cover all potential reasonable places to look for it.
# Un
less the conf file tells us to use another program, that is.
WGET=${WGET:-wget}
---------------------------------------
Pretty obvious how to fix this
------------ change made --------
# MUST HAVE gzip!
check_gzip
# Try to make sure we have wget SOMEWHERE in our path.
# Try to cover all potential reasonable places to look for it.
# Unless the conf file tells us to use another program, that is.
WGET=${WGET:-wget}
------------------------------------
Expect a new pkg-get package right away. You can edit the script file with
vi at the moment.
Please keep in mind that while this error is annoying it is also harmless.
It just happens to attempt to execute less ( less == a linux/GPL pager
program like more ) on files that don't exist. Then pkg-get proceeds
normally.
One moment please, technical crews are dispatched to fix this.
Dennis Clarke
Tue Jan 8 09:17:16 EST 2008
From dclarke at blastwave.org Tue Jan 8 15:24:46 2008
From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke)
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 09:24:46 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [csw-users] pkg_get 3.8.3 unstable:
In-Reply-To: <2176.80.152.208.69.1199801748.squirrel@secure.tomlik.de>
References: <20080108104945.2E2BEA8002@webmail223.herald.ox.ac.uk>
<478375E6.1070005@ericsson.com>
<2176.80.152.208.69.1199801748.squirrel@secure.tomlik.de>
Message-ID: <60790.70.50.143.237.1199802286.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
> Yepp... superfluous newline in /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get
>
> ---snip ---
> # diff /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get-right /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get-wrong
> 1993c1993,1994
> < # Unless the conf file tells us to use another program, that is.
> ---
>> # Un
>> less the conf file tells us to use another program, that is.
> ---snip ---
>
> I assume that has to do something with the last update of wget that bailed
> out with deinstalling wget before wgetting the dependent packages...
>
> have a lot fun
Exactly! You are very insightful to see that coming. Phil and I were
talking on the weekend about the update to openssl packages as well as
openssh. I had been running those updates internally for some time and all
was well with them. We also re-packaged wget :
http://www.blastwave.org/packages.php/wget
This respin of wget was to remove a dependency on the openssl metapackage
and to put in a dependency on openssl_rt which is where the libs really are.
This means that during testing the pkg-get script would pull its legs out
from under itself with the removal of wget.
That explains the respin of pkg-get.
Now then, I am working on a procedure to control this sort of thing in the
future. It is 2008 now and we are well past the "getting started" stages.
Dennis Clarke
From khfp.blastwave0704 at gmx.de Thu Jan 10 14:55:36 2008
From: khfp.blastwave0704 at gmx.de (Klaus Heinz)
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 14:55:36 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] make target "package" does not work
Message-ID: <20080110135536.207170@gmx.net>
Hi,
with a csw repository at revision 1836 from svn.blastwave.org I get
the following error:
$ gmake package
...
[install] complete for libdes.
gmake: *** No rule to make target `/home/kh/CSW/destdir/
spool.5.9-sparc', needed by `package'. Stop.
This error happens with my own package recipe as well with recipes
from the repository (tested with devel/m4 and lib/readline).
The attached patch seems to fix it for me.
ciao
Klaus
--
GMX FreeMail: 1 GB Postfach, 5 E-Mail-Adressen, 10 Free SMS.
Alle Infos und kostenlose Anmeldung: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/freemail
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: gar.pkg.mk.diff
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 350 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
From ml at eroteme.org Thu Jan 10 19:31:11 2008
From: ml at eroteme.org (S. Hakim Hamdani [ML])
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 23:01:11 +0430
Subject: [csw-users] meld and skencil broken by python upgrade?
Message-ID: <20080110230111.00001d00@asagao-jkk.greatwinter.org>
Hi all,
hadn't upgraded for a long time (six months roughly) and went from
python 2.3.x to 2.5.1 yesterday. since, meld and skencil are broken.
If anyone can advise, I'd be much obliged.
Cheers, Hakim
outputs:
[hhamdani at asagao-jkk ~]$ pkg-get -c | grep meld
meld 0.9 SAME
[hhamdani at asagao-jkk ~]$ pkg-get -c | grep skencil
skencil 0.6.16 SAME
[hhamdani at asagao-jkk ~]$ pkg-get -c | grep python
ap2_modpython [Not installed] 3.3.1,REV=2007.10.25
gnome_python 2.0.2,REV=2004.08.09 SAME
python 2.5.1,REV=2007.11.03 SAME
python_tk [Not installed] 2.5.1,REV=2007.11.03
[hhamdani at asagao-jkk ~]$ meld
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/opt/csw/bin/meld", line 69, in
import gtk
File "/opt/csw/lib/python2.3/site-packages/PIL/__init__.py", line 48,
in
ImportError: ld.so.1: python: fatal: relocation error:
file /opt/csw/lib/python/site-packages/gtk-2.0/gtk/_gtk.so: symbol
init_pygobject_check: referenced symbol not found
[hhamdani at asagao-jkk ~]$ skencil
/opt/csw/lib/skencil-0.6.16/Sketch/__init__.py:53: RuntimeWarning:
Python C API version mismatch for module _sketch: This Python has API
version 1013, module _sketch has version 1012. import
_sketch /opt/csw/lib/skencil-0.6.16/Sketch/__init__.py:53:
RuntimeWarning: Python C API version mismatch for module pax: This
Python has API version 1013, module pax has version 1012. import
_sketch /opt/csw/lib/python2.3/site-packages/PIL/Image.py:53:
RuntimeWarning: Python C API version mismatch for module _imaging: This
Python has API version 1013, module _imaging has version 1012. import
_imaging /opt/csw/lib/skencil-0.6.16/Sketch/Graphics/font.py:26:
RuntimeWarning: Python C API version mismatch for module streamfilter:
This Python has API version 1013, module streamfilter has version 1012.
import streamfilter /opt/csw/lib/skencil-0.6.16/Sketch/Lib/type1.py:31:
RuntimeWarning: Python C API version mismatch for module _type1: This
Python has API version 1013, module _type1 has version 1012. from
Sketch._type1 import decode,
hexdecode /opt/csw/lib/skencil-0.6.16/Sketch/Lib/type1.py:32:
RuntimeWarning: Python C API version mismatch for module pstokenize:
This Python has API version 1013, module pstokenize has version 1012.
from Sketch.pstokenize import PSTokenizer, OPERATOR, NAME, INT,
END /opt/csw/lib/skencil-0.6.16/Sketch/__init__.py:180: RuntimeWarning:
Python C API version mismatch for module paxtkinter: This Python has
API version 1013, module paxtkinter has version 1012. import paxtkinter
Traceback (most recent call last): File "/opt/csw/bin/skencil", line
34, in Sketch.main.main() File
"/opt/csw/lib/skencil-0.6.16/Sketch/Base/main.py", line 142, in main
Sketch.init_ui() File "/opt/csw/lib/skencil-0.6.16/Sketch/__init__.py",
line 187, in init_ui __import__(name) File
"/opt/csw/lib/skencil-0.6.16/Script/export_raster.py", line 46, in
from Sketch.UI.sketchdlg import SKModal File
"/opt/csw/lib/skencil-0.6.16/Sketch/UI/sketchdlg.py", line 66, in
from Tkinter import Toplevel, IntVar, Frame, Checkbutton,
Label ImportError: No module named Tkinter
--
S. Hakim Hamdani [ML] / Eroteme.org
From maybird1776 at yahoo.com Fri Jan 11 13:19:51 2008
From: maybird1776 at yahoo.com (ken mays)
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 04:19:51 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [csw-users] meld and skencil broken by python upgrade?
In-Reply-To: <20080110230111.00001d00@asagao-jkk.greatwinter.org>
Message-ID: <780117.88591.qm@web34203.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
The programs use various python binding packages. I've
refreshed pygtk and pygobject so that should fix them
for now. You have a few others, like gnome-python,
that will require those maintainers to refresh them as
well.
~ Ken
------------------->
Hi all,
hadn't upgraded for a long time (six months roughly)
and went from
python 2.3.x to 2.5.1 yesterday. since, meld and
skencil are broken.
If anyone can advise, I'd be much obliged.
Cheers, Hakim
outputs:
[hhamdani at asagao-jkk ~]$ pkg-get -c | grep meld
meld 0.9
SAME
[hhamdani at asagao-jkk ~]$ pkg-get -c | grep skencil
skencil 0.6.16
SAME
[hhamdani at asagao-jkk ~]$ pkg-get -c | grep python
ap2_modpython [Not installed]
3.3.1,REV=2007.10.25
gnome_python 2.0.2,REV=2004.08.09
SAME
python 2.5.1,REV=2007.11.03
SAME
python_tk
____________________________________________________________________________________
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page.
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
From ml at eroteme.org Sat Jan 12 20:32:14 2008
From: ml at eroteme.org (S. Hakim Hamdani [ML])
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 00:02:14 +0430
Subject: [csw-users] Another bit of python software broken after upgrade...
Message-ID: <20080113000214.00004df0@asagao-jkk.greatwinter.org>
Hello all,
bit of non-CSW software that used to run just fine with CSW software is
"gnome-specimen". since the last upgrade i did of my blastwave packages
(see my earlier email on the list regarding meld and skencil not
working anymore) it, too, isn't working anymore:
[hhamdani at asagao-jkk ~]$ gnome-specimen
Error: Importing pygtk and gtk modules failed (ld.so.1: python: fatal:
relocation error:
file /opt/csw/lib/python/site-packages/gtk-2.0/gtk/_gtk.so: symbol
init_pygobject_check: referenced symbol not found)
Cheers, Hakim
--
S. Hakim Hamdani [ML] / Eroteme.org
From a.cervellin at acm.org Sun Jan 13 10:52:29 2008
From: a.cervellin at acm.org (Alessio)
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 10:52:29 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] Another bit of python software broken after
upgrade...
In-Reply-To: <20080113000214.00004df0@asagao-jkk.greatwinter.org>
References: <20080113000214.00004df0@asagao-jkk.greatwinter.org>
Message-ID: <4789DF5D.6090707@acm.org>
Did you try pygobject 2.14.1 & pygtk 2.12.1?
You can find them on http://www.blastwave.org/testing
S. Hakim Hamdani [ML] wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> bit of non-CSW software that used to run just fine with CSW software is
> "gnome-specimen". since the last upgrade i did of my blastwave packages
> (see my earlier email on the list regarding meld and skencil not
> working anymore) it, too, isn't working anymore:
>
> [hhamdani at asagao-jkk ~]$ gnome-specimen
> Error: Importing pygtk and gtk modules failed (ld.so.1: python: fatal:
> relocation error:
> file /opt/csw/lib/python/site-packages/gtk-2.0/gtk/_gtk.so: symbol
> init_pygobject_check: referenced symbol not found)
>
> Cheers, Hakim
From gaa at ulticom.com Mon Jan 14 21:08:40 2008
From: gaa at ulticom.com (Gary Algier)
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 15:08:40 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] Source code for Blastwave packages?
Message-ID: <478BC148.1090905@ulticom.com>
Is there a simple way to get the source code for several Blastwave packages?
For example, I want to get the source code used to build Wireshark. If I
lookup Wireshark on the Blastwave software list it says:
http://www.wireshark.org/
While this may be the Wireshark web site, it does not get me to the exact
source code used to build Wireshark. This leads me to version 0.99.7, but
the binary is version 0.99.5.
In addition, I can't just stop there. In order to make Wireshark work,
I need to install 35 packages. Each of those could have the same problem.
I bring this up because the company I work for would like to include
Wireshark on our distributions for our own support purposes, but we
do not want to violate any of the license agreements. Several of the
licenses require us to be able to supply the source code matching
the binaries if we supply the binaries.
Is this stuff on the binary DVDs available? If I do order a set for
$45.00 can I order the equivalent source DVD for $45.00, too?
--
Gary Algier, WB2FWZ gaa at ulticom.com +1 856 787 2758
Ulticom Inc., 1020 Briggs Rd, Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054 Fax:+1 856 866 2033
Nielsen's First Law of Computer Manuals:
People don't read documentation voluntarily.
From dclarke at blastwave.org Mon Jan 14 21:25:35 2008
From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke)
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 15:25:35 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [csw-users] Source code for Blastwave packages?
In-Reply-To: <478BC148.1090905@ulticom.com>
References: <478BC148.1090905@ulticom.com>
Message-ID: <1481.72.39.216.186.1200342335.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
> Is there a simple way to get the source code for several Blastwave packages?
>
> For example, I want to get the source code used to build Wireshark. If I
> lookup Wireshark on the Blastwave software list it says:
> http://www.wireshark.org/
> While this may be the Wireshark web site, it does not get me to the exact
> source code used to build Wireshark. This leads me to version 0.99.7, but
> the binary is version 0.99.5.
>
> In addition, I can't just stop there. In order to make Wireshark work,
> I need to install 35 packages. Each of those could have the same problem.
>
> I bring this up because the company I work for would like to include
> Wireshark on our distributions for our own support purposes, but we
> do not want to violate any of the license agreements. Several of the
> licenses require us to be able to supply the source code matching
> the binaries if we supply the binaries.
>
> Is this stuff on the binary DVDs available? If I do order a set for
> $45.00 can I order the equivalent source DVD for $45.00, too?
I'm on the phone with you now .. we can sort this out.
No problem.
-
Dennis Clarke
From dclarke at blastwave.org Mon Jan 14 21:33:14 2008
From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke)
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 15:33:14 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [csw-users] Source code for Blastwave packages?
In-Reply-To: <478BC148.1090905@ulticom.com>
References: <478BC148.1090905@ulticom.com>
Message-ID: <1495.72.39.216.186.1200342794.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
> Is there a simple way to get the source code for several Blastwave packages?
>
> For example, I want to get the source code used to build Wireshark. If I
> lookup Wireshark on the Blastwave software list it says:
> http://www.wireshark.org/
> While this may be the Wireshark web site, it does not get me to the exact
> source code used to build Wireshark. This leads me to version 0.99.7, but
> the binary is version 0.99.5.
>
> In addition, I can't just stop there. In order to make Wireshark work,
> I need to install 35 packages. Each of those could have the same problem.
>
> I bring this up because the company I work for would like to include
> Wireshark on our distributions for our own support purposes, but we
> do not want to violate any of the license agreements. Several of the
> licenses require us to be able to supply the source code matching
> the binaries if we supply the binaries.
>
> Is this stuff on the binary DVDs available? If I do order a set for
> $45.00 can I order the equivalent source DVD for $45.00, too?
I know that you need more than this :
http://www.wireshark.org/download/src/all-versions/
... and I'll just wait for your email.
Dennis Clarke
dclarke at blastwave.org
From a.cervellin at acm.org Mon Jan 14 21:39:10 2008
From: a.cervellin at acm.org (Alessio)
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 21:39:10 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] Source code for Blastwave packages?
In-Reply-To: <478BC148.1090905@ulticom.com>
References: <478BC148.1090905@ulticom.com>
Message-ID: <478BC86E.5050009@acm.org>
Gary Algier wrote:
> For example, I want to get the source code used to build Wireshark. If I
> lookup Wireshark on the Blastwave software list it says:
> http://www.wireshark.org/
> While this may be the Wireshark web site, it does not get me to the exact
> source code used to build Wireshark.
it's built upon the official source code, which can be downloaded from
www.wireshark.org
no patches are needed, sometimes it could be needed small syntax fixes
to have it compliant with Sun C, anyway these patches are always
reported upstream.
> This leads me to version 0.99.7, but
> the binary is version 0.99.5.
because the 0.99.7 binary is still under testing on
http://www.blastwave.org/testing
From bob.cauthen at gmail.com Tue Jan 15 01:11:17 2008
From: bob.cauthen at gmail.com (BobC)
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 19:11:17 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] gnome hangs shortly after login
Message-ID: <4b3336c0801141611v4d6c0b9cpb21cb5fc70b08fa7@mail.gmail.com>
All-
Fresh install of Solaris 10 8/07. Just created a new zone and installed
Blastwave GNOME into the zone successfully.
I log in and everything is fine until..... I open File Manager/Nautilus and
choose help -> about and my gnome session hangs.
I can force it to hang every time that way. If I don't, it will hang 2-5
minutes after login every time.
I have enabled .dt session logs but they don't tell anything specific.
Anyone seen this before? Any other ideas?
BobC
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From dclarke at blastwave.org Tue Jan 15 01:37:21 2008
From: dclarke at blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke)
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 19:37:21 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [csw-users] gnome hangs shortly after login
In-Reply-To: <4b3336c0801141611v4d6c0b9cpb21cb5fc70b08fa7@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4b3336c0801141611v4d6c0b9cpb21cb5fc70b08fa7@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <60922.70.50.141.103.1200357441.squirrel@mail.blastwave.org>
> All-
> Fresh install of Solaris 10 8/07. Just created a new zone and installed
> Blastwave GNOME into the zone successfully.
>
> I log in and everything is fine until..... I open File Manager/Nautilus and
> choose help -> about and my gnome session hangs.
>
> I can force it to hang every time that way. If I don't, it will hang 2-5
> minutes after login every time.
>
> I have enabled .dt session logs but they don't tell anything specific.
>
sadly yes.
what version of GTK2 do you have there ?
run pkginfo -l CSWgtk2
Dennis
From bob.cauthen at gmail.com Tue Jan 15 16:51:10 2008
From: bob.cauthen at gmail.com (BobC)
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 10:51:10 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] gnome hangs shortly after login
In-Reply-To: <111812.93193.qm@web34210.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
References: <4b3336c0801141611v4d6c0b9cpb21cb5fc70b08fa7@mail.gmail.com>
<111812.93193.qm@web34210.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <4b3336c0801150751n3a1a6e98w7142e77728482718@mail.gmail.com>
Yep, I forced a pkgrm on CSWgtk2 that was installed with the current gnome
out of unstable, and installed the gtk2 2.10.11 from
blastwave.org/testingand it works (mostly).
It still seems to have some problems so I'll wait for 2.20/2.22...
Regardless, thanks for BOTH replies.... Ken and Dennis.
BobC
On Jan 14, 2008 11:49 PM, ken mays wrote:
> You may need the older GTK2 2.10.11 library until can
> be updated to GNOME 2.20/2.22.
>
> I'll try to leave a copy at
> http://www.blastwave.org/testing.
>
> ~K
>
>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> Be a better friend, newshound, and
> know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
> http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From dag at bakke.com Thu Jan 17 09:25:48 2008
From: dag at bakke.com (dag at bakke.com)
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 08:25:48 +0000 (GMT)
Subject: [csw-users] /testing ucarp 1.3
Message-ID: <721200944.293961200558348847.JavaMail.mail@webmail03>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From michael.schmarck at habmalnefrage.de Fri Jan 18 14:56:31 2008
From: michael.schmarck at habmalnefrage.de (Michael Schmarck)
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 13:56:31 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: [csw-users] Cannot install gcc4core
Message-ID:
Hello.
I tried to install gcc4core-4.0.2,REV=2005.09.29-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
on my SunOS 5.10 Generic_127111-05 machine. The pkg-get -i gcc4core
failed:
## Executing postinstall script.
*** NOTICE ***
Fixing the system headers
for a detailed log see /var/sadm/install/logs/CSWgcc4core-20080118122651
Don't forget: whenever your system headers change run the mkheaders script!
pkgadd: ERROR: postinstall script did not complete successfully
Installation of failed.
ERROR: could not add CSWgcc4core.
apache at winds01 ~ $ cat /var/sadm/install/logs/CSWgcc4core-20080118122651
chown: X11: No such file or directory
postinstall: anomaly : cannot change ownership for include directory!
There are /usr/include/X11 and /usr/X11 directories/symlinks
on my system. The links point to existing directories.
What's broken?
Thanks a lot,
Michael
From dam at baltic-online.de Fri Jan 18 21:09:37 2008
From: dam at baltic-online.de (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 21:09:37 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] /testing ucarp 1.3
In-Reply-To: <721200944.293961200558348847.JavaMail.mail@webmail03>
References: <721200944.293961200558348847.JavaMail.mail@webmail03>
Message-ID: <0706B0E0-1969-43E9-AFC7-447AD06B7D9C@baltic-online.de>
Hi Dag,
Am 17.01.2008 um 09:25 schrieb dag at bakke.com:
> I'll refer to: http://lists.blastwave.org/pipermail/users/2006-June/
> 001543.html ,
> which lists a number of Solaris specific patches for ucarp.
> Of particular interest would be 'patch 003-ucarp-solaris-if.diff',
> as I appear to have a problem with timing between master and backup.
> (The new master detects backup as active on the virtual IP and
> decides to disable the virtual IP.)
>
> Are these patches present in the version of ucarp currently on
> blastwave?
> It sure doesn't look like it, but I could be mistaken. If the
> patches really are present, are there any undocumented switches I
> could use?
>
> In short, how do I go about not using the up/down scripts?
I opened a bug report where the maintainer is informed.
You can track the progress at
http://www.blastwave.org/mantis/view_bug_advanced_page.php?
f_id=0002745
Best regards
-- Dago
From waldirio at gmail.com Wed Jan 23 13:00:29 2008
From: waldirio at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Waldirio_Manh=E3es_Pinheiro?=)
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 10:00:29 -0200
Subject: [csw-users] NetSnmp
Message-ID: <7df9f1820801230400v7b7f0b5dm49d273833dcd8e94@mail.gmail.com>
Hello All
I checked in sparc version of netsnmp package and cannot find snmpconf (used
to create a snmpd.conf file), I extracted the i386 package and copy the
struct below:
1. copy the dir opt/csw/share/snmp to /opt/csw/share
2. copy the file opt/csw/bin/snmpconf to /opt/csw/bin
3. create the dir /opt/csw/etc/snmp
Now, snmpconf work's fine creating config file.
I would like of know if is possible the package upgrade with this include ;)
Another doubt is about the mib's files (generally put in
/opt/csw/share/snmp). What package is necessary to install.
Tnx and Regards
Waldirio
--
______________
Atenciosamente
Waldirio
msn: wmp at sinope.com.br
Site: www.waldirio.com.br
Blog: blog.waldirio.com.br
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From iand at blastwave.org Wed Jan 23 14:16:24 2008
From: iand at blastwave.org (Ian Dickinson)
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 13:16:24 +0000
Subject: [csw-users] NetSnmp
In-Reply-To: <7df9f1820801230400v7b7f0b5dm49d273833dcd8e94@mail.gmail.com>
References: <7df9f1820801230400v7b7f0b5dm49d273833dcd8e94@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <47973E28.9030807@blastwave.org>
I'm currently working on packaging the latest net-snmp and will make sure this
works in the new version.
Ian
Waldirio Manh?es Pinheiro wrote:
> Hello All
>
> I checked in sparc version of netsnmp package and cannot find snmpconf (used
> to create a snmpd.conf file), I extracted the i386 package and copy the
> struct below:
> 1. copy the dir opt/csw/share/snmp to /opt/csw/share
> 2. copy the file opt/csw/bin/snmpconf to /opt/csw/bin
> 3. create the dir /opt/csw/etc/snmp
>
> Now, snmpconf work's fine creating config file.
>
> I would like of know if is possible the package upgrade with this include ;)
>
> Another doubt is about the mib's files (generally put in
> /opt/csw/share/snmp). What package is necessary to install.
>
> Tnx and Regards
> Waldirio
From waldirio at gmail.com Wed Jan 23 19:53:31 2008
From: waldirio at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Waldirio_Manh=E3es_Pinheiro?=)
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:53:31 -0200
Subject: [csw-users] NetSnmp
In-Reply-To: <47973E28.9030807@blastwave.org>
References: <7df9f1820801230400v7b7f0b5dm49d273833dcd8e94@mail.gmail.com>
<47973E28.9030807@blastwave.org>
Message-ID: <7df9f1820801231053w54c6b630h7d523dea55073414@mail.gmail.com>
Ok Ian,
Thanks for answer and I would like of make a second question (if is
possible ;) ), about init scripts, what usually the friend recommend ??!
Normally I create a start script "/etc/init.d" and put a link in
/etc/rc3.d to start and /etc/rc0.d to halt. If this is normal to package CSW
(I don't know if is), why isn't created ?!
Thanks all and sorry for any mistake in my english.
Regards
Waldirio
2008/1/23, Ian Dickinson :
>
> I'm currently working on packaging the latest net-snmp and will make sure
> this
> works in the new version.
>
> Ian
>
> Waldirio Manh?es Pinheiro wrote:
> > Hello All
> >
> > I checked in sparc version of netsnmp package and cannot find snmpconf
> (used
> > to create a snmpd.conf file), I extracted the i386 package and copy the
> > struct below:
> > 1. copy the dir opt/csw/share/snmp to /opt/csw/share
> > 2. copy the file opt/csw/bin/snmpconf to /opt/csw/bin
> > 3. create the dir /opt/csw/etc/snmp
> >
> > Now, snmpconf work's fine creating config file.
> >
> > I would like of know if is possible the package upgrade with this
> include ;)
> >
> > Another doubt is about the mib's files (generally put in
> > /opt/csw/share/snmp). What package is necessary to install.
> >
> > Tnx and Regards
> > Waldirio
>
--
______________
Atenciosamente
Waldirio
msn: wmp at sinope.com.br
Site: www.waldirio.com.br
Blog: blog.waldirio.com.br
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From iand at blastwave.org Tue Jan 29 12:58:55 2008
From: iand at blastwave.org (Ian Dickinson)
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 11:58:55 +0000
Subject: [csw-users] NetSnmp
In-Reply-To: <7df9f1820801231053w54c6b630h7d523dea55073414@mail.gmail.com>
References: <7df9f1820801230400v7b7f0b5dm49d273833dcd8e94@mail.gmail.com> <47973E28.9030807@blastwave.org>
<7df9f1820801231053w54c6b630h7d523dea55073414@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <479F14FF.9080709@blastwave.org>
Hi,
When the new netsnmp is packaged (coming soon) it will conform to the same
method as the existing package, which does not install startup scripts.
In a future release, I will repackage it to split out the agent and trap
listeners to different packages, since not everyone wants these i.e. it's
quite common to only want the commands and libraries, and have no services
running. At this point, I'll make it create the startup scripts in line with
blastwave guidelines.
In the meantime, I'm afraid you'll have to make your own.
Ian
Waldirio Manh?es Pinheiro wrote:
> Ok Ian,
>
> Thanks for answer and I would like of make a second question (if is
> possible ;) ), about init scripts, what usually the friend recommend ??!
>
> Normally I create a start script "/etc/init.d" and put a link in
> /etc/rc3.d to start and /etc/rc0.d to halt. If this is normal to package CSW
> (I don't know if is), why isn't created ?!
>
> Thanks all and sorry for any mistake in my english.
>
> Regards
> Waldirio
>
> 2008/1/23, Ian Dickinson :
>
>>I'm currently working on packaging the latest net-snmp and will make sure
>>this
>>works in the new version.
>>
>>Ian
>>
>>Waldirio Manh?es Pinheiro wrote:
>>
>>> Hello All
>>>
>>>I checked in sparc version of netsnmp package and cannot find snmpconf
>>
>>(used
>>
>>>to create a snmpd.conf file), I extracted the i386 package and copy the
>>>struct below:
>>>1. copy the dir opt/csw/share/snmp to /opt/csw/share
>>>2. copy the file opt/csw/bin/snmpconf to /opt/csw/bin
>>>3. create the dir /opt/csw/etc/snmp
>>>
>>>Now, snmpconf work's fine creating config file.
>>>
>>>I would like of know if is possible the package upgrade with this
>>
>>include ;)
>>
>>>Another doubt is about the mib's files (generally put in
>>>/opt/csw/share/snmp). What package is necessary to install.
>>>
>>>Tnx and Regards
>>>Waldirio
>>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.blastwave.org
> https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users
From delrio at mie.utoronto.ca Tue Jan 29 17:23:22 2008
From: delrio at mie.utoronto.ca (Oscar del Rio)
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 11:23:22 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] Cannot install gcc4core
In-Reply-To:
References:
Message-ID: <479F52FA.10707@mie.utoronto.ca>
Michael Schmarck wrote:
> I tried to install gcc4core-4.0.2,REV=2005.09.29-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> on my SunOS 5.10 Generic_127111-05 machine. The pkg-get -i gcc4core
> failed:
>
> ## Executing postinstall script.
> *** NOTICE ***
> Fixing the system headers
> for a detailed log see /var/sadm/install/logs/CSWgcc4core-20080118122651
> Don't forget: whenever your system headers change run the mkheaders script!
> pkgadd: ERROR: postinstall script did not complete successfully
>
> Installation of failed.
> ERROR: could not add CSWgcc4core.
>
> apache at winds01 ~ $ cat /var/sadm/install/logs/CSWgcc4core-20080118122651
> chown: X11: No such file or directory
> postinstall: anomaly : cannot change ownership for include directory!
I am getting the same error for gcc3core.
There is a bad symlink in /opt/csw/gcc3/...
# pwd
/opt/csw/gcc3/lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/3.4.5/include
# ls -ld X11
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 34 Jan 29 11:12 X11
-> root/usr/openwin/share/include/X11
^^^^
# cat /etc/release
Solaris Express Community Edition snv_78 SPARC
Copyright 2007 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Use is subject to license terms.
Assembled 20 November 2007
From delrio at mie.utoronto.ca Tue Jan 29 17:36:37 2008
From: delrio at mie.utoronto.ca (Oscar del Rio)
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 11:36:37 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] Cannot install gcc4core
In-Reply-To: <479F52FA.10707@mie.utoronto.ca>
References:
<479F52FA.10707@mie.utoronto.ca>
Message-ID: <479F5615.4070403@mie.utoronto.ca>
> # ls -ld X11
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 34 Jan 29 11:12 X11
> -> root/usr/openwin/share/include/X11
> ^^^^
sorry, there is a ./root directory but without the X11 target