From blizinski at google.com  Sun Aug  2 23:30:55 2009
From: blizinski at google.com (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski)
Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 22:30:55 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] Package request
In-Reply-To: <9B28411EE585684A87F9FA7E82DBDB302B13B5@ICABEXCCLU01B.int.sonofon.dk>
References: <9B28411EE585684A87F9FA7E82DBDB30240688@ICABEXCCLU01B.int.sonofon.dk>
	<f95457130904181229y67209843w646291a2ec0a9eb2@mail.gmail.com>
	<9B28411EE585684A87F9FA7E82DBDB30240B57@ICABEXCCLU01B.int.sonofon.dk>
	<f95457130904200055l710bb852u1b0d801029b41385@mail.gmail.com>
	<9B28411EE585684A87F9FA7E82DBDB302B13B5@ICABEXCCLU01B.int.sonofon.dk>
Message-ID: <ce97543b0908021430k1788ab58vcf2111c753090e0c@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Capana - Georg
Sluyterman<CPAGES at sonofon.dk> wrote:
> Its the one labeled Solaris
>
> http://come.to/cfg2html (select files -> sun ->
> cfg2html_solaris-1.6.4.tar.gz )
>
> Direct link:
>
> http://f1.grp.yahoofs.com/v1/AGb1ScNfVPRMeKaUjsCFdg8Cdxb6wd2H7r4ulLdsWGP
> 9W4FZZ3MTGioUzjxPE3dOVhRSQzdNZniXgSQB8eKTCNvxcLSGQQ/sun/cfg2html_solaris
> -1.6.4.tar.gz

The direct link is probably session-dependent, those files don't seem
to be publicly downloadable. I've joined the yahoo group to download
the source file.

I wrote a build for cfg2html, no idea if it's the way it should be.
Can you test it and get back to me with comments? You can get the
package at:

http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/cfg2html-1.14r1.8,REV=2009.08.02-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz

Maciej

From David.Crellin at uts.edu.au  Mon Aug  3 02:11:35 2009
From: David.Crellin at uts.edu.au (David Crellin)
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2009 10:11:35 +1000
Subject: [csw-users] [csw-announce] berkeleydb in flux
In-Reply-To: <20090731144955.GA30348@bolthole.com>
Message-ID: <D6887FBE252F4FEEA24506C007908184@turmoil>

Thanks sbg

Regards,

David Crellin
BSC(Comp)

Senior Server Administrator
Technical Services Branch
Information Technology Division
University of Technology, Sydney
Ph.  +61 02 95142171
Fax. +61 02 9514 1994
Mob. +61 439 951421 

-----Original Message-----
From: announce-bounces+sbg+blastwave=it.uts.edu.au at lists.opencsw.org
[mailto:announce-bounces+sbg+blastwave=it.uts.edu.au at lists.opencsw.org] On
Behalf Of Philip Brown
Sent: Saturday, 1 August 2009 12:50 AM
To: announce at lists.opencsw.org
Subject: [csw-announce] berkeleydb in flux


Warning to CSW users: the upgrade of berkeleydb in 'current' has caused some
unforseen side effects. Some things may break, if you upgrade berkeleydb at
this time.

We are working to rebuild known affected packages to use the newer version
instead.  Please only upgrade with caution.

_______________________________________________
announce mailing list
announce at lists.opencsw.org
https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/announce

UTS CRICOS Provider Code:  00099F
DISCLAIMER: This email message and any accompanying attachments may contain confidential information.  If you are not the intended recipient, do not
read, use, disseminate, distribute or copy this message or attachments.  If
you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately
and delete this message. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender expressly, and with authority,
states them to be the views of the University of Technology Sydney. Before
opening any attachments, please check them for viruses and defects.

Think. Green. Do.

Please consider the environment before printing this email.

From jmanuel.macias at rediris.es  Mon Aug  3 12:19:15 2009
From: jmanuel.macias at rediris.es (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jos=3Fe_Manuel_Macias_Luna?=)
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2009 12:19:15 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] CSW-bind
In-Reply-To: <625385e30907300713n392102bfp3e69339d6135fedc@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20090730013137.B783D6C0C@mail.opencsw.org>
	<625385e30907300713n392102bfp3e69339d6135fedc@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4A76B9A3.4090503@rediris.es>


Hi again,

   first of all, sorry for bothering you while on vacations, Peter... (I guess
you are from your words from last week... :))

   I installed last friday
bind-9.6.1,REV=2009.07.30_rev=P1-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg with no hassle, but when
 installing today bind-9.6.1,REV=2009.07.31_rev=P1-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg I'm
getting problems with the named binary itself:

bash-2.03# pkginfo -l CSWbind
   PKGINST:  CSWbind
      NAME:  bind - ISC BIND DNS main package
  CATEGORY:  application
      ARCH:  sparc
   VERSION:  9.6.1,REV=2009.07.31_rev=P1
    VENDOR:  http://www.isc.org/software/bind packaged for CSW by Peter Bonivart
    PSTAMP:  bonivart at build8s-20090731191430
  INSTDATE:  Aug 03 2009 10:57
   HOTLINE:  http://www.opencsw.org/bugtrack/
     EMAIL:  bonivart at opencsw.org
    STATUS:  completely installed
     FILES:       53 installed pathnames
                   4 shared pathnames
                   1 linked files
                   8 directories
                  10 executables
                1816 blocks used (approx)

bash-2.03# file /opt/csw/sbin/named
/opt/csw/sbin/named:    ELF 32-bit LSB executable 80386 Version 1, dynamically
linked, stripped

...while in the machine I successfully installed on friday says:

# file /opt/csw/sbin/named
/opt/csw/sbin/named:    ELF 32-bit MSB executable SPARC Version 1, dynamically
linked, stripped

That is: binaries for the SPARC bind in the testing directory seems to be i386
binaries...  could that be the case?

regards,

jose.


Peter Bonivart wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 3:31 AM, <darrell.burkey at anu.edu.au> wrote:
>> If everyone is bugging you about this just ignore my message. I'm interested if/whe you will be releasing an updated bind package so I can decide how I'll go about upgrading our Solaris 8 box given I used your package in the past.
>>
>> Thanks for your time and efforts. I certainly appreciate them.
> 
> I'm building 9.6.1-P1 right now on my work laptop connected through my
> fathers mobile broadband in their summerhouse 800 kilometers from
> home. :-)
> 
> There's new packages in testing now:
> 
> http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing.html
> 
> I can't test them right now myself so please let me know if they work for you.
> 


From bonivart at opencsw.org  Mon Aug  3 13:35:36 2009
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 13:35:36 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] CSW-bind
In-Reply-To: <4A76B9A3.4090503@rediris.es>
References: <20090730013137.B783D6C0C@mail.opencsw.org>
	<625385e30907300713n392102bfp3e69339d6135fedc@mail.gmail.com> 
	<4A76B9A3.4090503@rediris.es>
Message-ID: <625385e30908030435n4c44ded3r24d2912355295cd1@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Jos?e Manuel Macias
Luna<jmanuel.macias at rediris.es> wrote:
>
> Hi again,
>
> ? first of all, sorry for bothering you while on vacations, Peter... (I guess
> you are from your words from last week... :))

No problem, back at work today. :-)

> That is: binaries for the SPARC bind in the testing directory seems to be i386
> binaries... ?could that be the case?

You're right, I just checked. From my laptop with Ubuntu I could only
test with Solaris 10 i386 through VirtualBox. Something must have gone
wrong with the build system mixing the files. I'll rebuild both Sparc
and i386 from scratch and test them both.

Thanks for spotting this.

-- 
/peter

From jmanuel.macias at rediris.es  Mon Aug  3 14:08:37 2009
From: jmanuel.macias at rediris.es (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jos=3Fe_Manuel_Macias_Luna?=)
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2009 14:08:37 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] CSW-bind
In-Reply-To: <625385e30908030435n4c44ded3r24d2912355295cd1@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20090730013137.B783D6C0C@mail.opencsw.org>	<625385e30907300713n392102bfp3e69339d6135fedc@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A76B9A3.4090503@rediris.es>
	<625385e30908030435n4c44ded3r24d2912355295cd1@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4A76D345.3070404@rediris.es>

Peter Bonivart wrote:

> You're right, I just checked. From my laptop with Ubuntu I could only
> test with Solaris 10 i386 through VirtualBox. Something must have gone
> wrong with the build system mixing the files. I'll rebuild both Sparc
> and i386 from scratch and test them both.

No prob. Just tell me and I'll test here too. Now I have the release from
Thursday installed, which looks fine...

regards,

jose manuel.



From bonivart at opencsw.org  Mon Aug  3 15:11:28 2009
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 15:11:28 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] CSW-bind
In-Reply-To: <4A76D345.3070404@rediris.es>
References: <20090730013137.B783D6C0C@mail.opencsw.org>
	<625385e30907300713n392102bfp3e69339d6135fedc@mail.gmail.com> 
	<4A76B9A3.4090503@rediris.es>
	<625385e30908030435n4c44ded3r24d2912355295cd1@mail.gmail.com> 
	<4A76D345.3070404@rediris.es>
Message-ID: <625385e30908030611h7dfd3ddbubff2f04e58006599@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Jos?e Manuel Macias
Luna<jmanuel.macias at rediris.es> wrote:
> No prob. Just tell me and I'll test here too. Now I have the release from
> Thursday installed, which looks fine...

There's now new packages in testing:

http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing.html

I have checked and they contain the right architecture, I'm now about
to install them on test systems.

-- 
/peter

From bonivart at opencsw.org  Mon Aug  3 18:19:52 2009
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 18:19:52 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] CSW-bind
In-Reply-To: <625385e30908030611h7dfd3ddbubff2f04e58006599@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20090730013137.B783D6C0C@mail.opencsw.org>
	<625385e30907300713n392102bfp3e69339d6135fedc@mail.gmail.com> 
	<4A76B9A3.4090503@rediris.es>
	<625385e30908030435n4c44ded3r24d2912355295cd1@mail.gmail.com> 
	<4A76D345.3070404@rediris.es>
	<625385e30908030611h7dfd3ddbubff2f04e58006599@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <625385e30908030919r442e04eofea01bc0212a23ce@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Peter Bonivart<bonivart at opencsw.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Jos?e Manuel Macias
> Luna<jmanuel.macias at rediris.es> wrote:
>> No prob. Just tell me and I'll test here too. Now I have the release from
>> Thursday installed, which looks fine...
>
> There's now new packages in testing:
>
> http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing.html
>
> I have checked and they contain the right architecture, I'm now about
> to install them on test systems.

I have now tested both Sparc and i386 versions and they install and
start correctly. No heavy duty testing though so if someone could
confirm that todays packages work it would be great.

-- 
/peter

From r.martel at csuohio.edu  Mon Aug  3 19:51:29 2009
From: r.martel at csuohio.edu (Robert M Martel)
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 13:51:29 -0400
Subject: [csw-users] AUTO: Robert M Martel is out of the office. (returning
	Mon 08/10/2009)
Message-ID: <OF1C5F5CC3.1A5534D2-ON85257607.0062192A-85257607.0062192A@csuohio.edu>


I am out of the office from Mon 08/02/2004 until Mon 08/10/2009.

I will respond to your message when I return.


Note: This is an automated response to your message  "Re: [csw-users] where
is mantis?" sent on 8/27/08 11:29:32.

This is the only notification you will receive while this person is away.


From dam at opencsw.org  Wed Aug  5 17:04:26 2009
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 17:04:26 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] New GTK+ available
Message-ID: <68821C24-D763-4C75-ACEE-4B43AAE6F1A6@opencsw.org>

Hi,

there is an updated GTK+ available from testing which should fix
all open issues, including a new package for "gail" which is now
an empty dependency to GTK+ as is has been integrated into the
main project:

   gail-1.21.5.1,REV=2009.08.05-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz
   gtk2-2.16.5,REV=2009.08.05-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
   gtk2-2.16.5,REV=2009.08.05-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
   gtk2_devel-2.16.5,REV=2009.08.05-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
   gtk2_devel-2.16.5,REV=2009.08.05-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
   gtk2_doc-2.16.5,REV=2009.08.05-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz


Best regards

   -- Dago

From mwatters at opencsw.org  Fri Aug  7 21:22:39 2009
From: mwatters at opencsw.org (Mike Watters)
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2009 14:22:39 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] pidgin 2.5.8 in testing
Message-ID: <4A7C7EFF.9020901@opencsw.org>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

compiled against gtk2  version 2.16.5 and the CSW x11 packages

fixes yahoo instant messanger.


- --
~Mike
"Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex,
and more violent.  It takes a touch of genius -- and a lot of courage --
to move in the opposite direction." --> Albert Einstein 1879 - 1955
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (SunOS)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkp8fv4ACgkQLrhmsXMSLxfFIwCgz6/VZbw/8pDNFHFhkTjPRMI5
2yEAoNod5qB5UwwhQ0xo9ZlH7I4eRtf4
=j/ho
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

From mwatters at opencsw.org  Sat Aug  8 06:14:09 2009
From: mwatters at opencsw.org (Mike Watters)
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2009 23:14:09 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] gnupg 1.4 9 in testing
Message-ID: <4A7CFB91.90107@opencsw.org>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Changes:
setuid gpg binary
remove charset.alias from the package.


- --
~Mike
"Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex,
and more violent.  It takes a touch of genius -- and a lot of courage --
to move in the opposite direction." --> Albert Einstein 1879 - 1955
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (SunOS)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkp8+5AACgkQLrhmsXMSLxd6AgCg6PsO0lpacfo2Ge15+OoYpsME
hKUAoL0L/HJtYBKw0UE4JJStqmOZI3X7
=9SFt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

From trinkle at cs.purdue.edu  Mon Aug 10 04:41:10 2009
From: trinkle at cs.purdue.edu (Daniel Trinkle)
Date: Sun, 09 Aug 2009 22:41:10 -0400
Subject: [csw-users] berkeleydb in flux
In-Reply-To: <20090731145022.GB30348@bolthole.com>
References: <20090731145022.GB30348@bolthole.com>
Message-ID: <h5o1c7$emc$1@ger.gmane.org>

Philip Brown wrote:
> Warning to CSW users: the upgrade of berkeleydb in 'current' has caused
> some unforseen side effects. Some things may break, if you upgrade
> berkeleydb at this time.
> 
> We are working to rebuild known affected packages to use the newer version
> instead.  Please only upgrade with caution.

Unfortunately, this also has a disastrous effect on anything outside 
OpenCSW built against the libraries.  When built against explicit 
versions (i.e. /opt/csw/bdb43), I think it is a reasonable expectation 
that that will continue to be version 4.3.x -- not capriciously change 
to an incompatible 4.7.x version.

I can understand changing bdb4 to the latest version (though this breaks 
things as well), but making bdb43, bdb44, etc reference another version 
is guaranteed to cause problems.

At the very least the description and version information in the 
packages (CSWbdb4, CSWbdb43, CSWbdb44) should accurately reflect that 
the packages are now a reference to the current version.  This would 
help in tracking down problems and also provide meaningful information 
from "pkg-get compare".  Unfortunately it told me I was getting 
"4.2.52,REV=2009.07.28" (CSWbdb), "4.3.29,REV=2009.06.26" (CSWbdb43) and 
"4.4.20,REV=2009.07.28" (CSWbdb44) which clearly is not the case.

Dan


From dam at opencsw.org  Mon Aug 10 18:33:05 2009
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 18:33:05 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] New in testing/: libspeex 1.2rc1
Message-ID: <30359C01-DECD-4CCB-BD9C-83DBFF30B8D5@opencsw.org>

Hi,

after a lot of pain with autoconf/automake there is finally an updated  
version
of libspeex:

   libspeex-1.2rc1,REV=2009.08.10-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
   libspeex-1.2rc1,REV=2009.08.10-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz


Best regards

   -- Dago

From dam at opencsw.org  Mon Aug 10 22:22:38 2009
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 22:22:38 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] berkeleydb in flux
In-Reply-To: <h5o1c7$emc$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <20090731145022.GB30348@bolthole.com> <h5o1c7$emc$1@ger.gmane.org>
Message-ID: <AA097B66-9956-49A6-9C41-0935CEE46E1B@opencsw.org>

Hi Daniel,

Am 10.08.2009 um 04:41 schrieb Daniel Trinkle:
> Philip Brown wrote:
>> Warning to CSW users: the upgrade of berkeleydb in 'current' has  
>> caused
>> some unforseen side effects. Some things may break, if you upgrade
>> berkeleydb at this time.
>> We are working to rebuild known affected packages to use the newer  
>> version
>> instead.  Please only upgrade with caution.
>
> Unfortunately, this also has a disastrous effect on anything outside  
> OpenCSW built against the libraries.  When built against explicit  
> versions (i.e. /opt/csw/bdb43), I think it is a reasonable  
> expectation that that will continue to be version 4.3.x -- not  
> capriciously change to an incompatible 4.7.x version.

Is it really incompatible? With the symlinks in place there shouldn't
be a difference for most applications as BDB is ABI-compatible. If
there are any problems please post them! It is important that we are
aware of any issues that arise.

> I can understand changing bdb4 to the latest version (though this  
> breaks things as well), but making bdb43, bdb44, etc reference  
> another version is guaranteed to cause problems.
>
> At the very least the description and version information in the  
> packages (CSWbdb4, CSWbdb43, CSWbdb44) should accurately reflect  
> that the packages are now a reference to the current version.  This  
> would help in tracking down problems and also provide meaningful  
> information from "pkg-get compare".  Unfortunately it told me I was  
> getting "4.2.52,REV=2009.07.28" (CSWbdb),  
> "4.3.29,REV=2009.06.26" (CSWbdb43) and  
> "4.4.20,REV=2009.07.28" (CSWbdb44) which clearly is not the case.

I see, we are currently in the discussion on how to best proceed from  
here
and putting the 4.7.x version in the stub-packages would really be an  
honest
thing.


Best regards

   -- Dago

From trinkle at cs.purdue.edu  Mon Aug 10 23:03:29 2009
From: trinkle at cs.purdue.edu (Daniel Trinkle)
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 17:03:29 -0400
Subject: [csw-users] berkeleydb in flux
In-Reply-To: <AA097B66-9956-49A6-9C41-0935CEE46E1B@opencsw.org>
References: <20090731145022.GB30348@bolthole.com> <h5o1c7$emc$1@ger.gmane.org>
	<AA097B66-9956-49A6-9C41-0935CEE46E1B@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <h5q1v2$f10$1@ger.gmane.org>

Dagobert Michelsen wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
> 
> Am 10.08.2009 um 04:41 schrieb Daniel Trinkle:
>> Philip Brown wrote:
>>> Warning to CSW users: the upgrade of berkeleydb in 'current' has caused
>>> some unforseen side effects. Some things may break, if you upgrade
>>> berkeleydb at this time.
>>> We are working to rebuild known affected packages to use the newer
>>> version
>>> instead.  Please only upgrade with caution.
>>
>> Unfortunately, this also has a disastrous effect on anything outside
>> OpenCSW built against the libraries.  When built against explicit
>> versions (i.e. /opt/csw/bdb43), I think it is a reasonable expectation
>> that that will continue to be version 4.3.x -- not capriciously change
>> to an incompatible 4.7.x version.
> 
> Is it really incompatible? With the symlinks in place there shouldn't
> be a difference for most applications as BDB is ABI-compatible. If
> there are any problems please post them! It is important that we are
> aware of any issues that arise.

It may just be the application that is being overly paranoid.  Sendmail
spit out the following message and exited:

Aug  9 16:28:26 xxx sm-mta[457]: [ID 801593 mail.crit] NOQUEUE:
SYSERR(root): Berkeley DB version mismatch: compiled against 4.2.52,
run-time linked against 4.7.25
Aug  9 16:28:26 xxx sm-msp-queue[458]: [ID 801593 mail.crit] NOQUEUE:
SYSERR(root): Berkeley DB version mismatch: compiled against 4.2.52,
run-time linked against 4.7.25

The major/minor version check is in the sendmail code, not the BDB code.

Dan


From mwatters at opencsw.org  Tue Aug 11 00:00:01 2009
From: mwatters at opencsw.org (Mike Watters)
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 17:00:01 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] berkeleydb in flux
In-Reply-To: <h5q1v2$f10$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <20090731145022.GB30348@bolthole.com>
	<h5o1c7$emc$1@ger.gmane.org>	<AA097B66-9956-49A6-9C41-0935CEE46E1B@opencsw.org>
	<h5q1v2$f10$1@ger.gmane.org>
Message-ID: <4A809861.6040602@opencsw.org>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi Daniel,
Daniel Trinkle wrote:

> It may just be the application that is being overly paranoid.  Sendmail
> spit out the following message and exited:
> 
> Aug  9 16:28:26 xxx sm-mta[457]: [ID 801593 mail.crit] NOQUEUE:
> SYSERR(root): Berkeley DB version mismatch: compiled against 4.2.52,
> run-time linked against 4.7.25
> Aug  9 16:28:26 xxx sm-msp-queue[458]: [ID 801593 mail.crit] NOQUEUE:
> SYSERR(root): Berkeley DB version mismatch: compiled against 4.2.52,
> run-time linked against 4.7.25
> 
> The major/minor version check is in the sendmail code, not the BDB code.
> 

We are aware that sendmail has this problem,  we have a new version compiled
and out in testing.  if you have the ability to test this version to see if it
resolves your problem I would be most grateful.

to install from testing, you can use:
# pkg-get -s http://mirror.opencsw.org/opencsw/testing -U -u sendmail

and to revert back if you need to would be:
# pkgrm CSWsendmail; pkg-get -i sendmail


- --
~Mike
"Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex,
and more violent.  It takes a touch of genius -- and a lot of courage --
to move in the opposite direction." --> Albert Einstein 1879 - 1955
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (SunOS)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkqAmGEACgkQLrhmsXMSLxc/AACff9kygSABDVfc26x19LvibZLx
aOAAoIX+par+E6yIChXTh3U/LE0i7SaE
=9oYg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

From casterln at berkeley.edu  Tue Aug 11 01:53:26 2009
From: casterln at berkeley.edu (Gary Casterline)
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 16:53:26 -0700
Subject: [csw-users] berkeleydb in flux
In-Reply-To: <4A809861.6040602@opencsw.org>
References: <20090731145022.GB30348@bolthole.com>	<h5o1c7$emc$1@ger.gmane.org>	<AA097B66-9956-49A6-9C41-0935CEE46E1B@opencsw.org>	<h5q1v2$f10$1@ger.gmane.org>
	<4A809861.6040602@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <4A80B2F6.8030801@berkeley.edu>

I had a problem with DB_File after the berkeleydb pkgs changed:

   DB_File needs compatible versions of libdb & db.h
   you have db.h version 4.4.20 and libdb version 4.7.25

I had to download an old version to get things rolling again.
Anyone else see that?

 _Gary


Mike Watters wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
> Daniel Trinkle wrote:
> 
>> It may just be the application that is being overly paranoid.  Sendmail
>> spit out the following message and exited:
> 
>> Aug  9 16:28:26 xxx sm-mta[457]: [ID 801593 mail.crit] NOQUEUE:
>> SYSERR(root): Berkeley DB version mismatch: compiled against 4.2.52,
>> run-time linked against 4.7.25
>> Aug  9 16:28:26 xxx sm-msp-queue[458]: [ID 801593 mail.crit] NOQUEUE:
>> SYSERR(root): Berkeley DB version mismatch: compiled against 4.2.52,
>> run-time linked against 4.7.25
> 
>> The major/minor version check is in the sendmail code, not the BDB code.
> 
> 
> We are aware that sendmail has this problem,  we have a new version compiled
> and out in testing.  if you have the ability to test this version to see if it
> resolves your problem I would be most grateful.
> 
> to install from testing, you can use:
> # pkg-get -s http://mirror.opencsw.org/opencsw/testing -U -u sendmail
> 
> and to revert back if you need to would be:
> # pkgrm CSWsendmail; pkg-get -i sendmail
> 
> 
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users at lists.opencsw.org
https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/users


From ihsan at opencsw.org  Tue Aug 11 08:09:17 2009
From: ihsan at opencsw.org (Ihsan Dogan)
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 08:09:17 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] Apache 2.2.13 in testing
Message-ID: <4A810B0D.9080701@opencsw.org>

Hello,

I've updated Apache to 2.2.13 and it's available on testing now. It
contains a security fix and it's linked agains BerkeleyDB 4.7.

All architectures:
http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/apache2-2.2.13,REV=2009.08.10-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz
http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/apache2_manual-2.2.13,REV=2009.08.10-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz

sparc:
http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/ap2_prefork-2.2.13,REV=2009.08.10-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/ap2_suexec-2.2.13,REV=2009.08.10-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/ap2_worker-2.2.13,REV=2009.08.10-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/apache2_devel-2.2.13,REV=2009.08.10-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/apache2c-2.2.13,REV=2009.08.10-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/apache2rt-2.2.13,REV=2009.08.10-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

i386:
http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/ap2_prefork-2.2.13,REV=2009.08.10-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/ap2_suexec-2.2.13,REV=2009.08.10-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/ap2_worker-2.2.13,REV=2009.08.10-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/apache2_devel-2.2.13,REV=2009.08.10-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/apache2c-2.2.13,REV=2009.08.10-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/apache2rt-2.2.13,REV=2009.08.10-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

Feedback is always welcome and appreciated.



Ihsan

-- 
ihsan at dogan.ch		http://blog.dogan.ch/

From dam at opencsw.org  Tue Aug 11 16:33:43 2009
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 16:33:43 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] berkeleydb in flux
In-Reply-To: <4A80B2F6.8030801@berkeley.edu>
References: <20090731145022.GB30348@bolthole.com>	<h5o1c7$emc$1@ger.gmane.org>	<AA097B66-9956-49A6-9C41-0935CEE46E1B@opencsw.org>	<h5q1v2$f10$1@ger.gmane.org>
	<4A809861.6040602@opencsw.org> <4A80B2F6.8030801@berkeley.edu>
Message-ID: <5CBE347A-E9ED-48E8-8D30-DFD411F7EE89@opencsw.org>

Hi Gary,

Am 11.08.2009 um 01:53 schrieb Gary Casterline:
> I had a problem with DB_File after the berkeleydb pkgs changed:
>
>   DB_File needs compatible versions of libdb & db.h
>   you have db.h version 4.4.20 and libdb version 4.7.25
>
> I had to download an old version to get things rolling again.
> Anyone else see that?

Were you using the OpenCSW Perl? There has been an update to Perl lately
to accomodate for the BDB version bump. Could you please verify?


Best regards

   -- Dago

From james at opencsw.org  Tue Aug 11 18:31:32 2009
From: james at opencsw.org (James Lee)
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 16:31:32 GMT
Subject: [csw-users] fortran broken in gcc4?
In-Reply-To: <4A6EF592.1050409@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
References: <4A6EF592.1050409@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
Message-ID: <20090811.16313200.4199213468@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk>

On 28/07/09, 13:56:50, gerard <ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr> wrote regarding
[csw-users] fortran broken in gcc4?:

> hello all,

Hello to the very few people that use FORTRAN.


> i'm unable to compile a fortran program with gcc4:
> % gcc couleur_mod.f95
> gcc: error trying to exec 'f951': execvp: No such file or directory


> Here the packages installed:
> % pkginfo | grep CSWgcc4
> application CSWgcc4core gcc4core - GNU C Compiler
> application CSWgcc4corert gcc4corert - GNU C Compiler
> Run Time
> application CSWgcc4g++rt gcc4g++rt - GNU C++
> Compiler Run Time
> application CSWgcc4g95 gcc4g95 - GNU FORTRAN Compiler
> application CSWgcc4g95rt gcc4g95rt - GNU FORTRAN 95
> Compiler Run Time

Assuming you have gcc4 v4.3.3, remove CSWgcc4g95 and CSWgcc4g95rt and
install CSWgcc4gfortran and CSWgcc4gfortranrt.

gcc4g95 are from the previous gcc4 collection, either the name
shouldn't have changed or there should be some empty replacement
packages to remove the old files with special depends to install
the new packages are transparently.


$ pkginfo | grep CSWgcc4
application CSWgcc4core          gcc4core - GNU C Compiler
application CSWgcc4corert        gcc4corert - GNU C Compiler Run Time
application CSWgcc4g++           gcc4g++ - GNU C++ Compiler
application CSWgcc4g++rt         gcc4g++rt - GNU C++ Compiler Run Time
application CSWgcc4gfortran      gcc4gfortran - GNU Fortran Compiler
application CSWgcc4gfortranrt    gcc4gfortranrt - GNU Fortran Compiler
Run Time




Using the new packages I've just compiled a antique piece of code
- which has sections for Univacs and PDP-10s and used punch tapes
for "mass" storage - and I had I did have some other problems.

gcc3 and SunPRO both compiled fine.

Using /opt/csw/gcc4/bin/gcc as the compiler fails to link, trivial
example:

$ gcc main.f
Undefined                       first referenced
 symbol                             in file
main
/opt/csw/gcc4/lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/4.3.3/crt1.o
_gfortran_transfer_character        /tmp/ccUr3kjw.o
_gfortran_st_write                  /tmp/ccUr3kjw.o
_gfortran_set_options               /tmp/ccUr3kjw.o
_gfortran_st_write_done             /tmp/ccUr3kjw.o
ld: fatal: Symbol referencing errors. No output written to a.out


Use gfortran as the compiler.
export FC=/opt/csw/gcc4/bin/gfortran

$ gfortran main.f

but there is no RPATH to the FORTRAN lib:


$ ./a.out
ld.so.1: a.out: fatal: libgfortran.so.3: open failed: No such file or
directory
zsh: killed     ./a.out


$ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/opt/csw/gcc4/lib ./a.out
 hello from the past

better workaround is to set -R/opt/csw/gcc4/lib on link but obviously
the package needs fixing properly.





James.

From casterln at berkeley.edu  Tue Aug 11 18:31:43 2009
From: casterln at berkeley.edu (Gary Casterline)
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 09:31:43 -0700
Subject: [csw-users] berkeleydb in flux
In-Reply-To: <5CBE347A-E9ED-48E8-8D30-DFD411F7EE89@opencsw.org>
References: <20090731145022.GB30348@bolthole.com>	<h5o1c7$emc$1@ger.gmane.org>	<AA097B66-9956-49A6-9C41-0935CEE46E1B@opencsw.org>	<h5q1v2$f10$1@ger.gmane.org>	<4A809861.6040602@opencsw.org>
	<4A80B2F6.8030801@berkeley.edu>
	<5CBE347A-E9ED-48E8-8D30-DFD411F7EE89@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <4A819CEF.7000702@berkeley.edu>

Dagobert Michelsen wrote:
> Hi Gary,
> 
> Am 11.08.2009 um 01:53 schrieb Gary Casterline:
>> I had a problem with DB_File after the berkeleydb pkgs changed:
>>
>>   DB_File needs compatible versions of libdb & db.h
>>   you have db.h version 4.4.20 and libdb version 4.7.25
>>
>> I had to download an old version to get things rolling again.
>> Anyone else see that?
> 
> Were you using the OpenCSW Perl? There has been an update to Perl lately
> to accomodate for the BDB version bump. Could you please verify?
> 

Yes, I have /usr/bin/perl and /usr/local/bin/perl symlinked to
/opt/csw/bin/perl.

Here is my current list of berkeleydb packages:
berkeleydb              [Not installed]     4.7.25,REV=2009.07.01
berkeleydb3             [Not installed]     3.3.11,REV=2009.07.22
berkeleydb4       4.2.52,REV=2009.07.28                      SAME
berkeleydb43            [Not installed]     4.3.29,REV=2009.06.26
berkeleydb43_devel      [Not installed]     4.3.29,REV=2006.01.13
berkeleydb43_doc        [Not installed]     4.3.29,REV=2006.01.13
berkeleydb44      4.4.20,REV=2007.01.27     4.4.20,REV=2009.07.28
berkeleydb44_devel 4.4.20,REV=2009.05.26                     SAME
berkeleydb44_doc        [Not installed]     4.4.20,REV=2009.05.26
berkeleydb4_doc         [Not installed]     4.2.52,REV=2008.02.26
berkeleydb_devel        [Not installed]     4.7.25,REV=2009.07.01
berkeleydb_doc          [Not installed]     4.7.25,REV=2009.07.01
pm_berkeleydb       0.39,REV=2009.08.02                      SAME


Here is the full version check on DB_File.
This is after reverting to   berkeleydb44 4.4.20,REV=2007.01.27

$ perl -V -e "use DB_File; print qq{DB_File ver \$DB_File::VERSION\n}"

Summary of my perl5 (revision 5 version 8 subversion 8) configuration:
  Platform:
    osname=solaris, osvers=2.8, archname=sun4-solaris-thread-multi
    uname='sunos build8s 5.8 generic_virtual sun4u sparc sunw,sun-fire-280r'
    config_args=''
    hint=recommended, useposix=true, d_sigaction=define
    usethreads=define use5005threads=undef useithreads=define
usemultiplicity=define
    useperlio=define d_sfio=undef uselargefiles=define usesocks=undef
    use64bitint=undef use64bitall=undef uselongdouble=undef
    usemymalloc=n, bincompat5005=undef
  Compiler:
    cc='cc', ccflags ='-D_REENTRANT -xO3 -xtarget=ultra -xarch=v8
-I/opt/csw/bdb44/include -I/opt/csw/include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE
-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64',
    optimize='-xO3 -xtarget=ultra -xarch=v8',
    cppflags='-D_REENTRANT -xO3 -xtarget=ultra -xarch=v8
-I/opt/csw/bdb44/include -I/opt/csw/include'
    ccversion='Sun C 5.8 Patch 121015-06 2007/10/03', gccversion='',
gccosandvers=''
    intsize=4, longsize=4, ptrsize=4, doublesize=8, byteorder=4321
    d_longlong=define, longlongsize=8, d_longdbl=define, longdblsize=16
    ivtype='long', ivsize=4, nvtype='double', nvsize=8, Off_t='off_t',
lseeksize=8
    alignbytes=8, prototype=define
  Linker and Libraries:
    ld='cc', ldflags ='-L/opt/csw/bdb44/lib -L/opt/csw/lib -L/usr/lib
-L/usr/ccs/lib -L/lib'
    libpth=/usr/lib /usr/ccs/lib /lib /opt/csw/lib
    libs=-lsocket -lnsl -lgdbm -ldb-4.4 -ldl -lm -lpthread -lc
    perllibs=-lsocket -lnsl -ldb-4.4 -ldl -lm -lpthread -lc
    libc=/lib/libc.so, so=so, useshrplib=true, libperl=libperl.so.5.8.8
    gnulibc_version=''
  Dynamic Linking:
    dlsrc=dl_dlopen.xs, dlext=so, d_dlsymun=undef, ccdlflags='-R
/opt/csw/lib'
    cccdlflags='-KPIC', lddlflags='-G -L/opt/csw/bdb44/lib
-L/opt/csw/lib -L/usr/lib -L/usr/ccs/lib -L/lib'


Characteristics of this binary (from libperl):
  Compile-time options: MULTIPLICITY PERL_IMPLICIT_CONTEXT
                        PERL_MALLOC_WRAP USE_ITHREADS USE_LARGE_FILES
                        USE_PERLIO USE_REENTRANT_API USE_SITECUSTOMIZE
  Built under solaris
  Compiled at Oct  8 2008 14:03:19
  @INC:
    /opt/csw/lib/perl/5.8.8
    /opt/csw/share/perl/5.8.8
    /opt/csw/lib/perl/site_perl
    /opt/csw/share/perl/site_perl
    /opt/csw/share/perl/site_perl
    /opt/csw/lib/perl/csw
    /opt/csw/share/perl/csw
    /opt/csw/share/perl/csw
    .
DB_File ver 1.814

From bonivart at opencsw.org  Tue Aug 11 18:50:41 2009
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 18:50:41 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] berkeleydb in flux
In-Reply-To: <4A819CEF.7000702@berkeley.edu>
References: <20090731145022.GB30348@bolthole.com> <h5o1c7$emc$1@ger.gmane.org>
	<AA097B66-9956-49A6-9C41-0935CEE46E1B@opencsw.org>
	<h5q1v2$f10$1@ger.gmane.org> 
	<4A809861.6040602@opencsw.org> <4A80B2F6.8030801@berkeley.edu> 
	<5CBE347A-E9ED-48E8-8D30-DFD411F7EE89@opencsw.org>
	<4A819CEF.7000702@berkeley.edu>
Message-ID: <625385e30908110950u77a70ecfj9ff7ac610f8dd2a0@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 6:31 PM, Gary Casterline<casterln at berkeley.edu> wrote:
> ?Compiled at Oct ?8 2008 14:03:19

Please update your Perl package, you should have 5.8.8,REV=2009.08.05.

-- 
/peter

From jonathan.boyd at bioch.ox.ac.uk  Wed Aug 12 11:25:54 2009
From: jonathan.boyd at bioch.ox.ac.uk (Jonathan Boyd)
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 10:25:54 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] CSW and seamonkey
Message-ID: <20090812092554.52627804F@webmail221.herald.ox.ac.uk>

An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: not available
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20090812/764043b7/attachment.ksh>

From william at wbonnet.net  Wed Aug 12 12:40:02 2009
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 12:40:02 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] CSW and seamonkey
In-Reply-To: <20090812092554.52627804F@webmail221.herald.ox.ac.uk>
References: <20090812092554.52627804F@webmail221.herald.ox.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <4A829C02.1080207@wbonnet.net>

Hi Jonathan
>   I have been using CSW seamonkey (solaris 9 & sparc) 
> and I was wondering if any of the maintainers would 
> consider the possibility of trying to update the 
> existing version (VERSION:  1.1.11,REV=2008.07.17)?
>   
Currently it is not maintained, but since i package other mozilla 
software i can have a look to this. At least i can bring it to a newer 
version, maybe not latest (since FF 3.5.2) is not yet ready.
>   Is it possible to produce a more uptodate seamonkey 
> package which is compiled for use on older systems
> such as solaris 9 & sparc?
>   
Actually FF3 is available from testing for Solaris 9. Maybe it can help...

I'll tr to produce an update for September

cheers
W.

From william at wbonnet.net  Wed Aug 12 12:45:32 2009
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 12:45:32 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] /testing Firefox 3.0.13 is available
Message-ID: <4A829D4C.1040901@wbonnet.net>

Hi all

Firefox 3.0.13 is available from testing. I produced both Solaris 8 and 
9 packages.

http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/firefox-3.0.13,REV=2009.08.04-SunOS5.9-sparc.pkg.gz
http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/firefox-3.0.13,REV=2009.08.05-SunOS5.9-i386.pkg.gz

http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/firefox-3.0.13,REV=2009.08.06-SunOS5.8-i386.pkg.gz
http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/firefox-3.0.13,REV=2009.08.06-SunOS5.8-sparc.pkg.gz

Thanks for your feedback

cheers
W.

From mats.larsson at ericsson.com  Wed Aug 12 14:18:26 2009
From: mats.larsson at ericsson.com (Mats Larsson)
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 14:18:26 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] /testing Firefox 3.0.13 is available
In-Reply-To: <4A829D4C.1040901@wbonnet.net>
References: <4A829D4C.1040901@wbonnet.net>
Message-ID: <4A82B312.7000703@ericsson.com>

What's the diff between the S8 and S9 pkgs (sparc specifically)?

BR MOL

On 2009-08-12 12:45, William Bonnet wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Firefox 3.0.13 is available from testing. I produced both Solaris 8 
> and 9 packages.
>
> http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/firefox-3.0.13,REV=2009.08.04-SunOS5.9-sparc.pkg.gz 
>
> http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/firefox-3.0.13,REV=2009.08.05-SunOS5.9-i386.pkg.gz 
>
>
> http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/firefox-3.0.13,REV=2009.08.06-SunOS5.8-i386.pkg.gz 
>
> http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/firefox-3.0.13,REV=2009.08.06-SunOS5.8-sparc.pkg.gz 
>
>
> Thanks for your feedback
>
> cheers
> W.
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20090812/aca20881/attachment.html>

From james at opencsw.org  Wed Aug 12 14:40:22 2009
From: james at opencsw.org (James Lee)
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 12:40:22 GMT
Subject: [csw-users] /testing Firefox 3.0.13 is available
In-Reply-To: <4A82B312.7000703@ericsson.com>
References: <4A829D4C.1040901@wbonnet.net> <4A82B312.7000703@ericsson.com>
Message-ID: <20090812.12402200.597680040@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk>

On 12/08/09, 13:18:26, Mats Larsson <mats.larsson at ericsson.com> wrote 
regarding Re: [csw-users] /testing Firefox 3.0.13 is available:

> What's the diff between the S8 and S9 pkgs (sparc specifically)?

5.8 doesn't work.


$ firefox
ld.so.1: firefox-bin: fatal: /opt/csw/mozilla/firefox/lib/libjemalloc.so: 
object requires TLS, but TLS failed to initialize
Killed




James.



From william at wbonnet.net  Wed Aug 12 14:59:40 2009
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 14:59:40 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] /testing Firefox 3.0.13 is available
In-Reply-To: <4A82B312.7000703@ericsson.com>
References: <4A829D4C.1040901@wbonnet.net> <4A82B312.7000703@ericsson.com>
Message-ID: <4A82BCBC.40101@wbonnet.net>

Hi Mats

> What's the diff between the S8 and S9 pkgs (sparc specifically)?
They are basically the same package, build either on Solaris 8 or 9.

I did this for testing to be able to test both build. Solaris 9 packages 
are working on Solaris 9 and 10. Solaris 8 are still under test.


Cheers
W.

From william at wbonnet.net  Wed Aug 12 15:00:44 2009
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 15:00:44 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] /testing Firefox 3.0.13 is available
In-Reply-To: <20090812.12402200.597680040@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk>
References: <4A829D4C.1040901@wbonnet.net> <4A82B312.7000703@ericsson.com>
	<20090812.12402200.597680040@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk>
Message-ID: <4A82BCFC.6020001@wbonnet.net>

Thanks James
>> What's the diff between the S8 and S9 pkgs (sparc specifically)?
>>     
>
> 5.8 doesn't work.
>   
In fact it should work if you install it on some something newer than 
Solaris 8 :)
> $ firefox
> ld.so.1: firefox-bin: fatal: /opt/csw/mozilla/firefox/lib/libjemalloc.so: 
> object requires TLS, but TLS failed to initialize
> Killed
>   
Still the same error :(

I try again...

cheers
W.

From mats.larsson at ericsson.com  Wed Aug 12 15:03:56 2009
From: mats.larsson at ericsson.com (Mats Larsson)
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 15:03:56 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] /testing Firefox 3.0.13 is available
In-Reply-To: <4A82BCBC.40101@wbonnet.net>
References: <4A829D4C.1040901@wbonnet.net> <4A82B312.7000703@ericsson.com>
	<4A82BCBC.40101@wbonnet.net>
Message-ID: <4A82BDBC.3040203@ericsson.com>

On 2009-08-12 14:59, William Bonnet wrote:
> Hi Mats
>
>> What's the diff between the S8 and S9 pkgs (sparc specifically)?
> They are basically the same package, build either on Solaris 8 or 9.
Ok.
>
> I did this for testing to be able to test both build. Solaris 9 
> packages are working on Solaris 9 and 10. Solaris 8 are still under test.
So then I guess the goal is to make one SPARC pkg that works on Solaris 
8/9/10?

BR MOL

From william at wbonnet.net  Wed Aug 12 15:08:30 2009
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 15:08:30 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] /testing Firefox 3.0.13 is available
In-Reply-To: <4A82BDBC.3040203@ericsson.com>
References: <4A829D4C.1040901@wbonnet.net>
	<4A82B312.7000703@ericsson.com>	<4A82BCBC.40101@wbonnet.net>
	<4A82BDBC.3040203@ericsson.com>
Message-ID: <4A82BECE.7040309@wbonnet.net>

Hi Mats
> So then I guess the goal is to make one SPARC pkg that works on 
> Solaris 8/9/10?
That's right. But actually it does work only on Solaris 9 and 10. So I 
provides a Sol 9 package for both of these platform, and a Solaris 8 for 
testing purpose on this platform.

As i said in theother email, Solaris 8 package also work on Solaris 9 
and 10 (but not 8).

I plan to release Solaris 9 package that would be used on Solaris 9 and 
10, and stay to FF2.0.0.22 on Solaris 8 until i can fix it.

cheers
W.

From mats.larsson at ericsson.com  Wed Aug 12 15:16:12 2009
From: mats.larsson at ericsson.com (Mats Larsson)
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 15:16:12 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] /testing Firefox 3.0.13 is available
In-Reply-To: <4A82BECE.7040309@wbonnet.net>
References: <4A829D4C.1040901@wbonnet.net>	<4A82B312.7000703@ericsson.com>	<4A82BCBC.40101@wbonnet.net>	<4A82BDBC.3040203@ericsson.com>
	<4A82BECE.7040309@wbonnet.net>
Message-ID: <4A82C09C.8020004@ericsson.com>

On 2009-08-12 15:08, William Bonnet wrote:
> As i said in theother email, Solaris 8 package also work on Solaris 9 
> and 10 (but not 8).
>
> I plan to release Solaris 9 package that would be used on Solaris 9 
> and 10, and stay to FF2.0.0.22 on Solaris 8 until i can fix it. 
Ok. Would be nice you would be able to fix it since I still have a bunch 
of Solaris 8 users (~50) at my site.

BR MOL

From xc68000 at gmail.com  Sat Aug 15 20:17:21 2009
From: xc68000 at gmail.com (Sanford Barton)
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 12:17:21 -0600
Subject: [csw-users] JSD theme with CSW GTK apps
Message-ID: <35cdce540908151117x3330a2efh37e59f69159a9309@mail.gmail.com>

Hello,

When using GTK apps like Pidgin, is there a way to have them use the
theme that JDS is using?  For example, the way the version supplied in
Sol 10 does.  Thanks in advance.

From xc68000 at gmail.com  Sun Aug 16 01:57:21 2009
From: xc68000 at gmail.com (Bart)
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 17:57:21 -0600
Subject: [csw-users] Dev environment
Message-ID: <4A874B61.8010203@gmail.com>

I'd like to setup a development environment to try to compile a few 
packages I miss on Sol 10/Sparc.  It's been a long time since I've used 
a gcc/sunw tool chain and was hoping for some advice.  Most of the stuff 
I want to compile is your typical opensource linux crap and I'm guessing 
the best backend is just to use Studio 12 and the gcc chain on the 
front.  I'm guessing the easiest way for the later is to grab the gcc 
4.3.3 packages from CSW or is there a particular need/recommendation to 
stick with 3.4.6?  Is there a site any where that might give me a list 
of the basic packages I need for a fairly complete compile environment?

From bwalton at opencsw.org  Sun Aug 16 02:31:32 2009
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 20:31:32 -0400
Subject: [csw-users] Dev environment
In-Reply-To: <4A874B61.8010203@gmail.com>
References: <4A874B61.8010203@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1250382284-sup-7523@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca>

Excerpts from Bart's message of Sat Aug 15 19:57:21 -0400 2009:

Hi Bart,

> I'd like to setup a development environment to try to compile a few 
> packages I miss on Sol 10/Sparc.  It's been a long time since I've used 
> a gcc/sunw tool chain and was hoping for some advice.  Most of the stuff 
> I want to compile is your typical opensource linux crap and I'm guessing 
> the best backend is just to use Studio 12 and the gcc chain on the 

We typically try to build with SOS11 (support for sol8) and then fall
back to gcc 4 if that doesn't work.  Generally, gcc 3 is only used
when gcc is required but the code doesn't work in 4 for odd reasons
not worth fixing.

> front.  I'm guessing the easiest way for the later is to grab the gcc 
> 4.3.3 packages from CSW or is there a particular need/recommendation to 
> stick with 3.4.6?  Is there a site any where that might give me a list 
> of the basic packages I need for a fairly complete compile environment?

The following is the set of packages that GAR (the CSW build system)
depends on to get going:

CSWgmake CSWgtar CSWggrep CSWdiffutils CSWgfile CSWtextutils CSWwget
CSWfindutils CSWgsed CSWgawk CSWbzip2

Some of those won't be strictly necessary, but would likely help.
CSWautoconf may help if `configure` isn't shipped with your package,
although that's not common.

Also, you'll want -dev/-devel/etc packages for things you're building
against if they've been separated out from the main package.

If you're interested, you could sign up to be a maintainer and share
the work you're doing with others too...?  You'd get an account on the
buildfarm which gives you access to the various platforms that are
supported by CSW packages to build on.

HTH.
-Ben
-- 
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302

GPG Key Id: 8E89F6D2; Key Server: pgp.mit.edu
Contact me to arrange for a CAcert assurance meeting.

From ja at opencsw.org  Sun Aug 16 18:08:53 2009
From: ja at opencsw.org (Juergen Arndt)
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 18:08:53 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] Perl on build hosts and DynaLoader
Message-ID: <op.uyri42b8jbmpvo@imac.lan>

Hi all,

I'm trying to build Nagios with it's embedded perl interpreter. Some weeks  
ago that was no problem, but since yesterday I run into the following  
problem:

Undefined                       first referenced
  symbol                             in file
boot_DynaLoader                     perlxsi.o

The file perlxsi.c is created in the configure script:


         PERLLIBS="`/opt/csw/bin/perl -MExtUtils::Embed -e ldopts`"
         PERLDIR="`/opt/csw/bin/perl -MConfig -e 'print  
$Config{installsitearch}'`"
         CFLAGS="${CFLAGS} `/opt/csw/bin/perl -MExtUtils::Embed -e ccopts`"
         USEPERL=yes
         INSTALLPERLSTUFF=yes;
         PERLXSI_O=perlxsi.o
         OBJS="${OBJS} ${PERLXSI_O}"
         echo "creating base/perlxsi.c"
         /opt/csw/bin/perl -MExtUtils::Embed -e xsinit -- -o base/perlxsi.c


As far as Google told me, the needed libs should be determined by  
"/opt/csw/bin/perl -MExtUtils::Embed -e ldopts", so the configure script  
should be ok. I checked, if PERLLIBS is passed correctly to the compiler,  
which seems to be fine too. Nevertheless the compiler complains when  
building:


gmake[3]: Entering directory  
`/home/ja/mgar/pkg/nagios/trunk/work/build-isa-i386/nagios-3.2.0/base'
/opt/studio/SOS11/SUNWspro/bin/cc -xO3 -xarch=386 -I/opt/csw/include  
-I/opt/csw/nagios/include  -D_REENTRANT -xO3 -xarch=386 -I/opt/csw/include  
-D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64   
-I/opt/csw/lib/perl/5.8.8/CORE  -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DNSCORE -o nagios  
nagios.c broker.o nebmods.o checks.o config.o commands.o events.o  
flapping.o logging.o macros-base.o netutils.o notifications.o sehandlers.o  
skiplist.o utils.o retention-base.o xretention-base.o comments-base.o  
xcomments-base.o objects-base.o xobjects-base.o statusdata-base.o  
xstatusdata-base.o perfdata-base.o xperfdata-base.o downtime-base.o  
xdowntime-base.o  ../common/snprintf.o perlxsi.o  -xarch=386  
-L/opt/csw/nagios/lib -L/opt/csw/lib -R /opt/csw/lib -xarch=386  
-L/opt/csw/lib -L/usr/lib -L/usr/ccs/lib -L/lib   
-L/opt/csw/lib/perl/5.8.8/CORE -lperl -lsocket -lnsl -ldb-4.7 -ldl -lm  
-lpthread -lc -lperl -lm -lnsl -lsocket -lpthread -lltdl -lrt
"nagios.c", line 652: warning: implicit function declaration: asprintf
Undefined                       first referenced
  symbol                             in file
boot_DynaLoader                     perlxsi.o
ld: fatal: Symbol referencing errors. No output written to nagios


Does anybody have an advice for me?

Juergen

-- 
Juergen Arndt

From xc68000 at gmail.com  Sun Aug 16 19:07:34 2009
From: xc68000 at gmail.com (Bart)
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 11:07:34 -0600
Subject: [csw-users] bzflag - audio help
Message-ID: <4A883CD6.7030709@gmail.com>

I see the maintainer is "retired".  I sent an email anyway just in case 
he is still watching.

The last build of bzflag (2.0.8) isn't outputing any sound on my sol 
10/sunblade system.  There is no readme specifying this is broken, nor 
any CSW bug reports listing any issues like this that I can tell.

There is an "Audio" settings section that allows "Audio Device" and 
"Audio Driver" that I fiddled with, but no luck and can find virtually 
nothing on the web about the solaris port.

Perhaps someone knows something?


Thanks

From xc68000 at gmail.com  Mon Aug 17 05:11:12 2009
From: xc68000 at gmail.com (Bart)
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 21:11:12 -0600
Subject: [csw-users] dbus and shutdown/suspend
Message-ID: <4A88CA50.8090004@gmail.com>

Is there anything I can do to stop dbus from keeping a system from 
shutting down or suspending short of de-installing dbus?  I know it's a 
known issue, but I'd really like to use suspend.

From ja at opencsw.org  Mon Aug 17 12:11:04 2009
From: ja at opencsw.org (Juergen Arndt)
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:11:04 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] Perl on build hosts and DynaLoader
In-Reply-To: <op.uyri42b8jbmpvo@imac.lan>
References: <op.uyri42b8jbmpvo@imac.lan>
Message-ID: <op.uysw8obajbmpvo@ibm-1344209b5ff.ibm.com>

Hi,

> Undefined                       first referenced
>   symbol                             in file
> boot_DynaLoader                     perlxsi.o

just for info: Dago found the solution for that: Bug ID #0003859

CSWperl: "The should be static libs included in the package, at least  
DynaLoader.a should be in there or XS won't work."

Juergen

-- 
Juergen Arndt

From bonivart at opencsw.org  Mon Aug 17 15:51:58 2009
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 15:51:58 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] Perl on build hosts and DynaLoader
In-Reply-To: <op.uysw8obajbmpvo@ibm-1344209b5ff.ibm.com>
References: <op.uyri42b8jbmpvo@imac.lan>
	<op.uysw8obajbmpvo@ibm-1344209b5ff.ibm.com>
Message-ID: <625385e30908170651m3c733704j29829de3e54ffd8e@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Juergen Arndt<ja at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> Undefined ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? first referenced
>> ?symbol ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? in file
>> boot_DynaLoader ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? perlxsi.o
>
> just for info: Dago found the solution for that: Bug ID #0003859
>
> CSWperl: "The should be static libs included in the package, at least
> DynaLoader.a should be in there or XS won't work."

Try the updated Perl packages in testing, they include DynaLoader.a:

http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/perl-5.8.8,REV=2009.08.17-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/perl-5.8.8,REV=2009.08.17-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/perldoc-5.8.8,REV=2009.08.17-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz

# pkgutil -t http://mirror.opencsw.org/opencsw/testing -u perl

-- 
/peter

From gadavis at ucsd.edu  Tue Aug 18 00:25:23 2009
From: gadavis at ucsd.edu (Geoff Davis)
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 15:25:23 -0700
Subject: [csw-users] Status of libcairo and RRDTool
Message-ID: <EC0E08FB-DD88-4E6B-BEFC-168E534180D7@ucsd.edu>

Hi all,

I sent an email a while ago mentioning that RRDTool wouldn't build due  
to there being no SVG support in the most recent build of libCairo. I  
see that there is a new version in testing, but it has not made it  
into current yet. When is this supposed to happen?

Thanks,
Geoff

From dam at opencsw.org  Tue Aug 18 08:59:30 2009
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 08:59:30 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] Status of libcairo and RRDTool
In-Reply-To: <EC0E08FB-DD88-4E6B-BEFC-168E534180D7@ucsd.edu>
References: <EC0E08FB-DD88-4E6B-BEFC-168E534180D7@ucsd.edu>
Message-ID: <6FD80CF1-7F26-491F-A681-ACBAD5E146A2@opencsw.org>

Hi Geoff,

Am 18.08.2009 um 00:25 schrieb Geoff Davis:
> I sent an email a while ago mentioning that RRDTool wouldn't build  
> due to there being no SVG support in the most recent build of  
> libCairo. I see that there is a new version in testing, but it has  
> not made it into current yet. When is this supposed to happen?

Well, there haven't been much feedback on the updated libcairo in  
testing/.
If you could test them with your standard work set this would sure speed
up the release process.


Best regards

   -- Dago

From gadavis at ucsd.edu  Tue Aug 18 21:51:47 2009
From: gadavis at ucsd.edu (Geoff Davis)
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 12:51:47 -0700
Subject: [csw-users] berkeleydb in flux
In-Reply-To: <AA097B66-9956-49A6-9C41-0935CEE46E1B@opencsw.org>
References: <20090731145022.GB30348@bolthole.com> <h5o1c7$emc$1@ger.gmane.org>
	<AA097B66-9956-49A6-9C41-0935CEE46E1B@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <3CD2EF60-A610-4422-BF0F-5CD35DD0BD4C@ucsd.edu>

I agree with Daniel - linking bdb44 to version 4.7 is going to cause a  
lot of problems.

In this case, my hand-rolled CFEngine 2.2.8 binaries broke. They were  
linked to CSWbdb44. ABI compatibility does not mean logic  
compatibility, and certain programs have to do things differently  
depending on the version of BerkeleyDB. Please restore berkeleydb44 to  
a version that links against version 4.4 of BerkeleyDB.

Here's the relevant part of my CFAgent output where it segfaults  
trying to read the databases.

$ sudo cfagent -vq
Reference time set to Tue Aug 18 19:37:21 2009

GNU Configuration Engine -
2.2.8
Free Software Foundation 1994-
Donated by Mark Burgess, Oslo University College, Norway

[...removed some noise...]

DB->get_multiple: method not permitted before handle's open method
cfengine:anfdev: Couldn't open last-seen database /var/cfengine/ 
cf_LastSeen.db
cfengine:anfdev: db_open: Invalid argument
Segmentation Fault (core dumped)


On Aug 10, 2009, at 1:22 PM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote:

> Hi Daniel,
>
> Am 10.08.2009 um 04:41 schrieb Daniel Trinkle:
>> Philip Brown wrote:
>>> Warning to CSW users: the upgrade of berkeleydb in 'current' has  
>>> caused
>>> some unforseen side effects. Some things may break, if you upgrade
>>> berkeleydb at this time.
>>> We are working to rebuild known affected packages to use the newer  
>>> version
>>> instead.  Please only upgrade with caution.
>>
>> Unfortunately, this also has a disastrous effect on anything  
>> outside OpenCSW built against the libraries.  When built against  
>> explicit versions (i.e. /opt/csw/bdb43), I think it is a reasonable  
>> expectation that that will continue to be version 4.3.x -- not  
>> capriciously change to an incompatible 4.7.x version.
>
> Is it really incompatible? With the symlinks in place there shouldn't
> be a difference for most applications as BDB is ABI-compatible. If
> there are any problems please post them! It is important that we are
> aware of any issues that arise.
>
>> I can understand changing bdb4 to the latest version (though this  
>> breaks things as well), but making bdb43, bdb44, etc reference  
>> another version is guaranteed to cause problems.
>>
>> At the very least the description and version information in the  
>> packages (CSWbdb4, CSWbdb43, CSWbdb44) should accurately reflect  
>> that the packages are now a reference to the current version.  This  
>> would help in tracking down problems and also provide meaningful  
>> information from "pkg-get compare".  Unfortunately it told me I was  
>> getting "4.2.52,REV=2009.07.28" (CSWbdb),  
>> "4.3.29,REV=2009.06.26" (CSWbdb43) and  
>> "4.4.20,REV=2009.07.28" (CSWbdb44) which clearly is not the case.
>
> I see, we are currently in the discussion on how to best proceed  
> from here
> and putting the 4.7.x version in the stub-packages would really be  
> an honest
> thing.
>
>
> Best regards
>
>  -- Dago
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/users


From gadavis at ucsd.edu  Tue Aug 18 21:52:23 2009
From: gadavis at ucsd.edu (Geoff Davis)
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 12:52:23 -0700
Subject: [csw-users] Status of libcairo and RRDTool
In-Reply-To: <6FD80CF1-7F26-491F-A681-ACBAD5E146A2@opencsw.org>
References: <EC0E08FB-DD88-4E6B-BEFC-168E534180D7@ucsd.edu>
	<6FD80CF1-7F26-491F-A681-ACBAD5E146A2@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <D3AA9803-A0C8-4C39-AE2A-4E7D17B8FE76@ucsd.edu>

Comments below
On Aug 17, 2009, at 11:59 PM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote:

> Hi Geoff,
>
> Am 18.08.2009 um 00:25 schrieb Geoff Davis:
>> I sent an email a while ago mentioning that RRDTool wouldn't build  
>> due to there being no SVG support in the most recent build of  
>> libCairo. I see that there is a new version in testing, but it has  
>> not made it into current yet. When is this supposed to happen?
>
> Well, there haven't been much feedback on the updated libcairo in  
> testing/.
> If you could test them with your standard work set this would sure  
> speed
> up the release process.
>
>
> Best regards
>
>  -- Dago
>
OK, I have installed it on my production systems using my old hand- 
rolled RRDTool package, and everything seems to work once I add  
xcbutil and pixman as separate packages. Additionally, I'm able to  
build a new version of RRDTool with the libcairo_devel package.

From william at wbonnet.net  Tue Aug 18 23:00:26 2009
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 23:00:26 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] dbus and shutdown/suspend
In-Reply-To: <4A88CA50.8090004@gmail.com>
References: <4A88CA50.8090004@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4A8B166A.1040805@wbonnet.net>

Hi

> Is there anything I can do to stop dbus from keeping a system from 
> shutting down or suspending short of de-installing dbus?  I know it's 
> a known issue, but I'd really like to use suspend.
Yes there is a bug. Version currently in testing fix this bug and will 
be pushed to current soon.

cheers
W.

-- 
William                  http://www.wbonnet.net

http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix
http://www.opencsw.org 	 Community SoftWare for Solaris
http://www.guses.org     French speaking Solaris User Group



From james at opencsw.org  Fri Aug 21 15:30:34 2009
From: james at opencsw.org (James Lee)
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 13:30:34 GMT
Subject: [csw-users] /testing Firefox 3.0.13 is available
In-Reply-To: <4A82C09C.8020004@ericsson.com>
References: <4A829D4C.1040901@wbonnet.net> <4A82B312.7000703@ericsson.com>
	<4A82BCBC.40101@wbonnet.net> <4A82BDBC.3040203@ericsson.com>
	<4A82BECE.7040309@wbonnet.net> <4A82C09C.8020004@ericsson.com>
Message-ID: <20090821.13303400.635775941@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk>

On 12/08/09, 14:16:12, Mats Larsson <mats.larsson at ericsson.com> wrote
regarding Re: [csw-users] /testing Firefox 3.0.13 is available:

> Ok. Would be nice you would be able to fix it since I still have a bunch
> of Solaris 8 users (~50) at my site.

$ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/lwp firefox

:-)




James.

From ja at opencsw.org  Fri Aug 21 15:38:53 2009
From: ja at opencsw.org (Juergen Arndt)
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 15:38:53 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] Nagios 3.2.0 in testing
Message-ID: <op.uy0lixphjbmpvo@ibm-1344209b5ff.ibm.com>

Hi all,

Nagios 3.2.0 is in testing now.

Feedback is welcome.

Juergen

-- 
Juergen Arndt

From william at wbonnet.net  Sat Aug 22 11:33:46 2009
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 11:33:46 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] /testing Firefox 3.0.13 is available
In-Reply-To: <20090821.13303400.635775941@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk>
References: <4A829D4C.1040901@wbonnet.net>
	<4A82B312.7000703@ericsson.com>	<4A82BCBC.40101@wbonnet.net>
	<4A82BDBC.3040203@ericsson.com>	<4A82BECE.7040309@wbonnet.net>
	<4A82C09C.8020004@ericsson.com>
	<20090821.13303400.635775941@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk>
Message-ID: <4A8FBB7A.60105@wbonnet.net>

Hi James

>> Ok. Would be nice you would be able to fix it since I still have a bunch
>> of Solaris 8 users (~50) at my site.
>>     
>
> $ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/lwp firefox
>
> :-)
>   
Thanks for the feedback.

Does it makes everything working fine ? It would be a very good news :)

cheers
W.


From james at opencsw.org  Sat Aug 22 14:43:08 2009
From: james at opencsw.org (James Lee)
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 12:43:08 GMT
Subject: [csw-users] /testing Firefox 3.0.13 is available
In-Reply-To: <4A8FBB7A.60105@wbonnet.net>
References: <4A829D4C.1040901@wbonnet.net> <4A82B312.7000703@ericsson.com>
	<4A82BCBC.40101@wbonnet.net> <4A82BDBC.3040203@ericsson.com>
	<4A82BECE.7040309@wbonnet.net> <4A82C09C.8020004@ericsson.com>
	<20090821.13303400.635775941@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk>
	<4A8FBB7A.60105@wbonnet.net>
Message-ID: <20090822.12430800.1098253985@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk>

On 22/08/09, 10:33:46, William Bonnet <william at wbonnet.net> wrote regarding 
Re: [csw-users] /testing Firefox 3.0.13 is available:

> > $ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/lwp firefox
> >
> > :-)
> >
> Thanks for the feedback.

> Does it makes everything working fine ? It would be a very good news :)

It makes it run.  I've not tested much nor with Solaris 9 or 10 with this
setting.

The man page for libpthread(1) says:

     For multithreaded programs that have been previously  linked
     with the standard threads library, the environment variables
     LD_LIBRARY_PATH and LD_LIBRARY_PATH_64 can be set as follows
     to  bind  the  program  at  runtime to the alternate threads
     library:

     LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/lwp
     LD_LIBRARY_PATH_64=/usr/lib/lwp/64


so maybe you can swap the path in the start script with no need
to build with -L/usr/lib/lwp as well as -R/usr/lib/lwp.  There
is more in the man page about the differences in use of system
resources:

     When using the alternate one-level  threads  implementation,
     be  aware  that  it  may  create more LWPs than the standard
     implementation using unbound threads.  LWPs consume  operat-
     ing system memory in contrast to threads, which consume only
     user-level memory.  Thus a multithreaded application  linked
     against this library that creates thousands of threads would
     create an equal number of LWPs and might run the system  out
     of resources required to support the application.

Perhaps the start script needs:

if [ "`uname -r`" = "5.8" ] ; then
    LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/lwp


C thread experts please chip in.




James.

From xc68000 at gmail.com  Sat Aug 22 16:28:20 2009
From: xc68000 at gmail.com (Bart)
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 08:28:20 -0600
Subject: [csw-users] /testing Firefox 3.0.13 is available
In-Reply-To: <20090822.12430800.1098253985@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk>
References: <4A829D4C.1040901@wbonnet.net>
	<4A82B312.7000703@ericsson.com>	<4A82BCBC.40101@wbonnet.net>
	<4A82BDBC.3040203@ericsson.com>	<4A82BECE.7040309@wbonnet.net>
	<4A82C09C.8020004@ericsson.com>	<20090821.13303400.635775941@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk>	<4A8FBB7A.60105@wbonnet.net>
	<20090822.12430800.1098253985@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk>
Message-ID: <4A900084.8060908@gmail.com>

James Lee wrote:
> On 22/08/09, 10:33:46, William Bonnet <william at wbonnet.net> wrote regarding 
> Re: [csw-users] /testing Firefox 3.0.13 is available:
>
>   
>>> $ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/lwp firefox
>>>
>>> :-)
>>>
>>>       
>> Thanks for the feedback.
>>     
>
>   
>> Does it makes everything working fine ? It would be a very good news :)
>>     
>
> It makes it run.  I've not tested much nor with Solaris 9 or 10 with this
> setting.
>
> The man page for libpthread(1) says:
>
>      For multithreaded programs that have been previously  linked
>      with the standard threads library, the environment variables
>      LD_LIBRARY_PATH and LD_LIBRARY_PATH_64 can be set as follows
>      to  bind  the  program  at  runtime to the alternate threads
>      library:
>
>      LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/lwp
>      LD_LIBRARY_PATH_64=/usr/lib/lwp/64
>
>
> so maybe you can swap the path in the start script with no need
> to build with -L/usr/lib/lwp as well as -R/usr/lib/lwp.  There
> is more in the man page about the differences in use of system
> resources:
>
>      When using the alternate one-level  threads  implementation,
>      be  aware  that  it  may  create more LWPs than the standard
>      implementation using unbound threads.  LWPs consume  operat-
>      ing system memory in contrast to threads, which consume only
>      user-level memory.  Thus a multithreaded application  linked
>      against this library that creates thousands of threads would
>      create an equal number of LWPs and might run the system  out
>      of resources required to support the application.
>
> Perhaps the start script needs:
>
> if [ "`uname -r`" = "5.8" ] ; then
>     LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/lwp
>
>
> C thread experts please chip in.
>
>
>
>
> James.
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>   
Is there any benefit to running the CSW firefox over the fat client from 
mozilla.org?  For example is it noticeably faster? Thx.

From william at wbonnet.net  Sat Aug 22 17:37:01 2009
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 17:37:01 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] /testing Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (security fix) is
	available from testing
Message-ID: <4A90109D.8000502@wbonnet.net>

Hi from Oslo

Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 is available from testing :

http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/thunderbird-2.0.0.23,REV=2009.08.22-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/thunderbird-2.0.0.23,REV=2009.08.22-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

This release fixes the following bugs :

MFSA 2009-42  Compromise of SSL-protected communication ( 
http://www.mozilla.org/security/announce/2009/mfsa2009-42.html )


cheers
W.

From james at opencsw.org  Mon Aug 24 10:47:35 2009
From: james at opencsw.org (James Lee)
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 08:47:35 GMT
Subject: [csw-users] /testing Firefox 3.0.13 is available
In-Reply-To: <4A900084.8060908@gmail.com>
References: <4A829D4C.1040901@wbonnet.net> <4A82B312.7000703@ericsson.com>
	<4A82BCBC.40101@wbonnet.net> <4A82BDBC.3040203@ericsson.com>
	<4A82BECE.7040309@wbonnet.net> <4A82C09C.8020004@ericsson.com>
	<20090821.13303400.635775941@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk>
	<4A8FBB7A.60105@wbonnet.net>
	<20090822.12430800.1098253985@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk>
	<4A900084.8060908@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20090824.8473500.2065616148@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk>

On 22/08/09, 15:28:20, Bart <xc68000 at gmail.com> wrote regarding Re: 
[csw-users] /testing Firefox 3.0.13 is available:

> Is there any benefit to running the CSW firefox over the fat client from
> mozilla.org?  For example is it noticeably faster?

I can't see any mozilla.org 3.x package for Solaris 8 or 9 so there CSW's
is infinitely faster.



James.




From marsha.petry at hp.com  Tue Aug 25 08:12:20 2009
From: marsha.petry at hp.com (PETRY, MARSHA)
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 06:12:20 +0000
Subject: [csw-users] Berkeley DB 4.7 vs. 4.4 issue
Message-ID: <F7C44AA1F517274DA0B5BB579CBAF8071F0AFB222A@GVW0538EXC.americas.hpqcorp.net>

This might be a variation of the "Berkeley DB in Flux" discussion...

I updated the trac and svn packages using pkgutil, and now have a corrupt BDB when I try to use svn.

svn: Berkeley DB error for filesystem '/cust/repo/db' while opening environment:
svn: DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recovery
svn: bdb: Ignoring log file: /cust/repo/db/log.0000000918: magic number 88090400, not 40988
svn: bdb: Invalid log file: log.0000000918: Invalid argument
svn: bdb: PANIC: Invalid argument
svn: bdb: unable to join the environment

The resolution on the Oracle site says that I need to db_recover using the old BDB copy (4.4) --- that is now pointing to the new 4.7 copy and so I've lost the ability to run db_recover using the older version.  Is that correct? or is there a way to get that back?

Am I right in thinking I'll need to download/compile a personal "home directory" version of 4.4 and run the recover using that?  I do not see an easy way to re-create the old versions.

Any help would be much appreciated... I'm looking at a long process.  I don't think we even use gcc on this box and so I have lots of downloads to get.

Thanks
Marsha

From ihsan at opencsw.org  Tue Aug 25 09:38:29 2009
From: ihsan at opencsw.org (Ihsan Dogan)
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 09:38:29 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] Berkeley DB 4.7 vs. 4.4 issue
In-Reply-To: <F7C44AA1F517274DA0B5BB579CBAF8071F0AFB222A@GVW0538EXC.americas.hpqcorp.net>
References: <F7C44AA1F517274DA0B5BB579CBAF8071F0AFB222A@GVW0538EXC.americas.hpqcorp.net>
Message-ID: <4A9394F5.3080804@opencsw.org>

Hello Marsha,

On 25.08.2009 08:12, PETRY, MARSHA wrote:

> svn: Berkeley DB error for filesystem '/cust/repo/db' while opening environment:
> svn: DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recovery
> svn: bdb: Ignoring log file: /cust/repo/db/log.0000000918: magic number 88090400, not 40988
> svn: bdb: Invalid log file: log.0000000918: Invalid argument
> svn: bdb: PANIC: Invalid argument
> svn: bdb: unable to join the environment
> 
> The resolution on the Oracle site says that I need to db_recover using the old BDB copy (4.4) --- that is now pointing to the new 4.7 copy and so I've lost the ability to run db_recover using the older version.  Is that correct? or is there a way to get that back?
> 
> Am I right in thinking I'll need to download/compile a personal "home directory" version of 4.4 and run the recover using that?  I do not see an easy way to re-create the old versions.

As a temporary solution, you can installed the archived berkeleydb 4.4
package from http://csw.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/oldpkgs/ .




Ihsan

-- 
ihsan at dogan.ch		http://blog.dogan.ch/

From dam at opencsw.org  Tue Aug 25 13:04:03 2009
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 13:04:03 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] Berkeley DB 4.7 vs. 4.4 issue
In-Reply-To: <F7C44AA1F517274DA0B5BB579CBAF8071F0AFB222A@GVW0538EXC.americas.hpqcorp.net>
References: <F7C44AA1F517274DA0B5BB579CBAF8071F0AFB222A@GVW0538EXC.americas.hpqcorp.net>
Message-ID: <94F6C78F-718A-4107-A8B2-BFE5227C0353@opencsw.org>

Hi Marsha,

Am 25.08.2009 um 08:12 schrieb PETRY, MARSHA:
> This might be a variation of the "Berkeley DB in Flux" discussion...
>
> I updated the trac and svn packages using pkgutil, and now have a  
> corrupt BDB when I try to use svn.
>
> svn: Berkeley DB error for filesystem '/cust/repo/db' while opening  
> environment:
> svn: DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recovery
> svn: bdb: Ignoring log file: /cust/repo/db/log.0000000918: magic  
> number 88090400, not 40988
> svn: bdb: Invalid log file: log.0000000918: Invalid argument
> svn: bdb: PANIC: Invalid argument
> svn: bdb: unable to join the environment
>
> The resolution on the Oracle site says that I need to db_recover  
> using the old BDB copy (4.4) --- that is now pointing to the new 4.7  
> copy and so I've lost the ability to run db_recover using the older  
> version.  Is that correct? or is there a way to get that back?
>
> Am I right in thinking I'll need to download/compile a personal  
> "home directory" version of 4.4 and run the recover using that?  I  
> do not see an easy way to re-create the old versions.
>
> Any help would be much appreciated... I'm looking at a long  
> process.  I don't think we even use gcc on this box and so I have  
> lots of downloads to get.

In addition to the workaround Ihsan advised please note also that
there will a new version of Trac be released shortly, so please
take a careful eye on updating.

To make updating both easier and safer in the future there is currently
work going on to provide freezes of the package tree.

Also please help testing new packages from
   http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing.html
to find problems early.


Sorry for the inconvenience

   -- Dago

From tedwards at it.dcs.ch  Tue Aug 25 15:00:54 2009
From: tedwards at it.dcs.ch (Tim Edwards)
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 15:00:54 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] Where can I find previous versions of packages from
	current?
Message-ID: <4A93E086.3080308@it.dcs.ch>

Up until today I was deploying syslog_ng across our organisation's main
servers. Unfortunately this morning when I tried to finish off the last
few machines, of which one happens to be Solaris 9, I found that the
syslog-ng package has been changed and is no longer installable on
Solaris 9 - http://www.opencsw.org/bugtrack/view.php?id=3869

I was wondering if there's a way to get the previous version of this
package from any of the mirrors, or even if someone could email it to me?

Thanks for any help

Tim Edwards

From james at opencsw.org  Tue Aug 25 15:13:05 2009
From: james at opencsw.org (James Lee)
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 13:13:05 GMT
Subject: [csw-users] Where can I find previous versions of packages from
 current?
In-Reply-To: <4A93E086.3080308@it.dcs.ch>
References: <4A93E086.3080308@it.dcs.ch>
Message-ID: <20090825.13130500.3383926314@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk>

On 25/08/09, 14:00:54, Tim Edwards <tedwards at it.dcs.ch> wrote regarding 
[csw-users] Where can I find previous versions of packages from current?:

> I was wondering if there's a way to get the previous version of this
> package from any of the mirrors,

http://csw.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/oldpkgs/




James.

From maciej at opencsw.org  Tue Aug 25 15:26:38 2009
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski)
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 14:26:38 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] Where can I find previous versions of packages from
	current?
In-Reply-To: <4A93E086.3080308@it.dcs.ch>
References: <4A93E086.3080308@it.dcs.ch>
Message-ID: <ce97543b0908250626l58e5c8wacd9753c6b0dd7dc@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Tim Edwards<tedwards at it.dcs.ch> wrote:
> Up until today I was deploying syslog_ng across our organisation's main
> servers. Unfortunately this morning when I tried to finish off the last
> few machines, of which one happens to be Solaris 9, I found that the
> syslog-ng package has been changed and is no longer installable on
> Solaris 9 - http://www.opencsw.org/bugtrack/view.php?id=3869

I've put an updated syslog-ng package into testing:
http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing.html

You can try and see if it works for you.

Maciej

From tedwards at it.dcs.ch  Tue Aug 25 15:56:51 2009
From: tedwards at it.dcs.ch (Tim Edwards)
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 15:56:51 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] Where can I find previous versions of packages from
 current?
In-Reply-To: <ce97543b0908250626l58e5c8wacd9753c6b0dd7dc@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4A93E086.3080308@it.dcs.ch>
	<ce97543b0908250626l58e5c8wacd9753c6b0dd7dc@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4A93EDA3.9050306@it.dcs.ch>



Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Tim Edwards<tedwards at it.dcs.ch> wrote:
>> Up until today I was deploying syslog_ng across our organisation's main
>> servers. Unfortunately this morning when I tried to finish off the last
>> few machines, of which one happens to be Solaris 9, I found that the
>> syslog-ng package has been changed and is no longer installable on
>> Solaris 9 - http://www.opencsw.org/bugtrack/view.php?id=3869
> 
> I've put an updated syslog-ng package into testing:
> http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing.html
> 
> You can try and see if it works for you.
> 
> Maciej

Thanks for the quick response but unfortunately no luck with this
version either:

bash-2.05# pkgadd -d
./syslog_ng-3.0.4,REV\=2009.08.25-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg

The following packages are available:
  1  CSWsyslogng     syslog_ng - A powerful syslogd replacement
                     (sparc) 3.0.4,REV=2009.08.25

Select package(s) you wish to process (or 'all' to process
all packages). (default: all) [?,??,q]: a

Processing package instance <CSWsyslogng> from
</etc/rcS.d/syslog_ng-3.0.4,REV=2009.08.25-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg>

syslog_ng - A powerful syslogd replacement
(sparc) 3.0.4,REV=2009.08.25
Please see /opt/csw/share/doc/syslog_ng/license for license information.
## Processing package information.
## Processing system information.
   3 package pathnames are already properly installed.
## Verifying package dependencies.
## Verifying disk space requirements.
## Checking for conflicts with packages already installed.
## Checking for setuid/setgid programs.

This package contains scripts which will be executed with super-user
permission during the process of installing this package.

Do you want to continue with the installation of <CSWsyslogng> [y,n,?] y

Installing syslog_ng - A powerful syslogd replacement as <CSWsyslogng>

## Executing preinstall script.
Disabling svc:/system/system-log:default
/var/sadm/pkg/CSWsyslogng/install/preinstall: svcadm: not found
pkgadd: ERROR: preinstall script did not complete successfully

Installation of <CSWsyslogng> failed.


From tedwards at it.dcs.ch  Tue Aug 25 16:07:44 2009
From: tedwards at it.dcs.ch (Tim Edwards)
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:07:44 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] Where can I find previous versions of packages from
 current?
In-Reply-To: <20090825.13130500.3383926314@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk>
References: <4A93E086.3080308@it.dcs.ch>
	<20090825.13130500.3383926314@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk>
Message-ID: <4A93F030.8070304@it.dcs.ch>



James Lee wrote:
> On 25/08/09, 14:00:54, Tim Edwards <tedwards at it.dcs.ch> wrote regarding 
> [csw-users] Where can I find previous versions of packages from current?:
> 
>> I was wondering if there's a way to get the previous version of this
>> package from any of the mirrors,
> 
> http://csw.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/oldpkgs/
> 
> 
> 
> 
> James.

Thanks that worked

From maciej at opencsw.org  Tue Aug 25 17:10:26 2009
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski)
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:10:26 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] Where can I find previous versions of packages from
	current?
In-Reply-To: <4A93EDA3.9050306@it.dcs.ch>
References: <4A93E086.3080308@it.dcs.ch>
	<ce97543b0908250626l58e5c8wacd9753c6b0dd7dc@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A93EDA3.9050306@it.dcs.ch>
Message-ID: <ce97543b0908250810y52badfa3p1a102d2275162ad8@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Tim Edwards<tedwards at it.dcs.ch> wrote:
> Thanks for the quick response but unfortunately no luck with this
> version either:

Since it's stubborn, and you have a workaround, I'll take a more
careful look at it later tonight. I'll keep you posted.

Maciej

From william at wbonnet.net  Wed Aug 26 00:10:57 2009
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 00:10:57 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] OpenCSW IRL events on flickr
Message-ID: <4A946171.3060107@wbonnet.net>

Hi

Pictures of OpenCSW IRL events are now available on flickr.

http://www.flickr/photos/opencsw

Some of the pictures of the recent Summer Camp in Oslo have been added. 
Pictures of the funding meeting will also be moved (soon) to this place.

enjoy :)

cheers
W.

PS: If you have any picture of an OpenCSW IRL event, please contact a 
member of the board for publication.

-- 

William                  http://www.wbonnet.net

http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix
http://www.opencsw.org 	 Community SoftWare for Solaris
http://www.guses.org     French speaking Solaris User Group



From marsha.petry at hp.com  Fri Aug 28 01:28:07 2009
From: marsha.petry at hp.com (PETRY, MARSHA)
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 23:28:07 +0000
Subject: [csw-users] Berkeley DB 4.7 vs. 4.4 issue
In-Reply-To: <94F6C78F-718A-4107-A8B2-BFE5227C0353@opencsw.org>
References: <F7C44AA1F517274DA0B5BB579CBAF8071F0AFB222A@GVW0538EXC.americas.hpqcorp.net>
	<94F6C78F-718A-4107-A8B2-BFE5227C0353@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <F7C44AA1F517274DA0B5BB579CBAF8071F0B262745@GVW0538EXC.americas.hpqcorp.net>

I will go to topic-specific lists after this but since all my software is from opencsw I want to see if anyone has an answer here first...

My issue:
I upgraded svn and trac a couple days ago via opencsw(mostly "testing") and when I used svn I got a FATAL error (below this email, sent to list a couple days ago)

To fix that problem, using a link to old copy from someone on this list, I did the solution:
1.  Built an old BDB4.4 version
2.  db_archive -s -h old_repo          /*BDB4.4*/
3.  db_dump (each name from #2)        /*BDB4.4*/
4.  svnadmin create new_repo --fs_type = bdb  /*newest CSWsvn ver. 1.6.4*/
5.  db_load (each name from #2) to new_repo   /*BDB 4.7*/
6.  db_checkpoint -1 -v -h new_repo           /*BDB4.7*/
7.  db_verify    /*BDB4.7 ... verify each db... no error msgs*/
7.  svnserve ... /*svn 1.6.4*/

Works fine checking out code... until I check something in.  The checkin works but when I try to checkout again or update another checked-out copy I get:  "Decompression of .svn diff data failed"

/opt/csw/bin/svnadmin verify gives:
* Verified revision 0.
svnadmin: Checksum mismatch on representation '0':
   expected:  effd2c5b6f40c05496ad82988093ec13
     actual:  19b07c36abc7abbec99bf2bc432f8f64

db_recover, db_verify give no errors.  Representation '0' is scary... I found a suggestion that I should change the md5 sequences on the representations.dump file and re-load but there are over 30,000 of them.... ugh.

Is there anything obvious related to opencsw that I have missed?  Do my packages look mis-matched?  Are there any opencsw files for svn/bdb/trac that are known to have an issue?

CSWbdb                    4.7.25,REV=2009.07.01     not in catalog
CSWbdb4                   4.2.52,REV=2009.07.28     not in catalog
CSWbdb44                  4.4.20,REV=2009.07.28     not in catalog
CSWbdb47                  4.7.25,REV=2009.03.09     not in catalog
CSWsvn                    1.6.4,REV=2009.08.23      SAME
CSWtrac                   0.11.5,REV=2009.08.03     SAME
CSWzlib                   1.2.3,REV=2009.04.05      SAME

Thanks for any help. This is a showstopper problem for me and the only way I can think to recover is get rid of all these opencsw packages and use a different source for svn/trac.


> -----Original Message-----
> Am 25.08.2009 um 08:12 schrieb PETRY, MARSHA:
> > This might be a variation of the "Berkeley DB in Flux" discussion...
> >
> > I updated the trac and svn packages using pkgutil, and now have a 
> > corrupt BDB when I try to use svn.
> >
> > svn: Berkeley DB error for filesystem '/cust/repo/db' while opening
> > environment:
> > svn: DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recovery
> > svn: bdb: Ignoring log file: /cust/repo/db/log.0000000918: magic 
> > number 88090400, not 40988
> > svn: bdb: Invalid log file: log.0000000918: Invalid argument
> > svn: bdb: PANIC: Invalid argument
> > svn: bdb: unable to join the environment
> >
> > The resolution on the Oracle site says that I need to 
> db_recover using 
> > the old BDB copy (4.4) --- that is now pointing to the new 4.7 copy 
> > and so I've lost the ability to run db_recover using the older 
> > version.  Is that correct? or is there a way to get that back?
> >

From dam at opencsw.org  Fri Aug 28 08:41:24 2009
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 08:41:24 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] Berkeley DB 4.7 vs. 4.4 issue
In-Reply-To: <F7C44AA1F517274DA0B5BB579CBAF8071F0B262745@GVW0538EXC.americas.hpqcorp.net>
References: <F7C44AA1F517274DA0B5BB579CBAF8071F0AFB222A@GVW0538EXC.americas.hpqcorp.net>
	<94F6C78F-718A-4107-A8B2-BFE5227C0353@opencsw.org>
	<F7C44AA1F517274DA0B5BB579CBAF8071F0B262745@GVW0538EXC.americas.hpqcorp.net>
Message-ID: <EC3440D0-9D4F-4114-9CA8-FB5ACF8ECEAA@opencsw.org>

Hi Marsha,

Am 28.08.2009 um 01:28 schrieb PETRY, MARSHA:
> I will go to topic-specific lists after this but since all my  
> software is from opencsw I want to see if anyone has an answer here  
> first...

The problem you describe sounds ugly, but there were no reports about
this problem during upgrade now. I don't know if it really connects
to your update or some other strange bug, but also asking on the
subversion list is definitely a good idea.

> My issue:
> I upgraded svn and trac a couple days ago via opencsw(mostly  
> "testing") and when I used svn I got a FATAL error (below this  
> email, sent to list a couple days ago)
>
> To fix that problem, using a link to old copy from someone on this  
> list, I did the solution:
> 1.  Built an old BDB4.4 version
> 2.  db_archive -s -h old_repo          /*BDB4.4*/
> 3.  db_dump (each name from #2)        /*BDB4.4*/
> 4.  svnadmin create new_repo --fs_type = bdb  /*newest CSWsvn ver.  
> 1.6.4*/

Is there a specific reason why you are still using bdb as fsfs
was preferred by some time now because there are several limitation
with bdb? Please don't get this as fingerpointing, but if you
have to reload the repo I would continue with fsfs from the start.

> 5.  db_load (each name from #2) to new_repo   /*BDB 4.7*/
> 6.  db_checkpoint -1 -v -h new_repo           /*BDB4.7*/
> 7.  db_verify    /*BDB4.7 ... verify each db... no error msgs*/
> 7.  svnserve ... /*svn 1.6.4*/
>
> Works fine checking out code... until I check something in.  The  
> checkin works but when I try to checkout again or update another  
> checked-out copy I get:  "Decompression of .svn diff data failed"
>
> /opt/csw/bin/svnadmin verify gives:
> * Verified revision 0.
> svnadmin: Checksum mismatch on representation '0':
>   expected:  effd2c5b6f40c05496ad82988093ec13
>     actual:  19b07c36abc7abbec99bf2bc432f8f64
>
> db_recover, db_verify give no errors.  Representation '0' is  
> scary... I found a suggestion that I should change the md5 sequences  
> on the representations.dump file and re-load but there are over  
> 30,000 of them.... ugh.

Well, in fact that is vi'ing one file and a few lines on the shell
with a few mugs of coffee in between. Not desirable, but definitely
doable.

> Is there anything obvious related to opencsw that I have missed?  Do  
> my packages look mis-matched?  Are there any opencsw files for svn/ 
> bdb/trac that are known to have an issue?
>
> CSWbdb                    4.7.25,REV=2009.07.01     not in catalog
> CSWbdb4                   4.2.52,REV=2009.07.28     not in catalog
> CSWbdb44                  4.4.20,REV=2009.07.28     not in catalog
> CSWbdb47                  4.7.25,REV=2009.03.09     not in catalog
> CSWsvn                    1.6.4,REV=2009.08.23      SAME
> CSWtrac                   0.11.5,REV=2009.08.03     SAME
> CSWzlib                   1.2.3,REV=2009.04.05      SAME

You are working against the testing catalog from here:
   <http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing.html>
Please be advised that this is highly disregarded for production  
environments
unless explicitly needed for specific tests.

> Thanks for any help. This is a showstopper problem for me and the  
> only way I can think to recover is get rid of all these opencsw  
> packages and use a different source for svn/trac.

I do understand your anger about the project, but I don't see how  
changing
package sources will bring your repository back. It may be best to fix  
the
checksum after making a copy of the current repo e. g. descibed here
   http://blackcompanystudios.co.uk/blog/user/mrcranky/237
and then dump and reload it to fsfs.


Best regards

   -- Dago


From khfp.blastwave0704 at gmx.de  Sat Aug 29 13:48:54 2009
From: khfp.blastwave0704 at gmx.de (Klaus Heinz)
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 13:48:54 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] incomplete samba package in testing
Message-ID: <20090829114854.193990@gmx.net>

did anyone ever try to use the Samba package (3.2.4) from the "testing"
directory?

For nmbd I get 
        libtalloc.so.1 =>        (file not found)
        libtdb.so.1 =>   (file not found)

and for smbd
        libtalloc.so.1 =>        (file not found)
        libtdb.so.1 =>   (file not found)
        libwbclient.so.0 =>      (file not found)

Either those files are missing and should be contained in the package
or some other package (which one?) is supposed to provide them.

ciao
     Klaus
-- 
GRATIS f?r alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT!
Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome01

From dam at opencsw.org  Sat Aug 29 13:55:01 2009
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 13:55:01 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] incomplete samba package in testing
In-Reply-To: <20090829114854.193990@gmx.net>
References: <20090829114854.193990@gmx.net>
Message-ID: <F2BB7B9D-69F3-4FC0-BA8F-B981243385DC@opencsw.org>

Hi Klaus,

Am 29.08.2009 um 13:48 schrieb Klaus Heinz:
> did anyone ever try to use the Samba package (3.2.4) from the  
> "testing"
> directory?
>
> For nmbd I get
>        libtalloc.so.1 =>        (file not found)
>        libtdb.so.1 =>   (file not found)
>
> and for smbd
>        libtalloc.so.1 =>        (file not found)
>        libtdb.so.1 =>   (file not found)
>        libwbclient.so.0 =>      (file not found)
>
> Either those files are missing and should be contained in the package
> or some other package (which one?) is supposed to provide them.

That package is very old, it was essentially a proof-of-concept build  
from Phil.
Dominique has offered to build a current Samba during the technical  
summercamp
in Oslo, cc'ed him for status.


Best regards

   -- Dago

From khfp.blastwave0704 at gmx.de  Sat Aug 29 14:05:33 2009
From: khfp.blastwave0704 at gmx.de (Klaus Heinz)
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 14:05:33 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] incomplete samba package in testing
In-Reply-To: <F2BB7B9D-69F3-4FC0-BA8F-B981243385DC@opencsw.org>
References: <20090829114854.193990@gmx.net>
	<F2BB7B9D-69F3-4FC0-BA8F-B981243385DC@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <20090829120533.194030@gmx.net>

Hi,

> That package is very old, it was essentially a proof-of-concept build  
> from Phil.

Shouldn't it get removed, then? Especially as it is known now that it's
not usable.

> Dominique has offered to build a current Samba during the technical  
> summercamp
> in Oslo, cc'ed him for status.

Thanks for the information.

ciao
     Klaus
-- 
GRATIS f?r alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT!
Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome01

From dam at opencsw.org  Sat Aug 29 14:08:01 2009
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 14:08:01 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] incomplete samba package in testing
In-Reply-To: <20090829120533.194030@gmx.net>
References: <20090829114854.193990@gmx.net>
	<F2BB7B9D-69F3-4FC0-BA8F-B981243385DC@opencsw.org>
	<20090829120533.194030@gmx.net>
Message-ID: <D64F8DC8-5760-477F-B95F-77E4F9AA1260@opencsw.org>

Hi Klaus,

Am 29.08.2009 um 14:05 schrieb Klaus Heinz:
>> That package is very old, it was essentially a proof-of-concept build
>> from Phil.
>
> Shouldn't it get removed, then? Especially as it is known now that  
> it's
> not usable.

testing/ is used for both real testing and development. We are currently
redesigning the test process to ease testing and clarify this  
distinction,
also an "Olso result" :-)


Best regards

   -- Dago

From blizinski at google.com  Sat Aug 29 15:26:42 2009
From: blizinski at google.com (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski)
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 14:26:42 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] Package request
In-Reply-To: <ce97543b0908021430k1788ab58vcf2111c753090e0c@mail.gmail.com>
References: <9B28411EE585684A87F9FA7E82DBDB30240688@ICABEXCCLU01B.int.sonofon.dk>
	<f95457130904181229y67209843w646291a2ec0a9eb2@mail.gmail.com>
	<9B28411EE585684A87F9FA7E82DBDB30240B57@ICABEXCCLU01B.int.sonofon.dk>
	<f95457130904200055l710bb852u1b0d801029b41385@mail.gmail.com>
	<9B28411EE585684A87F9FA7E82DBDB302B13B5@ICABEXCCLU01B.int.sonofon.dk>
	<ce97543b0908021430k1788ab58vcf2111c753090e0c@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <ce97543b0908290626w2b81d847y87da6123cb209dee@mail.gmail.com>

On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Maciej (Matchek)
Blizinski<blizinski at google.com> wrote:
> I wrote a build for cfg2html, no idea if it's the way it should be.
> Can you test it and get back to me with comments? You can get the
> package at:
>
> http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/cfg2html-1.14r1.8,REV=2009.08.02-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz

Did you have any chance to test the package?

Maciej

From xc68000 at gmail.com  Sun Aug 30 06:11:01 2009
From: xc68000 at gmail.com (Bart)
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 22:11:01 -0600
Subject: [csw-users] Openoffice - 3.1 Sun4m?
Message-ID: <4A99FBD5.1080801@gmail.com>

Hello, is the OpenOffice 3.1 package suppose to be sun4m compatible?  I 
receive the following error when trying to launch if so -

Thank you,

$ swriter
ld.so.1: javaldx: fatal: 
/opt/csw/openoffice.org/ure/lib/libuno_sal.so.3: bad ELF flags value: [ 
EF_SPARC_32PLUS ]
ld.so.1: javaldx: fatal: relocation error: file 
/opt/csw/openoffice.org/ure/bin/javaldx: symbol sal_detail_initialize: 
referenced symbol not found
ld.so.1: soffice.bin: fatal: 
/opt/csw/openoffice.org/ure/lib/libuno_sal.so.3: bad ELF flags value: [ 
EF_SPARC_32PLUS ]
ld.so.1: soffice.bin: fatal: relocation error: file 
/opt/csw/openoffice.org/program/soffice.bin: symbol 
sal_detail_initialize: referenced symbol not found


From maciej at opencsw.org  Sun Aug 30 11:09:16 2009
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski)
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 10:09:16 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] Where can I find previous versions of packages from
	current?
In-Reply-To: <4A93EDA3.9050306@it.dcs.ch>
References: <4A93E086.3080308@it.dcs.ch>
	<ce97543b0908250626l58e5c8wacd9753c6b0dd7dc@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A93EDA3.9050306@it.dcs.ch>
Message-ID: <ce97543b0908300209k5426faa4j11321cd1491d2603@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Tim Edwards<tedwards at it.dcs.ch> wrote:
> bash-2.05# pkgadd -d
> ./syslog_ng-3.0.4,REV\=2009.08.25-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg
> ## Executing preinstall script.
> Disabling svc:/system/system-log:default
> /var/sadm/pkg/CSWsyslogng/install/preinstall: svcadm: not found
> pkgadd: ERROR: preinstall script did not complete successfully
>
> Installation of <CSWsyslogng> failed.

Hi Tim,

When you have the broken package installed, you need to take
additional steps to remove it first.

I've updated the issue: http://www.opencsw.org/bugtrack/view.php?id=3869

sudo rm /var/sadm/pkg/CSWsyslogng/install/postremove
sudo touch /etc/opt/csw/syslog-ng.conf.CSW
sudo pkgrm CSWsyslogng
sudo rm /etc/opt/csw/syslog-ng.conf.CSW

Once the old one is removed, the new one can be installed. It's in testing now:

http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/syslog_ng-3.0.4,REV=2009.08.30-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/syslog_ng-3.0.4,REV=2009.08.30-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

Maciej

From james at opencsw.org  Sun Aug 30 17:25:49 2009
From: james at opencsw.org (James Lee)
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 15:25:49 GMT
Subject: [csw-users] Openoffice - 3.1 Sun4m?
In-Reply-To: <4A99FBD5.1080801@gmail.com>
References: <4A99FBD5.1080801@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20090830.15254900.2015640913@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk>

On 30/08/09, 05:11:01, Bart <xc68000 at gmail.com> wrote regarding [csw-users] 
Openoffice - 3.1 Sun4m?:

> Hello, is the OpenOffice 3.1 package suppose to be sun4m compatible?  I
> receive the following error when trying to launch if so -

> $ swriter
> ld.so.1: javaldx: fatal:
> /opt/csw/openoffice.org/ure/lib/libuno_sal.so.3: bad ELF flags value: [
> EF_SPARC_32PLUS ]
> ld.so.1: javaldx: fatal: relocation error: file
> /opt/csw/openoffice.org/ure/bin/javaldx: symbol sal_detail_initialize:
> referenced symbol not found
> ld.so.1: soffice.bin: fatal:
> /opt/csw/openoffice.org/ure/lib/libuno_sal.so.3: bad ELF flags value: [
> EF_SPARC_32PLUS ]
> ld.so.1: soffice.bin: fatal: relocation error: file
> /opt/csw/openoffice.org/program/soffice.bin: symbol
> sal_detail_initialize: referenced symbol not found


It was built sun4m except for a few lines of assembler compiled into
libuno_sal.so.3 and stlport.  Download these files and copy into
/opt/csw/openoffice.org/ure/lib/ over the existing files.

http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/libuno_sal.so.3
http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/libstlport_sunpro.so


I can correct this but as the required Java itself isn't Sun4m
compatible so does it matter that the rest is not Sun4m compatible?

Build:
./configure
...
	--with-jdk-home=/usr/java1.2 \
...

checking the installed JDK... configure: error: JDK is too old, you need 
at least 1.5
...



Java and sun4m:
http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=6213546



All is not lost, see also:
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Java_and_OpenOffice.org


Although it still doesn't work for me:


$ uname -a
SunOS amsterdam 5.8 Generic_117350-38 sun4m sparc SUNW,SPARCstation-20
$ java -version
java version "1.2.2"
Solaris VM (build Solaris_JDK_1.2.2_05a, native threads, sunwjit)
$ swriter
javaldx: Could not find a Java Runtime Environment! 
The application cannot be started. 
The component manager is not available.
Segmentation Fault - core dumped




So maybe you are going to have to lay out $5 for an Ultra1 :-)





James.

From rgomes1997 at yahoo.co.uk  Mon Aug 31 23:51:30 2009
From: rgomes1997 at yahoo.co.uk (Richard Gomes)
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 22:51:30 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] Trying to build pgadmin3
Message-ID: <4A9C45E2.7070509@yahoo.co.uk>

Hi maintainers,

I was trying to build/package pgadmin3 but I found some troubles.
In a nutshell, in order to build pgadmin3, some preparation is needed.

In pgadmin3 INSTALL file, we can see step 3 as below.
Also, please find the Makefile I was working on attached to this file. I 
hope it help you guys.


Building:

1) Install libxml2 and libxslt if they are not already present on your 
system,
   per the instructions included with them.

2) Install PostgreSQL per the instructions included. It is recommended 
that you
   build with OpenSSL support, using the --with-openssl configure option.

3) Unpack the wxGTK tarball to a convenient location, and build and 
install it
   as follows:

     cd /path/to/wxGTK/source/
     ./configure --with-gtk --enable-gtk2 --enable-unicode
     make
     sudo make install

     # Install wxWidgets contrib modules.
     cd contrib/
     make
     sudo make install

   A script is included in the pgAdmin source tarball
   (xtra/wx-build/build-wxgtk) which will build and install wxWidgets in 
each
   combination of shared/static/debug/release builds for you.

4) Unpack the pgAdmin tarball to a convenient location, and build and 
install it
   as follows:

     bash bootstrap     # Required only if building from an SVN checkout
     ./configure
     make all
     sudo make install

   If any of the prerequisite components are installed in locations that the
   configure script cannot find, you may specify their locations on the 
command
   line. See the configure help (./configure --help) for details.

Thanks

-- 
Richard Gomes
M: +44(77)9955-6813
http://www.jquantlib.org/index.php/User:RichardGomes
twitter: frgomes

JQuantLib is a library for Quantitative Finance written in Java.
http://www.jquantlib.org/
twitter: jquantlib

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20090831/c388fe8e/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: Makefile
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20090831/c388fe8e/attachment-0001.ksh>

From william at wbonnet.net  Mon Aug 31 23:59:50 2009
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 23:59:50 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] Firefox 3 release
Message-ID: <4A9C47D6.4010501@wbonnet.net>

Hi,

I'm pleased to announced that Firefox 3.0.13 has been pushed to current. 
This version supports Solaris 8 and newer (thanks goes to James Lee for 
pointing me the solution).

Thunderbird has also been updated to version 2.0.0.23, latest stable 
before TB3 is released.

cheers
W.

-- 
William                  http://www.wbonnet.net

http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix
http://www.opencsw.org 	 Community SoftWare for Solaris
http://www.guses.org     French speaking Solaris User Group



From blizinski at google.com  Sun Aug  2 23:30:55 2009
From: blizinski at google.com (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski)
Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 22:30:55 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] Package request
In-Reply-To: <9B28411EE585684A87F9FA7E82DBDB302B13B5@ICABEXCCLU01B.int.sonofon.dk>
References: <9B28411EE585684A87F9FA7E82DBDB30240688@ICABEXCCLU01B.int.sonofon.dk>
	<f95457130904181229y67209843w646291a2ec0a9eb2@mail.gmail.com>
	<9B28411EE585684A87F9FA7E82DBDB30240B57@ICABEXCCLU01B.int.sonofon.dk>
	<f95457130904200055l710bb852u1b0d801029b41385@mail.gmail.com>
	<9B28411EE585684A87F9FA7E82DBDB302B13B5@ICABEXCCLU01B.int.sonofon.dk>
Message-ID: <ce97543b0908021430k1788ab58vcf2111c753090e0c@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Capana - Georg
Sluyterman<CPAGES at sonofon.dk> wrote:
> Its the one labeled Solaris
>
> http://come.to/cfg2html (select files -> sun ->
> cfg2html_solaris-1.6.4.tar.gz )
>
> Direct link:
>
> http://f1.grp.yahoofs.com/v1/AGb1ScNfVPRMeKaUjsCFdg8Cdxb6wd2H7r4ulLdsWGP
> 9W4FZZ3MTGioUzjxPE3dOVhRSQzdNZniXgSQB8eKTCNvxcLSGQQ/sun/cfg2html_solaris
> -1.6.4.tar.gz

The direct link is probably session-dependent, those files don't seem
to be publicly downloadable. I've joined the yahoo group to download
the source file.

I wrote a build for cfg2html, no idea if it's the way it should be.
Can you test it and get back to me with comments? You can get the
package at:

http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/cfg2html-1.14r1.8,REV=2009.08.02-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz

Maciej


From David.Crellin at uts.edu.au  Mon Aug  3 02:11:35 2009
From: David.Crellin at uts.edu.au (David Crellin)
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2009 10:11:35 +1000
Subject: [csw-users] [csw-announce] berkeleydb in flux
In-Reply-To: <20090731144955.GA30348@bolthole.com>
Message-ID: <D6887FBE252F4FEEA24506C007908184@turmoil>

Thanks sbg

Regards,

David Crellin
BSC(Comp)

Senior Server Administrator
Technical Services Branch
Information Technology Division
University of Technology, Sydney
Ph.  +61 02 95142171
Fax. +61 02 9514 1994
Mob. +61 439 951421 

-----Original Message-----
From: announce-bounces+sbg+blastwave=it.uts.edu.au at lists.opencsw.org
[mailto:announce-bounces+sbg+blastwave=it.uts.edu.au at lists.opencsw.org] On
Behalf Of Philip Brown
Sent: Saturday, 1 August 2009 12:50 AM
To: announce at lists.opencsw.org
Subject: [csw-announce] berkeleydb in flux


Warning to CSW users: the upgrade of berkeleydb in 'current' has caused some
unforseen side effects. Some things may break, if you upgrade berkeleydb at
this time.

We are working to rebuild known affected packages to use the newer version
instead.  Please only upgrade with caution.

_______________________________________________
announce mailing list
announce at lists.opencsw.org
https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/announce

UTS CRICOS Provider Code:  00099F
DISCLAIMER: This email message and any accompanying attachments may contain confidential information.  If you are not the intended recipient, do not
read, use, disseminate, distribute or copy this message or attachments.  If
you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately
and delete this message. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender expressly, and with authority,
states them to be the views of the University of Technology Sydney. Before
opening any attachments, please check them for viruses and defects.

Think. Green. Do.

Please consider the environment before printing this email.


From jmanuel.macias at rediris.es  Mon Aug  3 12:19:15 2009
From: jmanuel.macias at rediris.es (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jos=3Fe_Manuel_Macias_Luna?=)
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2009 12:19:15 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] CSW-bind
In-Reply-To: <625385e30907300713n392102bfp3e69339d6135fedc@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20090730013137.B783D6C0C@mail.opencsw.org>
	<625385e30907300713n392102bfp3e69339d6135fedc@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4A76B9A3.4090503@rediris.es>


Hi again,

   first of all, sorry for bothering you while on vacations, Peter... (I guess
you are from your words from last week... :))

   I installed last friday
bind-9.6.1,REV=2009.07.30_rev=P1-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg with no hassle, but when
 installing today bind-9.6.1,REV=2009.07.31_rev=P1-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg I'm
getting problems with the named binary itself:

bash-2.03# pkginfo -l CSWbind
   PKGINST:  CSWbind
      NAME:  bind - ISC BIND DNS main package
  CATEGORY:  application
      ARCH:  sparc
   VERSION:  9.6.1,REV=2009.07.31_rev=P1
    VENDOR:  http://www.isc.org/software/bind packaged for CSW by Peter Bonivart
    PSTAMP:  bonivart at build8s-20090731191430
  INSTDATE:  Aug 03 2009 10:57
   HOTLINE:  http://www.opencsw.org/bugtrack/
     EMAIL:  bonivart at opencsw.org
    STATUS:  completely installed
     FILES:       53 installed pathnames
                   4 shared pathnames
                   1 linked files
                   8 directories
                  10 executables
                1816 blocks used (approx)

bash-2.03# file /opt/csw/sbin/named
/opt/csw/sbin/named:    ELF 32-bit LSB executable 80386 Version 1, dynamically
linked, stripped

...while in the machine I successfully installed on friday says:

# file /opt/csw/sbin/named
/opt/csw/sbin/named:    ELF 32-bit MSB executable SPARC Version 1, dynamically
linked, stripped

That is: binaries for the SPARC bind in the testing directory seems to be i386
binaries...  could that be the case?

regards,

jose.


Peter Bonivart wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 3:31 AM, <darrell.burkey at anu.edu.au> wrote:
>> If everyone is bugging you about this just ignore my message. I'm interested if/whe you will be releasing an updated bind package so I can decide how I'll go about upgrading our Solaris 8 box given I used your package in the past.
>>
>> Thanks for your time and efforts. I certainly appreciate them.
> 
> I'm building 9.6.1-P1 right now on my work laptop connected through my
> fathers mobile broadband in their summerhouse 800 kilometers from
> home. :-)
> 
> There's new packages in testing now:
> 
> http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing.html
> 
> I can't test them right now myself so please let me know if they work for you.
> 



From bonivart at opencsw.org  Mon Aug  3 13:35:36 2009
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 13:35:36 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] CSW-bind
In-Reply-To: <4A76B9A3.4090503@rediris.es>
References: <20090730013137.B783D6C0C@mail.opencsw.org>
	<625385e30907300713n392102bfp3e69339d6135fedc@mail.gmail.com> 
	<4A76B9A3.4090503@rediris.es>
Message-ID: <625385e30908030435n4c44ded3r24d2912355295cd1@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Jos?e Manuel Macias
Luna<jmanuel.macias at rediris.es> wrote:
>
> Hi again,
>
> ? first of all, sorry for bothering you while on vacations, Peter... (I guess
> you are from your words from last week... :))

No problem, back at work today. :-)

> That is: binaries for the SPARC bind in the testing directory seems to be i386
> binaries... ?could that be the case?

You're right, I just checked. From my laptop with Ubuntu I could only
test with Solaris 10 i386 through VirtualBox. Something must have gone
wrong with the build system mixing the files. I'll rebuild both Sparc
and i386 from scratch and test them both.

Thanks for spotting this.

-- 
/peter


From jmanuel.macias at rediris.es  Mon Aug  3 14:08:37 2009
From: jmanuel.macias at rediris.es (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jos=3Fe_Manuel_Macias_Luna?=)
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2009 14:08:37 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] CSW-bind
In-Reply-To: <625385e30908030435n4c44ded3r24d2912355295cd1@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20090730013137.B783D6C0C@mail.opencsw.org>	<625385e30907300713n392102bfp3e69339d6135fedc@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A76B9A3.4090503@rediris.es>
	<625385e30908030435n4c44ded3r24d2912355295cd1@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4A76D345.3070404@rediris.es>

Peter Bonivart wrote:

> You're right, I just checked. From my laptop with Ubuntu I could only
> test with Solaris 10 i386 through VirtualBox. Something must have gone
> wrong with the build system mixing the files. I'll rebuild both Sparc
> and i386 from scratch and test them both.

No prob. Just tell me and I'll test here too. Now I have the release from
Thursday installed, which looks fine...

regards,

jose manuel.




From bonivart at opencsw.org  Mon Aug  3 15:11:28 2009
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 15:11:28 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] CSW-bind
In-Reply-To: <4A76D345.3070404@rediris.es>
References: <20090730013137.B783D6C0C@mail.opencsw.org>
	<625385e30907300713n392102bfp3e69339d6135fedc@mail.gmail.com> 
	<4A76B9A3.4090503@rediris.es>
	<625385e30908030435n4c44ded3r24d2912355295cd1@mail.gmail.com> 
	<4A76D345.3070404@rediris.es>
Message-ID: <625385e30908030611h7dfd3ddbubff2f04e58006599@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Jos?e Manuel Macias
Luna<jmanuel.macias at rediris.es> wrote:
> No prob. Just tell me and I'll test here too. Now I have the release from
> Thursday installed, which looks fine...

There's now new packages in testing:

http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing.html

I have checked and they contain the right architecture, I'm now about
to install them on test systems.

-- 
/peter


From bonivart at opencsw.org  Mon Aug  3 18:19:52 2009
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 18:19:52 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] CSW-bind
In-Reply-To: <625385e30908030611h7dfd3ddbubff2f04e58006599@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20090730013137.B783D6C0C@mail.opencsw.org>
	<625385e30907300713n392102bfp3e69339d6135fedc@mail.gmail.com> 
	<4A76B9A3.4090503@rediris.es>
	<625385e30908030435n4c44ded3r24d2912355295cd1@mail.gmail.com> 
	<4A76D345.3070404@rediris.es>
	<625385e30908030611h7dfd3ddbubff2f04e58006599@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <625385e30908030919r442e04eofea01bc0212a23ce@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Peter Bonivart<bonivart at opencsw.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Jos?e Manuel Macias
> Luna<jmanuel.macias at rediris.es> wrote:
>> No prob. Just tell me and I'll test here too. Now I have the release from
>> Thursday installed, which looks fine...
>
> There's now new packages in testing:
>
> http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing.html
>
> I have checked and they contain the right architecture, I'm now about
> to install them on test systems.

I have now tested both Sparc and i386 versions and they install and
start correctly. No heavy duty testing though so if someone could
confirm that todays packages work it would be great.

-- 
/peter


From r.martel at csuohio.edu  Mon Aug  3 19:51:29 2009
From: r.martel at csuohio.edu (Robert M Martel)
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 13:51:29 -0400
Subject: [csw-users] AUTO: Robert M Martel is out of the office. (returning
	Mon 08/10/2009)
Message-ID: <OF1C5F5CC3.1A5534D2-ON85257607.0062192A-85257607.0062192A@csuohio.edu>


I am out of the office from Mon 08/02/2004 until Mon 08/10/2009.

I will respond to your message when I return.


Note: This is an automated response to your message  "Re: [csw-users] where
is mantis?" sent on 8/27/08 11:29:32.

This is the only notification you will receive while this person is away.



From dam at opencsw.org  Wed Aug  5 17:04:26 2009
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 17:04:26 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] New GTK+ available
Message-ID: <68821C24-D763-4C75-ACEE-4B43AAE6F1A6@opencsw.org>

Hi,

there is an updated GTK+ available from testing which should fix
all open issues, including a new package for "gail" which is now
an empty dependency to GTK+ as is has been integrated into the
main project:

   gail-1.21.5.1,REV=2009.08.05-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz
   gtk2-2.16.5,REV=2009.08.05-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
   gtk2-2.16.5,REV=2009.08.05-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
   gtk2_devel-2.16.5,REV=2009.08.05-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
   gtk2_devel-2.16.5,REV=2009.08.05-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
   gtk2_doc-2.16.5,REV=2009.08.05-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz


Best regards

   -- Dago


From mwatters at opencsw.org  Fri Aug  7 21:22:39 2009
From: mwatters at opencsw.org (Mike Watters)
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2009 14:22:39 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] pidgin 2.5.8 in testing
Message-ID: <4A7C7EFF.9020901@opencsw.org>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

compiled against gtk2  version 2.16.5 and the CSW x11 packages

fixes yahoo instant messanger.


- --
~Mike
"Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex,
and more violent.  It takes a touch of genius -- and a lot of courage --
to move in the opposite direction." --> Albert Einstein 1879 - 1955
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (SunOS)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkp8fv4ACgkQLrhmsXMSLxfFIwCgz6/VZbw/8pDNFHFhkTjPRMI5
2yEAoNod5qB5UwwhQ0xo9ZlH7I4eRtf4
=j/ho
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


From mwatters at opencsw.org  Sat Aug  8 06:14:09 2009
From: mwatters at opencsw.org (Mike Watters)
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2009 23:14:09 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] gnupg 1.4 9 in testing
Message-ID: <4A7CFB91.90107@opencsw.org>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Changes:
setuid gpg binary
remove charset.alias from the package.


- --
~Mike
"Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex,
and more violent.  It takes a touch of genius -- and a lot of courage --
to move in the opposite direction." --> Albert Einstein 1879 - 1955
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (SunOS)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkp8+5AACgkQLrhmsXMSLxd6AgCg6PsO0lpacfo2Ge15+OoYpsME
hKUAoL0L/HJtYBKw0UE4JJStqmOZI3X7
=9SFt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


From trinkle at cs.purdue.edu  Mon Aug 10 04:41:10 2009
From: trinkle at cs.purdue.edu (Daniel Trinkle)
Date: Sun, 09 Aug 2009 22:41:10 -0400
Subject: [csw-users] berkeleydb in flux
In-Reply-To: <20090731145022.GB30348@bolthole.com>
References: <20090731145022.GB30348@bolthole.com>
Message-ID: <h5o1c7$emc$1@ger.gmane.org>

Philip Brown wrote:
> Warning to CSW users: the upgrade of berkeleydb in 'current' has caused
> some unforseen side effects. Some things may break, if you upgrade
> berkeleydb at this time.
> 
> We are working to rebuild known affected packages to use the newer version
> instead.  Please only upgrade with caution.

Unfortunately, this also has a disastrous effect on anything outside 
OpenCSW built against the libraries.  When built against explicit 
versions (i.e. /opt/csw/bdb43), I think it is a reasonable expectation 
that that will continue to be version 4.3.x -- not capriciously change 
to an incompatible 4.7.x version.

I can understand changing bdb4 to the latest version (though this breaks 
things as well), but making bdb43, bdb44, etc reference another version 
is guaranteed to cause problems.

At the very least the description and version information in the 
packages (CSWbdb4, CSWbdb43, CSWbdb44) should accurately reflect that 
the packages are now a reference to the current version.  This would 
help in tracking down problems and also provide meaningful information 
from "pkg-get compare".  Unfortunately it told me I was getting 
"4.2.52,REV=2009.07.28" (CSWbdb), "4.3.29,REV=2009.06.26" (CSWbdb43) and 
"4.4.20,REV=2009.07.28" (CSWbdb44) which clearly is not the case.

Dan



From dam at opencsw.org  Mon Aug 10 18:33:05 2009
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 18:33:05 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] New in testing/: libspeex 1.2rc1
Message-ID: <30359C01-DECD-4CCB-BD9C-83DBFF30B8D5@opencsw.org>

Hi,

after a lot of pain with autoconf/automake there is finally an updated  
version
of libspeex:

   libspeex-1.2rc1,REV=2009.08.10-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
   libspeex-1.2rc1,REV=2009.08.10-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz


Best regards

   -- Dago


From dam at opencsw.org  Mon Aug 10 22:22:38 2009
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 22:22:38 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] berkeleydb in flux
In-Reply-To: <h5o1c7$emc$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <20090731145022.GB30348@bolthole.com> <h5o1c7$emc$1@ger.gmane.org>
Message-ID: <AA097B66-9956-49A6-9C41-0935CEE46E1B@opencsw.org>

Hi Daniel,

Am 10.08.2009 um 04:41 schrieb Daniel Trinkle:
> Philip Brown wrote:
>> Warning to CSW users: the upgrade of berkeleydb in 'current' has  
>> caused
>> some unforseen side effects. Some things may break, if you upgrade
>> berkeleydb at this time.
>> We are working to rebuild known affected packages to use the newer  
>> version
>> instead.  Please only upgrade with caution.
>
> Unfortunately, this also has a disastrous effect on anything outside  
> OpenCSW built against the libraries.  When built against explicit  
> versions (i.e. /opt/csw/bdb43), I think it is a reasonable  
> expectation that that will continue to be version 4.3.x -- not  
> capriciously change to an incompatible 4.7.x version.

Is it really incompatible? With the symlinks in place there shouldn't
be a difference for most applications as BDB is ABI-compatible. If
there are any problems please post them! It is important that we are
aware of any issues that arise.

> I can understand changing bdb4 to the latest version (though this  
> breaks things as well), but making bdb43, bdb44, etc reference  
> another version is guaranteed to cause problems.
>
> At the very least the description and version information in the  
> packages (CSWbdb4, CSWbdb43, CSWbdb44) should accurately reflect  
> that the packages are now a reference to the current version.  This  
> would help in tracking down problems and also provide meaningful  
> information from "pkg-get compare".  Unfortunately it told me I was  
> getting "4.2.52,REV=2009.07.28" (CSWbdb),  
> "4.3.29,REV=2009.06.26" (CSWbdb43) and  
> "4.4.20,REV=2009.07.28" (CSWbdb44) which clearly is not the case.

I see, we are currently in the discussion on how to best proceed from  
here
and putting the 4.7.x version in the stub-packages would really be an  
honest
thing.


Best regards

   -- Dago


From trinkle at cs.purdue.edu  Mon Aug 10 23:03:29 2009
From: trinkle at cs.purdue.edu (Daniel Trinkle)
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 17:03:29 -0400
Subject: [csw-users] berkeleydb in flux
In-Reply-To: <AA097B66-9956-49A6-9C41-0935CEE46E1B@opencsw.org>
References: <20090731145022.GB30348@bolthole.com> <h5o1c7$emc$1@ger.gmane.org>
	<AA097B66-9956-49A6-9C41-0935CEE46E1B@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <h5q1v2$f10$1@ger.gmane.org>

Dagobert Michelsen wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
> 
> Am 10.08.2009 um 04:41 schrieb Daniel Trinkle:
>> Philip Brown wrote:
>>> Warning to CSW users: the upgrade of berkeleydb in 'current' has caused
>>> some unforseen side effects. Some things may break, if you upgrade
>>> berkeleydb at this time.
>>> We are working to rebuild known affected packages to use the newer
>>> version
>>> instead.  Please only upgrade with caution.
>>
>> Unfortunately, this also has a disastrous effect on anything outside
>> OpenCSW built against the libraries.  When built against explicit
>> versions (i.e. /opt/csw/bdb43), I think it is a reasonable expectation
>> that that will continue to be version 4.3.x -- not capriciously change
>> to an incompatible 4.7.x version.
> 
> Is it really incompatible? With the symlinks in place there shouldn't
> be a difference for most applications as BDB is ABI-compatible. If
> there are any problems please post them! It is important that we are
> aware of any issues that arise.

It may just be the application that is being overly paranoid.  Sendmail
spit out the following message and exited:

Aug  9 16:28:26 xxx sm-mta[457]: [ID 801593 mail.crit] NOQUEUE:
SYSERR(root): Berkeley DB version mismatch: compiled against 4.2.52,
run-time linked against 4.7.25
Aug  9 16:28:26 xxx sm-msp-queue[458]: [ID 801593 mail.crit] NOQUEUE:
SYSERR(root): Berkeley DB version mismatch: compiled against 4.2.52,
run-time linked against 4.7.25

The major/minor version check is in the sendmail code, not the BDB code.

Dan



From mwatters at opencsw.org  Tue Aug 11 00:00:01 2009
From: mwatters at opencsw.org (Mike Watters)
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 17:00:01 -0500
Subject: [csw-users] berkeleydb in flux
In-Reply-To: <h5q1v2$f10$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <20090731145022.GB30348@bolthole.com>
	<h5o1c7$emc$1@ger.gmane.org>	<AA097B66-9956-49A6-9C41-0935CEE46E1B@opencsw.org>
	<h5q1v2$f10$1@ger.gmane.org>
Message-ID: <4A809861.6040602@opencsw.org>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi Daniel,
Daniel Trinkle wrote:

> It may just be the application that is being overly paranoid.  Sendmail
> spit out the following message and exited:
> 
> Aug  9 16:28:26 xxx sm-mta[457]: [ID 801593 mail.crit] NOQUEUE:
> SYSERR(root): Berkeley DB version mismatch: compiled against 4.2.52,
> run-time linked against 4.7.25
> Aug  9 16:28:26 xxx sm-msp-queue[458]: [ID 801593 mail.crit] NOQUEUE:
> SYSERR(root): Berkeley DB version mismatch: compiled against 4.2.52,
> run-time linked against 4.7.25
> 
> The major/minor version check is in the sendmail code, not the BDB code.
> 

We are aware that sendmail has this problem,  we have a new version compiled
and out in testing.  if you have the ability to test this version to see if it
resolves your problem I would be most grateful.

to install from testing, you can use:
# pkg-get -s http://mirror.opencsw.org/opencsw/testing -U -u sendmail

and to revert back if you need to would be:
# pkgrm CSWsendmail; pkg-get -i sendmail


- --
~Mike
"Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex,
and more violent.  It takes a touch of genius -- and a lot of courage --
to move in the opposite direction." --> Albert Einstein 1879 - 1955
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (SunOS)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkqAmGEACgkQLrhmsXMSLxc/AACff9kygSABDVfc26x19LvibZLx
aOAAoIX+par+E6yIChXTh3U/LE0i7SaE
=9oYg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


From casterln at berkeley.edu  Tue Aug 11 01:53:26 2009
From: casterln at berkeley.edu (Gary Casterline)
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 16:53:26 -0700
Subject: [csw-users] berkeleydb in flux
In-Reply-To: <4A809861.6040602@opencsw.org>
References: <20090731145022.GB30348@bolthole.com>	<h5o1c7$emc$1@ger.gmane.org>	<AA097B66-9956-49A6-9C41-0935CEE46E1B@opencsw.org>	<h5q1v2$f10$1@ger.gmane.org>
	<4A809861.6040602@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <4A80B2F6.8030801@berkeley.edu>

I had a problem with DB_File after the berkeleydb pkgs changed:

   DB_File needs compatible versions of libdb & db.h
   you have db.h version 4.4.20 and libdb version 4.7.25

I had to download an old version to get things rolling again.
Anyone else see that?

 _Gary


Mike Watters wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
> Daniel Trinkle wrote:
> 
>> It may just be the application that is being overly paranoid.  Sendmail
>> spit out the following message and exited:
> 
>> Aug  9 16:28:26 xxx sm-mta[457]: [ID 801593 mail.crit] NOQUEUE:
>> SYSERR(root): Berkeley DB version mismatch: compiled against 4.2.52,
>> run-time linked against 4.7.25
>> Aug  9 16:28:26 xxx sm-msp-queue[458]: [ID 801593 mail.crit] NOQUEUE:
>> SYSERR(root): Berkeley DB version mismatch: compiled against 4.2.52,
>> run-time linked against 4.7.25
> 
>> The major/minor version check is in the sendmail code, not the BDB code.
> 
> 
> We are aware that sendmail has this problem,  we have a new version compiled
> and out in testing.  if you have the ability to test this version to see if it
> resolves your problem I would be most grateful.
> 
> to install from testing, you can use:
> # pkg-get -s http://mirror.opencsw.org/opencsw/testing -U -u sendmail
> 
> and to revert back if you need to would be:
> # pkgrm CSWsendmail; pkg-get -i sendmail
> 
> 
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users at lists.opencsw.org
https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/users



From ihsan at opencsw.org  Tue Aug 11 08:09:17 2009
From: ihsan at opencsw.org (Ihsan Dogan)
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 08:09:17 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] Apache 2.2.13 in testing
Message-ID: <4A810B0D.9080701@opencsw.org>

Hello,

I've updated Apache to 2.2.13 and it's available on testing now. It
contains a security fix and it's linked agains BerkeleyDB 4.7.

All architectures:
http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/apache2-2.2.13,REV=2009.08.10-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz
http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/apache2_manual-2.2.13,REV=2009.08.10-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz

sparc:
http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/ap2_prefork-2.2.13,REV=2009.08.10-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/ap2_suexec-2.2.13,REV=2009.08.10-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/ap2_worker-2.2.13,REV=2009.08.10-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/apache2_devel-2.2.13,REV=2009.08.10-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/apache2c-2.2.13,REV=2009.08.10-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/apache2rt-2.2.13,REV=2009.08.10-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

i386:
http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/ap2_prefork-2.2.13,REV=2009.08.10-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/ap2_suexec-2.2.13,REV=2009.08.10-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/ap2_worker-2.2.13,REV=2009.08.10-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/apache2_devel-2.2.13,REV=2009.08.10-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/apache2c-2.2.13,REV=2009.08.10-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/apache2rt-2.2.13,REV=2009.08.10-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

Feedback is always welcome and appreciated.



Ihsan

-- 
ihsan at dogan.ch		http://blog.dogan.ch/


From dam at opencsw.org  Tue Aug 11 16:33:43 2009
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 16:33:43 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] berkeleydb in flux
In-Reply-To: <4A80B2F6.8030801@berkeley.edu>
References: <20090731145022.GB30348@bolthole.com>	<h5o1c7$emc$1@ger.gmane.org>	<AA097B66-9956-49A6-9C41-0935CEE46E1B@opencsw.org>	<h5q1v2$f10$1@ger.gmane.org>
	<4A809861.6040602@opencsw.org> <4A80B2F6.8030801@berkeley.edu>
Message-ID: <5CBE347A-E9ED-48E8-8D30-DFD411F7EE89@opencsw.org>

Hi Gary,

Am 11.08.2009 um 01:53 schrieb Gary Casterline:
> I had a problem with DB_File after the berkeleydb pkgs changed:
>
>   DB_File needs compatible versions of libdb & db.h
>   you have db.h version 4.4.20 and libdb version 4.7.25
>
> I had to download an old version to get things rolling again.
> Anyone else see that?

Were you using the OpenCSW Perl? There has been an update to Perl lately
to accomodate for the BDB version bump. Could you please verify?


Best regards

   -- Dago


From james at opencsw.org  Tue Aug 11 18:31:32 2009
From: james at opencsw.org (James Lee)
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 16:31:32 GMT
Subject: [csw-users] fortran broken in gcc4?
In-Reply-To: <4A6EF592.1050409@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
References: <4A6EF592.1050409@cmi.univ-mrs.fr>
Message-ID: <20090811.16313200.4199213468@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk>

On 28/07/09, 13:56:50, gerard <ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr> wrote regarding
[csw-users] fortran broken in gcc4?:

> hello all,

Hello to the very few people that use FORTRAN.


> i'm unable to compile a fortran program with gcc4:
> % gcc couleur_mod.f95
> gcc: error trying to exec 'f951': execvp: No such file or directory


> Here the packages installed:
> % pkginfo | grep CSWgcc4
> application CSWgcc4core gcc4core - GNU C Compiler
> application CSWgcc4corert gcc4corert - GNU C Compiler
> Run Time
> application CSWgcc4g++rt gcc4g++rt - GNU C++
> Compiler Run Time
> application CSWgcc4g95 gcc4g95 - GNU FORTRAN Compiler
> application CSWgcc4g95rt gcc4g95rt - GNU FORTRAN 95
> Compiler Run Time

Assuming you have gcc4 v4.3.3, remove CSWgcc4g95 and CSWgcc4g95rt and
install CSWgcc4gfortran and CSWgcc4gfortranrt.

gcc4g95 are from the previous gcc4 collection, either the name
shouldn't have changed or there should be some empty replacement
packages to remove the old files with special depends to install
the new packages are transparently.


$ pkginfo | grep CSWgcc4
application CSWgcc4core          gcc4core - GNU C Compiler
application CSWgcc4corert        gcc4corert - GNU C Compiler Run Time
application CSWgcc4g++           gcc4g++ - GNU C++ Compiler
application CSWgcc4g++rt         gcc4g++rt - GNU C++ Compiler Run Time
application CSWgcc4gfortran      gcc4gfortran - GNU Fortran Compiler
application CSWgcc4gfortranrt    gcc4gfortranrt - GNU Fortran Compiler
Run Time




Using the new packages I've just compiled a antique piece of code
- which has sections for Univacs and PDP-10s and used punch tapes
for "mass" storage - and I had I did have some other problems.

gcc3 and SunPRO both compiled fine.

Using /opt/csw/gcc4/bin/gcc as the compiler fails to link, trivial
example:

$ gcc main.f
Undefined                       first referenced
 symbol                             in file
main
/opt/csw/gcc4/lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/4.3.3/crt1.o
_gfortran_transfer_character        /tmp/ccUr3kjw.o
_gfortran_st_write                  /tmp/ccUr3kjw.o
_gfortran_set_options               /tmp/ccUr3kjw.o
_gfortran_st_write_done             /tmp/ccUr3kjw.o
ld: fatal: Symbol referencing errors. No output written to a.out


Use gfortran as the compiler.
export FC=/opt/csw/gcc4/bin/gfortran

$ gfortran main.f

but there is no RPATH to the FORTRAN lib:


$ ./a.out
ld.so.1: a.out: fatal: libgfortran.so.3: open failed: No such file or
directory
zsh: killed     ./a.out


$ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/opt/csw/gcc4/lib ./a.out
 hello from the past

better workaround is to set -R/opt/csw/gcc4/lib on link but obviously
the package needs fixing properly.





James.


From casterln at berkeley.edu  Tue Aug 11 18:31:43 2009
From: casterln at berkeley.edu (Gary Casterline)
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 09:31:43 -0700
Subject: [csw-users] berkeleydb in flux
In-Reply-To: <5CBE347A-E9ED-48E8-8D30-DFD411F7EE89@opencsw.org>
References: <20090731145022.GB30348@bolthole.com>	<h5o1c7$emc$1@ger.gmane.org>	<AA097B66-9956-49A6-9C41-0935CEE46E1B@opencsw.org>	<h5q1v2$f10$1@ger.gmane.org>	<4A809861.6040602@opencsw.org>
	<4A80B2F6.8030801@berkeley.edu>
	<5CBE347A-E9ED-48E8-8D30-DFD411F7EE89@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <4A819CEF.7000702@berkeley.edu>

Dagobert Michelsen wrote:
> Hi Gary,
> 
> Am 11.08.2009 um 01:53 schrieb Gary Casterline:
>> I had a problem with DB_File after the berkeleydb pkgs changed:
>>
>>   DB_File needs compatible versions of libdb & db.h
>>   you have db.h version 4.4.20 and libdb version 4.7.25
>>
>> I had to download an old version to get things rolling again.
>> Anyone else see that?
> 
> Were you using the OpenCSW Perl? There has been an update to Perl lately
> to accomodate for the BDB version bump. Could you please verify?
> 

Yes, I have /usr/bin/perl and /usr/local/bin/perl symlinked to
/opt/csw/bin/perl.

Here is my current list of berkeleydb packages:
berkeleydb              [Not installed]     4.7.25,REV=2009.07.01
berkeleydb3             [Not installed]     3.3.11,REV=2009.07.22
berkeleydb4       4.2.52,REV=2009.07.28                      SAME
berkeleydb43            [Not installed]     4.3.29,REV=2009.06.26
berkeleydb43_devel      [Not installed]     4.3.29,REV=2006.01.13
berkeleydb43_doc        [Not installed]     4.3.29,REV=2006.01.13
berkeleydb44      4.4.20,REV=2007.01.27     4.4.20,REV=2009.07.28
berkeleydb44_devel 4.4.20,REV=2009.05.26                     SAME
berkeleydb44_doc        [Not installed]     4.4.20,REV=2009.05.26
berkeleydb4_doc         [Not installed]     4.2.52,REV=2008.02.26
berkeleydb_devel        [Not installed]     4.7.25,REV=2009.07.01
berkeleydb_doc          [Not installed]     4.7.25,REV=2009.07.01
pm_berkeleydb       0.39,REV=2009.08.02                      SAME


Here is the full version check on DB_File.
This is after reverting to   berkeleydb44 4.4.20,REV=2007.01.27

$ perl -V -e "use DB_File; print qq{DB_File ver \$DB_File::VERSION\n}"

Summary of my perl5 (revision 5 version 8 subversion 8) configuration:
  Platform:
    osname=solaris, osvers=2.8, archname=sun4-solaris-thread-multi
    uname='sunos build8s 5.8 generic_virtual sun4u sparc sunw,sun-fire-280r'
    config_args=''
    hint=recommended, useposix=true, d_sigaction=define
    usethreads=define use5005threads=undef useithreads=define
usemultiplicity=define
    useperlio=define d_sfio=undef uselargefiles=define usesocks=undef
    use64bitint=undef use64bitall=undef uselongdouble=undef
    usemymalloc=n, bincompat5005=undef
  Compiler:
    cc='cc', ccflags ='-D_REENTRANT -xO3 -xtarget=ultra -xarch=v8
-I/opt/csw/bdb44/include -I/opt/csw/include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE
-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64',
    optimize='-xO3 -xtarget=ultra -xarch=v8',
    cppflags='-D_REENTRANT -xO3 -xtarget=ultra -xarch=v8
-I/opt/csw/bdb44/include -I/opt/csw/include'
    ccversion='Sun C 5.8 Patch 121015-06 2007/10/03', gccversion='',
gccosandvers=''
    intsize=4, longsize=4, ptrsize=4, doublesize=8, byteorder=4321
    d_longlong=define, longlongsize=8, d_longdbl=define, longdblsize=16
    ivtype='long', ivsize=4, nvtype='double', nvsize=8, Off_t='off_t',
lseeksize=8
    alignbytes=8, prototype=define
  Linker and Libraries:
    ld='cc', ldflags ='-L/opt/csw/bdb44/lib -L/opt/csw/lib -L/usr/lib
-L/usr/ccs/lib -L/lib'
    libpth=/usr/lib /usr/ccs/lib /lib /opt/csw/lib
    libs=-lsocket -lnsl -lgdbm -ldb-4.4 -ldl -lm -lpthread -lc
    perllibs=-lsocket -lnsl -ldb-4.4 -ldl -lm -lpthread -lc
    libc=/lib/libc.so, so=so, useshrplib=true, libperl=libperl.so.5.8.8
    gnulibc_version=''
  Dynamic Linking:
    dlsrc=dl_dlopen.xs, dlext=so, d_dlsymun=undef, ccdlflags='-R
/opt/csw/lib'
    cccdlflags='-KPIC', lddlflags='-G -L/opt/csw/bdb44/lib
-L/opt/csw/lib -L/usr/lib -L/usr/ccs/lib -L/lib'


Characteristics of this binary (from libperl):
  Compile-time options: MULTIPLICITY PERL_IMPLICIT_CONTEXT
                        PERL_MALLOC_WRAP USE_ITHREADS USE_LARGE_FILES
                        USE_PERLIO USE_REENTRANT_API USE_SITECUSTOMIZE
  Built under solaris
  Compiled at Oct  8 2008 14:03:19
  @INC:
    /opt/csw/lib/perl/5.8.8
    /opt/csw/share/perl/5.8.8
    /opt/csw/lib/perl/site_perl
    /opt/csw/share/perl/site_perl
    /opt/csw/share/perl/site_perl
    /opt/csw/lib/perl/csw
    /opt/csw/share/perl/csw
    /opt/csw/share/perl/csw
    .
DB_File ver 1.814


From bonivart at opencsw.org  Tue Aug 11 18:50:41 2009
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 18:50:41 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] berkeleydb in flux
In-Reply-To: <4A819CEF.7000702@berkeley.edu>
References: <20090731145022.GB30348@bolthole.com> <h5o1c7$emc$1@ger.gmane.org>
	<AA097B66-9956-49A6-9C41-0935CEE46E1B@opencsw.org>
	<h5q1v2$f10$1@ger.gmane.org> 
	<4A809861.6040602@opencsw.org> <4A80B2F6.8030801@berkeley.edu> 
	<5CBE347A-E9ED-48E8-8D30-DFD411F7EE89@opencsw.org>
	<4A819CEF.7000702@berkeley.edu>
Message-ID: <625385e30908110950u77a70ecfj9ff7ac610f8dd2a0@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 6:31 PM, Gary Casterline<casterln at berkeley.edu> wrote:
> ?Compiled at Oct ?8 2008 14:03:19

Please update your Perl package, you should have 5.8.8,REV=2009.08.05.

-- 
/peter


From jonathan.boyd at bioch.ox.ac.uk  Wed Aug 12 11:25:54 2009
From: jonathan.boyd at bioch.ox.ac.uk (Jonathan Boyd)
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 10:25:54 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] CSW and seamonkey
Message-ID: <20090812092554.52627804F@webmail221.herald.ox.ac.uk>

An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: not available
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20090812/764043b7/attachment-0001.ksh>

From william at wbonnet.net  Wed Aug 12 12:40:02 2009
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 12:40:02 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] CSW and seamonkey
In-Reply-To: <20090812092554.52627804F@webmail221.herald.ox.ac.uk>
References: <20090812092554.52627804F@webmail221.herald.ox.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <4A829C02.1080207@wbonnet.net>

Hi Jonathan
>   I have been using CSW seamonkey (solaris 9 & sparc) 
> and I was wondering if any of the maintainers would 
> consider the possibility of trying to update the 
> existing version (VERSION:  1.1.11,REV=2008.07.17)?
>   
Currently it is not maintained, but since i package other mozilla 
software i can have a look to this. At least i can bring it to a newer 
version, maybe not latest (since FF 3.5.2) is not yet ready.
>   Is it possible to produce a more uptodate seamonkey 
> package which is compiled for use on older systems
> such as solaris 9 & sparc?
>   
Actually FF3 is available from testing for Solaris 9. Maybe it can help...

I'll tr to produce an update for September

cheers
W.


From william at wbonnet.net  Wed Aug 12 12:45:32 2009
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 12:45:32 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] /testing Firefox 3.0.13 is available
Message-ID: <4A829D4C.1040901@wbonnet.net>

Hi all

Firefox 3.0.13 is available from testing. I produced both Solaris 8 and 
9 packages.

http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/firefox-3.0.13,REV=2009.08.04-SunOS5.9-sparc.pkg.gz
http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/firefox-3.0.13,REV=2009.08.05-SunOS5.9-i386.pkg.gz

http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/firefox-3.0.13,REV=2009.08.06-SunOS5.8-i386.pkg.gz
http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/firefox-3.0.13,REV=2009.08.06-SunOS5.8-sparc.pkg.gz

Thanks for your feedback

cheers
W.


From mats.larsson at ericsson.com  Wed Aug 12 14:18:26 2009
From: mats.larsson at ericsson.com (Mats Larsson)
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 14:18:26 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] /testing Firefox 3.0.13 is available
In-Reply-To: <4A829D4C.1040901@wbonnet.net>
References: <4A829D4C.1040901@wbonnet.net>
Message-ID: <4A82B312.7000703@ericsson.com>

What's the diff between the S8 and S9 pkgs (sparc specifically)?

BR MOL

On 2009-08-12 12:45, William Bonnet wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Firefox 3.0.13 is available from testing. I produced both Solaris 8 
> and 9 packages.
>
> http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/firefox-3.0.13,REV=2009.08.04-SunOS5.9-sparc.pkg.gz 
>
> http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/firefox-3.0.13,REV=2009.08.05-SunOS5.9-i386.pkg.gz 
>
>
> http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/firefox-3.0.13,REV=2009.08.06-SunOS5.8-i386.pkg.gz 
>
> http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/firefox-3.0.13,REV=2009.08.06-SunOS5.8-sparc.pkg.gz 
>
>
> Thanks for your feedback
>
> cheers
> W.
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20090812/aca20881/attachment-0002.html>

From james at opencsw.org  Wed Aug 12 14:40:22 2009
From: james at opencsw.org (James Lee)
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 12:40:22 GMT
Subject: [csw-users] /testing Firefox 3.0.13 is available
In-Reply-To: <4A82B312.7000703@ericsson.com>
References: <4A829D4C.1040901@wbonnet.net> <4A82B312.7000703@ericsson.com>
Message-ID: <20090812.12402200.597680040@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk>

On 12/08/09, 13:18:26, Mats Larsson <mats.larsson at ericsson.com> wrote 
regarding Re: [csw-users] /testing Firefox 3.0.13 is available:

> What's the diff between the S8 and S9 pkgs (sparc specifically)?

5.8 doesn't work.


$ firefox
ld.so.1: firefox-bin: fatal: /opt/csw/mozilla/firefox/lib/libjemalloc.so: 
object requires TLS, but TLS failed to initialize
Killed




James.




From william at wbonnet.net  Wed Aug 12 14:59:40 2009
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 14:59:40 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] /testing Firefox 3.0.13 is available
In-Reply-To: <4A82B312.7000703@ericsson.com>
References: <4A829D4C.1040901@wbonnet.net> <4A82B312.7000703@ericsson.com>
Message-ID: <4A82BCBC.40101@wbonnet.net>

Hi Mats

> What's the diff between the S8 and S9 pkgs (sparc specifically)?
They are basically the same package, build either on Solaris 8 or 9.

I did this for testing to be able to test both build. Solaris 9 packages 
are working on Solaris 9 and 10. Solaris 8 are still under test.


Cheers
W.


From william at wbonnet.net  Wed Aug 12 15:00:44 2009
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 15:00:44 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] /testing Firefox 3.0.13 is available
In-Reply-To: <20090812.12402200.597680040@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk>
References: <4A829D4C.1040901@wbonnet.net> <4A82B312.7000703@ericsson.com>
	<20090812.12402200.597680040@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk>
Message-ID: <4A82BCFC.6020001@wbonnet.net>

Thanks James
>> What's the diff between the S8 and S9 pkgs (sparc specifically)?
>>     
>
> 5.8 doesn't work.
>   
In fact it should work if you install it on some something newer than 
Solaris 8 :)
> $ firefox
> ld.so.1: firefox-bin: fatal: /opt/csw/mozilla/firefox/lib/libjemalloc.so: 
> object requires TLS, but TLS failed to initialize
> Killed
>   
Still the same error :(

I try again...

cheers
W.


From mats.larsson at ericsson.com  Wed Aug 12 15:03:56 2009
From: mats.larsson at ericsson.com (Mats Larsson)
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 15:03:56 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] /testing Firefox 3.0.13 is available
In-Reply-To: <4A82BCBC.40101@wbonnet.net>
References: <4A829D4C.1040901@wbonnet.net> <4A82B312.7000703@ericsson.com>
	<4A82BCBC.40101@wbonnet.net>
Message-ID: <4A82BDBC.3040203@ericsson.com>

On 2009-08-12 14:59, William Bonnet wrote:
> Hi Mats
>
>> What's the diff between the S8 and S9 pkgs (sparc specifically)?
> They are basically the same package, build either on Solaris 8 or 9.
Ok.
>
> I did this for testing to be able to test both build. Solaris 9 
> packages are working on Solaris 9 and 10. Solaris 8 are still under test.
So then I guess the goal is to make one SPARC pkg that works on Solaris 
8/9/10?

BR MOL


From william at wbonnet.net  Wed Aug 12 15:08:30 2009
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 15:08:30 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] /testing Firefox 3.0.13 is available
In-Reply-To: <4A82BDBC.3040203@ericsson.com>
References: <4A829D4C.1040901@wbonnet.net>
	<4A82B312.7000703@ericsson.com>	<4A82BCBC.40101@wbonnet.net>
	<4A82BDBC.3040203@ericsson.com>
Message-ID: <4A82BECE.7040309@wbonnet.net>

Hi Mats
> So then I guess the goal is to make one SPARC pkg that works on 
> Solaris 8/9/10?
That's right. But actually it does work only on Solaris 9 and 10. So I 
provides a Sol 9 package for both of these platform, and a Solaris 8 for 
testing purpose on this platform.

As i said in theother email, Solaris 8 package also work on Solaris 9 
and 10 (but not 8).

I plan to release Solaris 9 package that would be used on Solaris 9 and 
10, and stay to FF2.0.0.22 on Solaris 8 until i can fix it.

cheers
W.


From mats.larsson at ericsson.com  Wed Aug 12 15:16:12 2009
From: mats.larsson at ericsson.com (Mats Larsson)
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 15:16:12 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] /testing Firefox 3.0.13 is available
In-Reply-To: <4A82BECE.7040309@wbonnet.net>
References: <4A829D4C.1040901@wbonnet.net>	<4A82B312.7000703@ericsson.com>	<4A82BCBC.40101@wbonnet.net>	<4A82BDBC.3040203@ericsson.com>
	<4A82BECE.7040309@wbonnet.net>
Message-ID: <4A82C09C.8020004@ericsson.com>

On 2009-08-12 15:08, William Bonnet wrote:
> As i said in theother email, Solaris 8 package also work on Solaris 9 
> and 10 (but not 8).
>
> I plan to release Solaris 9 package that would be used on Solaris 9 
> and 10, and stay to FF2.0.0.22 on Solaris 8 until i can fix it. 
Ok. Would be nice you would be able to fix it since I still have a bunch 
of Solaris 8 users (~50) at my site.

BR MOL


From xc68000 at gmail.com  Sat Aug 15 20:17:21 2009
From: xc68000 at gmail.com (Sanford Barton)
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 12:17:21 -0600
Subject: [csw-users] JSD theme with CSW GTK apps
Message-ID: <35cdce540908151117x3330a2efh37e59f69159a9309@mail.gmail.com>

Hello,

When using GTK apps like Pidgin, is there a way to have them use the
theme that JDS is using?  For example, the way the version supplied in
Sol 10 does.  Thanks in advance.


From xc68000 at gmail.com  Sun Aug 16 01:57:21 2009
From: xc68000 at gmail.com (Bart)
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 17:57:21 -0600
Subject: [csw-users] Dev environment
Message-ID: <4A874B61.8010203@gmail.com>

I'd like to setup a development environment to try to compile a few 
packages I miss on Sol 10/Sparc.  It's been a long time since I've used 
a gcc/sunw tool chain and was hoping for some advice.  Most of the stuff 
I want to compile is your typical opensource linux crap and I'm guessing 
the best backend is just to use Studio 12 and the gcc chain on the 
front.  I'm guessing the easiest way for the later is to grab the gcc 
4.3.3 packages from CSW or is there a particular need/recommendation to 
stick with 3.4.6?  Is there a site any where that might give me a list 
of the basic packages I need for a fairly complete compile environment?


From bwalton at opencsw.org  Sun Aug 16 02:31:32 2009
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 20:31:32 -0400
Subject: [csw-users] Dev environment
In-Reply-To: <4A874B61.8010203@gmail.com>
References: <4A874B61.8010203@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1250382284-sup-7523@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca>

Excerpts from Bart's message of Sat Aug 15 19:57:21 -0400 2009:

Hi Bart,

> I'd like to setup a development environment to try to compile a few 
> packages I miss on Sol 10/Sparc.  It's been a long time since I've used 
> a gcc/sunw tool chain and was hoping for some advice.  Most of the stuff 
> I want to compile is your typical opensource linux crap and I'm guessing 
> the best backend is just to use Studio 12 and the gcc chain on the 

We typically try to build with SOS11 (support for sol8) and then fall
back to gcc 4 if that doesn't work.  Generally, gcc 3 is only used
when gcc is required but the code doesn't work in 4 for odd reasons
not worth fixing.

> front.  I'm guessing the easiest way for the later is to grab the gcc 
> 4.3.3 packages from CSW or is there a particular need/recommendation to 
> stick with 3.4.6?  Is there a site any where that might give me a list 
> of the basic packages I need for a fairly complete compile environment?

The following is the set of packages that GAR (the CSW build system)
depends on to get going:

CSWgmake CSWgtar CSWggrep CSWdiffutils CSWgfile CSWtextutils CSWwget
CSWfindutils CSWgsed CSWgawk CSWbzip2

Some of those won't be strictly necessary, but would likely help.
CSWautoconf may help if `configure` isn't shipped with your package,
although that's not common.

Also, you'll want -dev/-devel/etc packages for things you're building
against if they've been separated out from the main package.

If you're interested, you could sign up to be a maintainer and share
the work you're doing with others too...?  You'd get an account on the
buildfarm which gives you access to the various platforms that are
supported by CSW packages to build on.

HTH.
-Ben
-- 
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302

GPG Key Id: 8E89F6D2; Key Server: pgp.mit.edu
Contact me to arrange for a CAcert assurance meeting.


From ja at opencsw.org  Sun Aug 16 18:08:53 2009
From: ja at opencsw.org (Juergen Arndt)
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 18:08:53 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] Perl on build hosts and DynaLoader
Message-ID: <op.uyri42b8jbmpvo@imac.lan>

Hi all,

I'm trying to build Nagios with it's embedded perl interpreter. Some weeks  
ago that was no problem, but since yesterday I run into the following  
problem:

Undefined                       first referenced
  symbol                             in file
boot_DynaLoader                     perlxsi.o

The file perlxsi.c is created in the configure script:


         PERLLIBS="`/opt/csw/bin/perl -MExtUtils::Embed -e ldopts`"
         PERLDIR="`/opt/csw/bin/perl -MConfig -e 'print  
$Config{installsitearch}'`"
         CFLAGS="${CFLAGS} `/opt/csw/bin/perl -MExtUtils::Embed -e ccopts`"
         USEPERL=yes
         INSTALLPERLSTUFF=yes;
         PERLXSI_O=perlxsi.o
         OBJS="${OBJS} ${PERLXSI_O}"
         echo "creating base/perlxsi.c"
         /opt/csw/bin/perl -MExtUtils::Embed -e xsinit -- -o base/perlxsi.c


As far as Google told me, the needed libs should be determined by  
"/opt/csw/bin/perl -MExtUtils::Embed -e ldopts", so the configure script  
should be ok. I checked, if PERLLIBS is passed correctly to the compiler,  
which seems to be fine too. Nevertheless the compiler complains when  
building:


gmake[3]: Entering directory  
`/home/ja/mgar/pkg/nagios/trunk/work/build-isa-i386/nagios-3.2.0/base'
/opt/studio/SOS11/SUNWspro/bin/cc -xO3 -xarch=386 -I/opt/csw/include  
-I/opt/csw/nagios/include  -D_REENTRANT -xO3 -xarch=386 -I/opt/csw/include  
-D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64   
-I/opt/csw/lib/perl/5.8.8/CORE  -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DNSCORE -o nagios  
nagios.c broker.o nebmods.o checks.o config.o commands.o events.o  
flapping.o logging.o macros-base.o netutils.o notifications.o sehandlers.o  
skiplist.o utils.o retention-base.o xretention-base.o comments-base.o  
xcomments-base.o objects-base.o xobjects-base.o statusdata-base.o  
xstatusdata-base.o perfdata-base.o xperfdata-base.o downtime-base.o  
xdowntime-base.o  ../common/snprintf.o perlxsi.o  -xarch=386  
-L/opt/csw/nagios/lib -L/opt/csw/lib -R /opt/csw/lib -xarch=386  
-L/opt/csw/lib -L/usr/lib -L/usr/ccs/lib -L/lib   
-L/opt/csw/lib/perl/5.8.8/CORE -lperl -lsocket -lnsl -ldb-4.7 -ldl -lm  
-lpthread -lc -lperl -lm -lnsl -lsocket -lpthread -lltdl -lrt
"nagios.c", line 652: warning: implicit function declaration: asprintf
Undefined                       first referenced
  symbol                             in file
boot_DynaLoader                     perlxsi.o
ld: fatal: Symbol referencing errors. No output written to nagios


Does anybody have an advice for me?

Juergen

-- 
Juergen Arndt


From xc68000 at gmail.com  Sun Aug 16 19:07:34 2009
From: xc68000 at gmail.com (Bart)
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 11:07:34 -0600
Subject: [csw-users] bzflag - audio help
Message-ID: <4A883CD6.7030709@gmail.com>

I see the maintainer is "retired".  I sent an email anyway just in case 
he is still watching.

The last build of bzflag (2.0.8) isn't outputing any sound on my sol 
10/sunblade system.  There is no readme specifying this is broken, nor 
any CSW bug reports listing any issues like this that I can tell.

There is an "Audio" settings section that allows "Audio Device" and 
"Audio Driver" that I fiddled with, but no luck and can find virtually 
nothing on the web about the solaris port.

Perhaps someone knows something?


Thanks


From xc68000 at gmail.com  Mon Aug 17 05:11:12 2009
From: xc68000 at gmail.com (Bart)
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 21:11:12 -0600
Subject: [csw-users] dbus and shutdown/suspend
Message-ID: <4A88CA50.8090004@gmail.com>

Is there anything I can do to stop dbus from keeping a system from 
shutting down or suspending short of de-installing dbus?  I know it's a 
known issue, but I'd really like to use suspend.


From ja at opencsw.org  Mon Aug 17 12:11:04 2009
From: ja at opencsw.org (Juergen Arndt)
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:11:04 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] Perl on build hosts and DynaLoader
In-Reply-To: <op.uyri42b8jbmpvo@imac.lan>
References: <op.uyri42b8jbmpvo@imac.lan>
Message-ID: <op.uysw8obajbmpvo@ibm-1344209b5ff.ibm.com>

Hi,

> Undefined                       first referenced
>   symbol                             in file
> boot_DynaLoader                     perlxsi.o

just for info: Dago found the solution for that: Bug ID #0003859

CSWperl: "The should be static libs included in the package, at least  
DynaLoader.a should be in there or XS won't work."

Juergen

-- 
Juergen Arndt


From bonivart at opencsw.org  Mon Aug 17 15:51:58 2009
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 15:51:58 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] Perl on build hosts and DynaLoader
In-Reply-To: <op.uysw8obajbmpvo@ibm-1344209b5ff.ibm.com>
References: <op.uyri42b8jbmpvo@imac.lan>
	<op.uysw8obajbmpvo@ibm-1344209b5ff.ibm.com>
Message-ID: <625385e30908170651m3c733704j29829de3e54ffd8e@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Juergen Arndt<ja at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> Undefined ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? first referenced
>> ?symbol ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? in file
>> boot_DynaLoader ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? perlxsi.o
>
> just for info: Dago found the solution for that: Bug ID #0003859
>
> CSWperl: "The should be static libs included in the package, at least
> DynaLoader.a should be in there or XS won't work."

Try the updated Perl packages in testing, they include DynaLoader.a:

http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/perl-5.8.8,REV=2009.08.17-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/perl-5.8.8,REV=2009.08.17-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/perldoc-5.8.8,REV=2009.08.17-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz

# pkgutil -t http://mirror.opencsw.org/opencsw/testing -u perl

-- 
/peter


From gadavis at ucsd.edu  Tue Aug 18 00:25:23 2009
From: gadavis at ucsd.edu (Geoff Davis)
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 15:25:23 -0700
Subject: [csw-users] Status of libcairo and RRDTool
Message-ID: <EC0E08FB-DD88-4E6B-BEFC-168E534180D7@ucsd.edu>

Hi all,

I sent an email a while ago mentioning that RRDTool wouldn't build due  
to there being no SVG support in the most recent build of libCairo. I  
see that there is a new version in testing, but it has not made it  
into current yet. When is this supposed to happen?

Thanks,
Geoff


From dam at opencsw.org  Tue Aug 18 08:59:30 2009
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 08:59:30 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] Status of libcairo and RRDTool
In-Reply-To: <EC0E08FB-DD88-4E6B-BEFC-168E534180D7@ucsd.edu>
References: <EC0E08FB-DD88-4E6B-BEFC-168E534180D7@ucsd.edu>
Message-ID: <6FD80CF1-7F26-491F-A681-ACBAD5E146A2@opencsw.org>

Hi Geoff,

Am 18.08.2009 um 00:25 schrieb Geoff Davis:
> I sent an email a while ago mentioning that RRDTool wouldn't build  
> due to there being no SVG support in the most recent build of  
> libCairo. I see that there is a new version in testing, but it has  
> not made it into current yet. When is this supposed to happen?

Well, there haven't been much feedback on the updated libcairo in  
testing/.
If you could test them with your standard work set this would sure speed
up the release process.


Best regards

   -- Dago


From gadavis at ucsd.edu  Tue Aug 18 21:51:47 2009
From: gadavis at ucsd.edu (Geoff Davis)
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 12:51:47 -0700
Subject: [csw-users] berkeleydb in flux
In-Reply-To: <AA097B66-9956-49A6-9C41-0935CEE46E1B@opencsw.org>
References: <20090731145022.GB30348@bolthole.com> <h5o1c7$emc$1@ger.gmane.org>
	<AA097B66-9956-49A6-9C41-0935CEE46E1B@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <3CD2EF60-A610-4422-BF0F-5CD35DD0BD4C@ucsd.edu>

I agree with Daniel - linking bdb44 to version 4.7 is going to cause a  
lot of problems.

In this case, my hand-rolled CFEngine 2.2.8 binaries broke. They were  
linked to CSWbdb44. ABI compatibility does not mean logic  
compatibility, and certain programs have to do things differently  
depending on the version of BerkeleyDB. Please restore berkeleydb44 to  
a version that links against version 4.4 of BerkeleyDB.

Here's the relevant part of my CFAgent output where it segfaults  
trying to read the databases.

$ sudo cfagent -vq
Reference time set to Tue Aug 18 19:37:21 2009

GNU Configuration Engine -
2.2.8
Free Software Foundation 1994-
Donated by Mark Burgess, Oslo University College, Norway

[...removed some noise...]

DB->get_multiple: method not permitted before handle's open method
cfengine:anfdev: Couldn't open last-seen database /var/cfengine/ 
cf_LastSeen.db
cfengine:anfdev: db_open: Invalid argument
Segmentation Fault (core dumped)


On Aug 10, 2009, at 1:22 PM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote:

> Hi Daniel,
>
> Am 10.08.2009 um 04:41 schrieb Daniel Trinkle:
>> Philip Brown wrote:
>>> Warning to CSW users: the upgrade of berkeleydb in 'current' has  
>>> caused
>>> some unforseen side effects. Some things may break, if you upgrade
>>> berkeleydb at this time.
>>> We are working to rebuild known affected packages to use the newer  
>>> version
>>> instead.  Please only upgrade with caution.
>>
>> Unfortunately, this also has a disastrous effect on anything  
>> outside OpenCSW built against the libraries.  When built against  
>> explicit versions (i.e. /opt/csw/bdb43), I think it is a reasonable  
>> expectation that that will continue to be version 4.3.x -- not  
>> capriciously change to an incompatible 4.7.x version.
>
> Is it really incompatible? With the symlinks in place there shouldn't
> be a difference for most applications as BDB is ABI-compatible. If
> there are any problems please post them! It is important that we are
> aware of any issues that arise.
>
>> I can understand changing bdb4 to the latest version (though this  
>> breaks things as well), but making bdb43, bdb44, etc reference  
>> another version is guaranteed to cause problems.
>>
>> At the very least the description and version information in the  
>> packages (CSWbdb4, CSWbdb43, CSWbdb44) should accurately reflect  
>> that the packages are now a reference to the current version.  This  
>> would help in tracking down problems and also provide meaningful  
>> information from "pkg-get compare".  Unfortunately it told me I was  
>> getting "4.2.52,REV=2009.07.28" (CSWbdb),  
>> "4.3.29,REV=2009.06.26" (CSWbdb43) and  
>> "4.4.20,REV=2009.07.28" (CSWbdb44) which clearly is not the case.
>
> I see, we are currently in the discussion on how to best proceed  
> from here
> and putting the 4.7.x version in the stub-packages would really be  
> an honest
> thing.
>
>
> Best regards
>
>  -- Dago
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/users



From gadavis at ucsd.edu  Tue Aug 18 21:52:23 2009
From: gadavis at ucsd.edu (Geoff Davis)
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 12:52:23 -0700
Subject: [csw-users] Status of libcairo and RRDTool
In-Reply-To: <6FD80CF1-7F26-491F-A681-ACBAD5E146A2@opencsw.org>
References: <EC0E08FB-DD88-4E6B-BEFC-168E534180D7@ucsd.edu>
	<6FD80CF1-7F26-491F-A681-ACBAD5E146A2@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <D3AA9803-A0C8-4C39-AE2A-4E7D17B8FE76@ucsd.edu>

Comments below
On Aug 17, 2009, at 11:59 PM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote:

> Hi Geoff,
>
> Am 18.08.2009 um 00:25 schrieb Geoff Davis:
>> I sent an email a while ago mentioning that RRDTool wouldn't build  
>> due to there being no SVG support in the most recent build of  
>> libCairo. I see that there is a new version in testing, but it has  
>> not made it into current yet. When is this supposed to happen?
>
> Well, there haven't been much feedback on the updated libcairo in  
> testing/.
> If you could test them with your standard work set this would sure  
> speed
> up the release process.
>
>
> Best regards
>
>  -- Dago
>
OK, I have installed it on my production systems using my old hand- 
rolled RRDTool package, and everything seems to work once I add  
xcbutil and pixman as separate packages. Additionally, I'm able to  
build a new version of RRDTool with the libcairo_devel package.


From william at wbonnet.net  Tue Aug 18 23:00:26 2009
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 23:00:26 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] dbus and shutdown/suspend
In-Reply-To: <4A88CA50.8090004@gmail.com>
References: <4A88CA50.8090004@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4A8B166A.1040805@wbonnet.net>

Hi

> Is there anything I can do to stop dbus from keeping a system from 
> shutting down or suspending short of de-installing dbus?  I know it's 
> a known issue, but I'd really like to use suspend.
Yes there is a bug. Version currently in testing fix this bug and will 
be pushed to current soon.

cheers
W.

-- 
William                  http://www.wbonnet.net

http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix
http://www.opencsw.org 	 Community SoftWare for Solaris
http://www.guses.org     French speaking Solaris User Group




From james at opencsw.org  Fri Aug 21 15:30:34 2009
From: james at opencsw.org (James Lee)
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 13:30:34 GMT
Subject: [csw-users] /testing Firefox 3.0.13 is available
In-Reply-To: <4A82C09C.8020004@ericsson.com>
References: <4A829D4C.1040901@wbonnet.net> <4A82B312.7000703@ericsson.com>
	<4A82BCBC.40101@wbonnet.net> <4A82BDBC.3040203@ericsson.com>
	<4A82BECE.7040309@wbonnet.net> <4A82C09C.8020004@ericsson.com>
Message-ID: <20090821.13303400.635775941@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk>

On 12/08/09, 14:16:12, Mats Larsson <mats.larsson at ericsson.com> wrote
regarding Re: [csw-users] /testing Firefox 3.0.13 is available:

> Ok. Would be nice you would be able to fix it since I still have a bunch
> of Solaris 8 users (~50) at my site.

$ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/lwp firefox

:-)




James.


From ja at opencsw.org  Fri Aug 21 15:38:53 2009
From: ja at opencsw.org (Juergen Arndt)
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 15:38:53 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] Nagios 3.2.0 in testing
Message-ID: <op.uy0lixphjbmpvo@ibm-1344209b5ff.ibm.com>

Hi all,

Nagios 3.2.0 is in testing now.

Feedback is welcome.

Juergen

-- 
Juergen Arndt


From william at wbonnet.net  Sat Aug 22 11:33:46 2009
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 11:33:46 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] /testing Firefox 3.0.13 is available
In-Reply-To: <20090821.13303400.635775941@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk>
References: <4A829D4C.1040901@wbonnet.net>
	<4A82B312.7000703@ericsson.com>	<4A82BCBC.40101@wbonnet.net>
	<4A82BDBC.3040203@ericsson.com>	<4A82BECE.7040309@wbonnet.net>
	<4A82C09C.8020004@ericsson.com>
	<20090821.13303400.635775941@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk>
Message-ID: <4A8FBB7A.60105@wbonnet.net>

Hi James

>> Ok. Would be nice you would be able to fix it since I still have a bunch
>> of Solaris 8 users (~50) at my site.
>>     
>
> $ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/lwp firefox
>
> :-)
>   
Thanks for the feedback.

Does it makes everything working fine ? It would be a very good news :)

cheers
W.



From james at opencsw.org  Sat Aug 22 14:43:08 2009
From: james at opencsw.org (James Lee)
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 12:43:08 GMT
Subject: [csw-users] /testing Firefox 3.0.13 is available
In-Reply-To: <4A8FBB7A.60105@wbonnet.net>
References: <4A829D4C.1040901@wbonnet.net> <4A82B312.7000703@ericsson.com>
	<4A82BCBC.40101@wbonnet.net> <4A82BDBC.3040203@ericsson.com>
	<4A82BECE.7040309@wbonnet.net> <4A82C09C.8020004@ericsson.com>
	<20090821.13303400.635775941@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk>
	<4A8FBB7A.60105@wbonnet.net>
Message-ID: <20090822.12430800.1098253985@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk>

On 22/08/09, 10:33:46, William Bonnet <william at wbonnet.net> wrote regarding 
Re: [csw-users] /testing Firefox 3.0.13 is available:

> > $ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/lwp firefox
> >
> > :-)
> >
> Thanks for the feedback.

> Does it makes everything working fine ? It would be a very good news :)

It makes it run.  I've not tested much nor with Solaris 9 or 10 with this
setting.

The man page for libpthread(1) says:

     For multithreaded programs that have been previously  linked
     with the standard threads library, the environment variables
     LD_LIBRARY_PATH and LD_LIBRARY_PATH_64 can be set as follows
     to  bind  the  program  at  runtime to the alternate threads
     library:

     LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/lwp
     LD_LIBRARY_PATH_64=/usr/lib/lwp/64


so maybe you can swap the path in the start script with no need
to build with -L/usr/lib/lwp as well as -R/usr/lib/lwp.  There
is more in the man page about the differences in use of system
resources:

     When using the alternate one-level  threads  implementation,
     be  aware  that  it  may  create more LWPs than the standard
     implementation using unbound threads.  LWPs consume  operat-
     ing system memory in contrast to threads, which consume only
     user-level memory.  Thus a multithreaded application  linked
     against this library that creates thousands of threads would
     create an equal number of LWPs and might run the system  out
     of resources required to support the application.

Perhaps the start script needs:

if [ "`uname -r`" = "5.8" ] ; then
    LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/lwp


C thread experts please chip in.




James.


From xc68000 at gmail.com  Sat Aug 22 16:28:20 2009
From: xc68000 at gmail.com (Bart)
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 08:28:20 -0600
Subject: [csw-users] /testing Firefox 3.0.13 is available
In-Reply-To: <20090822.12430800.1098253985@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk>
References: <4A829D4C.1040901@wbonnet.net>
	<4A82B312.7000703@ericsson.com>	<4A82BCBC.40101@wbonnet.net>
	<4A82BDBC.3040203@ericsson.com>	<4A82BECE.7040309@wbonnet.net>
	<4A82C09C.8020004@ericsson.com>	<20090821.13303400.635775941@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk>	<4A8FBB7A.60105@wbonnet.net>
	<20090822.12430800.1098253985@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk>
Message-ID: <4A900084.8060908@gmail.com>

James Lee wrote:
> On 22/08/09, 10:33:46, William Bonnet <william at wbonnet.net> wrote regarding 
> Re: [csw-users] /testing Firefox 3.0.13 is available:
>
>   
>>> $ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/lwp firefox
>>>
>>> :-)
>>>
>>>       
>> Thanks for the feedback.
>>     
>
>   
>> Does it makes everything working fine ? It would be a very good news :)
>>     
>
> It makes it run.  I've not tested much nor with Solaris 9 or 10 with this
> setting.
>
> The man page for libpthread(1) says:
>
>      For multithreaded programs that have been previously  linked
>      with the standard threads library, the environment variables
>      LD_LIBRARY_PATH and LD_LIBRARY_PATH_64 can be set as follows
>      to  bind  the  program  at  runtime to the alternate threads
>      library:
>
>      LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/lwp
>      LD_LIBRARY_PATH_64=/usr/lib/lwp/64
>
>
> so maybe you can swap the path in the start script with no need
> to build with -L/usr/lib/lwp as well as -R/usr/lib/lwp.  There
> is more in the man page about the differences in use of system
> resources:
>
>      When using the alternate one-level  threads  implementation,
>      be  aware  that  it  may  create more LWPs than the standard
>      implementation using unbound threads.  LWPs consume  operat-
>      ing system memory in contrast to threads, which consume only
>      user-level memory.  Thus a multithreaded application  linked
>      against this library that creates thousands of threads would
>      create an equal number of LWPs and might run the system  out
>      of resources required to support the application.
>
> Perhaps the start script needs:
>
> if [ "`uname -r`" = "5.8" ] ; then
>     LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/lwp
>
>
> C thread experts please chip in.
>
>
>
>
> James.
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>   
Is there any benefit to running the CSW firefox over the fat client from 
mozilla.org?  For example is it noticeably faster? Thx.


From william at wbonnet.net  Sat Aug 22 17:37:01 2009
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 17:37:01 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] /testing Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (security fix) is
	available from testing
Message-ID: <4A90109D.8000502@wbonnet.net>

Hi from Oslo

Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 is available from testing :

http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/thunderbird-2.0.0.23,REV=2009.08.22-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/thunderbird-2.0.0.23,REV=2009.08.22-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

This release fixes the following bugs :

MFSA 2009-42  Compromise of SSL-protected communication ( 
http://www.mozilla.org/security/announce/2009/mfsa2009-42.html )


cheers
W.


From james at opencsw.org  Mon Aug 24 10:47:35 2009
From: james at opencsw.org (James Lee)
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 08:47:35 GMT
Subject: [csw-users] /testing Firefox 3.0.13 is available
In-Reply-To: <4A900084.8060908@gmail.com>
References: <4A829D4C.1040901@wbonnet.net> <4A82B312.7000703@ericsson.com>
	<4A82BCBC.40101@wbonnet.net> <4A82BDBC.3040203@ericsson.com>
	<4A82BECE.7040309@wbonnet.net> <4A82C09C.8020004@ericsson.com>
	<20090821.13303400.635775941@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk>
	<4A8FBB7A.60105@wbonnet.net>
	<20090822.12430800.1098253985@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk>
	<4A900084.8060908@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20090824.8473500.2065616148@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk>

On 22/08/09, 15:28:20, Bart <xc68000 at gmail.com> wrote regarding Re: 
[csw-users] /testing Firefox 3.0.13 is available:

> Is there any benefit to running the CSW firefox over the fat client from
> mozilla.org?  For example is it noticeably faster?

I can't see any mozilla.org 3.x package for Solaris 8 or 9 so there CSW's
is infinitely faster.



James.





From marsha.petry at hp.com  Tue Aug 25 08:12:20 2009
From: marsha.petry at hp.com (PETRY, MARSHA)
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 06:12:20 +0000
Subject: [csw-users] Berkeley DB 4.7 vs. 4.4 issue
Message-ID: <F7C44AA1F517274DA0B5BB579CBAF8071F0AFB222A@GVW0538EXC.americas.hpqcorp.net>

This might be a variation of the "Berkeley DB in Flux" discussion...

I updated the trac and svn packages using pkgutil, and now have a corrupt BDB when I try to use svn.

svn: Berkeley DB error for filesystem '/cust/repo/db' while opening environment:
svn: DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recovery
svn: bdb: Ignoring log file: /cust/repo/db/log.0000000918: magic number 88090400, not 40988
svn: bdb: Invalid log file: log.0000000918: Invalid argument
svn: bdb: PANIC: Invalid argument
svn: bdb: unable to join the environment

The resolution on the Oracle site says that I need to db_recover using the old BDB copy (4.4) --- that is now pointing to the new 4.7 copy and so I've lost the ability to run db_recover using the older version.  Is that correct? or is there a way to get that back?

Am I right in thinking I'll need to download/compile a personal "home directory" version of 4.4 and run the recover using that?  I do not see an easy way to re-create the old versions.

Any help would be much appreciated... I'm looking at a long process.  I don't think we even use gcc on this box and so I have lots of downloads to get.

Thanks
Marsha

From ihsan at opencsw.org  Tue Aug 25 09:38:29 2009
From: ihsan at opencsw.org (Ihsan Dogan)
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 09:38:29 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] Berkeley DB 4.7 vs. 4.4 issue
In-Reply-To: <F7C44AA1F517274DA0B5BB579CBAF8071F0AFB222A@GVW0538EXC.americas.hpqcorp.net>
References: <F7C44AA1F517274DA0B5BB579CBAF8071F0AFB222A@GVW0538EXC.americas.hpqcorp.net>
Message-ID: <4A9394F5.3080804@opencsw.org>

Hello Marsha,

On 25.08.2009 08:12, PETRY, MARSHA wrote:

> svn: Berkeley DB error for filesystem '/cust/repo/db' while opening environment:
> svn: DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recovery
> svn: bdb: Ignoring log file: /cust/repo/db/log.0000000918: magic number 88090400, not 40988
> svn: bdb: Invalid log file: log.0000000918: Invalid argument
> svn: bdb: PANIC: Invalid argument
> svn: bdb: unable to join the environment
> 
> The resolution on the Oracle site says that I need to db_recover using the old BDB copy (4.4) --- that is now pointing to the new 4.7 copy and so I've lost the ability to run db_recover using the older version.  Is that correct? or is there a way to get that back?
> 
> Am I right in thinking I'll need to download/compile a personal "home directory" version of 4.4 and run the recover using that?  I do not see an easy way to re-create the old versions.

As a temporary solution, you can installed the archived berkeleydb 4.4
package from http://csw.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/oldpkgs/ .




Ihsan

-- 
ihsan at dogan.ch		http://blog.dogan.ch/


From dam at opencsw.org  Tue Aug 25 13:04:03 2009
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 13:04:03 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] Berkeley DB 4.7 vs. 4.4 issue
In-Reply-To: <F7C44AA1F517274DA0B5BB579CBAF8071F0AFB222A@GVW0538EXC.americas.hpqcorp.net>
References: <F7C44AA1F517274DA0B5BB579CBAF8071F0AFB222A@GVW0538EXC.americas.hpqcorp.net>
Message-ID: <94F6C78F-718A-4107-A8B2-BFE5227C0353@opencsw.org>

Hi Marsha,

Am 25.08.2009 um 08:12 schrieb PETRY, MARSHA:
> This might be a variation of the "Berkeley DB in Flux" discussion...
>
> I updated the trac and svn packages using pkgutil, and now have a  
> corrupt BDB when I try to use svn.
>
> svn: Berkeley DB error for filesystem '/cust/repo/db' while opening  
> environment:
> svn: DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recovery
> svn: bdb: Ignoring log file: /cust/repo/db/log.0000000918: magic  
> number 88090400, not 40988
> svn: bdb: Invalid log file: log.0000000918: Invalid argument
> svn: bdb: PANIC: Invalid argument
> svn: bdb: unable to join the environment
>
> The resolution on the Oracle site says that I need to db_recover  
> using the old BDB copy (4.4) --- that is now pointing to the new 4.7  
> copy and so I've lost the ability to run db_recover using the older  
> version.  Is that correct? or is there a way to get that back?
>
> Am I right in thinking I'll need to download/compile a personal  
> "home directory" version of 4.4 and run the recover using that?  I  
> do not see an easy way to re-create the old versions.
>
> Any help would be much appreciated... I'm looking at a long  
> process.  I don't think we even use gcc on this box and so I have  
> lots of downloads to get.

In addition to the workaround Ihsan advised please note also that
there will a new version of Trac be released shortly, so please
take a careful eye on updating.

To make updating both easier and safer in the future there is currently
work going on to provide freezes of the package tree.

Also please help testing new packages from
   http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing.html
to find problems early.


Sorry for the inconvenience

   -- Dago


From tedwards at it.dcs.ch  Tue Aug 25 15:00:54 2009
From: tedwards at it.dcs.ch (Tim Edwards)
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 15:00:54 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] Where can I find previous versions of packages from
	current?
Message-ID: <4A93E086.3080308@it.dcs.ch>

Up until today I was deploying syslog_ng across our organisation's main
servers. Unfortunately this morning when I tried to finish off the last
few machines, of which one happens to be Solaris 9, I found that the
syslog-ng package has been changed and is no longer installable on
Solaris 9 - http://www.opencsw.org/bugtrack/view.php?id=3869

I was wondering if there's a way to get the previous version of this
package from any of the mirrors, or even if someone could email it to me?

Thanks for any help

Tim Edwards


From james at opencsw.org  Tue Aug 25 15:13:05 2009
From: james at opencsw.org (James Lee)
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 13:13:05 GMT
Subject: [csw-users] Where can I find previous versions of packages from
 current?
In-Reply-To: <4A93E086.3080308@it.dcs.ch>
References: <4A93E086.3080308@it.dcs.ch>
Message-ID: <20090825.13130500.3383926314@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk>

On 25/08/09, 14:00:54, Tim Edwards <tedwards at it.dcs.ch> wrote regarding 
[csw-users] Where can I find previous versions of packages from current?:

> I was wondering if there's a way to get the previous version of this
> package from any of the mirrors,

http://csw.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/oldpkgs/




James.


From maciej at opencsw.org  Tue Aug 25 15:26:38 2009
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski)
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 14:26:38 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] Where can I find previous versions of packages from
	current?
In-Reply-To: <4A93E086.3080308@it.dcs.ch>
References: <4A93E086.3080308@it.dcs.ch>
Message-ID: <ce97543b0908250626l58e5c8wacd9753c6b0dd7dc@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Tim Edwards<tedwards at it.dcs.ch> wrote:
> Up until today I was deploying syslog_ng across our organisation's main
> servers. Unfortunately this morning when I tried to finish off the last
> few machines, of which one happens to be Solaris 9, I found that the
> syslog-ng package has been changed and is no longer installable on
> Solaris 9 - http://www.opencsw.org/bugtrack/view.php?id=3869

I've put an updated syslog-ng package into testing:
http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing.html

You can try and see if it works for you.

Maciej


From tedwards at it.dcs.ch  Tue Aug 25 15:56:51 2009
From: tedwards at it.dcs.ch (Tim Edwards)
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 15:56:51 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] Where can I find previous versions of packages from
 current?
In-Reply-To: <ce97543b0908250626l58e5c8wacd9753c6b0dd7dc@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4A93E086.3080308@it.dcs.ch>
	<ce97543b0908250626l58e5c8wacd9753c6b0dd7dc@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4A93EDA3.9050306@it.dcs.ch>



Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Tim Edwards<tedwards at it.dcs.ch> wrote:
>> Up until today I was deploying syslog_ng across our organisation's main
>> servers. Unfortunately this morning when I tried to finish off the last
>> few machines, of which one happens to be Solaris 9, I found that the
>> syslog-ng package has been changed and is no longer installable on
>> Solaris 9 - http://www.opencsw.org/bugtrack/view.php?id=3869
> 
> I've put an updated syslog-ng package into testing:
> http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing.html
> 
> You can try and see if it works for you.
> 
> Maciej

Thanks for the quick response but unfortunately no luck with this
version either:

bash-2.05# pkgadd -d
./syslog_ng-3.0.4,REV\=2009.08.25-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg

The following packages are available:
  1  CSWsyslogng     syslog_ng - A powerful syslogd replacement
                     (sparc) 3.0.4,REV=2009.08.25

Select package(s) you wish to process (or 'all' to process
all packages). (default: all) [?,??,q]: a

Processing package instance <CSWsyslogng> from
</etc/rcS.d/syslog_ng-3.0.4,REV=2009.08.25-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg>

syslog_ng - A powerful syslogd replacement
(sparc) 3.0.4,REV=2009.08.25
Please see /opt/csw/share/doc/syslog_ng/license for license information.
## Processing package information.
## Processing system information.
   3 package pathnames are already properly installed.
## Verifying package dependencies.
## Verifying disk space requirements.
## Checking for conflicts with packages already installed.
## Checking for setuid/setgid programs.

This package contains scripts which will be executed with super-user
permission during the process of installing this package.

Do you want to continue with the installation of <CSWsyslogng> [y,n,?] y

Installing syslog_ng - A powerful syslogd replacement as <CSWsyslogng>

## Executing preinstall script.
Disabling svc:/system/system-log:default
/var/sadm/pkg/CSWsyslogng/install/preinstall: svcadm: not found
pkgadd: ERROR: preinstall script did not complete successfully

Installation of <CSWsyslogng> failed.



From tedwards at it.dcs.ch  Tue Aug 25 16:07:44 2009
From: tedwards at it.dcs.ch (Tim Edwards)
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:07:44 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] Where can I find previous versions of packages from
 current?
In-Reply-To: <20090825.13130500.3383926314@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk>
References: <4A93E086.3080308@it.dcs.ch>
	<20090825.13130500.3383926314@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk>
Message-ID: <4A93F030.8070304@it.dcs.ch>



James Lee wrote:
> On 25/08/09, 14:00:54, Tim Edwards <tedwards at it.dcs.ch> wrote regarding 
> [csw-users] Where can I find previous versions of packages from current?:
> 
>> I was wondering if there's a way to get the previous version of this
>> package from any of the mirrors,
> 
> http://csw.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/oldpkgs/
> 
> 
> 
> 
> James.

Thanks that worked


From maciej at opencsw.org  Tue Aug 25 17:10:26 2009
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski)
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:10:26 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] Where can I find previous versions of packages from
	current?
In-Reply-To: <4A93EDA3.9050306@it.dcs.ch>
References: <4A93E086.3080308@it.dcs.ch>
	<ce97543b0908250626l58e5c8wacd9753c6b0dd7dc@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A93EDA3.9050306@it.dcs.ch>
Message-ID: <ce97543b0908250810y52badfa3p1a102d2275162ad8@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Tim Edwards<tedwards at it.dcs.ch> wrote:
> Thanks for the quick response but unfortunately no luck with this
> version either:

Since it's stubborn, and you have a workaround, I'll take a more
careful look at it later tonight. I'll keep you posted.

Maciej


From william at wbonnet.net  Wed Aug 26 00:10:57 2009
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 00:10:57 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] OpenCSW IRL events on flickr
Message-ID: <4A946171.3060107@wbonnet.net>

Hi

Pictures of OpenCSW IRL events are now available on flickr.

http://www.flickr/photos/opencsw

Some of the pictures of the recent Summer Camp in Oslo have been added. 
Pictures of the funding meeting will also be moved (soon) to this place.

enjoy :)

cheers
W.

PS: If you have any picture of an OpenCSW IRL event, please contact a 
member of the board for publication.

-- 

William                  http://www.wbonnet.net

http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix
http://www.opencsw.org 	 Community SoftWare for Solaris
http://www.guses.org     French speaking Solaris User Group




From marsha.petry at hp.com  Fri Aug 28 01:28:07 2009
From: marsha.petry at hp.com (PETRY, MARSHA)
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 23:28:07 +0000
Subject: [csw-users] Berkeley DB 4.7 vs. 4.4 issue
In-Reply-To: <94F6C78F-718A-4107-A8B2-BFE5227C0353@opencsw.org>
References: <F7C44AA1F517274DA0B5BB579CBAF8071F0AFB222A@GVW0538EXC.americas.hpqcorp.net>
	<94F6C78F-718A-4107-A8B2-BFE5227C0353@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <F7C44AA1F517274DA0B5BB579CBAF8071F0B262745@GVW0538EXC.americas.hpqcorp.net>

I will go to topic-specific lists after this but since all my software is from opencsw I want to see if anyone has an answer here first...

My issue:
I upgraded svn and trac a couple days ago via opencsw(mostly "testing") and when I used svn I got a FATAL error (below this email, sent to list a couple days ago)

To fix that problem, using a link to old copy from someone on this list, I did the solution:
1.  Built an old BDB4.4 version
2.  db_archive -s -h old_repo          /*BDB4.4*/
3.  db_dump (each name from #2)        /*BDB4.4*/
4.  svnadmin create new_repo --fs_type = bdb  /*newest CSWsvn ver. 1.6.4*/
5.  db_load (each name from #2) to new_repo   /*BDB 4.7*/
6.  db_checkpoint -1 -v -h new_repo           /*BDB4.7*/
7.  db_verify    /*BDB4.7 ... verify each db... no error msgs*/
7.  svnserve ... /*svn 1.6.4*/

Works fine checking out code... until I check something in.  The checkin works but when I try to checkout again or update another checked-out copy I get:  "Decompression of .svn diff data failed"

/opt/csw/bin/svnadmin verify gives:
* Verified revision 0.
svnadmin: Checksum mismatch on representation '0':
   expected:  effd2c5b6f40c05496ad82988093ec13
     actual:  19b07c36abc7abbec99bf2bc432f8f64

db_recover, db_verify give no errors.  Representation '0' is scary... I found a suggestion that I should change the md5 sequences on the representations.dump file and re-load but there are over 30,000 of them.... ugh.

Is there anything obvious related to opencsw that I have missed?  Do my packages look mis-matched?  Are there any opencsw files for svn/bdb/trac that are known to have an issue?

CSWbdb                    4.7.25,REV=2009.07.01     not in catalog
CSWbdb4                   4.2.52,REV=2009.07.28     not in catalog
CSWbdb44                  4.4.20,REV=2009.07.28     not in catalog
CSWbdb47                  4.7.25,REV=2009.03.09     not in catalog
CSWsvn                    1.6.4,REV=2009.08.23      SAME
CSWtrac                   0.11.5,REV=2009.08.03     SAME
CSWzlib                   1.2.3,REV=2009.04.05      SAME

Thanks for any help. This is a showstopper problem for me and the only way I can think to recover is get rid of all these opencsw packages and use a different source for svn/trac.


> -----Original Message-----
> Am 25.08.2009 um 08:12 schrieb PETRY, MARSHA:
> > This might be a variation of the "Berkeley DB in Flux" discussion...
> >
> > I updated the trac and svn packages using pkgutil, and now have a 
> > corrupt BDB when I try to use svn.
> >
> > svn: Berkeley DB error for filesystem '/cust/repo/db' while opening
> > environment:
> > svn: DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recovery
> > svn: bdb: Ignoring log file: /cust/repo/db/log.0000000918: magic 
> > number 88090400, not 40988
> > svn: bdb: Invalid log file: log.0000000918: Invalid argument
> > svn: bdb: PANIC: Invalid argument
> > svn: bdb: unable to join the environment
> >
> > The resolution on the Oracle site says that I need to 
> db_recover using 
> > the old BDB copy (4.4) --- that is now pointing to the new 4.7 copy 
> > and so I've lost the ability to run db_recover using the older 
> > version.  Is that correct? or is there a way to get that back?
> >


From dam at opencsw.org  Fri Aug 28 08:41:24 2009
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 08:41:24 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] Berkeley DB 4.7 vs. 4.4 issue
In-Reply-To: <F7C44AA1F517274DA0B5BB579CBAF8071F0B262745@GVW0538EXC.americas.hpqcorp.net>
References: <F7C44AA1F517274DA0B5BB579CBAF8071F0AFB222A@GVW0538EXC.americas.hpqcorp.net>
	<94F6C78F-718A-4107-A8B2-BFE5227C0353@opencsw.org>
	<F7C44AA1F517274DA0B5BB579CBAF8071F0B262745@GVW0538EXC.americas.hpqcorp.net>
Message-ID: <EC3440D0-9D4F-4114-9CA8-FB5ACF8ECEAA@opencsw.org>

Hi Marsha,

Am 28.08.2009 um 01:28 schrieb PETRY, MARSHA:
> I will go to topic-specific lists after this but since all my  
> software is from opencsw I want to see if anyone has an answer here  
> first...

The problem you describe sounds ugly, but there were no reports about
this problem during upgrade now. I don't know if it really connects
to your update or some other strange bug, but also asking on the
subversion list is definitely a good idea.

> My issue:
> I upgraded svn and trac a couple days ago via opencsw(mostly  
> "testing") and when I used svn I got a FATAL error (below this  
> email, sent to list a couple days ago)
>
> To fix that problem, using a link to old copy from someone on this  
> list, I did the solution:
> 1.  Built an old BDB4.4 version
> 2.  db_archive -s -h old_repo          /*BDB4.4*/
> 3.  db_dump (each name from #2)        /*BDB4.4*/
> 4.  svnadmin create new_repo --fs_type = bdb  /*newest CSWsvn ver.  
> 1.6.4*/

Is there a specific reason why you are still using bdb as fsfs
was preferred by some time now because there are several limitation
with bdb? Please don't get this as fingerpointing, but if you
have to reload the repo I would continue with fsfs from the start.

> 5.  db_load (each name from #2) to new_repo   /*BDB 4.7*/
> 6.  db_checkpoint -1 -v -h new_repo           /*BDB4.7*/
> 7.  db_verify    /*BDB4.7 ... verify each db... no error msgs*/
> 7.  svnserve ... /*svn 1.6.4*/
>
> Works fine checking out code... until I check something in.  The  
> checkin works but when I try to checkout again or update another  
> checked-out copy I get:  "Decompression of .svn diff data failed"
>
> /opt/csw/bin/svnadmin verify gives:
> * Verified revision 0.
> svnadmin: Checksum mismatch on representation '0':
>   expected:  effd2c5b6f40c05496ad82988093ec13
>     actual:  19b07c36abc7abbec99bf2bc432f8f64
>
> db_recover, db_verify give no errors.  Representation '0' is  
> scary... I found a suggestion that I should change the md5 sequences  
> on the representations.dump file and re-load but there are over  
> 30,000 of them.... ugh.

Well, in fact that is vi'ing one file and a few lines on the shell
with a few mugs of coffee in between. Not desirable, but definitely
doable.

> Is there anything obvious related to opencsw that I have missed?  Do  
> my packages look mis-matched?  Are there any opencsw files for svn/ 
> bdb/trac that are known to have an issue?
>
> CSWbdb                    4.7.25,REV=2009.07.01     not in catalog
> CSWbdb4                   4.2.52,REV=2009.07.28     not in catalog
> CSWbdb44                  4.4.20,REV=2009.07.28     not in catalog
> CSWbdb47                  4.7.25,REV=2009.03.09     not in catalog
> CSWsvn                    1.6.4,REV=2009.08.23      SAME
> CSWtrac                   0.11.5,REV=2009.08.03     SAME
> CSWzlib                   1.2.3,REV=2009.04.05      SAME

You are working against the testing catalog from here:
   <http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing.html>
Please be advised that this is highly disregarded for production  
environments
unless explicitly needed for specific tests.

> Thanks for any help. This is a showstopper problem for me and the  
> only way I can think to recover is get rid of all these opencsw  
> packages and use a different source for svn/trac.

I do understand your anger about the project, but I don't see how  
changing
package sources will bring your repository back. It may be best to fix  
the
checksum after making a copy of the current repo e. g. descibed here
   http://blackcompanystudios.co.uk/blog/user/mrcranky/237
and then dump and reload it to fsfs.


Best regards

   -- Dago



From khfp.blastwave0704 at gmx.de  Sat Aug 29 13:48:54 2009
From: khfp.blastwave0704 at gmx.de (Klaus Heinz)
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 13:48:54 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] incomplete samba package in testing
Message-ID: <20090829114854.193990@gmx.net>

did anyone ever try to use the Samba package (3.2.4) from the "testing"
directory?

For nmbd I get 
        libtalloc.so.1 =>        (file not found)
        libtdb.so.1 =>   (file not found)

and for smbd
        libtalloc.so.1 =>        (file not found)
        libtdb.so.1 =>   (file not found)
        libwbclient.so.0 =>      (file not found)

Either those files are missing and should be contained in the package
or some other package (which one?) is supposed to provide them.

ciao
     Klaus
-- 
GRATIS f?r alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT!
Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome01


From dam at opencsw.org  Sat Aug 29 13:55:01 2009
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 13:55:01 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] incomplete samba package in testing
In-Reply-To: <20090829114854.193990@gmx.net>
References: <20090829114854.193990@gmx.net>
Message-ID: <F2BB7B9D-69F3-4FC0-BA8F-B981243385DC@opencsw.org>

Hi Klaus,

Am 29.08.2009 um 13:48 schrieb Klaus Heinz:
> did anyone ever try to use the Samba package (3.2.4) from the  
> "testing"
> directory?
>
> For nmbd I get
>        libtalloc.so.1 =>        (file not found)
>        libtdb.so.1 =>   (file not found)
>
> and for smbd
>        libtalloc.so.1 =>        (file not found)
>        libtdb.so.1 =>   (file not found)
>        libwbclient.so.0 =>      (file not found)
>
> Either those files are missing and should be contained in the package
> or some other package (which one?) is supposed to provide them.

That package is very old, it was essentially a proof-of-concept build  
from Phil.
Dominique has offered to build a current Samba during the technical  
summercamp
in Oslo, cc'ed him for status.


Best regards

   -- Dago


From khfp.blastwave0704 at gmx.de  Sat Aug 29 14:05:33 2009
From: khfp.blastwave0704 at gmx.de (Klaus Heinz)
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 14:05:33 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] incomplete samba package in testing
In-Reply-To: <F2BB7B9D-69F3-4FC0-BA8F-B981243385DC@opencsw.org>
References: <20090829114854.193990@gmx.net>
	<F2BB7B9D-69F3-4FC0-BA8F-B981243385DC@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <20090829120533.194030@gmx.net>

Hi,

> That package is very old, it was essentially a proof-of-concept build  
> from Phil.

Shouldn't it get removed, then? Especially as it is known now that it's
not usable.

> Dominique has offered to build a current Samba during the technical  
> summercamp
> in Oslo, cc'ed him for status.

Thanks for the information.

ciao
     Klaus
-- 
GRATIS f?r alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT!
Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome01


From dam at opencsw.org  Sat Aug 29 14:08:01 2009
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 14:08:01 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] incomplete samba package in testing
In-Reply-To: <20090829120533.194030@gmx.net>
References: <20090829114854.193990@gmx.net>
	<F2BB7B9D-69F3-4FC0-BA8F-B981243385DC@opencsw.org>
	<20090829120533.194030@gmx.net>
Message-ID: <D64F8DC8-5760-477F-B95F-77E4F9AA1260@opencsw.org>

Hi Klaus,

Am 29.08.2009 um 14:05 schrieb Klaus Heinz:
>> That package is very old, it was essentially a proof-of-concept build
>> from Phil.
>
> Shouldn't it get removed, then? Especially as it is known now that  
> it's
> not usable.

testing/ is used for both real testing and development. We are currently
redesigning the test process to ease testing and clarify this  
distinction,
also an "Olso result" :-)


Best regards

   -- Dago


From blizinski at google.com  Sat Aug 29 15:26:42 2009
From: blizinski at google.com (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski)
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 14:26:42 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] Package request
In-Reply-To: <ce97543b0908021430k1788ab58vcf2111c753090e0c@mail.gmail.com>
References: <9B28411EE585684A87F9FA7E82DBDB30240688@ICABEXCCLU01B.int.sonofon.dk>
	<f95457130904181229y67209843w646291a2ec0a9eb2@mail.gmail.com>
	<9B28411EE585684A87F9FA7E82DBDB30240B57@ICABEXCCLU01B.int.sonofon.dk>
	<f95457130904200055l710bb852u1b0d801029b41385@mail.gmail.com>
	<9B28411EE585684A87F9FA7E82DBDB302B13B5@ICABEXCCLU01B.int.sonofon.dk>
	<ce97543b0908021430k1788ab58vcf2111c753090e0c@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <ce97543b0908290626w2b81d847y87da6123cb209dee@mail.gmail.com>

On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Maciej (Matchek)
Blizinski<blizinski at google.com> wrote:
> I wrote a build for cfg2html, no idea if it's the way it should be.
> Can you test it and get back to me with comments? You can get the
> package at:
>
> http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/cfg2html-1.14r1.8,REV=2009.08.02-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz

Did you have any chance to test the package?

Maciej


From xc68000 at gmail.com  Sun Aug 30 06:11:01 2009
From: xc68000 at gmail.com (Bart)
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 22:11:01 -0600
Subject: [csw-users] Openoffice - 3.1 Sun4m?
Message-ID: <4A99FBD5.1080801@gmail.com>

Hello, is the OpenOffice 3.1 package suppose to be sun4m compatible?  I 
receive the following error when trying to launch if so -

Thank you,

$ swriter
ld.so.1: javaldx: fatal: 
/opt/csw/openoffice.org/ure/lib/libuno_sal.so.3: bad ELF flags value: [ 
EF_SPARC_32PLUS ]
ld.so.1: javaldx: fatal: relocation error: file 
/opt/csw/openoffice.org/ure/bin/javaldx: symbol sal_detail_initialize: 
referenced symbol not found
ld.so.1: soffice.bin: fatal: 
/opt/csw/openoffice.org/ure/lib/libuno_sal.so.3: bad ELF flags value: [ 
EF_SPARC_32PLUS ]
ld.so.1: soffice.bin: fatal: relocation error: file 
/opt/csw/openoffice.org/program/soffice.bin: symbol 
sal_detail_initialize: referenced symbol not found



From maciej at opencsw.org  Sun Aug 30 11:09:16 2009
From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski)
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 10:09:16 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] Where can I find previous versions of packages from
	current?
In-Reply-To: <4A93EDA3.9050306@it.dcs.ch>
References: <4A93E086.3080308@it.dcs.ch>
	<ce97543b0908250626l58e5c8wacd9753c6b0dd7dc@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A93EDA3.9050306@it.dcs.ch>
Message-ID: <ce97543b0908300209k5426faa4j11321cd1491d2603@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Tim Edwards<tedwards at it.dcs.ch> wrote:
> bash-2.05# pkgadd -d
> ./syslog_ng-3.0.4,REV\=2009.08.25-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg
> ## Executing preinstall script.
> Disabling svc:/system/system-log:default
> /var/sadm/pkg/CSWsyslogng/install/preinstall: svcadm: not found
> pkgadd: ERROR: preinstall script did not complete successfully
>
> Installation of <CSWsyslogng> failed.

Hi Tim,

When you have the broken package installed, you need to take
additional steps to remove it first.

I've updated the issue: http://www.opencsw.org/bugtrack/view.php?id=3869

sudo rm /var/sadm/pkg/CSWsyslogng/install/postremove
sudo touch /etc/opt/csw/syslog-ng.conf.CSW
sudo pkgrm CSWsyslogng
sudo rm /etc/opt/csw/syslog-ng.conf.CSW

Once the old one is removed, the new one can be installed. It's in testing now:

http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/syslog_ng-3.0.4,REV=2009.08.30-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/syslog_ng-3.0.4,REV=2009.08.30-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz

Maciej


From james at opencsw.org  Sun Aug 30 17:25:49 2009
From: james at opencsw.org (James Lee)
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 15:25:49 GMT
Subject: [csw-users] Openoffice - 3.1 Sun4m?
In-Reply-To: <4A99FBD5.1080801@gmail.com>
References: <4A99FBD5.1080801@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20090830.15254900.2015640913@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk>

On 30/08/09, 05:11:01, Bart <xc68000 at gmail.com> wrote regarding [csw-users] 
Openoffice - 3.1 Sun4m?:

> Hello, is the OpenOffice 3.1 package suppose to be sun4m compatible?  I
> receive the following error when trying to launch if so -

> $ swriter
> ld.so.1: javaldx: fatal:
> /opt/csw/openoffice.org/ure/lib/libuno_sal.so.3: bad ELF flags value: [
> EF_SPARC_32PLUS ]
> ld.so.1: javaldx: fatal: relocation error: file
> /opt/csw/openoffice.org/ure/bin/javaldx: symbol sal_detail_initialize:
> referenced symbol not found
> ld.so.1: soffice.bin: fatal:
> /opt/csw/openoffice.org/ure/lib/libuno_sal.so.3: bad ELF flags value: [
> EF_SPARC_32PLUS ]
> ld.so.1: soffice.bin: fatal: relocation error: file
> /opt/csw/openoffice.org/program/soffice.bin: symbol
> sal_detail_initialize: referenced symbol not found


It was built sun4m except for a few lines of assembler compiled into
libuno_sal.so.3 and stlport.  Download these files and copy into
/opt/csw/openoffice.org/ure/lib/ over the existing files.

http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/libuno_sal.so.3
http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/libstlport_sunpro.so


I can correct this but as the required Java itself isn't Sun4m
compatible so does it matter that the rest is not Sun4m compatible?

Build:
./configure
...
	--with-jdk-home=/usr/java1.2 \
...

checking the installed JDK... configure: error: JDK is too old, you need 
at least 1.5
...



Java and sun4m:
http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=6213546



All is not lost, see also:
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Java_and_OpenOffice.org


Although it still doesn't work for me:


$ uname -a
SunOS amsterdam 5.8 Generic_117350-38 sun4m sparc SUNW,SPARCstation-20
$ java -version
java version "1.2.2"
Solaris VM (build Solaris_JDK_1.2.2_05a, native threads, sunwjit)
$ swriter
javaldx: Could not find a Java Runtime Environment! 
The application cannot be started. 
The component manager is not available.
Segmentation Fault - core dumped




So maybe you are going to have to lay out $5 for an Ultra1 :-)





James.


From rgomes1997 at yahoo.co.uk  Mon Aug 31 23:51:30 2009
From: rgomes1997 at yahoo.co.uk (Richard Gomes)
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 22:51:30 +0100
Subject: [csw-users] Trying to build pgadmin3
Message-ID: <4A9C45E2.7070509@yahoo.co.uk>

Hi maintainers,

I was trying to build/package pgadmin3 but I found some troubles.
In a nutshell, in order to build pgadmin3, some preparation is needed.

In pgadmin3 INSTALL file, we can see step 3 as below.
Also, please find the Makefile I was working on attached to this file. I 
hope it help you guys.


Building:

1) Install libxml2 and libxslt if they are not already present on your 
system,
   per the instructions included with them.

2) Install PostgreSQL per the instructions included. It is recommended 
that you
   build with OpenSSL support, using the --with-openssl configure option.

3) Unpack the wxGTK tarball to a convenient location, and build and 
install it
   as follows:

     cd /path/to/wxGTK/source/
     ./configure --with-gtk --enable-gtk2 --enable-unicode
     make
     sudo make install

     # Install wxWidgets contrib modules.
     cd contrib/
     make
     sudo make install

   A script is included in the pgAdmin source tarball
   (xtra/wx-build/build-wxgtk) which will build and install wxWidgets in 
each
   combination of shared/static/debug/release builds for you.

4) Unpack the pgAdmin tarball to a convenient location, and build and 
install it
   as follows:

     bash bootstrap     # Required only if building from an SVN checkout
     ./configure
     make all
     sudo make install

   If any of the prerequisite components are installed in locations that the
   configure script cannot find, you may specify their locations on the 
command
   line. See the configure help (./configure --help) for details.

Thanks

-- 
Richard Gomes
M: +44(77)9955-6813
http://www.jquantlib.org/index.php/User:RichardGomes
twitter: frgomes

JQuantLib is a library for Quantitative Finance written in Java.
http://www.jquantlib.org/
twitter: jquantlib

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20090831/c388fe8e/attachment-0002.html>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: Makefile
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20090831/c388fe8e/attachment-0002.ksh>

From william at wbonnet.net  Mon Aug 31 23:59:50 2009
From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet)
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 23:59:50 +0200
Subject: [csw-users] Firefox 3 release
Message-ID: <4A9C47D6.4010501@wbonnet.net>

Hi,

I'm pleased to announced that Firefox 3.0.13 has been pushed to current. 
This version supports Solaris 8 and newer (thanks goes to James Lee for 
pointing me the solution).

Thunderbird has also been updated to version 2.0.0.23, latest stable 
before TB3 is released.

cheers
W.

-- 
William                  http://www.wbonnet.net

http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix
http://www.opencsw.org 	 Community SoftWare for Solaris
http://www.guses.org     French speaking Solaris User Group