From res at colnet.cmhnet.org Sun Mar 1 06:29:48 2009 From: res at colnet.cmhnet.org (Rob Stampfli) Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 00:29:48 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Warning: Opencsw latest python 2.6.1 compiled for SPARC32PLUS Message-ID: <20090301052948.GA8317@keevey> A word to the wise: If you are on one of the older Sparc boxes with the original SPARC chipset, you will not be able to run the latest python load as it is compiled for the SPARC32PLUS instruction set. (I thought opencsw policy was to not do this. See: http://www.opencsw.org/userguide/faq ) Backing it out now... Rob From sanelson at gmail.com Mon Mar 2 05:37:37 2009 From: sanelson at gmail.com (Stephen Nelson-Smith) Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 04:37:37 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] CSWnrpe not working with custom plugin Message-ID: Hi, I've installed nrpe from the blastwave repository on Solaris 10. From my nagios server (Redhat 5), I'm able to run remote nrpe commands, as specified in nrpe.cfg, such as check_disk, or check_load. I've written a custom monitor which conforms to the nrpe API, and dropped it in /opt/csw/libexec/nagios-plugins/ with appropriate permissions. I've added a line to nrpe.cfg to enable it to be called remotely. I can run this command as the nagios user, and get the results as expected. However, if called over nrpe, I get the error: NRPE: Unable to read output I've enabled debug logging, and restarted nrpe, but I don't see any log messages in syslog other than startup and shutdown. If I disable cswnrpe via svcadm, and run /opt/csw/bin/nrpe -c /opt/csw/etc/nrpe.cfg -d as root on the command line, everything works fine, and I also get log messages, such as: Mar 1 07:56:41 viper SC Alert: [ID 114403 daemon.notice] Audit | minor: root : Activate Session : authentication type = MD5 : privilege level = admin : initial outbound sequence number = 0x8E6E9E0F : challenge string = 0xA8 0x4B 0xC8 0xFD 0xA2 0x4 0x1A 0x90 0xF4 0x49 0xFE 0x15 0x4B 0x48 0x96 0x2D : success Mar 1 07:56:41 viper SC Alert: [ID 709409 daemon.notice] Audit | minor: root : Set Session Privilege Level: privilege level = admin : success Mar 1 07:56:48 viper SC Alert: [ID 920036 daemon.notice] Audit | minor: root : Close Session : session ID = 4153983266 : success Mar 1 08:00:23 viper SC Alert: [ID 163647 daemon.notice] Audit | minor: root : Activate Session : authentication type = MD5 : privilege level = admin : initial outbound sequence number = 0xEC32CA41 : challenge string = 0x25 0xCB 0x5C 0x8F 0xAE 0x6D 0x45 0x46 0x27 0x86 0xE5 0x3F 0xA9 0x8D 0x8A 0x71 : success Mar 1 08:00:23 viper SC Alert: [ID 709409 daemon.notice] Audit | minor: root : Set Session Privilege Level: privilege level = admin : success Mar 1 08:00:31 viper SC Alert: [ID 954504 daemon.notice] Audit | minor: root : Close Session : session ID = 3706478101 : success I've had a look at the shell script that is used by svcadm - /opt/csw/lib/svc/method/svc-nrpe - and all that seems to do is invoke nrpe in the same way that I have on the command line. I see no information in the /var/svc/log/network-cswnrpe:default.log. I'm flummoxed - I can only thing it could be something to do with my environment - in that it works if I launch from the commandline, and doesn't when launched from a script. I can't really use this in production - I want to use the svc properly - but at present I can't see any way to get this to work other than running it manually. Any ideas for further troubleshooting, or suggestions as to what's wrong? Thanks in advance, S. -- Stephen Nelson-Smith Technical Director Atalanta Systems Ltd www.atalanta-systems.com From dam at opencsw.org Mon Mar 2 08:40:55 2009 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 08:40:55 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] CSWnrpe not working with custom plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <229E61A0-39CB-41BD-AA73-EB1F2036FB2F@opencsw.org> Hi Stephen, Am 02.03.2009 um 05:37 schrieb Stephen Nelson-Smith: > I can run this command as the nagios user, and get the results as > expected. However, if called over nrpe, I get the error: There is a new package in testing available at http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing.html Please see if the error persists. Best regards -- Dago From sanelson at gmail.com Mon Mar 2 11:54:08 2009 From: sanelson at gmail.com (Stephen Nelson-Smith) Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 10:54:08 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] CSWnrpe not working with custom plugin In-Reply-To: <229E61A0-39CB-41BD-AA73-EB1F2036FB2F@opencsw.org> References: <229E61A0-39CB-41BD-AA73-EB1F2036FB2F@opencsw.org> Message-ID: On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 7:40 AM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > Hi Stephen, > > Am 02.03.2009 um 05:37 schrieb Stephen Nelson-Smith: >> I can run this command as the nagios user, and get the results as >> expected. ?However, if called over nrpe, I get the error: > > There is a new package in testing available at > ? http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing.html > Please see if the error persists. Thanks. I've resolved the error - my fault entirely. My plugin had #!/usr/bin/env ruby, and not #!/opt/csw/bin/ruby. S. -- Stephen Nelson-Smith Technical Director Atalanta Systems Ltd www.atalanta-systems.com From schwindt at dfki.uni-kl.de Mon Mar 2 13:20:24 2009 From: schwindt at dfki.uni-kl.de (Nicolai Schwindt) Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 13:20:24 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] python:2.6.1 Message-ID: <200903021219.n22CJ7if007472@dfki.uni-kl.de> I did install this this one a few moments ago. Installation went fine, but .. This breaks ap2_modpython, which is not fine. I returned to normal state by installing the old version (python-2.5.1,REV=2007.11.03-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg). As there is no new version, relinking might suffice. Is it just me ? Or anybody experience the same Problem. Nicolai Schwindt From mwatters at opencsw.org Mon Mar 2 16:14:50 2009 From: mwatters at opencsw.org (Mike Watters) Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 09:14:50 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] python:2.6.1 In-Reply-To: <200903021219.n22CJ7if007472@dfki.uni-kl.de> References: <200903021219.n22CJ7if007472@dfki.uni-kl.de> Message-ID: <49ABF7EA.8070006@opencsw.org> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Nicolai Schwindt wrote: > > I did install this this one a few moments ago. Installation went fine, but .. > This breaks ap2_modpython, which is not fine. > I returned to normal state by installing the old version > (python-2.5.1,REV=2007.11.03-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg). > As there is no new version, relinking might suffice. > > Is it just me ? Or anybody experience the same Problem. > > > > > Nicolai Schwindt > > > > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/users I will update ap2_modpython - -- Thanks, Mike "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius -- and a lot of courage -- to move in the opposite direction." * Albert Einstein 1879 - 1955 US German-born Theoretical Physicist -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (SunOS) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkmr9+oACgkQLrhmsXMSLxebswCg2HNxTG7CHPU4IaWzmVXKU4VO ahAAoLhfP816uU5WVdy6pmy/syt8nBZe =Xpyq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From bwalton at opencsw.org Wed Mar 4 01:47:18 2009 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2009 19:47:18 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] ruby updates in testing Message-ID: <1236127436-sup-7169@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> Hi All, I believe this will be the final testing update of ruby before a new release to current. The packages in testing/ fix: 1. Missing libruby-static.a 2. Some path issues with the installed docs (tools knew where they were, but the locations weren't correct). 3. A proper rubydev package is split out. 4. Native extensions built get a proper -R path in LDFLAGS (tested with the mysql gem). Please let me know if you find anything amiss with these. I plan to release them to current by next week if I haven't had any negative feedback (or found something myself). Thanks -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 GPG Key Id: 8E89F6D2; Key Server: pgp.mit.edu Contact me to arrange for a CAcert assurance meeting. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20090303/4dfa413c/attachment-0001.asc From ja at baltic-online.de Wed Mar 4 19:34:47 2009 From: ja at baltic-online.de (Juergen Arndt) Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 19:34:47 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Problems with makepatch Message-ID: Hi all, for the last two days I have problem with "makepatch". Everytime I want to create a patch, the result is patch file, which subtracts _all_ lines from _all_ source files. I tested it with some other packages not maintained by me and the result was the same. As an example, here is a part of the contents of the generated patch file: ----- diff --speed-large-files --minimal -Nru pnp-0.4.13.orig/AUTHORS pnp-0.4.13/AUTHORS --- pnp-0.4.13.orig/AUTHORS 2009-02-19 18:29:18.000000000 +0100 +++ pnp-0.4.13/AUTHORS 1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100 @@ -1,3 +0,0 @@ -Authors: -Jrg Linge pitchfork at pnp4nagios.org -Hendrik Bcker andurin at process-zero.de diff --speed-large-files --minimal -Nru pnp-0.4.13.orig/BUGS pnp-0.4.13/BUGS --- pnp-0.4.13.orig/BUGS 2009-02-19 18:29:18.000000000 +0100 +++ pnp-0.4.13/BUGS 1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100 @@ -1 +0,0 @@ -A lots of it... diff --speed-large-files --minimal -Nru pnp-0.4.13.orig/COPYING pnp-0.4.13/COPYING --- pnp-0.4.13.orig/COPYING 2009-02-19 18:29:18.000000000 +0100 +++ pnp-0.4.13/COPYING 1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100 @@ -1,340 +0,0 @@ - GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE - Version 2, June 1991 - - Copyright (C) 1989, 1991 Free Software Foundation, Inc. - 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA - Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies - of this license document, but changing it is not allowed. - - Preamble - - The licenses for most software are designed to take away your ... and so on. ----- Also I am wondering, why the time stamp is at "1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100". My workflow is like this: - gmake extract - change some files - gmake makepatch I already created patches successfully, so I'm really surprised about this. Can anyone reproduce this behaviour? Or does anyone has a hint for me, what I do wrong? Juergen -- Juergen Arndt Baltic Online Computer GmbH Firmensitz: Alter Markt 1-2, 24103 Kiel http://www.baltic-online.de Tel.: +49 (0)431 54003-0 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Erik Cickovskis, Amtsgericht Kiel, HRB 3756 From hson at opencsw.org Wed Mar 4 19:51:43 2009 From: hson at opencsw.org (=?UTF-8?B?Um9nZXIgSMOla2Fuc3Nvbg==?=) Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 19:51:43 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Problems with makepatch In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <49AECDBF.9010902@opencsw.org> Juergen Arndt wrote: > Hi all, > > for the last two days I have problem with "makepatch". Everytime I want to > create a patch, the result is patch file, which subtracts _all_ lines from > _all_ source files. I tested it with some other packages not maintained by > me and the result was the same. > ... > > My workflow is like this: > > - gmake extract > - change some files > - gmake makepatch > > I already created patches successfully, so I'm really surprised about > this. Can anyone reproduce this behaviour? Or does anyone has a hint for > me, what I do wrong? > > Juergen > I've also noticed this, but I haven't investigated that much From Jon.Fechner at tellabs.com Wed Mar 4 21:24:45 2009 From: Jon.Fechner at tellabs.com (Fechner, Jon L.) Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 14:24:45 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] new stable release coming any time soon? Message-ID: <16060DBCD52A2445BD9CBF1498974A7D0107B45C@EX-NAP.tellabs-west.tellabsinc.net> Hello - I was wondering if there were any plans for a new stable release any time soon? It looks like there was a stable release 10/24/2008 from what I can tell which isn't all that long ago, but I am planning to update our systems in the next few months so I was wondering if there was any schedule. Stable releases used to be quarterly, but since the split with Blastwave that seems to have gone out the window with both distros. Thx for all you folks do! -Jon [cid:image002.jpg at 01C99CD4.C1715680] Jon Fechner Information Technology Engineering Tools Office: 630-798-6501 Mobile: 630-605-6506 jon.fechner at tellabs.com ============================================================ The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reproduction, dissemination or distribution of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you. Tellabs ============================================================ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20090304/e63cbaac/attachment.htm -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 2127 bytes Desc: image002.jpg Url : http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20090304/e63cbaac/attachment.jpg From Jon.Fechner at tellabs.com Wed Mar 4 21:34:30 2009 From: Jon.Fechner at tellabs.com (Fechner, Jon L.) Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 14:34:30 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] pine and alpine Message-ID: <16060DBCD52A2445BD9CBF1498974A7D0107B488@EX-NAP.tellabs-west.tellabsinc.net> Hello - I have some engineers in our organization that are interested in trying out 'alpine', the successor to pine. Pine is having some problems working with our new IMAP server which prevents some messages from being saved in folders, both automatically via a filter/rule and manually. I'm just wondering if anyone is interested in providing this in the CSW distro. Just thought I'd ask. We'd be willing to test it, but couldn't be the maintainer. Thx again, Jon [cid:image002.jpg at 01C99CD5.EBB7FB00] Jon Fechner Information Technology Engineering Tools Office: 630-798-6501 Mobile: 630-605-6506 jon.fechner at tellabs.com ============================================================ The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reproduction, dissemination or distribution of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you. Tellabs ============================================================ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20090304/ac3cc1d4/attachment-0001.htm -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 2127 bytes Desc: image002.jpg Url : http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20090304/ac3cc1d4/attachment-0001.jpg From dam at opencsw.org Wed Mar 4 21:51:29 2009 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 21:51:29 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Problems with makepatch In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi J?rgen, Am 04.03.2009 um 19:34 schrieb Juergen Arndt: > I already created patches successfully, so I'm really surprised about > this. Can anyone reproduce this behaviour? Or does anyone has a hint > for > me, what I do wrong? Basically, 'makepatch' is currently broken in mGAR v2 when modulated builds were introduced. In mGAR v1 it works :-( It is on my long list of things to fix and enhance... Ben, want to take a shot? Best regards -- Dago From dam at opencsw.org Wed Mar 4 21:53:50 2009 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 21:53:50 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] pine and alpine References: <49AEE882.9040705@opencsw.org> Message-ID: Hi Jon, Anfang der weitergeleiteten E-Mail: > Von: Mike Watters > Datum: 4. M?rz 2009 21:45:54 MEZ > An: internal list for the CSW maintainers > > Betreff: Re: [csw-maintainers] Fwd: [csw-users] pine and alpine > Antwort an: internal list for the CSW maintainers > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > I just pulled the source down. if there is not much to it I will > build the first release Looks like you are lucky and someone picked it up really fast :-) Thanks Mike! Best regards -- Dago > Dagobert Michelsen wrote: >> Hi, >> >> FYI. Maybe someone feels the urge to package this ;-) >> >> >> Best regards >> >> -- Dago >> >> Anfang der weitergeleiteten E-Mail: >> >>> *Von: *"Fechner, Jon L." >> > >>> *Datum: *4. M?rz 2009 21:34:30 MEZ >>> *An: *"users at lists.opencsw.org " >>> > >>> *Betreff: **[csw-users] pine and alpine* >>> *Antwort an: *questions and discussions >> > >>> >>> Hello ? >>> >>> I have some engineers in our organization that are interested in >>> trying out ?alpine?, the successor to pine. >>> >>> Pine is having some problems working with our new IMAP server which >>> prevents some messages from being saved in folders, both >>> automatically >>> via a filter/rule and manually. >>> >>> I?m just wondering if anyone is interested in providing this in >>> the >>> CSW distro. Just thought I?d ask. We?d be willing to test it, >>> but >>> couldn?t be the maintainer. >>> >>> Thx again, >>> Jon >>> >>> >>> *Jon Fechner* >>> *Information Technology* >>> *Engineering Tools* >>> >>> *Office: 630-798-6501* >>> *Mobile**: 630-605-6506 * >>> *jon.fechner at tellabs.com * >>> >>> >>> >>> ============================================================ >>> The information contained in this message may be privileged >>> and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader >>> of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee >>> or agent responsible for delivering this message to the >>> intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reproduction, >>> dissemination or distribution of this communication is strictly >>> prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, >>> please notify us immediately by replying to the message and >>> deleting it from your computer. Thank you. Tellabs >>> ============================================================ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> users mailing list >>> users at lists.opencsw.org >>> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/users >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> maintainers mailing list >> maintainers at lists.opencsw.org >> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers > > - -- > Thanks, > Mike > > "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, > and more violent. It takes a touch of genius -- and a lot of > courage -- > to move in the opposite direction." > > * Albert Einstein 1879 - 1955 > US German-born Theoretical Physicist > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iEYEARECAAYFAkmu6IIACgkQLrhmsXMSLxc+twCggnWhwNCmuugYpmA4C/h9SfoU > iv4AoKkspphmqI+WswaDJLccIC819Bx0 > =mys9 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > maintainers mailing list > maintainers at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers From dam at opencsw.org Wed Mar 4 21:57:33 2009 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 21:57:33 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] CSW LSOF package no longer works in Sol 10/Sparc/T5240 Setup In-Reply-To: References: <20090208.11394400.1182175421@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk> <498F272F.4060804@opencsw.org> Message-ID: <16F28F1D-10FB-4F5A-85C2-4392BDBE68BC@opencsw.org> Hi Jean-Luc, Am 10.02.2009 um 18:43 schrieb JL Picard: > After installing the LSOF package on a new install of the latest > Solaris 10 > revision on a T5240 server, LSOF no longer seems to work and I see a > lot of > msgs like the following, when I run "/opt/csw/bin/lsof -i": > no TCP/UDP/IP information available > > A quick test with the latest version of LSOF on www.sunfreeware.com > for Sol > 10 seems to work fine. Perhaps there is a requirement for a > specific Sol10 > package for LSOF now? Yes, there is. And that makes building a combined package suitable for NFS-Sharing not easy. However, it is noted that lsof is a useful and widely accepted packages which needs updating. Sorry for the inconvenience -- Dago From bwalton at opencsw.org Wed Mar 4 22:04:58 2009 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 16:04:58 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Problems with makepatch In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1236200557-sup-2750@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> Excerpts from Dagobert Michelsen's message of Wed Mar 04 15:51:29 -0500 2009: > Basically, 'makepatch' is currently broken in mGAR v2 when modulated > builds were introduced. In mGAR v1 it works :-( It is on my long list > of things to fix and enhance... > > Ben, want to take a shot? ...well, since I wasn't even aware of this feature until now, I'm certainly interested in it. I've been doing patches manually up to this point (or importing the source with git and using git-format-patch). This sounds like a nice feature though, so I'll take a stab at getting it back in action. Thanks -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 GPG Key Id: 8E89F6D2; Key Server: pgp.mit.edu Contact me to arrange for a CAcert assurance meeting. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20090304/ab1d236c/attachment.asc From ja at baltic-online.de Wed Mar 4 22:05:11 2009 From: ja at baltic-online.de (Juergen Arndt) Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 22:05:11 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Possible bug / type in gar.mk? Message-ID: Hi, I noticed the following, when I did a "gmake install": [===== NOW BUILDING: pnp-0.4.13 MODULATION isa-sparcv8: ISA=sparcv8 =====] [extract-modulated] complete for pnp. [test-modulated] complete for pnp. POST_INSTALL_TARGETS := strip fixconfig gmake[1]: POST_INSTALL_TARGETS: Command not found gmake[1]: *** [test-modulated] Error 127 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/home/ja/mgar/pkg/pnp/trunk' gmake: *** [install-isa-sparcv8] Error 2 In packages, I checked out some more days ago, everything was fine. So I figured out, that in gar.mk the following line is indented - which leads to that error. Without indention the installation step was ok. ifneq ($(GARFLAVOR),DBG) POST_INSTALL_TARGETS := strip $(POST_INSTALL_TARGETS) <----- endif Could someone take look to proof that? Juergen -- Juergen Arndt From bwalton at opencsw.org Wed Mar 4 22:27:03 2009 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 16:27:03 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Possible bug / type in gar.mk? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1236201976-sup-828@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> Excerpts from Juergen Arndt's message of Wed Mar 04 16:05:11 -0500 2009: > In packages, I checked out some more days ago, everything was fine. So I > figured out, that in gar.mk the following line is indented - which leads > to that error. Without indention the installation step was ok. Confirmed that I saw the error today, but I haven't had a chance to diagnose it yet. I'll test your fix later and let you know. Thanks -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 GPG Key Id: 8E89F6D2; Key Server: pgp.mit.edu Contact me to arrange for a CAcert assurance meeting. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20090304/9b8f88bc/attachment.asc From dam at opencsw.org Wed Mar 4 22:37:38 2009 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 22:37:38 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Possible bug / type in gar.mk? In-Reply-To: <1236201976-sup-828@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> References: <1236201976-sup-828@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: <305013BD-4FED-41C6-BDBF-EA1767330E80@opencsw.org> Hi Ben, Am 04.03.2009 um 22:27 schrieb Ben Walton: > Excerpts from Juergen Arndt's message of Wed Mar 04 16:05:11 -0500 > 2009: >> In packages, I checked out some more days ago, everything was fine. >> So I >> figured out, that in gar.mk the following line is indented - which >> leads >> to that error. Without indention the installation step was ok. > > Confirmed that I saw the error today, but I haven't had a chance to > diagnose it yet. I'll test your fix later and let you know. I already notified Sebastian: Am 03.03.2009 um 16:09 schrieb skayser at users.sourceforge.net: > Revision: 3566 > http://gar.svn.sourceforge.net/gar/?rev=3566&view=rev > Author: skayser > Date: 2009-03-03 15:09:38 +0000 (Tue, 03 Mar 2009) > > Log Message: > ----------- > When GARFLAVOR=DBG drop strip from $(POST_INSTALL_TARGETS) > > Modified Paths: > -------------- > csw/mgar/gar/v2/gar.mk > > Modified: csw/mgar/gar/v2/gar.mk > =================================================================== > --- csw/mgar/gar/v2/gar.mk 2009-03-03 12:40:35 UTC (rev 3565) > +++ csw/mgar/gar/v2/gar.mk 2009-03-03 15:09:38 UTC (rev 3566) > @@ -415,7 +415,10 @@ > $(DONADA) > > # strip - Strip executables > -POST_INSTALL_TARGETS := strip $(POST_INSTALL_TARGETS) > +ifneq ($(GARFLAVOR),DBG) > + POST_INSTALL_TARGETS := strip $(POST_INSTALL_TARGETS) > +endif > + > strip: > @for target in $(STRIP_DIRS) $(DESTDIR)$(bindir) $(DESTDIR)$ > (sbindir) ; \ > do \ > > > This was sent by the SourceForge.net collaborative development > platform, the world's largest Open Source development site. > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Best regards -- Dago From skayser at opencsw.org Wed Mar 4 22:57:13 2009 From: skayser at opencsw.org (Sebastian Kayser) Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 22:57:13 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Possible bug / type in gar.mk? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <49AEF939.5000005@opencsw.org> Juergen Arndt wrote: > I noticed the following, when I did a "gmake install": > > [===== NOW BUILDING: pnp-0.4.13 MODULATION isa-sparcv8: ISA=sparcv8 =====] > [extract-modulated] complete for pnp. > [test-modulated] complete for pnp. > POST_INSTALL_TARGETS := strip fixconfig > gmake[1]: POST_INSTALL_TARGETS: Command not found > gmake[1]: *** [test-modulated] Error 127 > gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/home/ja/mgar/pkg/pnp/trunk' > gmake: *** [install-isa-sparcv8] Error 2 > > In packages, I checked out some more days ago, everything was fine. So I > figured out, that in gar.mk the following line is indented - which leads > to that error. Without indention the installation step was ok. > > > ifneq ($(GARFLAVOR),DBG) > POST_INSTALL_TARGETS := strip $(POST_INSTALL_TARGETS) <----- > endif > > > Could someone take look to proof that? Sorry, my bad. Somehow i was urged to indent ... Fixed in r3586. Thanks for reporting. Sebastian From mwatters at opencsw.org Fri Mar 6 00:37:32 2009 From: mwatters at opencsw.org (Mike Watters) Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2009 17:37:32 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] Python 2.6 and mod_python Message-ID: <49B0623C.1080806@opencsw.org> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 unless I receive negative feed back: I plan to release the "fixed" python 2.6 packages as well as mod_python next week. the changes from the current version are: forced architecture to be v8 fixed python-config --ldflags to include -L and -R flags correctly. mod_python is just a recompile against the new python - -- Thanks, Mike "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius -- and a lot of courage -- to move in the opposite direction." * Albert Einstein 1879 - 1955 US German-born Theoretical Physicist -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkmwYjwACgkQLrhmsXMSLxfn+wCeMDrWVzdgtznt8B6J8Qz2oVCM PQYAoIzTBjliT5iWdB3SR/KW7az85VEC =12Ix -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From mwatters at opencsw.org Fri Mar 6 03:22:43 2009 From: mwatters at opencsw.org (Mike Watters) Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2009 20:22:43 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] gnupg_minimal, gnupg and gnupg2 now in Testing Message-ID: <49B088F3.9020607@opencsw.org> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 changes: gnupg_minimal and gnupg updated to version 1.4.9 gnupg2 at 2.0.10 all include 64 bit isaexec - -- Thanks, Mike "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius -- and a lot of courage -- to move in the opposite direction." * Albert Einstein 1879 - 1955 US German-born Theoretical Physicist -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkmwiPIACgkQLrhmsXMSLxcLSgCgy63QCXSmoKOCYqOFfY9DnRg0 nBMAn28MbANnIdYjO9LEANN/4kBwj1yQ =gHF0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From res at colnet.cmhnet.org Fri Mar 6 05:58:17 2009 From: res at colnet.cmhnet.org (Rob Stampfli) Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 23:58:17 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Python 2.6 and mod_python In-Reply-To: <49B0623C.1080806@opencsw.org> References: <49B0623C.1080806@opencsw.org> Message-ID: <20090306045816.GA11608@keevey> On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 05:37:32PM -0600, Mike Watters wrote: > unless I receive negative feed back: > I plan to release the "fixed" python 2.6 packages as well as mod_python next week. > > the changes from the current version are: forced architecture to be v8 > fixed python-config --ldflags to include -L and -R flags correctly. > > mod_python is just a recompile against the new python Tonight I downloaded the python-2.6.1,REV=2009.03.02-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz package from the opencsw.org buildfarm and installed it on my little LX, a sparcv8 machine. The poor LX still hasn't figured out what's hit it, but it seems to be working its way through the test subdirectory, so far, without incident. So, the rebuild is looking good to me. Didn't download or test the modpython or python_tk packages. Thanks for fixing this, Mike, and for your continuing role in supporting us opencsw users! Rob From ihsan at opencsw.org Fri Mar 6 17:38:35 2009 From: ihsan at opencsw.org (Ihsan Dogan) Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2009 17:38:35 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] unbound recursive DNS server in testing Message-ID: <49B1518B.9000702@opencsw.org> Hello, I've packaged Unbound and put it into testing. http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/unbound-1.2.1,REV=2009.03.06-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/unbound-1.2.1,REV=2009.03.06-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz >From Wikipedia: Unbound is a validating, recursive, and caching DNS server software product from NLnet Labs, VeriSign Inc., Nominet, and Kirei. It is distributed free of charge in open source form under the BSD license. Originally designed by Jakob Schlyter of Kirei and Roy Arends of Nominet in 2004, funding was provided by Verisign and ep.net to develop a prototype written in Java (David Blacka and Matt Larson, VeriSign). Starting in 2006 the prototype was re-written for high-performance in the C programming language by NLnet Labs. Unbound is designed as a set of modular components that incorporate modern features, such as enhanced security (DNSSEC) validation, Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6), and a client resolver library API as an integral part of the architecture. Ihsan -- ihsan at dogan.ch http://blog.dogan.ch/ From ja at baltic-online.de Sat Mar 7 19:17:10 2009 From: ja at baltic-online.de (Juergen Arndt) Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2009 19:17:10 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Problems building packages with SMF Message-ID: Hi all, (I posted this message yesterday to the devel list, I think, this is the better place for that. Sorry double posting.) I was trying to build a package with SMF support (the old style, without cswclassutils). During the packaging phase I got the following errors: ## Building pkgmap from package prototype file. ERROR in /home/ja/tmp/nrpe/trunk/work/build-global/CSWnrpe.prototype-sparc: no object for <$WORKDIR_FIRSTMOD/nrpe> found in root directory no object for <$WORKDIR_FIRSTMOD/nrpe.xml> found in root directory no object for <$WORKDIR_FIRSTMOD/svc-nrpe> found in root directory pkgmk: ERROR: unable to build pkgmap from prototype file ## Packaging was not successful. It turned out, that this happends with packages checked out in the very last few days. Building the same (and identical) package, checked out earlier, is no problem. Could anyone give me a hint? Maybe a typo in gar? Or did I miss something? Juergen -- Juergen Arndt From bonivart at opencsw.org Sat Mar 7 19:29:36 2009 From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart) Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 19:29:36 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Problems building packages with SMF In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <625385e30903071029q641cd529m3207fc9b33fb1b8a@mail.gmail.com> On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 7:17 PM, Juergen Arndt wrote: > I was trying to build a package with SMF support (the old style, without > cswclassutils). During the packaging phase I got the following errors: Is your XML manifest complicated? If it's basic you could use cswclassutils easily. http://wiki.opencsw.org/cswclassutils-package#toc0 > ## Building pkgmap from package prototype file. > ERROR in /home/ja/tmp/nrpe/trunk/work/build-global/CSWnrpe.prototype-sparc: > ? ? ?no object for <$WORKDIR_FIRSTMOD/nrpe> found in root directory > ? ? ?no object for <$WORKDIR_FIRSTMOD/nrpe.xml> found in root directory > ? ? ?no object for <$WORKDIR_FIRSTMOD/svc-nrpe> found in root directory > pkgmk: ERROR: unable to build pkgmap from prototype file > ## Packaging was not successful. I think Trygve wrote the GAR SMF support but that was before Dago heavily updated GAR so something may have broken. I'm sure those two can fix it again. -- /peter From mwatters at opencsw.org Mon Mar 9 01:37:46 2009 From: mwatters at opencsw.org (Mike Watters) Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2009 19:37:46 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] PHP5 and extentions now in Testing Message-ID: <49B464DA.2050203@opencsw.org> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Changes: compile version 5.2.6 with extensions (version not changed) recompile only to build the extensions. The Following extensions are included in this release php5_bcmath php5_bz2 php5_calendar php5_ctype php5_curl php5_dba php5_dbase php5_devel php5_dom php5_exif php5_filter php5_ftp php5_gd php5_gettext php5_gmp php5_hash php5_iconv php5_imap php5_json php5_ldap php5_mbstring php5_mcrypt php5_mhash php5_mime_magic php5_mssql php5_mysql php5_mysqli php5_ncurses php5_odbc php5_openssl php5_pcntl php5_pdomysql php5_pdoodbc php5_pdopgsql php5_pdosqlite php5_pgsql php5_posix php5_pspell php5_session php5_shmop php5_snmp php5_soap php5_sockets php5_sqlite php5_sysvmsg php5_sysvsem php5_sysvshm php5_tidy php5_tokenizer php5_wddx php5_xmlreader php5_xmlrpc php5_xmlwriter php5_xsl php5_zip - -- Thanks, Mike "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius -- and a lot of courage -- to move in the opposite direction." * Albert Einstein 1879 - 1955 US German-born Theoretical Physicist -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkm0ZNkACgkQLrhmsXMSLxelBQCfZNQ6KNjL2RZhKBsT794RZYP4 iy8AnjrNAm/IHryBwGLdvdPwan0DjEJ4 =dqTE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From maciej.blizinski at gmail.com Mon Mar 9 15:21:04 2009 From: maciej.blizinski at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Blizi=C5=84ski?=) Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 14:21:04 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] Where to report issues with GAR? Message-ID: For package-related issues we have http://www.opencsw.org/bugtrack - how about issues with GAR itself? Mantis installation doesn't have a 'gar' project. Looking around SourceForge, I found a bug tracker for the GAR project: http://sourceforge.net/tracker2/?atid=1075770&group_id=229205&func=browse I submitted a few issues, but the tracker seems otherwise empty. I'm not sure if it's the right place. Any ideas? From dam at opencsw.org Mon Mar 9 15:49:51 2009 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 15:49:51 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Where to report issues with GAR? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <7E83A24F-4D3E-47F6-A30E-C294E85DA8B0@opencsw.org> Hi Maciej, Am 09.03.2009 um 15:21 schrieb Maciej Blizi?ski: > For package-related issues we have http://www.opencsw.org/bugtrack - > how about issues with GAR itself? > > Mantis installation doesn't have a 'gar' project. This is correct, because Mantis is only for released packages and GAR is not (yet) a package. > Looking around > SourceForge, I found a bug tracker for the GAR project: > http://sourceforge.net/tracker2/?atid=1075770&group_id=229205&func=browse > > I submitted a few issues, but the tracker seems otherwise empty. I'm > not sure if it's the right place. Any ideas? The place is right and I'll take care of your bugs. Thanks for the report! -- Dago From ja at baltic-online.de Mon Mar 9 19:49:15 2009 From: ja at baltic-online.de (Juergen Arndt) Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 19:49:15 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] cswproto not found Message-ID: Hi all, while trying to build a package on host build10s, I get the following message: gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/home/ja/mgar/pkg/pnp/trunk' mkdir -p cookies/global/. && date >> cookies/global/merge-license-CSWpnp [merge-license] complete for pnp. [merge] complete for pnp. /bin/sh: cswproto: not found gmake: *** [work/build-global/prototype] Error 1 Building the same package on build8s is no problem. I can reproduce this behaviour with any package I tried to build until now. Does anyone have an idea? Juergen -- Juergen Arndt Baltic Online Computer GmbH Firmensitz: Alter Markt 1-2, 24103 Kiel http://www.baltic-online.de Tel.: +49 (0)431 54003-0 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Erik Cickovskis, Amtsgericht Kiel, HRB 3756 From rmacduff at opencsw.org Mon Mar 9 21:32:34 2009 From: rmacduff at opencsw.org (Ross Macduff) Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 16:32:34 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] gsed 4.1.5 in testing Message-ID: <1236630606-sup-8404@frog.chass.utoronto.ca> Hi All, gsed 4.1.5 is now available for testing: gsed-4.1.5,REV=2009.03.09 Please let me know if there are any issues with it. Thanks, Ross -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20090309/6cc4bf98/attachment-0001.asc From maciej.blizinski at gmail.com Tue Mar 10 08:50:35 2009 From: maciej.blizinski at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Blizi=C5=84ski?=) Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 07:50:35 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] cswproto not found In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 6:49 PM, Juergen Arndt wrote: > Hi all, > > while trying to build a package on host build10s, I get the following > message: > > > gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/home/ja/mgar/pkg/pnp/trunk' > mkdir -p cookies/global/. && date >> cookies/global/merge-license-CSWpnp > ? ? ? ? [merge-license] complete for pnp. > ? ? ? ? [merge] complete for pnp. > /bin/sh: cswproto: not found > gmake: *** [work/build-global/prototype] Error 1 > > > Building the same package on build8s is no problem. I can reproduce this > behaviour with any package I tried to build until now. Does anyone have an > idea? I saw the same problem: https://sourceforge.net/tracker2/?func=detail&aid=2674516&group_id=229205&atid=1075770 Is it gar v1 or v2? You can check that using: "grep http gar/.svn/entries" Maciej From ja at baltic-online.de Tue Mar 10 11:21:04 2009 From: ja at baltic-online.de (Juergen Arndt) Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 11:21:04 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] cswproto not found In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Maciej, >> gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/home/ja/mgar/pkg/pnp/trunk' >> mkdir -p cookies/global/. && date >> cookies/global/merge-license-CSWpnp >> ? ? ? ? [merge-license] complete for pnp. >> ? ? ? ? [merge] complete for pnp. >> /bin/sh: cswproto: not found >> gmake: *** [work/build-global/prototype] Error 1 >> >> >> Building the same package on build8s is no problem. I can reproduce this >> behaviour with any package I tried to build until now. Does anyone have >> an >> idea? > > I saw the same problem: > https://sourceforge.net/tracker2/?func=detail&aid=2674516&group_id=229205&atid=1075770 > > Is it gar v1 or v2? > > You can check that using: "grep http gar/.svn/entries" thanks for your reply. It's gar v2. Juergen -- Juergen Arndt From maciej.blizinski at gmail.com Tue Mar 10 13:34:21 2009 From: maciej.blizinski at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Blizi=C5=84ski?=) Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 12:34:21 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] cswproto not found In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Juergen Arndt wrote: > thanks for your reply. It's gar v2. What does "gmake modenv" show you? From ja at baltic-online.de Tue Mar 10 14:13:57 2009 From: ja at baltic-online.de (Juergen Arndt) Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 14:13:57 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] cswproto not found In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: > What does "gmake modenv" show you? On the Solaris 8 host and on Solaris 10 it's the same output, except the "merge exclude line": Arch: sparc Kernel: sparcv9 Default ISA 32: sparcv8 Default ISA 64: sparcv9 Requested ISAs: sparcv8 Needed ISAs: sparcv8 Build ISAs: sparcv8 ISAEXEC dirs: ISAEXEC files: Merge include: Merge exclude: /opt/csw/share/info/dir /opt/csw/lib/.*\.la .*\~ /opt/csw/lib/.*\.a Requested compiler flags: * Modulation isa-sparcv8: ISA=sparcv8 PATH = /home/ja/mgar/pkg/pnp/trunk/work/install-isa-sparcv8/opt/csw/bin:/home/ja/mgar/pkg/pnp/trunk/work/install-isa-sparcv8/opt/csw/bin:/home/ja/mgar/pkg/pnp/trunk/work/install-isa-sparcv8/opt/csw/sbin:/home/ja/mgar/pkg/pnp/trunk/work/install-isa-sparcv8/opt/csw/sbin:/opt/csw/bin:/opt/csw/bin:/opt/csw/sbin:/opt/csw/sbin:/opt/studio/SOS11/SUNWspro/bin:/home/ja/mgar/pkg/pnp/trunk/gar/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/java/bin:/usr/ccs/bin PKG_CONFIG_PATH = /opt/csw/lib/pkgconfig CFLAGS = -xO3 -xarch=v8 -I/opt/csw/include CXXFLAGS = -xO3 -xarch=v8 -I/opt/csw/include CPPFLAGS = -I/opt/csw/include LDFLAGS = -L/usr/ucblib ASFLAGS = OPTFLAGS = -xO3 -xarch=v8 I guess, the path variable is important, and there "/home/ja/mgar/pkg/pnp/trunk/gar/bin" - there "cswproto" is located. But I have no idea, why it works on the Solaris 8 system and not on Solaris 10. Juergen -- Juergen Arndt Baltic Online Computer GmbH Firmensitz: Alter Markt 1-2, 24103 Kiel http://www.baltic-online.de Tel.: +49 (0)431 54003-0 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Erik Cickovskis, Amtsgericht Kiel, HRB 3756 From maciej.blizinski at gmail.com Tue Mar 10 18:57:28 2009 From: maciej.blizinski at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Blizi=C5=84ski?=) Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 17:57:28 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] cswproto not found In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Juergen Arndt wrote: > ? ? ? ? LDFLAGS = -L/usr/ucblib Unrelated issue, but I couldn't resist - why do you need ucblib? > I guess, the path variable is important, and there > "/home/ja/mgar/pkg/pnp/trunk/gar/bin" - there "cswproto" is located. But I > have no idea, why it works on the Solaris 8 system and not on Solaris 10. That might be a stupid question, but have you verified that /home/ja/mgar/pkg/pnp/trunk/gar/bin/cswproto exists in your Solaris 10 system? From ja at baltic-online.de Tue Mar 10 19:02:25 2009 From: ja at baltic-online.de (Juergen Arndt) Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 19:02:25 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] cswproto not found In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 18:57:28 +0100, Maciej Blizi?ski wrote: > On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Juergen Arndt > wrote: >> ? ? ? ? LDFLAGS = -L/usr/ucblib > > Unrelated issue, but I couldn't resist - why do you need ucblib? In that special case I need it for Solaris 8. The software I want to package uses C functions, which are not in the Sol-8-libs, so I had to use the ucb libs. >> I guess, the path variable is important, and there >> "/home/ja/mgar/pkg/pnp/trunk/gar/bin" - there "cswproto" is located. >> But I >> have no idea, why it works on the Solaris 8 system and not on Solaris >> 10. > > That might be a stupid question, but have you verified that > /home/ja/mgar/pkg/pnp/trunk/gar/bin/cswproto exists in your Solaris 10 > system? I did and cswproto exists there. Juergen -- Juergen Arndt Baltic Online Computer GmbH Firmensitz: Alter Markt 1-2, 24103 Kiel http://www.baltic-online.de Tel.: +49 (0)431 54003-0 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Erik Cickovskis, Amtsgericht Kiel, HRB 3756 From maciej.blizinski at gmail.com Tue Mar 10 19:35:15 2009 From: maciej.blizinski at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Blizi=C5=84ski?=) Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 18:35:15 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] cswproto not found In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 6:02 PM, Juergen Arndt wrote: > In that special case I need it for Solaris 8. The software I want to > package uses C functions, which are not in the Sol-8-libs, so I had to use > the ucb libs. You don't have -I/usr/ucbinclude in your CPPFLAGS. If you don't have them, you can have problems like readdir() function stripping off first 2 characters of every file. I spent half a day today debugging that. You need to either use -I/usr/ucbinclude and -L/usr/ucblib, or none. Also, as a side note - if you're specifying -L/usr/ucblib, it's a good idea to specify also -R/usr/ucblib which will make the binary search /usr/ucblib for libraries during runtime. Otherwise you can get an error with a shared library not found. >>> I guess, the path variable is important, and there >>> "/home/ja/mgar/pkg/pnp/trunk/gar/bin" - there "cswproto" is located. >>> But I >>> have no idea, why it works on the Solaris 8 system and not on Solaris >>> 10. >> >> That might be a stupid question, but have you verified that >> /home/ja/mgar/pkg/pnp/trunk/gar/bin/cswproto exists in your Solaris 10 >> system? > > I did and cswproto exists there. So it's not that. I'd suggest setting variable DEBUG_PACKAGING in your main Makefile and editing gar/gar.pkg.mk around line 228 - you could add something like "echo PATH: $$PATH" to see what's going on in there. From maciej.blizinski at gmail.com Tue Mar 10 22:20:50 2009 From: maciej.blizinski at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Blizi=C5=84ski?=) Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 21:20:50 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] GAR builds license Message-ID: What is the license of GAR build files? Let's say I contribute a GAR build, which is essentially a bit of code. What license applies to this code? Where is the license specified? Should GAR Makefiles contain some form of a copyright note? Maciej From william at wbonnet.net Tue Mar 10 23:49:46 2009 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 23:49:46 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] /testing dbus 1.2.12 is available Message-ID: <49B6EE8A.6050007@wbonnet.net> Hi all dbus has been updated to version 1.2.12 and is available from testing. Thanks for your feedbacks cheers W. -- William http://www.wbonnet.net http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix http://www.opencsw.org Community SoftWare for Solaris http://www.guses.org French speaking Solaris User Group From dam at opencsw.org Tue Mar 10 23:51:28 2009 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 23:51:28 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] cswproto not found In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi, Am 09.03.2009 um 19:49 schrieb Juergen Arndt: > while trying to build a package on host build10s, I get the following > message: > > > gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/home/ja/mgar/pkg/pnp/trunk' > mkdir -p cookies/global/. && date >> cookies/global/merge-license- > CSWpnp > [merge-license] complete for pnp. > [merge] complete for pnp. > /bin/sh: cswproto: not found > gmake: *** [work/build-global/prototype] Error 1 > > > Building the same package on build8s is no problem. I can reproduce > this > behaviour with any package I tried to build until now. Does anyone > have an > idea? This kind of error is usually generated when an old version of gmake is in the path. Older versions of gmake don't understand $(abspath ...) and always return the empty string. As the result is used as a path that one is missing. On build10s was SUNWgmake installed which I deinstalled now. It may be a good idea to write some kind of test case which bails out if an unsuitable version of gmake is found. Please see if this really solved your problem. Best regards -- Dago From dam at opencsw.org Tue Mar 10 23:57:10 2009 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 23:57:10 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] cswproto not found In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <98313864-AC54-4D83-AD69-035832E45F81@opencsw.org> Hi Maciej, Am 10.03.2009 um 08:50 schrieb Maciej Blizi?ski: > Is it gar v1 or v2? > > You can check that using: "grep http gar/.svn/entries" This is, uhm, very creative ;-) The usual way to check this is via > dam at login [login]:/home/dam/mgar/pkg/autoconf > svn propget > svn:externals trunk/ > gar https://gar.svn.sf.net/svnroot/gar/csw/mgar/gar/v2 Best regards -- Dago From dam at opencsw.org Wed Mar 11 00:03:34 2009 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 00:03:34 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] GAR builds license In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi, Am 10.03.2009 um 22:20 schrieb Maciej Blizi?ski: > What is the license of GAR build files? Let's say I contribute a GAR > build, which is essentially a bit of code. What license applies to > this code? Where is the license specified? Should GAR Makefiles > contain some form of a copyright note? As mGAR was derived from GAR which was derived from GARNOME which was released under GPL I always thought everything in the repository was also under GPL, but I can't find a license anywhere. I guess we should add a central note about the license. Best regards -- Dago From bwalton at opencsw.org Wed Mar 11 00:20:05 2009 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 19:20:05 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] GAR builds license In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1236727099-sup-7200@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> Excerpts from Dagobert Michelsen's message of Tue Mar 10 19:03:34 -0400 2009: > As mGAR was derived from GAR which was derived from GARNOME which > was released under GPL I always thought everything in the repository > was also under GPL, but I can't find a license anywhere. I guess we > should add a central note about the license. This is something I've been wondering about lately too. GPL (2 or 3, I'm easy) would be my preference. If GAR's heritage is already in the GPL, that works for me! -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 GPG Key Id: 8E89F6D2; Key Server: pgp.mit.edu Contact me to arrange for a CAcert assurance meeting. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20090310/34ccdb25/attachment.asc From maciej.blizinski at gmail.com Wed Mar 11 08:47:51 2009 From: maciej.blizinski at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Blizi=C5=84ski?=) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 07:47:51 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] GAR builds license In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 11:03 PM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > As mGAR was derived from GAR which was derived from GARNOME which > was released under GPL I always thought everything in the repository > was also under GPL, but I can't find a license anywhere. Could a header be used in each Makefile? Something along the lines of: http://devmanual.gentoo.org/ebuild-writing/file-format/index.html#ebuild-header > I guess we should add a central note about the license. Or even two notes, one applying to mGAR itself (probably placed in [1]), and one applying to the builds. [1] https://gar.svn.sf.net/svnroot/gar/csw/mgar/gar/v2/ From maciej.blizinski at gmail.com Wed Mar 11 08:56:32 2009 From: maciej.blizinski at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Blizi=C5=84ski?=) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 07:56:32 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] cswproto not found In-Reply-To: <98313864-AC54-4D83-AD69-035832E45F81@opencsw.org> References: <98313864-AC54-4D83-AD69-035832E45F81@opencsw.org> Message-ID: On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:57 PM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > Hi Maciej, > > Am 10.03.2009 um 08:50 schrieb Maciej Blizi?ski: >> Is it gar v1 or v2? >> >> You can check that using: "grep http gar/.svn/entries" > > This is, uhm, very creative ;-) The usual way to check this > is via > >> dam at login [login]:/home/dam/mgar/pkg/autoconf > svn propget >> svn:externals trunk/ >> gar https://gar.svn.sf.net/svnroot/gar/csw/mgar/gar/v2 There's a problem with svn:externals: if you create new directory (e.g. for a new software package) and you add the property svn:externals, you need first to commit your directory (and svn:externals) and _then_ you can check out the externals. I had to do copy the directory with gar, and coulnd't have svn:externals property set. There probably is a better way of checking this, though. From maciej.blizinski at gmail.com Wed Mar 11 09:54:26 2009 From: maciej.blizinski at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Blizi=C5=84ski?=) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 08:54:26 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables Message-ID: I'm trying to build a package using gcc4. Running configure... checking build system type... i386-pc-solaris2.10 checking host system type... i386-pc-solaris2.10 configuring for rxvt 9.06 checking for gcc... /opt/csw/gcc4/bin/gcc checking for C compiler default output file name... configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables See `config.log' for more details. gmake[1]: *** [configure-work/build-isa-i386/rxvt-unicode-9.06/configure] Error 77 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/home/maciej/src/opencsw/pkg/rxvt-unicode/trunk' gmake: *** [merge-isa-i386] Error 2 Looking into config.log: configure:2228: /opt/csw/gcc4/bin/gcc --version >&5 gcc (GCC) 4.0.2 Copyright (C) 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. configure:2231: $? = 0 configure:2238: /opt/csw/gcc4/bin/gcc -v >&5 Reading specs from /opt/csw/gcc4/lib/gcc/i386-pc-solaris2.8/4.0.2/specs Target: i386-pc-solaris2.8 Configured with: ../sources/gcc-4.0.2/configure --prefix=/opt/csw/gcc4 --with-lo cal-prefix=/opt/csw --with-gnu-as --with-as=/opt/csw/bin/gas --without-gnu-ld -- with-ld=/usr/ccs/bin/ld --enable-threads=posix --enable-shared --enable-multilib --enable-nls --with-included-gettext --with-libiconv-prefix=/opt/csw --with-x - -enable-java-awt=xlib --with-system-zlib --enable-languages=c,c++,f95,java,objc, ada Thread model: posix gcc version 4.0.2 configure:2241: $? = 0 configure:2248: /opt/csw/gcc4/bin/gcc -V >&5 gcc: '-V' option must have argument configure:2251: $? = 1 configure:2274: checking for C compiler default output file name configure:2301: /opt/csw/gcc4/bin/gcc -xlibmil -errtags=yes -erroff=E_EMPTY_DECL ARATION -xlibmil -errtags=yes -erroff=E_EMPTY_DECLARATION -L/opt/csw/lib -R/opt /csw/lib -L/opt/csw/lib -R/opt/csw/lib conftest.c >&5 gcc: language libmil not recognized gcc: language libmil not recognized ld: warning: option -e appears more than once, first setting taken ld: warning: option -e appears more than once, first setting taken ld: warning: option -e appears more than once, first setting taken ld: fatal: file conftest.c: unknown file type ld: fatal: File processing errors. No output written to a.out collect2: ld returned 1 exit status configure:2304: $? = 1 My guess is that instead of /opt/csw/bin/gld, /usr/ccs/bin/ld is used. My Makefile is: =========================================================== GARNAME = rxvt-unicode GARVERSION = 9.06 CATEGORIES = x11 # http://dist.schmorp.de/rxvt-unicode/rxvt-unicode-9.06.tar.bz2 DESCRIPTION = Unicode-enabled terminal emulator define BLURB LONG DESCRIPTION endef MASTER_SITES = http://dist.schmorp.de/rxvt-unicode/ DISTFILES = $(GARNAME)-$(GARVERSION).tar.bz2 DISTFILES += $(call admfiles,CSWurxvt,) # We define upstream file regex so we can be notifed of new upstream software release UFILES_REGEX = $(GARNAME)-(\d+(?:\.\d+)*).tar.gz CONFIGURE_ARGS = $(DIRPATHS) CONFIGURE_ARGS += --disable-perl GARCOMPILER = GNU include gar/category.mk =========================================================== and files/CSWurxvt.gspec: =========================================================== %var bitname urxvt %var pkgname CSWurxvt %include url file://%{PKGLIB}/csw_dyndepend.gspec %copyright url file://%{WORKSRC}/COPYING =========================================================== As a workaround, I could use: chmod 644 /usr/ccs/bin/ld cd /opt/csw/bin/ ln -s gld ld But it's ugly. Do you have any better ideas? I looked into the configure script of my software package, but it doesn't have any option to specify the ld binary. From maciej.blizinski at gmail.com Wed Mar 11 10:53:55 2009 From: maciej.blizinski at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Blizi=C5=84ski?=) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 09:53:55 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] A build for review: rxvt-unicode Message-ID: The build is at: http://netra.chopin.edu.pl/~maciej/rxvt-unicode-9.06-gar-build.tar.gz2 It contains a patch for categories/x11/category.mk. Would someone care to review the build so I could improve it? Maciej From maciej.blizinski at gmail.com Wed Mar 11 11:11:38 2009 From: maciej.blizinski at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Blizi=C5=84ski?=) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 10:11:38 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] /testing dbus 1.2.12 is available In-Reply-To: <49B6EE8A.6050007@wbonnet.net> References: <49B6EE8A.6050007@wbonnet.net> Message-ID: On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:49 PM, William Bonnet wrote: > dbus has been updated to version 1.2.12 and is available from testing. Where is the testing directory available? My mirror [1] only shows 'current' (=='unstable') and 'stable'. [1] http://ftp.heanet.ie/pub/opencsw/ From william at wbonnet.net Wed Mar 11 11:11:53 2009 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 11:11:53 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] /testing dbus 1.2.12 is available In-Reply-To: References: <49B6EE8A.6050007@wbonnet.net> Message-ID: <49B78E69.1030509@wbonnet.net> Hi Maciej > Where is the testing directory available? My mirror [1] only shows > 'current' (=='unstable') and 'stable'. > Testing is not a source you can use with pkg-get or pkgtool. You can access testing from this place : http://www.opencsw.org/testing You have to remove old package and install new by hand Kind rgards, W. -- William http://www.wbonnet.net http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix http://www.opencsw.org Community SoftWare for Solaris http://www.guses.org French speaking Solaris User Group From maciej.blizinski at gmail.com Wed Mar 11 11:22:40 2009 From: maciej.blizinski at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Blizi=C5=84ski?=) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 10:22:40 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] A build for review: rxvt-unicode In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Maciej Blizi?ski wrote: > The build is at: (...) gz2 Apparently, I managed to invent a new compression format. The build is in now at: http://netra.chopin.edu.pl/~maciej/rxvt-unicode-9.06-gar-build.tar.gz As a side note, how is usually build submission done? Are new builds submitted to mantis, or is a mailing list used? Maciej From bonivart at opencsw.org Wed Mar 11 11:27:14 2009 From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 11:27:14 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] /testing dbus 1.2.12 is available In-Reply-To: References: <49B6EE8A.6050007@wbonnet.net> Message-ID: <625385e30903110327l20ce9dd7pffa6879386998c9e@mail.gmail.com> On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Maciej Blizi?ski wrote: > On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:49 PM, William Bonnet wrote: >> dbus has been updated to version 1.2.12 and is available from testing. > > Where is the testing directory available? My mirror [1] only shows > 'current' (=='unstable') and 'stable'. > > [1] http://ftp.heanet.ie/pub/opencsw/ The testing directory is not replicated to other mirrors. You can find it here: http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing.html If you copy your packages to /home/testing it will be available there in a few minutes. -- /peter From skayser at opencsw.org Wed Mar 11 13:08:57 2009 From: skayser at opencsw.org (Sebastian Kayser) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:08:57 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <49B7A9D9.2060902@opencsw.org> Hi Maciej, Maciej Blizi?ski wrote: > I'm trying to build a package using gcc4. Running configure... > ... > ld: fatal: File processing errors. No output written to a.out > > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > > As a workaround, I could use: > > chmod 644 /usr/ccs/bin/ld > cd /opt/csw/bin/ > ln -s gld ld > > But it's ugly. Do you have any better ideas? i am not a gcc expert (compile all my packages with Sun Studio), but i faced a similar question a while ago and that's what i found out then. Other than what one might think, gcc -> /usr/ccs/bin/ld is a valid build chain and according to some a more robust one than gcc -> gld [1,2]. Of course, the configure script has to be clever enough to notice the non GNU ld, which it doesn't seem to be in your case. You might give the -B option [3] to gcc/collect2 a try (pass it along with EXTRA_CFLAGS), although i don't know whether it is intended for that sort of stuff. Any particular reason you are compiling with gcc? Sun Studio 11 is the default compiler used with GAR and its available for free [4]. Install it with a prefix of /opt/studio/SOS11 and you have a machine that closely resembles one of our build hosts. I am not saying that this will make your life easier regarding the builds though ;) I usually tweak the autoconf files or Makefiles until they configure and build with Sun Studio. Sebastian [1] http://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=155501 [2] http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2006-11/msg00301.html [3] http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.0.4/gcc/Directory-Options.html#index-B-664 [4] http://developers.sun.com/sunstudio/products/previous/11/index.jsp From william at wbonnet.net Wed Mar 11 16:35:11 2009 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 16:35:11 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] A build for review: rxvt-unicode In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <49B7DA2F.8030004@wbonnet.net> Hi Maciej > Apparently, I managed to invent a new compression format. > > The build is in now at: > http://netra.chopin.edu.pl/~maciej/rxvt-unicode-9.06-gar-build.tar.gz > > Thanks, i'll give it a look tonight when i'll beback home. > As a side note, how is usually build submission done? Are new builds > submitted to mantis, or is a mailing list used? > You have to apply for membership and be subscribed to maintainer list. Then you will have access to the build farm. Packages must be built on the farm, then submitted to Phil for unstable. Kind rgards W. -- William http://www.wbonnet.net http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix http://www.opencsw.org Community SoftWare for Solaris http://www.guses.org French speaking Solaris User Group From ja at baltic-online.de Wed Mar 11 17:45:43 2009 From: ja at baltic-online.de (Juergen Arndt) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:45:43 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] cswproto not found In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi, > This kind of error is usually generated when an old version > of gmake is in the path. Older versions of gmake don't understand > $(abspath ...) and always return the empty string. As the > result is used as a path that one is missing. On build10s > was SUNWgmake installed which I deinstalled now. > > It may be a good idea to write some kind of test case > which bails out if an unsuitable version of gmake is found. > > Please see if this really solved your problem. that was the reason. With the updated version of gmake the problem is solved. Thank you! Juergen -- Juergen Arndt Baltic Online Computer GmbH Firmensitz: Alter Markt 1-2, 24103 Kiel http://www.baltic-online.de Tel.: +49 (0)431 54003-0 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Erik Cickovskis, Amtsgericht Kiel, HRB 3756 From ja at baltic-online.de Wed Mar 11 17:47:32 2009 From: ja at baltic-online.de (Juergen Arndt) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:47:32 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] cswproto not found In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 19:35:15 +0100, Maciej Blizi?ski wrote: > On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 6:02 PM, Juergen Arndt > wrote: >> In that special case I need it for Solaris 8. The software I want to >> package uses C functions, which are not in the Sol-8-libs, so I had to >> use >> the ucb libs. > > You don't have -I/usr/ucbinclude in your CPPFLAGS. If you don't have > them, you can have problems like readdir() function stripping off > first 2 characters of every file. I spent half a day today debugging > that. You need to either use -I/usr/ucbinclude and -L/usr/ucblib, or > none. Also, as a side note - if you're specifying -L/usr/ucblib, it's > a good idea to specify also -R/usr/ucblib which will make the binary > search /usr/ucblib for libraries during runtime. Otherwise you can get > an error with a shared library not found. Oh, thanks for that! I will try that and clean up the makefile. Juergen -- Juergen Arndt From mwatters at opencsw.org Wed Mar 11 18:23:36 2009 From: mwatters at opencsw.org (Mike Watters) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 12:23:36 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] New python dependent packages in Testing Message-ID: <49B7F398.3090604@opencsw.org> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 clearsilver pm_clearsilver py_clearsilver pydocutils pygobject pymysql5 pyorbit pysetuptools pysqlite pysqlite2 silvercity Feedback welcome and thank you for testing!! :) - -- Thanks, Mike "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius -- and a lot of courage -- to move in the opposite direction." * Albert Einstein 1879 - 1955 US German-born Theoretical Physicist -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (SunOS) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkm385gACgkQLrhmsXMSLxfCXACdGwFyuvTCZDMJAddy549R6NGF rmgAn0CJFNi6Eqd2tPiPzWhrI4ev49Fk =0wCS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From mwatters at opencsw.org Wed Mar 11 18:27:02 2009 From: mwatters at opencsw.org (Mike Watters) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 12:27:02 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] New Xchat packages in Testing Message-ID: <49B7F466.2070901@opencsw.org> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 changes: recompile against python 2.6 to change architecture from v8+ to v8 xchat xchat_pl xchat_py xchat_tcl - -- Thanks, Mike "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius -- and a lot of courage -- to move in the opposite direction." * Albert Einstein 1879 - 1955 US German-born Theoretical Physicist -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (SunOS) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkm39GYACgkQLrhmsXMSLxcWdgCfZrhx3az4MyF+YD1pSz1mTCnF z1wAn183eG5Xfuv9EU899nNtgbPdVSCj =aBbN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From william at wbonnet.net Wed Mar 11 21:12:09 2009 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 21:12:09 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] A build for review: rxvt-unicode In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <49B81B19.5090409@wbonnet.net> Hi Maciej Here is a quick review of your package . name of the directory containing the Makefile etc. should be name like the package ( urxvt ) . CATEGORIES = x11 This category is used to build x11 libs, not for all programs running under x11. It does not mean it is an error nor it should not be used. But some applications uses x11, some gnome, some apps. So i warn you to be sure you have checked what is defined by this category file. . UFILES_REGEX should be UFILES_REGEX = $(GARNAME)-(\d+(?:\.\d+)*).tar.bz2= $(GARNAME)-(\d+(?:\.\d+)*).tar.bz2 The regular expression has to match the filename of the source file you download ( not your fault, i'm late at releasing this documentation ;) ) . You are using GCC ? is there a reason why you cannot use SunStudio 11 ? I tried but it does not compile. I think you should look if it is possible or not to propose a patch to make it work with sunstudio. . You should add the following line to your Makefile TEST_SCRIPTS = It will prevent GAR from trying to run tests since the software does provide some . If you don't provide a depend file and use automatic generation (which is good), you should declare dependencies in the Makefile. Add the following line : REQUIRED_PKGS_CSWurxvt = CSWfconfig CSWftype2 CSWlibxft2 CSWlibxrender CSWzlib You can find which package are necessary after first build. In the case of this package the ouput is : Examining 'depend' file system CSWcommon common - common files and dirs for CSW packages SUGGESTION: you may want to add some or all of the following as depends: (Feel free to ignore SUNW or SPRO packages) > CSWfconfig > CSWftype2 > CSWlibxft2 > CSWlibxrender > CSWzlib > SUNWcsl > SUNWcslr > SUNWdpl > SUNWfontconfig > SUNWfreetype2 > SUNWlibms > SUNWlibmsr > SUNWxwplt > SUNWxwrtl > SUNWxwxft > SUNWzlib You have to add all CSW* packages If you rebuild after adding deps you have : Examining 'depend' file system CSWcommon common - common files and dirs for CSW packages application CSWfconfig fontconfig - A library for configuring and customizing font access. application CSWftype2 freetype2 - A free and portable TrueType font rendering engine application CSWlibxft2 libxft2 - FreeType-based font drawing library for X application CSWlibxrender libxrender - fontconfig.org Xrender library application CSWzlib zlib - Zlib Data Compression Library SUGGESTION: you may want to add some or all of the following as depends: (Feel free to ignore SUNW or SPRO packages) > SUNWcsl > SUNWcslr > SUNWdpl > SUNWfontconfig > SUNWfreetype2 > SUNWlibms > SUNWlibmsr > SUNWxwplt > SUNWxwrtl > SUNWxwxft > SUNWzlib I compiled it and installed on a test VM and it works. Thanks for this contribution and your good work. It is almost ready, you can submit it and finish your work on the farm. Regards, W. -- William http://www.wbonnet.net http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix http://www.opencsw.org Community SoftWare for Solaris http://www.guses.org French speaking Solaris User Group From hson at opencsw.org Wed Mar 11 21:34:09 2009 From: hson at opencsw.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Roger_H=E5kansson?=) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 21:34:09 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] New version of distcc in /testing Message-ID: <49B82041.2000406@opencsw.org> Changes - Update to 3.1 - Built with gar From hson at opencsw.org Wed Mar 11 21:34:57 2009 From: hson at opencsw.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Roger_H=E5kansson?=) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 21:34:57 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] New version of pwgen in /testing Message-ID: <49B82071.10406@opencsw.org> Changes: - Update to 2.06 - Built with gar From hson at opencsw.org Wed Mar 11 22:02:48 2009 From: hson at opencsw.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Roger_H=E5kansson?=) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 22:02:48 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] New version of gengetopt in /testing Message-ID: <49B826F8.8020200@opencsw.org> Changes - Update to 2.22 - Built with gar From hson at opencsw.org Wed Mar 11 22:22:12 2009 From: hson at opencsw.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Roger_H=E5kansson?=) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 22:22:12 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] New version of libgc in /testing Message-ID: <49B82B84.7060004@opencsw.org> Changes - Update to 7.0 - Built with gar From hson at opencsw.org Wed Mar 11 22:25:52 2009 From: hson at opencsw.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Roger_H=E5kansson?=) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 22:25:52 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] New version of libnids in /testing Message-ID: <49B82C60.5080208@opencsw.org> Change - Update to 1.23 - Built with gar From hson at opencsw.org Wed Mar 11 22:25:59 2009 From: hson at opencsw.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Roger_H=E5kansson?=) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 22:25:59 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] dsniff package update in /testing Message-ID: <49B82C67.3020903@opencsw.org> Change - Built with gar - Linked against libnids-1.23 From hson at opencsw.org Wed Mar 11 22:41:24 2009 From: hson at opencsw.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Roger_H=E5kansson?=) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 22:41:24 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] New version of w3m in /testing Message-ID: <49B83004.7050800@opencsw.org> Changes - Update to 0.5.2 - Built with gar From maciej.blizinski at gmail.com Thu Mar 12 08:47:29 2009 From: maciej.blizinski at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Blizi=C5=84ski?=) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 07:47:29 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] A build for review: rxvt-unicode In-Reply-To: <49B81B19.5090409@wbonnet.net> References: <49B81B19.5090409@wbonnet.net> Message-ID: Thanks for the review! I'll improve my build and get back to you. On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 8:12 PM, William Bonnet wrote: > . You are using GCC ? is there a reason why you cannot use SunStudio 11 ? > ? ?I tried but it does not compile. I think you should look if it is > possible or not to propose a patch to make it work with sunstudio. Making it work with Sun Studio is the biggest difficulty now. The error message I'm getting almost makes sense: "./../libev/ev++.h", line 636: Error: The name set is ambiguous, ev::base::set::K, ev::base::method>(ev::base::K*) and ev::base::set::K, ev::base::method>(ev::base::K*). Ambiguity, all is good, except the two choices between the 'ambiguous' statements are exactly the same! I mean, I could be unable to read, but I calculated md5sums and they are equal: maciej at quince ~ $ echo 'Error: The name set is ambiguous, ev::base::set::K, ev::base::method>(ev::base::K*) and ev::base::set::K, ev::base::method>(ev::base::K*).' | sed -e 's/.*uous,//' | sed -e 's/\.$//' | sed -e 's/ and /\n/' | while read line; do echo -n "${line}" | md5sum ; done 71745102eb4c293942acba5e1afd257f - 71745102eb4c293942acba5e1afd257f - The bit of code in question uses a big macro to avoid using templates. I'll need some time to pull it apart. From dam at opencsw.org Thu Mar 12 14:10:46 2009 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 14:10:46 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] cswproto not found In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <2781D7E2-6F0E-4349-9312-9939BD3D84FF@opencsw.org> Hi, Am 11.03.2009 um 17:45 schrieb Juergen Arndt: >> This kind of error is usually generated when an old version >> of gmake is in the path. Older versions of gmake don't understand >> $(abspath ...) and always return the empty string. As the >> result is used as a path that one is missing. On build10s >> was SUNWgmake installed which I deinstalled now. >> >> It may be a good idea to write some kind of test case >> which bails out if an unsuitable version of gmake is found. >> >> Please see if this really solved your problem. > > that was the reason. With the updated version of gmake the problem is > solved. This is now checked on each invocation and prints an error if there are gmake features missing: > dam at login [login]:/home/dam/mgar/pkg/autoconf/trunk/gar > gmake > gar.mk:25: *** Your version of 'make' is too old: 3.80. Please make > sure you are using at least 3.81. Stop. > zsh: 16007 exit 2 gmake It is fixed in r3724. Best regards -- Dago From mwatters at opencsw.org Thu Mar 12 16:48:09 2009 From: mwatters at opencsw.org (Mike Watters) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 10:48:09 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] subversion and bindings NOW IN TESTING Message-ID: <49B92EB9.2000106@opencsw.org> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Changes: * migrated build to gar v2 * updated to version 1.5.6 SPKG_DESC_CSWsvn = Version control rethought CATALOGNAME_CSWsvn = subversion SPKG_DESC_CSWsvn-devel = Subversion Development Support CATALOGNAME_CSWsvn-devel = subversion_devel SPKG_DESC_CSWap2svn = Subversion Modules for Apache 2 CATALOGNAME_CSWap2svn = ap2svn SPKG_DESC_CSWjavasvn = Subversion Java Language Binding CATALOGNAME_CSWjavasvn = javasvn SPKG_DESC_CSWpmsvn = Subversion Perl Language Binding CATALOGNAME_CSWpmsvn = pmsvn SPKG_DESC_CSWpysvn = Subversion Python Language Binding CATALOGNAME_CSWpysvn = pysvn SPKG_DESC_CSWrbsvn = Subversion Ruby Language Binding CATALOGNAME_CSWrbsvn = rbsvn - -- Thanks, Mike "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius -- and a lot of courage -- to move in the opposite direction." * Albert Einstein 1879 - 1955 US German-born Theoretical Physicist -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (SunOS) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkm5LrkACgkQLrhmsXMSLxeZlACfXzUStQYV8RZphuGWVWZAN64Q SQIAn03Ld6nHVgpvcSY1ZsOdHj0zqWSv =w+Lj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From harpchad at opencsw.org Thu Mar 12 17:51:16 2009 From: harpchad at opencsw.org (Chad Harp) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 11:51:16 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] In testing: vim/gvim 7.2.128, rdesktop 1.6.0, glib 2.18.4 Message-ID: <49B93D84.4@opencsw.org> gvim-7.2.128,REV=2009.03.01-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz gvim-7.2.128,REV=2009.03.01-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz vim-7.2.128,REV=2009.03.01-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz vim-7.2.128,REV=2009.03.01-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz vimrt-7.2.128,REV=2009.03.01-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz glib2-2.18.4,REV=2009.03.12-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz glib2-2.18.4,REV=2009.03.12-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz glib2_devel-2.18.4,REV=2009.03.12-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz glib2_devel-2.18.4,REV=2009.03.12-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz rdesktop-1.6.0,REV=2009.02.22-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz rdesktop-1.6.0,REV=2009.02.22-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz From harpchad at opencsw.org Thu Mar 12 18:48:40 2009 From: harpchad at opencsw.org (Chad Harp) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 12:48:40 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Updated pidgin in testing (2.5.5) Message-ID: <49B94AF8.8060602@opencsw.org> pidgin-2.5.5,REV=2009.03.12-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz pidgin-2.5.5,REV=2009.03.12-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz From harpchad at opencsw.org Thu Mar 12 18:54:49 2009 From: harpchad at opencsw.org (Chad Harp) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 12:54:49 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Updated curl in testing (Security Fix) Message-ID: <49B94C69.5000908@opencsw.org> This build addresses a vulnerability discussed here: http://curl.haxx.se/docs/adv_20090303.html curl-7.19.4,REV=2009.03.12-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz curl-7.19.4,REV=2009.03.12-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz curldevel-7.19.4,REV=2009.03.12-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz curldevel-7.19.4,REV=2009.03.12-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz curlrt-7.19.4,REV=2009.03.12-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz curlrt-7.19.4,REV=2009.03.12-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz From ja at baltic-online.de Thu Mar 12 19:57:10 2009 From: ja at baltic-online.de (Juergen Arndt) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 19:57:10 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Question about dependencies Message-ID: Hi all, I ran into the following situation: I want to package an application which depends on PHP. But for PHP exist different packages for different version of the Apache web server and of course it is not known, which version the end user has running. Additionaly the end user could have installed PHP manually or he has a different web server or ... . So, how could I handle that? Should my package depend on PHP or not? Maybe it's ok to print out a short message, that the user has to make sure, that PHP is installed and maybe a zlib extension too and so on? Juergen -- Juergen Arndt From bonivart at opencsw.org Thu Mar 12 20:04:07 2009 From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 20:04:07 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Question about dependencies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <625385e30903121204x7d42e429v43f725110a8bc442@mail.gmail.com> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 7:57 PM, Juergen Arndt wrote: > Hi all, > > I ran into the following situation: I want to package an application which > depends on PHP. But for PHP exist different packages for different version > of the Apache web server and of course it is not known, which version the > end user has running. Additionaly the end user could have installed PHP > manually or he has a different web server or ... . > > So, how could I handle that? Should my package depend on PHP or not? Maybe > it's ok to print out a short message, that the user has to make sure, that > PHP is installed and maybe a zlib extension too and so on? I think you should make a choice of what's the best configuration CSW can offer. I have some similar packages and I chose to depend on Apache2 even if it's possible to run on any web server. For most users that's what they expect to get and the easiest way to get up and running. An advanced user can always go around the dependencies. -- /peter From bwalton at opencsw.org Thu Mar 12 20:05:31 2009 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:05:31 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] Question about dependencies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1236884589-sup-6094@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> Excerpts from Juergen Arndt's message of Thu Mar 12 14:57:10 -0400 2009: > So, how could I handle that? Should my package depend on PHP or not? Maybe > it's ok to print out a short message, that the user has to make sure, that > PHP is installed and maybe a zlib extension too and so on? If the app needs php to function, I'd say you should definitely have the P in your depend file. Depend on php5 (or whatever specific separate CSW php5 package you need) and let the user make it work with any non-csw stuff. IMO, nothing _new_ should depend on php4 stuff, and not depending on php at all just makes for more bug reports for you! :) HTH -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 GPG Key Id: 8E89F6D2; Key Server: pgp.mit.edu Contact me to arrange for a CAcert assurance meeting. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20090312/2a813123/attachment.asc From ja at baltic-online.de Thu Mar 12 20:13:45 2009 From: ja at baltic-online.de (Juergen Arndt) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 20:13:45 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Question about dependencies In-Reply-To: <1236884589-sup-6094@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> References: <1236884589-sup-6094@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 20:05:31 +0100, Ben Walton wrote: > IMO, nothing _new_ should depend on php4 stuff, and not depending on > php at all just makes for more bug reports for you! :) Good point ;-) -- Juergen Arndt From ja at baltic-online.de Thu Mar 12 20:15:28 2009 From: ja at baltic-online.de (Juergen Arndt) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 20:15:28 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Question about dependencies In-Reply-To: <625385e30903121204x7d42e429v43f725110a8bc442@mail.gmail.com> References: <625385e30903121204x7d42e429v43f725110a8bc442@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 20:04:07 +0100, Peter Bonivart wrote: > I think you should make a choice of what's the best configuration CSW > can offer. I have some similar packages and I chose to depend on > Apache2 even if it's possible to run on any web server. For most users > that's what they expect to get and the easiest way to get up and > running. An advanced user can always go around the dependencies. Ok, I will do so and as Ben mentioned, I'll let the package depend on php 5. Thank you! -- Juergen Arndt Baltic Online Computer GmbH Firmensitz: Alter Markt 1-2, 24103 Kiel http://www.baltic-online.de Tel.: +49 (0)431 54003-0 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Erik Cickovskis, Amtsgericht Kiel, HRB 3756 From mwatters at opencsw.org Fri Mar 13 15:34:28 2009 From: mwatters at opencsw.org (Mike Watters) Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 09:34:28 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] [csw-maintainers] PHP5 and extentions now in Testing In-Reply-To: <49B94F00.2070805@jpl.nasa.gov> References: <49B464DA.2050203@opencsw.org> <49B94F00.2070805@jpl.nasa.gov> Message-ID: <49BA6EF4.4070703@opencsw.org> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Joseph Kwan wrote: > Mike Watters wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> >> Changes: >> compile version 5.2.6 with extensions (version not changed) >> recompile only to build the extensions. >> >> > Will there be an updated php5 at some point? I'm getting > a few notices about security problems with pre 5.2.8 > versions. > > http://www.security-database.com/detail.php?alert=USN-720-1 > > And it doesn't seem there's patches to resolve these, > just new version releases. > > thanks, > > Joe Kwan > Joseph Kwan, Sr. Network/Systems Analyst > Radar Science and Engineering (Section 334) > Jet Propulsion Laboratory / MS 300-235 > > _______________________________________________ > maintainers mailing list > maintainers at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers Yes I just started getting those. when I took over the package, 5.2.6 was the stable release, 5.2.7 was pulled due to the magic_quotes_gpc bug. I will start prepping for the update to 5.2.9. [ ** Begin Quote php.net ** ] The PHP development team would like to announce the immediate availability of PHP 5.2.9. This release focuses on improving the stability of the PHP 5.2.x branch with over 50 bug fixes, several of which are security related. All users of PHP are encouraged to upgrade to this release. [ ** End Quote php.net ** ] - -- Thanks, Mike "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius -- and a lot of courage -- to move in the opposite direction." * Albert Einstein 1879 - 1955 US German-born Theoretical Physicist -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (SunOS) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkm6bvQACgkQLrhmsXMSLxfaRQCgu+uv42jeaLoFv3VoTD3RBBQM XPkAn04ptu9as83XFy5ajzmvYfhT0toP =pBEn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From blizinski at google.com Fri Mar 13 17:25:26 2009 From: blizinski at google.com (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski) Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 16:25:26 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] Solaris port of vixie-cron - a GAR build for review Message-ID: I would like to offer a GAR build of vixie-cron. The build is based on cron_3.0pl1 as used in Debian, using a patch[3] pulled from Debian archives. Generally, the idea is to make it as close to Debian code as possible. The build is licensed under the terms of GPL-2. Porting to Solaris needed few tweaks. Three noticeable ones are: - function flock() is not available in Solaris. Code was changed to use lockf() - function mkdtemp() is not available in our version of Solaris and compiler tools. Function was added. - functions sigblock() and sigmask() are not available in Solaris, they have been replaced with sigemptyset(), sigaddset() and sigprocmask() All Solaris-specific changes are in one patch file: vixiecron/trunk/files/gar-vixiecron_3.0pl1.patch The build is available for review here: http://code.google.com/p/usable-solaris/source/detail?r=29 If you have a Google account, you can sign in and use the code reviewing tool, which allows to comment on specific lines of code. After sign in, a "Start code review" link will appear in the top right corner. Maciej From maciej.blizinski at gmail.com Fri Mar 13 19:07:57 2009 From: maciej.blizinski at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Blizi=C5=84ski?=) Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 18:07:57 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] Mail archives seem to be down Message-ID: This URL: https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo Says: ===================== Bug in Mailman version 2.1.9 We're sorry, we hit a bug! Please inform the webmaster for this site of this problem. Printing of traceback and other system information has been explicitly inhibited, but the webmaster can find this information in the Mailman error logs. ===================== Is there an ongoing maintenance now? From ihsan at opencsw.org Fri Mar 13 23:21:53 2009 From: ihsan at opencsw.org (Ihsan Dogan) Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 23:21:53 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Mail archives seem to be down In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <49BADC81.5010204@opencsw.org> Am 13.3.2009 19:07 Uhr, Maciej Blizi?ski schrieb: > This URL: https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo > > Says: > ===================== > Bug in Mailman version 2.1.9 > > We're sorry, we hit a bug! > > Please inform the webmaster for this site of this problem. Printing of > traceback and other system information has been explicitly inhibited, > but the webmaster can find this information in the Mailman error logs. > ===================== > > Is there an ongoing maintenance now? I just noticed that. I working on that now. Ihsan -- ihsan at dogan.ch http://blog.dogan.ch/ From bwalton at opencsw.org Sat Mar 14 01:51:48 2009 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 20:51:48 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] makepatch fixed Message-ID: <1236991770-sup-6192@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> Hi All, [Sorry for the cross post, I've seen interest from both lists and I'm not sure that all interested parties are on maintainers@, etc.] I just committed r3756 that should see the makepatch GAR target functional in GAR v2 again. It assumes that you'll make the changes you'd like to see in the patch in the first modulation source directory. Let me know if this is still broken in your use of it. Thanks -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 GPG Key Id: 8E89F6D2; Key Server: pgp.mit.edu Contact me to arrange for a CAcert assurance meeting. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20090313/c878f8a2/attachment-0001.asc From mwatters at opencsw.org Sat Mar 14 05:24:46 2009 From: mwatters at opencsw.org (Mike Watters) Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 23:24:46 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] PHP-5.2.9 *** Now In Testing *** Message-ID: <49BB318E.10908@opencsw.org> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Changes: updated from 5.2.6 to 5.2.9 Please read the change log for a detail list of changes. http://www.php.net/ChangeLog-5.php#5.2.9 - -- Thanks, Mike "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius -- and a lot of courage -- to move in the opposite direction." * Albert Einstein 1879 - 1955 US German-born Theoretical Physicist -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkm7MY4ACgkQLrhmsXMSLxcApgCfZKyPrmZ3K9imvnthFObHZt2U 9QgAniLU/vyaWH0R/LTIi8jLjkzfqTr7 =Iaij -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From ihsan at opencsw.org Sat Mar 14 09:35:53 2009 From: ihsan at opencsw.org (Ihsan Dogan) Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 09:35:53 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Mail server maintenance Message-ID: <20090314083606.E6DCB6CBD@mail.opencsw.org> Hello, Due some problems with the mailing list software, I have to take down the services on the mail server to do maintenance. Starting at 18:00 UTC, the services might not be available for approximately 2 hours. Ihsan -- ihsan at dogan.ch From maciej.blizinski at gmail.com Sat Mar 14 11:11:03 2009 From: maciej.blizinski at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Blizi=C5=84ski?=) Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 10:11:03 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] cswproto not found In-Reply-To: <2781D7E2-6F0E-4349-9312-9939BD3D84FF@opencsw.org> References: <2781D7E2-6F0E-4349-9312-9939BD3D84FF@opencsw.org> Message-ID: On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 1:10 PM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: >> dam at login [login]:/home/dam/mgar/pkg/autoconf/trunk/gar > gmake >> gar.mk:25: *** Your version of 'make' is too old: 3.80. Please make >> sure you are using at least 3.81. ?Stop. >> zsh: 16007 exit 2 ? ? gmake > > It is fixed in r3724. My system claims that the installed gmake version is 3.81, but the actual installed gmake version is 3.80: $ gmake package gar/gar.mk:25: *** Your version of 'make' is too old: 3.80. Please make sure you are using at least 3.81. Stop. yaga trunk $ gmake --version GNU Make 3.80 Copyright (C) 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. $ pkg-get upgrade gmake No worries... you already have version 3.81 of gmake If you doubt this message, run 'pkg-get -U', then run 'pkg-get upgrade gmake' $ pkgparam CSWgmake VERSION 3.81 Does anyone else see this? From hson at opencsw.org Sat Mar 14 11:32:07 2009 From: hson at opencsw.org (=?UTF-8?B?Um9nZXIgSMOla2Fuc3Nvbg==?=) Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 11:32:07 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] cswproto not found In-Reply-To: References: <2781D7E2-6F0E-4349-9312-9939BD3D84FF@opencsw.org> Message-ID: <49BB87A7.3060104@opencsw.org> Maciej Blizi?ski wrote: > On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 1:10 PM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: >>> dam at login [login]:/home/dam/mgar/pkg/autoconf/trunk/gar > gmake >>> gar.mk:25: *** Your version of 'make' is too old: 3.80. Please make >>> sure you are using at least 3.81. Stop. >>> zsh: 16007 exit 2 gmake >> It is fixed in r3724. > > My system claims that the installed gmake version is 3.81, but the > actual installed gmake version is 3.80: > > $ gmake package > gar/gar.mk:25: *** Your version of 'make' is too old: 3.80. Please > make sure you are using at least 3.81. Stop. > yaga trunk $ gmake --version > GNU Make 3.80 > Copyright (C) 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. > There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A > PARTICULAR PURPOSE. > $ pkg-get upgrade gmake > No worries... you already have version 3.81 of gmake > If you doubt this message, run 'pkg-get -U', then run > 'pkg-get upgrade gmake' > $ pkgparam CSWgmake VERSION > 3.81 > Are you sure that the CSW-version is the one you're using? Whats your PATH? From maciej.blizinski at gmail.com Sat Mar 14 11:48:23 2009 From: maciej.blizinski at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Blizi=C5=84ski?=) Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 10:48:23 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] cswproto not found In-Reply-To: <49BB87A7.3060104@opencsw.org> References: <2781D7E2-6F0E-4349-9312-9939BD3D84FF@opencsw.org> <49BB87A7.3060104@opencsw.org> Message-ID: On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 10:32 AM, Roger H?kansson wrote: > Are you sure that the CSW-version is the one you're using? > Whats your PATH? This is amusing: $ gmake --version GNU Make 3.80 $ `which gmake` --version GNU Make 3.81 Wasn't the command "which" supposed to agree with what shell is doing? My PATH is: $ echo $PATH /opt/csw/sbin:/opt/csw/bin:/bin:/sbin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/opt/SUNWjet/bin:/usr/sfw/bin:/usr/sfw/sbin:/usr/ccs/bin I used findutils to track down all the 'gmake' files. The 3.80 version was from /usr/sfw directory. I'm positive I have /opt/csw/bin first in my PATH. "pkgrm SUNWgmake" fixed the problem. From maciej.blizinski at gmail.com Sat Mar 14 12:27:37 2009 From: maciej.blizinski at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Blizi=C5=84ski?=) Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 11:27:37 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] Porting facter and puppet packages to mGAR Message-ID: Hi Gary, I can see you're using custom shell scripts to build facter and puppet packages[1]. Would you mind porting those builds to mGAR? Maciej [1] http://www.garylaw.net/packages/ From maciej.blizinski at gmail.com Sat Mar 14 14:26:15 2009 From: maciej.blizinski at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Blizi=C5=84ski?=) Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 13:26:15 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] Porting facter and puppet packages to mGAR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 11:27 AM, Maciej Blizi?ski wrote: > Hi Gary, > > I can see you're using custom shell scripts to build facter and puppet > packages[1]. Would you mind porting those builds to mGAR? > > Maciej > > [1] http://www.garylaw.net/packages/ I'm not sure which address Gary actually uses. His home page [2] says it's anything at his domain. But a message on puppet users mailing list mentions another address. I'll try that one too. Maciej [2] http://wiki.garylaw.net/doku.php?id=gary#contact_me [3] http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users/browse_thread/thread/4722c4119e4e9540/c064f4436c98e89d From skayser at opencsw.org Sat Mar 14 15:06:56 2009 From: skayser at opencsw.org (Sebastian Kayser) Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 15:06:56 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] cswproto not found In-Reply-To: References: <2781D7E2-6F0E-4349-9312-9939BD3D84FF@opencsw.org> <49BB87A7.3060104@opencsw.org> Message-ID: <20090314140656.GA21810@sebastiankayser.de> * Maciej Blizi??ski wrote: > On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 10:32 AM, Roger H?kansson wrote: > > Are you sure that the CSW-version is the one you're using? > > Whats your PATH? > > This is amusing: > > $ gmake --version > GNU Make 3.80 > $ `which gmake` --version > GNU Make 3.81 > > Wasn't the command "which" supposed to agree with what shell is doing? > > My PATH is: > > $ echo $PATH > /opt/csw/sbin:/opt/csw/bin:/bin:/sbin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/opt/SUNWjet/bin:/usr/sfw/bin:/usr/sfw/sbin:/usr/ccs/bin > > I used findutils to track down all the 'gmake' files. The 3.80 version > was from /usr/sfw directory. I'm positive I have /opt/csw/bin first in > my PATH. "pkgrm SUNWgmake" fixed the problem. I would guess that your shell had hashed the gmake from /usr/sfw/bin and thus didn't pick up the gmake from /opt/csw/bin when you installed it [1]. "which" is not a shell built-in and doesn't work with the shell hash table for commands, so it will traverse the $PATH as usual (and find the gmake from /opt/csw/bin as you had expected). Your current shell on the other hand would have known where to find gmake based on a previous call, when /opt/csw/bin/gmake wasn't yet available. Rather use the shell built-in "type", which will apply the same logic as your current shell (including the internal hash) to find a command. All assuming you are using bash, other shells might behave similar. Sebastian [1] http://www.gnu.org/software/bash/manual/bashref.html#Command-Search-and-Execution From ihsan at opencsw.org Sat Mar 14 20:41:07 2009 From: ihsan at opencsw.org (Ihsan Dogan) Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 20:41:07 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] [csw-maintainers] Mail server maintenance In-Reply-To: <20090314083606.E6DCB6CBD@mail.opencsw.org> References: <20090314083606.E6DCB6CBD@mail.opencsw.org> Message-ID: <49BC0853.6070505@opencsw.org> Am 14.3.2009 9:35 Uhr, Ihsan Dogan schrieb: > Due some problems with the mailing list software, I have to take down the > services on the mail server to do maintenance. Starting at 18:00 UTC, the > services might not be available for approximately 2 hours. I've updated now to the newest version of Mailman and the mailing lists are running fine again. Ihsan -- ihsan at dogan.ch http://blog.dogan.ch/ From ja at baltic-online.de Sun Mar 15 17:51:23 2009 From: ja at baltic-online.de (Juergen Arndt) Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 17:51:23 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Problem with RRDs (RRDtool Perl module) on Solaris 10 Message-ID: Hi all, I ran into a problem with the Perl module RRDs on Solaris 10. I evaluate a software (pnp, [1]), which stores data into RRD databases and visualises it as a graph. So nothing special. This software uses the RRDs perl module, which comes in CSWrrd. It works on Solaris 8 without any problem, on Solaris 10 nothing happends. After some digging in forums and chats I downloaded a test script (see below, [2]). It's no problem to run this script on Solaris 8 but Solaris 10 it cores. Can anybody reproduce this? And maybe someone has a solution? The output on Solaris 8 is as follows: root at sol8-cswpkg-test :/root/tmp > ./rrdtest Last 5 minutes: 1080462300: 5.6 1080462360: 5.7 1080462420: 5.8 1080462480: 5.9 1080462540: 6 1080462600: N/A Last 30 minutes: 1080460800: 3.5 1080461100: 4 1080461400: 4.5 1080461700: 5 1080462000: 5.5 1080462300: 6 1080462600: N/A root at sol8-cswpkg-test :/root/tmp > On Solaris 10 I get: root at ja01 [ja01]:/root/tmp > ./rrdtest zsh: 17975 segmentation fault (core dumped) ./rrdtest root at ja01 [ja01]:/root/tmp > Juergen [1] www.pnp4nagios.org [2] ftp://ftp.linux-magazin.de/pub/listings/magazin/2004/06/Perl/rrdtest (doesn't work sometimes): #!/opt/csw/bin/perl ########################################### # Feed test data to RRD # Mike Schilli, 2004 (m at perlmeister.com) ########################################### use warnings; use strict; use RRDs; my $DB = "/tmp/mydemo.rrd"; my $start = 1080460200; my $dst = "MAX"; my $nof_iterations = 40; my $end = $start + $nof_iterations * 60; RRDs::create( $DB, "--step=60", "--start=" . ($start-10), "DS:load:GAUGE:90:0:10.0", "RRA:$dst:0.5:1:5", "RRA:$dst:0.5:5:10", ) or die "Cannot create rrd ($RRDs::error)"; for(0..$nof_iterations) { my $time = $start + $_ * 60; my $value = 2 + $_ * 0.1; RRDs::update( $DB, "$time:$value") or die "Cannot update rrd ($!)"; } print "Last 5 minutes:\n"; fetch($end - 5*60, $end, $dst); print "Last 30 minutes:\n"; fetch($end - 30*60, $end, $dst); ########################################### sub fetch { ########################################### my($start, $end, $dst) = @_; my ($dbstart, $step, $names, $data) = RRDs::fetch($DB, "--start=$start", "--end=$end", $dst); foreach my $line (@$data) { print "$start: "; $start += $step; foreach my $val (@$line) { $val = "N/A" unless defined $val; print "$val\n"; } } } -- Juergen Arndt From skayser at opencsw.org Sun Mar 15 23:33:58 2009 From: skayser at opencsw.org (Sebastian Kayser) Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 23:33:58 +0100 (CET) Subject: [csw-users] Problem with RRDs (RRDtool Perl module) on Solaris 10 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <52854.217.227.44.156.1237156438.squirrel@ssl.skayser.de> Hi Juergen, Juergen Arndt schrieb: > I ran into a problem with the Perl module RRDs on Solaris 10. > > I evaluate a software (pnp, [1]), which stores data into RRD databases and > visualises it as a graph. So nothing special. This software uses the RRDs > perl module, which comes in CSWrrd. It works on Solaris 8 without any > problem, on Solaris 10 nothing happends. > > After some digging in forums and chats I downloaded a test script (see > below, [2]). It's no problem to run this script on Solaris 8 but Solaris > 10 it cores. Can anybody reproduce this? And maybe someone has a solution? from what i remember, we have a bug report about this in the bug tracker (filed against rrdtool). Have a look when the bug tracker is reachable again, maybe the report contains some information that is helpful in your situation. Otherwise add your findings to the bug tracker so that the package maintainer can take care of it. Sebastian From roger.hakansson at gmail.com Mon Mar 16 04:44:05 2009 From: roger.hakansson at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?Um9nZXIgSMOla2Fuc3Nvbg==?=) Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 04:44:05 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Porting facter and puppet packages to mGAR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <49BDCB05.2060804@gmail.com> Maciej Blizi?ski wrote: > Hi Gary, > > I can see you're using custom shell scripts to build facter and puppet > packages[1]. Would you mind porting those builds to mGAR? > In the spirit of the thematics of the month and having a few free minutes I took a quick look at it to help Gary. facter was no problem and what's in svn now builds a package which should be just like the released one. puppet is a bit trickier since there are two startup scripts and I'm really not used to create packages which have startup scipts. What's in svn isn't complete to build a package, right now pkgmk breaks due to problems with the startup scripts, but I commited it anyway so Gary at least have a starting point. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3331 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature URL: From dam at opencsw.org Mon Mar 16 21:43:07 2009 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 21:43:07 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Solaris port of vixie-cron - a GAR build for review In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <5097C18B-C38D-44E3-91FA-2E64F98A6ADF@opencsw.org> Hi Maciej, Am 13.03.2009 um 17:25 schrieb Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski: > I would like to offer a GAR build of vixie-cron. Did you ever found the time to commit it? Best regards -- Dago From dam at opencsw.org Mon Mar 16 21:44:49 2009 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 21:44:49 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] cswproto not found In-Reply-To: References: <98313864-AC54-4D83-AD69-035832E45F81@opencsw.org> Message-ID: <2186C1B8-8EC1-4D5E-84F5-B1282C51D902@opencsw.org> Hi Maciej, Am 11.03.2009 um 08:56 schrieb Maciej Blizi?ski: > On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:57 PM, Dagobert Michelsen > wrote: >> Hi Maciej, >> >> Am 10.03.2009 um 08:50 schrieb Maciej Blizi?ski: >>> Is it gar v1 or v2? >>> >>> You can check that using: "grep http gar/.svn/entries" >> >> This is, uhm, very creative ;-) The usual way to check this >> is via >> >>> dam at login [login]:/home/dam/mgar/pkg/autoconf > svn propget >>> svn:externals trunk/ >>> gar https://gar.svn.sf.net/svnroot/gar/csw/mgar/gar/v2 > > There's a problem with svn:externals: if you create new directory > (e.g. for a new software package) and you add the property > svn:externals, you need first to commit your directory (and > svn:externals) and _then_ you can check out the externals. I had to do > copy the directory with gar, and coulnd't have svn:externals property > set. There probably is a better way of checking this, though. Well, I usually do something like ln -s ../../../gar/v2 gar before committing to save this step. But you are right, ugly... Best regards -- Dago From ihsan at opencsw.org Mon Mar 16 21:50:58 2009 From: ihsan at opencsw.org (Ihsan Dogan) Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 21:50:58 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Problem with RRDs (RRDtool Perl module) on Solaris 10 In-Reply-To: <52854.217.227.44.156.1237156438.squirrel@ssl.skayser.de> References: <52854.217.227.44.156.1237156438.squirrel@ssl.skayser.de> Message-ID: <49BEBBB2.6050507@opencsw.org> Am 15.3.2009 23:33 Uhr, Sebastian Kayser schrieb: >> I evaluate a software (pnp, [1]), which stores data into RRD databases and >> visualises it as a graph. So nothing special. This software uses the RRDs >> perl module, which comes in CSWrrd. It works on Solaris 8 without any >> problem, on Solaris 10 nothing happends. >> >> After some digging in forums and chats I downloaded a test script (see >> below, [2]). It's no problem to run this script on Solaris 8 but Solaris >> 10 it cores. Can anybody reproduce this? And maybe someone has a solution? > > from what i remember, we have a bug report about this in the bug tracker > (filed against rrdtool). Have a look when the bug tracker is reachable > again, maybe the report contains some information that is helpful in your > situation. > > Otherwise add your findings to the bug tracker so that the package > maintainer can take care of it. I'm already looking into that. At least, I can reproduce it. Ihsan -- ihsan at dogan.ch http://blog.dogan.ch/ From glaw at opencsw.org Mon Mar 16 21:52:18 2009 From: glaw at opencsw.org (Gary Law) Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 20:52:18 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] Porting facter and puppet packages to mGAR In-Reply-To: <49BDCB05.2060804@gmail.com> References: <49BDCB05.2060804@gmail.com> Message-ID: 2009/3/16 Roger H?kansson > Maciej Blizi?ski wrote: > >> Hi Gary, >> >> I can see you're using custom shell scripts to build facter and puppet >> packages[1]. Would you mind porting those builds to mGAR? >> >> > In the spirit of the thematics of the month and having a few free minutes I > took a quick look at it to help Gary. > > facter was no problem and what's in svn now builds a package which should > be just like the released one. > > I'm not sure which address Gary actually uses. I'm pretty good at ignoring all of them. ;) so sorry to get into this discussion late, I'm a little busy at the moment. .. Most of my packages are in mgar, but not facter and puppet thus far. They're very custom, not you're usual configure/make/make install. Then again, I just got djbdns into mgar, and that's a fairly custom too, so I'm sure it's doable. I'll take a look at the facter output when I get some free time for testing it. > puppet is a bit trickier since there are two startup scripts and I'm really > not used to create packages which have startup scipts. > What's in svn isn't complete to build a package, right now pkgmk breaks due > to problems with the startup scripts, but I commited it anyway so Gary at > least have a starting point. > The startup scripts are based on those shipped by puppet's developers, nice of them to put together svcadm friendly xml files, I just needed to sed 'em into CSW-friendly paths. Not too tricky. I've also, purely for my own purposes, just put together the needed methods and xmls for puppetmaster, and was planning to pop these into the next update of the package I go. If you want to see the gory details of the scripts, in order to see what customisation needs to be ported into gar, they're here: http://garylaw.net/packages I've just re-uploaded tonight to make sure the published ones are the latest and greatest. I fully intend to get these into mgar. One day. I've also suggested to the maintainers list that all CSW software be either ported to mgar or desupported. Custom scripts are really not the way to go. I feel, at the very least, the custom scripts that are used need to be published or the software pulled from the archives. Anyway, thanks for taking a look. Gary -- Gary Law -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ja at baltic-online.de Mon Mar 16 23:17:09 2009 From: ja at baltic-online.de (Juergen Arndt) Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 23:17:09 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Problem with RRDs (RRDtool Perl module) on Solaris 10 In-Reply-To: <49BEBBB2.6050507@opencsw.org> References: <52854.217.227.44.156.1237156438.squirrel@ssl.skayser.de> <49BEBBB2.6050507@opencsw.org> Message-ID: On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 21:50:58 +0100, Ihsan Dogan wrote: > I'm already looking into that. At least, I can reproduce it. I'm quite sure, you already found it out by yourself, but in case if not, (at least) the function call RRDs::create leads into a segfault. I didn't looked into the source code yet, but if I can somehow assist you, let me know. Juergen -- Juergen Arndt From mwatters at opencsw.org Mon Mar 16 23:55:38 2009 From: mwatters at opencsw.org (Mike Watters) Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 17:55:38 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] libedit now in testing Message-ID: <49BED8EA.8090607@opencsw.org> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I have built packages for libedit. no 64bit yet, as I can not get it to compile with sun's cc and the gcc we have does not yet support amd64. ... I am getting closer on that but not quite there yet. some of the readline extensions "prefer" libedit over readline. - -- Thanks, Mike "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius -- and a lot of courage -- to move in the opposite direction." * Albert Einstein 1879 - 1955 US German-born Theoretical Physicist -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (SunOS) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkm+2OoACgkQLrhmsXMSLxfzGwCgrknJ0JT4YFHxN99rBh0fYXO4 aDYAn19oK2J5NiUuM4P7IbtsLtcYwgkn =ikzE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From blizinski at google.com Tue Mar 17 00:13:41 2009 From: blizinski at google.com (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski) Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 23:13:41 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] Solaris port of vixie-cron - a GAR build for review In-Reply-To: <5097C18B-C38D-44E3-91FA-2E64F98A6ADF@opencsw.org> References: <5097C18B-C38D-44E3-91FA-2E64F98A6ADF@opencsw.org> Message-ID: On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > Am 13.03.2009 um 17:25 schrieb Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski: >> >> I would like to offer a GAR build of vixie-cron. > > Did you ever found the time to commit it? I'm using a Google Code hosted project to publish proposed code: http://usable-solaris.googlecode.com/svn/branches/opencsw/vixiecron/ For viewing and commenting on the code, this link is better: http://code.google.com/p/usable-solaris/source/browse/#svn/branches/opencsw/vixiecron/trunk Maciej From harpchad at opencsw.org Tue Mar 17 04:56:05 2009 From: harpchad at opencsw.org (Chad Harp) Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 22:56:05 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] gnutls 2.6.4 in testing Message-ID: <9D6E6247-5DDC-4D41-B362-4D1E4355078A@opencsw.org> - Update to 2.6.4 - 64bit (sparcv9 only until gcc for amd64 is ready) gnutls-2.6.4,REV=2009.03.16-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz gnutls-2.6.4,REV=2009.03.16-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz gnutls_devel-2.6.4,REV=2009.03.16-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz gnutls_devel-2.6.4,REV=2009.03.16-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz From jgoerzen at opencsw.org Tue Mar 17 05:18:51 2009 From: jgoerzen at opencsw.org (Jake Goerzen) Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 21:18:51 -0700 Subject: [csw-users] updated gftp 2.0.19 in /testing Message-ID: <315c02ae0903162118h43f4e0acr2d930b40eb569fb9@mail.gmail.com> Hi, updated gftp (version 2.0.19) packages are availble in /testing changes since last version: Cleanups to the networking code Fixed several segfaults. Several i18n fixes Added support for wildcard SSL certificates Fixes for downloading files using SFTP where the user doesn't have write access to the file. Disable some features of the remote FTP server is a VMS server or OS/400 Fixed Solaris compile problem and pty issue under HPUX Updated to use FSPLIB 0.9 Added Tango styled icon theme The menus are now a little closer to other GNOME applications New/updated language translations: ar bg ca cs da de dz el en_CA en_GB el es fi fr gl gu he hu it ja ko lt lv mk nb ne nl no oc pt_BR pt_po ro ru rw sv uk zh_HK zh_TW Thanks, Jake From harpchad at opencsw.org Tue Mar 17 16:18:44 2009 From: harpchad at opencsw.org (Chad Harp) Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 10:18:44 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] intltool 0.40.6 in testing Message-ID: <49BFBF54.4010501@opencsw.org> intltool-0.40.6,REV=2009.03.17-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz intltool-0.40.6,REV=2009.03.17-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz From ja at baltic-online.de Tue Mar 17 17:31:44 2009 From: ja at baltic-online.de (Juergen Arndt) Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 17:31:44 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] How to merge multiple source trees into one package Message-ID: Hi all, how is it possible to merge multiple source trees into one package? Is there a piece of documentation or does anybody have a package, which I could use as an example? Juergen -- Juergen Arndt From schwindt at dfki.uni-kl.de Tue Mar 17 18:11:07 2009 From: schwindt at dfki.uni-kl.de (Nicolai Schwindt) Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 18:11:07 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] ap2_modphp install Message-ID: <200903171709.n2HH9igq008369@dfki.uni-kl.de> ... fails. Because it is not in the catalog file. tcsh at isg-1504 [/var/pkg-get] grep -l ap2_modphp5 * desc-serv-1500 Unlike : tcsh at isg-1504 [/var/pkg-get] grep -l php5_ldap * catalog-serv-1500 desc-serv-1500 I did try several mirrors ( ibiblio, erlangen i.e.) - so I think it is not my local mirror. Where as this works: tcsh at isg-1504 [~] pkg-get -D ap2_modphp5 # (Descriptions from site serv-1500 ) ap2_modphp5 - PHP 5 - Apache 2.2.x Module Are the mirrors out of sync or did I miss something ? Nicolai. From dam at opencsw.org Tue Mar 17 22:23:37 2009 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 22:23:37 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] How to merge multiple source trees into one package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi J?rgen, Am 17.03.2009 um 17:31 schrieb Juergen Arndt: > how is it possible to merge multiple source trees into one package? > Is there a piece of documentation or does anybody have a package, > which I could use as an example? All things from DISTFILES are extracted and can then be compiled and installed. Or do you need multiple versions of the same package? Please check in your material so we can have a look at it. Best regards -- Dago From dam at opencsw.org Tue Mar 17 23:33:34 2009 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 23:33:34 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] ap2_modphp install In-Reply-To: <200903171709.n2HH9igq008369@dfki.uni-kl.de> References: <200903171709.n2HH9igq008369@dfki.uni-kl.de> Message-ID: Hi Nicolai, Am 17.03.2009 um 18:11 schrieb Nicolai Schwindt: > ... fails. Because it is not in the catalog file. > ... > > tcsh at isg-1504 [~] pkg-get -D ap2_modphp5 > # (Descriptions from site serv-1500 ) > ap2_modphp5 - PHP 5 - Apache 2.2.x Module > > Are the mirrors out of sync or did I miss something ? Am 17.03.2009 um 22:44 schrieb Philip Brown: > hrrrm. there was another one missing too. mod_php5 !! > > fixed em both. Best regards -- Dago From william at wbonnet.net Tue Mar 17 23:34:49 2009 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 23:34:49 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] /testing sqlite3 3.6.10 is available Message-ID: <49C02589.9050800@wbonnet.net> Hi all Everything is in the title :) Thanks for your feedbacks http://www.opencsw/org/testing cheers W. -- William http://www.wbonnet.net http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix http://www.opencsw.org Community SoftWare for Solaris http://www.guses.org French speaking Solaris User Group From blizinski at google.com Tue Mar 17 23:39:17 2009 From: blizinski at google.com (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski) Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 22:39:17 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] Using pkg-get with custom packages Message-ID: I'm currently looking at a way of deploying a set of custom packages using pkg-get and pkg-get-style repositories. I found a thread on blastwave forums[1], but there wasn't any follow-up posts, it's hard to tell whether the original poster actually deployed it. I would like to do something similar, but I'd like to have both CSW and custom packages available for pkg-get installations. What are the options? One of them would be building own merged catalog with packages. Ideally, pkg-get would support multiple repositories in the vein of apt-get sources on Debian. Has this been done before? Maciej [1] http://wiki.blastwave.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=249#p249 From bonivart at opencsw.org Wed Mar 18 00:13:56 2009 From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart) Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 00:13:56 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Using pkg-get with custom packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <625385e30903171613g5a7d8311h67988d952886d98@mail.gmail.com> On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 11:39 PM, Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski wrote: > I'm currently looking at a way of deploying a set of custom packages > using pkg-get and pkg-get-style repositories. I found a thread on > blastwave forums[1], but there wasn't any follow-up posts, it's hard > to tell whether the original poster actually deployed it. I would like > to do something similar, but I'd like to have both CSW and custom > packages available for pkg-get installations. > > What are the options? One of them would be building own merged catalog > with packages. Ideally, pkg-get would support multiple repositories in > the vein of apt-get sources on Debian. > > Has this been done before? > > Maciej > > [1] http://wiki.blastwave.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=249#p249 Pkgutil already contains the tools you need (it was me replying in that thread). Pkgutil can combine a full official repository with your own local one just like we do for testing here at OpenCSW, see: http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing.html You also get tools for building and checking your own catalogs so you should be all set. In 1.5, which is available as beta 2, you can combine any number of repositories and it will automatically find the latest package for you unless you specifically ask for a certain version. http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/pkgutil-1.5b2,REV=2009.03.13-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/pkgutil-1.5b2,REV=2009.03.13-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz -- /peter From ja at baltic-online.de Wed Mar 18 12:42:43 2009 From: ja at baltic-online.de (Juergen Arndt) Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 12:42:43 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] How to merge multiple source trees into one package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 22:23:37 +0100, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > All things from DISTFILES are extracted and can then be compiled > and installed. Or do you need multiple versions of the same > package? Please check in your material so we can have a look > at it. I think, I was a little bit unprecise. I'd like to merge a piece of software A with software B into one package. My first guess is to create something like that in the Makefile: DISTFILES = software_A.tar.gz DISTFILES += software_B.tar.gz But I'm wondering, how to proceed with the other options like CONFIGURE_ARGS and so on. I think, there is another solution, which I don't know yet :-) Juergen -- Juergen Arndt From blizinski at google.com Wed Mar 18 13:34:52 2009 From: blizinski at google.com (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski) Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 12:34:52 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] How to merge multiple source trees into one package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 11:42 AM, Juergen Arndt wrote: > My first guess is to create something like that in the Makefile: > > DISTFILES ?= software_A.tar.gz > DISTFILES ?+= software_B.tar.gz > > But I'm wondering, how to proceed with the other options like CONFIGURE_ARGS > and so on. I think, there is another solution, which I don't know yet :-) You could write your own "master" Makefile which would in turn call both A and B Makefiles. However, I'd like to ask you about why do you want to merge two pieces of software like this? Why not have two separate packages, possibly with dependencies? From ja at baltic-online.de Wed Mar 18 14:28:11 2009 From: ja at baltic-online.de (Juergen Arndt) Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 14:28:11 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] How to merge multiple source trees into one package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 13:34:52 +0100, Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski wrote: > You could write your own "master" Makefile which would in turn call > both A and B Makefiles. Yes, good idea, thank you! > However, I'd like to ask you about why do you want to merge two pieces > of software like this? Why not have two separate packages, possibly > with dependencies? Philip and I discussed exactly this point yesterday. For this special case the main reason for merging binaries is to keep the package consistent to it's older versions. I agree, that it shouldn't be the general way to build packages. Juergen -- Juergen Arndt From mwatters at opencsw.org Thu Mar 19 04:20:24 2009 From: mwatters at opencsw.org (Mike Watters) Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 22:20:24 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] libssh2 now in testing Message-ID: <49C1B9F8.50009@opencsw.org> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Initial Packaging of version 1.0 architectures sparcv8, sparcv9, i386, amd64 - -- Thanks, Mike "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius -- and a lot of courage -- to move in the opposite direction." * Albert Einstein 1879 - 1955 US German-born Theoretical Physicist -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAknBufcACgkQLrhmsXMSLxfMjACgiZzugVmlEYUcVfGfqsL5R+ko uGAAoMrT805r/XNFceo48/ORk69159kF =tGPI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From william at wbonnet.net Thu Mar 19 15:59:51 2009 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 15:59:51 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] New opencsw mirror Message-ID: <49C25DE7.9060700@wbonnet.net> Hi I am pleased to net you know that a new mirror is available. opencsw.solaris-fr.org This mirror is based in France (Marseille area). Many thanks to Gerard Henry cheers W. -- William http://www.wbonnet.net http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix http://www.opencsw.org Community SoftWare for Solaris http://www.guses.org French speaking Solaris User Group From hson at opencsw.org Thu Mar 19 21:25:02 2009 From: hson at opencsw.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Roger_H=E5kansson?=) Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 21:25:02 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] xmlrpc-c 1.16.13 in /testing Message-ID: <49C2AA1E.7000202@opencsw.org> I've packaged xmlrpc-c 1.16.13 (from the stable branch) and the packages are availabe from /testing From bwalton at opencsw.org Thu Mar 19 21:27:00 2009 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:27:00 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] updated git in /testing Message-ID: <1237494397-sup-4665@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> I've placed 1.6.2.1 packages in /testing. Thanks -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 GPG Key Id: 8E89F6D2; Key Server: pgp.mit.edu Contact me to arrange for a CAcert assurance meeting. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From ja at baltic-online.de Fri Mar 20 23:04:23 2009 From: ja at baltic-online.de (Juergen Arndt) Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 23:04:23 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] New packages for nagios, nrpe, nsca and the nagios plugins released Message-ID: Hi all, new packages for nagios, NRPE, NSCA and the nagios plugins are available. The former package "nagiosp" was renamed to "nagios_plugins". As Phil statet: "pk-get upgrade" should work fine. But any prior saved output from "pkg-get -l" that had "nagiosp" in it, will now be invalid. Plus any automated checks for things like "pkg-get -c" that explicitly checked for nagiosp. Juergen -- Juergen Arndt From solaris at jmarki.net Sun Mar 22 08:27:37 2009 From: solaris at jmarki.net (Junhao) Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 15:27:37 +0800 Subject: [csw-users] New packages for nagios, nrpe, nsca and the nagios plugins released In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <49C5E869.4040704@jmarki.net> Juergen Arndt wrote: > Hi all, > > new packages for nagios, NRPE, NSCA and the nagios plugins are available. > > The former package "nagiosp" was renamed to "nagios_plugins". > > As Phil statet: "pk-get upgrade" should work fine. But any prior saved > output from > "pkg-get -l" that had "nagiosp" in it, will now be invalid. > Plus any automated checks for things like "pkg-get -c" that explicitly > checked for nagiosp. > > Juergen > There may be three problems with the CSWnrpe installation 1) it somehow overwrote my existing nrpe.cfg file at /opt/csw/nagios/etc/nrpe.cfg. Not sure how that happened. 2) the nrpe binary is at /opt/csw/bin/nrpe, but the manifest script looks at /opt/csw/nagios/bin/nrpe (filed as bug #3478) 3) the nrpe.cfg configuration file is installed in /opt/csw/etc/nrpe.cfg, but the manifest script does not look there. Should this be filed? Junhao From ja at baltic-online.de Sun Mar 22 09:07:04 2009 From: ja at baltic-online.de (Juergen Arndt) Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 09:07:04 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] New packages for nagios, nrpe, nsca and the nagios plugins released In-Reply-To: <49C5E869.4040704@jmarki.net> References: <49C5E869.4040704@jmarki.net> Message-ID: On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 08:27:37 +0100, Junhao wrote: > There may be three problems with the CSWnrpe installation > > 1) it somehow overwrote my existing nrpe.cfg file at > /opt/csw/nagios/etc/nrpe.cfg. Not sure how that happened. I cannot reproduce this, strange. In fact, the package doesn't create such a file. > 2) the nrpe binary is at /opt/csw/bin/nrpe, but the manifest script > looks at /opt/csw/nagios/bin/nrpe (filed as bug #3478) Bug is confirmed and the issue is fixed. Please try out the nrpe packages in testing. > 3) the nrpe.cfg configuration file is installed in > /opt/csw/etc/nrpe.cfg, but the manifest script does not look there. > Should this be filed? Not necessary in my opinion. I corrected that in the current testing package. If the testing package is working well (at least on my installation it does), I will release it. Please give me note. Thank you! Juergen -- Juergen Arndt Baltic Online Computer GmbH Firmensitz: Alter Markt 1-2, 24103 Kiel http://www.baltic-online.de Tel.: +49 (0)431 54003-0 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Erik Cickovskis, Amtsgericht Kiel, HRB 3756 From maciej.blizinski at gmail.com Sun Mar 22 10:32:19 2009 From: maciej.blizinski at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Blizi=C5=84ski?=) Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 09:32:19 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] A build for review: rxvt-unicode In-Reply-To: <49B7DA2F.8030004@wbonnet.net> References: <49B7DA2F.8030004@wbonnet.net> Message-ID: On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 3:35 PM, William Bonnet wrote: > (...) Packages must be built on the farm, then submitted to Phil for unstable. standards/pkg-walkthrough page says that packages are built by hand on machines, but then there's also the continuous integration (hudson) page, which suggests there's an automatic framework which builds packages. What's the current procedure of building a package? From maciej.blizinski at gmail.com Sun Mar 22 10:37:37 2009 From: maciej.blizinski at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Blizi=C5=84ski?=) Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 09:37:37 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] A build for review: rxvt-unicode In-Reply-To: References: <49B81B19.5090409@wbonnet.net> Message-ID: On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 7:47 AM, Maciej Blizi?ski wrote: > The bit of code in question uses a big macro to avoid using templates. > I'll need some time to pull it apart. I solved this bit, but other problems occurred, and I haven't been so far able to successfully build rxvt-unicode using Sun Studio. I submitted for now a gcc-based build. From maciej.blizinski at gmail.com Sun Mar 22 12:46:47 2009 From: maciej.blizinski at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Blizi=C5=84ski?=) Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 11:46:47 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] A build for review: rxvt-unicode In-Reply-To: References: <49B81B19.5090409@wbonnet.net> Message-ID: The package doesn't build on Solaris 8 due to the lack of XSetIMValues in /usr/include/X11/Xlib.h. /opt/csw/gcc4/bin/g++ -I.. -I. -I. -I./../libev -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I/opt/csw/include -I/opt/csw/include -I/opt/csw/include/freetype2 -mtune=i686 -O2 -pipe -m32 -march=i386 -I/opt/csw/include -w -DDEBUG_STRICT -c rxvttoolkit.C rxvttoolkit.C: In member function 'bool rxvt_xim::ref_init()': rxvttoolkit.C:189: error: 'XSetIMValues' was not declared in this scope gmake[4]: *** [rxvttoolkit.o] Error 1 gmake[4]: Leaving directory `/home/maciej/src/urxvt/trunk/work/build-isa-i386/rxvt-unicode-9.06/src' What's the usual way of handling this kind of problems? (incompatible/old headers on Solaris 8) Maciej From solaris at jmarki.net Sun Mar 22 15:17:06 2009 From: solaris at jmarki.net (Junhao) Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 22:17:06 +0800 Subject: [csw-users] New packages for nagios, nrpe, nsca and the nagios plugins released In-Reply-To: References: <49C5E869.4040704@jmarki.net> Message-ID: <49C64862.3010208@jmarki.net> Juergen Arndt wrote: > On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 08:27:37 +0100, Junhao wrote: > >> There may be three problems with the CSWnrpe installation >> >> 1) it somehow overwrote my existing nrpe.cfg file at >> /opt/csw/nagios/etc/nrpe.cfg. Not sure how that happened. > > I cannot reproduce this, strange. In fact, the package doesn't create > such a file. > >> 2) the nrpe binary is at /opt/csw/bin/nrpe, but the manifest script >> looks at /opt/csw/nagios/bin/nrpe (filed as bug #3478) > > Bug is confirmed and the issue is fixed. Please try out the nrpe > packages in testing. > >> 3) the nrpe.cfg configuration file is installed in >> /opt/csw/etc/nrpe.cfg, but the manifest script does not look there. >> Should this be filed? > > Not necessary in my opinion. I corrected that in the current testing > package. > > If the testing package is working well (at least on my installation it > does), I will release it. Please give me note. > > Thank you! > > Juergen > NRPE package in testing is working fine now. =) Just noticed something interesting: shell$ pkg-get -c nagios_plugins 1.4.13,REV=2009.03.20 SAME nagiosp 1.4.13,REV=2009.03.20 1.4.11,REV=2008.01.05 Not sure what's the cause, maybe it's a transition side effect from the ibiblio.org catalogue Regards, Junhao From hson at opencsw.org Sun Mar 22 16:01:59 2009 From: hson at opencsw.org (=?UTF-8?B?Um9nZXIgSMOla2Fuc3Nvbg==?=) Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 16:01:59 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] A build for review: rxvt-unicode In-Reply-To: References: <49B81B19.5090409@wbonnet.net> Message-ID: <49C652E7.8030207@opencsw.org> Maciej Blizi?ski wrote: > The package doesn't build on Solaris 8 due to the lack of XSetIMValues > in /usr/include/X11/Xlib.h. > > /opt/csw/gcc4/bin/g++ -I.. -I. -I. -I./../libev -DHAVE_CONFIG_H > -I/opt/csw/include -I/opt/csw/include -I/opt/csw/include/freetype2 > -mtune=i686 -O2 -pipe -m32 -march=i386 -I/opt/csw/include -w > -DDEBUG_STRICT -c rxvttoolkit.C > rxvttoolkit.C: In member function 'bool rxvt_xim::ref_init()': > rxvttoolkit.C:189: error: 'XSetIMValues' was not declared in this scope > gmake[4]: *** [rxvttoolkit.o] Error 1 > gmake[4]: Leaving directory > `/home/maciej/src/urxvt/trunk/work/build-isa-i386/rxvt-unicode-9.06/src' > > What's the usual way of handling this kind of problems? > (incompatible/old headers on Solaris 8) Make a patchfile for rxvttoolkit.C. What's needed is: #ifdef __sun extern "C" char * XSetIMValues(XIM im, ...); #endif From ja at baltic-online.de Sun Mar 22 16:24:29 2009 From: ja at baltic-online.de (Juergen Arndt) Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 16:24:29 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] New packages for nagios, nrpe, nsca and the nagios plugins released In-Reply-To: <49C64862.3010208@jmarki.net> References: <49C5E869.4040704@jmarki.net> <49C64862.3010208@jmarki.net> Message-ID: On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 15:17:06 +0100, Junhao wrote: > NRPE package in testing is working fine now. =) Good to hear that, sorry for any inconvenience. It will be released as soon as possible. > Just noticed something interesting: > > shell$ pkg-get -c > > nagios_plugins 1.4.13,REV=2009.03.20 SAME > nagiosp 1.4.13,REV=2009.03.20 1.4.11,REV=2008.01.05 > > Not sure what's the cause, maybe it's a transition side effect from the > ibiblio.org catalogue Hmm, seems to be related to the renaming from nagiosp to nagios_plugins. I'll try to get some info about that. Juergen -- Juergen Arndt From maciej.blizinski at gmail.com Sun Mar 22 20:10:01 2009 From: maciej.blizinski at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Blizi=C5=84ski?=) Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 19:10:01 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] rxvt-unicode available in testing Message-ID: Thanks to Roger I've built rxvt-unicode for Solaris 8 and pushed packages to testing. rxvt-unicode is a lightweight terminal emulator with unicode support. It has a nice feature of borrowing missing characters from other fonts; if the current font is missing certain character, rxvt-unicode will take a character from a different font. It's much better behavior than displaying a square or a question mark. pkg-get -s http://mirror.opencsw.org/opencsw/testing -U -u urxvt I've also created issue 3480[1] and a patch which deals with the problem of "Need TWO args to newer_rev" when installing a package from testing using pkg-get while having a non-en_US.UTF-8 locale. Maciej [1] http://www.opencsw.org/mantis/view.php?id=3480 From maciej.blizinski at gmail.com Sun Mar 22 20:15:28 2009 From: maciej.blizinski at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Blizi=C5=84ski?=) Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 19:15:28 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] cswproto not found In-Reply-To: References: <98313864-AC54-4D83-AD69-035832E45F81@opencsw.org> Message-ID: On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 7:56 AM, Maciej Blizi?ski wrote: > On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:57 PM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: >> Hi Maciej, >> >> Am 10.03.2009 um 08:50 schrieb Maciej Blizi?ski: >>> Is it gar v1 or v2? >>> >>> You can check that using: "grep http gar/.svn/entries" >> >> This is, uhm, very creative ;-) The usual way to check this >> is via >> >>> dam at login [login]:/home/dam/mgar/pkg/autoconf > svn propget >>> svn:externals trunk/ >>> gar https://gar.svn.sf.net/svnroot/gar/csw/mgar/gar/v2 > > There's a problem with svn:externals: if you create new directory > (e.g. for a new software package) and you add the property > svn:externals, you need first to commit your directory (and > svn:externals) and _then_ you can check out the externals. I had to do > copy the directory with gar, and coulnd't have svn:externals property > set. There probably is a better way of checking this, though. I found a better way. For the record: maciej at build8s [build8s]:~/src/urxvt/trunk > svn info gar | grep URL URL: https://gar.svn.sf.net/svnroot/gar/csw/mgar/gar/v2 From blizinski at google.com Sun Mar 22 22:43:27 2009 From: blizinski at google.com (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski) Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 21:43:27 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] keychain in testing Message-ID: keychain is a manager for ssh-agent. It's useful for keeping ssh keys safe. Typing passwords multiple times makes people use passwordless keys. Instead of doing that, ssh-agent can be used, but it's a bit cumbersome to manage. keychain nicely wraps ssh-agent (and gpg-agent). pkg-get -s http://mirror.opencsw.org/opencsw/testing -U -u keychain To use keychain, it's enough to add this to ~/.bash_profile: keychain ~/.ssh/id_dsa . ~/.keychain/$HOSTNAME-sh (assuming the usage of bash and id_dsa as the ssh key in use) Maciej From dam at opencsw.org Sun Mar 22 22:44:43 2009 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 22:44:43 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] A build for review: rxvt-unicode In-Reply-To: References: <49B7DA2F.8030004@wbonnet.net> Message-ID: Hi Maciej, Am 22.03.2009 um 10:32 schrieb Maciej Blizi?ski: > On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 3:35 PM, William Bonnet > wrote: >> (...) Packages must be built on the farm, then submitted to Phil >> for unstable. > > standards/pkg-walkthrough page says that packages are built by hand on > machines, Or with GAR. > but then there's also the continuous integration (hudson) > page, which suggests there's an automatic framework which builds > packages. What's the current procedure of building a package? You are urged to build the package on the buildfarm and GAR is highly recommended. The Hudson installation is experimental, feel free to ask here or Trygve Laugst?l directly as he is the Hudson maintainer of the farm. Best regards -- Dago From blizinski at google.com Sun Mar 22 22:52:11 2009 From: blizinski at google.com (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski) Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 21:52:11 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] A build for review: rxvt-unicode In-Reply-To: References: <49B7DA2F.8030004@wbonnet.net> Message-ID: On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 9:44 PM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: >> but then there's also the continuous integration (hudson) >> page, which suggests there's an automatic framework which builds >> packages. What's the current procedure of building a package? > > You are urged to build the package on the buildfarm and GAR is > highly recommended. The Hudson installation is experimental, > feel free to ask here or Trygve Laugst?l directly as he is > the Hudson maintainer of the farm. I would be interesting to learn how to use it. I really like the idea. In the meantime, I built rxvt-unicode using GAR on the farm, everything was jolly and good. By the way - is there a known way to build all 4 packages (build{8,10}{s,x}) at the same time? From dam at opencsw.org Sun Mar 22 22:56:30 2009 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 22:56:30 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] A build for review: rxvt-unicode In-Reply-To: References: <49B7DA2F.8030004@wbonnet.net> Message-ID: Hi Maciej, Am 22.03.2009 um 22:52 schrieb Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski: > On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 9:44 PM, Dagobert Michelsen > wrote: >>> but then there's also the continuous integration (hudson) >>> page, which suggests there's an automatic framework which builds >>> packages. What's the current procedure of building a package? >> >> You are urged to build the package on the buildfarm and GAR is >> highly recommended. The Hudson installation is experimental, >> feel free to ask here or Trygve Laugst?l directly as he is >> the Hudson maintainer of the farm. > > I would be interesting to learn how to use it. I really like the idea. > > In the meantime, I built rxvt-unicode using GAR on the farm, > everything was jolly and good. By the way - is there a known way to > build all 4 packages (build{8,10}{s,x}) at the same time? This is currently not possible as some directories in GAR overlap between sparc and x86. You need to build sparc only on Solaris 8. The package for x86 is usually a combined package containing files from Solaris 8 x86 and 64-bit components from Solaris 10 and must therefore always be built sequentially. Building multiple ISAs of one package at the same time is an ineteresting idea but some more time away. Best regards -- Dago From bonivart at opencsw.org Mon Mar 23 11:46:20 2009 From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 11:46:20 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] pkgutil 1.5 beta 3 - please help with testing Message-ID: <625385e30903230346r5a5f9aated6923184da8be7f@mail.gmail.com> Pkgutil, the easy to use install utility, will soon be released as version 1.5 and I would like some extra testing. One big change is that you can now have any number of mirrors configured and pkgutil will automatically select the latest package available unless you specify a version explicitly. For example, if you have this in pkgutil.conf: mirror=http://ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/opencsw/current mirror=http://mirror.opencsw.org/opencsw/testing It will pick from the testing mirror if a later version is available there but if you explicitly say that you want another version it will select that one, examples follow: # pkgutil -i memconf (will select memconf-2.10,REV=2009.03.23 from testing) # pkgutil -i memconf-2.9,REV=2008.11.21 (will select memconf-2.9,REV=2008.11.21 from current) Note that the syntax for the -t option has changed, you now don't have to add `uname -p`/`uname -r` any more so if you want to try a package from testing use this shorter command: # pkgutil -t http://mirror.opencsw.org/opencsw/testing -i Also, you should notice a big speed improvement when updating all packages (pkgutil -u), before pkgutil could spend considerable time finding dependencies but it should now be much faster. Here's the packages: http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/pkgutil-1.5b3,REV=2009.03.19-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/pkgutil-1.5b3,REV=2009.03.19-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz If you're already running an older version of pkgutil you can update with: # pkgutil -t http://mirror.opencsw.org/opencsw/testing/`uname -p`/`uname -r` -u pkgutil Report directly back to me if you find any problems but please also tell me if it works. As always your comments for future versions are welcome. Thanks! -- /peter From blizinski at google.com Mon Mar 23 19:29:27 2009 From: blizinski at google.com (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 18:29:27 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] Solaris port of vixie-cron - a GAR build for review In-Reply-To: <5097C18B-C38D-44E3-91FA-2E64F98A6ADF@opencsw.org> References: <5097C18B-C38D-44E3-91FA-2E64F98A6ADF@opencsw.org> Message-ID: On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > Hi Maciej, > > Am 13.03.2009 um 17:25 schrieb Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski: >> >> I would like to offer a GAR build of vixie-cron. > > Did you ever found the time to commit it? I committed the code I have at the moment; it needs more work. Specifically -- SMF support. I wanted to use builtin mGAR SMF support, but it's not finish yet, and the package doesn't build[1]. I was able to create a package by tweaking some GAR code, but the resulting package works only with the global zone. Since we're at it, there are at least 3 packages replacing existing daemons: printing, syslog and cron. How about having mGAR support a parameter denoting, which other SMF service should be disabled before enabling the one being installed? Maciej [1] https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2675276&group_id=229205&atid=1075770 From ihsan at opencsw.org Mon Mar 23 19:49:31 2009 From: ihsan at opencsw.org (Ihsan Dogan) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 19:49:31 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Apache 2.2.11 in testing Message-ID: <49C7D9BB.3040209@opencsw.org> Hello, New Apache 2.2.11 packages are in testing, available at http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing.html . CHANGES: - Using now cswinitsmf Ihsan -- ihsan at dogan.ch http://blog.dogan.ch/ From william at wbonnet.net Mon Mar 23 23:38:42 2009 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 23:38:42 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Perl module PDF2API v0.73 is in testing Message-ID: <49C80F72.90707@wbonnet.net> Hi Perl module PDF2API has been updated. Version 0.73 is in testing. Cheers W. -- William http://www.wbonnet.net http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix http://www.opencsw.org Community SoftWare for Solaris http://www.guses.org French speaking Solaris User Group From ja at baltic-online.de Mon Mar 23 23:51:32 2009 From: ja at baltic-online.de (Juergen Arndt) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 23:51:32 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] pnp 0.4.13 in testing Message-ID: Hi all, new pnp (www.pnp4nagios.org) packages are in testing. For Solaris 10 you have to configure pnp to use rrdtool itself instead of the RRDs perl module. There is a known bug in the module. (in /opt/csw/nagios/pnp/etc/process_perfdata.cfg: USE_RRDs = 0) If you don't want to use the npcd daemon, you can ignore the dependency to SUNWscpux on sparc or SUNWscpu on i386. Juergen -- Juergen Arndt From glaw at opencsw.org Tue Mar 24 00:45:20 2009 From: glaw at opencsw.org (Gary Law) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 23:45:20 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] puppet 0.24.8 in testing Message-ID: Feedback welcome Gary -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dam at opencsw.org Tue Mar 24 11:18:43 2009 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 11:18:43 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] libgsasl 1.0 in testing/ Message-ID: <4B467350-9411-4CD1-84BD-13202083EB5F@opencsw.org> Hi, I put an updated libgsasl 1.0 in testing/. As I don't use SASL myself please someone give it a try who actually uses it. Thanks! -- Dago From william at wbonnet.net Tue Mar 24 22:47:59 2009 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 22:47:59 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Some Perl module updates are in testing Message-ID: <49C9550F.8030109@wbonnet.net> Hi I have updated a few perl modules. They are availables from testing Parse-Syslog is now in version 1.10 Parse-RecDescent is now in version 1.96.0 Package-Constants is now in version 0.02 Object-Accessor is now in version 0.34 Cheers W. -- William http://www.wbonnet.net http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix http://www.opencsw.org Community SoftWare for Solaris http://www.guses.org French speaking Solaris User Group From sergiocharpinel at gmail.com Wed Mar 25 18:53:23 2009 From: sergiocharpinel at gmail.com (Sergio Charpinel Jr.) Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:53:23 -0300 Subject: [csw-users] KDE not starting Message-ID: Hi, I have SunOS 5.11 and I installed KDE through pkg-get : # pkg-get -i kde_gcc The installation run fine, but KDE doesnt start. It shows the KDE loading window, and takes a long time in Display icon. Then, it doesnt show all the buttons, the screen becomes white. Any helps please? Thanks -- Sergio Roberto Charpinel Jr. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From admin at dmarkey.com Wed Mar 25 20:00:56 2009 From: admin at dmarkey.com (David) Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 19:00:56 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] KDE not starting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <6894a6470903251200x50765668of3e9ec354d8fb47d@mail.gmail.com> How many versions of arts/qt do you installed? I think two conflict. Do the buttons have no text by any chance? 2009/3/25 Sergio Charpinel Jr. > Hi, > I have SunOS 5.11 and I installed KDE through pkg-get : # pkg-get -i > kde_gcc > The installation run fine, but KDE doesnt start. It shows the KDE loading > window, and takes a long time in Display icon. Then, it doesnt show all the > buttons, the screen becomes white. > Any helps please? > Thanks > > -- > Sergio Roberto Charpinel Jr. > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/users > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From sergiocharpinel at gmail.com Wed Mar 25 22:26:38 2009 From: sergiocharpinel at gmail.com (Sergio Charpinel Jr.) Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 18:26:38 -0300 Subject: [csw-users] KDE not starting In-Reply-To: <6894a6470903251200x50765668of3e9ec354d8fb47d@mail.gmail.com> References: <6894a6470903251200x50765668of3e9ec354d8fb47d@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: I tried to install KDE mannually before that. I will try to remove, and i will post the result Thankss 2009/3/25 David > How many versions of arts/qt do you installed? I think two conflict. Do the > buttons have no text by any chance? > > > > 2009/3/25 Sergio Charpinel Jr. > >> Hi, >> I have SunOS 5.11 and I installed KDE through pkg-get : # pkg-get -i >> kde_gcc >> The installation run fine, but KDE doesnt start. It shows the KDE loading >> window, and takes a long time in Display icon. Then, it doesnt show all the >> buttons, the screen becomes white. >> Any helps please? >> Thanks >> >> -- >> Sergio Roberto Charpinel Jr. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> users mailing list >> users at lists.opencsw.org >> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/users >> > > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/users > -- Sergio Roberto Charpinel Jr. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From sergiocharpinel at gmail.com Thu Mar 26 00:43:37 2009 From: sergiocharpinel at gmail.com (Sergio Charpinel Jr.) Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 20:43:37 -0300 Subject: [csw-users] KDE not starting In-Reply-To: References: <6894a6470903251200x50765668of3e9ec354d8fb47d@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: Thx David, there was another qt version installed. Not it is working. Just one more question. I need to copy the KDE's skel of linux to my Solaris. Do you know how can I do this? Thanks. 2009/3/25 Sergio Charpinel Jr. > I tried to install KDE mannually before that. > I will try to remove, and i will post the result > Thankss > > 2009/3/25 David > > How many versions of arts/qt do you installed? I think two conflict. Do the >> buttons have no text by any chance? >> >> >> >> 2009/3/25 Sergio Charpinel Jr. >> >>> Hi, >>> I have SunOS 5.11 and I installed KDE through pkg-get : # pkg-get -i >>> kde_gcc >>> The installation run fine, but KDE doesnt start. It shows the KDE loading >>> window, and takes a long time in Display icon. Then, it doesnt show all the >>> buttons, the screen becomes white. >>> Any helps please? >>> Thanks >>> >>> -- >>> Sergio Roberto Charpinel Jr. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> users mailing list >>> users at lists.opencsw.org >>> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/users >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> users mailing list >> users at lists.opencsw.org >> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/users >> > > > > -- > Sergio Roberto Charpinel Jr. > -- Sergio Roberto Charpinel Jr. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From schwindt at dfki.uni-kl.de Thu Mar 26 11:14:53 2009 From: schwindt at dfki.uni-kl.de (Nicolai Schwindt) Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 11:14:53 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Versions of git Message-ID: <200903261014.n2QAEpUn023095@dfki.uni-kl.de> my local machines tell me : pkg-get -c | grep git git 1.6.2.1,REV=2009.03.24 SAME git_cvs 1.6.2.1,REV=2009.03.24 1.6.0.5,REV=2009.01.08 git_doc 1.6.2.1,REV=2009.03.24 1.6.0.5,REV=2009.01.08 git_gui 1.6.2.1,REV=2009.03.24 1.6.0.5,REV=2009.01.08 git_svn 1.6.2.1,REV=2009.03.24 1.6.0.5,REV=2009.01.08 gitcvs 1.6.2.1,REV=2009.03.24 SAME gitdoc 1.6.2.1,REV=2009.03.24 SAME gitgui 1.6.2.1,REV=2009.03.24 SAME gitk 1.6.2.1,REV=2009.03.24 SAME gitsvn 1.6.2.1,REV=2009.03.24 SAME The occurrence of version 1.6.0.5 makes me wonder. Thats why I did : pkginfo | grep -i git application CSWgit git - Fast Version Control System application CSWgitcvs gitcvs - Git tools for working with CVS repositories application CSWgitdoc gitdoc - Documentation for Git application CSWgitemacs gitemacs - Git VCS support for Emacs application CSWgitgui gitgui - Git GUI tool application CSWgitk gitk - Git revision tree visualiser application CSWgitsvn gitsvn - Git tools for working with Subversion repositories Something is wrong with the naming scheme. Maybe it was a good Idea to take the old version containing the underscore of the mirror and out of the package list. One of my colleague - being unable to read version strings and release numbers - struggled a while trying to get rid of the old version and installing the new ones. Nicolai Schwindt From hson at opencsw.org Thu Mar 26 11:43:18 2009 From: hson at opencsw.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Roger_H=E5kansson?=) Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 11:43:18 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] netsnmp 5.4.2.1 in /testing Message-ID: <49CB5C46.8000005@opencsw.org> I've packaged netsnmp 5.4.2.1 and it's available from http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing I would appreciate if someone who actually use it today could test it before I release it. From skayser at opencsw.org Thu Mar 26 13:52:47 2009 From: skayser at opencsw.org (Sebastian Kayser) Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 13:52:47 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] pkgutil 1.5 beta 3 - please help with testing In-Reply-To: <625385e30903230346r5a5f9aated6923184da8be7f@mail.gmail.com> References: <625385e30903230346r5a5f9aated6923184da8be7f@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <49CB7A9F.1050208@opencsw.org> Peter Bonivart wrote: > Pkgutil, the easy to use install utility, will soon be released as > version 1.5 and I would like some extra testing. > > One big change is that you can now have any number of mirrors > configured and pkgutil will automatically select the latest package > available unless you specify a version explicitly. For example, if you > have this in pkgutil.conf: > > mirror=http://ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/opencsw/current > mirror=http://mirror.opencsw.org/opencsw/testing > > It will pick from the testing mirror if a later version is available > there but if you explicitly say that you want another version it will > select that one Peter, one more thing. Is it possible to specify a local file:// repository, too? We have some local build machines here and i would love to just point pkgutil to a mount point rather than setting up a web server. Sebastian From schwindt at dfki.uni-kl.de Thu Mar 26 14:15:05 2009 From: schwindt at dfki.uni-kl.de (Nicolai Schwindt) Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:15:05 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] package db Message-ID: <200903261315.n2QDF3ic026990@dfki.uni-kl.de> There might be another mistake pkg-get -u pymysql WARNING: remote version older than current version. Not installing remote package of pymysql (remote=1.2.2,REV=2007.10.04, local=1.2.2,REV=2009.03.11) I am using a local mirror of http://csw.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/csw/unstable/i386/5.10/ Just in case it is the mirror. Nicolai Schwindt From bwalton at opencsw.org Thu Mar 26 14:18:54 2009 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 09:18:54 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] Versions of git In-Reply-To: <200903261014.n2QAEpUn023095@dfki.uni-kl.de> References: <200903261014.n2QAEpUn023095@dfki.uni-kl.de> Message-ID: <1238073181-sup-9660@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> Excerpts from Nicolai Schwindt's message of Thu Mar 26 06:14:53 -0400 2009: Hi Nicolai, I apologize for this issue...I wasn't even aware of it until I saw your post here. I recently (between the 1.6.0.5 and 1.6.2.1 release) converted the build description from using static files to dynamically generated ones (GAR gspec). I must have changed the name without realizing it...as all my machines were updated by hand, I didn't bump into it myself. ...so, for any other git users out there, I'd suggest doing a manual pkgrm on CSWgit_svn CSWgit_cvs CSWgit_doc CSWgit_emacs CSWgit_gui, etc...any of the packages that had _ in the name. You should then be able to add back the new packages without problem. If you've already updated to the new versions, which will see you have (for example) gitcvs and git_cvs installed, I'd remove both and then re-add gitcvs. Lather rinse, repeat with any other _ versions you've got. I apologize for this. As I mentioned, it was not intentional. Sorry for any wasted cycles. Thanks -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 GPG Key Id: 8E89F6D2; Key Server: pgp.mit.edu Contact me to arrange for a CAcert assurance meeting. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From bwalton at opencsw.org Thu Mar 26 14:50:39 2009 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 09:50:39 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] Versions of git In-Reply-To: <1238073181-sup-9660@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> References: <200903261014.n2QAEpUn023095@dfki.uni-kl.de> <1238073181-sup-9660@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: <1238075074-sup-6822@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> Excerpts from Ben Walton's message of Thu Mar 26 09:18:54 -0400 2009: > Excerpts from Nicolai Schwindt's message of Thu Mar 26 06:14:53 -0400 2009: > ...so, for any other git users out there, I'd suggest doing a manual > pkgrm on CSWgit_svn CSWgit_cvs CSWgit_doc CSWgit_emacs CSWgit_gui, > etc...any of the packages that had _ in the name. You should then be > able to add back the new packages without problem. I realized that I only changed the catalog name, not the package name (which is better, but obviously not good). I still recommend pkgrm'ing CSWgit{emacs,doc,svn,cvs,gui} and then doing pkg-get -i git{emacs,doc,svn,cvs,gui} in whatever combo you want/need. I'll work to get the old names handled in a cleaner fashion (catalog-wise) for future updates. Thanks and sorry. -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 GPG Key Id: 8E89F6D2; Key Server: pgp.mit.edu Contact me to arrange for a CAcert assurance meeting. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From bonivart at opencsw.org Thu Mar 26 15:23:12 2009 From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart) Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 15:23:12 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] pkgutil 1.5 beta 3 - please help with testing In-Reply-To: <49CB7A9F.1050208@opencsw.org> References: <625385e30903230346r5a5f9aated6923184da8be7f@mail.gmail.com> <49CB7A9F.1050208@opencsw.org> Message-ID: <625385e30903260723u44070638u4f2f23b392708162@mail.gmail.com> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 1:52 PM, Sebastian Kayser wrote: > Peter, one more thing. Is it possible to specify a local file:// > repository, too? We have some local build machines here and i would love > to just point pkgutil to a mount point rather than setting up a web server. Try it. :-) I put that into 1.4. Specify something like: mirror=file://absolute/path/to/files Contact me if it doesn't work, since I don't use it myself I haven't tested it much. I'm planning to support curl in future versions and then we can use more transports, also in parallel. -- /peter From paul.salazar at testspectrum.com Thu Mar 26 16:24:33 2009 From: paul.salazar at testspectrum.com (Paul Salazar) Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 10:24:33 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] remove me from your list Message-ID: <49CB9E31.10401@testspectrum.com> thanks -- Paul Salazar Test Spectrum, Inc. 9701 Brodie Lane, Suite 101 Austin, TX 78748 Phone: (512) 472-6750 x305 Cell: (512) 762-9002 Fax: (512) 472-6760 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ja at opencsw.org Thu Mar 26 23:51:42 2009 From: ja at opencsw.org (Juergen Arndt) Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:51:42 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] NDOutils 1.4b7 and NagVis 1.3.2 in testing Message-ID: Hi all, packages for NDOutils (database backend for Nagios) and NagVis (visualization add-on for Nagios) are available in testing. Any feedback is welcome. Juergen -- Juergen Arndt From bwalton at opencsw.org Fri Mar 27 02:09:34 2009 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 21:09:34 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] Versions of git In-Reply-To: <200903261014.n2QAEpUn023095@dfki.uni-kl.de> References: <200903261014.n2QAEpUn023095@dfki.uni-kl.de> Message-ID: <1238116033-sup-4594@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> Hi Nicolai, I've released updated git packages that revert to the old catalog names. They will be available as the mirrors are updated. The accidentally introduced catalog names will be retired. Please let me know if you have any problems with this after your mirror has refreshed. Thanks, and once again, sorry for the inconvenience. -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 GPG Key Id: 8E89F6D2; Key Server: pgp.mit.edu Contact me to arrange for a CAcert assurance meeting. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From maciej at opencsw.org Fri Mar 27 09:01:19 2009 From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski) Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 08:01:19 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] clusterssh-3.25 in testing Message-ID: clusterssh-3.25 (upgrade from 3.22) is available in testing. New build fixes two missing dependencies. By the way, I know that packages usually have their maintainers - is it considered inappropriate to commit upgrades to other people's packages? I guess for packages such as openssl or mysql it is -- What about minor utilities such as this one? Maciej From bonivart at opencsw.org Fri Mar 27 10:42:57 2009 From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart) Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 10:42:57 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] clusterssh-3.25 in testing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <625385e30903270242lc8a240ep2b5b6a156c4d4be3@mail.gmail.com> On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 9:01 AM, Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski wrote: > By the way, I know that packages usually have their maintainers - is > it considered inappropriate to commit upgrades to other people's > packages? I guess for packages such as openssl or mysql it is -- What > about minor utilities such as this one? I think you should file an upgrade bug in Mantis first. Most maintainers use their own packages and keep it up to date but if they don't respond you can post on the maintainers list about taking over the package. This post really belongs on the maintainers list as well. Please subscribe to it if you don't already. -- /peter From maciej at opencsw.org Fri Mar 27 11:20:09 2009 From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski) Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 10:20:09 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] clusterssh-3.25 in testing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 8:01 AM, Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski wrote: > clusterssh-3.25 (upgrade from 3.22) is available in testing. New build > fixes two missing dependencies. > > By the way, I know that packages usually have their maintainers - is > it considered inappropriate to commit upgrades to other people's > packages? I guess for packages such as openssl or mysql it is -- What > about minor utilities such as this one? After talking to maintainers, I learned that building a package equals taking it over. I didn't mean to do that; I removed the package from testing and filed an issue[1] in Mantis instead. Maciej [1] http://www.opencsw.org/bugtrack/view.php?id=3507 From pfelecan at opencsw.org Fri Mar 27 15:48:48 2009 From: pfelecan at opencsw.org (Peter FELECAN) Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:48:48 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] pkgutil 1.5 beta 3 - please help with testing In-Reply-To: <625385e30903260723u44070638u4f2f23b392708162@mail.gmail.com> (Peter Bonivart's message of "Thu\, 26 Mar 2009 15\:23\:12 +0100") References: <625385e30903230346r5a5f9aated6923184da8be7f@mail.gmail.com> <49CB7A9F.1050208@opencsw.org> <625385e30903260723u44070638u4f2f23b392708162@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: Peter Bonivart writes: > On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 1:52 PM, Sebastian Kayser wrote: >> Peter, one more thing. Is it possible to specify a local file:// >> repository, too? We have some local build machines here and i would love >> to just point pkgutil to a mount point rather than setting up a web server. > > Try it. :-) > > I put that into 1.4. Specify something like: > > mirror=file://absolute/path/to/files make that mirror=file:///absolute/path/to/files -- Peter From bonivart at opencsw.org Fri Mar 27 16:08:56 2009 From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart) Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 16:08:56 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] pkgutil 1.5 beta 3 - please help with testing In-Reply-To: References: <625385e30903230346r5a5f9aated6923184da8be7f@mail.gmail.com> <49CB7A9F.1050208@opencsw.org> <625385e30903260723u44070638u4f2f23b392708162@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <625385e30903270808w4470672fv60727179c4a63c4b@mail.gmail.com> On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Peter FELECAN wrote: > Peter Bonivart writes: > >> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 1:52 PM, Sebastian Kayser wrote: >>> Peter, one more thing. Is it possible to specify a local file:// >>> repository, too? We have some local build machines here and i would love >>> to just point pkgutil to a mount point rather than setting up a web server. >> >> Try it. :-) >> >> I put that into 1.4. Specify something like: >> >> mirror=file://absolute/path/to/files > > make that mirror=file:///absolute/path/to/files Thanks. :-) I will check the man page and so on to make sure it's correct there. By the way, we're working on another beta which will include a couple of minor things and one larger issue with the dependency order when specifying multiple packages on the command line. Thanks for reporting both good and bad. -- /peter From hson at opencsw.org Fri Mar 27 17:43:50 2009 From: hson at opencsw.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Roger_H=E5kansson?=) Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 17:43:50 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] New netsnmp 5.4.2.1 packages in /testing Message-ID: <49CD0246.2060506@opencsw.org> New from yesterday is perl and python modules... From mwatters at opencsw.org Fri Mar 27 19:33:16 2009 From: mwatters at opencsw.org (Mike Watters) Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 13:33:16 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] cmake 2.6.3 now in testing Message-ID: <49CD1BEC.9090505@opencsw.org> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 built with gar v2 upgraded from 2.4.8 - -- Thanks, Mike "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius -- and a lot of courage -- to move in the opposite direction." * Albert Einstein 1879 - 1955 US German-born Theoretical Physicist -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (SunOS) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAknNG+wACgkQLrhmsXMSLxeM3QCfYsfEAaMqDeHVGTVNGWmT8oVf 560AoJ4LfHJB7OJ1npqkwnV3UU7LY7r9 =p0R7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From william at wbonnet.net Fri Mar 27 22:34:52 2009 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 22:34:52 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] NDOutils 1.4b7 and NagVis 1.3.2 in testing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <49CD467C.30902@wbonnet.net> Hi Juergen > NagVis (visualization add-on for Nagios) are available in testing. Thanks a lot :) Cheers -- William http://www.wbonnet.net http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix http://www.opencsw.org Community SoftWare for Solaris http://www.guses.org French speaking Solaris User Group From maciej at opencsw.org Sat Mar 28 07:33:45 2009 From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski) Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 06:33:45 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] *.wikidot.com DNS timeouts Message-ID: I observe problems with resolving hosts *.wikidot.org, on which wiki.opencsw.org depends. I had similar problems with pkgutil's wiki the other day. An example: maciej at quince ~ $ time host www.wikidot.org ;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached real 0m10.115s user 0m0.004s sys 0m0.000s Symptoms: web page doesn't display. After several refreshes, it displays, but without CSS. Did anyone else see this? From bonivart at opencsw.org Sat Mar 28 09:35:49 2009 From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart) Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 09:35:49 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] *.wikidot.com DNS timeouts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <625385e30903280135m66a6026al20bc28326b8ec3cd@mail.gmail.com> On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 7:33 AM, Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski wrote: > I observe problems with resolving hosts *.wikidot.org, on which > wiki.opencsw.org depends. I had similar problems with pkgutil's wiki > the other day. An example: > > maciej at quince ~ $ time host www.wikidot.org > ;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached > > real ? ?0m10.115s > user ? ?0m0.004s > sys ? ? 0m0.000s > > Symptoms: web page doesn't display. After several refreshes, it > displays, but without CSS. Did anyone else see this? I'm there quite frequently, having three wikis there, and haven't noticed any problems. I looked through their news where they post problems but I couldn't see anything related. Just tried the same you did: $ time host www.wikidot.org www.wikidot.org is an alias for wikidot.com. wikidot.com has address 67.228.37.26 wikidot.com mail is handled by 1 ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.com. wikidot.com mail is handled by 5 ALT1.ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.com. wikidot.com mail is handled by 5 ALT2.ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.com. wikidot.com mail is handled by 10 ASPMX2.GOOGLEMAIL.com. wikidot.com mail is handled by 10 ASPMX3.GOOGLEMAIL.com. wikidot.com mail is handled by 10 ASPMX4.GOOGLEMAIL.com. wikidot.com mail is handled by 10 ASPMX5.GOOGLEMAIL.com. real 0m0.353s user 0m0.004s sys 0m0.000s Please contact them directly if you keep having problems. -- /peter From yann at pleiades.fr.eu.org Sat Mar 28 14:03:45 2009 From: yann at pleiades.fr.eu.org (Yann Rouillard) Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 14:03:45 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] openssh 5.2 in testing (server/client split and LPK support) Message-ID: <49CE2031.9090003@pleiades.fr.eu.org> Hello, You will find openssh 5.2 packages in testing http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing.html I split the client part in a separate package in this release to allow to only install the client if need, this was requested in bug 2983: http://www.opencsw.org/mantis/view.php?id=2983 and I also created another package with ldap public key patch applied on William's request: http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/openssh_lpk-5.2,REV=2009.03.28_rev=p1-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gzhttp://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/openssh_lpk-5.2,REV=2009.03.28_rev=p1-SunOS5.10-i386-CSW.pkg.gz http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/openssh_lpk-5.2,REV=2009.03.28_rev=p1-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/openssh_lpk-5.2,REV=2009.03.28_rev=p1-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz see http://code.google.com/p/openssh-lpk/ for more information on the LPK patch. Feedbacks would be greatly appreciated. Yann From glaw at opencsw.org Sat Mar 28 18:15:06 2009 From: glaw at opencsw.org (Gary Law) Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 17:15:06 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] clusterssh-3.25 in testing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Thanks largely to Maciej's efforts there is now a new and improved clusterssh package in testing. Enjoy Gary -- Gary Law -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From bwalton at opencsw.org Sun Mar 29 21:54:44 2009 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 15:54:44 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] openssh 5.2 in testing (server/client split and LPK support) In-Reply-To: <49CE2031.9090003@pleiades.fr.eu.org> References: <49CE2031.9090003@pleiades.fr.eu.org> Message-ID: <1238356455-sup-87@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> Excerpts from Yann Rouillard's message of Sat Mar 28 09:03:45 -0400 2009: Hi Yann, > You will find openssh 5.2 packages in testing > http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing.html I'll give these a spin tomorrow. Thanks for splitting the functionality! :) Thanks -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 GPG Key Id: 8E89F6D2; Key Server: pgp.mit.edu Contact me to arrange for a CAcert assurance meeting. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From bonivart at opencsw.org Mon Mar 30 16:45:55 2009 From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:45:55 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] Are you having problems with DHCP 4.1? Message-ID: <625385e30903300745t148568aanc91ca4d75c609d2d@mail.gmail.com> There seems to be problems with the new DHCP package and it's not just our package or even Solaris but it also happens on other OS:es. So far ISC has not released an update. The problem is that some can't get it to work even though the same configuration (hw/sw) work with the old 3.1 package. I've heard from a few of you with problems but myself and a couple of others have it working with no problems. For those of you having problems I have dropped the old 3.1 package into testing so you can easily downgrade manually until this is resolved. It would be great if you could let me know what system and interface you're using DHCP on, maybe we can understand why it works for some and not for others. http://www.opencsw.org/mantis/view.php?id=3464 http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/dhcp-3.1.0,REV=2007.10.29-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/dhcp-3.1.0,REV=2007.10.29-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz -- /peter From mwatters at opencsw.org Tue Mar 31 22:19:34 2009 From: mwatters at opencsw.org (Mike Watters) Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 15:19:34 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] gcc-4.3.3 NOW IN TESTING Message-ID: <49D27AD6.10005@opencsw.org> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 After several concussions and gallons of spackle... gcc-4.3.3 is in testing. This is still missing the ada piece. that one is on its way. - -- Thanks, Mike "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius -- and a lot of courage -- to move in the opposite direction." * Albert Einstein 1879 - 1955 US German-born Theoretical Physicist -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (SunOS) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAknSetYACgkQLrhmsXMSLxcoIgCePPssSpG22F4LLdvi6uTEi1P/ U+cAoJpFLm9cVSV8egULsre6leGzapMl =K/M3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From res at colnet.cmhnet.org Sun Mar 1 06:29:48 2009 From: res at colnet.cmhnet.org (Rob Stampfli) Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 00:29:48 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Warning: Opencsw latest python 2.6.1 compiled for SPARC32PLUS Message-ID: <20090301052948.GA8317@keevey> A word to the wise: If you are on one of the older Sparc boxes with the original SPARC chipset, you will not be able to run the latest python load as it is compiled for the SPARC32PLUS instruction set. (I thought opencsw policy was to not do this. See: http://www.opencsw.org/userguide/faq ) Backing it out now... Rob From sanelson at gmail.com Mon Mar 2 05:37:37 2009 From: sanelson at gmail.com (Stephen Nelson-Smith) Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 04:37:37 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] CSWnrpe not working with custom plugin Message-ID: Hi, I've installed nrpe from the blastwave repository on Solaris 10. From my nagios server (Redhat 5), I'm able to run remote nrpe commands, as specified in nrpe.cfg, such as check_disk, or check_load. I've written a custom monitor which conforms to the nrpe API, and dropped it in /opt/csw/libexec/nagios-plugins/ with appropriate permissions. I've added a line to nrpe.cfg to enable it to be called remotely. I can run this command as the nagios user, and get the results as expected. However, if called over nrpe, I get the error: NRPE: Unable to read output I've enabled debug logging, and restarted nrpe, but I don't see any log messages in syslog other than startup and shutdown. If I disable cswnrpe via svcadm, and run /opt/csw/bin/nrpe -c /opt/csw/etc/nrpe.cfg -d as root on the command line, everything works fine, and I also get log messages, such as: Mar 1 07:56:41 viper SC Alert: [ID 114403 daemon.notice] Audit | minor: root : Activate Session : authentication type = MD5 : privilege level = admin : initial outbound sequence number = 0x8E6E9E0F : challenge string = 0xA8 0x4B 0xC8 0xFD 0xA2 0x4 0x1A 0x90 0xF4 0x49 0xFE 0x15 0x4B 0x48 0x96 0x2D : success Mar 1 07:56:41 viper SC Alert: [ID 709409 daemon.notice] Audit | minor: root : Set Session Privilege Level: privilege level = admin : success Mar 1 07:56:48 viper SC Alert: [ID 920036 daemon.notice] Audit | minor: root : Close Session : session ID = 4153983266 : success Mar 1 08:00:23 viper SC Alert: [ID 163647 daemon.notice] Audit | minor: root : Activate Session : authentication type = MD5 : privilege level = admin : initial outbound sequence number = 0xEC32CA41 : challenge string = 0x25 0xCB 0x5C 0x8F 0xAE 0x6D 0x45 0x46 0x27 0x86 0xE5 0x3F 0xA9 0x8D 0x8A 0x71 : success Mar 1 08:00:23 viper SC Alert: [ID 709409 daemon.notice] Audit | minor: root : Set Session Privilege Level: privilege level = admin : success Mar 1 08:00:31 viper SC Alert: [ID 954504 daemon.notice] Audit | minor: root : Close Session : session ID = 3706478101 : success I've had a look at the shell script that is used by svcadm - /opt/csw/lib/svc/method/svc-nrpe - and all that seems to do is invoke nrpe in the same way that I have on the command line. I see no information in the /var/svc/log/network-cswnrpe:default.log. I'm flummoxed - I can only thing it could be something to do with my environment - in that it works if I launch from the commandline, and doesn't when launched from a script. I can't really use this in production - I want to use the svc properly - but at present I can't see any way to get this to work other than running it manually. Any ideas for further troubleshooting, or suggestions as to what's wrong? Thanks in advance, S. -- Stephen Nelson-Smith Technical Director Atalanta Systems Ltd www.atalanta-systems.com From dam at opencsw.org Mon Mar 2 08:40:55 2009 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 08:40:55 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] CSWnrpe not working with custom plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <229E61A0-39CB-41BD-AA73-EB1F2036FB2F@opencsw.org> Hi Stephen, Am 02.03.2009 um 05:37 schrieb Stephen Nelson-Smith: > I can run this command as the nagios user, and get the results as > expected. However, if called over nrpe, I get the error: There is a new package in testing available at http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing.html Please see if the error persists. Best regards -- Dago From sanelson at gmail.com Mon Mar 2 11:54:08 2009 From: sanelson at gmail.com (Stephen Nelson-Smith) Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 10:54:08 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] CSWnrpe not working with custom plugin In-Reply-To: <229E61A0-39CB-41BD-AA73-EB1F2036FB2F@opencsw.org> References: <229E61A0-39CB-41BD-AA73-EB1F2036FB2F@opencsw.org> Message-ID: On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 7:40 AM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > Hi Stephen, > > Am 02.03.2009 um 05:37 schrieb Stephen Nelson-Smith: >> I can run this command as the nagios user, and get the results as >> expected. ?However, if called over nrpe, I get the error: > > There is a new package in testing available at > ? http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing.html > Please see if the error persists. Thanks. I've resolved the error - my fault entirely. My plugin had #!/usr/bin/env ruby, and not #!/opt/csw/bin/ruby. S. -- Stephen Nelson-Smith Technical Director Atalanta Systems Ltd www.atalanta-systems.com From schwindt at dfki.uni-kl.de Mon Mar 2 13:20:24 2009 From: schwindt at dfki.uni-kl.de (Nicolai Schwindt) Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 13:20:24 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] python:2.6.1 Message-ID: <200903021219.n22CJ7if007472@dfki.uni-kl.de> I did install this this one a few moments ago. Installation went fine, but .. This breaks ap2_modpython, which is not fine. I returned to normal state by installing the old version (python-2.5.1,REV=2007.11.03-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg). As there is no new version, relinking might suffice. Is it just me ? Or anybody experience the same Problem. Nicolai Schwindt From mwatters at opencsw.org Mon Mar 2 16:14:50 2009 From: mwatters at opencsw.org (Mike Watters) Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 09:14:50 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] python:2.6.1 In-Reply-To: <200903021219.n22CJ7if007472@dfki.uni-kl.de> References: <200903021219.n22CJ7if007472@dfki.uni-kl.de> Message-ID: <49ABF7EA.8070006@opencsw.org> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Nicolai Schwindt wrote: > > I did install this this one a few moments ago. Installation went fine, but .. > This breaks ap2_modpython, which is not fine. > I returned to normal state by installing the old version > (python-2.5.1,REV=2007.11.03-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg). > As there is no new version, relinking might suffice. > > Is it just me ? Or anybody experience the same Problem. > > > > > Nicolai Schwindt > > > > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/users I will update ap2_modpython - -- Thanks, Mike "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius -- and a lot of courage -- to move in the opposite direction." * Albert Einstein 1879 - 1955 US German-born Theoretical Physicist -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (SunOS) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkmr9+oACgkQLrhmsXMSLxebswCg2HNxTG7CHPU4IaWzmVXKU4VO ahAAoLhfP816uU5WVdy6pmy/syt8nBZe =Xpyq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From bwalton at opencsw.org Wed Mar 4 01:47:18 2009 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2009 19:47:18 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] ruby updates in testing Message-ID: <1236127436-sup-7169@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> Hi All, I believe this will be the final testing update of ruby before a new release to current. The packages in testing/ fix: 1. Missing libruby-static.a 2. Some path issues with the installed docs (tools knew where they were, but the locations weren't correct). 3. A proper rubydev package is split out. 4. Native extensions built get a proper -R path in LDFLAGS (tested with the mysql gem). Please let me know if you find anything amiss with these. I plan to release them to current by next week if I haven't had any negative feedback (or found something myself). Thanks -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 GPG Key Id: 8E89F6D2; Key Server: pgp.mit.edu Contact me to arrange for a CAcert assurance meeting. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From ja at baltic-online.de Wed Mar 4 19:34:47 2009 From: ja at baltic-online.de (Juergen Arndt) Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 19:34:47 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Problems with makepatch Message-ID: Hi all, for the last two days I have problem with "makepatch". Everytime I want to create a patch, the result is patch file, which subtracts _all_ lines from _all_ source files. I tested it with some other packages not maintained by me and the result was the same. As an example, here is a part of the contents of the generated patch file: ----- diff --speed-large-files --minimal -Nru pnp-0.4.13.orig/AUTHORS pnp-0.4.13/AUTHORS --- pnp-0.4.13.orig/AUTHORS 2009-02-19 18:29:18.000000000 +0100 +++ pnp-0.4.13/AUTHORS 1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100 @@ -1,3 +0,0 @@ -Authors: -Jrg Linge pitchfork at pnp4nagios.org -Hendrik Bcker andurin at process-zero.de diff --speed-large-files --minimal -Nru pnp-0.4.13.orig/BUGS pnp-0.4.13/BUGS --- pnp-0.4.13.orig/BUGS 2009-02-19 18:29:18.000000000 +0100 +++ pnp-0.4.13/BUGS 1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100 @@ -1 +0,0 @@ -A lots of it... diff --speed-large-files --minimal -Nru pnp-0.4.13.orig/COPYING pnp-0.4.13/COPYING --- pnp-0.4.13.orig/COPYING 2009-02-19 18:29:18.000000000 +0100 +++ pnp-0.4.13/COPYING 1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100 @@ -1,340 +0,0 @@ - GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE - Version 2, June 1991 - - Copyright (C) 1989, 1991 Free Software Foundation, Inc. - 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA - Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies - of this license document, but changing it is not allowed. - - Preamble - - The licenses for most software are designed to take away your ... and so on. ----- Also I am wondering, why the time stamp is at "1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100". My workflow is like this: - gmake extract - change some files - gmake makepatch I already created patches successfully, so I'm really surprised about this. Can anyone reproduce this behaviour? Or does anyone has a hint for me, what I do wrong? Juergen -- Juergen Arndt Baltic Online Computer GmbH Firmensitz: Alter Markt 1-2, 24103 Kiel http://www.baltic-online.de Tel.: +49 (0)431 54003-0 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Erik Cickovskis, Amtsgericht Kiel, HRB 3756 From hson at opencsw.org Wed Mar 4 19:51:43 2009 From: hson at opencsw.org (=?UTF-8?B?Um9nZXIgSMOla2Fuc3Nvbg==?=) Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 19:51:43 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Problems with makepatch In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <49AECDBF.9010902@opencsw.org> Juergen Arndt wrote: > Hi all, > > for the last two days I have problem with "makepatch". Everytime I want to > create a patch, the result is patch file, which subtracts _all_ lines from > _all_ source files. I tested it with some other packages not maintained by > me and the result was the same. > ... > > My workflow is like this: > > - gmake extract > - change some files > - gmake makepatch > > I already created patches successfully, so I'm really surprised about > this. Can anyone reproduce this behaviour? Or does anyone has a hint for > me, what I do wrong? > > Juergen > I've also noticed this, but I haven't investigated that much From Jon.Fechner at tellabs.com Wed Mar 4 21:24:45 2009 From: Jon.Fechner at tellabs.com (Fechner, Jon L.) Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 14:24:45 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] new stable release coming any time soon? Message-ID: <16060DBCD52A2445BD9CBF1498974A7D0107B45C@EX-NAP.tellabs-west.tellabsinc.net> Hello - I was wondering if there were any plans for a new stable release any time soon? It looks like there was a stable release 10/24/2008 from what I can tell which isn't all that long ago, but I am planning to update our systems in the next few months so I was wondering if there was any schedule. Stable releases used to be quarterly, but since the split with Blastwave that seems to have gone out the window with both distros. Thx for all you folks do! -Jon [cid:image002.jpg at 01C99CD4.C1715680] Jon Fechner Information Technology Engineering Tools Office: 630-798-6501 Mobile: 630-605-6506 jon.fechner at tellabs.com ============================================================ The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reproduction, dissemination or distribution of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you. Tellabs ============================================================ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 2127 bytes Desc: image002.jpg URL: From Jon.Fechner at tellabs.com Wed Mar 4 21:34:30 2009 From: Jon.Fechner at tellabs.com (Fechner, Jon L.) Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 14:34:30 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] pine and alpine Message-ID: <16060DBCD52A2445BD9CBF1498974A7D0107B488@EX-NAP.tellabs-west.tellabsinc.net> Hello - I have some engineers in our organization that are interested in trying out 'alpine', the successor to pine. Pine is having some problems working with our new IMAP server which prevents some messages from being saved in folders, both automatically via a filter/rule and manually. I'm just wondering if anyone is interested in providing this in the CSW distro. Just thought I'd ask. We'd be willing to test it, but couldn't be the maintainer. Thx again, Jon [cid:image002.jpg at 01C99CD5.EBB7FB00] Jon Fechner Information Technology Engineering Tools Office: 630-798-6501 Mobile: 630-605-6506 jon.fechner at tellabs.com ============================================================ The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reproduction, dissemination or distribution of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you. Tellabs ============================================================ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 2127 bytes Desc: image002.jpg URL: From dam at opencsw.org Wed Mar 4 21:51:29 2009 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 21:51:29 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Problems with makepatch In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi J?rgen, Am 04.03.2009 um 19:34 schrieb Juergen Arndt: > I already created patches successfully, so I'm really surprised about > this. Can anyone reproduce this behaviour? Or does anyone has a hint > for > me, what I do wrong? Basically, 'makepatch' is currently broken in mGAR v2 when modulated builds were introduced. In mGAR v1 it works :-( It is on my long list of things to fix and enhance... Ben, want to take a shot? Best regards -- Dago From dam at opencsw.org Wed Mar 4 21:53:50 2009 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 21:53:50 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] pine and alpine References: <49AEE882.9040705@opencsw.org> Message-ID: Hi Jon, Anfang der weitergeleiteten E-Mail: > Von: Mike Watters > Datum: 4. M?rz 2009 21:45:54 MEZ > An: internal list for the CSW maintainers > > Betreff: Re: [csw-maintainers] Fwd: [csw-users] pine and alpine > Antwort an: internal list for the CSW maintainers > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > I just pulled the source down. if there is not much to it I will > build the first release Looks like you are lucky and someone picked it up really fast :-) Thanks Mike! Best regards -- Dago > Dagobert Michelsen wrote: >> Hi, >> >> FYI. Maybe someone feels the urge to package this ;-) >> >> >> Best regards >> >> -- Dago >> >> Anfang der weitergeleiteten E-Mail: >> >>> *Von: *"Fechner, Jon L." >> > >>> *Datum: *4. M?rz 2009 21:34:30 MEZ >>> *An: *"users at lists.opencsw.org " >>> > >>> *Betreff: **[csw-users] pine and alpine* >>> *Antwort an: *questions and discussions >> > >>> >>> Hello ? >>> >>> I have some engineers in our organization that are interested in >>> trying out ?alpine?, the successor to pine. >>> >>> Pine is having some problems working with our new IMAP server which >>> prevents some messages from being saved in folders, both >>> automatically >>> via a filter/rule and manually. >>> >>> I?m just wondering if anyone is interested in providing this in >>> the >>> CSW distro. Just thought I?d ask. We?d be willing to test it, >>> but >>> couldn?t be the maintainer. >>> >>> Thx again, >>> Jon >>> >>> >>> *Jon Fechner* >>> *Information Technology* >>> *Engineering Tools* >>> >>> *Office: 630-798-6501* >>> *Mobile**: 630-605-6506 * >>> *jon.fechner at tellabs.com * >>> >>> >>> >>> ============================================================ >>> The information contained in this message may be privileged >>> and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader >>> of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee >>> or agent responsible for delivering this message to the >>> intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reproduction, >>> dissemination or distribution of this communication is strictly >>> prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, >>> please notify us immediately by replying to the message and >>> deleting it from your computer. Thank you. Tellabs >>> ============================================================ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> users mailing list >>> users at lists.opencsw.org >>> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/users >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> maintainers mailing list >> maintainers at lists.opencsw.org >> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers > > - -- > Thanks, > Mike > > "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, > and more violent. It takes a touch of genius -- and a lot of > courage -- > to move in the opposite direction." > > * Albert Einstein 1879 - 1955 > US German-born Theoretical Physicist > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iEYEARECAAYFAkmu6IIACgkQLrhmsXMSLxc+twCggnWhwNCmuugYpmA4C/h9SfoU > iv4AoKkspphmqI+WswaDJLccIC819Bx0 > =mys9 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > maintainers mailing list > maintainers at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers From dam at opencsw.org Wed Mar 4 21:57:33 2009 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 21:57:33 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] CSW LSOF package no longer works in Sol 10/Sparc/T5240 Setup In-Reply-To: References: <20090208.11394400.1182175421@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk> <498F272F.4060804@opencsw.org> Message-ID: <16F28F1D-10FB-4F5A-85C2-4392BDBE68BC@opencsw.org> Hi Jean-Luc, Am 10.02.2009 um 18:43 schrieb JL Picard: > After installing the LSOF package on a new install of the latest > Solaris 10 > revision on a T5240 server, LSOF no longer seems to work and I see a > lot of > msgs like the following, when I run "/opt/csw/bin/lsof -i": > no TCP/UDP/IP information available > > A quick test with the latest version of LSOF on www.sunfreeware.com > for Sol > 10 seems to work fine. Perhaps there is a requirement for a > specific Sol10 > package for LSOF now? Yes, there is. And that makes building a combined package suitable for NFS-Sharing not easy. However, it is noted that lsof is a useful and widely accepted packages which needs updating. Sorry for the inconvenience -- Dago From bwalton at opencsw.org Wed Mar 4 22:04:58 2009 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 16:04:58 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Problems with makepatch In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1236200557-sup-2750@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> Excerpts from Dagobert Michelsen's message of Wed Mar 04 15:51:29 -0500 2009: > Basically, 'makepatch' is currently broken in mGAR v2 when modulated > builds were introduced. In mGAR v1 it works :-( It is on my long list > of things to fix and enhance... > > Ben, want to take a shot? ...well, since I wasn't even aware of this feature until now, I'm certainly interested in it. I've been doing patches manually up to this point (or importing the source with git and using git-format-patch). This sounds like a nice feature though, so I'll take a stab at getting it back in action. Thanks -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 GPG Key Id: 8E89F6D2; Key Server: pgp.mit.edu Contact me to arrange for a CAcert assurance meeting. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From ja at baltic-online.de Wed Mar 4 22:05:11 2009 From: ja at baltic-online.de (Juergen Arndt) Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 22:05:11 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Possible bug / type in gar.mk? Message-ID: Hi, I noticed the following, when I did a "gmake install": [===== NOW BUILDING: pnp-0.4.13 MODULATION isa-sparcv8: ISA=sparcv8 =====] [extract-modulated] complete for pnp. [test-modulated] complete for pnp. POST_INSTALL_TARGETS := strip fixconfig gmake[1]: POST_INSTALL_TARGETS: Command not found gmake[1]: *** [test-modulated] Error 127 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/home/ja/mgar/pkg/pnp/trunk' gmake: *** [install-isa-sparcv8] Error 2 In packages, I checked out some more days ago, everything was fine. So I figured out, that in gar.mk the following line is indented - which leads to that error. Without indention the installation step was ok. ifneq ($(GARFLAVOR),DBG) POST_INSTALL_TARGETS := strip $(POST_INSTALL_TARGETS) <----- endif Could someone take look to proof that? Juergen -- Juergen Arndt From bwalton at opencsw.org Wed Mar 4 22:27:03 2009 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 16:27:03 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Possible bug / type in gar.mk? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1236201976-sup-828@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> Excerpts from Juergen Arndt's message of Wed Mar 04 16:05:11 -0500 2009: > In packages, I checked out some more days ago, everything was fine. So I > figured out, that in gar.mk the following line is indented - which leads > to that error. Without indention the installation step was ok. Confirmed that I saw the error today, but I haven't had a chance to diagnose it yet. I'll test your fix later and let you know. Thanks -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 GPG Key Id: 8E89F6D2; Key Server: pgp.mit.edu Contact me to arrange for a CAcert assurance meeting. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From dam at opencsw.org Wed Mar 4 22:37:38 2009 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 22:37:38 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Possible bug / type in gar.mk? In-Reply-To: <1236201976-sup-828@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> References: <1236201976-sup-828@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: <305013BD-4FED-41C6-BDBF-EA1767330E80@opencsw.org> Hi Ben, Am 04.03.2009 um 22:27 schrieb Ben Walton: > Excerpts from Juergen Arndt's message of Wed Mar 04 16:05:11 -0500 > 2009: >> In packages, I checked out some more days ago, everything was fine. >> So I >> figured out, that in gar.mk the following line is indented - which >> leads >> to that error. Without indention the installation step was ok. > > Confirmed that I saw the error today, but I haven't had a chance to > diagnose it yet. I'll test your fix later and let you know. I already notified Sebastian: Am 03.03.2009 um 16:09 schrieb skayser at users.sourceforge.net: > Revision: 3566 > http://gar.svn.sourceforge.net/gar/?rev=3566&view=rev > Author: skayser > Date: 2009-03-03 15:09:38 +0000 (Tue, 03 Mar 2009) > > Log Message: > ----------- > When GARFLAVOR=DBG drop strip from $(POST_INSTALL_TARGETS) > > Modified Paths: > -------------- > csw/mgar/gar/v2/gar.mk > > Modified: csw/mgar/gar/v2/gar.mk > =================================================================== > --- csw/mgar/gar/v2/gar.mk 2009-03-03 12:40:35 UTC (rev 3565) > +++ csw/mgar/gar/v2/gar.mk 2009-03-03 15:09:38 UTC (rev 3566) > @@ -415,7 +415,10 @@ > $(DONADA) > > # strip - Strip executables > -POST_INSTALL_TARGETS := strip $(POST_INSTALL_TARGETS) > +ifneq ($(GARFLAVOR),DBG) > + POST_INSTALL_TARGETS := strip $(POST_INSTALL_TARGETS) > +endif > + > strip: > @for target in $(STRIP_DIRS) $(DESTDIR)$(bindir) $(DESTDIR)$ > (sbindir) ; \ > do \ > > > This was sent by the SourceForge.net collaborative development > platform, the world's largest Open Source development site. > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Best regards -- Dago From skayser at opencsw.org Wed Mar 4 22:57:13 2009 From: skayser at opencsw.org (Sebastian Kayser) Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 22:57:13 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Possible bug / type in gar.mk? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <49AEF939.5000005@opencsw.org> Juergen Arndt wrote: > I noticed the following, when I did a "gmake install": > > [===== NOW BUILDING: pnp-0.4.13 MODULATION isa-sparcv8: ISA=sparcv8 =====] > [extract-modulated] complete for pnp. > [test-modulated] complete for pnp. > POST_INSTALL_TARGETS := strip fixconfig > gmake[1]: POST_INSTALL_TARGETS: Command not found > gmake[1]: *** [test-modulated] Error 127 > gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/home/ja/mgar/pkg/pnp/trunk' > gmake: *** [install-isa-sparcv8] Error 2 > > In packages, I checked out some more days ago, everything was fine. So I > figured out, that in gar.mk the following line is indented - which leads > to that error. Without indention the installation step was ok. > > > ifneq ($(GARFLAVOR),DBG) > POST_INSTALL_TARGETS := strip $(POST_INSTALL_TARGETS) <----- > endif > > > Could someone take look to proof that? Sorry, my bad. Somehow i was urged to indent ... Fixed in r3586. Thanks for reporting. Sebastian From mwatters at opencsw.org Fri Mar 6 00:37:32 2009 From: mwatters at opencsw.org (Mike Watters) Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2009 17:37:32 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] Python 2.6 and mod_python Message-ID: <49B0623C.1080806@opencsw.org> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 unless I receive negative feed back: I plan to release the "fixed" python 2.6 packages as well as mod_python next week. the changes from the current version are: forced architecture to be v8 fixed python-config --ldflags to include -L and -R flags correctly. mod_python is just a recompile against the new python - -- Thanks, Mike "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius -- and a lot of courage -- to move in the opposite direction." * Albert Einstein 1879 - 1955 US German-born Theoretical Physicist -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkmwYjwACgkQLrhmsXMSLxfn+wCeMDrWVzdgtznt8B6J8Qz2oVCM PQYAoIzTBjliT5iWdB3SR/KW7az85VEC =12Ix -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From mwatters at opencsw.org Fri Mar 6 03:22:43 2009 From: mwatters at opencsw.org (Mike Watters) Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2009 20:22:43 -0600 Subject: [csw-users] gnupg_minimal, gnupg and gnupg2 now in Testing Message-ID: <49B088F3.9020607@opencsw.org> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 changes: gnupg_minimal and gnupg updated to version 1.4.9 gnupg2 at 2.0.10 all include 64 bit isaexec - -- Thanks, Mike "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius -- and a lot of courage -- to move in the opposite direction." * Albert Einstein 1879 - 1955 US German-born Theoretical Physicist -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkmwiPIACgkQLrhmsXMSLxcLSgCgy63QCXSmoKOCYqOFfY9DnRg0 nBMAn28MbANnIdYjO9LEANN/4kBwj1yQ =gHF0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From res at colnet.cmhnet.org Fri Mar 6 05:58:17 2009 From: res at colnet.cmhnet.org (Rob Stampfli) Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 23:58:17 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Python 2.6 and mod_python In-Reply-To: <49B0623C.1080806@opencsw.org> References: <49B0623C.1080806@opencsw.org> Message-ID: <20090306045816.GA11608@keevey> On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 05:37:32PM -0600, Mike Watters wrote: > unless I receive negative feed back: > I plan to release the "fixed" python 2.6 packages as well as mod_python next week. > > the changes from the current version are: forced architecture to be v8 > fixed python-config --ldflags to include -L and -R flags correctly. > > mod_python is just a recompile against the new python Tonight I downloaded the python-2.6.1,REV=2009.03.02-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz package from the opencsw.org buildfarm and installed it on my little LX, a sparcv8 machine. The poor LX still hasn't figured out what's hit it, but it seems to be working its way through the test subdirectory, so far, without incident. So, the rebuild is looking good to me. Didn't download or test the modpython or python_tk packages. Thanks for fixing this, Mike, and for your continuing role in supporting us opencsw users! Rob From ihsan at opencsw.org Fri Mar 6 17:38:35 2009 From: ihsan at opencsw.org (Ihsan Dogan) Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2009 17:38:35 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] unbound recursive DNS server in testing Message-ID: <49B1518B.9000702@opencsw.org> Hello, I've packaged Unbound and put it into testing. http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/unbound-1.2.1,REV=2009.03.06-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/unbound-1.2.1,REV=2009.03.06-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz >From Wikipedia: Unbound is a validating, recursive, and caching DNS server software product from NLnet Labs, VeriSign Inc., Nominet, and Kirei. It is distributed free of charge in open source form under the BSD license. Originally designed by Jakob Schlyter of Kirei and Roy Arends of Nominet in 2004, funding was provided by Verisign and ep.net to develop a prototype written in Java (David Blacka and Matt Larson, VeriSign). Starting in 2006 the prototype was re-written for high-performance in the C programming language by NLnet Labs. Unbound is designed as a set of modular components that incorporate modern features, such as enhanced security (DNSSEC) validation, Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6), and a client resolver library API as an integral part of the architecture. Ihsan -- ihsan at dogan.ch http://blog.dogan.ch/ From ja at baltic-online.de Sat Mar 7 19:17:10 2009 From: ja at baltic-online.de (Juergen Arndt) Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2009 19:17:10 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Problems building packages with SMF Message-ID: Hi all, (I posted this message yesterday to the devel list, I think, this is the better place for that. Sorry double posting.) I was trying to build a package with SMF support (the old style, without cswclassutils). During the packaging phase I got the following errors: ## Building pkgmap from package prototype file. ERROR in /home/ja/tmp/nrpe/trunk/work/build-global/CSWnrpe.prototype-sparc: no object for <$WORKDIR_FIRSTMOD/nrpe> found in root directory no object for <$WORKDIR_FIRSTMOD/nrpe.xml> found in root directory no object for <$WORKDIR_FIRSTMOD/svc-nrpe> found in root directory pkgmk: ERROR: unable to build pkgmap from prototype file ## Packaging was not successful. It turned out, that this happends with packages checked out in the very last few days. Building the same (and identical) package, checked out earlier, is no problem. Could anyone give me a hint? Maybe a typo in gar? Or did I miss something? Juergen -- Juergen Arndt From bonivart at opencsw.org Sat Mar 7 19:29:36 2009 From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart) Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 19:29:36 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Problems building packages with SMF In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <625385e30903071029q641cd529m3207fc9b33fb1b8a@mail.gmail.com> On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 7:17 PM, Juergen Arndt wrote: > I was trying to build a package with SMF support (the old style, without > cswclassutils). During the packaging phase I got the following errors: Is your XML manifest complicated? If it's basic you could use cswclassutils easily. http://wiki.opencsw.org/cswclassutils-package#toc0 > ## Building pkgmap from package prototype file. > ERROR in /home/ja/tmp/nrpe/trunk/work/build-global/CSWnrpe.prototype-sparc: > ? ? ?no object for <$WORKDIR_FIRSTMOD/nrpe> found in root directory > ? ? ?no object for <$WORKDIR_FIRSTMOD/nrpe.xml> found in root directory > ? ? ?no object for <$WORKDIR_FIRSTMOD/svc-nrpe> found in root directory > pkgmk: ERROR: unable to build pkgmap from prototype file > ## Packaging was not successful. I think Trygve wrote the GAR SMF support but that was before Dago heavily updated GAR so something may have broken. I'm sure those two can fix it again. -- /peter From mwatters at opencsw.org Mon Mar 9 01:37:46 2009 From: mwatters at opencsw.org (Mike Watters) Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2009 19:37:46 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] PHP5 and extentions now in Testing Message-ID: <49B464DA.2050203@opencsw.org> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Changes: compile version 5.2.6 with extensions (version not changed) recompile only to build the extensions. The Following extensions are included in this release php5_bcmath php5_bz2 php5_calendar php5_ctype php5_curl php5_dba php5_dbase php5_devel php5_dom php5_exif php5_filter php5_ftp php5_gd php5_gettext php5_gmp php5_hash php5_iconv php5_imap php5_json php5_ldap php5_mbstring php5_mcrypt php5_mhash php5_mime_magic php5_mssql php5_mysql php5_mysqli php5_ncurses php5_odbc php5_openssl php5_pcntl php5_pdomysql php5_pdoodbc php5_pdopgsql php5_pdosqlite php5_pgsql php5_posix php5_pspell php5_session php5_shmop php5_snmp php5_soap php5_sockets php5_sqlite php5_sysvmsg php5_sysvsem php5_sysvshm php5_tidy php5_tokenizer php5_wddx php5_xmlreader php5_xmlrpc php5_xmlwriter php5_xsl php5_zip - -- Thanks, Mike "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius -- and a lot of courage -- to move in the opposite direction." * Albert Einstein 1879 - 1955 US German-born Theoretical Physicist -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkm0ZNkACgkQLrhmsXMSLxelBQCfZNQ6KNjL2RZhKBsT794RZYP4 iy8AnjrNAm/IHryBwGLdvdPwan0DjEJ4 =dqTE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From maciej.blizinski at gmail.com Mon Mar 9 15:21:04 2009 From: maciej.blizinski at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Blizi=C5=84ski?=) Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 14:21:04 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] Where to report issues with GAR? Message-ID: For package-related issues we have http://www.opencsw.org/bugtrack - how about issues with GAR itself? Mantis installation doesn't have a 'gar' project. Looking around SourceForge, I found a bug tracker for the GAR project: http://sourceforge.net/tracker2/?atid=1075770&group_id=229205&func=browse I submitted a few issues, but the tracker seems otherwise empty. I'm not sure if it's the right place. Any ideas? From dam at opencsw.org Mon Mar 9 15:49:51 2009 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 15:49:51 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Where to report issues with GAR? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <7E83A24F-4D3E-47F6-A30E-C294E85DA8B0@opencsw.org> Hi Maciej, Am 09.03.2009 um 15:21 schrieb Maciej Blizi?ski: > For package-related issues we have http://www.opencsw.org/bugtrack - > how about issues with GAR itself? > > Mantis installation doesn't have a 'gar' project. This is correct, because Mantis is only for released packages and GAR is not (yet) a package. > Looking around > SourceForge, I found a bug tracker for the GAR project: > http://sourceforge.net/tracker2/?atid=1075770&group_id=229205&func=browse > > I submitted a few issues, but the tracker seems otherwise empty. I'm > not sure if it's the right place. Any ideas? The place is right and I'll take care of your bugs. Thanks for the report! -- Dago From ja at baltic-online.de Mon Mar 9 19:49:15 2009 From: ja at baltic-online.de (Juergen Arndt) Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 19:49:15 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] cswproto not found Message-ID: Hi all, while trying to build a package on host build10s, I get the following message: gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/home/ja/mgar/pkg/pnp/trunk' mkdir -p cookies/global/. && date >> cookies/global/merge-license-CSWpnp [merge-license] complete for pnp. [merge] complete for pnp. /bin/sh: cswproto: not found gmake: *** [work/build-global/prototype] Error 1 Building the same package on build8s is no problem. I can reproduce this behaviour with any package I tried to build until now. Does anyone have an idea? Juergen -- Juergen Arndt Baltic Online Computer GmbH Firmensitz: Alter Markt 1-2, 24103 Kiel http://www.baltic-online.de Tel.: +49 (0)431 54003-0 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Erik Cickovskis, Amtsgericht Kiel, HRB 3756 From rmacduff at opencsw.org Mon Mar 9 21:32:34 2009 From: rmacduff at opencsw.org (Ross Macduff) Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 16:32:34 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] gsed 4.1.5 in testing Message-ID: <1236630606-sup-8404@frog.chass.utoronto.ca> Hi All, gsed 4.1.5 is now available for testing: gsed-4.1.5,REV=2009.03.09 Please let me know if there are any issues with it. Thanks, Ross -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From maciej.blizinski at gmail.com Tue Mar 10 08:50:35 2009 From: maciej.blizinski at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Blizi=C5=84ski?=) Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 07:50:35 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] cswproto not found In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 6:49 PM, Juergen Arndt wrote: > Hi all, > > while trying to build a package on host build10s, I get the following > message: > > > gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/home/ja/mgar/pkg/pnp/trunk' > mkdir -p cookies/global/. && date >> cookies/global/merge-license-CSWpnp > ? ? ? ? [merge-license] complete for pnp. > ? ? ? ? [merge] complete for pnp. > /bin/sh: cswproto: not found > gmake: *** [work/build-global/prototype] Error 1 > > > Building the same package on build8s is no problem. I can reproduce this > behaviour with any package I tried to build until now. Does anyone have an > idea? I saw the same problem: https://sourceforge.net/tracker2/?func=detail&aid=2674516&group_id=229205&atid=1075770 Is it gar v1 or v2? You can check that using: "grep http gar/.svn/entries" Maciej From ja at baltic-online.de Tue Mar 10 11:21:04 2009 From: ja at baltic-online.de (Juergen Arndt) Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 11:21:04 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] cswproto not found In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Maciej, >> gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/home/ja/mgar/pkg/pnp/trunk' >> mkdir -p cookies/global/. && date >> cookies/global/merge-license-CSWpnp >> ? ? ? ? [merge-license] complete for pnp. >> ? ? ? ? [merge] complete for pnp. >> /bin/sh: cswproto: not found >> gmake: *** [work/build-global/prototype] Error 1 >> >> >> Building the same package on build8s is no problem. I can reproduce this >> behaviour with any package I tried to build until now. Does anyone have >> an >> idea? > > I saw the same problem: > https://sourceforge.net/tracker2/?func=detail&aid=2674516&group_id=229205&atid=1075770 > > Is it gar v1 or v2? > > You can check that using: "grep http gar/.svn/entries" thanks for your reply. It's gar v2. Juergen -- Juergen Arndt From maciej.blizinski at gmail.com Tue Mar 10 13:34:21 2009 From: maciej.blizinski at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Blizi=C5=84ski?=) Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 12:34:21 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] cswproto not found In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Juergen Arndt wrote: > thanks for your reply. It's gar v2. What does "gmake modenv" show you? From ja at baltic-online.de Tue Mar 10 14:13:57 2009 From: ja at baltic-online.de (Juergen Arndt) Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 14:13:57 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] cswproto not found In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: > What does "gmake modenv" show you? On the Solaris 8 host and on Solaris 10 it's the same output, except the "merge exclude line": Arch: sparc Kernel: sparcv9 Default ISA 32: sparcv8 Default ISA 64: sparcv9 Requested ISAs: sparcv8 Needed ISAs: sparcv8 Build ISAs: sparcv8 ISAEXEC dirs: ISAEXEC files: Merge include: Merge exclude: /opt/csw/share/info/dir /opt/csw/lib/.*\.la .*\~ /opt/csw/lib/.*\.a Requested compiler flags: * Modulation isa-sparcv8: ISA=sparcv8 PATH = /home/ja/mgar/pkg/pnp/trunk/work/install-isa-sparcv8/opt/csw/bin:/home/ja/mgar/pkg/pnp/trunk/work/install-isa-sparcv8/opt/csw/bin:/home/ja/mgar/pkg/pnp/trunk/work/install-isa-sparcv8/opt/csw/sbin:/home/ja/mgar/pkg/pnp/trunk/work/install-isa-sparcv8/opt/csw/sbin:/opt/csw/bin:/opt/csw/bin:/opt/csw/sbin:/opt/csw/sbin:/opt/studio/SOS11/SUNWspro/bin:/home/ja/mgar/pkg/pnp/trunk/gar/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/java/bin:/usr/ccs/bin PKG_CONFIG_PATH = /opt/csw/lib/pkgconfig CFLAGS = -xO3 -xarch=v8 -I/opt/csw/include CXXFLAGS = -xO3 -xarch=v8 -I/opt/csw/include CPPFLAGS = -I/opt/csw/include LDFLAGS = -L/usr/ucblib ASFLAGS = OPTFLAGS = -xO3 -xarch=v8 I guess, the path variable is important, and there "/home/ja/mgar/pkg/pnp/trunk/gar/bin" - there "cswproto" is located. But I have no idea, why it works on the Solaris 8 system and not on Solaris 10. Juergen -- Juergen Arndt Baltic Online Computer GmbH Firmensitz: Alter Markt 1-2, 24103 Kiel http://www.baltic-online.de Tel.: +49 (0)431 54003-0 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Erik Cickovskis, Amtsgericht Kiel, HRB 3756 From maciej.blizinski at gmail.com Tue Mar 10 18:57:28 2009 From: maciej.blizinski at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Blizi=C5=84ski?=) Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 17:57:28 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] cswproto not found In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Juergen Arndt wrote: > ? ? ? ? LDFLAGS = -L/usr/ucblib Unrelated issue, but I couldn't resist - why do you need ucblib? > I guess, the path variable is important, and there > "/home/ja/mgar/pkg/pnp/trunk/gar/bin" - there "cswproto" is located. But I > have no idea, why it works on the Solaris 8 system and not on Solaris 10. That might be a stupid question, but have you verified that /home/ja/mgar/pkg/pnp/trunk/gar/bin/cswproto exists in your Solaris 10 system? From ja at baltic-online.de Tue Mar 10 19:02:25 2009 From: ja at baltic-online.de (Juergen Arndt) Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 19:02:25 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] cswproto not found In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 18:57:28 +0100, Maciej Blizi?ski wrote: > On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Juergen Arndt > wrote: >> ? ? ? ? LDFLAGS = -L/usr/ucblib > > Unrelated issue, but I couldn't resist - why do you need ucblib? In that special case I need it for Solaris 8. The software I want to package uses C functions, which are not in the Sol-8-libs, so I had to use the ucb libs. >> I guess, the path variable is important, and there >> "/home/ja/mgar/pkg/pnp/trunk/gar/bin" - there "cswproto" is located. >> But I >> have no idea, why it works on the Solaris 8 system and not on Solaris >> 10. > > That might be a stupid question, but have you verified that > /home/ja/mgar/pkg/pnp/trunk/gar/bin/cswproto exists in your Solaris 10 > system? I did and cswproto exists there. Juergen -- Juergen Arndt Baltic Online Computer GmbH Firmensitz: Alter Markt 1-2, 24103 Kiel http://www.baltic-online.de Tel.: +49 (0)431 54003-0 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Erik Cickovskis, Amtsgericht Kiel, HRB 3756 From maciej.blizinski at gmail.com Tue Mar 10 19:35:15 2009 From: maciej.blizinski at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Blizi=C5=84ski?=) Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 18:35:15 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] cswproto not found In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 6:02 PM, Juergen Arndt wrote: > In that special case I need it for Solaris 8. The software I want to > package uses C functions, which are not in the Sol-8-libs, so I had to use > the ucb libs. You don't have -I/usr/ucbinclude in your CPPFLAGS. If you don't have them, you can have problems like readdir() function stripping off first 2 characters of every file. I spent half a day today debugging that. You need to either use -I/usr/ucbinclude and -L/usr/ucblib, or none. Also, as a side note - if you're specifying -L/usr/ucblib, it's a good idea to specify also -R/usr/ucblib which will make the binary search /usr/ucblib for libraries during runtime. Otherwise you can get an error with a shared library not found. >>> I guess, the path variable is important, and there >>> "/home/ja/mgar/pkg/pnp/trunk/gar/bin" - there "cswproto" is located. >>> But I >>> have no idea, why it works on the Solaris 8 system and not on Solaris >>> 10. >> >> That might be a stupid question, but have you verified that >> /home/ja/mgar/pkg/pnp/trunk/gar/bin/cswproto exists in your Solaris 10 >> system? > > I did and cswproto exists there. So it's not that. I'd suggest setting variable DEBUG_PACKAGING in your main Makefile and editing gar/gar.pkg.mk around line 228 - you could add something like "echo PATH: $$PATH" to see what's going on in there. From maciej.blizinski at gmail.com Tue Mar 10 22:20:50 2009 From: maciej.blizinski at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Blizi=C5=84ski?=) Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 21:20:50 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] GAR builds license Message-ID: What is the license of GAR build files? Let's say I contribute a GAR build, which is essentially a bit of code. What license applies to this code? Where is the license specified? Should GAR Makefiles contain some form of a copyright note? Maciej From william at wbonnet.net Tue Mar 10 23:49:46 2009 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 23:49:46 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] /testing dbus 1.2.12 is available Message-ID: <49B6EE8A.6050007@wbonnet.net> Hi all dbus has been updated to version 1.2.12 and is available from testing. Thanks for your feedbacks cheers W. -- William http://www.wbonnet.net http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix http://www.opencsw.org Community SoftWare for Solaris http://www.guses.org French speaking Solaris User Group From dam at opencsw.org Tue Mar 10 23:51:28 2009 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 23:51:28 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] cswproto not found In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi, Am 09.03.2009 um 19:49 schrieb Juergen Arndt: > while trying to build a package on host build10s, I get the following > message: > > > gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/home/ja/mgar/pkg/pnp/trunk' > mkdir -p cookies/global/. && date >> cookies/global/merge-license- > CSWpnp > [merge-license] complete for pnp. > [merge] complete for pnp. > /bin/sh: cswproto: not found > gmake: *** [work/build-global/prototype] Error 1 > > > Building the same package on build8s is no problem. I can reproduce > this > behaviour with any package I tried to build until now. Does anyone > have an > idea? This kind of error is usually generated when an old version of gmake is in the path. Older versions of gmake don't understand $(abspath ...) and always return the empty string. As the result is used as a path that one is missing. On build10s was SUNWgmake installed which I deinstalled now. It may be a good idea to write some kind of test case which bails out if an unsuitable version of gmake is found. Please see if this really solved your problem. Best regards -- Dago From dam at opencsw.org Tue Mar 10 23:57:10 2009 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 23:57:10 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] cswproto not found In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <98313864-AC54-4D83-AD69-035832E45F81@opencsw.org> Hi Maciej, Am 10.03.2009 um 08:50 schrieb Maciej Blizi?ski: > Is it gar v1 or v2? > > You can check that using: "grep http gar/.svn/entries" This is, uhm, very creative ;-) The usual way to check this is via > dam at login [login]:/home/dam/mgar/pkg/autoconf > svn propget > svn:externals trunk/ > gar https://gar.svn.sf.net/svnroot/gar/csw/mgar/gar/v2 Best regards -- Dago From dam at opencsw.org Wed Mar 11 00:03:34 2009 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 00:03:34 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] GAR builds license In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi, Am 10.03.2009 um 22:20 schrieb Maciej Blizi?ski: > What is the license of GAR build files? Let's say I contribute a GAR > build, which is essentially a bit of code. What license applies to > this code? Where is the license specified? Should GAR Makefiles > contain some form of a copyright note? As mGAR was derived from GAR which was derived from GARNOME which was released under GPL I always thought everything in the repository was also under GPL, but I can't find a license anywhere. I guess we should add a central note about the license. Best regards -- Dago From bwalton at opencsw.org Wed Mar 11 00:20:05 2009 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 19:20:05 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] GAR builds license In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1236727099-sup-7200@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> Excerpts from Dagobert Michelsen's message of Tue Mar 10 19:03:34 -0400 2009: > As mGAR was derived from GAR which was derived from GARNOME which > was released under GPL I always thought everything in the repository > was also under GPL, but I can't find a license anywhere. I guess we > should add a central note about the license. This is something I've been wondering about lately too. GPL (2 or 3, I'm easy) would be my preference. If GAR's heritage is already in the GPL, that works for me! -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 GPG Key Id: 8E89F6D2; Key Server: pgp.mit.edu Contact me to arrange for a CAcert assurance meeting. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From maciej.blizinski at gmail.com Wed Mar 11 08:47:51 2009 From: maciej.blizinski at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Blizi=C5=84ski?=) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 07:47:51 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] GAR builds license In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 11:03 PM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > As mGAR was derived from GAR which was derived from GARNOME which > was released under GPL I always thought everything in the repository > was also under GPL, but I can't find a license anywhere. Could a header be used in each Makefile? Something along the lines of: http://devmanual.gentoo.org/ebuild-writing/file-format/index.html#ebuild-header > I guess we should add a central note about the license. Or even two notes, one applying to mGAR itself (probably placed in [1]), and one applying to the builds. [1] https://gar.svn.sf.net/svnroot/gar/csw/mgar/gar/v2/ From maciej.blizinski at gmail.com Wed Mar 11 08:56:32 2009 From: maciej.blizinski at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Blizi=C5=84ski?=) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 07:56:32 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] cswproto not found In-Reply-To: <98313864-AC54-4D83-AD69-035832E45F81@opencsw.org> References: <98313864-AC54-4D83-AD69-035832E45F81@opencsw.org> Message-ID: On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:57 PM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > Hi Maciej, > > Am 10.03.2009 um 08:50 schrieb Maciej Blizi?ski: >> Is it gar v1 or v2? >> >> You can check that using: "grep http gar/.svn/entries" > > This is, uhm, very creative ;-) The usual way to check this > is via > >> dam at login [login]:/home/dam/mgar/pkg/autoconf > svn propget >> svn:externals trunk/ >> gar https://gar.svn.sf.net/svnroot/gar/csw/mgar/gar/v2 There's a problem with svn:externals: if you create new directory (e.g. for a new software package) and you add the property svn:externals, you need first to commit your directory (and svn:externals) and _then_ you can check out the externals. I had to do copy the directory with gar, and coulnd't have svn:externals property set. There probably is a better way of checking this, though. From maciej.blizinski at gmail.com Wed Mar 11 09:54:26 2009 From: maciej.blizinski at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Blizi=C5=84ski?=) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 08:54:26 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables Message-ID: I'm trying to build a package using gcc4. Running configure... checking build system type... i386-pc-solaris2.10 checking host system type... i386-pc-solaris2.10 configuring for rxvt 9.06 checking for gcc... /opt/csw/gcc4/bin/gcc checking for C compiler default output file name... configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables See `config.log' for more details. gmake[1]: *** [configure-work/build-isa-i386/rxvt-unicode-9.06/configure] Error 77 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/home/maciej/src/opencsw/pkg/rxvt-unicode/trunk' gmake: *** [merge-isa-i386] Error 2 Looking into config.log: configure:2228: /opt/csw/gcc4/bin/gcc --version >&5 gcc (GCC) 4.0.2 Copyright (C) 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. configure:2231: $? = 0 configure:2238: /opt/csw/gcc4/bin/gcc -v >&5 Reading specs from /opt/csw/gcc4/lib/gcc/i386-pc-solaris2.8/4.0.2/specs Target: i386-pc-solaris2.8 Configured with: ../sources/gcc-4.0.2/configure --prefix=/opt/csw/gcc4 --with-lo cal-prefix=/opt/csw --with-gnu-as --with-as=/opt/csw/bin/gas --without-gnu-ld -- with-ld=/usr/ccs/bin/ld --enable-threads=posix --enable-shared --enable-multilib --enable-nls --with-included-gettext --with-libiconv-prefix=/opt/csw --with-x - -enable-java-awt=xlib --with-system-zlib --enable-languages=c,c++,f95,java,objc, ada Thread model: posix gcc version 4.0.2 configure:2241: $? = 0 configure:2248: /opt/csw/gcc4/bin/gcc -V >&5 gcc: '-V' option must have argument configure:2251: $? = 1 configure:2274: checking for C compiler default output file name configure:2301: /opt/csw/gcc4/bin/gcc -xlibmil -errtags=yes -erroff=E_EMPTY_DECL ARATION -xlibmil -errtags=yes -erroff=E_EMPTY_DECLARATION -L/opt/csw/lib -R/opt /csw/lib -L/opt/csw/lib -R/opt/csw/lib conftest.c >&5 gcc: language libmil not recognized gcc: language libmil not recognized ld: warning: option -e appears more than once, first setting taken ld: warning: option -e appears more than once, first setting taken ld: warning: option -e appears more than once, first setting taken ld: fatal: file conftest.c: unknown file type ld: fatal: File processing errors. No output written to a.out collect2: ld returned 1 exit status configure:2304: $? = 1 My guess is that instead of /opt/csw/bin/gld, /usr/ccs/bin/ld is used. My Makefile is: =========================================================== GARNAME = rxvt-unicode GARVERSION = 9.06 CATEGORIES = x11 # http://dist.schmorp.de/rxvt-unicode/rxvt-unicode-9.06.tar.bz2 DESCRIPTION = Unicode-enabled terminal emulator define BLURB LONG DESCRIPTION endef MASTER_SITES = http://dist.schmorp.de/rxvt-unicode/ DISTFILES = $(GARNAME)-$(GARVERSION).tar.bz2 DISTFILES += $(call admfiles,CSWurxvt,) # We define upstream file regex so we can be notifed of new upstream software release UFILES_REGEX = $(GARNAME)-(\d+(?:\.\d+)*).tar.gz CONFIGURE_ARGS = $(DIRPATHS) CONFIGURE_ARGS += --disable-perl GARCOMPILER = GNU include gar/category.mk =========================================================== and files/CSWurxvt.gspec: =========================================================== %var bitname urxvt %var pkgname CSWurxvt %include url file://%{PKGLIB}/csw_dyndepend.gspec %copyright url file://%{WORKSRC}/COPYING =========================================================== As a workaround, I could use: chmod 644 /usr/ccs/bin/ld cd /opt/csw/bin/ ln -s gld ld But it's ugly. Do you have any better ideas? I looked into the configure script of my software package, but it doesn't have any option to specify the ld binary. From maciej.blizinski at gmail.com Wed Mar 11 10:53:55 2009 From: maciej.blizinski at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Blizi=C5=84ski?=) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 09:53:55 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] A build for review: rxvt-unicode Message-ID: The build is at: http://netra.chopin.edu.pl/~maciej/rxvt-unicode-9.06-gar-build.tar.gz2 It contains a patch for categories/x11/category.mk. Would someone care to review the build so I could improve it? Maciej From maciej.blizinski at gmail.com Wed Mar 11 11:11:38 2009 From: maciej.blizinski at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Blizi=C5=84ski?=) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 10:11:38 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] /testing dbus 1.2.12 is available In-Reply-To: <49B6EE8A.6050007@wbonnet.net> References: <49B6EE8A.6050007@wbonnet.net> Message-ID: On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:49 PM, William Bonnet wrote: > dbus has been updated to version 1.2.12 and is available from testing. Where is the testing directory available? My mirror [1] only shows 'current' (=='unstable') and 'stable'. [1] http://ftp.heanet.ie/pub/opencsw/ From william at wbonnet.net Wed Mar 11 11:11:53 2009 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 11:11:53 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] /testing dbus 1.2.12 is available In-Reply-To: References: <49B6EE8A.6050007@wbonnet.net> Message-ID: <49B78E69.1030509@wbonnet.net> Hi Maciej > Where is the testing directory available? My mirror [1] only shows > 'current' (=='unstable') and 'stable'. > Testing is not a source you can use with pkg-get or pkgtool. You can access testing from this place : http://www.opencsw.org/testing You have to remove old package and install new by hand Kind rgards, W. -- William http://www.wbonnet.net http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix http://www.opencsw.org Community SoftWare for Solaris http://www.guses.org French speaking Solaris User Group From maciej.blizinski at gmail.com Wed Mar 11 11:22:40 2009 From: maciej.blizinski at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Blizi=C5=84ski?=) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 10:22:40 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] A build for review: rxvt-unicode In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Maciej Blizi?ski wrote: > The build is at: (...) gz2 Apparently, I managed to invent a new compression format. The build is in now at: http://netra.chopin.edu.pl/~maciej/rxvt-unicode-9.06-gar-build.tar.gz As a side note, how is usually build submission done? Are new builds submitted to mantis, or is a mailing list used? Maciej From bonivart at opencsw.org Wed Mar 11 11:27:14 2009 From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 11:27:14 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] /testing dbus 1.2.12 is available In-Reply-To: References: <49B6EE8A.6050007@wbonnet.net> Message-ID: <625385e30903110327l20ce9dd7pffa6879386998c9e@mail.gmail.com> On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Maciej Blizi?ski wrote: > On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:49 PM, William Bonnet wrote: >> dbus has been updated to version 1.2.12 and is available from testing. > > Where is the testing directory available? My mirror [1] only shows > 'current' (=='unstable') and 'stable'. > > [1] http://ftp.heanet.ie/pub/opencsw/ The testing directory is not replicated to other mirrors. You can find it here: http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing.html If you copy your packages to /home/testing it will be available there in a few minutes. -- /peter From skayser at opencsw.org Wed Mar 11 13:08:57 2009 From: skayser at opencsw.org (Sebastian Kayser) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:08:57 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <49B7A9D9.2060902@opencsw.org> Hi Maciej, Maciej Blizi?ski wrote: > I'm trying to build a package using gcc4. Running configure... > ... > ld: fatal: File processing errors. No output written to a.out > > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > > As a workaround, I could use: > > chmod 644 /usr/ccs/bin/ld > cd /opt/csw/bin/ > ln -s gld ld > > But it's ugly. Do you have any better ideas? i am not a gcc expert (compile all my packages with Sun Studio), but i faced a similar question a while ago and that's what i found out then. Other than what one might think, gcc -> /usr/ccs/bin/ld is a valid build chain and according to some a more robust one than gcc -> gld [1,2]. Of course, the configure script has to be clever enough to notice the non GNU ld, which it doesn't seem to be in your case. You might give the -B option [3] to gcc/collect2 a try (pass it along with EXTRA_CFLAGS), although i don't know whether it is intended for that sort of stuff. Any particular reason you are compiling with gcc? Sun Studio 11 is the default compiler used with GAR and its available for free [4]. Install it with a prefix of /opt/studio/SOS11 and you have a machine that closely resembles one of our build hosts. I am not saying that this will make your life easier regarding the builds though ;) I usually tweak the autoconf files or Makefiles until they configure and build with Sun Studio. Sebastian [1] http://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=155501 [2] http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2006-11/msg00301.html [3] http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.0.4/gcc/Directory-Options.html#index-B-664 [4] http://developers.sun.com/sunstudio/products/previous/11/index.jsp From william at wbonnet.net Wed Mar 11 16:35:11 2009 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 16:35:11 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] A build for review: rxvt-unicode In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <49B7DA2F.8030004@wbonnet.net> Hi Maciej > Apparently, I managed to invent a new compression format. > > The build is in now at: > http://netra.chopin.edu.pl/~maciej/rxvt-unicode-9.06-gar-build.tar.gz > > Thanks, i'll give it a look tonight when i'll beback home. > As a side note, how is usually build submission done? Are new builds > submitted to mantis, or is a mailing list used? > You have to apply for membership and be subscribed to maintainer list. Then you will have access to the build farm. Packages must be built on the farm, then submitted to Phil for unstable. Kind rgards W. -- William http://www.wbonnet.net http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix http://www.opencsw.org Community SoftWare for Solaris http://www.guses.org French speaking Solaris User Group From ja at baltic-online.de Wed Mar 11 17:45:43 2009 From: ja at baltic-online.de (Juergen Arndt) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:45:43 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] cswproto not found In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi, > This kind of error is usually generated when an old version > of gmake is in the path. Older versions of gmake don't understand > $(abspath ...) and always return the empty string. As the > result is used as a path that one is missing. On build10s > was SUNWgmake installed which I deinstalled now. > > It may be a good idea to write some kind of test case > which bails out if an unsuitable version of gmake is found. > > Please see if this really solved your problem. that was the reason. With the updated version of gmake the problem is solved. Thank you! Juergen -- Juergen Arndt Baltic Online Computer GmbH Firmensitz: Alter Markt 1-2, 24103 Kiel http://www.baltic-online.de Tel.: +49 (0)431 54003-0 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Erik Cickovskis, Amtsgericht Kiel, HRB 3756 From ja at baltic-online.de Wed Mar 11 17:47:32 2009 From: ja at baltic-online.de (Juergen Arndt) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:47:32 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] cswproto not found In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 19:35:15 +0100, Maciej Blizi?ski wrote: > On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 6:02 PM, Juergen Arndt > wrote: >> In that special case I need it for Solaris 8. The software I want to >> package uses C functions, which are not in the Sol-8-libs, so I had to >> use >> the ucb libs. > > You don't have -I/usr/ucbinclude in your CPPFLAGS. If you don't have > them, you can have problems like readdir() function stripping off > first 2 characters of every file. I spent half a day today debugging > that. You need to either use -I/usr/ucbinclude and -L/usr/ucblib, or > none. Also, as a side note - if you're specifying -L/usr/ucblib, it's > a good idea to specify also -R/usr/ucblib which will make the binary > search /usr/ucblib for libraries during runtime. Otherwise you can get > an error with a shared library not found. Oh, thanks for that! I will try that and clean up the makefile. Juergen -- Juergen Arndt From mwatters at opencsw.org Wed Mar 11 18:23:36 2009 From: mwatters at opencsw.org (Mike Watters) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 12:23:36 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] New python dependent packages in Testing Message-ID: <49B7F398.3090604@opencsw.org> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 clearsilver pm_clearsilver py_clearsilver pydocutils pygobject pymysql5 pyorbit pysetuptools pysqlite pysqlite2 silvercity Feedback welcome and thank you for testing!! :) - -- Thanks, Mike "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius -- and a lot of courage -- to move in the opposite direction." * Albert Einstein 1879 - 1955 US German-born Theoretical Physicist -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (SunOS) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkm385gACgkQLrhmsXMSLxfCXACdGwFyuvTCZDMJAddy549R6NGF rmgAn0CJFNi6Eqd2tPiPzWhrI4ev49Fk =0wCS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From mwatters at opencsw.org Wed Mar 11 18:27:02 2009 From: mwatters at opencsw.org (Mike Watters) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 12:27:02 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] New Xchat packages in Testing Message-ID: <49B7F466.2070901@opencsw.org> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 changes: recompile against python 2.6 to change architecture from v8+ to v8 xchat xchat_pl xchat_py xchat_tcl - -- Thanks, Mike "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius -- and a lot of courage -- to move in the opposite direction." * Albert Einstein 1879 - 1955 US German-born Theoretical Physicist -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (SunOS) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkm39GYACgkQLrhmsXMSLxcWdgCfZrhx3az4MyF+YD1pSz1mTCnF z1wAn183eG5Xfuv9EU899nNtgbPdVSCj =aBbN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From william at wbonnet.net Wed Mar 11 21:12:09 2009 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 21:12:09 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] A build for review: rxvt-unicode In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <49B81B19.5090409@wbonnet.net> Hi Maciej Here is a quick review of your package . name of the directory containing the Makefile etc. should be name like the package ( urxvt ) . CATEGORIES = x11 This category is used to build x11 libs, not for all programs running under x11. It does not mean it is an error nor it should not be used. But some applications uses x11, some gnome, some apps. So i warn you to be sure you have checked what is defined by this category file. . UFILES_REGEX should be UFILES_REGEX = $(GARNAME)-(\d+(?:\.\d+)*).tar.bz2= $(GARNAME)-(\d+(?:\.\d+)*).tar.bz2 The regular expression has to match the filename of the source file you download ( not your fault, i'm late at releasing this documentation ;) ) . You are using GCC ? is there a reason why you cannot use SunStudio 11 ? I tried but it does not compile. I think you should look if it is possible or not to propose a patch to make it work with sunstudio. . You should add the following line to your Makefile TEST_SCRIPTS = It will prevent GAR from trying to run tests since the software does provide some . If you don't provide a depend file and use automatic generation (which is good), you should declare dependencies in the Makefile. Add the following line : REQUIRED_PKGS_CSWurxvt = CSWfconfig CSWftype2 CSWlibxft2 CSWlibxrender CSWzlib You can find which package are necessary after first build. In the case of this package the ouput is : Examining 'depend' file system CSWcommon common - common files and dirs for CSW packages SUGGESTION: you may want to add some or all of the following as depends: (Feel free to ignore SUNW or SPRO packages) > CSWfconfig > CSWftype2 > CSWlibxft2 > CSWlibxrender > CSWzlib > SUNWcsl > SUNWcslr > SUNWdpl > SUNWfontconfig > SUNWfreetype2 > SUNWlibms > SUNWlibmsr > SUNWxwplt > SUNWxwrtl > SUNWxwxft > SUNWzlib You have to add all CSW* packages If you rebuild after adding deps you have : Examining 'depend' file system CSWcommon common - common files and dirs for CSW packages application CSWfconfig fontconfig - A library for configuring and customizing font access. application CSWftype2 freetype2 - A free and portable TrueType font rendering engine application CSWlibxft2 libxft2 - FreeType-based font drawing library for X application CSWlibxrender libxrender - fontconfig.org Xrender library application CSWzlib zlib - Zlib Data Compression Library SUGGESTION: you may want to add some or all of the following as depends: (Feel free to ignore SUNW or SPRO packages) > SUNWcsl > SUNWcslr > SUNWdpl > SUNWfontconfig > SUNWfreetype2 > SUNWlibms > SUNWlibmsr > SUNWxwplt > SUNWxwrtl > SUNWxwxft > SUNWzlib I compiled it and installed on a test VM and it works. Thanks for this contribution and your good work. It is almost ready, you can submit it and finish your work on the farm. Regards, W. -- William http://www.wbonnet.net http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix http://www.opencsw.org Community SoftWare for Solaris http://www.guses.org French speaking Solaris User Group From hson at opencsw.org Wed Mar 11 21:34:09 2009 From: hson at opencsw.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Roger_H=E5kansson?=) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 21:34:09 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] New version of distcc in /testing Message-ID: <49B82041.2000406@opencsw.org> Changes - Update to 3.1 - Built with gar From hson at opencsw.org Wed Mar 11 21:34:57 2009 From: hson at opencsw.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Roger_H=E5kansson?=) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 21:34:57 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] New version of pwgen in /testing Message-ID: <49B82071.10406@opencsw.org> Changes: - Update to 2.06 - Built with gar From hson at opencsw.org Wed Mar 11 22:02:48 2009 From: hson at opencsw.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Roger_H=E5kansson?=) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 22:02:48 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] New version of gengetopt in /testing Message-ID: <49B826F8.8020200@opencsw.org> Changes - Update to 2.22 - Built with gar From hson at opencsw.org Wed Mar 11 22:22:12 2009 From: hson at opencsw.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Roger_H=E5kansson?=) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 22:22:12 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] New version of libgc in /testing Message-ID: <49B82B84.7060004@opencsw.org> Changes - Update to 7.0 - Built with gar From hson at opencsw.org Wed Mar 11 22:25:52 2009 From: hson at opencsw.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Roger_H=E5kansson?=) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 22:25:52 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] New version of libnids in /testing Message-ID: <49B82C60.5080208@opencsw.org> Change - Update to 1.23 - Built with gar From hson at opencsw.org Wed Mar 11 22:25:59 2009 From: hson at opencsw.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Roger_H=E5kansson?=) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 22:25:59 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] dsniff package update in /testing Message-ID: <49B82C67.3020903@opencsw.org> Change - Built with gar - Linked against libnids-1.23 From hson at opencsw.org Wed Mar 11 22:41:24 2009 From: hson at opencsw.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Roger_H=E5kansson?=) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 22:41:24 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] New version of w3m in /testing Message-ID: <49B83004.7050800@opencsw.org> Changes - Update to 0.5.2 - Built with gar From maciej.blizinski at gmail.com Thu Mar 12 08:47:29 2009 From: maciej.blizinski at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Blizi=C5=84ski?=) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 07:47:29 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] A build for review: rxvt-unicode In-Reply-To: <49B81B19.5090409@wbonnet.net> References: <49B81B19.5090409@wbonnet.net> Message-ID: Thanks for the review! I'll improve my build and get back to you. On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 8:12 PM, William Bonnet wrote: > . You are using GCC ? is there a reason why you cannot use SunStudio 11 ? > ? ?I tried but it does not compile. I think you should look if it is > possible or not to propose a patch to make it work with sunstudio. Making it work with Sun Studio is the biggest difficulty now. The error message I'm getting almost makes sense: "./../libev/ev++.h", line 636: Error: The name set is ambiguous, ev::base::set::K, ev::base::method>(ev::base::K*) and ev::base::set::K, ev::base::method>(ev::base::K*). Ambiguity, all is good, except the two choices between the 'ambiguous' statements are exactly the same! I mean, I could be unable to read, but I calculated md5sums and they are equal: maciej at quince ~ $ echo 'Error: The name set is ambiguous, ev::base::set::K, ev::base::method>(ev::base::K*) and ev::base::set::K, ev::base::method>(ev::base::K*).' | sed -e 's/.*uous,//' | sed -e 's/\.$//' | sed -e 's/ and /\n/' | while read line; do echo -n "${line}" | md5sum ; done 71745102eb4c293942acba5e1afd257f - 71745102eb4c293942acba5e1afd257f - The bit of code in question uses a big macro to avoid using templates. I'll need some time to pull it apart. From dam at opencsw.org Thu Mar 12 14:10:46 2009 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 14:10:46 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] cswproto not found In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <2781D7E2-6F0E-4349-9312-9939BD3D84FF@opencsw.org> Hi, Am 11.03.2009 um 17:45 schrieb Juergen Arndt: >> This kind of error is usually generated when an old version >> of gmake is in the path. Older versions of gmake don't understand >> $(abspath ...) and always return the empty string. As the >> result is used as a path that one is missing. On build10s >> was SUNWgmake installed which I deinstalled now. >> >> It may be a good idea to write some kind of test case >> which bails out if an unsuitable version of gmake is found. >> >> Please see if this really solved your problem. > > that was the reason. With the updated version of gmake the problem is > solved. This is now checked on each invocation and prints an error if there are gmake features missing: > dam at login [login]:/home/dam/mgar/pkg/autoconf/trunk/gar > gmake > gar.mk:25: *** Your version of 'make' is too old: 3.80. Please make > sure you are using at least 3.81. Stop. > zsh: 16007 exit 2 gmake It is fixed in r3724. Best regards -- Dago From mwatters at opencsw.org Thu Mar 12 16:48:09 2009 From: mwatters at opencsw.org (Mike Watters) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 10:48:09 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] subversion and bindings NOW IN TESTING Message-ID: <49B92EB9.2000106@opencsw.org> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Changes: * migrated build to gar v2 * updated to version 1.5.6 SPKG_DESC_CSWsvn = Version control rethought CATALOGNAME_CSWsvn = subversion SPKG_DESC_CSWsvn-devel = Subversion Development Support CATALOGNAME_CSWsvn-devel = subversion_devel SPKG_DESC_CSWap2svn = Subversion Modules for Apache 2 CATALOGNAME_CSWap2svn = ap2svn SPKG_DESC_CSWjavasvn = Subversion Java Language Binding CATALOGNAME_CSWjavasvn = javasvn SPKG_DESC_CSWpmsvn = Subversion Perl Language Binding CATALOGNAME_CSWpmsvn = pmsvn SPKG_DESC_CSWpysvn = Subversion Python Language Binding CATALOGNAME_CSWpysvn = pysvn SPKG_DESC_CSWrbsvn = Subversion Ruby Language Binding CATALOGNAME_CSWrbsvn = rbsvn - -- Thanks, Mike "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius -- and a lot of courage -- to move in the opposite direction." * Albert Einstein 1879 - 1955 US German-born Theoretical Physicist -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (SunOS) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkm5LrkACgkQLrhmsXMSLxeZlACfXzUStQYV8RZphuGWVWZAN64Q SQIAn03Ld6nHVgpvcSY1ZsOdHj0zqWSv =w+Lj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From harpchad at opencsw.org Thu Mar 12 17:51:16 2009 From: harpchad at opencsw.org (Chad Harp) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 11:51:16 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] In testing: vim/gvim 7.2.128, rdesktop 1.6.0, glib 2.18.4 Message-ID: <49B93D84.4@opencsw.org> gvim-7.2.128,REV=2009.03.01-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz gvim-7.2.128,REV=2009.03.01-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz vim-7.2.128,REV=2009.03.01-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz vim-7.2.128,REV=2009.03.01-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz vimrt-7.2.128,REV=2009.03.01-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz glib2-2.18.4,REV=2009.03.12-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz glib2-2.18.4,REV=2009.03.12-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz glib2_devel-2.18.4,REV=2009.03.12-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz glib2_devel-2.18.4,REV=2009.03.12-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz rdesktop-1.6.0,REV=2009.02.22-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz rdesktop-1.6.0,REV=2009.02.22-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz From harpchad at opencsw.org Thu Mar 12 18:48:40 2009 From: harpchad at opencsw.org (Chad Harp) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 12:48:40 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Updated pidgin in testing (2.5.5) Message-ID: <49B94AF8.8060602@opencsw.org> pidgin-2.5.5,REV=2009.03.12-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz pidgin-2.5.5,REV=2009.03.12-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz From harpchad at opencsw.org Thu Mar 12 18:54:49 2009 From: harpchad at opencsw.org (Chad Harp) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 12:54:49 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] Updated curl in testing (Security Fix) Message-ID: <49B94C69.5000908@opencsw.org> This build addresses a vulnerability discussed here: http://curl.haxx.se/docs/adv_20090303.html curl-7.19.4,REV=2009.03.12-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz curl-7.19.4,REV=2009.03.12-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz curldevel-7.19.4,REV=2009.03.12-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz curldevel-7.19.4,REV=2009.03.12-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz curlrt-7.19.4,REV=2009.03.12-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz curlrt-7.19.4,REV=2009.03.12-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz From ja at baltic-online.de Thu Mar 12 19:57:10 2009 From: ja at baltic-online.de (Juergen Arndt) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 19:57:10 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Question about dependencies Message-ID: Hi all, I ran into the following situation: I want to package an application which depends on PHP. But for PHP exist different packages for different version of the Apache web server and of course it is not known, which version the end user has running. Additionaly the end user could have installed PHP manually or he has a different web server or ... . So, how could I handle that? Should my package depend on PHP or not? Maybe it's ok to print out a short message, that the user has to make sure, that PHP is installed and maybe a zlib extension too and so on? Juergen -- Juergen Arndt From bonivart at opencsw.org Thu Mar 12 20:04:07 2009 From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 20:04:07 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Question about dependencies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <625385e30903121204x7d42e429v43f725110a8bc442@mail.gmail.com> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 7:57 PM, Juergen Arndt wrote: > Hi all, > > I ran into the following situation: I want to package an application which > depends on PHP. But for PHP exist different packages for different version > of the Apache web server and of course it is not known, which version the > end user has running. Additionaly the end user could have installed PHP > manually or he has a different web server or ... . > > So, how could I handle that? Should my package depend on PHP or not? Maybe > it's ok to print out a short message, that the user has to make sure, that > PHP is installed and maybe a zlib extension too and so on? I think you should make a choice of what's the best configuration CSW can offer. I have some similar packages and I chose to depend on Apache2 even if it's possible to run on any web server. For most users that's what they expect to get and the easiest way to get up and running. An advanced user can always go around the dependencies. -- /peter From bwalton at opencsw.org Thu Mar 12 20:05:31 2009 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:05:31 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] Question about dependencies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1236884589-sup-6094@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> Excerpts from Juergen Arndt's message of Thu Mar 12 14:57:10 -0400 2009: > So, how could I handle that? Should my package depend on PHP or not? Maybe > it's ok to print out a short message, that the user has to make sure, that > PHP is installed and maybe a zlib extension too and so on? If the app needs php to function, I'd say you should definitely have the P in your depend file. Depend on php5 (or whatever specific separate CSW php5 package you need) and let the user make it work with any non-csw stuff. IMO, nothing _new_ should depend on php4 stuff, and not depending on php at all just makes for more bug reports for you! :) HTH -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 GPG Key Id: 8E89F6D2; Key Server: pgp.mit.edu Contact me to arrange for a CAcert assurance meeting. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From ja at baltic-online.de Thu Mar 12 20:13:45 2009 From: ja at baltic-online.de (Juergen Arndt) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 20:13:45 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Question about dependencies In-Reply-To: <1236884589-sup-6094@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> References: <1236884589-sup-6094@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 20:05:31 +0100, Ben Walton wrote: > IMO, nothing _new_ should depend on php4 stuff, and not depending on > php at all just makes for more bug reports for you! :) Good point ;-) -- Juergen Arndt From ja at baltic-online.de Thu Mar 12 20:15:28 2009 From: ja at baltic-online.de (Juergen Arndt) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 20:15:28 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Question about dependencies In-Reply-To: <625385e30903121204x7d42e429v43f725110a8bc442@mail.gmail.com> References: <625385e30903121204x7d42e429v43f725110a8bc442@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 20:04:07 +0100, Peter Bonivart wrote: > I think you should make a choice of what's the best configuration CSW > can offer. I have some similar packages and I chose to depend on > Apache2 even if it's possible to run on any web server. For most users > that's what they expect to get and the easiest way to get up and > running. An advanced user can always go around the dependencies. Ok, I will do so and as Ben mentioned, I'll let the package depend on php 5. Thank you! -- Juergen Arndt Baltic Online Computer GmbH Firmensitz: Alter Markt 1-2, 24103 Kiel http://www.baltic-online.de Tel.: +49 (0)431 54003-0 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Erik Cickovskis, Amtsgericht Kiel, HRB 3756 From mwatters at opencsw.org Fri Mar 13 15:34:28 2009 From: mwatters at opencsw.org (Mike Watters) Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 09:34:28 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] [csw-maintainers] PHP5 and extentions now in Testing In-Reply-To: <49B94F00.2070805@jpl.nasa.gov> References: <49B464DA.2050203@opencsw.org> <49B94F00.2070805@jpl.nasa.gov> Message-ID: <49BA6EF4.4070703@opencsw.org> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Joseph Kwan wrote: > Mike Watters wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> >> Changes: >> compile version 5.2.6 with extensions (version not changed) >> recompile only to build the extensions. >> >> > Will there be an updated php5 at some point? I'm getting > a few notices about security problems with pre 5.2.8 > versions. > > http://www.security-database.com/detail.php?alert=USN-720-1 > > And it doesn't seem there's patches to resolve these, > just new version releases. > > thanks, > > Joe Kwan > Joseph Kwan, Sr. Network/Systems Analyst > Radar Science and Engineering (Section 334) > Jet Propulsion Laboratory / MS 300-235 > > _______________________________________________ > maintainers mailing list > maintainers at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers Yes I just started getting those. when I took over the package, 5.2.6 was the stable release, 5.2.7 was pulled due to the magic_quotes_gpc bug. I will start prepping for the update to 5.2.9. [ ** Begin Quote php.net ** ] The PHP development team would like to announce the immediate availability of PHP 5.2.9. This release focuses on improving the stability of the PHP 5.2.x branch with over 50 bug fixes, several of which are security related. All users of PHP are encouraged to upgrade to this release. [ ** End Quote php.net ** ] - -- Thanks, Mike "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius -- and a lot of courage -- to move in the opposite direction." * Albert Einstein 1879 - 1955 US German-born Theoretical Physicist -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (SunOS) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkm6bvQACgkQLrhmsXMSLxfaRQCgu+uv42jeaLoFv3VoTD3RBBQM XPkAn04ptu9as83XFy5ajzmvYfhT0toP =pBEn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From blizinski at google.com Fri Mar 13 17:25:26 2009 From: blizinski at google.com (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski) Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 16:25:26 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] Solaris port of vixie-cron - a GAR build for review Message-ID: I would like to offer a GAR build of vixie-cron. The build is based on cron_3.0pl1 as used in Debian, using a patch[3] pulled from Debian archives. Generally, the idea is to make it as close to Debian code as possible. The build is licensed under the terms of GPL-2. Porting to Solaris needed few tweaks. Three noticeable ones are: - function flock() is not available in Solaris. Code was changed to use lockf() - function mkdtemp() is not available in our version of Solaris and compiler tools. Function was added. - functions sigblock() and sigmask() are not available in Solaris, they have been replaced with sigemptyset(), sigaddset() and sigprocmask() All Solaris-specific changes are in one patch file: vixiecron/trunk/files/gar-vixiecron_3.0pl1.patch The build is available for review here: http://code.google.com/p/usable-solaris/source/detail?r=29 If you have a Google account, you can sign in and use the code reviewing tool, which allows to comment on specific lines of code. After sign in, a "Start code review" link will appear in the top right corner. Maciej From maciej.blizinski at gmail.com Fri Mar 13 19:07:57 2009 From: maciej.blizinski at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Blizi=C5=84ski?=) Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 18:07:57 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] Mail archives seem to be down Message-ID: This URL: https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo Says: ===================== Bug in Mailman version 2.1.9 We're sorry, we hit a bug! Please inform the webmaster for this site of this problem. Printing of traceback and other system information has been explicitly inhibited, but the webmaster can find this information in the Mailman error logs. ===================== Is there an ongoing maintenance now? From ihsan at opencsw.org Fri Mar 13 23:21:53 2009 From: ihsan at opencsw.org (Ihsan Dogan) Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 23:21:53 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Mail archives seem to be down In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <49BADC81.5010204@opencsw.org> Am 13.3.2009 19:07 Uhr, Maciej Blizi?ski schrieb: > This URL: https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo > > Says: > ===================== > Bug in Mailman version 2.1.9 > > We're sorry, we hit a bug! > > Please inform the webmaster for this site of this problem. Printing of > traceback and other system information has been explicitly inhibited, > but the webmaster can find this information in the Mailman error logs. > ===================== > > Is there an ongoing maintenance now? I just noticed that. I working on that now. Ihsan -- ihsan at dogan.ch http://blog.dogan.ch/ From bwalton at opencsw.org Sat Mar 14 01:51:48 2009 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 20:51:48 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] makepatch fixed Message-ID: <1236991770-sup-6192@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> Hi All, [Sorry for the cross post, I've seen interest from both lists and I'm not sure that all interested parties are on maintainers@, etc.] I just committed r3756 that should see the makepatch GAR target functional in GAR v2 again. It assumes that you'll make the changes you'd like to see in the patch in the first modulation source directory. Let me know if this is still broken in your use of it. Thanks -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 GPG Key Id: 8E89F6D2; Key Server: pgp.mit.edu Contact me to arrange for a CAcert assurance meeting. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From mwatters at opencsw.org Sat Mar 14 05:24:46 2009 From: mwatters at opencsw.org (Mike Watters) Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 23:24:46 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] PHP-5.2.9 *** Now In Testing *** Message-ID: <49BB318E.10908@opencsw.org> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Changes: updated from 5.2.6 to 5.2.9 Please read the change log for a detail list of changes. http://www.php.net/ChangeLog-5.php#5.2.9 - -- Thanks, Mike "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius -- and a lot of courage -- to move in the opposite direction." * Albert Einstein 1879 - 1955 US German-born Theoretical Physicist -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkm7MY4ACgkQLrhmsXMSLxcApgCfZKyPrmZ3K9imvnthFObHZt2U 9QgAniLU/vyaWH0R/LTIi8jLjkzfqTr7 =Iaij -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From ihsan at opencsw.org Sat Mar 14 09:35:53 2009 From: ihsan at opencsw.org (Ihsan Dogan) Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 09:35:53 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Mail server maintenance Message-ID: <20090314083606.E6DCB6CBD@mail.opencsw.org> Hello, Due some problems with the mailing list software, I have to take down the services on the mail server to do maintenance. Starting at 18:00 UTC, the services might not be available for approximately 2 hours. Ihsan -- ihsan at dogan.ch From maciej.blizinski at gmail.com Sat Mar 14 11:11:03 2009 From: maciej.blizinski at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Blizi=C5=84ski?=) Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 10:11:03 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] cswproto not found In-Reply-To: <2781D7E2-6F0E-4349-9312-9939BD3D84FF@opencsw.org> References: <2781D7E2-6F0E-4349-9312-9939BD3D84FF@opencsw.org> Message-ID: On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 1:10 PM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: >> dam at login [login]:/home/dam/mgar/pkg/autoconf/trunk/gar > gmake >> gar.mk:25: *** Your version of 'make' is too old: 3.80. Please make >> sure you are using at least 3.81. ?Stop. >> zsh: 16007 exit 2 ? ? gmake > > It is fixed in r3724. My system claims that the installed gmake version is 3.81, but the actual installed gmake version is 3.80: $ gmake package gar/gar.mk:25: *** Your version of 'make' is too old: 3.80. Please make sure you are using at least 3.81. Stop. yaga trunk $ gmake --version GNU Make 3.80 Copyright (C) 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. $ pkg-get upgrade gmake No worries... you already have version 3.81 of gmake If you doubt this message, run 'pkg-get -U', then run 'pkg-get upgrade gmake' $ pkgparam CSWgmake VERSION 3.81 Does anyone else see this? From hson at opencsw.org Sat Mar 14 11:32:07 2009 From: hson at opencsw.org (=?UTF-8?B?Um9nZXIgSMOla2Fuc3Nvbg==?=) Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 11:32:07 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] cswproto not found In-Reply-To: References: <2781D7E2-6F0E-4349-9312-9939BD3D84FF@opencsw.org> Message-ID: <49BB87A7.3060104@opencsw.org> Maciej Blizi?ski wrote: > On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 1:10 PM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: >>> dam at login [login]:/home/dam/mgar/pkg/autoconf/trunk/gar > gmake >>> gar.mk:25: *** Your version of 'make' is too old: 3.80. Please make >>> sure you are using at least 3.81. Stop. >>> zsh: 16007 exit 2 gmake >> It is fixed in r3724. > > My system claims that the installed gmake version is 3.81, but the > actual installed gmake version is 3.80: > > $ gmake package > gar/gar.mk:25: *** Your version of 'make' is too old: 3.80. Please > make sure you are using at least 3.81. Stop. > yaga trunk $ gmake --version > GNU Make 3.80 > Copyright (C) 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. > There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A > PARTICULAR PURPOSE. > $ pkg-get upgrade gmake > No worries... you already have version 3.81 of gmake > If you doubt this message, run 'pkg-get -U', then run > 'pkg-get upgrade gmake' > $ pkgparam CSWgmake VERSION > 3.81 > Are you sure that the CSW-version is the one you're using? Whats your PATH? From maciej.blizinski at gmail.com Sat Mar 14 11:48:23 2009 From: maciej.blizinski at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Blizi=C5=84ski?=) Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 10:48:23 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] cswproto not found In-Reply-To: <49BB87A7.3060104@opencsw.org> References: <2781D7E2-6F0E-4349-9312-9939BD3D84FF@opencsw.org> <49BB87A7.3060104@opencsw.org> Message-ID: On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 10:32 AM, Roger H?kansson wrote: > Are you sure that the CSW-version is the one you're using? > Whats your PATH? This is amusing: $ gmake --version GNU Make 3.80 $ `which gmake` --version GNU Make 3.81 Wasn't the command "which" supposed to agree with what shell is doing? My PATH is: $ echo $PATH /opt/csw/sbin:/opt/csw/bin:/bin:/sbin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/opt/SUNWjet/bin:/usr/sfw/bin:/usr/sfw/sbin:/usr/ccs/bin I used findutils to track down all the 'gmake' files. The 3.80 version was from /usr/sfw directory. I'm positive I have /opt/csw/bin first in my PATH. "pkgrm SUNWgmake" fixed the problem. From maciej.blizinski at gmail.com Sat Mar 14 12:27:37 2009 From: maciej.blizinski at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Blizi=C5=84ski?=) Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 11:27:37 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] Porting facter and puppet packages to mGAR Message-ID: Hi Gary, I can see you're using custom shell scripts to build facter and puppet packages[1]. Would you mind porting those builds to mGAR? Maciej [1] http://www.garylaw.net/packages/ From maciej.blizinski at gmail.com Sat Mar 14 14:26:15 2009 From: maciej.blizinski at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Blizi=C5=84ski?=) Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 13:26:15 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] Porting facter and puppet packages to mGAR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 11:27 AM, Maciej Blizi?ski wrote: > Hi Gary, > > I can see you're using custom shell scripts to build facter and puppet > packages[1]. Would you mind porting those builds to mGAR? > > Maciej > > [1] http://www.garylaw.net/packages/ I'm not sure which address Gary actually uses. His home page [2] says it's anything at his domain. But a message on puppet users mailing list mentions another address. I'll try that one too. Maciej [2] http://wiki.garylaw.net/doku.php?id=gary#contact_me [3] http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users/browse_thread/thread/4722c4119e4e9540/c064f4436c98e89d From skayser at opencsw.org Sat Mar 14 15:06:56 2009 From: skayser at opencsw.org (Sebastian Kayser) Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 15:06:56 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] cswproto not found In-Reply-To: References: <2781D7E2-6F0E-4349-9312-9939BD3D84FF@opencsw.org> <49BB87A7.3060104@opencsw.org> Message-ID: <20090314140656.GA21810@sebastiankayser.de> * Maciej Blizi??ski wrote: > On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 10:32 AM, Roger H?kansson wrote: > > Are you sure that the CSW-version is the one you're using? > > Whats your PATH? > > This is amusing: > > $ gmake --version > GNU Make 3.80 > $ `which gmake` --version > GNU Make 3.81 > > Wasn't the command "which" supposed to agree with what shell is doing? > > My PATH is: > > $ echo $PATH > /opt/csw/sbin:/opt/csw/bin:/bin:/sbin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/opt/SUNWjet/bin:/usr/sfw/bin:/usr/sfw/sbin:/usr/ccs/bin > > I used findutils to track down all the 'gmake' files. The 3.80 version > was from /usr/sfw directory. I'm positive I have /opt/csw/bin first in > my PATH. "pkgrm SUNWgmake" fixed the problem. I would guess that your shell had hashed the gmake from /usr/sfw/bin and thus didn't pick up the gmake from /opt/csw/bin when you installed it [1]. "which" is not a shell built-in and doesn't work with the shell hash table for commands, so it will traverse the $PATH as usual (and find the gmake from /opt/csw/bin as you had expected). Your current shell on the other hand would have known where to find gmake based on a previous call, when /opt/csw/bin/gmake wasn't yet available. Rather use the shell built-in "type", which will apply the same logic as your current shell (including the internal hash) to find a command. All assuming you are using bash, other shells might behave similar. Sebastian [1] http://www.gnu.org/software/bash/manual/bashref.html#Command-Search-and-Execution From ihsan at opencsw.org Sat Mar 14 20:41:07 2009 From: ihsan at opencsw.org (Ihsan Dogan) Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 20:41:07 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] [csw-maintainers] Mail server maintenance In-Reply-To: <20090314083606.E6DCB6CBD@mail.opencsw.org> References: <20090314083606.E6DCB6CBD@mail.opencsw.org> Message-ID: <49BC0853.6070505@opencsw.org> Am 14.3.2009 9:35 Uhr, Ihsan Dogan schrieb: > Due some problems with the mailing list software, I have to take down the > services on the mail server to do maintenance. Starting at 18:00 UTC, the > services might not be available for approximately 2 hours. I've updated now to the newest version of Mailman and the mailing lists are running fine again. Ihsan -- ihsan at dogan.ch http://blog.dogan.ch/ From ja at baltic-online.de Sun Mar 15 17:51:23 2009 From: ja at baltic-online.de (Juergen Arndt) Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 17:51:23 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Problem with RRDs (RRDtool Perl module) on Solaris 10 Message-ID: Hi all, I ran into a problem with the Perl module RRDs on Solaris 10. I evaluate a software (pnp, [1]), which stores data into RRD databases and visualises it as a graph. So nothing special. This software uses the RRDs perl module, which comes in CSWrrd. It works on Solaris 8 without any problem, on Solaris 10 nothing happends. After some digging in forums and chats I downloaded a test script (see below, [2]). It's no problem to run this script on Solaris 8 but Solaris 10 it cores. Can anybody reproduce this? And maybe someone has a solution? The output on Solaris 8 is as follows: root at sol8-cswpkg-test :/root/tmp > ./rrdtest Last 5 minutes: 1080462300: 5.6 1080462360: 5.7 1080462420: 5.8 1080462480: 5.9 1080462540: 6 1080462600: N/A Last 30 minutes: 1080460800: 3.5 1080461100: 4 1080461400: 4.5 1080461700: 5 1080462000: 5.5 1080462300: 6 1080462600: N/A root at sol8-cswpkg-test :/root/tmp > On Solaris 10 I get: root at ja01 [ja01]:/root/tmp > ./rrdtest zsh: 17975 segmentation fault (core dumped) ./rrdtest root at ja01 [ja01]:/root/tmp > Juergen [1] www.pnp4nagios.org [2] ftp://ftp.linux-magazin.de/pub/listings/magazin/2004/06/Perl/rrdtest (doesn't work sometimes): #!/opt/csw/bin/perl ########################################### # Feed test data to RRD # Mike Schilli, 2004 (m at perlmeister.com) ########################################### use warnings; use strict; use RRDs; my $DB = "/tmp/mydemo.rrd"; my $start = 1080460200; my $dst = "MAX"; my $nof_iterations = 40; my $end = $start + $nof_iterations * 60; RRDs::create( $DB, "--step=60", "--start=" . ($start-10), "DS:load:GAUGE:90:0:10.0", "RRA:$dst:0.5:1:5", "RRA:$dst:0.5:5:10", ) or die "Cannot create rrd ($RRDs::error)"; for(0..$nof_iterations) { my $time = $start + $_ * 60; my $value = 2 + $_ * 0.1; RRDs::update( $DB, "$time:$value") or die "Cannot update rrd ($!)"; } print "Last 5 minutes:\n"; fetch($end - 5*60, $end, $dst); print "Last 30 minutes:\n"; fetch($end - 30*60, $end, $dst); ########################################### sub fetch { ########################################### my($start, $end, $dst) = @_; my ($dbstart, $step, $names, $data) = RRDs::fetch($DB, "--start=$start", "--end=$end", $dst); foreach my $line (@$data) { print "$start: "; $start += $step; foreach my $val (@$line) { $val = "N/A" unless defined $val; print "$val\n"; } } } -- Juergen Arndt From skayser at opencsw.org Sun Mar 15 23:33:58 2009 From: skayser at opencsw.org (Sebastian Kayser) Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 23:33:58 +0100 (CET) Subject: [csw-users] Problem with RRDs (RRDtool Perl module) on Solaris 10 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <52854.217.227.44.156.1237156438.squirrel@ssl.skayser.de> Hi Juergen, Juergen Arndt schrieb: > I ran into a problem with the Perl module RRDs on Solaris 10. > > I evaluate a software (pnp, [1]), which stores data into RRD databases and > visualises it as a graph. So nothing special. This software uses the RRDs > perl module, which comes in CSWrrd. It works on Solaris 8 without any > problem, on Solaris 10 nothing happends. > > After some digging in forums and chats I downloaded a test script (see > below, [2]). It's no problem to run this script on Solaris 8 but Solaris > 10 it cores. Can anybody reproduce this? And maybe someone has a solution? from what i remember, we have a bug report about this in the bug tracker (filed against rrdtool). Have a look when the bug tracker is reachable again, maybe the report contains some information that is helpful in your situation. Otherwise add your findings to the bug tracker so that the package maintainer can take care of it. Sebastian From roger.hakansson at gmail.com Mon Mar 16 04:44:05 2009 From: roger.hakansson at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?Um9nZXIgSMOla2Fuc3Nvbg==?=) Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 04:44:05 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Porting facter and puppet packages to mGAR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <49BDCB05.2060804@gmail.com> Maciej Blizi?ski wrote: > Hi Gary, > > I can see you're using custom shell scripts to build facter and puppet > packages[1]. Would you mind porting those builds to mGAR? > In the spirit of the thematics of the month and having a few free minutes I took a quick look at it to help Gary. facter was no problem and what's in svn now builds a package which should be just like the released one. puppet is a bit trickier since there are two startup scripts and I'm really not used to create packages which have startup scipts. What's in svn isn't complete to build a package, right now pkgmk breaks due to problems with the startup scripts, but I commited it anyway so Gary at least have a starting point. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3331 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature URL: From dam at opencsw.org Mon Mar 16 21:43:07 2009 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 21:43:07 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Solaris port of vixie-cron - a GAR build for review In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <5097C18B-C38D-44E3-91FA-2E64F98A6ADF@opencsw.org> Hi Maciej, Am 13.03.2009 um 17:25 schrieb Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski: > I would like to offer a GAR build of vixie-cron. Did you ever found the time to commit it? Best regards -- Dago From dam at opencsw.org Mon Mar 16 21:44:49 2009 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 21:44:49 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] cswproto not found In-Reply-To: References: <98313864-AC54-4D83-AD69-035832E45F81@opencsw.org> Message-ID: <2186C1B8-8EC1-4D5E-84F5-B1282C51D902@opencsw.org> Hi Maciej, Am 11.03.2009 um 08:56 schrieb Maciej Blizi?ski: > On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:57 PM, Dagobert Michelsen > wrote: >> Hi Maciej, >> >> Am 10.03.2009 um 08:50 schrieb Maciej Blizi?ski: >>> Is it gar v1 or v2? >>> >>> You can check that using: "grep http gar/.svn/entries" >> >> This is, uhm, very creative ;-) The usual way to check this >> is via >> >>> dam at login [login]:/home/dam/mgar/pkg/autoconf > svn propget >>> svn:externals trunk/ >>> gar https://gar.svn.sf.net/svnroot/gar/csw/mgar/gar/v2 > > There's a problem with svn:externals: if you create new directory > (e.g. for a new software package) and you add the property > svn:externals, you need first to commit your directory (and > svn:externals) and _then_ you can check out the externals. I had to do > copy the directory with gar, and coulnd't have svn:externals property > set. There probably is a better way of checking this, though. Well, I usually do something like ln -s ../../../gar/v2 gar before committing to save this step. But you are right, ugly... Best regards -- Dago From ihsan at opencsw.org Mon Mar 16 21:50:58 2009 From: ihsan at opencsw.org (Ihsan Dogan) Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 21:50:58 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Problem with RRDs (RRDtool Perl module) on Solaris 10 In-Reply-To: <52854.217.227.44.156.1237156438.squirrel@ssl.skayser.de> References: <52854.217.227.44.156.1237156438.squirrel@ssl.skayser.de> Message-ID: <49BEBBB2.6050507@opencsw.org> Am 15.3.2009 23:33 Uhr, Sebastian Kayser schrieb: >> I evaluate a software (pnp, [1]), which stores data into RRD databases and >> visualises it as a graph. So nothing special. This software uses the RRDs >> perl module, which comes in CSWrrd. It works on Solaris 8 without any >> problem, on Solaris 10 nothing happends. >> >> After some digging in forums and chats I downloaded a test script (see >> below, [2]). It's no problem to run this script on Solaris 8 but Solaris >> 10 it cores. Can anybody reproduce this? And maybe someone has a solution? > > from what i remember, we have a bug report about this in the bug tracker > (filed against rrdtool). Have a look when the bug tracker is reachable > again, maybe the report contains some information that is helpful in your > situation. > > Otherwise add your findings to the bug tracker so that the package > maintainer can take care of it. I'm already looking into that. At least, I can reproduce it. Ihsan -- ihsan at dogan.ch http://blog.dogan.ch/ From glaw at opencsw.org Mon Mar 16 21:52:18 2009 From: glaw at opencsw.org (Gary Law) Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 20:52:18 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] Porting facter and puppet packages to mGAR In-Reply-To: <49BDCB05.2060804@gmail.com> References: <49BDCB05.2060804@gmail.com> Message-ID: 2009/3/16 Roger H?kansson > Maciej Blizi?ski wrote: > >> Hi Gary, >> >> I can see you're using custom shell scripts to build facter and puppet >> packages[1]. Would you mind porting those builds to mGAR? >> >> > In the spirit of the thematics of the month and having a few free minutes I > took a quick look at it to help Gary. > > facter was no problem and what's in svn now builds a package which should > be just like the released one. > > I'm not sure which address Gary actually uses. I'm pretty good at ignoring all of them. ;) so sorry to get into this discussion late, I'm a little busy at the moment. .. Most of my packages are in mgar, but not facter and puppet thus far. They're very custom, not you're usual configure/make/make install. Then again, I just got djbdns into mgar, and that's a fairly custom too, so I'm sure it's doable. I'll take a look at the facter output when I get some free time for testing it. > puppet is a bit trickier since there are two startup scripts and I'm really > not used to create packages which have startup scipts. > What's in svn isn't complete to build a package, right now pkgmk breaks due > to problems with the startup scripts, but I commited it anyway so Gary at > least have a starting point. > The startup scripts are based on those shipped by puppet's developers, nice of them to put together svcadm friendly xml files, I just needed to sed 'em into CSW-friendly paths. Not too tricky. I've also, purely for my own purposes, just put together the needed methods and xmls for puppetmaster, and was planning to pop these into the next update of the package I go. If you want to see the gory details of the scripts, in order to see what customisation needs to be ported into gar, they're here: http://garylaw.net/packages I've just re-uploaded tonight to make sure the published ones are the latest and greatest. I fully intend to get these into mgar. One day. I've also suggested to the maintainers list that all CSW software be either ported to mgar or desupported. Custom scripts are really not the way to go. I feel, at the very least, the custom scripts that are used need to be published or the software pulled from the archives. Anyway, thanks for taking a look. Gary -- Gary Law -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ja at baltic-online.de Mon Mar 16 23:17:09 2009 From: ja at baltic-online.de (Juergen Arndt) Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 23:17:09 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Problem with RRDs (RRDtool Perl module) on Solaris 10 In-Reply-To: <49BEBBB2.6050507@opencsw.org> References: <52854.217.227.44.156.1237156438.squirrel@ssl.skayser.de> <49BEBBB2.6050507@opencsw.org> Message-ID: On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 21:50:58 +0100, Ihsan Dogan wrote: > I'm already looking into that. At least, I can reproduce it. I'm quite sure, you already found it out by yourself, but in case if not, (at least) the function call RRDs::create leads into a segfault. I didn't looked into the source code yet, but if I can somehow assist you, let me know. Juergen -- Juergen Arndt From mwatters at opencsw.org Mon Mar 16 23:55:38 2009 From: mwatters at opencsw.org (Mike Watters) Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 17:55:38 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] libedit now in testing Message-ID: <49BED8EA.8090607@opencsw.org> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I have built packages for libedit. no 64bit yet, as I can not get it to compile with sun's cc and the gcc we have does not yet support amd64. ... I am getting closer on that but not quite there yet. some of the readline extensions "prefer" libedit over readline. - -- Thanks, Mike "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius -- and a lot of courage -- to move in the opposite direction." * Albert Einstein 1879 - 1955 US German-born Theoretical Physicist -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (SunOS) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkm+2OoACgkQLrhmsXMSLxfzGwCgrknJ0JT4YFHxN99rBh0fYXO4 aDYAn19oK2J5NiUuM4P7IbtsLtcYwgkn =ikzE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From blizinski at google.com Tue Mar 17 00:13:41 2009 From: blizinski at google.com (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski) Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 23:13:41 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] Solaris port of vixie-cron - a GAR build for review In-Reply-To: <5097C18B-C38D-44E3-91FA-2E64F98A6ADF@opencsw.org> References: <5097C18B-C38D-44E3-91FA-2E64F98A6ADF@opencsw.org> Message-ID: On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > Am 13.03.2009 um 17:25 schrieb Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski: >> >> I would like to offer a GAR build of vixie-cron. > > Did you ever found the time to commit it? I'm using a Google Code hosted project to publish proposed code: http://usable-solaris.googlecode.com/svn/branches/opencsw/vixiecron/ For viewing and commenting on the code, this link is better: http://code.google.com/p/usable-solaris/source/browse/#svn/branches/opencsw/vixiecron/trunk Maciej From harpchad at opencsw.org Tue Mar 17 04:56:05 2009 From: harpchad at opencsw.org (Chad Harp) Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 22:56:05 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] gnutls 2.6.4 in testing Message-ID: <9D6E6247-5DDC-4D41-B362-4D1E4355078A@opencsw.org> - Update to 2.6.4 - 64bit (sparcv9 only until gcc for amd64 is ready) gnutls-2.6.4,REV=2009.03.16-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz gnutls-2.6.4,REV=2009.03.16-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz gnutls_devel-2.6.4,REV=2009.03.16-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz gnutls_devel-2.6.4,REV=2009.03.16-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz From jgoerzen at opencsw.org Tue Mar 17 05:18:51 2009 From: jgoerzen at opencsw.org (Jake Goerzen) Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 21:18:51 -0700 Subject: [csw-users] updated gftp 2.0.19 in /testing Message-ID: <315c02ae0903162118h43f4e0acr2d930b40eb569fb9@mail.gmail.com> Hi, updated gftp (version 2.0.19) packages are availble in /testing changes since last version: Cleanups to the networking code Fixed several segfaults. Several i18n fixes Added support for wildcard SSL certificates Fixes for downloading files using SFTP where the user doesn't have write access to the file. Disable some features of the remote FTP server is a VMS server or OS/400 Fixed Solaris compile problem and pty issue under HPUX Updated to use FSPLIB 0.9 Added Tango styled icon theme The menus are now a little closer to other GNOME applications New/updated language translations: ar bg ca cs da de dz el en_CA en_GB el es fi fr gl gu he hu it ja ko lt lv mk nb ne nl no oc pt_BR pt_po ro ru rw sv uk zh_HK zh_TW Thanks, Jake From harpchad at opencsw.org Tue Mar 17 16:18:44 2009 From: harpchad at opencsw.org (Chad Harp) Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 10:18:44 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] intltool 0.40.6 in testing Message-ID: <49BFBF54.4010501@opencsw.org> intltool-0.40.6,REV=2009.03.17-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz intltool-0.40.6,REV=2009.03.17-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz From ja at baltic-online.de Tue Mar 17 17:31:44 2009 From: ja at baltic-online.de (Juergen Arndt) Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 17:31:44 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] How to merge multiple source trees into one package Message-ID: Hi all, how is it possible to merge multiple source trees into one package? Is there a piece of documentation or does anybody have a package, which I could use as an example? Juergen -- Juergen Arndt From schwindt at dfki.uni-kl.de Tue Mar 17 18:11:07 2009 From: schwindt at dfki.uni-kl.de (Nicolai Schwindt) Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 18:11:07 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] ap2_modphp install Message-ID: <200903171709.n2HH9igq008369@dfki.uni-kl.de> ... fails. Because it is not in the catalog file. tcsh at isg-1504 [/var/pkg-get] grep -l ap2_modphp5 * desc-serv-1500 Unlike : tcsh at isg-1504 [/var/pkg-get] grep -l php5_ldap * catalog-serv-1500 desc-serv-1500 I did try several mirrors ( ibiblio, erlangen i.e.) - so I think it is not my local mirror. Where as this works: tcsh at isg-1504 [~] pkg-get -D ap2_modphp5 # (Descriptions from site serv-1500 ) ap2_modphp5 - PHP 5 - Apache 2.2.x Module Are the mirrors out of sync or did I miss something ? Nicolai. From dam at opencsw.org Tue Mar 17 22:23:37 2009 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 22:23:37 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] How to merge multiple source trees into one package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi J?rgen, Am 17.03.2009 um 17:31 schrieb Juergen Arndt: > how is it possible to merge multiple source trees into one package? > Is there a piece of documentation or does anybody have a package, > which I could use as an example? All things from DISTFILES are extracted and can then be compiled and installed. Or do you need multiple versions of the same package? Please check in your material so we can have a look at it. Best regards -- Dago From dam at opencsw.org Tue Mar 17 23:33:34 2009 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 23:33:34 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] ap2_modphp install In-Reply-To: <200903171709.n2HH9igq008369@dfki.uni-kl.de> References: <200903171709.n2HH9igq008369@dfki.uni-kl.de> Message-ID: Hi Nicolai, Am 17.03.2009 um 18:11 schrieb Nicolai Schwindt: > ... fails. Because it is not in the catalog file. > ... > > tcsh at isg-1504 [~] pkg-get -D ap2_modphp5 > # (Descriptions from site serv-1500 ) > ap2_modphp5 - PHP 5 - Apache 2.2.x Module > > Are the mirrors out of sync or did I miss something ? Am 17.03.2009 um 22:44 schrieb Philip Brown: > hrrrm. there was another one missing too. mod_php5 !! > > fixed em both. Best regards -- Dago From william at wbonnet.net Tue Mar 17 23:34:49 2009 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 23:34:49 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] /testing sqlite3 3.6.10 is available Message-ID: <49C02589.9050800@wbonnet.net> Hi all Everything is in the title :) Thanks for your feedbacks http://www.opencsw/org/testing cheers W. -- William http://www.wbonnet.net http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix http://www.opencsw.org Community SoftWare for Solaris http://www.guses.org French speaking Solaris User Group From blizinski at google.com Tue Mar 17 23:39:17 2009 From: blizinski at google.com (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski) Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 22:39:17 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] Using pkg-get with custom packages Message-ID: I'm currently looking at a way of deploying a set of custom packages using pkg-get and pkg-get-style repositories. I found a thread on blastwave forums[1], but there wasn't any follow-up posts, it's hard to tell whether the original poster actually deployed it. I would like to do something similar, but I'd like to have both CSW and custom packages available for pkg-get installations. What are the options? One of them would be building own merged catalog with packages. Ideally, pkg-get would support multiple repositories in the vein of apt-get sources on Debian. Has this been done before? Maciej [1] http://wiki.blastwave.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=249#p249 From bonivart at opencsw.org Wed Mar 18 00:13:56 2009 From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart) Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 00:13:56 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Using pkg-get with custom packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <625385e30903171613g5a7d8311h67988d952886d98@mail.gmail.com> On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 11:39 PM, Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski wrote: > I'm currently looking at a way of deploying a set of custom packages > using pkg-get and pkg-get-style repositories. I found a thread on > blastwave forums[1], but there wasn't any follow-up posts, it's hard > to tell whether the original poster actually deployed it. I would like > to do something similar, but I'd like to have both CSW and custom > packages available for pkg-get installations. > > What are the options? One of them would be building own merged catalog > with packages. Ideally, pkg-get would support multiple repositories in > the vein of apt-get sources on Debian. > > Has this been done before? > > Maciej > > [1] http://wiki.blastwave.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=249#p249 Pkgutil already contains the tools you need (it was me replying in that thread). Pkgutil can combine a full official repository with your own local one just like we do for testing here at OpenCSW, see: http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing.html You also get tools for building and checking your own catalogs so you should be all set. In 1.5, which is available as beta 2, you can combine any number of repositories and it will automatically find the latest package for you unless you specifically ask for a certain version. http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/pkgutil-1.5b2,REV=2009.03.13-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/pkgutil-1.5b2,REV=2009.03.13-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz -- /peter From ja at baltic-online.de Wed Mar 18 12:42:43 2009 From: ja at baltic-online.de (Juergen Arndt) Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 12:42:43 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] How to merge multiple source trees into one package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 22:23:37 +0100, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > All things from DISTFILES are extracted and can then be compiled > and installed. Or do you need multiple versions of the same > package? Please check in your material so we can have a look > at it. I think, I was a little bit unprecise. I'd like to merge a piece of software A with software B into one package. My first guess is to create something like that in the Makefile: DISTFILES = software_A.tar.gz DISTFILES += software_B.tar.gz But I'm wondering, how to proceed with the other options like CONFIGURE_ARGS and so on. I think, there is another solution, which I don't know yet :-) Juergen -- Juergen Arndt From blizinski at google.com Wed Mar 18 13:34:52 2009 From: blizinski at google.com (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski) Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 12:34:52 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] How to merge multiple source trees into one package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 11:42 AM, Juergen Arndt wrote: > My first guess is to create something like that in the Makefile: > > DISTFILES ?= software_A.tar.gz > DISTFILES ?+= software_B.tar.gz > > But I'm wondering, how to proceed with the other options like CONFIGURE_ARGS > and so on. I think, there is another solution, which I don't know yet :-) You could write your own "master" Makefile which would in turn call both A and B Makefiles. However, I'd like to ask you about why do you want to merge two pieces of software like this? Why not have two separate packages, possibly with dependencies? From ja at baltic-online.de Wed Mar 18 14:28:11 2009 From: ja at baltic-online.de (Juergen Arndt) Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 14:28:11 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] How to merge multiple source trees into one package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 13:34:52 +0100, Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski wrote: > You could write your own "master" Makefile which would in turn call > both A and B Makefiles. Yes, good idea, thank you! > However, I'd like to ask you about why do you want to merge two pieces > of software like this? Why not have two separate packages, possibly > with dependencies? Philip and I discussed exactly this point yesterday. For this special case the main reason for merging binaries is to keep the package consistent to it's older versions. I agree, that it shouldn't be the general way to build packages. Juergen -- Juergen Arndt From mwatters at opencsw.org Thu Mar 19 04:20:24 2009 From: mwatters at opencsw.org (Mike Watters) Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 22:20:24 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] libssh2 now in testing Message-ID: <49C1B9F8.50009@opencsw.org> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Initial Packaging of version 1.0 architectures sparcv8, sparcv9, i386, amd64 - -- Thanks, Mike "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius -- and a lot of courage -- to move in the opposite direction." * Albert Einstein 1879 - 1955 US German-born Theoretical Physicist -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAknBufcACgkQLrhmsXMSLxfMjACgiZzugVmlEYUcVfGfqsL5R+ko uGAAoMrT805r/XNFceo48/ORk69159kF =tGPI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From william at wbonnet.net Thu Mar 19 15:59:51 2009 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 15:59:51 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] New opencsw mirror Message-ID: <49C25DE7.9060700@wbonnet.net> Hi I am pleased to net you know that a new mirror is available. opencsw.solaris-fr.org This mirror is based in France (Marseille area). Many thanks to Gerard Henry cheers W. -- William http://www.wbonnet.net http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix http://www.opencsw.org Community SoftWare for Solaris http://www.guses.org French speaking Solaris User Group From hson at opencsw.org Thu Mar 19 21:25:02 2009 From: hson at opencsw.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Roger_H=E5kansson?=) Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 21:25:02 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] xmlrpc-c 1.16.13 in /testing Message-ID: <49C2AA1E.7000202@opencsw.org> I've packaged xmlrpc-c 1.16.13 (from the stable branch) and the packages are availabe from /testing From bwalton at opencsw.org Thu Mar 19 21:27:00 2009 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:27:00 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] updated git in /testing Message-ID: <1237494397-sup-4665@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> I've placed 1.6.2.1 packages in /testing. Thanks -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 GPG Key Id: 8E89F6D2; Key Server: pgp.mit.edu Contact me to arrange for a CAcert assurance meeting. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From ja at baltic-online.de Fri Mar 20 23:04:23 2009 From: ja at baltic-online.de (Juergen Arndt) Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 23:04:23 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] New packages for nagios, nrpe, nsca and the nagios plugins released Message-ID: Hi all, new packages for nagios, NRPE, NSCA and the nagios plugins are available. The former package "nagiosp" was renamed to "nagios_plugins". As Phil statet: "pk-get upgrade" should work fine. But any prior saved output from "pkg-get -l" that had "nagiosp" in it, will now be invalid. Plus any automated checks for things like "pkg-get -c" that explicitly checked for nagiosp. Juergen -- Juergen Arndt From solaris at jmarki.net Sun Mar 22 08:27:37 2009 From: solaris at jmarki.net (Junhao) Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 15:27:37 +0800 Subject: [csw-users] New packages for nagios, nrpe, nsca and the nagios plugins released In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <49C5E869.4040704@jmarki.net> Juergen Arndt wrote: > Hi all, > > new packages for nagios, NRPE, NSCA and the nagios plugins are available. > > The former package "nagiosp" was renamed to "nagios_plugins". > > As Phil statet: "pk-get upgrade" should work fine. But any prior saved > output from > "pkg-get -l" that had "nagiosp" in it, will now be invalid. > Plus any automated checks for things like "pkg-get -c" that explicitly > checked for nagiosp. > > Juergen > There may be three problems with the CSWnrpe installation 1) it somehow overwrote my existing nrpe.cfg file at /opt/csw/nagios/etc/nrpe.cfg. Not sure how that happened. 2) the nrpe binary is at /opt/csw/bin/nrpe, but the manifest script looks at /opt/csw/nagios/bin/nrpe (filed as bug #3478) 3) the nrpe.cfg configuration file is installed in /opt/csw/etc/nrpe.cfg, but the manifest script does not look there. Should this be filed? Junhao From ja at baltic-online.de Sun Mar 22 09:07:04 2009 From: ja at baltic-online.de (Juergen Arndt) Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 09:07:04 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] New packages for nagios, nrpe, nsca and the nagios plugins released In-Reply-To: <49C5E869.4040704@jmarki.net> References: <49C5E869.4040704@jmarki.net> Message-ID: On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 08:27:37 +0100, Junhao wrote: > There may be three problems with the CSWnrpe installation > > 1) it somehow overwrote my existing nrpe.cfg file at > /opt/csw/nagios/etc/nrpe.cfg. Not sure how that happened. I cannot reproduce this, strange. In fact, the package doesn't create such a file. > 2) the nrpe binary is at /opt/csw/bin/nrpe, but the manifest script > looks at /opt/csw/nagios/bin/nrpe (filed as bug #3478) Bug is confirmed and the issue is fixed. Please try out the nrpe packages in testing. > 3) the nrpe.cfg configuration file is installed in > /opt/csw/etc/nrpe.cfg, but the manifest script does not look there. > Should this be filed? Not necessary in my opinion. I corrected that in the current testing package. If the testing package is working well (at least on my installation it does), I will release it. Please give me note. Thank you! Juergen -- Juergen Arndt Baltic Online Computer GmbH Firmensitz: Alter Markt 1-2, 24103 Kiel http://www.baltic-online.de Tel.: +49 (0)431 54003-0 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Erik Cickovskis, Amtsgericht Kiel, HRB 3756 From maciej.blizinski at gmail.com Sun Mar 22 10:32:19 2009 From: maciej.blizinski at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Blizi=C5=84ski?=) Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 09:32:19 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] A build for review: rxvt-unicode In-Reply-To: <49B7DA2F.8030004@wbonnet.net> References: <49B7DA2F.8030004@wbonnet.net> Message-ID: On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 3:35 PM, William Bonnet wrote: > (...) Packages must be built on the farm, then submitted to Phil for unstable. standards/pkg-walkthrough page says that packages are built by hand on machines, but then there's also the continuous integration (hudson) page, which suggests there's an automatic framework which builds packages. What's the current procedure of building a package? From maciej.blizinski at gmail.com Sun Mar 22 10:37:37 2009 From: maciej.blizinski at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Blizi=C5=84ski?=) Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 09:37:37 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] A build for review: rxvt-unicode In-Reply-To: References: <49B81B19.5090409@wbonnet.net> Message-ID: On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 7:47 AM, Maciej Blizi?ski wrote: > The bit of code in question uses a big macro to avoid using templates. > I'll need some time to pull it apart. I solved this bit, but other problems occurred, and I haven't been so far able to successfully build rxvt-unicode using Sun Studio. I submitted for now a gcc-based build. From maciej.blizinski at gmail.com Sun Mar 22 12:46:47 2009 From: maciej.blizinski at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Blizi=C5=84ski?=) Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 11:46:47 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] A build for review: rxvt-unicode In-Reply-To: References: <49B81B19.5090409@wbonnet.net> Message-ID: The package doesn't build on Solaris 8 due to the lack of XSetIMValues in /usr/include/X11/Xlib.h. /opt/csw/gcc4/bin/g++ -I.. -I. -I. -I./../libev -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I/opt/csw/include -I/opt/csw/include -I/opt/csw/include/freetype2 -mtune=i686 -O2 -pipe -m32 -march=i386 -I/opt/csw/include -w -DDEBUG_STRICT -c rxvttoolkit.C rxvttoolkit.C: In member function 'bool rxvt_xim::ref_init()': rxvttoolkit.C:189: error: 'XSetIMValues' was not declared in this scope gmake[4]: *** [rxvttoolkit.o] Error 1 gmake[4]: Leaving directory `/home/maciej/src/urxvt/trunk/work/build-isa-i386/rxvt-unicode-9.06/src' What's the usual way of handling this kind of problems? (incompatible/old headers on Solaris 8) Maciej From solaris at jmarki.net Sun Mar 22 15:17:06 2009 From: solaris at jmarki.net (Junhao) Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 22:17:06 +0800 Subject: [csw-users] New packages for nagios, nrpe, nsca and the nagios plugins released In-Reply-To: References: <49C5E869.4040704@jmarki.net> Message-ID: <49C64862.3010208@jmarki.net> Juergen Arndt wrote: > On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 08:27:37 +0100, Junhao wrote: > >> There may be three problems with the CSWnrpe installation >> >> 1) it somehow overwrote my existing nrpe.cfg file at >> /opt/csw/nagios/etc/nrpe.cfg. Not sure how that happened. > > I cannot reproduce this, strange. In fact, the package doesn't create > such a file. > >> 2) the nrpe binary is at /opt/csw/bin/nrpe, but the manifest script >> looks at /opt/csw/nagios/bin/nrpe (filed as bug #3478) > > Bug is confirmed and the issue is fixed. Please try out the nrpe > packages in testing. > >> 3) the nrpe.cfg configuration file is installed in >> /opt/csw/etc/nrpe.cfg, but the manifest script does not look there. >> Should this be filed? > > Not necessary in my opinion. I corrected that in the current testing > package. > > If the testing package is working well (at least on my installation it > does), I will release it. Please give me note. > > Thank you! > > Juergen > NRPE package in testing is working fine now. =) Just noticed something interesting: shell$ pkg-get -c nagios_plugins 1.4.13,REV=2009.03.20 SAME nagiosp 1.4.13,REV=2009.03.20 1.4.11,REV=2008.01.05 Not sure what's the cause, maybe it's a transition side effect from the ibiblio.org catalogue Regards, Junhao From hson at opencsw.org Sun Mar 22 16:01:59 2009 From: hson at opencsw.org (=?UTF-8?B?Um9nZXIgSMOla2Fuc3Nvbg==?=) Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 16:01:59 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] A build for review: rxvt-unicode In-Reply-To: References: <49B81B19.5090409@wbonnet.net> Message-ID: <49C652E7.8030207@opencsw.org> Maciej Blizi?ski wrote: > The package doesn't build on Solaris 8 due to the lack of XSetIMValues > in /usr/include/X11/Xlib.h. > > /opt/csw/gcc4/bin/g++ -I.. -I. -I. -I./../libev -DHAVE_CONFIG_H > -I/opt/csw/include -I/opt/csw/include -I/opt/csw/include/freetype2 > -mtune=i686 -O2 -pipe -m32 -march=i386 -I/opt/csw/include -w > -DDEBUG_STRICT -c rxvttoolkit.C > rxvttoolkit.C: In member function 'bool rxvt_xim::ref_init()': > rxvttoolkit.C:189: error: 'XSetIMValues' was not declared in this scope > gmake[4]: *** [rxvttoolkit.o] Error 1 > gmake[4]: Leaving directory > `/home/maciej/src/urxvt/trunk/work/build-isa-i386/rxvt-unicode-9.06/src' > > What's the usual way of handling this kind of problems? > (incompatible/old headers on Solaris 8) Make a patchfile for rxvttoolkit.C. What's needed is: #ifdef __sun extern "C" char * XSetIMValues(XIM im, ...); #endif From ja at baltic-online.de Sun Mar 22 16:24:29 2009 From: ja at baltic-online.de (Juergen Arndt) Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 16:24:29 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] New packages for nagios, nrpe, nsca and the nagios plugins released In-Reply-To: <49C64862.3010208@jmarki.net> References: <49C5E869.4040704@jmarki.net> <49C64862.3010208@jmarki.net> Message-ID: On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 15:17:06 +0100, Junhao wrote: > NRPE package in testing is working fine now. =) Good to hear that, sorry for any inconvenience. It will be released as soon as possible. > Just noticed something interesting: > > shell$ pkg-get -c > > nagios_plugins 1.4.13,REV=2009.03.20 SAME > nagiosp 1.4.13,REV=2009.03.20 1.4.11,REV=2008.01.05 > > Not sure what's the cause, maybe it's a transition side effect from the > ibiblio.org catalogue Hmm, seems to be related to the renaming from nagiosp to nagios_plugins. I'll try to get some info about that. Juergen -- Juergen Arndt From maciej.blizinski at gmail.com Sun Mar 22 20:10:01 2009 From: maciej.blizinski at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Blizi=C5=84ski?=) Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 19:10:01 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] rxvt-unicode available in testing Message-ID: Thanks to Roger I've built rxvt-unicode for Solaris 8 and pushed packages to testing. rxvt-unicode is a lightweight terminal emulator with unicode support. It has a nice feature of borrowing missing characters from other fonts; if the current font is missing certain character, rxvt-unicode will take a character from a different font. It's much better behavior than displaying a square or a question mark. pkg-get -s http://mirror.opencsw.org/opencsw/testing -U -u urxvt I've also created issue 3480[1] and a patch which deals with the problem of "Need TWO args to newer_rev" when installing a package from testing using pkg-get while having a non-en_US.UTF-8 locale. Maciej [1] http://www.opencsw.org/mantis/view.php?id=3480 From maciej.blizinski at gmail.com Sun Mar 22 20:15:28 2009 From: maciej.blizinski at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Blizi=C5=84ski?=) Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 19:15:28 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] cswproto not found In-Reply-To: References: <98313864-AC54-4D83-AD69-035832E45F81@opencsw.org> Message-ID: On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 7:56 AM, Maciej Blizi?ski wrote: > On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:57 PM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: >> Hi Maciej, >> >> Am 10.03.2009 um 08:50 schrieb Maciej Blizi?ski: >>> Is it gar v1 or v2? >>> >>> You can check that using: "grep http gar/.svn/entries" >> >> This is, uhm, very creative ;-) The usual way to check this >> is via >> >>> dam at login [login]:/home/dam/mgar/pkg/autoconf > svn propget >>> svn:externals trunk/ >>> gar https://gar.svn.sf.net/svnroot/gar/csw/mgar/gar/v2 > > There's a problem with svn:externals: if you create new directory > (e.g. for a new software package) and you add the property > svn:externals, you need first to commit your directory (and > svn:externals) and _then_ you can check out the externals. I had to do > copy the directory with gar, and coulnd't have svn:externals property > set. There probably is a better way of checking this, though. I found a better way. For the record: maciej at build8s [build8s]:~/src/urxvt/trunk > svn info gar | grep URL URL: https://gar.svn.sf.net/svnroot/gar/csw/mgar/gar/v2 From blizinski at google.com Sun Mar 22 22:43:27 2009 From: blizinski at google.com (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski) Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 21:43:27 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] keychain in testing Message-ID: keychain is a manager for ssh-agent. It's useful for keeping ssh keys safe. Typing passwords multiple times makes people use passwordless keys. Instead of doing that, ssh-agent can be used, but it's a bit cumbersome to manage. keychain nicely wraps ssh-agent (and gpg-agent). pkg-get -s http://mirror.opencsw.org/opencsw/testing -U -u keychain To use keychain, it's enough to add this to ~/.bash_profile: keychain ~/.ssh/id_dsa . ~/.keychain/$HOSTNAME-sh (assuming the usage of bash and id_dsa as the ssh key in use) Maciej From dam at opencsw.org Sun Mar 22 22:44:43 2009 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 22:44:43 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] A build for review: rxvt-unicode In-Reply-To: References: <49B7DA2F.8030004@wbonnet.net> Message-ID: Hi Maciej, Am 22.03.2009 um 10:32 schrieb Maciej Blizi?ski: > On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 3:35 PM, William Bonnet > wrote: >> (...) Packages must be built on the farm, then submitted to Phil >> for unstable. > > standards/pkg-walkthrough page says that packages are built by hand on > machines, Or with GAR. > but then there's also the continuous integration (hudson) > page, which suggests there's an automatic framework which builds > packages. What's the current procedure of building a package? You are urged to build the package on the buildfarm and GAR is highly recommended. The Hudson installation is experimental, feel free to ask here or Trygve Laugst?l directly as he is the Hudson maintainer of the farm. Best regards -- Dago From blizinski at google.com Sun Mar 22 22:52:11 2009 From: blizinski at google.com (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski) Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 21:52:11 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] A build for review: rxvt-unicode In-Reply-To: References: <49B7DA2F.8030004@wbonnet.net> Message-ID: On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 9:44 PM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: >> but then there's also the continuous integration (hudson) >> page, which suggests there's an automatic framework which builds >> packages. What's the current procedure of building a package? > > You are urged to build the package on the buildfarm and GAR is > highly recommended. The Hudson installation is experimental, > feel free to ask here or Trygve Laugst?l directly as he is > the Hudson maintainer of the farm. I would be interesting to learn how to use it. I really like the idea. In the meantime, I built rxvt-unicode using GAR on the farm, everything was jolly and good. By the way - is there a known way to build all 4 packages (build{8,10}{s,x}) at the same time? From dam at opencsw.org Sun Mar 22 22:56:30 2009 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 22:56:30 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] A build for review: rxvt-unicode In-Reply-To: References: <49B7DA2F.8030004@wbonnet.net> Message-ID: Hi Maciej, Am 22.03.2009 um 22:52 schrieb Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski: > On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 9:44 PM, Dagobert Michelsen > wrote: >>> but then there's also the continuous integration (hudson) >>> page, which suggests there's an automatic framework which builds >>> packages. What's the current procedure of building a package? >> >> You are urged to build the package on the buildfarm and GAR is >> highly recommended. The Hudson installation is experimental, >> feel free to ask here or Trygve Laugst?l directly as he is >> the Hudson maintainer of the farm. > > I would be interesting to learn how to use it. I really like the idea. > > In the meantime, I built rxvt-unicode using GAR on the farm, > everything was jolly and good. By the way - is there a known way to > build all 4 packages (build{8,10}{s,x}) at the same time? This is currently not possible as some directories in GAR overlap between sparc and x86. You need to build sparc only on Solaris 8. The package for x86 is usually a combined package containing files from Solaris 8 x86 and 64-bit components from Solaris 10 and must therefore always be built sequentially. Building multiple ISAs of one package at the same time is an ineteresting idea but some more time away. Best regards -- Dago From bonivart at opencsw.org Mon Mar 23 11:46:20 2009 From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 11:46:20 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] pkgutil 1.5 beta 3 - please help with testing Message-ID: <625385e30903230346r5a5f9aated6923184da8be7f@mail.gmail.com> Pkgutil, the easy to use install utility, will soon be released as version 1.5 and I would like some extra testing. One big change is that you can now have any number of mirrors configured and pkgutil will automatically select the latest package available unless you specify a version explicitly. For example, if you have this in pkgutil.conf: mirror=http://ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/opencsw/current mirror=http://mirror.opencsw.org/opencsw/testing It will pick from the testing mirror if a later version is available there but if you explicitly say that you want another version it will select that one, examples follow: # pkgutil -i memconf (will select memconf-2.10,REV=2009.03.23 from testing) # pkgutil -i memconf-2.9,REV=2008.11.21 (will select memconf-2.9,REV=2008.11.21 from current) Note that the syntax for the -t option has changed, you now don't have to add `uname -p`/`uname -r` any more so if you want to try a package from testing use this shorter command: # pkgutil -t http://mirror.opencsw.org/opencsw/testing -i Also, you should notice a big speed improvement when updating all packages (pkgutil -u), before pkgutil could spend considerable time finding dependencies but it should now be much faster. Here's the packages: http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/pkgutil-1.5b3,REV=2009.03.19-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/pkgutil-1.5b3,REV=2009.03.19-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz If you're already running an older version of pkgutil you can update with: # pkgutil -t http://mirror.opencsw.org/opencsw/testing/`uname -p`/`uname -r` -u pkgutil Report directly back to me if you find any problems but please also tell me if it works. As always your comments for future versions are welcome. Thanks! -- /peter From blizinski at google.com Mon Mar 23 19:29:27 2009 From: blizinski at google.com (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 18:29:27 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] Solaris port of vixie-cron - a GAR build for review In-Reply-To: <5097C18B-C38D-44E3-91FA-2E64F98A6ADF@opencsw.org> References: <5097C18B-C38D-44E3-91FA-2E64F98A6ADF@opencsw.org> Message-ID: On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > Hi Maciej, > > Am 13.03.2009 um 17:25 schrieb Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski: >> >> I would like to offer a GAR build of vixie-cron. > > Did you ever found the time to commit it? I committed the code I have at the moment; it needs more work. Specifically -- SMF support. I wanted to use builtin mGAR SMF support, but it's not finish yet, and the package doesn't build[1]. I was able to create a package by tweaking some GAR code, but the resulting package works only with the global zone. Since we're at it, there are at least 3 packages replacing existing daemons: printing, syslog and cron. How about having mGAR support a parameter denoting, which other SMF service should be disabled before enabling the one being installed? Maciej [1] https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2675276&group_id=229205&atid=1075770 From ihsan at opencsw.org Mon Mar 23 19:49:31 2009 From: ihsan at opencsw.org (Ihsan Dogan) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 19:49:31 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Apache 2.2.11 in testing Message-ID: <49C7D9BB.3040209@opencsw.org> Hello, New Apache 2.2.11 packages are in testing, available at http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing.html . CHANGES: - Using now cswinitsmf Ihsan -- ihsan at dogan.ch http://blog.dogan.ch/ From william at wbonnet.net Mon Mar 23 23:38:42 2009 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 23:38:42 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Perl module PDF2API v0.73 is in testing Message-ID: <49C80F72.90707@wbonnet.net> Hi Perl module PDF2API has been updated. Version 0.73 is in testing. Cheers W. -- William http://www.wbonnet.net http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix http://www.opencsw.org Community SoftWare for Solaris http://www.guses.org French speaking Solaris User Group From ja at baltic-online.de Mon Mar 23 23:51:32 2009 From: ja at baltic-online.de (Juergen Arndt) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 23:51:32 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] pnp 0.4.13 in testing Message-ID: Hi all, new pnp (www.pnp4nagios.org) packages are in testing. For Solaris 10 you have to configure pnp to use rrdtool itself instead of the RRDs perl module. There is a known bug in the module. (in /opt/csw/nagios/pnp/etc/process_perfdata.cfg: USE_RRDs = 0) If you don't want to use the npcd daemon, you can ignore the dependency to SUNWscpux on sparc or SUNWscpu on i386. Juergen -- Juergen Arndt From glaw at opencsw.org Tue Mar 24 00:45:20 2009 From: glaw at opencsw.org (Gary Law) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 23:45:20 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] puppet 0.24.8 in testing Message-ID: Feedback welcome Gary -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dam at opencsw.org Tue Mar 24 11:18:43 2009 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 11:18:43 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] libgsasl 1.0 in testing/ Message-ID: <4B467350-9411-4CD1-84BD-13202083EB5F@opencsw.org> Hi, I put an updated libgsasl 1.0 in testing/. As I don't use SASL myself please someone give it a try who actually uses it. Thanks! -- Dago From william at wbonnet.net Tue Mar 24 22:47:59 2009 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 22:47:59 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Some Perl module updates are in testing Message-ID: <49C9550F.8030109@wbonnet.net> Hi I have updated a few perl modules. They are availables from testing Parse-Syslog is now in version 1.10 Parse-RecDescent is now in version 1.96.0 Package-Constants is now in version 0.02 Object-Accessor is now in version 0.34 Cheers W. -- William http://www.wbonnet.net http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix http://www.opencsw.org Community SoftWare for Solaris http://www.guses.org French speaking Solaris User Group From sergiocharpinel at gmail.com Wed Mar 25 18:53:23 2009 From: sergiocharpinel at gmail.com (Sergio Charpinel Jr.) Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:53:23 -0300 Subject: [csw-users] KDE not starting Message-ID: Hi, I have SunOS 5.11 and I installed KDE through pkg-get : # pkg-get -i kde_gcc The installation run fine, but KDE doesnt start. It shows the KDE loading window, and takes a long time in Display icon. Then, it doesnt show all the buttons, the screen becomes white. Any helps please? Thanks -- Sergio Roberto Charpinel Jr. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From admin at dmarkey.com Wed Mar 25 20:00:56 2009 From: admin at dmarkey.com (David) Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 19:00:56 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] KDE not starting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <6894a6470903251200x50765668of3e9ec354d8fb47d@mail.gmail.com> How many versions of arts/qt do you installed? I think two conflict. Do the buttons have no text by any chance? 2009/3/25 Sergio Charpinel Jr. > Hi, > I have SunOS 5.11 and I installed KDE through pkg-get : # pkg-get -i > kde_gcc > The installation run fine, but KDE doesnt start. It shows the KDE loading > window, and takes a long time in Display icon. Then, it doesnt show all the > buttons, the screen becomes white. > Any helps please? > Thanks > > -- > Sergio Roberto Charpinel Jr. > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/users > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From sergiocharpinel at gmail.com Wed Mar 25 22:26:38 2009 From: sergiocharpinel at gmail.com (Sergio Charpinel Jr.) Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 18:26:38 -0300 Subject: [csw-users] KDE not starting In-Reply-To: <6894a6470903251200x50765668of3e9ec354d8fb47d@mail.gmail.com> References: <6894a6470903251200x50765668of3e9ec354d8fb47d@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: I tried to install KDE mannually before that. I will try to remove, and i will post the result Thankss 2009/3/25 David > How many versions of arts/qt do you installed? I think two conflict. Do the > buttons have no text by any chance? > > > > 2009/3/25 Sergio Charpinel Jr. > >> Hi, >> I have SunOS 5.11 and I installed KDE through pkg-get : # pkg-get -i >> kde_gcc >> The installation run fine, but KDE doesnt start. It shows the KDE loading >> window, and takes a long time in Display icon. Then, it doesnt show all the >> buttons, the screen becomes white. >> Any helps please? >> Thanks >> >> -- >> Sergio Roberto Charpinel Jr. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> users mailing list >> users at lists.opencsw.org >> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/users >> > > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/users > -- Sergio Roberto Charpinel Jr. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From sergiocharpinel at gmail.com Thu Mar 26 00:43:37 2009 From: sergiocharpinel at gmail.com (Sergio Charpinel Jr.) Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 20:43:37 -0300 Subject: [csw-users] KDE not starting In-Reply-To: References: <6894a6470903251200x50765668of3e9ec354d8fb47d@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: Thx David, there was another qt version installed. Not it is working. Just one more question. I need to copy the KDE's skel of linux to my Solaris. Do you know how can I do this? Thanks. 2009/3/25 Sergio Charpinel Jr. > I tried to install KDE mannually before that. > I will try to remove, and i will post the result > Thankss > > 2009/3/25 David > > How many versions of arts/qt do you installed? I think two conflict. Do the >> buttons have no text by any chance? >> >> >> >> 2009/3/25 Sergio Charpinel Jr. >> >>> Hi, >>> I have SunOS 5.11 and I installed KDE through pkg-get : # pkg-get -i >>> kde_gcc >>> The installation run fine, but KDE doesnt start. It shows the KDE loading >>> window, and takes a long time in Display icon. Then, it doesnt show all the >>> buttons, the screen becomes white. >>> Any helps please? >>> Thanks >>> >>> -- >>> Sergio Roberto Charpinel Jr. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> users mailing list >>> users at lists.opencsw.org >>> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/users >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> users mailing list >> users at lists.opencsw.org >> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/users >> > > > > -- > Sergio Roberto Charpinel Jr. > -- Sergio Roberto Charpinel Jr. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From schwindt at dfki.uni-kl.de Thu Mar 26 11:14:53 2009 From: schwindt at dfki.uni-kl.de (Nicolai Schwindt) Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 11:14:53 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] Versions of git Message-ID: <200903261014.n2QAEpUn023095@dfki.uni-kl.de> my local machines tell me : pkg-get -c | grep git git 1.6.2.1,REV=2009.03.24 SAME git_cvs 1.6.2.1,REV=2009.03.24 1.6.0.5,REV=2009.01.08 git_doc 1.6.2.1,REV=2009.03.24 1.6.0.5,REV=2009.01.08 git_gui 1.6.2.1,REV=2009.03.24 1.6.0.5,REV=2009.01.08 git_svn 1.6.2.1,REV=2009.03.24 1.6.0.5,REV=2009.01.08 gitcvs 1.6.2.1,REV=2009.03.24 SAME gitdoc 1.6.2.1,REV=2009.03.24 SAME gitgui 1.6.2.1,REV=2009.03.24 SAME gitk 1.6.2.1,REV=2009.03.24 SAME gitsvn 1.6.2.1,REV=2009.03.24 SAME The occurrence of version 1.6.0.5 makes me wonder. Thats why I did : pkginfo | grep -i git application CSWgit git - Fast Version Control System application CSWgitcvs gitcvs - Git tools for working with CVS repositories application CSWgitdoc gitdoc - Documentation for Git application CSWgitemacs gitemacs - Git VCS support for Emacs application CSWgitgui gitgui - Git GUI tool application CSWgitk gitk - Git revision tree visualiser application CSWgitsvn gitsvn - Git tools for working with Subversion repositories Something is wrong with the naming scheme. Maybe it was a good Idea to take the old version containing the underscore of the mirror and out of the package list. One of my colleague - being unable to read version strings and release numbers - struggled a while trying to get rid of the old version and installing the new ones. Nicolai Schwindt From hson at opencsw.org Thu Mar 26 11:43:18 2009 From: hson at opencsw.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Roger_H=E5kansson?=) Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 11:43:18 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] netsnmp 5.4.2.1 in /testing Message-ID: <49CB5C46.8000005@opencsw.org> I've packaged netsnmp 5.4.2.1 and it's available from http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing I would appreciate if someone who actually use it today could test it before I release it. From skayser at opencsw.org Thu Mar 26 13:52:47 2009 From: skayser at opencsw.org (Sebastian Kayser) Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 13:52:47 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] pkgutil 1.5 beta 3 - please help with testing In-Reply-To: <625385e30903230346r5a5f9aated6923184da8be7f@mail.gmail.com> References: <625385e30903230346r5a5f9aated6923184da8be7f@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <49CB7A9F.1050208@opencsw.org> Peter Bonivart wrote: > Pkgutil, the easy to use install utility, will soon be released as > version 1.5 and I would like some extra testing. > > One big change is that you can now have any number of mirrors > configured and pkgutil will automatically select the latest package > available unless you specify a version explicitly. For example, if you > have this in pkgutil.conf: > > mirror=http://ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/opencsw/current > mirror=http://mirror.opencsw.org/opencsw/testing > > It will pick from the testing mirror if a later version is available > there but if you explicitly say that you want another version it will > select that one Peter, one more thing. Is it possible to specify a local file:// repository, too? We have some local build machines here and i would love to just point pkgutil to a mount point rather than setting up a web server. Sebastian From schwindt at dfki.uni-kl.de Thu Mar 26 14:15:05 2009 From: schwindt at dfki.uni-kl.de (Nicolai Schwindt) Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:15:05 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] package db Message-ID: <200903261315.n2QDF3ic026990@dfki.uni-kl.de> There might be another mistake pkg-get -u pymysql WARNING: remote version older than current version. Not installing remote package of pymysql (remote=1.2.2,REV=2007.10.04, local=1.2.2,REV=2009.03.11) I am using a local mirror of http://csw.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/csw/unstable/i386/5.10/ Just in case it is the mirror. Nicolai Schwindt From bwalton at opencsw.org Thu Mar 26 14:18:54 2009 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 09:18:54 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] Versions of git In-Reply-To: <200903261014.n2QAEpUn023095@dfki.uni-kl.de> References: <200903261014.n2QAEpUn023095@dfki.uni-kl.de> Message-ID: <1238073181-sup-9660@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> Excerpts from Nicolai Schwindt's message of Thu Mar 26 06:14:53 -0400 2009: Hi Nicolai, I apologize for this issue...I wasn't even aware of it until I saw your post here. I recently (between the 1.6.0.5 and 1.6.2.1 release) converted the build description from using static files to dynamically generated ones (GAR gspec). I must have changed the name without realizing it...as all my machines were updated by hand, I didn't bump into it myself. ...so, for any other git users out there, I'd suggest doing a manual pkgrm on CSWgit_svn CSWgit_cvs CSWgit_doc CSWgit_emacs CSWgit_gui, etc...any of the packages that had _ in the name. You should then be able to add back the new packages without problem. If you've already updated to the new versions, which will see you have (for example) gitcvs and git_cvs installed, I'd remove both and then re-add gitcvs. Lather rinse, repeat with any other _ versions you've got. I apologize for this. As I mentioned, it was not intentional. Sorry for any wasted cycles. Thanks -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 GPG Key Id: 8E89F6D2; Key Server: pgp.mit.edu Contact me to arrange for a CAcert assurance meeting. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From bwalton at opencsw.org Thu Mar 26 14:50:39 2009 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 09:50:39 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] Versions of git In-Reply-To: <1238073181-sup-9660@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> References: <200903261014.n2QAEpUn023095@dfki.uni-kl.de> <1238073181-sup-9660@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: <1238075074-sup-6822@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> Excerpts from Ben Walton's message of Thu Mar 26 09:18:54 -0400 2009: > Excerpts from Nicolai Schwindt's message of Thu Mar 26 06:14:53 -0400 2009: > ...so, for any other git users out there, I'd suggest doing a manual > pkgrm on CSWgit_svn CSWgit_cvs CSWgit_doc CSWgit_emacs CSWgit_gui, > etc...any of the packages that had _ in the name. You should then be > able to add back the new packages without problem. I realized that I only changed the catalog name, not the package name (which is better, but obviously not good). I still recommend pkgrm'ing CSWgit{emacs,doc,svn,cvs,gui} and then doing pkg-get -i git{emacs,doc,svn,cvs,gui} in whatever combo you want/need. I'll work to get the old names handled in a cleaner fashion (catalog-wise) for future updates. Thanks and sorry. -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 GPG Key Id: 8E89F6D2; Key Server: pgp.mit.edu Contact me to arrange for a CAcert assurance meeting. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From bonivart at opencsw.org Thu Mar 26 15:23:12 2009 From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart) Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 15:23:12 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] pkgutil 1.5 beta 3 - please help with testing In-Reply-To: <49CB7A9F.1050208@opencsw.org> References: <625385e30903230346r5a5f9aated6923184da8be7f@mail.gmail.com> <49CB7A9F.1050208@opencsw.org> Message-ID: <625385e30903260723u44070638u4f2f23b392708162@mail.gmail.com> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 1:52 PM, Sebastian Kayser wrote: > Peter, one more thing. Is it possible to specify a local file:// > repository, too? We have some local build machines here and i would love > to just point pkgutil to a mount point rather than setting up a web server. Try it. :-) I put that into 1.4. Specify something like: mirror=file://absolute/path/to/files Contact me if it doesn't work, since I don't use it myself I haven't tested it much. I'm planning to support curl in future versions and then we can use more transports, also in parallel. -- /peter From paul.salazar at testspectrum.com Thu Mar 26 16:24:33 2009 From: paul.salazar at testspectrum.com (Paul Salazar) Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 10:24:33 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] remove me from your list Message-ID: <49CB9E31.10401@testspectrum.com> thanks -- Paul Salazar Test Spectrum, Inc. 9701 Brodie Lane, Suite 101 Austin, TX 78748 Phone: (512) 472-6750 x305 Cell: (512) 762-9002 Fax: (512) 472-6760 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ja at opencsw.org Thu Mar 26 23:51:42 2009 From: ja at opencsw.org (Juergen Arndt) Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:51:42 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] NDOutils 1.4b7 and NagVis 1.3.2 in testing Message-ID: Hi all, packages for NDOutils (database backend for Nagios) and NagVis (visualization add-on for Nagios) are available in testing. Any feedback is welcome. Juergen -- Juergen Arndt From bwalton at opencsw.org Fri Mar 27 02:09:34 2009 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 21:09:34 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] Versions of git In-Reply-To: <200903261014.n2QAEpUn023095@dfki.uni-kl.de> References: <200903261014.n2QAEpUn023095@dfki.uni-kl.de> Message-ID: <1238116033-sup-4594@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> Hi Nicolai, I've released updated git packages that revert to the old catalog names. They will be available as the mirrors are updated. The accidentally introduced catalog names will be retired. Please let me know if you have any problems with this after your mirror has refreshed. Thanks, and once again, sorry for the inconvenience. -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 GPG Key Id: 8E89F6D2; Key Server: pgp.mit.edu Contact me to arrange for a CAcert assurance meeting. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From maciej at opencsw.org Fri Mar 27 09:01:19 2009 From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski) Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 08:01:19 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] clusterssh-3.25 in testing Message-ID: clusterssh-3.25 (upgrade from 3.22) is available in testing. New build fixes two missing dependencies. By the way, I know that packages usually have their maintainers - is it considered inappropriate to commit upgrades to other people's packages? I guess for packages such as openssl or mysql it is -- What about minor utilities such as this one? Maciej From bonivart at opencsw.org Fri Mar 27 10:42:57 2009 From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart) Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 10:42:57 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] clusterssh-3.25 in testing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <625385e30903270242lc8a240ep2b5b6a156c4d4be3@mail.gmail.com> On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 9:01 AM, Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski wrote: > By the way, I know that packages usually have their maintainers - is > it considered inappropriate to commit upgrades to other people's > packages? I guess for packages such as openssl or mysql it is -- What > about minor utilities such as this one? I think you should file an upgrade bug in Mantis first. Most maintainers use their own packages and keep it up to date but if they don't respond you can post on the maintainers list about taking over the package. This post really belongs on the maintainers list as well. Please subscribe to it if you don't already. -- /peter From maciej at opencsw.org Fri Mar 27 11:20:09 2009 From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski) Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 10:20:09 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] clusterssh-3.25 in testing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 8:01 AM, Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski wrote: > clusterssh-3.25 (upgrade from 3.22) is available in testing. New build > fixes two missing dependencies. > > By the way, I know that packages usually have their maintainers - is > it considered inappropriate to commit upgrades to other people's > packages? I guess for packages such as openssl or mysql it is -- What > about minor utilities such as this one? After talking to maintainers, I learned that building a package equals taking it over. I didn't mean to do that; I removed the package from testing and filed an issue[1] in Mantis instead. Maciej [1] http://www.opencsw.org/bugtrack/view.php?id=3507 From pfelecan at opencsw.org Fri Mar 27 15:48:48 2009 From: pfelecan at opencsw.org (Peter FELECAN) Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:48:48 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] pkgutil 1.5 beta 3 - please help with testing In-Reply-To: <625385e30903260723u44070638u4f2f23b392708162@mail.gmail.com> (Peter Bonivart's message of "Thu\, 26 Mar 2009 15\:23\:12 +0100") References: <625385e30903230346r5a5f9aated6923184da8be7f@mail.gmail.com> <49CB7A9F.1050208@opencsw.org> <625385e30903260723u44070638u4f2f23b392708162@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: Peter Bonivart writes: > On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 1:52 PM, Sebastian Kayser wrote: >> Peter, one more thing. Is it possible to specify a local file:// >> repository, too? We have some local build machines here and i would love >> to just point pkgutil to a mount point rather than setting up a web server. > > Try it. :-) > > I put that into 1.4. Specify something like: > > mirror=file://absolute/path/to/files make that mirror=file:///absolute/path/to/files -- Peter From bonivart at opencsw.org Fri Mar 27 16:08:56 2009 From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart) Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 16:08:56 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] pkgutil 1.5 beta 3 - please help with testing In-Reply-To: References: <625385e30903230346r5a5f9aated6923184da8be7f@mail.gmail.com> <49CB7A9F.1050208@opencsw.org> <625385e30903260723u44070638u4f2f23b392708162@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <625385e30903270808w4470672fv60727179c4a63c4b@mail.gmail.com> On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Peter FELECAN wrote: > Peter Bonivart writes: > >> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 1:52 PM, Sebastian Kayser wrote: >>> Peter, one more thing. Is it possible to specify a local file:// >>> repository, too? We have some local build machines here and i would love >>> to just point pkgutil to a mount point rather than setting up a web server. >> >> Try it. :-) >> >> I put that into 1.4. Specify something like: >> >> mirror=file://absolute/path/to/files > > make that mirror=file:///absolute/path/to/files Thanks. :-) I will check the man page and so on to make sure it's correct there. By the way, we're working on another beta which will include a couple of minor things and one larger issue with the dependency order when specifying multiple packages on the command line. Thanks for reporting both good and bad. -- /peter From hson at opencsw.org Fri Mar 27 17:43:50 2009 From: hson at opencsw.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Roger_H=E5kansson?=) Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 17:43:50 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] New netsnmp 5.4.2.1 packages in /testing Message-ID: <49CD0246.2060506@opencsw.org> New from yesterday is perl and python modules... From mwatters at opencsw.org Fri Mar 27 19:33:16 2009 From: mwatters at opencsw.org (Mike Watters) Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 13:33:16 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] cmake 2.6.3 now in testing Message-ID: <49CD1BEC.9090505@opencsw.org> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 built with gar v2 upgraded from 2.4.8 - -- Thanks, Mike "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius -- and a lot of courage -- to move in the opposite direction." * Albert Einstein 1879 - 1955 US German-born Theoretical Physicist -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (SunOS) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAknNG+wACgkQLrhmsXMSLxeM3QCfYsfEAaMqDeHVGTVNGWmT8oVf 560AoJ4LfHJB7OJ1npqkwnV3UU7LY7r9 =p0R7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From william at wbonnet.net Fri Mar 27 22:34:52 2009 From: william at wbonnet.net (William Bonnet) Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 22:34:52 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] NDOutils 1.4b7 and NagVis 1.3.2 in testing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <49CD467C.30902@wbonnet.net> Hi Juergen > NagVis (visualization add-on for Nagios) are available in testing. Thanks a lot :) Cheers -- William http://www.wbonnet.net http://www.sunwizard.net Le site fran?ais des amateurs de stations Unix http://www.opencsw.org Community SoftWare for Solaris http://www.guses.org French speaking Solaris User Group From maciej at opencsw.org Sat Mar 28 07:33:45 2009 From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski) Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 06:33:45 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] *.wikidot.com DNS timeouts Message-ID: I observe problems with resolving hosts *.wikidot.org, on which wiki.opencsw.org depends. I had similar problems with pkgutil's wiki the other day. An example: maciej at quince ~ $ time host www.wikidot.org ;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached real 0m10.115s user 0m0.004s sys 0m0.000s Symptoms: web page doesn't display. After several refreshes, it displays, but without CSS. Did anyone else see this? From bonivart at opencsw.org Sat Mar 28 09:35:49 2009 From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart) Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 09:35:49 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] *.wikidot.com DNS timeouts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <625385e30903280135m66a6026al20bc28326b8ec3cd@mail.gmail.com> On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 7:33 AM, Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski wrote: > I observe problems with resolving hosts *.wikidot.org, on which > wiki.opencsw.org depends. I had similar problems with pkgutil's wiki > the other day. An example: > > maciej at quince ~ $ time host www.wikidot.org > ;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached > > real ? ?0m10.115s > user ? ?0m0.004s > sys ? ? 0m0.000s > > Symptoms: web page doesn't display. After several refreshes, it > displays, but without CSS. Did anyone else see this? I'm there quite frequently, having three wikis there, and haven't noticed any problems. I looked through their news where they post problems but I couldn't see anything related. Just tried the same you did: $ time host www.wikidot.org www.wikidot.org is an alias for wikidot.com. wikidot.com has address 67.228.37.26 wikidot.com mail is handled by 1 ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.com. wikidot.com mail is handled by 5 ALT1.ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.com. wikidot.com mail is handled by 5 ALT2.ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.com. wikidot.com mail is handled by 10 ASPMX2.GOOGLEMAIL.com. wikidot.com mail is handled by 10 ASPMX3.GOOGLEMAIL.com. wikidot.com mail is handled by 10 ASPMX4.GOOGLEMAIL.com. wikidot.com mail is handled by 10 ASPMX5.GOOGLEMAIL.com. real 0m0.353s user 0m0.004s sys 0m0.000s Please contact them directly if you keep having problems. -- /peter From yann at pleiades.fr.eu.org Sat Mar 28 14:03:45 2009 From: yann at pleiades.fr.eu.org (Yann Rouillard) Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 14:03:45 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] openssh 5.2 in testing (server/client split and LPK support) Message-ID: <49CE2031.9090003@pleiades.fr.eu.org> Hello, You will find openssh 5.2 packages in testing http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing.html I split the client part in a separate package in this release to allow to only install the client if need, this was requested in bug 2983: http://www.opencsw.org/mantis/view.php?id=2983 and I also created another package with ldap public key patch applied on William's request: http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/openssh_lpk-5.2,REV=2009.03.28_rev=p1-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gzhttp://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/openssh_lpk-5.2,REV=2009.03.28_rev=p1-SunOS5.10-i386-CSW.pkg.gz http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/openssh_lpk-5.2,REV=2009.03.28_rev=p1-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/openssh_lpk-5.2,REV=2009.03.28_rev=p1-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz see http://code.google.com/p/openssh-lpk/ for more information on the LPK patch. Feedbacks would be greatly appreciated. Yann From glaw at opencsw.org Sat Mar 28 18:15:06 2009 From: glaw at opencsw.org (Gary Law) Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 17:15:06 +0000 Subject: [csw-users] clusterssh-3.25 in testing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Thanks largely to Maciej's efforts there is now a new and improved clusterssh package in testing. Enjoy Gary -- Gary Law -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From bwalton at opencsw.org Sun Mar 29 21:54:44 2009 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 15:54:44 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] openssh 5.2 in testing (server/client split and LPK support) In-Reply-To: <49CE2031.9090003@pleiades.fr.eu.org> References: <49CE2031.9090003@pleiades.fr.eu.org> Message-ID: <1238356455-sup-87@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> Excerpts from Yann Rouillard's message of Sat Mar 28 09:03:45 -0400 2009: Hi Yann, > You will find openssh 5.2 packages in testing > http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing.html I'll give these a spin tomorrow. Thanks for splitting the functionality! :) Thanks -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 GPG Key Id: 8E89F6D2; Key Server: pgp.mit.edu Contact me to arrange for a CAcert assurance meeting. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From bonivart at opencsw.org Mon Mar 30 16:45:55 2009 From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:45:55 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] Are you having problems with DHCP 4.1? Message-ID: <625385e30903300745t148568aanc91ca4d75c609d2d@mail.gmail.com> There seems to be problems with the new DHCP package and it's not just our package or even Solaris but it also happens on other OS:es. So far ISC has not released an update. The problem is that some can't get it to work even though the same configuration (hw/sw) work with the old 3.1 package. I've heard from a few of you with problems but myself and a couple of others have it working with no problems. For those of you having problems I have dropped the old 3.1 package into testing so you can easily downgrade manually until this is resolved. It would be great if you could let me know what system and interface you're using DHCP on, maybe we can understand why it works for some and not for others. http://www.opencsw.org/mantis/view.php?id=3464 http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/dhcp-3.1.0,REV=2007.10.29-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/dhcp-3.1.0,REV=2007.10.29-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz -- /peter From mwatters at opencsw.org Tue Mar 31 22:19:34 2009 From: mwatters at opencsw.org (Mike Watters) Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 15:19:34 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] gcc-4.3.3 NOW IN TESTING Message-ID: <49D27AD6.10005@opencsw.org> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 After several concussions and gallons of spackle... gcc-4.3.3 is in testing. This is still missing the ada piece. that one is on its way. - -- Thanks, Mike "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius -- and a lot of courage -- to move in the opposite direction." * Albert Einstein 1879 - 1955 US German-born Theoretical Physicist -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (SunOS) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAknSetYACgkQLrhmsXMSLxcoIgCePPssSpG22F4LLdvi6uTEi1P/ U+cAoJpFLm9cVSV8egULsre6leGzapMl =K/M3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----