From ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr Sat Oct 3 09:03:07 2009 From: ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr (gerard) Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2009 09:03:07 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] request tracker: new release? Message-ID: <4AC6F72B.4080001@cmi.univ-mrs.fr> hello all, i'm using RT 3.6.6, and i notice that the offocial release is actually 3.8 According to http://www.opencsw.org/packages/rt, the maintainer is retired. He did a very very good job. Is there a chance to have a newer release? thanks in advance, gerard From dam at opencsw.org Mon Oct 5 10:37:50 2009 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 10:37:50 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] (From [sysadmin-discuss]) Dovecot and Postfix References: <335E69A1-E951-4DB0-A442-B202CC8D31A9@baltic-online.de> Message-ID: <747476DC-35D8-497B-A735-4C2B1BDDB605@opencsw.org> Hi Tobias, Am 05.10.2009 um 10:04 schrieb Tobias Daub: > I'm running postfix and dovecot inside a ZONE under OpenSolaris > 2008.11. Each user has a .fetchmailrc, .procmailrc and a Maildir > directory in her/his home directory. > > It seems as dovecot doesn't find the Maildir/ directory. After I > fetched new mails with fetchmail, the Maildir directory crows, so I > would say, that the mails are stored there correctly. I can "login" > into the imap account (dovecot responds with SSL certificate and all > that stuff), but there are no mails! > > My dovecot.conf resides under /opt/csw/etc/ and the "mail_location" > ist set to maildir:~/Maildir. My postfix main.cf which resides > unter /etc/postfix/ has the entry home_mailbox = Maildir/ . > > I wasn't sure, where to put the main.cf, is that the right place? [Message forwarded to cswusers@ mailing list] > Does anybody has an idea, what could issue the problem? [cc'ing CSW Dovecot maintainer] Best regards -- Dago From skayser at opencsw.org Mon Oct 5 13:06:28 2009 From: skayser at opencsw.org (Sebastian Kayser) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 13:06:28 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [csw-users] [sysadmin-discuss] Dovecot and Postfix In-Reply-To: <335E69A1-E951-4DB0-A442-B202CC8D31A9@baltic-online.de> References: <4AC9A896.405@gmx.li> <335E69A1-E951-4DB0-A442-B202CC8D31A9@baltic-online.de> Message-ID: <65108.194.246.122.22.1254740788.squirrel@ssl.skayser.de> Hi Tobias, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > Am 05.10.2009 um 10:04 schrieb Tobias Daub: >> I'm running postfix and dovecot inside a ZONE under OpenSolaris >> 2008.11. Each user has a .fetchmailrc, .procmailrc and a Maildir >> directory in her/his home directory. >> >> It seems as dovecot doesn't find the Maildir/ directory. After I >> fetched new mails with fetchmail, the Maildir directory crows, so I >> would say, that the mails are stored there correctly. I can "login" >> into the imap account (dovecot responds with SSL certificate and all >> that stuff), but there are no mails! >> >> My dovecot.conf resides under /opt/csw/etc/ and the "mail_location" >> ist set to maildir:~/Maildir. My postfix main.cf which resides >> unter /etc/postfix/ has the entry home_mailbox = Maildir/ . >> >> I wasn't sure, where to put the main.cf, is that the right place? > > [Message forwarded to cswusers@ mailing list] > >> Does anybody has an idea, what could issue the problem? you can set "mail_debug = yes" in your dovecot.conf to have Dovecot log the location where it looks for the user inbox upon login. This is to make sure it is indeed looking for mail where you would expect it (~/Maildir is one of the defaults when you don't specify mail_location at all). Do you sort your mail into subfolders (find ~/Maildir -type d)? If so, you usually need to explicitly subscribe them in your mail client, as they don't show up per default. If the above doesn't help, please provide the output of "pkginfo -l CSWdovecot", "dovecot -n", "postconf -n", "postconf mailbox_command", and your .procmailrc. Sebastian From bwalton at opencsw.org Tue Oct 6 04:27:01 2009 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2009 22:27:01 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] big xml/docbook package update Message-ID: <1254796005-sup-4996@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> Hi All, I've just released a large set of interdependent packages[1] to the 'current' stream. This update will see several changes, but most importantly with respect to a clean update is that $sysconfdir is moving from /opt/csw/etc/ to /etc/opt/csw for all packages in this set. To smoothly handle the transition, I've provided a small script[2]. It will remove the packages (if found) in an order that won't upset the inter-dependencies and then reinstall them one by one. Other notable changes: docbook now provides 4.5 dtd's and sets this version as primary asciidoc is bumped to 8.4.5, which should fix a few bugs issues py_libxslt was formerly known as pylibxslt. renamed for consistency xmlto is bumped to 0.0.23 and should work better on solaris libxslt has a patch applied that corrects a segfault while debugging Sorry for any hassle this causes you. Thanks -Ben [1] List of updated packages: asciidoc-8.4.5,REV=2009.09.18-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz docbookdsssl-1.79,REV=2009.09.15-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz docbookdtds-4.5,REV=2009.09.16-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz docbookxsl-1.74.3,REV=2009.09.11-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz docbookxsldoc-1.74.3,REV=2009.09.11-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz libxml2-2.7.3,REV=2009.09.12-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz libxml2-2.7.3,REV=2009.09.12-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz libxml2_devel-2.7.3,REV=2009.09.12-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz libxml2_devel-2.7.3,REV=2009.09.12-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz libxslt-1.1.24,REV=2009.09.08-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz libxslt-1.1.24,REV=2009.09.08-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz libxslt_devel-1.1.24,REV=2009.09.08-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz libxslt_devel-1.1.24,REV=2009.09.08-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz openjade-1.3.2,REV=2009.09.11-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz openjade-1.3.2,REV=2009.09.11-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz py_libxml2-2.7.3,REV=2009.09.12-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz py_libxml2-2.7.3,REV=2009.09.12-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz py_libxslt-1.1.24,REV=2009.09.08-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz py_libxslt-1.1.24,REV=2009.09.08-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz sgmlcommon-0.6.3,REV=2009.09.13-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz xmlcommon-0.6.3,REV=2009.09.13-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz xmlto-0.0.23,REV=2009.09.27-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz xmlto-0.0.23,REV=2009.09.27-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz [2] http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/update_xml_pkgs.sh -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 GPG Key Id: 8E89F6D2; Key Server: pgp.mit.edu Contact me to arrange for a CAcert assurance meeting. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr Tue Oct 6 10:18:37 2009 From: ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr (Gerard Henry) Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 10:18:37 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] evince odesn't start when called by firefox Message-ID: <4ACAFD5D.7080508@cmi.univ-mrs.fr> hello all, i'm using firefox-3.5.3 from sun contribs, on a solaris 10 sparc machine. I've got this error: > [SmartNamer] updateEntry() > [SmartNamer] updateEntry() > [ConvConfHandler] isPreferred contentType: application/pdf > > (evince:1441): Pango-WARNING **: ld.so.1: evince: fatal: relocation error: file /usr/local/firefox-3.5.3/depend/lib/pango/1.6.0/modules/pango-basic-fc.so: symbol pango_is_zero_width: referenced symbol not found > > (evince:1441): Pango-WARNING **: Failed to load Pango module '/usr/local/firefox-3.5.3/depend/lib/pango/1.6.0/modules/pango-basic-fc.so' for id 'BasicScriptEngineFc' > > (evince:1441): Pango-WARNING **: ld.so.1: evince: fatal: relocation error: file /usr/local/firefox-3.5.3/depend/lib/pango/1.6.0/modules/pango-basic-fc.so: symbol pango_is_zero_width: referenced symbol not found > > (evince:1441): Pango-WARNING **: failed to choose a font, expect ugly output. engine-type='PangoRenderFc', script='common' but it works with xpdf. Anybody has seen it? thanks in advance, gerard From schwindt at dfki.uni-kl.de Tue Oct 6 15:26:49 2009 From: schwindt at dfki.uni-kl.de (Nicolai Schwindt) Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 15:26:49 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] evince odesn't start when called by firefox In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 06 Oct 2009 10:18:37 +0200." <4ACAFD5D.7080508@cmi.univ-mrs.fr> Message-ID: <200910061326.n96DQo8e012345@dfki.uni-kl.de> > hello all, > i'm using firefox-3.5.3 from sun contribs, on a solaris 10 sparc machine. > I've got this error: [...] > > but it works with xpdf. xpdf does not depend on pango - evince seems to. Firefox probably set an LD_LIBRARY_PATH, so evince finds the wrong pango lib. > Anybody has seen it? under /usr/local - not anymore since bsd. From mwatters at opencsw.org Tue Oct 6 21:24:13 2009 From: mwatters at opencsw.org (Mike Watters) Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 14:24:13 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] sendmail-8.14.3 in testing Message-ID: <4ACB995D.90707@opencsw.org> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 once Dago is done with berkeley DB it will be recompiled based on the "new" package names for bdb. please test and provide feedback. - -- ~Mike "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius -- and a lot of courage -- to move in the opposite direction." --> Albert Einstein 1879 - 1955 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (SunOS) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkrLmV0ACgkQLrhmsXMSLxcCvwCfbD1K8s6MUG0qYU0SJBjTRNwY YfwAoIZKLWZm0FKSFVRrckthtfrwYnZc =aqI+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From mwatters at opencsw.org Tue Oct 6 22:17:09 2009 From: mwatters at opencsw.org (Mike Watters) Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 15:17:09 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] libssh2 1.2.1 in testing Message-ID: <4ACBA5C5.5030804@opencsw.org> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Changes: upgraded to version 1.2.1 feedback welcome - -- ~Mike "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius -- and a lot of courage -- to move in the opposite direction." --> Albert Einstein 1879 - 1955 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (SunOS) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkrLpcQACgkQLrhmsXMSLxczbwCdGL3niQV1rG6L7ECKYSTPt/ZP yjYAn3fUYad0TFKm/Kg5a57i8pqWxVmM =gL9w -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From mwatters at opencsw.org Tue Oct 6 22:49:55 2009 From: mwatters at opencsw.org (Mike Watters) Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 15:49:55 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] drupal 6.14 now in testing Message-ID: <4ACBAD73.2060905@opencsw.org> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Changes: updated to 6.14 - -- ~Mike "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius -- and a lot of courage -- to move in the opposite direction." --> Albert Einstein 1879 - 1955 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (SunOS) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkrLrXMACgkQLrhmsXMSLxdK2gCeNtf1v6nNziHzQG9CtyH/TRka 32AAmgJWzM3fQa8sNJCjDt8ZeEr1QAjs =BD0J -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From karl at seven.com Wed Oct 7 05:02:40 2009 From: karl at seven.com (Karl J. Smith) Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 20:02:40 -0700 Subject: [csw-users] emacs_nox has a x dependency? Message-ID: <4ACC04D0.9070006@seven.com> Hi, I previously had version 22 of emacs_nox installed on a machine without any X Window System packages. It worked well. When trying to upgrade to version 23, I find that there is now a dependency for SUNWxwice which wasn't there before. emacs_nox pulls in emacs_common, which has the following dependency error. Is there any easy way around this? root at ap1.p3.uk:/var/pkg-get> pkg-get -u emacs_common No existing install of CSWemacscommon found. Installing... Pre-existing local file emacs_common-23.1,REV=2009.08.18-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz matches checksum Keeping existing file Analysing special files... Trying to install dependancy m17ndb No existing install of CSWm17ndb found. Installing... Pre-existing local file m17ndb-1.5.5,REV=2009.08.07-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz matches checksum Keeping existing file Analysing special files... Trying to install dependancy libm17n No existing install of CSWlibm17n found. Installing... Pre-existing local file libm17n-1.5.4,REV=2009.08.07-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz matches checksum Keeping existing file Analysing special files... Hmmm. Retrying with different archive offset...1692 blocks Trying to install dependancy libotf No existing install of CSWlibotf found. Installing... Pre-existing local file libotf-0.9.9,REV=2009.08.04-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz matches checksum Keeping existing file Analysing special files... ERROR: no info for *SUNWxwice.* Cannot install dependancy. ERROR: could not install required dependancies for CSWlibotf Once dependancies are up to date, call /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -i libotf to (re)install ERROR: install of CSWlibotf failed ERROR: could not install required dependancies for CSWlibm17n Once dependancies are up to date, call /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -i libm17n to (re)install ERROR: install of CSWlibm17n failed ERROR: could not install required dependancies for CSWm17ndb Once dependancies are up to date, call /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -i m17ndb to (re)install ERROR: install of CSWm17ndb failed ERROR: could not install required dependancies for CSWemacscommon Once dependancies are up to date, call /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -i emacs_common to (re)install -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From maciej at opencsw.org Wed Oct 7 13:02:10 2009 From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 12:02:10 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] urxvt-9.06 with a libev workaround in testing Message-ID: There was an issue with urxvt for which I've found a workaround thanks to a blogger from livejournal[1]. The error message was: (libev) port_getn: Error 0 I've created a package with a workaround: http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/urxvt-9.06,REV=2009.10.06-SunOS5.10-i386-CSW.pkg.gz http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/urxvt-9.06,REV=2009.10.06-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz Enjoy your unicode terminals! As a side note, urxvt won't be released in OpenCSW in the near future; the problem is that it doesn't build on Solaris 10, and I don't have the bandwidth to make it compile on Solaris 8. If you're interested in making it work on Solaris 8, I'll be happy to help you with setting up the environment. There's also the possibility of getting an account on the buildfarm. Maciej [1] http://cptsalek.livejournal.com/2558.html From aaron at ernieball.com Thu Oct 8 16:59:44 2009 From: aaron at ernieball.com (Aaron Wilson) Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2009 07:59:44 -0700 Subject: [csw-users] evince odesn't start when called by firefox In-Reply-To: <200910061326.n96DQo8e012345@dfki.uni-kl.de> References: <200910061326.n96DQo8e012345@dfki.uni-kl.de> Message-ID: <4ACDFE60.3020508@ernieball.com> Actually I kind of have seen this. Years ago I created a shell script with the help of someone from this list so my users could open up pdf's in the native Solaris version of Evolution I would get an error if I tried to open a pdf in evolution with /opt/csw/bin/evince So we created a script that I put at /opt/csw/bin/evince.sh The contents of that scritpt: #!/bin/sh unset LD_LIBRARY_PATH exec /opt/csw/bin/evince "$@" I've had that set as the default pdf handler in both Evolution and Firefox for years now. Recently I did update to Firefox 3.53 from http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/3.5.3/contrib/ Since upgrading my old evince.sh handler stopped working, so I tried just setting Firefox to use evince and now I can open pdfs again with Firefox. Maybe you'd have luck with that evince.sh script? -- Aaron Nicolai Schwindt wrote: >> hello all, >> i'm using firefox-3.5.3 from sun contribs, on a solaris 10 sparc machine. >> I've got this error: >> > [...] > >> but it works with xpdf. >> > > xpdf does not depend on pango - evince seems to. > Firefox probably set an LD_LIBRARY_PATH, so evince finds the wrong pango lib. > > > >> Anybody has seen it? >> > > under /usr/local - not anymore since bsd. > > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/users > From t.gollnick at gmail.com Fri Oct 16 10:15:52 2009 From: t.gollnick at gmail.com (Torsten Gollnick) Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 10:15:52 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] i386 libraries in mercurial for Solaris sparc Message-ID: Hello, mercurial does not work for me on Solaris Sparc due to i386 libs. I use url=http://ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/opencsw/current did pkg-get -U and pkg-get -u The package version is mercurial 1.3.1,REV=2009.10.03 How can I brief the maintainer? Torsten starting hg gives $ hg Traceback (most recent call last): File "/opt/csw/bin/hg", line 27, in mercurial.dispatch.run() File "/opt/csw/lib/python/site-packages/mercurial/dispatch.py", line 16, in run sys.exit(dispatch(sys.argv[1:])) File "/opt/csw/lib/python/site-packages/mercurial/dispatch.py", line 21, in dispatch u = _ui.ui() File "/opt/csw/lib/python/site-packages/mercurial/ui.py", line 35, in __init__ for f in util.rcpath(): File "/opt/csw/lib/python/site-packages/mercurial/util.py", line 1217, in rcpath _rcpath = os_rcpath() File "/opt/csw/lib/python/site-packages/mercurial/util.py", line 1193, in os_rcpath path = system_rcpath() File "/opt/csw/lib/python/site-packages/mercurial/posix.py", line 41, in system_rcpath '/../etc/mercurial')) File "/opt/csw/lib/python/site-packages/mercurial/posix.py", line 30, in rcfiles for f, kind in osutil.listdir(rcdir) File "/opt/csw/lib/python/site-packages/mercurial/demandimport.py", line 75, in __getattribute__ self._load() File "/opt/csw/lib/python/site-packages/mercurial/demandimport.py", line 47, in _load mod = _origimport(head, globals, locals) ImportError: ld.so.1: python: fatal: /opt/csw/lib/python/site-packages/mercurial/osutil.so: wrong ELF data format: ELFDATA2LSB and file /opt/csw/lib/python/site-packages/mercurial/osutil.so /opt/csw/lib/python/site-packages/mercurial/osutil.so: ELF 32-bit LSB dynamic lib 80386 Version 1, dynamically linked, not stripped The packge is Processing package instance from From maciej at opencsw.org Fri Oct 16 10:51:06 2009 From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski) Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 09:51:06 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] i386 libraries in mercurial for Solaris sparc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Torsten Gollnick wrote: > Hello, > > mercurial does not work for me on Solaris Sparc due to i386 libs. > I use > url=http://ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/opencsw/current > did pkg-get -U and pkg-get -u > > The package version is ?mercurial 1.3.1,REV=2009.10.03 > > How can I brief the maintainer? I'd suggest filing a bug at http://www.opencsw.org/bugtrack/ Maciej From dam at opencsw.org Mon Oct 19 07:53:07 2009 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 07:53:07 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] BerkeleyDB upgrade Message-ID: Dear users, I have now finally assembled a new and complete rebuild of the Berkeley DB libraries. In the new schema every version of BDB is sitting in a separate subdirectory, that means Berkeley DB X.Y.Z is located at /opt/csw/bdbXY/(bin|lib|...) The repackaged versions contain 3.3, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, 4.7 and 4.8. If necessary the legacy packages needed as dependencies have been replaced by stubs containing minimal links to the new locations with a respective dependency in the package. The following packages have been updated: CATALOGNAME PACKAGENAME berkeleydb CSWbdb berkeleydb3 CSWbdb3 berkeleydb3_devel CSWbdb3devel berkeleydb3_doc CSWbdb3doc berkeleydb4 CSWbdb4 berkeleydb42 CSWbdb42 berkeleydb42_devel CSWbdb42devel berkeleydb42_doc CSWbdb42doc berkeleydb43 CSWbdb43 berkeleydb43_devel CSWbdb43-devel berkeleydb43_doc CSWbdb43-doc berkeleydb44 CSWbdb44 berkeleydb44_devel CSWbdb44-devel berkeleydb44_doc CSWbdb44-doc berkeleydb47 CSWbdb47 berkeleydb47_devel CSWbdb47devel berkeleydb47_doc CSWbdb47doc berkeleydb48 CSWbdb48 berkeleydb48_devel CSWbdb48devel berkeleydb48_doc CSWbdb48doc The following packages are deprecated: - CSWbdb was newly introduced during the unification. It contains now only symlinks pointing inside CSWbdb47. The package will go away when all dependant packages habe been recompiled against CSWbdb47. /opt/csw/lib/amd64/libdb-4.7.so=../../bdb47/lib/amd64/libdb-4.7.so /opt/csw/lib/libdb-4.7.so=../bdb47/lib/libdb-4.7.so - CSWbdb4 contained the original Berkeley DB 4.2 in /opt/csw/bdb4. The package now contains /opt/csw/bdb4=bdb42 The following packages do not exist any more as the base packages are deprecated: - berkeleydb_doc CSWbdbdoc - berkeleydb_devel CSWbdbdevel - berkeleydb4_doc CSWbdb4-doc The following package names have been kept to match the existing naming. The package names will be adjusted at a later date with proper announcement: - berkeleydb43_devel CSWbdb43-devel - berkeleydb43_doc CSWbdb43-doc - berkeleydb44_devel CSWbdb44-devel - berkeleydb44_doc CSWbdb44-doc Should you encounter any issues please post to users@ as usual. Best regards -- Dago From james at opencsw.org Mon Oct 19 14:57:31 2009 From: james at opencsw.org (James Lee) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:57:31 GMT Subject: [csw-users] BerkeleyDB upgrade breaks OpenOffice.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20091019.12573100.684502501@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk> On 19/10/09, 06:53:07, Dagobert Michelsen wrote regarding [csw-users] BerkeleyDB upgrade: > - CSWbdb4 contained the original Berkeley DB 4.2 in /opt/csw/bdb4. > The package now contains > /opt/csw/bdb4=bdb42 This change breaks OpenOffice.org. Previously CSWbdb4 contained links to 4.7 Please DO NOT update BerkeleyDB until the repackage ooocore has also been released. James. From james at opencsw.org Wed Oct 21 17:53:16 2009 From: james at opencsw.org (James Lee) Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:53:16 GMT Subject: [csw-users] BerkeleyDB upgrade breaks OpenOffice.org In-Reply-To: <20091019.12573100.684502501@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk> References: <20091019.12573100.684502501@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk> Message-ID: <20091021.15531600.2065320642@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk> On 19/10/09, 13:57:31, James Lee wrote regarding Re: [csw-users] BerkeleyDB upgrade breaks OpenOffice.org: > > - CSWbdb4 contained the original Berkeley DB 4.2 in /opt/csw/bdb4. > > The package now contains > > /opt/csw/bdb4=bdb42 > This change breaks OpenOffice.org. Previously CSWbdb4 contained > links to 4.7 > Please DO NOT update BerkeleyDB until the repackage ooocore has also > been released. The updated ooocore is now released and should fix the moved BDB-4.7 problem. James. From maciej at opencsw.org Thu Oct 22 12:14:18 2009 From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski) Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 11:14:18 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] request tracker: new release? In-Reply-To: <4AC6F72B.4080001@cmi.univ-mrs.fr> References: <4AC6F72B.4080001@cmi.univ-mrs.fr> Message-ID: On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 8:03 AM, gerard wrote: > hello all, > i'm using RT 3.6.6, and i notice that the offocial release is actually 3.8 > According to http://www.opencsw.org/packages/rt, the maintainer is retired. > He did a very very good job. > Is there a chance to have a newer release? I saw packages such as sendmail (the same previous maintainer) being reworked from scratch. I'm afraid the same thing has to be done for rt. Would you like to try building it yourself? I can give you a hand with getting started. Maciej From dam at opencsw.org Thu Oct 22 13:23:57 2009 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:23:57 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] request tracker: new release? In-Reply-To: References: <4AC6F72B.4080001@cmi.univ-mrs.fr> Message-ID: Hi, Am 22.10.2009 um 12:14 schrieb Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski: > On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 8:03 AM, gerard wrote: >> hello all, >> i'm using RT 3.6.6, and i notice that the offocial release is >> actually 3.8 >> According to http://www.opencsw.org/packages/rt, the maintainer is >> retired. >> He did a very very good job. >> Is there a chance to have a newer release? > > I saw packages such as sendmail (the same previous maintainer) being > reworked from scratch. I'm afraid the same thing has to be done for > rt. Would you like to try building it yourself? I can give you a hand > with getting started. And you wouldn't have to deal with all the Perl modules, I'll update what is needed. Best regards -- Dago From gadavis at ucsd.edu Fri Oct 23 02:27:22 2009 From: gadavis at ucsd.edu (Geoff Davis) Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 17:27:22 -0700 Subject: [csw-users] PHP5 PEAR Modules with OpenCSW Message-ID: Hi all, My users want a PEAR module installed in PHP5. I've done this by hand on one or two systems, but I fear there may be more coming thus adding to my administrative burden. I was wondering if there were any plans to start packaging non- standard PEAR modules like the various Perl and Python modules are packaged. Thanks, Geoff From bwalton at opencsw.org Fri Oct 23 02:55:54 2009 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 20:55:54 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] syslogging package actions Message-ID: <1256258943-sup-1784@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> Hi All, I just placed cswpkglogger in testing/. It will log to user.notice package install, upgrade and remove actions. This is similar to what you can find in yum and via different mechanisms in debian-based systems. It's the first tool to leverage the new hook capabilities in pkgutil. Thanks -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 GPG Key Id: 8E89F6D2; Key Server: pgp.mit.edu Contact me to arrange for a CAcert assurance meeting. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From dam at opencsw.org Fri Oct 23 11:24:37 2009 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 11:24:37 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] PHP5 PEAR Modules with OpenCSW In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <38D2880E-AF46-4F6A-B04A-C2984CD61260@opencsw.org> Hi Geoff, Am 23.10.2009 um 02:27 schrieb Geoff Davis: > My users want a PEAR module installed in PHP5. I've done this by > hand on one or two systems, but I fear there may be more coming thus > adding to my administrative burden. > > I was wondering if there were any plans to start packaging non- > standard PEAR modules like the various Perl and Python modules are > packaged. Sure, why not. How about joining in and package up what you need? Of course we'll help setting up the necessary framework in GAR to do this as easily as possible. Best regards -- Dago From bwalton at opencsw.org Fri Oct 23 15:41:57 2009 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 09:41:57 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] syslogging package actions In-Reply-To: <1256258943-sup-1784@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> References: <1256258943-sup-1784@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: <1256305284-sup-8778@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> Excerpts from Ben Walton's message of Thu Oct 22 20:55:54 -0400 2009: > I just placed cswpkglogger in testing/. It will log to user.notice Repackaged as cswpkgsyslog after some feedback. -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 GPG Key Id: 8E89F6D2; Key Server: pgp.mit.edu Contact me to arrange for a CAcert assurance meeting. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From wib at cs.uni-kiel.de Wed Oct 28 10:50:05 2009 From: wib at cs.uni-kiel.de (Willi Burmeister) Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 10:50:05 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] no fonts after Blastwave -> OpenCSW migration Message-ID: <20091028095005.GA26718@eden.cs.uni-kiel.de> Hi, recently I changed one of our systems from Blastwave to OpenCSW. I removed every Blastwave package and even the /opt/csw directory. After that I installed pkg-get from OpenCSW and a lot of kde packages: % pkg-get -l | egrep -i kde kde_gcc kde_gcc_dtlogin kde_i18n_de kdeaccess_gcc kdeaddons_gcc kdeadmin_gcc kdeartwork_gcc kdebase_gcc kdeedu_gcc kdegames_gcc kdegraphics_gcc kdelibs_gcc kdemultimedia_gcc kdenetwork_gcc kdepim_gcc kdesdk kdesdkcommon kdetoys_gcc kdeutils_gcc kdevelop kdevelopcommon But something must be missing. I can't see any menu text on any kde application. Fonts seems to be missing completly. But gnome apps (from Sun and from OpenCSW) shows up correctly and /var/opt/csw/cache/fontconfig ist filled with a lot of files. Any help is appreciated Thanks Willi From ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr Sat Oct 3 09:03:07 2009 From: ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr (gerard) Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2009 09:03:07 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] request tracker: new release? Message-ID: <4AC6F72B.4080001@cmi.univ-mrs.fr> hello all, i'm using RT 3.6.6, and i notice that the offocial release is actually 3.8 According to http://www.opencsw.org/packages/rt, the maintainer is retired. He did a very very good job. Is there a chance to have a newer release? thanks in advance, gerard From dam at opencsw.org Mon Oct 5 10:37:50 2009 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 10:37:50 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] (From [sysadmin-discuss]) Dovecot and Postfix References: <335E69A1-E951-4DB0-A442-B202CC8D31A9@baltic-online.de> Message-ID: <747476DC-35D8-497B-A735-4C2B1BDDB605@opencsw.org> Hi Tobias, Am 05.10.2009 um 10:04 schrieb Tobias Daub: > I'm running postfix and dovecot inside a ZONE under OpenSolaris > 2008.11. Each user has a .fetchmailrc, .procmailrc and a Maildir > directory in her/his home directory. > > It seems as dovecot doesn't find the Maildir/ directory. After I > fetched new mails with fetchmail, the Maildir directory crows, so I > would say, that the mails are stored there correctly. I can "login" > into the imap account (dovecot responds with SSL certificate and all > that stuff), but there are no mails! > > My dovecot.conf resides under /opt/csw/etc/ and the "mail_location" > ist set to maildir:~/Maildir. My postfix main.cf which resides > unter /etc/postfix/ has the entry home_mailbox = Maildir/ . > > I wasn't sure, where to put the main.cf, is that the right place? [Message forwarded to cswusers@ mailing list] > Does anybody has an idea, what could issue the problem? [cc'ing CSW Dovecot maintainer] Best regards -- Dago From skayser at opencsw.org Mon Oct 5 13:06:28 2009 From: skayser at opencsw.org (Sebastian Kayser) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 13:06:28 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [csw-users] [sysadmin-discuss] Dovecot and Postfix In-Reply-To: <335E69A1-E951-4DB0-A442-B202CC8D31A9@baltic-online.de> References: <4AC9A896.405@gmx.li> <335E69A1-E951-4DB0-A442-B202CC8D31A9@baltic-online.de> Message-ID: <65108.194.246.122.22.1254740788.squirrel@ssl.skayser.de> Hi Tobias, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > Am 05.10.2009 um 10:04 schrieb Tobias Daub: >> I'm running postfix and dovecot inside a ZONE under OpenSolaris >> 2008.11. Each user has a .fetchmailrc, .procmailrc and a Maildir >> directory in her/his home directory. >> >> It seems as dovecot doesn't find the Maildir/ directory. After I >> fetched new mails with fetchmail, the Maildir directory crows, so I >> would say, that the mails are stored there correctly. I can "login" >> into the imap account (dovecot responds with SSL certificate and all >> that stuff), but there are no mails! >> >> My dovecot.conf resides under /opt/csw/etc/ and the "mail_location" >> ist set to maildir:~/Maildir. My postfix main.cf which resides >> unter /etc/postfix/ has the entry home_mailbox = Maildir/ . >> >> I wasn't sure, where to put the main.cf, is that the right place? > > [Message forwarded to cswusers@ mailing list] > >> Does anybody has an idea, what could issue the problem? you can set "mail_debug = yes" in your dovecot.conf to have Dovecot log the location where it looks for the user inbox upon login. This is to make sure it is indeed looking for mail where you would expect it (~/Maildir is one of the defaults when you don't specify mail_location at all). Do you sort your mail into subfolders (find ~/Maildir -type d)? If so, you usually need to explicitly subscribe them in your mail client, as they don't show up per default. If the above doesn't help, please provide the output of "pkginfo -l CSWdovecot", "dovecot -n", "postconf -n", "postconf mailbox_command", and your .procmailrc. Sebastian From bwalton at opencsw.org Tue Oct 6 04:27:01 2009 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2009 22:27:01 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] big xml/docbook package update Message-ID: <1254796005-sup-4996@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> Hi All, I've just released a large set of interdependent packages[1] to the 'current' stream. This update will see several changes, but most importantly with respect to a clean update is that $sysconfdir is moving from /opt/csw/etc/ to /etc/opt/csw for all packages in this set. To smoothly handle the transition, I've provided a small script[2]. It will remove the packages (if found) in an order that won't upset the inter-dependencies and then reinstall them one by one. Other notable changes: docbook now provides 4.5 dtd's and sets this version as primary asciidoc is bumped to 8.4.5, which should fix a few bugs issues py_libxslt was formerly known as pylibxslt. renamed for consistency xmlto is bumped to 0.0.23 and should work better on solaris libxslt has a patch applied that corrects a segfault while debugging Sorry for any hassle this causes you. Thanks -Ben [1] List of updated packages: asciidoc-8.4.5,REV=2009.09.18-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz docbookdsssl-1.79,REV=2009.09.15-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz docbookdtds-4.5,REV=2009.09.16-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz docbookxsl-1.74.3,REV=2009.09.11-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz docbookxsldoc-1.74.3,REV=2009.09.11-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz libxml2-2.7.3,REV=2009.09.12-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz libxml2-2.7.3,REV=2009.09.12-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz libxml2_devel-2.7.3,REV=2009.09.12-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz libxml2_devel-2.7.3,REV=2009.09.12-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz libxslt-1.1.24,REV=2009.09.08-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz libxslt-1.1.24,REV=2009.09.08-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz libxslt_devel-1.1.24,REV=2009.09.08-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz libxslt_devel-1.1.24,REV=2009.09.08-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz openjade-1.3.2,REV=2009.09.11-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz openjade-1.3.2,REV=2009.09.11-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz py_libxml2-2.7.3,REV=2009.09.12-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz py_libxml2-2.7.3,REV=2009.09.12-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz py_libxslt-1.1.24,REV=2009.09.08-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz py_libxslt-1.1.24,REV=2009.09.08-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz sgmlcommon-0.6.3,REV=2009.09.13-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz xmlcommon-0.6.3,REV=2009.09.13-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz xmlto-0.0.23,REV=2009.09.27-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz xmlto-0.0.23,REV=2009.09.27-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz [2] http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/update_xml_pkgs.sh -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 GPG Key Id: 8E89F6D2; Key Server: pgp.mit.edu Contact me to arrange for a CAcert assurance meeting. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr Tue Oct 6 10:18:37 2009 From: ghenry at cmi.univ-mrs.fr (Gerard Henry) Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 10:18:37 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] evince odesn't start when called by firefox Message-ID: <4ACAFD5D.7080508@cmi.univ-mrs.fr> hello all, i'm using firefox-3.5.3 from sun contribs, on a solaris 10 sparc machine. I've got this error: > [SmartNamer] updateEntry() > [SmartNamer] updateEntry() > [ConvConfHandler] isPreferred contentType: application/pdf > > (evince:1441): Pango-WARNING **: ld.so.1: evince: fatal: relocation error: file /usr/local/firefox-3.5.3/depend/lib/pango/1.6.0/modules/pango-basic-fc.so: symbol pango_is_zero_width: referenced symbol not found > > (evince:1441): Pango-WARNING **: Failed to load Pango module '/usr/local/firefox-3.5.3/depend/lib/pango/1.6.0/modules/pango-basic-fc.so' for id 'BasicScriptEngineFc' > > (evince:1441): Pango-WARNING **: ld.so.1: evince: fatal: relocation error: file /usr/local/firefox-3.5.3/depend/lib/pango/1.6.0/modules/pango-basic-fc.so: symbol pango_is_zero_width: referenced symbol not found > > (evince:1441): Pango-WARNING **: failed to choose a font, expect ugly output. engine-type='PangoRenderFc', script='common' but it works with xpdf. Anybody has seen it? thanks in advance, gerard From schwindt at dfki.uni-kl.de Tue Oct 6 15:26:49 2009 From: schwindt at dfki.uni-kl.de (Nicolai Schwindt) Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 15:26:49 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] evince odesn't start when called by firefox In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 06 Oct 2009 10:18:37 +0200." <4ACAFD5D.7080508@cmi.univ-mrs.fr> Message-ID: <200910061326.n96DQo8e012345@dfki.uni-kl.de> > hello all, > i'm using firefox-3.5.3 from sun contribs, on a solaris 10 sparc machine. > I've got this error: [...] > > but it works with xpdf. xpdf does not depend on pango - evince seems to. Firefox probably set an LD_LIBRARY_PATH, so evince finds the wrong pango lib. > Anybody has seen it? under /usr/local - not anymore since bsd. From mwatters at opencsw.org Tue Oct 6 21:24:13 2009 From: mwatters at opencsw.org (Mike Watters) Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 14:24:13 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] sendmail-8.14.3 in testing Message-ID: <4ACB995D.90707@opencsw.org> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 once Dago is done with berkeley DB it will be recompiled based on the "new" package names for bdb. please test and provide feedback. - -- ~Mike "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius -- and a lot of courage -- to move in the opposite direction." --> Albert Einstein 1879 - 1955 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (SunOS) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkrLmV0ACgkQLrhmsXMSLxcCvwCfbD1K8s6MUG0qYU0SJBjTRNwY YfwAoIZKLWZm0FKSFVRrckthtfrwYnZc =aqI+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From mwatters at opencsw.org Tue Oct 6 22:17:09 2009 From: mwatters at opencsw.org (Mike Watters) Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 15:17:09 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] libssh2 1.2.1 in testing Message-ID: <4ACBA5C5.5030804@opencsw.org> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Changes: upgraded to version 1.2.1 feedback welcome - -- ~Mike "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius -- and a lot of courage -- to move in the opposite direction." --> Albert Einstein 1879 - 1955 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (SunOS) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkrLpcQACgkQLrhmsXMSLxczbwCdGL3niQV1rG6L7ECKYSTPt/ZP yjYAn3fUYad0TFKm/Kg5a57i8pqWxVmM =gL9w -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From mwatters at opencsw.org Tue Oct 6 22:49:55 2009 From: mwatters at opencsw.org (Mike Watters) Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 15:49:55 -0500 Subject: [csw-users] drupal 6.14 now in testing Message-ID: <4ACBAD73.2060905@opencsw.org> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Changes: updated to 6.14 - -- ~Mike "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius -- and a lot of courage -- to move in the opposite direction." --> Albert Einstein 1879 - 1955 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (SunOS) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkrLrXMACgkQLrhmsXMSLxdK2gCeNtf1v6nNziHzQG9CtyH/TRka 32AAmgJWzM3fQa8sNJCjDt8ZeEr1QAjs =BD0J -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From karl at seven.com Wed Oct 7 05:02:40 2009 From: karl at seven.com (Karl J. Smith) Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 20:02:40 -0700 Subject: [csw-users] emacs_nox has a x dependency? Message-ID: <4ACC04D0.9070006@seven.com> Hi, I previously had version 22 of emacs_nox installed on a machine without any X Window System packages. It worked well. When trying to upgrade to version 23, I find that there is now a dependency for SUNWxwice which wasn't there before. emacs_nox pulls in emacs_common, which has the following dependency error. Is there any easy way around this? root at ap1.p3.uk:/var/pkg-get> pkg-get -u emacs_common No existing install of CSWemacscommon found. Installing... Pre-existing local file emacs_common-23.1,REV=2009.08.18-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz matches checksum Keeping existing file Analysing special files... Trying to install dependancy m17ndb No existing install of CSWm17ndb found. Installing... Pre-existing local file m17ndb-1.5.5,REV=2009.08.07-SunOS5.8-all-CSW.pkg.gz matches checksum Keeping existing file Analysing special files... Trying to install dependancy libm17n No existing install of CSWlibm17n found. Installing... Pre-existing local file libm17n-1.5.4,REV=2009.08.07-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz matches checksum Keeping existing file Analysing special files... Hmmm. Retrying with different archive offset...1692 blocks Trying to install dependancy libotf No existing install of CSWlibotf found. Installing... Pre-existing local file libotf-0.9.9,REV=2009.08.04-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz matches checksum Keeping existing file Analysing special files... ERROR: no info for *SUNWxwice.* Cannot install dependancy. ERROR: could not install required dependancies for CSWlibotf Once dependancies are up to date, call /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -i libotf to (re)install ERROR: install of CSWlibotf failed ERROR: could not install required dependancies for CSWlibm17n Once dependancies are up to date, call /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -i libm17n to (re)install ERROR: install of CSWlibm17n failed ERROR: could not install required dependancies for CSWm17ndb Once dependancies are up to date, call /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -i m17ndb to (re)install ERROR: install of CSWm17ndb failed ERROR: could not install required dependancies for CSWemacscommon Once dependancies are up to date, call /opt/csw/bin/pkg-get -i emacs_common to (re)install -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From maciej at opencsw.org Wed Oct 7 13:02:10 2009 From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 12:02:10 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] urxvt-9.06 with a libev workaround in testing Message-ID: There was an issue with urxvt for which I've found a workaround thanks to a blogger from livejournal[1]. The error message was: (libev) port_getn: Error 0 I've created a package with a workaround: http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/urxvt-9.06,REV=2009.10.06-SunOS5.10-i386-CSW.pkg.gz http://mirror.opencsw.org/testing/urxvt-9.06,REV=2009.10.06-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz Enjoy your unicode terminals! As a side note, urxvt won't be released in OpenCSW in the near future; the problem is that it doesn't build on Solaris 10, and I don't have the bandwidth to make it compile on Solaris 8. If you're interested in making it work on Solaris 8, I'll be happy to help you with setting up the environment. There's also the possibility of getting an account on the buildfarm. Maciej [1] http://cptsalek.livejournal.com/2558.html From aaron at ernieball.com Thu Oct 8 16:59:44 2009 From: aaron at ernieball.com (Aaron Wilson) Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2009 07:59:44 -0700 Subject: [csw-users] evince odesn't start when called by firefox In-Reply-To: <200910061326.n96DQo8e012345@dfki.uni-kl.de> References: <200910061326.n96DQo8e012345@dfki.uni-kl.de> Message-ID: <4ACDFE60.3020508@ernieball.com> Actually I kind of have seen this. Years ago I created a shell script with the help of someone from this list so my users could open up pdf's in the native Solaris version of Evolution I would get an error if I tried to open a pdf in evolution with /opt/csw/bin/evince So we created a script that I put at /opt/csw/bin/evince.sh The contents of that scritpt: #!/bin/sh unset LD_LIBRARY_PATH exec /opt/csw/bin/evince "$@" I've had that set as the default pdf handler in both Evolution and Firefox for years now. Recently I did update to Firefox 3.53 from http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/3.5.3/contrib/ Since upgrading my old evince.sh handler stopped working, so I tried just setting Firefox to use evince and now I can open pdfs again with Firefox. Maybe you'd have luck with that evince.sh script? -- Aaron Nicolai Schwindt wrote: >> hello all, >> i'm using firefox-3.5.3 from sun contribs, on a solaris 10 sparc machine. >> I've got this error: >> > [...] > >> but it works with xpdf. >> > > xpdf does not depend on pango - evince seems to. > Firefox probably set an LD_LIBRARY_PATH, so evince finds the wrong pango lib. > > > >> Anybody has seen it? >> > > under /usr/local - not anymore since bsd. > > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/users > From t.gollnick at gmail.com Fri Oct 16 10:15:52 2009 From: t.gollnick at gmail.com (Torsten Gollnick) Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 10:15:52 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] i386 libraries in mercurial for Solaris sparc Message-ID: Hello, mercurial does not work for me on Solaris Sparc due to i386 libs. I use url=http://ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/opencsw/current did pkg-get -U and pkg-get -u The package version is mercurial 1.3.1,REV=2009.10.03 How can I brief the maintainer? Torsten starting hg gives $ hg Traceback (most recent call last): File "/opt/csw/bin/hg", line 27, in mercurial.dispatch.run() File "/opt/csw/lib/python/site-packages/mercurial/dispatch.py", line 16, in run sys.exit(dispatch(sys.argv[1:])) File "/opt/csw/lib/python/site-packages/mercurial/dispatch.py", line 21, in dispatch u = _ui.ui() File "/opt/csw/lib/python/site-packages/mercurial/ui.py", line 35, in __init__ for f in util.rcpath(): File "/opt/csw/lib/python/site-packages/mercurial/util.py", line 1217, in rcpath _rcpath = os_rcpath() File "/opt/csw/lib/python/site-packages/mercurial/util.py", line 1193, in os_rcpath path = system_rcpath() File "/opt/csw/lib/python/site-packages/mercurial/posix.py", line 41, in system_rcpath '/../etc/mercurial')) File "/opt/csw/lib/python/site-packages/mercurial/posix.py", line 30, in rcfiles for f, kind in osutil.listdir(rcdir) File "/opt/csw/lib/python/site-packages/mercurial/demandimport.py", line 75, in __getattribute__ self._load() File "/opt/csw/lib/python/site-packages/mercurial/demandimport.py", line 47, in _load mod = _origimport(head, globals, locals) ImportError: ld.so.1: python: fatal: /opt/csw/lib/python/site-packages/mercurial/osutil.so: wrong ELF data format: ELFDATA2LSB and file /opt/csw/lib/python/site-packages/mercurial/osutil.so /opt/csw/lib/python/site-packages/mercurial/osutil.so: ELF 32-bit LSB dynamic lib 80386 Version 1, dynamically linked, not stripped The packge is Processing package instance from From maciej at opencsw.org Fri Oct 16 10:51:06 2009 From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski) Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 09:51:06 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] i386 libraries in mercurial for Solaris sparc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Torsten Gollnick wrote: > Hello, > > mercurial does not work for me on Solaris Sparc due to i386 libs. > I use > url=http://ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/opencsw/current > did pkg-get -U and pkg-get -u > > The package version is ?mercurial 1.3.1,REV=2009.10.03 > > How can I brief the maintainer? I'd suggest filing a bug at http://www.opencsw.org/bugtrack/ Maciej From dam at opencsw.org Mon Oct 19 07:53:07 2009 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 07:53:07 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] BerkeleyDB upgrade Message-ID: Dear users, I have now finally assembled a new and complete rebuild of the Berkeley DB libraries. In the new schema every version of BDB is sitting in a separate subdirectory, that means Berkeley DB X.Y.Z is located at /opt/csw/bdbXY/(bin|lib|...) The repackaged versions contain 3.3, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, 4.7 and 4.8. If necessary the legacy packages needed as dependencies have been replaced by stubs containing minimal links to the new locations with a respective dependency in the package. The following packages have been updated: CATALOGNAME PACKAGENAME berkeleydb CSWbdb berkeleydb3 CSWbdb3 berkeleydb3_devel CSWbdb3devel berkeleydb3_doc CSWbdb3doc berkeleydb4 CSWbdb4 berkeleydb42 CSWbdb42 berkeleydb42_devel CSWbdb42devel berkeleydb42_doc CSWbdb42doc berkeleydb43 CSWbdb43 berkeleydb43_devel CSWbdb43-devel berkeleydb43_doc CSWbdb43-doc berkeleydb44 CSWbdb44 berkeleydb44_devel CSWbdb44-devel berkeleydb44_doc CSWbdb44-doc berkeleydb47 CSWbdb47 berkeleydb47_devel CSWbdb47devel berkeleydb47_doc CSWbdb47doc berkeleydb48 CSWbdb48 berkeleydb48_devel CSWbdb48devel berkeleydb48_doc CSWbdb48doc The following packages are deprecated: - CSWbdb was newly introduced during the unification. It contains now only symlinks pointing inside CSWbdb47. The package will go away when all dependant packages habe been recompiled against CSWbdb47. /opt/csw/lib/amd64/libdb-4.7.so=../../bdb47/lib/amd64/libdb-4.7.so /opt/csw/lib/libdb-4.7.so=../bdb47/lib/libdb-4.7.so - CSWbdb4 contained the original Berkeley DB 4.2 in /opt/csw/bdb4. The package now contains /opt/csw/bdb4=bdb42 The following packages do not exist any more as the base packages are deprecated: - berkeleydb_doc CSWbdbdoc - berkeleydb_devel CSWbdbdevel - berkeleydb4_doc CSWbdb4-doc The following package names have been kept to match the existing naming. The package names will be adjusted at a later date with proper announcement: - berkeleydb43_devel CSWbdb43-devel - berkeleydb43_doc CSWbdb43-doc - berkeleydb44_devel CSWbdb44-devel - berkeleydb44_doc CSWbdb44-doc Should you encounter any issues please post to users@ as usual. Best regards -- Dago From james at opencsw.org Mon Oct 19 14:57:31 2009 From: james at opencsw.org (James Lee) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:57:31 GMT Subject: [csw-users] BerkeleyDB upgrade breaks OpenOffice.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20091019.12573100.684502501@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk> On 19/10/09, 06:53:07, Dagobert Michelsen wrote regarding [csw-users] BerkeleyDB upgrade: > - CSWbdb4 contained the original Berkeley DB 4.2 in /opt/csw/bdb4. > The package now contains > /opt/csw/bdb4=bdb42 This change breaks OpenOffice.org. Previously CSWbdb4 contained links to 4.7 Please DO NOT update BerkeleyDB until the repackage ooocore has also been released. James. From james at opencsw.org Wed Oct 21 17:53:16 2009 From: james at opencsw.org (James Lee) Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:53:16 GMT Subject: [csw-users] BerkeleyDB upgrade breaks OpenOffice.org In-Reply-To: <20091019.12573100.684502501@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk> References: <20091019.12573100.684502501@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk> Message-ID: <20091021.15531600.2065320642@gyor.oxdrove.co.uk> On 19/10/09, 13:57:31, James Lee wrote regarding Re: [csw-users] BerkeleyDB upgrade breaks OpenOffice.org: > > - CSWbdb4 contained the original Berkeley DB 4.2 in /opt/csw/bdb4. > > The package now contains > > /opt/csw/bdb4=bdb42 > This change breaks OpenOffice.org. Previously CSWbdb4 contained > links to 4.7 > Please DO NOT update BerkeleyDB until the repackage ooocore has also > been released. The updated ooocore is now released and should fix the moved BDB-4.7 problem. James. From maciej at opencsw.org Thu Oct 22 12:14:18 2009 From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski) Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 11:14:18 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] request tracker: new release? In-Reply-To: <4AC6F72B.4080001@cmi.univ-mrs.fr> References: <4AC6F72B.4080001@cmi.univ-mrs.fr> Message-ID: On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 8:03 AM, gerard wrote: > hello all, > i'm using RT 3.6.6, and i notice that the offocial release is actually 3.8 > According to http://www.opencsw.org/packages/rt, the maintainer is retired. > He did a very very good job. > Is there a chance to have a newer release? I saw packages such as sendmail (the same previous maintainer) being reworked from scratch. I'm afraid the same thing has to be done for rt. Would you like to try building it yourself? I can give you a hand with getting started. Maciej From dam at opencsw.org Thu Oct 22 13:23:57 2009 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:23:57 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] request tracker: new release? In-Reply-To: References: <4AC6F72B.4080001@cmi.univ-mrs.fr> Message-ID: Hi, Am 22.10.2009 um 12:14 schrieb Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski: > On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 8:03 AM, gerard wrote: >> hello all, >> i'm using RT 3.6.6, and i notice that the offocial release is >> actually 3.8 >> According to http://www.opencsw.org/packages/rt, the maintainer is >> retired. >> He did a very very good job. >> Is there a chance to have a newer release? > > I saw packages such as sendmail (the same previous maintainer) being > reworked from scratch. I'm afraid the same thing has to be done for > rt. Would you like to try building it yourself? I can give you a hand > with getting started. And you wouldn't have to deal with all the Perl modules, I'll update what is needed. Best regards -- Dago From gadavis at ucsd.edu Fri Oct 23 02:27:22 2009 From: gadavis at ucsd.edu (Geoff Davis) Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 17:27:22 -0700 Subject: [csw-users] PHP5 PEAR Modules with OpenCSW Message-ID: Hi all, My users want a PEAR module installed in PHP5. I've done this by hand on one or two systems, but I fear there may be more coming thus adding to my administrative burden. I was wondering if there were any plans to start packaging non- standard PEAR modules like the various Perl and Python modules are packaged. Thanks, Geoff From bwalton at opencsw.org Fri Oct 23 02:55:54 2009 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 20:55:54 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] syslogging package actions Message-ID: <1256258943-sup-1784@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> Hi All, I just placed cswpkglogger in testing/. It will log to user.notice package install, upgrade and remove actions. This is similar to what you can find in yum and via different mechanisms in debian-based systems. It's the first tool to leverage the new hook capabilities in pkgutil. Thanks -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 GPG Key Id: 8E89F6D2; Key Server: pgp.mit.edu Contact me to arrange for a CAcert assurance meeting. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From dam at opencsw.org Fri Oct 23 11:24:37 2009 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 11:24:37 +0200 Subject: [csw-users] PHP5 PEAR Modules with OpenCSW In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <38D2880E-AF46-4F6A-B04A-C2984CD61260@opencsw.org> Hi Geoff, Am 23.10.2009 um 02:27 schrieb Geoff Davis: > My users want a PEAR module installed in PHP5. I've done this by > hand on one or two systems, but I fear there may be more coming thus > adding to my administrative burden. > > I was wondering if there were any plans to start packaging non- > standard PEAR modules like the various Perl and Python modules are > packaged. Sure, why not. How about joining in and package up what you need? Of course we'll help setting up the necessary framework in GAR to do this as easily as possible. Best regards -- Dago From bwalton at opencsw.org Fri Oct 23 15:41:57 2009 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 09:41:57 -0400 Subject: [csw-users] syslogging package actions In-Reply-To: <1256258943-sup-1784@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> References: <1256258943-sup-1784@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: <1256305284-sup-8778@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> Excerpts from Ben Walton's message of Thu Oct 22 20:55:54 -0400 2009: > I just placed cswpkglogger in testing/. It will log to user.notice Repackaged as cswpkgsyslog after some feedback. -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 GPG Key Id: 8E89F6D2; Key Server: pgp.mit.edu Contact me to arrange for a CAcert assurance meeting. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From wib at cs.uni-kiel.de Wed Oct 28 10:50:05 2009 From: wib at cs.uni-kiel.de (Willi Burmeister) Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 10:50:05 +0100 Subject: [csw-users] no fonts after Blastwave -> OpenCSW migration Message-ID: <20091028095005.GA26718@eden.cs.uni-kiel.de> Hi, recently I changed one of our systems from Blastwave to OpenCSW. I removed every Blastwave package and even the /opt/csw directory. After that I installed pkg-get from OpenCSW and a lot of kde packages: % pkg-get -l | egrep -i kde kde_gcc kde_gcc_dtlogin kde_i18n_de kdeaccess_gcc kdeaddons_gcc kdeadmin_gcc kdeartwork_gcc kdebase_gcc kdeedu_gcc kdegames_gcc kdegraphics_gcc kdelibs_gcc kdemultimedia_gcc kdenetwork_gcc kdepim_gcc kdesdk kdesdkcommon kdetoys_gcc kdeutils_gcc kdevelop kdevelopcommon But something must be missing. I can't see any menu text on any kde application. Fonts seems to be missing completly. But gnome apps (from Sun and from OpenCSW) shows up correctly and /var/opt/csw/cache/fontconfig ist filled with a lot of files. Any help is appreciated Thanks Willi