From freddy.dsx at free.fr Sat Apr 4 12:23:59 2015 From: freddy.dsx at free.fr (Freddy DISSAUX) Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2015 12:23:59 +0200 Subject: fossil 1.32 update Message-ID: <20150404102358.GI7454@linutop.bsdsx.fr> Helo, patch for fossil 1.32. Regards, -------------- next part -------------- Index: Makefile =================================================================== --- Makefile (revision 24788) +++ Makefile (working copy) @@ -2,10 +2,9 @@ # TODO (release-critical prefixed with !, non release-critical with *) # Recipe sent in by Freddy DISSAUX freddy.dsx free.fr NAME = fossil -VERSION = 1.30 +VERSION = 1.32 GARTYPE = v2 GARCOMPILER = GNU -DISTVERSION = 20150119112900 DESCRIPTION = DSCM with built-in wiki, http interface and server, tickets database define BLURB Fossil is an easy-to-use Distributed Source Control Management system (DSCM) @@ -15,9 +14,7 @@ VENDOR_URL = http://www.fossil-scm.org/ MASTER_SITES = http://www.fossil-scm.org/download/ -DISTFILES = $(NAME)-src-$(DISTVERSION).tar.gz -WORKSRC = $(WORKDIR)/$(NAME)-src-$(DISTVERSION) -PATCHDIR = $(WORKSRC) +DISTFILES = $(NAME)-src-$(VERSION).tar.gz BUILD_DEP_PKGS = CSWlibssl-dev Index: checksums =================================================================== --- checksums (revision 24788) +++ checksums (working copy) @@ -1 +1 @@ -dd7cf91c2725ea8aaa0913330fffa0ff fossil-src-20150119112900.tar.gz +ddf352925a795e574925505b9344a58e fossil-src-1.32.tar.gz From dam at opencsw.org Sat Apr 4 23:57:04 2015 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2015 23:57:04 +0200 Subject: fossil 1.32 update In-Reply-To: <20150404102358.GI7454@linutop.bsdsx.fr> References: <20150404102358.GI7454@linutop.bsdsx.fr> Message-ID: <9F1EB29B-06D4-4B64-81A7-FE0A20529094@opencsw.org> Hi Freddy, > Am 04.04.2015 um 12:23 schrieb Freddy DISSAUX : > > Helo, > > patch for fossil 1.32. Thanks for the patch, I applied it and made some reformatting with respect to the latest standards. Fossil 1.32 has been rebuild and pushed to unstable. Best regards ? Dago -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 2418 bytes Desc: not available URL: From dam at opencsw.org Tue Apr 7 12:03:55 2015 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2015 12:03:55 +0200 Subject: OpenCSW question about package adobereader In-Reply-To: <201504070042.t370gGBI023927@www.opencsw.org> References: <201504070042.t370gGBI023927@www.opencsw.org> Message-ID: Hi Denber, > Am 07.04.2015 um 02:42 schrieb denber at mindspring.com: > > On a Sun Blade 2500 running Solaris 10 Sparc 64 I installed the OpenCSW acroread package and got this. Thing is, I do have libgcc_s.so.1. Any iudea what went wrong? Thanks. > > # pwd > /opt/csw/share/Adobe/Reader8/bin > # acroread > ld.so.1: acroread: fatal: libgcc_s.so.1: version \'GCC_3.4\' not found (required by file /opt/csw/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0) > ld.so.1: acroread: fatal: libgcc_s.so.1: open failed: No such file or directory > ld.so.1: acroread: fatal: libgcc_s.so.1: version \'GCC_3.4\' not found (required by file /opt/csw/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0) > ld.so.1: acroread: fatal: libgcc_s.so.1: open failed: No such file or directory > ld.so.1: acroread: fatal: libgcc_s.so.1: version \'GCC_4.3.0\' not found (required by file /opt/csw/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0) > ld.so.1: acroread: fatal: libgcc_s.so.1: open failed: No such file or directory > ld.so.1: acroread: fatal: libgcc_s.so.1: version \'GCC_4.3.0\' not found (required by file /opt/csw/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0) > ld.so.1: acroread: fatal: libgcc_s.so.1: open failed: No such file or directory > ld.so.1: acroread: fatal: libgcc_s.so.1: version \'GCC_4.3.0\' not found (required by file /opt/csw/lib/libgio-2.0.so.0) > ld.so.1: acroread: fatal: libgcc_s.so.1: open failed: No such file or directory > ld.so.1: acroread: fatal: libgcc_s.so.1: version \'GCC_4.3.0\' not found (required by file /opt/csw/lib/libgio-2.0.so.0) > ld.so.1: acroread: fatal: libgcc_s.so.1: open failed: No such file or directory > ld.so.1: acroread: fatal: libgcc_s.so.1: version \'GCC_4.3.0\' not found (required by file /opt/csw/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0) > ld.so.1: acroread: fatal: libgcc_s.so.1: open failed: No such file or directory > ld.so.1: acroread: fatal: relocation error: file /opt/csw/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0: symbol __clzsi2: referenced symbol not found > Killed > # I can confirm the error. This is the original invocation: LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/opt/csw/share/Adobe/Reader8/Reader/sparcsolaris/lib:/opt/csw/share/Adobe/Reader8/Reader/sparcsolaris/sidecars::/opt/csw/lib ldd /opt/csw/share/Adobe/Reader8/Reader/sparcsolaris/bin/acroread This fixes the error: LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/opt/csw/share/Adobe/Reader8/Reader/sparcsolaris/lib:/opt/csw/share/Adobe/Reader8/Reader/sparcsolaris/sidecars:/usr/lib:/usr/sfw/lib:/opt/csw/lib ldd /opt/csw/share/Adobe/Reader8/Reader/sparcsolaris/bin/acroread In /opt/csw/share/Adobe/Reader8/bin/acroread please replace the commented line with the uncommented one: #LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/opt/csw/lib LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib:/usr/sfw/lib Initially the package worked as it is, maybe some changes to our gtk/glib/pango etc. libs are now no longer compatible. Let me know if this fixes your issue. Best regards ? Dago -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 2418 bytes Desc: not available URL: From dam at opencsw.org Wed Apr 8 16:31:34 2015 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2015 16:31:34 +0200 Subject: OpenCSW question about package adobereader In-Reply-To: <552473B6.9080707@mindspring.com> References: <55247119.1050702@mindspring.com> <552473B6.9080707@mindspring.com> Message-ID: Hi Michele, > Am 08.04.2015 um 02:17 schrieb Michele Denber : > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: OpenCSW question about package adobereader > Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2015 12:03:55 +0200 > From: Dagobert Michelsen > To: denber at mindspring.com > CC: Questions and discussions > > Hi Denber, > > > I can confirm the error. > > This is the original invocation: > LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/opt/csw/share/Adobe/Reader8/Reader/sparcsolaris/lib:/opt/csw/share/Adobe/Reader8/Reader/sparcsolaris/sidecars::/opt/csw/lib ldd /opt/csw/share/Adobe/Reader8/Reader/sparcsolaris/bin/acroread > > This fixes the error: > LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/opt/csw/share/Adobe/Reader8/Reader/sparcsolaris/lib:/opt/csw/share/Adobe/Reader8/Reader/sparcsolaris/sidecars:/usr/lib:/usr/sfw/lib:/opt/csw/lib ldd /opt/csw/share/Adobe/Reader8/Reader/sparcsolaris/bin/acroread > > In /opt/csw/share/Adobe/Reader8/bin/acroread please replace the commented line with the uncommented one: > #LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/opt/csw/lib > LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib:/usr/sfw/lib > > Initially the package worked as it is, maybe some changes to our gtk/glib/pango etc. libs are now no longer > compatible. > > Let me know if this fixes your issue. > > It was a good idea but that didn't work: > > > # LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib:/usr/sfw/lib > # export LD_LIBRARY_PATH > # echo $LD_LIBRARY_PATH > /usr/lib:/usr/sfw/lib > # acroread > ld.so.1: acroread: fatal: libgcc_s.so.1: version 'GCC_3.4' not found (required by file /opt/csw/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0) > ld.so.1: acroread: fatal: libgcc_s.so.1: open failed: No such file or directory > ld.so.1: acroread: fatal: libgcc_s.so.1: version 'GCC_3.4' not found (required by file /opt/csw/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0) > ld.so.1: acroread: fatal: libgcc_s.so.1: open failed: No such file or directory > ld.so.1: acroread: fatal: libgcc_s.so.1: version 'GCC_4.3.0' not found (required by file /opt/csw/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0) > ld.so.1: acroread: fatal: libgcc_s.so.1: open failed: No such file or directory > ld.so.1: acroread: fatal: libgcc_s.so.1: version 'GCC_4.3.0' not found (required by file /opt/csw/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0) > ld.so.1: acroread: fatal: libgcc_s.so.1: open failed: No such file or directory > ld.so.1: acroread: fatal: libgcc_s.so.1: version 'GCC_4.3.0' not found (required by file /opt/csw/lib/libgio-2.0.so.0) > ld.so.1: acroread: fatal: libgcc_s.so.1: open failed: No such file or directory > ld.so.1: acroread: fatal: libgcc_s.so.1: version 'GCC_4.3.0' not found (required by file /opt/csw/lib/libgio-2.0.so.0) > ld.so.1: acroread: fatal: libgcc_s.so.1: open failed: No such file or directory > ld.so.1: acroread: fatal: libgcc_s.so.1: version 'GCC_4.3.0' not found (required by file /opt/csw/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0) > ld.so.1: acroread: fatal: libgcc_s.so.1: open failed: No such file or directory > ld.so.1: acroread: fatal: relocation error: file /opt/csw/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0: symbol __clzsi2: referenced symbol not found > Killed > # > > I do think though that it may very well be a library version issue. Just yesterday I had a similar problem around Open Office. Changing the library path there fixed that. I just don't know how to determine which version of whatever it is it wants. > > I'm not a systems programmer or anything so I really don't know what to make of this. You cannot set LD_LIBRARY_PATH on the command, my suggestion was to change the line in the file. I have made experimental packages which have been adjusted: http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/experimental.html#adobereader Please give them a try and let me know, if they work I?ll push them to unstable/. Best regards ? Dago -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 2418 bytes Desc: not available URL: From Tucker.Berckmann at sandisk.com Wed Apr 8 20:50:58 2015 From: Tucker.Berckmann at sandisk.com (Tucker Berckmann) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2015 18:50:58 +0000 Subject: Unable to perform basic setup Message-ID: Hello, I am having the same problem as Richard was: http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/users/2015-February/009972.html My questions are: * How do I add a now post to an existing thread? I am new to this forum and I don't know how to use it. Ideally, I would have responded to Dagobert instead of creating a new thread. * What is the resolution to this issue? I am using a vanilla install of Solaris 11.2. I don't know my pkgadd patchlevel, or even how to find it out. * Assuming the issue doesn't get resolved, how I download packages manually? I don't have a second Solaris machine with a working pkg-add, as recommended on the setup guide. Can't I just download packages individually to /var/spool/pkg and run pkgadd? Thanks, Tucker Berckmann ________________________________ PLEASE NOTE: The information contained in this electronic mail message is intended only for the use of the designated recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender by telephone or e-mail (as shown above) immediately and destroy any and all copies of this message in your possession (whether hard copies or electronically stored copies). -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rb4723 at att.com Wed Apr 8 22:00:31 2015 From: rb4723 at att.com (BRIGGS, RICHARD A) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2015 20:00:31 +0000 Subject: Unable to perform basic setup In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <0492D9B0A98BE2499F1C3398FD0C7DBE25CEFCB1@MOSTLS1MSGUSRFB.ITServices.sbc.com> Try this: # wget http://www.opencsw.org/pkg_get.pkg If it fails... you probably have firewall or proxy issues.... Then try this: How to use my proxy when downloading? You should set this personally in ~/.wgetrc or globally in /etc/wgetrc (or /etc/opt/csw/wgetrc if you're using wget from OpenCSW). You can also set it in pkgutil.conf by using the wgetopts option. wgetopts=--execute http_proxy=http://proxy.foo.com From: users [mailto:users-bounces+rb4723=att.com at lists.opencsw.org] On Behalf Of Tucker Berckmann Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2015 1:51 PM To: users at lists.opencsw.org Subject: Unable to perform basic setup Hello, I am having the same problem as Richard was: http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/users/2015-February/009972.html My questions are: * How do I add a now post to an existing thread? I am new to this forum and I don't know how to use it. Ideally, I would have responded to Dagobert instead of creating a new thread. * What is the resolution to this issue? I am using a vanilla install of Solaris 11.2. I don't know my pkgadd patchlevel, or even how to find it out. * Assuming the issue doesn't get resolved, how I download packages manually? I don't have a second Solaris machine with a working pkg-add, as recommended on the setup guide. Can't I just download packages individually to /var/spool/pkg and run pkgadd? Thanks, Tucker Berckmann ________________________________ PLEASE NOTE: The information contained in this electronic mail message is intended only for the use of the designated recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender by telephone or e-mail (as shown above) immediately and destroy any and all copies of this message in your possession (whether hard copies or electronically stored copies). -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Tucker.Berckmann at sandisk.com Thu Apr 9 20:40:02 2015 From: Tucker.Berckmann at sandisk.com (Tucker Berckmann) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2015 18:40:02 +0000 Subject: Unable to perform basic setup In-Reply-To: <0492D9B0A98BE2499F1C3398FD0C7DBE25CEFCB1@MOSTLS1MSGUSRFB.ITServices.sbc.com> References: <0492D9B0A98BE2499F1C3398FD0C7DBE25CEFCB1@MOSTLS1MSGUSRFB.ITServices.sbc.com> Message-ID: Richard, It was a network issue on my side, which has since been resolved. Now I can download packages according to the instructions. Thanks, Tucker From: , RICHARD A > Reply-To: Questions and discussions > Date: Wednesday, April 8, 2015 1:00 PM To: Questions and discussions > Subject: RE: Unable to perform basic setup Try this: # wget http://www.opencsw.org/pkg_get.pkg If it fails? you probably have firewall or proxy issues?. Then try this: How to use my proxy when downloading? You should set this personally in ~/.wgetrc or globally in /etc/wgetrc (or /etc/opt/csw/wgetrc if you're using wget from OpenCSW). You can also set it in pkgutil.conf by using the wgetopts option. wgetopts=--execute http_proxy=http://proxy.foo.com From: users [mailto:users-bounces+rb4723=att.com at lists.opencsw.org] On Behalf Of Tucker Berckmann Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2015 1:51 PM To: users at lists.opencsw.org Subject: Unable to perform basic setup Hello, I am having the same problem as Richard was: http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/users/2015-February/009972.html My questions are: * How do I add a now post to an existing thread? I am new to this forum and I don't know how to use it. Ideally, I would have responded to Dagobert instead of creating a new thread. * What is the resolution to this issue? I am using a vanilla install of Solaris 11.2. I don't know my pkgadd patchlevel, or even how to find it out. * Assuming the issue doesn't get resolved, how I download packages manually? I don't have a second Solaris machine with a working pkg-add, as recommended on the setup guide. Can't I just download packages individually to /var/spool/pkg and run pkgadd? Thanks, Tucker Berckmann ________________________________ PLEASE NOTE: The information contained in this electronic mail message is intended only for the use of the designated recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender by telephone or e-mail (as shown above) immediately and destroy any and all copies of this message in your possession (whether hard copies or electronically stored copies). -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From tstrain at planetpayment.com Mon Apr 13 16:43:34 2015 From: tstrain at planetpayment.com (Todd Strain) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 14:43:34 +0000 Subject: Custom packages in OpenCSW format. Message-ID: <90CAE261D47F604A93B4726ACB61936F4869358F@LAN-MBX01-DE.planetpayment.com> I've created my own Solaris packages for our custom software using the document found here. I've left them in the directory format. http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/packages/solaris/i86pc/html/creating.solaris.packages.html Then I converted those packages to an OpenCSW-format following this document. https://automatthias.wordpress.com/2009/11/26/sunw-packages-in-an-opencsw-format-catalog/#comment-19656 I then build the catalaog using ?bldcat? command. Everything looks fine at this point as "pkgutil -U" will update the host, and "pkgutil -a" shows all my packages. But "pkgutil --install" fails saying the package is not in the catalog. Can anyone tell me the proper way to add custom software to OpenCSW catalog format? I've seen the OpenCSW packaging tutorial on Youtube from Maciej Blizinski but this doesn't directly apply to me as my packages are just a collection of flat files and do not have to be compiled. Thank you, Todd ________________________________ CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information belonging to the sender and is only to be used by the intended recipient. Unless you are the intended recipient (or authorized to receive on their behalf), you may not: (a) use or act in reliance on this e-mail message or attachments, and/or (b) copy or disclose to anyone this e-mail message or any information contained in or attached to this e-mail message. If you received this in error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail and delete this message and any attachments.? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jh at opencsw.org Mon Apr 13 16:48:13 2015 From: jh at opencsw.org (Jan Holzhueter) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 16:48:13 +0200 Subject: Custom packages in OpenCSW format. In-Reply-To: <90CAE261D47F604A93B4726ACB61936F4869358F@LAN-MBX01-DE.planetpayment.com> References: <90CAE261D47F604A93B4726ACB61936F4869358F@LAN-MBX01-DE.planetpayment.com> Message-ID: <552BD72D.9090600@opencsw.org> Hi, Am 13.04.15 um 16:43 schrieb Todd Strain: > > > I then build the catalaog using ?bldcat? command. Everything looks fine > at this point as "pkgutil -U" will update the host, and "pkgutil -a" > shows all my packages. But "pkgutil --install" fails saying the package > is not in the catalog. > > > > Can anyone tell me the proper way to add custom software to OpenCSW > catalog format? not sure if that's the problem: # Support non-CSW packages. If you have your own packages that have a different # prefix that you want to use with pkgutil you must enable this otherwise # pkgutil will skip every package not prefixed by CSW. # NOTE: this also affects options like -c/C, however it's easy to filter the # output if wanted, e.g. "pkgutil -C CSW". # Default: false #noncsw=true Did you set noncsw=true in pkgutil.conf? Greetings Jan From dam at opencsw.org Mon Apr 13 16:49:36 2015 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 16:49:36 +0200 Subject: Custom packages in OpenCSW format. In-Reply-To: <90CAE261D47F604A93B4726ACB61936F4869358F@LAN-MBX01-DE.planetpayment.com> References: <90CAE261D47F604A93B4726ACB61936F4869358F@LAN-MBX01-DE.planetpayment.com> Message-ID: Hi Todd, Am 13.04.2015 um 16:43 schrieb Todd Strain : > I've created my own Solaris packages for our custom software using the document found here. I've left them in the directory format. I am not sure if this will work, usually packages are either datastream or gzipped datastream. > Then I converted those packages to an OpenCSW-format following this document. > > https://automatthias.wordpress.com/2009/11/26/sunw-packages-in-an-opencsw-format-catalog/#comment-19656 > > I then build the catalaog using ?bldcat? command. Everything looks fine at this point as "pkgutil -U" will update the host, and "pkgutil -a" shows all my packages. But "pkgutil --install" fails saying the package is not in the catalog. > > Can anyone tell me the proper way to add custom software to OpenCSW catalog format? Where did you put the packages/run bldcat and what is your configuration for ?mirror? in pkgutil.conf? pkgutil requires a specific directory layout like /(sparc|i386)/(5.9|5.10|5.11)/ You may find this useful, although it may be too specific for your need: https://sourceforge.net/p/opencsw/code/HEAD/tree/buildfarm/bin/cswcatalog Best regards ? Dago -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 2418 bytes Desc: not available URL: From bonivart at opencsw.org Mon Apr 13 16:54:20 2015 From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 16:54:20 +0200 Subject: Custom packages in OpenCSW format. In-Reply-To: <90CAE261D47F604A93B4726ACB61936F4869358F@LAN-MBX01-DE.planetpayment.com> References: <90CAE261D47F604A93B4726ACB61936F4869358F@LAN-MBX01-DE.planetpayment.com> Message-ID: On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Todd Strain wrote: > I then build the catalaog using "bldcat" command. Everything looks fine at > this point as "pkgutil -U" will update the host, and "pkgutil -a" shows all > my packages. But "pkgutil --install" fails saying the package is not in the > catalog. Can you provide some output from those commands? From tstrain at planetpayment.com Mon Apr 13 17:09:58 2015 From: tstrain at planetpayment.com (Todd Strain) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 15:09:58 +0000 Subject: Custom packages in OpenCSW format. In-Reply-To: <552BD72D.9090600@opencsw.org> References: <90CAE261D47F604A93B4726ACB61936F4869358F@LAN-MBX01-DE.planetpayment.com> <552BD72D.9090600@opencsw.org> Message-ID: <90CAE261D47F604A93B4726ACB61936F486936A8@LAN-MBX01-DE.planetpayment.com> Jan, Thanks you for quick response. Your solution did fix my issue. I just uncommented the "#noncsw=true" line and I am able to install my packages. My packages did not begin with CSW but our stock symbol as suggested by Oracle. I can't believe I missed this in the pkgutil.conf file. However, looking back at the logs of the repo web server I did think it was strange that the host never attempted to contact the repo server. -----Original Message----- From: users [mailto:users-bounces+tstrain=planetpayment.com at lists.opencsw.org] On Behalf Of Jan Holzhueter Sent: Monday, April 13, 2015 10:48 AM To: users at lists.opencsw.org Subject: Re: Custom packages in OpenCSW format. Hi, Am 13.04.15 um 16:43 schrieb Todd Strain: > > > I then build the catalaog using ?bldcat? command. Everything looks > fine at this point as "pkgutil -U" will update the host, and "pkgutil -a" > shows all my packages. But "pkgutil --install" fails saying the > package is not in the catalog. > > > > Can anyone tell me the proper way to add custom software to OpenCSW > catalog format? not sure if that's the problem: # Support non-CSW packages. If you have your own packages that have a different # prefix that you want to use with pkgutil you must enable this otherwise # pkgutil will skip every package not prefixed by CSW. # NOTE: this also affects options like -c/C, however it's easy to filter the # output if wanted, e.g. "pkgutil -C CSW". # Default: false #noncsw=true Did you set noncsw=true in pkgutil.conf? Greetings Jan ________________________________ CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information belonging to the sender and is only to be used by the intended recipient. Unless you are the intended recipient (or authorized to receive on their behalf), you may not: (a) use or act in reliance on this e-mail message or attachments, and/or (b) copy or disclose to anyone this e-mail message or any information contained in or attached to this e-mail message. If you received this in error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail and delete this message and any attachments.? From tstrain at planetpayment.com Mon Apr 13 17:18:58 2015 From: tstrain at planetpayment.com (Todd Strain) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 15:18:58 +0000 Subject: Custom packages in OpenCSW format. In-Reply-To: References: <90CAE261D47F604A93B4726ACB61936F4869358F@LAN-MBX01-DE.planetpayment.com> Message-ID: <90CAE261D47F604A93B4726ACB61936F48693706@LAN-MBX01-DE.planetpayment.com> Dago, My issue was due to the package names not starting with "CSW" but with our stock ticker. The fix was to set the noncsw=true setting in the pkgutil.conf file. But I'd like to answer your questions for anyone else having similar issues. >> I've created my own Solaris packages for our custom software using the document found here. I've left them in the directory format. >I am not sure if this will work, usually packages are either datastream or gzipped datastream. These were left in directory format to be compatible with the process to convert SUNW packages to OpenCSW format. Eventually they ended up as gzipped datastream . > Where did you put the packages/run bldcat and what is your configuration for ?mirror? >in pkgutil.conf? pkgutil requires a specific directory layout like > /(sparc|i386)/(5.9|5.10|5.11)/ I actually did have this directory structure. Thanks, Todd -----Original Message----- From: users [mailto:users-bounces+tstrain=planetpayment.com at lists.opencsw.org] On Behalf Of Dagobert Michelsen Sent: Monday, April 13, 2015 10:50 AM To: Questions and discussions Subject: Re: Custom packages in OpenCSW format. Hi Todd, Am 13.04.2015 um 16:43 schrieb Todd Strain : > I've created my own Solaris packages for our custom software using the document found here. I've left them in the directory format. I am not sure if this will work, usually packages are either datastream or gzipped datastream. > Then I converted those packages to an OpenCSW-format following this document. > > https://automatthias.wordpress.com/2009/11/26/sunw-packages-in-an-opencsw-format-catalog/#comment-19656 > > I then build the catalaog using ?bldcat? command. Everything looks fine at this point as "pkgutil -U" will update the host, and "pkgutil -a" shows all my packages. But "pkgutil --install" fails saying the package is not in the catalog. > > Can anyone tell me the proper way to add custom software to OpenCSW catalog format? Where did you put the packages/run bldcat and what is your configuration for ?mirror? in pkgutil.conf? pkgutil requires a specific directory layout like /(sparc|i386)/(5.9|5.10|5.11)/ You may find this useful, although it may be too specific for your need: https://sourceforge.net/p/opencsw/code/HEAD/tree/buildfarm/bin/cswcatalog Best regards ? Dago -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896 ________________________________ CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information belonging to the sender and is only to be used by the intended recipient. Unless you are the intended recipient (or authorized to receive on their behalf), you may not: (a) use or act in reliance on this e-mail message or attachments, and/or (b) copy or disclose to anyone this e-mail message or any information contained in or attached to this e-mail message. If you received this in error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail and delete this message and any attachments.? From ddoughty at epiqsystems.com Fri Apr 24 15:48:20 2015 From: ddoughty at epiqsystems.com (Doughty, Daniel) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 13:48:20 +0000 Subject: netsnmp won't install because SUNW is too low, but it's not too low Message-ID: My netsnmp install on one of my Solaris boxes works just fine but on another box it won't start up. I've checked and the SUNW package is the same version on both boxes but that is what netsnmp is complaining about: bash-3.00# cat /var/svc/log/network-cswnetsnmpd:default.log [ Apr 24 20:11:22 Disabled. ] [ Apr 24 20:11:23 Rereading configuration. ] [ Apr 24 20:11:23 Enabled. ] [ Apr 24 20:11:23 Executing start method ("/var/opt/csw/svc/method/svc-cswnetsnmpd start") ] -n Starting snmpd: ld.so.1: snmpd: fatal: libc.so.1: version `SUNW_1.22.5' not found (required by file /opt/csw/sbin/snmpd) ld.so.1: snmpd: fatal: libc.so.1: open failed: No such file or directory Killed [ Apr 24 20:11:23 Method "start" exited with status 137 ] [ Apr 24 20:11:23 Executing start method ("/var/opt/csw/svc/method/svc-cswnetsnmpd start") ] -n Starting snmpd: ld.so.1: snmpd: fatal: libc.so.1: version `SUNW_1.22.5' not found (required by file /opt/csw/sbin/snmpd) ld.so.1: snmpd: fatal: libc.so.1: open failed: No such file or directory Killed [ Apr 24 20:11:23 Method "start" exited with status 137 ] [ Apr 24 20:11:23 Executing start method ("/var/opt/csw/svc/method/svc-cswnetsnmpd start") ] -n Starting snmpd: ld.so.1: snmpd: fatal: libc.so.1: version `SUNW_1.22.5' not found (required by file /opt/csw/sbin/snmpd) ld.so.1: snmpd: fatal: libc.so.1: open failed: No such file or directory Killed [ Apr 24 20:11:23 Method "start" exited with status 137 ] [ Apr 24 20:13:03 Rereading configuration. ] bash-3.00# And my libc version is 1.23 which should be higher than 1.22.5 bash-3.00# pvs -no /usr/lib/libc.so /usr/lib/libc.so - SUNW_1.23; /usr/lib/libc.so - SUNWprivate_1.1; bash-3.00# Any advice would be very welcome. Thanks, Dan This communication (including any attachment(s)) is intended solely for the recipient(s) named above and may contain information that is confidential, privileged or legally protected. Any unauthorized use or dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by return e-mail message and delete all copies of the original communication to include any copy that may reside in your sent box. Thank you for your cooperation. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From laurent at opencsw.org Fri Apr 24 16:26:28 2015 From: laurent at opencsw.org (Laurent Blume) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 16:26:28 +0200 Subject: netsnmp won't install because SUNW is too low, but it's not too low In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <553A5294.2080602@opencsw.org> Le 2015/04/24 15:48 +0200, Daniel Doughty a ?crit: > And my libc version is 1.23 which should be higher than 1.22.5 One would think so, but actually, no. Sun had a long tradition of making a mess of any version numbering they use, and this one is no exception. You really need it to explicitly list 1.22.5: $ pvs /usr/lib/libc.so| grep 1.22.5 SUNW_1.22.5; If you don't have it, you need to patch or upgrade to a more recent Solaris. Laurent From ddoughty at epiqsystems.com Fri Apr 24 16:39:57 2015 From: ddoughty at epiqsystems.com (Doughty, Daniel) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 14:39:57 +0000 Subject: netsnmp won't install because SUNW is too low, but it's not too low In-Reply-To: <553A5294.2080602@opencsw.org> References: , <553A5294.2080602@opencsw.org> Message-ID: <2phyyyngx299plt21n3gx9se.1429886391733@email.android.com> I have another server at the same version and it's working there. Thanks for the response. Thanks, Dan Doughty Lead, Unix Team Epiq Systems Phone: 913-621-9886 Cell: 913-225-4438 -------- Original message -------- From: Laurent Blume Date:04/24/2015 9:27 AM (GMT-06:00) To: users at lists.opencsw.org Subject: Re: netsnmp won't install because SUNW is too low, but it's not too low Le 2015/04/24 15:48 +0200, Daniel Doughty a ?crit: > And my libc version is 1.23 which should be higher than 1.22.5 One would think so, but actually, no. Sun had a long tradition of making a mess of any version numbering they use, and this one is no exception. You really need it to explicitly list 1.22.5: $ pvs /usr/lib/libc.so| grep 1.22.5 SUNW_1.22.5; If you don't have it, you need to patch or upgrade to a more recent Solaris. Laurent This communication (including any attachment(s)) is intended solely for the recipient(s) named above and may contain information that is confidential, privileged or legally protected. Any unauthorized use or dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by return e-mail message and delete all copies of the original communication to include any copy that may reside in your sent box. Thank you for your cooperation. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From laurent at opencsw.org Fri Apr 24 16:45:12 2015 From: laurent at opencsw.org (Laurent Blume) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 16:45:12 +0200 Subject: netsnmp won't install because SUNW is too low, but it's not too low In-Reply-To: <2phyyyngx299plt21n3gx9se.1429886391733@email.android.com> References: , <553A5294.2080602@opencsw.org> <2phyyyngx299plt21n3gx9se.1429886391733@email.android.com> Message-ID: <553A56F8.2000901@opencsw.org> Le 2015/04/24 16:39 +0200, Daniel Doughty a ?crit: > I have another server at the same version and it's working there. In a nutshell, not possible :-) Either the netsnmp or the libc.so is different. Check the whole output of pvs libc.so. Laurent From ddoughty at epiqsystems.com Fri Apr 24 17:49:47 2015 From: ddoughty at epiqsystems.com (Doughty, Daniel) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 15:49:47 +0000 Subject: netsnmp won't install because SUNW is too low, but it's not too low In-Reply-To: <553A56F8.2000901@opencsw.org> References: , <553A5294.2080602@opencsw.org> <2phyyyngx299plt21n3gx9se.1429886391733@email.android.com> <553A56F8.2000901@opencsw.org> Message-ID: All caps is used for formatting, not to shout. DOESN'T WORK bash-3.00# pvs -no /usr/lib/libc.so /usr/lib/libc.so - SUNW_1.23; /usr/lib/libc.so - SUNWprivate_1.1; bash-3.00# svcs | grep snmpd maintenance 20:11:23 svc:/network/cswnetsnmpd:default bash-3.00# WORKS bash-3.00# !493 pvs -no /usr/lib/libc.so /usr/lib/libc.so - SUNW_1.23; /usr/lib/libc.so - SUNWprivate_1.1; bash-3.00# svcs | grep snmpd online Apr_22 svc:/network/cswnetsnmpd:default bash-3.00# Dan Doughty Lead, Unix Team Epiq Systems Information Technology Phone: 913-621-9886 -----Original Message----- From: users [mailto:users-bounces+ddoughty=epiqsystems.com at lists.opencsw.org] On Behalf Of Laurent Blume Sent: Friday, April 24, 2015 9:46 AM To: users at lists.opencsw.org Subject: Re: netsnmp won't install because SUNW is too low, but it's not too low Le 2015/04/24 16:39 +0200, Daniel Doughty a ?crit: > I have another server at the same version and it's working there. In a nutshell, not possible :-) Either the netsnmp or the libc.so is different. Check the whole output of pvs libc.so. Laurent This communication (including any attachment(s)) is intended solely for the recipient(s) named above and may contain information that is confidential, privileged or legally protected. Any unauthorized use or dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by return e-mail message and delete all copies of the original communication to include any copy that may reside in your sent box. Thank you for your cooperation. From dam at opencsw.org Fri Apr 24 22:11:21 2015 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 22:11:21 +0200 Subject: netsnmp won't install because SUNW is too low, but it's not too low In-Reply-To: References: <, > <553A5294.2080602@opencsw.org> <2phyyyngx299plt21n3gx9se.1429886391733@email.android.com> <553A56F8.2000901@opencsw.org> Message-ID: Hi Daniel, > Am 24.04.2015 um 17:49 schrieb Doughty, Daniel : > > All caps is used for formatting, not to shout. > > DOESN'T WORK > > bash-3.00# pvs -no /usr/lib/libc.so > /usr/lib/libc.so - SUNW_1.23; > /usr/lib/libc.so - SUNWprivate_1.1; > bash-3.00# svcs | grep snmpd > maintenance 20:11:23 svc:/network/cswnetsnmpd:default > bash-3.00# > > WORKS > > bash-3.00# !493 > pvs -no /usr/lib/libc.so > /usr/lib/libc.so - SUNW_1.23; > /usr/lib/libc.so - SUNWprivate_1.1; > bash-3.00# svcs | grep snmpd > online Apr_22 svc:/network/cswnetsnmpd:default > bash-3.00# The string ?SUNW_1.23? is a linker contract, there are a number of these. List them all with pvs -d /usr/lib/libc.so I bet one is missing the required SUNW_1.22.5. I then suggest comparing /etc/release and patch level. Best regards ? Dago > > > Dan Doughty > Lead, Unix Team > Epiq Systems > Information Technology > Phone: 913-621-9886 > > -----Original Message----- > From: users [mailto:users-bounces+ddoughty=epiqsystems.com at lists.opencsw.org] On Behalf Of Laurent Blume > Sent: Friday, April 24, 2015 9:46 AM > To: users at lists.opencsw.org > Subject: Re: netsnmp won't install because SUNW is too low, but it's not too low > > Le 2015/04/24 16:39 +0200, Daniel Doughty a ?crit: >> I have another server at the same version and it's working there. > > In a nutshell, not possible :-) > Either the netsnmp or the libc.so is different. > Check the whole output of pvs libc.so. > > Laurent > This communication (including any attachment(s)) is intended solely for the recipient(s) named above and may contain information that is confidential, privileged or legally protected. Any unauthorized use or dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by return e-mail message and delete all copies of the original communication to include any copy that may reside in your sent box. Thank you for your cooperation. -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 2418 bytes Desc: not available URL: From dam at opencsw.org Fri Apr 24 22:13:29 2015 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 22:13:29 +0200 Subject: OpenCSW question about package squid In-Reply-To: <201504241732.t3OHWrnq010331@www.opencsw.org> References: <201504241732.t3OHWrnq010331@www.opencsw.org> Message-ID: <14A81030-492B-4EB6-9171-683A52486A6D@opencsw.org> Hi Dave, > Am 24.04.2015 um 19:32 schrieb Rottman3D at yahoo.com: > > Thank you for your work on the Solaris Packages. I am trying to build Squid on Solaris and have been unable to get it to compile. I was curious what configure options you used, specifically mine is failing about DB_Create and DB_Create_Env symbols not being found. I followed the squid documentation on building on Solaris but keep running into this last issue. Sure, all build recipes and patches are available at https://buildfarm.opencsw.org/source/xref/opencsw/csw/mgar/pkg/squid/trunk/Makefile Best regards ? Dago -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 2418 bytes Desc: not available URL: From ddoughty at epiqsystems.com Fri Apr 24 22:30:20 2015 From: ddoughty at epiqsystems.com (Doughty, Daniel) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 20:30:20 +0000 Subject: netsnmp won't install because SUNW is too low, but it's not too low In-Reply-To: References: <, > <553A5294.2080602@opencsw.org> <2phyyyngx299plt21n3gx9se.1429886391733@email.android.com> <553A56F8.2000901@opencsw.org> Message-ID: Thanks, that makes more sense. [ddoughty at ED019-PRDM01 ~] $ pvs -d /usr/lib/libc.so libc.so.1; SUNW_1.23; SUNW_1.22.3; SUNW_1.22.2; SUNW_1.22.1; SUNW_1.22; SUNW_1.21.3; SUNW_1.21.2; SUNW_1.21.1; SUNW_1.21; SUNW_1.20.4; SUNW_1.20.1; SUNW_1.20; SUNW_1.19; SUNW_1.18.1; SUNW_1.18; SUNW_1.17; SUNW_1.16; SUNW_1.15; SUNW_1.14; SUNW_1.13; SUNW_1.12; SUNW_1.11; SUNW_1.10; SUNW_1.9; SUNW_1.8; SUNW_1.7; SUNW_1.6; SUNW_1.5; SUNW_1.4; SUNW_1.3; SUNW_1.2; SUNW_1.1; SUNW_0.9; SUNW_0.8; SUNW_0.7; SISCD_2.3; SYSVABI_1.3; SUNWprivate_1.1; [ddoughty at ED019-PRDM01 ~] $ Dan Doughty Lead, Unix Team Epiq Systems Information Technology Phone: 913-621-9886 -----Original Message----- From: users [mailto:users-bounces+ddoughty=epiqsystems.com at lists.opencsw.org] On Behalf Of Dagobert Michelsen Sent: Friday, April 24, 2015 3:12 PM To: Questions and discussions Subject: Re: netsnmp won't install because SUNW is too low, but it's not too low Hi Daniel, > Am 24.04.2015 um 17:49 schrieb Doughty, Daniel : > > All caps is used for formatting, not to shout. > > DOESN'T WORK > > bash-3.00# pvs -no /usr/lib/libc.so > /usr/lib/libc.so - SUNW_1.23; > /usr/lib/libc.so - SUNWprivate_1.1; > bash-3.00# svcs | grep snmpd > maintenance 20:11:23 svc:/network/cswnetsnmpd:default > bash-3.00# > > WORKS > > bash-3.00# !493 > pvs -no /usr/lib/libc.so > /usr/lib/libc.so - SUNW_1.23; > /usr/lib/libc.so - SUNWprivate_1.1; > bash-3.00# svcs | grep snmpd > online Apr_22 svc:/network/cswnetsnmpd:default > bash-3.00# The string "SUNW_1.23" is a linker contract, there are a number of these. List them all with pvs -d /usr/lib/libc.so I bet one is missing the required SUNW_1.22.5. I then suggest comparing /etc/release and patch level. Best regards - Dago > > > Dan Doughty > Lead, Unix Team > Epiq Systems > Information Technology > Phone: 913-621-9886 > > -----Original Message----- > From: users [mailto:users-bounces+ddoughty=epiqsystems.com at lists.opencsw.org] On Behalf Of Laurent Blume > Sent: Friday, April 24, 2015 9:46 AM > To: users at lists.opencsw.org > Subject: Re: netsnmp won't install because SUNW is too low, but it's not too low > > Le 2015/04/24 16:39 +0200, Daniel Doughty a ?crit: >> I have another server at the same version and it's working there. > > In a nutshell, not possible :-) > Either the netsnmp or the libc.so is different. > Check the whole output of pvs libc.so. > > Laurent > This communication (including any attachment(s)) is intended solely for the recipient(s) named above and may contain information that is confidential, privileged or legally protected. Any unauthorized use or dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by return e-mail message and delete all copies of the original communication to include any copy that may reside in your sent box. Thank you for your cooperation. -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896 This communication (including any attachment(s)) is intended solely for the recipient(s) named above and may contain information that is confidential, privileged or legally protected. Any unauthorized use or dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by return e-mail message and delete all copies of the original communication to include any copy that may reside in your sent box. Thank you for your cooperation.