From dam at opencsw.org  Sun Aug  9 11:45:20 2015
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2015 11:45:20 +0200
Subject: New package request : gedit
In-Reply-To: <201508070045.t770jKYQ021600@www.opencsw.org>
References: <201508070045.t770jKYQ021600@www.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <F4A8B8E4-E8D5-4A22-9ED2-334AB3066827@opencsw.org>

Hi Michele,

Am 07.08.2015 um 02:45 schrieb via pkgrequests <pkgrequests at lists.opencsw.org>:
> Dear maintainers,
> 
> A new package request has been received from Michele Denber (mailto:denber at mindspring.com). gedit is requested to be added to our catalog.
> 
> Here is the attached message : 
> 
> The gedit currently in OpenCSW is version 2.30.4.  On my Sun Blade 2500 it dumps core with an error \"failed to find gam_server
> Failed to connect to socket /tmp/fam-root/fam-
> 
> (gedit:14837): GLib-GIO-WARNING **: FAMOpen failed, FAMErrno=3\"
> 
> The latest version of gedit is 3.16.  Any chance we could get this updated?  Thanks!

I have not been working on a Solaris desktop for some time now and it is
unlikely that this will start again. I forwarded your request to maintainers,
maybe there is someone who is willing to give it a go.

Apart from that your report sounds more like a problem with SGIs libfam
or better the GAMIN rewrite of it. The version 0.1.10 is still the latest
and the total quality of GAMIN was not the best, so fixing this may require
some debugging. You may also try to go back to the obsoleted SGI implementation
if that works for you.


Best regards

  ? Dago


-- 
"You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2418 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20150809/8007c177/attachment.p7s>

From grzemba at contac-dt.de  Tue Aug 11 15:39:20 2015
From: grzemba at contac-dt.de (Carsten Grzemba)
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 15:39:20 +0200
Subject: New package request : gedit
In-Reply-To: <F4A8B8E4-E8D5-4A22-9ED2-334AB3066827@opencsw.org>
References: <201508070045.t770jKYQ021600@www.opencsw.org>
	<F4A8B8E4-E8D5-4A22-9ED2-334AB3066827@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <beeda374530e.55ca1728@contac-dt.de>

I can reproduce this and have seen that not only gedit, also evince cores on Sparc and hang on x86.

Am 09.08.15 11:45 schrieb Dagobert Michelsen  <dam at opencsw.org>: 
> 
> Hi Michele,
> 
> Am 07.08.2015 um 02:45 schrieb via pkgrequests <pkgrequests at lists.opencsw.org>:
> > Dear maintainers,
> > 
> > A new package request has been received from Michele Denber (mailto:denber at mindspring.com <denber at mindspring.com>). gedit is requested to be added to our catalog.
> > 
> > Here is the attached message : 
> > 
> > The gedit currently in OpenCSW is version 2.30.4. On my Sun Blade 2500 it dumps core with an error \"failed to find gam_server
> > Failed to connect to socket /tmp/fam-root/fam-
> > 
> > (gedit:14837): GLib-GIO-WARNING **: FAMOpen failed, FAMErrno=3\"
> > 
> > The latest version of gedit is 3.16. Any chance we could get this updated? Thanks!
> 
> I have not been working on a Solaris desktop for some time now and it is
> unlikely that this will start again. I forwarded your request to maintainers,
> maybe there is someone who is willing to give it a go.
> 
> Apart from that your report sounds more like a problem with SGIs libfam
> or better the GAMIN rewrite of it. The version 0.1.10 is still the latest
> and the total quality of GAMIN was not the best, so fixing this may require
> some debugging. You may also try to go back to the obsoleted SGI implementation
> if that works for you.
> 
> 
> Best regards
> 
>  ? Dago
> 
> 
> -- 
> "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
> and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896
> 
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20150811/119d17a1/attachment-0001.html>

From grzemba at contac-dt.de  Wed Aug 12 08:44:39 2015
From: grzemba at contac-dt.de (Carsten Grzemba)
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 08:44:39 +0200
Subject: where is gnome_doc_utils, was Re: New package request : gedit
In-Reply-To: <F4A8B8E4-E8D5-4A22-9ED2-334AB3066827@opencsw.org>
References: <201508070045.t770jKYQ021600@www.opencsw.org>
	<F4A8B8E4-E8D5-4A22-9ED2-334AB3066827@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <bddcb4c556d2.55cb0777@contac-dt.de>

For respin gedit we need xml2po (package gnome_doc_utils) but I can't found this anywhere?

Am 09.08.15 11:45 schrieb Dagobert Michelsen  <dam at opencsw.org>: 
> 
> Hi Michele,
> 
> Am 07.08.2015 um 02:45 schrieb via pkgrequests <pkgrequests at lists.opencsw.org>:
> > Dear maintainers,
> > 
> > A new package request has been received from Michele Denber (mailto:denber at mindspring.com <denber at mindspring.com>). gedit is requested to be added to our catalog.
> > 
> > Here is the attached message : 
> > 
> > The gedit currently in OpenCSW is version 2.30.4. On my Sun Blade 2500 it dumps core with an error \"failed to find gam_server
> > Failed to connect to socket /tmp/fam-root/fam-
> > 
> > (gedit:14837): GLib-GIO-WARNING **: FAMOpen failed, FAMErrno=3\"
> > 
> > The latest version of gedit is 3.16. Any chance we could get this updated? Thanks!
> 
> I have not been working on a Solaris desktop for some time now and it is
> unlikely that this will start again. I forwarded your request to maintainers,
> maybe there is someone who is willing to give it a go.
> 
> Apart from that your report sounds more like a problem with SGIs libfam
> or better the GAMIN rewrite of it. The version 0.1.10 is still the latest
> and the total quality of GAMIN was not the best, so fixing this may require
> some debugging. You may also try to go back to the obsoleted SGI implementation
> if that works for you.
> 
> 
> Best regards
> 
>  ? Dago
> 
> 
> -- 
> "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
> and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896
> 
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20150812/4ce47dad/attachment.html>

From dhollen at mosis.com  Wed Aug 19 18:36:41 2015
From: dhollen at mosis.com (David Hollenberg)
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 09:36:41 -0700
Subject: Apache 2.2.31 packages not available in testing catalog
Message-ID: <55D4B099.8030207@mosis.com>

I noticed that Apache 2.2.31 packages have been built, but are not
yet showing up in the testing catalog.  Page

    http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/package-promotions/promote-packages.html

shows that there are zero days left until these packages are promoted
from unstable to testing, but it also lists "blocking bugs".  However,
the single blocking bug is from January 2015 and it looks like it has
been resolved.

Will these packages show up in the testing catalog anytime soon or is
there some problem I'm not aware of?

Thanks in advance.

Dave

From dam at opencsw.org  Wed Aug 19 20:00:35 2015
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 20:00:35 +0200
Subject: Apache 2.2.31 packages not available in testing catalog
In-Reply-To: <55D4B099.8030207@mosis.com>
References: <55D4B099.8030207@mosis.com>
Message-ID: <B3752DDF-83C5-475F-9791-FF888C386CDC@opencsw.org>

Hi David,

Am 19.08.2015 um 18:36 schrieb David Hollenberg <dhollen at mosis.com>:
> I noticed that Apache 2.2.31 packages have been built, but are not
> yet showing up in the testing catalog.  Page
> 
>   http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/package-promotions/promote-packages.html
> 
> shows that there are zero days left until these packages are promoted
> from unstable to testing, but it also lists "blocking bugs".  However,
> the single blocking bug is from January 2015 and it looks like it has
> been resolved.
> 
> Will these packages show up in the testing catalog anytime soon or is
> there some problem I'm not aware of?

The bug was still in state ?feedback? which prevented the propagation.
I now closed the bug and the packages should appear soon in testing.

Thanks for letting me know!

  ? Dago

-- 
"You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2418 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20150819/0a02bc59/attachment.p7s>