From uoi at buffalo.edu Fri Jun 5 20:47:45 2015 From: uoi at buffalo.edu (Uyi Idemudia) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2015 14:47:45 -0400 (EDT) Subject: 64 bit apache v2 package for ubbusiness Message-ID: Carsten, Good afternoon. What is the "type" of the smf "config" property group? We're bumping up against errors trying to start up apache in 64 bit mode: svcprop: Couldn't find property group `config' for instance `svc:/network/cswapache24:default' We currently have it set as type, "application": svc:/network/cswapache24> select cswapache24:default svc:/network/cswapache24:default> listprop general framework general/package astring CSWapache24 general/enabled boolean true restarter_actions framework NONPERSISTENT restarter_actions/refresh integer restarter_actions/maint_off integer restarter framework NONPERSISTENT restarter/logfile astring /var/svc/log/network-cswapache24:default.log restarter/start_pid count 20743 restarter/start_method_timestamp time 1433528054.109227000 restarter/start_method_waitstatus integer 256 restarter/contract count restarter/auxiliary_state astring fault_threshold_reached restarter/next_state astring none restarter/state astring maintenance restarter/state_timestamp time 1433528054.117455000 config application config/enable_64bit boolean true Thank you, Uyi -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Re: [csw-users] 64 bit apache v2 package Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 08:17:25 +0200 From: Carsten Grzemba Reply-To: cgrzemba at opencsw.org, Questions and discussions To: Questions and discussions I have uploded a 64bit apache24 version and you can give it a try: pkgutil -t http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/opencsw/experimental/apache24 -i apache24 The 64bit version will selected: /usr/sbin/svccfg -s cswapache24 'setprop config/enable_64bit = :boolean true' reports are wellcome. Am 12.05.15 schrieb *Lenny Miceli * : > Does anyone know if this was ever done? I don't find it in the > package list. > > Thanks, > Lenny > > On 08/02/2012 10:37 AM, Lenny Miceli wrote: > >For my case I need it for Coldfusion v9. As of that version it only > >comes in a 64 bit version on Solaris. So I need a 64 bit apache to > >place in front of it. > > > >Lenny > > > >On 08/02/2012 09:56 AM, Peter Bonivart wrote: > >>On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Lenny Miceli wrote: > >>>Hi Everyone, > >>> > >>>Is a 64 bit apache v2 package being considered? We used to install > >>>64 bit > >>>apache v2.2.15 using Blastwave from the harvard mirror. > >>> > >>>I don't see a 64 bit apache package in OpenCSW. It would be a nice > >>>addition > >>>to add a 64 bit apache package since Solaris 10 doesn't come with a > >>>64-bit > >>>version. > >> > >>What's the benefit of a web server being 64-bit if you don't mind me > >>asking? > >> > >>/peter > >>_______________________________________________ > >>users mailing list > >>users at lists.opencsw.org > >>https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/users > >> > > > >_______________________________________________ > >users mailing list > >users at lists.opencsw.org > >https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > From uoi at buffalo.edu Mon Jun 8 20:54:13 2015 From: uoi at buffalo.edu (Uyi Idemudia) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2015 14:54:13 -0400 (EDT) Subject: 64 bit apache v2 package for ubbusiness In-Reply-To: References:

Message-ID: Carten, Good evening. Although your change did help us advance, we've run into a curiousity. We've been troubleshooting and have found the included executables to all be the 32-bit versions. The binaries referenced in the start up script, are not part of the package (e.g., /opt/csw/sbin64/apachectl). We confirmed with the package listing on OpenCSW at: https://www.opencsw.org/search/apache24/ Your assistance in troubleshooting here would be greatly appreciated. Thank you, Uyi ------------ Uyi Idemudia Senior Unix Analyst CIT Enterprise Infrastructure Support University at Buffalo uoi at buffalo.edu On Mon, 8 Jun 2015, Carsten Grzemba wrote: > Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2015 17:07:36 +0200 > From: Carsten Grzemba > Reply-To: cgrzemba at opencsw.org > To: Uyi Idemudia > Subject: Re: 64 bit apache v2 package for ubbusiness > > I have updated the package on buildfarm at Jun 2nd. There the property is moved to group 'general'. > That should work better. > > Try a: > pkgutil -t http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/opencsw/experimental/apache24 -i > again. > > Carsten > ? > Am 05.06.15 schrieb Uyi Idemudia : >> Carsten, >> >> Good afternoon. What is the "type" of the smf "config" property group? We're bumping up against errors trying to start up apache in 64 bit mode: >> >> svcprop: Couldn't find property group `config' for instance `svc:/network/cswapache24:default' >> >> We currently have it set as type, "application": >> >> svc:/network/cswapache24> select cswapache24:default >> svc:/network/cswapache24:default> listprop >> general framework >> general/package astring CSWapache24 >> general/enabled boolean true >> restarter_actions framework NONPERSISTENT >> restarter_actions/refresh integer >> restarter_actions/maint_off integer >> restarter framework NONPERSISTENT >> restarter/logfile astring /var/svc/log/network-cswapache24:default.log >> restarter/start_pid count 20743 >> restarter/start_method_timestamp time 1433528054.109227000 >> restarter/start_method_waitstatus integer 256 >> restarter/contract count >> restarter/auxiliary_state astring fault_threshold_reached >> restarter/next_state astring none >> restarter/state astring maintenance >> restarter/state_timestamp time 1433528054.117455000 >> config application >> config/enable_64bit boolean true >> >> Thank you, >> >> Uyi >> >> -------- Forwarded Message -------- >> Subject: Re: [csw-users] 64 bit apache v2 package >> Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 08:17:25 +0200 >> From: Carsten Grzemba >> Reply-To: cgrzemba at opencsw.org, Questions and discussions >> >> To: Questions and discussions >> >> >> >> I have uploded a 64bit apache24 version and you can give it a try: >> >> pkgutil -t http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/opencsw/experimental/apache24 -i >> apache24 >> >> The 64bit version will selected: >> >> /usr/sbin/svccfg -s cswapache24 'setprop config/enable_64bit = :boolean >> true' >> >> reports are wellcome. >> >> Am 12.05.15 schrieb *Lenny Miceli * : >>> Does anyone know if this was ever done? I don't find it in the >>> package list. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Lenny >>> >>> On 08/02/2012 10:37 AM, Lenny Miceli wrote: >>>> For my case I need it for Coldfusion v9. As of that version it only >>>> comes in a 64 bit version on Solaris. So I need a 64 bit apache to >>>> place in front of it. >>>> >>>> Lenny >>>> >>>> On 08/02/2012 09:56 AM, Peter Bonivart wrote: >>>>> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Lenny Miceli wrote: >>>>>> Hi Everyone, >>>>>> >>>>>> Is a 64 bit apache v2 package being considered? We used to install >>>>>> 64 bit >>>>>> apache v2.2.15 using Blastwave from the harvard mirror. >>>>>> >>>>>> I don't see a 64 bit apache package in OpenCSW. It would be a nice >>>>>> addition >>>>>> to add a 64 bit apache package since Solaris 10 doesn't come with a >>>>>> 64-bit >>>>>> version. >>>>> >>>>> What's the benefit of a web server being 64-bit if you don't mind me >>>>> asking? >>>>> >>>>> /peter >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> users mailing list >>>>> users at lists.opencsw.org >>>>> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/users >>>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> users mailing list >>>> users at lists.opencsw.org >>>> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/users From uoi at buffalo.edu Mon Jun 8 20:58:12 2015 From: uoi at buffalo.edu (Uyi Idemudia) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2015 14:58:12 -0400 (EDT) Subject: 64 bit apache v2 package for ubbusiness In-Reply-To: References:

Message-ID: Carsten, I should point out that the references start up script: /etc/opt/csw/init.d/cswapache24 Has the following: #!/sbin/ksh # # Copyright 2004 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All rights reserved. # Use is subject to license terms. # # ident "@(#)http-apache2 1.2 04/11/11 SMI" # #RC_KNUM 16 #RC_SNUM 80 #RC_KLEV 0,1,2,S #RC_SLEV 3 #FMRI network ENABLE64=$(/usr/bin/svcprop -p general/enable_64bit ${SMF_FMRI}) [ ${ENABLE64} = "true" ] && MM=/64 APACHE_HOME=/opt/csw CONF_FILE=/etc/opt/csw/apache2/httpd.conf APACHECTL=/opt/csw/sbin${MM}/apachectl Thank you, Uyi ------------ Uyi Idemudia Senior Unix Analyst CIT Enterprise Infrastructure Support University at Buffalo uoi at buffalo.edu On Mon, 8 Jun 2015, Uyi Idemudia wrote: > Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2015 14:54:13 -0400 (EDT) > From: Uyi Idemudia > To: cgrzemba at opencsw.org, Questions and discussions > Subject: Re: 64 bit apache v2 package for ubbusiness > > Carten, > > Good evening. Although your change did help us advance, we've run into a > curiousity. We've been troubleshooting and have found the included > executables to all be the 32-bit versions. The binaries referenced in the > start up script, are not part of the package (e.g., > /opt/csw/sbin64/apachectl). We confirmed with the package listing on OpenCSW > at: > > https://www.opencsw.org/search/apache24/ > > Your assistance in troubleshooting here would be greatly appreciated. Thank > you, > > Uyi > > ------------ > Uyi Idemudia > Senior Unix Analyst > CIT Enterprise Infrastructure Support > University at Buffalo > uoi at buffalo.edu > > > On Mon, 8 Jun 2015, Carsten Grzemba wrote: > >> Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2015 17:07:36 +0200 >> From: Carsten Grzemba >> Reply-To: cgrzemba at opencsw.org >> To: Uyi Idemudia >> Subject: Re: 64 bit apache v2 package for ubbusiness >> >> I have updated the package on buildfarm at Jun 2nd. There the property is >> moved to group 'general'. >> That should work better. >> >> Try a: >> pkgutil -t http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/opencsw/experimental/apache24 -i >> again. >> >> Carsten >> ? >> Am 05.06.15 schrieb Uyi Idemudia : >>> Carsten, >>> >>> Good afternoon. What is the "type" of the smf "config" property group? >>> We're bumping up against errors trying to start up apache in 64 bit mode: >>> >>> svcprop: Couldn't find property group `config' for instance >>> `svc:/network/cswapache24:default' >>> >>> We currently have it set as type, "application": >>> >>> svc:/network/cswapache24> select cswapache24:default >>> svc:/network/cswapache24:default> listprop >>> general framework >>> general/package astring CSWapache24 >>> general/enabled boolean true >>> restarter_actions framework NONPERSISTENT >>> restarter_actions/refresh integer >>> restarter_actions/maint_off integer >>> restarter framework NONPERSISTENT >>> restarter/logfile astring /var/svc/log/network-cswapache24:default.log >>> restarter/start_pid count 20743 >>> restarter/start_method_timestamp time 1433528054.109227000 >>> restarter/start_method_waitstatus integer 256 >>> restarter/contract count >>> restarter/auxiliary_state astring fault_threshold_reached >>> restarter/next_state astring none >>> restarter/state astring maintenance >>> restarter/state_timestamp time 1433528054.117455000 >>> config application >>> config/enable_64bit boolean true >>> >>> Thank you, >>> >>> Uyi >>> >>> -------- Forwarded Message -------- >>> Subject: Re: [csw-users] 64 bit apache v2 package >>> Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 08:17:25 +0200 >>> From: Carsten Grzemba >>> Reply-To: cgrzemba at opencsw.org, Questions and discussions >>> >>> To: Questions and discussions >>> >>> >>> >>> I have uploded a 64bit apache24 version and you can give it a try: >>> >>> pkgutil -t http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/opencsw/experimental/apache24 -i >>> apache24 >>> >>> The 64bit version will selected: >>> >>> /usr/sbin/svccfg -s cswapache24 'setprop config/enable_64bit = :boolean >>> true' >>> >>> reports are wellcome. >>> >>> Am 12.05.15 schrieb *Lenny Miceli * : >>>> Does anyone know if this was ever done? I don't find it in the >>>> package list. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Lenny >>>> >>>> On 08/02/2012 10:37 AM, Lenny Miceli wrote: >>>>> For my case I need it for Coldfusion v9. As of that version it only >>>>> comes in a 64 bit version on Solaris. So I need a 64 bit apache to >>>>> place in front of it. >>>>> >>>>> Lenny >>>>> >>>>> On 08/02/2012 09:56 AM, Peter Bonivart wrote: >>>>>> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Lenny Miceli >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> Hi Everyone, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Is a 64 bit apache v2 package being considered? We used to install >>>>>>> 64 bit >>>>>>> apache v2.2.15 using Blastwave from the harvard mirror. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I don't see a 64 bit apache package in OpenCSW. It would be a nice >>>>>>> addition >>>>>>> to add a 64 bit apache package since Solaris 10 doesn't come with a >>>>>>> 64-bit >>>>>>> version. >>>>>> >>>>>> What's the benefit of a web server being 64-bit if you don't mind me >>>>>> asking? >>>>>> >>>>>> /peter >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> users mailing list >>>>>> users at lists.opencsw.org >>>>>> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/users >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> users mailing list >>>>> users at lists.opencsw.org >>>>> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/users From tosmi at opencsw.org Tue Jun 9 22:30:17 2015 From: tosmi at opencsw.org (Toni Schmidbauer) Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2015 22:30:17 +0200 Subject: [HEADSUP] updated facter to 2.4.4 Message-ID: <87bngowrom.fsf@opencsw.org> hi *, i've just uploaded facter 2.4.4 to unstable. so please test and let me know if anything breaks. thanks toni From freddy.dsx at free.fr Fri Jun 12 08:55:14 2015 From: freddy.dsx at free.fr (Freddy DISSAUX) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 08:55:14 +0200 Subject: Update recipe - libasr Message-ID: <20150612065513.GU30641@linutop.my.domain> Hello, Update libasr to 1.0.2 http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/~bsdsx/libasr/libasr_1.0.2.patch Regards, -------------- next part -------------- Index: Makefile =================================================================== --- Makefile (revision 25062) +++ Makefile (working copy) @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ # TODO (release-critical prefixed with !, non release-critical with *) # NAME = libasr -VERSION = 201505061057 +VERSION = 1.0.2 GARTYPE = v2 DESCRIPTION = A free, simple and portable asynchronous resolver library Index: checksums =================================================================== --- checksums (revision 25062) +++ checksums (working copy) @@ -1 +1 @@ -2a4b768b54892465570ef7488e56b737 libasr-201505061057.tar.gz +2a2832e8c25683bd17f4ce8b37ba940a libasr-1.0.2.tar.gz From dam at opencsw.org Fri Jun 12 11:12:24 2015 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 11:12:24 +0200 Subject: Update recipe - libasr In-Reply-To: <20150612065513.GU30641@linutop.my.domain> References: <20150612065513.GU30641@linutop.my.domain> Message-ID: Hi Freddy, > Am 12.06.2015 um 08:55 schrieb Freddy DISSAUX : > > Hello, > > Update libasr to 1.0.2 > > http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/~bsdsx/libasr/libasr_1.0.2.patch Feel free to commit your change and release the package, I am glad for all help. Best regards ? Dago -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 2418 bytes Desc: not available URL: From upendra.gandhi at gmail.com Thu Jun 25 21:09:03 2015 From: upendra.gandhi at gmail.com (upen) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 14:09:03 -0500 Subject: Sparc/Solaris10 and python 2.7 Message-ID: Hello, I am trying to run python2.7 at /opt/csw/bin/python2.7 and running into library version issue for libc.so as below. ld.so.1: python2.7: fatal: libc.so.1: version `SUNW_1.22.5' not found (required by file /opt/csw/bin/python2.7) ld.so.1: python2.7: fatal: libc.so.1: open failed: No such file or directory bash-3.2# ldd /opt/csw/bin/python2.7 libpython2.7.so.1.0 => /opt/csw/lib/libpython2.7.so.1.0 libsocket.so.1 => /lib/libsocket.so.1 libnsl.so.1 => /lib/libnsl.so.1 librt.so.1 => /lib/librt.so.1 libdl.so.1 => /lib/libdl.so.1 libm.so.2 => /lib/libm.so.2 libc.so.1 => /lib/libc.so.1 libc.so.1 (SUNW_1.22.5) => (version not found) libgcc_s.so.1 => /opt/csw/lib/libgcc_s.so.1 libc.so.1 (SUNW_1.22.5) => (version not found) libmp.so.2 => /lib/libmp.so.2 libmd.so.1 => /lib/libmd.so.1 libscf.so.1 => /lib/libscf.so.1 libaio.so.1 => /lib/libaio.so.1 libc.so.1 (SUNW_1.22.5) => (version not found) libdoor.so.1 => /lib/libdoor.so.1 libuutil.so.1 => /lib/libuutil.so.1 libgen.so.1 => /lib/libgen.so.1 /platform/SUNW,Sun-Fire-V240/lib/libc_psr.so.1 /platform/SUNW,Sun-Fire-V240/lib/libmd_psr.so.1 bash-3.2# pvc /lib/libc.so.1 bash: pvc: command not found bash-3.2# pvs /lib/libc.so.1 libc.so.1; SUNW_1.23; SUNW_1.22.4; SUNW_1.22.3; SUNW_1.22.2; SUNW_1.22.1; SUNW_1.22; SUNW_1.21.3; SUNW_1.21.2; SUNW_1.21.1; SUNW_1.21; SUNW_1.20.4; SUNW_1.20.1; SUNW_1.20; SUNW_1.19; SUNW_1.18.1; SUNW_1.18; SUNW_1.17; SUNW_1.16; SUNW_1.15; SUNW_1.14; SUNW_1.13; SUNW_1.12; SUNW_1.11; SUNW_1.10; SUNW_1.9; SUNW_1.8; SUNW_1.7; SUNW_1.6; SUNW_1.5; SUNW_1.4; SUNW_1.3; SUNW_1.2; SUNW_1.1; SUNW_0.9; SUNW_0.8; SUNW_0.7; SISCD_2.3; SYSVABI_1.3; SUNWprivate_1.1; pkginfo SUNWcslr system SUNWcslr Core Solaris Libraries (Root) bash-3.2# pkginfo -l SUNWcslr PKGINST: SUNWcslr NAME: Core Solaris Libraries (Root) CATEGORY: system ARCH: sparc VERSION: 11.10.0,REV=2005.01.21.15.53 BASEDIR: / VENDOR: Sun Microsystems, Inc. DESC: core software for a specific instruction-set architecture PSTAMP: on10-patch20091102142416 INSTDATE: Dec 09 2009 15:56 HOTLINE: Please contact your local service provider STATUS: completely installed FILES: 244 installed pathnames 2 shared pathnames 5 directories 132 executables 34014 blocks used (approx) What do you recommend to fix the lic.so issue? Anyone knows or can help me find out what immediate patch can fix this issue on solaris side? Thanks!! Upen -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dam at opencsw.org Fri Jun 26 07:28:47 2015 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 07:28:47 +0200 Subject: Sparc/Solaris10 and python 2.7 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Upen, Am 25.06.2015 um 21:09 schrieb upen : > I am trying to run python2.7 at /opt/csw/bin/python2.7 and running into library version issue for libc.so as below. > > ld.so.1: python2.7: fatal: libc.so.1: version `SUNW_1.22.5' not found (required by file /opt/csw/bin/python2.7) > ld.so.1: python2.7: fatal: libc.so.1: open failed: No such file or directory ... > What do you recommend to fix the lic.so issue? Anyone knows or can help me find out what immediate patch can fix this issue on solaris side? You need to upgrade to Solaris 10u8 as announced here: https://www.opencsw.org/2014/12/minimum-libc-version-is-1-22-5/ Best regards ? Dago -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 2418 bytes Desc: not available URL: From upendra.gandhi at gmail.com Fri Jun 26 13:54:50 2015 From: upendra.gandhi at gmail.com (upen) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 06:54:50 -0500 Subject: Sparc/Solaris10 and python 2.7 In-Reply-To: References:

Message-ID: Hello Dago, On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 12:28 AM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > Hi Upen, > > Am 25.06.2015 um 21:09 schrieb upen : > > I am trying to run python2.7 at /opt/csw/bin/python2.7 and running into > library version issue for libc.so as below. > > > > ld.so.1: python2.7: fatal: libc.so.1: version `SUNW_1.22.5' not found > (required by file /opt/csw/bin/python2.7) > > ld.so.1: python2.7: fatal: libc.so.1: open failed: No such file or > directory > ... > > What do you recommend to fix the lic.so issue? Anyone knows or can help > me find out what immediate patch can fix this issue on solaris side? > > You need to upgrade to Solaris 10u8 as announced here: > https://www.opencsw.org/2014/12/minimum-libc-version-is-1-22-5/ > Thank you for this information. Very useful. Sorry I did not look carefully before posting. Thanks, -- upen, emerge -uD life (Upgrade Life with dependencies) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: