From noloader at gmail.com  Thu Jul 19 16:37:46 2018
From: noloader at gmail.com (Jeffrey Walton)
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 10:37:46 -0400
Subject: Access to SPARC hardware
Message-ID: <CAH8yC8mhLz6KA+w_U2ppxGUgKFGsuU4nNRoHLs4vFDZb2rSBUg@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Everyone,

I help with several open source projects. I'm trying to gain access to
a SPACRC machine and possibly Sun Studio so I can test on SPARC using
SunCC. We currently test on Intel hardware with both GCC and SunCC,
and both are OK. I've learned SunCC can be full of surprises and I
would really like to get some time on SPARC with or without SunCC.

My first question is, does anyone offer or provide SSH access to SPARC hardware?

I see there is a Build Farm wiki entry at
https://www.opencsw.org/manual/for-maintainers/buildfarm-setup.html .
GCC maintains a Compile Farm at https://cfarm.tetaneutral.net/. The
GCC Compile Farm supplies many cpu arch's configured with different
packages and compilers for testing. The GCC compile farm is available
to free and open software developers.

A second question is, does the OpenCSW build farm work like the GCC
Compile Farm?

Thanks in advance.

From dam at opencsw.org  Thu Jul 19 16:50:18 2018
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 16:50:18 +0200
Subject: Access to SPARC hardware
In-Reply-To: <CAH8yC8mhLz6KA+w_U2ppxGUgKFGsuU4nNRoHLs4vFDZb2rSBUg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAH8yC8mhLz6KA+w_U2ppxGUgKFGsuU4nNRoHLs4vFDZb2rSBUg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <A3E617DC-CB7D-42DE-BD3F-55BB2B8F5918@opencsw.org>

Hi Jeffrey,

Am 19.07.2018 um 16:37 schrieb Jeffrey Walton via users <users at lists.opencsw.org>:
> I help with several open source projects. I'm trying to gain access to
> a SPACRC machine and possibly Sun Studio so I can test on SPARC using
> SunCC. We currently test on Intel hardware with both GCC and SunCC,
> and both are OK. I've learned SunCC can be full of surprises and I
> would really like to get some time on SPARC with or without SunCC.
> 
> My first question is, does anyone offer or provide SSH access to SPARC hardware?

Yes, OpenCSW already does for a lot of opensource projects:
  https://www.opencsw.org/extend-it/signup/to-upstream-maintainers/
If you are interested just let me know.

> I see there is a Build Farm wiki entry at
> https://www.opencsw.org/manual/for-maintainers/buildfarm-setup.html .
> GCC maintains a Compile Farm at https://cfarm.tetaneutral.net/. The
> GCC Compile Farm supplies many cpu arch's configured with different
> packages and compilers for testing. The GCC compile farm is available
> to free and open software developers.

Good to know.

> A second question is, does the OpenCSW build farm work like the GCC
> Compile Farm?

Sort of, you login to a jump machine and from there you have access to
the build servers for the different OS levels and architectures.


Best regards

  ? Dago

-- 
"You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896


From noloader at gmail.com  Thu Jul 19 17:23:24 2018
From: noloader at gmail.com (Jeffrey Walton)
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 11:23:24 -0400
Subject: Access to SPARC hardware
In-Reply-To: <A3E617DC-CB7D-42DE-BD3F-55BB2B8F5918@opencsw.org>
References: <CAH8yC8mhLz6KA+w_U2ppxGUgKFGsuU4nNRoHLs4vFDZb2rSBUg@mail.gmail.com>
 <A3E617DC-CB7D-42DE-BD3F-55BB2B8F5918@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <CAH8yC8koFVjRY_2OvmJAwFpXy3w0xtuQC_24UmXsffDHL0V2sA@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 10:50 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Hi Jeffrey,
>
> Am 19.07.2018 um 16:37 schrieb Jeffrey Walton via users <users at lists.opencsw.org>:
>> I help with several open source projects. I'm trying to gain access to
>> a SPACRC machine and possibly Sun Studio so I can test on SPARC using
>> SunCC. We currently test on Intel hardware with both GCC and SunCC,
>> and both are OK. I've learned SunCC can be full of surprises and I
>> would really like to get some time on SPARC with or without SunCC.
>>
>> My first question is, does anyone offer or provide SSH access to SPARC hardware?
>
> Yes, OpenCSW already does for a lot of opensource projects:
>   https://www.opencsw.org/extend-it/signup/to-upstream-maintainers/
> If you are interested just let me know.

Ack, thanks. I emailed you off-list. Please feel free to share as necessary.

>> A second question is, does the OpenCSW build farm work like the GCC
>> Compile Farm?
>
> Sort of, you login to a jump machine and from there you have access to
> the build servers for the different OS levels and architectures.

Thanks.

In return I can offer access to an old PowerMac. The PowerMac is a
big-endian PowerPC-64 using an Apple port of GCC 4.1. Everything else
I have is run-of-the-mill or under-powered dev-boards.

A lot of projects have access to the PowerMac, including Jonathan
Wakely of GCC, Andy Polyakov of OpenSSL. and the MacPorts project.

Share and share alike :)

Jeff

From yvoinov at gmail.com  Fri Jul 20 17:46:04 2018
From: yvoinov at gmail.com (Yuri)
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2018 21:46:04 +0600
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: mirrors of opencsw unavailable
In-Reply-To: <B3337189-2422-4DAC-A12F-AC24B501002A@opencsw.org>
References: <5B2A660C.7324.4CF2BF84@dehaenp.drever.be>
 <6de21975-2852-078f-8954-4c5b3416a28a@opencsw.org>
 <EDB71F5F8D842A449069B5DD5487D01ABBD0118A@EIS-MB0402CPC.eis.ds.usace.army.mil>
 <B3337189-2422-4DAC-A12F-AC24B501002A@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <f474620a-9b97-829e-3821-bbadc5b7e470@gmail.com>

Mirrors again down:


# pkgutil -u -U -y
=> Fetching new catalog and descriptions
(http://mirror.opencsw.org/opencsw/testing/i386/5.10) if available ...
--2018-07-20 21:44:55--?
http://mirror.opencsw.org/opencsw/testing/i386/5.10/catalog
Connecting to 127.0.0.1:3128... connected.
Proxy request sent, awaiting response... 504 Gateway Timeout
Retrying.

--2018-07-20 21:44:57--? (try: 2)?
http://mirror.opencsw.org/opencsw/testing/i386/5.10/catalog
Connecting to 127.0.0.1:3128... connected.
Proxy request sent, awaiting response... 502 Bad Gateway
2018-07-20 21:44:57 ERROR 502: Bad Gateway.


Fetching of catalog failed.


21.06.2018 13:13, Dagobert Michelsen via users ?????:
> Hi folks,
>
>> Am 20.06.2018 um 19:23 schrieb Davis, Mark S CTR USARMY CEFC (US) via
>> users <users at lists.opencsw.org <mailto:users at lists.opencsw.org>>:
>>
>> I've tried this yesterday and today with the same result. Is it related?
>>
>> [coe-cpcuct01dcd]# /opt/csw/bin/pkgutil -U
>
> To make a long story short: the webserver process hung, I just
> restarted it and everything should be back to normal.
>
>
> Best regards
>
> ? ? Dago
>
>
> --?
> "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by
> wanting to do something,
> and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." -
> xkcd #896
>

-- 
"C++ seems like a language suitable for firing other people's legs."

*****************************
* C++20 : Bug to the future *
*****************************

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20180720/74810d17/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 659 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20180720/74810d17/attachment-0001.asc>

From dam at opencsw.org  Fri Jul 20 18:33:11 2018
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2018 18:33:11 +0200
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: mirrors of opencsw unavailable
In-Reply-To: <f474620a-9b97-829e-3821-bbadc5b7e470@gmail.com>
References: <5B2A660C.7324.4CF2BF84@dehaenp.drever.be>
 <6de21975-2852-078f-8954-4c5b3416a28a@opencsw.org>
 <EDB71F5F8D842A449069B5DD5487D01ABBD0118A@EIS-MB0402CPC.eis.ds.usace.army.mil>
 <B3337189-2422-4DAC-A12F-AC24B501002A@opencsw.org>
 <f474620a-9b97-829e-3821-bbadc5b7e470@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <37667C2F-E82B-4581-8348-3B79D2207D3D@opencsw.org>

Hi Yuri,

Am 20.07.2018 um 17:46 schrieb Yuri via users <users at lists.opencsw.org>:
> Mirrors again down:

Dammit, lighttpd became unstable since I changed the machine and OS to Solaris 11.3.
I guess I?ll try a more recent build.

Everything should be fine again. Thanks for letting me know!


Best regards

  ? Dago

--
"You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 873 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20180720/f4b8688b/attachment.asc>

From noloader at gmail.com  Sat Jul 21 14:19:31 2018
From: noloader at gmail.com (Jeffrey Walton)
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2018 08:19:31 -0400
Subject: ANN: Crypto++ is well supported for Solaris
Message-ID: <CAH8yC8=eGG4+YkU_0GOkt0+X2CuKatZqhyTWVbVXTGpZDKnA0w@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Everyone,

My apologies for the extra Inbox noise.  The Crypto++ project is a C++
class library of cryptographic schemes originally written by Wei Dai.
The project's homepage is at https://www.cryptopp.com/ .

Crypto++ recently received access to OpenCSW's compile farm. We were
able to look at some known issues for Sparc machines. All the issues
have been cleared. Also see
https://github.com/weidai11/cryptopp/issues/691 .

The Crypto++ library is now well supported for Solaris, including x86
and Sparc. We hope to provide an OpenCSW package shortly.

From dam at opencsw.org  Sat Jul 21 14:36:04 2018
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2018 14:36:04 +0200
Subject: ANN: Crypto++ is well supported for Solaris
In-Reply-To: <CAH8yC8=eGG4+YkU_0GOkt0+X2CuKatZqhyTWVbVXTGpZDKnA0w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAH8yC8=eGG4+YkU_0GOkt0+X2CuKatZqhyTWVbVXTGpZDKnA0w@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <3E0A6C06-5D54-48C7-B61E-7BE1E49127EA@opencsw.org>

Hi Jeff,

Am 21.07.2018 um 14:19 schrieb Jeffrey Walton via users <users at lists.opencsw.org>:
> Crypto++ recently received access to OpenCSW's compile farm. We were
> able to look at some known issues for Sparc machines. All the issues
> have been cleared. Also see
> https://github.com/weidai11/cryptopp/issues/691 .
> 
> The Crypto++ library is now well supported for Solaris, including x86
> and Sparc. We hope to provide an OpenCSW package shortly.

I worked on a cryptopp package 2011 but never gotten around finishing it. I just
committed my stuff which may act as a starting point and it will show up here shortly:
  https://buildfarm.opencsw.org/source/xref/opencsw/csw/mgar/pkg/cryptopp/trunk/Makefile


Best regards

  ? Dago

-- 
"You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896


From noloader at gmail.com  Sat Jul 21 14:49:18 2018
From: noloader at gmail.com (Jeffrey Walton)
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2018 08:49:18 -0400
Subject: ANN: Crypto++ is well supported for Solaris
In-Reply-To: <3E0A6C06-5D54-48C7-B61E-7BE1E49127EA@opencsw.org>
References: <CAH8yC8=eGG4+YkU_0GOkt0+X2CuKatZqhyTWVbVXTGpZDKnA0w@mail.gmail.com>
 <3E0A6C06-5D54-48C7-B61E-7BE1E49127EA@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <CAH8yC8=if0QBBtUOBx-buNL14ARPXkrqrDNECPxHfCWNNfT=xw@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 8:36 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
>
> Am 21.07.2018 um 14:19 schrieb Jeffrey Walton via users <users at lists.opencsw.org>:
>> Crypto++ recently received access to OpenCSW's compile farm. We were
>> able to look at some known issues for Sparc machines. All the issues
>> have been cleared. Also see
>> https://github.com/weidai11/cryptopp/issues/691 .
>>
>> The Crypto++ library is now well supported for Solaris, including x86
>> and Sparc. We hope to provide an OpenCSW package shortly.
>
> I worked on a cryptopp package 2011 but never gotten around finishing it. I just
> committed my stuff which may act as a starting point and it will show up here shortly:
>   https://buildfarm.opencsw.org/source/xref/opencsw/csw/mgar/pkg/cryptopp/trunk/Makefile

Thais is awesome Dago. Thank you very much.

If you have some time would you make a quick pass through
https://www.opencsw.org/manual/for-maintainers/buildfarm-setup.html ?
I think I will be using it for my guide.

If I should be in a different area then please let me know.

Jeff

From noloader at gmail.com  Sat Jul 21 15:02:32 2018
From: noloader at gmail.com (Jeffrey Walton)
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2018 09:02:32 -0400
Subject: ANN: Crypto++ is well supported for Solaris
In-Reply-To: <3E0A6C06-5D54-48C7-B61E-7BE1E49127EA@opencsw.org>
References: <CAH8yC8=eGG4+YkU_0GOkt0+X2CuKatZqhyTWVbVXTGpZDKnA0w@mail.gmail.com>
 <3E0A6C06-5D54-48C7-B61E-7BE1E49127EA@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <CAH8yC8mvH4cgq5RJD3A0TXk8c3s3edwQxKUQfGkPA9F39v5=fA@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 8:36 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
>
> Am 21.07.2018 um 14:19 schrieb Jeffrey Walton via users <users at lists.opencsw.org>:
>> Crypto++ recently received access to OpenCSW's compile farm. We were
>> able to look at some known issues for Sparc machines. All the issues
>> have been cleared. Also see
>> https://github.com/weidai11/cryptopp/issues/691 .
>>
>> The Crypto++ library is now well supported for Solaris, including x86
>> and Sparc. We hope to provide an OpenCSW package shortly.
>
> I worked on a cryptopp package 2011 but never gotten around finishing it. I just
> committed my stuff which may act as a starting point and it will show up here shortly:
>   https://buildfarm.opencsw.org/source/xref/opencsw/csw/mgar/pkg/cryptopp/trunk/Makefile

One other thing Dago...

I enjoy writing and wrote most of the Crypto++ wiki and parts of the
OpenSSL wiki. Cf., https://www.cryptopp.com/wiki/Main_Page and
https://wiki.openssl.org/index.php/Cryptogams_AES .

I can document Crypto++ for OpenCSW if I have access to
https://www.opencsw.org/manual/ . Or I can create a page and email to
you to drop in-place. Do you have a preference?

Jeff

From noloader at gmail.com  Mon Jul 23 03:26:42 2018
From: noloader at gmail.com (Jeffrey Walton)
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2018 21:26:42 -0400
Subject: 46.235.226.80 and Network is unreachable.
Message-ID: <CAH8yC8m4N=_StdfCh_J8WwuNy_0Cks0EL9ES4-YGwmJg0RHenQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Everyone,

I am testing some scripts on unstable11s. The script downloads Bzip
and builds it from sources. It is usually mostly boring. On
unstable11s the wget download results in:

--2018-07-23 03:09:12--  http://www.bzip.org/1.0.6/bzip2-1.0.6.tar.gz
Resolving www.bzip.org... 2a00:1098:0:86:1000:44:0:80, 46.235.226.80
Connecting to www.bzip.org|2a00:1098:0:86:1000:44:0:80|:80... failed:
Network is unreachable.
Connecting to www.bzip.org|46.235.226.80|:80... failed: Network is unreachable.

On another machine at my house:

--2018-07-23 01:15:49--  http://www.bzip.org/1.0.6/bzip2-1.0.6.tar.gz
Resolving www.bzip.org... 46.235.226.80, 2a00:1098:0:86:1000:44:0:80
Connecting to www.bzip.org|46.235.226.80|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 782025 (764K) [application/x-gzip]
Saving to: ?bzip2-1.0.6.tar.gz?

Any ideas why the script might be failing on unstable11s?

Jeff

From dam at opencsw.org  Mon Jul 23 11:00:44 2018
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2018 11:00:44 +0200
Subject: 46.235.226.80 and Network is unreachable.
In-Reply-To: <CAH8yC8m4N=_StdfCh_J8WwuNy_0Cks0EL9ES4-YGwmJg0RHenQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAH8yC8m4N=_StdfCh_J8WwuNy_0Cks0EL9ES4-YGwmJg0RHenQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4EAD85E4-E7F9-4416-851E-6E9BA3546A09@opencsw.org>

Hi Jeff,

Am 23.07.2018 um 03:26 schrieb Jeffrey Walton via users <users at lists.opencsw.org>:
> I am testing some scripts on unstable11s. The script downloads Bzip
> and builds it from sources. It is usually mostly boring. On
> unstable11s the wget download results in:
> 
> --2018-07-23 03:09:12--  http://www.bzip.org/1.0.6/bzip2-1.0.6.tar.gz
> Resolving www.bzip.org... 2a00:1098:0:86:1000:44:0:80, 46.235.226.80
> Connecting to www.bzip.org|2a00:1098:0:86:1000:44:0:80|:80... failed:
> Network is unreachable.
> Connecting to www.bzip.org|46.235.226.80|:80... failed: Network is unreachable.
> 
> On another machine at my house:
> 
> --2018-07-23 01:15:49--  http://www.bzip.org/1.0.6/bzip2-1.0.6.tar.gz
> Resolving www.bzip.org... 46.235.226.80, 2a00:1098:0:86:1000:44:0:80
> Connecting to www.bzip.org|46.235.226.80|:80... connected.
> HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
> Length: 782025 (764K) [application/x-gzip]
> Saving to: ?bzip2-1.0.6.tar.gz?
> 
> Any ideas why the script might be failing on unstable11s?

Works for me:

root at unstable11s:~# wget http://www.bzip.org/1.0.6/bzip2-1.0.6.tar.gz
--2018-07-23 10:59:46--  http://www.bzip.org/1.0.6/bzip2-1.0.6.tar.gz
Resolving proxy (proxy)... 192.168.1.6
Connecting to proxy (proxy)|192.168.1.6|:3128... connected.
Proxy request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 782025 (764K) [application/x-gzip]
Saving to: ?bzip2-1.0.6.tar.gz?

bzip2-1.0.6.tar.gz                                  100%[====================================================================================================================>] 763.70K  1.37MB/s   in 0.5s   

2018-07-23 10:59:46 (1.37 MB/s) - ?bzip2-1.0.6.tar.gz? saved [782025/782025]

root at unstable11s:~# /opt/csw/bin/wget http://www.bzip.org/1.0.6/bzip2-1.0.6.tar.gz
--2018-07-23 10:59:52--  http://www.bzip.org/1.0.6/bzip2-1.0.6.tar.gz
Resolving proxy (proxy)... 192.168.1.6
Connecting to proxy (proxy)|192.168.1.6|:3128... connected.
Proxy request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 782025 (764K) [application/x-gzip]
Saving to: ?bzip2-1.0.6.tar.gz.1?

bzip2-1.0.6.tar.gz.1                                100%[==================================================================================================================>] 763.70K  1.30MB/s    in 0.6s    

2018-07-23 10:59:53 (1.30 MB/s) - ?bzip2-1.0.6.tar.gz.1? saved [782025/782025]

root at unstable11s:~# 


What are you invoiking exactly and how is your environment looking?


Best regards

  ? Dago

-- 
"You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896


From noloader at gmail.com  Tue Jul 24 21:58:55 2018
From: noloader at gmail.com (Jeffrey Walton)
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2018 15:58:55 -0400
Subject: Crypto++ makefile (was: ANN: Crypto++ ...)
Message-ID: <CAH8yC8==m5LHXsVMbMNXNLRoT9CMj=YepZ1EJWapLrB+MpT-oA@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 8:49 AM, Jeffrey Walton <noloader at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 8:36 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
>> Hi Jeff,
>>
>> Am 21.07.2018 um 14:19 schrieb Jeffrey Walton via users <users at lists.opencsw.org>:
>>> Crypto++ recently received access to OpenCSW's compile farm. We were
>>> able to look at some known issues for Sparc machines. All the issues
>>> have been cleared. Also see
>>> https://github.com/weidai11/cryptopp/issues/691 .
>>>
>>> The Crypto++ library is now well supported for Solaris, including x86
>>> and Sparc. We hope to provide an OpenCSW package shortly.
>>
>> I worked on a cryptopp package 2011 but never gotten around finishing it. I just
>> committed my stuff which may act as a starting point and it will show up here shortly:
>>   https://buildfarm.opencsw.org/source/xref/opencsw/csw/mgar/pkg/cryptopp/trunk/Makefile

I probably should have mentioned the Makefiles distributed with the
library prior to 5.6.3 were very basic. They were end-user biased with
options like -march=native. They were not distro friendly at all.

Recent makefiles are more distro friendly. We try to work closely with
folks like Debian and Fedora for packaging.

We also help maintain Autotools
(https://github.com/noloader/cryptopp-autotools) and Cmake
(https://github.com/noloader/cryptopp-cmake) for folks who wish to use
them. They are unofficial but they should "just work" if we are doing
our jobs correctly.

Jeff

From noloader at gmail.com  Tue Jul 24 22:35:58 2018
From: noloader at gmail.com (Jeffrey Walton)
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2018 16:35:58 -0400
Subject: You need to select a valid option!
Message-ID: <CAH8yC8m-Gr-YHEV-EAjqEVD7MhnJpyJeVBjjavjHrKLJsHSNtA@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Everyone,

I'm having a little trouble installing packages. I seem to be losing a
primpt somewhere:

# pkgutil install wget
Checking integrity of
/var/opt/csw/pkgutil/catalog.mirror.opencsw.org_opencsw_testing_i386_5.11
with gpg.
gpg: Signature made Sun Jul 15 12:10:25 2018 EDT using DSA key ID 9306CC77
gpg: Good signature from "OpenCSW catalog signing <board at opencsw.org>"
gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
gpg:          There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner.
Primary key fingerprint: 4DCE 3C80 AAB2 CAB1 E60C  9A3C 05F4 2D66 9306 CC77
You need to select a valid option!

I believe I have accomplished these tasks:
https://www.opencsw.org/manual/for-administrators/getting-started-optional-steps.html#setting-up-cryptograhic-verification

What is the valid option I am missing?

Jeff

From bonivart at opencsw.org  Tue Jul 24 22:44:38 2018
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2018 22:44:38 +0200
Subject: You need to select a valid option!
In-Reply-To: <CAH8yC8m-Gr-YHEV-EAjqEVD7MhnJpyJeVBjjavjHrKLJsHSNtA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAH8yC8m-Gr-YHEV-EAjqEVD7MhnJpyJeVBjjavjHrKLJsHSNtA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CABY0g1X6Bm3M+G6w6KFLy5KNGABY__Ax7-Aeht_n1XjLQJmGHA@mail.gmail.com>

You need to use -i or ?install. Type pkgutil and nothing else and you will
get a short help.

On Tue, 24 Jul 2018 at 22:36, Jeffrey Walton via users <
users at lists.opencsw.org> wrote:

> Hi Everyone,
>
> I'm having a little trouble installing packages. I seem to be losing a
> primpt somewhere:
>
> # pkgutil install wget
> Checking integrity of
> /var/opt/csw/pkgutil/catalog.mirror.opencsw.org_opencsw_testing_i386_5.11
> with gpg.
> gpg: Signature made Sun Jul 15 12:10:25 2018 EDT using DSA key ID 9306CC77
> gpg: Good signature from "OpenCSW catalog signing <board at opencsw.org>"
> gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
> gpg:          There is no indication that the signature belongs to the
> owner.
> Primary key fingerprint: 4DCE 3C80 AAB2 CAB1 E60C  9A3C 05F4 2D66 9306 CC77
> You need to select a valid option!
>
> I believe I have accomplished these tasks:
>
> https://www.opencsw.org/manual/for-administrators/getting-started-optional-steps.html#setting-up-cryptograhic-verification
>
> What is the valid option I am missing?
>
> Jeff
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20180724/ab311816/attachment.html>

From noloader at gmail.com  Tue Jul 24 23:49:17 2018
From: noloader at gmail.com (Jeffrey Walton)
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2018 17:49:17 -0400
Subject: You need to select a valid option!
In-Reply-To: <CABY0g1X6Bm3M+G6w6KFLy5KNGABY__Ax7-Aeht_n1XjLQJmGHA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAH8yC8m-Gr-YHEV-EAjqEVD7MhnJpyJeVBjjavjHrKLJsHSNtA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CABY0g1X6Bm3M+G6w6KFLy5KNGABY__Ax7-Aeht_n1XjLQJmGHA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAH8yC8nqwYkRUb2gXnE+oubUd05SNH_6_vDKz06TEU60ECgUZg@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 4:44 PM, Peter Bonivart <bonivart at opencsw.org> wrote:
> You need to use -i or ?install. Type pkgutil and nothing else and you will
> get a short help.

Ah, thanks. It did not occur to me.

Jeff

From noloader at gmail.com  Tue Jul 24 23:54:48 2018
From: noloader at gmail.com (Jeffrey Walton)
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2018 17:54:48 -0400
Subject: Building an OpenCSW package
Message-ID: <CAH8yC8nAMmAfvJukEu7N4LMpNP200XuLLP0xNzqdTg4_VJwO7A@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Everyone,

I'm having trouble finding instructions for building a package. Google
is not helping very much:
https://www.google.com/search?q=opencsw+how+to+build+a+package .

The docs seem to miss it and skip to the catalogue step:
https://www.opencsw.org/manual/for-maintainers/building-a-catalog.html
. The catalogue page references the package:

    catalog_root=${HOME}/opencsw-catalog
    catalog_path=${catalog_root}/$(uname -p)/$(uname -r)
    cp /path/to/your_package.pkg ${catalog_path}
    bldcat ${catalog_path}

Where are the instructions for creating "your_package.pkg" ?

Jeff

From noloader at gmail.com  Wed Jul 25 02:11:32 2018
From: noloader at gmail.com (Jeffrey Walton)
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2018 20:11:32 -0400
Subject: Simple project to use as a template?
Message-ID: <CAH8yC8nbT-jFzQTwwAWbk2o1AJ8rTZeaFqH_sbnpY9rQnTXhJw@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Everyone,

I think I am somewhere around here now:
http://wiki.opencsw.org/gar-wrapper . I think that follows
https://www.opencsw.org/manual/for-maintainers/buildfarm-setup.html
and precedes https://www.opencsw.org/manual/for-maintainers/catalog-format.html
.

I'm trying to see how the machinery is supposed to work on a simple
project. I selected zLib:

solaris3:zlib$ cd trunk/
solaris3:trunk$ make
Makefile:62: gar/category.mk: No such file or directory
make: *** No rule to make target 'gar/category.mk'.  Stop.

Several other projects fail to build with the same error. I feel like
I am missing some obvious things.

Does anyone know of a project that builds as expected after installing
the components and checking out the build tree? If so, then what is
it?

Thanks in advance.

From dam at opencsw.org  Wed Jul 25 09:01:04 2018
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2018 09:01:04 +0200
Subject: Building an OpenCSW package
In-Reply-To: <CAH8yC8nAMmAfvJukEu7N4LMpNP200XuLLP0xNzqdTg4_VJwO7A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAH8yC8nAMmAfvJukEu7N4LMpNP200XuLLP0xNzqdTg4_VJwO7A@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4BE99F0F-ADF6-4D33-8104-9E746E9B3EF1@opencsw.org>

Hi Jeff,

Am 24.07.2018 um 23:54 schrieb Jeffrey Walton via users <users at lists.opencsw.org>:
> I'm having trouble finding instructions for building a package. Google
> is not helping very much:
> https://www.google.com/search?q=opencsw+how+to+build+a+package .

You are almost there. If you run you own buildfarm:
  https://www.opencsw.org/manual/for-maintainers/buildfarm-setup.html

If you want to build a package on the buildfarm:
  https://www.opencsw.org/2012/12/gar-setup-and-packaging-tutorial/

Or take a talk from DOAG from me (unfortunately in german):
  https://www.doag.org/formes/pubfiles/3923877/2012-K-INF-Dagobert_Michelsen-OpenCSW-Pakete_fuer_das_Rechenzentrum-Manuskript.pdf

As package maintainer you should come over to the maintainers@
mailing list.

@Ihsan: Can you please subscribe Jeff to maintainers@ ?

-- 
"You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896


From dam at opencsw.org  Wed Jul 25 09:07:31 2018
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2018 09:07:31 +0200
Subject: Simple project to use as a template?
In-Reply-To: <CAH8yC8nbT-jFzQTwwAWbk2o1AJ8rTZeaFqH_sbnpY9rQnTXhJw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAH8yC8nbT-jFzQTwwAWbk2o1AJ8rTZeaFqH_sbnpY9rQnTXhJw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <D53BCC5D-FD3F-470B-9514-6B37C91CA07D@opencsw.org>

Hi Jeff,

Am 25.07.2018 um 02:11 schrieb Jeffrey Walton via users <users at lists.opencsw.org>:
> I think I am somewhere around here now:
> http://wiki.opencsw.org/gar-wrapper . I think that follows
> https://www.opencsw.org/manual/for-maintainers/buildfarm-setup.html
> and precedes https://www.opencsw.org/manual/for-maintainers/catalog-format.html
> .
> 
> I'm trying to see how the machinery is supposed to work on a simple
> project. I selected zLib:
> 
> solaris3:zlib$ cd trunk/
> solaris3:trunk$ make
> Makefile:62: gar/category.mk: No such file or directory
> make: *** No rule to make target 'gar/category.mk'.  Stop.
> 
> Several other projects fail to build with the same error. I feel like
> I am missing some obvious things.
> 
> Does anyone know of a project that builds as expected after installing
> the components and checking out the build tree? If so, then what is
> it?

The buildfarm setup is a bit difficult. I suggest to start on our buildfarm with
  mgar init
and take a look at the video I already referenced
  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JWKCbPJSaxw


Best regards

  ? Dago

-- 
"You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896