On 6/11/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Alex Moore</b> <<a href="mailto:asmoore@blastwave.org">asmoore@blastwave.org</a>> wrote:<div><span class="gmail_quote"></span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 18:45:38 -0400<br>"Brian Gupta" <<a href="mailto:brian.gupta@gmail.com">brian.gupta@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><br>> Why don't the following manifests start with a csw in their name?
<br>><br><br>I ask: Why would it? They are just files that live somewhere under<br>the /opt/csw/ namespace. If you look at the service name registered<br>with SMF, which does have to co-exist with other service names outside
<br>of the csw namespace, you should see that name prefaced with csw.<br><br>Enough from me,<br><br>Alex<br>_______________________________________________<br>users mailing list<br><a href="mailto:users@lists.blastwave.org">
users@lists.blastwave.org</a><br><a href="https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users">https://lists.blastwave.org/mailman/listinfo/users</a></blockquote><div><br><br>Alex, try not to take this critism personally. There are over 1500 packages in the tree. These inconsistencies are but a minor fraction of that tree. I'd say that is a pretty good ratio.
<br></div><br></div>Consistency makes the software more predictable. If software is more predictable, people are less likely to make mistakes.<br><br>-Brian<br>