<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=Windows-1252">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Exchange Server">
<!-- converted from text --><style><!-- .EmailQuote { margin-left: 1pt; padding-left: 4pt; border-left: #800000 2px solid; } --></style>
</head>
<body>
<div>
<div>I have another server at the same version and it's working there. Thanks for the response. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div style="font-size:9px">Thanks,<br>
Dan Doughty<br>
Lead, Unix Team<br>
Epiq Systems<br>
Phone: 913-621-9886<br>
Cell: 913-225-4438<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div></div>
<br>
<br>
<div>-------- Original message --------</div>
<div>From: Laurent Blume </div>
<div>Date:04/24/2015 9:27 AM (GMT-06:00) </div>
<div>To: users@lists.opencsw.org </div>
<div>Subject: Re: netsnmp won't install because SUNW is too low, but it's not too low
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
<font size="2"><span style="font-size:10pt;">
<div class="PlainText">Le 2015/04/24 15:48 +0200, Daniel Doughty a écrit:<br>
> And my libc version is 1.23 which should be higher than 1.22.5<br>
<br>
One would think so, but actually, no. Sun had a long tradition of making<br>
a mess of any version numbering they use, and this one is no exception.<br>
<br>
You really need it to explicitly list 1.22.5:<br>
<br>
$ pvs /usr/lib/libc.so| grep 1.22.5<br>
SUNW_1.22.5;<br>
<br>
If you don't have it, you need to patch or upgrade to a more recent Solaris.<br>
<br>
Laurent<br>
</div>
</span></font>This communication (including any attachment(s)) is intended solely for the recipient(s) named above and may contain information that is confidential, privileged or legally protected. Any unauthorized use or dissemination of this communication
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by return e-mail message and delete all copies of the original communication to include any copy that may reside in your sent box. Thank you for
your cooperation.
</body>
</html>