[bug-notifications] [pkgutil 0003903]: pkgutil -r: Reference found where even-sized list expected
Mantis Bug Tracker
noreply at opencsw.org
Fri Sep 18 14:57:10 CEST 2009
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
======================================================================
http://www.opencsw.org/mantis/view.php?id=3903
======================================================================
Reported By: skayser
Assigned To: bonivart
======================================================================
Project: pkgutil
Issue ID: 3903
Category: regular use
Reproducibility: always
Severity: tweak
Priority: normal
Status: assigned
======================================================================
Date Submitted: 2009-09-17 14:40 CEST
Last Modified: 2009-09-18 14:57 CEST
======================================================================
Summary: pkgutil -r: Reference found where even-sized list
expected
Description:
Happens with 1.7 as well as r102. Removal works fine though.
# pkgutil -t http://mirror.opencsw.org/opencsw/testing -r sudosh2
Fetching new catalog and descriptions
(http://mirror.opencsw.org/opencsw/testing/i386/5.10) if available...
Fetching new catalog and descriptions
(http://csw.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/csw/current/i386/5.10) if
available...
Parsing catalog, may take a while...
Reference found where even-sized list expected at /opt/csw/bin/pkgutil
line 1038.
Looking at installed CSW packages...
Examining dependencies for:
CSWsudosh2 (remove)
CSWcswclassutils (in use)
CSWcommon (in use)
=> Removing CSWsudosh2
The following package is currently installed:
CSWsudosh2 sudosh2 - Extensive auditing of user shell usage
(i386) 1.0.2,REV=2009.09.17
Do you want to remove this package? [y,n,?,q] q
1 package was not processed!
#
======================================================================
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(0006716) bonivart (manager) - 2009-09-18 14:57
http://www.opencsw.org/mantis/view.php?id=3903#c6716
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was a declaration of an unused hash that caused the noise. I have
removed it in r105. I'm sorry to say the remove option is not really
reliable and I haven't had time to really look at it. This was easy to fix
though.
More information about the bug-notifications
mailing list