[bug-notifications] [cupsclient 0004533]: cups binaries conflict with system binary names
Mantis Bug Tracker
noreply at opencsw.org
Fri Aug 27 21:04:49 CEST 2010
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
======================================================================
https://www.opencsw.org/mantis/view.php?id=4533
======================================================================
Reported By: phil
Assigned To:
======================================================================
Project: cupsclient
Issue ID: 4533
Category: packaging
Reproducibility: always
Severity: minor
Priority: normal
Status: new
======================================================================
Date Submitted: 2010-08-27 19:24 CEST
Last Modified: 2010-08-27 21:04 CEST
======================================================================
Summary: cups binaries conflict with system binary names
Description:
I have only just noticed that "cupsclient" provides binaries that have a
namespace conflict with system level ones! :( specifically, lp, lpstat,
lpq, lpr, lprm, cancel
I dont recall this ever being brought up on the maintainers list, or
discussed previously. "cups" has always been just a black hole to me. Until
I decided to try using it just now :(
Please give some thought to this problem.
======================================================================
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(0008219) maciej (manager) - 2010-08-27 21:04
https://www.opencsw.org/mantis/view.php?id=4533#c8219
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Part of cups deployment on Solaris is removing the SUNW printing packages.
It's up to the user to remove the packages beforehand.
The packages are:
SUNWscplp SUNWppm SUNWpsu SUNWpsr SUNWpcu SUNWpcr
After these packages are removed, lp, lpstat, lpq and the like are all
gone from /usr/bin. There are still conflicting man pages; I removed these
using a configuration management system. I don't know if there's any good
way of handling that.
Back to the /usr/bin vs /opt/csw/bin topic, I don't see any issue with the
binary names. There's a blog post that I used as a guideline for deploying
cups:
http://blogs.sun.com/DanX/entry/using_cups_print_server_for
Perhaps we could have a better documentation and a better way of
delivering the documentation.
More information about the bug-notifications
mailing list