[bug-notifications] [tetex 0003508]: Package shouldn't contain texi2pdf

[Mantis Bug Tracker]

The following issue has been RESOLVED. 
====================================================================== 
https://www.opencsw.org/mantis/view.php?id=3508 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                dam
Assigned To:                pfelecan
====================================================================== 
Project:                    tetex
Issue ID:                   3508
Category:                   packaging
Reproducibility:            have not tried
Severity:                   minor
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     resolved
Resolution:                 fixed
Fixed in Version:           
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2009-03-27 17:30 CET
Last Modified:              2010-10-05 20:38 CEST
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    Package shouldn't contain texi2pdf
Description: 
The package contains
    /opt/csw/bin/texi2pdf
which is also in CSWtexinfo. IMHO it should not be in CSWtetex.
======================================================================
Relationships       ID      Summary
----------------------------------------------------------------------
has duplicate       0004318 File clash with CSWtetex
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 (0007650) dam (administrator) - 2010-03-15 12:58
 https://www.opencsw.org/mantis/view.php?id=3508#c7650 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
The texi2pdf binary is both in CSWtetex and CSWtexinfo, but the texi2pdf(1)
manpage is only in CSWtexinfo, so I think it should be removed from
CSWtexinfo.

The infokey binary is only in CSWtexinfo and not CSWtexinfo, so the
infokey.1 manpage really doesn't belong to CSWtetex and should be removed.

Do you see a chance to rebuild the package with GAR?