[bug-notifications] [pixman 0004691]: package repositories provide versions inconsistently over the mirrors

[Mantis Bug Tracker]

A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
https://www.opencsw.org/mantis/view.php?id=4691 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                flod
Assigned To:                dam
====================================================================== 
Project:                    pixman
Issue ID:                   4691
Category:                   packaging
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   major
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     assigned
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2011-02-17 01:55 CET
Last Modified:              2011-02-17 15:36 CET
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    package repositories provide versions inconsistently
over the mirrors
Description: 
There are at least three different versions that are mentioned as the
latest on the various mirrors/websites.

Website:
http://www.opencsw.org/packages/CSWpixman/ : 0.21.4,REV=2011.02.02

ibiblio:
http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/opencsw/current/i386/5.10/ ->
http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/opencsw/current/i386/5.10/pixman-0.17.10%2cREV%3d2010.03.06-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

usc.edu:
http://mirrors.usc.edu/pub/csw/current/i386/5.10/pixman-0.17.8,REV=2010.02.25-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz

ftp.uni-erlangen.de
http://ftp.uni-erlangen.de/pub/mirrors/csw/current/i386/5.10/pixman-0.17.8,REV=2010.02.25-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 (0008803) flod (reporter) - 2011-02-17 15:36
 https://www.opencsw.org/mantis/view.php?id=4691#c8803 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
I checked the list before submitting my report.
So I was aware of the issue.

As I am a big fan of naming schemes, I find it perfectly reasonable.
As disucussed there, submission and rollback should be always en bloc.

It is totally okay, that there are rollbacks. But I consider it a bug in
the rollback process that some mirrors do/did not show the latest version
before the wrongly released packages. They showed another older version
before that.
When rolling back this should not happen.