[bug-notifications] [gtk_engines 0004721]: Sparc package includes 386 files.

[Mantis Bug Tracker]

A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
https://www.opencsw.org/mantis/view.php?id=4721 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                james
Assigned To:                phil
====================================================================== 
Project:                    gtk_engines
Issue ID:                   4721
Category:                   packaging
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   minor
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     resolved
Resolution:                 fixed
Fixed in Version:           
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2011-03-06 16:32 CET
Last Modified:              2011-03-08 19:39 CET
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    Sparc package includes 386 files.
Description: 
$ uname -p
sparc
$ file /opt/csw/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/engines/libclearlooks.so
/opt/csw/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/engines/libclearlooks.so:   ELF 32-bit LSB
dynamic lib 80386 Version 1 [FPU], dynamically linked, stripped


looks suspect.  I've not checked the 386 package for sparc files.
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 (0008878) dam (administrator) - 2011-03-08 19:31
 https://www.opencsw.org/mantis/view.php?id=4721#c8878 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Hi Phil,

that package has a ton of problems in checkpkg:
 
http://pkg.opencsw.org/pkgbrowser/reports/pkgbrowse-phil.html#d5ebb76b17defc6c9b83dc12b71e17dc-error_tags


---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 (0008879) phil (manager) - 2011-03-08 19:39
 https://www.opencsw.org/mantis/view.php?id=4721#c8879 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Hmm.
Most of those are bogus.
The dependancy thing is valid I suppose... although its not so much
"wrong", as "out of date".

It would have been picked up by me properly, if the library packages on
the build machines were up to date.
How about fixing that?